HomeVideos

Boris Johnson: "They Were Looking at Engineering the Virus” & “The Government Tried To Bribe Me!"

Now Playing

Boris Johnson: "They Were Looking at Engineering the Virus” & “The Government Tried To Bribe Me!"

Transcript

2818 segments

0:00

do you really think I was deliberately

0:01

partti and breaking the rules but it's

0:03

all about leading by example ISM sorry

0:05

but to say it was a party is a complete

0:08

travesty seeing that photo when one of

0:10

my friends can go to their grandmother's

0:11

funeral is the most enraging thing I

0:14

think all Gatherings should have been

0:15

Bann at number 10 because I think what

0:17

do you mean Gatherings Gatherings with

0:18

alcohol and music and Cake you should

0:21

never have allowed that to happen I

0:24

apologize for that Johnson the former

0:27

prime minister of the UK whose Reign

0:29

included brexit Co and the Ukraine war

0:31

he's one of the world's most famous

0:33

politicians on this point of brexit how

0:35

did David Cameron react when you said

0:36

you're going to vote leave he said if

0:38

you come out and support leave I will

0:40

you up forever but if you support remain

0:43

you can have a top five job in the

0:44

cabinet but is that not a bit corrupt

0:46

and is that how the jobs are dished out

0:47

in the government at the moment look I'm

0:49

sad to say that this probably been the

0:51

way politics has been since the dawn of

0:53

time and then this letter you wrote

0:54

about the decision to leave or stay

0:56

within the EU which was unpublished you

0:58

seemed torn so do do you regret brexit

1:02

well the next big thing was the pandemic

1:05

there was a lot of stuff we we didn't

1:06

know I I think almost certainly was a

1:09

lab accident they they were looking at

1:11

engineering viruses and ways that they

1:13

could manipulate it sadly something went

1:15

wrong when you talk about lockdowns you

1:17

refer to them as Bonkers which is

1:19

strange hearing it from the guy that put

1:20

the rules in place well did the benefits

1:23

of lockdown outweigh the very very

1:26

severe Damage Done to kids what do you

1:28

think the answer to that question is

1:29

honestly I think I just wanted to ask a

1:31

few more things Trump or camalo who's

1:33

the best for international relations how

1:34

many kids do you have Charlotte Owen

1:36

you're not related to you and then you

1:38

have quite a distinct Persona people

1:39

describe you as being a buffoon when I

1:41

first saw you I thought you were a

1:42

parody from Bose selector is it

1:44

calculated well to get people's interest

1:46

in politics you got a sugar the pill but

1:48

also your mother said you had certain

1:50

mechanisms to cope with pain because

1:52

your mother is sent to a psychiatric

1:54

facility when you were 10 I read There

1:56

was physical violence in the house and

1:57

then at 14 your parents get divorced yes

2:00

we were in Somerset my father told us

2:03

and I was look I was cross and said you

2:05

know so so why did you have us

2:08

then you

2:10

know

2:17

[Music]

2:20

um this has always blown my mind a

2:22

little bit 53% of you that listen to the

2:25

show regularly haven't yet subscribed to

2:27

the show so could I ask you for a favor

2:29

before we start if you like the show and

2:31

you like what we do here and you want to

2:32

support us the free simple way that you

2:34

can do just that is by hitting the

2:35

Subscribe button and my commitment to

2:37

you is if you do that then I'll do

2:39

everything in my power me and my team to

2:40

make sure that this show is better for

2:42

you every single week we'll listen to

2:44

your feedback we'll find the guests that

2:45

you want me to speak to and we'll

2:47

continue to do what we do thank you so

2:50

[Music]

2:52

much

2:54

Boris Ste what do I need to understand

2:58

about your earliest years to understand

3:01

the man that you are today I think

3:04

the key

3:07

thing is

3:10

my

3:12

wonderful happy very kind of paginating

3:17

childhood um in the company of my

3:20

siblings the key fact was that after a

3:25

18 months of existence my sister Rachel

3:28

was born and ever after it was just a

3:32

constant struggle to

3:36

keep the the pretense of Primacy with my

3:40

with my siblings but I think it's it is

3:43

probably true to say that

3:48

healthy

3:50

incessant

3:53

sibling interaction competition whatever

3:56

you want to call it

3:57

rivalry um definitely played a part in

4:00

my formation and we used to make fun of

4:02

it too we used to think it was rather

4:05

pathetic we all knew that there was a

4:07

culture of trying to win so we used to

4:11

say oh little baby wants to win and so

4:14

we were kind of we competed but we

4:17

also deprecated the the competition at

4:22

that age um say before the age of 10 how

4:25

does that manifest in terms of a feeling

4:27

because you can in hindsight say okay I

4:29

was competitive but how did it feel you

4:31

know CU you it felt like fun but but

4:34

this idea that Rachel came along and

4:35

then you were vying for attention and

4:36

competition with her how did how does

4:39

that feel when you're under the age of

4:40

10 because your your your father at

4:42

least was very very busy as a man so I'm

4:44

presuming he wasn't necessarily so

4:47

present um I was reading you moved house

4:50

32 times in 14 years yeah but that okay

4:53

I mean he was

4:56

um but really I think I you know I speak

4:59

for all of my siblings now when I say

5:01

that you really couldn't have had a more

5:04

loving caring you know they they both of

5:06

them I mean you they're both very busy

5:08

both my mother and father mother was

5:11

painter um my father yeah writer did a

5:15

huge number of things but they did

5:17

invest a lot of time in US I mean really

5:20

a lot it sounded like you had a rough

5:22

sort of first 10 years of life because

5:24

you also had glue ear which is uh which

5:26

made you deaf a little yes well I don't

5:28

know I think we need to look very care

5:31

the I I definitely had adenoids and I

5:36

had tonsilitis and I spent a lot of time

5:39

in s Barts and had my adenoids out my T

5:43

and everything like that and I did have

5:45

glue here but it but my my my

5:48

deafness there's no trace of it now

5:51

particularly and I kind of wonder

5:53

whether it was in fact

5:56

a a a cunning means to avoid my mother's

6:00

questions and I I think look I mean I

6:03

don't know it may be that I wasn't as

6:05

deaf as as all that you know what I mean

6:07

would you ever do that if your mother

6:08

was asking you something you didn't

6:09

actually want to engage and I don't

6:11

think I'm that coming you what I mean

6:13

not at8 years

6:14

old your mother Charlotte um she had

6:17

four children you were the oldest of

6:18

those four

6:21

um she seems to be a really important

6:23

character in your life In fact when I

6:24

opened up the first couple of pages of

6:25

the book you you dedicate the book in

6:27

memory of of Charlotte your mother I do

6:30

she was an artist she had many paint

6:32

paintings of of of her children but also

6:35

other things I saw some of those

6:36

paintings I did some research on those

6:37

paintings um but one of the sort of

6:40

really pivotal moments in her OT

6:41

bringing is that she suffered from

6:43

obsessive compulsive disorder she did

6:45

yeah you're what 10 years old when your

6:48

mother is an uh put as an impatient in a

6:52

Psy psychiatric hospital and you're

6:55

apart for eight months something like

6:58

that yes what what impact does that have

7:00

on you in terms of

7:03

shaping shaping the Boris that we know

7:06

today if

7:07

any I mean I remember it all very very

7:10

well

7:11

and it's hard to say exactly what impact

7:14

it it had on me but I think

7:18

what certainly happened was that all

7:21

four of us all four of the children that

7:24

um that my mother had we definitely

7:30

kind of coagulated as a as a group

7:33

because it was a tough time there were

7:35

well there were aspects of that were

7:37

were tough because you know she she

7:39

wasn't always there and so I think it

7:41

did breed a certain kind of group

7:46

solidarity and she always kind of blamed

7:51

herself for not being there for the8

7:55

months whatever period it was and I I

7:57

remember feeling very strongly that that

8:00

was unfair and on and that

8:03

she actually you know did an amazing job

8:07

and you know you couldn't you couldn't

8:09

have asked for more did you notice her

8:12

anything unusual about her behavior

8:13

before she was yes so the OCD thing is

8:15

absolutely right she did have that and

8:18

you know it was it was very difficult

8:19

and I'm sure people who are watching

8:22

this know exactly what it is but she

8:24

lots of

8:25

different patterns of behavior one of

8:28

the one of them was was about ESS so so

8:31

so the so the she she wash her

8:35

hands and then um she she would realize

8:39

in order to turn the tap off she'd have

8:41

to touch the the the foret the spiger

8:44

and and and she didn't want to do that

8:45

because that would make her hands dirty

8:47

again she thought but you know this is a

8:49

very well-known symptom and she and she

8:52

totally got over it I she totally got

8:54

over it she got through it why was she

8:57

sent to a psychiatric facility

9:02

um well I guess because she's I

9:08

think that's a JT good question I don't

9:11

know really know the answer I think I

9:12

think

9:14

she

9:15

probably said that she thought she could

9:19

benefit

9:20

from

9:23

therapy

9:25

and that's what she and my father

9:27

decided to was a best way forward but I

9:30

I I honestly don't know the answer to

9:32

that and who looked after you while she

9:34

was in that facility at 10 years old

9:38

well my father was there and we had uh a

9:42

wonderful series of opair girls and

9:44

nannies and and so on and so forth and

9:46

at 14 years old they they were all great

9:48

too but you know I don't I don't you

9:50

know I don't want to give the impression

9:53

which would not be fair that my mother

9:55

kind of um was

9:59

absent for long periods or wasn't a a

10:02

presence in our lives because she really

10:04

was it was more her words I saw her

10:06

doing an interview where she was talking

10:07

about um her belief that you had certain

10:11

mechanisms to cope with the pain of her

10:13

going to the facility for eight months

10:15

but then also the divorce when you were

10:16

14 I thought those ages that sort of

10:20

puberty age where you're figuring

10:22

yourself

10:23

out to get such a jolt of bad news is

10:28

yeah I think that's I mean classically

10:32

yes and look I'm not going to I think

10:36

you're on to it you you know there's

10:38

there's there was an element of of

10:40

self-defense that then that you know

10:43

many kids in in my our position then

10:47

develop um but I do insist that they

10:53

both remained remarkable parents we know

10:56

it wasn't like we were suddenly cut a

10:57

drift but by either of them on the

10:59

contrary

11:02

self-defense well yeah I don't know I

11:05

mean I'm quoting her on on me by the way

11:07

so I'm quoting I'm quoting you qu

11:09

quoting her um you there so you yeah but

11:12

I mean you know I don't it didn't it

11:14

didn't occur to me at the time yeah I

11:16

don't think it can for a 14-year-old but

11:18

in hindsight as an as a man you go okay

11:20

that was I create a p know but I mean

11:23

but

11:24

maybe I I've got nothing else to compare

11:26

it to right um you know you're growing

11:29

up anyway you're becoming more

11:30

self-reliant you got to do things to

11:33

yourself um so I think so go back to

11:36

where it was with my my brothers and

11:39

sisters I think certainly you know it

11:42

was another thing that drove us all

11:45

together why self-defense and how did

11:47

that self-defense manifest in terms of

11:50

behavior I

11:54

just I'd be the worst type of um what

11:57

let me think well how did I how did I

12:00

how how did my self-defense manifest I

12:02

suppose I

12:05

became yes unquestionably it was

12:08

painful so how did I protect myself

12:11

against that well one obvious thing to

12:16

do which I suppose we all do and I think

12:19

I found the best therapy for every type

12:22

of pain emotional

12:24

pain is to try to Lose Yourself in your

12:29

work emotional pain is is about a lot

12:35

about it's about self-esteem so so like

12:37

with when when when parents split up um

12:41

you know the shock is well you you can't

12:44

love us that much but if you're doing

12:46

this right that's the that's the what

12:48

it's all about which is not true of

12:50

course but that's what the children

12:51

that's what children feel they feel it's

12:54

their failure there's something wrong

12:55

with

12:57

them and that's not true but that's how

13:00

kids feel I suppose to protect myself

13:03

against that like I had a natural Avenue

13:08

for to build up

13:10

my self-esteem and that was academic

13:14

work um that kind of thing but again you

13:18

know another I suppose another type of

13:20

of competition and it I'm it is a good

13:24

therapy work is a work is a is a great

13:28

reliever or distraction

13:32

well depends on your sort of theory of

13:34

psychology but

13:37

um I think it

13:39

both both why did they divorce do you

13:43

know I think formerly speaking what had

13:46

happened was that um you know my mother

13:49

has simply decided she wanted to make

13:51

another life and and she you know she

13:53

she found someone wonderful and and all

13:56

all the rest of it um

13:59

but I think that my father um

14:06

and and

14:10

mother the weird thing about their

14:12

divorce was that they both continued to

14:16

be very strongly affectionate towards

14:19

each other

14:22

and you know I'm again I'm not trying to

14:24

minimize

14:26

the psychological importance of any of

14:28

this stuff for us as as

14:32

kids but that was immensely fortifying

14:35

because it was so obvious that it wasn't

14:38

like they were at War I mean you know

14:40

they had a big bus stops but it was we

14:45

felt that there was a

14:47

real residue of of love and affection

14:50

between them even if even if it was I

14:51

mean I think the way the way we

14:52

explained it to ourselves was that there

14:56

was still a residue of love and

14:57

affection but that it was just

14:59

practically impossible for them to to

15:02

continue and so that was that was how we

15:05

rationalized it and um they both found

15:07

other people and and and were very happy

15:10

you you say Bust ups that from

15:13

everything that I've read There was

15:15

physical violence in the household when

15:16

you were

15:17

younger yeah well this is this is

15:19

something that um has been alleged by uh

15:23

sadly by one of my biographers um so

15:27

sort of pomping to say one of my

15:28

biographers um some guy wrote a book um

15:32

and put that stuff in you know what I

15:35

can tell you is I have no direct

15:36

knowledge of of what he said um I don't

15:39

want to get into it because I don't want

15:42

to be disrespectful to my mother's

15:44

memory and I I certainly don't want to

15:47

say anything that would cause pain or

15:51

embarrassment to my father so but I can

15:53

what I can say is I had as a child no

15:56

direct knowledge of it myself what did

15:58

um their relationship teach you that

16:00

marriage and love

16:03

was

16:04

they they they so they met at

16:07

University um they clearly loved each

16:10

other and I think if you ask my siblings

16:13

they'll they'll they'll tell you

16:15

that so that you know it was upsetting

16:18

when when they split up because do you

16:21

remember the day they told you they yeah

16:22

yeah I do I do I do I do it was it was

16:24

uh we were we were in we were in

16:27

Somerset and my father said that we all

16:30

had to go and and up by the the the gate

16:34

towards the engine shed so he went and

16:37

stood by the gate towards the engine

16:38

shed and and we were told this you know

16:41

sad news what did he say I don't

16:45

remember exactly I don't remember

16:46

exactly but I was look I was cross and

16:50

and and said you know so so why did you

16:52

have us then because I thought

16:54

well you

16:56

know um

17:04

as you know I

17:08

think it is upsetting

17:12

and kids do take you know kids take it

17:16

upon themselves right and so they do

17:18

they do think that there must be some

17:21

fault or mistake in that in

17:23

themselves and that isn't that isn't

17:25

true I mean you know you

17:29

it's very important for kids not to

17:31

blame themselves for for these things

17:32

and I think

17:34

that it's you know back to the point I

17:36

was making earlier on with you

17:39

um I

17:42

think you know you do need

17:46

to feed the

17:50

the your

17:52

self-esteem and you need to get yourself

17:55

back up again and so work was my it was

17:59

my way of doing it I I could see the um

18:02

the emotion in your face when you talk

18:03

about that moment as if you were

18:04

teleported back to that moment for a

18:06

second

18:08

yeah yeah I mean it may look I the the

18:12

actual the truth is I'm I'm now told in

18:14

retrospect that that is what I said I

18:16

don't personally remember it you

18:18

remember how it

18:19

feels yeah but look I mean yes but I

18:22

really wouldn't want to over egg it

18:26

because my parents were incred kind to

18:31

each other after that you know when you

18:33

do this and you throw the the coal in

18:35

the air I was just stoking the fness of

18:37

my of my self-esteem yeah yeah you um

18:40

you have quite a distinct Persona you're

18:42

I mean much of where you sort of first

18:44

came to public knowledge was on the TV

18:45

show have I got news for you yeah I know

18:47

I think the BBC very they live in

18:49

permanent state of horror about what

18:51

they did that because you know I think

18:52

that's one of the reasons that that they

18:54

I think they they have a terrible sense

18:55

of corporate guilt that they Unleashed

18:57

this thing

18:59

is is there a link between your persona

19:02

comedic kind of you know people often

19:04

describe you as being a bit of a buffoon

19:06

I actually thought you were a this is

19:08

just being honest because I feel like

19:10

it's important to be honest to someone

19:11

if you've said it behind their back but

19:13

I when I first saw you on the screen I

19:14

was a very young man I must have been I

19:17

don't know 14 and I thought you were a

19:20

parody from Bo selector like I thought I

19:23

thought you were I thought it was a

19:24

parody but then I came to learn you know

19:27

when you did the London May thing ET

19:28

that you were a politician and who you

19:30

were and where you'd come from but the

19:31

out the out external person is very

19:33

atypical of a politician right and your

19:36

general comedic sense that shows up in

19:38

the book a lot um you were very comedic

19:41

on have I got news how I have I got news

19:43

for you um is that at all linked when

19:47

when did that behavior show up because

19:50

there was two points of reference that I

19:51

was mulling one is things your sister

19:53

said about where you sort of learned

19:55

that comedy was a useful device um and

19:58

the second one is something Jimmy Carr

20:00

actually said to me he said to me that

20:01

um he goes if you ever meet anyone

20:03

comedic or a comedian don't ask them if

20:05

they're depressed ask them which one of

20:07

their parents they were trying to cheer

20:09

up or win favor from and I I wondered if

20:12

all yeah and I think I don't know I I

20:14

think that um one of the things I've

20:17

tried to do in politics is to get people

20:20

interested and one of the things I'm

20:23

trying to do and Unleashed which is

20:24

unquestionably a a mixture there's a lot

20:28

of serious argument in it but also I'm

20:31

trying to tell the story in as readable

20:33

a way as possible and you have to you

20:37

have to

20:39

use you got to Sugar the pill you've got

20:42

to so it's like it's like a it's like a

20:44

packet of uh of digestive biscuits MH um

20:47

if you've got to have so each of the

20:49

chapters uh has a uh some solid you know

20:53

wheat germ pabulum but it's covered with

20:56

some a little layer of chocolate did you

20:59

so say you you go down you go down the

21:02

packet compulsively and each of those 60

21:04

chapters I think there are 60 chapters

21:06

in that book is designed to give you a

21:09

bit of both so are you the pill that was

21:11

sugared you sugared yourself no well I

21:14

it's well I know there are it's the fact

21:17

of the great things that I think that we

21:19

did we know we took back control of our

21:21

of our country we we had a we we went

21:24

for a type of Independence that people

21:27

thought was impossible no I'm

21:30

spefic complicated arguments about um

21:34

Middle East about as a as a as a guide

21:37

to the last 15 years in in politics I

21:41

think it's it's pretty useful but I mean

21:43

I worked in marketing for about 15 years

21:45

so I find it quite fascinating that

21:47

right now in the world it seems that

21:48

there's a certain type of atypical

21:50

personality that's breaking through and

21:51

being

21:52

resident is your persona

21:56

a carefully constructed marketing

21:59

strategy or is because someone someone

22:03

that knows you referred to as a bit of a

22:04

loner in private and a quite quiet

22:05

person yeah no no I I live I so I'm very

22:08

I have a wonderful life um I I spend my

22:11

time I I do a lot of painting um I I do

22:17

a lot of reading and writing um I mck

22:21

around mck around with my kids it

22:23

doesn't take much to you know my cup to

22:26

run over with with with happiness but

22:28

you know all this stuff

22:29

like yeah but I know but that's I've got

22:32

I've always had a lot of energy but I've

22:35

always had a lot you understand that

22:36

that's part of your persona right well

22:38

am I supposed to do about that but I'm

22:40

trying to understand is it calculated is

22:41

it something that you've you've thought

22:43

about and you understand is effective

22:46

because they describe you as being one

22:47

of the best sort of election winners of

22:51

our of our time I think what people will

22:54

I don't know I mean what people will

22:56

also say is that um

22:59

I haven't really

23:00

changed I mean you know going back to

23:02

your earlier earlier line of question I

23:04

can see where you're going with this

23:06

you're saying as part of the strategy

23:08

for defense do we adopt comedic Persona

23:11

or or or whatever was um I don't think

23:15

that was I think it was just with my

23:17

brothers and sisters in our family there

23:19

was a kind of horror of of you know

23:22

being dull or not saying anything you

23:24

know we we had to you know we all had to

23:26

amuse each each other why

23:29

that was really really polite

23:32

I you know because it was more fun your

23:35

brothers and sisters are less amusing

23:37

than you are I wouldn't say

23:40

that that's a very controversial thing

23:42

to say you would say that I would no I

23:44

would not say that you would say that

23:46

who I would say that yeah you think Leo

23:49

have you met my brother Leo no I've not

23:50

met well then you got to get Leo on this

23:52

show but your sister my brother Joe yes

23:55

you met my brother

23:57

Jo no look honestly there's a serious uh

24:01

risk of of

24:03

uh we had a wonderful childhood because

24:06

and they wouldn't deny this because we

24:08

all you know we had a lot of fun trying

24:12

to interest and amuse each other and and

24:14

and and to your point probably our

24:17

parents as well CU your sister that's

24:19

not to say that we were we were you know

24:20

we didn't we didn't do kind of shards

24:23

and and Christmas masks and and plays

24:26

and and God knows what jery Corbin said

24:28

Boris is a calculated intelligent who

24:30

lives in a Persona which is the

24:33

opposite is that TR at

24:36

all

24:38

um no I I mean I I think that I I wish

24:42

you were true in some ways but I don't

24:46

I because most of your most you videos

24:48

on YouTube are you tackling a small

24:50

child we thing rugby and by the way by

24:52

the way he he he would I reckon he could

24:54

be much older than he looked you know

24:57

the guy in Japan the kid you tackled the

24:59

kid in Japan the one I accidentally

25:01

knocked over in Japan they're all comedy

25:02

videos yeah he he

25:04

anyway Eon it's pretty crazy she went to

25:08

Eaton at 13 years old it's the crazy

25:10

thing for me is that approximately 20 of

25:12

the 57 individuals who have served as

25:14

prime minister went to Eon which is

25:17

roughly 35% of the UK prime ministers

25:19

were educated at Eaton roughly yeah this

25:22

for me when I read that I go something's

25:23

broken here because for one school to

25:25

contribute so many of the most powerful

25:28

people in in the land feels like a

25:30

little bit of like someone's got their

25:32

hands on the scale or there's some kind

25:34

of that's why you need to read level

25:36

read the book because the book contains

25:38

this is the whole theme of the book

25:40

right not the whole theme of the book

25:42

it's one of the major themes of the book

25:43

it's about leveling up yeah and if if

25:46

you remember what I say about I don't

25:48

know whether you got through that bit

25:51

but I so I went there on a scholarship

25:53

and it was fantastic I was very lucky I

25:55

was I was paid for by the by Henry V 6

25:58

oh the legacy of Henry V 6 and I

26:01

remember feeling this

26:03

incredible sense

26:08

of

26:10

Amazement

26:12

that there were kids from some of the

26:14

most famous illustrious families in in

26:17

Britain uh who plainly didn't have you

26:22

know much um intellectual interest

26:26

academic you know Spark

26:28

in them and and kidss who'd come from

26:32

backgrounds all over the

26:34

country who were incredible and I and my

26:37

my insight at school very very very

26:39

young was that this there's there's a

26:41

fundamental problem which is that there

26:44

is ambition and energy and genius and

26:48

talent probably completely evenly

26:50

distributed throughout the UK

26:53

population

26:54

and opportunity is not yeah I

26:58

and that is the problem and that is the

27:01

basic problem with our country and this

27:03

country has more potential arguably than

27:07

any other major European economy because

27:10

it's so imbalanced and if you look at

27:12

the the propon schools like mine p in

27:16

London in the Southeast in the UK

27:18

economy it's actually unlike France

27:22

Germany Italy Holland it's also totally

27:24

unlike the United

27:25

States and so

27:28

I I decided very early on that the

27:33

that there was massive massive wasted

27:37

potential and so one of the so when I

27:40

became mayor of

27:41

London one of my biggest projects was

27:45

really the biggest thing we did was

27:46

really all about trying to lift the the

27:50

the burrow that people said were were

27:51

locked in a permanent cycle of

27:54

disadvantage and and you know you know

27:58

what I mean the inner the inner donut of

28:00

London hne where you know all that and

28:03

and it was total rubbish total rubbish

28:06

and you you can change

28:09

people's aspirations but you can then

28:11

also change uh the culture of of

28:13

achievement

28:15

and and I saw it happen in London and I

28:18

was only mayor for eight years but in

28:20

that period you really did see the city

28:23

change in in you know quite a

28:26

significant way and and I believe very

28:30

very strongly that that is fundamentally

28:34

what needs to happen in the whole of the

28:35

UK and and I think that this is the job

28:38

of politic I don't care whether they're

28:39

labor or conservative or whoever I think

28:41

that that is that is what we need to to

28:43

be doing and I think there are very

28:45

simple ingredients that polit there's

28:47

not there's limits to what politicians

28:49

can do but there are some simple things

28:50

that politicians need to be doing to to

28:52

make that happen has the conservative

28:54

government done well enough at leveling

28:56

up the the whole of the UK over the last

28:59

decade uh obviously not because it's not

29:03

happening f it is I mean it is happening

29:05

leveling up is happening but if you look

29:07

at the but it's nothing like fast enough

29:09

yeah

29:10

and you know so you know AB I was proud

29:14

of doing things like um rolling out

29:18

gigabit Broadband from you know 7 to 70%

29:21

69 70% of of households in in 3 years

29:24

which is not not bad going I was proud

29:26

of all the infrastructure stuff we were

29:28

we were doing I think it's a mistake to

29:31

to stop

29:32

that

29:34

infrastructure is crucial

29:36

[Music]

29:37

for leveling up transport infrastructure

29:40

is a great is a great equalizer of

29:43

opportunity so things like hs2 Northern

29:46

Powerhouse

29:47

rail we should be going on with those in

29:49

in my view and um you know whatever my

29:53

my defects as a politician I think one

29:56

thing I was good at was getting a lot of

29:58

stuff done fast and get and and driving

30:01

and driving project projects but the

30:04

problem is Eaton Eaton was to back to

30:07

your

30:09

question that youthful

30:12

experience

30:14

was I I was also at Primary School in in

30:18

London and I really really decided that

30:23

this was because I think our country has

30:25

this

30:26

problem worse than most other most

30:29

comparable countries but if you think

30:30

how if you think of how strong the UK

30:32

economy already

30:34

is then imagine what we could achieve if

30:38

we leveled up right do you know this

30:39

this stat around Eon that 20 out of the

30:41

57 individuals who've served as prime

30:43

minister came from there isn't that just

30:45

the clearest example of the fact that it

30:48

is yeah the people that are coming into

30:51

politics but also generally the people

30:52

that are getting to the top in society

30:55

are starting with a unfair advantage to

30:58

some

30:59

degree I well I think what it shows is

31:04

that I mean you probably point to

31:07

cultures like France or wherever where

31:10

you know the a lot of the the country is

31:12

run by the um the the people from the

31:16

the the Great Schools um but yeah I mean

31:22

fundamentally yes that's I think that

31:24

the so so the great the great choice for

31:27

for anybody who's interested in public

31:29

policy is well okay this is a this is

31:32

clearly clearly a problem uh it's

31:34

clearly wrong uh it's clearly imbalanced

31:38

what do you do uh do you set out to

31:41

launch a kind of cultural assault um

31:44

Paul pot Style on the successful

31:48

institutions or do you say actually what

31:51

we're going to do is try to spread

31:55

opportunity so it's more like America

31:57

and and if you look at

32:00

America you the growth rates are

32:02

spectacularly outperformed European

32:04

growth rates there's a different sense

32:06

people have a different sense of what

32:08

they can do and we need to have a we

32:11

need to have a a culture in the UK where

32:15

people don't feel prisoners of their

32:17

geography of their background that

32:19

certainly is the case isn't it at the

32:21

moment in the UK too much the case I

32:22

mean it's less it's less than it was I

32:24

went undercover I went undercover in a

32:26

school in Liverpool that was very poorly

32:29

ranked on the offed rankings and I

32:31

remember being in that school and just

32:32

thinking how on Earth are these kids

32:35

going to have a chance well they're not

32:37

going to have a chance if their teachers

32:38

tell them that they're never going to

32:39

get into a Russell group University and

32:41

they and they well what I observed when

32:42

I was there was I observed one teacher

32:45

running from one classroom to the next

32:47

classroom this was under Ator government

32:49

trying to teach two classes at the same

32:51

time and I remember sitting down with

32:53

her cuz I cuz I got like kicked out of

32:54

school then I was unexposed from school

32:55

so I had a bit of my own prejudices

32:57

about school I thought teachers were the

32:58

problem and what I came to learn from

33:00

speaking to the Headmaster of the school

33:02

was that this is effectively run like a

33:03

business and the amount of students that

33:05

choose that school every year determines

33:07

how much money the school is given by

33:08

the the conservative government and the

33:10

the amount of the parents choose schools

33:12

based on the league table and the league

33:14

table is determined by grades so really

33:16

if you think about the the structure

33:18

here um the reason why they're driving

33:21

kids like me to do subjects which I

33:22

absolutely hated when I was really

33:24

interested in business was because if

33:26

they don't get me to get 12 AED to sees

33:28

or whatever the nonsense is in certain

33:30

subjects less they they rank poorly in

33:32

the league table less parents choose the

33:34

school they get less money from the

33:36

government and it's this down with

33:37

spiral and because the school was so so

33:39

people are people are are naturally

33:40

skewed to doing subjects that

33:42

perhaps no interest of them they had me

33:45

pushing some plastic baby around the

33:46

school in Health and Social care when I

33:47

was running businesses in the school and

33:49

I was I was spending so much time in my

33:51

in exclusion unit because I was falling

33:53

asleep in classrooms turns out I had

33:55

ADHD I wasn't interested in these things

33:57

but I was obs in these things the system

33:59

is that is designed to just to just sort

34:01

of spread bet you across multiple

34:02

subjects and you're a failure if you're

34:04

not good at that but going back to the

34:05

sort of the E the the um e economics of

34:09

the school I watched this teacher run

34:11

from one classroom to the other teaching

34:12

two classrooms at the same time and she

34:15

told me that because less students had

34:16

chosen that school this year she was

34:18

having to pay for the footballs and the

34:21

the pencils in her classroom this school

34:23

I I observed the quality of Education

34:25

with all due respect they did the best

34:27

with with what they had but oh my God it

34:30

doesn't compare doesn't compare to a lot

34:32

of the other schools that I've observed

34:34

and I thought God these children in this

34:36

school are starting out life with a

34:38

significant disadvantage and much of

34:41

that is just down to the funding

34:42

situation they don't have the teachers

34:45

the teachers are dropping like flies

34:46

because they're getting sick because

34:48

they're understaffed and I just thought

34:50

that that's such a if we think about you

34:52

know what's the furthest Upstream thing

34:54

we can do to give people a fair Shake in

34:57

life so that they can become a prime

34:58

minister or a CEO or whatever they want

35:00

to be it starts there it starts with

35:03

education and just giving everyone the

35:04

same sort of quality of opportunity but

35:06

right now and especially under the the

35:07

sort of last 10 15 years of

35:09

government Cas I think I probably ought

35:12

to to to try and resist some of that

35:15

because um yeah I mean I think teaching

35:17

is incred I tried to be a teacher myself

35:20

it's it's it's unbelievably difficult

35:22

and and demanding job and I hugely

35:26

admire teachers

35:28

um when I came in in 2019 we put a lot

35:31

of money into into the education budgets

35:33

and um made sure teachers were going to

35:37

be paid new new teachers are starting

35:39

Sal at least 30,000 pounds and uh put a

35:45

lot of money into into further

35:47

education um and actually if you look at

35:49

that period of con of the conservative

35:53

Administration I think most fairm minded

35:55

people say actually look UK went up the

35:58

pza rankings uh for literacy and

36:02

numeracy most people actually would say

36:04

that education was one of the things

36:06

where things did get better and uh I

36:10

think the driving out of the whole

36:12

Academy program I

36:14

mean not remotely denying what you say

36:17

about

36:19

um the teacher you you know the teachers

36:21

you saw being being totally run run

36:23

ragged um and you know the

36:28

they need the maximum possible support

36:31

but if you look at the

36:34

data schools did get appreciably better

36:37

in this country during that period now

36:41

what I wanted to do was really

36:43

turbocharge that and

36:46

give not just school children but also

36:50

kids who'd left school at at 16 the

36:52

types of skills that they were going to

36:54

need to

36:57

compete and to make sure that business

37:00

felt that they had in the schools in the

37:03

Fe colleges in wherever it was they had

37:06

the talent that they needed to invest in

37:08

that area because that's ultimately what

37:10

it's all about it's about having the

37:13

um the

37:16

confidence that the the state is doing

37:19

enough

37:21

to deliver private sector

37:23

investment that is that is ultimately

37:26

what will transform

37:28

the the neighborhood and and you get

37:31

instead of getting the vicious circle of

37:32

of decline that you talked about you'll

37:33

get a you'll get a uh a positive

37:36

feedback Loot and uh parents want to

37:40

move there they want to send their kids

37:41

to the to to the school the school get a

37:43

good good reputation and and so things

37:46

will things will turn around as they did

37:47

in London look at London schools um you

37:52

know I can't I can't comment on the

37:53

school you mentioned in Liverpool but

37:55

London schools really really changed a

37:57

lot

37:57

I think with even with the leveling up

37:59

thing one of the easiest ways to level

38:00

up without building the train line would

38:02

just be to improve the quality of

38:04

Education in these and I think if you

38:06

look at what the conservatives did they

38:08

really focused on that and they focused

38:10

on the curriculum they focused on

38:11

standards they focused on quality and I

38:15

think that was very important because

38:16

you

38:21

know I mean it's Al it's very very

38:23

important to to to fund schools properly

38:26

um but but you know you you shouldn't

38:29

underestimate what what a great teacher

38:31

can achieve and the difference that they

38:33

can make and you know if if you

38:36

emphasize quality and you

38:39

emphasize attainment and you and you

38:42

focus on that that's why I'm I know I

38:44

think it's I'm slightly worried about

38:46

what's happening now with with ofstead I

38:48

mean I I I can understand why people

38:50

don't like one word ofstead gradings but

38:54

parents need to know whether a school is

38:57

gonna deliver you went to Oxford

38:59

University then you had a job as a

39:00

Management Consultant which lasted only

39:02

a week I hear yeah I was wasn't really

39:04

cut out for Management Consultant you

39:05

know you then become a journalist um you

39:07

become a journalist for the next couple

39:09

of years you then appear on have I got

39:11

news for you is it is it now is it now

39:13

feeded from the memory it's slightly

39:15

it's slightly fading it's still a great

39:16

show but it's still slightly fading um

39:18

you were then editor he must tell in his

39:20

lot that it's F and and uh you an empty

39:23

at the house of comms um then eventually

39:27

you for London mayor were you did you

39:30

expect to win the London mayor ship I

39:32

well you see this is the way you I

39:34

hadn't got the faintest idea I mean

39:36

seemed the thing was that I'd actually

39:38

been quite an admirer of Ken Livingston

39:39

in in the old days and I thought that he

39:42

had some some bold and original ideas

39:45

for London I I thought he was good on

39:47

the environment he was good on air

39:48

quality he was good on on the I thought

39:50

there was some some some good things

39:52

that he that he did um but it was clear

39:56

that after 8 years you know you start to

39:58

get a bit ragged did you did you think

40:00

you would

40:01

win I suppose I must have done I suppose

40:03

I must have thought it was a good chance

40:04

it was it was it was a pretty exhausting

40:06

campaign but if you ask me if I thought

40:09

I would win something I can tell you in

40:11

hset whether I thought I'd win I did

40:12

soccer Aid last year this year and I can

40:14

tell you if I thought I was going to win

40:16

did you think you were going to win when

40:18

you

40:19

ran I thought there was a goodish chance

40:22

but it wasn't obvious I mean I I think

40:25

the bookies didn't really had me as the

40:29

as the favorite uh for for a long time I

40:32

think it then changed I can't remember

40:34

exactly but

40:37

um you know you make your own L right I

40:40

mean I had to I had to go in there and

40:42

make the arguments I me I think one of

40:43

the things that

40:44

Ken didn't pay enough attention to was

40:47

crime and I thought

40:50

the was a real issue that needed to be

40:54

addressed and that was the the numbers

40:56

of teenage kids being murdered and we

41:00

really really went at that hard and

41:03

again it was one of those things where

41:05

when I together with a lot of other

41:07

people kit Mouse Deputy Mayor Steven

41:10

greenhalge uh Paul Stevenson the

41:13

commissioner Bernard Hogan

41:14

how who who followed him we really

41:18

really tried to fix knife crime and gang

41:21

crime I used to literally lie awake at

41:24

night worrying about it because it was

41:26

so on me

41:28

you know every every single casualty

41:31

having to talk to the parents you know

41:33

the misery the misery of of their

41:36

suffering we really felt it and we and

41:39

it was it was a good example of

41:41

democracy because we'd pledged to fix

41:43

it and if we

41:46

didn't we had nowhere to go one of the

41:49

things I'm proud of is we we cut the

41:50

murder in London during my time by 50%

41:53

in 2016 at 52 years old you become

41:56

co-leader along side Michael go of the

41:58

campaign to take Britain out of the EU

42:00

when I when I look at your Premiership

42:02

as prime minister of the UK there's

42:04

three really significant moments isn't

42:06

there that typically don't fall all in

42:09

one

42:10

person's role as a prime minister you

42:12

had the brexit issues you had Co and you

42:16

had the Ukraine war y um before I before

42:18

I talk about those particular

42:21

issues in hindsight now how do you feel

42:24

about the fact that you had to contend

42:26

with three

42:28

generational crises and issues but you

42:31

know that's the job of being prime

42:32

minister but most Prime Ministers don't

42:34

get sure but but you know pandemic

42:37

leaving the EU some Prim ministers have

42:40

had Wars some Prim ministers have had uh

42:44

terrible crisis uh Sterling crisis

42:47

terrible you wish you got a different

42:48

hand no I I I think actually do you

42:51

think you'd still be in politics now and

42:53

as prime minister if you if you got a

42:55

different hand no I think there are I

42:57

think honestly I think there were other

42:59

reasons for for for that I mean I'm so

43:02

I'm I'm proud of of the things that we

43:04

did with with the country I think it was

43:08

very you know people now say um oh

43:10

brexit War actually you know one of the

43:13

points I make in in Unleashed is that if

43:16

you look at it the model of national

43:18

Independence that we got was crucial so

43:21

full freedom to do what we wanted in

43:23

legislation and regulation that was

43:25

actually crucial when it came to that

43:27

pandemic because we were able to

43:29

vaccinate faster than any other European

43:31

country a much faster I mean did you

43:34

think you were going to win the brexit

43:36

vote um I honestly when I was outside

43:40

London yes when I was inside London no

43:44

so whenever I traveled around the

43:45

country I thought my God people are

43:47

going to vote then when I got back into

43:48

the

43:49

Metropolis um it felt very different so

43:52

if you had to put your house on it

43:54

remain or leave in terms of the

43:56

probability of the outcome what you your

43:58

predicted outcome which one would you

44:00

have voted

44:02

on well I the polls were were basically

44:05

more for remain than for

44:09

leave um but I sort of thought that our

44:13

voters were more motivated so I hoped

44:18

that they would come out and I hoped

44:20

that they

44:23

would that was and but he did but on a

44:26

scale had foreseen I mean because we had

44:28

17.4 million people voted Lee which was

44:30

the biggest number voted for any

44:32

proposition in history and um but you

44:37

know there were plenty of times when I

44:38

you

44:39

know you could be in a in I was a St

44:44

Andrews University in Scotland for my

44:47

daughter's graduation day and you really

44:49

wouldn't have thought that we were going

44:51

to leave talking to those people there

44:53

so you know it depended do you know

44:55

what's interesting when I was reading

44:57

your book but also when I was reading

44:58

some of your previous writings you

45:00

seemed really conflicted on which way to

45:03

go leave or remain right up until you

45:07

wrote your sort of first announcement

45:08

piece that you were supporting leave you

45:10

seemed to be really really

45:12

conflicted the the reasons for for for

45:17

not

45:18

leaving were it seemed to me to be more

45:22

to do with Britain's duty to the rest of

45:25

Europe or need to be good partners uh

45:28

our need not to be

45:31

negative uh to be friendly I that that

45:33

those were the things that worried me

45:35

people the positive reasons for leaving

45:37

people point at this letter which was

45:39

unpublished you know the letter I'm

45:40

referring to the unpublished letter you

45:42

wrote about the decision to leave or

45:44

stay within the EU is this no you mean

45:46

the the article the unpublished article

45:48

yeah yeah yeah yeah where you said here

45:50

some of the the phrases from that piece

45:51

think of Britain think of the rest of

45:53

the EU think of of the future think of

45:55

the desire of our children and our

45:56

grandchildren to live and work in other

45:58

European countries to sell things there

46:00

to make friends perhaps to find Partners

46:02

there I like the sound of freedom I like

46:03

the sound of restoring democracy but

46:05

what are the downsides and here we must

46:07

be honest there is the worry about

46:09

Scotland about the possibility that the

46:11

English only Lee vote could lead to the

46:13

breakup of the Union there is the Putin

46:14

Factor we don't want to do anything to

46:16

encourage more shirtless swaggering from

46:18

the Russian leader not the Middle East

46:20

not anywhere and then there is the whole

46:22

geostrategic anxiety Britain is a great

46:24

nation a global Force for good it is

46:25

surely a boon for for the world and for

46:28

Europe that she should be intimately

46:30

engaged in the EU lastly this is a

46:32

market on our doorstep ready for future

46:34

exploitation by British firms the

46:36

membership fee seems rather small for

46:39

all that access why are we so determined

46:41

to turn our back on it shouldn't our

46:42

policy be like our policy on cake pro-

46:44

having it and pro eating it pro Europe

46:46

and pro rest of the world so when I read

46:48

that but then I also I read the um the

46:51

very Vivid description you gave of that

46:53

night when you're trying to make your

46:54

decision in your book unle

46:57

and you seemed torn but the guy that

47:00

went out and campaigned didn't seem torn

47:03

there was a there was a real lack of

47:04

nuance in the campaign but there's such

47:06

a a huge amount of nuance in both the

47:08

moment you were making the decision and

47:10

the Articles you wrote about that

47:12

decision there are arguments both ways

47:15

and and I I I say it in the in the book

47:18

and it's certainly true that as I as I

47:20

said just now the the case for for stay

47:24

is I think one about um not seeming to

47:28

be hostile not seeming to be detached

47:31

but I had to

47:33

decide because the being in the EU isn't

47:37

like just being in a club that where the

47:38

rules don't change it's it's a project

47:43

to create a United States of of Europe

47:46

with a single currency with a single

47:48

Parliament and and and so on

47:52

and I thought that we weren't ever going

47:54

to get the choice again the chance again

47:56

to have National Democratic Independence

47:59

and as I said in so I wrote that article

48:02

you just quoted was a sort of pasti of a

48:05

of a

48:06

counterargument which I wrote for myself

48:08

as an exercise after I'd already written

48:11

the piece to to come

48:13

out and I wanted to set them side by

48:18

side and and to think the that's nuanced

48:21

but the campaign wasn't nuanced but if

48:23

you read the the other article yeah

48:26

you'll see the points that I came down

48:28

in favor of MH

48:31

and that was about having full marhall

48:35

Independence and be able to do things

48:37

your own way and the trouble with

48:40

staying in the

48:42

EU was it it meant that we were going to

48:45

become less and less

48:47

Democratic and in the end you've got to

48:49

be able

48:50

to as a

48:54

politician you've got to be able to

48:56

answer the question

48:57

question who put you in authority over

49:01

me and how can I remove you from office

49:06

and the problem with the EU is there's

49:08

no way they can answer that question

49:10

because they're not they're not

49:11

democratically is there not way you can

49:13

reform the relationship with the EU

49:14

while being in the EU you know it's

49:16

interesting I think I was thinking of a

49:18

football analogy as you're talking there

49:20

and right now Manchester United my team

49:21

are having a bit of struggle right and

49:23

um my friends in the group chat are

49:25

saying do you think that we should get

49:26

rid of the manager and I'm saying when

49:28

you think about making a decision like

49:29

that you also have to factor in um what

49:34

you do after I.E who replaces the

49:36

manager so many fans would just say sack

49:38

the manager but then the question

49:40

becomes but then what and it was quite

49:42

clear in your book that although you

49:43

wanted to leave the EU you had no

49:47

idea what the plan would be thereafter

49:50

and in fact no but no but what we needed

49:52

to do is take back control and so that's

49:55

like fire the manager I'm saying but

49:56

then what

49:57

it

49:58

wasn't I was just wanting to win an

50:00

argument with the public about their

50:03

democracy and whether they should

50:04

control it or not and I thought that

50:07

ultimately we had to do that and and I

50:10

think that if you look at so going back

50:12

to the points that we were talking about

50:14

earlier to growth rates in America and

50:17

and Europe you couldn't say that the the

50:18

EU model has been economically

50:22

successful not at all um it's got

50:25

chronically bad growth rates um very low

50:30

Innovation by comparison with the United

50:32

States something is is not working so

50:35

whatever that whatever they're doing in

50:36

Brussels to provide this this great body

50:39

of of Regulation it's not actually

50:41

delivering results for the people of of

50:43

Europe and if

50:45

you clip when compared to America well

50:49

so so from 2008 on to 15 take the 15

50:52

years 2008

50:55

20202 whatever to tr indry um but does

50:59

that mean that the EU is doing something

51:00

wrong or that the Americans are doing

51:02

something right because when I think of

51:04

America I think of insane

51:07

Innovation a lot a bit of both a lot I

51:09

mean a lot of both

51:10

so me the Americans by the way would

51:14

never dream of trading away National

51:17

sovereignty over anything they just

51:18

don't they never they never they never

51:21

in any way NATO is a bit of a act where

51:25

they've formed complete hegemony in NATO

51:28

I mean you know that's but they joined

51:29

forces to make the some greater than the

51:32

parts yeah but you know there's no the

51:34

the the EU provides a a body of new and

51:39

a continuously evolving body of new law

51:42

which British the British Parliament

51:44

can't change and so to get back to so

51:47

why I mean I'm not pretending it wasn't

51:49

an e it wasn't a difficult decision it

51:50

was a difficult decision uh for the you

51:52

know for the reasons that you that that

51:54

we've gone into but I wanted the country

51:59

our country to be

52:02

legislatively free again and and at the

52:05

heart of the book you know you talk

52:07

about the pandemic being the most

52:09

difficult thing it was very very

52:10

difficult but and it was very difficult

52:13

to persuade the British public to I very

52:15

find ways of stopping the spread of the

52:17

disease but one thing we did better than

52:20

any other European country was vaccinate

52:23

and one reason we were able to vaccinate

52:25

so fast is because we had regulatory

52:30

freedom of exactly the kind I mean it

52:33

was a complete flute but it turn exactly

52:35

the kind we'll talk about that that I

52:37

that I had advocated we'll talk about

52:39

that and so and so that for me was

52:41

absolutely crucial and then we'll talk

52:43

about that I just want to I need to make

52:44

sure I'm clear because if I'm not clear

52:46

moving forward then my audience aren't

52:47

going to be clear um this idea of like

52:50

Freedom if we take the the analogy of

52:53

like a of a

52:54

parachute if I cut the C WS I'm free but

52:58

I'm also in danger unless I have a

52:59

paraglider waiting to catch me and my

53:01

point here is I understand the head all

53:04

the like the big emotional words that

53:06

freedom Take Back Control Etc it sounds

53:08

compelling to me but as I said with the

53:10

football analogy what's the plan

53:12

thereafter and I think I I actually

53:15

don't want I don't about cutting you

53:17

talking about the parachute right and

53:19

cutting the cords of the of the

53:22

parachute um actually it was the other

53:24

way around it was because we'd come out

53:27

of the EU that we were able to equip

53:30

ourselves with a parachute faster than

53:31

anybody else and uh we were able to to

53:35

get out of the Burning Plane uh faster

53:38

and to get to ground safely faster

53:42

because we' taken back control of our of

53:45

our regulatory freedom and that meant

53:48

that by March 2021 we' vaccinated 45% of

53:52

the adult population and of the older

53:55

people I think we done almost 80 over

53:57

the over 80 we done almost 100% and that

53:59

was incredible if you remember we had we

54:01

had we'll talk about the vaccines in

54:03

early in those early day but the two

54:04

things are connected those early days we

54:06

had thousands you know up to a thousand

54:08

people dying every day and so it was

54:12

incredibly important just we were able

54:15

to give elderly and vulnerable people in

54:17

the UK a protection from in a on this

54:21

point of brexit though in your book you

54:24

say you almost sort of connect yourself

54:27

from the fact that you there had to be a

54:29

plan associated with the decision

54:32

because you seem almost angry that

54:33

people would expect you to have the plan

54:35

even though you led the campaign yeah so

54:38

I mean I'm trying to make the connection

54:40

between brexit and the real world and

54:42

why brexit delivers value was there a

54:44

plan for leaving so so but on the in

54:47

2016 and I think what you're really

54:49

saying is what was our plan for the

54:53

um the referendum outcome so me

54:56

everybody who campaigned to to leave

54:58

were we expecting to win uh were we

55:00

expecting to form the next government

55:01

let me quote your book this is good for

55:02

promotion for your book so you're like

55:03

this never at any point in that campaign

55:06

did we Boris and Michael gave discuss a

55:09

future leave based government because we

55:11

did not imagine that there would be

55:13

would have we would have to be in charge

55:15

of government the government stated

55:17

policy was to implement the referendum

55:19

result it was a result it was a

55:21

referendum not an election we had no

55:23

plans for government no plans for

55:25

negotiations because it was not our

55:28

job and in so far as the next few days

55:31

were chaotic which they were it is

55:33

utterly infuriating that we should be

55:35

blamed it was up to the government to

55:37

announce the plan to withdraw it was up

55:38

to the government to begin negotiations

55:41

so this is I mean this is this is a huge

55:43

issue because if in the context of

55:45

business because when because when

55:46

because why because because because I

55:48

think there a fundamental misconception

55:50

when you when when when a government

55:51

decides to put something to the people

55:52

in a

55:53

referendum the government is not saying

55:57

um oh you know if if it goes against our

56:00

you know the any particular position

56:03

we'll we'll disappear but the government

56:05

they wanted to remain in France uh for

56:08

instance uh uh uh France miton had

56:11

referendum on I I can't remember I think

56:14

it was the master treaty um or was one

56:17

of the treaties that he he lost the vote

56:20

um and he didn't resign he didn't

56:22

disappear plenty of European uh leaders

56:25

have had referendums on E on on on the

56:28

EU and and they've gone against them but

56:32

they haven't vanished from the scene and

56:35

so you know let put this the other way

56:38

around imagine imagine that go and I or

56:42

the whole of the leave team had been

56:44

specifically campaigning to in the leave

56:48

vote to form the next government and to

56:51

install ourselves as the rulers of the

56:53

country people would have said this is

56:56

not about um this you're plainly you

57:00

you're talking all your arguments

57:03

designed to advance your political

57:04

careers you're not you're not talking

57:06

about the issue of leave or remain

57:07

you're talking about a plan to take over

57:09

the government I and so totally I'm not

57:11

politici I'm just I'm just a member of

57:13

public I'm just trying to I'm trying to

57:14

explain why that that was not possible I

57:16

get it but as a member of the public I

57:18

think if you're leading the charge for

57:20

an outcome you must have looked a couple

57:23

of steps further to think about the

57:24

implications and the real ity of this

57:28

outcome like you must have had okay do

57:30

it like this we I assume that the

57:32

government would have bring would have a

57:34

white paper that said that brought they

57:37

they were going to bring forward the

57:39

options for the country and a plan to

57:40

negotiate and a plan and a plan to would

57:43

to do what they said they were going to

57:45

do but the government including your

57:46

friend David Cameron said this is a

57:48

really bad idea he so one would one

57:51

would take from that that the plan is

57:53

not a good one that they've looked at

57:55

all the available options post leaving

57:57

and there's no good options here so if

57:59

the people in charge were saying we

58:01

should not leave there is no good

58:03

plan shouldn't we have listened to them

58:06

well no because I think they were

58:08

wrong as a member of public is I see two

58:10

like two people stood at a cliff Edge

58:12

and you got one guy called David one guy

58:14

called Boris and David has said listen

58:16

I'm taking you to the cliff Edge because

58:18

it's your right to to make this decision

58:20

but do not jump and this other guy

58:23

called Boris is going jump I would

58:25

assume that Boris knows something about

58:27

how we survive once we start falling but

58:30

to find out that Boris had no plan and

58:31

thought David was going to pull out the

58:33

parachute for me is like well David D

58:37

the problem the problem was that I I

58:39

then we then had to we then found

58:41

ourselves because David prime minister

58:43

Cameron then disappeared from the

58:46

scene

58:48

immediately as I as I described in the

58:51

book we then we then had a a chaotic

58:53

period where we had to work out what the

58:54

hell we were going to do because it was

58:56

clear

58:58

that we were going to somebody was going

59:00

to have to take over and and lead us

59:02

through it did David Cameron react badly

59:05

when you told him when he thought that

59:07

you might be voting to leave because you

59:10

talk about in the book he yes I did he

59:12

but I mean but I describe it um in the

59:15

in the book he he said he said

59:19

um he

59:21

said I well I said look I I was really

59:24

struggling with this because I didn't

59:26

see how I consistently cuz he'd offered

59:28

me he said if you come out and support

59:30

rain you can have a top five job in the

59:33

cabinet I couldn't work out what a top

59:34

five job was and then he and then he

59:36

said um and then I he I said well look I

59:40

was Finding very because I've written

59:41

lots and lots of Articles the pointing

59:43

out the the Democratic problems of the

59:46

of the EU and you know finally we had a

59:48

chance to to resolve this and I was

59:50

thinking of of coming out for leave and

59:52

I you know didn't know how to put it to

59:54

him that was the the truth and he he

59:56

said this isn't about articles this is

59:57

about the future of the country I said

59:59

well I agreed about the future of the

60:00

country but I was still thinking canot

60:01

believe and he said well if you if you

60:05

if you come out believe he said I will

60:08

and I you know apologize for he same he

60:10

said I will I will [ __ ] you up

60:12

forever and which I thought was quite a

60:14

big big you know sort of promise to me

60:16

he said he was going to [ __ ] you up

60:17

forever forever and so I immediately um

60:21

went back home after I went back home

60:23

after that evening and uh and cycled

60:27

back from my office in in in City Hall

60:30

and talked to my my family my kids and

60:32

one of my kids uh said immediately well

60:34

you know he got no choice and you'll

60:36

have to come out for leave so

60:39

um I mean I put that in to to I put all

60:42

that in really to just to show you that

60:46

um there were very good Arguments

60:50

for having a quiet life do you know

60:53

what's interesting in that is I when I

60:54

read that part in your book The was two

60:56

things that I thought the first was him

60:58

offering you a top five job if you

61:01

followed his opinion is that not briary

61:04

and is that how the jobs are dished out

61:06

in the government at the moment if if

61:08

you if you do what I say I'll give you a

61:09

top like if you do what I say I'll make

61:12

you health secretary or defense

61:13

secretary seems like but it seems like

61:16

from as a someone who's not in

61:17

government it seems like a really

61:18

corrupt way to dish out jobs like if you

61:21

if you go with me it wasn't clear it

61:22

wasn't clear you've got to be fair to

61:24

Dave it wasn't clear what job he was

61:25

offering but top five is what defense

61:26

secretary Health

61:29

secretary you know PMS were top five

61:31

jobs so there's what really four

61:32

remaining it's probably you thought in

61:33

the book you talk about potentially

61:35

defense secretary I don't know but yes

61:36

but yeah I mean look but but is that not

61:38

a bit corrupt is that not like the

61:40

definition of corruption because if I

61:42

was it to my employ my own view about

61:44

all I think it's a it's a huge mistake

61:46

to do that kind of thing because there

61:49

are always far more people that you know

61:53

you end up you know thinking

61:56

that you should be making a promise to

61:57

then there are jobs you can possibly

61:59

give so the best thing in those

62:00

circumstan is to say nothing I I've I've

62:02

always wondered this about government

62:04

and I've never understood it is how does

62:06

someone become the head of a department

62:08

when they have no prior experience in it

62:11

like you made Matt hanock Health

62:14

secretary how did how did Margaret

62:15

thater become Prime Minister or

62:18

secretary for Education when she had no

62:19

previous previous experience how did

62:21

Tony Blair become Prime Minister when no

62:22

the Prime Minister thing I understand

62:24

how but how did how did T become you

62:27

know a shadow Minister when he had no

62:30

experience you tell me do you think this

62:31

is a good system well so this is a

62:34

really really important point because I

62:37

think that there is a

62:40

um I

62:43

I I do worry that it's quite hard to

62:47

persuade you know really good

62:49

administrative types to go into to

62:52

politics and you know you see it the the

62:55

whole time it's called Dar CEO right and

63:00

you see it the whole time you see loads

63:02

and loads of um I plenty of examples of

63:07

top business people who tried to get who

63:09

tried to become politicians and it just

63:12

doesn't seem to work and I I don't know

63:15

I mean can I can I have a guess go on

63:18

well if I look at the data I go if 35%

63:21

of them come from one school eaten and

63:23

then there's jobs being dished out based

63:25

on if you take my opinion I'll give you

63:27

a top five job I go I understand why I

63:29

could never get in even if I was the

63:31

best candidate because it's not being

63:32

done based on who's the best candidate

63:34

it's being done based on like the old

63:36

boys club but I'll do you a favor I'll

63:38

if you well not not under not under the

63:39

labor party presumably uh or you know or

63:42

or any other party not not not not under

63:43

the I mean most most conservative

63:45

cabinets so just under the T party no I

63:47

I think under under any party I think I

63:49

think that business people do for

63:53

reasons I find hard to put my f

63:56

on they don't necessarily flourish in in

63:59

that environment and who flourishes what

64:02

I what I worry about is that the only

64:05

people who are already going to start

64:06

doing it are people who are willing to

64:09

go through a lot of um you know

64:13

public attack I think social pass well I

64:17

mean well the fact so look one of the

64:20

interesting things that's happened

64:21

recently is that social media has become

64:24

very very

64:26

virulent and um I I don't read it myself

64:31

but I think it it becomes very

64:33

oppressive for politicians and also for

64:36

journalists and I think journalists

64:39

[Music]

64:42

um you know they get a lot of

64:44

shellacking and a lot of abuse if

64:47

they're not thought to be taking one

64:49

line or or the other or you know going

64:52

easy on someone um I mean somebody who's

64:55

going to interview me for this this book

64:58

um yeah you look at and she's a very

65:02

very good journalist but you look at the

65:04

stuff that she gets

65:06

online um about you

65:09

know you know her being an Inquisitor of

65:12

mine or whatever it's appalling it's

65:14

really appalling and I think so I think

65:16

that and I think that it's also the same

65:19

for MPS I think that they get

65:22

very um they think they think if it's a

65:26

choice between having a life where I can

65:28

you know avoid this sort of stuff

65:32

and you know having a wonderful

65:35

existence doing something else or or

65:37

putting myself through this on the point

65:39

of that I said think thinking that it's

65:40

related to the fact that people have got

65:42

their hands on the scales they're

65:42

pulling their friends up it's a bit of a

65:44

boys club is there any truth in that I

65:46

think but I think I look I'm sad to say

65:49

Steve I think that this probably been

65:50

the way politics has been since the dawn

65:52

of time I think that politicians I think

65:55

politics has tended to be um

65:58

factional uh since the dawn of time I

66:01

think it's tended to be just sad but I

66:04

think true um the the good thing is

66:07

that in the end the people who are

66:10

really successful are the people

66:13

who get things done that the people want

66:16

done do you think it's say magnet and so

66:18

and so and so so so it's a it's

66:22

a it's a magnet for very determined

66:26

characters who are willing to put

66:27

themselves through a lot soop get things

66:30

well well I

66:32

mean um have I used those words before

66:35

no no but that's the kind of person

66:37

you're making me sounds like you're

66:38

quoting me about maybe you but yeah but

66:42

the kind of person that I think would be

66:46

compelled and succeed in such an

66:48

environment um I

66:50

think I think you have to have a pretty

66:53

thick skin okay but the but because of

66:56

the because of the way it

66:58

works the people who actually succeed

67:03

are the people who really can drive

67:05

something forward and and deliver it

67:07

closing off on brexit um 62% of British

67:10

people view brexit as more of a failure

67:12

according to yugov and 9% consider it

67:15

more of a success um according to yugov

67:17

as well 46% of British people say they

67:19

should there should be a second e

67:21

referendum in 10 years compared to just

67:23

36% that say it shouldn't be

67:26

and according to let me just finish the

67:28

stats you can respond um according to

67:29

the UK's Real gross added value the gva

67:32

a measure of the size of the economy um

67:35

they say there's approximately 140

67:36

billion Less in 2023 in the UK economy

67:39

compared to if the UK had stayed in the

67:41

single EU Market according to the same

67:44

thing they say that 300 billion has been

67:46

wiped off the value of the UK's economy

67:49

um by

67:50

2035 and my last stat here is a report

67:53

from the center of European reform in

67:56

2023 estimates the UK GDP was 5.5%

67:59

smaller by mid 2023 compared to a

68:01

scenario where the UK had remained in

68:03

the EU this equates to an economic loss

68:06

of about 40 billion annually and just as

68:08

a business owner myself I was looking at

68:10

some stats around what business owners

68:12

think about 33% of small businesses

68:14

reported that brexit has made it harder

68:15

for them to trade with the EU due to

68:17

increased paperwork and things like this

68:19

and the London School of Economics said

68:21

that brex added 6% to food prices

68:23

between 2020 and 2023

68:26

with all of this in mind do you regret

68:28

brexit not at all not at all I mean

68:32

honestly uh so we've outgrown Germany uh

68:37

France since 2016 onwards uh sorry

68:41

certainly out grown Italy uh since 2016

68:43

onwards last time I looked Germany and

68:45

Italy were both members of the of the EU

68:49

and when you the statistics that you

68:51

give I mean they are dwarfed for

68:53

instance by

68:55

covid um you know even if I even if you

68:59

accept that um which I don't necessarily

69:03

uh that uh brexit has caused uh problems

69:08

it's also caused massive opportunities

69:10

because we because we were able to come

69:12

out of the lockdown earlier than any

69:15

other country remember we we came out of

69:17

lockdown in

69:20

July

69:22

2021 we ended we ended all restrictions

69:26

and that meant that we had the fastest

69:30

economic rebound of any G7 country and

69:34

that would not have happened in my view

69:37

without the assistance of brexit

69:39

freedoms do you know the O ecd do you

69:42

know what that body is yes yes they say

69:44

the UK is the only major Rich economy

69:46

that remains smaller poorer than prior

69:48

to the pandemic and brexit may be a

69:51

factor in that in the government's

69:52

independent Watchdog which I know you

69:54

know the office for Budget

69:54

responsibility thinks the UK will

69:56

ultimately be 4% worse off than it would

69:58

have been had it not voted for brexit

70:01

when I you know in business everything

70:03

is a trade-off everything is a trade-off

70:05

so you must be able to identify the

70:09

tradeoff that the UK has made for all of

70:11

the upsides that you claim brexit is

70:13

delivered so I think it's intellectually

70:16

honest of anyone to be able to identify

70:18

both sides of the argument here so what

70:20

is the trade-off what has brexit cost us

70:22

just it cost what it cost us yeah I

70:25

think I think that that it's certainly

70:27

true that um the the way that some of it

70:31

is being managed by some of our by our

70:34

European friends is unnecessarily

70:37

bureaucratic at the moment I think that

70:38

will get better I I I I I accept that

70:42

criticism I don't think it's the end of

70:44

the the end of the world but I do think

70:46

ultimately the advantage of being free

70:50

to do your own thing free to run your

70:52

own country to control your own tradeoff

70:56

no I have I impact for us in but for me

71:00

as an average citizen what's the what's

71:02

the what's the trade downside yeah well

71:04

I think you know you I it's certainly

71:06

true that some some businesses are

71:08

finding it harder

71:10

to there is paperwork that I don't think

71:12

there needs to be and we need to fix

71:15

that but I think that the te we have

71:16

technological solutions to that I don't

71:20

think that we need to be part of a

71:22

European Empire of law get and ever

71:25

denser and more detailed Empire of law

71:29

controlling our freedom and stopping us

71:31

is there an economic

71:33

trade-off I I don't think I think that

71:35

ultimately we will be richer as a result

71:38

in the near ter we're going to be poorer

71:39

well I you know again people were very

71:42

emotional about this and look can I just

71:44

remind you when before the referendum

71:47

people said that and no one ever holds

71:50

these people to account people said that

71:52

there would be Millions more unemployed

71:54

right do you remember that people said

71:55

there would have to be an emergency tax

71:57

raising budget if the people voted to

71:59

leave the EU actually uh when I cease to

72:03

be prime minister unemployment was at a

72:05

50-year low and we had 620,000 more

72:10

people in paid employment than before

72:12

pandemic began point about the

72:15

economic I'm just saying that people

72:17

people make all sorts of

72:18

prognostications about brexit the stats

72:21

that I read you do you believe them that

72:22

there's an economic struggle in the

72:24

short

72:25

people said that we would be we would

72:28

have a million people on the do Que

72:29

because of brexit okay fine but do you

72:31

believe that there's a in the near town

72:33

they're now saying because they're now

72:35

it's it's confirmation bias right people

72:38

but you said we will be richer

72:40

eventually so I'm saying I hope that we

72:42

will if if we do the right thing sure so

72:44

in the near term do you think there's a

72:45

little bit of struggle to get through

72:47

economically as a result of brexit I

72:49

think the I think that will that's

72:51

certainly the case if we make the

72:53

mistake of of staying I mean which is

72:57

what K star and the labor parties you

72:59

know want to do is staying

73:02

in align alignment with the the EU they

73:05

they basically want to be us to be rules

73:07

takers okay I think that's a huge huge

73:09

mistake we should go for

73:11

freedom I don't know how to say this you

73:13

in a way that you're going to understand

73:14

but perfect T is banging I'm an investor

73:17

in the company I drink it every day the

73:19

whole team drinks perfect Ted every day

73:21

we have a perfect Ted fridge in the

73:22

office here's why I like perfect Ted

73:23

typical energy drinks used to give me

73:25

these crashes and as a podcaster the

73:26

last thing you want to do is be crashing

73:28

in a conversation the founders of

73:29

perfect Ted wanted to create an energy

73:31

drink that wouldn't create that horrible

73:33

crash cycle that many of us go through

73:35

so they used matcha as the energy source

73:37

and somehow they also made it really

73:39

really delicious they've just come out

73:40

with this new flavor called juicy Peach

73:42

and it is banging if you try perfect TS

73:44

juicy Peach and it's not banging feel

73:46

free to get in my DMs and cuss me out

73:49

you can pick it up at tesos or waos or

73:51

you can get it online and here's a

73:52

secret that you've got to keep to

73:53

yourself I'm going to give you 40% off

73:56

perfect Ted just so you can try juicy

73:58

Peach yourself go to perfect ted.com and

74:00

at checkout put in the code diary 40 I'm

74:03

going to leave that up for some time not

74:04

forever that's perfect ted.com and then

74:06

use code diary 40 at checkout when you

74:08

try it make sure you tag me on Instagram

74:10

and and say Steve you were right it's

74:12

banging the next big thing was the

74:15

pandemic this was once you'd become the

74:18

prime minister of the United Kingdom um

74:22

and you have this pandemic begin to roll

74:24

in I was looking at your the the way you

74:27

described that situation in late 2019

74:30

early 2020 in your book and it appears

74:34

that you had no idea of the severity of

74:37

this virus that was rolling into the

74:39

shores when was the first time you heard

74:41

that there was a virus that had come in

74:42

from China whatever the date was I think

74:45

it was either end

74:47

of uh 2019 beginning of 2020 I I can't

74:51

remember exactly when but there's

74:52

there's a day when uh when I'm walking

74:55

through the lobby of the House of

74:56

Commons with the health secretary and he

74:58

says you know there's I'm worried about

75:00

this um this Chinese virus was that

75:03

hanock the right person to be handling

75:05

that because that is a generational once

75:07

in a lifetime health issue yeah and in I

75:11

look I think I think he did a very good

75:12

job yes I think he was he was very

75:13

energetic was he the best person to be

75:15

handling it I think it I think he I

75:19

think he did a very good job and I think

75:22

that was he the best person to be

75:24

handling it

75:26

look in

75:28

hindsight well I I certainly think that

75:30

he well yes because I think yes I think

75:33

that he had the right mixture of energy

75:38

and and

75:40

realism um don't forget we didn't know

75:44

about the the disease we didn't know how

75:48

lethal it was we didn't know how

75:50

contagious it was and we didn't know how

75:54

exactly how it was transmitted there was

75:56

a lot of stuff we we didn't know some

75:58

quotes from your book here you said the

76:00

problem wasn't that I was ignorant to

76:02

zuntic diseases the problem was that I

76:04

felt I knew all about

76:06

them um after more than 30 years of

76:09

writing about or dealing with new zootic

76:12

zootic yeah diseases I felt I knew my

76:15

SARS and my Ebola so to speak and I

76:17

concluded two things first that these

76:19

novel zuntic plagues tend to sort

76:21

themselves out and second that the

76:24

greater risk of destruction from from

76:26

these from attempts to stop them by

76:28

politicians um was there sort of

76:30

attempts to contain the diseases that

76:32

the prevention would probably be worse

76:35

than the cause in some

76:38

respects so when hanock started talking

76:41

about a new Corona virus possibly from

76:42

bats and the risk that it would sweep

76:44

the country it was hardly surprising

76:45

that I felt I'd heard this all

76:51

before little did we

76:53

know yes I I mean so I think that's I

76:56

that's I'm I'm being very honest there

76:57

about about um as I am throughout

77:00

Unleashed about the my state of mind

77:04

because you know i' I'd covered in great

77:06

detail um the

77:10

uh salmon and eggs Panic uh when

77:14

millions of chickens were slaughtered uh

77:17

needlessly i' covered the uh the bines

77:19

punch for men off the Panic mad car

77:22

disease when uh vast portion of the UK

77:26

dairy uh cattle herd was slaughtered

77:28

probably uh

77:30

needlessly um the livelihoods of farmers

77:33

were destroyed um I'd been mayor of

77:35

London when we we were threatened with

77:38

the uh with a bird flu um so didn't was

77:42

a big deal and we we' laid on stocks of

77:45

Tamiflu which turned out not to be to be

77:47

necessary uh so I've seen SARS come and

77:52

go uh Ebola and so on and in each of

77:56

these cases what what what seemed to

77:58

have happened was that there had been a

78:01

rational anxiety about the risk of a

78:06

xonotic disease

78:09

um often from Asia or

78:12

wherever um we would get in a real we'

78:15

do our best to get ready and then

78:18

it mysteriously leave us almost

78:20

completely unaffected I remember the

78:22

swine flu is that what you thought was

78:24

happen in this case and I didn't know

78:27

course I didn't know but I was what I

78:29

was trying to do was to give you context

78:32

the context and the state of mind that I

78:35

think a lot of people were in

78:37

when they they heard about about Co when

78:41

did you call China February had it

78:44

February 2020 there was a call you made

78:46

to the leader of China to Xin ping yeah

78:48

yeah I mean I would have called him I

78:50

mean it'll be in the it'll be in it'll

78:52

be in the book and you were sending

78:53

supplies yeah that stage we were we were

78:55

still

78:56

sending um supplies to help them there

78:59

we were we were sending prote what did

79:00

he say about the virus well I said

79:08

um I look my remember the conversation

79:10

is hazy now I I I think I you know

79:15

um congratulated him on what seemed to

79:17

be his efforts to control the disease

79:20

but said I was I was anxious about the

79:23

what was happening in these wet markets

79:25

because at that stage we were given to

79:27

understand that these the disease had

79:30

had

79:30

occurred um spontaneously in a in a

79:34

market in Wuhan what did he say and I

79:37

can't remember what he said to to that

79:39

um I don't think I he look I mean he's a

79:43

he a president of China I don't think he

79:45

wanted to particularly the implication

79:47

that China was in any way at at fault

79:50

and I can take understand that but I now

79:54

think that wasn't right I know I think

79:55

it almost certainly was a um a lab

79:59

accident or it was as a result of

80:01

something that went wrong in that lab

80:03

can I ask about this because this

80:04

started as a conspiracy theory that is

80:06

now widely accepted as the probable

80:09

likely outcome why were they messing

80:11

around with a virus in a lab in Wuhan

80:14

well you may well ask I mean I think it

80:16

I think they were why do you think they

80:18

were someone that is so far away from

80:20

why people do these s such a thing I I I

80:22

genuinely don't know but I think that

80:24

they

80:25

were they were exp you know science the

80:29

the point of science is to keep pushing

80:30

back the frontiers of human knowledge

80:32

everywhere and to see what you see what

80:34

they could do you think it was a weapon

80:36

I don't I didn't have any reason to

80:38

think so I didn't have any reason to

80:40

think so I think it was a terrible

80:41

accident I think the thing um escaped

80:44

from the lab I think you know they they

80:46

were uh looking at engineering these

80:50

viruses a function gain of the of the um

80:54

of the virus and and ways that they

80:56

could manipulate it and um sadly

81:00

something went wrong um that's that's my

81:03

best guess and a lot of people now seem

81:04

to think that you called Trump around

81:06

this time as well to speak to him about

81:07

it I did yes what did he think um well I

81:13

yeah I mean he took the the firm view

81:16

that you know China had a case to answer

81:19

but so did a lot of people and in the

81:21

book you talk about the World Health

81:22

organization's response being seen

81:24

seemingly hesitant because they are

81:26

wanted to keep Beijing in

81:30

favor yes I think a lot of scientists

81:32

were anxious

81:34

about cheesing off the the Chinese and I

81:37

think a lot of scientists you know

81:39

because China is very heavily involved

81:41

in the support and sponsorship for of a

81:43

lot of um academic research and and so

81:46

on so there was a sort of hesitant I

81:48

felt I me I might have been wrong about

81:50

this my impression was there was a sort

81:52

of um gingerness about seeming to fing

81:55

of the Chinese too much on lockdowns um

81:59

it's interesting that I was reading in

82:00

your book that around the 8th of March

82:02

you start to see what's going on in

82:04

Italy and I think we can all vividly

82:05

remember those scenes from those Italian

82:07

hospitals where there was patients in

82:09

the chors being pushed around on trol

82:11

trollies and there was not enough beds

82:13

and I think for me as well that was one

82:14

of the big moments where I realized

82:16

watching it actually play out on Twitter

82:18

that this was an incredibly serious

82:21

situation something that I'd never seen

82:23

in my lifetime before

82:25

um was that the the penny drop moment

82:27

for you that this wasn't just another

82:29

bird flu or I was very anxious about it

82:32

because I knew the Italian Health Care

82:33

system I thought it was broadly

82:34

excellent and I remember when you know

82:37

one of our one of our kids had a uh fell

82:40

into a swim pool in in in Italy once you

82:44

know when everybody was having a lion

82:45

you know most shattering thing that you

82:48

know could never happened to you and the

82:50

Italian Prontos Coro came and they were

82:53

unbelievably good they were so fast they

82:55

were they they were so and I thought you

82:57

know if the Italians are having problems

83:00

with this thing and you know frankly our

83:03

population is about as elderly as theirs

83:05

then this could be very very serious so

83:07

I think that I think I think that did

83:09

really register with me and so if you

83:11

look at the and obvious I defer

83:13

completely to the inquiry into into all

83:16

this under Dame Heather Howard but if

83:17

you look at what happened from then on

83:19

in you see a series through through

83:22

March up till the 23rd of March you see

83:24

a series of intensifying steps to try to

83:28

get people to take precautions what I

83:31

what I observed I saw that in the book

83:33

and you kind of have the stages that you

83:34

break down um that you went through from

83:36

that moment onwards what I observed

83:38

though and I think this is probably a

83:40

fair estimation or a fair description of

83:43

what happened was there was

83:47

indecision because it seemed like there

83:49

was facts coming from one ear facts

83:51

coming from the other ear and there was

83:53

almost a bit of paral is and when you

83:55

look at the rest of the European numbers

83:56

which I was looking through um yesterday

83:59

about when different sort of European

84:00

markets made that decision the UK

84:04

appears to make the decision to lock

84:05

down much slower than all the other

84:07

European nations um slower to close the

84:10

schools the shops and events seem to be

84:13

later than our European counterparts and

84:16

Matt hanock went on to say that they

84:18

were ahead of us in the in the in the

84:20

epicur anyway MH uh so so so they they

84:24

so you mentioned the Italian situation

84:27

yeah and they they were already ahead of

84:30

us and you know we could see that we

84:33

were going to have to bring in measures

84:37

but you know again this will be for the

84:39

inquiry to to comment upon but it's it's

84:43

it's pretty clear to me that we we

84:44

couldn't reasonably have

84:47

instituted these measures in the UK

84:51

which would novel and draconian

84:54

um in advance of the scientific advice

84:56

or opinion and and that's what and

84:58

that's what it would have been them

85:00

being ahead of us isn't relevant because

85:01

the chart I have here shows how many

85:04

days it took us to take decisive action

85:07

after the third death and it shows that

85:09

for all of the European nations and when

85:11

I was reading about the information you

85:13

were getting from scientists on this end

85:15

and from other people in

85:17

politics it was so contradictory that I

85:22

think I was guessing that that's what

85:23

caused the decision and also your own

85:25

sort of philosophy towards shutting down

85:27

soci we had this group called the

85:28

scientific Advisory Group on emergencies

85:30

right the sage and they they were so we

85:36

were going to be led by the science

85:40

and we basically had to I decided that

85:44

we had to follow what Sage

85:46

advised

85:48

and for a long

85:50

time to a point they hesitated about

85:55

schools because of all the dis benefits

85:58

and if you remember the argument was

86:00

that if you went too early then there

86:04

was a a risk that you'd have to keep

86:06

doing it uh because you you know the

86:09

public would lose patience with with the

86:13

lockdown and there was there there was a

86:16

second argument which was there would

86:18

then be bounced back if you if if you

86:20

went too early uh and you kept on for

86:22

twoo you'd then

86:24

take the measures off and the virus

86:27

would would flare up again and which

86:28

indeed did happen um throughout the

86:32

course of the of the pandemic so there

86:35

were the scientific

86:38

advice

86:40

was I mean it wasn't I wouldn't say it

86:43

was particularly confused at that stage

86:45

I think it was they were struggling to

86:48

assess exactly what to to do and there

86:50

were different views within the

86:52

scientists about certain things like

86:56

Matt hanock said that we could have

86:57

saved 30,000 lines like um masks and so

87:00

on is that true Matt Han you know

87:03

I if we if we' lock down earlier I I I

87:06

can't say that for sure uh I I I've no

87:09

no way of knowing that um but what I

87:12

what I can say is that

87:17

the to have locked down earlier would

87:20

have been to have um

87:25

gone beyond to have

87:27

anticipated scientific advice it would

87:30

not have been some and I'm you know I'm

87:32

not a epidemiologist I'm I'm not a

87:34

scientist uh I was being asked to you

87:37

know the what was on the agenda was

87:39

imprisoning the whole UK

87:41

population um it wasn't something the

87:43

scientists were yet recommending in the

87:46

book you seem to question whether those

87:48

lockdowns really even worked so I'm not

87:50

saying that what I'm saying so dep what

87:52

you mean by work

87:54

I think that they

87:56

certainly

87:59

did have a role

88:04

in stopping spread of the disease and

88:08

they helped probably to turn down the

88:11

the curve of the of the disease probably

88:14

I you know almost certainly what I find

88:16

very difficult to gauge now and you know

88:19

again this is for for heet is to what

88:23

extent was it the

88:25

lockdowns what did it and to what extent

88:28

was this going to happen naturally a

88:31

result of the the natural Parabola and

88:34

you suspect it was going to happen

88:35

anyway I'm not what I what I'm saying is

88:37

that to some extent it to some extent or

88:39

to a large extent it was perhaps going

88:41

to happen anyway perhaps and

88:45

given that it was perhaps it was to a

88:48

large exent perhaps going to happen

88:50

anyway the question

88:52

is did the benefit benefits of

88:55

lockdown

88:56

outweigh the very very severe Damage

89:00

Done to kids life chances at school

89:03

which talked about earlier what do you

89:04

think the answer to that question is I

89:06

think that we did the right thing you

89:08

think we did the right thing I think we

89:09

did the right thing but I but I'm I'm

89:10

conscious that there are lots of people

89:13

who who disagree and what I hope is that

89:17

the covid inquiry will will say that yes

89:19

we did do the right thing in your book

89:20

when you talk about those those measures

89:22

um you refer to them as Bon

89:25

the the sort of different areas yeah I

89:27

think that's that's bit that's later

89:28

that's by the that's when we got to the

89:30

tearing system the tearing system you

89:31

talked B Bonkers and you seem surprised

89:33

that people would follow this stuff and

89:36

that they wanted to follow this

89:39

stuff which is strange hearing it from

89:41

the guy that put the rules in place you

89:42

think it's the tearing system was

89:44

Bonkers and you surprised talk about the

89:46

hindsight right yeah yeah so at the time

89:48

at the time it seemed so we had a

89:51

situation so coming out of the first

89:55

um the

89:57

first um lockdown so in in the summer of

90:00

of 2020 and and going into the into the

90:03

Autumn and things start to get more

90:06

difficult again we have a situation

90:08

where in some parts of the country in I

90:11

don't know places uh like leester or

90:14

West Midlands or or

90:16

wherever uh

90:18

Northwest um you have the tears you've

90:21

got a problem which is that some areas

90:24

haven't really seen a you know the co

90:26

really go down anything like as much as

90:28

it went down say West country Cornwall

90:32

was that a bad idea in say and so you

90:34

had uh people saying you know why the

90:37

hell should pu be closing cornall yeah

90:40

when there's no Co and just because

90:43

there there's Transmission in in in

90:45

bolon or wherever so is that a bad idea

90:47

in hindsight well no it was a good idea

90:49

in principle because because because

90:51

after all um it was it it was crazy it

90:55

seemed but the problem the problem was

90:57

that it was very very difficult to draw

90:59

the boundaries and as soon as you as

91:01

soon as you said you know well this bit

91:04

of Lester's in uh tier which whatever or

91:07

or yeah it was it was impossible went

91:10

crazy because it was very invidious and

91:12

it see and on on a human level when

91:15

you're leading the country during a

91:17

pandemic and you've got you're getting

91:18

these numbers every day that people are

91:20

dying and that people are sick and then

91:21

you know I know you got sick yourself

91:24

what is there a mental toll on you

91:26

throughout that

91:28

period Well I think it

91:30

was so as you discover it Unleashed I

91:35

like it when I can go forward and when I

91:36

have things positive projects to do so

91:39

it was very very difficult when I was

91:41

constantly having to shut the country

91:44

down constantly trying to stop the

91:46

transmission of the Disease by these

91:48

very very crude methods but once

91:55

in by end of 2020 we had the prospect of

91:59

a vaccination then my mood totally

92:01

changed because because then I had

92:03

something my question was about you as a

92:05

human being when you're dealing with

92:07

tragic news and this escalating pandemic

92:11

what what's the human toll if i' had

92:13

been a fly on the wall in your hardest

92:14

moments throughout that pandemic what

92:15

would I have seen well I think that I

92:17

think it was certainly pretty tough I I

92:19

had a bad bout of covid what was the

92:21

hardest day outside of the getting the

92:23

illness yourself what was the hardest

92:24

day for you throughout that

92:27

period I think

92:30

that ah boy I think it

92:33

was there was a lot of tough times but I

92:35

think having

92:37

to having to go probably the to go back

92:40

into lockdown in in in the end of 2020

92:44

was pretty pretty awful because the CL

92:47

you we'd really really hope that tearing

92:49

would work and you know some people

92:51

still think it could have worked

92:54

um but it just W you know we we couldn't

92:57

I couldn't take the risk the quote from

92:59

your book that I pulled out which really

93:01

shocked me was the real question I

93:02

suppose is why on Earth the public so

93:04

avidly craved these rules and why they

93:06

were so willing to have their doings

93:08

circumscribed in such a rabinal detail

93:12

in their complexity they were also like

93:15

a kind of religion detailed rituals you

93:17

just obeyed L Leviticus like in the hope

93:19

of Salvation because science was slow to

93:22

help us on the 13th of September 2021

93:26

your mother Charlotte passes away while

93:29

at the same time you're dealing with all

93:31

of this Fallout and the recovery from

93:33

the

93:36

pandemic that's a tough moment yeah but

93:39

that's the same for any person in any um

93:42

in any Walk of Life you know that's

93:44

always a a very very tough moment um I

93:48

think

93:49

that

93:51

um you know to to your to your point

93:54

about the the people why why do people

93:55

obey the rules so much and and my my

93:58

feelings about that I think no I'm

94:01

asking about your mother here so your

94:03

mother passed away in September

94:05

2021 and you you don't touch on it so

94:07

heavily in the book the circumstances of

94:10

that but that must be a particularly

94:11

tough moment for a person that's dealing

94:12

with all of these other social issues

94:15

and political issues at the same

94:17

time yes I know but I mean I think I

94:19

suppose the point I make there is that

94:21

is our our common human law lot isn't it

94:24

and yes it it

94:27

was tough for me and my my brothers and

94:30

sisters of my family

94:33

um very very very tough you know we miss

94:36

her to this day uh all of us but you

94:39

know um a lot of people were suffering a

94:43

lot throughout that pandemic and a lot

94:46

of people lost loved ones

94:50

and you know I had to be I had to be

94:52

very very mindful of

94:54

of what was happening every day in in

94:57

households across the country and and I

94:59

had to try to and I had a desperately

95:01

difficult because one of the interesting

95:02

things about being prime minister is is

95:05

the way it works now is how much of it

95:08

is just funneled

95:10

upwards and you know there's you have to

95:13

take those decisions there's nobody else

95:15

who can do it for you would you remember

95:17

where you were when you found out that

95:18

Charlotte was had passed away got I

95:23

think it was in I was driving driving to

95:24

London I I'd been I'd been out on a

95:26

visit and was it

95:29

unexpected well I mean you know

95:33

um she'd had she'd been out for a long

95:35

time with um with

95:37

Parkinson's and she had various

95:40

complications associated with

95:43

Parkinson's

95:44

um and she'd had a bad scare about a

95:47

year previously so no I couldn't say it

95:50

was you know um medically

95:55

I could not say it was medically totally

95:56

unexpected no did you have a chance to

95:59

grieve her

96:01

passing I certainly did grief her

96:03

passing

96:05

um but

96:09

um if if you mean did I sort

96:12

of process it mourn it I you know to I

96:17

to the best of my ability yes are you

96:19

good are you a natural at that sort of

96:21

thing that sort of

96:24

emotional I guess connection with

96:32

yourself God

96:35

um I think probably go back to some of

96:38

the earlier things we were we were

96:40

saying I mean I did grieve and you know

96:42

I do miss her like all my brothers and

96:44

sisters I do I do miss her today but you

96:47

know um I also had a huge amount to to

96:51

think about and to get done and

96:54

and we just have to you know we had to

96:56

do it many members of the UK population

97:00

were also mourning and grieving at the

97:02

same time and I think that's why the the

97:03

party gate scenario which you talk about

97:05

in the book was so enraging for many

97:09

people because as someone who again is

97:11

not very close to politics like myself

97:14

it's Optics here you know and I think

97:17

that's really the issue when you've got

97:19

people who are unable to see their their

97:21

loved ones because of the situation with

97:22

funerals and the pandemic even the

97:26

suggestion that there was a rave going

97:28

on in number 10 is the most enraging

97:31

thing that I think anyone could say but

97:32

there wasn't a rave going on I mean

97:34

you'll find it all that you'll find all

97:35

Unleashed and there and I feel desperate

97:37

about it and I really do and I and I

97:39

understand you know completely why

97:41

people got so enraged I really do

97:42

understand that and I did my I did my

97:45

best to to try and you know I think I

97:47

mishandled the whole thing the the the

97:50

revelations as such as they were uh but

97:54

also

97:55

reality but you know because at the end

97:57

of the book you do seem to to highlight

97:59

that you could have done things to well

98:01

what I could have done was what I could

98:03

have done I think so I I wonder why I

98:07

commissioned Sue gray uh to conduct an

98:10

investigation into it I mean I I was

98:12

informed that she was the you know

98:15

politically impartial and a model of

98:17

sort of you know obsessed with with

98:19

Proby and and neither of those things

98:22

now seem to me to

98:24

true I've got a picture here um there

98:27

was 17 parties that were alleged during

98:30

the the the sort of party gate time

98:33

frame and one of the pictures that

98:35

leaked to the public was this picture of

98:37

you enjoying some cheese and some wine I

98:39

believe um at 10 Downing Street now as

98:42

again a member of the public I look at

98:44

this I look at some of these key dates I

98:45

know you were fined for one particular

98:46

date which was your birthday I think

98:48

where you were raising the glass of wine

98:49

with some colleagues no I wasn't you see

98:52

again you see

98:54

people say this kind of thing and it was

98:56

it the AIDS leaving drink that you were

98:58

fined for no I wasn't fined for that

99:00

what were you find for I was fined for

99:03

my for going into stand at my desk in

99:06

the cabinet room uh between meetings

99:09

with a glass of wine no not with a glass

99:10

of wine um and

99:14

several members of staff were also there

99:17

but there were people I saw throughout

99:19

the working day anyway but this picture

99:22

and just just cuz people think that I

99:24

had a cake and that we we didn't have a

99:27

I didn't have a cake I I I didn't even

99:29

see a cake

99:31

um to say it was a party is a complete

99:36

travesty it was about the most

99:38

lugubrious event in the it was it

99:42

consisted of people who were part of my

99:45

normal working life that that picture

99:47

that you you're pointing to

99:50

there was this the the Metropolitan

99:52

Police did at that but they decided

99:54

there was no offense committed because

99:55

what you've got is people sitting

99:57

outside as as people tried to do during

100:00

those times because there was much less

100:03

risk of infection just let me just read

100:06

some of the stuff so 15th of May 2020

100:08

cheese and wine um at Downing Street

100:10

approximately 349 people had died from

100:13

Co that Day in the UK Mr Johnson was

100:15

photographed sitting with his wife

100:16

Carrie and some staff at a table with

100:18

wine and cheese in the number 10 Garden

100:20

at this time Co restrictions so that

100:22

people could not

100:24

reasonable excuse let me just read this

100:25

and then I'll but we we were I was that

100:26

that's my that is my home that's the

100:29

garden I was supposed to be May 20th um

100:32

there was a bring your own booze party

100:35

on the same day that 38 people died from

100:36

the from the pandemic and you attended

100:38

for about 30 minutes you say it was 25

100:41

minutes and then the 19th of June was

100:43

your your birthday sorry okay can I just

100:45

go back over there I mean you know none

100:47

of this watches with the public because

100:48

they all think that we were you know

100:50

having dancing around and and getting

100:52

drunk

100:54

12th of April Johnson announces that he

100:56

has been f50s by the police do you know

100:58

what it is though it

101:00

like it's all about it's all it's all

101:03

about leading by example isn't it and

101:06

you know this

101:07

yeah I think my opinion is that whatever

101:11

is going on at number 10 needs to be the

101:12

extreme demonstration of the perfect

101:15

example the extreme demonstration

101:18

because you of course you're going to be

101:19

attacked you know that yeah of course if

101:21

you sneeze you'll be attacked and I say

101:23

that in that's what I'm saying so so

101:26

what we should have done and and I I say

101:28

is we should have I should have said to

101:31

everybody look people are going to say

101:34

you know matter because it was in fact

101:36

as I tried to explain impossible to

101:38

maintain perfect social distancing uh in

101:41

the the office environment that we were

101:43

in um people were working around the

101:46

clock um

101:50

and I I think that um I should have said

101:54

something to the staff like people are

101:56

going to be out to get us for God's sake

101:59

you

102:00

know not only obey the rules but be seen

102:02

to obey the rules now we had you know

102:04

all the signs in the corridors and and

102:07

and stuff like

102:08

that I think that there were a lot of

102:11

people by that stage who were perhaps

102:13

not altogether friendly to me uh who

102:16

wanted to you know that's that's fine

102:18

that's fine but honestly I I can't help

102:20

but believe cuz I try and remain pretty

102:22

impartial in these things so I try to

102:23

apply common sense as like a business

102:24

person but do you really think I was

102:26

deliberately partying and breaking the

102:28

rules for me do you really think that

102:30

for me seeing that photo when one of my

102:32

friends can go to their grandmother's

102:33

funeral and seeing that there's people

102:35

drinking and have appearing to have a

102:37

whale of a time just in this photo but

102:39

also the other photos where you're

102:40

cheersing with wine I go you should

102:42

never have allowed that to happen do you

102:45

know and I think you agree with me agree

102:47

with me because you said at the end of

102:48

the book you said I should have said to

102:51

to my whole team don't even let

102:54

them appear to be breaking the rules in

102:56

in in in the course

102:59

of almost two

103:02

years of people working around the clock

103:04

in number 10 in conditions of great

103:08

proximity to each other

103:11

um there were going to be moments when

103:14

of course when colleagues are saying are

103:16

going away when you raise a glass to

103:18

them unless you're going to ban that I

103:20

think you should have well that's a

103:21

point of view because I just think

103:23

alcohol in 1940 we would we would have

103:25

won the second world war I think Prime I

103:26

think prime minister during a pandemic I

103:28

think you just have to be the most

103:29

extreme

103:31

example we we got a ban on alcohol in

103:33

this country no I think I think I think

103:35

genuinely s if we if we if we banned

103:38

alcohol in number 10 in 1940 M I think

103:41

all Gatherings should have been banned

103:42

at number 10 because I think sorry but

103:44

we were gather we that means Banning

103:46

meetings so what do you mean Gatherings

103:49

Gatherings with alcohol and music and

103:51

cake I think have been B I've tried to

103:54

explain to you there was no cake or I

103:56

saw no cake I I was at no event where

103:59

there was there was music or dancing

104:00

that total nonsense now maybe those

104:04

things took place but they certainly

104:06

didn't Place take place when I was there

104:08

I think one of the problem one of the

104:09

mistakes I made was beginning the whole

104:13

thing by issuing this General apology

104:17

and so what happened was so that people

104:19

think that there was um

104:23

there was do you still apologize I don't

104:25

apologize for allegations of vomiting or

104:28

fist fights because they turned out what

104:30

you apologize for and well I in so far

104:33

as people broke the rules on my watch

104:34

and far as I'm responsible of course I

104:36

apologize for that but what I was what

104:38

I'm what I'm saying in

104:39

Unleashed is that

104:42

um the problem with leading with a

104:46

blanket apology was that it then meant

104:48

that absolutely any allegation that was

104:51

you you know you've said you've just

104:52

said made a couple of your so um you

104:54

know any allegation that was then made

104:57

about and in Sue Gray's initial report

104:59

that she had to to change it she said

105:02

there were uh there was a you know

105:05

violent altercation and and vomiting and

105:07

somebody V but they that both of those

105:09

things turned out not to be true you

105:10

said you made the mistake in the in your

105:12

book you say you made the mistake of

105:13

issuing pathetic and groveling apologies

105:15

over the Scandal which made it look as

105:17

though we were far more culpable than we

105:18

were which is just the point I've just

105:20

made because I think because because it

105:22

it looked as though

105:24

but by issuing a sort of universal

105:28

apology it meant that any

105:32

subsequent um

105:34

allegation people assume well that must

105:36

be what happened and you and you to be

105:38

fair to I I I kind of get the feeling

105:40

that's what you think

105:44

and that was largely my fault because I

105:47

seem to

105:48

be intently validating the apology is is

105:51

is not I seem to be validating

105:55

everything that people said about what

105:57

was going on and what was actually going

105:59

on was that people were working

106:01

unbelievably hard around the clock to

106:04

get a lot of very difficult things done

106:06

I and and and actually what the the

106:10

things that they were successful in are

106:13

very creditable and I and

106:16

so I feel badly about them on page 75 of

106:20

your book you say in retrospect I should

106:22

have done more to protect myself and the

106:23

rest of white hle against party type

106:25

allegations I should have said to the

106:26

entire staff perhaps in a letter about

106:28

the vital importance of not only obeying

106:30

the rules but also to be seen to be

106:32

obeying them and reminding um and I

106:35

think that that is actually my point

106:37

which is apologies I think are good

106:38

things I think people should apologize

106:40

no but you I'm trying to explain if if

106:42

you apologize in advance for the the

106:46

problem was that a lot of things were

106:47

said about staff in number 10 that

106:49

weren't true and weren't fair to them

106:51

and my blanket

106:53

looked as though I was validating and

106:57

accepting all those criticisms okay

106:59

which which I think was not in

107:01

retrospect I think I should have waited

107:03

to see exactly what people you know said

107:08

and I what was established to be true

107:10

and then I should have apologized for

107:11

what what actually happened you see what

107:13

I'm saying and and also I want to stick

107:16

up again for those officials yeah uh who

107:18

were working around the clock to sort

107:22

out the government's and the country's

107:24

response to covid and when it came to it

107:27

did an absolutely outstanding job and I

107:29

I don't want I

107:30

don't I know you've been you've been

107:33

very patient with me you you know you

107:34

you've you've allowed me to talk for

107:36

almost two and a half hours and of what

107:38

I thought was going to be an hour's show

107:40

so I'm you've been heroic in putting up

107:42

with we're wrapping up now but I just

107:43

wanted wanted to ask a few more things

107:44

these are personal questions that I have

107:46

so um um one of the things that no one

107:49

knows about you is how many kids you

107:51

have why is this such a

107:53

widely debated subject I've never sat

107:55

with a guest on my show where I don't

107:57

know why widely debated it's a matter of

107:59

a matter of I have eight children it's

108:01

eight matter matter of public record

108:03

okay I don't know why people why is

108:04

everyone so obsessed with with a of kids

108:05

you have search me go Charlotte Owen

108:08

you're not related to her are you no

108:09

she's not a former lover no okay I asked

108:12

my friends some of the things they want

108:13

to she so she's but it's in the book

108:15

read read all about it in the book she

108:17

is a she is a very capable adviser and

108:20

what happens next for Boris Johnson are

108:22

you going back into

108:23

I live a life of blameless rustic

108:25

obscurity you want to get back into

108:26

politics I I think that um I stay in

108:30

unleashed the chance of the frisbe

108:32

dec I saying Unleashed you you should

108:34

only do things if you genuinely think

108:36

you can be useful at the moment I think

108:38

the most I'm loving I do a lot of

108:39

painting I'm having a great time living

108:41

in uh you know in the countryside um I I

108:46

got my hands folding all sorts of things

108:48

and and next question quick fire yeah

108:51

Trump or camalo and you can't sit on the

108:52

phone

108:54

all British prime ministers including

108:56

ex- Prime Ministers yeah are

108:58

constitutionally obliged to be friendly

109:00

with whoever who's the best for

109:01

international relations whoever whoever

109:04

the um the American people decide that

109:06

is that is the right thing and you are

109:09

dwindling audience would not expect who

109:12

who's better for stopping the wars a

109:14

who's better for stopping the wars I

109:16

mean you know if you read Unleashed I

109:18

did read it okay and I saw your

109:19

interview on GB news and you seem to

109:21

think that Trump would be a better well

109:23

I think what I'm saying is that you

109:24

should be aware of some of the kind of

109:28

anti-trump prejudice about his handling

109:31

of foreign policy and there are very

109:33

good re you know there very when he was

109:36

president he took some tough decisions

109:38

and and you know projected in a sense of

109:43

American strength and purpose and that's

109:45

you know but I make no no further

109:46

comment than that and we have a closing

109:48

tradition on this podcast where the last

109:49

guest leaves a question for the next

109:50

guest not knowing who they're going to

109:51

leave it for right okay and the question

109:54

that's been left for you is Success

109:57

often comes at a price and one of those

110:00

is the relationships we lose along the

110:02

way which relationship or person did you

110:05

lose in the pursuit of your

110:07

success

110:11

um you seem to one of the longer you

110:15

live the the the more you you know you

110:17

can have what seems to be a complete

110:21

terrible Sun

110:23

and then Le and behold things cheer up

110:26

and andn your your your friends again

110:29

and

110:30

um

110:33

so I mean look at look at look at

110:35

Michael go you got to answer the

110:37

question which relationship will pass

110:39

the answer the answer your question is I

110:41

don't I don't I don't regard any of the

110:44

termination any any rupture I don't

110:46

regard any rupture as fin no one's ever

110:47

swered this question so you're not going

110:48

to be the first I didn't regard any

110:50

rupture as final which relationship or

110:51

person did you lose in the pursuit of

110:53

your success they are not lost I didn't

110:55

I I don't give me a person give me a

110:57

name we've never had a this is a

110:59

long-standing tradition no one's ever

111:00

swerve this question I had a clearly I

111:02

had a rupture with Michael Gove but then

111:05

um in 2016 but then with um heroic

111:10

optimism I I I put him back in the in

111:14

the cabinet and and you know there you

111:17

go Baris thank you thank you for your

111:20

time and I'm going to link this book

111:22

below so any

111:23

uned can can get the book it'll be

111:24

linked below um it was your your your

111:27

writing style is exceptionally engaging

111:30

I think everyone that's interviewed you

111:31

from the ITV to GB news has said the

111:34

same thing um the book is linked below

111:36

if you're interested in the subject

111:38

matters we've talked about but many more

111:39

it's an exceptionally long book some

111:42

700 I don't know I got it wrong I think

111:44

it's it's over 7 771 pages2 pages with

111:48

the with the index and the and the and

111:50

the thanks and Incredibly detailed um

111:52

book into all of the key issues that

111:54

have happened over the last five six

111:56

seven years and some touches of of what

111:59

happened in your life

112:00

before link down below Boris Johnson

112:03

Unleashed thank you so much Boris thank

112:05

you very much Steve it's been an honor I

112:07

I think do I get a prize for I think

112:09

that must be that was a that how long

112:10

was that interview supposed to be

112:11

because I don't know they're always two

112:13

usually they're four sometimes they're

112:14

four hours I

112:18

see isn't this cool every single

112:22

conversation I have here on the Diary of

112:23

a CEO at the very end of it you'll know

112:25

I asked the guest to leave a question in

112:28

the Diary of a CEO and what we've done

112:31

is we've turned every single question

112:33

written in the Diary of a CEO into these

112:36

conversation cards that you can play at

112:39

home so you've got every guest we've

112:41

ever had their question and on the back

112:44

of it if you scan that QR code you get

112:47

to watch the person who answered that

112:50

question we're finally revealing

112:53

all of the questions and the people that

112:56

answered the question the brand new

112:58

version 2 updated conversation cards are

113:01

out right now at Theon conversation

113:03

cards.com they've sold out twice

113:06

instantaneously so if you are interested

113:07

in getting hold of some limited edition

113:09

conversation cards I really really

113:11

recommend acting quickly

113:15

[Music]

113:23

a

113:26

[Music]

Interactive Summary

This interview features former UK Prime Minister Boris Johnson discussing his book 'Unleashed'. The conversation spans his early life, political career, key moments such as Brexit and the handling of the COVID-19 pandemic, and his personal reflections on his leadership and public persona.

Suggested questions

4 ready-made prompts