HomeVideos

Ex-CIA Spy: China Is Preparing & We're Not Paying Attention! Here's What Happens If They Takeover!

Now Playing

Ex-CIA Spy: China Is Preparing & We're Not Paying Attention! Here's What Happens If They Takeover!

Transcript

3511 segments

0:00

China is at war with the West already we

0:03

just don't see it and when I look at a

0:04

map like this I see a lot of problems

0:07

here is one issue over there Putin is

0:09

threatening nuclear weapons and then

0:11

this regime has been engaged in

0:13

assassination plots on the president

0:15

elect and then over here this is looming

0:17

right as a major issue who's the real

0:18

enemy of the West in your opinion I've

0:20

talked to a number of experts and their

0:22

take is is that how do you think this

0:26

ends

0:28

um EX CIA officer Mike Baker spent

0:31

decades in the field mastering the Spy

0:33

skills you need to achieve success in

0:35

business and everyday life and offers

0:37

unique insights into the looming

0:38

geopolitical threats that's facing the

0:40

West when you left the CIA you start

0:42

being a spy for companies why because in

0:45

its core the cia's responsibility is to

0:47

get intelligence because without that

0:49

you cannot make smart strategic

0:51

decisions and if you can sell the idea

0:53

to somebody that they should commit

0:54

treason on their country and betray

0:56

their family to gather intelligence and

0:58

Protect US National Security interests

1:00

then that's an incredible skill to use

1:03

in selling in business and there's a lot

1:04

of ways you can do this people are

1:06

capable of it more so than they realize

1:08

but there's a lot of similarities

1:09

between what I used to do in the Spy

1:11

world and what you do in business

1:13

there's targeting manipulation

1:15

psychology of how people think

1:17

identifying weaknesses and leverage how

1:18

they close the deal the most important

1:20

thing I took away was what I referred to

1:22

as getting off the X and that's how you

1:24

get companies to stay with you for 20

1:26

years let's go through all of them first

1:28

of all you start with

1:30

this has always blown my mind a little

1:32

bit 53% of you that listen to the show

1:34

regularly haven't yet subscribed to the

1:36

show so could I ask you for a favor

1:38

before we start if you like the show and

1:40

you like what we do here and you want to

1:41

support us the free simple way that you

1:43

can do just that is by hitting the

1:44

Subscribe button and my commitment to

1:46

you is if you do that then I'll do

1:48

everything in my power me and my team to

1:49

make sure that this show is better for

1:51

you every single week we'll listen to

1:53

your feedback we'll find the guest that

1:54

you want me to speak to and we'll

1:56

continue to do what we do thank you so

1:58

much

2:01

[Music]

2:04

Mike who are

2:06

you and give

2:08

me a couple of sentences on the Journey

2:11

of your career and what it's exposed you

2:14

to I'm a a dude who's been very

2:16

fortunate in life um I started with the

2:20

CIA uh at an early age not necessarily

2:23

expecting to start with the CIA and the

2:25

operations directorate and you you

2:27

joined the CIA at 22 years old

2:30

yeah basically um early ' 80s beginning

2:33

of the 80s what was your how did you

2:34

sort of encapsulate your mission into a

2:35

couple of sentences during that

2:38

time this is going to sound really weird

2:40

to do whatever I was instructed to do

2:44

um to further um the mission objectives

2:48

so and what I mean by that is that's not

2:50

just me or another officer or somebody

2:53

else in there that's their job so the

2:57

CIA doesn't set priorities it doesn't

2:59

set Set uh tasking right that's done by

3:02

the White House um and those in the

3:06

White House in the government at the

3:07

time the administration at the time for

3:10

setting the priorities tasking and

3:13

that's in part obviously Guided by

3:16

intelligence provided by the

3:17

intelligence community so it's it's a

3:19

symbiotic relationship but the tasking

3:21

comes into the agency and the agency

3:23

says Fine get on with it and that could

3:26

be collection of Intelligence on a

3:27

particular subject and so you could be

3:29

talking about we need to know what uh

3:32

Putin's plans and intentions are we need

3:34

to know what's the uh breakout time for

3:38

the Iranian regime to actually uh reach

3:43

uh weapons capability for the nuclear

3:44

program whatever the tasking is right it

3:46

comes into the agency the agency then

3:49

fine let's get busy with it and there's

3:52

other elements of the Intel Community

3:53

all working very hard to accomplish that

3:55

same thing so it could be the NSA is

3:57

also working on that it could be

3:59

military Ence is also working on that

4:01

there's there's a lot of moving Parts

4:04

but uh my part was was at the agency so

4:07

did you have to spend a lot of time

4:08

overseas and if so if you were overseas

4:10

what were you doing overseas yeah uh I

4:12

spent uh my entire time um I never had a

4:17

what you would call a headquarters tour

4:19

so I spent all my time overseas

4:20

traveling what was your day-to-day like

4:23

because it's just it's just a world so

4:24

far away from anything that I know so

4:26

I'm like you spend all that time in the

4:28

CIA overseas when you wake up in the

4:30

morning are you are you undercover

4:33

because if you're in a foreign country

4:34

presumably they don't know that you're

4:35

part of the CIA well no we have

4:37

different types of of operations and

4:39

different types of things I mean so you

4:41

can you could end up living in a in a

4:43

foreign country for two or three years

4:46

right you got a home there and you're

4:47

you know you're working there and and um

4:50

other times it could be a short one-off

4:53

operation where you're just dropping in

4:55

to do something in particular maybe to

4:57

meet an asset or whatever it might be

5:00

what's an asset an asset is a is a

5:01

source uh is a recruited source so um

5:06

that's a good point there's there's

5:08

misconception sometimes in vocabulary

5:10

right so they'll say CIA agent well in

5:13

reality it's a CIA officer the agent is

5:16

the person that's been recruited or the

5:18

asset um the the human source and so

5:22

that's and that's a that's a in

5:25

incredible skill right to be able to go

5:28

out you have to you have to identify

5:30

first of all you start with what's

5:31

what's the information you're looking

5:32

for and that's the fascinating thing

5:34

this it turns out that what I used to do

5:37

and what we do in in my business which

5:38

is you know intelligence and

5:41

investigations um Security Services is

5:45

pretty much the same thing what

5:47

information does the client in the cia's

5:49

case that's the US government what

5:50

information does the client need uh

5:53

where does it reside who has access to

5:55

it and how can you you get a hold of it

5:59

appropriately right so how can you get

6:00

that

6:01

information you identify the target then

6:04

you figure out you know what you need to

6:05

do to uh develop potentially a

6:09

relationship you develop that

6:10

relationship then you if you're

6:12

fortunate enough you recruit that asset

6:14

that person could be a deputy foreign

6:16

minister could be a senior military

6:18

officer could be could be a cab driver

6:21

you know who uh can tell you everything

6:24

that's happening in a particular

6:25

neighborhood of Interest whatever it

6:26

might be um but that process of that

6:29

that recruitment cycle um of the

6:33

spotting you know targeting development

6:36

recruitment running then you've got to

6:38

maintain that

6:39

relationship and the interesting thing

6:41

is um often times particularly when

6:44

you're talking about a

6:46

really a really important asset someone

6:48

who's in a position of

6:50

access um maybe because they've risen up

6:53

through their own government

6:55

right that that window from the minute

6:58

you get them on board you set the hook

7:01

you get them recruited and they start

7:03

reporting taking tasking that window

7:06

starts to

7:07

close and there's a clock that that's

7:10

ticking because usually that's a it can

7:13

be a corrosive thing on on a person's in

7:16

you know character right on on on their

7:18

on their their being right so you

7:22

recruit a you recruit a Russian right um

7:26

you're you're always in the back of your

7:28

mind thinking okay you you know how long

7:30

do we have here right before because it

7:33

it's unless they're a psychotic right

7:36

then then they don't care they don't

7:38

give a [ __ ] they they'll be happy to to

7:40

to do this but it's not a normal thing

7:43

right so to be able to convince somebody

7:46

to sell the idea to somebody that they

7:49

should uh they should um essentially

7:54

commit treason on their country right um

7:59

is is a remarkable thing I've always

8:01

felt anyway so then when I went into

8:05

business you know the idea of of

8:08

business development of selling seemed

8:10

like sure that's that's an easy lift

8:13

right because yeah that's anyway I'm

8:15

disappearing down a rabbit hole no

8:17

you're not I mean this is exactly the

8:18

rabbit hole that I wanted to go down

8:20

because I mean this is the D so I do

8:22

want to understand how you think about

8:24

selling because that seems like the

8:26

hardest thing to sell to get you know

8:28

potentially a Russian to commit treason

8:30

against their country I'm thinking God

8:31

what what are you offering them in in

8:33

terms of an

8:34

incentive um so would would your job in

8:37

that be to convince them or would it be

8:39

to go and meet them to collect the

8:41

information or would it be something

8:42

else could be all of those be all of

8:44

those and then part of it depends on

8:46

where what location I mean sometimes you

8:48

have you have difficult places obviously

8:50

it's more difficult to work in in um a

8:54

challenging environment like um pick a

8:57

place I mean right now current conf

8:59

think about working in Lebanon right if

9:02

you're developing or working with a

9:04

source I don't there's not a lot of

9:06

potential recruits forah right now they

9:08

don't even though there's Headroom they

9:10

don't I don't don't think there's a lot

9:11

of willing people wanting to take some

9:13

of those jobs but but the point being is

9:15

is uh that um you could end up doing all

9:18

of those things you might have spotted

9:20

somebody you might develop them you

9:21

might recruit them right and you're

9:23

going to handle them for a while uh

9:25

maybe then you're going to head off

9:26

someplace else and someone else is going

9:28

to come in and take over that

9:29

relationship that's also a crucial point

9:31

right because you know if you've

9:33

developed a a a personal relationship

9:35

with somebody uh to the point where

9:38

they're going yeah I guess I can't do

9:40

that I can't provide you with

9:41

Intelligence on this or that right

9:43

because think about they're not just

9:45

betraying they're not betraying their

9:47

country I've always thought about this

9:50

uh particularly when we're talking about

9:51

Traders here uh in the states right we

9:55

you you know edley Howard Jim Nicholson

9:59

right um who are these people Hansen

10:01

these are all traders to the US so um

10:05

moles whatever you want to call them

10:06

within the uh agency Hansen was a at the

10:09

FBI one of the most destructive Traders

10:12

we ever had but what did he do um he

10:15

interestingly enough um was a longtime

10:18

FBI agent who

10:21

um he was responsible for uh Counter

10:25

Intelligence to some degree uh for a big

10:27

degree uh related to the former Soviet

10:31

Union and Russia um and so he had a

10:35

tremendous amount of knowledge about how

10:37

the Russian service worked right and

10:39

then eventually he ended up uh allowing

10:43

he wasn't even recruited he offered his

10:44

services but he offered him in such a

10:47

way because he understood how they

10:49

worked that he was able to do it without

10:52

the Russians

10:53

knowing who he was right so it was a

10:57

very remote relationship and he trolled

10:59

it which is fascinating which allowed

11:02

him to then do this for a very long

11:03

period of time and and betray a number

11:06

of of uh of of our Russian assets and

11:10

those people didn't have a happy ending

11:13

and so uh but the the idea is that you

11:18

look at those people or you look at

11:20

anybody who does that right they're not

11:21

just portraying their country they're

11:23

betraying their their service they're

11:24

betraying their family all all these

11:27

things because it's a it's a fascinating

11:29

psychology and if you don't think about

11:30

that if you don't understand that then I

11:32

think it's hard to to close the deal

11:35

with anybody um what is that deal so in

11:38

the case of the gentleman you mentioned

11:40

who was a traitor to the US is he

11:42

getting paid is it money that they're

11:44

doing it was he was getting paid he had

11:46

some issues he was he was kind of a

11:48

quirky individual he was spending a lot

11:50

of money on a mistress or someone who

11:52

you imagined to be his mistress and um

11:55

motivation can be a difficult thing

11:57

right sometimes and sometimes it's a

11:59

very straightforward thing it's usually

12:01

not ideology interesting yeah I know

12:04

that that I had the same thought when

12:06

when I first started and and they kind

12:08

of went through this process of saying

12:09

what are motivations well money is a big

12:12

one so you've got you know and then

12:15

ideology not so much uh sometimes it

12:17

could be something as simple as they've

12:19

got a sick kid they can't get treatment

12:21

for the kid in whatever country they

12:23

happen to reside in sometimes

12:26

it's it's it's more based than that just

12:29

they they don't feel like they got

12:31

enough hugs from their employer or they

12:33

feel disrespected by their their their

12:36

their their government or whatever you

12:38

you have to be able to identify those

12:39

weaknesses and then you have to be

12:40

willing to to play on them frankly and

12:43

so on the point of identification if you

12:46

met me and I was an asset is that that's

12:50

the word right um you would be I mean

12:52

you know if we had just met yeah you

12:54

would you would be a potential a

12:56

potential Source Target uh velopmental

13:00

okay so I've got I'm a cab driver and I

13:03

drive a high ranking official and every

13:05

day in the car he's telling me

13:06

everything that's going on he's just

13:08

offloading so you want to recruit me

13:10

right yeah so how' you go about

13:12

recruiting me well theoretically it's

13:14

it's just going to be I'm going to find

13:16

something that you're interested in how

13:18

and then I'm going to be a conversation

13:19

it's as simple as that so you might get

13:21

in my cab one day yeah and then I'll

13:22

I'll just get in your cab and we'll

13:24

start talking

13:26

and people love this you I mean you're

13:30

probably on planes as much as I am um

13:33

people love to talk right and they love

13:37

to talk about themselves right so if you

13:39

get if if you just ask questions right

13:42

if that's all you do you don't have to

13:43

say anything about yourself right I

13:45

don't know how many thousands of

13:47

conversations I've had where you know

13:49

someone says so what are you doing I

13:50

said just you know I'll give them some

13:52

[ __ ] I mean not now but and as soon

13:56

as you give them something that doesn't

13:58

sound interesting

13:59

then fine now you got a A Runway then

14:02

you just turn it on onto them and say so

14:03

what do you do people want to talk about

14:06

themselves it's it's it's striking

14:08

sometimes and I mean we find this all

14:11

the time and it's just information

14:12

gathering right like if we if we have a

14:14

client and they say uh we've got a a

14:18

business

14:19

in pickup Place let's just just for

14:23

grins let's say China we've got an

14:25

investment that we've made in China but

14:28

it doesn't it's not sense right we're

14:30

not seeing what we thought we were going

14:31

to see from the revenues or from the the

14:33

the production whatever what's going on

14:35

well if we have someone Rock up at that

14:39

factory or that manufacturing facility

14:42

or whatever and outside there outside

14:45

the factory is just rows of of noodle

14:48

shops or whatever you know food trucks

14:49

or whatever you want to call but there's

14:52

a maybe there's a security guard or you

14:54

know some people just sitting around

14:55

they love to talk right because they've

14:58

got nothing else going on in their day

15:00

right and so the information you can get

15:03

from people whether it's a security

15:05

guard sitting in a booth all day long

15:07

who's suddenly going to tell you well no

15:08

the plant is only up and operating

15:10

Mondays Wednesdays and Fridays or you

15:13

know this is this is the number of

15:15

trucks that are coming out you know

15:16

little benign stuff that that no one's

15:18

going to think anything of the amount of

15:20

information you can gather from people

15:22

um maybe it's someone who's working as a

15:24

cleaner in a building maybe it's a cab

15:25

driver it doesn't matter um you know

15:28

it's it's a secretary in a business

15:30

right you're you're looking for people

15:32

with access who um they're just going to

15:35

be inclined to talk right it it sounds

15:38

odd sometimes but you get that

15:39

conversation going you find things that

15:41

the person's interested in then you

15:43

start mirroring that perhaps maybe that

15:45

oh you know I'm interested in that too

15:46

maybe I'm not maybe I find it boring as

15:48

hell there was one where it was like

15:50

chess I was like God damn I hate chess

15:52

but but the guy was really into chess

15:55

right and uh it was overseas and and uh

15:59

we were drinking and bumped into him at

16:01

the bar and and uh you know we started

16:04

talking and turns out that his his

16:07

passion was chess suddenly my passion is

16:11

chess problem is you got to demonstrate

16:14

that right and I sucked at it so so it

16:17

was a quick a quick uh crash course in

16:19

how to at least make myself look

16:22

somewhat reasonable um but then and then

16:24

you're just looking for other points of

16:26

of of of access and and what that turns

16:30

into is points of

16:32

Leverage so that sounds you know if once

16:35

you take it further enough down the the

16:37

the the walk it can sound very mercenary

16:39

right and it is you're talking about

16:42

again asking people to do something

16:44

that's not necessarily in their best

16:47

interests but you're doing it for a very

16:51

stated purpose now again a lot of people

16:53

will listen to this and go that's just

16:54

[ __ ] you're just doing it for the

16:55

man right you're doing it for the the

16:57

government and okay well you know what

17:01

nations that are hostile to us interests

17:04

or UK's interests or Australia's

17:06

interest or Canada's interest or

17:07

Europe's interest they're doing this all

17:10

the time and they're doing it a lot more

17:11

aggressively and with no guard rails

17:14

about how they behave right

17:17

so yeah yeah so I'm that cab driver I've

17:20

started off loading to because you've

17:21

got me talking you've told me your you

17:23

know you've said your career is not

17:24

interesting I start talking at what

17:27

point do you

17:29

seek out that leverage so at some point

17:30

you're looking for him to maybe say his

17:31

son's sick or something right well I

17:33

mean yeah something along those lines or

17:36

you're just looking for you're looking

17:37

for

17:39

um you're building a profile of the

17:41

person's personality right so you're

17:43

trying to understand what's important to

17:44

them you're trying to understand what

17:46

drives them you're trying to understand

17:48

where their problems are you know uh

17:50

you're trying to understand if they have

17:51

any grievances you're looking for you're

17:53

really just building a a a a map of what

17:56

this P person is like you're not going

17:57

to get that in one taxi ride oh no no no

17:59

not at all not at all so what do you

18:01

want to do you want to you want to have

18:02

a you want to have a reason to uh uh

18:07

meet up again right you're always

18:08

looking in simple terms you know you get

18:10

that first encounter what do you want

18:12

well you want a second encounter so you

18:14

got to find some reason for that now

18:16

sometimes it's easier than other times

18:18

right like so you know you can't uh uh

18:21

you know you can't always get that but

18:23

that's what you're looking for another

18:24

reason to meet back up with that

18:26

individual seemingly just for no reason

18:29

it just happens right or or

18:32

uh I mean it's like this morning I got

18:36

in a car right um was an

18:39

Uber and at the end of the the uh the

18:42

drive the guy gives me his card says uh

18:46

hey you know if if you ever need a ride

18:48

whatever um you know I've got a couple

18:50

of cars and so I you know this is kind

18:51

of what I do plus I do the draw Uber I

18:53

like that as

18:54

well um and so now yeah fine I can give

18:59

him a call back right and and I've done

19:01

that overseas in cases where I've said

19:03

look I you know I need to know that I

19:04

can get from point A to point B tomorrow

19:07

can I just call you rather than hope

19:08

that I catch a cab there's a lot of ways

19:11

you can do this it's not it's not rocket

19:13

science you know but it can be

19:17

um it can be uh difficult when you're

19:20

talking about a high value Target yeah

19:23

yeah yeah cab driver is probably a

19:24

little bit more straightforward because

19:25

there's a clear reason why you'd

19:27

frequent the the Pres but maybe the head

19:29

of the Iranian nuclear program might be

19:31

a little bit more complicated

19:32

to although that would be good too um

19:36

yeah so your training they they they

19:39

find you at 22 years old I hear what do

19:42

they train you to be good at there's

19:45

everything from um tradecraft which is a

19:49

key part of it and tradecraft

19:50

encompasses a lot of things right it's

19:52

it's how do you conduct yourself

19:54

overseas how do you do clandestine

19:56

Communications um how' you go cover how

19:59

do you go undercover um use of Disguise

20:03

uh there's surveillance counter

20:06

surveillance uh there's there's a lot to

20:10

when I just say tradecraft what that

20:11

involves um and then there's other

20:15

training there's paramilitary training

20:17

and and other things that you do what

20:19

about people skills what are the people

20:20

skills they try and teach you there's a

20:23

lot of talking about um um the

20:27

psychology of the recruitment process uh

20:30

which means you're diving into you know

20:33

profiling individuals the psychology of

20:35

of how people think um what that process

20:40

does to an individual I mean and and

20:44

there's um it's interesting I mean

20:47

there's there's there's some folks who

20:49

who I think struggled with that more

20:52

than others and I think the idea of of

20:55

of of getting people to that point of

20:58

recruiting people I think some folks I

21:00

think found

21:01

it uh difficult

21:04

maybe problematic right because of of

21:08

the manipulation involved

21:11

um you know I I I didn't I again not

21:15

necessarily being a deep thinker I

21:16

didn't sit a lot of the time you know at

21:19

home angst ridden over you know whether

21:21

I was being manipulative or not I was

21:23

just I have a task I'm going to do the

21:25

task and and and then move on but um the

21:29

training can take quite a while can a

21:31

couple of years uh before they feel like

21:34

you're ready to to go out so you

21:37

eventually leave the

21:39

CIA um after a very very long career

21:42

there why did you

21:44

leave my daughter was young and um uh I

21:50

was in the process of uh of getting a

21:53

divorce uh which took a while my ex-wife

21:56

great person but not compatible by the

21:58

end I think I my career was a little

22:01

difficult um and so I needed to do

22:04

something that kept

22:06

me closer to home you started doing

22:09

corporate Espionage

22:11

thereafter we call it we call it

22:14

strategic intelligence and

22:15

investigations okay so for someone that

22:18

doesn't know what strategic intelligence

22:19

and investigations corporate Espionage

22:21

is it's effectively being a spy for

22:24

companies it could be there could be an

22:27

element of that yes I'm not gonna I'm

22:29

not going to deny that look it's it

22:31

there are corporations out there that

22:32

are very aggressive in understanding

22:34

what other companies are doing right in

22:36

particular um but what we got started in

22:41

um was

22:44

primarily a company will come to you and

22:46

say we're making an investment

22:49

in a country we've never operated in

22:52

before pick a country um tell us

22:54

everything we need to know what what are

22:56

the problems what are the risks what are

22:57

the threats what are you know how do you

22:58

assess that uh it could be we've had a

23:01

fraud we've had a and and and now we've

23:03

had theft of intellectual property we

23:04

need to know how bad it is um it could

23:08

be we're doing a joint venture and we

23:10

just need to know about who we're

23:11

investing in right you never know it

23:14

could be that they're saying look we're

23:16

we're not having any success in maybe

23:20

they're in the mining sector we're not

23:21

having any success in Africa where we're

23:23

trying to pick up these licenses and yet

23:25

these other companies are picking them

23:26

up left and right what are we doing

23:28

wrong what are they doing right who are

23:31

they dealing with so now we're getting

23:33

closer to what you referred to as

23:35

corporate

23:36

Espionage

23:38

um but you have to because you're not

23:42

working for a government you know the

23:45

the guard rails have now shrunk right in

23:47

terms of what you can do and so you have

23:49

to know what is uh legally appropriate

23:53

in each jurisdiction and that changes

23:55

right what you can do over here is

23:57

different than what you could do in the

23:58

UK or in France or in the US or whatever

24:00

so as long as you know what the

24:02

parameters are um then you you you do

24:05

that right to gather information that's

24:07

going to benefit the client did you have

24:10

to go undercover terms of physical

24:12

disguises yeah yeah on on occasion which

24:14

was great yeah I mean if you like if you

24:16

I I love the acting part of it right

24:18

because you you'd be you'd be I would

24:20

get completely absorbed in it right and

24:24

then uh and I I loved it so I I didn't

24:26

have a problem sometimes people don't

24:28

enjoy it or they don't it's it's not if

24:31

you if you're not confident if you don't

24:33

have if you're put on a disguise whether

24:36

it's a full overhead mask or whether

24:37

it's just you know disguised kid or

24:39

whatever uh if you're not comfortable

24:41

doing that it'll show out right but if

24:44

you're walking down the street in

24:45

Disguise nobody on that street is

24:49

thinking oh that guy's in Disguise it's

24:50

not how people think right so unless you

24:52

do something stupid it's not going to

24:54

show out did you ever wear a Masque yeah

24:57

yeah that's apris look we had Hollywood

24:59

makeup artists uh there that I mean

25:02

their their disguise unit is legendary

25:05

amazing what they can do yeah why did

25:07

you write company rules I felt like for

25:11

me over a short period of time after I'd

25:13

been involved in private sector for for

25:15

quite a

25:16

while it suddenly occurred to me that I

25:19

was the reason why we were able to keep

25:21

a business breathing was because of some

25:24

of these things that I absorbed from the

25:26

company right the these rules the and

25:28

it's not like there a book they don't

25:29

hand you a book and say Here's your

25:31

company rules on day one right it's

25:34

they're implied they're they're kind of

25:37

embedded in the training process of the

25:39

CIA of the CIA right and so what I

25:42

hadn't realized was I because I thought

25:44

when I got out look people asked me when

25:45

I said I was going to leave I I didn't

25:47

retire I was too young to retire I was

25:49

leaving right I left behind my pension

25:52

and everything I didn't have there was

25:53

no Financial reason to do what I did and

25:58

um so they were their question was

26:01

always the same which what the hell you

26:02

going to

26:03

do I I didn't have an answer which

26:06

probably should have been a red flag but

26:09

um I knew I was going to have to go into

26:11

kind of this world of gathering

26:14

information of Security

26:16

Services because I I don't think I'd fit

26:19

anywhere else and so it took me a long

26:21

time to realize that the reason why I

26:24

was able to build a business and I

26:27

couldn't have built a business with a

26:29

very very close friend of mine uh Nick

26:31

day who came out of of uh um SPS and and

26:35

uh

26:36

MI5

26:38

um but we couldn't have done that if I

26:41

hadn't absorbed some of that training

26:43

and those rules as I put them from the

26:45

agency and so that's why I wanted to try

26:47

to say look this is why I was able to do

26:51

this um and keep a business breathing

26:54

look we haven't built a mega Corporation

26:56

but we built a nice life for a lot of

26:58

people right and what are the most sort

26:59

of transferable rules that you were able

27:02

to transfer from your time as a CI

27:04

working in the CIA to the world of

27:07

business that you were like oh my God

27:08

this is exactly the same game here the

27:10

same technique I mean first and foremost

27:13

it was um we'll start out with the first

27:16

one that I put down which which is

27:17

Define the mission right so the agency

27:20

does that very well with a very outset

27:22

you spend a lot of time sitting in

27:24

classrooms listening to people explain

27:26

how the agency works why it works the

27:28

way it does where it fits within the

27:30

government what its purpose what it's

27:33

what its mission is and if you don't

27:35

know that right then whether it's the

27:37

CIA or whether it's your business then

27:40

you got a problem you probably shouldn't

27:42

really get started and then you have to

27:44

communicate that mission and that's what

27:46

they did very very well and so I took

27:49

that away and I was always very simpl

27:52

minded in terms of a business I always

27:54

knew what I wanted to do which was

27:56

provide again the best quality product

27:59

possible that's how you get companies to

28:01

stay with you for 20 years right they

28:03

know you're going to bust your ass and

28:05

you're going to overproduce and you're

28:06

going to do everything within again

28:08

within the balance of what you can do to

28:10

give them the best information so that

28:12

they can then win in whatever they're

28:14

working or operating and then we we you

28:17

know I think if you if you hire smart

28:19

people um and you explain the mission

28:22

you communicate that properly to

28:24

them then you know your battles

28:28

half one right you really you know you

28:31

you you've cracked that that uh that nut

28:33

but then other parts of it are uh you've

28:37

got to know your uh your risk appetite

28:40

and the agency spends a lot of time I

28:42

guess that was my point from earlier is

28:44

it a lot of people think the agency just

28:46

goes out and does [ __ ] right let's just

28:47

go blow that building up or let's go

28:49

pick up that high value Target or let's

28:51

go whatever it is we're going to do and

28:52

they don't give any thought to it

28:54

because that's how the movies operate

28:55

right and they just yeah go do this [ __ ]

28:57

um

28:58

there's a lot of time spent on risk

29:01

versus gain um and what's the potential

29:05

blowback what are those scenarios look

29:06

like so you have to know your risk

29:08

appetite and you have to communicate

29:10

that because everybody has to be on the

29:11

same page as to what's allowable and

29:13

what's not allowable and that's true in

29:15

in in in private sector as well we have

29:17

to know you can't do this you can't have

29:19

a a one party conversation and record it

29:21

in particular jurisdiction or you know

29:24

no you can't can't do the following

29:26

because the information you're Gathering

29:27

is end up in court it's got to be you

29:29

know evidentially proper so things have

29:32

to be done in a in a in an appropriate

29:34

way so if you don't know all those

29:35

things then you're going to get yourself

29:37

you know crosswise somehow um know your

29:41

operating environment is a key thing uh

29:45

this is a a constant surprise sometimes

29:47

with with some companies that we start

29:50

working with where you realize that they

29:52

don't necessarily understand the

29:54

operating environment they where they're

29:56

working what the market rest

29:58

restrictions are what their competitors

29:59

are doing right what the uh the

30:01

government is like in that particular

30:03

country what the instability issues are

30:04

what whatever it may be you put all that

30:07

together you know your operating

30:08

environment you know your your risk uh

30:11

you defined your mission and then at

30:13

some point you got

30:14

to um make decisions right and I think

30:18

that's again long-winded answer to your

30:20

question which is probably the most

30:22

important thing I took away was uh what

30:26

I referred to as getting off the a and

30:28

the a is the Ambush site so in in the

30:31

old days you don't want to end up on the

30:32

Ambush site that's a bad place to be um

30:35

and there are indicators right whether

30:37

you're talking about being in in Mexico

30:39

and rolling up on a cartel Ambush or

30:41

you're talking about being overseas uh

30:43

in a place like U Iraq and you're in a

30:47

convoy movement and you have to

30:49

understand what the indicators are that

30:50

something bad is is going to happen if

30:53

you don't make a

30:54

decision you're never going to get all

30:56

the information you want in business

30:58

right but there are a lot of people who

31:01

get paralyzed by that they want all the

31:02

data you know they want to be able to

31:04

think through and that's you know that's

31:05

a good thing if that's your mindset but

31:07

something bad's going to happen or

31:09

you're going to miss an opportunity it's

31:10

going to pass you by and so one of the

31:13

things that the agency taught was just

31:15

make a damn decision right with the

31:17

information that you've got you're

31:18

always going to want more but with the

31:20

information that you've got whether it's

31:21

imperfect or not understand the nature

31:23

of that information but then just make a

31:25

damn decision right how do they get you

31:27

to do that because there's a lot of

31:28

people listening now that are maybe

31:30

paralyzed in their own personal lives

31:32

with a decision to leave a job to leave

31:33

a city to leave a partner yeah you know

31:36

or a big strategic decision that's

31:39

actually really good it's a good point

31:41

yeah

31:42

uh I

31:44

I the agency teaches you through sort of

31:48

repetition and and uh and understanding

31:51

that would sorry you waited too long

31:53

this is this is not good you

31:56

you uh but in a in a better sense I

31:59

think what I've learned also is look I

32:02

tell my kids this all the time um I tell

32:05

my boys and my daughter this is

32:09

it there's never that many options on

32:12

the decision tree right not that life's

32:14

completely binary but we tend to

32:18

overthink everything and we tend to over

32:20

complicate things when we're faced with

32:21

a decision whether it's do I leave my my

32:24

job uh do I move whatever it might be do

32:27

I you know take a big strategic decision

32:29

for my company you tend to you tend to

32:32

over complicate right life I I've always

32:35

found and maybe maybe I'm simple-minded

32:38

but one of the things that I I took away

32:40

from the agency is that life sometimes

32:43

is just as simple as it seems right

32:45

again why I'm not a big conspiracy theor

32:48

theorist but um so if you narrow it down

32:53

and say look I'm not faced with an

32:54

endless array of options here you know I

32:56

may have on any big decision I may have

32:58

two or three options right I'm going to

33:01

take this job okay what does that mean

33:03

well it means I'm taking a chance take

33:05

okay people talk about writing your

33:07

positives and your negatives down I

33:09

don't know whether that's really a

33:10

helpful thing or not right because then

33:12

you get lost in this list and then you

33:13

start imagining positives and negatives

33:15

and then it's a so I always try to say

33:18

look you gotta you don't act just for

33:20

the sake of acting right that's

33:22

sometimes has its own negative

33:23

consequences but you you take the

33:25

information you've got and then

33:28

you just you you make a decision right

33:32

because if you again if it's the inertia

33:34

of not acting if you're if you're in an

33:37

unhappy relationship and you say you

33:38

know what do I do do I stay in this

33:40

unhappy relationship because maybe it's

33:41

going to get better okay what are the

33:43

odds of that happening right it's been

33:44

going on for 10 years maybe you're not

33:46

happy get the hell out right do

33:48

something different if you're thinking

33:49

about changing your job if you're not

33:51

happy in your job which is a it's a

33:53

quality of life issue right I and I tell

33:56

that to to my folks all the time if you

33:58

think you would be happier somewhere

33:59

else you got to go give it a try if you

34:01

think you'd be happier going out and

34:02

starting a business you should do that

34:04

right but you got to you got to jump in

34:07

and I know I'm I'm this is probably not

34:10

as detailed as a you know psychiatrist

34:14

would give but I really do honestly

34:16

believe that any any major decision you

34:20

can distill it down to a very very

34:23

limited number of options and that makes

34:24

it easier but if you just sit there

34:26

staring at it and people do I would see

34:27

the this in operations all the time

34:29

people would just start imagining all

34:31

the different scenarios and I thought

34:33

you know what honest to God when the the

34:36

when the whistle goes right and the

34:38

Ambush starts and usually you shouldn't

34:40

start an ambush with a whistle um you

34:43

know it's going to go you know one way

34:45

another way you don't

34:46

don't don't don't get bogged down in

34:49

what could happen What might happen that

34:51

was another thing I think I I did well

34:53

at the agency was I didn't ever sit

34:54

around and stare at my belly button and

34:56

think well I wonder what would have

34:58

happened if I had done this no you live

35:01

with your mistakes you live with your

35:03

consequences you live with the good

35:05

things life is tough enough as it is

35:08

right and we just we just seem like we

35:11

want to make it tougher and I don't ever

35:13

understand that it's an interesting time

35:16

in the United States at the

35:17

moment is it something happen yeah I

35:20

mean it's an interesting time in the

35:21

world to be honest when you think about

35:22

everything that's going on very very

35:24

unique times but Trump has just been

35:26

elected he's now president

35:27

president-elect of the United

35:30

States is that

35:32

consequential and if so how would you

35:34

believe it to be

35:38

consequential yeah uh what do they say

35:40

don't talk about politics religion or

35:42

taxes um so yes I think it is

35:46

consequential um I think it was

35:48

something that uh very few people

35:51

predicted the the size of the of the

35:55

victory uh look he um he took all the

35:58

swing States right um he turned uh a

36:03

surprising number of of districts uh in

36:06

favor of the Republicans in states that

36:08

he didn't win um he outperformed in most

36:14

categories right uh the demographics

36:17

were rather shocking right and people

36:20

wanted to talk about how well it's going

36:21

to be the it's going to come down to the

36:23

Women Voters well it didn't right fewer

36:25

Women Voters voted for kamla Harris they

36:27

did previously for Hillary Clinton and

36:30

Joe Biden right so and he gained in uh

36:35

in Suburban voters Women Voters so it's

36:38

consequential in reshaping at least in

36:41

in the short to midterm people's

36:44

understanding of the uh the electorate I

36:47

think now it's probably not

36:50

consequential in the fact that I don't

36:52

know that the Democrats they don't seem

36:54

to be doing it yet I don't think they're

36:56

going to be particularly uh

36:58

uh self-aware or introspective right

37:01

they spent months longer than that

37:05

referring to a large portion of the

37:08

population as uh as moronic as

37:10

unintelligent as sexist as racist as um

37:14

as as garbage as fascists as Nazis right

37:18

they you how you do that and then

37:21

not understand how you've just gotten

37:23

kicked in the ass during the election

37:25

I'm not quite sure but they seem

37:27

incapable right now of any sort of

37:30

reflection on what they need to do as a

37:32

party right to maybe turn things around

37:35

so I don't know consequentially whether

37:37

it's going to change the Democrat Party

37:40

for the next election um but yeah it'll

37:44

be and and then you have to ask yourself

37:45

okay the policies that you know that

37:47

that are important um from National

37:50

Security perspective from foreign policy

37:52

you know what are we looking at

37:53

differently here with Trump coming in do

37:56

do you think he's going to end some Wars

37:57

like the war in the Ukraine and Russia

38:00

do you think he's going to end that

38:02

because I mean he's he's pretty much

38:04

said in the election cycle that he was

38:05

gonna call Putin an end it on day one or

38:09

something like that

38:10

so I yeah that's right I forgot about

38:13

that it's gonna end it on day one gonna

38:15

stop this war

38:20

um yeah

38:22

with set Trump over here to the side for

38:25

a second M and you have to look at the

38:27

what's happening on the ground right

38:28

with Ukraine and Russia because that

38:31

will determine whether Trump's going to

38:33

be successful in any move that he makes

38:37

so the problem that Ukraine is facing

38:40

right now is a they're going into winter

38:42

and

38:43

a massive percentage of their uh energy

38:47

infrastructure has been destroyed by by

38:50

Russia so it's going to be a very hard

38:52

winter um you look at the resolve of the

38:56

Ukrainian people

38:58

and

38:59

uh an Institute in ke does these very

39:03

interesting um surveys of Ukrainian

39:05

citizens in in in throughout Ukraine not

39:08

just in Kei on a regular basis and they

39:11

ask questions like you know um are you

39:15

willing to fight indefinitely are you

39:18

willing to stay in the game are you

39:20

willing to give it your all you know for

39:22

however long it takes and to that

39:25

question to that phrasing

39:27

at the beginning of the year 73% said

39:30

yes right of the

39:32

citizenry uh last month it was uh

39:35

63% right it's and so that's a 10% drop

39:39

is significant when we're talking about

39:41

the fate of your nation um

39:45

they they're

39:47

losing um they're losing soldiers at an

39:51

alarming rate and they have a

39:54

significant uh disadvantage to the

39:56

Russians terms of Manpower Russian

39:59

Manpower has depending on who you talk

40:01

to maybe a three to1 advantage in terms

40:03

of available

40:05

combatants

40:08

um the Russian military is gaining

40:10

ground in the eastern part of Ukraine in

40:12

theet in particular it's a the the the

40:15

front the front line is about 600 miles

40:18

long 620 miles

40:21

long um

40:23

in overall right now if you said stop

40:27

the war stop the fighting right now

40:30

Russia controls 20% of Ukraine good time

40:35

to my little map here so you can show me

40:38

what you're talking

40:44

about why why did Russia start this

40:49

war well I mean if you if you wanted a

40:52

sort of a theoretical 30,000 foot answer

40:56

um

40:58

Putin has

41:00

repeatedly uh referred to the collapse

41:03

of the Soviet Union as the greatest

41:05

disaster of the 20th century and he

41:07

meant it right and so he's been trying

41:09

and he hasn't been shy about it ever

41:12

since he's he's been in charge which

41:13

seems now like about 100 years um to

41:18

recreate the glory the strength of the

41:21

former Soviet Union in some capacity not

41:23

not you know entirely he's not he's not

41:25

crazy but

41:27

he is completely jonesing for some form

41:31

of of a of a stronger Russia um and in

41:36

his mind that means he's got to have a

41:38

buffer zone between him and NATO right

41:42

and so this is this is part of that he

41:44

also considers if you if you think about

41:46

it right

41:48

here he's basically

41:51

saying this is mine right if you think

41:54

that which is the east of this is this

41:56

is the Eastern part of Ukraine right

41:58

here is it's Ukraine um Front Line This

42:01

is not I mean you know I'm simplifying

42:03

this but front line stretches about 600

42:05

miles uh he's also annexed of course

42:08

Crimea but that's that's another issue

42:10

here and that's that's the only port for

42:12

their Black Sea Fleet which Ukrainian

42:14

military is frankly destroyed almost um

42:17

at this stage of the game but they own

42:21

at this stage they've got about

42:23

20% of of uh Ukraine if you were to say

42:27

you know stop the shooting now

42:30

and then the the the problem is that at

42:34

the outset of this this

42:37

war zalinski and the Ukrainian

42:41

government uh said you know the only

42:45

answer here is total Victory we have to

42:47

get all our territory back

42:49

Crimea detet Lans zapia uh we have to

42:54

get it all back and that is not again

42:59

it's not satisfying to say this but it's

43:02

not possible right so the problem that

43:06

is being faced right now

43:09

is when this war got started in the

43:12

first year year and a half everybody was

43:15

you know they were putting their Flags

43:17

Ukrainian flags on their porch they were

43:19

putting a little flag on their their X

43:21

site their Twitter site um they go okay

43:26

and there's no doubt the Ukrainian

43:27

military has been incredibly courageous

43:29

and the population of Ukraine has put up

43:31

with a great deal look the months of

43:34

September and October of this

43:36

year those two months there's only been

43:39

one night when keev hasn't been under

43:42

attack by Russian drones

43:46

right which is if you think about it

43:48

it's insane right and that's just Kei

43:51

they all their other their major cities

43:53

have also been under attack by the

43:55

Russians they've destroyed much of their

43:57

energy infrastructure um now a bright

44:01

spot was for for the Ukrainian military

44:04

was that they did a surprise offensive

44:07

into KK which is Russian territory and

44:10

in doing that that was the first time

44:13

there were foreign troops on Russian

44:15

Turf right since World War II um and

44:20

that really shocked the hell out of

44:21

Putin and and the Russian military and

44:24

they acted as if they really didn't know

44:26

how to resp respond didn't have the

44:28

resources to respond but this is a game

44:30

of attrition right we're going into our

44:33

you know full third year early this

44:35

coming year um

44:39

and what's kept them in the fight is US

44:43

support and EU or NATO support the eu's

44:45

done very good job I mean look they've

44:47

they've picked up uh a great part of the

44:50

of the the uh the

44:52

effort without that support this thing

44:56

would never have lasted lasted this long

44:57

never and so I think Putin in part has

45:00

been very surprised he miscalculated a

45:02

lot of things but he miscalculated the

45:04

sort of support that Ukraine would

45:05

receive from nato in particular um

45:09

and now and why is NATO giving so much

45:13

support why is this in their interests

45:15

well think about where Ukraine is yeah

45:17

think about where Poland is look Russian

45:19

missiles have flown errantly into into

45:21

Poland um their history tells them or

45:27

informs them that if Putin takes this

45:31

Ukraine yeah it takes Ukraine then it's

45:35

not as if he's going to say okay I'm

45:37

done I'm finished right they believe now

45:40

whether they're right or not this is but

45:41

this answers the question about why such

45:44

strong NATO support they believe that

45:45

that's not his inclination right it's

45:47

not in his his character to say that's

45:49

all I want I'm good what do you think I

45:52

take him at his word when he says he

45:54

wants to recreate the former Soviet

45:57

Union in a fashion do I think this is

46:00

enough of a buffer from NATO for him I

46:02

don't think so do I think he might uh

46:04

consider moving a little bit further

46:06

north look he already has this is

46:07

Belarus bellus is a solid Ally of uh of

46:11

Putin um but is there a chance that you

46:14

know he says to himself well well you

46:15

know maybe over here he's already made

46:17

verbal threats up here so L Latvia yeah

46:22

and so I I think I understand what their

46:25

mindset is it's like Israel right we

46:28

sometimes we like oh my God why is

46:29

Israel acting the way they do well

46:31

because they're surrounded by a ring of

46:33

terrorist proxy that all are there to

46:36

serve the purpose of the Iranian regime

46:37

which is to destroy Israel so that's

46:40

their mindset right we don't live there

46:42

we don't understand it so to say okay

46:44

well that's ridiculous for someone in

46:46

the US to go it's ridiculous that that's

46:48

Putin okay you know well [ __ ] off you

46:50

don't live here right you're not in

46:52

Poland watching this if he takes over

46:54

Ukraine and so and world wasn't so long

46:58

ago exactly it wasn't until I studied

47:01

World War II which actually wasn't very

47:02

long ago it was about 6 months ago that

47:05

I understood the sort of geopolitical

47:08

backdrop as to why you need to defend

47:09

Ukraine because when you see you can

47:11

probably explain it better than me but

47:13

what Hitler did and he just took a

47:15

little bit was it like Czechoslovakia

47:17

just a little bit take this piece and a

47:19

little bit more and then he took a

47:20

little bit more and then a little bit

47:22

more and by by the end of it he was

47:23

trying to take the UK he was trying to

47:24

take Russia he was trying to take the

47:25

lot over here in the states right you

47:28

had this isolationist feeling so World

47:30

War II is happening um and they don't

47:33

want any of it right they've went

47:34

through World War I they sent a lot of

47:36

their boys over and they're like no

47:38

screw it you know look we got this big

47:39

ocean here you know we don't have to

47:41

worry about it and yeah that that was

47:44

that's a problem and but you see that

47:46

now there's some of this this

47:47

isolationist attitude which is why do we

47:49

even care and that's a okay fine that's

47:51

a great question to ask people should

47:53

ask questions like that but um yeah I'm

47:57

telling you having having worked against

47:59

Russia for for a long period of time U

48:02

it's a mistake not to take Putin at his

48:06

word right and and we tend to always

48:08

mirror our values it's like when we were

48:10

talking about the cab driver how do you

48:11

get him into a conversation you start to

48:12

mirror the values right and we do that

48:16

as a nation sometimes in the us where we

48:18

imagine that people are going to react

48:20

the same way or think the same way about

48:22

Freedom or democracy what and and it's

48:25

not how the world works so I just going

48:28

back here to to the incursion into um

48:31

into Russia that the Ukrainian military

48:33

did so they they've hold they're holding

48:35

territory up there maybe it depends on

48:37

who you talk to maybe um 500 square

48:40

miles it's it varies but they've

48:43

stretched their resources relatively

48:45

thin and that's a problem because it all

48:48

goes back to War as long as we've known

48:51

war which is supply lines right if you

48:53

if you can't maintain your supply lines

48:55

you you've you know lost the plot and so

49:00

what we're seeing right now is Putin has

49:02

amassed about 40,000 Russian troops and

49:06

about 10,000 North Korean troops and

49:08

that's another that's another story so

49:10

North North Korea because Kim Jong-un of

49:12

North Korea is best buddies now with

49:14

Putin he has sent upwards of 12,000

49:17

troops to Russia and they are now on the

49:21

front lines essentially they're already

49:23

in combat but they're an important part

49:25

of of of Putin's effort and I I think

49:29

what he's trying to

49:31

do Trump has won takes us back to our

49:34

original point of okay what's Trump

49:35

going to do and what's this going to

49:37

look like after the uh

49:39

inauguration Trump's one I think there's

49:42

a calculation here Putin could be saying

49:45

I've got to do everything now I've got

49:47

to throw everything I can to gain that

49:49

Russian territory back before sitting

49:52

down at a negotiating table and coming

49:55

up with a deal I don't want to sit at

49:57

the negotiating table if zinski and NATO

50:00

are saying we have part of your Russian

50:01

territory you want it back well we're

50:04

going to need we're going to need this

50:05

back we're going to need eastern Ukraine

50:07

back or we're going to need Crimea back

50:09

I don't think he's ever given back

50:10

Crimea right but it's likely I think if

50:13

you have to make these decisions and

50:15

without real insight into his mindset um

50:18

it's it's true it's all speculation but

50:21

I I wouldn't be surprised if what he's

50:23

calculated right now is I got to throw

50:25

all these troops to re gain this Russian

50:27

territory the ukrainians surprised Us by

50:29

taking ahead of sitting down and doing a

50:32

negotiated settlement which again is

50:34

going to be very unsatisfying to all

50:36

those people who put Ukrainian flags on

50:38

their porch and oh they're going to get

50:39

all their territory back no they're not

50:41

they don't have the ability to do that

50:44

and and I hope that what we don't see is

50:48

if Trump well when Trump comes into

50:51

office um I think he and the people that

50:54

he will have around him working on this

50:57

issue will be sufficiently convinced

51:01

that they have to maintain a level of

51:03

support that allows Ukraine to sit down

51:05

at the negotiating table from at least a

51:08

position of relative strength right um

51:11

otherwise they're just sitting and

51:13

they're asking you know for whatever

51:15

they can get in this deal and that's not

51:17

that's never going to sell zelinsky's

51:19

got to sell this to the the Ukrainian

51:21

population this is an incredible moment

51:24

in time right this is this is an

51:25

invading this is this is an invading

51:28

force from Russia into another country

51:30

an independent country

51:33

um and there's there there's so much

51:35

complexity it's hard to explain and you

51:37

know without saying okay we're going to

51:38

take the next five or six days to talk

51:40

about it but it's an incredible moment

51:43

in time and so yes it matters a great

51:46

deal about you know is this

51:48

consequential it's consequential if

51:51

worst case scenario um the next

51:54

Administration says that's it we're

51:55

cutting off all assist and all Aid well

51:58

the rest of NATO will definitely stay in

52:00

the game right because they view it

52:02

differently because they're right here

52:04

but us support is critical and it's

52:08

critical to

52:09

get a settlement and if what you want is

52:12

to end War to stop the the the

52:15

killing

52:16

um and if you're pragmatic you have to

52:20

you have to assume this is going to be a

52:22

settlement that means that Russia's

52:23

going to keep maybe not all of this

52:25

maybe they'll keep this much and this

52:27

will be maybe a demilitarized zone right

52:30

uh patrolled by un peacekeepers or

52:31

whatever to act as a buffer but then you

52:34

have other issues is Putin going to say

52:37

no part of this deal has got to be that

52:38

Ukraine never joins

52:41

NATO that's I'm sure that's going to be

52:43

a part of his deal um and then how NATO

52:46

deals with that I have no idea because

52:49

you know they've already made sort of a

52:51

guarantee okay you're going to be in at

52:52

some point anyway that's uh how do you

52:56

think it end if you had to be if you had

52:58

to bet I think uh look part of the

53:00

reason why um part of the reason why the

53:04

the North Korean troops have ended up in

53:07

in in Russia which is again is an

53:10

astounding thing um is because Putin

53:14

desperately doesn't want to do another

53:15

conscription he knows that's vastly

53:18

unpopular with his with his folks which

53:20

is when you ask your you basically

53:22

people round up more people right I'm

53:25

I'm going to need I'm going to need

53:25

another 50,000 soldiers because he runs

53:29

what's essentially called a meat grinder

53:30

operation he just throws people in the

53:33

front right as Canon F I mean the the

53:36

Russian casualty rate has been

53:39

ridiculous right compared to um the the

53:43

ukrainians but they've been willing to

53:45

sacrifice um all those people so I think

53:49

the the the idea being look Kim Jong-un

53:52

he's making money off of this deal

53:53

sending troops up there he's getting the

53:55

troops that survive anyway will get

53:57

combat experience and he doesn't have a

53:59

military with any combat experience

54:00

right now and he's also getting weapons

54:02

technology transfer from Russia so he's

54:04

getting part of a deal here what's Putin

54:07

getting I think Putin's just getting

54:08

bodies he can throw out there ahead of

54:11

the next wave which will be Russian

54:12

troops right so I think I think those

54:15

10,000 North Koreans uh soldiers are

54:17

[ __ ] there's been a a rising sentiment

54:20

in the United States that we should stop

54:21

sending money to Ukraine and why are we

54:24

bothering and this isn't our problem etc

54:26

etc MH what do you say to those people

54:29

because that sentiment is rising and

54:30

it's rising from my opinion it's rising

54:33

on the right side of politics I hear it

54:35

more and more on some of the big

54:36

podcasts I hear it more and more on um X

54:39

and Twitter and again it's only because

54:42

I I researched what happened in Nazi

54:44

Germany in World War II that I suddenly

54:47

go this is much more complicated than

54:49

you think and you can embolden someone

54:52

if you don't resist their them invading

54:54

a local country yeah and why put one

54:57

right well look I mean this and and the

54:59

thing

55:01

is the world the world is shrinking

55:04

right the world is and has been and

55:06

continues to shrink nothing happens in a

55:08

bubble so what's happening right here is

55:10

being watched by uh you know xiin ping

55:14

in China right in terms of Taiwan I mean

55:16

he's sitting there saying okay here's

55:18

Taiwan there's a straight of Taiwan it's

55:20

no distance whatsoever he's just

55:23

conducted xiin ping and the Chinese

55:24

regime has just conducted the large lest

55:26

military exercise around Taiwan ever

55:28

basically blocking it off blocking the

55:30

ports and uh you know patrolling the

55:32

airs Airway uh Airway so the idea being

55:35

he just wanted to show that he could do

55:37

that right and so he's watching what's

55:40

happening over here in terms of the US

55:42

response and NATO response and and say

55:45

okay at what point does it make sense

55:47

for me to do this because at the end of

55:49

the day xiin ping is tied to his desired

55:52

Legacy which is the reunification and

55:54

and in his mind this belongs right here

55:56

and so so let's we'll move on to China

55:58

then um question was how do you think it

56:01

ends if you're a betting man how do you

56:03

think the Ukrainian war ends I think in

56:05

this coming year I think in part I know

56:08

I've talked a lot about what the

56:09

ukrainians are suffering from but

56:10

there's there are reasons why Putin is

56:13

going to need to uh figure this out as

56:15

well I think part of it is his economy

56:17

is is is suffering um

56:20

and so I think it finishes with a

56:23

negotiated settlement at some point

56:25

during 20 25 and I think that means uh

56:30

the lines are going to look again I keep

56:33

using the word unsatisfactory but that's

56:35

the way it's going to feel to a lot of

56:37

people uh the lines are going to look a

56:38

lot like they did before The Invasion uh

56:41

maybe a some additional territory being

56:44

held by the Russians and then I do think

56:45

that there will be some agreement to

56:48

have a buffer zone uh that will be

56:51

essentially under the opes of un

56:54

peacekeeping troops somehow

56:57

um you know no fly zone whatever you

56:59

want to call it as well I think that's

57:01

how it's going to end up I think K that

57:02

region in in in uh in Russia goes back

57:05

to the Russians I think that problem's

57:07

going to be I think in the short order

57:09

um I think they're going to want to move

57:11

quickly right before we get into the

57:13

teeth of winter um I think that's going

57:16

to be a mess so that's going to be a

57:18

major when they start that offensive and

57:20

we're talking again potentially 50,000

57:23

troops thrown at uh a relatively Thin

57:27

Line um I think that territory goes back

57:30

to Russia in the next

57:32

month I would I would suspect yeah I

57:35

mean basically you don't you don't put

57:37

troops there you know with all those

57:38

resources without intending to to use

57:41

them um and I think the longer those

57:44

North Korean troops sit there the more

57:46

trouble they will have in terms of

57:47

command and control so they're going to

57:48

want to get them into the uh into into

57:51

the cannon uh as quickly as

57:53

possible so you mentioned China China

57:56

feel like Taiwan is there Taiwan is this

57:58

little island off the coast of

58:01

China I hear about this um this plan

58:04

that they say China has which is the

58:07

2049 plan what is China's 2049

58:12

plan well part of that was based around

58:14

a timeline um for uh how we want to

58:18

refer to it the reunification the

58:19

absorption of Taiwan the taking over of

58:21

Taiwan nobody really knows what that

58:24

will look like because there's a a

58:26

concern um you know is it going to be a

58:29

completely kinetic is it going to be a

58:31

military operation uh is it going to be

58:33

more of a soft takeover uh sort of like

58:37

U you know there's it's a good example

58:39

right here Hong Kong um you remember

58:42

there used to be democracy in Hong Kong

58:44

and now there's not um and that happened

58:47

over a period of time but they basically

58:50

just squashed all remnants of democracy

58:52

particularly during the pandemic so

58:55

what's it going to look like when they

58:56

do take over Taiwan that's that's the

58:58

big question but the timeline has shrunk

59:01

so they now there's some feeling that

59:04

the movement on Taiwan will be during

59:06

the course of XI jinping's tenure right

59:10

so what are you looking at well that

59:11

depends on his grip on power which seems

59:14

very solid um it seems like it depends

59:17

on his health which you know again I be

59:20

speculating but so I don't see him

59:23

riding off into the sunset willingly

59:25

without finishing that project that in

59:28

his mind is so important um he's

59:31

Consolidated power in in China like

59:33

nobody

59:34

since Den jaia ping or or Mali dong you

59:38

know so I think um I think he's serious

59:41

again take take certain leaders at their

59:44

word some you know some Bluster a lot

59:46

some some make very big pronouncements

59:48

Donald Trump would be one of them who

59:50

tends to just speak off the cuff and

59:51

throw things out I think the danger

59:53

sometimes is is the the Dem democrats

59:56

for example take him at his word right

59:58

for everything he says right they take

59:59

everything he says literally um but

60:02

there are other leaders um Putin shiing

60:04

ping I think you need to pay real close

60:07

attention to exactly what they're saying

60:09

so I think when he talks about the you

60:11

know absorbing Taiwan and and making it

60:13

part of the motherland again I he's not

60:15

kidding around why does he want Taiwan

60:17

it looks like such an insignificant part

60:19

of that part of the map it's so small in

60:21

comparison to to China it's a good point

60:24

when you look at the map you go really

60:26

need to bother um you know what it's

60:29

part of it is is is the history right

60:31

and you know ever since the the you know

60:34

the Chen Kai Sheek and you know the

60:36

separatist and escaping to Taiwan and

60:40

raising it as a separate

60:42

nation it's

60:44

just it's it's hard to explain but it's

60:47

a very emotive subject right why does

60:50

the US care so much about

60:52

Taiwan um that's a better question too

60:56

um okay part of that

60:59

is part of that is uh I don't want to

61:02

say emotional but it's the idea of look

61:04

there Democratic

61:06

institutions um it's an ally you know

61:09

how could we possibly Stand By and Watch

61:11

a Communist Regime you know step on it

61:13

and and and destroy it part of it is um

61:18

practical it's like you know it's it's

61:20

an important chip manufacturing center

61:23

so you know there's a couple elements to

61:25

it um honestly look if if if all the

61:29

chip manufacturing on Taiwan was

61:32

reshored over to California somewhere um

61:36

would we care quite as much well we

61:39

would still care on that sort of

61:41

emotional values-based

61:43

uh

61:45

side we could probably we could probably

61:48

Overlook it in a long run now are we

61:50

going to send boots on the ground over

61:52

to defend Taiwan if there if there's a

61:54

military action uh um you know going

61:57

back to your betting person I would bet

61:58

no no matter who's in office but they

62:00

will say they're going to defend Taiwan

62:03

everyone all of the like the US

62:05

presidents are always asked would you

62:06

defend Taiwan if Russia invaded and

62:08

you'll probably know some of the quotes

62:09

better than I do but they've all said

62:10

that they would yeah yeah the only slip

62:13

up at one point was uh uh Biden where he

62:16

I don't think he really meant to say

62:17

what he said which was you know sort of

62:19

ambiguous towards the the defense of

62:21

Taiwan but then he corrected it um so

62:26

do I honestly think that we would send

62:29

uh troops over no no I don't um do I

62:33

think that we would do what we're doing

62:34

with Ukraine sure yeah would we provide

62:37

resources but this is a much different

62:40

uh situation right

62:43

um and so I

62:45

think while I get uh the concept uh I

62:50

just don't know that there's be follow

62:52

through

62:53

because that is a very tough cell to

62:58

explain why we're sending troops over to

63:01

face down the Chinese military which is

63:04

about a Stones throw away from Taiwan

63:08

and look this is going to be an

63:10

interesting situation right because the

63:13

folks over here the folks in

63:15

China they don't view the folks in

63:17

Taiwan as Taiwanese they view them as

63:19

Chinese right so are you going to have

63:21

you know Chinese military shooting

63:23

Chinese I don't know maybe it's going to

63:26

be a softer takeover maybe there's going

63:28

to there's more influence there's a

63:29

massive disinformation campaigns that go

63:31

on on Taiwan courtesy of the Chinese

63:33

regime there's all sorts of efforts

63:35

there to to

63:37

undermine uh Taiwanese leadership

63:40

but it this is again the point being is

63:43

this is a crisis look this is already

63:45

this is a mess and has been and it's

63:48

underway and it's in Ukraine situation

63:51

but over here this is looming right as a

63:53

major issue and and if you think about

63:55

the there other activities this is is

63:57

what's referred to as a South China Sea

63:59

right which is below Taiwan it is yes

64:01

and it's it's um this is the Philippines

64:04

here uh Vietnam over here China has

64:08

always viewed this as their territory

64:11

right this this is their backyard well

64:13

ever since World War II the US is

64:16

essentially patrolled and and maintained

64:20

Security in the South China Sea right in

64:22

the interest of international free trade

64:24

and you know freedom of movement

64:26

um there are increasing numbers of

64:28

encounters between the the Chinese Navy

64:31

and the Philippines uh Vietnamese over

64:35

um this this sea because again they view

64:39

this as theirs they're constantly in

64:41

here pushing they're building uh uh

64:43

artificial Islands there for ports um

64:47

there's there's a major flash point here

64:49

right for for potential

64:52

conflict and China I've talked to number

64:56

of experts that I really value and their

65:00

take is and I think it's not incorrect

65:03

is that China is basically on a war

65:05

footing with the West already right we

65:08

just don't see it or we don't feel it or

65:10

we don't want to acknowledge it and I

65:12

don't mean like they're going to launch

65:13

missiles but in their minds they're at

65:15

war with the US already and they're

65:17

they're acting in a sense as if that's

65:20

the case and we act as if well they're

65:21

just an economic competitor but it would

65:24

be nice if we could all get along

65:26

um so I think we may be misreading the

65:29

the tea leaves who's the the real enemy

65:32

of the West in your opinion who who

65:34

would you if you were the president of

65:35

the United States who would you be most

65:37

concerned

65:40

about well this is this is our biggest

65:43

this is our biggest concern right China

65:45

China is the is I think is the Topline

65:48

concern because of their their abilities

65:51

their resources um and you know again

65:54

the sort of the increasing

65:55

aggressiveness in this region um their

65:58

desire to uh reshape the the global

66:02

structure right they don't want the West

66:04

to be in charge they you know they view

66:06

this as you know how do we realign this

66:07

so that we get what you know the bricks

66:09

and and uh uh a different realignment of

66:14

of world order so that the US and its

66:16

allies are not at the top of the food

66:19

chain so in a sense that doesn't mean

66:21

that I think that we're going to be in a

66:23

in a in a shooting match with China

66:24

anytime soon I don't actually believe

66:26

that's going to be the case but that's

66:28

where we have to focus a lot of our

66:31

concerns when you talk about identifying

66:33

and resolving and you know prioritizing

66:35

threats um in the short

66:38

term um right here is

66:42

Iran

66:45

and look the Iranian regime has been

66:48

engaged in uh assassination plots to try

66:52

to kill uh now the president elect uh as

66:57

well as several other uh us officials

67:00

whom they uh believe were responsible

67:02

for the targeting back in 2020 of KM

67:06

solomani who ran the kuds force and was

67:08

a very close Ally of the supreme leader

67:11

Kaman in Iran you think Iran have tried

67:14

to kill Trump oh they have definitely

67:16

yeah there's no doubt that that they've

67:17

been engaged in they have a hit list and

67:20

they've actually been engaged in trying

67:21

to get uh plots underway um to uh you

67:26

know to uh Target not just him but Mike

67:28

Pompeo uh Mark Millie former head of the

67:31

or chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

67:33

Mark eser former Secretary of Defense

67:35

Brian hook uh and others so but I guess

67:38

you know from a setting that aside

67:41

setting aside the bizarreness of this

67:43

state with a hit list of US officials

67:46

right and that's just saying that out

67:48

loud should make people think well that

67:50

is bizarre but what they've done in

67:53

terms of uh establishing and building

67:56

over the years this this network of of

68:00

proxies thetis Islamic jihadah Kamas um

68:05

Iran has stated numerous times they've

68:06

been very clear about it their desire

68:08

their objective is to wipe Israel from

68:10

the face of the the Earth so they've set

68:13

up their proxies with the same objective

68:16

and the idea being okay we'll let the

68:17

proxies do the dirty work we're not

68:19

going to take accountability we're not

68:20

going to be in the direct line of fire

68:22

now that's happened a couple of times

68:24

right there's been this direct you know

68:26

back and forth between Iran and Israel

68:29

um so this is a this is a very serious

68:31

problem that will not be

68:33

resolved as long as the Iranian regime

68:36

and the Revolutionary guard Corps the

68:39

irgc maintain their belief system that

68:42

Israel needs to be wiped off the face of

68:44

the Earth as long as they believe that

68:47

they will continue to be the primary

68:49

cause of instability um in uh the Middle

68:52

East so we talk talk about getting

68:56

ceasefires in Gaza talk about ceasefire

68:58

with Hezbollah in Lebanon not that

69:00

there's much left of the hesah

69:01

leadership but that's just putting

69:04

lipstick on a pig right because you're

69:06

not solving the problem and you know I

69:09

don't know that you change the belief

69:10

structure of the Iranian regime and the

69:13

irgc so in that case what do you hope

69:16

for what you hope for internally that

69:18

there will be at some point the

69:21

population would just say we've had

69:22

enough right I mean there have been how

69:25

many cases do we need where you know

69:27

women go out on the streets to protest

69:29

right the new morality laws and they

69:31

disappear right they're just they're it

69:34

it's brutal yeah you don't hear any of

69:36

that you don't hear people you know you

69:37

don't hear activists in the States going

69:38

on college campuses and protesting the

69:41

treatment of of women in in Iran no it's

69:44

always you know God my god look what

69:46

Israel is doing those protests in Iran

69:48

do the United States fuel those protests

69:52

do they cause disinformation in that

69:54

country to try and stabiliz it to try

69:56

and get a coup so that they can throw

69:57

out the leadership is that how the world

69:59

Works um you know what it I'm going to

70:02

what I'm going to say I think a lot of

70:03

people who would look at my background

70:05

and go well of course that son of a

70:07

[ __ ] is going to say that this is what

70:08

I would say is that what happens

70:13

um

70:14

is okay let me put it this way year in

70:18

years pasted yeah that's what would have

70:20

happened we would have tried to say okay

70:22

how do we get that that Uprising how do

70:24

we get that

70:26

but now it's more how do we get

70:27

information into those people and then

70:29

if there is a protest that develops how

70:33

do we support it what do you do to

70:35

support

70:36

that uh that I would argue has you know

70:39

not worked um the green movement and and

70:44

few other un you know unsuccessful

70:45

attempts by people to kind of get out on

70:47

the streets and protest have been

70:48

brutally put down and and the US and the

70:51

UN and others for the most part you know

70:53

they're going to protest and write a

70:55

nasty memo but none of it helps right

70:59

how do you get information to the people

71:01

in a country like that you know they

71:03

have they have access to some degree

71:06

most of it's locked down I guess but but

71:08

they have access to some degree so you

71:09

try to you try to push information out

71:11

look Voice of America is is probably the

71:13

best example over the years vaa was for

71:16

years its whole purpose was how do we

71:19

get information about what happens in

71:21

the world um into Russia into the Soviet

71:24

Union

71:25

and nowadays you know you could argue

71:28

you've got more possibilities because of

71:31

Technology U that's outside my scope and

71:33

we start talking about how do you you

71:35

know aside from dropping leaflets um

71:38

which which bizarrely enough in South

71:41

Korea and North Korea they still do

71:43

South Korea drops leaflets using

71:45

balloons over North Korean territory to

71:47

convince people that Kim Jong on is bad

71:49

and that life could be better um but

71:52

yeah I the the worst part is with Iran

71:55

is you just look these people are under

71:57

the thumb of the mulles in the

71:59

irgc and they are brutal right it's like

72:02

it's like Hamas Hamas has ruled Gaza

72:04

with an Iron Fist and they've been

72:05

brutal against anyone that they disagree

72:08

with

72:09

lgbtq activists women name them and and

72:13

yet you know you never see protests

72:14

outside the country about Hamas you know

72:16

how they beat um you know uh a gay

72:21

activist it doesn't happen right the C

72:23

campus protests are all about Israel

72:25

Israel is surrounded by a ring of of

72:28

proxies built by Iran that wants to

72:30

destroy them so yes they're going to

72:32

think differently than we do what

72:34

happened in

72:35

Israel on that day where I mean people

72:38

rushed into the their country and

72:40

thousands of people died yeah as of that

72:43

yeah their estimate was 12200 and then

72:45

uh 250 were dragged off into uh into

72:48

Gaza I just don't know how that that's

72:50

possible when that that state is so

72:53

unbelievably paranoid about invasions

72:55

and attacks and they have the the Iron

72:58

Dome how does that happen how do and

73:01

yeah it that was a um it was a

73:05

long-term uh project that was very well

73:09

orchestrated by Hamas uh with Iran the

73:12

rgc was fully aware of what was going on

73:14

the rgc provided some of the training to

73:16

some of the Kamas Fighters that

73:17

eventually ended up in inside Southern

73:20

Israel um so probably the best way to

73:24

put it would

73:25

be they lulled the Israeli government to

73:29

sleep and the the military to sleep they

73:32

made them believe that they really

73:34

weren't interested in violence anymore

73:36

and what that did and and that what they

73:39

really wanted was okay we just want to

73:40

like try to build up our economy right

73:44

and and try to make a better life well

73:46

that was horseshit on hamas's part

73:48

that's what the Palestinians would like

73:50

but that was horeshit on hamas's part um

73:53

what they were doing was

73:55

lulling them to sleep in that then they

73:58

kind of took their eye off the ball the

74:00

Israeli government in particular started

74:02

looking more inward you know you had a

74:04

lot of internal political battles going

74:07

on um and they were doing that because

74:09

they viewed that they didn't have the

74:10

same existential threat on their

74:12

doorstep that they had been dealing with

74:14

right they they sort of took the bait

74:16

and it was an intelligence failure

74:18

there's no doubt about it in part

74:20

because the uh the people running that

74:22

operation dumbed down their

74:24

Communications right they deliberately

74:26

stopped using Communications that they

74:28

felt could be compromised or had been

74:32

compromised and we we've seen that over

74:34

the years um Al-Qaeda is a good example

74:36

once Al-Qaeda understood uh the extent

74:39

to which we could intercept their

74:40

Communications you know they went back

74:42

to the old days right handing

74:44

handwritten notes right this is my

74:46

cousin I want you to take it to that

74:47

person over there who's his cousin only

74:50

give him that note right don't talk to

74:51

anybody very hard to intercept right

74:54

very and so you you no it's very hard to

74:56

conduct your operations it takes a lot

74:57

more time um but that's the extent to

75:01

which they went to try to get this thing

75:03

done and uh yeah unfortunately they were

75:05

very

75:07

successful how are you thinking about

75:09

the world's perception specifically the

75:11

United States perception of what's going

75:12

on in Israel and Palestine you know we

75:14

talked about how support seems to be

75:16

waning for providing support to Ukraine

75:19

is support waning do you believe for

75:21

Israel and the plight of Israel because

75:23

there's been a lot of information around

75:25

the amount of innocent people that have

75:26

been killed in Palestine yeah I would be

75:29

more concerned about um Ukrainian

75:33

support and I would be losing um the

75:36

level of Israeli support why because I

75:39

think um it's a little bit of a

75:41

different Dynamic right there's Israel

75:43

has always kind of had this this

75:45

interesting place within us psyche I

75:48

guess and um and it's also look there's

75:51

a massive Jewish American Community

75:54

right I mean there's no doubt about that

75:55

so there's there's a level of support

75:57

there that that Ukraine doesn't have um

76:02

and and also just the length of support

76:05

look we've been we've been close allies

76:07

of Israel for Generations right ever

76:09

since it it started uh you can't say the

76:11

same thing about Ukraine so I guess I'm

76:14

hopeful that moving into the next

76:17

Administration and I know people say oh

76:19

my God you know you sounds like you're a

76:20

warmonger well no again I go back to

76:23

with Ukraine if you want peace peace if

76:25

that's what you want if you don't want

76:26

the conflict then my argument is they've

76:29

got to be able to sit down at a

76:31

negotiating table if Putin feels like

76:33

he's winning right if he feels like the

76:36

US is backing off he's not going to

76:38

negotiate he's just going to move

76:39

forward he doesn't he doesn't give a

76:41

[ __ ] about his soldiers he just keeps

76:42

throwing them into the front lines right

76:45

so if you want peace here then you need

76:48

to continue support sufficiently to get

76:50

them to the table and I do think we're

76:53

we're we're close because again I don't

76:54

you know Russia yes they're making

76:56

Headway here but a longterm you know

77:00

meaning another two or three years I

77:02

don't think I don't think Putin can

77:03

sustain that with the Russian population

77:05

so how does Israel palestine's war

77:09

end unfortunately I I again being a

77:12

cynic um I think it ends the way a lot

77:15

of these have ended which means we're

77:16

just putting a Band-Aid on a sucking

77:19

chest wound and they'll come up with a

77:22

ceasefire um I think Kamas they'll

77:25

figure out a way to bring in the

77:27

Palestinian Authority to govern Hamas or

77:31

sorry Gaza um I think uh I think sort of

77:36

the Lynch pin there is if they can get a

77:37

ceasefire with uh with Gaza with

77:41

Hamas that will make it infinitely

77:43

easier for the hooes to say okay we'll

77:46

back off we're not going to keep

77:48

screwing up the Red Sea firing missiles

77:49

at International Trade and us and Allied

77:52

naval ships and I think think that it

77:55

also allows for Hezbollah look I think

77:58

the Israelis look at Hezbollah

77:59

leadership now I think we've pretty much

78:00

taken everybody out

78:03

um and there's more of a structure in in

78:06

Lebanon I think it's it's always been

78:08

problematic but I think the Lebanese

78:10

government could um you know could deal

78:14

with the problem if there is a an

78:17

official ceasefire with hezb so I think

78:19

it all comes down to um

78:24

and I guess what I mean by the bandaid

78:26

on a second chest wound is that's all

78:28

well and good we'll stop the conflicts

78:30

right I think those will stop relatively

78:32

soon um I don't think Iran is interested

78:35

in getting into a bigger shooting match

78:37

with Israel because I I think they

78:39

understand there's no way they do that

78:41

without the US entering the US has

78:43

already got you know carriers forward

78:45

deployed out here a big show of force

78:47

right we moved B52 fortresses out there

78:50

nuclear capable not that that we would

78:52

drop nukes but it's a show of force

78:55

that I think Iran understands and the

78:58

mullers the mullers the irgc in

79:01

particular which has its fingers in

79:02

every part of the Iranian economy and

79:04

has made itself wealthy much like the

79:05

Hamas leadership made themselves Wealthy

79:07

by stealing billions that leadership in

79:10

Iran it's very similar to Putin in a

79:13

sense and very similar over here to xiin

79:15

Ping the one thing they want more than

79:17

anything else is to retain control so

79:20

the Iranian regime is going to look at

79:22

this and go can we really afford to get

79:23

into a shooting match with the US and

79:25

Israel and the answer is no they can't

79:27

win that so I think they're not inclined

79:29

to to do this so we're going to get

79:31

these ceasefires and then we're just

79:33

kicking the can down the road but if

79:35

they get nuclear weapons then they can

79:37

hold their weight absolutely absolutely

79:39

yeah and that will that will completely

79:41

change the the calculus in terms of how

79:43

do we deal with them and the negoti so

79:46

and again this going to make me sound

79:47

like a warmonger but that last um that

79:50

last um retaliatory strike by Israel

79:53

into Iran

79:55

they focused on Missile production

79:56

facilities and air defense systems

80:00

now that's smart in that destroying a

80:04

significant portion of their missile

80:06

production capabilities impacts their

80:07

ability to both attack directly Israel

80:10

but also then to provide those missiles

80:12

to their proxies the air defense You

80:14

could argue is setting the table right

80:18

if they decide that that breakout window

80:20

for the Iranian regime to get a nuke is

80:24

tightening uh to a point where it's not

80:26

really acceptable and if you've if

80:29

you've basically destroyed their defense

80:32

systems and they somewhat naked in that

80:33

regard then you're talking about you

80:36

know dropping and trying to disrupt

80:38

their their weapons capability the most

80:40

of that is significantly underground how

80:43

do we know they don't have a nuclear

80:44

weapon I don't think they could have

80:46

kept their Yap shut they would have told

80:48

us because for what you're saying which

80:50

is okay now what right um I don't think

80:54

that I don't think they could have kept

80:56

that secret plus also we rely on our

80:58

liaison Partners so the Israeli

81:00

intelligence Jordanian intelligence

81:02

Saudi intelligence we rely on a sort of

81:04

a input from a lot of the players look

81:06

the the Saudis the jordanians and others

81:08

would they be upset if the Iranian

81:10

regime would to change no they would

81:12

they would like what do they want they

81:13

want they want stability right because

81:16

that leads to economic Prosperity that's

81:17

better for their populations keeps their

81:19

folks happy um and so you know you know

81:24

are they going to come right out and say

81:25

it no but there's a lot of reasons so I

81:28

think the the the problem with these

81:29

ceasefires not again it's it's good you

81:32

want to end conflict um you don't want

81:34

people suffering it it would be

81:36

fantastic if the Palestinians had a much

81:38

better opportunity for a great life but

81:41

you don't get there as long as the

81:43

Iranian regime and and the irgc are

81:45

saying we want to destroy Israel so

81:47

we're going to keep pushing at it um

81:49

that's not really a recipe for long-term

81:51

stability so that's why I say they're

81:53

kind of key to this whole problem why is

81:56

the US so focused on Iran of all these

81:59

countries not getting a nuclear weapon

82:01

the US seem obsessed with making sure

82:03

Iran of all people don't get a nuclear

82:05

weapon well because they're the largest

82:07

state sponsor of terrorism is one issue

82:10

and um and they've shown it right I mean

82:13

they they've been perfectly willing to

82:15

look I mean the the fellow who was

82:16

killed in 2020 uh who was the head of

82:19

the goods force cassm

82:20

solomani uh and it was his targeting

82:24

that then created the supreme leader

82:26

desire and the Iranian regime's desire

82:28

to Target us officials including the

82:31

president-elect um he had the blood of

82:35

thousands of US soldiers on his hands

82:37

because he was running operations um to

82:40

develop IEDs uh and get them out in the

82:43

field uh train up uh Iraqi militias to

82:48

uh so I again they hate the US they hate

82:51

the US yeah so I look it's it

82:55

again going back to that same thing it'd

82:56

be lovely if we all lived in a community

82:58

of Nations but when I look at a map like

83:00

this I don't see a community of Nations

83:02

I see problems which again maybe makes

83:05

me just a cynical old bastard problems

83:09

you recently said we're in a more

83:10

sensitive time right now than in recent

83:12

modern times than we can recall and you

83:16

were referring here to nuclear

83:19

weapons people are normalizing the

83:21

limited use of nukes and that is

83:23

worrisome we've got Russia doing

83:26

tactical Nuclear drills on the border

83:29

alongside

83:30

Ukraine how can how concerned should we

83:33

be about nuclear weapons and why should

83:35

we be so concerned I actually didn't

83:37

realize until recently when I spoke to

83:38

Annie Jacobson that the president has

83:41

the sole responsibility and the sole

83:43

power to launch a nuclear weapon but

83:45

they don't have to speak to anyone to

83:47

launch a nuclear weapon they don't have

83:48

to have a meeting don't have to speak to

83:49

the house or the Senate they Trump could

83:51

turn around and say launch that nuke

83:54

yeah so could Biden so could you know

83:57

Barack Obama so could George Bush or

83:58

Ronald Reagan or you know let's go back

84:01

in in in time um look the Russians

84:04

created um what was referred to as the

84:06

Dead Hand system right which took people

84:08

completely out of the decision-making

84:10

process I mean if you want to talk about

84:12

something that's that's even more

84:13

frightening is let's remove humans from

84:15

the decision to launch uh the nukes

84:17

what's the dead it was what it was

84:19

referred to as it was the idea was

84:21

during the Cold War um the idea was

84:24

Kremlin started sitting around thinking

84:26

a little bit too much and they said well

84:27

what happens if if there's a first

84:29

strike and we're taken out meaning the

84:31

Kremlin meaning they leadership well H

84:34

okay well we need some system in place

84:36

an automated system that will respond

84:40

right um and so they created this system

84:43

that would luckily obviously never used

84:47

but it was referred to as the Dead Hand

84:48

system it was a it was a non-human um uh

84:52

decision-making process that would

84:54

assess the Damage Done in the first uh

84:57

strike and would then make a decision on

85:00

its own as to what to

85:02

do so that's a that's a problem but yes

85:06

and and that's still there uh no it's

85:08

not there supposedly they they've you

85:12

know advised us that it's been disarmed

85:14

some time ago um but you know again who

85:17

knows I mean and and again that's

85:19

another problem with AI and and you know

85:21

its ability uh to supplant humans you

85:25

talk about drones and taking humans out

85:27

of drone strikes you can't you can't do

85:29

that either you need to have you need to

85:32

have that element I think in in any

85:34

weapon system but yeah Russia talking

85:38

about and and um you know medev and

85:40

Dimitri pesov and and some of the other

85:42

minions for Putin rattling the nuclear

85:44

saber on on occasion uh doing their

85:47

tactical drills um you know obviously

85:51

North Korea who has nuclear weapons here

85:54

well I mean the members of the nuclear

85:55

Club um so I've got United States Russia

85:58

France China the UK Pakistan Pakistan

86:01

India uh yep India Israel we don't know

86:05

I mean that's a very I mean it's a great

86:08

point we assume but we don't know North

86:11

Korea because they've never yeah North

86:12

Korea yeah North Korea have got nuclear

86:13

weapons well

86:15

uh they don't have a delivery system so

86:18

they don't have a missile that can fire

86:20

right right and are they completely

86:22

there is is up for grabs so that program

86:28

isn't quite as well understood uh the

86:30

Iranian program is is a heavy lift in

86:33

terms of specific intelligence the

86:35

breakout window is often discussed but

86:37

it's anywhere from oh it's a couple of

86:39

weeks to it's months you know so that

86:40

tells you because of the Gap and that

86:42

and the parameters there that tells you

86:44

that maybe the intelligence isn't as

86:45

good as it should be just to give a

86:47

context on how powerful these weapons

86:49

are there was a stat I read that said

86:50

the Warhead on one US nuclear armed

86:53

submarine Marine has seven times the

86:56

destructive power of all the bombs

86:59

dropped during World War II including

87:02

two atomic bombs combined and the US has

87:04

10 of those submarines MH yeah where are

87:09

we closer now to nuclear war than we've

87:10

ever been in the last

87:14

century no um I think we were closer in

87:18

the in the height of the Cold War I

87:20

think um there it really was I mean it

87:23

was

87:24

are you know top of Mind people

87:27

literally thought we were going to get

87:28

into a a a shooting match with the

87:31

Soviet Union and I think we were close

87:35

on on occasion so I wouldn't argue that

87:38

we're it's more prevalent right and and

87:40

by that I mean there's more of them um

87:43

than there were at that point there's

87:44

more members of the nuclear Club um but

87:48

I that was at a point in time when I

87:50

think we were much closer because also

87:52

in part we there wasn't the

87:55

understanding the level of communication

87:57

that exists there look there's still a

87:58

lot of you know there's there's even

88:01

when it seems like two nations are at

88:03

odds you know I think sometimes people

88:05

don't understand how much communication

88:06

still exists off the radar between

88:08

militaries between Intel

88:10

organizations um people understand that

88:12

the the risk but I my point is when you

88:15

talk about it a lot when you when you

88:18

threaten it you're you're normalizing it

88:21

and I think that that could lead us down

88:23

a very bad path um and then if if the

88:27

Iranian regime were to get nuclear

88:29

weapons

88:31

um are they are they on the logic train

88:35

you know or do they view this as

88:37

something that they they use as leverage

88:39

to exert uh to get uh concessions from

88:42

Israel whatever those might be I I don't

88:44

know I think there there would be an

88:45

unknown player in that realm and I think

88:48

that causes some of this concern also as

88:49

to why it's felt they shouldn't have it

88:51

and also if they announce they announce

88:53

that they have a nuclear weapon then you

88:56

can count on the Saudis saying to

88:58

themselves me too right I'm I'm going to

89:00

get them so I'm not going to look the

89:02

it's not as if the Saudis and the

89:04

Iranians are are you know close friends

89:06

there becomes a Tipping Point here

89:07

doesn't there where you know Iran gets

89:09

their nuclear weapons Saudi want a

89:10

nuclear weapon and then you know most of

89:12

the countries in this region and other

89:13

parts of the world think well we need

89:14

one now we need one and the Israelis

89:16

maybe that's the moment when they come

89:18

out and say and confirm whether they do

89:19

or don't and they're not going to

89:20

confirm that they don't um yeah so I

89:23

think it there there's some real

89:25

problems there look it's it's bad that

89:26

anybody has them obviously everybody

89:28

wants peace but you have to deal with

89:30

the world you got not the one you hope

89:32

for it's interesting when I think about

89:34

the biggest risk to the world and I

89:37

think about all the potential things

89:38

that could happen we could have a solar

89:39

flare there could be I don't know

89:41

whatever could happen there's a meteor

89:42

of death too a meteor for that yeah

89:45

global warming could do it the thing

89:46

that seems to be so obvious to me is if

89:49

you get more and more nuclear weapons

89:50

and you've got more and more of these

89:53

sometimes crazy egotistical leaders who

89:56

are aging and they're trying to hang on

89:58

to their power and then you throw in AI

90:01

which is a kind of sentient being that

90:02

can think for itself for me I go I don't

90:05

know in the next hundred years there's

90:06

got to be an incident there's got to be

90:10

an incident because like

90:11

probabilistically this many weapons this

90:13

many crazy leaders this much disruption

90:15

to technology you know people not

90:17

wanting to let go of their power

90:19

something's going to go wrong it might

90:20

be a mistake or something but all it

90:22

takes is one missile to fly or one

90:25

person to think that a missile's flying

90:27

right or you get one Broken Arrow uh you

90:29

get one um one missing nuke right gets

90:33

in the wrong hands how about the story I

90:35

think was it in Hawaii when Hawaii's

90:37

missile detection system went off one

90:39

day and they thought that they were

90:40

about to be hit by a yeah exactly think

90:42

about what those people went through and

90:43

it wasn't like a minute or two I I think

90:45

it I forget what the the length of time

90:47

was before they got the all clear 30

90:48

minutes I think roughly yeah I mean

90:50

where everyone in Hawaii thought that a

90:52

missile was about to them and I heard

90:55

the stories of people trying to decide

90:56

which kid to go to and hiding in

90:58

cupboards and going out on the beach and

91:00

praying and and uh just so everyone

91:04

knows hiding in a Cupboard is not going

91:05

to

91:06

be and that was just because one person

91:09

in a office somewhere clicked the wrong

91:12

button yeah and that sent that nation

91:14

into Panic so you can imagine in Iran

91:16

someone accidentally clicking the wrong

91:17

button or or deliberately clicking the

91:19

wrong button or or whatever I just think

91:21

it's you get um look there's always this

91:23

concern concern right I mean Russia has

91:25

moved you know some of its Arsenal to

91:27

bellarus well you know okay what happens

91:31

if you know one of those goes missing or

91:32

what happens if if a non-state actor uh

91:36

organization gets a hold of one of

91:38

Pakistan so there's a complete Fallout

91:40

in the Pakistan government and suddenly

91:41

you've got a very hostile government

91:44

that you know has control so yeah it's

91:46

it's it's an issue uh you have to ask

91:49

yourself sometimes why would you want to

91:50

be a world leader what is your biggest

91:53

concern as it relates to the map but

91:55

also technology and the future that

91:56

we're heading towards what's your

91:57

biggest concern I don't know that that's

92:00

a that's a really interesting question

92:01

and I know I should have like a a pat

92:03

answer right off the top of my head um I

92:07

tend

92:08

to I tend to look at at

92:12

uh the next big global conflict so I'm

92:15

not so much I again don't get me wrong

92:17

these are bad right these potential

92:19

flareups these problems this conflict

92:21

here in the Middle East these are all

92:22

bad people are suffering

92:24

but I think about the next actual global

92:27

conflict and when that occurs right just

92:32

like another pandemic's going to happen

92:33

right it's it's not like we're not going

92:35

to get another pandemic um when the next

92:38

big global conflict occurs I think what

92:41

we're going to find is that the pain has

92:43

brought to the Homeland a lot quicker

92:46

right so what I mean by that is uh say

92:50

you're in the US well we know that

92:54

Nations that don't necessarily have us

92:56

interests at heart China let's let's

92:58

let's focus on China because they are

93:00

you know close to the top of the Heap

93:01

and they're motivated to get to the top

93:04

um not again not saying it's going to be

93:05

a shooting match but the point being is

93:08

every day uh the critical infrastructure

93:10

critical systems in the US are being

93:12

tested and poked and prodded and looked

93:15

at and mapped out and there's a reason

93:17

why that happens right so they're

93:19

developing A playbook that says in the

93:21

event that it should happen and we have

93:24

a global conflict we are going to shut

93:26

down everything we can shut down in the

93:28

US suddenly all power goes off your

93:32

water treatment facilities aren't

93:33

working you can't move fuel around you

93:36

can't get fuel Pharmaceuticals aren't

93:38

being delivered no food is being

93:39

delivered can't get cash out whether you

93:42

want cash or not at that point um the

93:44

idea being is we're going to bring the

93:45

pain to the Homeland right immediately

93:47

that's what you want to do and will

93:49

there be a a Connecticut element will

93:51

you actually have a shooting match with

93:52

you know troops on around yeah I'm not

93:55

sure that ever goes away but the next

93:57

global conflict is going to be fought in

93:59

a way that that we have a hard time

94:01

understanding and then it'll be up in

94:02

space as well they've you know the

94:04

Chinese have spent a great deal of

94:05

effort on uh directed energy weapons and

94:09

one of the points of that is essentially

94:11

to knock out Satellite Systems right you

94:13

think about you take away take away

94:15

satellite structures you know whether

94:16

it's starlink or or any of the satellite

94:18

systems up there you shut down GPS right

94:21

people can't move you shut down the

94:22

internet my God people are losing Lo

94:23

their minds right um can't do Tick Tock

94:27

and uh so it's you know not to make

94:30

light of it because we're talking about

94:32

a different type of warfare and so

94:36

that's kind of the thing that I worry

94:38

about if you if you said what are people

94:39

really worry about well yeah top

94:41

concerns always you know China and

94:43

Russia and Iran but it's the

94:45

infrastructure and it's a way that it's

94:46

going to be brought to the Homeland

94:48

that's going to create I think a level

94:50

of pain that most people aren't going to

94:53

be willing to put up with for very long

94:55

when you say they're going to bring pain

94:57

to the Homeland were you saying the US

94:59

were going to shut down their

95:01

infrastructure no I'm I'm saying that

95:03

whoever again I'm just as a u it could

95:05

be any you know it could be the EU in a

95:07

conflict it could be the US and nato in

95:09

a conflict with another but the point

95:11

being is that you know they don't they

95:13

don't map out infrastructure for for no

95:15

reason at all who's mapping the

95:16

infrastructure uh well Russia China okay

95:18

there might be our infrastructure our

95:19

infrastructure we're doing the same

95:21

thing people always say they say well

95:22

you're doing the same well you better

95:24

hope that whether it's the UK or whether

95:26

it's Australia whether it's us that you

95:28

hope that we're engaged in the same

95:30

activities because that's where this is

95:31

is is going to end up going um having

95:34

said that you know if someone had said

95:36

we're going to be engaged in a massive

95:37

land War World War I Style with with

95:40

trenches and very little ground gain and

95:43

and lots of bombardment over people

95:45

would said nah that's never going to

95:46

happen again but that's happening in

95:48

Ukraine right now it's happening in

95:49

Ukraine you can go you know the Imperial

95:50

War Museum in London which is a

95:52

wonderful Museum they've got a World War

95:54

I exhibit and you go through the World

95:56

War I

95:57

exhibit and you you you look at it and

96:00

you realize the same thing is taking

96:02

place you look at the aerial photographs

96:03

of the front line and you see the trench

96:05

lines here in in in Ukraine it's it's

96:09

stunning and we're just making the same

96:11

mistakes over again it's funny how

96:13

history has a strange way of repeating

96:15

itself yeah because we don't we like to

96:16

think that we learn but we're dealing

96:18

with the same old humans with the same

96:20

old emotions and Egos and ideologies and

96:22

stuff over and over again so it's

96:25

because humans haven't changed you're

96:26

right you're absolutely yeah that's

96:27

right how are how are you preparing on a

96:29

personal level if if you're seeing that

96:31

some of these a lot of guns and ammo

96:33

really no I'm kidding well no I'm not

96:35

kidding but that's not how I'm preparing

96:37

I just like to you know load up because

96:39

you're saying you don't believe

96:40

Americans and you know westerners really

96:43

understand how the next big global

96:45

conflict will

96:47

look yeah so is there a way they can

96:49

prepare for such a conflict well well on

96:52

one level uh

96:54

you know people need to read as much as

96:56

they can and and pay attention right I

96:58

mean get as many different sources of

97:00

information don't just read one outlet

97:02

that you happen to agree with um but you

97:05

know try to be as informed as possible

97:08

um which uh you know I think sometimes

97:12

it's difficult to do because we're all

97:13

busy right we're all putting food on the

97:15

table and trying to take care of

97:17

families and whatever but um so I think

97:20

there's there's an element of of folks

97:21

just trying to be informed

97:24

and then you know that would be look I

97:27

mean the pandemic that occurred the

97:28

covid-19

97:31

thing if if people were really really

97:34

watching what was going on you know

97:36

October 2019 right there was you there's

97:40

this weird situation going on in China a

97:42

couple of cities were were quarantined

97:45

and that started to Bubble Up and and

97:47

people were paying attention to it I I

97:48

was getting notifications about you know

97:50

what the hell's going on in China um

97:53

well before there was any Declaration of

97:56

a problem right and so and and and the

97:59

Wuhan lab was mentioned

98:01

repeatedly um so I think just being

98:04

informed is one of the best things that

98:06

people can do and then you know I'm not

98:09

a prepper um but it's always good just

98:12

to you know be prepared for a natural

98:16

crisis right power goes out because

98:18

there's a blackout fine you know there's

98:20

a you know whatever the reason may be um

98:23

just just be a little aware of and have

98:25

a plan of some sort that says if there

98:27

is a natural disaster not saying a

98:30

shooting match then what do I do what's

98:32

my C plan I got kids at school how do I

98:34

reach them we're so unprepared because

98:36

in our lifetimes we've never had a war

98:39

so we I grew up I'm about 32 years old

98:41

now I assume Wars happen in other places

98:44

they don't happen in the UK or in LA or

98:47

New York they happen over there so I'm

98:50

comfortable and I'm complacent to some

98:52

degree MH like I could never imagine

98:55

even a adversarial plane flying over my

98:57

city yeah there's a there's a level of

99:00

uh We've we've all

99:02

gotten we've all gotten I don't want to

99:04

say soft necessarily but look every

99:06

generation wants it to be easier right

99:09

my parents uh were older when they had

99:11

me they they were born in 1919 and 1920

99:15

right and they went through the um you

99:19

know the tough times Economic Times They

99:21

went through you know a couple of wars

99:24

um they wanted it better for their kids

99:27

right now you know their parents my

99:30

grandparents wanted it better for them

99:32

right and so on and so you that's human

99:34

nature you want to be doing the best for

99:36

your kids you want it to be better for

99:38

that generation I think eventually you

99:40

reach uh diminishing returns right and I

99:44

do worry that that's kind of where we're

99:45

at I you know I look at my own kids and

99:47

look nobody's out there you know in in

99:50

in here or over here or whatever there's

99:52

there's certainly places in the world

99:53

where that's not true but you know the

99:56

these areas here that we're talking

99:58

about we're not out worrying about

100:00

whether we can collect enough food and

100:01

clean water necessarily you know we're

100:03

worried about um you is my Wi-Fi signal

100:06

strong enough but it's interesting when

100:08

you were talking about Israel earlier

100:09

you said how Israel had got a bit

100:12

comfortable so they started infighting

100:14

right and what you're seeing over in the

100:16

United States and other parts of Europe

100:18

is infighting it's like we've got

100:19

nothing better to do so we're arguing

100:21

over identity politics and are getting

100:23

more woke and it's more divided because

100:25

I don't know it's like we have nothing

100:26

better to do right and also that's being

100:28

fueled look they you never want to

100:30

underestimate the impact of the

100:32

disinformation campaigns run by I mean

100:34

again I keep going I sound like I'm just

100:36

constantly throwing out the same bogey

100:37

man but look it's that's the way the

100:39

world is China Russia in particular Iran

100:41

has proven itself to be very Adept at

100:43

this at disinformation campaigns that

100:45

prey on whether it's in in the EU or

100:48

whether it's in the US or elsewhere that

100:50

prey on what they view as

100:51

vulnerabilities so it goes back to what

100:53

we were talking about before about

100:54

recruiting an asset right or identifying

100:57

weaknesses and leverage well they look

100:58

at the US and they go you know what if

101:00

we if we kind of just keep poking at

101:01

that racist issue we keep you know

101:03

poking it at woke issues right I mean

101:06

that's very divisive and it's and it

101:07

does right it works so the next thing

101:10

you know they're they're putting

101:11

together a a a bot they're throwing out

101:13

some misinformation or disinformation on

101:16

on X someone looks at that and goes yeah

101:18

that's that's right then they just

101:19

forward it on to their friends and their

101:21

family and it just keeps building so the

101:24

the the those campaigns have a a real

101:27

significant impact on on on the west

101:30

because we're not inclined for whatever

101:33

reason we're not curious enough or we

101:35

don't have enough time or whatever to

101:37

look at a piece of information and go is

101:38

this even credible what you say to

101:40

people that think that's just completely

101:42

impossible it's a conspiracy theory

101:43

there's no way China and Russia are

101:46

involved in misinformation there's no

101:47

way they're trying to tear us apart yeah

101:49

uh you know what all they need to do is

101:51

is a little uh fact-based research spend

101:54

a little time they don't have to look at

101:55

one side or another look across the

101:57

board at at at a variety of of uh uh

102:00

think tanks and research institutes that

102:02

that focus on this sort of thing and no

102:05

there's look there's there is no doubt

102:08

there is a a a concerted effort to

102:11

influence whether it's an election and

102:13

and they're not trying necessarily to

102:14

get anybody to win they're just trying

102:16

to undermine the the the the concept of

102:18

democracy they want to create some chaos

102:20

that that's from their perspective

102:21

that's a win so do you know Russia

102:23

wanted Trump to win that's a good

102:25

question I don't know if they did I

102:27

think they've made a mistake or they've

102:28

calculated wrong here because I know

102:30

there's sort of a Trope out there that

102:32

says well he's Putin's puppet well we

102:34

also have to remember that was a very

102:36

large disinformation campaign or

102:38

misinformation campaign you know I don't

102:40

want to make it sound more nefarious but

102:42

people swallowed that Hook Line and

102:44

Sinker and then ran with it right over

102:46

this idea that uh oh my God look at the

102:48

dossier so I think um I you know there's

102:54

there's sort of this narrative that says

102:55

okay well yeah Putin definitely wanted

102:57

Trump to win because Trump's going to

102:58

completely get out of Ukraine I don't

102:59

think that's going to happen um and you

103:02

know there's already been reporting that

103:03

he had a call with uh with Putin already

103:05

now the Kremlin saying oh that call

103:07

never happened but according to Western

103:08

reporting he had a call and he said you

103:11

are not to to uh intensify this War uh

103:15

and then basically setting down a marker

103:17

now again we won't know until we know

103:20

until you know he gets out there and he

103:21

starts you know putting more people in

103:23

place I'm very curious to see who he

103:25

puts in in at the Pentagon at sorry at

103:28

the defense department but um because if

103:31

I was Putin I know Trump has ran his

103:34

whole campaign saying he's gonna end

103:36

this war and if I'm Putin I go that

103:38

means that I don't have to throw more

103:40

men at the front line I can get my

103:41

economy back Putin also wants to end

103:44

this war but Trump if Trump doesn't end

103:46

that war in the next four years the

103:49

Democrats are going to get in because

103:51

they're going to say you said you were

103:52

going to end the war with out there

103:53

fighting you said you're going to end

103:54

this but think about it if he does end

103:56

the war then they're going to say well

103:58

yeah that's because you know you and

104:00

Putin like each other and and yeah and

104:02

you gave away you know some Ukrainian

104:03

territory well the reality is look Putin

104:07

he he annexed crimeia during Obama's

104:11

administration he invaded during Biden's

104:14

Administration he knew what he had he

104:16

knew what the response was going to be

104:18

now now look people say well you know

104:20

Biden you know to his credit you know he

104:22

kind of rallied and he pushed for more

104:23

support and yes that's absolutely true

104:26

but Putin engaged in this during his

104:29

time right because I think he knew or he

104:32

felt he knew maybe that's more important

104:34

he felt he knew what he was going to get

104:36

now he wasn't anticipating that NATO

104:38

response was going to be his Hardline

104:40

and that's a good thing I'm glad that

104:41

Biden has done that Biden has also

104:45

withheld authorization to use long range

104:48

Munitions to Target Russian military

104:51

sites that are being used to Target

104:53

Target Ukraine right now you could argue

104:55

that until Putin feels some pain or

104:57

Ukraine is in a better offensive

104:59

position of some sort that you can't get

105:01

people to the negotiating table and

105:03

again if you want to end the conflict

105:04

you're probably going to want to do that

105:06

uh unless you just want Putin to overrun

105:08

Ukraine if you want to if you want that

105:09

to happen then stop support and that's

105:11

what's going to happen but I think you

105:14

know the the the narrative I think is a

105:16

little bit off I'm not because yeah

105:19

you're right if if the war continues

105:21

right I'm not sure the Democrats have as

105:24

much you know to to play off of but I

105:26

think if if the war is ended then I

105:28

think what they'll say is H you gave it

105:30

away acting as if somehow Ukraine could

105:33

have won and gained all their territory

105:35

back which is unrealistic I think it's

105:37

more more compelling to say we stopped

105:39

all the wars and I think for Americans

105:41

right now I think they want to look we

105:42

saved your money we stopped sending

105:44

billions there we stopped the war people

105:45

aren't dying anymore I think that's much

105:47

more compelling narrative then I don't

105:49

think Americans care as as much this is

105:51

a guess about giving away a little piece

105:54

yeah okay I yeah I was I you're right I

105:56

that was my mistake I think you're

105:57

you're right in the sense that um if the

106:00

war is still ongoing yeah the Dems have

106:02

the Democrats you lied you said you shut

106:04

it down in day one yeah no I see what

106:05

you're saying from an electoral

106:07

perspective down the road uh four years

106:09

from now wow 2028 so if I'm Putin I'm

106:11

going I know Trump he's got he's

106:14

incentivized to stop this thing and you

106:16

know I can so that that puts me in a

106:19

stronger position because if Trump

106:20

doesn't stop it then maybe Eric Trump's

106:22

not going to get in next year or whoever

106:23

or JD Vance is yeah I mean I think Putin

106:26

also I think is smart enough to to

106:28

realize to remember that um it was the

106:32

Trump Administration that authorized

106:33

lethal Aid to Ukraine to begin with uh

106:36

the back during Obama Biden years they

106:39

did not authorize lethal Aid into

106:41

Ukraine and despite um despite uh

106:46

apparently crime annexation was going to

106:48

be a red line and it wasn't there's no

106:50

safe like a Simply Safe the sponsor of

106:52

today episode and who this next story is

106:54

brought to you by there's something I

106:56

never told you guys that happened a

106:57

couple of years ago right here in the

106:58

Dio Studio you might remember that when

107:01

I said we'd lost the audio files for

107:03

Mel's episode who was a former Spice

107:06

Girl I didn't say how or why we'd lost

107:09

the audio files well the reason we lost

107:10

the audio file was because someone broke

107:12

into our studio at night time and stole

107:14

all of our cameras and a few of our key

107:16

hard drives which contained those audio

107:19

files it was a shocking day and it led

107:21

us on a quest to figure out how to

107:22

secure our building and that's when I

107:24

discovered Simply Safe who are now a

107:25

sponsor of this podcast interestingly we

107:27

did have security at the time but the

107:28

type that we had only triggered an alarm

107:30

once Intruders were inside the building

107:33

what I like about Simply Safe is their

107:34

active guard outdoor protection which

107:36

notifies you and their live monitoring

107:38

agents when suspicious activity is

107:40

detected outside of your building

107:42

especially if it's an unfamiliar face

107:44

and most security providers don't have

107:45

the type of AI technology it also means

107:47

that guards can trigger alarm systems or

107:49

turn on spotlights which deter Intruders

107:51

from entering your property in the first

107:53

place if we'd had Simply Safe installed

107:55

at the time it likely means that we

107:57

would have known earlier that Intruders

107:59

were trying to get into our building at

108:00

3: in the morning and we could have

108:02

acted to secure the building straight

108:03

away so this is your reminder to make

108:06

sure your home and workplace is secure

108:08

Simply Safe as offering my listeners in

108:10

the United States an exclusive discount

108:12

of 60% off your new Simply Safe security

108:14

system when you sign up for a select

108:16

professional monitoring plan you'll also

108:18

get your first month free just visit

108:20

simply.com diary to customize your plan

108:23

right now and remember there's no safe

108:25

like a Simply Safe we mentioned

108:28

disinformation Tik Tok mhm I mean Tik

108:31

Tok has ties to China has Origins to

108:33

China right do you think Tik Tok

108:37

is the the interesting thing about Tik

108:39

Tok so I worked in social media for 10

108:40

years is Tik Tok as a platform the

108:43

algorithm is so

108:46

unbelievably a addictive um what how

108:49

would I describe it I guess the word is

108:51

the algorithm is so powerful and you

108:54

notice this anyone that uses Tik Tok

108:55

you'll notice this because if you post

108:56

something on your page and you have a

108:57

million followers the post could either

108:59

get a th000 views or 10 million views

109:03

and when when I think about algorithms

109:05

the variance in views you're getting

109:07

basically are an expression of how

109:08

powerful the algorithm is so on

109:11

Instagram say you have a million

109:12

followers and you post something the

109:14

variance between how many views you're

109:15

going to get is quite low but on Tik Tok

109:18

it's wide so what the algorithm is doing

109:19

is it's saying take that and show

109:21

everyone take this show no one and what

109:25

this means is that the so this is why

109:26

it's so addictive to young people

109:28

because everything they're seeing is

109:30

really really interesting stuff and they

109:32

care a lot less about how many followers

109:34

you have and it's more about is this

109:36

really really interesting so as a as a

109:39

platform it's super addictive it can put

109:41

you in an echo chamber faster than

109:43

anything because if I'm looking at

109:44

videos about I don't know X it's going

109:46

to keep showing me the most interesting

109:48

emotional fear Centric videos about that

109:50

thing no boring yeah you're going to see

109:51

no boring so do you think there's a

109:53

chance that Tik Tok is is being used by

109:56

one of our foreign adversaries to divide

109:58

us oh sure yeah I think I think social

110:00

media is look in the old days if you

110:02

wanted to influence hearts and Minds if

110:04

you wanted to change uh uh say you were

110:06

interested in in uh turning the

110:08

population in where Kenya you know

110:10

Nigeria ner um then it was kind of old

110:16

school stuff right you would how am I

110:18

going to get um information out there

110:21

I'm going to I'm going to recruit a

110:22

bunch of journalists right local

110:24

journalists and I'm going to get them to

110:25

publish stories right maybe there's a

110:27

radio station I'll recruit somebody who

110:29

can put stories on the radio technology

110:31

has given uh the ability to do covert

110:35

action campaigns um propaganda

110:38

disinformation whatever you want to call

110:39

it um you know a real jump start right

110:43

so the concept is the same I'm trying to

110:45

influence opinion I'm trying to you know

110:48

get viewers whatever it is um trying to

110:51

change hearts and Minds

110:53

but uh you can do it much faster right

110:56

and and that's the type of thing the us

110:58

would have done to their adversaries

110:59

right the US would literally send a

111:04

entrepreneur undercover into these

111:06

countries to start a perfectly

111:08

legitimate business with his family

111:10

they'd find a way to potentially fund it

111:12

in some way to make sure it was

111:14

successful and he might be starting a

111:16

social media app in Russia undercover

111:19

like that's the type of thing the CIA

111:20

and other you know maybe m

111:23

other would do it's um you're looking

111:26

for ways to I mean you wouldn't

111:28

necessarily want to say okay I'm going

111:29

to go into China I'm going to go into

111:30

Russia and start a a business right

111:33

because now that's that's problematic

111:34

from an operational perspective right

111:36

but you're going to use the technology

111:38

for sure to get to as many eyeballs as

111:42

possible and so yes I mean you know Tik

111:45

tok's a a great example of that there's

111:47

a reason why you Chinese citizens can't

111:50

access Tik Tok inside China right I mean

111:53

if you think about that is this is Tik

111:54

Tok you know uh is is it uh is it

111:57

beneficial to our kids well if it was

112:01

Tik Tok could probably be available

112:03

inside China uh but it's not um it's a

112:06

it's it's a tough one I we deal with

112:09

that on a personal level all the time

112:10

trying to you know figure out how much

112:11

screen time you know and what the what

112:13

the kids can access now they're getting

112:15

older so it's you know you're kind of

112:17

fighting a losing battle on that one

112:19

some people think that there's like a

112:21

back Channel where t um China are

112:23

harvesting data from the back end of Tik

112:24

Tok in some way and I you know much like

112:28

you I'm less likely to believe those

112:30

kinds of conspiracy theories but one

112:32

theory that makes logical sense to me is

112:34

if I was China and I wanted to sew

112:36

division in the United States what I

112:38

would do is make an make an app a social

112:40

media app that has a really really

112:43

powerful device of algorithm which

112:45

really really is strong and I would just

112:48

make it succeed in the country I don't

112:49

need the data because what as you said

112:51

what I'm going to do is I'm going to

112:53

Pop I would say yes that's that's the

112:56

that's a a good point and you see that

112:58

based on what you're saying I don't have

112:59

anywhere near the level of understanding

113:01

of of the app world but but you see that

113:04

when you you know um just say okay oh

113:08

I'm interested in that look at that

113:09

there's a protest over here right next

113:11

thing you know you're getting you know

113:12

40 protest uh videos or whatever um but

113:16

I would say also they still want data

113:19

right they they thrive on collecting

113:23

Mass amounts of information and so um

113:27

you know I again I I'm don't know that

113:30

that Tech world uh well enough to to get

113:33

into a conversation about that but it is

113:36

it is clear based on their uh economic

113:39

Espionage and efforts over the past that

113:42

they love nothing better than to collect

113:45

as much information as possible and it

113:46

doesn't even have to be on a Target that

113:48

you think know no wonder they're they're

113:50

targeting Ron or they're targeting a

113:52

company that makes sense they'll go

113:53

after anybody really um and it is yeah

113:57

so I but I I think for the most part

114:00

when you talk about um social media what

114:04

I worry about the most is this tendency

114:06

for people not to question not to be

114:09

cynical or not to be at least curious

114:11

and say where's this come from and if

114:14

they if if everyone would just do that

114:16

because there is no other defense at the

114:18

end of the day you don't want the

114:19

government telling you what you can see

114:21

and what you can't see I don't think

114:22

anyway but there's no there's no other

114:25

defense in the front line which is the

114:27

individual with their smartphone looking

114:29

at something and saying and then

114:31

stopping for at least a moment to say

114:33

where's this information coming from is

114:34

it credible let me check uh elsewhere

114:37

before I send this on to my family right

114:40

and create you know more conflict just

114:43

just take the time to be quizzical it's

114:45

difficult because we all have like

114:46

confirmation bias right so we're we're

114:48

looking for what we want to believe true

114:51

and so it's just thinking about that you

114:53

just see it you saw it in this election

114:54

cycle if that is what I wanted to

114:56

believe and what I think is um right

114:58

then I think that's true and I will

115:00

share that and you see it in the

115:02

election cycle as someone who is this

115:03

sort of outside Observer I'm watching

115:06

disinformation on both sides I'm

115:07

watching them lie about Trump and I'm

115:09

watching them lie about Kamala on both

115:11

sides and I'm watching it happen and

115:12

going oh no that's a lie that's a lie

115:13

that's a lie that's a lie that's a lie

115:14

but both sides are enraged and they

115:16

think they're the the sort of Bastion of

115:18

truth it's so interesting but the the

115:20

hard edges are are equally problematic

115:23

right and the problem we have is you

115:24

know much much like the conflict in

115:27

Ukraine on the front lines in the

115:29

trenches there people are sitting in

115:31

their trenches throwing hand grenades at

115:32

each other and there's nobody living in

115:34

the middle anymore right and you know

115:37

it's almost become a a nasty word to say

115:39

compromise but I don't know how you get

115:41

meaningful things done you know without

115:44

the ability to listen to to both sides

115:47

and say okay well that that idea

115:49

actually kind of makes sense or that

115:50

idea doesn't make sense but but at least

115:51

to work together but nobody is in the

115:53

center for the most part or if they are

115:55

they don't make any noise right random

115:58

idea random thought I just had um Scott

116:00

Gallow was on my podcast and he said

116:01

there's a 33% chance that Trump dies in

116:04

office based on his age in

116:06

BMI like statistically he's he's the age

116:09

he's at and the the BMI he has there's a

116:11

33% chance he dies while he's in the

116:13

next four years I just

116:15

wonder what that might do to this whole

116:18

thing because if if Trump drops dead one

116:20

day in the United States people aren't

116:22

going to believe that was

116:25

innocent the destabilizer I just you

116:27

know the one of the one of the best

116:29

results that came out of this election

116:30

was the size of the result right that

116:33

was important regardless of who won and

116:36

you know I had I don't know how many

116:37

conversations with a variety of people

116:38

on the you know on both sides of the

116:40

spectrum of the politics and and they

116:42

all kind of felt the same way which was

116:44

okay well whoever wins I just hope it's

116:45

convincing so that we don't then

116:48

struggle with this over the next four

116:50

years um but you're right we what

116:54

happens in the next four

116:56

years I've got my own theory of how it

116:58

plays out but yeah um I think um Again

117:02

part of it depends on on how good the

117:04

Democrat party is at at introspection

117:07

not very good not very good I don't

117:09

think so uh but I don't think it's it's

117:12

still the government right it's still

117:14

the US government and we have to

117:16

remember people are you know they're

117:17

very upset about the idea that oh my God

117:19

you know maybe the Republicans have all

117:20

three they have the white they have the

117:22

Congress they have the Senate um but

117:24

that's been the case

117:26

for many going back I don't know how

117:28

many administrations but several at

117:30

least five or six where the president

117:32

started out with control of both houses

117:34

and so you know the lesson from that

117:36

usually is that uh not a lot really gets

117:39

done it's still a very large machine and

117:42

so I know people are you know look they

117:45

they spent people spent a long time

117:48

saying if Trump wins it's the end of

117:50

Life as we know it it's the end of

117:51

democracy oh my my God this is going to

117:53

be and then you know a day and a half

117:55

later President Biden you know comes out

117:57

and goes you know we're going to be just

117:59

fine then people are like well what the

118:01

[ __ ] was all that talk about the end of

118:03

the world then right it's politics it's

118:05

a narrative but it's gotten so um

118:09

hyperbolic there's just like this you

118:11

have to take it to the far extreme no

118:13

matter what you're saying right and so

118:15

then now people have a hard time

118:16

absorbing that well but you told me to

118:17

to go out in the street and Rend my

118:19

clothing and cry and Nash my teeth and

118:21

and now you're telling it's going to be

118:22

okay what you know so I think we're

118:25

going to be just fine and we would have

118:27

been just fine if we had the other it's

118:29

a very resilient Nation it's a despite

118:33

these things that we've been talking

118:34

about it's a pretty resilient world

118:36

right so um I think you know there's not

118:39

going to be we're not going to see 10

118:41

million people deported for instance

118:43

right I don't I don't think that's going

118:44

to happen will we have a tougher border

118:46

policy will there be some deportations

118:49

yes will they start with uh folks who

118:51

are in the country illegally who have

118:53

committed crimes well yes is that a

118:55

problem uh I I don't know is anyone

118:58

upset if someone who's got a criminal

119:00

convictions and is here illegally is

119:02

deported you know I guess maybe there's

119:05

maybe there's some issue there but um

119:08

you know is so I

119:10

think we tend to get so over the top on

119:14

whether we're talking about left or

119:15

right that the reality is

119:20

usually there's not the sea change that

119:23

people anticipate so I think we're going

119:25

to be okay that's why I I'm still I'm

119:28

optimistic that this next Administration

119:31

will hold the line realizing that

119:33

holding the line is the best way to get

119:36

folks to the table to come up with a

119:38

settlement in Ukraine and Russia in

119:40

Ukraine and Russia sorry exactly and you

119:43

know again I'm more cynical about this

119:45

region just because I think nobody

119:47

really wants to deal with the Iranian

119:49

regime and so fine yes we get ceasefires

119:52

doesn't mean anything in the long term

119:53

no we'll be dealing with this conflict

119:56

you know our kids will be dealing with

119:58

this conflict um so I'm a little bit

120:00

more reluctant to to say happy things

120:03

about that um anyway kids just to close

120:08

off if you were had to give your

120:09

children advice on how to be successful

120:12

based on everything you learned at your

120:13

time in the CIA on how to climb whatever

120:16

ladder that they aspire to climb in

120:17

their life what would you say to them uh

120:19

well I'll tell you what I do say to them

120:21

which is

120:23

my job as a parent is not to raise uh

120:27

average kids there's enough

120:30

mediocrity uh out there right my job is

120:32

to raise exceptional children and that

120:36

means they have to not give it 150% I

120:41

don't know what that is and people talk

120:42

about that you got to give 110% but you

120:44

have to work a little bit harder than

120:47

everyone else right and your gain your

120:51

result is is that much more it's it's

120:53

it's it's really shocking you just have

120:56

to work a little bit harder and you can

120:58

always do a little bit more than you

120:59

think you can do right um it's hard to

121:02

explain that to kids because they think

121:04

they're bulletproof they think they've

121:05

got uh you know 2,000 years ahead of

121:08

them they they don't understand how time

121:11

passes but if it's if it's one thing I

121:13

tell them I mean aside from the basics

121:15

you know just be honest be loyal uh be

121:18

kind um it's this idea you just you have

121:21

have to put in the effort and if you do

121:24

you can I don't want to say you can do

121:26

anything you you probably don't have the

121:27

genetic build of LeBron James right so

121:29

you're probably not probably not doing

121:31

what he's doing

121:33

but that's that's it it's and and I

121:36

always felt it's just it's it's a it's a

121:38

simple thing but if I've learned one

121:41

thing in in whether it was in the agency

121:43

or out all you got to do is work a

121:45

little bit harder what about people

121:48

advice you give them to you know cuz I

121:51

spoke to Andre bustan in the podcast and

121:53

he talks about motivation and

121:54

manipulation being two sides of the same

121:56

coin when you think about what stands in

121:58

the way of your life when you think

121:59

about the sort of geopolitical issues

122:00

where we were describing it's all just

122:03

people your business at the moment is

122:05

people my business is people even doing

122:08

this podcast it's trying to understand

122:10

people um one of the things I got from

122:12

you which I think is just really

122:14

unappreciated is just the remarkable

122:17

power of just list listening and let

122:18

letting someone else talk so you can

122:20

understand them is there anything else

122:22

you think about if you're trying to

122:23

create a good sales person um as it

122:26

relates to

122:27

people you can't I suppose a psychotic

122:32

or could but you you can't fake um

122:35

empathy you can't fake um real interest

122:39

right you can't fake um uh enjoyment of

122:43

people right and and I I do think folks

122:48

even if they're not trained they're

122:49

they're they're pretty good at spotting

122:51

that bad right there pretty good

122:53

spotting if people are being uh

122:55

disingenuous

122:57

so um it's it's really it's really that

123:01

I mean you have

123:03

to with with I mean I don't want to

123:06

dwell too much on business but in that

123:08

world when I'm talking to my folks um I

123:12

just know some of them aren't going to

123:14

enjoy the process of sales if we're

123:16

talking about sales they're not going to

123:17

enjoy going out and doing business

123:18

development but they do an amazing job

123:21

on the other as ects of the work right

123:22

and all that work keeps clients coming

123:25

back right so it's horses for courses I

123:28

you know I I think you know people are

123:30

made up differently and and you can't

123:32

ask everyone to do the same thing um the

123:36

only things you can control I keep going

123:37

back to the same thing with because I

123:39

keep thinking about my kids now that we

123:40

talked about them is they can't like the

123:43

middle boy you know he plays basketball

123:45

it's all he wants to do he plays

123:46

basketball he goes to an academy down in

123:48

Florida IMG which is an amazing place

123:51

and it's a sports academy for the most

123:54

part um

123:56

and he can't control how tall he is

123:59

right how how I mean he can work on how

124:01

fast he is I suppose but you know those

124:03

sort of things but he can control how

124:05

hard he works and he can always work

124:07

harder than the next guy you you think

124:10

about it I've been in situations before

124:11

where I thought I cannot take one more

124:13

step and then you think well yeah I can

124:15

take one more step right it's not it's I

124:17

know again this is not an epiphany but

124:20

people forget that right people

124:22

sometimes lose sight in part because

124:25

they're not pushed or they're not

124:26

challenged or the circumstances mean

124:28

that they don't have to be pushed or

124:29

Challenge and so people get away from

124:32

understanding exactly what they're

124:33

capable of accomplishing if they really

124:35

think about it so that's all I I all I

124:38

ask for my folks is is you know be

124:40

honest work hard um keep the clients

124:43

happy and you know Bob's your uncle but

124:46

um you know people right now are going

124:48

Mike that's it that's your advice Bob's

124:49

your uncle

124:51

you said you like you like you think

124:53

life is much more simple than most

124:55

people portray and I think hard work is

124:56

definitely one of those things that um

124:59

is both controllable and it creates such

125:01

a disproportionate winning advantage

125:04

that's exactly right that's a much more

125:05

elegant way than if you're not I'm to

125:07

I'm going to steal

125:08

that but it does yeah but it's it does

125:12

and and it's not sexy because who wants

125:14

[ __ ] hard work people want tricks and

125:16

TI there's got to be some so what do you

125:18

do how do you how do you tell if

125:19

somebody's like no just you know what

125:21

just yeah unass the sofa work a little

125:23

bit harder and you're right it's not a

125:24

popular thing to say um but I think

125:27

people are capable of it and more so

125:29

than they realize we have a closing

125:31

tradition on this podcast where the last

125:32

guest leaves a question for the next not

125:33

knowing who they're leaving it for and

125:35

the question that's been left for you is

125:37

what do you think is the most important

125:39

thing that has happened in your life to

125:41

create your

125:46

success wow you obviously have some

125:49

smart guests on here I'm I'm already

125:51

jumped to the next point where I'm like

125:53

ah what's your favorite

125:57

color um you know what the thing I would

126:00

have to

126:02

say um this is going to

126:05

sound what's it going to sound like I

126:07

don't

126:08

know I think I

126:12

um

126:14

had I think I had the probably the best

126:18

parents that you could ask for I had my

126:21

dad was an amazing individual amazing

126:24

individual

126:27

and they I think more than anything

126:31

right if I I have to go all the way back

126:32

look meeting my my wife Emily I mean

126:35

she's the smartest person I know uh the

126:37

funniest person I know so but you know I

126:39

met her you know going on 20 years ago

126:42

now so what happened before the 20 years

126:44

and what happened leading through if I

126:46

you know if I said that then you know

126:47

the first half of my life I think it was

126:49

my parents right and no doubt about it

126:50

my dad uh was just uh such a uh role

126:55

model and and just laid a foundation um

127:00

but I would say then the next half would

127:04

definitely be uh my wife I think it's

127:06

that's what does it as the people what

127:08

was the model that your dad left

127:10

you part of it was the work ethic my dad

127:13

worked hard um and he he never

127:18

complained right he he didn't and he and

127:22

he loved my mother just they were

127:24

married for 50 years and that was part

127:26

of it too is I was fortunate I was

127:29

blessed and and I realize it's it's you

127:31

know a lot of people come from very

127:32

different circumstances but I came from

127:34

one of those families where I was there

127:36

was never in question my father was

127:39

fiercely loyal uh to my mother and she

127:41

was fiercely loyal to him and

127:45

um and and and loyalty um I think plays

127:50

an important role in in what you're

127:52

doing I think people people see that as

127:55

something that they can count on right

127:57

and that sets you up for Success too I

128:00

think so I would say that was that was

128:04

uh that was probably again the first

128:06

half of my life I would say that's what

128:08

that's what paved the way and then uh

128:11

meeting Emily I completely out kicked my

128:14

coverage as they say yeah did your dad

128:17

know how much you appreciated the model

128:19

of what it is to be a man that you he

128:21

said you yeah yeah I feel good about

128:25

um I remember thinking about that when

128:27

he

128:29

died I remember thinking that

128:35

uh I remember thinking that I was very

128:38

happy that that I had told him sorry

128:40

that I had told him what I thought of

128:42

him right we were very we we were very

128:45

good with each other in terms of talking

128:47

about what we felt um and how uh we

128:51

appre appreciated each other and that's

128:53

that's a really good thing cuz I don't

128:55

think you want someone to go and you

128:57

think well I should have said that I

128:59

should have said should have said

129:00

something different um I was lucky you

129:03

know he uh you know we we had a we had a

129:06

really good

129:09

dialogue

129:10

yeah where does that emotion come from

129:13

you just you know there it's it's I

129:16

think

129:17

it's that's that's Humanity it's just

129:20

how you feel right and and your your

129:25

experiences um you know all my

129:28

experiences with you know my dad were

129:31

just solid you know just going out just

129:34

doing things just getting together just

129:36

meeting up as as you know when when uh

129:40

you know I was older and I'd come I'd

129:42

come back to the States for you know a

129:44

few days and we get together and and uh

129:48

you know just like there was there was a

129:50

a b there that was just really solid and

129:54

I feel the same way with I've you know

129:55

I've got brothers and they're all older

129:57

than I am um and you know that's that's

130:01

that's a tight relationship right so

130:04

yeah I think it's it's good I don't I

130:06

don't get uh I don't get emotional about

130:09

much but but family I do um because at

130:12

the end of the day nobody nobody's going

130:14

to write on my Tombstone that I worked

130:16

my ass off right or that I was a I was a

130:20

real solid

130:22

you know officer or that you know I sure

130:24

built a really nice business it's not

130:26

going to matter it's you know all I care

130:28

about is his family and friends if you

130:31

could write something on his

130:33

Tombstone what would you

130:38

write thanks I don't know what else you

130:41

would say you know just thank you

130:45

um you

130:47

know I did write a little little note he

130:51

was in his uniform when we buried him

130:53

and uh I wrote a little note and tucked

130:55

it in his in his uniform pocket um but

130:59

that's between me and

131:02

him so but I appreciate you bringing

131:05

this up it's nice I mean it is nice to

131:07

talk I would you know I love talking

131:08

about the family um but uh yeah that's

131:13

that's it it's it's not a you know it's

131:14

probably not the probably not the the

131:17

most dynamic answer you get from that

131:19

question I suppose people have more more

131:22

um

131:24

more interesting answers but I don't

131:27

know you know one that would be more

131:29

meaningful

131:31

so anyway I think it's a perfectly I

131:34

think it's a wonderful answer because it

131:36

says so much about your values and where

131:39

you've come from and what's driving you

131:40

and the man that you are and your

131:42

priorities because it's so clear how

131:43

much he meant to you and and it's

131:46

evident to me how you must be paying

131:48

that forward as a man to your children

131:50

as well

131:51

um in any way that you possibly can and

131:53

I think if we understand especially for

131:55

men I think if we understand the role

131:56

model that our fathers set us we we

131:58

understand what we think is important

132:00

and what we think is right yeah because

132:02

my same with my father my father and my

132:04

mother didn't get on but one of the

132:06

things I'll always remember was even In

132:08

the Heat of their like

132:10

conflicts if she needed something mid

132:12

argument he would do it he never left

132:16

because of the kids and so there there

132:19

was clearly a principle in my father

132:20

where

132:22

there was something more important than

132:23

the argument and that is the family the

132:26

love and the taking care of of your

132:28

woman yeah so even now when I'm in a

132:30

relationship if I'm in an argument with

132:32

my girlfriend or we're disagreeing about

132:34

something I will always know that

132:35

there's something more important which

132:36

is my responsibility to take care of

132:38

these people right you and that came

132:40

from my dad that's exactly right that's

132:42

that's exactly right yeah you have to

132:44

know when to bend your spear right and

132:47

you just I think um yeah I I I think

132:50

that's

132:51

if you can if you can pass that sense of

132:56

of uh whatever it is of loyalty of of

132:58

appreciation of Duty of um of hard work

133:03

of honesty if you can pass that along to

133:05

your kids you know you've done your

133:08

job that's why I say it's it's and

133:10

that's what I mean by I'm not here to

133:12

raise average kids I don't mean like

133:14

I've got to raise you know

133:15

multi-millionaire so I've got to you

133:17

know that's not what I'm talking about

133:18

I'm talking about their their character

133:20

and how they deal with the

133:23

world Mike thank you thank you for doing

133:25

what you do it's um as I said before we

133:27

started recording I'm someone that's

133:28

quite naive to these issues and uh part

133:32

of that is because I'm very busy doing

133:33

my own thing so I I try not to talk

133:35

about these things that I don't

133:36

understand but the way that you deliver

133:38

the the information through your book

133:39

through your podcast and even here today

133:41

and on all the shows that I've seen you

133:42

on is incredibly important because it's

133:44

so accessible thank you um and that

133:47

means that people like me can gain a

133:48

better understanding of what's happening

133:49

in the world and then make you know

133:51

better decisions for my life but what

133:53

you know who I'm voting for and why I'm

133:54

voting for them um which are

133:55

consequential to all of us and that's a

133:57

very noble noble cause thaning so thank

134:00

you I know thank you I've enjoyed the

134:02

hell out of this conversation I really

134:04

really have and and uh it's gone by very

134:06

quickly and I apologize for marking up

134:08

your map it's all good thank you

134:11

[Music]

134:13

Mike I'm going to let you into a little

134:15

bit of a secret you're probably going to

134:17

think me and my team are a little bit

134:18

weird but I can still remember to this

134:20

day when Jima from my team posted on

134:21

slack that she Chang the scent in this

134:24

studio and right after she posted it the

134:26

entire office clapped in our slack

134:28

Channel and this might sound crazy but

134:30

at the DI ofo this is the type of 1%

134:32

Improvement we make on our show and that

134:34

is why the show is the Way It Is by

134:36

understanding the power of compounding

134:38

1% you can absolutely change your

134:41

outcomes in your life it isn't about

134:43

drastic Transformations or quick wins

134:45

it's about the small consistent actions

134:48

that have a lasting change in your

134:50

outcomes so so 2 years ago we started

134:52

the process of creating this beautiful

134:54

diary and it's truly beautiful inside

134:56

there's lots of pictures lots of

134:57

inspiration and motivation as well some

135:00

interact developments and the purpose of

135:02

this diary is to help you identify stay

135:05

focused on develop consistency with the

135:07

1% that will ultimately change your life

135:10

we're only going to do a limited run of

135:11

these Diaries so if you want one for

135:13

yourself or for a friend or for a

135:14

colleague or for your team then head to

135:16

the diary.com right now I'll link it

135:18

below

135:21

oh

135:22

[Music]

135:39

[Music]

Interactive Summary

This episode features an in-depth conversation with Mike Baker, a former CIA officer, who discusses geopolitical threats, his experiences in the field, and how the core principles of tradecraft apply to business and everyday decision-making. Topics include the complexities of the Russia-Ukraine war, the geopolitical tensions with China regarding Taiwan, and the underlying psychological strategies of recruitment and intelligence gathering. The discussion also touches upon the personal values and leadership principles that drive Baker's approach to success and family.

Suggested questions

4 ready-made prompts