How Private Equity Ruined American Youth Sports
562 segments
This is the Mandandalay Bay South
Convention Center. And for 3 days in
April, it turns into an unintentional
display of everything that's wrong with
American youth sports. The
transformation begins on Good Friday of
Easter weekend when crews turn the
massive Bayside exhibit halls into
uniform row after uniform row of
volleyball courts, 123 to be exact. The
next two days will be absurdly busy.
Every individual court will be played on
non-stop by a rotating set of eight
teams from 7:30 a.m. to 9:30 p.m.,
making for just under 1,000 teams in
total passing through the event. Each
team composed of on average 10 players,
two coaches, and at least an equal
number of parents and family members
means conservatively about 24 people per
team. So about 24,000 people at the
event. With all the whistles, squeaking
shoes, and screaming U11 to U15 girls,
it'll be uncomfortably loud. Without a
single window, with absurdly long
concession lines, and absurdly priced
concessions, to the uninvested onlooker,
it would all seem an impressive but
rather unappealing event to spend much
time at. But to the players, coaches,
and parents duking it out on the court,
this weekend means everything.
This youth tournament, the Red Rock
Rave, is sanctioned by USA Volleyball,
which as the sports governing body
grants the tournament status as a
national qualifier. And to everyone in
the club volleyball ecosystem, national
qualifiers are a big deal. Depending on
which division a team is in, if they win
or play second or third in some, they'll
get a bid to go to USAV Nationals in
either Indianapolis or Minneapolis.
Getting to play at nationals represents
a massive achievement for clubs,
coaches, and players. So, right now, for
every one of the 950 teams in Las Vegas,
a bid is the dream, even if there are
only 31 up for grabs in total. And
they're all paying a pretty penny for
the privilege of chasing the stream. For
the clubs, the regional host, the
hotels, the sanctioning body, this
tournament means big business. To play
in this tournament, each of these teams
paid $950. And that is just the tip of
the iceberg. Plastered on the court map
distributed around the event is the logo
of the company facilitating lodging for
this event, KC Sports Housing, reminding
each parent of the tournament that this
is what's called a staytoplay event.
This term is just what it sounds like, a
quidd proquo. Book hotel reservations
through a handful of options that the
tournament has partnered with and your
team will be allowed to play. In this
situation, it limits options to the
Mandandalay Bay, Luxor, and a host of
other gaming and non-gaming hotels while
still offering pretty competitive rates.
It's a pain, but it's hard to get around
when organizing massive events like
this. In other markets with more
alternatives like Airbnb, Verbbo, or an
extra room at a family friend's house,
stay can feel restricting, and the rates
can also feel artificially high. Whether
fair criticisms or not, stay to play
brings into focus the travel cost. There
are only a few teams here locally. The
rest are from everywhere. Colorado,
California, Idaho, Texas, Missouri, even
Hawaii. Three nights at a hotel then
along with airfare or gas and a mom and
a daughter are looking at a bare minimum
of $1,000, making their $95 share of the
tournament fee if split between 10 girls
easy to overlook. Throw in a sibling or
a spouse coming along, and the number
goes up to ballpark $1,500
for the weekend in travel. The costs
continue to accumulate. Outside food and
drink are prohibited, so if you don't
smuggle it in, you're resigned to $12
chicken sandwiches, $10 slices of pizza,
or especially popular with the kids, $16
asai bowls throughout the three days.
Tournament merch is critical for the
kids to proudly show off they've been to
a big tournament, so another $50 on a
hoodie. Should the parent actually want
to watch their kid play, there's an
entry fee of $27.50
plus processing or a $65.40 3-day pass.
For the rest of the family back home,
these games are streamed, but the
entry-level subscription for that
service is $44.85.
Then there are the coaches. While the
kids coaches are hardly compensated,
they're at least put up in a hotel and
given a travel stipend, which parents
are also on the hook for. They pay for
this as well as the tournament fee
through what are called club dues. Way
back in July, when teams were selected
after the tryyout window opened, parents
agreed that on top of paying for their
kid to get four to six of these
tournaments, they'd also pay their share
to rent gym space, compensate a coach,
cover the club's insurance, and
generally keep the lights on. These run
about $2,500 to $7,000 depending on the
club age group, and travel. While the
total may differ widely, what's common
in the space is for these club dues to
be pretty opaque. You're told the total,
but you're not exactly sure where that
money is going. Put all of this together
for a kid to play club volleyball with
the travel, food, entrance fee, and
every other nickel and dimeming that
comes with each tournament, and you're
looking at a $2,000 weekend at the very
least. Now, multiply that by four
tournaments, then add, say, $3,500 in
dues, and a pretty typical competitive
club experience is now nearing $11,500
for just the season. And if a kid starts
as a 12-year-old and ends up pursuing it
all the way through their 18's year, the
last as a junior, there are six more
years of these $11,500
seasons coming. It's an extremely
expensive investment for a budding hobby
or passion. But club parents aren't
treating this like any old hobby. Just
like the kid that's pursuing the ever
meaningful bid, the parent is pursuing a
dream, too. The dream of a college
scholarship. Of course, the odds here
are similarly small to the chances of
getting a bit at just this one
tournament. There are nearly the same
amount of players as there are in all
division 1 volleyball without even
considering how many are on scholarship.
But anything that could potentially help
cover costs of an education that's
anywhere from $25,000 to $65,000 a year
or beyond feels worth pursuing. There
are lower levels of college play, too.
Division 2, Division 3, NIA, but none
offer full scholarships that pay all
college dues and room and board. Not all
even provide partial scholarships to
cover the ballooning costs of college.
But the dream is too deeply ingrained to
look too closely at the numbers. The
people set to turn a profit off these
youth endeavors won't allow it. Drowning
out the less than stellar statistics
that fewer than 6% of youth volleyball
players will play in college and that
only 1.2% 2% will play division one are
the posts from tournament organizers on
how many college coaches will be in
attendance at this tournament. And it's
more than likely you'll run into any
reference to those slim odds when the
local club only brings up the college
players they have produced when trying
to secure a kid's commitment and their
parents' club dues. The dream is even
culturally perpetuated too as it's a
massive honor within a parent's social
circle to send a kid into college
athletics. Something they can boast
about, something they believe serves as
a badge of good parenting. This dream
shared by the kid, their coach, and the
parent is so pervasive, so strongly
held, and such a money generator that
private equity has now gotten involved.
Across Red Rock Ray's 123 courts,
there's an increasingly common, albeit
pretty minimalist and easy to miss logo
adorning jerseys. It reads LOV, but is
pronounced love, and it represents the
most dramatic private equity invasion
into the sport. League 1 volleyball is
technically a professional league with a
highly unique business model. Only 2
years old, the league has six teams with
a few more on the way. What makes it
novel is that this league also owns 90
youth volleyball clubs around the US.
This at the youth level is presented as
a real plus. It means that the league
supports the grassroots of American
volleyball. It means there's a direct
pipeline to the pros, furthering the
excited buyin from players and parents
alike. Love is equal parts aspirational
and empowering. The company is proudly
women-ledd and in their words committed
to empowering women both on and off the
court. And seeming likely each team in
the league is at least in part owned by
professional or former professional
athletes, also often female. For those
playing at, say, Club V and Salt Lake
City, well, the club's name hasn't
changed while the coaches and leadership
has remained the same. There's now the
common occurrence of one of the love
Salt Lake City players walking into
their gym. It's all very exciting
because it just makes the big leagues
feel more possible. But for Love, the
grassroots involvement isn't just
something they're doing out of the
goodness of their hearts. And it's
certainly not why they've received
private equity buyin. To run this
upstart professional league, Love needs
those club dues. And to maximize the
return, private equity needs to see
those club dues go up. The money that's
propped Love up has come through a few
different channels. It has brand deals
with Adidas and Ski. It has broadcast
deals with USA and ESPN. And it's been
backed by some major investments by
private equity firms. The league has
garnered somewhere near $200 million in
total funding led by the Atwater Group
and supplemented by Aries Management
Fund and Left Lane Capital, while some
individual teams are now owned by groups
like Synergy Sports Capital. To make the
private equity ties even deeper, Love
CEO Caitlyn Gao came from Bane Capital.
And what's brought all this private
equity interest into the space is not
the upside of the professional league,
but the confidence in a robust outlook
for the youth side going forward. In
Hatwwaterat's words, it's not just about
generating returns, but also leveraging
their experience in media and
entertainment to engage fans in exciting
ways and inspire the next generation of
exceptional athletes. Effectively, they
believe in love as a way to further
perpetuate the dreams that have parents
spending more and more money on youth
sports. This is private equity strategy
beyond volleyball, too. Because not only
is the space a $40 billion a year
sector, it's growing at 8 to 10% a year.
And most importantly, the system is
self-perpetuating. Parents are
increasingly finding themselves in a
spending war for more specialization and
more training time. So more money goes
into the machine. It all creates a flow
that looks like this. The most money and
the most players at the grassroots level
with a disproportionate amount of money
in comparison to the players rising up
the triangle. And because of this
structure, the incentives from the
perspective of the development of the
game are skewed. There's the most
pressure on youth sports not to teach
the game first and foremost, but to sell
dreams of bids and college scholarships
so that the gym stays full and the club
dues keep flowing in. Then, of course,
there's the issue of access in the first
place. As a player ages out of
introductory public programs and into
middle school and high school sports
that are publicly funded, these publicly
funded programs are so competitive and
carry so few players that a kid
practically has to play club to make the
team. And if club costs upward of
$10,000 a year, the sport immediately
turns a massive swath of the population
away. Beyond the cost, the travel and
time away from work is extreme. And then
there's the cultural factor that the
game begins to feel like it's only for
the wealthy and upper middle class. All
this has become so ingrained in the
American athletic consciousness that it
all feels second nature. But this
structure isn't the norm elsewhere.
This is called Lamasia. Located in the
suburbs of Barcelona, Spain, this is
hallowed ground in the soccer or
football world. This is the historical
youth training site for FC Barcelona's
upandcomers. Like at a competitive
volleyball club in the US, the kids here
were recruited and vetted and are
continually pushed to grow as players.
Unlike in the US, these kids, some of
which grew up to be Leono Messi, Andreas
Sinesta, Lamin, a few of the game's
biggest names in the past few decades,
do not pay to be here. rather the
opposite. They're being trained in the
club's ways while also getting paid. In
this situation, the financial aspect of
the triangle is effectively flipped. As
FC Barcelona is one of the world's
largest and most important clubs,
there's a lot of money coming in at the
top of the triangle, which it then
reinvests in its youth development to
ensure that the club is able to stay one
of the largest in the world by
developing worldclass talent. Perhaps
it's unfair to compare a startup
volleyball league in a country that
shown the appetite at the youth level
for the sport, but has never developed
its own domestic professional league
successfully with one of the largest
clubs in the world's biggest sport. So
instead, take baseball. It's America's
national pastime, and it's a profitable
entity at the highest level in the US.
And yet, the extreme financial demands
of youth baseball still exist in a very
similar manner to those in volleyball.
To keep up with your peers, you can't
just play at your high school or middle
school. You need to play travel
baseball. The dream here is alluring,
too. Perhaps even more so. A highlevel
high school player can get drafted
directly into Major League Baseball and
receive a multi-million dollar signing
bonus at 18 years old. For those that
aren't quite as promising, there's still
the college option and the everuring
scholarship. This isn't just a baseball
issue. In all American sports that
generate revenue at the professional
level, hockey, American football,
basketball, little of the massive profit
brought in from endless sponsorship and
massive broadcast deals is making it
down to the youth level to fund the
development of the next generation as
college athletics sever the connection
of the pipeline. This is a uniquely
American problem as the US's massive
expensive university system also happens
to be the dream destination for top
athletes. They want to play a sport in
college. Colleges offer scholarships,
stipens, and due to increasingly relaxed
rules over what is considered an amateur
athlete, some ways to make some money,
but they don't invest in youth programs
like FC Barcelona. And they shield the
major revenue professional leagues from
the pressure to invest in youth sports,
too. Rather than growing through a
development pipeline where the highest
levels water the grassroots with access
to the game, coaches, and further and
further training for those that show the
most promise, in the US, it's
increasingly on the drive of kids and
the pocketbooks of parents to begin
opening opportunities for higher level
play. It's all hyperindividualist,
hyperco competitive, hyper American. But
it just isn't working.
Across the sports landscape in the US,
there are indicators. At the highest
level of American sports, there's a
notable uptick in second generation
professionals. Ethan Holidayiday, who
signed the largest baseball signing
bonus out of high school, is the son of
legendary baseball player Matt Holiday.
Aio O'Neal and the sisters Madison and
Avery Skinner are dominant for the US
volleyball team and are daughters of
former NBA players. It's not nepotism.
These young athletes are all extremely
deserving, driven, and capable. Rather,
these second generation stars are
becoming more common because their
athletic advantages are matched by
financial advantages. They've had the
access through their professional
athlete parents to elite training and
high level coaching their whole lives.
In soccer, no country has more youth
players than the US, but because of
barriers to access, clubs incentivized
to turn a profit and compete for
meaningless tournament results rather
than player development. The US men's
side failed to qualify for the 2018
World Cup, while tiny Iceland held its
own against mighty Argentina. And in
2022, the men's team was knocked out
comfortably by the Netherlands, whose
population is slightly smaller than that
of the state of New York. Then there's
Norway. At the last Winter Olympics, the
nation of under 6 million stacked up 18
gold medals, six more than the US, and
41 total medals, eight more than the US.
In the US, it's common for older
generations of coaches and leaders to
lament the fact that everyone now gets a
participation trophy. Not only is this
not true, as youth sports have never
been more competitive here than they are
now, but the nation might benefit from
it. Norway's sporting success is largely
attributed to its youth model that
prioritizes finding joy in the sport and
an internal love for improving at the
practice rather than just focusing on
results and scores and finishing
positions. A naysayer might push back
and say that it is culture and heritage
pushing this tiny nation in front of the
US in the Winter Olympics. That'd be
wrong. Their best triathletes are the
best in the world. Their distance
runners are beating East Africans and
Americans alike. Even their best men's
beach volleyball partnership is better
than any the US can produce. The United
States is unapologetically a sports
obsessed nation. It's a massive nation,
too. And yet, in sports that the rest of
the world participates in, the US does
just okay. The talent is here, but it's
just not getting the opportunity. But
the problem is bigger than American
national teams and the highest reaches
of athletic achievement. It's a public
health issue. In a 2025 hearing, the
subcommittee on early childhood,
elementary, and secondary education
discussed the negative ramifications
that declining numbers in youth sports
has on kids. With 70% of all US kids
quitting organized sports by 13, there's
an everinccreasing number of kids losing
out on the benefits that sports bring.
Without sports, kids are more likely to
think negatively of themselves. They're
more likely to become obese. They're
less likely to succeed in school, less
likely to be an active parent and raise
an active child. Hyper specialization is
burning kids out. Hyperco competitive
resultsoriented approaches are leaving
too many kids in the cold. What seems
increasingly clear is that when we push
on our youth programs to produce wins,
winners, and more and more dollars,
we're setting ourselves up to lose in
the long run.
Miselline incentives and subsequent bad
outcomes also happens to be in the
broadest sense the story of Mustard's
latest episode of Unsealed called The
Virus That Infected Boeing, which is
available right now on the sponsor of
this video, Nebula. If you're watching
this video, you're likely aware of
Mustard's YouTube channel. And if you're
anything like me, you too are always
excited when their team releases another
spellbinding story with some of the most
amazingly detailed and cinematic 3D
motion graphics about some of the most
interesting aviation and engineering
stories out there. I was genuinely so
excited to find out that accompanying
Mustard's last YouTube release on the
context behind the first Boeing 707
barrel roll was an episode of Unsealed
that tells the larger story about
Boeing's rise and its problems. And I
really think it illustrates just how
valuable a product Nebula is. Now, I may
be biased because I have a role in
shaping what Nebula is as a streaming
service, but because it's a platform
designed by creators, we can run the
platform in a way that allows everyone
on the platform to push really good
content in that direction. And Unsealed
is a perfect example. Unsealed is a
series that falls under the Nebula Plus
umbrella, meaning when the Mustard team
puts all the work their videos require
to produce an airtight script and
stunning visuals, they're never really
going to come across story lines and
ideas that don't perfectly fit the video
at hand. But rather than tossing those
out, with Nebula, they become another
standalone video. The upshot is that
everyone wins. Fans of the creator now
have another 20-minute hyperdetailed
story to dive into. Nebula adds another
banger to its catalog. And the Mustard
team makes the most of all the research
they put into a similar story. And
Nebula Plus is just one of the perks of
the streaming platform. There are Nebula
First videos that release early and
without ad reads that allow you to stay
a week ahead on some of your favorite
serieses like Tom Scott's England which
brings all the exploratory intrigue and
joy of discovery of the Tom Scott videos
of old to Tom's Homeland. Then if you
like our content, there's just so much
more of it available through Nebula as
Nebula originals. Whether it's our
comedy stuff like Abolish Everything,
our travel competition Jetlag the game,
or our documentary projects like Scav,
we've now put a whole lot of content
we're really proud of on Nebula over the
past few years. If you'd like to give it
a try, use my link
nebula.tv/wendoverproductions
to get 50% off an annual subscription.
That's just $30 a year or $2.50 per
month. It's not a lot, but it would mean
a lot to us. So, thanks.
Ask follow-up questions or revisit key timestamps.
This video explores the problematic state of youth sports in the United States, specifically using competitive volleyball as a case study. It highlights how the industry has shifted toward an expensive, hyper-competitive, and profit-driven model characterized by 'pay-to-play' structures, intense parental pressure driven by the dream of college scholarships, and the increasing involvement of private equity firms. The video contrasts this American model with more successful, development-oriented systems in other countries, and argues that this profit-first approach, combined with barriers to access, is ultimately detrimental to child development and public health.
Videos recently processed by our community