HomeVideos

British Deep State Lines Up Starmer Replacement

Now Playing

British Deep State Lines Up Starmer Replacement

Transcript

194 segments

0:00

All right, Alexander, let's do a very

0:02

quick video on what is happening in the

0:05

the UK. What is going on in the UK? What

0:07

is going on with Stalmer? He's still

0:09

there. He's still hanging around. And

0:11

he's also seizing uh a a Russian uh

0:14

shadow fleet tanker. I don't know if

0:16

it's a Russian tanker, a Russian flag,

0:19

but he's he's very proud of himself for

0:21

for taking that tanker. Anyway, what is

0:22

going on with uh with Kmer and his

0:24

government? I it it's not it's not say

0:28

Russian flagship. But the point is

0:31

Starmmer had to do this because as

0:34

you've reported he's just lost his

0:36

entire uh defense ministry leadership.

0:39

The defense minister John Healey

0:42

resigned. Uh he subordinate uh the

0:44

assistant defense minister Khn who's a

0:46

former military man also resigned. They

0:50

um criticized Starmmer because he's not

0:53

spending enough on the military and not

0:56

supporting Ukraine strongly enough. I

0:58

mean that was the subtext that I mean

1:00

that's incredible to think that that's

1:01

what they what's that's that's what they

1:04

are saying. So, um, what that tells me

1:08

is that, um, everybody now expects that

1:12

Starmmer will be gone within a few weeks

1:15

at most and that there's already

1:18

preparations for a battle for who is to

1:21

become the next prime minister. And

1:23

Healey, I suspect, plans to become wants

1:28

to run as prime minister. Perhaps not so

1:31

much because he expects to win, but

1:34

because by campaigning as the next Labor

1:37

leader and prime minister, he wants to

1:40

make absolutely sure that commitment to

1:43

Project Ukraine in Britain remains total

1:47

and commitment to the defense buildup

1:50

remains total. And um by campaigning, by

1:55

involving himself, that will push people

1:58

like Bernham, assuming it is Bernham or

2:00

Raino or whoever uh from the so-called

2:04

left, they're not real left, who stands,

2:06

you know, for the Labor leadership.

2:08

They're going to be told, "Look, if

2:11

you're going to become prime minister,

2:14

you have to go along with Project

2:16

Ukraine because if you don't, these

2:18

hardliners are there always ready to

2:21

take over." That is my assessment of

2:23

this move. I think it was much more

2:26

carefully planned and far more carefully

2:28

prepared than some people are saying.

2:31

>> Yeah, absolutely. I agree with you. Uh,

2:33

I'm no expert in the UK, but when I saw

2:35

the the Healey letter, his resignation

2:37

letter, the first thing that I thought

2:38

of is that this was carefully planned

2:40

>> and this was all about Ukraine and the

2:42

military-industrial complex and to put

2:44

focus. I mean, that whole resignation

2:46

letter was all about putting focus on

2:49

getting more money to the military

2:51

>> and keeping the money going to Project

2:53

Ukraine. That's the message that they

2:54

wanted to get out there. And basically,

2:56

the deep state, the UK deep state told

2:58

Healey, "Look, it's a sinking ship

3:00

anyway. Resign. we'll put together this

3:02

resignation letter and you're going to

3:04

do your part to keep the money flowing

3:07

and and to keep project Ukraine going.

3:09

That's what the whole thing was about.

3:11

And and Hilly said, "Sure. What does he

3:12

have to lose?"

3:14

>> Gets after the Somber administration and

3:16

he prepares for for the next move.

3:18

>> Exactly. Your your your assessment is

3:22

completely correct. So they're preparing

3:25

for the postarmmer era, but they're

3:28

preparing to make sure that the policy

3:32

remains unchanged, which of course dooms

3:35

Britain to a continuation of a policy,

3:38

which as we've discussed many times in

3:40

many programs, ensures further economic

3:43

decline.

3:44

>> Well, it's all about uh military now. I

3:47

mean, everything in Europe is is about

3:49

the military. Everything in the UK is

3:50

about the military. It's it's really

3:52

strange. ironic projection, I guess you

3:55

could call it, but they were going on

3:56

and on about how Russia's in a war

3:57

economy and Russia's turning into a war

3:59

economy.

4:01

>> They were basically telegraphing what

4:03

they're planning to do, which is their

4:06

entire economy is going to be built on

4:09

war, on military spending, on military

4:12

funds, on project Ukraine, on all of

4:14

these things

4:15

>> which which having now been in Russia, I

4:17

can only say that the Russian economy is

4:20

not. But you're absolutely correct. This

4:23

is all about also sustaining

4:26

indefinitely the geopolitical conflict

4:28

with Russia.

4:31

>> Uh what is uh what is happening with

4:34

Stalmer? Uh the pl the plan that we

4:37

talked about uh about 3 four weeks ago

4:41

which was to keep stmer in place at

4:43

least until uh Burnham is ready. That

4:46

seems to be what they've executed,

4:47

right?

4:48

>> Yes. Yes. So he that's what's going to

4:51

happen. There's going to be this

4:52

bi-election in Mafield. The expectation

4:55

now is that Bernham will probably win.

4:59

If he wins, he's already made it clear

5:01

he's going to challenge Star. I think at

5:04

that point there's a fair chance that

5:07

however stubborn he is, Star will resign

5:10

and we will have Andy Bernham basically

5:12

crowned prime minister almost

5:14

immediately. So that then of course

5:17

already has the deep state ready to take

5:20

you with with this healing move to make

5:23

sure that Burnham sticks to the course

5:26

that's been set. So that's that's one

5:29

possibility. There's still an outside

5:31

chance Burnham could lose. But if he

5:35

does lose, I think already the

5:38

assumption is the universal belief is

5:40

that Starmer is so unpopular and so

5:44

discredited that in that case there will

5:47

be a challenge probably from Angela

5:49

Raina who's now got the tax issue behind

5:52

her. She will probably be the next

5:54

person to bring the challenge. She will

5:56

become the new prime minister and the

5:58

new Labor leader. But the Healey Khn's

6:03

resignation, the statement, all of those

6:05

things again have set her the limit as

6:09

to what she can do. So they're already

6:11

planning for the for the world, the

6:15

political time before Stara. They want

6:18

to make sure that when Starmmer goes,

6:20

whoever takes over continues in exactly

6:23

the way that um that he has that he has

6:27

been.

6:27

>> Right. All the policy has already been

6:29

decided on the the foreign policy,

6:31

Russia, the immigration policy, all all

6:33

of it's been decided. The question is

6:35

now who who do we put in place uh to to

6:38

to take over for Stammer? How long just

6:40

a final question, how long could could a

6:43

Burnham or Rainer or whoever it is,

6:45

>> how long could they last as prime

6:46

minister? Is is there a chance they

6:48

could go for for one, two, three years

6:51

or

6:52

>> Yes.

6:53

>> looking at another rotation after say

6:55

another year or so? I I I think provided

6:58

they stick to the line that they're

7:00

being given which they will they they

7:03

will continue until the election. It

7:05

will be like Rishi Sununak. Richie

7:07

Sunnak took over from Boris Johnson if

7:09

you remember because in in circumstances

7:12

that were in some ways similar and other

7:13

ways different but once the decision was

7:16

made to appoint Sunnac they couldn't

7:18

really do it all over again. So Bernham,

7:21

however unpopular he be, let's assume he

7:23

miss Bernham, however unpopular and

7:26

unsuccessful he becomes, he will

7:29

nonetheless drag it out all the way to

7:32

the general election. Uh when of course

7:34

he will go down um in exactly the same

7:37

way that Sunnak did in the election in

7:40

>> which which is when real quick.

7:42

>> Oh, do you know is it 2029 or 2028?

7:45

>> It's 20 It's 2028, I believe.

7:48

>> 2028. Okay, we'll see. Anyway, okay.

7:50

Yeah, they can get there. All right,

7:51

we'll end the video there. The

7:52

dand.locals.com. We're on X. We're on

7:54

Rumble. We're on Telegram. Go to Durant

7:55

shop, pick up some merch. Link is in in

7:57

the description box down below.

Interactive Summary

This video analyzes the political instability within the UK government under Prime Minister Keir Starmer. The speakers discuss the strategic resignations of defense leadership, specifically John Healey, as a calculated effort by the UK 'deep state' to ensure the continuation of military funding and commitment to 'Project Ukraine,' regardless of who succeeds Starmer. They predict a transition to a new leader, such as Andy Burnham or Angela Rayner, who will be forced to maintain these established policies until the next general election in 2028.

Suggested questions

3 ready-made prompts