British Deep State Lines Up Starmer Replacement
194 segments
All right, Alexander, let's do a very
quick video on what is happening in the
the UK. What is going on in the UK? What
is going on with Stalmer? He's still
there. He's still hanging around. And
he's also seizing uh a a Russian uh
shadow fleet tanker. I don't know if
it's a Russian tanker, a Russian flag,
but he's he's very proud of himself for
for taking that tanker. Anyway, what is
going on with uh with Kmer and his
government? I it it's not it's not say
Russian flagship. But the point is
Starmmer had to do this because as
you've reported he's just lost his
entire uh defense ministry leadership.
The defense minister John Healey
resigned. Uh he subordinate uh the
assistant defense minister Khn who's a
former military man also resigned. They
um criticized Starmmer because he's not
spending enough on the military and not
supporting Ukraine strongly enough. I
mean that was the subtext that I mean
that's incredible to think that that's
what they what's that's that's what they
are saying. So, um, what that tells me
is that, um, everybody now expects that
Starmmer will be gone within a few weeks
at most and that there's already
preparations for a battle for who is to
become the next prime minister. And
Healey, I suspect, plans to become wants
to run as prime minister. Perhaps not so
much because he expects to win, but
because by campaigning as the next Labor
leader and prime minister, he wants to
make absolutely sure that commitment to
Project Ukraine in Britain remains total
and commitment to the defense buildup
remains total. And um by campaigning, by
involving himself, that will push people
like Bernham, assuming it is Bernham or
Raino or whoever uh from the so-called
left, they're not real left, who stands,
you know, for the Labor leadership.
They're going to be told, "Look, if
you're going to become prime minister,
you have to go along with Project
Ukraine because if you don't, these
hardliners are there always ready to
take over." That is my assessment of
this move. I think it was much more
carefully planned and far more carefully
prepared than some people are saying.
>> Yeah, absolutely. I agree with you. Uh,
I'm no expert in the UK, but when I saw
the the Healey letter, his resignation
letter, the first thing that I thought
of is that this was carefully planned
>> and this was all about Ukraine and the
military-industrial complex and to put
focus. I mean, that whole resignation
letter was all about putting focus on
getting more money to the military
>> and keeping the money going to Project
Ukraine. That's the message that they
wanted to get out there. And basically,
the deep state, the UK deep state told
Healey, "Look, it's a sinking ship
anyway. Resign. we'll put together this
resignation letter and you're going to
do your part to keep the money flowing
and and to keep project Ukraine going.
That's what the whole thing was about.
And and Hilly said, "Sure. What does he
have to lose?"
>> Gets after the Somber administration and
he prepares for for the next move.
>> Exactly. Your your your assessment is
completely correct. So they're preparing
for the postarmmer era, but they're
preparing to make sure that the policy
remains unchanged, which of course dooms
Britain to a continuation of a policy,
which as we've discussed many times in
many programs, ensures further economic
decline.
>> Well, it's all about uh military now. I
mean, everything in Europe is is about
the military. Everything in the UK is
about the military. It's it's really
strange. ironic projection, I guess you
could call it, but they were going on
and on about how Russia's in a war
economy and Russia's turning into a war
economy.
>> They were basically telegraphing what
they're planning to do, which is their
entire economy is going to be built on
war, on military spending, on military
funds, on project Ukraine, on all of
these things
>> which which having now been in Russia, I
can only say that the Russian economy is
not. But you're absolutely correct. This
is all about also sustaining
indefinitely the geopolitical conflict
with Russia.
>> Uh what is uh what is happening with
Stalmer? Uh the pl the plan that we
talked about uh about 3 four weeks ago
which was to keep stmer in place at
least until uh Burnham is ready. That
seems to be what they've executed,
right?
>> Yes. Yes. So he that's what's going to
happen. There's going to be this
bi-election in Mafield. The expectation
now is that Bernham will probably win.
If he wins, he's already made it clear
he's going to challenge Star. I think at
that point there's a fair chance that
however stubborn he is, Star will resign
and we will have Andy Bernham basically
crowned prime minister almost
immediately. So that then of course
already has the deep state ready to take
you with with this healing move to make
sure that Burnham sticks to the course
that's been set. So that's that's one
possibility. There's still an outside
chance Burnham could lose. But if he
does lose, I think already the
assumption is the universal belief is
that Starmer is so unpopular and so
discredited that in that case there will
be a challenge probably from Angela
Raina who's now got the tax issue behind
her. She will probably be the next
person to bring the challenge. She will
become the new prime minister and the
new Labor leader. But the Healey Khn's
resignation, the statement, all of those
things again have set her the limit as
to what she can do. So they're already
planning for the for the world, the
political time before Stara. They want
to make sure that when Starmmer goes,
whoever takes over continues in exactly
the way that um that he has that he has
been.
>> Right. All the policy has already been
decided on the the foreign policy,
Russia, the immigration policy, all all
of it's been decided. The question is
now who who do we put in place uh to to
to take over for Stammer? How long just
a final question, how long could could a
Burnham or Rainer or whoever it is,
>> how long could they last as prime
minister? Is is there a chance they
could go for for one, two, three years
or
>> Yes.
>> looking at another rotation after say
another year or so? I I I think provided
they stick to the line that they're
being given which they will they they
will continue until the election. It
will be like Rishi Sununak. Richie
Sunnak took over from Boris Johnson if
you remember because in in circumstances
that were in some ways similar and other
ways different but once the decision was
made to appoint Sunnac they couldn't
really do it all over again. So Bernham,
however unpopular he be, let's assume he
miss Bernham, however unpopular and
unsuccessful he becomes, he will
nonetheless drag it out all the way to
the general election. Uh when of course
he will go down um in exactly the same
way that Sunnak did in the election in
>> which which is when real quick.
>> Oh, do you know is it 2029 or 2028?
>> It's 20 It's 2028, I believe.
>> 2028. Okay, we'll see. Anyway, okay.
Yeah, they can get there. All right,
we'll end the video there. The
dand.locals.com. We're on X. We're on
Rumble. We're on Telegram. Go to Durant
shop, pick up some merch. Link is in in
the description box down below.
Ask follow-up questions or revisit key timestamps.
This video analyzes the political instability within the UK government under Prime Minister Keir Starmer. The speakers discuss the strategic resignations of defense leadership, specifically John Healey, as a calculated effort by the UK 'deep state' to ensure the continuation of military funding and commitment to 'Project Ukraine,' regardless of who succeeds Starmer. They predict a transition to a new leader, such as Andy Burnham or Angela Rayner, who will be forced to maintain these established policies until the next general election in 2028.
Videos recently processed by our community