HomeVideos

Rick Caruso on California’s Collapse: Broken Leadership, LA Wildfire Failures & the Fix

Now Playing

Rick Caruso on California’s Collapse: Broken Leadership, LA Wildfire Failures & the Fix

Transcript

665 segments

0:00

For people who don't know who Rick

0:01

Caruso is, he's a great developer. You

0:03

walk into one of Caruso's places and

0:05

it's safe, it's clean, you want to bring

0:08

your kids.

0:08

>> Ideology did not save the Palisades.

0:11

Competency would have.

0:13

Running this city is running a business

0:15

for the benefit of the residents. You

0:17

got to make good business decisions. It

0:20

was predictable, Bill. What's

0:21

predictable is preventable.

0:23

>> Rick Caruso now has a golden road in the

0:26

governor's race if he wants it.

0:28

>> What's happened to LA over the last

0:30

decade is just tragic. It's sad to

0:33

watch. Ladies and gentlemen, please

0:36

welcome Rick Caruso.

0:39

[Music]

0:48

What's this about?

0:48

>> Great to see you, brother. Thank you for

0:50

coming. Thank you very much. All right.

0:53

Make my rounds.

0:55

Thank you. Good to see you. Good seeing

0:56

you.

0:58

Hello, everybody.

0:59

All right.

1:01

Rick, um

1:03

we're 9 months out from the tragic

1:05

fires. So much has happened. So much has

1:07

happened. Karen Bass

1:11

so incompetent, such a disgraziata.

1:15

Disgraziata.

1:15

>> Disgraziata. Disgraziata. My my Italian

1:19

brother in here. But when you when you

1:22

look at it in all seriousness,

1:24

you know, you had some properties there

1:26

and you've always been an innovator.

1:28

Everybody knows The Grove. I spent so

1:30

much time there with my beautiful

1:31

daughter, Lotus, and and my my beautiful

1:33

wife, um Jade. Just

1:36

what a gift you've given so many times

1:38

over to this amazing city and then you

1:41

watch this horrible incompetence.

1:44

And yet you innovated and you

1:47

had these incredible this incredible

1:48

insight that when the fires were coming,

1:50

you would get water

1:52

in trucks

1:54

and bring it to the Pacific Palisades

1:56

and then you found this unique group of

1:58

innovators called firefighters and you

2:00

also brought some of them.

2:02

What did you see

2:04

in this incredible moment of clarity

2:07

that when the fires were coming that

2:09

Karen Bass didn't see? Well, the first

2:12

thing that I did is I stayed in town. Um

2:15

which

2:17

I I I think when

2:19

>> abandon the city. I think when you want

2:21

to be a leader, you should probably be

2:23

present. But uh

2:24

>> Good start. That's a good rule. Listen,

2:26

we learned a lot when we were building

2:28

our resort up in Montecito in Miramar.

2:31

Uh we had fires there that were

2:33

threatening the construction site. We

2:36

were just under construction.

2:38

And I had a very smart guy still doing

2:39

the team, name is Banyan,

2:42

and he's the one that said,

2:44

"We can bring in private firefighters.

2:46

We can bring in our own water trucks. We

2:49

can bring in retardant."

2:51

And listen, here's another rule that's

2:53

really important when you're in the

2:54

commercial side of the business.

2:57

You want the firefighters

2:59

that are working for the city or the

3:00

county

3:02

first and foremost to protect the homes.

3:05

And we know that they should be doing

3:06

that, so we want to have resources to

3:09

protect our buildings so the resources

3:12

aren't taken away from the residential

3:14

areas. That's just I think being a good

3:16

citizen.

3:17

So fast forward to Palisades, we know

3:21

we're in a fire zone.

3:22

We built it with all non-combustible

3:24

materials. We designed it so there was

3:27

no open vents that an ember can get

3:29

into. About 90% of the homes in the

3:31

Palisades and Altadena burned from the

3:34

inside out. Mhm.

3:36

So these wind warnings came and I'm sure

3:39

you all saw them to the point that I

3:42

didn't even believe that they could be

3:43

true. Catastrophic,

3:46

life-threatening winds.

3:48

And our team rallied. We had our

3:52

firefighters,

3:53

our water, our retardant stationed there

3:56

2 days before the fire.

3:58

And we were ready to go. And I'm really

4:00

proud of my team because they not only

4:03

saved the village, but we saved the

4:05

whole block

4:07

of properties. And we were actually on

4:10

the 7th loaning equipment to LA Fire

4:12

Department who was running short of

4:14

equipment. And we were actually loaning

4:17

water cuz we were bringing in our water

4:18

tanks when the water hydrants failed to

4:21

work.

4:21

>> Rick, it's been 8 months, I guess, since

4:23

these fires. Um how much of it is being

4:26

rebuilt now?

4:28

Not enough. I was out there last night.

4:30

Um it's slower than it should be. And

4:33

what is slowing it down?

4:35

What's slowing it down is an enormous

4:36

amount of red tape. I mean, the previous

4:38

speaker's talking about red tape in the

4:40

state of California. We have red tape in

4:42

the city of Los Angeles and the county

4:44

that's ridiculous. But let me just give

4:46

you an example.

4:47

Since COVID,

4:49

we have still not, we being the city,

4:51

has still not called back workers to

4:54

city hall. So plan checkers in LA city

4:57

are working from home.

4:59

You just lost 7,000 homes.

5:03

You would think the first thing the

5:05

mayor would do is say, "You 10 plan

5:07

checkers are now out in the Palisades in

5:10

a construction trailer where the people

5:13

need you." They're still working out of

5:14

a home. Why do the people Why? I I want

5:16

to know why.

5:17

>> Yeah, why?

5:18

>> That makes me angry. You'll have to call

5:20

1-800 Karen Bass. I don't know the

5:22

answer. What's What's your I've I've

5:24

tried to call that number a number of

5:26

times. What is What is your sense of the

5:28

incentives there? What is driving that?

5:31

Is it a union thing? Is it a you're

5:34

going to get unelected because this

5:35

voting block wants to work from home?

5:37

What is the incentive there?

5:38

>> Incompetence. What is no sense. I I

5:41

think this is what it is.

5:43

I I think there's a level of

5:44

incompetence

5:45

that's combined with literally a

5:49

stagnation.

5:51

And there's no urgency to do anything.

5:53

So there's no decision-making.

5:55

And all of us have been in situations in

5:57

business or whatnot where you meet

5:59

somebody that is just not well equipped.

6:02

And so what happens when you're not well

6:04

equipped to make decisions in either

6:07

easy situations or complex situations,

6:09

you sort of freeze up. So the kids were

6:11

on the class?

6:12

Yeah. I'll throw out a theory and get

6:14

your reaction to it, which is California

6:16

is a one-party state and Karen Bass

6:19

doesn't really need to serve the people

6:21

because historically we haven't really

6:22

had competitive elections. What's

6:24

important is that she satisfies this

6:26

political machine that keeps her in

6:28

office. She wasn't a particularly

6:29

distinguished candidate or anything like

6:31

that. She's just been around the block

6:32

for a long time. Yeah.

6:35

And frankly, we had the best candidate

6:38

to ever challenge Karen Bass, which was

6:40

you, who was a successful businessman.

6:42

Unbelievable. And and the proof of that

6:45

is that I love this crowd, by the way.

6:48

This crowd is intelligent.

6:49

>> Yeah, yes, they are.

6:50

>> Yeah, and the and the proof of that was

6:52

was in the fires cuz I think it's pretty

6:53

obvious that the Palisades wouldn't have

6:55

burned to the ground if you had been the

6:56

mayor because you would have made sure

6:58

that there was water in the fire

6:59

hydrants.

7:00

>> Wait, David, what's amazing to me is and

7:02

we're waiting for this action

7:04

after action report, which is

7:05

incredible. We don't even have it yet.

7:08

But I am I was convinced 9 months ago,

7:11

I'm more convinced today that fire was

7:13

completely preventable.

7:15

And if you think I'm wrong and it wasn't

7:17

completely preventable, the damage could

7:19

have been significantly mitigated.

7:21

>> Mhm. The fire department was never

7:23

pre-deployed.

7:25

Where the fire started is the same exact

7:27

place that there was a fire 7 days

7:29

before. I think what we're going to see

7:31

is the fire department did not

7:35

put that original fire out. It smoldered

7:38

and reignited.

7:40

When it reignited, the winds were not

7:42

here yet. The smoke was going straight

7:43

up.

7:45

We had the largest reservoir not filled

7:47

with water.

7:49

I mean, I got the call at night, the

7:51

family was together, your daughter's

7:53

home is burning down and the

7:55

firefighters, their hoses have stopped.

7:58

There is no more water in the fire

7:59

hydrants. And I said, "How can that be?

8:02

We're the second largest city in the

8:03

country."

8:04

Impossible. But listen, I think all of

8:07

it is fixable.

8:09

So I'm an optimist.

8:11

And with the right kind of leadership,

8:13

and I'm not saying it's me. I'm just

8:15

saying in general in this state, in this

8:17

city, in this country, with the right

8:19

kind of leadership

8:21

that is competent, eager, and willing to

8:25

make decisions

8:27

because they want to do what's best for

8:28

the people they serve and not worrying

8:30

about getting reelected,

8:32

great things can happen. And that's my

8:34

hope for the

8:35

>> Why is this happening around the nation?

8:37

When you look at Portland, Seattle,

8:40

Chicago, New York, these cities around

8:43

this country, we're seeing similar kind

8:45

of systems of decay They're blue.

8:48

>> degradation But is it What did you say?

8:50

>> No, he said they're blue.

8:52

But I I I want to like is that is that

8:54

really what's going on or is there is a

8:56

social thing that's going on or a

8:57

societal thing that's going on that's

9:00

causing people to say, "Let's let these

9:02

cities kind of decay. Let's stop doing

9:03

our jobs. Let's keep kind of ballooning

9:06

the the budgets but not delivering any

9:08

results." What is it that's going on? I

9:10

have a little bit different take. I have

9:11

a different take that I think there's

9:12

been a

9:13

a sense of apathy. I think people have

9:16

not gotten engaged. Not enough people

9:18

vote and get involved and we don't hold

9:21

our elected officials accountable. Uh

9:23

people now that run for office believe

9:25

they have an office for life and I think

9:27

that's very dangerous. That was never

9:29

the intent of our founding fathers. It

9:31

was to serve and then go back to your

9:33

private life.

9:34

>> That's right. And and now what we have

9:35

is people just they cycle through it.

9:38

And what we need to do is get more

9:40

people active. I don't care what your

9:43

political persuasion is, get out and

9:45

vote. And but what we have seen,

9:48

particularly, are extremes

9:50

that are very motivated to vote and

9:53

they're moving these uh elected

9:56

officials that are ideal logs into

9:59

positions and this ideology which may be

10:01

well-intended has not had good results.

10:05

>> Have the people of Los Angeles seen

10:06

enough do you think to have the common

10:09

sense

10:10

to put competent leadership in?

10:12

I hope so.

10:13

>> enough? We're going to find out in about

10:15

a year. What do the politicians mean

10:17

when I mean I think I've heard Karen

10:18

Bass say this and I think I've heard

10:20

Gavin Newsom say this that they see

10:23

that what happened in the Palisades is

10:24

an opportunity to reimagine. What are

10:27

they imagining there?

10:30

And how is that different than just

10:31

letting people rebuild their homes?

10:33

I I I can't I can't speak I can't speak

10:36

for that. I can't speak for that. I

10:37

can't speak for that. I can't speak for

10:38

that. I can't speak for that. I can't

10:38

speak for that. I can't speak for that.

10:39

I can't speak for that. I can't speak

10:40

for that. I can't speak for that. I

10:41

can't speak for that. I can't speak for

10:42

that. I can't speak for that. I can't

10:42

speak

10:43

I don't think so. I I think there's

10:45

probably fringe people

10:47

who would like to see zoning changes. I

10:49

don't believe that there should be

10:51

zoning changes

10:52

on the backs of people who have lost

10:54

their homes and their businesses. If you

10:56

want to do that, you want to have that

10:57

discussion, do it in an orderly fashion,

11:00

but do everything you can to get people

11:02

back into their communities, back in

11:04

their homes.

11:05

And I this city and government has got

11:08

to have this culture that we've got your

11:10

back.

11:11

We're here for you and we don't have

11:13

that. And you're not going to get people

11:15

to reinvest in their own homes and their

11:17

own community unless they think the

11:19

city's going to be there with them. How

11:21

how much of the ineptitude of Los

11:24

Angeles

11:25

is derived from the ineptitude of the

11:27

state of California?

11:29

Well, I think it's part and parcel, you

11:31

know, to be honest, but

11:33

I also believe that

11:34

>> So is is Gavin Newsom helpful? Has he

11:36

done stuff to help like when you when

11:38

all the people in LA who are still

11:41

you know, dispossessed and out of a home

11:43

called him, is he able to apply pressure

11:45

to the city of California or is it just

11:47

city of LA rather or is it just chaos? I

11:50

don't think it's chaos. I think actually

11:51

Gavin has done some good things

11:54

waving sequa, waving the coastal

11:56

commission. Those are really smart

11:57

things that he's done. I'd like to see

11:59

him do more What would what would you

12:01

want him to do?

12:03

What he could do is he could demand

12:05

changes very quickly

12:07

and if not, he could exert

12:10

independent California authority to make

12:13

changes.

12:14

These communities, Altadena and Malibu

12:17

and Palisades, they need completely new

12:20

infrastructure. They need all the power

12:22

lines underground. They need new water

12:23

systems. All of that has to be done.

12:26

He's got the power to really make that

12:28

happen and frankly, we've got to figure

12:30

out a way to get the federal government

12:32

to help financially. And I think

12:34

name-calling

12:36

probably is not a good way to build a

12:38

relationship to get billions of dollars

12:40

into the state of California. So I'd

12:42

like to see that stop. Where can you be

12:44

more effective

12:46

as mayor or governor of California?

12:49

I think they're very different. Um

12:51

but I think either one of them. I really

12:53

do.

12:55

I think I think either one of them.

12:57

But I think they have different they

12:58

obviously have different authorities and

13:00

different powers,

13:01

but I think either one can be very

13:02

effective.

13:03

>> You you'd be great. You'd be great in

13:04

either one and um it'd be it'd be great

13:07

to to see

13:09

Thank you. I appreciate that. It'd be

13:10

great it'd be great to get a to get an

13:12

outsider so you know, into politics. The

13:15

thing I I I worry about is in

13:18

California, you've got ballot harvesting

13:19

is legal and checking someone's voter ID

13:23

is illegal.

13:25

And I just wonder if the combination of

13:27

those two things makes it impossible for

13:29

someone outside the political machine to

13:31

get elected. What do what do you think?

13:33

Well, you know, it may David, but I may

13:36

I may give that a try. So we'll see.

13:38

We'll see if it works.

13:40

It didn't go the way I you wanted to

13:41

last time.

13:42

Hold on. Hold on. Hold on. I got I got

13:43

to follow up on this one. You're I know

13:45

the people who have been having some of

13:47

these conversations with you. There's

13:48

one camp that's pushing you to governor

13:51

and the other camp is pushing you to

13:52

mayor.

13:53

How do you make that decision? When are

13:55

you going to make that decision? We've

13:57

got 8 minutes and 53 seconds left here.

14:00

Can we get it done now?

14:01

>> get it done in 8 minutes?

14:03

All right, let's start. Mayor clap.

14:06

Who wants him to go for mayor? And now

14:07

governor. Governor.

14:10

Wow. Wow.

14:12

Wow.

14:13

>> You I just want to let you know right

14:14

now,

14:15

you have the full support of the All In

14:17

platform for whichever one you choose.

14:20

The level of confidence you and I have

14:23

developed a bit of a friendship. We talk

14:24

on text and I every time I go to one of

14:27

your facilities and we talk about the

14:29

detail, the detail that you have at the

14:33

Grove, Pacific Palisades, this

14:35

incredible Montecito property that I got

14:38

to stay at recently.

14:40

That attention to detail

14:43

is what

14:54

Where did this attention to detail,

14:59

the understanding of customers and

15:01

consumers in your private sector life,

15:04

where did it come from?

15:06

I love what I do and if if you go to the

15:09

root of what we do as a company and you

15:12

ask anybody in the company, what is your

15:13

business?

15:14

Everybody in our company is going to say

15:17

to bring joy and enrich people's lives.

15:19

It sounds corny,

15:21

but if you do that, it gives you a

15:24

platform in business that gives you

15:26

permission to do things that your

15:29

competitors are not allowing themselves

15:31

to do.

15:32

It gives you permission to build a place

15:34

called the Grove which you and I talk

15:36

about and you get to run a trolley

15:38

through the middle of it.

15:39

>> Is it really that simple like you're

15:40

building a business and you're like I'm

15:42

just going to enrich the lives of my

15:44

customers and make them happy and your

15:46

competitors literally don't do that?

15:48

Well, my competitors building an indoor

15:50

mall with no trees or light and an

15:53

escalator and So you're just shaking

15:56

your head like how is this how how is

15:57

this even possible? Well, don't you want

15:59

to be in a place that feels good, makes

16:01

you happy? You see trees, you have

16:03

water, you have flowers, there's nice

16:05

music. Nobody's It feels like the

16:07

perfect platform

16:09

or or stadium

16:11

So that's where that platform gives you

16:13

this incredible power and authority to

16:16

go do things. I mean,

16:18

you look at the Rosewood Miramar, our

16:20

resort, we have a full train running

16:23

through it. Everybody's stayed away from

16:25

that property and when I announced we're

16:27

going to build a five-star hotel,

16:28

everybody said you're crazy, you got a

16:30

train running through it. We made the

16:31

train an amenity. Right.

16:34

>> We built a bar next to it with a bell

16:36

that gets rung when the train comes by

16:38

and people celebrate it. Yeah. So that's

16:41

enriching lives. I I just love watching

16:44

people

16:46

enjoy their life and that's what fuels

16:49

my public service and it's what I really

16:51

enjoyed

16:52

when I worked for three mayors, when I

16:54

worked for Tom Bradley and Dick Riordan

16:55

and Jim Hahn.

16:57

You can actually make changes in public

16:59

service

17:00

that makes people's lives better.

17:03

How great is that?

17:04

>> That's great. People don't know this

17:06

widely, but tomorrow is the 175th

17:09

anniversary of the state of California.

17:11

Governor Newsom, it's a great state and

17:15

an amazing place.

17:17

Governor Newsom is giving his state of

17:19

the state tomorrow morning. If you were

17:20

in that seat, what would you say at the

17:23

state of the state tomorrow? What's your

17:25

read on the state of the state of

17:26

California?

17:27

I think the state of California should

17:29

lead the nation in everything that we

17:31

do. I think the state of California

17:32

should have

17:34

the best housing, it should have the

17:35

best school system, the lowest crime

17:38

rate. We should not have homeless living

17:39

on the streets. We should have

17:41

opportunities for people to grow a

17:43

business, raise their family, feel good

17:45

about life, be enriched.

17:47

And we should be in the top of every

17:52

category that you want to measure

17:54

quality of life.

17:56

If if you say we're the fourth largest

17:59

economy in the world,

18:00

which our elected officials say very

18:03

often,

18:05

then act like it and the people of

18:06

California should be benefiting from

18:09

being the fourth largest economy in the

18:11

world.

18:11

>> How would you deal with homeless? You

18:12

got these encampments. We're driving

18:14

around here downtown LA. It had such a

18:17

renaissance for a short period of time.

18:18

It feels like it's devolved again. It

18:21

has. And it just seems to me that it

18:23

just should be zero tolerance for

18:25

camping on the street. Yet here we are

18:28

again with encampments everywhere. What

18:31

would be your approach?

18:33

Well, my approach was simple when I ran

18:35

is you can't allow encampments on the

18:36

street, but you've got to give

18:39

people who are on the streets an

18:40

opportunity to have

18:42

a productive life. So give them the

18:44

services they need, build the housing

18:46

that they need.

18:48

We are spending in the city of Los

18:50

Angeles

18:52

$900,000

18:56

per person that they're removing from

18:58

the streets.

18:59

$900,000.

19:02

>> Per year? Yeah. Oh my god.

19:05

>> There's billions and billions of dollars

19:07

wasted. Redirect that to organizations

19:10

that have incredible track records of

19:12

being successful in Los Angeles, of

19:14

housing people, giving them the services

19:17

for mental health and drug addiction.

19:19

And the first thing you do is you do not

19:20

allow the sale of drugs on the street.

19:22

Right now we do.

19:24

I mean, this that's a crime. It's

19:25

illegal. Don't allow it. It is a crime.

19:28

Yeah. I I mean, if you look at fentanyl,

19:31

it is just a different category of drug.

19:33

We've seen the president who you don't

19:35

agree with everything on, but he's

19:36

taking a pretty hardline stance to the

19:39

point at which he's activating the

19:40

military. Pretty controversial. What's

19:42

your take on that? I think we should

19:44

actually have secure borders and shut

19:47

down the drugs 100%.

19:50

Absolutely.

19:51

>> So in full agreement with the president.

19:53

>> Yeah. I I don't know how you can say I

19:56

want to have a livable society, a

19:57

quality of life, allow people to build a

19:59

business, raise a family, and then at

20:02

the same time you allow drug dealing to

20:03

go on the streets. You just can't do it.

20:05

We have an area out here called the

20:07

Sepulveda Basin. I got a call from a

20:09

resident yesterday

20:11

and this poor resident that lives out in

20:13

Encino was talking about the amount of

20:15

encampments

20:16

in Sepulveda Basin. And what they have

20:19

done now the homeless he's telling me is

20:21

they've made these booby traps

20:24

and connected homemade bombs to them. Oh

20:27

my god.

20:28

>> the police or the fire department try to

20:29

go in there

20:31

this one firefighter was severely

20:33

injured, lost an ear because it hit a

20:34

tripwire.

20:36

And he had called the mayor. The mayor

20:38

said, "Well, it's very complicated to

20:40

try to figure out how to get in there to

20:42

clean it up." It's not complicated. You

20:44

go in there and clean it up. Period.

20:47

Full stop. Period. Full stop. We just

20:48

got to do that.

20:50

So,

20:52

one of the complications here is

20:54

the Democrats don't seem to want to

20:56

clean up the cities.

20:58

The president has checkmated them by

21:01

saying, "If you don't clean it up, I'll

21:03

clean it up." Seems like a midterm

21:05

driven approach. What's your take on the

21:08

National Guard being sent into these

21:09

cities? Because if Karen Bass won't

21:11

clean it up, if J.B. Pritzker won't

21:13

clean it up, is there an argument for

21:16

the president to send the National Guard

21:18

in? It seems like overreach in one way,

21:20

but we're sitting here talking about

21:23

absolute incompetence and a refusal to

21:25

deal with this issue. The people who are

21:26

affected by it are like, "Yes, send the

21:28

National Guard in if that's what it

21:30

takes." What's your take?

21:32

Well, my take on it is sending in the

21:33

National Guard in Washington D.C. is a

21:35

very different situation

21:38

than sending the National Guard into

21:39

L.A. or Chicago.

21:41

Cuz Washington D.C. is a federal

21:43

territory.

21:44

So, that's different.

21:46

What I think should be done

21:48

is we should hold our elected officials

21:50

accountable

21:51

to have a police department that's fully

21:53

engaged and given the authority to

21:55

enforce the laws.

21:57

And we're not doing that. You're not

21:58

backing They're not backing up the cops.

22:02

They're not backing up the cops. The

22:03

cops are not allowed to clean up the

22:05

streets. The cops are not allowed to

22:07

hold people accountable for selling drug

22:08

on the streets. There's a whole bunch of

22:10

protocols in the city of Los Angeles

22:13

that do not allow the cops to do their

22:14

job.

22:16

The any kind of federal

22:18

interference, I think, should be the

22:20

very, very last resort. So, I don't

22:22

support that. I don't support it, but I

22:24

do support a fully engaged leadership

22:28

system that require that the laws be

22:31

enforced and give police

22:33

the opportunity and not only that,

22:37

demand that they enforce the law. Ladies

22:39

and gentlemen, the next governor and/or

22:41

mayor

22:43

of California, Los Angeles,

22:46

Rick Caruso.

22:47

>> Thank you very

22:48

That was fantastic. Great. Thank you

22:49

very much.

22:50

That was great.

22:51

>> very much.

22:52

I got You got it, brother. Appreciate

22:54

you, brother.

Interactive Summary

The video features a discussion with developer Rick Caruso about his insights on effective leadership, the recent fires in the Pacific Palisades, and the systemic issues facing Los Angeles and California. Caruso argues that incompetence, red tape, and a lack of accountability in city governance are preventing effective solutions for problems like rebuilding after disasters and managing homelessness, emphasizing that a business-like, results-oriented approach is necessary for public service.

Suggested questions

4 ready-made prompts