HomeVideos

COL. Lawrence Wilkerson : Trump's Leverage Over Netanyahu on Lebanon Withdrawal

Now Playing

COL. Lawrence Wilkerson : Trump's Leverage Over Netanyahu on Lebanon Withdrawal

Transcript

96 segments

0:00

What, uh,

0:01

control does Trump think he has over BB?

0:04

Do you foresee Trump

0:05

complying with clause one of the MOU,

0:09

which is to get the IDF out of, uh,

0:12

Lebanon?

0:13

>> I think Erats has it right if I'm

0:16

reading between the lines and in some

0:19

places explicitly,

0:21

that what's happening right now is that

0:24

Trump believes he has some measure of

0:26

control over what BB does, but Trump is

0:31

ultimately going to join BB in a second,

0:34

and they think, both of them,

0:37

overwhelming attack on Iran. And it is

0:39

coming, and it is going to come either

0:42

right before the elections or right

0:44

after the elections if BB is successful

0:47

and stays in power. And I would submit

0:49

that it might even happen even even if

0:51

BB's replaced, it just might be delayed

0:53

slightly.

0:55

That is a situation that I think is

0:58

fraught with problems for the immediate

1:01

reasons of let's take a look at the MOU

1:04

and at the trilateral agreement,

1:06

whatever they're calling it. You look at

1:08

them, and they're so contradictory that

1:10

you can't understand exactly how they

1:12

they they call this diplomacy. And

1:15

nothing has changed in terms of the

1:17

force deployments on the ground in

1:19

Lebanon or in Gaza or elsewhere. And

1:22

he's rolling up the West Bank as fast as

1:24

he can. And he's in Syria, and I think

1:27

he's contemplating going deeper into

1:28

Syria.

1:29

So, you're looking at force dispositions

1:32

that belay all this diplomacy,

1:35

particularly the force disposition in

1:37

Lebanon where BB's doing pretty much as

1:39

he pleases and is not going to stop

1:41

anytime soon. Now, Hezbollah knows that,

1:44

and Iran knows that if BB continues in

1:48

this way, even if he just stays static,

1:50

then Hezbollah is not going to be able

1:52

to forcefully and outright and

1:55

decisively join, as it did before, in

1:59

attacking Israel when Iran hits it

2:01

again, which it inevitably inevitably is

2:03

going to do. So, Iran's got to be

2:05

concerned that that disposition of

2:08

forces is there in Lebanon and sort of

2:11

made sacrosanct by this hodgepodge of

2:13

diplomacy that's occurred. But, I don't

2:15

think that's going to stop them from

2:17

another attack on Israel. In fact, it

2:20

may be even more intense than we would

2:23

expect otherwise because Hezbollah won't

2:25

be able to join in unless Hezbollah

2:28

works a way into the north again in a

2:31

way that's unimpeded not impeded by the

2:34

Israelis, which they are going to try to

2:36

do, and is able to join in again and

2:40

reinforce what Iran does to Israel.

2:42

Then, you got to think about what is

2:44

Iran going to do if this kicks off again

2:47

in a big way, and they understand that

2:49

once again they've been cheated, they've

2:51

been lied to, and it it's a big big war

2:55

again. Then, they're going to hit these

2:57

other targets, I think, like they have

2:59

hit targets in the first round, but

3:03

these targets are going to be, as I've

3:04

said before, very very

3:08

detrimental to the global economy.

3:10

They're going to hit things that really

3:11

are going to impact the global economy.

3:14

They won't do it to the extent that I

3:16

thought before because I think Russia

3:18

and China are tapering that a little bit

3:21

or

3:22

refining it a little bit in terms of

3:24

what might happen in that round of

3:26

attacks unless, of course,

3:28

Iran and China see that the United

3:30

States and Israel are in combination

3:33

going for

3:35

the golden ring, if you will, to to

3:37

pursue the utter destruction and defeat

3:40

and Bantustan creation of Iran. In that

3:43

case, here's the here's the

3:46

the bottom line.

3:47

Russia and China are not going to let

3:50

Iran fall, period.

3:53

Not going to let them fall.

Interactive Summary

The video discusses the complex geopolitical dynamics between Trump, Netanyahu (BB), Iran, and Hezbollah. It suggests that despite diplomatic efforts, Netanyahu is maintaining aggressive force dispositions in the region. The analysis posits that an intensified conflict between Israel and Iran is likely, with potential global economic repercussions, while noting that Russia and China remain committed to preventing the collapse of the Iranian state.

Suggested questions

3 ready-made prompts