COL. Lawrence Wilkerson : Trump's Leverage Over Netanyahu on Lebanon Withdrawal
96 segments
What, uh,
control does Trump think he has over BB?
Do you foresee Trump
complying with clause one of the MOU,
which is to get the IDF out of, uh,
Lebanon?
>> I think Erats has it right if I'm
reading between the lines and in some
places explicitly,
that what's happening right now is that
Trump believes he has some measure of
control over what BB does, but Trump is
ultimately going to join BB in a second,
and they think, both of them,
overwhelming attack on Iran. And it is
coming, and it is going to come either
right before the elections or right
after the elections if BB is successful
and stays in power. And I would submit
that it might even happen even even if
BB's replaced, it just might be delayed
slightly.
That is a situation that I think is
fraught with problems for the immediate
reasons of let's take a look at the MOU
and at the trilateral agreement,
whatever they're calling it. You look at
them, and they're so contradictory that
you can't understand exactly how they
they they call this diplomacy. And
nothing has changed in terms of the
force deployments on the ground in
Lebanon or in Gaza or elsewhere. And
he's rolling up the West Bank as fast as
he can. And he's in Syria, and I think
he's contemplating going deeper into
Syria.
So, you're looking at force dispositions
that belay all this diplomacy,
particularly the force disposition in
Lebanon where BB's doing pretty much as
he pleases and is not going to stop
anytime soon. Now, Hezbollah knows that,
and Iran knows that if BB continues in
this way, even if he just stays static,
then Hezbollah is not going to be able
to forcefully and outright and
decisively join, as it did before, in
attacking Israel when Iran hits it
again, which it inevitably inevitably is
going to do. So, Iran's got to be
concerned that that disposition of
forces is there in Lebanon and sort of
made sacrosanct by this hodgepodge of
diplomacy that's occurred. But, I don't
think that's going to stop them from
another attack on Israel. In fact, it
may be even more intense than we would
expect otherwise because Hezbollah won't
be able to join in unless Hezbollah
works a way into the north again in a
way that's unimpeded not impeded by the
Israelis, which they are going to try to
do, and is able to join in again and
reinforce what Iran does to Israel.
Then, you got to think about what is
Iran going to do if this kicks off again
in a big way, and they understand that
once again they've been cheated, they've
been lied to, and it it's a big big war
again. Then, they're going to hit these
other targets, I think, like they have
hit targets in the first round, but
these targets are going to be, as I've
said before, very very
detrimental to the global economy.
They're going to hit things that really
are going to impact the global economy.
They won't do it to the extent that I
thought before because I think Russia
and China are tapering that a little bit
or
refining it a little bit in terms of
what might happen in that round of
attacks unless, of course,
Iran and China see that the United
States and Israel are in combination
going for
the golden ring, if you will, to to
pursue the utter destruction and defeat
and Bantustan creation of Iran. In that
case, here's the here's the
the bottom line.
Russia and China are not going to let
Iran fall, period.
Not going to let them fall.
Ask follow-up questions or revisit key timestamps.
The video discusses the complex geopolitical dynamics between Trump, Netanyahu (BB), Iran, and Hezbollah. It suggests that despite diplomatic efforts, Netanyahu is maintaining aggressive force dispositions in the region. The analysis posits that an intensified conflict between Israel and Iran is likely, with potential global economic repercussions, while noting that Russia and China remain committed to preventing the collapse of the Iranian state.
Videos recently processed by our community