HomeVideos

The Marketing Secrets Apple & Tesla Always Use: Rory Sutherland | E165

Now Playing

The Marketing Secrets Apple & Tesla Always Use: Rory Sutherland | E165

Transcript

2666 segments

0:00

I think the NHS could create massively

0:02

greater patient Satisfaction by

0:04

deploying certain behaviors and

0:06

techniques like what well Rory

0:10

Southerland he is an author columnist

0:12

and the vice chairman of Aug UK one of

0:14

the largest marketing companies in the

0:16

world he's an adman stories are the PDF

0:19

files of human information they're the

0:22

vehicle we use for storing information

0:24

and the vehicle we use for sharing it if

0:25

you want to improve how people feel

0:27

psychology is a better area for

0:29

exploration than rational Improvement

0:31

don't make the Eurostar faster make the

0:34

journey more enjoyable and that's one of

0:35

the cleverest reframings you can do the

0:38

Uber map is a psychological moonshot

0:41

what bothers us about waiting for a taxi

0:43

isn't actually the duration it's the

0:45

degree of uncertainty and if you have a

0:47

map which shows you where the taxi is

0:49

you're basically relaxed you can

0:51

genuinely perform magic in perception

0:54

what is the seat covering for the Tesla

0:56

it's called vegan leather now actually

0:58

to be honest we would have called those

1:00

plastic seats back in the day if it

1:02

makes things feel more valuable is it a

1:06

con without further Ado I'm Steven

1:08

Bartlett and this is the dire of CEO I

1:11

hope nobody's listening but if you are

1:13

then please keep this to

1:15

[Music]

1:21

yourself Ry first of all thank you for

1:24

being here as uh as someone who built a

1:26

marketing business and has worked in

1:28

sort of similar industry um to you for a

1:31

huge portion of my life um you're

1:33

someone that I've always looked up to

1:35

and even young members of my team here

1:36

cite you as being an inspiration on an

1:39

ongoing basis for the work they're doing

1:41

just broadly on even of these new

1:42

platforms like Tik Tok because the

1:45

principles and the psychology and the

1:47

the sort of rationality underneath much

1:49

of your work is is really really

1:51

Timeless um so thank you for being here

1:54

I that's a great honor and um uh we'll

1:56

get into some mutual fanboying later um

2:00

but no I mean I one of the great

2:01

insights I think which I hope helps

2:03

motivate everybody working in our

2:05

industry and related Industries is that

2:07

when you create perceptual value you are

2:10

creating value value can be created in

2:12

the mind every bit as much as it can be

2:14

created in the factory and I think there

2:16

was a an unfortunate story about

2:19

marketing that treated it as kind of

2:20

optional extra it was the fairy dust on

2:23

top of the real intrinsic value that

2:25

resided in a product or service and I

2:28

completely dispute that I think we value

2:30

things according not to what they are

2:31

but what they mean and what they mean is

2:34

context dependent it can be uh massively

2:37

transformed by storytelling Framing

2:41

recontextualization and you can

2:43

absolutely use psychological um

2:45

mechanisms to make things more valuable

2:47

more enjoyable more precious that's one

2:50

important point I might make the

2:52

additional point which is to be honest

2:54

over ambitious but I make it anyway

2:56

which is that actually perceived value

2:58

is a very environmentally friendly form

3:00

of value to

3:02

create because you can generally create

3:04

meaning and imbue a product with meaning

3:08

um with a lot less carbon consumption

3:11

than is necessarily involved in making

3:12

the product three times bigger or five

3:14

times faster and you know my argument

3:18

would also be if we're looking for

3:20

breakthrough 10x moonshot

3:23

improvements it's actually much easier

3:25

to find psychological moonshots than

3:27

technological moonshots you know make a

3:30

train 10 times faster you know it was

3:32

possible in 1840 1820 okay very

3:36

difficult to do now um to a point of

3:38

just dangerousness or you know

3:41

extraordinarily difficult engineering

3:43

problem making a train journey 10 times

3:45

more enjoyable that's still doable in my

3:48

view give me an example then what's the

3:50

the example that always comes to mind

3:51

for you of where someone has managed to

3:55

put tremendous moonshot style value on

3:58

something a brand po

4:00

just with marketing and advertising but

4:03

what I'm always very fond of is I think

4:05

the Uber map is a psychological

4:08

moonshot and it's based I mean the the

4:11

story which may or may not be true is

4:13

that one of the founders of uber was

4:15

inspired by watching Goldfinger and when

4:18

he saw Bond effectively following

4:20

Goldfinger using a tracking device there

4:22

was a scrolling map in the dashboard of

4:24

the db4 which showed him where

4:26

goldfinger's car was so he could Trail

4:28

it while remaining out of of sight um uh

4:32

then um what was extraordinary about

4:34

that was that it was based on a very

4:37

clever insight into human psychology

4:40

which most of us ourselves aren't really

4:42

aware of which is the we would say and

4:44

we confidently say we believe that I

4:47

hate it when a taxi takes a long time to

4:49

turn up I like it when a taxi turns up

4:51

quickly so a rational person or an

4:54

engineer would react to that by saying

4:56

what we need is a predictive algorithm

4:58

so that taxies to be available in areas

5:01

where we predict heavy demand so that we

5:03

can service customers more quickly and

5:05

by the way there's nothing wrong with

5:06

that it may be a very worthwhile thing

5:07

to do although it's worth saying that it

5:09

requires quite a lot of scale in order

5:12

to achieve

5:13

that but the real insight with the map

5:16

is that deep down you know somewhere in

5:18

the amydala what bothers us about

5:20

waiting for a taxi isn't actually the

5:22

duration it's the degree of uncertainty

5:25

in other words is he here yet maybe he's

5:27

pared around the corner or what if he

5:29

can't find that house maybe he's already

5:31

left was the person on the phone lying

5:33

and so wait that period between booking

5:35

a taxi and waiting for it to arrive was

5:37

one of General high stress now what's

5:40

interesting is you could reduce that

5:41

stress I admit by getting the taxi to

5:43

turn up very quickly or at least you'd

5:46

reduce the period of stress but the

5:48

stress would still remain on the other

5:50

hand if you have a map which shows you

5:52

where the taxi is you're basically

5:54

relaxed okay instead of going oh my God

5:57

you know where is he where is he I'm

5:59

sure you know maybe he's already left i'

6:01

better go and stand out in the rain so

6:03

he doesn't miss me or get impatient you

6:05

just look at the map and you go oh look

6:06

he's stuck at those traffic lights I'll

6:08

have another pint Okay now what's

6:10

interesting is that the quantity of

6:12

waiting is the same with or without a

6:15

map you know in pure quantitative

6:17

measured SI unit terms of time and

6:20

duration no difference the quality of

6:23

the waiting is totally transformed it's

6:26

almost taking it from a a system

6:27

dependent on TR on trust how much you

6:30

trust that particular firm how have they

6:31

performed in the past do they sometimes

6:33

lie to me have other taxi drivers

6:35

sometimes lied to me to A system that is

6:36

almost completely trustless where I

6:38

don't need to trust you because I can

6:40

see for myself and I suppose there's

6:41

also an element of trust which uh okay

6:44

was provided historically in London by

6:46

the knowledge and the knowledge was an

6:49

interesting thing because I I

6:51

occasionally debate this which is was

6:54

the knowledge really about knowledge in

6:56

other words we don't need black cab

6:58

drivers to St to this level of detail

7:01

now we have the technology of the

7:03

satinav yeah and pure sort of

7:05

utilitarian people go why on Earth am I

7:07

paying a premium for a black cab driver

7:08

to learn all this stuff um when he could

7:11

simply buy a TomTom for 300 quid and

7:13

stick it on the dashboard and there's

7:16

some argument for that okay the only

7:19

other point is that you have a very high

7:21

degree of trust one of the great things

7:22

you could say about the knowledge is it

7:24

sunk cost it's commit it's proof of

7:26

commitment you're only going to actually

7:28

go through that Pro process if you're

7:30

pretty serious about being a really good

7:32

cab

7:33

driver also it provides you if you think

7:37

about if you've spent what a year and a

7:39

half two years scuttling around London

7:40

on a moped with one of those clipboards

7:43

rehearsing for your sessions of the

7:45

knowledge okay you'd be a bit of an

7:48

idiot uh effectively losing your taxi

7:50

license day one wouldn't you okay you

7:53

know it's you know in other words it is

7:56

to some it's rather like medieval guilds

7:58

they required extraordinary stringent

8:00

conditions of entry into the guild but

8:03

that was what ensured honesty because uh

8:06

the cost of being thrown out of the

8:08

guild given the effort you'd put into

8:10

actually being admitted in the first

8:12

place was therefore made it not

8:14

worthwhile to cheat you you also say

8:16

something in in your book about how

8:18

making a process more difficult can

8:21

sometimes make it more attractive to

8:23

Consumers so I mean this is known

8:25

sometimes as the Ikea effect which is

8:27

that um certainly um cprad who's the

8:31

kind of owner and founder of Ikea

8:34

believes that the fact that you assemble

8:35

the furniture yourself contributes to

8:37

its perceived value in other words

8:39

you've committed something of yourself

8:41

to its assembly and creation you might

8:43

also argue it d stigmatizes low prices

8:46

okay so I'll give you an example of that

8:49

there's a very big difference between

8:50

cheap strawberries and pick your own

8:52

strawberries now picky own strawberries

8:55

are cheap but there's a narrative as to

8:57

why they're cheap which is I put into

8:58

some of the effort into the harvesting

9:00

of the things and I have to go out into

9:02

a field and pick the things myself cheap

9:04

strawberries by contrast May create some

9:07

degree of uncertainty because you look

9:09

at the market and go well if these

9:10

strawberries were really good why

9:13

wouldn't they charge full price for them

9:14

what's wrong with this and so quite

9:17

often you know sometimes you have to

9:19

make things more expensive to make them

9:21

trustworthy oddly okay you know you can

9:24

be too good to be true that consumers

9:27

won't necessarily trust something that's

9:29

cheap unless there's a narrative around

9:31

it as to where the cost savings are made

9:33

I mean I think I think a lot of low if

9:35

you think about lowcost Airlines okay

9:38

they spent quite a lot of effort talking

9:40

about what you didn't get you don't get

9:42

a meal okay uh you have to pay to check

9:45

in your luggage uh you don't get it

9:46

originally with easy jet you didn't even

9:48

get pre-allocated seating okay it was

9:51

you know effectively like a bus uh you

9:53

had to book online you couldn't book

9:55

through a travel agent and those

9:57

constraints to some extent

9:59

were there to make it believable to the

10:03

consumer that there was a legitimate

10:05

form of cost saving going on now if

10:08

you'd said if you launched EasyJet and

10:10

you'd said we're just as good as British

10:11

Airways were but we're half the

10:13

price the untrusting consumer is going

10:16

to ask how are you doing this okay does

10:19

it mean you're not servicing the engines

10:21

all the pilots are all on day release

10:23

from prison or something right you're

10:25

going to start having doubts so

10:27

interestingly sometimes negative stories

10:29

around a product can be used to offset

10:33

the negatives which a consumer would

10:35

tend to imagine if Ikea had ready

10:37

assembled Furniture which wasn't sold in

10:39

a warehouse it was sold in a kind of

10:41

Posh heels style

10:43

Emporium we'd think there was something

10:45

a bit iffy going on so you know and

10:48

there's also the wonderful Ikea effect

10:50

which is the effort of actually going to

10:51

an Ikea and navigating the maze makes it

10:54

more or less impossible for you to go

10:56

home empty-handed you know you have to

10:57

buy some tea lights at the very minimum

10:59

just to validate your trip now the I

11:02

suppose the earliest manifestation of

11:04

this although it's sometimes called the

11:06

Ikea

11:07

effect was a very famous marketing case

11:09

study um for Betty Crocker cakes where

11:12

they had a cake mix where you just added

11:14

water put in the oven created a cake and

11:17

it didn't sell very well and a

11:19

psychologist came in and said there

11:22

isn't enough effort involved in this to

11:24

make it feel like cooking and so they

11:26

added the slogan just add an egg the

11:29

addition of the egg although it actually

11:31

imposed a cost and a small degree of

11:33

effort suddenly made the product much

11:35

more popular why now the idea would be

11:39

that now it was actually cooking you

11:40

were preparing something for your family

11:42

you weren't just

11:44

cheating perhaps I mean it's an

11:46

interesting debate because we don't

11:48

fully know that this this wasn't tested

11:50

to an absolutely robust level of

11:52

academic uh certainty uh you know um uh

11:56

but nonetheless it's a very common it's

11:58

very popular anecdote within marketing

12:00

that sometimes the counterintuitive I

12:02

think that's all you need to derive from

12:03

it okay all you need to derive from it

12:06

in business decision making is sometimes

12:08

the counterintuitive approach might be

12:11

better and this I'm I was thinking then

12:13

about these modern sort of meal delivery

12:15

companies so you have obviously on one

12:17

end Super Convenience you have Uber Uber

12:19

Eats Etc delivery and then you have this

12:22

Middle Ground of where we'll send you

12:23

the ingredients and tell you how to put

12:25

it in the pan and we'll measure so that

12:27

be gust or hello fresh yeah exactly you

12:36

putsy feel like you cooked it's a very

12:38

strange thing um because uh one of the

12:41

founders of Gusto actually met me

12:43

shortly before

12:45

lockdown and I was I couldn't really

12:47

make sense of the product okay at first

12:51

and this by the way really interested me

12:53

because Bill Gates once said of

12:54

technology that the problem we have with

12:56

technology is people don't know how to

12:57

want the things we can offer them and

12:59

one of the things that increasingly

13:01

fascinates me is products which an

13:04

economist would call them an experience

13:06

good where it's only really possible to

13:08

perceive their value by actually using

13:11

them I have to admit when I was

13:13

presented with gusto and hellofresh I

13:15

thought this is kind of dumb I've got an

13:17

you know cardo account I can order

13:18

things from Sainsbury's for click and

13:20

collect I've got well my wife more

13:23

accurately has got 20 or 30 cookery

13:25

books of various kinds all I have to do

13:27

is pick a recipe from a cookery book

13:29

effectively order the necessary

13:31

ingredients follow instructions cook at

13:34

home job done why on Earth would I want

13:37

a box with um you know pre-selected

13:40

ingredients and the right ratio arriving

13:42

with a recipe

13:43

card but anyway I met this guy and he

13:45

said well I'll send you a free box now

13:48

you know I'm not so you know ungrateful

13:51

and nasty a human being that I go I

13:53

don't want your stinking box of free

13:54

food and I think it was actually towards

13:56

the beginning of the pandemic anyway so

13:58

I wasn't entir sure that food was going

14:00

to remain abundantly available so I said

14:02

sure you know absolutely I'm delighted

14:05

the other thing is I probably ordered a

14:06

Gusto box for um the only reason we

14:10

stopped was actually we had our kitchen

14:11

replaced and had a period with an oven

14:13

but pretty much every week um my

14:15

assistant Anna who's in the Next Room

14:17

has also had a

14:19

Gusto the majority of weeks for two and

14:21

a half years ever since experiencing it

14:24

you asked me to explain this I mean this

14:26

is what's So Glorious which is I can't

14:28

quite explain

14:29

why once experience this is such a

14:31

compelling benefit true um okay um it

14:37

possibly is the fact that because these

14:39

ingredients in the right ratio and have

14:41

a limited shelf life it forces you to

14:43

cook them and therefore it forces you to

14:47

cook what ends up being a restaurant

14:49

quality meal at home with not too much

14:53

effort okay in by the way a reasonably

14:56

healthy quantity as well one of the

14:58

problems with take away food is if you

15:00

want variety you end up with completely

15:02

excessive quantity don't you you end up

15:04

either keeping the stuff in the fridge

15:05

or with an extraordinary amount of food

15:07

waste because the take unlike a

15:09

restaurant where they think well if we

15:11

give them slightly too little food they

15:12

might order a pudding or something else

15:15

in takeaway food you don't get a second

15:16

chance to top them up so the great

15:19

paranoia I think of all takeaway

15:20

restaurants is not putting enough

15:22

quantity

15:23

in and so you do end up with a

15:25

restaurant quality meal at the price of

15:27

a ready meal um which you have cooked

15:30

yourself that's very logical though give

15:31

me the illogical uh was there something

15:34

some surprise and Delight in I genuinely

15:38

I I don't I've just got one product okay

15:40

which is the greatest example of a

15:42

product which genuinely kind of creates

15:47

massive contradictions in my own mind

15:49

which is the quooker I don't know if

15:50

you've got one of instant boiling water

15:52

effectively oh yeah I've got one you got

15:54

one over there yeah if you want the

15:55

story of the crooker by the way I'll

15:56

tell your listeners CU it's fascinating

15:58

there were two people I think at unil

16:00

who were who their brief was effectively

16:03

to invent CER soup and they did it very

16:06

successfully they produced what is a

16:08

powdered form of

16:09

soup and one of them said right job done

16:12

we've created the cup of soup boil a

16:13

kettle pour the water on you've got a

16:15

nice mug of soup job done I'll go back

16:17

to the day job and the other Dutch guy

16:21

basically felt no I've only solved half

16:22

the problem here because you still have

16:24

to wait for the kettle to

16:26

boil and for whatever reason I mean you

16:28

must have been a kind of of compulsive

16:29

inventor he became obsessed with solving

16:32

the second half of the cuper souit

16:33

problem which is how can we create

16:35

boiling water faster which was

16:38

technically off brief but nonetheless

16:40

for some reason absolutely preoccupied

16:43

him and so he effectively ended up

16:46

creating what is a Dutch company cooker

16:48

now okay half of me you know perhaps the

16:52

more puritanical rational half is going

16:55

you've just paid not quite a four-figure

16:57

sum but a very large figure some for a

17:00

very fast

17:01

Kettle and the other half of me is going

17:04

I wouldn't go back you know having I

17:07

don't know what your relationship is

17:08

with your cooker but i' find it

17:10

difficult now going back to a kettle

17:12

having experienced instant tea making

17:15

instant soup making if you want to poach

17:17

an egg you can fill a pan with boiling

17:19

water uh instantaneously you don't have

17:21

to wait for that to cook up Suddenly of

17:23

course you discover new and

17:25

complimentary uses for boiling water

17:27

that all seems very logical to me that

17:29

makes perfect sense yeah I mean the only

17:31

thing is I think you've got a lot of

17:32

products which are much much easier for

17:35

you to defend or understand or

17:36

appreciate in retrospect than they are

17:38

few to write a check for in advance

17:41

right I've got you and that's that's a

17:42

marketing problem the electric car by

17:45

the way is I mean one really interesting

17:47

question I always ask about any

17:49

technology which I think is a question

17:51

that's asked too little people ask what

17:53

are the unit sales of this technology

17:55

and how fast are they growing actually

17:57

any new technology grows very slowly to

18:00

begin with it's a sigmoid curve um

18:02

nearly anything significantly new starts

18:05

off fairly Niche yeah yeah and the

18:08

reason is that the two driving forces of

18:10

human behavior are habit and social

18:12

copying and therefore when you've never

18:15

done it before and none of your friends

18:16

do it doing something is much more

18:19

difficult to do and I'm old enough to

18:21

remember the time when the majority of

18:23

my friends said I don't understand why

18:25

you'd want a mobile phone okay I mean I

18:28

can actually remember when Mo I I used a

18:30

mobile phone on Oxford Street in 1989

18:32

two people shouted abuse at me from

18:34

passing

18:36

taxis it was like a brick it was a

18:39

social statement it was my phone it was

18:41

we had company phones and we signed them

18:43

out for the day but just the act of

18:44

using one of these things in public

18:46

would expose you to a general appr

18:49

probium and it's impossible for anybody

18:51

now to think back on that because I

18:53

don't think anybody knows anybody

18:54

without a mobile phone the example that

18:56

I that comes to mind for me and it's Al

18:59

to do with a crooker I didn't call it a

19:00

cooker I just call it the tap but yeah

19:02

instant hot water instant cold water um

19:05

is music and a friend of mine told me

19:08

the story of standing with the HMV I

19:09

think it's HMV CEO looking out on the

19:11

shop floor at all these people buying

19:13

CDs and he said to him we'll always have

19:15

a business because people love music now

19:19

what he got wrong is he was right that

19:21

people love music but they don't love

19:23

getting in their car driving in the rain

19:25

and then getting a plastic seed uh piece

19:27

of plastic which they can then get

19:29

damaged very easily they can only carry

19:31

a few of them and driving it back to the

19:32

house people loved music and he only

19:35

really found they really like CDs I

19:38

might make a point by the way that in

19:40

terms of its if someone has a design

19:42

sensibility in terms of its

19:46

proliferation the CD laughably named

19:49

jewel case the plastic hinge case in

19:52

which the CD came was probably the

19:55

nastiest single you know manufactured

19:57

item in everything from environmental

20:00

terms to just usability you know the

20:02

fact that it opened with a horrible sort

20:03

of cracking snap now what's interesting

20:06

is that vinyl has made a

20:08

Resurgence but I don't see any sign of a

20:11

CD Resurgence any more than I see there

20:13

are a few weird people who are back into

20:15

cassettes aren't there there but I think

20:17

that's fairly nichy yeah that's kind of

20:20

like lomography and photography it's one

20:22

of those sort of weird countercultures

20:25

but but but I can understand I can just

20:28

about understand it's slightly weird

20:30

when my daughter asked for a a

20:31

gramophone player for her birthday

20:34

because I'm kind of going I you know I

20:35

was born in 1965 I spent my whole life

20:38

trying to get rid of the nuisance of

20:40

physical music to you know effectively

20:43

something akin to Spotify and now you're

20:45

weirdly reverting to this thing you know

20:47

it made no sense to me um possibly

20:50

there's an element that if you're really

20:51

devoted to a particular band you want to

20:53

spend money and Signal your devotion in

20:56

some physical form I don't know what's

20:58

going on there fully I I think is that

21:00

not just a case of like scarcity yeah I

21:03

I well I suspect one of the one of the

21:05

curses of capitalism is that is

21:08

recursive fashion exactly uh so um

21:11

Jeremy bulmore who's now I suppose in

21:13

his late 80s wonderful guy who was the

21:15

creative director of Jay Walter Thompson

21:17

he was a director of wpp for many years

21:20

he made the point and by the way as you

21:21

get older you realize much more of this

21:25

here we go again you know because you

21:27

have greater chronologic context in

21:29

which to appreciate it but he made the

21:31

point that when he was a child all

21:32

cheddar cheese came with a rind so most

21:35

cheese you buy in a shop was cut from a

21:37

wheel and it would have either some sort

21:38

of wax or or else rind or sometimes it's

21:42

cloth on the exterior and someone then

21:45

started selling rindless cheddar and

21:47

they charged a premium for it you see

21:50

because you know oh brilliant I don't

21:52

have to pay for the Rind and I don't

21:53

have to cut it off what a wonderful

21:55

convenience and then memories being

21:58

short and obviously some people being

22:01

born before they could remember cheddar

22:02

with a rind anyway about 25 30 years

22:05

after that people started introducing

22:07

Farmhouse Artisan cheddar with the Rind

22:10

left on and they charged a premium for

22:12

that so you do have this peculiar thing

22:15

where um that's all marketing though

22:17

isn't advertising because what you're

22:18

saying that's the real key it's it's

22:20

it's human partly human neophilia so

22:23

that what's different attracts our

22:25

attention Okay so undoubtedly we

22:27

disproportionately pay attention to

22:29

things which are new or seemingly

22:31

different and we're novelty seeking to a

22:33

great extent what is the story though if

22:35

I buy that Artis analy the story for me

22:37

especially being Artisan is this is the

22:38

real cheese in my head I immediately go

22:40

that Supermarket stuff is just fake

22:42

processed but the Rind signals that this

22:44

I'm paying for real cheese well I mean

22:47

we can look at the we can look at the

22:48

interesting uh re exactly it's a

22:51

recursive Trend and of course in fashion

22:52

it happens all the time that you know uh

22:55

that the most bizarre Fashions including

22:57

sort of flare and um Afghan coats you

23:01

know sequins have made a massive

23:04

comeback and you um and the truth is

23:08

that when they come around a second time

23:10

the context is different so they mean

23:11

something different you see the same

23:13

with Brands like fer like these old

23:15

brands have exploded Fela is in a good

23:18

example where it was it became when I

23:20

was 10 years old re you but if you

23:21

bought feler you had no money and you

23:23

weren cool when I was 20 if you have fer

23:25

you were the coolest person Burberry had

23:28

that as as well they went from being oh

23:30

if you're if you're wearing bbery you

23:32

are a bit of a ruy right you're a little

23:33

bit rough as a person to this kind of I

23:36

guess it was a branding exercise where

23:38

brand bbery then became really cool

23:40

again maybe because of part of the term

23:42

for this is sometimes counter signaling

23:44

it was a bit like um hipsters drinking

23:47

pabs Blue Ribbon ribbon I think it's

23:49

called Uh which is it was historically

23:52

down Market Blue Collar American Beer

23:54

right okay okay it was down Market of

23:56

kind of Bud visor and the other you know

23:58

cause and so forth and this is a really

24:01

interesting thing in human behavior

24:03

sometimes in marketing itself but also

24:05

in how humans Market themselves because

24:07

I I think one of the conclusions we've

24:09

got to come to and we have to admit and

24:12

which the better understanding of will

24:14

be I think central to understanding um

24:17

how we solve things like the

24:18

environmental crisis and indeed overc

24:21

consumption is that the human brain

24:23

itself has quite a large marketing

24:24

function you know it has an accounting

24:26

function it cares about the efficient

24:28

use of resources it has you know all

24:31

kinds of kind of algorithms and

24:33

heuristics that are kind of in many

24:35

cases innate and built in but it also

24:37

has a marketing function it very much

24:39

cares about uh image and Status

24:43

effectively what something you do means

24:45

to other people now one thing that is

24:48

common to lots of animals is signaling

24:51

you know the most common example is the

24:52

peacock's tail elk antlers things you do

24:55

often costly things you do to

24:57

demonstrate that you can do them

24:59

Ferraris okay um and you know in many

25:02

Ferraris in London of course you know I

25:04

mean the extraordinary thing when you

25:06

think about it is having a Ferrari in

25:07

central London is about as deranged A

25:09

Car Choice as you can imagine okay but

25:12

the very fact that it's impractical and

25:15

ludicrous is almost what gives it

25:16

meaning okay as I said you know if the

25:19

um this is a very mischievous sentence

25:21

but if people were attracted to people

25:24

who drove expensive Vehicles okay then

25:28

they find Lorry drivers more attractive

25:30

than Ferrari owners in many cases

25:32

because the truck is actually more

25:33

expensive as a vehicle or a really

25:35

Luxury Motor Coach but the motor coach

25:38

actually has a practical function which

25:39

diminishes its signaling value because

25:42

if you want to show that you really have

25:43

resources to spare nothing beats waste

25:46

indiscriminate waste shows that you

25:49

really have resources to spare you know

25:51

or you pursue things that are

25:52

disproportionately scarce the real

25:55

interesting thing with humans though and

25:56

I don't think there's a case where

25:58

animals do this is they also practice

26:00

something called counter

26:02

signaling which is showing that you

26:04

don't have to try because you're

26:06

confident enough in your other

26:07

attributes okay so an example of that

26:10

would be in

26:11

Academia a an a professor who's aspiring

26:15

to get a let's say a named professorship

26:18

or tenure will go around in a suit okay

26:21

a tenard professor who has job security

26:24

for life will go around dressed like a

26:26

[ __ ] you know if you've won Nobel Prize

26:29

my hunch is once you've won a Nobel

26:31

Prize I think famously George stiglets

26:34

used to actually turn up at the World

26:35

Bank with no shoes on okay now

26:37

interestingly you do that it's a bit

26:39

like that old joke why do dogs lick

26:41

their own balls because they can okay

26:44

and to some extent people do what they

26:46

can get away with so you know the the

26:48

classic example is you know people who

26:50

play in very fashionable bands can

26:52

afford to be extraordinarily scruffy

26:55

because what effectively Liam and Noel

26:57

are saying is that our presence in this

27:00

band renders us so unbelievably cool and

27:03

sexy that we don't even have to make an

27:05

effort on the sorial front I've seen

27:07

this in my own life it's funny just

27:09

through the Journey of my career in the

27:10

last 10 years the example I'd give is in

27:12

my early career speaking on stage I

27:14

would try and dress really smart and

27:15

wear a suit now yeah I think it's much

27:18

better that I present myself in the

27:20

track suit bottom in the tracksuit that

27:22

I would wear like going around the house

27:24

when I speak on stage a because it's

27:26

more akin to who I am B because I can

27:28

and see I think the psychological that

27:30

I'm not adting because it might make

27:31

seem like an [ __ ] is it's actually

27:33

more of a status play to not wear a suit

27:36

and to not show off and the same applies

27:38

for Louis Vuitton like early part of my

27:40

first five years of my career when I was

27:41

just about getting some money I'd buy

27:43

these designer Brands like Louis Vuitton

27:45

now I genuinely think if I hold a Louis

27:47

Vuitton B bag it makes me look bad so I

27:51

i' I've like rid myself and when I walk

27:52

in some I say to my man cuz I've just

27:54

got the one left that hasn't managed to

27:55

break yet I say can you hold that cuz I

27:58

want to be associated with that level of

28:01

signaling if that makes sense I guess no

28:02

and the argument is that you know you're

28:05

famous enough now that you no longer

28:06

need fashion

28:08

brands um uh to Accord you know in in

28:12

fact the very fact that you were trying

28:16

um uh given your Fame to actually uh

28:19

signal your success through fashion

28:21

would probably be counterproductive it

28:23

would stress you insecure or trying too

28:25

hard and so that thing of we do what we

28:28

can get away with to Signal what we're

28:30

cap you know what we're capable of so

28:32

it's a very oblique form of of statea

28:34

signaling it might be very valuable

28:36

environmentally counter signaling might

28:38

be something you need to harness in

28:40

other words it's cool you know it's cool

28:43

to own less yes because I don't have

28:46

things I don't have a watch I don't have

28:48

as I said to you I have an electric bike

28:49

which you've just seen like I to be fair

28:51

I do have a nice Cut um car that they

28:52

drive me in sometimes but other than

28:54

that in terms of my own possessions it's

28:56

really all about utility and not buying

28:59

it in excess and I actually think that's

29:00

a really good point that that can be

29:01

leveraged to try and um help the

29:04

environment which I I think that's

29:06

happening there's a very interesting

29:07

thing happening which is in electric

29:09

cars and I was speaking to the marketing

29:10

director of scoda they produced

29:12

something called the enyak which is

29:13

actually it's similar to the Volkswagen

29:15

id4 but it's very very good electric car

29:17

and one of the things they're noticing I

29:18

migrated from a Jaguar to the Ford

29:20

Mustang

29:21

macki um quite a few people on The macki

29:24

Forum are actually ex luxury car owners

29:27

m and quite a few people um the the

29:30

scoda marketing director was telling me

29:33

um that quite a few people who'd gone to

29:35

the scoda ENC had actually come from for

29:37

example Audi Jaguar um fairly premium

29:40

cars so there is a thing that actually

29:42

having the electric car even in a you

29:45

know a less leather clad you know Walnut

29:49

infested form uh that's now the status

29:52

component it's not the brand of the car

29:54

it's the fact that it's electric Tesla's

29:56

the same I think of Tesla as a big um I

29:58

don't give a [ __ ] in a weird way I think

30:01

it's a big for me it's a um The Journey

30:04

honestly would be you you get a lamb if

30:07

you were insecure and this is what

30:08

you're into you'd get one of those

30:09

really fancy Brands and then the next

30:11

step is saying do you know what I don't

30:12

give a [ __ ] which is what you see going

30:14

on in San Francisco with the

30:15

billionaires and the CEOs and the VCS

30:18

I'm going to be a Tesla person now which

30:20

is I care more about the environment and

30:21

other things and I don't really care if

30:22

you think it's still a premium brand I

30:23

mean let's be honest because let's face

30:25

it any Tesla is probably less than three

30:28

years old and actually most people don't

30:30

buy cars from new ever or only once in

30:33

their life it's not fancy though but

30:35

it's not it's not particularly fancy I

30:37

mean there's a wonderful piece of Little

30:39

Alchemy in it of course which is the

30:40

invention of the phrase vegan leather oh

30:43

really if if you think the reason I

30:45

wrote the book Alchemy is partly to

30:47

elevate the status and centrality of

30:49

marketing in business success that

30:52

actually what you are is effectively a

30:55

product of how you make people feel okay

30:58

ultimately and that's psychological it's

31:00

not technological and therefore if you

31:03

want to improve how people feel

31:05

psychology is a better area for

31:07

exploration than what you might call

31:09

rational Improvement don't make the

31:11

Eurostar faster make the journey more

31:13

enjoyable okay put Wi-Fi on the trains

31:15

serve better food okay it's a cheaper

31:19

way actually to compete okay strangely

31:22

Engineers see it as cheating you see if

31:23

you have a an engineering or a finance

31:26

background you see psychological value

31:28

is invalid but the vital thing about

31:30

psychological value is whereas it's very

31:32

difficult to perform magic in the world

31:34

of physics or engineering you can

31:36

genuinely perform magic in perception

31:39

now what is the F what what is the seat

31:41

covering for the Tesla it's called vegan

31:43

leather now actually to be honest we

31:45

would have called those plastic seats

31:47

back in the day in my childhood in the

31:49

1970s and ' 80s we

31:51

G it's got plastic seats okay now I'm

31:54

sure that vegan leather is better than

31:56

the plastic seats which you'd find in a

31:58

voxal Viva in 1977 okay I'm sure it's

32:02

better in all kinds of ways

32:04

breathability you know cleanliness

32:06

whatever but nonetheless calling it

32:07

vegan leather in other words I'm doing

32:10

this for the planet rather than plastic

32:12

which is in other words what you're

32:14

doing there is you're making it a choice

32:15

not a compromise yeah and that's one of

32:18

the cleverest reframings you can do an

32:21

aspirational Choice as indeed so yeah no

32:23

and so you know I I ABS you know I look

32:26

at things like range anxxiety and I get

32:27

that's psychological okay what's that

32:29

okay range anxiety is a big obstacle to

32:31

electric car purchase oh yeah in the UK

32:34

in two in two two levels okay one it

32:37

prob well three levels one it means that

32:40

cars tend to compete on their range

32:42

which in a sense is further emphasizing

32:44

a negative to the consumer because if

32:46

electric car advertising is all about

32:48

range okay people start to see range as

32:51

more of a problem than it is secondly it

32:53

makes the batteries bigger the cars

32:55

heavier and more expensive than they

32:56

probably need to be so it's interesting

32:59

because so often I think the obstacles

33:01

to technology adoption are really

33:04

psychological hurdles much more than

33:06

technological hurdles this is why I

33:08

think marketing is so fascinating

33:10

because there there are these products

33:12

exactly like Gusto or hellofresh which

33:15

once you experience them 50% of people

33:17

become a convert but the real marketing

33:20

challenge is well that's fine that's

33:22

great but how on Earth do you convert

33:24

people in the first place and that's a

33:26

very interesting case where after the

33:28

pandemic and this is I think the value I

33:31

think there's a multiple value to having

33:33

occasional disruptions in life one of

33:36

which is that businesses become much

33:39

less risk averse when they're facing a

33:42

crisis MH it's of necessity is the

33:44

mother of invention but consumers also

33:48

have a narrative for why they're doing

33:50

things

33:50

differently I mean in a way you could if

33:53

you looked at the whole path of human

33:56

history the 19 30s in the United States

33:59

I.E the decade immediately after the

34:01

Great Depression was probably the period

34:03

of greatest innovation in terms of you

34:07

know human welfare in everything from

34:08

Cars aircraft Etc it was an

34:10

extraordinary period of innovation and

34:13

yet it came on the heels of this total

34:15

economic disaster and I think there is

34:17

something there in that idea that um

34:20

it's almost like a kneeling when you

34:22

make a samurai sword you actually bang

34:24

the thing while it's cooling that

34:26

actually

34:28

um some periods of disruption that some

34:31

degree of variance and instability in

34:34

economies is possibly long-term healthy

34:37

I mean I I I I I'm a huge Dev more so

34:40

than you I I know you've got a very

34:42

intelligent approach to flexible working

34:43

which is yeah that's what I wanted to

34:44

talk about is yeah yeah but but it was

34:46

interesting it was interesting that

34:49

given the fact that the whole promise of

34:51

the internet really I mean I think this

34:53

is in a Douglas Copeland book called

34:55

microserfs where one of the Geeks

34:57

features in this Douglas Copeland book

34:59

it was written in the '90s I think but

35:01

he makes a very interesting comment

35:03

which is the whole purpose of what you

35:06

might call Silicon Valley technology is

35:08

to make location Irrelevant in other

35:10

words it's to make where you are

35:12

irrelevant to the performance of a

35:14

particular function and by the way there

35:16

are negatives to that there were great

35:18

positives in my childhood to the fact

35:20

that what you could do was constrained

35:22

by where you were so when you left the

35:25

office you couldn't meaningfully work

35:27

okay cuz your computer was on a desk you

35:29

photocopied in the photocopier room you

35:31

met in the meeting room you you know you

35:35

uh you wrote things at A T at a keyboard

35:38

where you were determined what you were

35:39

doing and so a certain Focus arose from

35:42

that which I think has been destroyed by

35:44

the mobile phone to some degree which

35:45

technically lets you do anything from

35:47

anywhere I find myself on holiday and

35:50

day three worrying about what I'm going

35:52

to order from a cardo when I get home

35:54

and I go actually you shouldn't be doing

35:57

this another thing it probably does by

35:59

the way is it encourages us to over plan

36:01

and I'm a big believer I I've booked a

36:03

holiday um in July and August and I'm

36:07

trying to say to my family no no we're

36:08

going to land in Chicago we're going to

36:10

leave from New York what we do in

36:12

between those dates we're going to leave

36:13

open until the very last moment the the

36:16

other great problem the internet allows

36:18

you to do I think with your holiday is

36:19

to plan it down to a kind of granular

36:21

level of detail which is actually anical

36:24

to having a good time you know a good

36:26

time often requires spontaneity and you

36:29

know my my wife and I discovered New

36:31

Mexico in just whole American St we knew

36:33

it existed okay we discovered New Mexico

36:36

more or less by accident we were on a

36:37

driving holiday and we got stuck in El

36:39

Paso and needed to get somewhere else so

36:41

we said well let's try this you know

36:43

let's L Alamos I've heard about that

36:45

right okay fairly famous okay let's go

36:48

and have a decco absolutely gorgeous

36:50

State and we've been that back five

36:51

times we discovered it effectively

36:53

through Serendipity so there are

36:55

downsides to this you can do anything

36:56

from anywhere but is a bit weird that

37:00

you know trillions of dollars invested

37:02

in the capacity to to obtain effects

37:07

remotely hadn't made a dent in the

37:09

commute all now I'm by the way I'm

37:12

totally open to people who say entirely

37:15

you know okay Airbnb has gone uh

37:18

effectively remote forever fully remote

37:21

forever now bear in mind as a company

37:24

working as a company the entire company

37:26

is is going to be 100% remote working

37:28

now there are two interesting things

37:31

going on there one of which is if you're

37:32

Airbnb and your slogan is be at home

37:34

anywhere okay it's it's a bit

37:36

countercultural to demand that people

37:38

why weren't you at your desk okay there

37:41

may be an element of Henry Ford to it

37:43

you know that Henry Ford partly created

37:45

slightly ocal but not entirely created a

37:48

two-day weekend for his own workers

37:51

because he thought if it actually spread

37:53

then it'll be worth people buying cars

37:55

if he could increase the salary for

37:57

factory work and give people two days of

37:59

guaranteed Leisure then you had people

38:01

who could both afford and make use of a

38:04

car and with their BNB if you think

38:06

about it uh they stand to be fairly

38:08

major beneficiaries of working from

38:11

anywhere oh yeah so doing it with their

38:13

own staff there was a rumor I'm not sure

38:16

it's true so for God's sake don't sue me

38:18

on this there was a famous rumor that

38:20

unila created uh dress down Fridays okay

38:24

and the I to be honest I think it's a

38:26

conspiracy theory I don't think this

38:27

happened if it did all credit to them

38:30

and the idea was if we could create a

38:31

social Norm where people went into work

38:33

in chinos and you know sweatshirts on a

38:37

Friday uh we get one extra day of

38:40

laundry because you dry cleaner suit but

38:43

you launder a uh chinos or you launder

38:47

um you know polish shirt you launder

38:48

ordinary white shirts but you launder

38:50

cotton jackets and you know casual

38:52

clothes so the argument was it was

38:54

actually a laundry maximization Ploy by

38:57

either PNG or unver not sure that's true

39:00

it would be very clever if it were but

39:01

Henry Ford undoubtedly did write about

39:04

this that creating leure was part of his

39:06

strategy for selling cars now that's

39:10

interesting because most businesses

39:12

nowadays don't have that Vision to say

39:15

actually we don't necessarily have to

39:19

optimize what we do for Imagined static

39:22

human economic behavior we can actually

39:25

change the way people behave we can

39:27

change what things mean we can change

39:29

whether something feels cheap or

39:30

expensive we can make feler a really

39:32

cool brand you know and this is why you

39:36

know I wrote the book Alchemy partly

39:37

saying we have a kind of culture in

39:40

business particularly in the finance

39:41

function of business which does which

39:44

refuses to believe in magic now I'm not

39:46

saying magic is easy or that everybody

39:48

can do it all the time it's certainly

39:50

not that easy but you shouldn't discount

39:52

it because there are vegan leather the

39:55

Uber map there are magical Solutions out

39:58

there I had a few words to say about one

40:00

of my sponsors on this podcast what's

40:02

this one hule that's hule so do I need

40:05

to mix it with water or do I just drink

40:07

it it's um no no no you wouldn't put it

40:10

in the water don't put it in the water

40:12

yeah we'll give you a separate glass if

40:14

you want it is a nutritionally complete

40:18

it's a meal and a drink effectively oh

40:21

fantastic this is a this is an

40:23

interesting brand actually for many of

40:25

the reasons we've been talking about so

40:26

this is the

40:28

last year the fastest growing e-commerce

40:31

company internationally and think about

40:33

what what what they're doing so H are

40:34

nutritionally complete

40:36

convenience um it's basically I think

40:39

it's certainly Delicious By the way

40:41

delicious it's not Nest quick I'll say

40:43

that so it's not like you know raving

40:45

delicious but nor should it be because

40:47

we wouldn't believe it amen if you made

40:49

it too tasty we wouldn't believe its

40:51

medicinal properties it's exactly like

40:53

the weird Taste of Red Bull which I was

40:55

so two lessons are magic is possible in

40:59

Psychology even if it isn't in

41:01

physics and the second lesson is

41:03

sometimes the opposite of a good idea is

41:05

another good idea in Psychology you can

41:08

actually uh you know there's Dyson and

41:10

there's the Henry you know they're both

41:12

strong vacuum CA brands in entirely

41:16

different um uh directions if you like

41:20

and the point I'm making is that I think

41:23

that High School maths encourages us to

41:25

believe that there's a single optimal

41:26

answer

41:29

uh which comes from resolving a

41:31

tradeoff and economics economics always

41:34

assumes tradeoffs I want to show you

41:36

this grenade bar it's in the draw down

41:39

so this is this shows how what you're

41:41

saying about that the the Opposites can

41:43

be two good ideas because this company

41:46

run by another one of my friends both

41:48

these companies run by my friends has

41:50

taken the complete opposite approach

41:51

they are a a protein bar right yeah I've

41:54

bought them actually tastes amazing

41:56

tastes as good as a chocolate bar and

41:57

I'm I'm going to probably tell a lie

41:58

here but I believe they are the fastest

42:01

growing chocolate bar or the most bought

42:02

chocolate bar in the UK now they are a

42:05

protein bar and they focus entirely on

42:09

taste and they've just sold to mon delay

42:11

I think for well I know for several

42:13

hundred millions so the founder is very

42:15

very wealthy now good friend of mine

42:17

right they went for Taste and they won

42:19

these have gone for much the opposite

42:21

which is really really focused on being

42:23

nutritionally complete and healthy and

42:24

I've sat in the it's not repellent it's

42:26

not absolutely not

42:27

quite quite the opposite I would drink

42:28

this perfectly content but you it it

42:31

tastes good enough for you to trust it

42:33

if it tasted even better I would stop

42:35

trusting it and having sat in the room

42:37

with the CEO and the founder we they

42:40

brought in these bars that tasted like

42:42

this what tasted good yeah and there was

42:44

a small compromise to the nutritionally

42:47

complete um um part in these new bars

42:51

and the founder and the managing

42:53

director said no we'd rather have bars

42:55

that taste worse

42:57

and protect that nutritionally complete

42:59

um sort of philosophy than to have it

43:02

taste really good an interesting an

43:04

interesting piece of psychology is that

43:05

Diet Coke has to taste slightly more

43:08

bitter than standard Coke for you to

43:10

believe it for you to believe it in

43:12

other words it's kind of

43:15

um in other words you have to have that

43:17

slight little bit of extra bite because

43:20

otherwise it does you you it doesn't

43:21

feel like a diet drink what are you

43:23

going to say about Red Bull you were

43:24

saying about you write a lot about the

43:26

there's lot about Red Bull because it's

43:28

this mysterious thing which is so

43:29

counterintuitive in that you know it

43:31

tastes nastier than Coke it costs a lot

43:33

more than Coke and it comes in a much

43:34

smaller can than

43:36

Coke and part of that is I think it's

43:40

not a drink it's a it's a medicine I

43:42

mean the whole marketing behind it it's

43:44

it's a drug

43:46

it's and actually the promise of

43:49

psychoactive Powers is delivered much

43:51

better by high price and weird taste and

43:54

small portions you wouldn't really I

43:56

mean okay to give you an extreme case

43:59

there there is a case where they

44:01

discover that drugs that op

44:04

work for relatively minor conditions by

44:08

which I let let's say as mild asthma

44:12

okay also work for certain rare Cancers

44:16

and apparently when they do this they

44:18

exaggerate the side effects because you

44:21

feel that if it's to be tackling a much

44:23

tougher challenge which is cancer you

44:26

would expect greater side effects I mean

44:29

you what you wouldn't want is an

44:30

oncology treatment which was pineapple

44:32

flavored and so there's this weird thing

44:35

which is you can you can do things which

44:37

kind of make sense which is we want this

44:39

to taste as nice as possible and you can

44:41

end up being logically wrong rather than

44:44

illogically right yeah and I think that

44:46

distinction is really useful because um

44:50

I'll give you an example actually nearly

44:51

all pharmaceutical

44:53

companies make the pills as easy to take

44:56

as possible okay as small as possible

44:58

you know and as few needed as possible

45:00

and so forth and when we heard this both

45:03

Dan arieli and I who were on I think a

45:05

zoom call at the time said oh dear and

45:09

they said well it's logical you know

45:11

we're designing a drug we produce the

45:13

drug how can we make the drug and we

45:14

said well when you make something very

45:17

small and very easy to take you also

45:18

make it very

45:20

forgettable and we actually said there

45:22

are you sure we shouldn't add a degree

45:23

of difficulty should you actually

45:25

require people to grind the drug up mix

45:28

it with water because there are several

45:30

reasons for that the more effort you put

45:32

into the preparation of the drug will

45:33

probably boost the placebo effect okay

45:37

uh but the second thing is you'll also

45:39

create a ritual which means you'll

45:41

remember whether or not you've taken it

45:43

whereas if a pill is literally you know

45:44

you have these pills where the biggest

45:46

problem with treating the condition is

45:48

not finding the medication it's it's

45:50

patient

45:51

compliance and we said maybe if you had

45:53

a bit of a Dar ritual around this where

45:55

you had to actually grind in the pestel

45:57

and mortar and add something you'd find

46:00

much higher levels of compliance and and

46:02

a boosted placebo effect as well really

46:05

interesting that this idea that friction

46:07

can create create value but it also can

46:09

can ingrain something in your routine

46:10

the other thing that I I I think about a

46:12

lot sometimes by the way some travel

46:14

websites deliberately make the search

46:16

procedure artificially

46:18

slow because you value the results more

46:21

highly if you've had a screen that says

46:23

we're now searching EasyJet British

46:25

Airways Alitalia d

46:27

and then 15 seconds later after a load

46:29

sort of flurry of activity on the screen

46:32

it delivers you your holiday

46:33

results you attach more significance to

46:36

those results and are more likely to go

46:38

through and book than if it just goes

46:40

bang and gives you an instantaneous

46:42

result well I think you did a thorough

46:43

job so I trust you more if I see you've

46:45

done you've searched 50 I go okay well I

46:47

don't need to do that myself then you've

46:49

looked at them all for me yeah that's

46:51

really interesting I now feel

46:53

scammed well interesting thing is this

46:55

is the interesting and this is a sort of

46:56

philosophic question which is if it

46:59

makes things feel more

47:01

valuable is it a con so okay I mean if

47:06

you take this whole question of how we

47:08

perceive value you could undou you

47:11

wouldn't disagree with the fact that the

47:13

nature of a restaurant and how it's

47:15

designed or the service adds to the

47:16

appreciation of food well if it's too

47:18

quick to deliver me my meal I think they

47:20

yeah well that's that's that's a very

47:21

interesting point yeah if absolutely

47:23

right um so the way in which the food is

47:26

presented it affects your appreciation

47:28

of the food now my argument is your your

47:31

job as a business person is to create as

47:33

much perceived value as

47:35

possible

47:37

and if you okay now I was talking to Jay

47:40

Raina the other day and just to be clear

47:42

on this you cannot create a great

47:43

restaurant with rubbish food okay yeah

47:46

yeah okay that's not going to happen but

47:48

once you reach what you might call table

47:50

stakes in terms of food quality the

47:52

things that make a restaurant great are

47:55

often what you might call tangential to

47:58

the food or the meal itself magic um or

48:00

you and it's it's atmosphere Decor you

48:03

know

48:04

theater who the other diners are it can

48:07

be all manner of different things and so

48:10

just as I think you're wrong Running a

48:11

Restaurant where you say the food is the

48:13

only thing that matters because you

48:14

could serve mandard food in a restaurant

48:16

that smelled of Wei and nobody would

48:18

enjoy their meal even though the food

48:20

was objectively superb um I think the

48:23

worst thing you can do in in in both

48:25

environmental terms and in business

48:27

terms is to create underappreciated

48:30

value is to go to the effort of

48:32

manufacturing something without actually

48:34

working out how to allow people to

48:36

realize how great it is scarcity in

48:39

packaging um one of the things that I'm

48:41

quite I I saw one of my favorite Brands

48:43

the other day do a trip around their

48:45

warehouse showing the warehouse and on

48:48

one hand I love seeing the warehouse I

48:49

love seeing the the craftsmanship that

48:51

goes into it and then they panned across

48:53

to this big Rail and I saw the item that

48:56

I and I saw like a like thousands of

48:59

them and I remember thinking oh [ __ ] and

49:02

it made me reflect on what Apple do by

49:04

just laying out like one of the products

49:05

on the shop floor and how much how much

49:08

more that makes me think there's

49:09

tremendous value because I just see one

49:11

iPad and one phone and one watch there

49:13

is a kind of Genius to that yeah they

49:16

will the ancillary products they will

49:18

show in some sort of bulk won't they and

49:19

if you're buying Mouse mats or something

49:21

they don't mind having 10 of those but

49:23

the mainstream products there is one of

49:25

them and the rest of them are kept out

49:26

of sight yeah which is very interesting

49:29

Brands don't do that enough I don't

49:30

think there is also that interesting

49:32

question about the tour of the warehouse

49:34

which is you know how much do you want

49:35

to let people in on the reality on the

49:38

yeah because it can be like it can kill

49:39

the magic to to a certain point

49:41

depending on what's going on in that

49:42

warehouse it all depends I I went out

49:44

and when we were working with laa the

49:46

famous Italian you know lingerie brand

49:49

and I flew out to the there were a

49:50

client of they flew out to Italy to

49:51

their warehouses and I I I read the

49:54

story of golden scissors the original

49:56

founder would make all of the lingerie

49:57

with their hands and golden scissors and

49:59

I saw these women who all have a another

50:02

woman standing over their shoulders

50:03

ensuring perfection in the garments and

50:05

my biggest thing to the CEO of luro at

50:07

the time was like oh my God you've never

50:09

told the story of golden figures you've

50:11

never filmed this process you're now

50:13

just competing on the High Street

50:15

against um these sort of uh cheaper

50:18

lingerie Brands who are selling at 30s

50:20

you're selling at 150 and no one knows

50:22

why no cuz you just haven't told you've

50:25

not sort of it's what you said L as a

50:27

fairly insubstantial product so it's not

50:29

if you're getting sees it this is the no

50:31

so no one sees the craftsmanship I had

50:33

no awareness of that either there you go

50:35

and isn't that and I tell you what

50:36

happened to laa they went bust and and

50:40

and when I got when I seen in Italy just

50:42

the unbelievable the fact that all of

50:44

the people hand so they never told that

50:46

story they never told the story on a

50:48

slightly more praic basis I always every

50:51

time I meet KFC I always tell them to

50:54

tell people that Colonel Saunders

50:56

effectively founded KFC when he was 65

50:58

years old you know he had a a convoluted

51:01

career but he had spent about eight

51:02

years perfecting this recipe for chicken

51:05

and it's an extraordinary story you know

51:07

the fact that a multinational

51:08

corporation was created by someone in

51:10

there basically at retirement age and my

51:13

argument is I can't explain entirely why

51:15

but it just makes me think of the thing

51:17

differently knowing the knowing the

51:19

foundational story behind it can I tell

51:21

you a really secret a really easy way I

51:23

found to do exactly that to instill any

51:25

product with a apparent sense of huge

51:28

value in historic like story is just by

51:30

naming it after a person so if if I

51:33

named if I name if I have salad if I

51:36

have Italian uh spaghetti sauce which

51:38

I've just made in a factory and I called

51:39

it I don't know la la Bellis yeah you

51:42

immediately think of a family history

51:44

that must have been attached to that

51:45

product and and years and years of

51:47

iteration from this family and it was so

51:48

good that people now Buy on mass and

51:50

Tesco and I think that's that for me is

51:52

such an interesting example where just

51:54

by calling it after someone who sounds a

51:56

Italian yeah implants this whole you

51:59

know this this story of Heritage what do

52:02

you think about personalization and when

52:04

I say personalization I really mean this

52:06

the surface level personalization of

52:08

tickling someone's ego by yeah I always

52:10

talk about Starbucks them just writing

52:12

your name on the side of the cup or the

52:13

Sher a coat campaign where they put your

52:16

name on a that was us actually that was

52:17

in Australia who instigated that

52:19

brilliant idea but um um it's very

52:22

interesting personalization because it's

52:23

one of those things you have to be very

52:25

judicious about you know it can be

52:27

spooky okay and you know there are

52:30

companies that get it worryingly wrong

52:33

uh by essentially uh playing back to

52:36

people things that they shouldn't know

52:38

or didn't need to know I've had that and

52:40

so it's often one of those things which

52:42

I think is interesting because it's best

52:43

done obliquely spooky example give so if

52:45

you know something about someone in a

52:47

personalized letter you say uh you know

52:50

uh you may be the kind of person who

52:51

recently did this rather than saying you

52:54

did this and it can it can be spooky and

52:56

it's one of those very interesting

52:58

things where knowing how to play it uh

53:01

is um uh really really critical I'm

53:03

going to give you an example where I

53:04

think someone played it wrong because I

53:05

was thinking about yeah so one of the

53:07

this is maybe slightly different but um

53:09

I went I I registered for a gym on the

53:11

other side of the world I won't say the

53:13

country because they might listen on the

53:14

other side of the world right and 30 or

53:17

40 minutes after registering for the gym

53:19

I got an email from the CEO saying hi

53:22

Steve I've just seen you've registered

53:24

for our gym um if there's anything I can

53:26

do while while you're in town please let

53:28

me know blah blah blah blah blah now on

53:29

one hand people might think that's

53:31

that's great and that's lovely of them

53:32

to do but I don't know how that

53:34

individual got my details so I gave it

53:36

to an iPad on the front desk to a nice

53:38

Indonesian lady right and then the CEO

53:41

who's a British person is clearly what

53:43

else did they see of my details did they

53:45

see my my password did they see my bank

53:47

details so it just kind of it hurt me it

53:50

I was a bit shook by it I was like how

53:52

in 35 minutes since I put that details

53:53

into the iPad has the CEO in the UK

53:55

emailed me email not just has emailed my

53:58

manager and then I'll give you a good

54:00

example which is I flew to India I got

54:02

to a a hotel in India and as I went into

54:04

the room they had a chocolate Taj Mahal

54:06

and they had my company logo social

54:07

chain and a small rice paper sticker on

54:09

the the thing and I thought that that

54:11

made me feel special yeah one of them

54:14

made me feel like they'd invaded my

54:15

privacy a little bit and the other one

54:16

had made me feel really special and I

54:17

took my phone out and I do loads of

54:18

Instagrams about this hotel and this Taj

54:21

Mahal rice paper sticker that cost $2 so

54:24

you're right there is a fine line there

54:25

and you can I mean it's very interesting

54:27

because there's all you've also got to

54:28

be very very alert to cultural

54:30

differences so that Germans have a

54:32

paranoia about data protection and

54:34

privacy uh which is an order of

54:36

magnitude greater than that you find in

54:38

say the US where I think most people in

54:41

the US kind of have the mentality that

54:42

the horse is already bolted it's too

54:44

late everybody already knows all this

54:46

stuff so leaving aside things like

54:48

medical data and stuff that is you know

54:51

naturally expected to remain secret um

54:54

it's CU I thought with a machine it's

54:55

funny cuz when you put your details into

54:57

computers and like login forms and

54:58

registration you assume they're going

55:00

into some Vault it never occurred to me

55:02

that that now because you'd self inputed

55:04

it yeah um you'd assumed that

55:07

effectively it was Anonymous yes and it

55:09

was going into some vault in a computer

55:11

yeah that was encrypted and secure so to

55:13

get an email 35 I go well these people

55:16

saying all my dat got my phone number

55:17

he's got my passwords and that was just

55:19

felt like a bit and what's interesting

55:21

is you you you found it unpleasant

55:24

another person otherwise demographically

55:25

identical to you would be cool with it

55:27

yeah they put thought it was great

55:29

customer service generally it's probably

55:31

it's probably a caution that people who

55:32

work in

55:33

marketing are less um likely to be

55:39

sensitized to positive possible negative

55:42

interpretations of what they're doing

55:44

sure because people who work in

55:45

marketing are high on openness I'll give

55:47

you a lovely example of this which I I

55:48

better not name the client but it was

55:50

simply there was a special offer by a

55:53

credit card

55:54

company and uh the envelope sent out

55:59

just said final reminder in red because

56:01

the offer was about to expire okay and

56:05

we thought it was you know reasonably

56:06

cute you're going to open a letter with

56:07

final reminder on it and it'll tell you

56:09

that you've only got 10 days left to

56:10

enjoy this particular

56:12

discount and a significant minority of

56:15

people went bananas with this and the

56:19

reason was do you know what they said

56:21

that to a Londoner this is

56:22

incomprehensible okay if you live in

56:24

London or you live in a large city my

56:26

Postman thinks I don't pay my bills

56:29

because they'd received a letter with

56:30

final reminder on the outside of the

56:32

envelope now most people in London don't

56:34

really know their postmen and they

56:36

certainly wouldn't worry about their

56:37

postmen going around and gossiping about

56:39

them because in a place like London

56:40

there's a l of anonymity if you live in

56:43

a small Country Village totally

56:45

different matter because the postman

56:46

drinks at the same Pub as your friends

56:48

oh yeah of course and that's one of

56:49

those cases where no nobody working on

56:52

the thing had had any consideration

56:54

because londoners wouldn't be bothered

56:56

by by that equally as someone who shares

56:58

a doormat with five other people might

57:00

be bothered by that let me give you let

57:02

me I want to get some real um some

57:04

advice from you then so I'm I'm

57:06

launching a uh a brand soon and it's an

57:10

apparel brand and we've been working

57:11

very hard on it over the last year or so

57:13

maybe a bit too hard on it when when it

57:14

comes to delivering that apparel brand

57:16

to the world and making it um It's

57:18

actually an extension of this podcast

57:19

it's called doac D CEO um what advice

57:23

would you give me as it relates to

57:24

delivering that product to the world to

57:25

make sure that it is inherently valuable

57:28

and that people you know uh one one

57:31

piece of advice in any form of uh etail

57:34

two two forms of advice actually uh the

57:38

two M and by the way I think marketers

57:40

spent too much time focusing on the

57:42

addition of positives when a lot of time

57:45

needs to be spent on the removal of

57:47

negatives uh one thing is answer the

57:50

phone okay and do not hide your phone

57:54

number I I that so what seems to happen

57:58

in most e-commerce is you have what you

58:01

might call the sales area which is

58:03

everything that happens up to and

58:07

including a point of

58:09

purchase and everything there is

58:11

glorious and attractive and you know and

58:14

Slick okay assuming by the way you don't

58:17

have a weird question to

58:20

ask um but I would argue one um what

58:24

then happens is if something goes wrong

58:26

with your experience either the delivery

58:28

of the experience or you need to cancel

58:31

something as soon as you deviate from

58:33

that very narrowly preconceived sort of

58:35

purchase funnel you enter a world of

58:38

pain okay and the two things which are I

58:41

think grossly under underinvested in uh

58:44

in terms of e-commerce are one giving

58:47

what what tends to happen is once once

58:49

the marketing job is done because the

58:51

person has clicked

58:53

by the responsibility for that customer

58:55

is now hand it over to people whose

58:57

metrics are anything but customer

58:59

satisfaction their cost reduction how

59:01

can we make sure that nobody phones us

59:03

up how can we make sure that every phone

59:04

call is as brief as is feasibly possible

59:07

and how can we minimize the cost of

59:08

delivery and distribution now one of the

59:11

things I think is a grotesque mistake

59:13

that most e-commerce providers make not

59:15

all of them but many is not offering you

59:17

a choice of delivery couriers for

59:20

example okay now I know why they do that

59:23

they want to put everything through one

59:25

delivery Courier so can maximize their

59:27

rebate through through volume economies

59:29

of scale actually I think I you know I

59:32

think many me two two problems happen

59:34

there one if you don't get to choose how

59:36

your item is delivered if anything goes

59:37

wrong you blame the company you don't

59:39

blame the delivery company or yourself

59:41

if I had chosen to have it delivered by

59:43

Royal Mail and it went missing I blame

59:45

Royal Mail if they insist that I have it

59:48

delivered by you know without singling

59:49

out UPS dpd whatever and it goes wrong I

59:52

blame them MH um secondly you know

59:56

people have various preferences you know

59:59

uh your liking for ivery used to be

60:01

called um uh Hermes okay varies

60:05

enormously depending on which postcode

60:06

District you're in because if you have a

60:07

very good local driver it's incredibly

60:10

good and if your local driver's off sick

60:12

it's a disaster in some cases okay um

60:16

and by not not respecting the the fact

60:19

that the person is paying for the

60:20

delivery should choose who delivers it

60:22

yeah yeah strikes me as a fundamental

60:24

failing the business of hiding the phone

60:26

number so that anybody who has a problem

60:28

is effectively treated like a second

60:30

class citizen so you have this very

60:32

characteristic thing which I think is a

60:34

problem with e-commerce which is when it

60:36

goes well it's miraculously good okay

60:40

but the second anything out of the

60:42

ordinary happens you enter a world of

60:44

pain you know um and I think that is

60:48

that's a fundamental failing this is a

60:50

customer service point the importance of

60:51

customer service right a few people I

60:53

mean selfes do selfes do it pretty well

60:55

okay

60:56

um other things I do is I would offer a

60:58

kind of Amazon Prime equivalent where if

61:00

you pay a few pounds for delivery you

61:02

get free delivery for a year that seems

61:04

to be a you know fairly obvious and

61:06

brilliant idea because why should loyal

61:08

customers pay you know inordinately more

61:10

for you know delivery than one off

61:13

customers

61:14

do um I think you know I I think you can

61:17

make an effort around how the thing is

61:18

delivered and packaged and presented

61:20

which some people do well and some

61:22

people don't bother to do at all what do

61:23

you think the secret is there to doing a

61:25

good job with pack

61:26

um possibly there's a little bit of

61:28

costly signaling involved I mean if you

61:29

order something from selfridges um the

61:33

uh inside of the box is actually yellow

61:36

with the self's logo on a kind of shiny

61:39

backdrop and there's a little bit of

61:40

tissue paper okay so you're never left

61:44

um that will have a halo effect on your

61:47

perceived value of the product by the

61:49

way you I know we don't like it but

61:51

actually packaging is to some extent

61:53

packaging is where a product first

61:55

becomes a brand

61:57

it's where it first takes on a

61:58

personality an identity uh you know

62:02

um you know a kind of an implied target

62:06

audience and so in in this thing now the

62:09

interesting thing is how are you going

62:11

to uh what's your stick do you have for

62:14

example scarcity is the clothing

62:16

available in a limited so limited runs

62:18

we we actually we actually sold some

62:20

before when I did a tour of the UK and

62:22

you had to come to the tour to buy it

62:23

and every single night on the tour we

62:24

did nine nine nights three nights at the

62:26

London plaum took it up in another

62:28

country it sold out every single night

62:29

every single item to the point that we

62:30

sold the ones on our backs yeah and well

62:32

gave them away but um every single item

62:34

sold out in every single size on the

62:36

tour so this is like the second drop of

62:37

it everyone's well aware that the first

62:40

the first run of it all sold out um we

62:42

have a very limited line uh we have a

62:46

limited amount of items again this time

62:48

and I think the key thing with this um

62:51

release is we've just agonized over the

62:54

story of the piece so it's like it

62:55

really looks more like art than it does

62:57

clothing and we've worked with artists

62:59

and there's this big movie that I'm

63:00

releasing with every single item to

63:02

explain the meaning of the piece and

63:03

then we've put a lot of effort into the

63:05

packaging the bo unboxing experience so

63:07

it is limited it will honestly probably

63:09

sell out in the first day and um I don't

63:13

even think we're going to make money

63:13

from it but that's not really why I do

63:14

it it's more because I just love the I

63:17

love the process but um probably will

63:19

you probably will make money I mean

63:21

merch is um I'm just really not bothered

63:24

by making money from it it's not the

63:25

thing in my life I same with a tour like

63:27

I spent every penny I could on on the

63:29

bloody tour because it wasn't really why

63:31

I was doing it there's probably more of

63:32

a br a wider brand play yes to doing it

63:35

which is like it's it's bringing our

63:37

audience closer to us so it's maybe a

63:39

lost leader in terms of the financials

63:41

but in the broader engagement to no I

63:43

mean this is this is actually the great

63:45

curse of a lot of modern business given

63:47

the title of your um podcast which is

63:51

that people generally over obsess about

63:54

things which are immediately

63:55

quantifiable and

64:03

underinvestment or loyalty of course I

64:06

mean it's worth noting that customer

64:07

loyalty is much much slower to measure

64:11

than for example conversion yeah and so

64:13

the extent that money is invested in

64:15

Performance Marketing or the bottom of

64:17

the funnel relative to let's say wider

64:19

brand Fame yeah uh it's a widespread

64:22

problem in the whole business World

64:24

which is that the money isn't

64:26

necessarily being spent in in the in the

64:29

channels it is because it's more

64:31

effective there but simply because it's

64:33

more it's easier to prove that it has an

64:36

effect the truth of the matter is the

64:38

world will always be too uncertain for

64:41

us to know who our customers are in

64:42

advance and therefore since you know 97%

64:46

of the potential customer base aren't in

64:48

Market at any given time and therefore

64:51

won't being covered by search or you

64:53

know uh remarketing or whatever

64:56

spending money on the 97% of people in

64:59

advance ahead of times is still a very

65:02

effective thing to do the reason people

65:04

do too little of it is that it's hard to

65:06

quantify on that particular point then

65:09

having worked in the advertising

65:10

industry this is a conversation we have

65:11

all the time with clients which is

65:13

you'll meet a certain type of client who

65:15

is very uh who who's they're religious

65:17

about the bottom of the funnel they're

65:18

if it if I can't track it and I don't

65:20

know exact I won't do it then you'll

65:23

sometimes meet the opposite which is who

65:26

just loves to spend on brand and I don't

65:28

NE they're both wrong I don't think they

65:30

yeah I mean I mean Mark riten very good

65:32

marketing Professor always talks about

65:34

the importance of both ISM and he says

65:36

it's vitally important that when I

65:38

actually speak about the importance of

65:39

brand marketing that you do not

65:42

interpret this as denigrating digital

65:44

marketing in fact I go a bit further and

65:46

say the bottom of the funnel in many

65:47

respects is the thing you have to

65:49

optimize

65:50

first because there's no point in

65:52

actually uh if there's a a bottleneck at

65:55

the bottom of the funnel if there's some

65:57

constraint or a problem or a failing uh

65:59

you know if you have very poor

66:00

conversion okay there's no point in

66:02

spending money on Advertising because

66:03

you'll just introduce more people to a

66:05

disappointing experience you're wasting

66:07

money so youve got to get the back end

66:08

and I would argue the first thing in

66:10

theory you should optimize if you're

66:11

being an absolute purist is repeat

66:14

purchase um because having gone through

66:16

the expense to acquire these customers

66:18

and actually that's the that's the

66:20

metric that always fascinates me because

66:22

we were talking earlier about electric

66:23

cars and I said the question about

66:25

Electric carss isn't how many people are

66:26

buying them okay it's not what

66:28

percentage of the new car market in the

66:30

UK in July were plug-in

66:33

Vehicles now only question worth asking

66:36

really in the long term is does anybody

66:39

who buys an electric car go back to

66:41

buying a gasoline

66:43

car because if the answer to that is

66:45

hardly anybody then okay you don't know

66:48

the exact shape of the S curve but you

66:50

know the growth is going to be pretty

66:51

spectacular and so the thing to

66:53

understand I think in a market is to

66:55

what extent does your uh product

66:57

actually convert someone to something

67:00

and then the lifetime value so You'

67:02

start with repeat purchase then you go

67:03

to conversion and then you'd work your

67:05

way up but what tends to happen is that

67:08

when people are OBS are obsessed with

67:11

quantification of everything okay it's

67:14

worth noting by the way that all big

67:16

data comes from the same place the past

67:18

all right so there's a limit to how much

67:21

big data particularly if you've had some

67:23

major event like a pandemic in between

67:25

how much big data can actually tell you

67:27

about the future in any case um as David

67:30

Ogie famously said you're not

67:31

advertising to a standing army you're

67:33

advertising to a moving parade people

67:35

are coming in and out of Market all the

67:37

time um and so uh you're absolutely

67:41

right you get some people who are just

67:42

Fame junkies and by the way I suppose

67:44

there are brand categories where that's

67:45

appropriate if it's sold through

67:47

retailers you know in other words if

67:49

it's mostly sold in the physical space

67:51

you might you know you might argue to an

67:53

extent you know for let's say a burger

67:55

or McDonald's that's not a totally crazy

67:58

position although it is now because

68:00

suddenly they got to think about

68:01

delivery and and whether people order

68:03

through the app or order through an

68:04

intermediary because it has a major

68:06

bearing on their business but but at the

68:09

same time yeah I mean the tragedy is

68:12

this idea of this false dichotomy

68:15

between brand advertising and what you

68:16

might call Performance or digital

68:18

marketing as if you have to be in one

68:21

camp or the other where is the balance

68:23

though and how does one go about is it

68:24

just in is it just there are figures on

68:27

this so if you look at the work of um

68:30

Les Benet for example and Peter field uh

68:34

the ratio shifts a little bit but

68:36

generally they'll stipulate a figure

68:38

around about the 6040 Mark in favor of

68:42

what you might call Brand mass media uh

68:46

expenditure because they have a a

68:48

mutually beneficial relationship top of

68:50

the makes the the first 20 years of my

68:52

life I spent in direct marketing and

68:54

actually you know because direct

68:56

marketing was unfashionable we spent a

68:58

lot of time denigrating advertising

68:59

spend because they got much bigger

69:01

budgets than us not necessarily rightly

69:04

but they were also you know much more

69:06

indulged than we were because they

69:08

didn't have to prove Effectiveness down

69:10

to the same sort of level of statistical

69:13

significance but we came to realize

69:15

pretty quickly that actually um first of

69:18

all there's nothing harder than direct

69:19

marketing a product that nobody's ever

69:20

heard of yeah and that every time just

69:23

to give an example every time American

69:24

Express went on television or advertised

69:27

big in mass media uh the response rates

69:30

to direct mail would not quite double

69:33

maybe but they increased pretty

69:35

significantly you had to work less hard

69:37

and you had to work it's that wonderful

69:39

phrase which comes from a book by uh let

69:41

me get his job right uh his his his name

69:44

right

69:45

um I think it's Matt Johnson who's just

69:48

written a book called um uh brands that

69:50

mean business and his wonderful line is

69:52

having a great brand means you get to

69:54

play the game of capital m in Easy Mode

69:57

yeah so true and that's and what what is

69:59

true is is Fame to some extent brings a

70:03

load of benefits which aren't

70:04

necessarily sales related so for example

70:07

you can [ __ ] up and your customers will

70:09

be more forgiving okay uh take the

70:12

example of Apple I mean on a couple of

70:14

occasions Apple has produced products

70:17

which had Fairly major flaws which might

70:20

have proved pretty fatal to lesser

70:23

Brands you know the famous f where if

70:25

you held it in the wrong way it didn't

70:27

make phone calls for example and um

70:30

given the reality Distortion field

70:32

around the Apple brand people have

70:34

passed over those incredibly rapidly and

70:36

so there you know people are less price

70:39

sensitive that's not easy to measure by

70:41

the way as well it's very easy to

70:43

measure the the extent to which

70:44

something has an effect on sales but the

70:47

effect to which something has an effect

70:48

on price elasticity and the extent to

70:51

which you can command a premium because

70:53

it's a great brand because it's a great

70:54

brand is harder to measure because you

70:56

don't have the

70:57

counterfactual you know when you sell

70:59

something the counterfactual is that you

71:01

assume that you wouldn't have sold it

71:03

otherwise but if you sell something for

71:05

a high

71:06

price you can't in fact determine that

71:09

without your advertising you wouldn't

71:11

have sold it yeah for you know for that

71:13

for that premium price so it's it's to

71:16

some extent this quest for perfect

71:18

measurement to to reduce marketing to a

71:21

kind of Newtonian physics is a bit of a

71:23

false god Fame you about Fame there Fame

71:26

can also be applied in the topic of

71:28

personal branding as well obviously

71:30

social media has allowed us all now to

71:31

build our personal Brands you've got the

71:32

Gary Vaya Chucks of the world who have

71:34

built you know you know their companies

71:36

are famous because they've they've

71:38

branded a person at Ogie and within your

71:41

sort of your your marketing what kind of

71:44

shift have you seen in the desire for

71:45

people to become Brands themselves and

71:47

how valuable do you think that is I

71:50

think advertising always had those

71:53

personal Brands and if anything it's

71:55

slightly diminished actually really um

71:58

uh campaign magazine always did a very

72:01

good job of you know making sure there

72:03

were 30 or 40 sort of famous names

72:06

within the within the business that that

72:09

just happens in a different medium now

72:11

right it happens on LinkedIn with yes I

72:13

I agree I mean you know so I mean one of

72:15

the greatest things for example there's

72:17

a wonderful wonderful guy who now must

72:19

be I don't want to name his age but you

72:21

know his you know past retirement age

72:23

called Dave Trot you probably know okay

72:26

uh he'd be a brilliant interview by the

72:27

way on the show absolutely fantastic but

72:29

what has been absolutely fantastic is

72:32

that um uh you know he's a glorious

72:35

advertising mind I mean just an absolute

72:37

ornament to the industry and he through

72:40

Twitter and through uh

72:42

blogging has had a completely new lease

72:45

of life and influence to a completely

72:46

new generation of people um and has been

72:50

you know hugely valuable as a teacher

72:53

what's interesting about that actually

72:54

is that of course uh he does that

72:57

unpaid and one of the things that is

72:59

complicated about this new world okay

73:02

you know the most valuable thing I often

73:04

do in the course of a working week is

73:07

either to give something away or to put

73:09

somebody in touch with something else

73:11

neither of which you know that kind of

73:14

barter um neither of those things is in

73:17

any way monetizable is it well

73:19

reciprocity would say otherwise I know I

73:21

suppose you've just got to rely on a

73:22

high degree of reciprocity in some

73:24

respect I mean it always it always

73:26

bothers me about this which is that

73:27

we're in a business advertising which is

73:29

paid by the hour which is a terrible way

73:32

to pay for ideas yeah because the value

73:34

of something has no relation to the time

73:37

uh devoted to its

73:39

Inception and

73:41

um it it is genuine I mean you know I

73:44

always joke about this the most valuable

73:45

thing I probably did was almost

73:47

accidentally my working life which was

73:48

to go to the government's behavioral

73:50

insights team and as a sort of fanatical

73:53

Vapor I'd been a longtime smoker and had

73:56

a been able to quit for the first time

73:58

successfully by switching to vaping it

74:00

took me a little while but once I'd made

74:02

the switch I've never gone back

74:05

um and I went to the government's

74:07

behavioral insights team and I said look

74:09

um these things are coming over from

74:11

both Japan and the United States they're

74:12

electronic cigarettes I think there are

74:14

two things you need to be alert to in

74:17

Psychology one of which is that um

74:19

because they actually replicate the

74:21

habit of smoking not just the nicotine

74:23

uh they are a major kind of what you

74:26

might call a gateway drug act they're a

74:28

major source of harm reduction at the

74:30

very least uh it may help people to quit

74:33

uh at the very least it'll help people

74:35

to shift to something a much less

74:36

harmful delivery device versus patches

74:38

versus patches and guns and things like

74:40

that which didn't replicate the behavior

74:42

and then the second thing I said is the

74:44

second thing you got to be alert to is

74:46

that because of peculiar human

74:48

psychology half the people in the what

74:50

you might call the health and

74:52

anti-smoking Lobby will be fanatical

74:54

about banning electronic

74:56

cigarettes and all credited them the

74:58

behavioral insights team um under a guy

75:00

called David halpen I think they went to

75:02

the Cameron government and said favor

75:04

here can we have a light touch on vaping

75:07

regulation please and you know various

75:10

parts of the EU have gone for much

75:11

stricter regulation there were some

75:13

countries which were more or less

75:14

Banning it the US has banned jeel for

75:17

some reason bizarre on that on that

75:19

point of personal branding though do do

75:20

you think building a personal brand is

75:22

important yeah um it's very interesting

75:25

I mean you have a personal brand whether

75:26

you like it or not but that's one really

75:28

important point about branding which is

75:31

that everybody you know and and that's

75:33

by the way why I think marketing is so

75:35

important because it's not the brand is

75:38

not the heated steering wheel of the

75:39

marketing world you know the optional

75:41

extra that you can do without but is

75:43

quite nice to have people are going to

75:45

perceive you in some way regardless of

75:48

anything you do okay they're going to

75:50

form an impression of you they're going

75:52

to form an impression of what you're

75:53

worth what kind of business you are um

75:56

you know and they will use all manner of

75:58

kind of inferences and heuristics to

76:00

arrive at this

76:02

conclusion and in many ways I suppose

76:04

this is why I argue that marketing isn't

76:06

an optional extra it's an essential

76:08

because the worst thing you can

76:10

do is build a great product and fail to

76:14

present it in a way that is convincing

76:17

appealing attractive or which confers

76:20

status on its users and the same applies

76:22

for your personal brand and the same

76:24

yeah the same you're going to have a

76:25

personal brand whether you like it or

76:27

not so you might as well try and have a

76:29

good one I think it probably is true to

76:31

say that the personal brand requires

76:33

sacrifice you know that old that old

76:35

saying that strategy is the art of

76:38

sacrifice but way not totally true I

76:41

think there are win-wins you know what

76:43

is the sacrifice of a penel brand but

76:45

well I I

76:48

suspect you don't need to suspect you

76:50

got a personal brand yeah you you have

76:52

to have weaknesses as well as strengths

76:54

now interesting ly for example one of

76:56

the things that will be part of my

76:57

personal brand is I I'm not a CEO I have

77:00

no aspiration to be a CEO and I know

77:02

enough about myself to know I would not

77:03

be good at that job okay there are

77:06

certain forms of uh of ambition and

77:09

aspiration which you know constant with

77:12

with a personal brand that I have uh are

77:14

basically there avenues that are closed

77:16

to me I'm not very good at

77:17

Administration I'm very bad at making

77:20

difficult decisions self-awareness is a

77:22

personal brand strength yeah I suppose

77:23

but I'm I'm know I'd be useful I'd be

77:25

useful at making oblique or unusual

77:28

suggestions I'd be useful at getting

77:31

people to consider the same thing in

77:32

five different ways or uh promoting a

77:34

counterintuitive thought I might be

77:37

useful at suggesting somebody you know

77:39

you I've got fairly good personal roller

77:40

deex you know before you run off and do

77:43

this on your own why don't you talk to

77:45

this guy at this University who's been

77:46

studying this for the last 15 years when

77:49

you think about why you were successful

77:51

in your career and why you know you're

77:53

very very well known in the industry and

77:55

people speak very highly of you why in

77:57

hindsight do you think as you look back

77:59

and connect those dots you were

78:01

successful um I think um and by the way

78:06

this is also an argument for you know

78:08

ethnic cognitive all kinds of diversity

78:11

I really really love the Avatar and

78:13

marketing industry I think it's a source

78:16

of endless Fascination I think it's much

78:18

much more economically important uh than

78:21

is recognized uh in the contribution it

78:23

makes to uh Innovation to progress uh to

78:28

human flourishing actually uh so I tend

78:31

to take a fairly positive take the only

78:33

the only thing I'd say is I've always

78:35

had half one foot out of the industry I

78:39

haven't entirely bought in you know I

78:43

never I I half bought into the awards

78:45

culture let's say but retained a degree

78:47

of skepticism you know I half buy

78:51

into purpose but but you in other words

78:54

haven't become ideological about

78:57

anything to some extent I'm ideological

78:59

about not being

79:00

ideological um you know human psychology

79:04

is immensely complicated okay even at

79:06

the level of the individual at the level

79:08

of individuals interacting with other

79:11

individuals it is immensely complicated

79:14

I don't think it's something you can

79:16

generally pronounce confidently about

79:18

all you can do is start by asking better

79:20

questions and perform better experiments

79:23

I think and I think that's to some

79:25

extent why entrepreneurs are so

79:27

essential uh in

79:29

Innovation bit of it a bit of it is the

79:32

one disadvantage big companies have in

79:33

innovating is that it's very difficult

79:35

to get the timing right and if you think

79:38

about it while one big company has one

79:41

shot at an idea 15 entrepreneurs will

79:45

launch at 15 different times and one of

79:47

them will get the timing right just by

79:49

the law of averages okay so the timing

79:51

is one issue but the other issue is that

79:55

maybe the really Innovative product

79:58

require some component of nonsense I

80:02

don't mean nonsense but I mean nonsense

80:04

you know there's a degree of uh either

80:07

sort of counterintuitive or seemingly

80:10

illogical quality to them I want to know

80:13

about you though okay why you were

80:15

successful so you said that sort of

80:18

unconven maintaining unconventional

80:20

thinking and it even actually struck me

80:21

because when you said you went to this

80:22

bug convention giving yourself another

80:25

point of reference to inspire creativity

80:27

or out of the box out of the industry

80:29

thinking is quite clearly a huge

80:30

Advantage yeah c i curiosity is probably

80:33

the kind of table stakes in in this

80:35

business if you're generally curious

80:37

what about what else about you though um

80:40

I can I has it a guess I'm quite okay

80:43

I'm quite good at the Spiel you I'm

80:45

quite good at my feet which I don't know

80:47

where that came from uh you know growing

80:49

up in Wales is a bit of a bonus the

80:52

Spiel what you mean well you you grew up

80:53

in Plymouth okay okay yeah

80:55

now without without disparaging people

80:58

in the southeast of England okay in the

81:00

west of England and in the Celtic

81:02

Fringe people talk not just to convey

81:06

information but to prove they're good at

81:08

talking there's a kind of musical

81:10

quality to Celtic Irish Welsh

81:13

conversation which is it's a form of

81:16

kind of regardless of the actual

81:18

information it contains people enjoy

81:21

seeing it done really well why do they

81:23

why do you think people enjoy hearing

81:24

talk because I would agree I think that

81:26

you're a very very good talker oh one

81:29

thing um by the way which Nim Talib very

81:32

interesting on this Nim Talib always

81:34

says you should Mumble or you should

81:36

speak very fast and his argument is that

81:39

if you make it slightly difficult for

81:41

people to comprehend what you're saying

81:43

either by speaking very fast or by

81:45

speaking slightly indistinctly they pay

81:47

more attention to what you're saying I

81:49

think I think there's an interesting

81:50

thing just from hearing you speak today

81:52

where um you you're actually you're a

81:55

very engaging speaker because when you

81:56

introduce a point you introduce it with

81:58

a compelling slightly ambiguous story so

82:01

even you'll you'll start it with that

82:04

and then the next sentence leads me up

82:06

to you're almost making me a promise

82:07

that of of what you're going to reveal

82:09

to me in that story and then you deliver

82:12

upon that Promise by telling me a story

82:15

and certain I have I see it a lot with

82:16

people when they're speaking and also

82:18

there's other things like your tonal

82:19

fluctuations so if you and also your use

82:21

of pausing but your tonal fluctuations

82:23

actually do keep maybe a Welsh thing by

82:25

the way I don't have a Welsh accent but

82:27

some people have said I I've kind of got

82:29

Welsh intonation I've sat here with

82:31

authors before and they they're so smart

82:33

but honestly I just can't I can't stay

82:35

with them because it's always like this

82:37

the whole to of the conversation is like

82:38

this so you just really it's F really

82:40

you know what I mean yeah and it's just

82:41

that it's so but you yeah see you can't

82:44

you can't accuse the Welsh of not adding

82:46

a little bit of musicality to uh it's

82:48

just interesting when you look back in

82:49

hindsight because I genuinely believe

82:51

having spoken to you today your delivery

82:53

of ideas and stories and it's funny that

82:55

I even use use of the word stories is

82:57

such a huge part of why you've been able

83:00

to rise above the crop and I actually

83:02

think about it with myself it's it's

83:04

it's all good having talent and genius

83:06

and smarts which you have and a lot of

83:07

people have but then the ability to

83:09

liquate it and articulate it in a way

83:11

that's captivating I think stories are

83:13

the PDF files of human information okay

83:17

so they're they're the vehicle we use

83:19

for storing information and the vehicle

83:21

we use for sharing it it's a universal

83:23

format like the f file you know it

83:25

doesn't matter what Hardware the

83:26

recipient's got they can read the file

83:29

okay you just did it again okay so you

83:31

said you introduced a really compelling

83:33

idea that I'd never heard before I think

83:34

they are the PDF file of human

83:35

information I like what and then you

83:37

have me and by a lot of people don't do

83:39

that a lot of people don't introduce the

83:41

first concept in the sentence as being

83:43

something slightly ambiguous and unusual

83:46

which inspires curiosity via engagement

83:49

so it's it's an interesting it's

83:50

probably a habit that you have but I

83:51

think it's a very useful one if for

83:53

people to try and learn so class IST at

83:54

University whether I learned it a bit uh

83:57

I mean doing I'm a big fan of Classics

83:59

in schools by the way because I think

84:01

first of all I don't think you can

84:02

actually decide as an English speaker

84:04

which language you should learn in

84:06

advance so learning a language which

84:08

allows you to learn other languages more

84:10

quickly may not maybe the best approach

84:12

for modern languages ironically is to

84:15

teach dead languages I German might be

84:17

an alternative because that at least

84:18

teaches you how language sort of works

84:21

um didn't you say something actually in

84:23

this book about this about how making

84:25

something ambiguous is actually

84:27

sometimes more effective because yes the

84:30

the idea that Trump was quite a valuable

84:32

deterrent I'm not sure that they would

84:34

have invaded the Ukraine if Trump had

84:36

still been president because uh this is

84:39

this comes down to the realm of Game

84:40

Theory which is that being

84:42

irrational uh in some senses is is

84:45

actually an intelligent strategy because

84:48

no one's quite sure what you're going to

84:49

do in response yeah that the that once

84:51

you're rational you're predictable and

84:53

once you're predictable you can be

84:55

hacked and so having some element of

84:58

this is where probably the need for

85:00

human temper and anger arises you see if

85:03

you had someone who would never lose

85:05

their temper and lash out even at some

85:08

risk to their own safety okay you could

85:11

dick around with them almost endlessly

85:13

couldn't you if you had someone who is

85:15

100% docile and would just roll with all

85:18

the punches and would never lose it and

85:20

would never retaliate simply because it

85:22

wasn't rational to retaliate against say

85:25

unsuitable odds I mean there probably

85:28

were people like that but they didn't

85:29

have many descendants I think from a

85:31

darwinian point of view no you're right

85:33

and actually entirely rational people

85:35

wouldn't have spawned many descendants

85:37

because their behavior would have been

85:38

too predictable it been very easy to

85:40

trap them I just think there's a broader

85:42

Point here which in which is it's I mean

85:44

it's Central to advertising as well

85:45

which is people Overlook the importance

85:47

of communication hugely in in in overall

85:52

outcomes and even when I sit here with

85:54

people that can speak well and tell

85:56

stories well and convey ideas well I

85:58

don't even think half the time they

85:59

realize that that's such a huge part of

86:00

their Brilliance over the course of a

86:02

lifetime imagine imagine the

86:05

opportunities you'll create the ability

86:06

to sell yourself the ability to push

86:08

your ideas forward whether they're right

86:09

or wrong the ability to inspire others

86:11

and I I honestly think I well actually

86:14

one of the things that's most painful to

86:15

me about watching The Dragon's Den is

86:18

now I I occasionally watch Shark Tank or

86:20

whatever the American equivalent okay

86:22

now Americans have this tradition of

86:23

show tell don't they where even when

86:25

you're at primary school you have to go

86:27

up and give a talk about something MH

86:29

and

86:31

generally I find most Americans are

86:34

pretty good at you know at giving an

86:37

account of something 100% And one of the

86:39

painful things about the Brits on

86:41

Dragon's Den is sometimes I can see the

86:44

people have actually what is a pretty

86:45

good idea but they're telling the story

86:47

from like the wrong end of the telescope

86:49

completely I'm I'm going this is this is

86:51

actually painful to me because you have

86:54

this fantastic idea now you know okay

86:58

this is okay slightly unethical but in a

87:01

few cases I just go look if you just

87:03

invent a story about how you came up

87:06

with this okay now apparently the whole

87:08

eBay story about pezes was never really

87:11

true you know that his girlfriend wanted

87:13

to trade pezes but they felt they needed

87:15

a foundation myth for how eBay got

87:17

started you know and you I I bet I

87:20

wonder if it's actually true that that

87:22

Uber came up with a map when

87:24

I see it all the time in the see these

87:26

wonderful stories come up just come up

87:28

with a you know you know a great story

87:32

but also the way in which they um the

87:36

their ability to generate perceived

87:39

value through

87:41

narrative um is their greatest weakness

87:44

and I I I'm watching this I'm get this

87:46

is just painful you know I mean actually

87:48

schools should be teaching this yeah

87:50

that's what I'm saying should I mean how

87:52

it leads you to worry you know are there

87:54

people out there and by the way I'm sure

87:57

this is you know this is true there are

87:59

there must have been people out there

88:00

who had extraordinary inventive skills

88:03

whose complete lack of marketing skills

88:07

effectively meant they died in obscurity

88:08

just even their complete lack of simple

88:10

communication skills yeah like not even

88:12

Mar marketing is maybe step two but just

88:15

being able to tell someone else like an

88:17

investor or a potential co-founder about

88:20

their ideas in an inspiring way that

88:21

will Galvanize them and get them in to

88:24

join the mission yeah I I I honestly I

88:26

think the most important skill in the

88:28

world that that you could you know give

88:30

gift to a child or anyone is just the

88:32

ability to uh communicate effectively

88:34

tell stories and what which is

88:35

ultimately what we call sales yeah and

88:37

you do it when you're meeting a girl in

88:39

a nightclub or whether you're inspiring

88:40

employees or investors or you're

88:42

building a personal brand or you're

88:43

talking to customers the ability to

88:46

understand how to keep people um well I

88:48

got an idea I want to propose to the

88:50

government that I mean I think that if

88:53

we take Mar thinking and alchemical

88:55

thinking we can also deploy it within

88:57

politics and government and and um uh

89:01

public sector decision

89:03

making you know I think the NHS could

89:06

actually create massively greater

89:08

patient

89:09

Satisfaction by deploying certain you

89:12

know behaviors and techniques just for

89:14

their meaning not for their objective

89:16

medical value

89:18

okay but um like what well I

89:25

I'll give one example I think you could

89:26

actually reframe waiting time for an

89:28

operation in some cases as preparation

89:30

for the operation so if that time can be

89:33

put to good use actually losing weight

89:35

in my case if I ever I had to have

89:36

invasive surgery okay if they said okay

89:39

the operation's in six weeks that means

89:40

you've got six weeks to lose so many

89:42

Stone and this is how we're going to do

89:44

it and so the time is actually spent

89:45

improving the odds of the operation

89:47

rather than just waiting secondly you

89:49

could probably borrow a tip from Uber

89:52

and you could continually remind them of

89:54

of the date remind them of Milestones so

89:56

they didn't feel that part of the reason

89:58

they're terrified of it being six weeks

90:00

away is because they think it's going to

90:01

shift by another six weeks you know it's

90:04

a bit like there's a very big difference

90:06

between waiting for a pastel to arrive

90:08

which you can track and waiting for a

90:10

pastel to arrive that you can't track

90:12

yeah so you know making making things

90:14

sort of trackable in some sense to

90:16

reassure people I think there are a lot

90:18

of psychological uh things you know just

90:21

as actually Dume ingeniously if you have

90:23

to Q for Dum they come out and make you

90:26

chai okay and they serve chai to the

90:28

waiting Q now that's very clever because

90:31

that act of generosity inspires

90:33

reciprocation so you're much less likely

90:35

to quit the queue I think another one i'

90:38

do is i' I'd reduce student loans

90:41

significantly if people had worked for

90:43

one or two years before they went to

90:45

University I think that I think that

90:47

could be a major major game Cher because

90:50

at the moment why why would you do okay

90:52

right what what happened

90:54

okay this is one of those invisible

90:56

effects which nobody notices when I went

90:59

to University in

91:00

1984 okay okay you know I I had a

91:03

private education not a you know very

91:05

good one actually and I I I went to

91:08

Cambridge in 1984 Okay then if you had a

91:11

degree from let's say a Russell group

91:14

University it was um sufficient to get

91:18

you a reasonably good starting job but

91:19

it wasn't necessary what happened when

91:22

we expand expanded higher education was

91:24

a degree became necessary but not

91:27

sufficient mhm okay and so you have a

91:30

bunch of people who might be better off

91:32

or happier going straight into the world

91:34

of work who are now required to get a

91:37

degree in order to start work at a kind

91:39

of level in which they can reach

91:41

positions of reasonable reward okay now

91:44

it wasn't like that you could you could

91:46

go into you know well-paid work without

91:48

a degree in 1987 you can't do that now

91:51

okay very easily

91:54

now I think if you reserved a whole load

91:57

of University places or you discounted

91:59

University places for people who'd

92:01

worked somewhere first some of these

92:03

people may well find out that they love

92:05

the business so much they wouldn't

92:06

bother going to University at all but

92:08

you'd also create a social Norm where

92:10

there was nothing weird about not going

92:13

to University before you started work so

92:15

you'd break that assumption that

92:18

University automatically comes straight

92:20

after school but the third requirement

92:22

would be if we're going to educate

92:24

people it's not a totally crazy

92:26

requirement of them to make them prove

92:28

that they can actually function in the

92:30

real world with other people because I'm

92:33

not sure I was bit I'm a bit sad that

92:35

kemy banock was just knocked out of the

92:37

conservative leadership thing because a

92:39

she didn't have a degree in PPE from

92:42

Oxford which is a positive in my book

92:44

but also she worked in McDonald's now

92:46

I'm not sure genuinely that in terms of

92:50

tacit knowledge understanding of the

92:52

world I'm not sure that I wouldn't have

92:55

been better off with one year less at

92:56

Cambridge and one year more working at

92:58

McDonald's I you know we forget this we

93:01

have this extraordinary narrative that

93:04

education adds to people's human capital

93:07

okay and that somehow the second you

93:09

start work you know you become just you

93:12

know you learn nothing this is

93:15

completely the opposite of my experience

93:17

you know I learned just as much to my

93:18

first three years in Ogie as I did at

93:20

three years in University the idea that

93:23

working isn't educational and that

93:26

there's that the only way you can add to

93:27

human capital or value is by putting

93:29

people through these incredibly

93:30

artificial sort of oblique intelligence

93:33

tests which aren't really very good

93:35

you're looking at a Dropout so I I the

93:38

interesting thing the interesting thing

93:39

which must be true statistically and it

93:41

must be true simply because simply

93:44

because of Bill Gates and Mark

93:45

Zuckerberg is that the average Harvard

93:48

Dropout is almost certainly much richer

93:50

than the average Harvard graduate

93:52

because even Zuckerberg and Gates on

93:54

their own would make that a statistical

93:57

necessity yeah I yeah and I I would not

93:58

be surprised to hear that because I

94:00

think it also points to another

94:01

characteristic that those individuals

94:02

have that is conducive with success we

94:05

do have a closing tradition on this

94:07

podcast which is the last guest writes a

94:09

question for the next guest yeah um and

94:12

this guest has written a question for

94:13

you now their handwriting is not good so

94:16

this is I've been staring at this for

94:18

about 15 minutes trying to figure out

94:19

what it says but here we go um if I

94:21

asked you at the age of 16 who in the

94:23

world you would have liked to be what

94:28

would you have said and has

94:31

your answer

94:33

changed uh probably not it probably

94:36

would have been someone like John C um I

94:38

venerate commedian the comedian John C

94:41

of of the Monty Python okay and Faulty

94:44

Towers it probably would have been

94:46

someone like that I think because I

94:49

venerate comedians because they bring

94:52

this extraordinary

94:54

fresh I got to use a fancy epistemology

94:57

you know their way of perceiving the

94:59

world is in and this is why I'm very

95:01

much against politically correct um uh

95:04

sort of political activists uh trying to

95:07

effectively censor comedians because

95:09

what you're allowing there is for a

95:10

group of people who have an incredibly

95:12

narrow unsophisticated and moronic

95:15

epistemology to legislate on people who

95:19

have a spectacularly sophisticated and

95:21

nuanced and um uh and complex uh sense

95:26

of perception it's completely the wrong

95:28

way around you know comedians should be

95:29

able to ban political activists for

95:31

being boring in a healthy world not the

95:33

other way around um so yeah i' I I

95:37

venerate comedians to a particular

95:39

degree I think um so your answer would

95:42

have been um yeah I think I think it

95:44

would have been some kind of comedian uh

95:47

I would have you know whether later on

95:49

it might have been the not the 9:00 news

95:50

team I didn't know who he was at the

95:53

time but John Lloyd who is behind a

95:55

great deal of actually very successful

95:57

advertising uh but also behind a great

96:00

deal of very successful television

96:01

comedy has to be considered one of the

96:03

all-time greats and has your answer

96:05

changed no not really uh no I still I

96:08

still venerate uh those people you know

96:11

I'll sit down with YouTube and watch you

96:12

know three hours of Bill Burr and four

96:15

hours of Dave Chappelle Dave Chappelle

96:17

by the way you know as uh in terms of

96:19

delivery is we're talking about that

96:21

whole business of how you speak mhm um I

96:25

mean I I just sit there in awe you know

96:27

um and so no those are the people those

96:29

are the people who I I kind of can't

96:31

help but uh venerate first of all I just

96:34

want to say thank you it's been a really

96:35

inspiring conversation and really this

96:37

book is really great it's really

96:38

challenging in all the right ways but

96:40

it's based on so much truth and

96:42

experience that I really believe that

96:43

it's one of those essential books for

96:45

people that are working in these

96:46

industries or just in really any

96:47

industry because if you're in business

96:49

the principles within this book are so

96:51

applicable to so many things

96:54

um that I feel like it's a really

96:55

essential book so thank you for writing

96:57

it thank you for being here today it's

96:59

been a real honor to speak to you um and

97:01

yeah continue being yourself because I

97:02

think the world needs a few more people

97:04

like you that that thinking the way you

97:05

do so thank you so much R I'll keep

97:07

trying thank you very much and keep up

97:09

the good work it's been fantastic and an

97:11

inspiration thank you Rory quick one as

97:14

you might know crafted are one of the

97:15

sponsors of this podcast and crafted are

97:18

a jewelry brand and they make really

97:20

meaningful pieces of jewelry the really

97:22

wonderful thing about crafted jewelry is

97:24

it's super affordable it looks amazing

97:26

the pieces hold tremendous meaning and

97:29

they are really wellmade I think I've

97:31

worn this piece for almost a year it

97:34

hasn't broken hasn't changed color cuz

97:36

it's really really good quality and it

97:38

costs roughly 50 Quid people will be

97:41

surprised when they hear that they'll

97:42

probably assume that all of my jewelry

97:44

is like solid gold and cost thousands

97:46

and thousands of pounds but what's the

97:47

point when you can achieve the exact

97:49

same effect from a piece of jewelry

97:51

that's high quality and cost 50 quids

97:53

that's why I crafted

97:57

[Music]

98:15

[Music]

Interactive Summary

The video features an in-depth conversation between Steven Bartlett and Rory Sutherland, an expert in marketing and human psychology. The core of their discussion revolves around the idea that human value is often 'perceptual' rather than merely functional. Sutherland argues that businesses can create immense 'moonshot' value by focusing on psychological framing, storytelling, and enhancing user experience rather than just relying on engineering improvements. They cover various examples like the Uber map, the 'vegan leather' in Teslas, and the 'Ikea effect,' illustrating how counterintuitive behaviors and even slight friction can sometimes increase consumer trust and perceived value.

Suggested questions

4 ready-made prompts