HomeVideos

You’re Watching the End of the World in Real Time - Eric Weinstein

Now Playing

You’re Watching the End of the World in Real Time - Eric Weinstein

Transcript

4150 segments

0:00

Jeffrey Epstein was a product of at

0:02

least one element of the intelligence

0:03

community. I would bet money on it. The

0:05

CIA, FBI? I don't know who ran him, but

0:08

he knew a tremendous amount about my

0:09

scientific work in ways that he wasn't

0:11

supposed to. Very powerful people told

0:13

me I needed to meet him. He certainly

0:15

was not a financier in any standard

0:17

sense. That was a cover story. I need to

0:19

know what this thing was, and I want to

0:21

know why people don't investigate. I

0:23

want to know why nobody asks for the

0:25

filings, but I think more than anything,

0:27

we don't trust our scientists because

0:29

our scientists are the most powerful

0:31

people in our society. So, do you think

0:33

science is being controlled so that it

0:35

can be used in a way that's beneficial?

0:37

Let's put it this way. Eric Weinstein is

0:39

a renowned mathematician and one of the

0:41

most fearless and provocative thinkers

0:42

of our time. He dissects the failures of

0:45

science, exposes elite networks, and

0:47

proposes bold new theories that could

0:49

save humanity. So, top of mind for me at

0:51

the moment is the apocalypse and

0:52

tropical fruit.

0:54

I'm not kidding. You're looking at the

0:56

end, man. Do you really think this is

0:57

the start of the end? Of course it is.

0:59

Look at how much has happened in the

1:01

last month. And the big problem is that

1:03

we share one atmosphere. All of

1:05

humanity's eggs are in one basket. So,

1:07

what needs to happen to get me a future?

1:09

So, I think Elon is 100% right. You got

1:11

to get to another sphere, but he's being

1:13

a complete when it comes to science, and

1:15

he's being a total hero when it comes to

1:17

engineering. But you can't engineer your

1:18

way to the stars with the science we

1:20

have. But physics opens the universe to

1:22

you. But we have a real problem. A new

1:24

idea in physics changes the balance of

1:27

power in the world. The desire of our

1:30

government is to get the science to give

1:32

us as much power as possible. But then

1:34

they castrate the scientists, belittle

1:36

them, destroy their families, their

1:38

lives, their ability to earn because our

1:40

government isn't good enough to keep its

1:42

own secrets. I Do you think

1:44

>> My employer was a special informant to

1:46

the FBI. There's a doctrine that says

1:48

physicists don't have free speech.

1:49

They're stopping the world's most

1:51

important group from making progress.

1:54

Physics is the only thing that's going

1:55

to get you a future.

1:57

So, let's talk about that.

2:00

I see messages all the time in the

2:01

comment section that some of you didn't

2:03

realize you didn't subscribe. So, if you

2:05

could do me a favor and double-check if

2:06

you're a subscriber to this channel,

2:07

that would be tremendously appreciated.

2:09

It's the simple It's the free thing that

2:11

anybody that watches this show

2:12

frequently can do to help us here to

2:14

keep everything going in this show in

2:16

the trajectory it's on. So, please do

2:17

double-check if you subscribed and thank

2:20

you so much because in a strange way you

2:21

are you're part of our history and

2:24

you're on this journey with us and I

2:25

appreciate you for that. So, yeah, thank

2:27

you.

2:30

Eric, you are a particularly captivating

2:34

individual for the very fact that you

2:36

grace so many different intellectual

2:38

subjects.

2:40

As we sit here now having this

2:42

conversation, I want to know

2:45

what subjects at this moment in in time

2:47

are occupying most of your thoughts and

2:49

most of your thinking?

2:51

We have

2:52

a a strong listenership here

2:55

and I think the responsibility that I

2:57

have meeting someone like you is to

2:58

understand

3:00

what we should be talking about.

3:03

So, top of mind for me at the moment is

3:04

tropical fruit and physics.

3:07

I'm not kidding. Tropical fruit and

3:09

physics?

3:09

>> Yeah. But that's just because you're

3:10

catching me on a particular day. Okay.

3:13

And my my local

3:15

99 Ranch Market ran out of rambutan,

3:18

which I'm addicted to.

3:21

No, I have serious issues with tropical

3:22

fruit. I'm I'm completely obsessed by

3:24

it. What about this week? What what's

3:26

been occupying most of your thoughts

3:27

this week? Well, the apocalypse

3:29

and physics.

3:31

Why do you say the apocalypse?

3:34

Um

3:34

>> What do you mean by the apocalypse?

3:36

Well, we're we're becoming

3:38

immune to to the apocalypse. We just

3:40

watched hypersonic missiles slam into a

3:42

modern city

3:44

on TV and

3:47

we're watching one of the world's

3:51

most remarkable civilizations, the

3:53

Persians, take

3:55

uh direct hits from both Israel and

3:59

the US, and I'm just beside myself.

4:02

I mean,

4:03

this is incredibly dramatic.

4:07

If If you think about, you know, just

4:08

the idea of the Jews and the Persians

4:10

are both still here.

4:12

And, you know, one of the things that I

4:15

find really just painful is that

4:19

I care about certain certain cultures

4:21

that I know well more than others, and

4:23

these are two of my absolute favorites.

4:26

What's What's going on at this moment in

4:28

time? Because it feels like there's more

4:31

conflict than there's ever been.

4:33

I don't know whether that's just a bias

4:34

that I have at this moment, but whether

4:36

I'm looking at the wrong social media

4:37

algorithm, but it feels like the world

4:39

isn't is tense.

4:40

>> Well, you're too You're too young for

4:41

the Cold War.

4:43

So, I don't know how old you are.

4:45

>> 32. Yeah, so you you you really missed I

4:48

grew up in a different world where

4:50

things were tense because there were two

4:51

players, and you know, it was more or

4:53

less the US and the Soviets.

4:57

And then we decided and one of the

4:59

dumbest things we ever came up with, a

5:00

very smart man

5:02

came up with the dumbest one of the

5:03

dumbest ideas, which was the end of

5:04

history. And,

5:07

you know, the the post-World War II

5:09

order

5:11

is here to stop us from using the

5:13

technologies that came out of this, and

5:15

I you know, I talked about this a lot.

5:17

There was a 6-month period between

5:19

November of '52 and April of '53 where

5:23

we unlocked first

5:25

the power of the nucleus because we

5:27

could fuse hydrogen, and the

5:30

other thing we were able to do was uh

5:32

figure out the three-dimensional

5:33

structure

5:34

of nucleic acid in the form of the

5:36

double helix,

5:38

and suddenly

5:40

in in no time flat, we had access to the

5:43

two most powerful levers uh humanity

5:46

has ever had or perhaps ever will. And

5:48

so, we're just not in a position to deal

5:51

with this. And the remarkable thing What

5:53

does that mean, sorry? In terms of You

5:55

said we had access to the two most

5:57

remarkable things. Well,

5:59

the hydrogen bomb

6:01

is not something that has ever been used

6:03

by anyone against

6:06

an enemy.

6:07

This is the first full-scale test of a

6:09

hydrogen device.

6:11

If the reaction goes, we're in the

6:13

thermonuclear era. 3 2

6:17

1

6:20

SO, WE'RE WE'RE AWAITING ITS first use

6:22

in war. We we we did use fission

6:25

devices, but we didn't use fusion

6:26

devices.

6:27

And they're at completely different

6:29

scales.

6:30

So, the Hiroshima Nagasaki are the only

6:33

two situations in which a nuke has ever

6:35

been used against

6:37

a population, civilian or otherwise.

6:40

And we don't know, for example, whether

6:43

or not, I don't know, um, at least COVID

6:46

had its origins in a bioweapons program.

6:50

So, at some level, we're playing with

6:53

levers and tools that are so powerful.

6:56

Do you realize that the the key

6:57

ingredient that made COVID so unique

7:01

was a four amino acid sequence inserted

7:05

into spike protein.

7:07

So, that's 12 nucleotides coding for

7:10

four amino acids shut down planet Earth

7:12

for a couple of years.

7:14

That's how powerful this is, you know,

7:15

and and there are very few things that

7:18

have this kind of leverage. In 2017, we

7:21

had a discovery, a white paper

7:24

called Attention Is All You Need. And if

7:26

oddly, many of us

7:27

dealing with AI and LLMs and talking

7:29

that language don't even realize there's

7:32

a paper that you can read that changed

7:33

everything.

7:35

Uh, it's eight authors out of Google, I

7:37

think. Um, and that opened up AI.

7:40

Uh, Satoshi in 2008 2009 with the

7:45

the solution to the double distributed

7:47

double spend problem where you could

7:48

effectively port um conservation laws

7:52

from the physical world into the digital

7:53

world giving us digital gold uh but just

7:56

as a as a beginning.

7:58

These ideas that have such high leverage

8:02

are

8:04

making us powerful beyond

8:07

any previous world with no

8:11

attendant increase in our wisdom and our

8:14

ability to use

8:16

and wield these things. And right now

8:17

you're seeing the face where we're

8:20

unveiling what does drone warfare look

8:22

like in FPV? What is FPV? first-person

8:27

where you know where you're looking

8:28

through the lens of the drone as it

8:31

slams into a personnel carrier.

8:34

You know, maybe you maybe you've seen

8:35

this on Telegram where you're just

8:37

watching individuals being menaced

8:40

by mechanical flying birds equipped to

8:43

kill them.

8:44

So

8:45

we didn't know what drone warfare looked

8:48

like. This is the beginning of drone

8:49

warfare. We didn't know what hypersonic

8:52

missiles look like when they slam into a

8:54

population center. I was just in Tel

8:56

Aviv

8:57

Yeah.

8:58

a couple months ago and I was in you

9:00

know shelters because the Houthis

9:02

and some of the uh Palestinian Arabs in

9:05

Gaza were letting off missiles.

9:07

But not like this.

9:09

Persians really you know

9:12

and by the way they're choosing I think

9:14

to not inflict maximal damage. I don't I

9:17

don't think that they

9:18

they could have gotten the body count a

9:20

lot higher if they'd wanted to. They're

9:22

trying to speak

9:25

the language of violence in a very

9:28

measured fashion.

9:30

So is this a particularly

9:33

tense moment or is it just the bias that

9:35

I have because I've not been through

9:36

these things before. Is there something

9:37

different?

9:38

>> you're looking

9:39

I can't even believe the question.

9:41

You're looking at the end, man.

9:44

This is the beginning. This is a slow

9:46

roll out

9:48

of a completely different world. You've

9:50

been in

9:50

We've all been in a completely

9:52

artificially stagnant bubble

9:55

for decades. My entire life up until now

9:58

has been in a bubble.

10:00

The only people who've seen real life

10:02

are extremely old.

10:05

Who are those people that have seen real

10:06

life? Well, I would say people who went

10:08

through the depression, World War II.

10:11

You know, in China, people who went

10:13

through Mao's Great Leap Forward. But

10:15

most of us have no idea of what like a

10:18

real pandemic, like a Spanish flu or

10:20

Black Plague is like. We don't know what

10:23

uh Poland went through where they lost,

10:25

you know, I don't know, 20 25% of their

10:27

population to war. Look at the stat

10:30

statistics on the Battle of Stalingrad.

10:33

We don't really understand We've We've

10:36

We've just

10:37

our whole life has been in a bubble.

10:40

You said I'm looking at the end. Yeah.

10:44

Remember all the talk about the

10:45

singularity? Like Ray Kurzweil, we're

10:46

heading to the singularity. What is the

10:48

singularity going to be like?

10:50

You're in it.

10:53

This is This This is now.

10:59

You're looking at the disintegration of

11:01

NATO.

11:03

You're looking at people who don't know

11:04

how to maintain the systems that were

11:06

engineered by their great grandparents

11:07

after World War II. That order

11:11

that, you know, you're from the UK.

11:14

If you think about

11:16

how how the UK woke up to the idea that

11:18

they had

11:19

built into their heads

11:22

that we are the masters of the world.

11:24

So, you you saw the beginning of the end

11:27

of this concept of the British Empire.

11:30

That moment is coming for the

11:33

And it it may be that it's coming for

11:35

Israel or maybe that it's coming for

11:37

Iran. See, in 1967 the Israelis felt

11:40

invincible in the Six-Day War.

11:44

And then in 1973 they had the Yom Kippur

11:46

War.

11:47

And all the people that they were

11:49

you know, priding themselves having

11:51

beaten these ferocious enemies that were

11:53

arrayed against them

11:54

woke up on Yom Kippur in 1973 and

11:57

bloodied the Israelis and they surprised

12:00

them. So, the Israelis underestimated

12:02

their enemy and that changed the entire

12:05

character of the country. It went from

12:07

being a triumphal state that felt that

12:10

David could defeat Goliath to realizing

12:12

that Goliath was quite powerful.

12:14

And you know, the same thing is going to

12:16

happen here. You you saw the celebration

12:18

that Trump

12:20

you know, had dealt this blow to the

12:21

Iranian nuclear facilities. You you

12:23

watch the Persians come back. It's going

12:25

to

12:25

we're starting to realize what the

12:27

boundaries are as people are more bold

12:31

in trying things. Maybe she's going to

12:32

try to cross the Taiwan Strait. I don't

12:34

know. But the era of stasis where very

12:37

little happened over very long periods

12:39

of time is over.

12:41

So, you think this is the start of

12:43

escalation?

12:44

This is the start of the undoing of the

12:46

post-World War II order. The idea that

12:49

the post-World War II order is still in

12:51

place is astounding.

12:54

So, what happens next? We either scare

12:57

the crap out of ourselves and come to

12:58

our senses or we don't. We scare the

13:00

crap out of ourselves and come to our

13:02

senses. Or we don't. Hm. And what does

13:04

that look like scaring the crap out of

13:06

ourselves? Well, I don't know. How did

13:07

you feel about the hypersonic missiles?

13:09

Like we started this and I'm talking

13:10

about tropical fruit

13:12

cuz I'm trying to figure out whether I

13:13

should buy a jackfruit and stink up my

13:15

wife's kitchen.

13:17

You know, and on the other hand I just

13:18

saw hypersonic missiles slam into the

13:20

buildings I was just in for meetings in

13:23

Tel Aviv.

13:25

There's a a nuclear

13:28

threat that weirdly hangs over us and I

13:30

I almost feel at some deep level we all

13:33

understand and feel that threat, that

13:35

there's these nine or 10 countries

13:36

around the world that have the ability

13:38

to basically wipe out all of us at any

13:40

moment. I feel like that's almost within

13:43

us all.

13:44

That knowing is within us all. I totally

13:46

disagree.

13:46

>> Really? Yeah, I think about nothing else

13:48

sometimes and I still don't believe I

13:50

don't believe it. There's a difference

13:52

between knowing something in your head

13:53

and knowing something embodied. Yeah.

13:56

I don't know if we're able to

13:57

distinguish whether we know it in our

13:58

head or whether it's embodied

14:00

unconsciously to the point that it's

14:01

changing how we act.

14:04

Do you know what I mean? Because I'm I'm

14:05

now aware that there's nine country and

14:06

I'm also aware of that really it's one

14:08

individual's

14:10

decision as to whether those

14:12

nuclear bombs were to fly. So there's a

14:14

part of me that's I don't know, maybe in

14:16

suspended disbelief or at a deeper level

14:19

feels an angst.

14:21

But nobody knows what to do with it and

14:22

this is part of what what Elon is all

14:24

about, which is that

14:26

I am convinced that everybody else needs

14:28

to be talking about this much more and I

14:29

need to be talking about this much less.

14:33

I talk about this all the time.

14:35

And people are always

14:37

I want to survive more than anything

14:39

else.

14:40

There's so many things that I love about

14:41

this place

14:42

and I don't like the idea that we're all

14:44

trapped here

14:46

with one atmosphere, with nine

14:48

individuals if you like,

14:50

who could all wake up on the wrong side

14:52

of the bed and say,

14:54

"Uh,

14:55

today's the day."

14:58

Part of what I'm so exercised about with

15:00

respect to the apocalypse is how many

15:01

things I want to save.

15:04

I mean, this city just went up in

15:05

flames.

15:07

It's very

15:08

focuses the mind. How many things can I

15:10

save in one car load

15:12

if I know that the police are not going

15:14

to let me come back to my home?

15:16

Do you save photos? Do you save musical

15:18

instruments?

15:19

Do you save financial records? What what

15:21

is it that you save? You know, it was a

15:23

very focusing

15:24

question. We're already over it. We

15:26

can't even remember the fires.

15:29

On that point of

15:30

the things that give us meaning

15:32

>> Yeah. in our lives,

15:33

where do you think we're at as a society

15:36

in terms of our

15:38

feelings of meaning and purpose and

15:40

connectedness to maybe something

15:42

transcendent or I was mulling over this

15:44

idea the other day. I actually posted it

15:45

on on my LinkedIn page of all places.

15:48

I said that I'm I think we need to

15:50

ladder up to things like anchored and

15:52

content in life. Like we you know, we

15:53

ladder up we start with ourselves and we

15:54

ladder up to family then community then

15:56

maybe a mission or a purpose and then

15:57

maybe to something transcendent. And it

15:59

feels like it because of the design of

16:01

our lives and the optimization of it, we

16:03

we're increasingly laddering up to just

16:05

ourselves. Yeah. I think even in my life

16:07

I'm wondering whether

16:09

there's like a layer missing like which

16:11

is the religious layer or a spiritual

16:13

layer.

16:13

>> pray?

16:15

Mhm, it's a good question.

16:17

You come over Friday night and pray with

16:19

us.

16:19

I'd say I do pray.

16:22

That's pretty weak.

16:23

>> But it's not a it's not the way that I

16:24

see prayer on in movies and stuff. So

16:27

that's the thing, right? We have this

16:28

idea that somebody puts their hands

16:30

together

16:30

>> Yeah. and they just believe. Yeah. A lot

16:33

of time when you're praying, you don't

16:34

really believe.

16:35

You're not sure that you're doing

16:36

anything sensible. You you feel

16:37

ridiculous. Mhm. And that's true even if

16:39

you're a believer.

16:42

Do you think we need religion?

16:44

Yeah.

16:46

Said the atheist.

16:47

Are you an atheist?

16:48

>> Yeah.

16:51

But I take religion super seriously.

16:55

I don't think we're meant to live

16:56

without it.

16:59

That's an interesting

17:01

conundrum. I don't think so. Everybody

17:03

gets hung up on it. I sort of wonder

17:05

what their problem is. Please explain.

17:06

So you believe that we shh aren't meant

17:09

to live without religion. We're meant to

17:10

be orientated by something transcendent.

17:13

But you don't believe that it's real.

17:15

I think that

17:20

You know, there's this great trick that

17:21

I learned when I was scuba diving.

17:24

Which is that your your need to breathe

17:27

is triggered by the build-up of CO2 in

17:29

your lungs. And there are all sorts of

17:31

things you can do to decrease your need

17:33

to breathe. One is you can

17:34

hyperventilate. And you can get rid of

17:36

all of the CO2 that's residual.

17:39

You can also inner your lungs to CO2 by

17:42

smoking.

17:43

You can also breathe out the precious

17:45

air that your instincts tell you to hold

17:47

in. You can do all these things and then

17:49

you can go super deep. You can equal out

17:51

learn how to equalize the pressure in

17:52

your ears by holding your nose and and

17:55

and these techniques.

17:56

And suddenly you're far deeper than

17:58

you've ever been and you're exploring

18:00

the rocks and the fishes and there's a

18:02

turtle and there's an eel.

18:04

And you get a message, you're out of

18:06

air.

18:08

And you look up and you see, I am really

18:10

far from the surface. This is

18:11

terrifying.

18:13

That's what happens when you unhook

18:16

the proximate, which is air hunger,

18:20

from the ultimate, which is the need to

18:21

breathe.

18:23

So, thirst is proximate to dehydration.

18:25

Hunger

18:27

is proximate to the need for

18:29

nourishment.

18:31

In part, religion and prayer

18:34

is there to keep us from unhooking

18:38

all of these protective things and just

18:41

turning life into a hoot.

18:43

You can have a hoot without religion.

18:45

But if everybody has a hoot, the whole

18:46

society collapses.

18:51

Some point I think

18:52

a president of the United States may

18:54

have said that people who defend this

18:55

country were suckers.

18:58

Something like that.

19:00

And I thought, god damn you.

19:02

Maybe it's true even.

19:05

But how many families have have received

19:08

a a flag-draped coffin

19:12

and

19:13

felt pride.

19:15

Like we lost something precious, but we

19:17

are part of the American tapestry in a

19:19

way that few families can be.

19:21

And when we outsmart ourselves, when we

19:23

unhook all of these things,

19:26

you know, every single young woman has

19:29

an idea about what the opportunity cost

19:33

of not going on OnlyFans is.

19:38

Before we didn't know what the

19:39

opportunity cost There was no

19:40

measurement of it.

19:42

We're becoming too sophisticated. We've

19:44

got too much information. We're

19:46

deranging ourselves. We're having a

19:48

blast.

19:50

And we're completely undoing all of the

19:53

superstructure of the world.

19:56

The number of people who don't have

19:58

children or want children or

20:02

My kids make fun of me that I just go

20:04

around telling people to make babies.

20:09

And it's the most normal thing in the

20:10

world.

20:12

I meet parents who don't harass their

20:14

own children to get married and have

20:15

families. Like, what are you doing?

20:19

The superstructures of the worlds? Yeah.

20:23

One being family family. Yeah.

20:26

Traditions. Yeah. Things that ground

20:29

that connect you to

20:31

And what are the symptoms of that

20:33

unhooking from the superstructures of

20:34

the world?

20:35

>> do you care about things How much do you

20:38

care about people saying your name four

20:40

generations out?

20:42

Me? Yeah, you. You're probably asking

20:44

the wrong person cuz I just don't think

20:45

legacy matters cuz I'm going to be dead.

20:47

That's right, but you're

20:49

I'm asking all of you who believe that.

20:52

Yeah.

20:53

That is so sad.

20:55

It is so weird

20:57

that no one cares about their legacy cuz

20:59

they don't see a future.

21:01

So, what I'm trying to say is

21:03

I'm desperate to get you a future so

21:05

that you care.

21:08

What needs to happen to get me a future?

21:10

Something remarkable. Something utterly

21:12

remarkable because it's not it's not

21:14

going that way. And that's what that's

21:16

what the physics part is. Like I talk

21:18

about physics constantly. Physics is the

21:20

only thing that's going to get you a

21:22

future.

21:23

And how how?

21:25

Well, right now the big problem is that

21:27

we share one atmosphere. Yeah. So

21:29

everything that can

21:33

all the really bad things, whether it's

21:34

pathogens, like imagine something

21:37

COVID-like but far worse,

21:39

or

21:41

climate,

21:42

or

21:44

uh

21:44

radiation,

21:46

all of these things

21:48

don't know anything about borders.

21:50

To an extent, there's a southern and a

21:52

northern hemisphere that are separate,

21:53

but even that's not

21:55

a great border. So we can draw all the

21:57

borders on land that we want, but we

21:58

still have basically

22:00

one or two atmospheres, and I would

22:02

really say one.

22:04

And we've now gotten powerful enough to

22:05

really screw it up.

22:08

Right? And so Through nukes or through

22:11

carbon emissions?

22:12

>> of those things. Right? Everything that

22:15

you care about

22:16

is on one sphere with one one

22:18

atmosphere.

22:20

And I think Elon is 100% right. We got

22:23

to get to another sphere.

22:25

I can't believe

22:27

that

22:29

he's focused on Mars. I mean, by by

22:32

Sure. Focus on the moon, focus on Mars,

22:34

focus on chemical rockets.

22:37

But throw a couple billion towards

22:38

physics, for God's sakes, let us get it

22:40

Let us get serious about exploring the

22:43

cosmos.

22:45

This is our womb. This is not our home.

22:48

We're You know You know this song,

22:49

Closing Time? No, I don't. Closing Time.

22:54

Uh You don't have to go home, but you

22:55

can't stay here. I think it's about

22:57

birth.

22:59

Yeah, it's time to be born.

23:02

You can't stay here.

23:04

This is completely obvious to me and I

23:06

am the only person who who's talks this

23:08

way and so I sound like a lunatic and I

23:09

get tired of it.

23:11

But the real reason it it you know, it's

23:13

about the mangoes. It's about the

23:14

rambutan. It's about the music.

23:18

It's about all the things that I love.

23:21

So why would you want to leave?

23:23

I want to take it with us and I want to

23:25

see what else is out there and I want to

23:26

meet people. Why don't you just stay

23:28

here and fix this? On it. Cuz you can't.

23:33

The odds of fixing one sphere for a

23:35

permanent future. You've already talked

23:37

about it. You don't care about the

23:38

future.

23:39

I don't have children yet either so I

23:40

don't Yeah, I don't have that.

23:41

>> But I

23:42

My children don't have children and

23:44

their children don't have children.

23:46

And I care about them and they're not

23:48

even here.

23:50

We've got some time left here, don't we?

23:53

Well, we did.

23:56

Have you looked what's happened in the

23:57

last month?

24:00

It's coming undone. Pakistan and India.

24:06

Do you really think this is the start of

24:07

the end?

24:10

I I have no idea where I am. Of course

24:13

it is.

24:16

The World War II order was keeping it

24:18

It's like control rods keeping the world

24:21

from going super critical. Can't we just

24:23

put the rods back together?

24:26

Have you looked at who

24:27

We had an election with Donald Trump

24:30

versus Kamala Harris in the US.

24:34

Tell me what's going on in the UK. What

24:35

are we doing in the mayoral race for for

24:38

New York?

24:39

I don't know if you're watching what I'm

24:41

watching.

24:42

Look at the mess

24:44

that's going on in Gaza.

24:48

Russia is nuclear.

24:50

Israel is presumably nuclear. Pakistan

24:52

and India nuclear. The US is nuclear.

24:54

Iran is almost nuclear. China is pissed

24:57

off about Iran because it was trying to

24:59

make a play through the region.

25:01

North Korea's watching.

25:04

Oh, and and look at the UK in turmoil.

25:09

UK is a very nuclear country.

25:12

To say nothing of France.

25:14

This is not going to go well. We just we

25:17

By the way, look at how much is

25:18

happening with AI.

25:21

Right?

25:23

Everything was really stagnant. That's

25:25

why I I I have this famous challenge

25:26

that I give people, which is

25:28

go into a room

25:30

and subtract the screens and forget

25:33

about style. How do you know you're not

25:35

in 1973?

25:39

Like drones are the beginning.

25:42

Imagine I needed a refill on my coffee

25:44

and you know, you did something and a

25:46

drone brought me a coffee to not

25:48

interrupt the flow.

25:49

That would we'd know we weren't in '73,

25:51

but in general, drones aren't a big part

25:53

of our lives.

25:55

And these robots, I've never seen a

25:56

humanoid robot actually doing anything

25:59

other than on YouTube where it's like

26:00

doing the mashed potato. Mhm.

26:03

So in general, yeah.

26:05

Things were just really stagnant for a

26:07

really long time. And then during that

26:09

period of stagnation, we we had this

26:10

crazy narrative, which is like the

26:12

dizzying pace of change is making it

26:14

almost impossible to keep up while

26:16

things were incredibly stagnant. And so

26:18

it just shows you sort of this weird way

26:20

in which

26:21

our minds can be programmed to

26:23

completely ignore what we're

26:24

experiencing.

26:26

Is there not chance that we'll just

26:28

continue to

26:31

Okay, if you want to go with chance,

26:34

look, until until you're worried about

26:37

your great-great-grandchildren,

26:39

I don't want to have this conversation

26:40

with you.

26:42

I want you to start caring about that. I

26:45

want you to go to church.

26:47

You you're heir to a great tradition.

26:51

One of the most important traditions in

26:52

the world has to be Christianity.

26:55

Cuz both Judaism and Islam are screwed

26:57

up over the law, or legal traditions.

27:01

Christianity, not so much.

27:03

I think I first time somebody

27:04

crystallized that for me was Sam Harris.

27:08

It's a really important point. But

27:10

you're heir to an incredibly powerful

27:12

and important tradition. And if we don't

27:13

have a Christian substrate, we're in

27:15

real trouble because all of our society

27:17

is based on on an assumption of a

27:19

Christian substrate.

27:21

You're advising me to be

27:25

Christian in tradition, but not in

27:27

necessarily in belief.

27:29

Well, this is the thing. You're

27:30

alienated because you think that you

27:31

have to be a believer in order to go in,

27:33

otherwise you're faking it. Yeah.

27:37

Get over yourself. That's not how it

27:38

works.

27:38

>> That's true. That's me just me being

27:39

honest. I do think that if I went to a

27:40

church and I I sung and I I prayed and

27:43

stuff, and I didn't believe, I would

27:45

that I'd be like

27:47

it'd be it'd be fake. Okay.

27:51

Do you imagine that all those people who

27:53

go to church are just sitting there 100%

27:54

sure that there's a there's a Jesus to

27:56

pray to?

27:58

Do you know any Christians? Yeah. Yeah,

28:01

they're not like that.

28:04

They sneak off and do bad things. If

28:06

they were confident that Jesus was

28:08

watching everything that they were

28:09

doing, and they were constantly talking

28:11

about how they sin.

28:13

I'm a sinner.

28:14

Right? It's a very complicated,

28:16

interesting

28:18

piece of kit.

28:20

And my claim is that

28:23

you know,

28:26

I said the Lord's Prayer as part of

28:28

going to high school.

28:33

I sat in a church,

28:35

a chapel at a high school in LA that had

28:38

a stained glass window with an American

28:40

soldier trampling a Nazi flag. In the

28:43

stained glass window.

28:46

It's amazing.

28:47

How does this link to

28:49

me I was about to say comp

28:51

Don't you have faith that we'll just be

28:53

able to kind of keep this It feels like

28:55

a bit of a standoff.

28:55

>> So you're the one with the faith. I'm

28:57

the one who's nervous.

28:59

You Look, you're the believer.

29:03

I'm not going to trust that.

29:05

No, no, no. I'm going to get my hands

29:06

dirty and try to do something about it.

29:07

Do you know what if I think it in part

29:09

it's because as you said, I've been

29:10

alive for 32 years and through that time

29:12

has been relative peace especially in

29:13

the Western world. So it's all I've ever

29:15

known so I I'm born with this assumption

29:17

that this is just kind of how it goes.

29:19

There's always threat but we kind of

29:20

figure it out. Come to the Pacific

29:22

Palisades. It looks like Gaza.

29:25

Yeah.

29:29

Yeah, I've got some friends that lost

29:29

their houses there.

29:31

You know. Checked out Lahaina in West

29:34

Maui recently?

29:35

No.

29:37

It's an absolute disaster.

29:40

Is AI a protagonist in this story? Is it

29:42

sure? In what In what respect?

29:45

Well, what do you What do you think

29:46

about it? We're going through

29:49

going through a wild revolution at the

29:50

moment and

29:52

I just hear people saying the dumbest

29:53

things about it.

29:55

What do I think about it? I'm scared I

29:57

might say something dumb now but

29:58

>> Well, let's try it cuz I I'm going to

29:59

say something dumb. I think I Well, I

30:01

look at both sides of the coin and I

30:02

look at the

30:04

opportunity and the and the threat. My

30:06

concern when I hear about the CEOs of

30:08

the biggest AI companies in the world

30:10

talking about this fast takeoff is that

30:12

the transition will be too quick for us

30:13

to adjust.

30:15

And when they say fast takeoff, they

30:16

mean that AGI like arrives and it the

30:20

rate of its learning accelerates so

30:22

quickly that

30:24

it really um disrupts the need for

30:28

human beings to do a lot of the sort of

30:30

jobs we're doing today that are centered

30:32

on intelligence.

30:33

Which jobs require intelligence? Pretty

30:35

much all of them these days because

30:36

we've had the industrial revolution

30:37

where we've

30:38

outsourced a lot of the labor to

30:40

machines but I don't think so. Really?

30:42

Like I think Yeah, I think a large

30:43

portion of our conversation was actually

30:45

an LLM.

30:48

We didn't actually get to the stuff

30:51

outside of the LLM.

30:53

You and I are two chatbots for the most

30:55

part. You're a good one.

30:57

Thank you.

30:57

>> I'm on a huge I'm on a huge platform

30:59

again, you know?

31:01

But my claim is is that that's the

31:02

really disturbing part that more or less

31:04

we're LLMs. More or less we don't do a

31:06

single intelligent thing all day long.

31:09

And the reason that they're able to

31:10

mimic us is because we don't realize

31:12

that intelligence is a last resort for

31:14

us.

31:15

We try to automate.

31:18

Like you know, if you think about

31:19

greetings.

31:24

Your assistant was very kind. I got out

31:26

of a black car that you guys sent around

31:28

and

31:29

I was greeted with the phrase

31:31

"There he is, the man, the myth." And I

31:33

knew what was coming next, "The legend."

31:36

Right? Because that is a sort of

31:38

humorous way of giving an intimate

31:40

greeting.

31:41

But it's still an LLM.

31:44

And I'm not saying that your assistant

31:45

is an LLM. I'm saying that more or less

31:48

what we do all day long is LLM

31:50

interactions.

31:52

"Hey buddy, how are you?" "Good, good.

31:54

Things have been really busy."

31:56

"How about you?" "Well, I got some

31:57

travel coming up. Kind of excited about

31:59

it, but I have to get through some work

32:00

first." "I understand."

32:02

That's an entirely scripted

32:03

conversation.

32:07

That's why I'm trying to say that I want

32:08

to do podcasting that is outside of the

32:11

LLM model. I don't want to do just

32:13

dangerous stupid stuff, but I want to

32:14

talk about things that I've never

32:16

explored.

32:17

Where I don't have something,

32:20

you know, ready.

32:22

Do you think AI will ever break out of

32:24

the

32:25

the the LLM, or will it expand into

32:28

>> the LLM as well.

32:30

I don't See, I think that waiting for

32:32

AGI as the problem is a is a bad idea. I

32:35

think the problems are going to get here

32:37

far before AGI.

32:39

I think even that, the AGI expectation

32:41

is something we're trained to do.

32:44

Do you think AGI is coming? Do you think

32:45

we'll survive AGI? Will AGI be good or

32:47

bad?

32:48

All of that's pre-programmed into you.

32:50

Why do you Why are you waiting for AGI?

32:53

Did you not

32:54

AlphaFold 3? Did you Did you track that?

32:57

Do you know about this? Is that Was that

32:58

the chess game? The Well, it's the chess

33:00

game that became the protein folding

33:02

game. Oh, yeah.

33:03

>> You want to talk about great games?

33:04

Protein folding. Now, that's a game.

33:06

I have no no knowledge of this at all.

33:08

Okay.

33:09

What do you know about proteins?

33:11

Very little.

33:12

Okay, think about proteins as tiny

33:14

machines. Yeah. That There's copying

33:17

machine, there's a scissors and a

33:19

shearing machine, there's a

33:21

a light-making machine, all sorts of

33:23

things.

33:24

And all of those machines are weirdly

33:26

coded

33:28

I mean Imagine that you had like a

33:30

children's show.

33:32

And uh

33:33

a bunch of girl superheroes, and they

33:34

all had necklaces with

33:36

uh 20 different kinds of beads around

33:38

their neck. And so, when they needed a

33:41

machine, they'd take off the necklace,

33:43

they'd throw it into a thing called a

33:44

ribosome. The ribosome would take these

33:47

20 kinds of pearls, and suddenly it

33:48

would build you a car or a spaceship or

33:51

a gun or who knows what. Well, that's

33:52

That's That's the story of DNA,

33:55

RNA, and uh and protein.

33:59

The only thing is,

34:00

isn't it weird that a linear sequence

34:02

suddenly crumples up into a

34:04

three-dimensional object that does

34:05

something? So, for example,

34:08

I don't know if you've ever seen um

34:09

these Turkish rabbits that glow in the

34:11

dark?

34:12

No. Okay. So, they took green

34:14

fluorescent protein out of jellyfish.

34:16

Yeah.

34:17

And they uh

34:19

spliced them into the nucleic acids

34:22

of rabbits. And the Turks bred all of

34:25

these glow-in-the-dark bunnies.

34:27

And what that is is a structure, so

34:30

there's there's something called

34:31

secondary structure in protein where

34:34

sometimes you get these spirals called

34:35

alpha helices and then sometimes you get

34:37

a two-dimensional sheet that's made from

34:39

taking

34:41

a switchback

34:42

in in strings of amino acids. And then

34:45

if you wrap that around, you don't have

34:46

a beta sheet, you have a beta barrel.

34:48

And these beta barrels are the

34:50

glow-in-the-dark aspect of green

34:52

fluorescent protein, okay?

34:54

And

34:56

what we didn't know was how a series of

34:59

A's, C's, T's, and G's could code for

35:02

sequences of amino acids, could form

35:04

three-dimensional structures. So if you

35:06

just read DNA, you didn't know

35:09

well, that's going to be a a sports car.

35:11

Yeah.

35:13

AlphaFold

35:14

figured it out for the most part. Like

35:16

to a to an enormous extent. Humans were

35:18

stuck there. And what does that mean? It

35:21

means that you could

35:22

I don't know, you could target your

35:24

enemies that have particular regions on

35:26

their cell surfaces and you could come

35:28

up with proteins that only attach to

35:30

them and attach. It could mean anything.

35:32

Could mean nanorobots.

35:34

I don't know what it means, but my point

35:36

is is that that's already here.

35:39

And you're not focused on it.

35:42

And you're thinking AGI. And the funny

35:44

part is is that's your LLM that got

35:46

programmed to wait for AGI.

35:49

Like how do you know, people that I

35:50

think are very smart, much smarter than

35:52

me, talk about the Don't listen to them.

35:55

Elon? Sure. I mean he's he says that

35:57

it's our biggest existential threat is

35:59

AI.

36:02

Elon

36:04

has become the outsourcing for much of

36:06

our intelligence. And if Elon means

36:08

anything to you,

36:11

he's really saying to you, "Don't listen

36:13

to me, do something remarkable."

36:17

He's saying, "Where is everybody?

36:19

Why is there only one Elon?

36:22

There used to be lots of them."

36:26

Why is there only one Elon?

36:28

Yeah, not the right question. Where

36:30

Where did all the other Elons go? Same

36:33

question, is it not?

36:35

No, I think that the Why is there only

36:37

one Elon makes Elon feel more singular.

36:39

You know, if you ever get a chance to go

36:41

to Cappadocia or Bryce National Park in

36:44

Utah,

36:45

you see what happens, which is that

36:47

you'll have a stone that was resting on

36:49

the soil,

36:51

and suddenly the wind starts to erode

36:53

everything except the compactified soil

36:55

right under that stone, and you get

36:56

what's called a fairy chimney or hood.

36:59

And so, the claim is is that sometimes

37:01

you get these isolated structures,

37:04

and the key point is everything else

37:06

eroded away.

37:08

We're supposed to have tons of Elon.

37:14

And everybody else got taken out.

37:18

What or who took them out?

37:21

Look at how much trouble Elon has being

37:23

Elon.

37:26

Look, we keep hearing about him, you

37:28

know,

37:30

he's on drugs.

37:32

Great. Take drugs.

37:34

No, I'm not kidding.

37:35

Do you know how many amazing people take

37:37

drugs?

37:39

If you care about jazz, jazz is a whole

37:41

you know, it's a history of drugs.

37:43

Whenever I'm listening to Ray Charles,

37:44

I'm hearing heroin.

37:47

Okay.

37:48

What are they doing at Burning Man?

37:51

They're trying to live

37:53

luxuriously under oppression,

37:56

simultaneously luxuriously and as just

37:59

dirty and disgusting as you'll ever be.

38:01

Hopefully, they're having tons of

38:04

eye-opening, mind-bending experiences

38:08

chasing some way of getting out of the

38:09

LLM.

38:12

And you know, my feeling about this is

38:15

it's not even honest.

38:17

I I I believe that Elon, for example,

38:19

does understand that population and

38:21

growth is really important.

38:23

But I also think he just enjoys making

38:25

babies.

38:26

In a In a In a In a weird way, this idea

38:29

of I'm going to have an empire of my

38:31

children

38:32

is a forbidden concept.

38:35

Try explaining that to HR.

38:38

You know, it's like, "What did you say

38:39

at work?"

38:41

So, the key point is Elon is barely able

38:43

to be Elon.

38:45

Do you think we're overestimating the

38:47

impact AI is going to have?

38:50

Because people people see this as really

38:52

fundamentally transformative. No.

38:55

You don't think we're underestimating

38:56

it? I think it's going to be

38:59

I I I think that what AI means to us is

39:02

is bizarre. We've We've come up with

39:04

this whole script about AGI and

39:09

it's going to take everything we do

39:11

that's repetitive

39:13

is on the chopping block.

39:15

And since almost everything we do is

39:17

repetitive,

39:19

we don't need to get it to AGI. We just

39:21

need to do things where lots of people

39:23

create lots of repetitive data,

39:25

and then we tokenize it, and we train

39:28

the AI on the tokens,

39:30

and then for the most part, it says, you

39:32

know, it doesn't matter. It can be a

39:33

photograph, it can be music,

39:36

whatever it is.

39:37

Amino acids. Just give me a large enough

39:39

data set and let me add it in and you

39:42

know,

39:42

take a hike for for a little while. I'll

39:44

train on it, and then I'll know how to

39:45

do that.

39:47

You know what it's bad at?

39:48

Things that where there isn't much data.

39:52

So, I I just I just found out about

39:54

these orphan proteins where

39:56

like everybody's got a different version

39:58

of hemoglobin. Mhm.

40:00

But, you know, the the the quaternary

40:02

structure of he- hemoglobin is these

40:04

four heme groups,

40:05

you know, four different proteins around

40:07

a central element.

40:09

What happens when you have a protein

40:11

that has no analog anywhere else? The

40:13

The system doesn't have the ability to

40:14

learn it.

40:17

If If I train you on the blues and you

40:20

find out what a 12-bar blues progression

40:22

is then you find out that there's a

40:23

variation where this you know, the

40:24

second bar goes to the fourth rather

40:26

than just staying on the one for four

40:28

bars. And then sometimes the fourth bar

40:30

has a seven in it to create tension.

40:32

Okay, so it's going to learn every

40:33

single form of the blues

40:36

like that.

40:37

And because there's a large corpus of

40:39

that stuff, it's going to get really

40:40

good at blues music.

40:42

You know, as a but if you take something

40:45

that basically

40:47

never happens, it's not going to have an

40:49

easy ability to train and give you more.

40:51

So, I think that AI

40:54

is almost certainly going to transform

40:57

the economy because everything that we

40:59

we know how to do through education

41:01

creates repetitive behaviors.

41:04

We don't know how to educate for

41:05

creativity and genius. We know how to

41:07

educate for doing higher level things.

41:10

So, radiology is a great example.

41:12

Radiologists are, you know, some of the

41:15

first uh in the crosshairs.

41:18

I'm going to stare at some imaging

41:21

and I'm going to say I think that's a

41:23

tumor.

41:24

I think that's benign.

41:26

And it's going to say just give me give

41:28

me give me all of these tokens. Like,

41:30

well, they're x-rays, they're cats can

41:32

No, no, no, they're just tokens.

41:35

So, yeah.

41:36

It's going to start to automate away

41:39

every repetitive behavior. And then

41:40

what's going to be left

41:42

is the tiny number of things that aren't

41:44

really highly repetitive or things where

41:46

we really that a human does it. Very

41:48

interesting what's happened with chess.

41:51

I don't know if if you've been following

41:53

chess.

41:54

I loosely understand it mainly because

41:56

I've spoken to a lot of AI experts and

41:58

they often reference chess

42:00

as as an example where

42:01

>> It's one of the first things that humans

42:03

did that we really cared about that

42:04

fell.

42:06

So, they've been longer

42:09

in the AI

42:11

tractor beam than any of the rest of us

42:13

in some sense.

42:15

How did it fall?

42:17

Through Deep Blue, and IBM, and Garry

42:20

Kasparov.

42:22

But does that mean that people people

42:23

aren't interested in chess anymore? What

42:24

what what are you saying? No, no, no,

42:25

that's the whole point.

42:28

So, Magnus Carlsen, the greatest chess

42:30

player of our time and perhaps of all

42:32

time, was on Joe Rogan.

42:34

And Joe asked him the simple question,

42:36

"Can your phone beat you?" He's like,

42:37

"Yeah, easily."

42:39

So, the point is we can't compete

42:42

with

42:43

I don't know.

42:44

Stockfish or what whatever the top chess

42:46

programs of our time. I don't know

42:47

anymore. But nobody cares about those

42:49

programs except for AI experts.

42:52

We care about the drama

42:55

of

42:59

you know, Onon versus Carlson.

43:02

Two humans? Two humans, because it's

43:05

about us. We're we're very narcissistic

43:07

in this way.

43:09

And so, there was a period and you know,

43:10

this is something that my wife

43:12

uh

43:14

tried to popularize. So, she said this

43:16

thing about the golden age of AI

43:18

complementarity,

43:20

where the AIs aren't good enough to take

43:22

over from us,

43:24

but they're amazing tools. And so,

43:26

there's a period where we're teamed up,

43:28

you know, the prompt engineering

43:30

revolution.

43:31

They're not good enough to come up with

43:32

their own prompts.

43:34

And a great example of this that she and

43:37

I have been talking about is the cyborg

43:39

chess era,

43:41

which is a period where humans and the

43:44

AIs could form teams that would do

43:46

better. But at some point, the AI just

43:49

looks at the human and says,

43:50

"You're just holding me back."

43:53

You've got two children. Yeah.

43:56

When they're thinking about their career

43:57

prospects, with all that you think and

43:59

know and believe about the future that

44:00

we're heading towards, what what kind of

44:02

career advice would you be

44:04

giving to them?

44:04

>> Oh, I've given them terrible career

44:05

advice.

44:07

I give them I gave gave them somewhat

44:08

different career advice. So, to my son

44:11

my my advice was do the hardest, most

44:15

technical thing you possibly can do.

44:18

And be prepared to use that ability,

44:21

that facility in different ways than

44:23

you're

44:24

you're honing it. But, train yourself.

44:27

With my daughter,

44:28

um

44:29

I think she cares deeply about people.

44:32

And, you know, there's a typical

44:33

male-female divide. And I'm not By the

44:35

way, I'm not going to talk overly much

44:37

about them cuz I try to keep them out.

44:39

But, she is, uh, you know, somebody who

44:43

is taking same level of analytic ability

44:47

but putting it in the service of the law

44:50

and trying to help

44:51

people who are, you know, really

44:53

unfortunate. She's very idealistic. And

44:54

so, at some level, the law

44:57

is not going to allow us to have AI

44:58

lawyers for quite some time. It's not

45:01

going to trust anything. We We've got

45:02

jury

45:04

uh, trials and and judges and a legal

45:06

system that's written into our founding

45:08

documents.

45:11

To the average person

45:13

I would say get your board in the water

45:16

and prepare to paddle like all get out.

45:20

A tsunami of a lifetime is coming, and

45:22

nothing your elders have seen is going

45:24

to prepare.

45:27

There's no good advice to give that's

45:29

specific.

45:30

Let's put it this way. One of the things

45:32

when people tell me about they're moving

45:33

from one city to another

45:36

I have a phrase that nobody likes, which

45:37

is every place is over.

45:40

Oh, I'm moving to Austin. Yeah, it's

45:41

over. Miami, it's over. Nashville, over.

45:46

You know, all these places are over. And

45:48

every occupation that is named is over.

45:52

I'm going to be a dentist.

45:54

Radiologist.

45:56

Accountant.

45:58

Teacher.

45:59

These are all over.

46:02

Whatever's coming,

46:04

get flexible.

46:06

Get good.

46:07

Get good on a bunch of different stuff.

46:10

Learn how to think across disciplines. I

46:12

have no idea what what's going to be

46:14

left for us.

46:18

But, you know, somebody's going to come

46:20

out on top.

46:23

And I I hate to tell people that you

46:25

should try to come out on top.

46:28

I don't think it's healthy to have

46:30

everyone trying to be

46:32

world-class.

46:34

I think you should be able to just have

46:35

a life.

46:37

I have a golden retriever. I don't know

46:39

that it's the greatest golden retriever

46:40

in the world.

46:41

Sometimes I think it is, but

46:44

does a lot of dumb stuff.

46:46

But, he's my golden retriever. I just

46:47

don't think it I think that this

46:49

mania for optimization, like if you look

46:52

at your own videos, you'll find

46:54

some of the best-performing videos

46:57

are

46:58

This is how to succeed.

46:59

This is how to get anyone you want. This

47:02

is how to get out of a bad situation.

47:03

People just want

47:05

capacity.

47:07

But, for what?

47:09

Okay, you've optimized your day, you've

47:11

optimized your health.

47:13

Your social media's optimized.

47:16

Now what?

47:19

Now what?

47:20

I don't know.

47:22

What should be then? Say

47:24

you know, is it the is it time to just

47:27

One would say, "Well, now I One would

47:29

incorrectly say, "Well, now I can play

47:30

with my golden retriever." And then one

47:31

would say, "Well, you should have been

47:32

playing with your golden retriever the

47:33

whole time."

47:36

Let me put it a little differently.

47:41

Through some bizarre accident,

47:44

I've gotten the chance to meet

47:46

incredible people that I don't even talk

47:48

about who I have met, you know?

47:51

I've got a chance to see the world. I

47:53

haven't seen South America, but I've

47:54

seen

47:55

most of the other continents

47:57

other than that

47:58

the Antarctic.

48:00

I've had a really rich life.

48:05

Take somebody who hasn't had those

48:07

opportunities,

48:09

but they got a chance to have three

48:10

kids.

48:14

I'm not sure I wouldn't trade places. I

48:16

had so enjoyed raising my children.

48:21

And it's available to everyone.

48:25

It is such a strange thing that we're

48:27

talking about optimization and all this

48:29

stuff. I I get to think about the the

48:31

substrate of the universe, theoretical

48:33

physics. I dream about visiting the

48:35

stars.

48:36

I dream about multiple dimensions of

48:38

time, meeting aliens, all sorts of

48:40

things.

48:45

I still think having kids was like

48:48

unbeatable.

48:50

I'm so sad that it's over.

48:52

I'm so sad that they moved out. I cannot

48:55

believe that I was dumb enough to live

48:56

in a society that doesn't believe

48:59

in having your kids with you your whole

49:01

life.

49:02

The idea that we look at places where

49:04

kids live at home as backwards is beyond

49:07

me.

49:10

And shout out to the entire Indian

49:12

subcontinent.

49:14

You know, it's just like

49:16

family is everything. They drive me

49:17

crazy.

49:22

But it it's just meaning is available

49:25

for you.

49:26

And and again,

49:30

yeah,

49:31

every time I get a chance to eat a

49:32

rambutan,

49:34

it's one of my favorite fruits, mangoes,

49:35

rambutans, jackfruit,

49:37

sitaphal, if you can get custard apple,

49:41

the amount of pleasure I get,

49:43

I've never had a good custard apple in

49:45

the entire time I've lived in the US,

49:47

not one.

49:48

I've had a frozen one imported from

49:50

Taiwan.

49:52

You get this cherimoya, just get out of

49:54

here, cherimoya. You're not good.

49:58

Great custard apple, great soursop.

50:01

What a pleasure to be on this earth. And

50:03

it's available

50:05

to almost anyone.

50:07

I just think that you can find meaning

50:10

you know,

50:11

for God's sakes, go to Spotify if you

50:13

have a a connection, if you can afford a

50:15

connection to Spotify

50:17

and put in Pablo Casals' version of the

50:19

Bach Cello Suites.

50:22

You're as rich as you need to be.

50:25

I've flown private. I'd much prefer to

50:28

listen to Pablo Casals playing the the

50:30

Cello Suites in economy

50:32

than to be to be to be deprived of real

50:35

luxury.

50:37

I don't know, I just to me, meaning is

50:40

everywhere.

50:42

I can't swing a cat without hitting

50:43

meaning.

50:46

Have you always been like that? Or is

50:47

that something that you've cultivated?

50:50

The the point about being able to swing

50:51

a cat and find meaning, so many people

50:52

that will be listening now

50:54

could swing a

50:55

100-mi stick and wouldn't hit meaning in

50:58

their lives.

50:59

But you seem to be able to find it in

51:01

the

51:02

the purer things, the more simple

51:03

things.

51:04

And I'm wondering if that's something

51:05

that we can all cultivate with a change

51:07

of perspective or if it's

51:09

just the way that you've always been.

51:12

Why is Joe Rogan such a big deal?

51:15

You ever listen to Joe Rogan talk about

51:17

pugilism?

51:18

Two gentlemen beating the crap out of

51:20

each other as poetry,

51:22

as chess.

51:28

I I could listen to Joe talk about MMA

51:30

for days.

51:32

Yeah.

51:34

You know,

51:35

the story of Mighty Mouse, the guy

51:37

trapped in some, I don't know, flyweight

51:39

division with unbelievable skills who

51:41

never gets to meet a formidable enemy.

51:45

You know?

51:48

Do you think that's a privilege? Do you

51:49

think that there's a privilege in being

51:51

able to craft a story cuz so much of the

51:53

meaning you're describing there comes

51:54

from these great stories. And not

51:57

everybody is able to craft the story

52:00

upon seeing something. You probably look

52:02

at this item in front of me, this glass,

52:03

and create a story about it that drives

52:06

meaning, that makes you feel something.

52:07

I worry about its manufacture. How is it

52:10

that we got a surface of revolution?

52:12

What What is What is the industrial

52:13

process? How do I take a picture of this

52:15

and get it

52:17

a photograph of the machine that made

52:18

it? You know that fly that has been

52:20

buzzing around us this entire interview?

52:22

Do you remember when Obama had a fly?

52:24

Yeah, and he caught it and bam.

52:26

Yeah.

52:27

The confidence of that man.

52:29

See, I'd try that and I'd miss and I'd

52:31

screw it up in front of millions of

52:32

people.

52:34

You know, it's like I I took so much

52:37

meaning away from that fly.

52:39

Were you trying to or is that just a

52:41

sort of predisposed

52:42

>> did.

52:43

No, everyone. Some people would have

52:45

gone, "Huh?" How was it that you knew

52:48

exactly what I was talking about?

52:50

Because it captured a moment.

52:54

He was the girl in the red dress.

52:57

You know, there's this thing that women

52:58

say, "Not every woman can wear red."

53:00

Well, not every man

53:03

can grab a fly with confidence.

53:06

I

53:07

I think I think we all see this.

53:10

I think we all see beauty everywhere.

53:13

Do you remember that movie American

53:14

Beauty with the the plastic bag that

53:16

gets in the

53:17

air funnel going up?

53:21

And the key point is the ability just

53:23

to see beauty wherever you find it.

53:27

You know, everything behind you means

53:29

something to me.

53:30

The letter B

53:32

uh strange to me that there's only one

53:35

phonetic alphabet and that every

53:36

phonetic alphabet is descended from it.

53:39

You know? right.

53:42

I I I

53:44

I basically view everything as a

53:45

hyperlink. I just want to click on the

53:47

world and see where it goes to.

53:49

Not everybody does, though.

53:51

But, we do.

53:52

They don't make the step is what I'm

53:54

saying, cuz people would see the bee and

53:56

nothing would cross their You know, it's

53:57

it's funny.

53:59

>> There's an absolutely horrible account

54:02

that has been just dogging me for years

54:04

trying to make my life miserable.

54:07

And A social media account?

54:09

>> Yeah. Doesn't matter. Yeah.

54:12

And the person said, "You know, one

54:14

thing I just never understand is

54:17

he's not

54:20

he's not hawking a book.

54:23

He

54:25

He's just talking. What Why are his

54:27

numbers high?"

54:30

And the answer is everybody cares about

54:31

this stuff.

54:32

They want an invitation.

54:35

One of the funniest things that gets

54:36

said about me on social media is he goes

54:38

on forever and he never says anything.

54:41

And then like I look at the word clouds

54:43

of things that I I've talked about and

54:45

people are just Googling everything

54:46

incessantly.

54:48

You know, if you didn't know who Pablo

54:49

Casals was, now you do. Now you know

54:51

what a real cello sounds like.

54:53

Um

54:55

I don't know. I just

54:59

I can't believe that I'm so far through

55:01

this life and that there's so little

55:03

left.

55:07

I can't believe this doesn't go on

55:08

forever.

55:10

Is that all you? Yeah.

55:15

My people just got hit.

55:17

And

55:21

you know, you want to talk about the

55:22

river and the sea.

55:26

That river is not the Jordan River and

55:30

that sea is not the Mediterranean.

55:33

The Arab world stretches from the

55:36

Atlantic with Morocco

55:39

right up to the What is it?

55:41

Shatt al-Arabia waterway that divides

55:43

Iraq from Iran.

55:47

And I don't think

55:51

this is stable.

55:53

There is no way in which

55:57

we should be fighting like this. This is

55:59

ridiculous.

56:04

Trump Trump used the F-word.

56:08

I mean, he's getting taking a ton of

56:09

crap.

56:10

Why would you use the F-word? Well,

56:11

well, isn't it interesting people view

56:13

Trump as so tacky?

56:17

You know, he's he's got this Queens sort

56:19

of bluster. He doesn't doesn't reek of

56:22

uh

56:24

finalist clubs at Harvard or

56:27

Skull and Bones or whatever.

56:30

No.

56:32

Trump doesn't use the F-word for a

56:33

reason. He needs it once in a blue moon,

56:36

and it better mean something.

56:39

And he said this to Iran, and he said

56:41

this to Israel. These two two countries

56:44

have been

56:45

fighting for so long.

56:47

They don't know what the [ __ ] they're

56:49

doing.

56:52

He didn't make a mistake.

56:54

The rest of the world has just forgotten

56:55

how to calibrate.

56:57

What do you see Trump in? How is he

56:59

clothed?

57:01

He's almost always in a suit and tie.

57:03

And he almost never says the F-word.

57:06

And it's carefully calibrated to get

57:08

everybody's attention, and we're so

57:10

asleep that we don't even hear it.

57:14

This is World War III,

57:16

and it's already started.

57:21

Biden was there

57:23

in the Oval Office

57:27

non compos mentis.

57:29

And I I being told, "Don't worry,

57:31

there's a committee that's replaced

57:33

him."

57:35

Because I was talking about the fact

57:36

that he can't be president.

57:39

I I just don't know what we're doing.

57:41

I'm so mystified by everybody else. You

57:43

know, it's like Elon makes sense to me.

57:50

I'm not Elon. I'm very different person,

57:52

but at least Elon makes sense to me.

57:55

Not 100%, but 98% Elon makes sense to

57:58

me. It's everybody else that I'm

57:59

completely confused about. What part of

58:01

what Elon is saying makes so much sense

58:03

to you?

58:04

Oh, jeez, everything. One, we have to

58:07

have babies. We have to keep going.

58:09

Two,

58:11

it can't all be about problems.

58:14

You have to be excited to be alive every

58:16

morning.

58:19

You have to work your ass off your whole

58:21

life. You know what one of the most

58:22

beautiful things that ever happened?

58:24

Somebody telling Elon that he was the

58:26

world's richest human being.

58:28

He said, "Huh, it's interesting.

58:31

Okay, back to work."

58:36

Amazing, right?

58:38

There's no reward

58:40

that he can't have

58:43

more of by stopping work and enjoying

58:46

his wealth except doing stuff.

58:49

And

58:51

I was born in this country.

58:53

My

58:54

parents were born in this country.

58:57

My grandparents on one side were not,

58:59

but my grandparents on the other side

59:00

were.

59:01

Elon is so American.

59:07

That cowboy spirit

59:10

that

59:11

he does all sorts of stuff I can't

59:12

stand. I don't want to see one more of

59:14

those Pepe memes ever.

59:16

I really don't. What the [ __ ] is his

59:18

problem? Okay? I don't know him at all.

59:24

But Elon at his best is is the United

59:27

States.

59:29

You know?

59:31

Anything is possible here.

59:33

And we And we just waste our lives on

59:36

interpersonal drama.

59:38

He wastes his life to an enormous extent

59:41

as a troll.

59:44

I cannot That's The part of him that I

59:46

don't understand is one, why he's not

59:48

focused 100% on physics.

59:51

I think he sees it as going through Grok

59:53

and AI. He doesn't want to trust humans.

59:55

I think he sees Mars as energizing to

59:57

engineers and the stars are enervating

60:00

to engineers because the science There's

60:02

no amount of engine- You can't engineer

60:04

your way to the stars with the science

60:05

we have.

60:07

But

60:08

he's he's being a complete [ __ ] when it

60:10

comes to science and he's being a total

60:12

hero when it comes to engineering.

60:15

Um

60:18

but he is the quintessential American.

60:20

A business is only as good as the people

60:22

inside it. So, how do you make sure

60:23

you're hiring the best? Our sponsor,

60:25

LinkedIn, can help you find these

60:27

quickly. I believe in taking time to

60:29

hire slowly, but I also understand that

60:32

once you've decided to hire, you want to

60:34

get the ball rolling and get the best

60:35

candidates in front of you to start

60:37

interviewing. And that's where paying to

60:39

promote your role on LinkedIn makes all

60:40

the difference because you'll get

60:42

applicants seven times faster than if

60:44

you post your job for free. And even

60:46

though slower, more considered hiring is

60:48

important, you never want your hiring

60:50

platforms to be what's holding you back.

60:52

LinkedIn keeps pace. It takes care of

60:55

the heavy lifting, sending you highly

60:57

skilled candidates that you wouldn't

60:58

find anywhere else. So, when the time

61:00

comes to make your next hire, make it

61:02

count and promote your job on LinkedIn.

61:04

Head to linkedin.com/doac.

61:06

That's linkedin.com/doac

61:09

and terms and conditions apply.

61:11

A second ago you said you can't believe

61:13

it doesn't go on forever. Yeah.

61:17

You or the universe or I can't believe

61:19

my story doesn't go on forever. Look,

61:21

I've never died before, so I have no

61:22

experience with it. So, as as far as I

61:25

know,

61:26

I've always been alive.

61:28

And it will always go on that way. But,

61:30

there's another thing that, you know, I

61:31

I've talked about occasionally,

61:34

which is I'm not the most

61:36

public-spirited human being.

61:40

You know, I I am somebody who will take

61:41

the last

61:42

the last rambutan.

61:45

You know, and I know that you're not

61:46

supposed to do that in almost any

61:47

culture on Earth, but sometimes it's

61:49

just sitting there and it bothers me.

61:51

Okay? So, I'm not the I'm not the

61:52

classiest person on Earth.

61:56

But, I'll tell you something. If you

61:57

have a kid, and you have a choice about

61:59

eating the rambutan yourself or giving

62:01

the rambutan to your child, this it's a

62:02

no-brainer. You'll you'll enjoy the

62:04

rambutan so much more if you give it to

62:06

your kid.

62:08

And you'll see.

62:11

And that's the way that which this goes

62:13

on forever.

62:18

It's great. I mean, just

62:20

how many young people do I have to yell

62:22

at?

62:24

Well, I don't know if I want to have

62:25

kids. I don't want to bring anyone into

62:27

this horrible world.

62:30

Why do you have kids? It both is it I

62:32

can see it personally bothers you.

62:38

Do you have any idea how much hate there

62:40

is right now for Israel?

62:43

Do you have any idea how destabilizing

62:45

this action against Iran was?

62:50

Do you have any idea how many people

62:51

have suffered for how long under the

62:54

mullahs?

62:58

We are being cheated of Persia.

63:02

I'm not talking about

63:04

Iran for the Persians.

63:06

I'm talking about

63:07

we are cheated

63:09

of Persia. The entire planet.

63:11

One of the greatest societies on Earth

63:13

taken offline.

63:16

I Look,

63:20

You're catching me on the wrong week.

63:26

I I don't want to dwell on it.

63:28

Th- This is just incredibly

63:30

irresponsible. We're not going to

63:31

survive this.

63:34

Israel is certainly not going to survive

63:36

this.

63:40

If the Abrahamic world does not get its

63:41

head out of its ass.

63:43

If the Christian world does not start to

63:45

stand up for itself without becoming

63:48

this Christ is king nightmare.

63:52

You know, I was in Tel Aviv before this

63:53

all happened. And I I just said from the

63:55

stage, make the Middle East Christian

63:57

again.

64:01

D- Does nobody understand their role is

64:03

sort of my question.

64:06

How can you have Bethlehem without a

64:09

strong Christian presence?

64:14

Have you ever been to the Church of the

64:15

Holy Sepulchre? No.

64:18

Can I give you another assignment? Yeah.

64:20

Get off your ass and go. You got the

64:21

money.

64:22

Walk the stations of the cross.

64:28

And for God's sake, stop with the issue

64:30

about belief.

64:33

You can pray like the rest of us. We're

64:35

not sure if we're praying We're not sure

64:36

if the thing is hooked up and anyone's

64:38

listening.

64:43

You have the right to go back even with

64:45

doubt, even with knowledge.

64:48

And you have the right to believe about

64:49

it tomorrow, you know, where where

64:51

you're not going to be, but people are

64:53

going to be mentioning your name.

64:55

When you say that your your people are

64:57

under attack, who are you referencing as

65:00

your people?

65:02

I would in general there's several

65:05

groups of people that I would describe

65:07

as my people. The Jews would be one.

65:09

Dyslexics would be another. Americans

65:11

would be another.

65:14

Scientists would be another.

65:16

It depends on on what these think. But

65:18

right now I'm thinking about the Jews

65:20

and I'm thinking about the fact that the

65:21

social media

65:23

businesses have lost complete control of

65:27

uh the bot farms. And we're just seeing

65:30

this un- I I I feel like I'm living

65:32

through the 1930s again.

65:35

I We've seen this movie before.

65:38

It doesn't end well.

65:40

You know, what happened in Gaza is an

65:43

unbelievable tragedy.

65:46

And that tragedy was partially

65:48

architected by the United States of

65:50

America shoving a two-state solution

65:52

down the throats

65:54

of Palestinian Arabs who absolutely do

65:56

not want a two-state solution.

66:05

And the creation

66:06

in part of the situation where Israel

66:09

has a hand, the US has a hand, the

66:10

Palestinian Arabs have a hand.

66:13

The creation of Hamas

66:15

and the and the promotion of this just

66:18

unbelievable genius Sinwar,

66:21

the leader of Hamas, who is continuing

66:23

to best Bibi Netanyahu from the grave.

66:28

You know, it's just an amazing feat.

66:32

Nobody reads anymore, as you know.

66:34

Um

66:36

There's an old Sherlock Holmes story

66:37

called The Problem at Thor Bridge. Ever

66:39

heard of it? No.

66:41

So, you're British. Um

66:43

Sherlock Holmes gets called in on a case

66:46

in which

66:47

um

66:51

there's a murder.

66:54

And the murder

66:56

is traced The murder is traced to this

66:59

gentleman who still exists.

67:02

Uh

67:05

What Sherlock Holmes figures out is that

67:07

it's not a murder, it's a suicide in

67:09

which the gun

67:11

will

67:13

fall into the river at Thor Bridge

67:17

because it's tied to a weight.

67:19

And the person uses the suicide

67:22

to frame someone else.

67:25

And it's just one of these genius little

67:27

vignettes. And that's what Sinwar was.

67:29

He was a genius. He He knew he was going

67:32

to die. Who is Sinwar? Sinwar is a

67:35

person who who's committed suicide.

67:38

Sinwar's suicide was an IDF assisted

67:41

suicide. I wrote about this almost

67:43

instantly after the October 7th

67:45

invasion.

67:46

It didn't make any sense that Gaza would

67:49

undertake

67:50

such an act against Israel given the

67:52

asymmetry.

67:54

And what this mirrored was that before

67:56

the 1990s

67:57

So you think Sinwar committed suicide to

68:00

then cause

68:02

the people of Gaza to invade Israel? No,

68:04

no, no. I'm sorry.

68:06

Sinwar would be happy enough for all the

68:08

Gazans to die.

68:11

And so

68:12

what he did was he architected a

68:14

situation in which Israel would be

68:17

compelled to respond using the wrong

68:19

tools.

68:22

He tricked Israel. And I you know, I'm

68:25

very confident to to talk about this

68:27

because if you check my old tweets, I

68:29

say IDF assisted suicide

68:32

and Munchausen by proxy and Zukswang,

68:35

right? And I said these are the concepts

68:37

familiarize yourself because Israel is

68:39

going to invade

68:41

Gaza.

68:43

And I knew what was going to happen

68:44

because took me a like why would you do

68:46

this? It doesn't make sense from

68:48

first order logic, but third and fourth

68:50

order logic you like oh, of course it

68:52

makes sense.

68:53

This is hybrid war. The most important

68:55

thing for Sinwar is video.

68:59

Why?

69:00

Look at the effect of the video.

69:03

The video of Gaza

69:05

has turned the world to an extent

69:08

against Israel that's sort of

69:09

inconceivable.

69:18

There's a doctrine called hybrid

69:19

warfare.

69:21

And I think it came out of

69:24

the US in the early 2000s.

69:26

And it says that the kinetic component

69:29

of warfare, the killing, the actual

69:31

shooting and the planes and the bombs

69:32

and all this kind of stuff,

69:35

is

69:37

not the major component.

69:40

The social media is really important.

69:43

The video is important. The memetic

69:45

complex is important.

69:48

And

69:50

Israel has an advantage over the Gazan

69:53

Arabs

69:56

in kinetic warfare.

69:58

And Sinwar knew that. And he was like,

70:00

"Brilliant.

70:02

All we need to do is force Israel to

70:04

come after us." And this is this thing I

70:06

was going to say before the 1990s,

70:08

we had a spate of killings

70:10

of policemen firing on people who had

70:13

pulled toy guns on them.

70:16

And we would we would say things and I

70:17

remember this like, "Whatever you do,

70:19

don't point a toy gun at a policeman.

70:21

You're it's Don't you realize what's

70:22

going to happen?"

70:24

And then somebody coined the phrase

70:27

police assisted suicide.

70:30

The policeman is the instrument.

70:35

That's what I knew was going to happen.

70:37

And for better or for worse, BB just

70:39

couldn't figure out

70:41

where he was.

70:43

And BB was dumber and Sinwar was

70:44

smarter.

70:46

Is there Is there any way back from

70:48

here?

70:49

Cuz you said this is World War III.

70:51

Well, the the way

70:53

There There is, but it's slim and it's

70:55

evaporating.

70:57

I mean, almost everything depends on

70:58

Saudi Arabia and the and the Iranians,

71:02

the Persians.

71:04

If the Persians didn't take this

71:05

opportunity to rise up against their

71:07

oppressors,

71:09

I don't know what they're waiting for.

71:11

Yes, you're going to get killed in some

71:12

numbers, but

71:14

you have to figure out whether you're

71:15

interested in tyranny or not.

71:17

So, the Persians are absolutely falling

71:19

down on the ground on the job

71:22

not rising up against the mullahs.

71:25

This is a coordinated moment. Like, you

71:26

know, there's there's a moment for a

71:28

prison break, this would be it. Who are

71:30

the mullahs in this scenario? The

71:32

Ayatollahs, the The government of Iran.

71:34

>> Khamenei, yeah, the the theocratic

71:36

government of Iran.

71:36

>> So, the rulers of Iran, basically, the

71:38

people that are Okay. So, I don't know

71:40

if if if you know a a ton of Persians,

71:42

they're varied in their religiosity,

71:45

but there's a you know, there's an

71:46

underground gay scene in Tehran, there's

71:49

super hyper-modern

71:51

people just like you and me who can't

71:53

stand these guys.

71:55

Mhm.

71:55

And so, you're saying that if they rise

71:57

up

71:57

>> that would be one of the parts of the

71:59

solution. The other thing is Saudi

72:01

Arabia and and I have to be very

72:03

measured and careful here.

72:07

You can't fantasize about the Middle

72:09

East becoming

72:11

Western Europe overnight.

72:13

Every time we do this, we make a

72:14

terrible mistake.

72:16

When you have a modernizer like MBS in

72:18

Saudi Arabia, Who's the ruler of Saudi

72:20

Arabia, right? De facto.

72:24

He can't

72:26

suddenly become a modern person. So, you

72:28

know, if if if we end up talking about

72:30

Khashoggi and murders and the murdered

72:32

journalist and all this stuff, the whole

72:33

conversation will derail.

72:35

But, he's a modernizer.

72:37

And there was a moment

72:39

where he needed to not

72:42

condemn Israel publicly and thank it

72:44

privately,

72:46

but to say,

72:48

"We've all been terrorized by this

72:50

country, and Israel did what everyone

72:54

needed.

72:57

We needed to rise up against the mullahs

72:58

because you can't have a nuclear

73:00

theocracy.

73:02

You can't have a highly developed notion

73:04

of heaven

73:06

where this is the this is the anteroom

73:09

where you're waiting to get into the

73:10

real room.

73:14

That issue

73:16

of

73:17

needing to be rid of an

73:21

aspiring nuclear theocracy

73:24

is something that in that Israel

73:26

undertook. Now,

73:28

something that I'm going to say

73:30

there's three words in Yiddish which you

73:31

may have heard or may not may not,

73:33

schlemazel and nebbish.

73:37

So, there're three unfortunate people.

73:40

You don't want to be any one of those

73:42

three. But, the subtlety is that the

73:44

schlemazel

73:46

is a klutz and the schlemazel spills hot

73:48

soup on the schlemazel. So, the

73:50

schlemazel is the unfortunate person to

73:53

whom bad things happen.

73:55

And the nebbish is the weak ineffectual

73:57

person who decides that it's his job to

74:00

clean up the mess.

74:02

So, the schlemazel spills the scalding

74:04

hot soup on the schlemazel and the

74:05

nebbish cleans it up.

74:07

Now, in the US, we've got this terrible

74:10

sort of Christian nationalist

74:13

uh problem that we've developed which is

74:15

what sometimes people call the woke

74:17

right

74:18

where

74:19

we have a bunch of people who've been

74:20

badly treated.

74:22

White Christian Americans have been

74:24

badly treated in the woke era. They've

74:26

been forced to salute everybody else's,

74:29

yeah.

74:30

Yay for uh you know, I don't know,

74:32

Honduran uh lesbians day. And and it's

74:35

like, okay, enough. We don't we don't

74:36

want to do that anymore. We've also done

74:38

great things. And

74:40

I absolutely think that they've been

74:41

mistreated. Yeah.

74:44

And they've gone sort of metastatic.

74:47

And their attitude is no more wars for

74:49

Israel, America first.

74:51

What I was getting to with the

74:52

schlimazel and the nebbish

74:55

is that most Americans don't have any

74:57

idea who Kermit Roosevelt was. Do you

74:59

have any idea of who Kermit

75:01

So, the US and the UK jointly

75:05

overthrew

75:06

a democratically elected in Iran through

75:08

something called Operation Ajax.

75:12

We installed the Shah.

75:13

And then there's this period where

75:15

everybody stupidly celebrates the mini

75:16

skirts and the jazz that was going

75:18

through Tehran,

75:20

which was a bridge too far. In other

75:22

words, the mini skirts were really bad

75:24

idea.

75:25

Because they weren't ready they were

75:27

ready for some amount of modernization

75:28

and they weren't ready for that. And so

75:30

we pushed it too far.

75:32

And so we got the mullahs for 40 years.

75:34

And now we chop off people's fingers and

75:36

we pluck out people's eyes and we

75:39

put homosexuals on ropes and dangle them

75:42

from from crane. They're barbaric

75:44

They're horrible human beings.

75:46

Okay? These are really bad men, the

75:48

mullahs.

75:51

And we did that.

75:53

So, the scalding hot soup

75:55

is

75:56

revolutionary

75:58

theocratic Iran.

76:00

And we spilled it all over the Middle

76:02

East,

76:03

which is the schlimazel.

76:05

We spilled it on Saudi Arabia. We

76:07

spilled it

76:08

on Iraq. We spilled it on Israel.

76:11

Everybody suffers from having these

76:13

people installed because of the US and

76:16

the UK instituting a problem back in the

76:18

'50s.

76:20

And who's the nebbish?

76:22

Who cleans this up?

76:24

Israel volunteers for this job.

76:28

And then Saudi Arabia pretends, "Oh my

76:30

god, this is terrible.

76:33

Our our Muslim brother is being attacked

76:35

by our Jewish

76:38

I I I just can't believe anybody's dumb

76:40

enough to fall for all of this.

76:44

Like we're involved in a story where

76:46

nobody can sort things out. There's no

76:48

talking heads anyone believes in.

76:51

And if I didn't understand this, then

76:52

how is it that I have a tweet

76:54

from, you know,

76:56

10 days after October 7th where I

76:58

appeared on Triggernometry. I'm telling

76:59

you, Israel hasn't even walked into Gaza

77:02

yet, and I know what the strategy is.

77:06

Iran sent hypersonic missiles into the

77:09

ground in Israel

77:12

as a message.

77:14

Violence is a language, and they spoke

77:16

it well.

77:17

The mullahs may be crazy, but they're

77:19

still Persians. They're they're

77:21

extraordinarily skilled.

77:24

And so what they did is they wasted some

77:25

of their arsenal saying, "You have no

77:28

Iron Dome."

77:30

And we're not going to kill you.

77:33

We're going to put our missiles, we're

77:34

going to waste our missiles by sending

77:35

them into your Earth and try to kill no

77:38

one.

77:39

And these Israelis, these brilliant

77:41

genius Israelis who pull off all sorts

77:44

of things that the world can't believe,

77:46

are dumb enough, some of them, to say,

77:49

"Huh, they sent all these missiles and

77:50

they couldn't even hit anyone."

77:52

And I'm just thinking,

77:55

do do do none of you understand

77:56

anything?

77:57

I I just don't even know where I am.

78:02

And I I'm looking at, you know, I know

78:05

Tulsi.

78:06

Tulsi Gabbard?

78:07

>> Yeah.

78:08

Tulsi's amazing. She's the head of the

78:10

intelligence program for the United

78:11

States.

78:14

>> Director of National Intelligence,

78:15

right?

78:17

Tulsi

78:18

has seen the devastation not of war, but

78:21

of US action abroad. Like we haven't

78:24

really had full wars, but we get

78:26

involved in Afghanistan or Iraq or

78:28

wherever. And in, you know, people die

78:30

and there are firefights. It's not like

78:32

it has nothing to do with war, but

78:34

full-on war is a is a very different

78:36

thing. We We say the Iraq war, but I

78:38

I want to be very careful about the

78:40

language.

78:42

War usually involves you getting

78:45

rocked at home, not just your your

78:46

troops abroad.

78:51

I don't think she

78:54

I don't think she appreciates the

78:56

gravity of the situation. That somehow

78:58

what we need to do is we need to

78:59

stabilize this thing

79:01

for 50 to 100 years while we desperately

79:04

try to figure out a long-term solution.

79:08

This idea of like just

79:14

We're not taking responsibility for the

79:16

world we already screwed up.

79:18

I don't want to send Americans I you

79:21

know, I'm not an Israeli, I'm an

79:22

American. I don't want to send my fellow

79:25

Americans to die in foreign battles that

79:28

we have no business being in, but

79:30

we have to take ownership of our history

79:32

with oil and energy in the Middle East.

79:35

And what does that look like taking

79:36

ownership?

79:37

Recognizing that we created the mullahs.

79:40

And doing what about it?

79:41

>> Wait, wait, wait a second. Not just

79:42

that, and that we also created a lot of

79:44

the heartache

79:46

along with Sinwar and to a much lesser

79:49

extent Israel

79:50

by foisting this two-state solution

79:54

on people who would never put up with

79:56

it.

79:57

Like I I lived in in Israel for 2 years.

80:00

And you would have conversations with

80:02

Arabs

80:04

some of whom are Israelis.

80:06

You know, and they would say, "Look, you

80:08

know, you just don't understand the West

80:09

Bank. You don't understand the

80:11

difference between the West Bank and

80:12

Gaza."

80:14

And they would tell me straight up,

80:16

"You're going to get us all killed with

80:18

this two-state solution. Stop it."

80:23

And I you know, it was very hard for me

80:24

to hear.

80:26

But

80:27

we're just having a child's conversation

80:29

about the Middle East.

80:32

And I will say this about the UK.

80:36

The British Foreign Service

80:38

had a different failure mode than the

80:40

US. They really learned the regions.

80:44

They learned the dialects of the

80:45

languages of the countries that they

80:47

were involved in. The British Empire

80:49

took

80:51

many places that they were involved in

80:53

seriously. And they have a very

80:55

complicated legacy. You know, I'm

80:58

I spent a lot of time in Bombay and

80:59

there's a lot of debate among very

81:01

educated Indians

81:04

about figuring out how to think about

81:06

the the British legacy. All of the great

81:08

institutional

81:09

structures that were built, all of the

81:12

prejudice and bigotry.

81:14

Why was a such a small country able to

81:16

colonize such a large land basically

81:19

working with the locals, you know, it's

81:21

a rich conversation. We're having

81:23

childlike conversations about all of

81:25

this.

81:26

I'm sorry if I'm going on about this,

81:28

but

81:30

it's just a very weird thing that we're

81:32

we can't get anybody's attention.

81:36

You can't even get my attention, you

81:38

know, I'm watching hypersonic missiles

81:40

slam into the places I just was.

81:46

And then I'm watching a cat video.

81:52

And then I'm trying to figure out what

81:53

to order through Uber Eats. And it's

81:54

just like I can't stay focused.

81:58

It's really important to put this um

82:01

to put this right.

82:03

And the US screwed up the Middle East

82:05

along with the UK really good. And we

82:07

have a lot of responsibility. And if we

82:09

want to go isolationist, I understand

82:11

that.

82:12

But you first have to put back the

82:14

chicken soup that you spilled. And how

82:16

do you do that?

82:17

I'm not sure. I'm not the director of

82:19

National Intelligence. I'm not

82:22

I'm not the Secretary of Defense. I'm

82:24

not in the Oval Office. I mean, you

82:26

know, it's it's very weird. I was

82:27

workmates with J.D. Vance.

82:31

You know,

82:33

these these are people who are

82:35

you know, Bobby Kennedy lives one canyon

82:37

over from me in Los Angeles.

82:41

The people around

82:43

power

82:44

in the US,

82:49

Godspeed, you know, just just wish them

82:51

well.

82:53

I don't care what party you're in, but

82:55

to to try to sabotage Trump or sabotage

82:58

Tulsi or sabotage Pete Hegseth, I

83:02

these guys need to figure this out and

83:03

they need to be at a totally different

83:05

level. And he's figuring it out, peace

83:07

in the region.

83:10

You know, the peace with

83:11

between Egypt and Israel is a shitty,

83:13

crappy, horrible peace.

83:15

But it's peace.

83:18

It's not a loving relationship.

83:21

It's not a question of everybody going

83:23

back and forth between the two countries

83:25

saying, you know, we used to be

83:27

enemies, now we're friends. It's a

83:29

lousy, cold peace.

83:31

I'll take it.

83:33

We need to have peace between Israel and

83:36

the Palestinian Arabs who can live in

83:38

peace. And we need the people who cannot

83:40

live in peace,

83:42

we need to find someplace else for them

83:43

to be.

83:45

It is absolutely imperative. And it By

83:48

the way, this goes for the Israelis.

83:50

There are a small number of hardcore

83:51

Israeli settlers who cannot live

83:54

uh you know, in peace with their

83:55

neighbors.

83:57

And it's very important that the people

83:58

who cannot live in peace not be there.

84:01

Do we need to go to Are you Are you

84:02

suggesting that we

84:05

focus on regime change in Iran?

84:09

That is really the responsibility of the

84:11

Persians.

84:13

So, I want to I want to get clear on

84:16

what you see as a solution because

84:17

you're saying the Persian people have to

84:18

rise up. The US need to cab and not get

84:20

involved in that regime change.

84:23

>> I'm saying that

84:25

a bunch of things need to happen if

84:27

we're to have a long-term solution. I

84:29

make you president tomorrow. I hate when

84:31

people do this. But I it's the clearest

84:33

way of understanding the actions you

84:35

would First of all, if I was president

84:37

tomorrow, I sure as hell wouldn't be on

84:38

a podcast discussing strategy with you.

84:41

Trump does it. Yeah, I decline to answer

84:44

all sorts of questions on camera.

84:45

>> Fair. Yeah.

84:47

So, my feeling is is that you do a lot

84:49

more behind closed doors. And this idea

84:51

of just handing people

84:53

"You're the king of the world. What do

84:54

you do tomorrow to stop" you know, it's

84:56

like don't do that to me cuz it's just

84:58

it's a no-win question. If I was going

85:00

to I I do a lot of stress in

85:01

communication. I'd meet with people in

85:04

private. I'd use lots of carrots and

85:06

sticks. I'd try to use long-range

85:08

thinking, and I wouldn't tell you what

85:09

my plan is. And by the way,

85:12

I very much respect Donald Trump in

85:15

certain ways. One of which is is that

85:17

and this confuses our friend Sam Harris

85:19

no end.

85:20

Sam is always like, "Well, he's not

85:21

being truthful. He's not making sense."

85:22

He's a negotiator.

85:25

You don't sit down to a negotiation with

85:27

an open book saying, "Let me make sense

85:29

to you."

85:31

You sit there saying, "You don't know

85:32

what I'm going to do next. You don't

85:34

know how big the stick is. You don't

85:36

know how much carrot there is.

85:38

Maybe I'm prepared to give you more.

85:40

Maybe my stick isn't as big as you think

85:42

or maybe it's twice as big." Do you

85:43

think anyone has get answers?

85:46

I'll be honest. I think that Trump is in

85:49

part respected because he has some

85:51

intuitions about this stuff.

85:55

His intuition is not to say everything.

85:58

His intuition is that negotiation is

86:00

more important than transparency.

86:03

And at a time when everybody's craving

86:06

transparency. Tell me everything.

86:10

No. I'm not going to tell you

86:11

everything.

86:13

I'm going to try to save some children

86:14

today.

86:16

I'm going to threaten.

86:17

I'm going to cajole.

86:21

I'm going to do all sorts of things. And

86:23

you know, that's what I do.

86:25

I would I would assemble the best people

86:27

around me.

86:28

I would stop giving so many press

86:30

conferences. I wouldn't tweet every 4

86:32

seconds. I'd be extremely strategic

86:34

about it.

86:36

But

86:38

you know, the situation

86:40

in Tel Aviv and in Gaza makes me sick to

86:43

my stomach.

86:46

And and in Ukraine.

86:49

Almost all of my DNA comes from Ukraine.

86:54

At least passed through it.

86:57

And I've been there.

86:59

And you know,

87:03

Russians and

87:04

Ukraine used to be known as Little

87:05

Russia.

87:09

This is a

87:10

How are we sitting here watching this?

87:14

What [ __ ] decided in 2004

87:18

that we were just going to hand full

87:20

Article 5 status

87:23

to former Soviet

87:26

republics without consequence.

87:31

It is not the case that I don't I would

87:34

love to have Estonia, Latvia, and

87:37

Lithuania in NATO.

87:41

Not at this cost.

87:47

Look,

87:51

the world is a brutal brutal place.

87:56

We've gotten really bad at at

87:58

international

88:00

understandings.

88:03

I can't stand what's happened to Europe.

88:05

Europe has been completely denatured.

88:11

We're we're playing with fire

88:13

everywhere. And I just I don't know how

88:14

to talk about it because

88:17

every time I talk about things where I'm

88:18

the only person who sounds like this

88:22

it's bad for my life.

88:26

Look, if you're in general a Ukraine

88:29

hawk and you say

88:30

you know, we we need to make sure that

88:32

Ukraine is completely supported so that

88:34

they don't give an inch of territory.

88:36

Yeah, you'll take a lot of crap, but

88:37

you'll be in a large group.

88:40

And if you basically have the idea that

88:41

Russia, you know, was minding its own

88:43

business and the US was encircling it

88:46

and good Russia, bad US.

88:50

You'll have a lot of company for that

88:51

perspective.

88:53

I don't sound like any of that.

88:56

The most important thing is to stabilize

88:58

the world again and we're not going to

89:00

get another chance like World War II if

89:02

we're not smart.

89:04

We're crazy to give up this order that

89:05

we have and

89:07

again, you know, one more time I'm

89:08

talking about this stuff and I don't

89:10

want to be talking about this stuff.

89:12

Elon is 100% right. We can't talk about

89:14

problems all the time.

89:16

It's cheap meaning.

89:20

There's an entire universe to explore.

89:24

And we're sitting here focused on our

89:26

own drama, always.

89:28

And I'm getting sucked into it I don't

89:29

want.

89:32

I want to be talking about traveling

89:34

through time and space

89:37

using

89:39

Easter eggs and hidden features of what

89:41

we thought was the space-time continuum.

89:44

Because I talked about ketosis on this

89:45

podcast and ketones, a brand called

89:47

KetoneIQ sent me their little product

89:50

here. It was on my desk when I got to

89:51

the office. I picked it up, it sat on my

89:53

desk for a couple of weeks, then one day

89:55

I tried it.

89:57

And honestly, I've not looked back ever

89:59

since. I now have this everywhere I go.

90:02

When I travel all around the world, it's

90:04

in my hotel room, my team will put it

90:05

there. Before I did the podcast

90:06

recording today that I've just finished,

90:08

I had a shot of ketone IQ. And as is

90:11

always the case when I fall in love with

90:12

a product, I called the CEO and asked if

90:14

I could invest a couple of million quid

90:16

into their company. So, I'm now an

90:18

investor in the company as well as them

90:19

being a brand sponsor. I find it so easy

90:22

to drop into deep focused work when I've

90:24

had one of these. I would love you to

90:25

try one and see the impact it has on

90:28

you, your focus, your productivity, and

90:29

your endurance. So, if you want to try

90:31

it today, visit ketone.com/steven for

90:33

30% off your subscription. Plus, you'll

90:35

receive a free with your second

90:37

shipment. That's ketone.com/steven.

90:41

I'm excited for you.

90:43

I am.

90:44

Every single one of you watching this

90:45

right now has something to offer,

90:46

whether it's knowledge, your skills, or

90:48

experience, and that means you have

90:50

value. Stan Store, the platform I co-own

90:52

who are one of the sponsors of this

90:53

podcast, turns your knowledge into a

90:55

business through one single click. You

90:58

can sell digital products, coaching,

90:59

communities, and you don't need any

91:01

coding experience, either. Just the

91:03

drive to start. This is a business I

91:06

really believe in, and already $300 has

91:09

been earned by creators, coaches, and

91:10

entrepreneurs just like you have the

91:12

potential to be on Stan Store. These are

91:14

people who didn't wait, who heard me

91:15

saying things like this, and instead of

91:17

procrastinating, started building, then

91:19

launched something, and now they're

91:20

getting paid to do it. Stan is

91:22

incredibly simple and incredibly easy,

91:24

and you can link it with a Shopify store

91:25

that you're already using if you want

91:27

to. I'm on it, and so is my girlfriend

91:28

and many of my team. So, if you want to

91:30

join, start by launching your own

91:32

business with a free 30-day trial. Visit

91:34

stevenbartlett.stan.store

91:37

and get your setup within minutes.

91:39

I've got this uh

91:41

this

91:42

picture that I came across. Tell me.

91:45

Um well, I'd I'd love you to tell me.

91:46

This is the flower of life geometric

91:49

model. And I was

91:51

I was reading through some of your work,

91:52

and I came across this sentence that

91:54

said, you'd kept a secret for 30 years

91:58

in terms of your belief about the nature

92:00

of the reality that we live in, and that

92:02

you thought maybe it was more than

92:04

just the dimensions we experience maybe

92:05

there was 14 dimensions.

92:08

I've always I wonder this a lot you know

92:10

cuz we we're fixated on problems we're

92:13

fixated on what we see and what we hear

92:14

and what we feel but I wonder sometimes

92:16

if if even that is an illusion. I I've

92:18

spent a lot of time actually thinking

92:19

recently about the simulation theory and

92:21

is this whole reality just some

92:23

simulation on some kids video game in

92:25

another dimension.

92:27

Um so I thought you know you're a

92:28

physicist.

92:29

>> a favor put that in a triangle pattern

92:31

here. Okay so we have three monks.

92:35

Think of those as vertices of a

92:36

tetrahedron.

92:38

And think of this coaster floating here

92:40

as the fourth vertex. Mhm.

92:43

For every

92:44

two vertices so the number of vertices

92:47

we would agree is four. Yeah what's what

92:49

does vertice mean? Points.

92:51

>> Yeah one two three four.

92:53

>> Idealize these three things in this as

92:55

points.

92:55

>> Mhm. Draw a line segment between

92:59

all of these four vertices. How many

93:01

line segments are there?

93:04

One two three

93:07

four

93:08

five six six Yep. So there's six edges

93:13

four vertices. How many triangular faces

93:16

that have three vertices on them?

93:19

Oh four. Yeah this is how to think about

93:22

the actual dimensions that we have open

93:24

to us. The four faces we know about.

93:27

The key point that I was trying to get

93:29

at is

93:30

I don't believe that you just have the

93:32

four dimensions. I believe that you have

93:35

all six edges are dimensions.

93:39

And all

93:40

four vertices are also dimensions.

93:44

I'm talking about a hidden world.

93:48

It's very interesting physics has gone

93:50

stagnant in terms of how we usually

93:53

measure progress. The the way we measure

93:55

progress is

93:56

the change in something called the

93:58

action or the Lagrangian, a specialized

94:01

device.

94:02

And that used to change a lot, and then

94:04

in 1973 it stopped changing.

94:07

The major thing that we have is we have

94:09

no new ideas about how to change the

94:12

Lagrangian that anybody finds that

94:16

exciting or interesting. So, there's

94:17

been no progress. Nobody goes to

94:18

Stockholm to get a Nobel Prize because

94:21

they changed the Lagrangian of the

94:22

world.

94:23

What's the Lagrangian? The Lagrangian

94:27

So,

94:28

you probably think about physics in

94:29

terms of equations, like Maxwell's

94:31

equations or the Einstein equations or

94:34

whatever.

94:36

Think about it an equation

94:38

as being not the primary thing that

94:42

physicists think about. So, I give this

94:44

example. The Beatles had four basically

94:47

different configurations.

94:49

When Ringo was

94:51

the front man, he was singing Octopus's

94:53

Garden. George Harrison is

94:56

singing While My Guitar Gently Weeps.

94:59

You know, uh

95:00

Paul is singing about Penny Lane, and

95:01

John is singing about Strawberry Fields

95:03

Forever.

95:04

Those four equations,

95:07

those would be those different

95:09

configurations of the Beatles with one

95:10

of them front and everybody else backing

95:12

the front man

95:14

would be the equations, but the Beatles

95:16

would be the Lagrangian. It's the thing

95:18

that generates the four different

95:20

configurations.

95:21

>> Okay.

95:22

And there's this bizarre force field

95:24

that anybody who wants to talk about

95:27

physics and doing something new, in

95:29

particular leaving

95:31

or traversing time

95:34

or multiple dimensions of time, anything

95:36

that's really close to

95:39

what might be possible gets slammed.

95:43

We don't know why.

95:46

Because

95:47

it's very cheap to explore ideas, and we

95:49

have no new ideas.

95:53

But the only thing about a new idea in

95:54

physics

95:56

is that a new idea changes the balance

95:58

of power in the world. So you remember

96:00

the thing I was saying about AlphaFold

96:01

3? Yeah. AlphaFold 3 changed the balance

96:04

of power in the world. Bitcoin changed

96:06

the balance of power in the world.

96:09

The DEFUSE proposal

96:11

from the EcoHealth Alliance

96:14

changed the balance of power in the

96:15

world if that was the source of the

96:17

COVID virus.

96:19

Anytime somebody has a really big idea,

96:22

and the biggest idea and you know, I

96:25

talk about this, people don't grasp it.

96:27

Probably the most dangerous thought

96:29

anyone has ever had

96:33

was Rutherford in 1911 saying

96:36

I wonder whether

96:38

there's a neutral version of the proton.

96:44

It doesn't sound dangerous.

96:48

But it's hard to send a proton into a

96:50

bunch of protons because it's positively

96:52

charged and a massive nucleus is really

96:54

positively charged and so there's a

96:55

repulsion.

96:58

If there's a neutral version of the

96:59

proton and these things are barely stuck

97:01

together with the strong force even

97:03

though they're trying to scream away

97:04

from each other cuz they want they're

97:06

all positively charged.

97:07

You can send a neutral version of the

97:09

proton right into the center.

97:12

Tap and just imagine you have a bunch of

97:13

magnets that are trying to flee from

97:15

each other and the Velcro around them is

97:17

barely holding it together.

97:18

So now you

97:20

have a bullet in the form of a neutral

97:21

proton, a neutron, and it hits this

97:23

thing where the magnets want to come

97:25

apart and the Velcro is barely holding

97:27

it together.

97:28

Well, that idea

97:30

led to the chain reaction.

97:33

And then the nuclear bomb? Well, that

97:34

that was the fission bomb.

97:36

And then a geometer, so I'm a geometer

97:40

and not a physicist.

97:42

And a physicist named Edward Teller and

97:44

the geometer is named Stanislaw Ulam

97:48

said, "I wonder if there's a way to take

97:51

the chemical bomb

97:53

that creates the fission bomb

97:56

and use the fission bomb as the

97:58

detonator for a fusion bomb."

98:01

So,

98:02

bomb number one, bomb number two, bomb

98:04

number three.

98:06

And what they figured out was is that

98:08

the only way to create that

98:11

is to reflect light

98:14

in a particular way to compress

98:17

hydrogen into helium and release

98:20

energy.

98:22

Because anything other than light

98:23

wouldn't get

98:25

to this the tertiary stage fast enough

98:29

before the atomic bomb, like you're

98:30

using a Hiroshima Nagasaki as a

98:32

detonator. That's how crazy it is.

98:35

So, that chain of ideas, which is maybe

98:38

there's a neutral version of the proton,

98:41

maybe I can send that into the middle of

98:43

an atom that's very heavy that was built

98:45

in a stellar collision.

98:47

Maybe if I have a bunch of those uranium

98:50

or plutonium type things, each one when

98:52

they break apart will have more neutrons

98:54

inside, that is more neutral protons

98:56

that will hit more nuclei that will

98:58

release more energy, and maybe that can

99:00

then focus the light, the gamma

99:02

radiation that comes off of this thing,

99:04

or who knows what,

99:07

to compress

99:08

a narrow rod to create fusion, which

99:11

only occurs on the sun in the sun. But

99:14

but do it on Earth. So, we're going to

99:15

take a little bit of the sun

99:17

on Earth.

99:18

That chain of ideas

99:21

was the most dangerous thing anybody's

99:23

ever thunk.

99:26

And that's why when you try to do

99:28

physics, you don't know, why are people

99:30

making fun of me? Why are they being

99:32

mean? Why are they dissuading me from

99:34

talking?

99:36

I don't know.

99:37

You have a suspicion. Well, there was a

99:39

guy named Jack Ripper,

99:41

the unfortunately named Mr. Jack Raper,

99:44

who was a reporter in Cleveland,

99:46

who for some reason during the war in

99:48

1944 decided to vacation in New Mexico.

99:52

So, he goes to New Mexico and he comes

99:54

back and he says, "I've got a crazy

99:56

story.

99:57

There's a city that nobody knows about

100:00

with a mayor

100:01

who's supposed to be the second

100:03

Einstein.

100:04

And it's the most secretive city in the

100:06

world. And the mayor is working on a

100:09

doomsday weapon and even the people who

100:10

live in the city don't know what it is."

100:13

And he writes the story of Los Alamos

100:15

and publishes it 1944.

100:18

The scoop of the millennium to say

100:20

nothing of the century. Nobody knows

100:22

about this article.

100:23

And it's called Forbidden City.

100:28

We pretended that it never happened.

100:31

For those that don't know Los Alamos is

100:33

where

100:34

the atomic the nuclear bomb was, I

100:35

guess, conceived and brought to life and

100:38

tested.

100:40

Well, it was really it was really

100:41

designed there and most of the

100:45

nuclear processing took place at other

100:48

sites, whether Hanford or Oak Ridge, I'm

100:50

not sure.

100:51

And it was tested a short distance away

100:55

uh at the Trinity site.

100:57

So, go watch the movie Oppenheimer, if

100:59

you will. But, this is why physics

101:02

physicists are the only occupation

101:07

in the country that doesn't have full

101:08

free that there's dangers in believing

101:11

in more dimensions that maybe some

101:14

people might not want

101:16

to be known in the same way that we

101:18

didn't want the

101:19

My point is

101:21

I don't think our government knows the

101:24

real secrets of physics.

101:26

If I had to make a bet tomorrow, I don't

101:28

think there's a secret government office

101:30

that knows physics.

101:34

Okay? Mhm.

101:35

I think that there were a bunch of very

101:37

smart people who knew how dangerous

101:39

physics was and that the idea that we

101:42

would continue to do it in public struck

101:44

them as insane.

101:47

Because it could lead to destruction.

101:49

When I tell you that the most dangerous

101:51

idea in human history is maybe there's a

101:53

neutral version of the proton. That's

101:54

supposed to sound insane.

101:57

Mhm. But the entire chain of ideas

102:00

results

102:03

in nuclear fusion happening on Earth

102:06

at the direction of the president of the

102:07

United States.

102:09

And that's what I'm trying to get at

102:10

which people don't understand, which is

102:13

you probably don't even realize that the

102:15

Department of Energy is really the

102:16

Department of Physics.

102:19

Because we we we pretend that it's

102:21

the Department of Energy. Like we had a

102:23

war department that became the

102:24

Department of Defense. We're scared of

102:26

the possibility of physics. We don't

102:28

even want to talk about it.

102:31

The the

102:33

literally no other occupation

102:37

has

102:39

lost free speech like physics. There's a

102:42

special doctrine called restricted data

102:45

that says

102:46

you cannot

102:50

write

102:52

physics on a napkin.

102:54

Even if you have nothing to do with the

102:56

government, I think even if you're not

102:57

an American.

103:00

If it has anything that could possibly

103:02

have to do with nuclear weapons.

103:05

In other words, any advance

103:07

that might have to do with nuclear

103:08

weapons

103:10

you have to recognize that the instant

103:13

you put pen to paper or you start

103:15

talking to somebody

103:16

you're committing

103:18

a violation of the 1917 Espionage Act.

103:22

And if you think that's crazy, start

103:23

exploring the words restricted data,

103:25

1917 Espionage Act, 1946 and 1954 Atomic

103:30

Energy Acts, the doctrine of born

103:32

secret.

103:35

It is illegal to pursue Q clearance data

103:39

if you don't have a Q clearance, but if

103:40

you're creating Q clearance data out of

103:43

your own head as a byproduct of trying

103:45

to do physics,

103:47

you are actually potentially committing

103:49

a capital offense.

103:51

And your theory of everything, your

103:53

theory the theory you just talked to me

103:55

about that, what does that mean for the

103:56

for the average person that's listening

103:58

to this?

103:59

In terms of the

104:00

the basic

104:01

>> This is my point. Did Rutherford

104:03

know what he was doing?

104:06

No. So,

104:07

I talk about this a lot, but I do think

104:09

it's probably one of the greatest lyrics

104:11

ever in any song.

104:13

And unfortunately, it occurs in

104:16

a song that got way too popular.

104:18

Um

104:20

The baffled king composing hallelujah,

104:22

that line.

104:25

A baffled king does not realize what he

104:27

is doing when he composes.

104:30

Rutherford was a baffled king.

104:33

Maybe there is a neutral version of the

104:34

proton.

104:36

He was composing the end of the human

104:38

race.

104:39

And your ideas about the nature of

104:41

reality

104:42

>> person.

104:44

And your proposal I I am baffled.

104:47

I don't know what it leads to is what

104:49

I'm trying to tell you. But your

104:50

assertion is that there's more than this

104:51

dimension that we understand and more

104:53

than our understanding

104:54

>> you that I can name for you what

104:56

particles there are left to be found.

104:59

Mhm.

104:59

And the what comes back to me

105:03

is you don't have any predictions. And

105:05

I'm thinking,

105:08

this doesn't even make sense.

105:11

Literally, I'm telling you there are

105:13

maybe there's a neutral version of the

105:14

proton doesn't begin to talk about all

105:16

the things that I'm talking about.

105:19

So many new forces, so many new

105:21

particles, ways to go in

105:24

there's There's longer an arrow of time

105:26

in my theory.

105:29

So, you could live forever

105:30

theoretically. What does it mean?

105:35

If If you think about a final theory,

105:37

and again, by the way, I just want to

105:39

say something. I say my theory sometimes

105:41

when I'm having to defend it, but it

105:43

isn't mine.

105:45

It It It just is.

105:49

You know,

105:50

Everest didn't belong

105:53

to Sir Edmund Hillary or to Mallory or

105:56

even to the surveyor for whom the

105:58

mountain is named.

106:01

When you chose to make the first ascent

106:04

on Everest,

106:06

you just chose a route, and then you

106:09

either did or did not traverse the

106:10

route. We don't know whether Mallory may

106:12

have succeeded.

106:14

But, my point is that this isn't my

106:16

theory.

106:19

There is a theory that's there.

106:21

It might be wrong.

106:22

It's possible.

106:24

I may have screwed it up.

106:26

But,

106:30

it's got so much in it that I have no

106:32

idea what it means.

106:34

And the simple way to understand this

106:35

theory is that there's dimensions that

106:36

exist beyond the ones that we know. We

106:39

already know from Einstein

106:41

that these dimensions are implicitly

106:44

in Einstein's theory.

106:46

Every single dimension that I'm talking

106:48

about

106:49

is being constructed out of the four

106:52

that we began with. When I put the cups

106:55

here and the coaster,

106:58

the edges were calculated from the

107:00

vertices, and the faces were calculated

107:02

from the edges. Mhm. My point being,

107:05

these dimensions are already here.

107:09

And because the dimensions are already

107:10

here,

107:12

they were already present in Einstein's

107:13

theory all along. When you ask for what

107:15

Einstein's real equation is,

107:19

we actually don't think about it that

107:20

way. We call it the Einstein field

107:22

equations, plural. How many of them are

107:24

there?

107:26

10.

107:27

Why are there 10?

107:29

Because there are

107:31

six edges

107:34

and four vertices

107:36

that weren't accounted for. They're

107:38

already in Einstein's theory.

107:44

We just didn't take them seriously as

107:46

directions you could go in. You've heard

107:48

about this simulation theory, haven't

107:49

you?

107:50

What? I don't want to talk about it.

107:52

Really? Well,

107:53

it gets to the LLM problem.

107:55

The really interesting thing comes from

107:58

I don't know

107:59

and maybe the maybe the cosmos is

108:01

traversable.

108:03

Maybe times travel replaces time travel.

108:12

You see, if I flip all of the dimensions

108:15

of time

108:16

and space.

108:17

So, I have one of time, three of space

108:19

in Einstein's theory.

108:20

Okay? The time dimension gets a minus

108:22

sign. The the three spatial dimensions

108:24

get a plus sign. And the three spatial

108:25

dimensions are

108:26

>> X, Y, and Z. Yeah. Z. Forgive me. Which

108:29

is for for a simple person

108:31

depth, width, and height. Yeah, you can

108:33

go like forward, backward, up, down.

108:35

>> Right. Okay? So, we have three

108:36

dimensions there and then we have one of

108:37

time because the conversation takes

108:39

place over time. You're moving around.

108:43

Now, flip

108:45

the time dimension to being plus when it

108:48

was minus before and all the plus

108:50

dimensions to being minus. So, I have

108:52

now I have three time dimensions and one

108:53

space dimension.

108:55

It would look exactly the same.

109:00

The one space dimension would take the

109:02

function of time and the three time

109:04

dimensions would have the function of

109:05

space.

109:06

We don't even teach people the idea

109:10

that there is not necessarily an arrow

109:13

of time if time is not one-dimensional.

109:17

The only dimension that has an arrow

109:21

is one.

109:22

If something has one dimension, you can

109:24

say

109:26

And you know, I tried to do this on

109:27

Rogan. I said, "If you have a cassette

109:29

tape

109:30

and you want to go back to an earlier

109:32

song." Again, your younger listeners

109:34

will have no idea what we're talking

109:35

about.

109:36

Um you have to go back through all of

109:39

the songs before. But if you have a

109:42

stylus on a turntable, some of them will

109:44

be hipsters with vinyl in their own

109:46

homes,

109:47

you can lift the stylus up and it

109:49

doesn't need to go back and

109:52

unplay each song in reverse. Mhm.

109:55

Okay.

109:56

You may be able to go back in time

109:58

without going back through time.

110:03

I don't know what this means, but it's a

110:05

lot like saying maybe there's a neutral

110:07

version of the proton. Now, what I'm

110:09

concerned about

110:11

is that essentially none of my physics

110:13

friends know that there is a doctrine of

110:15

restricted data. They've never heard of

110:17

the 1946 and 54 Atomic Energy Acts. They

110:20

don't know that the Department of Energy

110:22

that funds them

110:23

is really the the Department of Physics.

110:26

They don't know the extent to which we

110:27

went to hide all of this stuff. They

110:29

don't know that they're not allowed to

110:30

talk

110:32

to foreign nationals from hostile

110:34

nations on our own soil

110:36

because of a doctrine called deemed

110:38

exports. There's an entire hidden world

110:41

of national security. And the penalty

110:43

for talking about national security

110:46

with people who don't live that

110:48

is that you're a conspiracy theorist.

110:50

It's like,

110:52

"Do you have any of this terminology? Do

110:53

you know the acts? Do you want to Google

110:55

it? Well, you're

110:57

This is also just something that's

110:58

really interesting about the UFO UAP

111:00

world. We had this admission recently

111:04

that the government knew that at a

111:06

minimum, and again, I don't think this

111:08

is by anywhere close to the full story,

111:10

at a minimum, there were secret fake

111:14

special access programs. Do you know

111:15

about special access programs? Su- super

111:17

secret programs are called special

111:19

access programs.

111:21

Then there's a further category called

111:24

unacknowledged special access programs

111:26

or USAPs, which is

111:28

you can know that a special access

111:29

program exists.

111:31

Like, you know, maybe warhead recovery

111:34

is a might be a known one.

111:37

But then like there might be an

111:38

unacknowledged special access program,

111:40

which is like

111:42

theft of a foreign nuclear warheads,

111:44

which we It's not even on the books.

111:45

Only only the super secret lawmakers,

111:49

you know, in the gang of eight or

111:49

whatever it is, can know that that

111:51

exists.

111:52

And then there are further designations

111:55

of

111:56

secretness. There's waved and bigoted.

111:59

So, you could have like a waved bigoted

112:01

unacknowledged special access program.

112:04

And you don't know any of this language.

112:07

And then there's this chorus of morons

112:10

who the instant you start to educate

112:12

people about the existence of the su-

112:14

super secret squirrel club

112:17

rise up and say

112:20

this is all conspiracy theory.

112:23

And you're saying,

112:24

"Wait a second. We just admitted in UFO

112:28

UAP land

112:30

that we have a fake special access

112:32

program, which I predicted on Joe Rogan.

112:35

I said, "We may be faking a UFO

112:37

situation."

112:40

The cost and the penalty at a personal

112:42

level

112:43

for letting people know how the

112:45

government keeps secrets is personal

112:47

destruction.

112:49

The US faked a UFO program.

112:50

>> Yes, correct. You don't know about this.

112:54

I think the Wall Street Journal had an

112:55

article about it. So, these guys knew

112:57

when they filed their reports on the UFO

113:00

UAP

113:01

that there actually is

113:03

at a minimum a fake UFO UAP program.

113:07

Why would they want to fake UFOs?

113:11

This is so weird.

113:13

Did you Did you happen to watch

113:15

Joe Rogan episode 1945 where I talked

113:18

about the whole history of the golden

113:21

age of general relativity and its

113:22

relationship to UFO UAP anti-gravity

113:25

research and the atomic bomb? I didn't.

113:27

No. Okay.

113:29

When we invaded

113:31

the beaches of Normandy on D-Day,

113:35

that was called Operation Overlord.

113:38

We had an entirely fake invasion planned

113:41

of Norway called Operation Fortitude

113:44

that was part of Operation Bodyguard

113:45

which is part of just total deception.

113:48

And why? Because we were building up

113:50

troops to do something huge.

113:52

So, we tried to convince We like planted

113:55

plans for the invasion of Norway on dead

113:57

bodies to wash up on beaches so the

113:59

Germans would find them.

114:01

We fake stuff all the time.

114:04

That's what we do.

114:08

And

114:09

you can't talk about what we do that is

114:12

deceptive without being ruined by what

114:15

are called

114:17

covert influence operations.

114:20

Like if you'll

114:21

watch my Twitter account, you'll see all

114:22

sorts of accounts descend on it. Fraud,

114:25

charlatan, grifter, blah blah blah blah

114:26

blah blah.

114:29

Some of that is just people being mean.

114:32

But you'll notice that like if I really

114:34

start talking about physics and I start

114:36

talking about security and I start

114:38

talking about things that anyone can

114:40

Google and most of us don't think to do

114:42

it.

114:43

Suddenly it gets really really intense.

114:48

And the whole point is it's supposed to

114:50

be untraceable.

114:52

It's supposed to be a way in which

114:55

like almost certainly

114:57

we know a ton about what happened in the

114:59

Wuhan Institute of Virology

115:03

because of two bioweapons conventions

115:06

that we were signatories in to and which

115:08

we ratified. There's the Geneva

115:10

Convention and a bioweapons convention

115:11

in the 1970s.

115:13

But that's not top of mind for ordinary

115:15

people. They just watched,

115:18

you know, their great-grandma die and

115:20

they're watched their children get sick

115:23

and they watched their own brain fog.

115:26

They can't know whether that was a

115:27

bioweapon that we were working on coming

115:29

out of the University of North Carolina

115:31

Chapel Hill with Ralph Baric's lab.

115:36

You know, we're we're up to constant

115:38

secret stuff.

115:40

Why would they fake the UFOs, though?

115:43

What was the What was that a distraction

115:44

for?

115:45

>> seen the B-2 bomber? Yeah.

115:47

What if you saw that before we were

115:48

ready to say it existed? Yeah, you'd

115:50

think it was a UFO or something.

115:51

>> So, wouldn't it be better if we had a

115:53

UFO

115:54

story ready to go when we had cool

115:56

aerospace? Oh, okay. So, you're saying

115:58

they're working on something which they

116:00

didn't want you to know is what's What's

116:01

more, what if we convinced China or

116:04

Russia or Iran

116:06

that we had incredible powers that they

116:08

don't have?

116:11

Then they might be very reluctant to

116:12

strike us.

116:14

Or they might waste a tremendous amount

116:17

of money developing

116:19

anti-gravity technology when there's no

116:21

such thing.

116:22

There are plenty of good reasons to fake

116:24

such thing. Why would we fake an Why

116:26

would we plan an invasion of Norway?

116:29

If we weren't going to invade. But if

116:31

that's a distraction technique, do you

116:32

have any hypothesis as to what was going

116:35

on there? But that's not my job. Okay.

116:38

Because as soon as you do that, I know

116:40

that my the quality of my guessing is

116:43

not going to be at the quality of my

116:45

detecting when we're up to [ __ ]

116:47

Okay. So, in other words, if you ask me,

116:51

"Why is physics stagnant?"

116:54

I can say, "I don't know, but there's a

116:56

decent chance that we know how dangerous

116:59

physics is and that it's crazy to do it

117:01

in an open university environment. We've

117:03

taken precautions. We have a system of

117:05

national laboratories,

117:07

which are effectively our secret

117:08

university system,

117:10

uh where you have to be an American. So,

117:11

we're we're using our regular

117:13

universities and the whole world comes

117:14

through it.

117:15

You know, we have Chinese people

117:17

learning physics side by side our own

117:18

people.

117:20

And I guess you're saying that you don't

117:21

know if UFOs exist, but you you'll

117:23

you'll show now that they were faking

117:25

this whole thing.

117:26

>> positive that we have

117:28

unacknowledged programs

117:31

that have UFO written on the side of

117:33

them.

117:35

Okay. In other words, the number of

117:37

people who repeat who repeat strikingly

117:40

similar things

117:42

who appear to be completely sober in

117:44

every other respect with no known acting

117:46

ability, there is no way in the world

117:49

that these people just spontaneously

117:51

have decided to destroy their sanity,

117:53

their career, and their reputation.

117:55

I've got you.

117:56

>> At a minimum, we're faking.

118:00

I think we are doing a lot more than

118:02

faking a UFO program.

118:05

I don't know what it is, and I also

118:08

would not be talking about this on a

118:10

large podcast but for one thing.

118:14

I have a particular hatred for one

118:17

aspect of our intelligence community.

118:19

And I I don't mean that I dis- disagree

118:22

or don't like or I'm not uncomfortable.

118:25

When

118:26

our secret squirrel club inside the

118:29

intelligence world and inside in

118:31

particular covert operations targets our

118:34

own people who are not read into these

118:36

programs for personal destruction,

118:39

reputational destruction, mental

118:41

destruction, economic destruction. We

118:43

take our best people and we make fun of

118:46

them.

118:46

And we belittle them, and we destroy

118:48

their families, their lives, their

118:50

ability to earn.

118:52

I have a very strong sense that you

118:54

never destroy your best people.

118:57

Do you think you're under attack?

118:59

Let me talk about Leo Szilard instead.

119:03

Leo Szilard is the father of the

119:04

Manhattan Project.

119:06

Which was the where the nuclear bomb was

119:08

created? That's right. He was not

119:09

allowed to go inside the Manhattan

119:12

Project because they didn't trust him.

119:15

He was a genius.

119:17

He was the idea for the Manhattan

119:19

Project. He and Einstein made sure that

119:21

it happened.

119:23

The government barely trusted

119:25

Oppenheimer if you saw the film.

119:29

What they did with Leo Szilard was they

119:31

minded him.

119:33

They knew how good he was. They knew how

119:34

important he was. They listened to him

119:37

and they didn't destroy him. He

119:38

undoubtedly knew that the program was

119:40

going on.

119:42

But he wasn't allowed inside the

119:44

program.

119:47

I think that's okay.

119:50

I think it's okay that our security

119:52

state

119:54

recognizes that some people are not cut

119:56

out to keep secrets. Some people are not

119:58

cut out

120:00

to die with certain facts that have to

120:02

be kept hidden. That's fine.

120:05

The desire of our government to destroy

120:08

people who have no idea what they've

120:10

tripped over

120:11

because our government isn't good enough

120:13

to keep its own secrets.

120:17

This is an abomination.

120:20

You cannot destroy your A team.

120:23

Who are you referring to when you say

120:25

people are being destroyed? Are you

120:26

referring to people like yourself?

120:28

You know,

120:29

if you look at for example

120:33

Jeffrey Epstein.

120:34

Jeffrey Epstein conducted a conference

120:37

called Confronting Gravity.

120:41

I don't know who Jeffrey Epstein was,

120:42

but I'll I would certainly bet money

120:44

that he was It's product of at least one

120:47

uh

120:48

or more elements of the intelligence

120:50

community. The CIA, the FBI? That those

120:53

are ours.

120:55

Right? Department of Homeland Security

120:57

has some of the stuff.

120:58

Geospatial intelligence has some of this

121:00

You know, it's a it's a large network.

121:03

Um I'm talking about people like David

121:05

Grusch.

121:08

I'm talking about people potentially

121:10

like David Fravor.

121:12

I'm talking about people like Jake

121:14

Barber.

121:16

I'm talking about scientists.

121:19

Like Leo Szilard.

121:21

Imagine if Leo Szilard didn't know that

121:23

the Manhattan Project was going on. Or

121:25

Jack Ruby, a journalist who broke a

121:27

story. These people all think that

121:29

they're doing their jobs.

121:35

I desperately want to know why Jeffrey

121:37

Epstein knew so much

121:40

about my work.

121:42

And I want to know why he was connected

121:43

to my graduate program.

121:48

I was I was in the Harvard mathematics

121:49

department. Jeffrey Epstein was

121:51

absolutely connected to the Harvard math

121:53

department. I want to know why. How was

121:55

he connected to the math department?

121:57

You're pushing me to say things I'm not

121:58

going to say.

122:00

But I I don't mind

122:00

>> I'm curious. I'm not trying to push you

122:02

away.

122:03

>> But I'm just not going to do it. I'm

122:05

saying that anybody who wants

122:07

But you say he was connected to the math

122:08

department.

122:09

>> Harvard mathematics department.

122:11

>> How did you know he was connected?

122:13

You can Google it. You could Google it

122:15

right now.

122:17

This is not

122:19

I I can point at all sorts of stuff

122:22

that's hidden in plain sight. So, I'll

122:23

take your word for it. And the assertion

122:25

that I'm picking up on is that Jeffrey

122:27

Epstein was planted in your world to I'm

122:30

not saying he's planted. I don't know

122:32

who he was. I don't know who ran him. He

122:34

certainly was not a financier in any

122:36

standard sense. Really? That was a cover

122:38

story, yes. The way that we know Jeffrey

122:40

Epstein in the UK especially is just

122:42

this guy who was this rich guy who had

122:44

this island who brought people there and

122:46

then did these

122:48

despicable things there.

122:49

>> Disgraced financier Jeffrey Epstein.

122:51

Yeah, that's what we That's the story.

122:52

>> Disgraced financier Jeffrey Epstein.

122:53

It's called perseveration. He was a

122:54

disgraced financier. What kind of a

122:56

financier? A disgraced one. What was his

122:58

name? Oh, it was disgraced financier

123:00

Jeffrey Epstein.

123:01

They perseverate that into your mind so

123:04

that you auto complete that in your LLM

123:06

life.

123:08

Do you believe that that's what Jeffrey

123:09

Epstein was?

123:11

You met him you

123:13

Yeah. I'm What do you see as disgraced?

123:15

I mean financier? He wasn't a financier

123:18

the day I met him. What was he?

123:21

He was a weird guy who didn't seem to

123:22

know a lot about currency trading.

123:27

Claiming to run a multi-billion dollar

123:30

FX hedge fund.

123:33

When you say a weird guy, what made him

123:34

weird?

123:35

Same stuff I've said on Chris Weidman.

123:37

I'm not going to go back through that.

123:38

Just

123:39

My my point is you're getting a

123:40

different interview.

123:41

Right? Mhm. So, what I'm trying to get

123:43

at is

123:45

Jeffrey Epstein knew a tremendous amount

123:47

about my work when nobody knew anything

123:49

about my work.

123:51

And he had a pipeline into me that I

123:52

didn't understand, which is that he was

123:54

connected to my graduate program.

123:56

And you can check out the conference

123:58

called exploring gravity

124:01

And hosted physical workshop called

124:03

confronting gravity.

124:04

>> Confronting gravity, that's right. In

124:05

March 2006.

124:06

>> Yeah, what is Jeffrey Epstein Jeffrey

124:07

Epstein is very focused on gravity.

124:10

Was it a gravity conference? Yeah. It

124:12

was about gravity. Yeah. What the [ __ ]

124:14

was he doing talking about bloody

124:15

gravity if he's a financier? It was very

124:17

important to get Nobel laureates and

124:19

some of the smartest people on Earth to

124:20

come to the Virgin Islands and talk

124:22

about gravity. Stephen Hawking was

124:23

there, David Gross was there, Lawrence

124:25

Krauss was there, Lisa Randall was

124:26

there.

124:28

Right before his conviction.

124:31

And I'm telling you he was very focused

124:32

on the Harvard math department.

124:35

And he knew all about me in ways that he

124:37

wasn't supposed to.

124:42

I have to I have to be clear. I have to

124:44

be clear on my understanding of what

124:46

you're saying. From what I understood

124:48

and you can say Stephen I'm not going to

124:49

answer that whatever but I just have to

124:50

cuz I you've opened up a curiosity hole

124:52

in my mind. So let me try and fill it

124:53

even if it's the conversation I had with

124:55

Chris I

124:56

um I'll just evade you if you Yeah,

124:58

yeah, fine. You're within the rights to

124:59

evade me and I hold the right to ask

125:01

which is um

125:03

So is

125:04

what I'm hearing is you believe I'm just

125:06

going to say it how I think it is what

125:08

I'm hearing is you believe that Jeff

125:10

Jeffrey Epstein was not a financier. He

125:13

was planted He was a construct

125:16

is what I said. He was a construct

125:18

in some way

125:19

to

125:21

mess with the

125:23

progression of physics.

125:25

Jeffrey Epstein

125:28

apparently I think some I'll tell you

125:30

what I said. When I met him

125:32

and the meeting was over I immediately

125:34

called my wife.

125:36

And I said, I have just met a construct.

125:38

She said, what do you mean? I said, this

125:39

person is not who they claim to be.

125:41

Somebody has constructed this human

125:42

being to be something that they are not.

125:45

Which is a hedge fund genius.

125:48

Somebody who could understand the euro

125:49

and the yen like nobody else. [ __ ]

125:51

Not true.

125:58

I believe that whoever constructed

126:00

Jeffrey Epstein was running multiple

126:03

different programs through the same

126:05

thing having put in a large initial

126:07

investment.

126:09

It wasn't about one thing. If you build

126:11

a mall, you don't just have clothing

126:12

stores in the mall. You have a food

126:14

court in the mall.

126:16

Right? You have jewelry in the mall. You

126:17

you you have all sorts of different

126:19

things in the mall.

126:21

Jeffrey Epstein was

126:23

a construct of something

126:26

that was running multiple things. One of

126:28

those things was science and I I think

126:30

that the science and the pedophilia were

126:32

necessarily in the same bucket.

126:34

He was funding all sorts of people.

126:37

I don't think everybody at that, you

126:38

know, part of the problem with calling

126:40

his plane the Lolita Express and calling

126:42

his island Pedophile Island

126:45

is is that

126:47

you just can't see all the different

126:48

things that were going through this guy.

126:53

I don't think almost any of the

126:54

scientists are exposed you know, maybe a

126:57

few of them, but very few of them

126:59

to anything really horrible.

127:01

I think he was trying to keep a

127:02

periscope on everything that was

127:04

interesting.

127:07

And I think that his girlfriend's father

127:09

Robert Maxwell

127:11

was all through scientific pub-

127:12

publishing.

127:14

And I think Pergamon Press was in part a

127:18

control mechanism

127:20

for making sure that

127:22

revolutionary discoveries were taking

127:25

place within a framework.

127:27

Anybody can Look,

127:30

you can write

127:32

a Substack article and you can hit post

127:34

and suddenly the world has access to

127:36

your Substack article.

127:38

That is a nightmare. What if somebody

127:40

posts, you know, weaponized anthrax?

127:45

What if they do the equivalent of

127:47

saying, "What if there's a neutral

127:48

proton?"

127:49

So, you think he was controlling

127:50

science? I think that Robert Maxwell was

127:53

in part trying to control science. I

127:55

think Jeffrey Epstein was in part trying

127:57

to fund science, trying to control it. I

127:59

don't really know.

128:02

Again, you know, part of the problem

128:03

with why conspiracy theorists have a bad

128:05

name

128:07

is that they're not content to live in

128:09

ignorance.

128:10

And I mean I am.

128:14

I I know something is really off with

128:16

the story.

128:18

What

128:19

If If you look at me saying things like

128:21

you don't know whether Biden is going to

128:22

make it to November.

128:24

Ha ha ha, Eric, you know, what an idiot,

128:26

blah blah blah, okay?

128:28

Then he has a debate. He doesn't make it

128:29

to November.

128:31

You know, I'm not Nostradamus. I'm just

128:32

dumb enough to say something in public

128:35

that that makes sense. Let me say

128:37

something in public that makes sense.

128:41

Our national security people suck at

128:42

their jobs.

128:45

The people who are in charge

128:48

of the Department of Energy, which is

128:49

masking the Department of Physics, which

128:51

is masking the Department of Nuclear

128:53

Weapons, right?

128:55

The Atomic Energy Acts, which are really

128:57

about atomic weaponry,

128:59

recast as Atoms for Peace or who knows

129:01

what. Jeffrey Epstein, who is not a

129:03

disgraced financier.

129:06

The newspapers that have always had a

129:08

national interest component and have

129:09

liaisons so that they can work with the

129:11

CIA and the State Department and they do

129:13

each other's bidding and scratch each

129:15

other. This whole network

129:19

is the is what I've called managed

129:20

reality. We live in managed reality.

129:24

We are all in some version of the Truman

129:26

Show.

129:28

And you can look at it, you can Google

129:30

it. I can give you a million search

129:31

terms and every time I give a million

129:33

search terms, you'll watch my reputation

129:35

get torn apart.

129:38

Are you going to blame me that you

129:39

didn't know what the whole of society

129:41

approach is because you didn't know the

129:42

Daniel K. Inouye Center for Security in

129:44

the Pacific came up with an idea for

129:45

soft fascism to fight hybrid wars? You

129:48

didn't know what hybrid warfare?

129:50

Look look at my talk at ARC, Jordan

129:52

Peterson's group, the Alliance for

129:53

Responsible Citizenship. It's at almost

129:55

2 million views. And why is it? Because

129:58

people are saying, "I didn't know these

129:59

terms."

130:01

Did you know what the Human Terrain

130:02

Project is? Do you know Do you know

130:04

about human terrain?

130:06

You're a mountain, I'm a valley, and

130:08

instead of war

130:09

planners figuring out how do we use that

130:12

valley to capture that mountain top

130:13

because it gives us a

130:15

an eagle's nest you know, to snipe from

130:17

or whatever, they say, "Okay,

130:19

this is the second most powerful podcast

130:22

in the in the world, second to Joe

130:24

Rogan. How do we capture him?

130:26

[ __ ]

130:27

Leave me alone, please.

130:28

>> No, but that's what I'm trying to say.

130:29

You're human terrain. Yeah.

130:31

When the human terrain wakes up and

130:33

says, "Wait a minute, I'm human

130:34

terrain."

130:37

Well, my feeling is if you don't want me

130:39

to talk about this on a podcast, then

130:41

keep your terms

130:42

separate.

130:44

Nobody knew the term pre-bunked

130:45

malinformation. Do you know what

130:47

pre-bunked malinformation is?

130:49

Malinformation is information we don't

130:51

want to get out.

130:54

Technically, people try to pretend that

130:56

it's information that will be

130:57

misinterpreted, but really it's

131:00

real stuff that is deleterious to the

131:03

narratives that we're trying to push

131:04

forward and what we're trying to do. And

131:06

pre-bunked means discredited.

131:09

So, we knew what debunked dis We have to

131:11

debunk this information. We get that.

131:14

But you didn't know that we had to

131:15

pre-bunk malinformation, which is we

131:17

have to destroy truth tellers.

131:20

What do you think that means for people

131:21

like me as podcasters?

131:23

You know, cuz we're doing these

131:24

long-form conversations. I

131:26

taking

131:27

>> back. You'll say, "That was a really

131:29

interesting talk."

131:33

And then you'll have somebody else on

131:34

who'll be talking about the importance

131:36

of melatonin and how we don't understand

131:39

uh

131:40

the role of sleep.

131:41

And then you'll have somebody else, you

131:43

know, on with who will be talking about

131:45

how do you do a

131:47

a clothing brand from scratch uh and

131:50

turn it into a billion-dollar unicorn.

131:53

You're not going to stay here on this

131:54

topic.

131:56

This is your time with me.

131:59

And it'll have some effect, and it'll

132:01

start to fade.

132:04

And and and that's what this is.

132:08

I'd love to be doing my podcast.

132:11

I just don't know how to do it safely.

132:14

I I talk about taking our lives back

132:17

from the intelligence community. I want

132:18

to talk about taking our lives back from

132:20

Silicon Valley, even though those people

132:22

are my friends.

132:24

I want to talk about taking my life back

132:26

from the phone.

132:28

From despair, from not having a future.

132:32

I want to talk about having a glorious

132:34

existence that is not mediated by morons

132:37

who sit inside the Beltway

132:39

and play with large budgets and hurt

132:41

people. Particularly really good people

132:43

who are good at their job, we're trying

132:45

to figure out how to advance

132:48

humankind, their family, the national

132:50

interest, and get fouled.

132:53

I did not ask for Jeffrey Epstein to

132:55

fall into my life.

132:58

I met him once.

133:00

But it was enough to know, "Holy cow,

133:02

the Harvard math department can't be

133:04

what I think it is."

133:06

Why was he there? I didn't even know I

133:07

never heard his name when I was there.

133:10

Is that where you met him? In the in

133:12

Harvard?

133:13

>> No, no, no.

133:16

I think one very powerful people at JP

133:19

JP Morgan

133:21

told me I needed to meet him.

133:23

He didn't want to talk about finance.

133:27

He wanted to talk about science.

133:29

You can't do your podcast safely.

133:32

Do you think

133:33

>> My employer was a special informant to

133:35

the FBI.

133:37

He's like one of my closest friends. I'm

133:39

not going to say who it is.

133:41

Your employer?

133:43

Yeah, and one of my closest friends.

133:48

I I live under a periscope.

133:53

Proctoscope is really what I meant, but

133:56

Yeah, I don't I want to do physics, man.

134:02

I'm really, really good at it.

134:05

You know?

134:07

And if we have an idea that we shouldn't

134:09

do physics in public, I would like to

134:11

have a call from somebody inside.

134:14

Hey Eric, we we need you to come in.

134:16

Okay, great.

134:17

What's up?

134:20

But I didn't use your resources. I

134:22

didn't use your grants.

134:24

Nobody ever informed me. My God, nobody

134:27

ever informed me about restricted data.

134:31

How many people on Earth know that

134:32

there's a doctrine that says physicists

134:34

don't have free speech?

134:37

We can execute you for doing your job.

134:40

It's never been tested in the courts and

134:42

I hope that the Supreme Court will not

134:43

allow it.

134:44

But you know, if we have a problem that

134:46

is so serious in theoretical physics

134:49

that

134:51

it needs the the world's largest

134:53

exemption from free speech.

134:55

We need to amend the Constitution. You

134:57

can't just do this as a sneak attack

135:00

where you reserve the right casually to

135:02

hook the 1917 Espionage Act up against

135:05

the 1946 and 54 Atomic Energy Acts.

135:10

I I've canvassed my physics colleagues.

135:14

You know, like one of the memes against

135:16

me, which is very funny, is that no

135:18

physicists take me seriously when I'm in

135:20

their offices all the time.

135:25

I I just don't know what my life is.

135:27

And and with this latest advent of war

135:30

in the Middle East

135:32

are you really going to pretend that if

135:34

you can Google all of these things that

135:35

I have no idea what I'm talking about?

135:40

I'm looking to have a conversation with

135:42

my own government.

135:45

I'm looking to have a conversation about

135:46

theoretical physics.

135:49

And I can do it quietly, but I have

135:51

rights and I do not believe that the

135:53

1946 and 1954 Atomic Energy Acts are

135:56

constitutional.

135:58

Try me.

136:01

There is no restricted data.

136:03

You can't do that to an American.

136:06

And you can't just keep mounting covert

136:10

influence campaigns, you know?

136:15

I just spent 5 days in a physics

136:16

department. I'm not allowed to say that

136:18

it was 5 days in a physics department as

136:20

a visitor.

136:21

I gave a talk. I'm not allowed to say

136:23

that I gave a talk.

136:27

I don't know what this is.

136:32

And I'm tired of it, you know? It's just

136:33

like

136:40

If you're managing the Middle East this

136:42

badly, if you're managing physics this

136:44

badly, if you're managing the national

136:46

economy this badly,

136:48

if you screwed up COVID this badly by

136:51

getting inside of the Lancet and Nature,

136:56

you know, peer review is this fake thing

136:58

that supposedly stretches back to the

137:00

founding of the Royal Society. And it's

137:02

very clear from the scholarship around

137:04

it

137:05

that it comes out of night period

137:07

between 1965 and 1975 initiated by the

137:10

Medicare Act

137:12

predicated on the need for

137:15

editors for the journal expansion

137:17

founded by Pergamon Press and Robert

137:19

Maxwell. By 1975,

137:22

there's a giant battle between the NSF

137:25

and both fiscal and cultural

137:28

conservatives

137:30

against something called Man: A Course

137:31

of Study or MACOS

137:33

where peer review

137:36

was born in a Utah clinic,

137:38

uh came out of the medical literature

137:41

because the federal government in 1965

137:43

with the Medicare Act picked up the need

137:45

to pay for so many medical procedures.

137:47

They wanted to say, "Why are we

137:49

assigning this many medical procedures?"

137:51

The doctors circled the wagons and said,

137:53

"We will peer review each other."

137:55

Then in night By 1975, the NSF was under

137:58

the um microscope and they used peer

138:02

review as a self-defense of last resort

138:04

to say we will be reviewing each other,

138:06

right? Peer review is a myth.

138:12

The scholarship is clear as day.

138:17

I I can't keep going on the world's

138:18

largest podcast saying everything that

138:21

can be Googled and figured out, and just

138:23

constantly have as my reward

138:26

that the government refuses to have a

138:27

conversation with me and sends its

138:30

gaggle of

138:32

of idiots to harass me.

138:35

You think it's doing that? It's sending

138:36

a gaggle of

138:38

Yes, I do. I do think I think that some

138:40

of them are actual idiots who just enjoy

138:43

having causing problems, but I think

138:45

more than anything, we have a real

138:47

problem.

138:48

Science is too powerful.

138:51

The real if you wanted to just cut to

138:53

the

138:54

ultimate core of this,

138:58

if four amino acids can shut down planet

139:01

Earth,

139:03

if what is it, a nine-page paper

139:06

solving the double spin problem can

139:08

create a new currency not backed by

139:10

violence, but backed by mathematics,

139:15

if the concept of an inner product in a

139:17

large vector space

139:20

generates something you can't tell isn't

139:22

a human being

139:24

in 2017,

139:26

do you have any idea what the power of

139:28

the human mind is

139:30

at this point?

139:32

Linear algebra

139:34

can create something that you would fall

139:36

in love with.

139:39

It can create the most beautiful music

139:41

you can imagine, or can animate a photo

139:44

of a dead relative so that you can

139:45

actually have the experience of having

139:47

some video of you with a great

139:49

grandparent you can't even remember.

139:52

Science is the most amazing, powerful,

139:55

crazy stuff possible.

139:57

And we spend a fortune

139:59

trying to convince people that

140:01

scientists are worthless.

140:03

That scientists are incapable.

140:06

And in large measure they've convinced

140:08

the scientists themselves. My My

140:10

colleagues, the supposed physicists,

140:14

will spend their entire lives pretending

140:16

to do physics and retire without ever

140:18

having actually done any.

140:21

I was in this physics department I was

140:22

just in. It's been a long time since I

140:24

since I've spent that long as a visitor.

140:27

The top people in this physics

140:29

department

140:32

professed that they had no interest in

140:34

the physical world.

140:36

That they only cared about the

140:37

mathematics that they were doing. And I

140:39

just thought,

140:41

you're in a theoretical physics

140:44

group

140:46

and you profess openly that you have no

140:48

interest whatsoever in the physical

140:50

world.

140:51

Well done.

140:52

I don't know who you were.

140:54

I don't know how you did it, but it took

140:57

you four decades to get the physicist to

140:59

stop caring about the physical physical

141:01

world.

141:03

Somehow what we did

141:06

is we stopped the world's most powerful

141:08

and the world's most important group

141:11

from making progress. And why Elon Musk

141:14

is not out here

141:16

saving this

141:18

by just throwing a few billion at it.

141:20

You know, Elon, if you're out there,

141:22

it's ad astra, yes or no?

141:25

Mars is a stopgap message. Do you want

141:27

to go to the stars? Is there something

141:29

we don't know?

141:30

To the Department of Energy, do you want

141:31

to have conversations?

141:33

Is there anyone at all out here? That's

141:36

my question. That's why I do the

141:37

podcasts. And it's By the way, I'm

141:39

repeating myself. I've said this before.

141:41

Send lawyers, guns, and money. There's

141:43

no one out here.

141:46

But, I will say this.

141:49

If we could get out of here,

141:52

you know, in terms of transcendence, in

141:53

terms of things that are really

141:54

exciting, there's nothing that I had

141:56

greater pleasure at as a father than

141:58

taking my children for meteor showers.

142:01

We take the dog, go to a secret location

142:03

outside of Los Angeles that's quite

142:05

dark.

142:06

We just lie under the sky

142:09

and watch for hours,

142:11

you know?

142:12

And look up at the heavens and think,

142:13

"My god, that's a destination. That's

142:15

someplace I could go."

142:18

I don't think that there's a more

142:19

inspiring thing than to figure out the

142:22

infinity of space, all of these galaxies

142:25

in the deep-field photographs of these

142:28

space telescopes,

142:30

filled with worlds.

142:32

And we're stuck here.

142:34

It's like, "It's enough already. Time to

142:36

go. Let's have some fun." That's That's

142:38

really what I'm excited about.

142:42

Been great here Great to be here.

142:44

Thank you for being here.

142:46

Super fascinating and it's spun my brain

142:48

in several different directions at the

142:50

same time.

142:57

I want to I want to bring it um back to

142:59

the person who's who's got to the end of

143:00

this conversation and they're sat at

143:01

home in their boxer shorts, maybe

143:04

listening on their iPhone as they fall

143:05

asleep, wherever they are in the world

143:06

or on a train or plane or whatever, and

143:09

allow you to offer them some kind of

143:11

closing message that might make their

143:13

life better

143:14

in some way.

143:16

It's a broad brief, but I think it's the

143:17

most important brief, which is

143:19

you know, uh can having heard everything

143:21

we've talked about today,

143:24

what advice would you give the listener,

143:26

an actionable piece of advice so that

143:28

they could live

143:29

a subjectively better life?

143:37

The songs of Tom Lehrer are pretty

143:38

terrific, as are the operettas of

143:41

Gilbert and Sullivan. You might want to

143:42

explore the Azores as well as the

143:45

Indonesian

143:46

archipelago. Indonesian's one of the

143:48

easiest languages to learn because it's

143:51

been denuded of most of the complexity

143:53

that screw up people have a hard time

143:55

learning other languages.

143:57

Buy a poster of tropical fruit and make

143:59

sure that you visit every single one on

144:00

that poster before it's time for lights

144:03

out.

144:03

Consider Box B Minor Mass and the cello

144:06

suites particularly by Pablo Casals and

144:08

take a serious listen to Yma Sumac

144:12

uh singing Stormy Monday in an album

144:15

called Live from Blues Alley to see if

144:17

uh

144:18

you really know how to feel things. I

144:19

think Professor Longhair's Big Chief

144:23

is one of the most brilliant pieces of

144:24

piano music. It's absolutely inspiring

144:26

and if you really like that, James

144:28

Carroll Booker the Third has an album

144:30

called The Resurrection of the Bayou

144:32

Maharaja.

144:34

Seriously think about

144:37

visiting the island of Saint Helena in

144:39

the South Atlantic.

144:41

Take a look at Kurt J. Mangles channel.

144:43

He's doing amazing stuff being done by

144:45

no one else on Earth. I think that Chris

144:48

Buck is really amazing and if you think

144:49

that Crossroads is good, have a listen

144:51

to his version of Miss You by The

144:54

Rolling Stones.

144:55

An incredible groove and I didn't really

144:57

appreciate it the first time I heard it.

145:00

I think that the people making Spark

145:01

Amps at Positive Grid

145:04

and the my friends at Neural DSP

145:08

uh with the Quad Cortex will blow your

145:11

mind with how much great audio equipment

145:14

you can make. You can get a good

145:15

electric guitar for a few hundred bucks

145:17

thanks to advances in China.

145:19

Put it into an open tuning and buy

145:22

yourself a slide or just slide a glass

145:24

along it and you'll be able to play most

145:26

songs that you care about with in a

145:28

minute or two, maybe three cuz you only

145:30

need three chords.

145:33

Get married.

145:35

It may not work out. It may be

145:36

miserable. Have some kids. There's

145:38

nothing else great to do on this planet.

145:40

At at give it a try. And if your parents

145:42

won't pressure you to do it, I'm happy

145:44

to do it.

145:46

Try to keep this thing going.

145:48

Try to keep this thing going. Try to

145:50

dream big about legacy. Don't feel

145:52

embarrassed about wanting to conquer the

145:55

world or leave a permanent stain. Get

145:58

out of this moment where everybody's

145:59

worried about narcissism and drama.

146:02

Listen for meteor showers. They're

146:04

announced regularly. Nobody actually

146:06

does anything about them and it's worth

146:08

inconveniencing yourself with people you

146:10

love and take the dog.

146:12

Really seriously think about you won't

146:14

whether you want to pile on when you see

146:17

what is almost certainly

146:19

a federal or other campaign targeting

146:23

people who are standing up for you,

146:25

whether they're trying to figure out

146:26

where COVID came from, trying to figure

146:28

out who was behind Jeffrey Epstein.

146:32

Recognize that almost everything you've

146:33

been taught to do in terms of hating

146:35

Israel is part of somebody's campaign.

146:38

Out of cutter, the situation in Gaza is

146:41

incredibly dire. Don't stop caring about

146:43

the people who are living under that.

146:45

Recognize that the Persians are not the

146:47

mullahs.

146:48

Get involved.

146:50

Wish your

146:51

Wish your country's leadership well even

146:54

if you didn't vote for them and you

146:55

think that they're horrible people.

146:56

They've got very hard work to do.

146:59

Be good to each other. Try. It's a grand

147:01

adventure.

147:03

And um

147:04

make sure you have some fun before it's

147:06

lights out.

147:08

That's it.

147:11

We have a closing tradition where the

147:13

last guest leaves a question for the

147:14

next guest not knowing who they're

147:15

leaving it for.

147:17

And the question that was left for you

147:24

I love this question.

147:26

What is the problem that you are doing

147:28

the most mental gymnastics to avoid?

147:34

Pass.

147:40

>> I know the answer. It's not appropriate

147:42

for your audience.

147:48

One of the things about being in the hot

147:50

seat on podcasts

147:53

is is that it is not right to force

147:55

anyone to respond to a question. I know

147:57

how to falsify an answer to that and I'm

147:58

not going to do that and I'm not going

148:00

to share the answer to that question

148:01

because it's not appropriate. But it's a

148:03

great question. Feel free to leave it

148:05

for someone else. It doesn't seem fair.

148:08

Whoever you were, thank you for the

148:09

question.

148:11

Obviously, my reaction was just

148:13

tremendous curiosity, which would be a

148:14

natural reaction to what you just said.

148:17

Thank you for a great interview.

148:19

>> Thank you so much for being here. I was

148:20

so grateful to you. So unbelievably

148:21

fascinating and

148:23

you've given me so much

148:25

Unfortunately, you've given me a lot of

148:26

answers, but you've given me even more

148:27

questions and maybe that's the product

148:29

of a good conversation.

148:30

>> in LA? Yeah. We'll do it again. Thank

148:32

you so much for your time. I really

148:33

appreciate you. I appreciate you. Thank

148:35

you. Thanks.

148:37

We launched these conversation cards and

148:38

they sold out. We launched them again

148:40

and they sold out again. We launched

148:41

them again and they sold out again

148:42

because people love playing these with

148:44

colleagues at work, with friends at home

148:46

and also with family. And we've also got

148:48

a big audience that use them as journal

148:49

prompts. Every single time a guest comes

148:52

on the Diary of a CEO, they leave a

148:53

question for the next guest in the diary

148:56

and I've sat here with some of the most

148:57

incredible people in the world and

148:59

they've left all of these questions in

149:01

the diary and I've ranked them from one

149:04

to three in terms of the depth. One

149:05

being a starter question and a level

149:08

three, if you look on the back here,

149:10

this is a level three, becomes a much

149:12

deeper question that builds even more

149:14

connection. If you turn the cards over

149:16

and you scan that QR code, you can see

149:19

who answered the card and watch the

149:21

video of them answering it in real time.

149:24

So if you would like to get your hands

149:25

on some of these conversation cards, go

149:27

to the diary.com or look at the link in

149:29

the description below.

Interactive Summary

This episode features mathematician and thinker Eric Weinstein in a wide-ranging conversation with Steven Bartlett. Weinstein discusses his concerns about the state of science, the stagnation of physics, the dangers of elite networks, and the geopolitical tensions he believes mark the end of the post-World War II order. He also touches on his personal view of religion as a necessary social substrate, his reflections on legacy, and his thoughts on AI as a transformative but potentially dangerous force, all while advocating for a more profound search for meaning in life.

Suggested questions

5 ready-made prompts