You’re Watching the End of the World in Real Time - Eric Weinstein
4150 segments
Jeffrey Epstein was a product of at
least one element of the intelligence
community. I would bet money on it. The
CIA, FBI? I don't know who ran him, but
he knew a tremendous amount about my
scientific work in ways that he wasn't
supposed to. Very powerful people told
me I needed to meet him. He certainly
was not a financier in any standard
sense. That was a cover story. I need to
know what this thing was, and I want to
know why people don't investigate. I
want to know why nobody asks for the
filings, but I think more than anything,
we don't trust our scientists because
our scientists are the most powerful
people in our society. So, do you think
science is being controlled so that it
can be used in a way that's beneficial?
Let's put it this way. Eric Weinstein is
a renowned mathematician and one of the
most fearless and provocative thinkers
of our time. He dissects the failures of
science, exposes elite networks, and
proposes bold new theories that could
save humanity. So, top of mind for me at
the moment is the apocalypse and
tropical fruit.
I'm not kidding. You're looking at the
end, man. Do you really think this is
the start of the end? Of course it is.
Look at how much has happened in the
last month. And the big problem is that
we share one atmosphere. All of
humanity's eggs are in one basket. So,
what needs to happen to get me a future?
So, I think Elon is 100% right. You got
to get to another sphere, but he's being
a complete when it comes to science, and
he's being a total hero when it comes to
engineering. But you can't engineer your
way to the stars with the science we
have. But physics opens the universe to
you. But we have a real problem. A new
idea in physics changes the balance of
power in the world. The desire of our
government is to get the science to give
us as much power as possible. But then
they castrate the scientists, belittle
them, destroy their families, their
lives, their ability to earn because our
government isn't good enough to keep its
own secrets. I Do you think
>> My employer was a special informant to
the FBI. There's a doctrine that says
physicists don't have free speech.
They're stopping the world's most
important group from making progress.
Physics is the only thing that's going
to get you a future.
So, let's talk about that.
I see messages all the time in the
comment section that some of you didn't
realize you didn't subscribe. So, if you
could do me a favor and double-check if
you're a subscriber to this channel,
that would be tremendously appreciated.
It's the simple It's the free thing that
anybody that watches this show
frequently can do to help us here to
keep everything going in this show in
the trajectory it's on. So, please do
double-check if you subscribed and thank
you so much because in a strange way you
are you're part of our history and
you're on this journey with us and I
appreciate you for that. So, yeah, thank
you.
Eric, you are a particularly captivating
individual for the very fact that you
grace so many different intellectual
subjects.
As we sit here now having this
conversation, I want to know
what subjects at this moment in in time
are occupying most of your thoughts and
most of your thinking?
We have
a a strong listenership here
and I think the responsibility that I
have meeting someone like you is to
understand
what we should be talking about.
So, top of mind for me at the moment is
tropical fruit and physics.
I'm not kidding. Tropical fruit and
physics?
>> Yeah. But that's just because you're
catching me on a particular day. Okay.
And my my local
99 Ranch Market ran out of rambutan,
which I'm addicted to.
No, I have serious issues with tropical
fruit. I'm I'm completely obsessed by
it. What about this week? What what's
been occupying most of your thoughts
this week? Well, the apocalypse
and physics.
Why do you say the apocalypse?
Um
>> What do you mean by the apocalypse?
Well, we're we're becoming
immune to to the apocalypse. We just
watched hypersonic missiles slam into a
modern city
on TV and
we're watching one of the world's
most remarkable civilizations, the
Persians, take
uh direct hits from both Israel and
the US, and I'm just beside myself.
I mean,
this is incredibly dramatic.
If If you think about, you know, just
the idea of the Jews and the Persians
are both still here.
And, you know, one of the things that I
find really just painful is that
I care about certain certain cultures
that I know well more than others, and
these are two of my absolute favorites.
What's What's going on at this moment in
time? Because it feels like there's more
conflict than there's ever been.
I don't know whether that's just a bias
that I have at this moment, but whether
I'm looking at the wrong social media
algorithm, but it feels like the world
isn't is tense.
>> Well, you're too You're too young for
the Cold War.
So, I don't know how old you are.
>> 32. Yeah, so you you you really missed I
grew up in a different world where
things were tense because there were two
players, and you know, it was more or
less the US and the Soviets.
And then we decided and one of the
dumbest things we ever came up with, a
very smart man
came up with the dumbest one of the
dumbest ideas, which was the end of
history. And,
you know, the the post-World War II
order
is here to stop us from using the
technologies that came out of this, and
I you know, I talked about this a lot.
There was a 6-month period between
November of '52 and April of '53 where
we unlocked first
the power of the nucleus because we
could fuse hydrogen, and the
other thing we were able to do was uh
figure out the three-dimensional
structure
of nucleic acid in the form of the
double helix,
and suddenly
in in no time flat, we had access to the
two most powerful levers uh humanity
has ever had or perhaps ever will. And
so, we're just not in a position to deal
with this. And the remarkable thing What
does that mean, sorry? In terms of You
said we had access to the two most
remarkable things. Well,
the hydrogen bomb
is not something that has ever been used
by anyone against
an enemy.
This is the first full-scale test of a
hydrogen device.
If the reaction goes, we're in the
thermonuclear era. 3 2
1
SO, WE'RE WE'RE AWAITING ITS first use
in war. We we we did use fission
devices, but we didn't use fusion
devices.
And they're at completely different
scales.
So, the Hiroshima Nagasaki are the only
two situations in which a nuke has ever
been used against
a population, civilian or otherwise.
And we don't know, for example, whether
or not, I don't know, um, at least COVID
had its origins in a bioweapons program.
So, at some level, we're playing with
levers and tools that are so powerful.
Do you realize that the the key
ingredient that made COVID so unique
was a four amino acid sequence inserted
into spike protein.
So, that's 12 nucleotides coding for
four amino acids shut down planet Earth
for a couple of years.
That's how powerful this is, you know,
and and there are very few things that
have this kind of leverage. In 2017, we
had a discovery, a white paper
called Attention Is All You Need. And if
oddly, many of us
dealing with AI and LLMs and talking
that language don't even realize there's
a paper that you can read that changed
everything.
Uh, it's eight authors out of Google, I
think. Um, and that opened up AI.
Uh, Satoshi in 2008 2009 with the
the solution to the double distributed
double spend problem where you could
effectively port um conservation laws
from the physical world into the digital
world giving us digital gold uh but just
as a as a beginning.
These ideas that have such high leverage
are
making us powerful beyond
any previous world with no
attendant increase in our wisdom and our
ability to use
and wield these things. And right now
you're seeing the face where we're
unveiling what does drone warfare look
like in FPV? What is FPV? first-person
where you know where you're looking
through the lens of the drone as it
slams into a personnel carrier.
You know, maybe you maybe you've seen
this on Telegram where you're just
watching individuals being menaced
by mechanical flying birds equipped to
kill them.
So
we didn't know what drone warfare looked
like. This is the beginning of drone
warfare. We didn't know what hypersonic
missiles look like when they slam into a
population center. I was just in Tel
Aviv
Yeah.
a couple months ago and I was in you
know shelters because the Houthis
and some of the uh Palestinian Arabs in
Gaza were letting off missiles.
But not like this.
Persians really you know
and by the way they're choosing I think
to not inflict maximal damage. I don't I
don't think that they
they could have gotten the body count a
lot higher if they'd wanted to. They're
trying to speak
the language of violence in a very
measured fashion.
So is this a particularly
tense moment or is it just the bias that
I have because I've not been through
these things before. Is there something
different?
>> you're looking
I can't even believe the question.
You're looking at the end, man.
This is the beginning. This is a slow
roll out
of a completely different world. You've
been in
We've all been in a completely
artificially stagnant bubble
for decades. My entire life up until now
has been in a bubble.
The only people who've seen real life
are extremely old.
Who are those people that have seen real
life? Well, I would say people who went
through the depression, World War II.
You know, in China, people who went
through Mao's Great Leap Forward. But
most of us have no idea of what like a
real pandemic, like a Spanish flu or
Black Plague is like. We don't know what
uh Poland went through where they lost,
you know, I don't know, 20 25% of their
population to war. Look at the stat
statistics on the Battle of Stalingrad.
We don't really understand We've We've
We've just
our whole life has been in a bubble.
You said I'm looking at the end. Yeah.
Remember all the talk about the
singularity? Like Ray Kurzweil, we're
heading to the singularity. What is the
singularity going to be like?
You're in it.
This is This This is now.
You're looking at the disintegration of
NATO.
You're looking at people who don't know
how to maintain the systems that were
engineered by their great grandparents
after World War II. That order
that, you know, you're from the UK.
If you think about
how how the UK woke up to the idea that
they had
built into their heads
that we are the masters of the world.
So, you you saw the beginning of the end
of this concept of the British Empire.
That moment is coming for the
And it it may be that it's coming for
Israel or maybe that it's coming for
Iran. See, in 1967 the Israelis felt
invincible in the Six-Day War.
And then in 1973 they had the Yom Kippur
War.
And all the people that they were
you know, priding themselves having
beaten these ferocious enemies that were
arrayed against them
woke up on Yom Kippur in 1973 and
bloodied the Israelis and they surprised
them. So, the Israelis underestimated
their enemy and that changed the entire
character of the country. It went from
being a triumphal state that felt that
David could defeat Goliath to realizing
that Goliath was quite powerful.
And you know, the same thing is going to
happen here. You you saw the celebration
that Trump
you know, had dealt this blow to the
Iranian nuclear facilities. You you
watch the Persians come back. It's going
to
we're starting to realize what the
boundaries are as people are more bold
in trying things. Maybe she's going to
try to cross the Taiwan Strait. I don't
know. But the era of stasis where very
little happened over very long periods
of time is over.
So, you think this is the start of
escalation?
This is the start of the undoing of the
post-World War II order. The idea that
the post-World War II order is still in
place is astounding.
So, what happens next? We either scare
the crap out of ourselves and come to
our senses or we don't. We scare the
crap out of ourselves and come to our
senses. Or we don't. Hm. And what does
that look like scaring the crap out of
ourselves? Well, I don't know. How did
you feel about the hypersonic missiles?
Like we started this and I'm talking
about tropical fruit
cuz I'm trying to figure out whether I
should buy a jackfruit and stink up my
wife's kitchen.
You know, and on the other hand I just
saw hypersonic missiles slam into the
buildings I was just in for meetings in
Tel Aviv.
There's a a nuclear
threat that weirdly hangs over us and I
I almost feel at some deep level we all
understand and feel that threat, that
there's these nine or 10 countries
around the world that have the ability
to basically wipe out all of us at any
moment. I feel like that's almost within
us all.
That knowing is within us all. I totally
disagree.
>> Really? Yeah, I think about nothing else
sometimes and I still don't believe I
don't believe it. There's a difference
between knowing something in your head
and knowing something embodied. Yeah.
I don't know if we're able to
distinguish whether we know it in our
head or whether it's embodied
unconsciously to the point that it's
changing how we act.
Do you know what I mean? Because I'm I'm
now aware that there's nine country and
I'm also aware of that really it's one
individual's
decision as to whether those
nuclear bombs were to fly. So there's a
part of me that's I don't know, maybe in
suspended disbelief or at a deeper level
feels an angst.
But nobody knows what to do with it and
this is part of what what Elon is all
about, which is that
I am convinced that everybody else needs
to be talking about this much more and I
need to be talking about this much less.
I talk about this all the time.
And people are always
I want to survive more than anything
else.
There's so many things that I love about
this place
and I don't like the idea that we're all
trapped here
with one atmosphere, with nine
individuals if you like,
who could all wake up on the wrong side
of the bed and say,
"Uh,
today's the day."
Part of what I'm so exercised about with
respect to the apocalypse is how many
things I want to save.
I mean, this city just went up in
flames.
It's very
focuses the mind. How many things can I
save in one car load
if I know that the police are not going
to let me come back to my home?
Do you save photos? Do you save musical
instruments?
Do you save financial records? What what
is it that you save? You know, it was a
very focusing
question. We're already over it. We
can't even remember the fires.
On that point of
the things that give us meaning
>> Yeah. in our lives,
where do you think we're at as a society
in terms of our
feelings of meaning and purpose and
connectedness to maybe something
transcendent or I was mulling over this
idea the other day. I actually posted it
on on my LinkedIn page of all places.
I said that I'm I think we need to
ladder up to things like anchored and
content in life. Like we you know, we
ladder up we start with ourselves and we
ladder up to family then community then
maybe a mission or a purpose and then
maybe to something transcendent. And it
feels like it because of the design of
our lives and the optimization of it, we
we're increasingly laddering up to just
ourselves. Yeah. I think even in my life
I'm wondering whether
there's like a layer missing like which
is the religious layer or a spiritual
layer.
>> pray?
Mhm, it's a good question.
You come over Friday night and pray with
us.
I'd say I do pray.
That's pretty weak.
>> But it's not a it's not the way that I
see prayer on in movies and stuff. So
that's the thing, right? We have this
idea that somebody puts their hands
together
>> Yeah. and they just believe. Yeah. A lot
of time when you're praying, you don't
really believe.
You're not sure that you're doing
anything sensible. You you feel
ridiculous. Mhm. And that's true even if
you're a believer.
Do you think we need religion?
Yeah.
Said the atheist.
Are you an atheist?
>> Yeah.
But I take religion super seriously.
I don't think we're meant to live
without it.
That's an interesting
conundrum. I don't think so. Everybody
gets hung up on it. I sort of wonder
what their problem is. Please explain.
So you believe that we shh aren't meant
to live without religion. We're meant to
be orientated by something transcendent.
But you don't believe that it's real.
I think that
You know, there's this great trick that
I learned when I was scuba diving.
Which is that your your need to breathe
is triggered by the build-up of CO2 in
your lungs. And there are all sorts of
things you can do to decrease your need
to breathe. One is you can
hyperventilate. And you can get rid of
all of the CO2 that's residual.
You can also inner your lungs to CO2 by
smoking.
You can also breathe out the precious
air that your instincts tell you to hold
in. You can do all these things and then
you can go super deep. You can equal out
learn how to equalize the pressure in
your ears by holding your nose and and
and these techniques.
And suddenly you're far deeper than
you've ever been and you're exploring
the rocks and the fishes and there's a
turtle and there's an eel.
And you get a message, you're out of
air.
And you look up and you see, I am really
far from the surface. This is
terrifying.
That's what happens when you unhook
the proximate, which is air hunger,
from the ultimate, which is the need to
breathe.
So, thirst is proximate to dehydration.
Hunger
is proximate to the need for
nourishment.
In part, religion and prayer
is there to keep us from unhooking
all of these protective things and just
turning life into a hoot.
You can have a hoot without religion.
But if everybody has a hoot, the whole
society collapses.
Some point I think
a president of the United States may
have said that people who defend this
country were suckers.
Something like that.
And I thought, god damn you.
Maybe it's true even.
But how many families have have received
a a flag-draped coffin
and
felt pride.
Like we lost something precious, but we
are part of the American tapestry in a
way that few families can be.
And when we outsmart ourselves, when we
unhook all of these things,
you know, every single young woman has
an idea about what the opportunity cost
of not going on OnlyFans is.
Before we didn't know what the
opportunity cost There was no
measurement of it.
We're becoming too sophisticated. We've
got too much information. We're
deranging ourselves. We're having a
blast.
And we're completely undoing all of the
superstructure of the world.
The number of people who don't have
children or want children or
My kids make fun of me that I just go
around telling people to make babies.
And it's the most normal thing in the
world.
I meet parents who don't harass their
own children to get married and have
families. Like, what are you doing?
The superstructures of the worlds? Yeah.
One being family family. Yeah.
Traditions. Yeah. Things that ground
that connect you to
And what are the symptoms of that
unhooking from the superstructures of
the world?
>> do you care about things How much do you
care about people saying your name four
generations out?
Me? Yeah, you. You're probably asking
the wrong person cuz I just don't think
legacy matters cuz I'm going to be dead.
That's right, but you're
I'm asking all of you who believe that.
Yeah.
That is so sad.
It is so weird
that no one cares about their legacy cuz
they don't see a future.
So, what I'm trying to say is
I'm desperate to get you a future so
that you care.
What needs to happen to get me a future?
Something remarkable. Something utterly
remarkable because it's not it's not
going that way. And that's what that's
what the physics part is. Like I talk
about physics constantly. Physics is the
only thing that's going to get you a
future.
And how how?
Well, right now the big problem is that
we share one atmosphere. Yeah. So
everything that can
all the really bad things, whether it's
pathogens, like imagine something
COVID-like but far worse,
or
climate,
or
uh
radiation,
all of these things
don't know anything about borders.
To an extent, there's a southern and a
northern hemisphere that are separate,
but even that's not
a great border. So we can draw all the
borders on land that we want, but we
still have basically
one or two atmospheres, and I would
really say one.
And we've now gotten powerful enough to
really screw it up.
Right? And so Through nukes or through
carbon emissions?
>> of those things. Right? Everything that
you care about
is on one sphere with one one
atmosphere.
And I think Elon is 100% right. We got
to get to another sphere.
I can't believe
that
he's focused on Mars. I mean, by by
Sure. Focus on the moon, focus on Mars,
focus on chemical rockets.
But throw a couple billion towards
physics, for God's sakes, let us get it
Let us get serious about exploring the
cosmos.
This is our womb. This is not our home.
We're You know You know this song,
Closing Time? No, I don't. Closing Time.
Uh You don't have to go home, but you
can't stay here. I think it's about
birth.
Yeah, it's time to be born.
You can't stay here.
This is completely obvious to me and I
am the only person who who's talks this
way and so I sound like a lunatic and I
get tired of it.
But the real reason it it you know, it's
about the mangoes. It's about the
rambutan. It's about the music.
It's about all the things that I love.
So why would you want to leave?
I want to take it with us and I want to
see what else is out there and I want to
meet people. Why don't you just stay
here and fix this? On it. Cuz you can't.
The odds of fixing one sphere for a
permanent future. You've already talked
about it. You don't care about the
future.
I don't have children yet either so I
don't Yeah, I don't have that.
>> But I
My children don't have children and
their children don't have children.
And I care about them and they're not
even here.
We've got some time left here, don't we?
Well, we did.
Have you looked what's happened in the
last month?
It's coming undone. Pakistan and India.
Do you really think this is the start of
the end?
I I have no idea where I am. Of course
it is.
The World War II order was keeping it
It's like control rods keeping the world
from going super critical. Can't we just
put the rods back together?
Have you looked at who
We had an election with Donald Trump
versus Kamala Harris in the US.
Tell me what's going on in the UK. What
are we doing in the mayoral race for for
New York?
I don't know if you're watching what I'm
watching.
Look at the mess
that's going on in Gaza.
Russia is nuclear.
Israel is presumably nuclear. Pakistan
and India nuclear. The US is nuclear.
Iran is almost nuclear. China is pissed
off about Iran because it was trying to
make a play through the region.
North Korea's watching.
Oh, and and look at the UK in turmoil.
UK is a very nuclear country.
To say nothing of France.
This is not going to go well. We just we
By the way, look at how much is
happening with AI.
Right?
Everything was really stagnant. That's
why I I I have this famous challenge
that I give people, which is
go into a room
and subtract the screens and forget
about style. How do you know you're not
in 1973?
Like drones are the beginning.
Imagine I needed a refill on my coffee
and you know, you did something and a
drone brought me a coffee to not
interrupt the flow.
That would we'd know we weren't in '73,
but in general, drones aren't a big part
of our lives.
And these robots, I've never seen a
humanoid robot actually doing anything
other than on YouTube where it's like
doing the mashed potato. Mhm.
So in general, yeah.
Things were just really stagnant for a
really long time. And then during that
period of stagnation, we we had this
crazy narrative, which is like the
dizzying pace of change is making it
almost impossible to keep up while
things were incredibly stagnant. And so
it just shows you sort of this weird way
in which
our minds can be programmed to
completely ignore what we're
experiencing.
Is there not chance that we'll just
continue to
Okay, if you want to go with chance,
look, until until you're worried about
your great-great-grandchildren,
I don't want to have this conversation
with you.
I want you to start caring about that. I
want you to go to church.
You you're heir to a great tradition.
One of the most important traditions in
the world has to be Christianity.
Cuz both Judaism and Islam are screwed
up over the law, or legal traditions.
Christianity, not so much.
I think I first time somebody
crystallized that for me was Sam Harris.
It's a really important point. But
you're heir to an incredibly powerful
and important tradition. And if we don't
have a Christian substrate, we're in
real trouble because all of our society
is based on on an assumption of a
Christian substrate.
You're advising me to be
Christian in tradition, but not in
necessarily in belief.
Well, this is the thing. You're
alienated because you think that you
have to be a believer in order to go in,
otherwise you're faking it. Yeah.
Get over yourself. That's not how it
works.
>> That's true. That's me just me being
honest. I do think that if I went to a
church and I I sung and I I prayed and
stuff, and I didn't believe, I would
that I'd be like
it'd be it'd be fake. Okay.
Do you imagine that all those people who
go to church are just sitting there 100%
sure that there's a there's a Jesus to
pray to?
Do you know any Christians? Yeah. Yeah,
they're not like that.
They sneak off and do bad things. If
they were confident that Jesus was
watching everything that they were
doing, and they were constantly talking
about how they sin.
I'm a sinner.
Right? It's a very complicated,
interesting
piece of kit.
And my claim is that
you know,
I said the Lord's Prayer as part of
going to high school.
I sat in a church,
a chapel at a high school in LA that had
a stained glass window with an American
soldier trampling a Nazi flag. In the
stained glass window.
It's amazing.
How does this link to
me I was about to say comp
Don't you have faith that we'll just be
able to kind of keep this It feels like
a bit of a standoff.
>> So you're the one with the faith. I'm
the one who's nervous.
You Look, you're the believer.
I'm not going to trust that.
No, no, no. I'm going to get my hands
dirty and try to do something about it.
Do you know what if I think it in part
it's because as you said, I've been
alive for 32 years and through that time
has been relative peace especially in
the Western world. So it's all I've ever
known so I I'm born with this assumption
that this is just kind of how it goes.
There's always threat but we kind of
figure it out. Come to the Pacific
Palisades. It looks like Gaza.
Yeah.
Yeah, I've got some friends that lost
their houses there.
You know. Checked out Lahaina in West
Maui recently?
No.
It's an absolute disaster.
Is AI a protagonist in this story? Is it
sure? In what In what respect?
Well, what do you What do you think
about it? We're going through
going through a wild revolution at the
moment and
I just hear people saying the dumbest
things about it.
What do I think about it? I'm scared I
might say something dumb now but
>> Well, let's try it cuz I I'm going to
say something dumb. I think I Well, I
look at both sides of the coin and I
look at the
opportunity and the and the threat. My
concern when I hear about the CEOs of
the biggest AI companies in the world
talking about this fast takeoff is that
the transition will be too quick for us
to adjust.
And when they say fast takeoff, they
mean that AGI like arrives and it the
rate of its learning accelerates so
quickly that
it really um disrupts the need for
human beings to do a lot of the sort of
jobs we're doing today that are centered
on intelligence.
Which jobs require intelligence? Pretty
much all of them these days because
we've had the industrial revolution
where we've
outsourced a lot of the labor to
machines but I don't think so. Really?
Like I think Yeah, I think a large
portion of our conversation was actually
an LLM.
We didn't actually get to the stuff
outside of the LLM.
You and I are two chatbots for the most
part. You're a good one.
Thank you.
>> I'm on a huge I'm on a huge platform
again, you know?
But my claim is is that that's the
really disturbing part that more or less
we're LLMs. More or less we don't do a
single intelligent thing all day long.
And the reason that they're able to
mimic us is because we don't realize
that intelligence is a last resort for
us.
We try to automate.
Like you know, if you think about
greetings.
Your assistant was very kind. I got out
of a black car that you guys sent around
and
I was greeted with the phrase
"There he is, the man, the myth." And I
knew what was coming next, "The legend."
Right? Because that is a sort of
humorous way of giving an intimate
greeting.
But it's still an LLM.
And I'm not saying that your assistant
is an LLM. I'm saying that more or less
what we do all day long is LLM
interactions.
"Hey buddy, how are you?" "Good, good.
Things have been really busy."
"How about you?" "Well, I got some
travel coming up. Kind of excited about
it, but I have to get through some work
first." "I understand."
That's an entirely scripted
conversation.
That's why I'm trying to say that I want
to do podcasting that is outside of the
LLM model. I don't want to do just
dangerous stupid stuff, but I want to
talk about things that I've never
explored.
Where I don't have something,
you know, ready.
Do you think AI will ever break out of
the
the the LLM, or will it expand into
>> the LLM as well.
I don't See, I think that waiting for
AGI as the problem is a is a bad idea. I
think the problems are going to get here
far before AGI.
I think even that, the AGI expectation
is something we're trained to do.
Do you think AGI is coming? Do you think
we'll survive AGI? Will AGI be good or
bad?
All of that's pre-programmed into you.
Why do you Why are you waiting for AGI?
Did you not
AlphaFold 3? Did you Did you track that?
Do you know about this? Is that Was that
the chess game? The Well, it's the chess
game that became the protein folding
game. Oh, yeah.
>> You want to talk about great games?
Protein folding. Now, that's a game.
I have no no knowledge of this at all.
Okay.
What do you know about proteins?
Very little.
Okay, think about proteins as tiny
machines. Yeah. That There's copying
machine, there's a scissors and a
shearing machine, there's a
a light-making machine, all sorts of
things.
And all of those machines are weirdly
coded
I mean Imagine that you had like a
children's show.
And uh
a bunch of girl superheroes, and they
all had necklaces with
uh 20 different kinds of beads around
their neck. And so, when they needed a
machine, they'd take off the necklace,
they'd throw it into a thing called a
ribosome. The ribosome would take these
20 kinds of pearls, and suddenly it
would build you a car or a spaceship or
a gun or who knows what. Well, that's
That's That's the story of DNA,
RNA, and uh and protein.
The only thing is,
isn't it weird that a linear sequence
suddenly crumples up into a
three-dimensional object that does
something? So, for example,
I don't know if you've ever seen um
these Turkish rabbits that glow in the
dark?
No. Okay. So, they took green
fluorescent protein out of jellyfish.
Yeah.
And they uh
spliced them into the nucleic acids
of rabbits. And the Turks bred all of
these glow-in-the-dark bunnies.
And what that is is a structure, so
there's there's something called
secondary structure in protein where
sometimes you get these spirals called
alpha helices and then sometimes you get
a two-dimensional sheet that's made from
taking
a switchback
in in strings of amino acids. And then
if you wrap that around, you don't have
a beta sheet, you have a beta barrel.
And these beta barrels are the
glow-in-the-dark aspect of green
fluorescent protein, okay?
And
what we didn't know was how a series of
A's, C's, T's, and G's could code for
sequences of amino acids, could form
three-dimensional structures. So if you
just read DNA, you didn't know
well, that's going to be a a sports car.
Yeah.
AlphaFold
figured it out for the most part. Like
to a to an enormous extent. Humans were
stuck there. And what does that mean? It
means that you could
I don't know, you could target your
enemies that have particular regions on
their cell surfaces and you could come
up with proteins that only attach to
them and attach. It could mean anything.
Could mean nanorobots.
I don't know what it means, but my point
is is that that's already here.
And you're not focused on it.
And you're thinking AGI. And the funny
part is is that's your LLM that got
programmed to wait for AGI.
Like how do you know, people that I
think are very smart, much smarter than
me, talk about the Don't listen to them.
Elon? Sure. I mean he's he says that
it's our biggest existential threat is
AI.
Elon
has become the outsourcing for much of
our intelligence. And if Elon means
anything to you,
he's really saying to you, "Don't listen
to me, do something remarkable."
He's saying, "Where is everybody?
Why is there only one Elon?
There used to be lots of them."
Why is there only one Elon?
Yeah, not the right question. Where
Where did all the other Elons go? Same
question, is it not?
No, I think that the Why is there only
one Elon makes Elon feel more singular.
You know, if you ever get a chance to go
to Cappadocia or Bryce National Park in
Utah,
you see what happens, which is that
you'll have a stone that was resting on
the soil,
and suddenly the wind starts to erode
everything except the compactified soil
right under that stone, and you get
what's called a fairy chimney or hood.
And so, the claim is is that sometimes
you get these isolated structures,
and the key point is everything else
eroded away.
We're supposed to have tons of Elon.
And everybody else got taken out.
What or who took them out?
Look at how much trouble Elon has being
Elon.
Look, we keep hearing about him, you
know,
he's on drugs.
Great. Take drugs.
No, I'm not kidding.
Do you know how many amazing people take
drugs?
If you care about jazz, jazz is a whole
you know, it's a history of drugs.
Whenever I'm listening to Ray Charles,
I'm hearing heroin.
Okay.
What are they doing at Burning Man?
They're trying to live
luxuriously under oppression,
simultaneously luxuriously and as just
dirty and disgusting as you'll ever be.
Hopefully, they're having tons of
eye-opening, mind-bending experiences
chasing some way of getting out of the
LLM.
And you know, my feeling about this is
it's not even honest.
I I I believe that Elon, for example,
does understand that population and
growth is really important.
But I also think he just enjoys making
babies.
In a In a In a In a weird way, this idea
of I'm going to have an empire of my
children
is a forbidden concept.
Try explaining that to HR.
You know, it's like, "What did you say
at work?"
So, the key point is Elon is barely able
to be Elon.
Do you think we're overestimating the
impact AI is going to have?
Because people people see this as really
fundamentally transformative. No.
You don't think we're underestimating
it? I think it's going to be
I I I think that what AI means to us is
is bizarre. We've We've come up with
this whole script about AGI and
it's going to take everything we do
that's repetitive
is on the chopping block.
And since almost everything we do is
repetitive,
we don't need to get it to AGI. We just
need to do things where lots of people
create lots of repetitive data,
and then we tokenize it, and we train
the AI on the tokens,
and then for the most part, it says, you
know, it doesn't matter. It can be a
photograph, it can be music,
whatever it is.
Amino acids. Just give me a large enough
data set and let me add it in and you
know,
take a hike for for a little while. I'll
train on it, and then I'll know how to
do that.
You know what it's bad at?
Things that where there isn't much data.
So, I I just I just found out about
these orphan proteins where
like everybody's got a different version
of hemoglobin. Mhm.
But, you know, the the the quaternary
structure of he- hemoglobin is these
four heme groups,
you know, four different proteins around
a central element.
What happens when you have a protein
that has no analog anywhere else? The
The system doesn't have the ability to
learn it.
If If I train you on the blues and you
find out what a 12-bar blues progression
is then you find out that there's a
variation where this you know, the
second bar goes to the fourth rather
than just staying on the one for four
bars. And then sometimes the fourth bar
has a seven in it to create tension.
Okay, so it's going to learn every
single form of the blues
like that.
And because there's a large corpus of
that stuff, it's going to get really
good at blues music.
You know, as a but if you take something
that basically
never happens, it's not going to have an
easy ability to train and give you more.
So, I think that AI
is almost certainly going to transform
the economy because everything that we
we know how to do through education
creates repetitive behaviors.
We don't know how to educate for
creativity and genius. We know how to
educate for doing higher level things.
So, radiology is a great example.
Radiologists are, you know, some of the
first uh in the crosshairs.
I'm going to stare at some imaging
and I'm going to say I think that's a
tumor.
I think that's benign.
And it's going to say just give me give
me give me all of these tokens. Like,
well, they're x-rays, they're cats can
No, no, no, they're just tokens.
So, yeah.
It's going to start to automate away
every repetitive behavior. And then
what's going to be left
is the tiny number of things that aren't
really highly repetitive or things where
we really that a human does it. Very
interesting what's happened with chess.
I don't know if if you've been following
chess.
I loosely understand it mainly because
I've spoken to a lot of AI experts and
they often reference chess
as as an example where
>> It's one of the first things that humans
did that we really cared about that
fell.
So, they've been longer
in the AI
tractor beam than any of the rest of us
in some sense.
How did it fall?
Through Deep Blue, and IBM, and Garry
Kasparov.
But does that mean that people people
aren't interested in chess anymore? What
what what are you saying? No, no, no,
that's the whole point.
So, Magnus Carlsen, the greatest chess
player of our time and perhaps of all
time, was on Joe Rogan.
And Joe asked him the simple question,
"Can your phone beat you?" He's like,
"Yeah, easily."
So, the point is we can't compete
with
I don't know.
Stockfish or what whatever the top chess
programs of our time. I don't know
anymore. But nobody cares about those
programs except for AI experts.
We care about the drama
of
you know, Onon versus Carlson.
Two humans? Two humans, because it's
about us. We're we're very narcissistic
in this way.
And so, there was a period and you know,
this is something that my wife
uh
tried to popularize. So, she said this
thing about the golden age of AI
complementarity,
where the AIs aren't good enough to take
over from us,
but they're amazing tools. And so,
there's a period where we're teamed up,
you know, the prompt engineering
revolution.
They're not good enough to come up with
their own prompts.
And a great example of this that she and
I have been talking about is the cyborg
chess era,
which is a period where humans and the
AIs could form teams that would do
better. But at some point, the AI just
looks at the human and says,
"You're just holding me back."
You've got two children. Yeah.
When they're thinking about their career
prospects, with all that you think and
know and believe about the future that
we're heading towards, what what kind of
career advice would you be
giving to them?
>> Oh, I've given them terrible career
advice.
I give them I gave gave them somewhat
different career advice. So, to my son
my my advice was do the hardest, most
technical thing you possibly can do.
And be prepared to use that ability,
that facility in different ways than
you're
you're honing it. But, train yourself.
With my daughter,
um
I think she cares deeply about people.
And, you know, there's a typical
male-female divide. And I'm not By the
way, I'm not going to talk overly much
about them cuz I try to keep them out.
But, she is, uh, you know, somebody who
is taking same level of analytic ability
but putting it in the service of the law
and trying to help
people who are, you know, really
unfortunate. She's very idealistic. And
so, at some level, the law
is not going to allow us to have AI
lawyers for quite some time. It's not
going to trust anything. We We've got
jury
uh, trials and and judges and a legal
system that's written into our founding
documents.
To the average person
I would say get your board in the water
and prepare to paddle like all get out.
A tsunami of a lifetime is coming, and
nothing your elders have seen is going
to prepare.
There's no good advice to give that's
specific.
Let's put it this way. One of the things
when people tell me about they're moving
from one city to another
I have a phrase that nobody likes, which
is every place is over.
Oh, I'm moving to Austin. Yeah, it's
over. Miami, it's over. Nashville, over.
You know, all these places are over. And
every occupation that is named is over.
I'm going to be a dentist.
Radiologist.
Accountant.
Teacher.
These are all over.
Whatever's coming,
get flexible.
Get good.
Get good on a bunch of different stuff.
Learn how to think across disciplines. I
have no idea what what's going to be
left for us.
But, you know, somebody's going to come
out on top.
And I I hate to tell people that you
should try to come out on top.
I don't think it's healthy to have
everyone trying to be
world-class.
I think you should be able to just have
a life.
I have a golden retriever. I don't know
that it's the greatest golden retriever
in the world.
Sometimes I think it is, but
does a lot of dumb stuff.
But, he's my golden retriever. I just
don't think it I think that this
mania for optimization, like if you look
at your own videos, you'll find
some of the best-performing videos
are
This is how to succeed.
This is how to get anyone you want. This
is how to get out of a bad situation.
People just want
capacity.
But, for what?
Okay, you've optimized your day, you've
optimized your health.
Your social media's optimized.
Now what?
Now what?
I don't know.
What should be then? Say
you know, is it the is it time to just
One would say, "Well, now I One would
incorrectly say, "Well, now I can play
with my golden retriever." And then one
would say, "Well, you should have been
playing with your golden retriever the
whole time."
Let me put it a little differently.
Through some bizarre accident,
I've gotten the chance to meet
incredible people that I don't even talk
about who I have met, you know?
I've got a chance to see the world. I
haven't seen South America, but I've
seen
most of the other continents
other than that
the Antarctic.
I've had a really rich life.
Take somebody who hasn't had those
opportunities,
but they got a chance to have three
kids.
I'm not sure I wouldn't trade places. I
had so enjoyed raising my children.
And it's available to everyone.
It is such a strange thing that we're
talking about optimization and all this
stuff. I I get to think about the the
substrate of the universe, theoretical
physics. I dream about visiting the
stars.
I dream about multiple dimensions of
time, meeting aliens, all sorts of
things.
I still think having kids was like
unbeatable.
I'm so sad that it's over.
I'm so sad that they moved out. I cannot
believe that I was dumb enough to live
in a society that doesn't believe
in having your kids with you your whole
life.
The idea that we look at places where
kids live at home as backwards is beyond
me.
And shout out to the entire Indian
subcontinent.
You know, it's just like
family is everything. They drive me
crazy.
But it it's just meaning is available
for you.
And and again,
yeah,
every time I get a chance to eat a
rambutan,
it's one of my favorite fruits, mangoes,
rambutans, jackfruit,
sitaphal, if you can get custard apple,
the amount of pleasure I get,
I've never had a good custard apple in
the entire time I've lived in the US,
not one.
I've had a frozen one imported from
Taiwan.
You get this cherimoya, just get out of
here, cherimoya. You're not good.
Great custard apple, great soursop.
What a pleasure to be on this earth. And
it's available
to almost anyone.
I just think that you can find meaning
you know,
for God's sakes, go to Spotify if you
have a a connection, if you can afford a
connection to Spotify
and put in Pablo Casals' version of the
Bach Cello Suites.
You're as rich as you need to be.
I've flown private. I'd much prefer to
listen to Pablo Casals playing the the
Cello Suites in economy
than to be to be to be deprived of real
luxury.
I don't know, I just to me, meaning is
everywhere.
I can't swing a cat without hitting
meaning.
Have you always been like that? Or is
that something that you've cultivated?
The the point about being able to swing
a cat and find meaning, so many people
that will be listening now
could swing a
100-mi stick and wouldn't hit meaning in
their lives.
But you seem to be able to find it in
the
the purer things, the more simple
things.
And I'm wondering if that's something
that we can all cultivate with a change
of perspective or if it's
just the way that you've always been.
Why is Joe Rogan such a big deal?
You ever listen to Joe Rogan talk about
pugilism?
Two gentlemen beating the crap out of
each other as poetry,
as chess.
I I could listen to Joe talk about MMA
for days.
Yeah.
You know,
the story of Mighty Mouse, the guy
trapped in some, I don't know, flyweight
division with unbelievable skills who
never gets to meet a formidable enemy.
You know?
Do you think that's a privilege? Do you
think that there's a privilege in being
able to craft a story cuz so much of the
meaning you're describing there comes
from these great stories. And not
everybody is able to craft the story
upon seeing something. You probably look
at this item in front of me, this glass,
and create a story about it that drives
meaning, that makes you feel something.
I worry about its manufacture. How is it
that we got a surface of revolution?
What What is What is the industrial
process? How do I take a picture of this
and get it
a photograph of the machine that made
it? You know that fly that has been
buzzing around us this entire interview?
Do you remember when Obama had a fly?
Yeah, and he caught it and bam.
Yeah.
The confidence of that man.
See, I'd try that and I'd miss and I'd
screw it up in front of millions of
people.
You know, it's like I I took so much
meaning away from that fly.
Were you trying to or is that just a
sort of predisposed
>> did.
No, everyone. Some people would have
gone, "Huh?" How was it that you knew
exactly what I was talking about?
Because it captured a moment.
He was the girl in the red dress.
You know, there's this thing that women
say, "Not every woman can wear red."
Well, not every man
can grab a fly with confidence.
I
I think I think we all see this.
I think we all see beauty everywhere.
Do you remember that movie American
Beauty with the the plastic bag that
gets in the
air funnel going up?
And the key point is the ability just
to see beauty wherever you find it.
You know, everything behind you means
something to me.
The letter B
uh strange to me that there's only one
phonetic alphabet and that every
phonetic alphabet is descended from it.
You know? right.
I I I
I basically view everything as a
hyperlink. I just want to click on the
world and see where it goes to.
Not everybody does, though.
But, we do.
They don't make the step is what I'm
saying, cuz people would see the bee and
nothing would cross their You know, it's
it's funny.
>> There's an absolutely horrible account
that has been just dogging me for years
trying to make my life miserable.
And A social media account?
>> Yeah. Doesn't matter. Yeah.
And the person said, "You know, one
thing I just never understand is
he's not
he's not hawking a book.
He
He's just talking. What Why are his
numbers high?"
And the answer is everybody cares about
this stuff.
They want an invitation.
One of the funniest things that gets
said about me on social media is he goes
on forever and he never says anything.
And then like I look at the word clouds
of things that I I've talked about and
people are just Googling everything
incessantly.
You know, if you didn't know who Pablo
Casals was, now you do. Now you know
what a real cello sounds like.
Um
I don't know. I just
I can't believe that I'm so far through
this life and that there's so little
left.
I can't believe this doesn't go on
forever.
Is that all you? Yeah.
My people just got hit.
And
you know, you want to talk about the
river and the sea.
That river is not the Jordan River and
that sea is not the Mediterranean.
The Arab world stretches from the
Atlantic with Morocco
right up to the What is it?
Shatt al-Arabia waterway that divides
Iraq from Iran.
And I don't think
this is stable.
There is no way in which
we should be fighting like this. This is
ridiculous.
Trump Trump used the F-word.
I mean, he's getting taking a ton of
crap.
Why would you use the F-word? Well,
well, isn't it interesting people view
Trump as so tacky?
You know, he's he's got this Queens sort
of bluster. He doesn't doesn't reek of
uh
finalist clubs at Harvard or
Skull and Bones or whatever.
No.
Trump doesn't use the F-word for a
reason. He needs it once in a blue moon,
and it better mean something.
And he said this to Iran, and he said
this to Israel. These two two countries
have been
fighting for so long.
They don't know what the [ __ ] they're
doing.
He didn't make a mistake.
The rest of the world has just forgotten
how to calibrate.
What do you see Trump in? How is he
clothed?
He's almost always in a suit and tie.
And he almost never says the F-word.
And it's carefully calibrated to get
everybody's attention, and we're so
asleep that we don't even hear it.
This is World War III,
and it's already started.
Biden was there
in the Oval Office
non compos mentis.
And I I being told, "Don't worry,
there's a committee that's replaced
him."
Because I was talking about the fact
that he can't be president.
I I just don't know what we're doing.
I'm so mystified by everybody else. You
know, it's like Elon makes sense to me.
I'm not Elon. I'm very different person,
but at least Elon makes sense to me.
Not 100%, but 98% Elon makes sense to
me. It's everybody else that I'm
completely confused about. What part of
what Elon is saying makes so much sense
to you?
Oh, jeez, everything. One, we have to
have babies. We have to keep going.
Two,
it can't all be about problems.
You have to be excited to be alive every
morning.
You have to work your ass off your whole
life. You know what one of the most
beautiful things that ever happened?
Somebody telling Elon that he was the
world's richest human being.
He said, "Huh, it's interesting.
Okay, back to work."
Amazing, right?
There's no reward
that he can't have
more of by stopping work and enjoying
his wealth except doing stuff.
And
I was born in this country.
My
parents were born in this country.
My grandparents on one side were not,
but my grandparents on the other side
were.
Elon is so American.
That cowboy spirit
that
he does all sorts of stuff I can't
stand. I don't want to see one more of
those Pepe memes ever.
I really don't. What the [ __ ] is his
problem? Okay? I don't know him at all.
But Elon at his best is is the United
States.
You know?
Anything is possible here.
And we And we just waste our lives on
interpersonal drama.
He wastes his life to an enormous extent
as a troll.
I cannot That's The part of him that I
don't understand is one, why he's not
focused 100% on physics.
I think he sees it as going through Grok
and AI. He doesn't want to trust humans.
I think he sees Mars as energizing to
engineers and the stars are enervating
to engineers because the science There's
no amount of engine- You can't engineer
your way to the stars with the science
we have.
But
he's he's being a complete [ __ ] when it
comes to science and he's being a total
hero when it comes to engineering.
Um
but he is the quintessential American.
A business is only as good as the people
inside it. So, how do you make sure
you're hiring the best? Our sponsor,
LinkedIn, can help you find these
quickly. I believe in taking time to
hire slowly, but I also understand that
once you've decided to hire, you want to
get the ball rolling and get the best
candidates in front of you to start
interviewing. And that's where paying to
promote your role on LinkedIn makes all
the difference because you'll get
applicants seven times faster than if
you post your job for free. And even
though slower, more considered hiring is
important, you never want your hiring
platforms to be what's holding you back.
LinkedIn keeps pace. It takes care of
the heavy lifting, sending you highly
skilled candidates that you wouldn't
find anywhere else. So, when the time
comes to make your next hire, make it
count and promote your job on LinkedIn.
Head to linkedin.com/doac.
That's linkedin.com/doac
and terms and conditions apply.
A second ago you said you can't believe
it doesn't go on forever. Yeah.
You or the universe or I can't believe
my story doesn't go on forever. Look,
I've never died before, so I have no
experience with it. So, as as far as I
know,
I've always been alive.
And it will always go on that way. But,
there's another thing that, you know, I
I've talked about occasionally,
which is I'm not the most
public-spirited human being.
You know, I I am somebody who will take
the last
the last rambutan.
You know, and I know that you're not
supposed to do that in almost any
culture on Earth, but sometimes it's
just sitting there and it bothers me.
Okay? So, I'm not the I'm not the
classiest person on Earth.
But, I'll tell you something. If you
have a kid, and you have a choice about
eating the rambutan yourself or giving
the rambutan to your child, this it's a
no-brainer. You'll you'll enjoy the
rambutan so much more if you give it to
your kid.
And you'll see.
And that's the way that which this goes
on forever.
It's great. I mean, just
how many young people do I have to yell
at?
Well, I don't know if I want to have
kids. I don't want to bring anyone into
this horrible world.
Why do you have kids? It both is it I
can see it personally bothers you.
Do you have any idea how much hate there
is right now for Israel?
Do you have any idea how destabilizing
this action against Iran was?
Do you have any idea how many people
have suffered for how long under the
mullahs?
We are being cheated of Persia.
I'm not talking about
Iran for the Persians.
I'm talking about
we are cheated
of Persia. The entire planet.
One of the greatest societies on Earth
taken offline.
I Look,
You're catching me on the wrong week.
I I don't want to dwell on it.
Th- This is just incredibly
irresponsible. We're not going to
survive this.
Israel is certainly not going to survive
this.
If the Abrahamic world does not get its
head out of its ass.
If the Christian world does not start to
stand up for itself without becoming
this Christ is king nightmare.
You know, I was in Tel Aviv before this
all happened. And I I just said from the
stage, make the Middle East Christian
again.
D- Does nobody understand their role is
sort of my question.
How can you have Bethlehem without a
strong Christian presence?
Have you ever been to the Church of the
Holy Sepulchre? No.
Can I give you another assignment? Yeah.
Get off your ass and go. You got the
money.
Walk the stations of the cross.
And for God's sake, stop with the issue
about belief.
You can pray like the rest of us. We're
not sure if we're praying We're not sure
if the thing is hooked up and anyone's
listening.
You have the right to go back even with
doubt, even with knowledge.
And you have the right to believe about
it tomorrow, you know, where where
you're not going to be, but people are
going to be mentioning your name.
When you say that your your people are
under attack, who are you referencing as
your people?
I would in general there's several
groups of people that I would describe
as my people. The Jews would be one.
Dyslexics would be another. Americans
would be another.
Scientists would be another.
It depends on on what these think. But
right now I'm thinking about the Jews
and I'm thinking about the fact that the
social media
businesses have lost complete control of
uh the bot farms. And we're just seeing
this un- I I I feel like I'm living
through the 1930s again.
I We've seen this movie before.
It doesn't end well.
You know, what happened in Gaza is an
unbelievable tragedy.
And that tragedy was partially
architected by the United States of
America shoving a two-state solution
down the throats
of Palestinian Arabs who absolutely do
not want a two-state solution.
And the creation
in part of the situation where Israel
has a hand, the US has a hand, the
Palestinian Arabs have a hand.
The creation of Hamas
and the and the promotion of this just
unbelievable genius Sinwar,
the leader of Hamas, who is continuing
to best Bibi Netanyahu from the grave.
You know, it's just an amazing feat.
Nobody reads anymore, as you know.
Um
There's an old Sherlock Holmes story
called The Problem at Thor Bridge. Ever
heard of it? No.
So, you're British. Um
Sherlock Holmes gets called in on a case
in which
um
there's a murder.
And the murder
is traced The murder is traced to this
gentleman who still exists.
Uh
What Sherlock Holmes figures out is that
it's not a murder, it's a suicide in
which the gun
will
fall into the river at Thor Bridge
because it's tied to a weight.
And the person uses the suicide
to frame someone else.
And it's just one of these genius little
vignettes. And that's what Sinwar was.
He was a genius. He He knew he was going
to die. Who is Sinwar? Sinwar is a
person who who's committed suicide.
Sinwar's suicide was an IDF assisted
suicide. I wrote about this almost
instantly after the October 7th
invasion.
It didn't make any sense that Gaza would
undertake
such an act against Israel given the
asymmetry.
And what this mirrored was that before
the 1990s
So you think Sinwar committed suicide to
then cause
the people of Gaza to invade Israel? No,
no, no. I'm sorry.
Sinwar would be happy enough for all the
Gazans to die.
And so
what he did was he architected a
situation in which Israel would be
compelled to respond using the wrong
tools.
He tricked Israel. And I you know, I'm
very confident to to talk about this
because if you check my old tweets, I
say IDF assisted suicide
and Munchausen by proxy and Zukswang,
right? And I said these are the concepts
familiarize yourself because Israel is
going to invade
Gaza.
And I knew what was going to happen
because took me a like why would you do
this? It doesn't make sense from
first order logic, but third and fourth
order logic you like oh, of course it
makes sense.
This is hybrid war. The most important
thing for Sinwar is video.
Why?
Look at the effect of the video.
The video of Gaza
has turned the world to an extent
against Israel that's sort of
inconceivable.
There's a doctrine called hybrid
warfare.
And I think it came out of
the US in the early 2000s.
And it says that the kinetic component
of warfare, the killing, the actual
shooting and the planes and the bombs
and all this kind of stuff,
is
not the major component.
The social media is really important.
The video is important. The memetic
complex is important.
And
Israel has an advantage over the Gazan
Arabs
in kinetic warfare.
And Sinwar knew that. And he was like,
"Brilliant.
All we need to do is force Israel to
come after us." And this is this thing I
was going to say before the 1990s,
we had a spate of killings
of policemen firing on people who had
pulled toy guns on them.
And we would we would say things and I
remember this like, "Whatever you do,
don't point a toy gun at a policeman.
You're it's Don't you realize what's
going to happen?"
And then somebody coined the phrase
police assisted suicide.
The policeman is the instrument.
That's what I knew was going to happen.
And for better or for worse, BB just
couldn't figure out
where he was.
And BB was dumber and Sinwar was
smarter.
Is there Is there any way back from
here?
Cuz you said this is World War III.
Well, the the way
There There is, but it's slim and it's
evaporating.
I mean, almost everything depends on
Saudi Arabia and the and the Iranians,
the Persians.
If the Persians didn't take this
opportunity to rise up against their
oppressors,
I don't know what they're waiting for.
Yes, you're going to get killed in some
numbers, but
you have to figure out whether you're
interested in tyranny or not.
So, the Persians are absolutely falling
down on the ground on the job
not rising up against the mullahs.
This is a coordinated moment. Like, you
know, there's there's a moment for a
prison break, this would be it. Who are
the mullahs in this scenario? The
Ayatollahs, the The government of Iran.
>> Khamenei, yeah, the the theocratic
government of Iran.
>> So, the rulers of Iran, basically, the
people that are Okay. So, I don't know
if if if you know a a ton of Persians,
they're varied in their religiosity,
but there's a you know, there's an
underground gay scene in Tehran, there's
super hyper-modern
people just like you and me who can't
stand these guys.
Mhm.
And so, you're saying that if they rise
up
>> that would be one of the parts of the
solution. The other thing is Saudi
Arabia and and I have to be very
measured and careful here.
You can't fantasize about the Middle
East becoming
Western Europe overnight.
Every time we do this, we make a
terrible mistake.
When you have a modernizer like MBS in
Saudi Arabia, Who's the ruler of Saudi
Arabia, right? De facto.
He can't
suddenly become a modern person. So, you
know, if if if we end up talking about
Khashoggi and murders and the murdered
journalist and all this stuff, the whole
conversation will derail.
But, he's a modernizer.
And there was a moment
where he needed to not
condemn Israel publicly and thank it
privately,
but to say,
"We've all been terrorized by this
country, and Israel did what everyone
needed.
We needed to rise up against the mullahs
because you can't have a nuclear
theocracy.
You can't have a highly developed notion
of heaven
where this is the this is the anteroom
where you're waiting to get into the
real room.
That issue
of
needing to be rid of an
aspiring nuclear theocracy
is something that in that Israel
undertook. Now,
something that I'm going to say
there's three words in Yiddish which you
may have heard or may not may not,
schlemazel and nebbish.
So, there're three unfortunate people.
You don't want to be any one of those
three. But, the subtlety is that the
schlemazel
is a klutz and the schlemazel spills hot
soup on the schlemazel. So, the
schlemazel is the unfortunate person to
whom bad things happen.
And the nebbish is the weak ineffectual
person who decides that it's his job to
clean up the mess.
So, the schlemazel spills the scalding
hot soup on the schlemazel and the
nebbish cleans it up.
Now, in the US, we've got this terrible
sort of Christian nationalist
uh problem that we've developed which is
what sometimes people call the woke
right
where
we have a bunch of people who've been
badly treated.
White Christian Americans have been
badly treated in the woke era. They've
been forced to salute everybody else's,
yeah.
Yay for uh you know, I don't know,
Honduran uh lesbians day. And and it's
like, okay, enough. We don't we don't
want to do that anymore. We've also done
great things. And
I absolutely think that they've been
mistreated. Yeah.
And they've gone sort of metastatic.
And their attitude is no more wars for
Israel, America first.
What I was getting to with the
schlimazel and the nebbish
is that most Americans don't have any
idea who Kermit Roosevelt was. Do you
have any idea of who Kermit
So, the US and the UK jointly
overthrew
a democratically elected in Iran through
something called Operation Ajax.
We installed the Shah.
And then there's this period where
everybody stupidly celebrates the mini
skirts and the jazz that was going
through Tehran,
which was a bridge too far. In other
words, the mini skirts were really bad
idea.
Because they weren't ready they were
ready for some amount of modernization
and they weren't ready for that. And so
we pushed it too far.
And so we got the mullahs for 40 years.
And now we chop off people's fingers and
we pluck out people's eyes and we
put homosexuals on ropes and dangle them
from from crane. They're barbaric
They're horrible human beings.
Okay? These are really bad men, the
mullahs.
And we did that.
So, the scalding hot soup
is
revolutionary
theocratic Iran.
And we spilled it all over the Middle
East,
which is the schlimazel.
We spilled it on Saudi Arabia. We
spilled it
on Iraq. We spilled it on Israel.
Everybody suffers from having these
people installed because of the US and
the UK instituting a problem back in the
'50s.
And who's the nebbish?
Who cleans this up?
Israel volunteers for this job.
And then Saudi Arabia pretends, "Oh my
god, this is terrible.
Our our Muslim brother is being attacked
by our Jewish
I I I just can't believe anybody's dumb
enough to fall for all of this.
Like we're involved in a story where
nobody can sort things out. There's no
talking heads anyone believes in.
And if I didn't understand this, then
how is it that I have a tweet
from, you know,
10 days after October 7th where I
appeared on Triggernometry. I'm telling
you, Israel hasn't even walked into Gaza
yet, and I know what the strategy is.
Iran sent hypersonic missiles into the
ground in Israel
as a message.
Violence is a language, and they spoke
it well.
The mullahs may be crazy, but they're
still Persians. They're they're
extraordinarily skilled.
And so what they did is they wasted some
of their arsenal saying, "You have no
Iron Dome."
And we're not going to kill you.
We're going to put our missiles, we're
going to waste our missiles by sending
them into your Earth and try to kill no
one.
And these Israelis, these brilliant
genius Israelis who pull off all sorts
of things that the world can't believe,
are dumb enough, some of them, to say,
"Huh, they sent all these missiles and
they couldn't even hit anyone."
And I'm just thinking,
do do do none of you understand
anything?
I I just don't even know where I am.
And I I'm looking at, you know, I know
Tulsi.
Tulsi Gabbard?
>> Yeah.
Tulsi's amazing. She's the head of the
intelligence program for the United
States.
>> Director of National Intelligence,
right?
Tulsi
has seen the devastation not of war, but
of US action abroad. Like we haven't
really had full wars, but we get
involved in Afghanistan or Iraq or
wherever. And in, you know, people die
and there are firefights. It's not like
it has nothing to do with war, but
full-on war is a is a very different
thing. We We say the Iraq war, but I
I want to be very careful about the
language.
War usually involves you getting
rocked at home, not just your your
troops abroad.
I don't think she
I don't think she appreciates the
gravity of the situation. That somehow
what we need to do is we need to
stabilize this thing
for 50 to 100 years while we desperately
try to figure out a long-term solution.
This idea of like just
We're not taking responsibility for the
world we already screwed up.
I don't want to send Americans I you
know, I'm not an Israeli, I'm an
American. I don't want to send my fellow
Americans to die in foreign battles that
we have no business being in, but
we have to take ownership of our history
with oil and energy in the Middle East.
And what does that look like taking
ownership?
Recognizing that we created the mullahs.
And doing what about it?
>> Wait, wait, wait a second. Not just
that, and that we also created a lot of
the heartache
along with Sinwar and to a much lesser
extent Israel
by foisting this two-state solution
on people who would never put up with
it.
Like I I lived in in Israel for 2 years.
And you would have conversations with
Arabs
some of whom are Israelis.
You know, and they would say, "Look, you
know, you just don't understand the West
Bank. You don't understand the
difference between the West Bank and
Gaza."
And they would tell me straight up,
"You're going to get us all killed with
this two-state solution. Stop it."
And I you know, it was very hard for me
to hear.
But
we're just having a child's conversation
about the Middle East.
And I will say this about the UK.
The British Foreign Service
had a different failure mode than the
US. They really learned the regions.
They learned the dialects of the
languages of the countries that they
were involved in. The British Empire
took
many places that they were involved in
seriously. And they have a very
complicated legacy. You know, I'm
I spent a lot of time in Bombay and
there's a lot of debate among very
educated Indians
about figuring out how to think about
the the British legacy. All of the great
institutional
structures that were built, all of the
prejudice and bigotry.
Why was a such a small country able to
colonize such a large land basically
working with the locals, you know, it's
a rich conversation. We're having
childlike conversations about all of
this.
I'm sorry if I'm going on about this,
but
it's just a very weird thing that we're
we can't get anybody's attention.
You can't even get my attention, you
know, I'm watching hypersonic missiles
slam into the places I just was.
And then I'm watching a cat video.
And then I'm trying to figure out what
to order through Uber Eats. And it's
just like I can't stay focused.
It's really important to put this um
to put this right.
And the US screwed up the Middle East
along with the UK really good. And we
have a lot of responsibility. And if we
want to go isolationist, I understand
that.
But you first have to put back the
chicken soup that you spilled. And how
do you do that?
I'm not sure. I'm not the director of
National Intelligence. I'm not
I'm not the Secretary of Defense. I'm
not in the Oval Office. I mean, you
know, it's it's very weird. I was
workmates with J.D. Vance.
You know,
these these are people who are
you know, Bobby Kennedy lives one canyon
over from me in Los Angeles.
The people around
power
in the US,
Godspeed, you know, just just wish them
well.
I don't care what party you're in, but
to to try to sabotage Trump or sabotage
Tulsi or sabotage Pete Hegseth, I
these guys need to figure this out and
they need to be at a totally different
level. And he's figuring it out, peace
in the region.
You know, the peace with
between Egypt and Israel is a shitty,
crappy, horrible peace.
But it's peace.
It's not a loving relationship.
It's not a question of everybody going
back and forth between the two countries
saying, you know, we used to be
enemies, now we're friends. It's a
lousy, cold peace.
I'll take it.
We need to have peace between Israel and
the Palestinian Arabs who can live in
peace. And we need the people who cannot
live in peace,
we need to find someplace else for them
to be.
It is absolutely imperative. And it By
the way, this goes for the Israelis.
There are a small number of hardcore
Israeli settlers who cannot live
uh you know, in peace with their
neighbors.
And it's very important that the people
who cannot live in peace not be there.
Do we need to go to Are you Are you
suggesting that we
focus on regime change in Iran?
That is really the responsibility of the
Persians.
So, I want to I want to get clear on
what you see as a solution because
you're saying the Persian people have to
rise up. The US need to cab and not get
involved in that regime change.
>> I'm saying that
a bunch of things need to happen if
we're to have a long-term solution. I
make you president tomorrow. I hate when
people do this. But I it's the clearest
way of understanding the actions you
would First of all, if I was president
tomorrow, I sure as hell wouldn't be on
a podcast discussing strategy with you.
Trump does it. Yeah, I decline to answer
all sorts of questions on camera.
>> Fair. Yeah.
So, my feeling is is that you do a lot
more behind closed doors. And this idea
of just handing people
"You're the king of the world. What do
you do tomorrow to stop" you know, it's
like don't do that to me cuz it's just
it's a no-win question. If I was going
to I I do a lot of stress in
communication. I'd meet with people in
private. I'd use lots of carrots and
sticks. I'd try to use long-range
thinking, and I wouldn't tell you what
my plan is. And by the way,
I very much respect Donald Trump in
certain ways. One of which is is that
and this confuses our friend Sam Harris
no end.
Sam is always like, "Well, he's not
being truthful. He's not making sense."
He's a negotiator.
You don't sit down to a negotiation with
an open book saying, "Let me make sense
to you."
You sit there saying, "You don't know
what I'm going to do next. You don't
know how big the stick is. You don't
know how much carrot there is.
Maybe I'm prepared to give you more.
Maybe my stick isn't as big as you think
or maybe it's twice as big." Do you
think anyone has get answers?
I'll be honest. I think that Trump is in
part respected because he has some
intuitions about this stuff.
His intuition is not to say everything.
His intuition is that negotiation is
more important than transparency.
And at a time when everybody's craving
transparency. Tell me everything.
No. I'm not going to tell you
everything.
I'm going to try to save some children
today.
I'm going to threaten.
I'm going to cajole.
I'm going to do all sorts of things. And
you know, that's what I do.
I would I would assemble the best people
around me.
I would stop giving so many press
conferences. I wouldn't tweet every 4
seconds. I'd be extremely strategic
about it.
But
you know, the situation
in Tel Aviv and in Gaza makes me sick to
my stomach.
And and in Ukraine.
Almost all of my DNA comes from Ukraine.
At least passed through it.
And I've been there.
And you know,
Russians and
Ukraine used to be known as Little
Russia.
This is a
How are we sitting here watching this?
What [ __ ] decided in 2004
that we were just going to hand full
Article 5 status
to former Soviet
republics without consequence.
It is not the case that I don't I would
love to have Estonia, Latvia, and
Lithuania in NATO.
Not at this cost.
Look,
the world is a brutal brutal place.
We've gotten really bad at at
international
understandings.
I can't stand what's happened to Europe.
Europe has been completely denatured.
We're we're playing with fire
everywhere. And I just I don't know how
to talk about it because
every time I talk about things where I'm
the only person who sounds like this
it's bad for my life.
Look, if you're in general a Ukraine
hawk and you say
you know, we we need to make sure that
Ukraine is completely supported so that
they don't give an inch of territory.
Yeah, you'll take a lot of crap, but
you'll be in a large group.
And if you basically have the idea that
Russia, you know, was minding its own
business and the US was encircling it
and good Russia, bad US.
You'll have a lot of company for that
perspective.
I don't sound like any of that.
The most important thing is to stabilize
the world again and we're not going to
get another chance like World War II if
we're not smart.
We're crazy to give up this order that
we have and
again, you know, one more time I'm
talking about this stuff and I don't
want to be talking about this stuff.
Elon is 100% right. We can't talk about
problems all the time.
It's cheap meaning.
There's an entire universe to explore.
And we're sitting here focused on our
own drama, always.
And I'm getting sucked into it I don't
want.
I want to be talking about traveling
through time and space
using
Easter eggs and hidden features of what
we thought was the space-time continuum.
Because I talked about ketosis on this
podcast and ketones, a brand called
KetoneIQ sent me their little product
here. It was on my desk when I got to
the office. I picked it up, it sat on my
desk for a couple of weeks, then one day
I tried it.
And honestly, I've not looked back ever
since. I now have this everywhere I go.
When I travel all around the world, it's
in my hotel room, my team will put it
there. Before I did the podcast
recording today that I've just finished,
I had a shot of ketone IQ. And as is
always the case when I fall in love with
a product, I called the CEO and asked if
I could invest a couple of million quid
into their company. So, I'm now an
investor in the company as well as them
being a brand sponsor. I find it so easy
to drop into deep focused work when I've
had one of these. I would love you to
try one and see the impact it has on
you, your focus, your productivity, and
your endurance. So, if you want to try
it today, visit ketone.com/steven for
30% off your subscription. Plus, you'll
receive a free with your second
shipment. That's ketone.com/steven.
I'm excited for you.
I am.
Every single one of you watching this
right now has something to offer,
whether it's knowledge, your skills, or
experience, and that means you have
value. Stan Store, the platform I co-own
who are one of the sponsors of this
podcast, turns your knowledge into a
business through one single click. You
can sell digital products, coaching,
communities, and you don't need any
coding experience, either. Just the
drive to start. This is a business I
really believe in, and already $300 has
been earned by creators, coaches, and
entrepreneurs just like you have the
potential to be on Stan Store. These are
people who didn't wait, who heard me
saying things like this, and instead of
procrastinating, started building, then
launched something, and now they're
getting paid to do it. Stan is
incredibly simple and incredibly easy,
and you can link it with a Shopify store
that you're already using if you want
to. I'm on it, and so is my girlfriend
and many of my team. So, if you want to
join, start by launching your own
business with a free 30-day trial. Visit
stevenbartlett.stan.store
and get your setup within minutes.
I've got this uh
this
picture that I came across. Tell me.
Um well, I'd I'd love you to tell me.
This is the flower of life geometric
model. And I was
I was reading through some of your work,
and I came across this sentence that
said, you'd kept a secret for 30 years
in terms of your belief about the nature
of the reality that we live in, and that
you thought maybe it was more than
just the dimensions we experience maybe
there was 14 dimensions.
I've always I wonder this a lot you know
cuz we we're fixated on problems we're
fixated on what we see and what we hear
and what we feel but I wonder sometimes
if if even that is an illusion. I I've
spent a lot of time actually thinking
recently about the simulation theory and
is this whole reality just some
simulation on some kids video game in
another dimension.
Um so I thought you know you're a
physicist.
>> a favor put that in a triangle pattern
here. Okay so we have three monks.
Think of those as vertices of a
tetrahedron.
And think of this coaster floating here
as the fourth vertex. Mhm.
For every
two vertices so the number of vertices
we would agree is four. Yeah what's what
does vertice mean? Points.
>> Yeah one two three four.
>> Idealize these three things in this as
points.
>> Mhm. Draw a line segment between
all of these four vertices. How many
line segments are there?
One two three
four
five six six Yep. So there's six edges
four vertices. How many triangular faces
that have three vertices on them?
Oh four. Yeah this is how to think about
the actual dimensions that we have open
to us. The four faces we know about.
The key point that I was trying to get
at is
I don't believe that you just have the
four dimensions. I believe that you have
all six edges are dimensions.
And all
four vertices are also dimensions.
I'm talking about a hidden world.
It's very interesting physics has gone
stagnant in terms of how we usually
measure progress. The the way we measure
progress is
the change in something called the
action or the Lagrangian, a specialized
device.
And that used to change a lot, and then
in 1973 it stopped changing.
The major thing that we have is we have
no new ideas about how to change the
Lagrangian that anybody finds that
exciting or interesting. So, there's
been no progress. Nobody goes to
Stockholm to get a Nobel Prize because
they changed the Lagrangian of the
world.
What's the Lagrangian? The Lagrangian
So,
you probably think about physics in
terms of equations, like Maxwell's
equations or the Einstein equations or
whatever.
Think about it an equation
as being not the primary thing that
physicists think about. So, I give this
example. The Beatles had four basically
different configurations.
When Ringo was
the front man, he was singing Octopus's
Garden. George Harrison is
singing While My Guitar Gently Weeps.
You know, uh
Paul is singing about Penny Lane, and
John is singing about Strawberry Fields
Forever.
Those four equations,
those would be those different
configurations of the Beatles with one
of them front and everybody else backing
the front man
would be the equations, but the Beatles
would be the Lagrangian. It's the thing
that generates the four different
configurations.
>> Okay.
And there's this bizarre force field
that anybody who wants to talk about
physics and doing something new, in
particular leaving
or traversing time
or multiple dimensions of time, anything
that's really close to
what might be possible gets slammed.
We don't know why.
Because
it's very cheap to explore ideas, and we
have no new ideas.
But the only thing about a new idea in
physics
is that a new idea changes the balance
of power in the world. So you remember
the thing I was saying about AlphaFold
3? Yeah. AlphaFold 3 changed the balance
of power in the world. Bitcoin changed
the balance of power in the world.
The DEFUSE proposal
from the EcoHealth Alliance
changed the balance of power in the
world if that was the source of the
COVID virus.
Anytime somebody has a really big idea,
and the biggest idea and you know, I
talk about this, people don't grasp it.
Probably the most dangerous thought
anyone has ever had
was Rutherford in 1911 saying
I wonder whether
there's a neutral version of the proton.
It doesn't sound dangerous.
But it's hard to send a proton into a
bunch of protons because it's positively
charged and a massive nucleus is really
positively charged and so there's a
repulsion.
If there's a neutral version of the
proton and these things are barely stuck
together with the strong force even
though they're trying to scream away
from each other cuz they want they're
all positively charged.
You can send a neutral version of the
proton right into the center.
Tap and just imagine you have a bunch of
magnets that are trying to flee from
each other and the Velcro around them is
barely holding it together.
So now you
have a bullet in the form of a neutral
proton, a neutron, and it hits this
thing where the magnets want to come
apart and the Velcro is barely holding
it together.
Well, that idea
led to the chain reaction.
And then the nuclear bomb? Well, that
that was the fission bomb.
And then a geometer, so I'm a geometer
and not a physicist.
And a physicist named Edward Teller and
the geometer is named Stanislaw Ulam
said, "I wonder if there's a way to take
the chemical bomb
that creates the fission bomb
and use the fission bomb as the
detonator for a fusion bomb."
So,
bomb number one, bomb number two, bomb
number three.
And what they figured out was is that
the only way to create that
is to reflect light
in a particular way to compress
hydrogen into helium and release
energy.
Because anything other than light
wouldn't get
to this the tertiary stage fast enough
before the atomic bomb, like you're
using a Hiroshima Nagasaki as a
detonator. That's how crazy it is.
So, that chain of ideas, which is maybe
there's a neutral version of the proton,
maybe I can send that into the middle of
an atom that's very heavy that was built
in a stellar collision.
Maybe if I have a bunch of those uranium
or plutonium type things, each one when
they break apart will have more neutrons
inside, that is more neutral protons
that will hit more nuclei that will
release more energy, and maybe that can
then focus the light, the gamma
radiation that comes off of this thing,
or who knows what,
to compress
a narrow rod to create fusion, which
only occurs on the sun in the sun. But
but do it on Earth. So, we're going to
take a little bit of the sun
on Earth.
That chain of ideas
was the most dangerous thing anybody's
ever thunk.
And that's why when you try to do
physics, you don't know, why are people
making fun of me? Why are they being
mean? Why are they dissuading me from
talking?
I don't know.
You have a suspicion. Well, there was a
guy named Jack Ripper,
the unfortunately named Mr. Jack Raper,
who was a reporter in Cleveland,
who for some reason during the war in
1944 decided to vacation in New Mexico.
So, he goes to New Mexico and he comes
back and he says, "I've got a crazy
story.
There's a city that nobody knows about
with a mayor
who's supposed to be the second
Einstein.
And it's the most secretive city in the
world. And the mayor is working on a
doomsday weapon and even the people who
live in the city don't know what it is."
And he writes the story of Los Alamos
and publishes it 1944.
The scoop of the millennium to say
nothing of the century. Nobody knows
about this article.
And it's called Forbidden City.
We pretended that it never happened.
For those that don't know Los Alamos is
where
the atomic the nuclear bomb was, I
guess, conceived and brought to life and
tested.
Well, it was really it was really
designed there and most of the
nuclear processing took place at other
sites, whether Hanford or Oak Ridge, I'm
not sure.
And it was tested a short distance away
uh at the Trinity site.
So, go watch the movie Oppenheimer, if
you will. But, this is why physics
physicists are the only occupation
in the country that doesn't have full
free that there's dangers in believing
in more dimensions that maybe some
people might not want
to be known in the same way that we
didn't want the
My point is
I don't think our government knows the
real secrets of physics.
If I had to make a bet tomorrow, I don't
think there's a secret government office
that knows physics.
Okay? Mhm.
I think that there were a bunch of very
smart people who knew how dangerous
physics was and that the idea that we
would continue to do it in public struck
them as insane.
Because it could lead to destruction.
When I tell you that the most dangerous
idea in human history is maybe there's a
neutral version of the proton. That's
supposed to sound insane.
Mhm. But the entire chain of ideas
results
in nuclear fusion happening on Earth
at the direction of the president of the
United States.
And that's what I'm trying to get at
which people don't understand, which is
you probably don't even realize that the
Department of Energy is really the
Department of Physics.
Because we we we pretend that it's
the Department of Energy. Like we had a
war department that became the
Department of Defense. We're scared of
the possibility of physics. We don't
even want to talk about it.
The the
literally no other occupation
has
lost free speech like physics. There's a
special doctrine called restricted data
that says
you cannot
write
physics on a napkin.
Even if you have nothing to do with the
government, I think even if you're not
an American.
If it has anything that could possibly
have to do with nuclear weapons.
In other words, any advance
that might have to do with nuclear
weapons
you have to recognize that the instant
you put pen to paper or you start
talking to somebody
you're committing
a violation of the 1917 Espionage Act.
And if you think that's crazy, start
exploring the words restricted data,
1917 Espionage Act, 1946 and 1954 Atomic
Energy Acts, the doctrine of born
secret.
It is illegal to pursue Q clearance data
if you don't have a Q clearance, but if
you're creating Q clearance data out of
your own head as a byproduct of trying
to do physics,
you are actually potentially committing
a capital offense.
And your theory of everything, your
theory the theory you just talked to me
about that, what does that mean for the
for the average person that's listening
to this?
In terms of the
the basic
>> This is my point. Did Rutherford
know what he was doing?
No. So,
I talk about this a lot, but I do think
it's probably one of the greatest lyrics
ever in any song.
And unfortunately, it occurs in
a song that got way too popular.
Um
The baffled king composing hallelujah,
that line.
A baffled king does not realize what he
is doing when he composes.
Rutherford was a baffled king.
Maybe there is a neutral version of the
proton.
He was composing the end of the human
race.
And your ideas about the nature of
reality
>> person.
And your proposal I I am baffled.
I don't know what it leads to is what
I'm trying to tell you. But your
assertion is that there's more than this
dimension that we understand and more
than our understanding
>> you that I can name for you what
particles there are left to be found.
Mhm.
And the what comes back to me
is you don't have any predictions. And
I'm thinking,
this doesn't even make sense.
Literally, I'm telling you there are
maybe there's a neutral version of the
proton doesn't begin to talk about all
the things that I'm talking about.
So many new forces, so many new
particles, ways to go in
there's There's longer an arrow of time
in my theory.
So, you could live forever
theoretically. What does it mean?
If If you think about a final theory,
and again, by the way, I just want to
say something. I say my theory sometimes
when I'm having to defend it, but it
isn't mine.
It It It just is.
You know,
Everest didn't belong
to Sir Edmund Hillary or to Mallory or
even to the surveyor for whom the
mountain is named.
When you chose to make the first ascent
on Everest,
you just chose a route, and then you
either did or did not traverse the
route. We don't know whether Mallory may
have succeeded.
But, my point is that this isn't my
theory.
There is a theory that's there.
It might be wrong.
It's possible.
I may have screwed it up.
But,
it's got so much in it that I have no
idea what it means.
And the simple way to understand this
theory is that there's dimensions that
exist beyond the ones that we know. We
already know from Einstein
that these dimensions are implicitly
in Einstein's theory.
Every single dimension that I'm talking
about
is being constructed out of the four
that we began with. When I put the cups
here and the coaster,
the edges were calculated from the
vertices, and the faces were calculated
from the edges. Mhm. My point being,
these dimensions are already here.
And because the dimensions are already
here,
they were already present in Einstein's
theory all along. When you ask for what
Einstein's real equation is,
we actually don't think about it that
way. We call it the Einstein field
equations, plural. How many of them are
there?
10.
Why are there 10?
Because there are
six edges
and four vertices
that weren't accounted for. They're
already in Einstein's theory.
We just didn't take them seriously as
directions you could go in. You've heard
about this simulation theory, haven't
you?
What? I don't want to talk about it.
Really? Well,
it gets to the LLM problem.
The really interesting thing comes from
I don't know
and maybe the maybe the cosmos is
traversable.
Maybe times travel replaces time travel.
You see, if I flip all of the dimensions
of time
and space.
So, I have one of time, three of space
in Einstein's theory.
Okay? The time dimension gets a minus
sign. The the three spatial dimensions
get a plus sign. And the three spatial
dimensions are
>> X, Y, and Z. Yeah. Z. Forgive me. Which
is for for a simple person
depth, width, and height. Yeah, you can
go like forward, backward, up, down.
>> Right. Okay? So, we have three
dimensions there and then we have one of
time because the conversation takes
place over time. You're moving around.
Now, flip
the time dimension to being plus when it
was minus before and all the plus
dimensions to being minus. So, I have
now I have three time dimensions and one
space dimension.
It would look exactly the same.
The one space dimension would take the
function of time and the three time
dimensions would have the function of
space.
We don't even teach people the idea
that there is not necessarily an arrow
of time if time is not one-dimensional.
The only dimension that has an arrow
is one.
If something has one dimension, you can
say
And you know, I tried to do this on
Rogan. I said, "If you have a cassette
tape
and you want to go back to an earlier
song." Again, your younger listeners
will have no idea what we're talking
about.
Um you have to go back through all of
the songs before. But if you have a
stylus on a turntable, some of them will
be hipsters with vinyl in their own
homes,
you can lift the stylus up and it
doesn't need to go back and
unplay each song in reverse. Mhm.
Okay.
You may be able to go back in time
without going back through time.
I don't know what this means, but it's a
lot like saying maybe there's a neutral
version of the proton. Now, what I'm
concerned about
is that essentially none of my physics
friends know that there is a doctrine of
restricted data. They've never heard of
the 1946 and 54 Atomic Energy Acts. They
don't know that the Department of Energy
that funds them
is really the the Department of Physics.
They don't know the extent to which we
went to hide all of this stuff. They
don't know that they're not allowed to
talk
to foreign nationals from hostile
nations on our own soil
because of a doctrine called deemed
exports. There's an entire hidden world
of national security. And the penalty
for talking about national security
with people who don't live that
is that you're a conspiracy theorist.
It's like,
"Do you have any of this terminology? Do
you know the acts? Do you want to Google
it? Well, you're
This is also just something that's
really interesting about the UFO UAP
world. We had this admission recently
that the government knew that at a
minimum, and again, I don't think this
is by anywhere close to the full story,
at a minimum, there were secret fake
special access programs. Do you know
about special access programs? Su- super
secret programs are called special
access programs.
Then there's a further category called
unacknowledged special access programs
or USAPs, which is
you can know that a special access
program exists.
Like, you know, maybe warhead recovery
is a might be a known one.
But then like there might be an
unacknowledged special access program,
which is like
theft of a foreign nuclear warheads,
which we It's not even on the books.
Only only the super secret lawmakers,
you know, in the gang of eight or
whatever it is, can know that that
exists.
And then there are further designations
of
secretness. There's waved and bigoted.
So, you could have like a waved bigoted
unacknowledged special access program.
And you don't know any of this language.
And then there's this chorus of morons
who the instant you start to educate
people about the existence of the su-
super secret squirrel club
rise up and say
this is all conspiracy theory.
And you're saying,
"Wait a second. We just admitted in UFO
UAP land
that we have a fake special access
program, which I predicted on Joe Rogan.
I said, "We may be faking a UFO
situation."
The cost and the penalty at a personal
level
for letting people know how the
government keeps secrets is personal
destruction.
The US faked a UFO program.
>> Yes, correct. You don't know about this.
I think the Wall Street Journal had an
article about it. So, these guys knew
when they filed their reports on the UFO
UAP
that there actually is
at a minimum a fake UFO UAP program.
Why would they want to fake UFOs?
This is so weird.
Did you Did you happen to watch
Joe Rogan episode 1945 where I talked
about the whole history of the golden
age of general relativity and its
relationship to UFO UAP anti-gravity
research and the atomic bomb? I didn't.
No. Okay.
When we invaded
the beaches of Normandy on D-Day,
that was called Operation Overlord.
We had an entirely fake invasion planned
of Norway called Operation Fortitude
that was part of Operation Bodyguard
which is part of just total deception.
And why? Because we were building up
troops to do something huge.
So, we tried to convince We like planted
plans for the invasion of Norway on dead
bodies to wash up on beaches so the
Germans would find them.
We fake stuff all the time.
That's what we do.
And
you can't talk about what we do that is
deceptive without being ruined by what
are called
covert influence operations.
Like if you'll
watch my Twitter account, you'll see all
sorts of accounts descend on it. Fraud,
charlatan, grifter, blah blah blah blah
blah blah.
Some of that is just people being mean.
But you'll notice that like if I really
start talking about physics and I start
talking about security and I start
talking about things that anyone can
Google and most of us don't think to do
it.
Suddenly it gets really really intense.
And the whole point is it's supposed to
be untraceable.
It's supposed to be a way in which
like almost certainly
we know a ton about what happened in the
Wuhan Institute of Virology
because of two bioweapons conventions
that we were signatories in to and which
we ratified. There's the Geneva
Convention and a bioweapons convention
in the 1970s.
But that's not top of mind for ordinary
people. They just watched,
you know, their great-grandma die and
they're watched their children get sick
and they watched their own brain fog.
They can't know whether that was a
bioweapon that we were working on coming
out of the University of North Carolina
Chapel Hill with Ralph Baric's lab.
You know, we're we're up to constant
secret stuff.
Why would they fake the UFOs, though?
What was the What was that a distraction
for?
>> seen the B-2 bomber? Yeah.
What if you saw that before we were
ready to say it existed? Yeah, you'd
think it was a UFO or something.
>> So, wouldn't it be better if we had a
UFO
story ready to go when we had cool
aerospace? Oh, okay. So, you're saying
they're working on something which they
didn't want you to know is what's What's
more, what if we convinced China or
Russia or Iran
that we had incredible powers that they
don't have?
Then they might be very reluctant to
strike us.
Or they might waste a tremendous amount
of money developing
anti-gravity technology when there's no
such thing.
There are plenty of good reasons to fake
such thing. Why would we fake an Why
would we plan an invasion of Norway?
If we weren't going to invade. But if
that's a distraction technique, do you
have any hypothesis as to what was going
on there? But that's not my job. Okay.
Because as soon as you do that, I know
that my the quality of my guessing is
not going to be at the quality of my
detecting when we're up to [ __ ]
Okay. So, in other words, if you ask me,
"Why is physics stagnant?"
I can say, "I don't know, but there's a
decent chance that we know how dangerous
physics is and that it's crazy to do it
in an open university environment. We've
taken precautions. We have a system of
national laboratories,
which are effectively our secret
university system,
uh where you have to be an American. So,
we're we're using our regular
universities and the whole world comes
through it.
You know, we have Chinese people
learning physics side by side our own
people.
And I guess you're saying that you don't
know if UFOs exist, but you you'll
you'll show now that they were faking
this whole thing.
>> positive that we have
unacknowledged programs
that have UFO written on the side of
them.
Okay. In other words, the number of
people who repeat who repeat strikingly
similar things
who appear to be completely sober in
every other respect with no known acting
ability, there is no way in the world
that these people just spontaneously
have decided to destroy their sanity,
their career, and their reputation.
I've got you.
>> At a minimum, we're faking.
I think we are doing a lot more than
faking a UFO program.
I don't know what it is, and I also
would not be talking about this on a
large podcast but for one thing.
I have a particular hatred for one
aspect of our intelligence community.
And I I don't mean that I dis- disagree
or don't like or I'm not uncomfortable.
When
our secret squirrel club inside the
intelligence world and inside in
particular covert operations targets our
own people who are not read into these
programs for personal destruction,
reputational destruction, mental
destruction, economic destruction. We
take our best people and we make fun of
them.
And we belittle them, and we destroy
their families, their lives, their
ability to earn.
I have a very strong sense that you
never destroy your best people.
Do you think you're under attack?
Let me talk about Leo Szilard instead.
Leo Szilard is the father of the
Manhattan Project.
Which was the where the nuclear bomb was
created? That's right. He was not
allowed to go inside the Manhattan
Project because they didn't trust him.
He was a genius.
He was the idea for the Manhattan
Project. He and Einstein made sure that
it happened.
The government barely trusted
Oppenheimer if you saw the film.
What they did with Leo Szilard was they
minded him.
They knew how good he was. They knew how
important he was. They listened to him
and they didn't destroy him. He
undoubtedly knew that the program was
going on.
But he wasn't allowed inside the
program.
I think that's okay.
I think it's okay that our security
state
recognizes that some people are not cut
out to keep secrets. Some people are not
cut out
to die with certain facts that have to
be kept hidden. That's fine.
The desire of our government to destroy
people who have no idea what they've
tripped over
because our government isn't good enough
to keep its own secrets.
This is an abomination.
You cannot destroy your A team.
Who are you referring to when you say
people are being destroyed? Are you
referring to people like yourself?
You know,
if you look at for example
Jeffrey Epstein.
Jeffrey Epstein conducted a conference
called Confronting Gravity.
I don't know who Jeffrey Epstein was,
but I'll I would certainly bet money
that he was It's product of at least one
uh
or more elements of the intelligence
community. The CIA, the FBI? That those
are ours.
Right? Department of Homeland Security
has some of the stuff.
Geospatial intelligence has some of this
You know, it's a it's a large network.
Um I'm talking about people like David
Grusch.
I'm talking about people potentially
like David Fravor.
I'm talking about people like Jake
Barber.
I'm talking about scientists.
Like Leo Szilard.
Imagine if Leo Szilard didn't know that
the Manhattan Project was going on. Or
Jack Ruby, a journalist who broke a
story. These people all think that
they're doing their jobs.
I desperately want to know why Jeffrey
Epstein knew so much
about my work.
And I want to know why he was connected
to my graduate program.
I was I was in the Harvard mathematics
department. Jeffrey Epstein was
absolutely connected to the Harvard math
department. I want to know why. How was
he connected to the math department?
You're pushing me to say things I'm not
going to say.
But I I don't mind
>> I'm curious. I'm not trying to push you
away.
>> But I'm just not going to do it. I'm
saying that anybody who wants
But you say he was connected to the math
department.
>> Harvard mathematics department.
>> How did you know he was connected?
You can Google it. You could Google it
right now.
This is not
I I can point at all sorts of stuff
that's hidden in plain sight. So, I'll
take your word for it. And the assertion
that I'm picking up on is that Jeffrey
Epstein was planted in your world to I'm
not saying he's planted. I don't know
who he was. I don't know who ran him. He
certainly was not a financier in any
standard sense. Really? That was a cover
story, yes. The way that we know Jeffrey
Epstein in the UK especially is just
this guy who was this rich guy who had
this island who brought people there and
then did these
despicable things there.
>> Disgraced financier Jeffrey Epstein.
Yeah, that's what we That's the story.
>> Disgraced financier Jeffrey Epstein.
It's called perseveration. He was a
disgraced financier. What kind of a
financier? A disgraced one. What was his
name? Oh, it was disgraced financier
Jeffrey Epstein.
They perseverate that into your mind so
that you auto complete that in your LLM
life.
Do you believe that that's what Jeffrey
Epstein was?
You met him you
Yeah. I'm What do you see as disgraced?
I mean financier? He wasn't a financier
the day I met him. What was he?
He was a weird guy who didn't seem to
know a lot about currency trading.
Claiming to run a multi-billion dollar
FX hedge fund.
When you say a weird guy, what made him
weird?
Same stuff I've said on Chris Weidman.
I'm not going to go back through that.
Just
My my point is you're getting a
different interview.
Right? Mhm. So, what I'm trying to get
at is
Jeffrey Epstein knew a tremendous amount
about my work when nobody knew anything
about my work.
And he had a pipeline into me that I
didn't understand, which is that he was
connected to my graduate program.
And you can check out the conference
called exploring gravity
And hosted physical workshop called
confronting gravity.
>> Confronting gravity, that's right. In
March 2006.
>> Yeah, what is Jeffrey Epstein Jeffrey
Epstein is very focused on gravity.
Was it a gravity conference? Yeah. It
was about gravity. Yeah. What the [ __ ]
was he doing talking about bloody
gravity if he's a financier? It was very
important to get Nobel laureates and
some of the smartest people on Earth to
come to the Virgin Islands and talk
about gravity. Stephen Hawking was
there, David Gross was there, Lawrence
Krauss was there, Lisa Randall was
there.
Right before his conviction.
And I'm telling you he was very focused
on the Harvard math department.
And he knew all about me in ways that he
wasn't supposed to.
I have to I have to be clear. I have to
be clear on my understanding of what
you're saying. From what I understood
and you can say Stephen I'm not going to
answer that whatever but I just have to
cuz I you've opened up a curiosity hole
in my mind. So let me try and fill it
even if it's the conversation I had with
Chris I
um I'll just evade you if you Yeah,
yeah, fine. You're within the rights to
evade me and I hold the right to ask
which is um
So is
what I'm hearing is you believe I'm just
going to say it how I think it is what
I'm hearing is you believe that Jeff
Jeffrey Epstein was not a financier. He
was planted He was a construct
is what I said. He was a construct
in some way
to
mess with the
progression of physics.
Jeffrey Epstein
apparently I think some I'll tell you
what I said. When I met him
and the meeting was over I immediately
called my wife.
And I said, I have just met a construct.
She said, what do you mean? I said, this
person is not who they claim to be.
Somebody has constructed this human
being to be something that they are not.
Which is a hedge fund genius.
Somebody who could understand the euro
and the yen like nobody else. [ __ ]
Not true.
I believe that whoever constructed
Jeffrey Epstein was running multiple
different programs through the same
thing having put in a large initial
investment.
It wasn't about one thing. If you build
a mall, you don't just have clothing
stores in the mall. You have a food
court in the mall.
Right? You have jewelry in the mall. You
you you have all sorts of different
things in the mall.
Jeffrey Epstein was
a construct of something
that was running multiple things. One of
those things was science and I I think
that the science and the pedophilia were
necessarily in the same bucket.
He was funding all sorts of people.
I don't think everybody at that, you
know, part of the problem with calling
his plane the Lolita Express and calling
his island Pedophile Island
is is that
you just can't see all the different
things that were going through this guy.
I don't think almost any of the
scientists are exposed you know, maybe a
few of them, but very few of them
to anything really horrible.
I think he was trying to keep a
periscope on everything that was
interesting.
And I think that his girlfriend's father
Robert Maxwell
was all through scientific pub-
publishing.
And I think Pergamon Press was in part a
control mechanism
for making sure that
revolutionary discoveries were taking
place within a framework.
Anybody can Look,
you can write
a Substack article and you can hit post
and suddenly the world has access to
your Substack article.
That is a nightmare. What if somebody
posts, you know, weaponized anthrax?
What if they do the equivalent of
saying, "What if there's a neutral
proton?"
So, you think he was controlling
science? I think that Robert Maxwell was
in part trying to control science. I
think Jeffrey Epstein was in part trying
to fund science, trying to control it. I
don't really know.
Again, you know, part of the problem
with why conspiracy theorists have a bad
name
is that they're not content to live in
ignorance.
And I mean I am.
I I know something is really off with
the story.
What
If If you look at me saying things like
you don't know whether Biden is going to
make it to November.
Ha ha ha, Eric, you know, what an idiot,
blah blah blah, okay?
Then he has a debate. He doesn't make it
to November.
You know, I'm not Nostradamus. I'm just
dumb enough to say something in public
that that makes sense. Let me say
something in public that makes sense.
Our national security people suck at
their jobs.
The people who are in charge
of the Department of Energy, which is
masking the Department of Physics, which
is masking the Department of Nuclear
Weapons, right?
The Atomic Energy Acts, which are really
about atomic weaponry,
recast as Atoms for Peace or who knows
what. Jeffrey Epstein, who is not a
disgraced financier.
The newspapers that have always had a
national interest component and have
liaisons so that they can work with the
CIA and the State Department and they do
each other's bidding and scratch each
other. This whole network
is the is what I've called managed
reality. We live in managed reality.
We are all in some version of the Truman
Show.
And you can look at it, you can Google
it. I can give you a million search
terms and every time I give a million
search terms, you'll watch my reputation
get torn apart.
Are you going to blame me that you
didn't know what the whole of society
approach is because you didn't know the
Daniel K. Inouye Center for Security in
the Pacific came up with an idea for
soft fascism to fight hybrid wars? You
didn't know what hybrid warfare?
Look look at my talk at ARC, Jordan
Peterson's group, the Alliance for
Responsible Citizenship. It's at almost
2 million views. And why is it? Because
people are saying, "I didn't know these
terms."
Did you know what the Human Terrain
Project is? Do you know Do you know
about human terrain?
You're a mountain, I'm a valley, and
instead of war
planners figuring out how do we use that
valley to capture that mountain top
because it gives us a
an eagle's nest you know, to snipe from
or whatever, they say, "Okay,
this is the second most powerful podcast
in the in the world, second to Joe
Rogan. How do we capture him?
[ __ ]
Leave me alone, please.
>> No, but that's what I'm trying to say.
You're human terrain. Yeah.
When the human terrain wakes up and
says, "Wait a minute, I'm human
terrain."
Well, my feeling is if you don't want me
to talk about this on a podcast, then
keep your terms
separate.
Nobody knew the term pre-bunked
malinformation. Do you know what
pre-bunked malinformation is?
Malinformation is information we don't
want to get out.
Technically, people try to pretend that
it's information that will be
misinterpreted, but really it's
real stuff that is deleterious to the
narratives that we're trying to push
forward and what we're trying to do. And
pre-bunked means discredited.
So, we knew what debunked dis We have to
debunk this information. We get that.
But you didn't know that we had to
pre-bunk malinformation, which is we
have to destroy truth tellers.
What do you think that means for people
like me as podcasters?
You know, cuz we're doing these
long-form conversations. I
taking
>> back. You'll say, "That was a really
interesting talk."
And then you'll have somebody else on
who'll be talking about the importance
of melatonin and how we don't understand
uh
the role of sleep.
And then you'll have somebody else, you
know, on with who will be talking about
how do you do a
a clothing brand from scratch uh and
turn it into a billion-dollar unicorn.
You're not going to stay here on this
topic.
This is your time with me.
And it'll have some effect, and it'll
start to fade.
And and and that's what this is.
I'd love to be doing my podcast.
I just don't know how to do it safely.
I I talk about taking our lives back
from the intelligence community. I want
to talk about taking our lives back from
Silicon Valley, even though those people
are my friends.
I want to talk about taking my life back
from the phone.
From despair, from not having a future.
I want to talk about having a glorious
existence that is not mediated by morons
who sit inside the Beltway
and play with large budgets and hurt
people. Particularly really good people
who are good at their job, we're trying
to figure out how to advance
humankind, their family, the national
interest, and get fouled.
I did not ask for Jeffrey Epstein to
fall into my life.
I met him once.
But it was enough to know, "Holy cow,
the Harvard math department can't be
what I think it is."
Why was he there? I didn't even know I
never heard his name when I was there.
Is that where you met him? In the in
Harvard?
>> No, no, no.
I think one very powerful people at JP
JP Morgan
told me I needed to meet him.
He didn't want to talk about finance.
He wanted to talk about science.
You can't do your podcast safely.
Do you think
>> My employer was a special informant to
the FBI.
He's like one of my closest friends. I'm
not going to say who it is.
Your employer?
Yeah, and one of my closest friends.
I I live under a periscope.
Proctoscope is really what I meant, but
Yeah, I don't I want to do physics, man.
I'm really, really good at it.
You know?
And if we have an idea that we shouldn't
do physics in public, I would like to
have a call from somebody inside.
Hey Eric, we we need you to come in.
Okay, great.
What's up?
But I didn't use your resources. I
didn't use your grants.
Nobody ever informed me. My God, nobody
ever informed me about restricted data.
How many people on Earth know that
there's a doctrine that says physicists
don't have free speech?
We can execute you for doing your job.
It's never been tested in the courts and
I hope that the Supreme Court will not
allow it.
But you know, if we have a problem that
is so serious in theoretical physics
that
it needs the the world's largest
exemption from free speech.
We need to amend the Constitution. You
can't just do this as a sneak attack
where you reserve the right casually to
hook the 1917 Espionage Act up against
the 1946 and 54 Atomic Energy Acts.
I I've canvassed my physics colleagues.
You know, like one of the memes against
me, which is very funny, is that no
physicists take me seriously when I'm in
their offices all the time.
I I just don't know what my life is.
And and with this latest advent of war
in the Middle East
are you really going to pretend that if
you can Google all of these things that
I have no idea what I'm talking about?
I'm looking to have a conversation with
my own government.
I'm looking to have a conversation about
theoretical physics.
And I can do it quietly, but I have
rights and I do not believe that the
1946 and 1954 Atomic Energy Acts are
constitutional.
Try me.
There is no restricted data.
You can't do that to an American.
And you can't just keep mounting covert
influence campaigns, you know?
I just spent 5 days in a physics
department. I'm not allowed to say that
it was 5 days in a physics department as
a visitor.
I gave a talk. I'm not allowed to say
that I gave a talk.
I don't know what this is.
And I'm tired of it, you know? It's just
like
If you're managing the Middle East this
badly, if you're managing physics this
badly, if you're managing the national
economy this badly,
if you screwed up COVID this badly by
getting inside of the Lancet and Nature,
you know, peer review is this fake thing
that supposedly stretches back to the
founding of the Royal Society. And it's
very clear from the scholarship around
it
that it comes out of night period
between 1965 and 1975 initiated by the
Medicare Act
predicated on the need for
editors for the journal expansion
founded by Pergamon Press and Robert
Maxwell. By 1975,
there's a giant battle between the NSF
and both fiscal and cultural
conservatives
against something called Man: A Course
of Study or MACOS
where peer review
was born in a Utah clinic,
uh came out of the medical literature
because the federal government in 1965
with the Medicare Act picked up the need
to pay for so many medical procedures.
They wanted to say, "Why are we
assigning this many medical procedures?"
The doctors circled the wagons and said,
"We will peer review each other."
Then in night By 1975, the NSF was under
the um microscope and they used peer
review as a self-defense of last resort
to say we will be reviewing each other,
right? Peer review is a myth.
The scholarship is clear as day.
I I can't keep going on the world's
largest podcast saying everything that
can be Googled and figured out, and just
constantly have as my reward
that the government refuses to have a
conversation with me and sends its
gaggle of
of idiots to harass me.
You think it's doing that? It's sending
a gaggle of
Yes, I do. I do think I think that some
of them are actual idiots who just enjoy
having causing problems, but I think
more than anything, we have a real
problem.
Science is too powerful.
The real if you wanted to just cut to
the
ultimate core of this,
if four amino acids can shut down planet
Earth,
if what is it, a nine-page paper
solving the double spin problem can
create a new currency not backed by
violence, but backed by mathematics,
if the concept of an inner product in a
large vector space
generates something you can't tell isn't
a human being
in 2017,
do you have any idea what the power of
the human mind is
at this point?
Linear algebra
can create something that you would fall
in love with.
It can create the most beautiful music
you can imagine, or can animate a photo
of a dead relative so that you can
actually have the experience of having
some video of you with a great
grandparent you can't even remember.
Science is the most amazing, powerful,
crazy stuff possible.
And we spend a fortune
trying to convince people that
scientists are worthless.
That scientists are incapable.
And in large measure they've convinced
the scientists themselves. My My
colleagues, the supposed physicists,
will spend their entire lives pretending
to do physics and retire without ever
having actually done any.
I was in this physics department I was
just in. It's been a long time since I
since I've spent that long as a visitor.
The top people in this physics
department
professed that they had no interest in
the physical world.
That they only cared about the
mathematics that they were doing. And I
just thought,
you're in a theoretical physics
group
and you profess openly that you have no
interest whatsoever in the physical
world.
Well done.
I don't know who you were.
I don't know how you did it, but it took
you four decades to get the physicist to
stop caring about the physical physical
world.
Somehow what we did
is we stopped the world's most powerful
and the world's most important group
from making progress. And why Elon Musk
is not out here
saving this
by just throwing a few billion at it.
You know, Elon, if you're out there,
it's ad astra, yes or no?
Mars is a stopgap message. Do you want
to go to the stars? Is there something
we don't know?
To the Department of Energy, do you want
to have conversations?
Is there anyone at all out here? That's
my question. That's why I do the
podcasts. And it's By the way, I'm
repeating myself. I've said this before.
Send lawyers, guns, and money. There's
no one out here.
But, I will say this.
If we could get out of here,
you know, in terms of transcendence, in
terms of things that are really
exciting, there's nothing that I had
greater pleasure at as a father than
taking my children for meteor showers.
We take the dog, go to a secret location
outside of Los Angeles that's quite
dark.
We just lie under the sky
and watch for hours,
you know?
And look up at the heavens and think,
"My god, that's a destination. That's
someplace I could go."
I don't think that there's a more
inspiring thing than to figure out the
infinity of space, all of these galaxies
in the deep-field photographs of these
space telescopes,
filled with worlds.
And we're stuck here.
It's like, "It's enough already. Time to
go. Let's have some fun." That's That's
really what I'm excited about.
Been great here Great to be here.
Thank you for being here.
Super fascinating and it's spun my brain
in several different directions at the
same time.
I want to I want to bring it um back to
the person who's who's got to the end of
this conversation and they're sat at
home in their boxer shorts, maybe
listening on their iPhone as they fall
asleep, wherever they are in the world
or on a train or plane or whatever, and
allow you to offer them some kind of
closing message that might make their
life better
in some way.
It's a broad brief, but I think it's the
most important brief, which is
you know, uh can having heard everything
we've talked about today,
what advice would you give the listener,
an actionable piece of advice so that
they could live
a subjectively better life?
The songs of Tom Lehrer are pretty
terrific, as are the operettas of
Gilbert and Sullivan. You might want to
explore the Azores as well as the
Indonesian
archipelago. Indonesian's one of the
easiest languages to learn because it's
been denuded of most of the complexity
that screw up people have a hard time
learning other languages.
Buy a poster of tropical fruit and make
sure that you visit every single one on
that poster before it's time for lights
out.
Consider Box B Minor Mass and the cello
suites particularly by Pablo Casals and
take a serious listen to Yma Sumac
uh singing Stormy Monday in an album
called Live from Blues Alley to see if
uh
you really know how to feel things. I
think Professor Longhair's Big Chief
is one of the most brilliant pieces of
piano music. It's absolutely inspiring
and if you really like that, James
Carroll Booker the Third has an album
called The Resurrection of the Bayou
Maharaja.
Seriously think about
visiting the island of Saint Helena in
the South Atlantic.
Take a look at Kurt J. Mangles channel.
He's doing amazing stuff being done by
no one else on Earth. I think that Chris
Buck is really amazing and if you think
that Crossroads is good, have a listen
to his version of Miss You by The
Rolling Stones.
An incredible groove and I didn't really
appreciate it the first time I heard it.
I think that the people making Spark
Amps at Positive Grid
and the my friends at Neural DSP
uh with the Quad Cortex will blow your
mind with how much great audio equipment
you can make. You can get a good
electric guitar for a few hundred bucks
thanks to advances in China.
Put it into an open tuning and buy
yourself a slide or just slide a glass
along it and you'll be able to play most
songs that you care about with in a
minute or two, maybe three cuz you only
need three chords.
Get married.
It may not work out. It may be
miserable. Have some kids. There's
nothing else great to do on this planet.
At at give it a try. And if your parents
won't pressure you to do it, I'm happy
to do it.
Try to keep this thing going.
Try to keep this thing going. Try to
dream big about legacy. Don't feel
embarrassed about wanting to conquer the
world or leave a permanent stain. Get
out of this moment where everybody's
worried about narcissism and drama.
Listen for meteor showers. They're
announced regularly. Nobody actually
does anything about them and it's worth
inconveniencing yourself with people you
love and take the dog.
Really seriously think about you won't
whether you want to pile on when you see
what is almost certainly
a federal or other campaign targeting
people who are standing up for you,
whether they're trying to figure out
where COVID came from, trying to figure
out who was behind Jeffrey Epstein.
Recognize that almost everything you've
been taught to do in terms of hating
Israel is part of somebody's campaign.
Out of cutter, the situation in Gaza is
incredibly dire. Don't stop caring about
the people who are living under that.
Recognize that the Persians are not the
mullahs.
Get involved.
Wish your
Wish your country's leadership well even
if you didn't vote for them and you
think that they're horrible people.
They've got very hard work to do.
Be good to each other. Try. It's a grand
adventure.
And um
make sure you have some fun before it's
lights out.
That's it.
We have a closing tradition where the
last guest leaves a question for the
next guest not knowing who they're
leaving it for.
And the question that was left for you
I love this question.
What is the problem that you are doing
the most mental gymnastics to avoid?
Pass.
>> I know the answer. It's not appropriate
for your audience.
One of the things about being in the hot
seat on podcasts
is is that it is not right to force
anyone to respond to a question. I know
how to falsify an answer to that and I'm
not going to do that and I'm not going
to share the answer to that question
because it's not appropriate. But it's a
great question. Feel free to leave it
for someone else. It doesn't seem fair.
Whoever you were, thank you for the
question.
Obviously, my reaction was just
tremendous curiosity, which would be a
natural reaction to what you just said.
Thank you for a great interview.
>> Thank you so much for being here. I was
so grateful to you. So unbelievably
fascinating and
you've given me so much
Unfortunately, you've given me a lot of
answers, but you've given me even more
questions and maybe that's the product
of a good conversation.
>> in LA? Yeah. We'll do it again. Thank
you so much for your time. I really
appreciate you. I appreciate you. Thank
you. Thanks.
We launched these conversation cards and
they sold out. We launched them again
and they sold out again. We launched
them again and they sold out again
because people love playing these with
colleagues at work, with friends at home
and also with family. And we've also got
a big audience that use them as journal
prompts. Every single time a guest comes
on the Diary of a CEO, they leave a
question for the next guest in the diary
and I've sat here with some of the most
incredible people in the world and
they've left all of these questions in
the diary and I've ranked them from one
to three in terms of the depth. One
being a starter question and a level
three, if you look on the back here,
this is a level three, becomes a much
deeper question that builds even more
connection. If you turn the cards over
and you scan that QR code, you can see
who answered the card and watch the
video of them answering it in real time.
So if you would like to get your hands
on some of these conversation cards, go
to the diary.com or look at the link in
the description below.
Ask follow-up questions or revisit key timestamps.
This episode features mathematician and thinker Eric Weinstein in a wide-ranging conversation with Steven Bartlett. Weinstein discusses his concerns about the state of science, the stagnation of physics, the dangers of elite networks, and the geopolitical tensions he believes mark the end of the post-World War II order. He also touches on his personal view of religion as a necessary social substrate, his reflections on legacy, and his thoughts on AI as a transformative but potentially dangerous force, all while advocating for a more profound search for meaning in life.
Videos recently processed by our community