Here’s Why China is MAD About Venezuela | China Decode
845 segments
Venezuela is not Taiwan in terms of
China's core interests. It is a
important strategic foothold uh for
China in Latin America. I mean, it was
described as an all-weather strategic
partnership back in 2023. So, this was a
critical relationship that has, I think,
been [music] weakened with the Trump
administration's move.
[music]
Welcome to China Decode. I'm Alice Han
>> and I'm James King. In today's episode
of China Decode, we're discussing how
China will respond to Trump's takeover
of Venezuela, a turning point in the
electric vehicle race, and China's
luxury food boom. That's all coming up.
But first, let's do a quick check-in
with how the Chinese markets are
starting the week. On Monday, the
Shanghai Asshare index rose 1.4% on its
first trading day of the year. The
Hangshare index rose less than 0.1%
hovering near a 7-week high. Oil
companies Petrochina and China National
Offshore Oil Corporation both fell more
than 3% due to their ties to Venezuela.
And Miniax, a Shanghai based AI company
backed by both Alibaba and Tencent, is
expected to begin trading on the Hong
Kong stock exchange within the week at
an IPO valuation of $6.5 billion. All
right, let's get right into it. China
just watched the US pull off a lightning
strike and takeover in Venezuela,
removing the leader Nicholas Maduro and
threatening to take some control over
the nation's oil industry. Now, this
happened just hours after Beijing's top
envoy was sitting with Maduro himself.
Now, this timing could be accidental or
it could be the opposite. But for China,
Venezuela isn't just an ideological
ally. It is a significant energy
supplier, a major data, a strategic
foothold in Latin America and a test
case for pushing against US dominance in
the Western Hemisphere. A day after the
US operation, the Chinese Foreign
Ministry declared itself quote unquote
deeply shocked and strongly condemned
the flagrant use of force by the United
States against a sovereign state. So the
real question now isn't so much whether
China is angry, it's how it will
respond. Will Beijing swallow the loss
and play the long game? Or does Trump's
move force China to harden its posture
elsewhere from Latin America to Taiwan
or even the South China Sea? What
happens next could tell us a lot about
the shape of US China relations in 2026?
James, I'm very excited to be talking
about this for the first episode of the
year. I want to hear your takes before I
dive into mine. What's what's your view
on this?
>> Well, Alice, I mean, you know, when it
rains, it pours.
um the the new year starting off like
this. Uh there really couldn't be a
bigger geopolitical question for China
than how it reacts to this. And I think
you framed it perfectly. Is it going to
play the long game or are we going to
see some retaliation
uh pretty much straight off potentially
even military retaliation? Now, I'm not
going to duck the question. I'm going to
go straight in there. Um, of course, we
can't know the answer. Such things are
among China's most closely guarded
secrets. I think that we will not see a
military retaliation from China on
Taiwan or in the South China Sea, at
least not in the short term. I think
that what you framed as China playing
the long game is a much more uh likely
scenario. And the reason I think that is
because Taiwan considerations
are in the background of China's
reaction to this. Venezuela is a long
way from China. It's a long way from
Taiwan. But just let me try and sketch
out why I think Taiwan and and and
China's reaction to Taiwan is crucial in
this geopolitical shadow play that we're
watching. I think that the way in which
the US framed its move on Venezuela as
part of its uh attempts to shore up its
backyard to concentrate on what both
Trump and Marco Rubio described as the
Western Hemisphere. I think that that
may give China a ray of hope or at least
cause to wait and see whether the US is
really serious about concentrating its
geopolitical attention onto the Western
Hemisphere, which of course doesn't
include Taiwan or China, and thereby
move away or shift the focus of its
geopolitical reach away from China's
sphere of influence.
And so I think if that does turn out to
be the case, we may well see China
taking a longer view on this and
although yes, some of China's
condemnations um have been fairly
strong, I also think that uh other
statements by the Chinese so far give
the sense that China is really waiting
uh to see. The two pieces of reasoning
that I advanced to support my point of
view is that the national security
strategy which the US released in
December last year identifies the
western hemisphere as the vital interest
of the US and it drops language from the
Biden presidency that identified China
as America's most consequential
geopolitical challenge. Um, it also
doesn't even mention great power
competition at all with China and it
also downgrades the status of Taiwan.
Um, in the past under Biden, it used to
say that the US was opposed to a shift
in the status quo of Taiwan. But the new
uh national security strategy unveiled
in December last year in the US says
that it quote does not support a change
in the status quo of Taiwan. This is
seen as a clear downgrading of the
importance and sensitivity of the Taiwan
question. So my response is I think that
China is hopefully waiting to see the US
redefine its geopolitical focus to its
own backyard i.e. Latin America and in
this case Venezuela in particular and
thereby shift away from Taiwan and those
contentious areas the South China Sea
and China itself. And if that happens,
it will give China breathing space to
advance its biggest priority in terms of
geopolitics. But this is really hard to
call at the moment, Alice. I'm really
interested in your take on it. So, how
do you see it?
>> Well, very quickly on the geopolitical
front before I talk about some of the
economic consequences which are worth
delving into as well. uh is is it's
interesting that uh you know we talk a
lot about the the Trump's approach is
the Roosevelt crawler into the Monroe
Doctrine. Uh to borrow another Roosevelt
analogy uh I think China's approach to
this after seeing what happened in
Venezuela is going to be uh to speak
softly and carry a big stick. And what I
mean by that is on one hand it will
continue I think to pursue some kind of
trade day to to try to soften some of
the edges the rough edges in the
relationship. Uh I think that they were
heartened by the national security
strategy document that you referred to
James not being an attack a direct
attack on China as it had been in
previous administrations. But at the
same time you know massively uh
increasing its investments uh and
deployment of its military capabilities.
We saw that in in full display a couple
months ago at the September parade. So I
think we'll have a two sort of two-track
approach to this relationship and
towards China's geopolitical strategy.
But it it is worth mentioning, James,
that even although Venezuela is not
Taiwan in terms of China's core
interests, it is a important strategic
foothold uh for China in Latin America.
I mean, it was described as an
all-weather strategic partnership back
in 2023. That's sort of the second tier
in terms of what we think about uh in
terms of friendships that China has with
the rest of the world. So, this was a
critical relationship that has I think
been weakened with the Trump
administration's move. And we if we
think about the economic implications as
well, it's not so much about oil because
only about 5% of China's seaborn crude
imports come from Venezuela. It's more
about uh the debt that's outstanding. So
we have still by some estimates around
$10 billion if not more of debt
outstanding that Venezuela owes to
China. And a lot of that traditionally
from Chavez onwards to Maduro was in the
form of loan for oil deals. that I think
is going to be subject to debate whether
or not Chinese creditors are going to
get a haircut or they're going to have
to miss a lot of the debt that's owed
because fundamentally uh Venezuela I
think is going to have to listen to the
Americans uh at least in the short term
in terms of some of these debt
restructuring and and oil developments
in the region. So I think for from
China's vantage point this is a net loss
certainly but I agree with you James if
we broaden it out I don't think this
materially increases China's uh designs
to invade or blockade Taiwan I think if
if I'm in Beijing watching this I would
tread carefully because the Trump
administration has shown that it has the
military muscle to fight in areas that
it deems to be in its national core
interests which in in this
administration is about the western
hemisphere. So, if I'm Xi Jinping
sitting in Beijing, I'm going to sit
tight a little bit and see what the
Trump administration is going to do uh
in its second half of a lame duck
presidency because remember, we have the
midterms coming up. A lot can change
domestically that can also transform and
alter Trump's uh geopolitical strategy.
>> Absolutely. I think uh one of the one of
the first indicators that we're going to
get of the trajectory of China US
relations after uh this move in
Venezuela is whether or not uh Trump's
meeting with Cining which is supposed to
take place in April actually goes ahead.
Um if we start seeing that you know that
meeting is called off or or people are
talking about rescheduling a meeting
then I think it will be a sign that
things are going badly wrong uh in the
US China relationship perhaps partly
because of these tensions and losses
that China is going to suffer over
Venezuela. But if China gets a sense
that there is something to play for on
its crucial priority of Taiwan i.e. a
softening of the US position on Taiwan,
then I would expect China to be pushing
full steam ahead for that meeting to go
ahead.
>> Yeah, I agree. I think that will be the
next litmus test uh in April if the two
presidents meet and whether or not
Taiwan is on the table, so to speak. And
I'm sure that the Chinese will be
testing the Americans to see to what
extent uh the Trump administration is
willing to sacrifice uh blood and
treasure for a Taiwan campaign, which at
least to my mind when we when I think
about the Trump uh clan and the people
around Trump, I mean, including frankly
uh Rubio as Secretary of State, it
doesn't seem to be a top priority. I
think that the focus in this
administration is very much on Latin
America, on defending the Western
Hemisphere as opposed to uh being
embroiled in conflicts overseas. I
wanted to talk a little bit about some
of the economic implications for some of
the players in China because, you know,
we've heard on Monday that the NFRA, the
National Financial Regulatory
Administration, is telling the banks
that it needs to release its exposure to
Venezuela. It's still unclear when I was
digging into the data to the extent to
which the policy banks and banks uh in
China are exposed to Venezuelan debt.
When I look at the numbers since 2007,
uh you have over hundred billion in
loans that were lent to Venezuela uh to
help with infrastructure, to help with
oil. What's your take on this? Uh have
you been following this, James? Yeah, I
mean I I used to write a lot about China
Venezuela because Venezuela was the
poster child of the Belt and Road
initiative um launched by China around
2012 in Latin America. It was the number
one borrower um among Latin American
countries from China and China was
building all kinds of infrastructure in
Venezuela. There were factories,
railways, roads. It really was a
showcase of what China could do and
China wanted to show the whole region.
And I remember back in the days of
former President Hugo Chavez in
Venezuela talking about the alliances
between China and Venezuela as like a
great wall of friendship that obviously
we were supposed to read in would sort
of keep the Americans out. And so as you
rightly say Alice, Venezuela has been
really crucial for China. but less so
recently. And as you've already sketched
out, I think if we boil it down to uh
brass tax, I think China stands to lose
about 10 billion US uh in loans that are
not repaid if the deal doesn't go to its
advantage. And also there's a potential
that it could lose around 2 billion in
terms of investment that was intended by
Chinese companies in the Venezuelan oil
sector that may now not go ahead. Those
are big numbers but they're not
catastrophic. Um, China is lent more
than$2 trillion US dollars as part of
its uh, belt and road initiative um,
according to aid data a US consultancy
over the last 10 or more years. So 10
billion it's a large number but it's not
catastrophic in terms of the general
reach of China's uh, development lending
around the world.
>> Yeah, I'm going to agree with that. I
think that the bigger implication is the
geostrategic one for China and Latin
America. And when we broaden it out to
China's allies or partners, you know, I
I feel very much that the access of ill
will has been weakened. Iran has been
weakened substantially by Israel over
the last few years. This is yet another
I think ally and partner for China that
has been weakened uh under this
administration. So, we'll have to see uh
what happens uh in 2026 with with the
rest of the players. Okay, we'll be back
with more after a quick break and stay
with us.
[music]
Welcome back. Tesla has just lost its
crown. The company sales fell 16% at the
end of 2025, hit hard by the roll back
of US EV tax credits. And for the first
time, China's BYD has overtaken Tesla as
the world's top electric car maker. It's
a sharp turn for a company that once
aimed to dominate global auto sales and
is now betting its future on
self-driving tech and robots. James,
let's go right into it. I have a lot of
opinions, but I want to get your take on
why BYD has over finally overtaken uh
Elon Musk's Tesla. It's not been a good
year for Elon Musk 2025, I have to say.
>> Yeah, I mean uh this is one of the great
corporate rivalries of our time. I mean,
it's rather like the Coca-Cola versus
Pepsi, Apple versus Microsoft,
McDonald's versus Burger King, but this
time it has an extra twist because this
is an American high-tech champion versus
a Chinese high-tech champion. And the
bare facts are that Tesla has lost its
global sales crown to BYD, the Chinese
uh car maker after almost a decade as
the world's bestselling EV brand. This
is because both BYYD's numbers were up
very sharply in 2025. They got a 28%
increase in global sales and Tesla sales
were down 8.6%
uh for the year. Of course, Tesla's
sales are down partly because of tax
changes in the US which removed an
incentive for American consumers to buy
uh Tesla cars. But more generally, I
think, and this is where I think the
main story is, BYD is steamrolling into
markets all over the world. um here in
Europe and I've actually driven one of
the BYD cars as it came off the first
shipment to Australia. There was a
massive ship transporter and about 5,000
BYD cars came off the ship and I I drove
one in 2024 in Bremen and I have to say
it took me a while to understand how to
use it. There were so many kind of
gadgets and dials and the car was
talking to me in German which I speak
very poorly. But after I got going, I
have to say it was a very smooth ride.
So, it's a piece of high technology. But
I think the crucial point is that the
BYD car that I was driving, which was
the Dolphin Surf, cost about 22 uh
23,000.
That's almost half the cost of the Tesla
Model 3. And I have to say the cars are
are, you know, comparable in terms of
their technology and their look. And I
think that fact lies behind why BYYD has
managed to record a million sales of
vehicles outside China uh last year.
That's up an incredible 150% from 2024.
So, I think Tesla is being beaten by a
cheaper car that looks kind of almost as
good and is technologically either on a
par with Tesla or even slightly better.
What's your opinion, Alice?
>> Well, at the risk of being contrarian,
James, I'm going to take the other side
of it and say that BYD may have peaked
and some of these EV players may have
peaked at least domestically in China.
You know, just to give people a sense of
the numbers, BYD sold 2.26 26 million uh
electric vehicles this year. Uh Tesla
sold 1.63 million. So that's quite a big
delta uh between the two players. But a
lot of it, James, I mean to your point
uh still is a domestic driven story. I
think the majority of EVs sold by BYD
still consumed by Chinese consumers.
That trend that in the last few years
has shifted. We're seeing more that are
going out. Um but we can also discuss
whether or not that is going to be an
ongoing trajectory given some of the
trade uh barriers that countries like
the EU uh for instance are putting on
China. But when I look at the domestic
outlook, what's interesting to me is
that the government just in the last
week or so has announced that it's going
to get rid of some of the tax waiver for
the purchase tax on EVs. So originally
there should be a 10% purchase tax.
There was a full 100% exemption of that
for a couple of years. As of this year,
it's going to be a 50% exemption. So,
effectively a 5% purchase tax on all
EVs. That could have a material impact
on whether or not you as a Chinese
consumer are going to buy a new vehicle.
But on the flip side, they've announced
uh at the end of December that they're
going to put in $ 8.9 billion ultra-long
special treasury bond issuance program
to fund tradein of EVs uh and subsidies.
So it could be that we could see after
March at the NPC meeting that there is
some more support uh for for existing EV
consumers trading in their old vehicles
and buying new ones. But you know we're
also seeing an economy that's still
trapped in some kind of deflation.
Consumers are not spending as much as
they the government wants them to. So
I'm still a little bit skeptical about
the growth trajectory domestically uh in
terms of demand for EVs. Uh, and then
when we factor in some of the headwinds
globally to Chinese EV providers, I'm a
little bit worried. Yes, I mean BYD has
a superior product. I was just in a BYD
vehicle uh a couple days ago in Sydney,
Australia. I'm seeing more of them on
the streets for sure, but I I I worry a
little bit about how this will be
perceived by foreign governments uh as
an influx of of cheap Chinese EVs. So,
I'm a bit skeptical. I'm holding my
breath to see if we're going to see
major legislation from countries around
the world to try to limit the amount of
Chinese electric vehicles cuz remember
autos is a huge political issue not just
an economic issue for a lot of countries
around the world. So I think this will
be an interesting thing to track
obviously when we think about the
broader Chinese uh overcapacity issue
and China's export engine. But one last
thing that I wanted to add which I
thought was super interesting again tied
to Elon Musk is that he tweeted a couple
days ago that uh China's silver export
controls are not good that because
silver is uh needed in many industrial
processes and I think people forget that
given that silver is a precious metal
but it is used it is used in cars for
instance in electric vehicles in solar
panels uh in AI data centers uh and you
know we've seen the creation of these
export controls to restrict the global
supply uh more recently of rare earths.
Silver has been added to that list. I
think this is important and worth
tracking because this also could have a
material impact on Tesla for instance on
other automakers because silver is still
an important input in into some of these
processes. And when I think about some
of the levers that China will use in
2026 when it is unhappy with say the
Venezuela policy with Trump's tariff
policy, I think people should expect
more of these precious metals, critical
minerals, intermediary inputs being
added to some kind of export control
list and weaponized by China.
>> I think that's really interesting.
Alice, I just want to mention one thing.
You you you uh raised the issue of
protectionism.
countries here in Europe or elsewhere in
the world may see these Chinese EVs
steamrolling into their markets and
displacing sales of, you know, valued uh
um domestic brands. And so I definitely
think that protectionist pressures will
rise, but I don't know whether here in
Europe anyway, the Europeans will
actually get it together to have the
unity to push forward, you know, uh,
greater tariffs or other other forms of
protectionism against the influx of
these Chinese cars. And just one other
really fascinating aspect that lies in
the future that is that BYD is planning
on bringing its so-called flash charging
batteries to Europe sometime this year.
Now these flash chargers can charge uh a
car within 5 minutes. That means that
they will significantly reduce the
amount of time it takes to charge your
EV. Uh the one I drove um in Germany, I
almost missed my plane on the way back
to the UK because the charger that we
found was so slow that uh you know, we
were standing there literally biting our
nails looking at the clock wondering if
we had the charge to get us to the
airport. That will be a thing of the
past when you can just draw up alongside
a flash charger that will charge your
car within 5 minutes. Now Tesla does not
have that technology. It is bringing out
technology, but it will be slower than
the five minute charge. What I've been
able to read online says that the next
Tesla supercharger will charge a battery
to within a range of 200 miles within 15
minutes. So China is ahead yet again in
this crucial aspect of the whole EV
market.
>> Very interesting. All right, let's take
one last quick break and stay with us.
>> [music]
>> Welcome back. China is now exporting
more than electronics and EVs. It is
exporting luxury food. From caviar to
fuagra, truffles to macadamia nuts,
China has quietly become a global
heavyweight in high-end agriculture,
supplying its growing domestic appetite
and increasingly reshaping markets
overseas. Now backed by provincial
governments and years of investment,
China now dominates global caviar
production. A shift that's turning what
were once niche European delicacies into
another front in China's expanding trade
power. I mean this is a topic close to
my heart given that I I do love food.
James
>> and you're a tremendous cook as well
which is credentials that I definitely
don't have. So um I think your take's
going to be more in instructive but I
would just start by saying how wrong I
have been in my thinking on this topic.
Um I never imagined that China would
leap to the global for forefront of
luxury food. Um I I just thought that um
markets such as caviar, fuagua,
macadamia nuts, black truffles, matcha
tea would remain the domain largely of
premium foreign brands in China. They
have a kind of a cache. Let's say the
brand is French or Australian or
Japanese or or Russian or Iranian when
it comes to caviar. But nope. uh in this
area too it seems that China has risen
to the forefront and is now dominating
uh not only the market inside China but
globally too. I just never imagined that
that would happen. The Financial Times
has got a really good piece on this
phenomenon. Um, and it turns out that
the caviar example uh goes right back to
the late 1990s when some aquaculture
scientists decided that you could uh use
um sturgeon to breed. Um, and it would
take about 7 to 10 years for a sturgeon
to mature, produce eggs, and then you
would uh take those eggs to a breeding
center and then the young sturgeon would
would uh would grow. And that's how this
uh market has developed. So since that
time when China produced almost no
sturgeon to 2024,
China produced 43%
of the global total. I just find that
extraordinary. But uh tell me Alice h
how are you seeing this whole topic?
Well, firstly I have to preface this
with the fact that you know when I I
love European food and I think there's
something special about uh you know
Parmesan coming from the region of Italy
um Hmon Burka coming from Spain there's
something that is unique about those
flavors and the artisal nature of how
that developed and when I mentioned this
topic to a couple of Europeans uh
European friends of mine I think they
were uh very upset by this because they
their immediate reaction was well it's
never going to taste as good as what we
produce here in Europe. But I think that
that defeats the purpose and I think
that that is not seeing this for what it
is which is that China is trying to
create more agricultural products. It is
trying to develop more high technology
and agricultural development aspects I
think which will both appear in the
5-year plan in March. And this is all
part of she's broader strategy to have
on the one hand agricultural
self-sufficiency but also develop
agricultural critical technologies that
can be developed domestically but also
potentially exported around the rest of
the world. I'm thinking particularly of
global south countries like Africa where
it would be particularly germanine and
and of use. So when I think about this,
I think about it more in the context of
of China, you know, using its export
engine and manufacturing engine to the
food realm. And I think that there will
be a degree of nationalism whereby
Chinese people will think, well, I don't
need to get caviar from Eastern Europe
or Russia. I don't need to get truffles
from Italy. These truffles domestically
have a a good enough terois, you know,
to borrow a wine term and and we want to
support domestic producers. So, I can
see that as a trend domestically with
within China. I'm not so sure if this is
going to be an attractor proposition for
foreigners, but you know, if you're cost
conscious, uh, you know, and you're
looking to get something that is half
the price, say, of a European premium
good, maybe you go for the Chinese one.
But I think it'll be harder sell
globally. I do think this will do very
well domestically for all the reasons I
mentioned. And and and just to drive
home a personal story, so I was
traveling in Eunan last year and Eunan
some people may know has the most
biodiverse uh range of mushrooms in the
world. Uh most of the world's actually
porchini mushrooms come from China, come
from Euran specifically. Uh and China
accounts for a third of the world's
truffles and exports went up 60% since
last year. I actually went to an
Italian's factory in Junan and he was
producing porchini mushrooms, portoella
mushrooms, uh truffles which he was
selling in powdered form or dried form
to the European market. Uh and
apparently Europe does not have enough
uh uh porchini mushrooms to make all
those risotto sachets. So in some ways,
China is part of this global industry
because it has the ability to produce on
mass and at scale. Uh and so I think
that there will be areas like this dried
mushroom powder that I'm talking about
where China is already being globally
accepted. And I don't think people
actually even realize that. And one last
fun fact I have about this is that
apparently people in China don't like
the taste of truffles. So it's a very
easy cell to to cultivate that
domestically in your and then sell it to
the rest of the world because it's not
seen as delicacy uh in China which I
thought was quite interesting
comparative advantage at play. But super
interesting story and I'm glad FT
covered it because I think it shows uh
so many aspects of what's happening in
China in terms of taste changing in
terms of domestic alternatives to
foreign products uh and in terms of
China trying to compete at at a global
scale with some of these premium goods.
>> Yeah. And you mentioned Yunan there,
which I'm really glad because I I think
that sometimes maybe people outside
China when they think of China, they've
seen all the pictures of the factories
and the big cities and the smog and the
pollution. But a a province like Yunan,
which is right on the southwest uh uh
sort of bottom corner of China on the
map, bordering Myanmar, is honestly one
of the most beautiful places anywhere in
the world. And you mentioned terowa. I
would have thought that Yunan tera is
superior to to many parts of the world.
The biobiodiversity is absolutely off
the charts. And uh in the financial
times story that I'm quoting from,
there's a quote here from uh one of the
growers there who says there's a joke
that whatever expensive fruit exists in
the world, Yunan will import it,
research it, cultivate it, and bring
down the price. So, I think that that
sort of um sums up uh this trend, but uh
we really shouldn't underestimate some
of the natural underpinnings that China
has to grow this stuff and to grow
really high quality uh uh food.
>> Well, I guess we're going to have to try
Chinese caviar next time we're in town.
I think you're going to China very soon,
James. So, you're going to have to try
some for me.
>> I have to admit, I don't like caviar.
[laughter]
>> Do you like truffles, James? Listen,
Alice, I I come from North Yorkshire,
which is a very set to bottom place. I
don't think I've ever had a truffle in
my life. What about you?
>> I am very partial to truffles. I mean, I
was in Southwest France uh a couple
months ago, and they and they have a
particular white truffle that's quite
unique there. Um so, I I am partial to
them. But James, we're going to have to
change that uh for 2026. We're going to
have to get you eating caviar and
truffles. [laughter]
>> Okay.
>> Living the high life. All right, James,
it is prediction time and we're going to
make our first predictions for 2026. Uh
I'm going to do something a bit left
field because I think uh this is going
to come up in a couple weeks. You know,
when we see on Jan 20 the economic
readout in China, I think the economic
uh trajectory of China is still going to
be a topline issue uh for investors and
the and the rest of the world in 2026.
But I want to take it to a prediction
that I feel fairly strongly about, which
is on the currency side. I think we're
going to see an appreciation of the CNY,
a slight appreciation by at least 10%. I
think I feel comfortable about the
currency ending at 6.8 to 6.9 uh by the
end of the year. Uh primarily because I
think the Trump administration is going
to elect uh a fairly doubbish uh Fed
chair. It could well be Kevin Hasset.
And in that case, uh, when we factor in
the interest rate differentials between
the Fed and the PBOC and the fact that
China isn't going to intervene, I think
strongly to to defend the currency, I
think we could see uh the currency go up
and strengthen uh against the dollar to
around 6.8 to 6.9 uh by the end of the
year. And that is materially important
because it obviously impacts US China
trade talks, negotiations. Trump isn't a
fan of a weak CNY. He wants to see a
weak dollar and I think this could be an
era in which there is some degree of of
compromise between China and the US. But
James, what's your prediction for 2026?
>> I'm going to go back to what we were
talking about at the top, Alice. I think
that China will swallow its pride,
swallow its humiliation, suffer its
losses with regard to Venezuela, and I
think it will play the long game. And I
think the Trump C meeting in April will
go ahead and both sides will try to gain
whatever advantage they can in other
areas uh effectively putting aside what
China is currently condemning as uh as
this unlawful move by the United States
in Venezuela.
>> Okay, so watch the space. We're going to
wait for a Trump meeting in April.
That'll be exciting. All right, that's
all for this episode. Thank you so much
for listening to China Decode. Make sure
to follow us wherever you get your
podcast so you don't miss an episode.
And talk to you again next week.
[music]
Ask follow-up questions or revisit key timestamps.
This episode of "China Decode" covers three significant developments. Firstly, the US takeover in Venezuela sparked a "deeply shocked" reaction from China, prompting a discussion on whether Beijing will play a long game or adopt a harder stance, especially given Venezuela's strategic importance and China's substantial investments there. Secondly, China's BYD has surpassed Tesla as the world's leading electric vehicle manufacturer, attributed to its aggressive pricing and technological advancements, though it faces challenges from domestic tax changes and global protectionism. Lastly, China is emerging as a global leader in luxury food exports, from caviar to truffles, leveraging government support and agricultural innovation to dominate markets traditionally held by European producers.
Videos recently processed by our community