HomeVideos

Are we risking nuclear war by supporting Ukraine?

Now Playing

Are we risking nuclear war by supporting Ukraine?

Transcript

230 segments

0:00

especially if there's no retirement plan

0:02

for Putin no well one of the things

0:04

that's interesting from your book

0:05

there's things that are seen by one side

0:09

as we are detering the other side often

0:11

seen as the other side as a provocation

0:13

where the embargos from the US are seen

0:16

as Japan as a deadline to attack people

0:19

who are less sympathetic to the

0:21

Ukrainian cause I've said extending NATO

0:24

which we thought would be deterrence is

0:25

that was actually a provocation for

0:26

Putin um first of all I think you should

0:29

look at the people living in the

0:30

countries in question so before we

0:33

decide that we're the important people

0:34

in the world Americans or we're in

0:36

Britain now or Britains and therefore

0:38

anyone in between doesn't count I

0:41

believe that's wrong so all of the

0:43

countries that joined NATO desperately

0:46

wanted to join NATO right and they've

0:49

had a whole history of Russians doing

0:52

terrible things to them I'm not making

0:54

it up it's this is what Russia's been up

0:58

to they have been correct that Russia is

1:00

going to do more terrible things they

1:02

were correct doing everything they could

1:04

to get into NATO it's incredible in my

1:08

lifetime I'm remembering what the

1:10

standards of living of people in Eastern

1:13

Europe that the Soviet Union had

1:15

dominated and what it is now since they

1:18

have uh been freed of Soviet domination

1:22

it's been massive compounding of

1:24

standards of living it's allowed people

1:26

your age to travel the world have

1:30

allowed to have aspirations in their

1:31

lives right there's no podcasting Yeah

1:35

well yeah but if if when you talk about

1:37

oh should we deny these things because

1:39

we got some egos in Russia that want to

1:42

maintain a continental Empire I cannot

1:45

or you cannot change how Russians think

1:47

about things right the Russians have to

1:51

how they think about the the things

1:53

that's their decision but um if you look

1:57

at Europe as a peninsula uh you're

2:00

better off with more insulation from

2:03

Russia than not but isn't this another

2:05

case of that not thinking in terms of

2:07

both half of the court in tennis where

2:09

compared to the possibility of nuclear

2:11

war Ju Just nudging that a number up and

2:13

down matters far more than whether

2:15

another uh country in Eastern Europe

2:17

gets to be part of NATO or not well I

2:19

think what what what was hoped and it uh

2:23

hope is has has been said not to be a

2:24

strategy The Hope was that trying to get

2:27

Russia to join the party so trying to um

2:31

integrate their energy supplies into

2:33

Europe paying them good money for it

2:35

have them make lots of money on that

2:37

hoping that they would invest this into

2:39

their Road system which is lamentable

2:41

and hoping that they would invest this

2:43

to cleaning out their business laws

2:45

which are uh it's horrendous trying to

2:48

run a business there as you watch right

2:50

now as different things get nationalized

2:51

and taken over and different Business

2:53

Leaders who are successful wind up

2:55

unaccountably dropping out of six floor

2:57

windows and things or old people always

2:59

seem to fall downstairs I think that's a

3:02

a special way of of offing people that

3:05

was the hope is join the party because

3:08

you will become wealthy too Russian

3:10

standards of living have been stagnating

3:13

for quite a while that Putin's model of

3:16

the uh basically taking over your

3:19

neighbor stuff and then whatever you

3:21

have a bomb flat bringing home is it's

3:24

not an efficient way to make wealth and

3:27

you're killing so many people so

3:30

uh I don't believe that we in the west

3:33

have

3:34

this denying people of Eastern

3:38

Europe uh saying well actually because

3:40

the Russians have such an attitude you

3:42

get to be their surfs forever or I guess

3:44

it's not about uh not that it's just but

3:48

there are broader considerations for the

3:49

same reason that you might were talking

3:51

about earlier that would not have made

3:53

sense for Americans would have not been

3:55

plausible that we would have kept

3:56

fighting further to prevent uh the

3:59

Eastern Europe at the time from

4:00

succumbing to the Red Army the

4:01

ukrainians are doing the fighting right

4:03

now supplied by tremendous amounts of

4:05

Western Aid yeah they are but that's

4:07

Pennies on the dollar it's they're

4:10

willing to to fight for their country

4:13

it's not about the cost to the United

4:14

it's not like the 40 billion or whatever

4:16

it's be how does this the nuclear war

4:17

prob well what's the nuclear war going

4:19

to do

4:21

Putin the Ukrainian forces are just spur

4:24

what's the target it's going to be keev

4:26

I suppose or I don't know he thinks that

4:28

he's out of options so let's go bomb

4:30

NATO headquarters or something I think

4:31

the Chinese have whispered in his ear

4:32

and this is pure speculation is Buddy if

4:35

you do this everybody in the on the

4:38

planet's going to get nuclear weapons

4:39

and all of a sudden we aren't going to

4:40

have this little small Club of people

4:42

with nuclear weapons and the

4:44

consequences going to be rather

4:45

horrendous and also look at China it has

4:47

more nuclear armed neighbors than anyone

4:49

on the planet and some of them are

4:51

totally

4:52

nuts Putin himself right Pakistan I

4:55

would think oh well let's try North

4:57

Korea for the a country has got

4:59

starvation in the 21st century how did

5:02

you do it although on this point another

5:04

thing your books have emphasized is how

5:05

often leaders make mistakes that make no

5:08

strategic make very little strategic

5:10

sense and are very stupid you could

5:12

imagine even though it would be very

5:14

stupid for Putin to escalate especially

5:15

if he personally is uh going to be you

5:19

know there's no retirement plan I could

5:22

imagine him doing very stupid things uh

5:24

well let's let's put stupid out of it

5:26

because it's not explanatory by saying

5:28

well someone's stupid because it means

5:30

you write off understanding their

5:31

reasoning so a lot of westerners when

5:34

they think of governments think about

5:36

governments operating the interest of

5:38

their population so when their decisions

5:41

don't improve standards of living

5:42

security and things then we say those

5:44

aren't good decisions all right but

5:46

that's not the game in China for

5:49

instance it's all about maintaining the

5:51

Monopoly of the Chinese Communist party

5:54

to rule and if that conflicts with

5:57

having higher living standards you

5:59

better believe they're choosing

6:00

Communist party so you're watching those

6:02

kind of decisions going on right now

6:04

where their most talented entrepreneurs

6:07

are being uh relieved of their

6:10

Enterprises or Putin as you said he's

6:13

made a pivotal error he has no backdown

6:15

plan he only has a double down plan

6:18

expect him to Double Down forever and uh

6:22

the then the question is whether all the

6:25

oligarchs want to keep doubling down

6:27

with him and his generals or whether

6:29

they I don't know give them something

6:31

extra in his cheero some morning who

6:33

knows so I feel like this is one of the

6:35

lessons you were actually talking about

6:36

earlier where you don't want somebody to

6:38

feel like they're up against the wall

6:40

where even if it would be an unjust sort

6:42

of resolution some sort of ceasefire or

6:44

Putin can stve face I wonder if your

6:46

sort of historical lessons would would

6:48

bring you to that conclusion oh and

6:50

Putin um he will be back for more and

6:55

understand that that's just the case but

6:57

but then what is the solution we can't

6:58

have unconditional surrender unless no

7:00

no no one's marching on Moscow right um

7:04

the United States has done this for many

7:06

years as you don't recognize the

7:07

territories that he's taken which means

7:10

the Russians are stuck with a sanction

7:12

regime of some type forever and you go

7:15

oh well that'll weaken certain people

7:17

won't adhere to it it will depress

7:19

Russian growth forever which goes back

7:21

to an earlier part of this conversation

7:22

of its really powerful and it was some

7:25

Russians who themselves when at the very

7:28

beginning so said oh no we are going to

7:30

be like North Korea yeah you will be

7:33

that's exactly where he's heading them

7:36

uh we don't control when the Russians

7:39

reassess we can't even predict when or

7:42

whether they'll re reassess we can't

7:45

predict whether there'll be some kind of

7:47

incipient Civil War in Russia right

7:49

which would be well destabilizing by

7:52

definition who knows how that who knows

7:54

how that goes one of the things you

7:57

asked me in an email about is whether

8:00

Superior finances wins Wars or something

8:03

it's Superior Alliance systems that win

8:05

Wars and it's interesting that the

8:08

Europeans particularly the Eastern

8:10

Europeans are the leaders of all this

8:13

and isn't it fascinating that the fins

8:15

and the swedes who forever were neutral

8:18

are now all over this um and they know

8:22

so um what is it the enemy gets a vote

8:26

the Russians have a vote as long as the

8:28

Russians are playing this game our best

8:30

bet is to support ukrainians because

8:33

unlike Iraq and Afghanistan where the

8:36

locals did not do the bulk of the

8:38

fighting this is when the locals are and

8:40

that's key on whe on whether uh you also

8:43

were emailing me and asking me about

8:45

successful versus unsuccessful

8:48

interventions when the locals do all the

8:50

fighting that's when your best starts

8:52

are of helping them yeah

Interactive Summary

Ask follow-up questions or revisit key timestamps.

This video discusses the ongoing conflict and its implications, focusing on the perspectives of various nations and the strategic decisions made by leaders. It explores the idea that actions perceived as deterrents by one side can be seen as provocations by another, citing the US embargoes on Japan and NATO expansion as examples. The speaker emphasizes the desire of Eastern European countries to join NATO due to historical experiences with Russia and highlights the significant improvement in living standards in these nations after their liberation from Soviet domination. The discussion also touches upon the economic model of Russia under Putin, suggesting it's not a sustainable way to generate wealth and leads to negative consequences. The speaker questions the idea of leaders making decisions that don't benefit their populations, contrasting Western governments with systems like China's, where maintaining Communist Party rule is paramount, even at the expense of living standards. The video also delves into the potential for leaders to make

Suggested questions

6 ready-made prompts