Are we risking nuclear war by supporting Ukraine?
230 segments
especially if there's no retirement plan
for Putin no well one of the things
that's interesting from your book
there's things that are seen by one side
as we are detering the other side often
seen as the other side as a provocation
where the embargos from the US are seen
as Japan as a deadline to attack people
who are less sympathetic to the
Ukrainian cause I've said extending NATO
which we thought would be deterrence is
that was actually a provocation for
Putin um first of all I think you should
look at the people living in the
countries in question so before we
decide that we're the important people
in the world Americans or we're in
Britain now or Britains and therefore
anyone in between doesn't count I
believe that's wrong so all of the
countries that joined NATO desperately
wanted to join NATO right and they've
had a whole history of Russians doing
terrible things to them I'm not making
it up it's this is what Russia's been up
to they have been correct that Russia is
going to do more terrible things they
were correct doing everything they could
to get into NATO it's incredible in my
lifetime I'm remembering what the
standards of living of people in Eastern
Europe that the Soviet Union had
dominated and what it is now since they
have uh been freed of Soviet domination
it's been massive compounding of
standards of living it's allowed people
your age to travel the world have
allowed to have aspirations in their
lives right there's no podcasting Yeah
well yeah but if if when you talk about
oh should we deny these things because
we got some egos in Russia that want to
maintain a continental Empire I cannot
or you cannot change how Russians think
about things right the Russians have to
how they think about the the things
that's their decision but um if you look
at Europe as a peninsula uh you're
better off with more insulation from
Russia than not but isn't this another
case of that not thinking in terms of
both half of the court in tennis where
compared to the possibility of nuclear
war Ju Just nudging that a number up and
down matters far more than whether
another uh country in Eastern Europe
gets to be part of NATO or not well I
think what what what was hoped and it uh
hope is has has been said not to be a
strategy The Hope was that trying to get
Russia to join the party so trying to um
integrate their energy supplies into
Europe paying them good money for it
have them make lots of money on that
hoping that they would invest this into
their Road system which is lamentable
and hoping that they would invest this
to cleaning out their business laws
which are uh it's horrendous trying to
run a business there as you watch right
now as different things get nationalized
and taken over and different Business
Leaders who are successful wind up
unaccountably dropping out of six floor
windows and things or old people always
seem to fall downstairs I think that's a
a special way of of offing people that
was the hope is join the party because
you will become wealthy too Russian
standards of living have been stagnating
for quite a while that Putin's model of
the uh basically taking over your
neighbor stuff and then whatever you
have a bomb flat bringing home is it's
not an efficient way to make wealth and
you're killing so many people so
uh I don't believe that we in the west
have
this denying people of Eastern
Europe uh saying well actually because
the Russians have such an attitude you
get to be their surfs forever or I guess
it's not about uh not that it's just but
there are broader considerations for the
same reason that you might were talking
about earlier that would not have made
sense for Americans would have not been
plausible that we would have kept
fighting further to prevent uh the
Eastern Europe at the time from
succumbing to the Red Army the
ukrainians are doing the fighting right
now supplied by tremendous amounts of
Western Aid yeah they are but that's
Pennies on the dollar it's they're
willing to to fight for their country
it's not about the cost to the United
it's not like the 40 billion or whatever
it's be how does this the nuclear war
prob well what's the nuclear war going
to do
Putin the Ukrainian forces are just spur
what's the target it's going to be keev
I suppose or I don't know he thinks that
he's out of options so let's go bomb
NATO headquarters or something I think
the Chinese have whispered in his ear
and this is pure speculation is Buddy if
you do this everybody in the on the
planet's going to get nuclear weapons
and all of a sudden we aren't going to
have this little small Club of people
with nuclear weapons and the
consequences going to be rather
horrendous and also look at China it has
more nuclear armed neighbors than anyone
on the planet and some of them are
totally
nuts Putin himself right Pakistan I
would think oh well let's try North
Korea for the a country has got
starvation in the 21st century how did
you do it although on this point another
thing your books have emphasized is how
often leaders make mistakes that make no
strategic make very little strategic
sense and are very stupid you could
imagine even though it would be very
stupid for Putin to escalate especially
if he personally is uh going to be you
know there's no retirement plan I could
imagine him doing very stupid things uh
well let's let's put stupid out of it
because it's not explanatory by saying
well someone's stupid because it means
you write off understanding their
reasoning so a lot of westerners when
they think of governments think about
governments operating the interest of
their population so when their decisions
don't improve standards of living
security and things then we say those
aren't good decisions all right but
that's not the game in China for
instance it's all about maintaining the
Monopoly of the Chinese Communist party
to rule and if that conflicts with
having higher living standards you
better believe they're choosing
Communist party so you're watching those
kind of decisions going on right now
where their most talented entrepreneurs
are being uh relieved of their
Enterprises or Putin as you said he's
made a pivotal error he has no backdown
plan he only has a double down plan
expect him to Double Down forever and uh
the then the question is whether all the
oligarchs want to keep doubling down
with him and his generals or whether
they I don't know give them something
extra in his cheero some morning who
knows so I feel like this is one of the
lessons you were actually talking about
earlier where you don't want somebody to
feel like they're up against the wall
where even if it would be an unjust sort
of resolution some sort of ceasefire or
Putin can stve face I wonder if your
sort of historical lessons would would
bring you to that conclusion oh and
Putin um he will be back for more and
understand that that's just the case but
but then what is the solution we can't
have unconditional surrender unless no
no no one's marching on Moscow right um
the United States has done this for many
years as you don't recognize the
territories that he's taken which means
the Russians are stuck with a sanction
regime of some type forever and you go
oh well that'll weaken certain people
won't adhere to it it will depress
Russian growth forever which goes back
to an earlier part of this conversation
of its really powerful and it was some
Russians who themselves when at the very
beginning so said oh no we are going to
be like North Korea yeah you will be
that's exactly where he's heading them
uh we don't control when the Russians
reassess we can't even predict when or
whether they'll re reassess we can't
predict whether there'll be some kind of
incipient Civil War in Russia right
which would be well destabilizing by
definition who knows how that who knows
how that goes one of the things you
asked me in an email about is whether
Superior finances wins Wars or something
it's Superior Alliance systems that win
Wars and it's interesting that the
Europeans particularly the Eastern
Europeans are the leaders of all this
and isn't it fascinating that the fins
and the swedes who forever were neutral
are now all over this um and they know
so um what is it the enemy gets a vote
the Russians have a vote as long as the
Russians are playing this game our best
bet is to support ukrainians because
unlike Iraq and Afghanistan where the
locals did not do the bulk of the
fighting this is when the locals are and
that's key on whe on whether uh you also
were emailing me and asking me about
successful versus unsuccessful
interventions when the locals do all the
fighting that's when your best starts
are of helping them yeah
Ask follow-up questions or revisit key timestamps.
This video discusses the ongoing conflict and its implications, focusing on the perspectives of various nations and the strategic decisions made by leaders. It explores the idea that actions perceived as deterrents by one side can be seen as provocations by another, citing the US embargoes on Japan and NATO expansion as examples. The speaker emphasizes the desire of Eastern European countries to join NATO due to historical experiences with Russia and highlights the significant improvement in living standards in these nations after their liberation from Soviet domination. The discussion also touches upon the economic model of Russia under Putin, suggesting it's not a sustainable way to generate wealth and leads to negative consequences. The speaker questions the idea of leaders making decisions that don't benefit their populations, contrasting Western governments with systems like China's, where maintaining Communist Party rule is paramount, even at the expense of living standards. The video also delves into the potential for leaders to make
Videos recently processed by our community