HomeVideos

Peter Attia: Anti-aging Cure No One Talks About! 50% Chance You’ll Die In A Year If This Happens!

Now Playing

Peter Attia: Anti-aging Cure No One Talks About! 50% Chance You’ll Die In A Year If This Happens!

Transcript

2903 segments

0:00

Death is inevitable, but the rate of

0:02

decline is very much up to us. But the

0:05

drawback that young people have is they

0:07

only begin to realize the inevitability

0:10

of the decline when it besets them. So

0:12

your team that came in for testing that

0:14

are in their 20s, when I'm looking at

0:15

these results, there were issues that

0:16

were uncovered that were a concern. And

0:18

ignoring it doesn't lead to a good

0:20

outcome when you're 65. But a lot of

0:22

people have this issue. So it's okay to

0:23

speak freely about this. Yeah. The

0:25

biggest concern is that Dr. Dr. Peter

0:27

Aia is the go-to physician for high

0:29

performers, celebrities, and anyone

0:31

serious about unlocking the science

0:32

behind a longer, stronger, and healthier

0:34

life. I had a big epiphany at a funeral

0:37

of a friend of mine who I realized had

0:39

declined so much during their last

0:41

decade that when they couldn't do those

0:43

things that gave them pleasure because

0:44

of injuries, aches, and pains, they

0:47

weren't enjoying life. I call it the

0:49

marginal decade. Wow. Okay. So, what are

0:51

the most important parts of my health

0:53

that I should be thinking about for

0:54

longevity? So there's muscle mass,

0:55

muscle strength, but we don't have a

0:57

single metric that we can measure that

0:59

better predicts how long they will live

1:00

and how high their V2 max is, which is a

1:02

maximum amount of oxygen you can

1:05

consume. And if you compare somebody who

1:07

is in the top 2% to someone who is in

1:09

the bottom 25%, there is a 400%

1:13

difference in their all-c cause

1:14

mortality over the coming year. But how

1:16

do I know if it's an issue or not? We'll

1:17

go into much more detail around that,

1:19

but the way to avoid this is to train

1:21

specifically for that marginal decade.

1:23

And there's so many things that we just

1:25

do wrong. The sooner you start, the

1:28

better. So, rule number

1:31

one, this has always blown my mind a

1:33

little bit. 53% of you that listen to

1:36

the show regularly haven't yet

1:37

subscribed to the show. So, could I ask

1:39

you for a favor before we start? If you

1:41

like the show and you like what we do

1:42

here and you want to support us, the

1:44

free simple way that you can do just

1:45

that is by hitting the subscribe button.

1:47

And my commitment to you is if you do

1:48

that, then I'll do everything in my

1:50

power, me and my team, to make sure that

1:52

this show is better for you every single

1:54

week. We'll listen to your feedback.

1:55

We'll find the guests that you want me

1:57

to speak to and we'll continue to do

1:58

what we do. Thank you so

2:03

much. Dr. Peter, what is keeping you

2:07

busy at the moment in terms of the

2:09

subjects that you wrote about and

2:10

outlive, but the work that you do online

2:11

and the work you do in the variety of

2:14

businesses that you have? What is

2:15

keeping you fascinated at the moment?

2:17

Like what is what does one's mind focus

2:19

on? I wish I could say one thing.

2:21

There's probably a few things and maybe

2:23

that's um not good. Uh maybe the most

2:27

successful people in life only think

2:28

about one thing. I would say one of the

2:31

things I'm thinking a lot about is how

2:32

to translate outlive into a delivery

2:37

system uh obviously digitally that

2:41

basically operationalizes what is in

2:43

that book in a manner that allows people

2:46

to with as little friction as possible

2:48

implement the solutions for themselves.

2:50

So basically how do you live a longer

2:52

life? How do you age uh as gracefully as

2:55

possible and maximize your health span?

2:57

I think the other thing I'm focused on

3:00

that is related to that of course but

3:02

distinct um which I know your team got

3:05

to participate in a little bit this week

3:07

was kind of how to train people for

3:11

their marginal decade right so this idea

3:13

of we're all going to have a last decade

3:15

of life I call it the marginal decade

3:17

just so that we can get comfortable

3:19

talking about something that people

3:20

don't like to think about and um I'm

3:24

convinced that ignoring it and Not

3:27

thinking about it doesn't lead to a good

3:28

outcome. Instead, if you prepare for it

3:32

and train for it like an athlete trains

3:34

and prepares for their sport, uh you'll

3:36

have the best version of that possible.

3:39

Marginal decades and centurion

3:42

decathlon. Did I say that correctly?

3:44

Centinarian decathlon. Yep. Centinarian

3:45

decathlon. Can you explain these two

3:47

terms to me? Y. So, the marginal decade

3:48

is the last decade. Last decade of life.

3:50

Again, it's this weird thing where most

3:52

people don't know the day they've

3:53

entered it, but most people also realize

3:56

at some point when they're in it.

3:59

Um, I thought a lot about it. This was

4:02

sort of a big epiphany that I had in

4:04

2018 when I was sitting in the in the

4:07

church at a funeral of the parent of a

4:09

friend of mine who's who I realized had

4:12

declined so much during the last decade

4:16

of their life that even though they were

4:20

alive they weren't enjoying life. The

4:23

things that they loved to do in the case

4:26

of this individual play golf and tend to

4:28

the garden they couldn't do. they just

4:31

physically couldn't do it right. They

4:33

had injuries. They had aches and pains.

4:36

And when they couldn't do those things

4:38

that gave them pleasure, they retreated

4:40

from life. And I I I don't think there's

4:42

a person listening to us who can't

4:45

appreciate that because they they've

4:46

witnessed it, right? They've seen it in

4:49

a parent, a grandparent, a loved one.

4:52

And I don't know, there was just

4:54

something about that moment, which is

4:56

often the case, right? It's usually like

4:58

years and years of thinking about

4:59

something and it crystallizes in an

5:01

instant. But in that moment, I realized

5:03

aha the way to avoid this is to train

5:09

specifically for that decade. And the

5:13

best model for how to do that is to look

5:14

at athletes because every athlete trains

5:17

with specificity, right? So think think

5:19

of like all the different types of

5:20

athletes you would know. So if you think

5:22

about like a sprinter or a basketball

5:25

player or a football player, they are so

5:29

different and very little of their

5:31

training looks like the other guy. And

5:34

the reason for that is they're doing

5:36

something very specific, right? The

5:38

sprinter has a goal which is to move 100

5:40

meters as fast as possible. That's it.

5:43

And that requires a certain set of

5:45

skills. And the footballer has a totally

5:47

different goal. Yes, he has to be able

5:48

to run fast for short distances, but

5:51

just being able to run fast would not

5:53

produce in, you know, superior results.

5:55

And then the basketball player would be

5:56

different. And then the skier would have

5:57

a totally different set of skills. So I

6:00

said, "Well, who's the most well-rounded

6:02

athlete out there?" It's the decathlete

6:04

because that guy's got to do 10

6:06

different things really well. Now, he or

6:09

she doesn't have to be the best in the

6:11

world at those 10. In fact, they never

6:14

are. But overall they're considered the

6:17

best athlete because of the diversity

6:18

and breadth of what they can do. And so

6:21

I said that is our model. So what is the

6:25

centinarian decathlon then is I say to

6:28

you Stephen one day you are going to be

6:31

in your marginal

6:32

decade. What do you want to be able to

6:35

do physically athletically in that last

6:38

decade? It's the answer is so clear to

6:41

me because it's associated with all the

6:42

things that make me happy. So it would

6:44

be being able to explore the world still

6:48

with my partner, my romantic partner. It

6:50

would be But I would even dig further.

6:52

Tell me what that looks like. Okay. So I

6:54

went to Bali. Mhm. And me and my

6:57

girlfriend wanted to go white water

6:58

rafting. And to get down to the white

7:00

water rafts in Bali, we had to walk down

7:03

and then up again. Mhm. About a 100

7:06

meters of stairs. And as I went down

7:09

those stairs, I had one of those moments

7:10

that it sounds like you had at the

7:11

funeral where I realized that my dad

7:13

could not walk down these stairs. He

7:15

couldn't walk down them and he couldn't

7:16

walk up them. And by the way, it's a

7:18

different reason. I'm going to point

7:19

this out and I want to come back to your

7:21

story. Walking down is not about

7:23

endurance. Walking down is about

7:26

eccentric strength in the quads to be

7:28

able to uh decelerate the body as it's

7:31

moving down. Very important. Coming up

7:34

is about concentric strength in the

7:36

quads and glutes. and endurance. Okay.

7:39

All right. But continue. No, that's a

7:40

really good point because they're two

7:42

different training systems. And then the

7:44

reason why that was so important was

7:45

because of the great time I had in the

7:47

white water raft with my girlfriend. So

7:50

going down that lake through barley and

7:51

I thought, gosh,

7:53

it

7:55

hadn't if I'm not careful and I don't

7:57

think about this, I won't be able to

7:58

have these experiences when I'm 60. What

8:01

was involved in being in the raft? Yeah.

8:02

So, a lot of strength required to like

8:04

row um to keep us away from the rocks um

8:06

to push us off when we got stuck. Um

8:09

fall in the water, get it back in the

8:11

boat.

8:12

Absolutely. Think about the scapular

8:14

stability that's required. Think about

8:15

the upper body strength you need to lift

8:17

yourself back into a boat if you fall. I

8:19

mean, the list goes on and on and on.

8:21

And it was it was it took a long time.

8:23

We were out there for two hours going

8:24

through this lake. So, the other thing I

8:26

think about is Christmas. And I I think

8:28

about my nieces. So, my brother's a year

8:29

older than me and he has three kids

8:31

under the age of six. And you know what

8:33

that's like? These kids just sprint off

8:35

in every direction. And they'll say to

8:37

my dad, they'll say, "Come and play in

8:38

the garden." And my dad um wouldn't be

8:41

able to play with them in the garden the

8:42

way that they would want to play in the

8:43

garden, running around um being chased

8:45

around. So, my dad just watches them

8:47

from the kitchen. And so, these are just

8:50

obviously all the emotional things come

8:52

to mind first because those are the

8:54

things that stay with us. I'll give you

8:55

one more.

8:58

Um, the other thing that comes to mind

9:00

as a man is just being able to protect

9:02

my family. And I don't necessarily mean

9:04

wrestle an intruder, but I mean like

9:06

lift things. And um, if something falls,

9:09

being able to pick it up and move it. So

9:12

those are the things that come come to

9:13

mind first and foremost. It's

9:14

protection, it's memories, it's

9:16

activities that create relationships and

9:18

connection. I mean, that's exactly the

9:21

exercise we do, right? we take people

9:25

through, give us the 10 most important

9:27

things you want to be able to do. So

9:29

like if you start with, I want to be

9:30

able to go back to Bali and I want to be

9:32

able to go down those hundred stairs,

9:34

get in the raft, go down the river, come

9:36

back up the stairs, that gets broken

9:38

down into very specific movement

9:41

patterns. Playing football with the kids

9:44

out back gets broken down into very

9:47

specific movement patterns. By the way,

9:48

they're very different, right? That one

9:50

comes down much more to foot reactivity,

9:51

lateral movement, things like that.

9:53

Being able to pick something up off the

9:56

floor is yet another set of movement

9:57

patterns. It turns out there are

10:00

approximately 27 physical requirements

10:03

that are necessary to do the sum total

10:06

of most things people want to do. Part

10:08

of the reason why I think people don't

10:11

care enough is because they see aging as

10:14

inevitable. Mhm. So they look at their

10:16

their parents, their grandparents, and

10:17

go they're immobile. They can't function

10:20

properly. That's my destiny. It's

10:23

genetic.

10:25

Obviously, I don't agree with that.

10:27

Although I have tremendous empathy for

10:29

people who might feel that way. It's uh

10:32

when you see something as ubiquitous as

10:35

the decline

10:37

of untold numbers of people as they age,

10:41

it would be very easy and tempting to

10:42

say that that is the inevitability of

10:44

our species. Death is inevitable despite

10:48

what some biohackers may tell you. Um

10:50

decline is inevitable but the rate of

10:54

decline is very much up to us and the

10:59

preservation of strength, stamina,

11:03

movement capacity, uh those things are

11:06

largely up to us. In fact, there are

11:09

actual data that demonstrate quite

11:12

clearly. In fact, I was just reading a

11:14

paper yesterday in in the journal Cell

11:17

that looked at the role of exercise in

11:20

aging individuals to preserve

11:22

mitochondrial function. So, this is a

11:24

study that looked at older individuals

11:27

and it randomized one group to a

11:30

significant amount of exercise and the

11:32

other group was just sort of business as

11:33

usual being largely sedentary. And then

11:36

using pretty elaborate techniques where

11:38

you biopsy the muscle, they look at the

11:40

mitochondria which are the kind of the

11:42

powerhouse of the cell in these

11:44

individuals. And it turned out that in

11:46

the people who were exercising, there

11:48

was very little decline in the

11:50

mitochondrial function compared to what

11:53

happened in the people who were not

11:54

exercising. Now, just because your

11:57

mitochondria continue to function well

11:59

doesn't mean all aspects of aging are

12:01

offset. But it's a very important one to

12:04

demonstrate. And this is also true by

12:06

the way of strength and endurance.

12:07

There's a big difference in the rate of

12:09

decline of muscle mass, muscle strength,

12:12

and cardiopulmonary fitness in people

12:14

who exercise versus who don't. So, it's

12:17

all kind of a long-winded way of saying

12:19

um you have as an individual so much

12:22

more under your control than you

12:24

realize, but you have to sort of begin

12:27

to compounding the gains. I'll do it

12:29

when I'm 50.

12:31

Well, look, the good news is 50 isn't

12:33

too old. And I've met many people who

12:36

don't begin to do this until they're 50.

12:38

But again, the analogy I would use here

12:40

is comparable to that of investing for

12:43

retirement. The longer you wait, uh, the

12:47

less money you're probably going to have

12:49

at the end.

12:51

Springs to mind this graph I saw the

12:52

other day which I'd sent to my friends

12:53

which shows that, um, the the decline, I

12:56

think it was in muscle mass from when

12:58

you're 30. And it makes the point that

13:01

there's this line which on this graph

13:03

called disability. And it shows that

13:05

people who didn't have enough muscle

13:06

mass when they were 30 cross the line of

13:09

disability when they're 70. Uh and those

13:12

that did have more muscle mass at 30

13:14

don't don't get close to that line. Um

13:18

so that for me was shocking because it

13:20

goes to show that what I do now is going

13:21

to determine whether

13:22

I'm, you know, by all intents of

13:24

measures disabled when I'm 70 or if I'm

13:27

able. The sooner you start, the better.

13:30

The drawback that young people have is I

13:34

mean, you've had a you've had a great

13:35

experience because you're you're

13:37

introspective about it and you've been

13:39

able to observe it in somebody older.

13:41

So, you've been able to gather

13:43

motivation without having to experience

13:45

the decline yourself. Um, so that's a

13:48

that's a wonderful position to be in.

13:50

For many people, that's not the case.

13:51

They only begin to realize the

13:54

inevitability of the decline when it

13:56

besets them. But the way to think about

13:58

this again is another analogy is that of

14:00

a glider. So gliders eventually all have

14:04

to come down, right? Our health span is

14:07

basically a glider, but we have a lot of

14:10

control about how long it stays in the

14:13

air based on how high we can start it.

14:15

So if you think about, you know, would

14:17

you rather take a glider off a really

14:19

high cliff or off a low cliff, that's

14:23

the that's the decision we get to make.

14:25

And and we sort of call that concept

14:27

physiologic headroom. So the example you

14:30

gave is a great one, right? So muscle

14:32

mass, muscle strength provide an

14:34

enormous amount of physiologic headroom

14:36

as does cardopulinary fitness. These are

14:39

huge variables that make all the

14:41

difference. and everyone's coming down,

14:43

but the fitter you are, the slower the

14:47

rate of decline and therefore the longer

14:49

it takes before you cross below a

14:51

threshold. And that threshold differs by

14:54

different metrics, but once you're below

14:56

that threshold, it's very difficult to

14:58

engage in activities of enjoyment.

15:01

Peter, you're 51 now. 52. 52. What do

15:04

you wish someone had told you when you

15:06

were 32? I'm 32 years old. What do you

15:09

wish um someone had screamed in your

15:11

face and told you when you were my age?

15:14

It wouldn't have been much about

15:16

exercise. It would have been more about

15:18

other aspects of life for sure. Um

15:21

because for whatever reason, I've always

15:24

gravitated towards exercise. That's

15:26

always been a very high priority for me.

15:29

So, I think my advice to 32-year-old

15:31

Peter would be much more about um

15:34

relationships and emotional health. But

15:36

if I could go back and speak

15:39

to 14-year-old

15:42

Peter, he a he wouldn't have listened,

15:44

but I would have begged him to go a

15:47

little bit easier on his body and back

15:50

off on certain things that probably have

15:52

led to injuries I have today that could

15:54

have been prevented.

15:57

Can I ask what they said things are?

15:59

Sure. Um, I think I I think I lifted far

16:03

too heavy far too often and probably

16:06

without enough coaching on technique.

16:09

And so, you know, I by the time I was

16:13

27, I had a devastating back injury, but

16:17

it's one of those things that happened

16:18

without any incident, which which is

16:21

often the case, by the way, for a back

16:22

injury. When you really blow out a disc

16:24

in your back, it's not necessarily

16:27

something you did in that moment. It's

16:28

usually something that's been built up

16:30

from the past. So, this injury I had at

16:32

the age of 27 really was the result of

16:36

years

16:37

of unnecessarily heavy axial loading uh

16:41

loading done with probably insufficient

16:45

technique, you know, or technique that

16:47

was at times sloppy and under fatigue

16:49

because I used to do a lot under

16:51

fatigue. You know, I sort of believed in

16:53

training under a lot of fatigue and and

16:56

I I think that that's a mistake. I think

16:57

that training under very heavy load

17:00

should not be done under great fatigue.

17:02

Interesting. We'll talk about that as

17:03

well. On that point of advice that you

17:05

gave me there about emotional health.

17:07

One of the things that's been very front

17:08

of mind for me at the moment is men's

17:11

health, specifically men's emotional

17:13

health because I read a report that came

17:15

out in March called Lost Boys and it

17:17

just details this pretty horrific

17:18

picture of men's emotional health in the

17:22

UK at the moment in particular, but the

17:24

trend holds around the world. and it

17:26

came out in the start of March. It's

17:28

been in all the newspapers in the UK and

17:29

it details a couple of sort of headline

17:31

stats. The reverse gender pay gap

17:33

amongst young men. So women are now

17:35

earning more. You know the stats

17:36

probably around um soon for every yeah

17:39

suicide and one in seven young men are

17:42

unemployed or out of work. All these

17:44

sort of horrific stats and then it

17:45

compounds with things like suicide

17:47

suicidal ideation etc

17:49

etc. I was thinking about this this

17:51

morning when I was listening to some of

17:52

your your work. I was thinking I wonder

17:53

what Peter's perspective is

17:56

on what it is to be a man. Actually, it

17:59

does kind of dovetail into some of your

18:00

work around testosterone and the decline

18:03

in testosterone. And because one of the

18:05

things I was thinking about is how

18:06

testosterone plays a role in what it is

18:08

to be a man, but if you look at the

18:10

stats around testosterone, um it appears

18:12

to be declining. Yes. And I say this in

18:15

part as well because testosterone causes

18:17

a certain set of behaviors

18:19

um in men

18:23

that define and shape what a man is and

18:27

what they want and how they show up. And

18:29

even when I said earlier on protection

18:30

as one of the three things I cared

18:32

about, that's probably in part because

18:34

of the testosterone in me. This debate

18:36

around testosterone, this conversation

18:37

around testosterone um and its

18:40

decline, is it declining? It is. It is.

18:43

Why is it declining and what and is this

18:46

does it matter? Well, I think the second

18:48

question is easier to answer than the

18:49

first. I do think it matters. Um the the

18:52

the why is probably multiffactorial and

18:56

the why is just as important as the fact

18:59

that it is. In other words, the fact

19:00

that it's declining is both relevant for

19:02

the fact that a very very important

19:04

hormone that has incredible benefit to

19:08

men uh and women by the way is going

19:11

down. And we have to come up with a an

19:13

answer to that, right? Like so how do we

19:15

address that? Do we address it medically

19:17

where we replace that hormone

19:18

exogenously, meaning we give you that

19:20

hormone directly or do we try to fix the

19:22

underlying problem? So if you want to do

19:24

the latter, you have to know what the

19:25

underlying problem is. Now at the

19:27

population level, the best answer as to

19:30

why testosterone levels are declining

19:33

and um unmistakably they are. So the

19:35

data here are unambiguous. There's no

19:37

debate on this fact. Um the debate is

19:39

around the why. I believe that the best

19:41

answer probably has to do with two

19:44

things. Uh one is uh increase in body

19:48

weight and fat, body fat specifically in

19:50

men. Um and uh some combination of uh

19:56

reduced quality of sleep and um and and

20:00

and sort of disruption to sleep. So so

20:03

why are those two things relevant? So

20:05

when you increase body fat, two things

20:08

are happening. One is you're increasing

20:10

inflammation and you are reducing the

20:14

amount of testosterone that gets to stay

20:16

in the form of testosterone because part

20:18

of the testosterone gets converted into

20:21

estrogen. So with body fat comes more of

20:24

this process called aromatization or

20:26

converting testosterone into estrogen.

20:29

So if you think about what those two

20:30

things are doing, if you have more

20:32

inflammation, that reduces your ability

20:34

to make testosterone and you have more

20:37

capacity to turn the less testosterone

20:39

you make into estrogen, the net result

20:42

of that is both of those things are

20:44

reducing your total pool of

20:45

testosterone.

20:47

If you couple that with less, you know,

20:50

lower quality sleep, and I'm not talking

20:52

about over the last three years, I'm

20:54

comparing like now to say 40 years ago.

20:57

And what are all the reasons that people

20:58

might have poorer quality of sleep? Now

21:00

I think there are many but obviously

21:02

phones and social media and uh just the

21:05

stimulation of the world we live in

21:06

probably plays a greater role in that.

21:08

Sleep is when we make these hormones,

21:10

right? So so so we we make follicle

21:13

stimulating hormone and luteinizing

21:15

hormone at their maximum amount during

21:17

sleep and those are the hormones that

21:19

are driving the production of

21:21

testosterone. So, what we've seen in

21:24

many of our patients when they have low

21:26

testosterone, because there's a test you

21:28

can do to see if their testosterone is

21:30

low because their body can't make it or

21:34

because their brain isn't receiving

21:36

enough of a signal to make it. This is a

21:38

very easy thing to determine medically.

21:41

Unfortunately, most people aren't

21:42

subjected to that level of testing

21:45

because they go to these testosterone

21:47

shops on street corners that are just

21:48

giving everybody testosterone. But if if

21:51

if a physician is curious enough to

21:53

understand that you can give a patient a

21:56

drug or a hormone called hCG. HCG is

22:00

luteinizing hormone which is one of the

22:02

hormones made by the brain. So if you

22:04

come in and you see a man who's got very

22:06

low testosterone and you can understand

22:08

why you give him luteinizing hormone. If

22:11

he still has low testosterone, you know

22:14

that he has what's called primary

22:16

hypogonatism, which means his

22:17

testosterone is low because his testes

22:19

can't make testosterone. Conversely, if

22:22

you give the man luteinizing hormone and

22:24

all of a sudden his testosterone goes

22:25

up, he has secondary hypogonadism or I

22:28

mean, you could mix the primary

22:30

secondary there, but really what it the

22:32

terminology doesn't mean anything. what

22:33

matters is he can make testosterone, but

22:37

for some reason his brain isn't giving

22:39

his body the signal to do it. And that's

22:42

that's a classic finding in a person

22:44

who's under high stress and or not

22:47

sleeping well. So that's a long-winded

22:49

answer to your question, but I think

22:53

that those are probably the greatest

22:55

contributors to this. Now, people have

22:57

talked a lot about what about

22:59

microplastics, what about other

23:00

environmental factors, what about other

23:02

factors in nutrition beyond just the

23:05

ones that would contribute to excess

23:07

body fat. The evidence there is less

23:10

compelling, but I don't think we should

23:12

discount it. But I I think I think that

23:14

that if those things are playing a role,

23:16

it is probably much smaller than than

23:18

what we just talked about. I was

23:19

thinking as you were speaking about

23:20

sleep and testosterone about how and

23:23

also the link there with bad diets, how

23:25

if I've not slept well, I wake up and

23:28

make worse food choices for sure. And I

23:31

was like, is that like dopamine

23:33

dysfunction?

23:35

Probably more due to insulin signaling.

23:39

So um we know from ex really good

23:43

experimental studies that when you

23:45

sleepdeprive people they become insulin

23:48

resistant and the more insulin resistant

23:51

a person is the less they're able to

23:55

access their stored uh energy. So higher

24:00

insulin resistance means greater

24:02

difficulty accessing stored energy. So,

24:05

if you're if you wake up and you're if

24:08

you know if you have successive days of

24:10

poor sleep and you're becoming somewhat

24:11

insulin resistant, um you're going to

24:14

want to eat more because you're not able

24:17

to access your own natural stores of

24:19

fat, which is where we want to go for

24:20

energy. So, if you look at one

24:23

experiment that was done out of the

24:24

University of Chicago, they they took uh

24:27

healthy subjects, young young subjects,

24:29

and sleepd deprived them for somewhere

24:32

between 10 and 14 days. So, not a huge

24:35

period of time. And they only let them

24:37

sleep four hours a night, which by the

24:39

way, I know a lot of people who were

24:40

doing that for years at a time. In in

24:44

that 10 to 14 day period of time, their

24:47

insulin resistance was worsened by 50%.

24:51

This is in other words they they do an

24:53

experiment called a uglycemic clamp

24:55

where they inject them with glucose to

24:57

see how effectively they can put glucose

25:00

into their cells which is that's the

25:02

that's the hallmark of insulin

25:03

sensitivity is how well you can put

25:05

glucose into your muscles when it's

25:07

infused in you and their capacity to do

25:09

that was reduced by 50%. after such a

25:12

short intervention. Um, so I think sleep

25:15

uh restriction and unhealthy sleep is a

25:18

is a very underappreciated cause of

25:21

metabolic health and weight gain and

25:22

then by extension these other things

25:24

we're talking about. It seems to me to

25:26

be the thing furthest upstream in my

25:27

life that then causes this cascading

25:29

effect to how I show up in sort of

25:32

cognitive performance. How well I can

25:33

articulate myself if I go to the gym,

25:35

how hard my workout is, if I choose

25:37

healthy options versus unhealthy

25:38

options. So it feels like the and mood

25:41

in general. Yeah. Yeah. I mean, look, I

25:43

I I've said this before and I'm not the

25:45

first to say this, so I'm paraphrasing

25:47

others, but if you really stop to think

25:49

about it, sleep doesn't make a lot of

25:52

sense from an evolutionary perspective.

25:54

Like, if you go back in time a few

25:56

hundred thousand years, why would we

25:59

have spent a third of our life

26:01

unconscious? It didn't serve our

26:03

purpose. You can't mate, you can't hunt,

26:06

and you can't defend yourself.

26:09

So you have to believe that if we could

26:12

have evolved out of it, we would have

26:14

done it and we didn't. So that means

26:18

that whatever it's doing, it must be

26:21

really important. I mean core essential

26:25

to our existence. While I will

26:28

completely acknowledge that different

26:30

people have a different necessity or

26:32

requirement for how much they sleep, I

26:35

still think that many people

26:37

underestimate how much they need. You

26:39

know, you asked me at the start, you

26:40

said, um, what are the things that you

26:42

want to do when you reach your marginal

26:44

decade? And I gave you my answer. What's

26:46

your answer to that now that you're a

26:48

father in heaven or in a different

26:50

season of life? Well, they're very

26:51

similar to the types of things you're

26:52

thinking about. And I love how you've

26:54

got specific examples. So, I really like

26:57

playing with my kids, right? So, I can

27:01

imagine that in my marginal decade, I'll

27:03

have grandkids that are the age of my

27:06

kids. Yeah. Right. And and you know,

27:09

maybe a bit older, but but as I'm even

27:11

getting towards that marginal decade.

27:12

Okay. So, playing sports is really,

27:15

really fun. I really like playing

27:19

especially because when I grew up like I

27:21

played hockey because I grew up in

27:22

Canada and then I immediately went into

27:25

kind of boxing and martial arts and

27:27

those became my life. So now playing

27:29

sports that I didn't play much as a kid

27:31

is really fun. Like I'm really enjoying

27:33

baseball. I'm really enjoying soccer.

27:36

And um and so when you play these

27:39

things, you realize this is not an easy

27:42

thing to do when you get old. Like to

27:45

sit in the, you know, to play to sit in

27:46

the goal and actually like stop a ball

27:48

when a kid is blasting at you full stop.

27:51

You have to be able to move around. So

27:53

again, like I would love to be able to

27:56

play soccer, throw a football, throw and

27:59

hit a baseball as long as possible. you

28:03

can get into movements that are much

28:04

simpler. Uh, but if I can do all of

28:07

those things, I'm in great shape. Now,

28:08

of course, to be able to do that, I also

28:10

need to be able to do a lot of things

28:11

that many people also can't do in their

28:13

marginal decade, like sit on the floor,

28:15

get up off the floor under their own

28:17

power, um, you know, walk up x number of

28:19

flights of stairs, having the strength

28:21

to do that. I like doing certain things

28:24

like I like archery a lot. So it's, you

28:26

know, I want to be able to pull a bow

28:28

back. Obviously not at the same poundage

28:30

as the current bow that I pull back, but

28:32

I would still like to be able to pull a

28:34

50 lb bow back in the final decade of my

28:37

life. And when you think about all those

28:38

things you want to accomplish, if we

28:39

were then to sort of codify them into a

28:41

bunch of exercises or areas of your

28:44

health that you had to now be thinking

28:46

about that I needed to be thinking

28:47

about, what are the most important

28:50

things? So, I'm a 32-year-old. What are

28:53

what are the most important parts of my

28:55

health that I should be thinking about

28:56

if I want to achieve all the things that

28:57

I said to you in my final decade? No one

28:59

in the final decade of their life ever

29:01

said, "I wish I had less strength and I

29:04

wish I I wish I had less endurance." So,

29:06

you cannot be too strong and you cannot

29:08

be too fit. The only time that one would

29:12

throttle back on the pursuit of those is

29:14

a if doing so is come at the expense of

29:17

something else either with respect to

29:19

your health or your life and two if the

29:24

pursuit of that at such an extreme level

29:27

produces risk of injury. Okay. So in

29:30

other words, could I be stronger than I

29:32

am today? Yes. Uh I'll give you an

29:35

example. We know that in resistance

29:38

training, the sweet spot for pure

29:41

strength is one to five

29:47

reps. When your goal is to maximize

29:51

strength, you need to be pushing 1 2 3 4

29:54

five reps. Once you start thinking about

29:56

hypertrophy, muscle size, we're starting

29:58

to think about 7 8 9 10 11 12 reps. Once

30:01

we start thinking about muscular

30:02

endurance, we start thinking about north

30:04

of 15, right? Those are the general

30:06

patterns of resistance training. So, if

30:08

I want to build my muscles because I'm

30:10

going for aesthetic goals, then I need

30:12

to be aiming above five reps. I need to

30:14

be 10 or 12. But if I'm just purely

30:16

thinking about strength, bigger weights,

30:18

but lower reps. That's exactly right.

30:19

Okay. And then if I got muscular

30:21

endurance, which be even higher reps.

30:23

Okay. Lower weight. Yep. Okay. So,

30:26

again, we could go into much more detail

30:28

around that, but just to finish the

30:30

point here, why do I not do much

30:32

training at one to five reps? In fact,

30:34

these days I don't do any training at 1

30:35

to five reps anymore.

30:37

Why? Because to train at 1 to five reps

30:41

comes at a risk. Okay? Especially for

30:44

heavy compound movements. So

30:47

like I'm, you know, I'm okay getting a

30:51

little bit less of a strength benefit

30:53

while still of course getting stronger,

30:55

but training at a higher rep load. So

30:58

I'm typically so I'm targeting 8 to 12

31:03

reps with one to two reps in reserve is

31:07

basically how I'm doing my resistance

31:09

training. That means every set I'm doing

31:13

I would expect to get to within about

31:15

one rep of failure somewhere. So today

31:17

when I lifted I don't think I did less

31:20

than seven. I didn't do more than 12.

31:22

And the weight was always titrated so

31:24

that I was either failing, almost

31:26

failing, or one rep away from failing

31:28

somewhere in there. And I was adjusting

31:30

the weight constantly on every exercise

31:32

to get there with the exception of one

31:33

exercise. I did. Push-ups was one of the

31:35

things I did. Push-ups are kind of more

31:36

in the muscle endurance. Obviously, I'm

31:37

doing more reps when I was doing

31:38

push-ups, but pretty much everything

31:40

else was in that range. So again, I'm

31:43

not fully maximizing strength anymore

31:46

because the cost of it might be a little

31:49

bit high in terms of injury risk.

31:51

Similarly, I'm not strength training

31:54

24/7 because I need to make time to do

31:57

my endurance training and other types of

31:59

training. How often do you train uh

32:03

resistance training? I resistance

32:05

training three times a week. And how

32:06

often do you train generally? And I

32:09

train every day. Every day. Yeah. Why?

32:11

Because, you know, again, the the

32:13

intensity of my training is not that

32:16

high. At least three days a week. So the

32:19

three resistance days are pretty hard

32:21

because I'm really only doing each body

32:23

part once a week. So when I'm doing it,

32:25

I'm really I'll spend that 90 minutes

32:27

really kind of hammering those body

32:29

parts. Three of those days are just zone

32:31

two. So, my three three of my four

32:34

cardio days are zone two days where I'm

32:38

doing, you know, I'm on a bike and I am

32:42

riding at a level of intensity that

32:45

actually allows me to still talk some,

32:48

you know, not not talk like I am now,

32:50

but talking in a sort of a strained way.

32:52

So, for me, that's about a heart rate of

32:54

140 beats per minute. And that's just

32:58

not that's just not taking a huge toll

33:00

on me. like that. Those are almost like

33:03

recovery days for me. And then one day a

33:06

week I do a a really really hard V2 max

33:10

day and that's that's a really hard day.

33:12

That burns a lot of matches. That's

33:14

tomorrow. Not looking forward to it

33:16

already. Do you do cardio on your

33:18

resistance training days as well? No, I

33:20

don't. So, it's the seven day. It's four

33:22

days of cardio, three days of uh of

33:26

resistance. Now, that's going to change

33:28

in the summer when I'm going to add 3

33:30

days of swimming. Um, and I will end up

33:33

doing some swims on some resistance

33:36

days. So, before you do your resistance

33:38

workout, you don't go on the stepper for

33:39

20 minutes or cycle for 20 minutes or

33:42

something. I don't. Is there a

33:43

particular reason why? It wouldn't

33:44

really serve a purpose. Um, I So, I I

33:47

know a lot of people do that. I know a

33:48

lot of people will say, "Hey, I'm going

33:49

to do a little bit of a warm up on this

33:51

treadmill or the stepmaster before I

33:53

lift." But I actually have a pretty

33:55

strong point of view on how we should

33:56

warm up to lift. And I don't think

33:59

walking on the treadmill or running on

34:01

the treadmill or being on the

34:02

stairmaster or on the bike is a great

34:04

prep for the lift. I think it's better

34:06

to warm up for a lift doing movements

34:08

that prepare you to lift. So for

34:11

example, like if it's a leg day, so

34:14

Monday's leg day, right? So what am I

34:15

going to do? I'm going to start by doing

34:18

a bunch of core stabilizing stuff. So,

34:20

I'm going to do a whole bunch of this

34:22

dynamic neuromuscular stabilization

34:23

stuff. So, you get into basically these

34:25

baby positions and you really learn to

34:28

activate your core as you move around in

34:30

a six-month position and stuff like

34:31

that. I then do a whole bunch of um like

34:35

do you know what a 9090 is or a shinbox

34:37

exercise is um where you're you're kind

34:40

of on the ground in a position where

34:41

you're really is you know uh you can

34:44

start out doing it isometrically but

34:46

ultimately going through uh a slow

34:48

eccentric and concentric phase of

34:50

movement that's kind of activating

34:52

glutes. So I go through basically a

34:54

whole DNS sequence. Then I get into a

34:57

dynamic movement prep. So then I get

34:58

into a bunch of bouncing, a bunch of

35:00

footwork. Um, and then I start with

35:03

really light weights. So I'll go to a

35:05

leg extension machine and do very, very

35:06

light leg extensions, very, very light

35:08

leg curls. Come back and do more jumping

35:10

and moving and lunging and go back and

35:12

forth. So I'll spend 20 minutes doing a

35:16

warm-up, but the warm-up is geared for

35:19

me to lift. Whereas if I had just sat on

35:21

a bike and pedal around, that doesn't

35:23

actually replicate any of the movements

35:25

I'm going to do when I start loading

35:26

myself. I've got particularly concerned

35:28

about injury. Yeah. Now that I'm 32,

35:31

because when I was bloody 20, I could do

35:32

almost anything, it seemed, and nothing

35:34

would break. But I had a couple of

35:35

injuries when doing like shoulder

35:37

presses and things like that. And one of

35:38

my friends had a similar injury recently

35:40

which took him out for three or four

35:41

months where he did a shoulder press,

35:43

pulled something in his back or

35:45

something, his like neck. Yeah. And then

35:46

he couldn't like turn his head anymore.

35:49

In terms of

35:51

injury, if I wanted to get injured, am I

35:53

right in thinking that the the thing

35:55

that leads to injury is basically just

35:57

walking straight in and trying to lift

35:58

something heavy? Or is there things

35:59

further upstream that cause injury in

36:02

the gym? No, there's I mean that's one

36:04

way to increase your risk of injury for

36:06

sure. Uh but but yes, there are other

36:08

ways that it can happen and I think

36:10

about it a lot. I mean one of the

36:12

injuries I think a lot about are calf

36:15

injuries, Achilles injuries, sort of

36:17

tendon injuries. This is, I think, one

36:19

of the things that becomes a real

36:22

problem for people as they age. You

36:24

know, you you often hear about people my

36:26

age, uh, tearing an Achilles. It's a

36:29

devastating injury. Now, again, it's not

36:31

devastating in that you won't recover

36:32

from it, but boy, it's going to take you

36:33

out of commission for 6 months. So, a

36:36

lot of these injuries happen because the

36:39

individual still has strength, um, but

36:42

they've they've kind of lost some of the

36:44

pliability in the tendon because they've

36:46

kind of lost some of the jumping. That's

36:48

why I always start these workouts with

36:52

low level of jumping and I'll progress

36:54

to higher levels of jumping. But jumping

36:56

is actually a very important part of

36:59

training and it's one of the things that

37:01

we take for granted. But boy, when your

37:03

ability to jump is gone, and jumping, by

37:05

the way, can mean like just initiating a

37:07

jump. But it can also mean jumping off

37:09

something and stopping yourself. Those

37:11

are really important skills. And so like

37:14

something like jumping rope is really

37:16

important, right? Your feet are just

37:18

kind of moving like that. They're

37:20

they're acting as shock absorbers. Calfs

37:22

and Achilles have to constantly change

37:24

in length. And that accommodation is a

37:26

really important part of resilience. And

37:28

I think that should that should be an

37:30

important part of everybody's warm-up at

37:32

a minimum, if not part of their workout.

37:34

One thing I'd love you to do is to

37:36

persuade people listening that muscle

37:38

mass matters for longevity because

37:42

um and also if you can within that that

37:46

leg day matters because we all avoid leg

37:49

day including me and sometimes I need to

37:51

be told again why why it matters for me

37:54

to add it. Well, I mean, I think look,

37:56

muscle mass

37:58

um is is probably the second most highly

38:02

uh correlated finding uh or third most

38:06

to longevity after strength and

38:10

cardiorespiratory fitness V2 max. So,

38:14

why is that? Um so, first of all, I

38:16

think that muscle mass is both directly

38:19

a proxy for strength in general. The

38:22

more muscle you have, the stronger you

38:23

are. We all know exceptions to that. We

38:26

know wiry little people who are insanely

38:28

strong. And I have patients like that.

38:31

They're just naturally, you know, thin

38:34

people. But when we put them through the

38:36

testing

38:37

protocols, you know, they're remarkable

38:40

in terms of their strength. And I tend

38:42

to not worry about the fact that they're

38:44

slight in build when when I see that

38:46

they're strong across the board. There

38:48

is another benefit of muscle mass which

38:49

is it's the place where you dispose of

38:51

glucose. So from a metabolic

38:53

perspective, the more muscle mass you

38:55

have, the more glucose buffering

38:58

capacity you have. And why does that

38:59

matter as I age? Because you know, one

39:02

of the hallmarks of aging is a reduction

39:06

in the capacity to metabolize and buffer

39:09

glucose. And so as as glucose levels

39:12

become less and less regulated, all

39:15

sorts of bad things happen. uh bad

39:17

things happen to micro vessels in the

39:19

body. So we if you think of the most

39:21

extreme example of this is type two

39:22

diabetes. So once a person has type two

39:24

diabetes, what are they at risk for?

39:26

They're at the risk of reduced vision

39:28

and ultimately blindness, amputations of

39:31

their digits, impetence, right? The

39:33

penis has tons of tiny blood vessels in

39:35

it and the more that you know

39:37

glycosillated proteins accumulate there,

39:39

the less they get blood flow and

39:41

obviously damage to the small blood

39:43

vessels of the brain as well. So all of

39:46

these things are hugely problematic when

39:48

glucose is disregulated. And again, the

39:51

most important thing that you can do to

39:53

regulate glucose in addition to the

39:56

obvious, which is eating energy balance,

39:59

not eating too much, is making sure you

40:01

have large insulin sensitive muscles,

40:04

which means large muscles in the context

40:06

of an individual who's sleeping well and

40:08

exercising. And you're going to

40:10

basically have a great place to put all

40:12

of that glucose when you consume it. And

40:14

is that going to save off me getting

40:15

belly fat because my glucose is going to

40:18

be stored in the muscles as opposed to

40:19

somewhere else or again it all depends

40:21

on the total energy balance. But yes,

40:23

it's clearly going to make a difference,

40:25

right? So one of the shest ways to um

40:29

reduce your capacity to store fat is to

40:31

add more muscle. Okay. Um I I did the

40:34

grip strength test. I've done it twice

40:36

now. And meaning you did one of the like

40:39

grip meters or you did a hanging test.

40:41

The uh one of the grip grip meters.

40:42

actually did it at Brian Johnson's house

40:44

and then I but I also did it with Andy

40:45

Galpin and people tell me it's a

40:48

indicator of longevity but I've never

40:50

really understood why is it just testing

40:52

my strength. Yeah. Um grip strength of

40:55

all the strength metrics it's one of the

40:57

most highly correlated with longevity.

40:59

We actually prefer to do it like at 10

41:01

squared where your colleagues tested

41:04

yesterday. We prefer to do it on a dead

41:06

hang. So, we make them hang from a bar.

41:09

Um, and we just time how long they can

41:11

hang. So, that that's a really good

41:13

metric of your grip strength because

41:14

it's also normalized to your weight.

41:16

Okay. So, uh, so we we want to see that

41:19

people can hang for at least two minutes

41:21

on a bar. And so, the question is why is

41:24

that so highly correlated with

41:26

longevity? And it's what you said. It's

41:28

it's it's strength. Uh, and the reason

41:31

for it is it's really hard to be strong

41:34

anywhere in the upper body if your grip

41:36

is weak. Like if you think about being

41:39

able to push, especially being able to

41:41

pull, like all of the real metrics of

41:44

upper body strength require a strong

41:46

grip. And if you have a strong grip, you

41:48

have a strong hand, you have a strong

41:50

forearm, you have a strong scapula that

41:53

is connected to your rib cage, like it

41:55

goes up the whole chain. That's another

41:56

reason why we like the dead hang as a

41:58

way to test it because the dead hang is

42:01

testing everything. It's testing your

42:03

actual grip. It's testing your scapular

42:05

stabilization, the stability of your

42:07

shoulder. It's basically testing that

42:09

entire chain. And then I also think

42:11

there's a practical side of this, right?

42:13

when when you know it's very

42:15

underappreciated what frailty does to an

42:17

aging individual and what sarcopenia

42:20

loss of muscle mass does to an aging

42:22

person and and what it is about falling

42:25

that is so devastating to an older

42:28

person and the stronger your grip the

42:31

easier you're able to navigate a lot of

42:33

those things right it just seems

42:34

unthinkable that falling is something I

42:36

should be thinking about at 32 in the

42:38

future like cuz my seems ridiculous it

42:40

seems ridiculous yeah and yet it is

42:43

devastating. So once you reach the age

42:46

of

42:47

65, which that ain't that far. I mean,

42:50

if you you know 65 year olds all day

42:52

long, that does that's not a that's not

42:53

a very old person. Yeah. Once you reach

42:55

the age of 65, your mortality from a

43:00

fall that results in a broken hip or

43:02

femur is 15 to 30%. Think just think

43:06

that is such a staggering number. So,

43:09

you're over 65, you fall, and that fall

43:11

results in the break of a femur or hip.

43:14

There's a 15 to 30% chance you'll be

43:17

dead within a year. What kills me? It

43:20

could be something very acute like you

43:22

bang, you know, the fall that's

43:23

significant enough to do that also bangs

43:25

your head. It could be that you get a

43:27

fat embolism, you get a blood clot. It

43:30

could be that, you know, during the

43:32

recovery process of this, you just never

43:34

really get better. You never thrive

43:36

again. I think a more disturbing

43:38

statistic is that of all the people who

43:41

survive, 50% will never again regain the

43:44

level of function they had before the

43:46

injury. Wow. So they will require a cane

43:49

for the rest of their life or something

43:50

like that. Um now there are lots of

43:52

things that account for that. Andy

43:53

Galpin, who you mentioned a moment ago,

43:55

talks a lot about this, but it's a lot

43:57

of it comes down to foot explosiveness,

43:59

power. So the reason you're not really

44:02

afraid of falling like when was the last

44:04

time you were walking and you your your

44:05

foot caught something and you you

44:07

slipped like yesterday. Yeah, quite

44:10

often. Yeah, exactly. Why don't you fall

44:12

when that happens? Because I can quickly

44:14

readjust, right? That's power. Okay, so

44:18

you have the power in your foot to

44:20

readjust when you lose your step. You

44:23

step off a curb not realizing it, it

44:25

doesn't matter. You readjust. Okay,

44:27

those are a very very specific muscle

44:29

fiber that is responsible for that. It's

44:31

called the type 2B muscle fiber. That is

44:34

the first fiber that atrophies when you

44:36

age. In fact, you're already at your

44:38

peak. It's all downhill from where you

44:40

are now. Thank you so much. Yes. So, I'm

44:42

I'm already 20 years past you and my

44:44

power is a fraction of what it was 20

44:46

years ago. Now, I fight like hell based

44:50

on the exercises I do to try to make to

44:52

try to keep it as high as possible. So

44:55

the reason that these, you know, people

44:56

who are in their 70s are falling all the

44:58

time is people think it's a balance

45:01

thing. It's not just a balance thing,

45:03

right? It's that they're undergoing the

45:05

same insult you and I undergo on a daily

45:07

basis. But the difference is their

45:09

probability of being able to catch it

45:11

either through the explosiveness of

45:13

their foot or their lower leg coupled

45:15

with maybe not being able to grab onto

45:17

something as quickly and adjust. Uh it's

45:19

a power deficit problem. So, what do I

45:21

have to train now at 32 to ensure that

45:24

specifically the example of hitting

45:26

something and quickly being able to

45:27

adjust? Um, I'm able to do that when I'm

45:29

70. I think jumping is a great way to do

45:31

this, right? So, so I mean I use certain

45:33

specialized pieces of equipment that

45:35

actually have power built into it

45:36

because power is different from

45:38

strength, right? So, strength is really

45:40

the ability to is is just the ability to

45:43

move a force independent of the speed at

45:45

which you move it. Power is the maximum

45:49

combination of force and speed. Okay? So

45:54

if you on the on the on the um x axis if

45:56

you were to put force and on the y-axis

46:00

if you were to put power the curve is an

46:03

inverted u. So as the force or the

46:07

weight that you're moving goes up and

46:09

you're trying to move it as fast as you

46:11

can, you're getting more and more and

46:12

more and more power. But then at some

46:14

point the weight gets so heavy that even

46:15

as you continue to move it, it's going

46:17

slower and slower and slower. So your

46:18

power is going down. So there's a sweet

46:20

spot there. So one of the things I do is

46:21

there's certain specialized pieces of

46:23

equipment that allow you to train in

46:25

that way. So I definitely rely on a lot

46:27

of those. But even if you don't have

46:28

access to that machine, jumping is a

46:30

really important way to generate power.

46:32

So if you're just doing a vertical jump,

46:34

that's a that's power. What about

46:36

balance? I I was at Brian Johnson's

46:38

house and as he was cooking his I don't

46:40

know breakfast or lunch or whatever, he

46:43

was balancing on a half

46:46

ball. You've seen one of those things.

46:48

Yeah. Yeah. I I don't think I asked him

46:50

why he was balancing on it, but I assume

46:51

it was to do with balance and the

46:54

certain muscles in the in the leg. There

46:56

are lots of exercises that are great for

46:57

balance. Um, anything that produces

46:59

instability is great because it's uh,

47:02

you know, for lack of a better term,

47:04

I've heard it described as problem

47:05

solving for your foot. Okay? Right? So,

47:07

so if you think about being on any

47:09

unstable surface, even if you're just

47:11

walking on an unstable surface, so if

47:13

you if you were to look at a person's

47:15

foot, their lower leg actually, as

47:17

they're walking on a surface that's

47:20

constantly changing, so like a gravel

47:21

path or something like that, you're

47:23

going to see like if this were my lower

47:25

leg, you would see the musculature of

47:27

the lower leg constantly adjusting to

47:30

it. And so, yeah, I'm I really enjoy

47:33

things that force that type of training.

47:35

Do you do flexibility stuff? Yeah. So,

47:38

I'm actually naturally a pretty lax

47:42

person. So, I don't do any stretching if

47:45

that's what you're asking. But all of

47:48

the sort of stability and dynamic stuff

47:50

I do incorporates movement at end

47:55

ranges. So,

47:57

um I I'll give you an example of why I

48:00

think the notion of flexibility might be

48:02

a little bit misunderstood. If you ask a

48:05

person to stand up and with their legs

48:07

straight touch their toes, most people

48:11

would say that's a great test of

48:12

flexibility in the hamstring, right? And

48:14

most people can't do that. What they

48:17

don't realize is everybody's hamstrings

48:20

are long enough to allow them to do

48:23

that. The reason they can't do it is

48:27

their central nervous system will not

48:30

release them to do it. Does that make

48:32

sense? Interesting. The central nervous

48:35

system won't release them to do it.

48:36

That's right. It doesn't feel safe for

48:39

them to do it. Now, how do I know this?

48:42

Because if you take a person under

48:44

general

48:45

anesthesia, you can put them into almost

48:48

any position possible. So, if you took a

48:50

person under general anesthesia, laid

48:51

them on the operating room table, you

48:53

could lift their leg up to

48:56

here. When they're awake, you couldn't

48:59

get it past here. When they wake up from

49:01

surgery, will they have a torn

49:03

hamstring? Not at all. They won't even

49:05

know their leg was moved. The difference

49:07

is when they're under general

49:08

anesthesia, their brain is not sending a

49:10

signal to the leg that says don't lift.

49:13

So why is the why is the leg why is the

49:16

brain doing that to the individual? This

49:18

is how I learned it on a personal level.

49:20

So about six years ago, I had tweaked my

49:24

back and had just done a, you know,

49:27

unnecessarily heavy set of deadlifts and

49:30

just pushed it a little too far. And I

49:31

was kind of nursing this this sort of,

49:33

you know, just very very tight QL. I was

49:36

completely jammed up. And I came in to

49:38

to do some training with a friend of

49:40

mine who's one of the guys that actually

49:42

he is really the guy that introduced me

49:43

to this thing called DNS, dynamic

49:44

neuromuscular stabilization. And I mean,

49:47

I was stiff as a board. I couldn't, you

49:50

know, get past my knees bending forward

49:52

and I'd been hurting for like three

49:54

days. And we went through a series of

49:58

exercises

49:59

for 40 minutes, which included me laying

50:03

on my back with my legs up, him leaning

50:06

on top of me, so my feet are here on his

50:09

chest and doing isomemmetric pushes

50:13

while working on uh generating

50:16

intraabdominal pressure. And after an

50:20

yeah maybe 40 minutes of this type of

50:22

exercises, I was palms on the

50:25

floor. Now, how do I go from not being

50:29

able to get to my knees to palms on the

50:32

floor in 40 minutes with three days of

50:36

horrible back pain? The difference is

50:38

when I my back was hurting, it was my

50:41

body was not going to let me go down,

50:43

right? The body was saying, "No way.

50:46

your back. I'm protecting you because

50:48

you were you are not stable. You're not

50:51

going to go any further. And what we

50:53

went through with this exercise and a

50:55

series of exercises was basically I mean

50:59

I'm oversimplifying this and sort of

51:00

anthropomorphizing it, but letting my

51:02

brain know it's okay. You're stable.

51:05

You're stable. You're stable. The back

51:06

is safe. The back is safe. Let him go.

51:09

And then ah I'm palms on the floor. So I

51:13

love testing this. Sometimes I'll just

51:14

wake up in the morning and do five

51:15

minutes of breathing exercises when I'm

51:17

stiff as a board and just get into a you

51:20

know position on the floor. Why the

51:21

breathing breathing exercises? Because

51:23

that's really how it's the it's the the

51:25

breathing is how I kind of create this

51:27

cylinder in my abdomen to sort of push

51:29

the you know push the the the floor of

51:31

the cylinder down as the pelvic wall.

51:33

The diaphragm is the se cylinder uh the

51:35

top and then the the entire you know

51:38

entirety of my abdomen is the wall of

51:40

the cylinder. And so I kind of go

51:41

through these exercises every single

51:43

day, usually on my back actually. That's

51:45

kind of like part of my warm-up and and

51:47

it's just a way to kind of ground myself

51:49

around creating uh concentric pressure

51:52

in the abdomen. Just to get some tips

51:54

from you around your your strength

51:56

training regime. Um how many exercises

51:59

do you do? What does I'm really curious.

52:00

So you train three days a week doing

52:02

strength and resistance stuff.

52:05

Do you do like shoulders and back and um

52:07

as like a pet like you know people it's

52:09

just totally Yeah. Yeah. Exactly. So on

52:11

Monday Monday is uh is pure lower body.

52:14

Okay. And uh uh Wednesday is arms and

52:18

shoulders and Friday is uh chest and

52:22

back. Okay. Super simple like nothing

52:25

nothing no rocket science. An hour uh I

52:28

mean it's it's a like an hour and a half

52:30

of lifting play plus maybe 20 minutes of

52:32

the warm-up stuff. So on the chest and

52:35

back day, how many chest exercises are

52:38

you doing? Four. Four. Okay. And then

52:40

four on back. Yeah. Okay. And I just I'm

52:42

just super setting them. And I'm going

52:45

to do maybe five sets of each. So five

52:48

working sets. So there's a lot of

52:49

warm-up in there, too. Um and I'll also

52:51

do some other stuff like some medball

52:53

slams or things like that as well.

52:55

There's been this huge rise in people

52:57

doing these um high roxes and sort of

53:00

elite endurance events and and such.

53:03

really interesting that it's become so

53:04

popular. Even things like running clubs,

53:06

I know, but the fact that people are

53:08

more people are doing marathons now than

53:10

ever before. Why do you think this is

53:11

happening? I don't know. I mean, I think

53:13

it's a very net positive thing, though.

53:15

I mean, I I I I do think that there's um

53:18

more and more people that are taking up

53:20

things like rucking and running and and

53:23

you know, finding camaraderie in these

53:24

things. The only thing I hope is that

53:26

that people are doing it in a manner

53:28

that's sustainable and safe and allows

53:29

them to do it indefinitely. So I, you

53:31

know, I just I'm always hopeful that

53:32

whatever thing that people are doing,

53:35

they're not injuring themselves cuz

53:36

again, rule number one is don't get

53:39

injured. So So you're, you know, you're

53:41

you're you're playing uh you're playing,

53:44

you want the game, the name of the game

53:45

is to play the game as long as possible.

53:48

In front of me, I have a bunch of

53:49

different graphs and images. Um, and

53:51

they some of them relate to a word you

53:53

said earlier on, which is V2 max. And

53:56

this is something I've heard you talk

53:57

about previously, but for anyone that

54:01

doesn't understand what V2 max is or why

54:03

it's important, um, can you explain what

54:06

it is and why it's so critical to

54:08

longevity and health span? I think most

54:11

people will be familiar with the idea

54:12

that we are obligate anorobes, which in

54:15

English means we cannot survive without

54:17

oxygen.

54:19

Okay. So why is that?

54:22

So oxygen is absolutely essential to

54:27

catalyze the chemical reaction that

54:30

turns food into a currency for energy

54:35

called

54:36

ATP. So everybody's probably heard of

54:38

ATP. ATP is the money, the currency of

54:42

energy in our body. Anything that

54:45

interrupts the production of ATP is

54:47

fatal. So an extreme example of that is

54:50

cyanide. Everyone's heard of cyanide as

54:52

a poison. If you take cyanide, you'll be

54:55

dead within seconds because cyanide

54:57

blocks one of the transporters in the

55:00

production of ATP. So that just gives

55:02

you a sense of how critical it is to

55:04

have an infinite and abundant supply of

55:06

ATP. Oxygen is also essential for that.

55:09

That's why without oxygen, you can only

55:11

survive for a couple of minutes. Longer

55:13

than you can without cyanide, but not

55:15

much longer. So how does it work?

55:18

So we breathe in air and that air goes

55:22

into our lungs and that air goes through

55:25

our lungs into these distal things

55:26

called capillaries where hemoglobin is

55:30

bringing the waste product called carbon

55:33

dioxide back to the lungs. And there's a

55:35

gradient of of partial pressure between

55:38

oxygen and carbon dioxide such that a

55:40

switch takes place. The air that we

55:42

breathe in delivers some of its oxygen

55:45

to the hemoglobin molecules and the

55:47

carbon dioxide diffuses off that into

55:49

the air and we breathe out air that is

55:52

lower in oxygen and higher in carbon

55:54

dioxide than what we breathed in. Mhm.

55:57

So if I go that was high oxygen, low

56:00

carbon

56:01

dioxide, that was low oxygen, high

56:04

carbon dioxide. And that's the that's

56:06

happening every second of every day.

56:08

That oxygen, that hemoglobin molecule

56:11

that's carrying oxygen is carrying it to

56:13

every cell in my body because every cell

56:16

in my body needs

56:18

oxygen. And that cell in the body is

56:21

taking the oxygen to run that chemical

56:23

reaction to make ATP. and it's shuttling

56:26

back carbon dioxide. And it's just the

56:28

most incredible thing in the world to

56:30

imagine how frequently this is

56:32

happening. And the more you exercise,

56:35

the more you consume oxygen. So oxygen

56:38

consumption is a proxy for energy

56:42

demand. So we can measure this. Now to

56:46

do so, you have to put a mask on because

56:49

I have to be able to measure very

56:52

precisely two things.

56:54

I have to be able to measure exactly the

56:57

flow rate of air going in and out of

56:59

your mouth and I have to be able to

57:02

measure very precisely the concentration

57:05

of oxygen coming out. If I know those

57:09

two things, I can calculate how many

57:12

lers per minute of oxygen you are

57:14

consuming.

57:16

So you and I sitting here right now are

57:21

probably

57:25

consuming less than half a liter a

57:29

minute. So call it 500 cc a minute of

57:32

oxygen right now because you have to

57:35

consume some to be alive. And look, I'm

57:37

moving my arms around and you're nodding

57:39

and taking notes. So, you know, if

57:42

you're sleeping, you might be consuming

57:44

300 milliliters of oxygen per minute.

57:46

That's that's the lowest level.

57:49

If you were to get up and we were to

57:51

walk around here, that number might go

57:54

up to 800 milliliters uh per minute. If

57:58

we were to walk a little more briskly,

57:59

we might be at a liter per minute of

58:01

oxygen. If I said, "Let's go out in the

58:03

parking lot and jog." Well, we might get

58:06

up to like 1.5 L per minute. we pick up

58:09

the pace a little bit, we'll get to two

58:10

liters per minute. If I start really,

58:12

really running us hard, we're going to

58:14

get to three and a half, four liters per

58:16

minute. Well, at some point, I am going

58:19

to push you so hard that you will

58:23

achieve your maximum level of oxygen

58:26

consumption. And if I push you any

58:28

harder and faster, you won't extract

58:30

more oxygen from the air. You may go

58:33

faster but you will do so through a

58:36

process that does not involve the

58:38

consumption of oxygen. You will do do so

58:40

through an anorobic glycolytic pathway

58:43

but you will have achieved your maximum

58:45

consumption of oxygen. And that number

58:47

has a very special name. It's called V2

58:50

max. So V2 max measured in liters per

58:53

minute is the maximum amount of oxygen

58:57

you can consume. And the only way you

58:59

can measure that again is to have this

59:01

mask with very very fancy apparatus that

59:05

measures both of those things I said.

59:06

And you have to be stressed hard. So we

59:10

typically do this on a treadmill or on a

59:12

bike. So your your your colleagues that

59:15

came into 10 squared yesterday, they did

59:17

it on treadmills. They ran and they ran

59:20

them and ran them and they ran them

59:22

until they couldn't go any faster. And

59:25

then we measured how many liters per

59:27

minute of oxygen they were consuming.

59:30

Now that answers what V2 max is. So the

59:32

next question is does this matter? Well

59:35

the short answer is we don't have a

59:37

single metric of humans that we can

59:39

measure that better predicts how long

59:41

they will live than how high their V2

59:43

max

59:44

is.

59:46

And it's not even close to be completely

59:49

clear. So if you compare somebody who is

59:52

in the top 2% to someone who is in the

59:55

bottom 25% for their age uh the

59:59

difference in mortality is 5x 500%. Yes.

60:03

400% technically because with hazard

60:05

ratios you you you go two two a 2x

60:09

hazard ratio is 100% I guess. Yeah. So

60:12

let's look at you. So I see you've

60:14

pulled this chart out which is one of my

60:15

favorite charts. Okay. So you Oh, by the

60:18

way, there's one other thing I should

60:19

state. We normalize this by weight.

60:22

Okay. Okay. So, we always divide that

60:24

number of liters per minute by how many

60:26

kilograms you are. So, the number is

60:29

actually reported as milliliters per

60:33

kilogram per minute. Okay.

60:36

Okay. All right. So if we look at

60:39

somebody who is your age, male 30 to

60:43

39, if their V2 max is below 35

60:48

milliliters per kilogram per minute,

60:50

they are in the bottom

60:55

25%. Conversely, if they are at 53

60:59

milliliters per kilogram per minute,

61:02

they are in the top two and a half

61:04

percent.

61:06

So to be clear, if you take a

61:09

35-year-old man and one of them has a V2

61:12

max of 53 and the other one has a V2 max

61:16

of

61:16

35, there is a

61:19

400% difference in their all-c cause

61:21

mortality over the coming year. Wow.

61:24

Okay. So all cause mortality, anything

61:27

killing them over the coming year.

61:28

That's right. Now, this becomes more and

61:30

more profound as you age because

61:33

the all cause mortality ratio for a

61:36

35-year-old is incredibly low. Yeah,

61:38

it's like 1%. So, that means you're

61:41

comparing 1% to 4%. It's not that big a

61:43

deal. But when you get up to my age, so

61:47

I'm two decades older than you. So now

61:50

the low bar, the bottom quartile is less

61:53

than

61:54

29. The high bar is more than 50.

61:59

Well, my relative mortality in the next

62:02

decade is probably 2 to 3%. So now

62:04

multiply that by four. Okay. When I get

62:07

into my marginal decade, the low bar is

62:12

18. The high bar is

62:16

36. That's a 2x difference in V2 max. A

62:20

4x difference in mortality is huge. when

62:24

the all-c cause mortality for an 85y old

62:27

is going to

62:29

be, you know, the one-year annual, you

62:31

know, the one-year mortality for that

62:33

person is, you know, more than 10%.

62:35

Yeah. So, one of the things that we do

62:39

is we sort of think through this not

62:43

just through the lens of mortality,

62:44

which is what I just walked you through

62:46

here, but also health span, which is

62:47

kind of what you were talking about

62:48

earlier with the graph of strength and

62:52

disability. So we have another figure

62:55

that we show people that um on the x

62:58

axis shows age. Yeah. And on the y ais

63:02

shows

63:03

V2. And it has a whole bunch of lines

63:07

that come across that show various

63:09

activities. You know, if you want to be

63:11

able to run a six-minute mile, you have

63:12

to have a V2 that's very high. If you

63:14

want to be able to run an 8-minute mile,

63:16

a 10-minute mile. If you want to be able

63:17

to climb a flight of stairs without

63:19

getting out of breath, like it shows all

63:21

of these different things. And you see

63:23

what the required V2 is. Mhm. I think in

63:26

fact we might even have these graphs in

63:27

here.

63:30

Yeah. Right there. So we put your dot on

63:35

the graph and we say if you stay where

63:38

you are, you're meaning right at that

63:40

green curve, you're in for a great life.

63:43

Why? Because even when you're in your

63:45

80s, you're still going to be able to do

63:47

all of those things. So the results

63:49

you're looking at here are Jack's

63:52

results. Yep. Who runs the production

63:53

here. He came to your center. Yep. Came

63:57

to 10 squared in Austin. He did the

63:59

test. I think he was on the treadmill

64:00

for like an hour or something like that.

64:02

And can you explain to me exactly what

64:04

his results say as it relates to what

64:06

you were just describing? Yeah. So he

64:09

did both a zone 2 and a V2 max test. So

64:12

Jack got on the treadmill and you know

64:15

there's a protocol for how you warm

64:16

somebody up. really want them to be able

64:18

to get to a maximum effort. You don't

64:20

just put them on a treadmill and crank

64:21

it up. You take you take your time

64:23

getting them up there. And he had an

64:25

amazing result. So, his V2 max was 4.1

64:30

lers per minute. And he achieved that at

64:34

a heart rate of 204 beats per minute,

64:38

which is higher than what was predicted

64:39

for his age. If you normalize it by his

64:42

weight, he was at

64:44

56.5 milliliters per kilogram per

64:47

minute. So when you look at his age,

64:51

because he's in his 20s, he was at about

64:54

the 97th percentile for his age, meaning

64:58

his V2 max was higher than 97% of people

65:02

his age.

65:04

And uh so out of the gate that just

65:06

tells us from a longevity standpoint,

65:09

our goal is to keep him there as long as

65:11

possible. I mean, we're so ambitious

65:14

with our patients and clients that we

65:16

actually want them to be as as an

65:18

aspiration to be two decades younger at

65:21

the top 2%.

65:23

So if you're 50, you want to be V2 max

65:27

north of 53. And then the other thing we

65:31

do is we check on something called heart

65:33

rate recovery. So in 60 seconds post V2

65:37

max, how long does it take uh how many

65:40

beats does their heart rate come down in

65:42

one minute? This is also a very powerful

65:44

predictor of mortality because it's a

65:47

huge indication of what's called

65:48

parasympathetic sympathetic balance. So,

65:50

it's basically a question of how does

65:53

the how how much is their autonomic

65:56

nervous system in favor of sort of a

65:59

stress response versus a recovery

66:00

response. And so, the gold standard

66:02

here, we want to see people that can

66:04

recover at least 30 beats in the first

66:08

minute. He did pretty well. He recovered

66:10

28 beats. You know, if you're really,

66:12

really fit, you're going to be 40, 50

66:14

beats of recovery within the first um

66:17

one minute. It's incredible. Incredible.

66:20

Then we tested his um lactate levels and

66:25

we ran him for what we called zone 2

66:28

testing. Right? So zone 2 is his aerobic

66:31

base. This is where he should be

66:32

spending 80% of his training. 80% of his

66:35

cardio training time should be in this

66:37

energy system. So it's hard enough that

66:40

it's not just pure recovery, but not so

66:43

hard that it's, you know, uh pushing

66:46

energy systems that are that are higher.

66:48

This is this is a pace he should be able

66:49

to hold for an hour and he should

66:52

certainly feel like he's working but not

66:54

feel it too much. Technically it's also

66:56

a place where he's prod he's got maximum

66:58

fat oxidation. So we do this also in the

67:01

same measure on a treadmill. This is a

67:03

bit more of a complicated test because

67:05

you're titrating between how he feels

67:07

and what his blood lactate levels are.

67:10

Maybe not to get too complicated in the

67:12

weeds on that, but we're simultaneously

67:15

looking at the ratio of how much carbon

67:18

dioxide he produces to how much oxygen

67:20

he consumes. That tells us how much fat

67:23

he is using in his own body. And we look

67:27

at that number and he maxed out

67:30

at.77 grams per minute, which is very

67:32

good. One gram per minute of fat

67:34

oxidation is exceptional. So

67:38

7677 is pretty darn good. His lactate

67:41

hit about 2 mill and he achieved this

67:44

running at 7.3 miles hour. So So again,

67:48

that's there there's a lot to unpack in

67:50

there, but that gives us a pretty good

67:51

sense of his level of fitness. And for a

67:54

guy in his 20s, um that's that's really

67:57

good fitness. He does a lot of running.

67:59

Yes. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. And and but even

68:01

this test is a body of work. We normally

68:02

would separate these two tests on two

68:04

separate days. Okay. So people, you

68:06

know, the the people who come to 10

68:07

squared are not from Austin. They're

68:09

from all over the place. So they come in

68:10

for two days of testing. And you got to

68:13

sort of figure out a way to take a

68:14

person who's not necessarily that fit

68:16

and and allow them to do these tests. So

68:18

it's kind of broken up over to a couple

68:20

days so they can mix it with the

68:21

strength testing and all the other

68:22

stuff. And if you were advising Jack on

68:25

how to improve some of these scores

68:27

here, what would you say? So the truth

68:29

of the matter is looking at his stuff

68:32

here I would say I think you've got the

68:34

endurance thing really covered in his

68:36

case there were other issues that were

68:38

uncovered during his intake that were of

68:40

more concern and this is a matter of

68:42

like now what we think of as portfolio

68:44

management right so when your V2 max is

68:47

in the top 2% when your fat oxidizing 7

68:50

you know almost8 grams per minute and

68:52

he's got a heart rate of 165 to 170 when

68:55

he's um in zone 2 I mean this Guys,

68:58

cardio is dialed in. Bad skin. I've had

69:02

it and I'm sure many of you listening

69:03

have had it, too. Or maybe you have it

69:06

right now. I know how draining it can

69:09

be, especially if you're in a job where

69:10

you're presenting often like I am. So,

69:12

let me tell you about something that's

69:13

helped both my partner and me and my

69:15

sister, which is red light therapy. I

69:18

only got into this a couple of years

69:19

ago, but I wish I'd known a little bit

69:21

sooner. I've been using our show

69:23

sponsors Bon Chargar's infrared sauna

69:25

blanket for a while now, but I just got

69:27

hold of their red light therapy mask as

69:29

well. Red light has been proven to have

69:31

so many benefits for the body. Like any

69:33

area of your skin that's exposed will

69:35

see a reduction in scarring, wrinkles,

69:37

and even blemishes. It also helps with

69:39

complexion. It boosts collagen, and it

69:41

does that by targeting the upper layers

69:43

of your skin. And Bon Charge ships

69:45

worldwide with easy returns and a

69:47

year-long warranty on all of their

69:48

products. So, if you'd like to try it

69:50

yourself, head over to

69:52

bondcharge.com/diary and use code diary

69:54

for 25% off any product sitewide. Just

69:58

make sure you order through this link.

70:01

boncharge.com/diary with code diary.

70:03

I've got a story that I think you'll be

70:05

interested in hearing, and it's brought

70:06

to you by my show sponsor, Fiverr. About

70:09

6 months ago, my team and I sat down to

70:11

try and work out how we were going to

70:12

build the most valuable newsletter for

70:14

ambitious entrepreneurs ever. And after

70:17

hours of discussion, we finally agreed

70:19

that to tip the odds in our favor, we

70:21

needed to be constantly experimenting.

70:24

But to do this, we needed man power or

70:26

woman power. So we hired a group of

70:28

freelancers through Fiverr and tasked

70:30

them with testing different elements,

70:31

which are like the visuals in the

70:32

newsletter, the subject lines, the copy

70:34

links. And even after launching 100

70:36

CEOs, the new newsletter, and getting

70:38

93,000 signups on the first day, our

70:41

experimenting hasn't stopped. I'm

70:43

confident we wouldn't have seen the same

70:45

success had we not experimented in this

70:47

way. And our freelance support from

70:48

Fiverr was critical to that. So next

70:50

time you're launching something, find

70:52

your failures and fix them fast with

70:54

Fiverr freelancers. Visit

70:56

fiverr.com/diary today and use code doc

70:59

for 10% off your first order. These are

71:02

Jack's results. So I've invited Jack in

71:04

because I feel like he might have some

71:05

questions and you might have some

71:06

questions. So you guys go ahead. All

71:08

right. Well, uh, first off, Jack, thanks

71:11

for being an awesome guinea pig

71:12

yesterday. You hit it out of the park,

71:15

um, as far as your cardio training. So,

71:17

tell me a little bit like what are you

71:18

what are you doing for cardio? How often

71:20

are you running? So, I actually stripped

71:21

it back quite a lot. I probably started

71:24

maybe maybe like two years ago going

71:26

really heavy on running and that's all I

71:29

did. And then I started getting a little

71:30

bit injured. So, now I've cut it back,

71:32

but I'd say I do like one long run a

71:35

week and that's like 20k. Outside of

71:37

that, I don't really do much other

71:38

cardio. Interesting. I I know that the

71:41

team talked to you about your left foot.

71:44

Yes. And did did they show you the

71:46

pictures on the treadmill? They did.

71:47

Yeah. That's super interesting. Super

71:49

interesting. I sprained my ankle really

71:51

badly like 6 months ago. Y said that

71:53

could have been something. I think it's

71:55

very likely that the ankle sprain has

71:57

not has changed your gate such that you

72:01

probably are going to develop an injury

72:03

over time with your running. if the if

72:07

your pattern is not corrected. So,

72:08

you're overcompensating on the left and

72:11

did I I assume that I assume you noticed

72:12

the difference in the height of your

72:14

shoulders and your head and everything

72:15

while you were running. So, even though

72:17

the engine is working insanely well,

72:19

this test only measures the performance

72:21

of your engine, your chassis, which is a

72:23

subjective assessment to use the car

72:26

analogy shows that the chassis is a bit

72:28

weak. Okay, I'll give a bit of context

72:30

on what that actually was. So, when I

72:31

was running on the treadmill, um I think

72:33

it was Kyler was it? He he showed me a

72:35

picture afterwards of me running and

72:37

basically my head was right in the

72:39

middle. When I went on my right side,

72:42

but then when I went on my left, my

72:44

whole body was like a bit lopsided. Y So

72:46

yeah, that's kind of what you're talking

72:47

about there. That's right. And again,

72:49

like the good news about running is each

72:51

step is very light. Mhm. But if you're

72:54

running 20k, that's a lot of steps. So

72:57

even something that's a light impact but

73:00

done thousands of times will produce a

73:02

problem. Okay, so let's shift from how

73:06

well the engine is, which is exceptional

73:09

at both ends. By the way, to be clear,

73:12

your peak engine output, which is V2

73:14

max, was awesome, and your engine

73:16

efficiency, which was your zone 2, your

73:19

fat oxidation, exceptional. We do have

73:21

this issue on the chassis that needs to

73:22

be addressed or you're going to get a

73:24

repetitive strain injury. Mhm. Um, so

73:26

then the next thing that the the team

73:28

did was just a very simple test called

73:29

the DEEXA scan, but we we do a more

73:32

comprehensive one. So we're looking at

73:34

all the bone density, left hip, right

73:36

hip, lumbar, spine, and then total body

73:38

fat, total muscle mass, and then

73:40

visceral fat, which is fat around the

73:41

organs. I think the most surprising

73:43

aspect of the test was your bone

73:46

density. So, um, a DEXA scan, uh,

73:50

measures bone density very accurately

73:53

and both, uh, sort of across the board

73:56

in terms of your your lumbar spine and

73:58

your right hip and your left hip, you

74:00

were in your in your lumbar spine two

74:03

standard deviations below the mean for

74:06

someone your age. So, that means

74:09

basically you're in the bottom 10

74:11

percentile of bone density for a guy

74:14

your age. And for your hips, you're not

74:18

much better. Both on the left and right

74:20

hip, you're about 1 and a half to 1.7

74:22

standard deviations below the

74:24

mean. So what does that mean? That means

74:28

that you're at you you already have

74:30

something called osteoporosis. So when

74:33

your T-core, which in your case is

74:35

almost the same as your zcore because of

74:37

your age, but the zcore compares you to

74:39

someone your age. The t-core compares

74:40

you to someone 30 years old. So when

74:43

your T-core is minus1 um you have

74:46

osteopenia and when it gets below minus

74:49

2.5 you have osteoporosis. Those are

74:50

just technical definitions of bone

74:52

density. The problem is your risk of

74:54

bone fracture goes up really

74:57

significantly. Now because of how young

74:59

you are. It's not like I'm worried

75:01

you're going to walk out of here and

75:02

something's going to go wrong. But the

75:05

risk of you sustaining an injury in

75:07

sport is is not trivial. Right? If you

75:08

were out skiing and Steven was out

75:11

skiing, assuming he had normal bone

75:12

density, and you guys both took a

75:14

tumble, I would be infinitely more

75:16

worried about your bone density. And we

75:17

have patients in our practice who do.

75:19

They're young, healthy people, and they

75:21

get these freakish fractures while

75:22

skiing or playing sports and things like

75:24

that and they have really low bone

75:26

density. So, so one, it's just something

75:28

we want to address. The bigger concern

75:29

is that what's what is the what is the

75:32

story of this going to be when you're 60

75:33

and 65 and 70? And that's that's the one

75:35

where we really want to mitigate it. So,

75:37

I know that the team talked to you about

75:39

making sure you follow up with an

75:40

endocrinologist. You want to make sure

75:41

that there's nothing here that is

75:43

medically obvious to be treated, such as

75:46

vitamin D deficiency, anything that has

75:48

to do with parathyroid hormone or

75:50

calcium and things that are, you know,

75:51

medically obvious to treat. Um the most

75:55

important behavioral thing that a person

75:57

can do with low bone density beyond

75:59

correcting all the nutritional

76:01

deficiencies that can lead to it is

76:04

applying heavy load to the bone. So

76:07

bones are active pieces of tissue even

76:11

though we don't think of them that way

76:12

and they respond to deformation. So you

76:15

have to put strain into a bone for it to

76:19

respond and strengthen. And it's

76:23

counterintuitive that running is not

76:25

amazing at doing that. It's not bad. So

76:28

on in general, runners have better bone

76:30

density than sedentary people, but not

76:32

by much, believe it or not. Uh swimmers

76:35

and cyclists, believe it or not, tech

76:37

actually have lower bone density on

76:39

average. But resistance training with

76:42

heavy weights is is actually kind of

76:45

what is necessary. Grappling as well, by

76:47

the way. people who do jiu-jitsu,

76:48

strength training, resistance training,

76:50

those are those are the ways that you're

76:51

going to you're going to increase this.

76:52

So, I would say that was the first

76:54

finding that that that is, you know,

76:56

important and worth discussing. Do you

76:59

have any questions on that? Cuz I've got

77:00

a couple. Uh well, I think my first one

77:02

was so I I only actually started lifting

77:04

weights like properly maybe two years

77:06

ago. So, that's probably why you're

77:07

seeing that. Maybe. I mean, I guess did

77:10

you have asthma as a child or anything?

77:11

No. I know when I my mom says something

77:14

about like when I was born I had low

77:17

calcium something about low calcium they

77:19

had to put something on my teeth but I

77:20

don't know what that is exactly. Well if

77:22

you had low if if there's something that

77:24

was impacting your calcium levels when

77:25

you were little that would certainly be

77:27

a potential risk for it. Um the the our

77:29

bones are mostly formed for for males in

77:33

the early 20s for girls typically in the

77:35

late teens. So, anything that disrupted

77:38

calcium metabolism when you were young

77:39

could have played a role in this for

77:41

sure. Um, the reason I asked if you had

77:43

asthma is a lot of the times we see

77:45

folks that you know had any medical

77:47

condition that required corticosteroids,

77:49

prolonged use of corticosteroids would

77:51

be another big risk factor. Of course,

77:53

there's also genetics. So, probably

77:55

worth knowing if your parents themselves

77:57

have low bone density. Um, but but it

78:00

sounds like there's something going on

78:02

with calcium metabolism as a as a kid

78:03

that might have played a role. Um the

78:06

reason it is really important to connect

78:08

with an endocrinologist now is there are

78:10

actual medical uh treatments that can

78:13

increase bone density in addition to all

78:14

of sort of the total optimization of the

78:17

nutritional stuff vitamin D calcium

78:19

levels things of that nature and of

78:21

course the training. M are there

78:23

specific exercises I would do to

78:25

increase that or is it just an all round

78:27

kind of No, I mean I think the the if

78:29

you think about the long bones of the

78:31

body which are the the the ones that

78:32

we're basically measuring here I mean

78:34

the short bones in the spine but the

78:35

femurss and hips anything that puts

78:37

those things under deformation. So

78:39

anything from a farmer's carry to a step

78:42

up to a box squat. I mean, you know,

78:44

it's whatever you can do safely that's

78:46

loading you and placing these bones in a

78:48

manner that that forces them to to

78:51

actually undergo deformation. The way

78:53

the way and the other thing I would also

78:55

make sure of is that someone's checking

78:56

your blood levels to look at things like

78:58

testosterone and estrogen. So estrogen,

79:00

believe it or not, probably the most

79:01

important hormone besides vitamin D in

79:04

bone health. So you can think of a bone

79:07

as something with a strain gauge in it.

79:10

And as the bone is deformed, the strain

79:13

gauge sends a signal, a chemical signal

79:16

to cells that build the bone. The

79:18

chemical signal is estrogen. So the

79:21

reason women are so susceptible to

79:23

osteopenio and osteoporosis is once they

79:26

go through menopause, many of them lose

79:28

their estrogen if they're not placed on

79:29

well, they all lose their estrogen, but

79:30

if they're not placed on hormone

79:31

replacement therapy, they don't get it

79:33

back. And so they lose that chemical

79:35

signal. So women see a rapid drop off in

79:37

bone density at menopause. Peter, is

79:39

this graph accurate roughly?

79:42

Yes, this would be accurate. So, if this

79:44

is broadly accurate, what is the game

79:46

then for someone like Jack? Is it is it

79:49

building bone or is it preventing

79:52

decline? Yeah. Preventing decline. Most

79:54

of us reach our peak bone mass uh in our

79:58

20s. Okay. Yep. So, so the name of the

80:01

game is prevent it from getting any

80:03

weaker. The good news is, by the way, I

80:05

had a woman on my podcast named Belinda

80:07

Beck who studies osteoporosis. She's

80:10

she's from Australia and um she did this

80:13

amazing study there called the Lyftmore

80:15

study where she enrolled a bunch of

80:17

women with

80:18

osteoporosis who had never done any

80:21

resistance training and half of them

80:22

were randomized to the usual activities

80:25

like you know yoga and things of that

80:27

nature and then half of them were

80:28

randomized to heavy resistance training.

80:31

And the women that did the heavy

80:32

resistance training actually first of

80:35

all on DEXA saw no change in bone

80:37

density or saw a very minor reduction in

80:39

bone density compared to a significant

80:41

reduction in the women who were not

80:42

resistance training. But more

80:44

importantly on CT scans the women who

80:47

had did done the resistance training

80:48

actually showed an increase in cortical

80:50

thickening of bone suggesting that it

80:52

might even be that DEXA is not by itself

80:55

sufficient to fully assess bone health.

80:58

It assesses bone density, but not

81:00

necessarily bone health. And her

81:02

hypothesis is that these women might

81:04

actually be getting stronger bones even

81:06

if the density is going down just a

81:08

little. But either way, even if density

81:10

were sufficient, the fact that their

81:11

density went down so much less than the

81:14

others, uh, was amazing. And it's it's

81:16

actually, you know, if you can find the

81:17

video and link to it on YouTube, Belinda

81:19

Beck's lift more study. It's just an

81:21

awesome video to watch these little old

81:24

ladies walking around picking up, you

81:26

know, deadlifting their body weight and

81:27

stuff like that. Is there anything else

81:29

you wanted to ask Jack or about your

81:31

results or anything else pressing

81:33

questions you you have? Yeah, nutrition

81:35

would be a good one actually. Yeah,

81:37

calcium, vitamin D, protein, everything

81:39

that's going to support muscle mass as

81:41

well because that's the other thing that

81:42

we found here. So, we we looked at your

81:44

body fat percentage. Again, in absolute

81:46

terms, not that high, but for your age,

81:48

pretty high, right? Because you're

81:49

because you're young. So you were at the

81:51

80th percentile for your age and your

81:53

visceral fat was at the 50th percentile

81:56

for your age. We like to see so we don't

81:58

really care that much about total body

82:00

fat. We care a lot more about visceral

82:02

fat. So the fact that your visceral fat

82:04

was at the 50th percentile. Visceral fat

82:06

is the fat that's around your organs.

82:08

That's the more metabolically deranging

82:10

damaging fat. We actually we have a very

82:11

high standard. We want to see that below

82:13

the 10th percentile. I'll hit pause on

82:15

that for a second. But then to relay the

82:17

next thing that we looked at was your

82:19

muscle mass. So, we looked at the total

82:21

muscle mass in your arms and legs.

82:23

That's called your appendicular lean

82:25

mass. And then we looked at the total

82:26

fat-free mass in your body. And both of

82:29

those put you at about the 20th

82:31

percentile. So, the first question I'm

82:34

asking when I'm looking at these results

82:36

is, are you adequately muscled or

82:39

undermuscled? So, I really want to see

82:41

somebody above the 50th percentile in

82:43

muscle mass. So, you're under muscled.

82:46

The second thing I'm looking at is with

82:49

the body fat percentage where it is both

82:51

and the visceral fat is that to me I

82:54

call that overnourished. Now I don't

82:56

have blood tests to see where you are

82:57

metabolically but I want those are the

82:59

those are what I call my three

83:00

questions. Are you metabolically healthy

83:02

or not? I need a blood test to see it. I

83:04

suspect you are though based on your

83:06

zone 2. So the fact that your fat

83:08

oxidation was 77 grams per minute very

83:11

hard and your fasting lactate was 0.5

83:13

which is also very good. So my bet is

83:16

you are metabolically healthy. We would

83:18

have to do a bunch of blood tests to

83:19

confirm that, but I bet you would be.

83:22

But you are

83:23

overnourished, meaning body fat is too

83:25

high and visceral fat is too high. And

83:27

you are under muscled, your ALMI and

83:30

your FFMI are too low. So that

83:32

immediately tells me like what do you

83:34

need to be doing? You need to be eating

83:37

more protein, fewer calories, more

83:39

resistance training. You don't need to

83:41

do any more cardio. Like that's like

83:43

oversimplification, but like that's the

83:44

that's your path forward. And the last

83:48

question I had around uh I think I've

83:49

heard you speak about it before, but

83:50

it's around like the potential of what

83:52

your muscles mass can be. If you lift as

83:55

a teenager versus if you start lifting

83:57

and you're I'm 29. So if I start lifting

83:59

at like 27, the potential is a lot less,

84:02

right? Is that true or is that uh I'm

84:04

I'm I'm not sure. I think I think

84:06

genetics play a pretty big role in that.

84:09

Um, and I think, in other words, I think

84:12

that your ceiling is probably more

84:15

dictated by your genetics than it is the

84:18

age at which you started. I think if you

84:20

took a, you know, someone who was just

84:22

genetically wired to put on muscle and

84:24

they don't start lifting until they're

84:25

in their 20s, they're still going to put

84:27

on a ton of muscle. I mean, like, I've

84:29

been lifting weights my whole life since

84:31

I was 13 years old. I'm never going to

84:32

be like a monster. Like, it's just not

84:35

gonna happen, right? there's no chance

84:37

I'm ever going to be on the stage of a

84:39

bodybuilding, you know, contest. Okay.

84:41

Yeah. That's just one thing that's like

84:42

always haunted me. Well, haunted me in

84:44

the last two years. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah.

84:46

And now you but but but I don't again

84:48

there's you have to consider a bunch of

84:49

variables as you're lifting. Right. So,

84:51

are you training at the right intensity?

84:54

Are you training at the right frequency?

84:56

Do you have the right selection of

84:58

exercises? Is your technique correct?

85:00

So, lifting weights, it's not a uniform

85:02

term. Um, so, so you really have to dive

85:05

into that, right? So, to put on muscle,

85:07

you probably need to be doing a minimum

85:10

of 10 and I would say ideally closer to

85:12

20 sets per week per body group. The

85:15

intensity has to be sufficient. So, we

85:17

were talking about that minimum two,

85:20

ideally one rep in reserve per working

85:22

set. So, if you're if you're just doing

85:25

like three sets of 10, but you could

85:27

have done three more reps if you really

85:29

pushed, there was no training stimulus

85:31

there. I've got a question on that which

85:33

is linked to one of my friends, but it's

85:36

something I've heard you say which is

85:37

you you've said to me before that you

85:39

struggled with gaining weight. Yes. A

85:41

friend of mine says has said this to me

85:42

for the last 10 years that muscle. Yeah.

85:44

He said yeah. So he says like he even

85:46

when he eats a lot he has like feels

85:48

like he's force-feeding himself um and

85:50

it's like not natural and then when he

85:51

goes to the gym he hasn't seen the

85:53

results. Whereas for me I don't I've

85:56

never had the problem of like I I can

85:58

eat loads and then I go to the gym and I

86:00

work out and muscle comes on. So, for

86:02

those people that struggle with a eating

86:04

enough calories and then they go to the

86:07

gym and they don't feel like they're

86:08

able to gain muscle, you've you've

86:10

experienced this before, haven't you?

86:11

You've experienced people that have said

86:11

this to you. Sure. It's actually much

86:14

more common with with women than men,

86:16

but um it it's sort of focusing more on

86:19

the protein as opposed to the total

86:20

calories. I mean, you do need the

86:22

calories, but it's probably breaking

86:24

down the protein intake into smaller

86:26

servings. Um, and that for many people

86:29

just means they have to get shakes or

86:30

things like that. like they're not going

86:31

to get it through whole foods all the

86:33

time. I I I don't need to drink shakes

86:35

because I'm able to get protein through

86:36

food enough, but that shouldn't be

86:39

viewed as as something you don't want to

86:40

do. I mean, even I'm sure some of the,

86:43

you know, most successful bodybuilders

86:44

in the world just based on their protein

86:46

requirements still have to resort to

86:47

shakes. So, figuring out what it takes

86:49

to get one gram of protein per pound of

86:52

body weight and making sure you get

86:54

that, even if it takes four servings a

86:56

day, is a it should be the highest

86:58

priority. And again, you don't need more

87:00

calories at this point based on your

87:02

visceral and body fat. Um, we just need

87:04

to make sure you're getting that gram of

87:06

protein per pound of body weight. Um,

87:08

and that you're doing the you're getting

87:10

the right training stimulus in the gym.

87:12

Okay. Yeah. Thank you.

87:15

Okay. Thank you for that, Peter. I

87:17

didn't know we were going to be doing a

87:18

little consult here. I know, but it's

87:20

super fascinating. Even for me, even

87:21

though they're not my results, I learned

87:22

a ton about about that. Um the question

87:25

we don't necessarily need to go through

87:26

all of the results here for Jamaima but

87:28

how do you see women's results being

87:30

different typically as it relates to

87:31

bone density muscle mass and those

87:33

things. I was wondering if even for the

87:34

V2 max are expecting different results

87:36

for women or well we we score them on a

87:39

different curve. So the the results are

87:41

going to be a little lower and again

87:43

part of the reason is women have less

87:44

muscle all things equal and muscle is

87:48

the organ that is going to consume the

87:50

most oxygen uh I mean outside of the

87:52

brain. So, um, so you know, if you if

87:55

you took a a woman at 25 and a man at

87:58

25, there's a different threshold for

88:00

what a what the grade is on the curve.

88:03

But I would say the biggest difference

88:04

we typically see is, and not so much at

88:08

the ages of these guys because they're

88:10

both so young and fit, but as we as we

88:13

get into kind of older folks, we we

88:16

definitely see more of an issue with

88:18

muscle mass in women and bone density in

88:20

women. I was quite surprised with Jack

88:22

when you you talked about um visceral

88:24

fat. Yeah. There's two types of fat that

88:26

I've come to learn. Subcutaneous which

88:27

is I think is on the outside is and then

88:29

visceral is around the organs. Right. So

88:30

the body fat is mostly measuring his

88:32

subcutaneous fat. Oh, on the outside. Y.

88:35

Okay.

88:37

I've got a little bit of subcutaneous

88:38

fat right now. As we do all, how do I

88:41

know if it's if it's an issue or not?

88:43

Unfortunately, it's very difficult to

88:46

know without further investigation. Um,

88:49

I say this because I haven't been able

88:52

to predict it looking at somebody. Like

88:53

I've seen people who have lots of

88:55

subcutaneous fat, but when you look at

88:58

their liver and look at their visceral

89:00

fat, they have virtually none. And they

89:02

tend to be quite metabolically healthy.

89:05

So maybe aesthetically they've got too

89:07

much body fat. And there are lots of

89:09

reasons why they might want that, might

89:10

not want that, I'm sorry, based on, you

89:12

know, excess body weight that just in

89:14

general is an impediment to movement or,

89:16

you know, pain in their knees or joints.

89:18

Um, but it's not actually causing them

89:21

harm physiologically. And conversely,

89:24

you know, if you look at Jack, like he's

89:25

he actually looks he's a pretty

89:26

lean-look guy. Like nobody would look at

89:28

Jack and say he's overweight, but he's

89:30

got a little bit too much fat on the

89:31

inside. and that if not I mean I think

89:36

his running and his fitness is probably

89:38

offsetting it metabolically but there

89:41

might be come a day when that's not the

89:43

case. So it it you know this is

89:46

something that I think just needs to be

89:48

addressed and and again people that are

89:50

in their 20s can get away with a lot and

89:52

it starts to become something you don't

89:54

get away with in your 40s. Is there a

89:55

genetic component to this and also what

89:57

has caused

89:59

it? What usually causes it? the body

90:02

fat, the visceral fat. Visceral fat.

90:04

Yeah, there's definitely a genetic

90:06

component to it, but the truth of the

90:07

matter is the cause of this is is just

90:10

fuel partitioning. It's just it's just

90:11

where the body is putting excess energy,

90:14

right? So, so all of the fat we have in

90:16

our body comes down to where does our

90:18

body choose to store excess energy

90:20

because that's that's the only way we

90:21

store it. We can't store protein. So, we

90:24

can only store I mean, we store protein

90:26

technically in muscles, but we're

90:27

basically storing carbohydrates and fat.

90:30

So you can store carbohydrates

90:32

preferably in the muscle and in the

90:34

liver as glycogen, but that's a very

90:35

finite source. So most of where you're

90:38

storing those things is excess glucose

90:41

gets stored as fat and then in fat gets

90:43

stored as fat. So if theoretically if

90:46

Jack had a higher muscle mass, he would

90:48

have less visceral fat potentially.

90:51

Yeah, probably because first of all

90:53

muscle is more metabolically active. So

90:55

more metabolically active tissue means

90:57

higher energy expenditure which would

90:59

all things equal mean lower fat. That

91:02

makes sense. And if there were a couple

91:05

of things that I could do to reduce my

91:06

visceral fat, we talked about exercise

91:08

there. We talked about diet.

91:09

Intermittent fasting, do they are you

91:11

are you a fan of those kinds of things?

91:13

There's no evidence that intermittent

91:15

fasting produces any benefits above the

91:18

equivalent amount of caloric

91:20

restriction. So you know whe whether

91:22

you're eating in eight hours or six

91:24

hours or across 12 hours if the same

91:27

number of calories are consumed it's

91:29

essentially producing the same outcome.

91:31

Sleep stress absolutely dramatic. We've

91:34

talked about sleep already right if your

91:36

sleep is not good you are going to be

91:38

insulin resistant. If you are insulin

91:40

resistant, you are partitioning fuel in

91:42

an unfavorable way, which in English

91:44

means you are more likely to access

91:47

glucose than access fat even at low

91:50

levels of intensity when you should be

91:52

accessing fat. That's why, by the way, I

91:55

thought he's probably still insulin

91:57

sensitive based on how high his fat

91:59

oxidation was.

92:02

Meaning when he was at 165 beats per

92:04

minute on a treadmill, he was pulling

92:07

out almost 0.88 gram per minute of fat.

92:11

That's really good. That tells me he

92:13

fuel partitions

92:15

well. He knows how to access fat when he

92:18

needs fat. So that's that's still

92:19

working in his favor. But for many

92:21

people, once they're exercising that

92:24

hard, their their fat oxidation goes to

92:26

hell and all they're doing is accessing

92:28

glucose. But there could be a link for

92:30

in his case between sleep and visceral

92:34

fat. Yep. Especially if he travels with

92:36

you. Yeah. And then alcohol. You mean

92:38

Jack doesn't drink alcohol? But

92:39

generally visceral fat and alcohol.

92:40

Yeah. Bad sign. I want to talk to you

92:42

about this alcohol point because I saw

92:44

Huberman um tweet the other day saying

92:45

that it's now pretty well established

92:48

that even moderate alcohol intake is bad

92:50

for you. But I sat here the other day

92:51

with someone else who said to me that

92:53

they talked about the Medit

92:54

Mediterranean diet, the Italians, they

92:56

seem to be fine, etc. And I wanted to

92:58

kind of get your perspective on whether

93:00

small amounts of alcohol intake are okay

93:03

or not because some people still think

93:05

it's healthy to have moderate alcohol

93:06

intake. It's better for the heart. I

93:10

think that is pretty abundantly not

93:12

true. So I don't

93:15

think I am aware of any real evidence

93:19

and we've scrutinized the heck out of

93:20

this. We so the subscribers to our

93:22

podcast get these premium newsletters

93:24

every month where we do an ultra insane

93:27

deep dive into a topic and alcohol was

93:30

one of them. So this is like you're

93:31

getting a treaties right a 20page

93:33

research report on a topic. So uh for

93:36

anybody who's interested in that they

93:38

should go and get the alcohol piece but

93:40

I'll link it below. Yeah, the TLDDR is

93:43

that there is no compelling evidence

93:45

whatsoever that there is a health

93:48

benefit that comes from ethanol

93:50

consumption. The molecule of ethanol is

93:53

not healthy at any dose and I believe

93:56

that is unambiguously true. That said,

94:00

it does not appear to be linearly

94:05

toxic, meaning low doses, probably sub

94:11

15 gram per day. 15 grams of ethanol

94:14

would be what you would get in a

94:16

standard drink. Standard drink, not a

94:18

generous drink. So, you know, whatever.

94:20

Like 3 4 ounces of wine would be 15

94:23

grams of ethanol, 14 grams of ethanol.

94:26

It appears that for most people the

94:28

toxicity of that amount of ethanol is

94:31

very difficult to

94:33

measure. And this is where you get into

94:36

the area of for some people there might

94:39

actually be enough of a pro-social

94:42

benefit from that amount of ethanol if

94:44

consumed in an otherwise healthy

94:47

environment. Right? So if you talk about

94:50

the individual who comes home and has a

94:53

glass of wine while he's with his wife

94:55

and they kind of unwind in the backyard

94:58

and talk about their day and things like

95:00

that, there might be benefits from doing

95:02

that that outweigh the very very small

95:05

amount of toxicity that came in that

95:07

ethanol.

95:08

Once you reach about 30 grams of ethanol

95:10

a day, I don't see and I have not seen a

95:13

shred of evidence that there is any

95:15

amount of pro-social behavior that can

95:17

offset the toxicity of that ethanol. So,

95:21

while I would not go as far as the World

95:24

Health Organization, which has condemned

95:26

ethanol as a carcinogen at every dose, I

95:31

just don't see the data to make that

95:33

case for every dose.

95:35

I tell my patients in a very measured,

95:38

nuanced way, kind of what I just told

95:40

you, like, you know, I drink alcohol and

95:45

I I but I but I think about it every

95:48

time I do, like, is it worth it? Is it

95:50

worth it? Is it worth it? Like, I'm not

95:51

just drinking for the sake of drinking.

95:53

I have this expression, don't drink on

95:54

airplanes because the alcohol sucks.

95:56

Like, I'm not just drinking to numb

95:58

myself, right? Like, if I'm going to

96:00

drink, there's a reason. It's going to

96:02

be really freaking good. And that for me

96:05

amounts to probably like four drinks a

96:07

week. Just for a second, I want to talk

96:08

about a company I've invested in and who

96:10

sponsored this podcast called Zoey. Like

96:13

me, many of you are big on tracking your

96:15

fitness and your sleep. But how many of

96:17

you understand how your body handles

96:18

food? Metabolic fitness is all about

96:21

understanding your metabolism's response

96:23

to food. And we all react differently.

96:25

So Zoe created a test to help you

96:27

understand how your body responds. And

96:29

it starts with their famous test

96:30

cookies, which are identical test meals

96:33

with the same sugar, fat, and calorie

96:35

content of the average meal, and

96:37

therefore acts as a metabolic challenge.

96:39

You also wear a continuous glucose

96:41

monitor that tests your blood sugar

96:42

levels. I've done this test, and it left

96:44

me wondering how my metabolic fitness

96:46

compared to others like me, and my

96:48

results revealed everything. So, if

96:50

you'd like to learn about your body's

96:52

response to food, head over to zoey.com

96:54

to order your test kit now. And if you

96:56

want a discount, use code Stephen 10 at

96:59

checkout for 10% off your membership. As

97:01

a Zoey member, you'll get an athome test

97:03

kit and personalized nutrition program

97:05

to help you make smarter food choices

97:07

that support your health. That's zoe.com

97:09

with code

97:11

stephven10. You're just talking about

97:13

airplanes there. I was thinking about

97:14

electrolytes. There's been a huge boom

97:17

over the last couple of months year of

97:20

people consuming more and more um

97:22

electrolytes. Everyone's launching an

97:24

electrolyte drink and consuming much

97:26

more salt and sodium. What do you make

97:28

of this? Are we electrolyte deficient?

97:31

Um, well, first of all, as a disclosure,

97:33

I'm an investor in a company that sells

97:35

electrolytes, so LMT. Um, so I'm an

97:37

investor in that company, which I always

97:39

want to disclose stuff like that if it's

97:41

pertinent. Um, the short answer is it

97:44

depends. So, why did I get interested in

97:47

electrolytes? Well, I historically never

97:49

consumed electrolytes when exercising. I

97:51

was pretty much always consuming water

97:53

and or water plus carbohydrate depending

97:55

on the intensity and duration of the

97:56

exercise. I also tend to have very low

97:59

blood pressure and a couple of years ago

98:02

I had a really really bad fall when I

98:04

woke up in the morning and I was

98:06

jet-lagged. So I had just flown to

98:08

Brazil. So obviously you get a little

98:10

bit dehydrated on a plane and then the

98:12

first like you know you get in whatever

98:15

that night and then the next morning I

98:17

woke up got out of bed and faceplanted

98:20

into a table. You can probably still see

98:21

the scar on my forehead. And I got back

98:24

home and you know my doc measures my

98:27

blood pressure. It's like 95 over 60.

98:31

And he's like yeah you're just you're

98:32

really dehydrated man. Like you we need

98:35

to get a little more. And it's not like

98:36

I don't eat salt. I make zero effort to

98:39

restrict sodium in my diet, but clearly

98:42

I was just exercising too much, you

98:44

know? I mean, especially living in

98:45

Texas, like when I'm exercising

98:46

outdoors, I'm sweating like crazy. So,

98:48

it was like, you just got to get more

98:49

salt, man. So, I just went I literally

98:52

then did a super deep dive on hydration

98:55

and realized that there's basically two

98:57

ways to maximize hydration. Either you

99:00

consume water with a high enough not

99:03

just a high enough with the absolute

99:05

correct concentration of glucose in it

99:07

and the correct concentration is between

99:08

five and 6%. So that's 50 to 60 grams of

99:11

glucose per liter of fluid will maximize

99:14

water uptake through the sodium water

99:17

transporter or you consume um what's

99:21

called osmotic sodium in water. Those

99:23

are your two options uh with the with

99:25

the glucose one being slightly better.

99:28

And so what I realized is look, I don't

99:30

exercise long enough anymore to justify

99:32

it. And the only workout I do a week

99:34

that is intense enough to justify it is

99:36

that V2 max one where I'm I actually am

99:38

using glucose and water. But for the

99:40

rest of my workouts, I don't I don't

99:42

need it. I just need sodium and water.

99:44

And then I just went through every

99:46

product on the market. Like literally

99:48

went to Amazon, click click click click

99:50

click click click order every one of

99:52

them and realize at the end of the day

99:53

it's a commodity product. Get the one

99:55

that tastes the best because that's the

99:56

one you're going to have to suck down

99:58

every day. Peter, what's the most

99:59

important thing we didn't talk about

100:00

that we should have talked about as it

100:02

relates to your work, the science that

100:04

you're obsessed with at the moment, and

100:06

anything that my audience might and

100:08

should need to know that we haven't yet

100:10

discussed.

100:12

May maybe just the idea that it's really

100:14

tempting in in the world I live

100:19

in to want to find single sources of

100:23

problems, right? So there's always a

100:25

there's always a a boogeyman and I think

100:30

unfortunately the the entire landscape

100:33

of health influencing and social media

100:38

has has created a very unhelpful

100:40

narrative around many of these things.

100:42

And

100:44

so, you know, there's an effect called

100:46

the Dunning Krueger effect, which can be

100:48

sort of, you know, put into a cartoon,

100:51

right? Where it shows, you know,

100:53

experience on the, uh, x-axis and

100:57

confidence on the y- axis. So, you've

100:59

seen this graph, I'm sure, where it

101:00

starts out like it just skyrockets up to

101:03

what's called the peak of stupidity, and

101:05

then it kind of comes down into the

101:06

valley of humility, and then as you

101:08

become more and more of an expert, you

101:10

gradually rise, right? So, so this idea

101:11

of like the deeper you go out from

101:13

shore, the further from shore, the

101:14

deeper the water gets. And yet, and most

101:16

of what you're what what I'm sure your

101:19

audience is is going to be exposed to

101:20

because we all are if we're on social

101:22

media or whatever is like people

101:24

preaching from the peak of Mount

101:25

Stupidity. And so, I think maybe maybe

101:27

the thing to be thinking about is like

101:28

what are the signs of that, right? And

101:31

it's usually people that are like

101:33

there's one thing that is the thing,

101:35

right? like it's this additive in food

101:38

or it's this particular oil or it's this

101:41

sugar or it's this that and it's like

101:44

the truth of the matter is it isn't one

101:46

thing like it's it's really really

101:49

complicated and it's hard to talk about

101:52

things that are complicated and we tend

101:54

to just want to focus on one thing and

101:56

I've been guilty of this myself if I

101:58

look at stuff I was writing 15 years ago

102:00

I'm like man you really oversimplified

102:03

that too much like you overindex on that

102:06

and you ignored this thing and and so I

102:08

I just think that you know try try to

102:10

identify people out there who are

102:12

talking about things in a nuanced way

102:14

and you're generally going to be closer

102:16

to the direction of reality and how do

102:18

you deal with that as a podcast host

102:19

because you must sit there you know so

102:21

much about the subject matter and you

102:22

must sit there and hear people say to

102:24

you on your podcast things that you

102:26

don't agree with. Well, on my podcast,

102:28

it's easy because again, the nature of

102:30

my podcast is super inquisitive. So,

102:32

it's just very easy to to push back and

102:34

sometimes I don't. Sometimes I'll, you

102:37

know, I I was recently interviewing

102:38

somebody and they they made a comment

102:40

and and I just knew it was wrong, but I

102:42

I was like, you

102:44

know,

102:45

I I'll make an editorial comment later

102:48

about this for the audience to

102:50

understand that he's he's he's confusing

102:52

cause and effect. And I didn't push

102:54

back. and afterwards I thought I

102:55

probably should have I probably should

102:57

have pushed back on what he said a

102:59

little bit. Um but again on my podcast

103:01

it's easy. I think the bigger issue is

103:02

when people send me links to podcasts

103:05

like what do you think of this and I

103:07

have to go through and like explain why

103:09

what this person said is completely

103:12

wrong. I mean just completely unfounded

103:14

in any scientific uh basis whatsoever.

103:18

But they're a very compelling speaker

103:19

and so I get it like I get why you know

103:23

that that you would you know as as my

103:24

friend send that to me with concern. One

103:27

of the things we've introduced recently

103:28

well in the last 3 four months is just

103:30

we put um we have some independent

103:33

scientific individuals who have a look

103:36

at some of the things that are being

103:37

said just to cross reference and provide

103:39

context. We call it kind of context

103:40

checking. Nice. just because some of the

103:42

bigger things obviously there's so many

103:43

big as you were saying so many terms

103:46

like seed oils and this and this and

103:48

this that have started a bit of a

103:49

nutrition war on the internet and so we

103:51

just want to make sure that we provide

103:53

more context to these things so that a

103:55

person at home who isn't going to take

103:57

it upon themselves to apply that context

103:59

or do the research has more more of a

104:01

wide opinion but it's difficult because

104:03

as you say oftent times it's the best

104:05

speaker or the person with the most

104:07

conviction that gets heard. um you've

104:09

managed to break through all of that and

104:11

provide an tremendous amount of nuance

104:13

and complexity to these subjects, but

104:15

also to achieve the same focus and

104:17

articulation and resonance and

104:19

accessibility that some of those

104:21

individuals have achieved. I would

104:23

highly recommend anybody who has not

104:25

read this book to read this book because

104:28

this is the book on this subject. And I

104:31

say that I've interviewed many hundreds

104:32

of people, but this is the book on this

104:34

subject. It's been a global phenomenon

104:36

for all the reasons I've described about

104:38

it being so accessible. It's so nuanced,

104:40

but so um easy for someone like me to

104:43

understand even though I'm not a

104:44

scientist. And it's the book that I

104:46

recommend to my friends, to my family

104:47

when they're trying to understand the

104:49

subject matter of longevity in a world

104:51

where there is just so much information.

104:53

And that's why this book did so well and

104:54

it continues to do so unbelievably well.

104:56

But I'd also recommend everybody go

104:57

check out your podcast, which I love

104:59

watching. And also if they want um other

105:02

resources from you, where do we send

105:04

people? Peter, I think our website

105:06

probably. So Peter Aia MD the the

105:08

website will probably direct people to

105:10

all the different sort of places where

105:11

we have unbelievable amounts of free

105:13

information. So we have a newsletter

105:15

that comes out every single week. It's

105:17

free. It's really valuable. People, you

105:20

know, the open rate on that is through

105:21

the roof because it's not junk. like

105:23

it's it's we're putting something in

105:25

your inbox every single Sunday that

105:26

you're going to want to read about the

105:28

exact topics you're asking. So, I'm

105:30

going to link all of that below. So, put

105:31

all of the links below for for Peter's

105:33

work if you if you haven't become

105:35

obsessed like we all are here with

105:36

Peter's work. And I really mean that.

105:37

We're all massive fans of yours. Jack

105:39

was saying before you came, he said,

105:40

"Oh, I love Peter." You were saying this

105:42

the other day. I was saying this about a

105:43

week ago. And that's something that I

105:45

think we all feel because of the impact

105:46

you've had on our lives of demystifying

105:48

this information, but bringing it to us

105:49

in a way that's so so accessible, so

105:51

smart, and so trustworthy. So Peter,

105:53

thank you for what you're doing because

105:54

you're demystifying a very complicated

105:56

world for all of us. And it's a world

105:58

that if demystified, we stand a better

106:00

chance of living happier, healthier,

106:01

longer lives. And there's probably

106:02

nothing more important to to what makes

106:05

life meaningful and fulfilling. And me

106:07

being able to walk up and down those

106:08

stairs in Bali when I'm 75. So thank

106:10

you, Peter. It's tremendous. Really,

106:12

really tremendous. And I appreciate you

106:13

very very much. Peter, I I was so caught

106:16

up in um admiration of you that I forgot

106:18

that we have to ask you this question,

106:19

which is the question left by the last

106:21

guest. And that is what would you do if

106:23

you weren't

106:27

afraid? Why that

106:31

face? Oh.

106:36

Um because I've been dealing with that

106:38

for a long I've been dealing with

106:40

something for for a couple of weeks that

106:41

that is is is incredibly uh frightening,

106:45

but I think I've finally worked up the

106:47

courage to do it. Um but I can't speak

106:49

about it, unfortunately. Oh, really?

106:51

um at least not yet. I will be able to

106:54

one day. There will be a day when I will

106:55

be able to tell this story and it it

106:58

will it will be one of the most

107:00

important decisions I've ever made in my

107:02

life. Oh, I'm so curious and so

107:04

intrigued. Yeah. And it's um I can tell

107:06

by your reaction that it's going to be

107:09

profound for both you and all of us. I

107:12

could tell by your reaction because I

107:13

can tell that there's some element of

107:14

struggle there. So, yes, whatever it is,

107:17

best of luck and maybe we'll talk again

107:18

in the future once you've uh been able

107:20

to talk about it. I can't wait. Thank

107:21

you, Peter.

107:24

We launched these conversation cards and

107:25

they sold out and we launched them again

107:26

and they sold out again. We launched

107:28

them again and they sold out again

107:29

because people love playing these with

107:30

colleagues at work, with friends at

107:32

home, and also with family. And we've

107:34

also got a big audience that use them as

107:36

journal prompts. Every single time a

107:38

guest comes on the diary of a CEO, they

107:40

leave a question for the next guest in

107:42

the diary. And I've sat here with some

107:44

of the most incredible people in the

107:45

world, and they've left all of these

107:47

questions in the diary. And I've ranked

107:49

them from one to three in terms of the

107:51

depth. One being a starter question. And

107:54

level three, if you look on the back

107:56

here, this is a level three, becomes a

107:58

much deeper question. That builds even

108:00

more connection. If you turn the cards

108:02

over and you scan that QR code, you can

108:05

see who answered the card and watch the

108:08

video of them answering it in real time.

108:10

So, if you would like to get your hands

108:12

on some of these conversation cards, go

108:13

to the diary.com or look at the link in

108:16

the description below. This has always

108:17

blown my mind a little bit. 53% of you

108:20

that listen to the show regularly

108:22

haven't yet subscribed to the show. So,

108:24

could I ask you for a favor? If you like

108:25

the show and you like what we do here

108:26

and you want to support us, the free

108:28

simple way that you can do just that is

108:29

by hitting the subscribe button. And my

108:31

commitment to you is if you do that,

108:33

then I'll do everything in my power, me

108:35

and my team, to make sure that this show

108:36

is better for you every single week.

108:38

We'll listen to your feedback. We'll

108:40

find the guests that you want me to

108:41

speak to, and we'll continue to do what

108:43

we do. Thank you so much. Heat. Heat.

108:47

[Music]

108:57

I

108:58

Wow.

109:04

[Music]

Interactive Summary

Dr. Peter Attia explores the concept of the 'marginal decade,' emphasizing that while decline is inevitable, the rate of decline is largely within our control. He discusses the critical role of muscle mass, strength, and VO2 max in maintaining a healthy 'healthspan.' Through a focus on specific training, including resistance training and VO2 max-focused cardio, individuals can prepare for their later years and avoid the functional limitations often associated with aging. The interview also touches on the importance of sleep, nutrition, and metabolic health, providing a framework for optimizing longevity through proactive lifestyle choices.

Suggested questions

5 ready-made prompts