HomeVideos

From California to Maine, Unpacking the Races That Will Shape the Midterms | Big Take

Now Playing

From California to Maine, Unpacking the Races That Will Shape the Midterms | Big Take

Transcript

543 segments

0:01

[music]

0:02

>> Bloomberg Audio Studios. Podcasts,

0:05

radio, news.

0:08

>> Primary season in the US is underway

0:11

[music]

0:11

with 5 months of intense campaigning to

0:14

go till the midterms.

0:15

>> Maine is pretty much a must-win for

0:16

Democrats if they're going to have any

0:18

chance at all of taking the Senate.

0:20

>> Tomorrow, Maine voters will cast their

0:22

ballots in the Democratic Senate primary

0:24

[music]

0:25

where Graham Platner, the leading

0:26

Democratic candidate to take on

0:28

incumbent Republican Susan Collins, is

0:31

facing new controversies.

0:33

>> The New York Times reporting several

0:35

ex-girlfriends describe [music]

0:36

unsettling behavior. One alleging

0:38

Platner grabbed her hard enough to leave

0:40

marks and during one argument twisted

0:43

her arm behind her back and blocked her

0:45

in a room. Platner fiercely denies any

0:48

violence.

0:49

>> [music]

0:49

>> Midterms tend to be tough for the

0:50

incumbent party and this year has come

0:53

as Trump's approval ratings continue to

0:55

slide.

0:56

Polling data compiled by Real Clear

0:58

Politics show the president's overall

1:00

rating is hovering around 40%. On

1:03

average, just 34% of Americans approve

1:06

of how he's handling the economy.

1:08

>> I think the big themes on the Republican

1:10

side are just Trump's grip on the

1:11

Republican party and how long that

1:13

lasts.

1:14

>> Bloomberg political correspondent Nancy

1:16

Cook.

1:17

>> On the Democratic side, I think that

1:19

they are really looking for leaders and

1:21

looking for ideas that are going to

1:22

bring them back to power and there's a

1:24

lot of competing factions.

1:26

>> [music]

1:26

>> Nancy says Democrats and Republicans are

1:29

fighting for control of the House and

1:31

the Senate

1:32

>> [music]

1:32

>> and so much more.

1:34

>> Trump is not going to be able to confirm

1:36

people to lead agencies if he fires them

1:39

or confirm judges if Democrats control

1:41

the Senate. He's not going to be able to

1:42

pass legislation through Congress if

1:45

[music] Democrats take back the Senate

1:47

and Democrats meanwhile want to take

1:49

back the Senate and the House because

1:50

they want to have checks on Trump.

1:53

>> As all eyes are on these national races,

1:56

state and local elections are also

1:58

painting a clearer picture of US

2:00

political sentiment [music] and

2:02

strategy.

2:03

Votes are still being tallied in the

2:04

primary for California governor.

2:06

>> It's one of the top jobs in Democratic

2:08

politics. It is a state where you get

2:11

to, you know, lead a lot of the liberal

2:14

Democratic opposition to Trump.

2:16

>> Eliyahu Kamisher has been following

2:19

elections in California for Bloomberg.

2:21

>> You have a massive economy. If it was

2:23

its own country, it would be around the

2:26

fourth biggest GDP in the world.

2:29

Um and you get to also set the agenda

2:31

for Democrats.

2:33

>> Nancy and Eliyahu say it's all building

2:35

to a bigger question. [music]

2:37

Who will run? And who could win in 2028?

2:41

[music]

2:41

>> There's a real fight for ideas and

2:43

leadership in the Democratic Party and

2:45

who wins in November will give us some

2:47

really key [music] clues as to what type

2:51

of Democrat is best positioned to become

2:54

the Democratic nominee in 2028.

3:00

>> [music]

3:01

>> This is the Big Take from Bloomberg

3:02

News. I'm Sara Holder. Today on the

3:05

show, [music] as US midterm election

3:07

season begins to ramp up, my co-host

3:09

David Gura and I sit down with

3:11

Bloomberg's [music] Nancy Cook and

3:12

Eliyahu Kamisher to understand what's at

3:15

stake and which messages will land with

3:18

voters.

3:22

>> Nancy, let me start with you. You are a

3:24

political correspondent for Bloomberg

3:25

and I imagine that these days the

3:26

midterms are taking up a lot of your

3:29

psychic space. We're talking right

3:31

before a few closely watched races this

3:32

week in Maine and South Carolina and I

3:35

want to start with Maine. There's a

3:36

primary to determine who's going to

3:38

challenge Republican Senator Susan

3:39

Collins and Graham Platner has been the

3:41

frontrunner.

3:43

Now he's dealing with some personal

3:44

controversies that could derail the

3:46

success he's had. In broad strokes first

3:48

of all, who is he and and how did he

3:50

become the frontrunner in Maine?

3:52

>> So, Gideon Platner um is a very

3:54

interesting figure. You know, Chuck

3:55

Schumer, the minority leader in the

3:57

Senate, had wanted Janet Mills, who is

3:59

the sitting governor, who has been a

4:01

really, you know, successful critic of

4:03

Trump, has governing experience. He had

4:05

really wanted her to be the Democratic

4:08

nominee for Senate. But she's 76 and

4:11

there is obviously in the post Joe Biden

4:13

era a lot of sensitivity about putting

4:15

up someone in their mid to late 70s for

4:18

a 6-year Senate term. And a lot of

4:21

people in Maine also passed on getting

4:23

into the race. They didn't want to run

4:25

for Senate against Susan Collins, who is

4:27

a long-time Republican incumbent. And

4:30

so, while everybody in Maine was

4:31

dithering around, Gideon Platner, who is

4:34

a veteran and an oysterman, threw his

4:36

name into the ring and ended up getting

4:38

a lot of energy just from actual voters.

4:41

And Bernie Sanders endorsed him and

4:43

Elizabeth Warren endorsed him based on

4:45

sort of the connection that he had with

4:47

voters and also these messages of

4:49

economic populism that he was espousing.

4:53

>> Because I can't wait to wade into that

4:56

fight alongside Gideon Platner.

5:00

>> And I think that people in Democratic

5:02

politics came to view him as kind of one

5:04

of these new outsider candidates that

5:06

they're looking for. But there has been

5:09

this steady drip of problematic stories

5:11

about him. He has a Nazi-ling tattoo on

5:14

his chest, which he ended up covering

5:16

up. He has said different stories about

5:18

whether or not he knew it was affiliated

5:20

with the Nazis. The New York Times came

5:22

out with a big story about how he

5:24

treated some of his ex-girlfriends. You

5:27

know, sort of allegations of physical

5:30

abuse, which he has said are not true.

5:33

And Janet Mills has said, you know,

5:34

she's not going to she wasn't going to

5:36

run anymore, but her name is still on

5:37

the ballot. And so, it's really

5:39

interesting dynamic in Maine, where now

5:41

Democrats are stuck with this candidate

5:43

who is kind of imperfect, who has all

5:45

these headlines running against Susan

5:47

Collins who, you know, Republicans don't

5:49

totally love but still want her to

5:51

control the Senate. And Maine is really

5:54

important to the Senate race because it

5:57

was one of the seats that Democrats

5:58

viewed as most promising to flip and

6:01

potentially take over from Republicans

6:03

and now that just really seems in doubt.

6:05

>> And Nancy, Glenn Platner seems to

6:06

represent a sort of shift in the typical

6:09

candidate that Democrats have been

6:11

running, right? What do you think his

6:13

brand of politics signals about the

6:15

Democrats' broader strategy heading into

6:17

these midterms and what happens

6:20

if he wins and and what happens if he

6:21

loses?

6:22

>> I've been to Kentucky in the last month,

6:24

I've been to Texas, I've been talking to

6:25

a lot of voters and I think that people

6:28

are very mad. You know, they're very mad

6:29

at both parties. And so that is what

6:32

gives an opening to candidates like

6:34

Glenn Platner and I think that

6:37

there is this tendency for voters to

6:39

kind of look for the non-politician now

6:41

and that is very alluring. And you have

6:44

to remember a decade ago we saw that

6:45

with Donald Trump. And so I think what

6:47

Glenn Platner shows us is like how much

6:50

appetite is there really for an

6:51

outsider? Are you uh comfortable with

6:53

the fact that there might be a lot of

6:54

skeletons in their closet you might not

6:56

know exactly what you're getting? How

6:57

much do you want that?

6:59

>> And I think the uniqueness of Maine is a

7:01

huge part of this. I've got family in

7:03

Maine and it's been interesting to see

7:04

sort of how

7:05

they have processed what's come out,

7:08

what they've said about their friends

7:09

who have kind of noticed who have maybe

7:10

supported Platner and seen all of this

7:11

come out. And there's kind of an

7:13

iconoclastic

7:14

mold to a lot of Mainers I think. Um

7:16

Sarah, you've got family in California.

7:18

I know that you've been following the

7:19

races there very closely because of it.

7:20

>> Yeah, Elihu, I really wanted to talk

7:22

about this cuz in my household we've

7:24

been refreshing and refreshing the

7:26

results from the gubernatorial and LA

7:28

mayoral primaries. California has pretty

7:31

reliably produced national candidates.

7:33

They've tested national strategies there

7:36

at least as far as the Democratic Party

7:37

goes.

7:39

So as you look at some of the key

7:41

California races.

7:43

What is at stake both locally and

7:45

nationally?

7:46

>> I think the big race is the governor's

7:48

primary and it's been really the first

7:51

truly wide-open gubernatorial primary in

7:54

decades. So now it's come down to Javier

7:58

Becerra, Joe Biden's former health

8:00

secretary, and Steve Hilton, the former

8:04

Fox News commentator. He was also in the

8:07

British government under David Cameron,

8:10

a proponent of Brexit. And then also

8:13

it's still too early to call

8:15

the former hedge fund founder Tom Steyer

8:19

who became a billionaire and then left

8:21

his hedge fund to pursue climate

8:23

activism. He's trailing in third.

8:25

>> What does this match up say to you? And

8:28

what's driving these two very different

8:30

candidates' appeal in the state?

8:33

>> Yeah, it's a good question. I think with

8:35

Becerra

8:36

what it really says is actually the

8:37

staying power of a candidate who has a

8:41

long political track record and has

8:43

risen through the ranks of Democratic

8:45

politics. He He started in Congress in

8:47

the 1990s. He is a fixture in the state.

8:51

You know, early in this race he was

8:53

polling at 4 or 5%. He was at the bottom

8:57

of the pack.

8:58

And even the state Democratic Party

9:00

people were kind of telling Javier,

9:03

"Hey, I think you probably need to drop

9:04

out because there was actually some

9:06

worries early on that two Republicans

9:08

could make it to the top because it's a

9:11

it's a top two primary format."

9:13

>> Which would be pretty unheard of for

9:14

California.

9:15

>> That would have been unheard of. The

9:16

state party was essentially they were

9:18

shaming people like Javier and some of

9:21

the lower polling candidates saying like

9:23

they're releasing these public polls

9:24

saying you guys kind of need to drop

9:26

out. He didn't drop out and then we had

9:27

this huge kind of October surprise that

9:31

didn't happen in October, but Eric

9:33

Swalwell faced some really serious

9:36

sexual assault and sexual misconduct

9:38

allegations and his campaign imploded

9:41

and he resigned from Congress. He

9:44

dropped out of the race.

9:46

And there was kind of this remarkable

9:49

almost overnight surge for Javier.

9:52

He also has a record as a California AG

9:55

of suing Trump like 120 times and you

9:59

know, that holds a lot of sway amongst

10:01

California Democratic voters where

10:02

they're going to be able to oppose

10:03

Trump. So

10:04

you know, almost overnight he saw a huge

10:06

surge in the poll. He went to the

10:08

frontrunner status and he's held that

10:10

through, you know, through the primary.

10:12

>> You've walked through the personal

10:13

dynamics. I'm curious sort of from a

10:15

policy perspective, what issues were on

10:17

the ballot for California voters and I

10:19

think there's this tendency rightly or

10:20

wrongly to look at a primary in a state

10:22

like California and try to divine some

10:24

indication of what the the broader

10:25

electorate is is looking for here in the

10:27

the midterms.

10:28

Should we do that in this case or are

10:30

the issues animating the California

10:31

electorate the same as the ones you

10:32

think that are animating voters around

10:34

the country?

10:34

>> I think so. I mean, the affordability is

10:37

is the big one in California right now

10:39

and you do see this kind of division.

10:42

Tom Steyer ran on this populist message

10:45

of saying we're going to tax

10:46

corporations, we're going to tax

10:48

billionaires and we're going to, you

10:51

know, use that revenue to make things

10:53

more affordable. We're also going to go

10:55

like directly at the pocketbooks of

10:57

utilities in the state which have kind

11:00

of a state-mandated monopoly.

11:02

He spent over $215 million of his own

11:05

money pushing this message out into

11:08

California and that bought him a role in

11:12

this in this election, but it didn't

11:15

totally resonate with people and I think

11:18

because if you're selling a populist

11:19

message, people have to believe the

11:22

person who is selling that message and

11:25

at the end of the day, Tom Steyer is a

11:26

billionaire and a lot of people I talked

11:29

to said, you know, like that's kind of a

11:31

non-starter for them.

11:33

>> [music]

11:33

>> After the break, how Trump's

11:35

endorsements are influencing the

11:37

midterms, and whether AI could be the

11:40

next political battle line.

11:49

Presidential endorsements can make a big

11:51

impact on local races. They can elevate

11:53

a candidate's name recognition, put them

11:56

on the national map.

11:58

But with President Trump's approval

11:59

rating declining, we wanted to ask Nancy

12:02

and Eliahu what kind of influence he has

12:04

on the midterms this time around.

12:07

>> I think Trump still has a huge amount of

12:09

sway over how Republican politics is

12:12

going to play out both in the midterms

12:14

and in uh you know, 2028. I was in

12:17

Kentucky and there was a Republican

12:19

primary with Thomas Massie and Ed

12:22

Gallrein who is the Trump-endorsed

12:24

candidate who no one had ever heard of

12:27

and he was a Navy SEAL, but he'd never

12:29

held office before. And basically his

12:31

whole message to voters was like Trump

12:33

endorsed me and that was like that was

12:35

it. He refused to outline policy

12:36

positions, he wasn't doing media

12:38

interviews, but it was like Trump

12:39

endorsed me.

12:40

>> Massie, the latest Republican lawmaker

12:42

to lose after being declared disloyal by

12:45

the president.

12:46

>> And so I still think that Trump holds a

12:48

ton of sway in a bunch of different

12:50

states and is still powerful enough that

12:52

just like him endorsing someone or or

12:55

tweeting about someone really makes a

12:57

difference.

12:58

>> Nancy, you talked about the power of the

13:00

the Trump endorsement and he quite

13:01

proudly has trumpeted that after the

13:03

primaries that we've seen thus far. We

13:05

did see a crack in that Waller and his

13:07

ability to do that in Iowa in this

13:09

gubernatorial primary. Zack Lorn

13:12

defeated President Trump's pick, that's

13:14

Randy Feenstra, the the congressman.

13:16

What does that tell you? Is that an

13:17

anomaly in light of all of the successes

13:19

that Donald Trump has had thus far or is

13:21

it a sign to you that power may not be

13:24

as as strong as the president's

13:25

presenting and as we've kind of accepted

13:26

here over the the first primaries we've

13:28

seen.

13:28

>> I think that his power is still strong,

13:31

but I think that we're we're seeing

13:33

cracks and we're seeing that in polling,

13:35

we're seeing that as I talked to voters,

13:36

we're seeing that in Iowa, and I feel

13:38

like Iowa is a good example of a place

13:41

where people are mad about a lot of

13:43

Trump policies. You know, Iowa, when I

13:45

was there in 2024 for the Republican

13:48

caucuses, like it's it's, you know, was

13:50

really a Trump country at that point.

13:53

However, people are very mad there about

13:55

the tariffs, uh you know, they're really

13:58

mad about the war in Iran. It has raised

14:00

fuel prices, prices for fertilizer, you

14:03

know, a lot of uh farmers are mad about

14:05

the uh policies that they've done with

14:07

tariffs on beef. I mean, there's just

14:09

like a lot of economic policies that are

14:13

hurting people in Iowa, voters there,

14:15

Republicans, and they're not happy about

14:17

it. And I think that that's why we saw

14:19

the Trump-backed candidate not win,

14:21

because I Iowa voters are looking at

14:23

their own pocketbooks and thinking like

14:25

this agenda's not working for me, even

14:26

though I voted for this guy.

14:28

>> I mean, that is a pattern we've seen in

14:30

past midterms, right, Nancy? In general,

14:32

incumbent parties tend to lose ground,

14:34

and we're obviously seeing polling

14:36

indicate that the president has made a

14:38

lot of um choices that are unpopular

14:41

with voters.

14:42

What are we seeing this year in terms of

14:44

the breakdown between where Democrats

14:47

are potentially picking up votes and

14:48

where Republicans are holding strong?

14:50

>> The Republican base is still pretty with

14:52

Trump on things like, you know, the

14:54

economy and immigration or you know,

14:56

they're still willing to give him some

14:58

grace. But I think that where Democrats

15:00

see, you know, there was a whole crew of

15:02

people who really swayed towards

15:04

Republicans in 2024 for the presidential

15:06

race, and this was, you know, swing

15:08

voters, independents, um black men,

15:11

young men, Hispanics, and that whole

15:15

crew is kind of up for grabs in the

15:17

midterms. And

15:18

that coalition that Trump assembled has

15:21

really been frayed. They're not locked

15:23

in with the Republican Party. They are

15:25

not Republicans. And so I think that

15:27

Democrats are trying to win those people

15:29

over. Democrats are also really trying

15:31

to win over working-class people again,

15:34

white working-class people. Trump was

15:36

really the first Republican to come in

15:38

and take that those voters away from

15:40

Democrats a decade ago. And so I think

15:42

Democrats are trying to win back those

15:45

people.

15:46

>> [music]

15:46

>> Is there anything else that we should be

15:48

factoring in as we look forward to these

15:49

primaries this week and and in the weeks

15:52

ahead and and make our way to the

15:53

midterms? Um

15:55

Nancy, I'll start with you.

15:56

>> There are new things coming up in

15:58

elections. And so how AI plays out in

16:01

the election both in terms of what it

16:03

looks like in ads, what it looks like in

16:05

disinformation online to try to convince

16:07

voters. And then AI companies are

16:11

pouring a huge amount of money into

16:13

different races. Um and so that is kind

16:16

of a new dark money group that you can't

16:19

discount because that is a new industry

16:22

that wants some say in the regulations.

16:24

And I think that that is going to play a

16:26

huge role in the midterms, sort of where

16:28

that money flows, and an even bigger

16:29

role in 2028.

16:31

>> I was actually going to echo that, the

16:33

impact of tech and AI. And I think what

16:36

we saw was actually that tech [music] is

16:40

becoming a bit of a boogeyman.

16:42

There was one candidate, his name was

16:44

Matt Mahan. He's the mayor of San Jose.

16:46

It's like the largest city in Silicon

16:48

Valley.

16:49

>> [music]

16:49

>> His candidacy was like backed by a huge

16:52

amount of

16:53

>> [music]

16:54

>> of Silicon Valley figures, some big

16:56

names like Sergey Brin, also Reed

16:58

Hastings, CEO of Netflix. A lot of

17:00

venture capitalists came in for him. And

17:03

they liked his moderate Democrat,

17:06

uh little more fiscally conservative,

17:09

anti-establishment.

17:10

Um but he didn't come in saying, "I'm

17:12

going to take on tech." Um and that

17:14

money ended up kind of being an

17:16

albatross for him. He was labeled as a

17:18

tech bro, [music] and he failed to kind

17:21

of break out of that. And I think a lot

17:24

of people saw that and said, "Hey, if

17:26

you're backed by all these

17:28

>> [music]

17:28

>> you know, singular billionaires, and you

17:31

say you're going to turn around and

17:32

regulate them, that's a hard thing to

17:35

sell." [music]

17:35

And then, you know, nearby there was a

17:38

uh Ro Khanna faced primary from a

17:41

Democrat, Ethan Agarwal, and that was

17:45

spurred by Ro Khanna backing a proposed

17:47

billionaire tax in California. After

17:49

[music] he came out with that, you saw a

17:52

huge amount of kind of

17:55

anger on social media from some of these

17:57

tech [music] elite.

17:58

And they said Ro Khanna's, you know,

18:01

done with, and we're going to back a

18:03

primary against him. They backed this

18:04

guy named Ethan, [music]

18:05

and he has done, you know, dismally, and

18:09

Ro Khanna seems stronger than ever. So,

18:12

I think that was kind of another

18:13

reflection of like Silicon Valley

18:16

frustration with Democrats and the kind

18:18

of skewing [music] towards Republicans

18:20

that we're seeing on the national level.

18:22

That is definitely [music] not playing

18:25

well in California at the moment. This

18:28

kind of AI nexus with billionaires, with

18:31

Trump, I think that's going to be kind

18:34

of an emerging issue that's going to be,

18:35

you know, playing out in more elections

18:37

to come.

18:42

>> [music]

18:44

>> This is The Big Take from Bloomberg

18:46

News. I'm Sarah Holder. [music]

18:47

To get more from The Big Take and

18:49

unlimited access to all of

18:51

Bloomberg.com,

18:52

>> [music]

18:52

>> subscribe today at Bloomberg.com/podcast

18:56

offer.

18:57

Thanks for listening. [music] We'll be

18:58

back tomorrow.

Interactive Summary

The podcast episode discusses the shifting political landscape ahead of the US midterm elections. Bloomberg correspondents analyze key races in Maine and California, highlighting the challenges Democrats face with controversial candidates, the influence of Donald Trump's endorsements, and the rising impact of AI and technology industry money in politics.

Suggested questions

4 ready-made prompts