HomeVideos

Andrew Yang: AI disruption will be worse than anyone thinks

Now Playing

Andrew Yang: AI disruption will be worse than anyone thinks

Transcript

259 segments

0:00

Entrepreneur and former presidential

0:01

candidate, Andrew Yang, is here with me

0:02

at Yahoo Finance H2. It's good to see

0:04

you. I follow you on X. It's good to see

0:05

you in person, finally.

0:06

>> Yes, I'm real. I'm still

0:08

>> Yeah, like he's real. Like he's like a

0:09

real guy.

0:10

>> Yes.

0:10

>> Um look, I remember it feels like

0:12

yesterday when you warned about AI. At

0:13

the time, it was 2020. Nobody even knew

0:15

what the hell AI was. Um

0:18

what we're seeing right now in terms of

0:19

job loss, are we still at the tip of the

0:21

iceberg or like we are in the middle of

0:23

the iceberg?

0:24

>> Oh, yeah. We're We're just in the first

0:26

or second inning. And a public company

0:29

CEO reached out to me, bought me

0:31

breakfast, and said, "I'm going to fire

0:33

30% of my workforce, and my revenue's

0:35

going to go up 200%, and I'm going to

0:36

get a raise.

0:38

What do we do?" And so, these are the

0:40

very early days. Look, was there some

0:44

muddying of the water in terms of the

0:45

tech layoffs? Like did they over hire,

0:47

and then are you they using AI as

0:49

something of a justification or

0:50

rationale? Yes, but the AI

0:53

buzzsaw is real.

0:55

>> What if a company replaces or releases

0:58

or fires, however you want to say it,

0:59

10,000 plus workers, which is what we

1:01

have been seeing, what do they owe

1:03

society?

1:05

>> So, this is the harsh truth, is that the

1:07

purpose of a corporation is not to

1:09

employ lots of people. And it used to be

1:11

a generation ago, if I was a CEO and

1:13

said, "Hey, I employ a lot of people,"

1:14

that's a badge of honor.

1:15

>> Yeah.

1:15

>> Now it means you're schmuck.

1:17

You're the curve, and like what are you

1:18

doing wrong?

1:19

>> Yes.

1:19

>> Um and so, the purpose of the

1:21

corporation is to deliver its product or

1:23

service as cost-efficiently as possible.

1:25

I'm not like a, you know, cult of

1:27

shareholder value maximization guy, but

1:30

it is certainly not the CEO's

1:31

responsibility to hire and employ a lot

1:33

of people.

1:34

And so, this is why I ran for president.

1:36

It's the government's responsibility to

1:38

help manage this transition, but our

1:41

government, in my opinion, is asleep at

1:42

the switch.

1:43

>> Where does this all leave this concept

1:45

of universal basic income?

1:47

>> It's becoming increasingly mainstream

1:50

and common. When I ran for president in

1:52

2020,

1:54

you know, shame I didn't

1:56

I didn't prevail, but

1:59

the days are real.

2:03

so universal basic income's approval

2:05

rating at that time was in the 30s. Now

2:07

it's in the mid to high 60s

2:10

because people get it and they saw that

2:13

government can actually send out

2:14

stimulus checks quickly and broadly

2:17

and it works. It helps.

2:19

>> What should the American worker do at

2:21

this point with this AI tidal wave

2:23

coming at them?

2:24

>> They should try and become conversant

2:26

and expert in these tools. Mark Cuban

2:28

makes the case that a bunch of small and

2:30

medium-sized businesses are going to

2:31

need folks to help implement and deploy.

2:34

I agree with that.

2:36

But it's to know that your job's days

2:38

might be numbered if there are a bunch

2:39

of you in an office or cubicle

2:42

and a lot of folks I know who are in the

2:44

industry say, "I can tell they're

2:46

training the AI to replace me. I'm

2:48

training my own replacement."

2:50

>> Is it the I mean the incentive look CEOs

2:52

of public companies they have to

2:53

maximize shareholder value. Isn't that

2:56

Isn't there just more incentive for them

2:57

to now

2:58

fire as many people as possible?

3:00

>> Yeah, and they're going to lose their

3:02

own job if they don't do so and they all

3:03

know it. I mean you see multiple CEOs

3:05

stepping aside and then on the way out

3:07

they're like, "Hey, one of the reasons

3:08

I'm doing this is because of AI and I'm

3:10

not sure I fully understand it and

3:12

parentheses I didn't want to

3:13

>> They don't want to be the face of this

3:14

crap.

3:15

>> I didn't want to chop chop chop you know

3:17

30% of my workforce. It's miserable. So

3:18

I'm going to step aside and let the next

3:20

person do it. And the public markets

3:23

reward you as soon as you make the

3:24

announcements like we we cut 10,000

3:27

workers and then our stock pops.

3:29

>> Are you Are you running again in 2028?

3:31

>> I get asked every day Brian and I will

3:34

say my case has aged very well.

3:36

>> [laughter]

3:37

>> You got a lot I mean you have you have a

3:38

lot of Ws on the board man.

3:39

>> Oh well, thank you.

3:41

You know, I'm still very much here and

3:44

willing to serve and so we'll have to

3:46

see what 2028 holds.

3:47

>> What would a president Andrew Yang do

3:50

Um, you know 2028 AI is even more

3:52

powerful. Would you tax AI?

3:55

>> Yes, and that's not just me saying it.

3:57

That's Daniel Ammann saying token tax.

3:59

It's Sam Altman saying national wealth

4:00

fund. Uh, it makes zero sense that you'd

4:03

have AI which compares itself to

4:05

electricity and then not [clears throat]

4:07

tax it and not regulate it. Can you

4:08

imagine if all the power grid was

4:10

>> [laughter]

4:11

>> unregulated and un That'd be insane. So,

4:15

uh, that that's just again an example of

4:17

our government not um, being on the

4:19

curve.

4:20

>> So,

4:21

don't tax employees per se. We got to

4:23

tax AI companies.

4:24

>> Yes. Uh, I run a company Noble Mobile

4:27

and we are discouraged from hiring

4:29

because we have to pay for your health

4:30

care, we have to pay for your social

4:32

security tax. Then you're going to pay

4:34

like a ton of income tax. Uh, there are

4:37

a number of people like Vinod Khosla and

4:39

others who are saying we should stop

4:41

trying to disadvantage hiring in human

4:43

labor and I totally agree with that.

4:45

Right now, we're if you if I use the

4:47

bots, I'd pay zero in taxes and the AI

4:50

company pays zero in taxes. [laughter]

4:51

And then if I hire you, then I pay a

4:54

bunch of tax and so do you.

4:55

>> Same block. Um, it was 2019. You

4:58

actually got an endorsement from Elon

5:00

Musk.

5:01

Uh, I think we showed we got the tweets.

5:02

I I went and found them. So, I'm I'm

5:04

glad they they still exist out there.

5:06

What do you think about There it is. Um,

5:08

what do you think about

5:10

the increase in his wealth since then? I

5:11

think at the time he was worth 20

5:12

billion. Now he's our first

5:13

trillionaire.

5:15

>> Yeah, uh, you know, he's creating a lot

5:17

of value and uh, he's for universal high

5:21

income because he thinks that AI and

5:23

robots are going to create so much

5:25

growth and do a lot of the work. Um, so,

5:28

uh, Elon's not just been ahead of the

5:30

curve, he's been making the curve

5:31

happen.

5:32

>> Would you still an accept an endorsement

5:33

from him if you did run it?

5:35

>> Yeah, I would. I mean, shoot. Uh, like

5:38

he's for trying uh, to advance society

5:41

in different ways. Don't agree with him

5:43

on every single thing, but like who the

5:45

heck agrees with some some someone on

5:47

everything? Uh, would gladly accept

5:49

Elon's support.

5:50

>> One and I suspect you have a you take on

5:52

this and this news crossed

5:55

yesterday late yesterday proposal to tax

5:57

the wealth of billionaires in California

5:59

it's got enough signatures to appear in

6:01

November ballot what do you think about

6:03

that?

6:04

>> I think wealth taxes on the state level

6:06

are a mistake people are portable the

6:09

capital is portable and imagining that

6:10

they can move to Austin is dumb mean

6:13

billionaires have things called planes

6:15

they also have accounts and

6:17

>> [laughter]

6:18

>> other things

6:19

so it you know to to me the goal should

6:22

be to try and get the value from AI from

6:25

the bots

6:26

but a state level wealth tax isn't the

6:28

way to go.

6:28

>> I was really it got me thinking like

6:30

what what would happen to California

6:32

like look at all the I mean you're you

6:34

are in tech you want you understand the

6:35

space like what would happen to

6:37

California if like some of the most

6:38

innovative CEOs and companies move out

6:40

of that state?

6:41

>> You're already seeing that happen in

6:43

Seattle some people

6:45

departed and California because they see

6:48

the writing on the wall

6:50

with some of this legislation so

6:53

unfortunately California might like be

6:55

able to illustrate what you're

6:56

describing not in the hypothetical but

6:58

in real life.

6:58

>> Lastly I know you're a big crypto guy

7:01

crypto has really had its moment

7:04

where do you see the future for crypto?

7:06

>> I'm for a localized currencies that can

7:10

keep value

7:12

in a community

7:14

to me I will say one of my issues with

7:16

crypto has been that the primary use

7:18

case has been financial speculation and

7:20

that's not what attracted me to the

7:21

space it was around

7:23

poverty alleviation and innovation in

7:26

the way that we use currencies I'm still

7:29

a big believer in localized currencies

7:30

and even currencies that reward things

7:33

like health and wellness arts and

7:34

creativity nurturing and caretaking like

7:37

that that's the vision that I think

7:39

crypto should to behind.

7:40

>> Lastly I mean tell us about this new

7:42

book. You read this. What uh what do I

7:44

need to know from it?

7:45

>> Yang, where is my thousand bucks, which

7:46

I've gotten on the streets of New York.

7:48

Uh, the the alternate title was, hey, am

7:49

I racist or are you Andrew Yang? Um, but

7:52

>> That'll get your attention.

7:54

>> Yeah, maybe I should use that one. But,

7:55

it it's fun stories uh from the trail uh

7:58

and like hopefully uh path forward.

8:01

>> Good to see you. It's been a while. I

8:02

appreciate you doing this.

8:03

>> I'll be back for sure, buddy.

8:04

>> Yeah, thank you.

Interactive Summary

Andrew Yang discusses the impact of AI on the workforce, emphasizing that we are in the early stages of a significant shift. He highlights that corporations are driven by efficiency rather than employment, advocating for government intervention, including AI taxation and universal basic income. Yang also touches on his potential political future, his perspective on wealth taxes, and his vision for cryptocurrency as a tool for community benefit.

Suggested questions

4 ready-made prompts