Why has Trump's potential Iran deal upset so many Republicans?
218 segments
Simon, there's a few things to get into.
Thank you for joining us. Let's um let's
start first with this breaking news that
we've seen from President Trump, if
that's all right. Um on Truth Social,
just to tell listeners, the blockade
will remain in full force and effect
until an agreement is reached,
certified, and signed. Both sides must
take their time and get it right. Simon,
your interpretation of that. Good
afternoon.
>> Good afternoon to you, Henry. Look, he's
been on the receiving end of incoming
from furious Republicans for the last 12
hours uh since his previous Truth Social
posting in which he revealed uh that
he'd had this big conversation on
Saturday afternoon uh with uh leaders
across the Middle East uh that uh there
was a a possible ceasefire extension in
the offing uh that the straight of
Hormuz news was going to be reopened as
part of this. Then details started
tumbling out from uh Middle Eastern
governments, Iranian sources, and those
details deeply worried and indeed
infuriated
some very senior Republican lawmakers,
including Senator Ted Cruz of Texas,
Senator Lindsey Graham of South
Carolina, a very influential foreign
policy voice in the president's ear, who
took to social media to say, in the case
of Lindsey Graham, based on what he was
hearing about what the president may be
on the verge of agreeing to, he couldn't
really understand why the war had been
started in the first place because both
Senator Cruz and Senator Graham and many
others uh argued that this was
tantamount to basically an American
surrender to the Iranian regime that
will be left in place. That in and of
itself is anathema, particularly to
Senator Lindsey Graham, but also without
securing any guarantees that at the end
of the day, the Iranians were not going
to be able to rebuild their nuclear
program. All of that was going to be
kicked down the road for 60 days while
you kind of sort of resolved the
straight of Hormuz issue. Although there
were huge questions about the nature of
that, while also giving the Iranians a
promise that if they negotiated and
signed and sealed a fullscale peace deal
within the next 60 days, they would
enjoy a waiver on American sanctions
against uh the sale of oil and would
secure billions of dollars in unfrozen
uh in in assets, Iranian assets that are
currently frozen here that those would
be unfrozen. And let me tell you why
that strikes a real nerve for
Republicans. President Trump for months
has publicly humiliated Barack Obama for
unfreezing $400 million, not billion,
$400 million and literally flying the
cash to Iran back in January of 2016.
Now suddenly Republicans are being asked
to swallow the idea that Donald Trump
might unfreeze billions with a bee of
frozen Iranian assets. Exactly the kind
of war chest that they worry the regime
could then use to rebuild its ability to
be a military threat not only to the
United States but particularly to uh its
allies, America's allies and partners in
the region. uh including of course the
possibility that some of that money
would flow to Hezbollah in Lebanon to
rebuild that Iranian proxy. So
Republicans are incandescent
about this deal that President Trump uh
appears to be considering. They think
that this is the Iran nuclear deal all
over again and potentially even weaker
than that. And so now you see Donald
Trump taking to Truth Social to say
basically, I've heard what you're
saying. Of course, we're going to give
this all the time that it needs. I think
it raises huge questions about whether
that 60-day extended ceasefire is going
to be able to go ahead. It's also, by
the way, not just Republican lawmakers,
you know, prominent figures here. Bob
Kagan, neoconservative, who founded uh
the project for the new American
century. He's immediately authored a
piece for the Atlantic here saying that
Donald Trump's endgame in Iran is
surrender. So he's got a real problem on
the conservative side of the aisle here
with what yesterday he was touting uh as
a brilliant outcome uh that was going to
allow the straight of horses to be
reopened.
>> Well, and he's had Marco Rubio sent out
just hours ago talking about the the
sort of the extolling the virtues of
this as well. So, you're right. It's
very confusing. And I see on I mean the
the truth social post is so long, Simon,
that it' be end up I'll be taking some
of James Hansen's show if I read it all
out. But he does talk about the um the
Obama administration, as you say, um the
rank amateurs, he calls them. He says um
that this transaction with Iran is the
exact opposite um of of that.
Well, well, it's only the opposite in
the sense that Barack Obama only sent
millions of dollars uh to Iran. Donald
Trump appears to be considering
unfreezing billions of dollars for Iran.
Also, just worth bearing in mind, Henry,
that this comes, this is not
contextfree, this push back by the
Republicans. Remember that last week,
Republicans in the Senate finally found
a teeny bit of spine to revolt against
Donald Trump's proposed weaponization
compensation fund that they learned with
fury. Uh is poised potentially to hand
cash payments over to some of Donald
Trump's insurrectionists who claim that
they were uh being pursued by a
weaponized Department of Justice under
the Biden administration. So,
Republicans, uh, you know, the the blood
of Republicans is up with this White
House. And the biggest problem, of
course, now for Trump's defenders is
that this critique of what he's doing on
Iran, this allegation that he's engaged
in an act of humiliating surrender by
the United States is not coming from the
Democrats. It's coming from loyal
traditional supporters of Donald Trump
up on Capitol Hill. Simon, while I've
got you, can we talk as well about what
happened overnight at the White House?
>> Yeah, so we now know a lot more about
this uh shooting that took place uh
right outside the White House at a uh
checkpoint where uh a gunman confronted
members of the Secret Service, opened
fire, and was then uh shot at by the
Secret Service who killed him. This
gunman was known to the security teams
at the White House. His name was Neri
Best. According to media reports here,
he was 21 years of age. He had made
multiple efforts in the past uh to try
and at least glean information from the
Secret Service about how someone might
be able to gain entry to the White
House. He was arrested last July uh for
walking into a restricted area on White
House grounds after reportedly ignoring
signs and commands to stop. The
authorities say here that he was
obsessed with trying to gain access to
the White House at one point in one of
his encounters with the Secret Service.
He said that he believed that he was
Jesus Christ uh and that he had been
commanded essentially to try and gain
entry to the building. Uh he was
involuntarily held back in June of last
year for blocking a vehicle entry uh on
the east side of the White House. That
was when he said he was Jesus Christ and
wanted to get arrested. Uh, a judge had
issued a stay away order following that
arrest that was that had barred him
around from from from going anywhere
near basically the White House. And lo
and behold, he showed up at the White
House last night with a gun. So this
appears to be an incident of someone who
was suffering from uh you know
tremendous mental challenges uh
determined to try and gain entrance to
the building and discovering that one
man with a with a gun is no match for
the very heavily armed secret service
that already surround the building like
a ring of seal. Of course, President
Trump is arguing this is one reason why
he needs to build what we've all got to
stop calling his bald ballroom and all
need to start talking about as his
fortress. You know, this heavily
fortified, impenetrable sixstory deep
bunker that is being constructed at the
White House. So, he immediately on
social media last night said, "Well,
this proves why we need to do that." You
could also argue it actually proved that
the existing security arrangements are
sufficient, that this gunman was
neutralized. uh killed by the Secret
Service, though unfortunately a
bystander uh was wounded after getting
caught in the crossfire.
Ask follow-up questions or revisit key timestamps.
The video discusses President Trump facing backlash from senior Republican lawmakers regarding potential negotiations with Iran, which some argue amounts to a surrender, particularly concerning the unfreezing of assets. Additionally, the video covers a shooting incident outside the White House involving an individual with a history of mental health struggles who was neutralized by the Secret Service, a situation Trump is using to justify the construction of further security fortifications at the executive residence.
Videos recently processed by our community