HomeVideos

Former CIA Spies (NEW): Leave the USA Before 2030! The CIA Tried To Ban This Story!

Now Playing

Former CIA Spies (NEW): Leave the USA Before 2030! The CIA Tried To Ban This Story!

Transcript

4532 segments

0:00

When this story hits the airwaves, it's

0:02

going to transform people's opinion

0:03

about CIA and the depths to which CIA

0:06

will dive to collect intelligence that

0:07

protects Americans. So, one of its own

0:09

officers became a spy reporting our

0:12

secrets to a foreign adversary. My wife

0:14

and I were included in an operation to

0:16

bait the mole to make a mistake so that

0:18

the mole could be found and disclosed.

0:20

Your wife is here today and you've never

0:22

told this story before, have you? No.

0:25

And your curiosity right now is a major

0:28

issue with CIA because they don't want

0:30

the world to know who those people are.

0:31

It's a dangerous game.

0:33

Well, obviously my research team tried

0:34

to figure out who it was.

0:37

So, was this the mole?

0:40

Married CIA spies Andrew and Jeehi

0:43

Bustamante were tasked with unraveling

0:45

one of the greatest intelligence

0:46

operations in modern history. Their

0:48

untold story shows you how to build

0:50

trust, manipulate, and thrive under

0:53

pressure.

0:55

What actually happened?

0:57

A foreign ally contacted CIA and said,

1:00

"You have somebody inside your

1:01

organization sharing information on

1:03

operations, officers, assets to an enemy

1:06

country." They deployed us to the

1:07

country and crafted a new identities,

1:09

new aliases so that we could build new

1:11

sources of intelligence and try to find

1:13

the mole. And we were really successful

1:15

in doing that. Nobody felt like they

1:16

were in imminent danger, but then that

1:18

changed. My presence in the enemy

1:20

country became known. I called Jeehi and

1:23

said, "I'm coming home early." And from

1:24

that, I knew that something was wrong

1:27

because it is very real that you can be

1:29

disappeared by a foreign adversary.

1:31

Or worse, being captured and the

1:33

president can plausibly deny that you're

1:35

CIA. So, I had to try to escape the

1:37

country, but everything went wrong. And

1:39

what happens next? A horrible story.

1:42

So,

1:45

this is the first time I'm setting you

1:47

at home a challenge when you listen to

1:49

this episode. Can you figure out which

1:52

country Andrew and Jeehi were undercover

1:55

in as spies from what they say, but also

1:59

our team here figured out that the mole

2:02

in the CIA was one of these three

2:05

people.

2:06

Can you figure out from what they say

2:08

which person was the mole? It might make

2:12

sense for you at this moment to

2:13

screenshot these three faces and the

2:15

details below so you can remember their

2:17

profiles. And by the end of the

2:18

conversation, I want you to comment

2:21

below which country you thought Andrew

2:22

was undercover as a spy and which one of

2:25

these people was the mole within the

2:28

CIA?

2:29

Let's do this. Listen, to my regular

2:31

listeners, I know you don't like it when

2:33

I ask you to subscribe at the start of

2:34

these conversations. I don't like saying

2:35

I don't like it being in there. None of

2:37

us like it.

2:38

It's frustrating. Do you know what's

2:39

also frustrating? It's also frustrating

2:41

when I go into the back end of the

2:42

YouTube channel and I see that 56% of

2:44

you that listen frequently to this

2:46

podcast haven't yet subscribed. And so

2:48

many of you don't even know that you

2:49

haven't subscribed because I see in the

2:50

comment section you say to me, you got I

2:51

didn't even realize I didn't subscribe.

2:53

And that actually fuels the show. It's

2:55

basically like you're making a donation

2:56

to the show. So that's why I ask all the

2:58

time because it enables us to build and

2:59

build and build and build. And we're

3:01

going for the long term here. So all I'd

3:03

ask you is if you've seen the show

3:04

before and you like it, help me, help my

3:06

team here, hit the subscribe button and

3:08

we'll continue to build this show for

3:09

you. That's my promise. Thank you to all

3:11

of you guys that do subscribe. Means the

3:13

world to me.

3:14

Let's get on with the show.

3:19

Andrew,

3:21

you've never told this story before,

3:23

have you? No.

3:25

I have never told the story of my own

3:28

operational background. It's been It's

3:29

been something that CIA has forbidden

3:32

for a long time.

3:34

And what's written in this book has

3:35

taken you a long time to get approved by

3:38

the CIA. Correct. So all CIA officers

3:41

sign a lifetime secrecy agreement. And

3:43

that secrecy agreement gives CIA the

3:46

right to to approve or disapprove any

3:50

operational elements of our background

3:53

that are still classified and that fit

3:56

under this very kind of narrow rubric of

3:58

sources and methods, sources and methods

4:00

of active intelligence collection.

4:02

Because of my time at CIA, my work at

4:04

CIA, and the sensitivity of that work, I

4:06

just kind of assumed I would never be

4:08

able to talk about it. And then all that

4:10

changed with the first Trump

4:11

administration. What was the CIA's

4:13

response when you said that you wanted

4:14

to talk about what you're going to talk

4:16

about today?

4:17

Well, that's what's interesting. They

4:18

had two different responses. When I

4:19

first submitted the request in 2019 to

4:23

CIA to write about my operational

4:25

background, we went through kind of some

4:27

normal bureaucratic back and forth and

4:29

they ultimately said, "Yes, you can

4:31

write about it in in detail." And then

4:33

in 2021,

4:35

when we submitted the manuscript and it

4:37

was complete, the world started to

4:39

change. In 2022,

4:42

uh multiple major issues uh erupted

4:45

between major adversaries of the United

4:46

States and CIA came back and and removed

4:50

their previous permission. Uh they

4:52

basically said that in light of current

4:53

geopolitics, everything in the book was

4:55

now reclassified. How did you get the

4:57

CIA to change their mind so that you

4:59

could release this book and talk about

5:01

what you're going to talk about today?

5:02

We engaged with an attorney, one of the

5:04

top attorneys in the space of classified

5:05

information and publishing information.

5:07

So, the attorney believed that because

5:10

of the effort that my wife and I had put

5:11

into the book, CIA would back off. And

5:14

ultimately, that is what they did. When

5:15

we threatened them with a First

5:16

Amendment lawsuit, they came back and

5:17

said, "We don't want to go down that

5:19

road. We think we can collaborate on

5:21

this. We'll approve your book and you

5:23

can move forward."

5:24

Why do you think they didn't want you to

5:26

publish this book and the story to get

5:28

out? When this story hits the airwaves,

5:30

it's going to transform people's opinion

5:32

about CIA in two big ways.

5:34

First, they'll understand that CIA is

5:36

not what the movies portray it to be.

5:38

It's not superhuman spies who go out

5:41

there like James Bond or Jason Bourne

5:44

who are one man against the world.

5:45

That's not how espionage works.

5:47

Espionage is a team sport. You have

5:49

wins, you have losses. The second thing

5:51

is they'll actually they'll start to

5:52

understand the depths to which CIA will

5:54

dive to collect intelligence that

5:56

protects Americans. Inside this book we

5:58

talk about a mole that actually

5:59

penetrated CIA that CIA has never

6:01

acknowledged. Inside this book we talk

6:03

about new tactics that CIA learned from

6:05

terrorism and then used against our own

6:09

most strategic adversaries. I don't

6:11

think people recognize that CIA is

6:15

morally ambivalent to how it executes

6:18

espionage operations. The goal is to

6:20

keep Americans safe. When you say in

6:22

this book

6:23

you disclose that there was a mole

6:25

within the CIA. What does that mean for

6:28

someone that doesn't know what a mole in

6:29

the CIA is? One of the worst things that

6:31

can happen to an intelligence service is

6:33

that one of its own officers

6:35

becomes a spy for a foreign adversary.

6:39

That is what I'm referring to when I

6:40

talk about a mole.

6:42

And you were involved in that operation

6:44

to find the mole within the CIA.

6:47

Correct. More specifically, my wife and

6:50

I were included in in an operation to

6:53

kind of ferret out the mole, to bait and

6:56

and tempt the mole to make a mistake so

6:59

that the mole could be found and

7:00

disclosed. And your wife is here today.

7:03

Correct.

7:03

>> And we're going to bring her in and talk

7:05

to her as well. But for that for anyone

7:06

that doesn't know your backstory, which

7:08

would be pretty remarkable thing as

7:09

you've been on this channel now a few

7:10

times. Um could you give me a a

7:12

whistle-stop tour of your professional

7:14

background up until the point that you

7:16

met Chee Hee. Yeah, absolutely. So I'm

7:18

from a rural place in in Pennsylvania.

7:21

Uh I was like the only brown kid in a

7:22

white high school, but I ended up going

7:24

to an air a military academy. I went to

7:25

the Air Force Academy. And from the Air

7:26

Force Academy I go into the Air Force.

7:29

The Air Force teaches me how to fly.

7:30

They teach me a foreign language and

7:32

then they teach me about nuclear weapons

7:35

and nuclear missiles and I serve as a

7:36

nuclear missile officer in the Air

7:37

Force. So CIA picked me up uh and in my

7:41

first my first day on the job in CIA is

7:43

the day that I met my wife. Um, she was

7:45

sitting in the back of the classroom. I

7:47

of course worked my way to the front of

7:48

the classroom. And uh, and from there

7:51

our training just kind of overlapped and

7:53

we we became close. Well, G is here. So,

7:57

I'd like to hear his version of events.

8:01

Was there any inconsistency in the story

8:03

he told?

8:05

What was your perspective? There's

8:05

always another perspective. Are you

8:07

allowed to date in the CIA? Oh, yeah.

8:09

It's encouraged um, because

8:12

it's really hard when you're

8:15

keeping so many secrets

8:17

to date somebody outside of the CIA and

8:19

not be able to tell that cuz we had

8:20

friends who did that who did that. You

8:21

have to keep your whole life secret. So,

8:23

you're lying to them about where you're

8:25

going and what you do and

8:26

>> day. Day to day. Every single day. So,

8:28

you're building a relationship

8:30

and lying all the time. And it's really

8:33

difficult. So, if you date within the

8:35

CIA,

8:36

you know,

8:37

if you're in different divisions or

8:39

whatever, like maybe you can't talk

8:40

about everything in detail, but you at

8:42

least know what's going on. You know why

8:45

somebody's going TDY or where they're

8:46

going for a training um, session or We

8:49

can explain to each other. Like, "Hey,

8:51

I'm going to go work with the Spanish.

8:52

I'm going to go work with the with the

8:54

Canadians." Mhm. But, when you're dating

8:56

somebody on the outside, you can't say

8:58

those things. So, it becomes I'm going

9:00

on a business meeting. I'm going on a

9:02

trip. Crazy. And we've had many friends

9:04

who have had relationships explode or

9:06

melt down because the the partner starts

9:09

to ask very logical questions. We had

9:12

one good friend of ours who was an

9:14

outsider who was dating one of our good

9:16

friends who was an insider. And she

9:18

pulled me aside one day and she was

9:20

like, "You know, he goes on all these

9:22

business trips, but he never takes any

9:23

suits."

9:25

She's like, "I think he's cheating on

9:26

me." And I was like, "No, he's actually

9:27

going to a tactical training course

9:28

where you don't need to wear anything

9:29

except BDUs, but I can see your

9:32

concerns." So, you have to walk your

9:33

like there's a lot of walking people off

9:36

a cliff because they start to come to

9:37

the wrong conclusion

9:39

about what their actual partner is

9:41

doing.

9:42

What's your journey into the CIA? Mine

9:44

was kind of an unexpected journey

9:46

because I went into social work working

9:49

with survivors of torture from other

9:51

countries, with refugees, with

9:53

assignees. But before I got that job,

9:55

I'd actually I'd spent my entire last

9:58

year of grad school going to job fairs.

10:00

And I wanted what I really wanted was to

10:01

work for the federal government for like

10:03

the larger mission for the United

10:05

States, for like the people of the

10:06

United States. But then nobody was

10:08

calling me back. And I was like, okay. I

10:09

was like, I'll just submit an

10:11

application, like an online application

10:12

to CIA, which I thought was funny. And

10:14

then a few months later I got a call

10:15

back. She was like, come to the

10:17

information session. So I went in like a

10:19

random hotel with these like nondescript

10:22

signs outside. And you walk in and

10:23

you're like, I don't know if I'm in the

10:24

in the right place. And then they close

10:26

the door and they're like, welcome to

10:28

the CIA recruiting session. And you're

10:30

like, oh, this is so bizarre. And um Did

10:33

they tell you what your role is? Cuz I

10:34

know there's several different roles in

10:36

in the CIA. Mhm. Targeters began

10:40

uh during the war on terror.

10:41

And because what they initially did was

10:44

target individuals for capture or kill

10:47

for the military. Okay. So, what what

10:50

does that mean? They targeted people for

10:52

capture or kill for the military. So you

10:54

would Yeah.

10:55

find the person to capture or kill

10:57

>> Yes. in a foreign country. Yes.

11:00

And so, because, you know, everybody

11:03

else is doing their job of

11:05

you know, logistics or weapons or

11:07

fighting or strategy. So the targeter

11:09

position was really important because it

11:12

takes time to to go through all this

11:15

data to piece together this puzzle of

11:18

who is important, who is important to

11:21

capture, who's important to kill, and

11:23

how do you get to them? The how do you

11:25

get to them is the piece that like

11:26

everybody else wants to know, but they

11:28

don't really have time to do that in

11:31

their other jobs. So, they carved out

11:32

this targeter role so one person can do

11:35

all this research and identify in the

11:38

you know, terrorists

11:39

were really fascinating because they had

11:41

how their organizations were structured.

11:44

And so, you really needed somebody who

11:45

could look I mean it's like a like

11:48

targeting the mafia, right? Like

11:51

everybody has a role. Like there's a big

11:52

organization, everybody has a role. It

11:56

is in your favor if you're target if

11:57

you're going after them to find out who

12:01

who's who. Who's who, who's connected to

12:03

who, how can you get to different people

12:05

cuz you're never going to be able to

12:06

just get the top person right away. So,

12:08

how do you get there, right? And you

12:10

became a targeter. Yes. So, your job was

12:13

to figure out who to capture and kill.

12:14

Or capture or

12:16

>> Or kill.

12:18

And what was your role in the CIA? How

12:19

is your role different? Can you explain

12:21

it for a layman? Yeah, so where Gihi was

12:23

trying to find the individuals that were

12:26

of interest, my job was to learn what to

12:29

do after a targeter identified those

12:31

individuals. How do you actually meet

12:33

the person? How do you befriend the

12:34

person? How do you win their trust? How

12:35

do you collect their secrets? What's

12:37

known as a a field officer, an

12:38

operations officer, a case officer.

12:41

Those are the different terminologies

12:42

that we use internally. But you

12:44

essentially have every case is kind of

12:46

handed over from person to person. So,

12:49

raw information, sometimes open source

12:52

information is handed to a targeter who

12:53

creates a profile, a dossier, a

12:56

targeting package who hands it to an

12:58

operations officer who goes out and

12:59

actually makes that first contact. And

13:01

then when first contact is made, we pass

13:03

all the information back and it goes

13:05

back to all the same people to build the

13:07

next package for the next target. So,

13:10

Gihi would identify the individual and

13:12

then your job was to

13:14

fly overseas, go undercover, and make

13:16

first contact with that individual to

13:18

extract intelligence from them. And not

13:21

at first. By the time that CIA started

13:24

utilizing us as a tandem couple. A

13:26

tandem couple is a term that means a

13:27

married, truly married, CIA trained

13:31

couple. When we started becoming a

13:33

tandem couple, that's how we were a

13:35

one-two punch in for operations. Prior

13:37

to that, we were in separate offices and

13:38

separate divisions doing separate work.

13:40

So, we got along and we were

13:43

complementary because I understood the

13:44

challenges of her job and she understood

13:47

the challenges of my job, which made

13:48

both of us better

13:50

working with our counterparts in our

13:51

different offices. So, where where does

13:54

the story begin?

13:55

Andy.

13:57

You know, you you wrote this book to

13:58

tell a story. So, I'm asking you the

14:00

question. We usually I'd I'd I'd hazard

14:02

a guess where to start, but where does

14:03

this story begin?

14:05

From my perspective, the story really

14:08

starts on uh on I think it was a winter

14:11

day when we were both called in to a

14:14

counterintelligence office

14:17

that was a massive

14:19

oak table. It was a It was a senior

14:22

executive leadership type of room.

14:25

But, there were only three people there.

14:26

It was she, it was me, and it was the

14:28

leader of what's known as Falcon House,

14:30

which is this group of specialists

14:33

inside of CIA focused on one particular

14:35

adversary, an adversary that we've had

14:37

to code name Falcon to maintain

14:40

confidentiality with CIA. And so, Falcon

14:42

is a country, basically.

14:43

>> Falcon is a country, correct. And that

14:45

leader

14:47

revealed to us that they believed there

14:50

was a penetration, a mole,

14:52

that was inside of Falcon House, inside

14:54

of CIA,

14:56

and that they needed us to agree to do

14:59

an operation so that the mole will make

15:01

a mistake here. Cuz if the mole makes a

15:03

mistake here, we'll find him. But, we

15:06

can't have you be here cuz if you're

15:08

here, the mole will find you. And then

15:09

we don't know what happens if the mole

15:11

finds you. So, we're going to send you

15:12

across the world

15:13

to go work in this other country, Falcon

15:16

being the country, while we here as the

15:19

experts in Washington D.C. try to find

15:21

the mole.

15:22

And that was privileged information that

15:25

neither of us as junior officers ever

15:27

thought we would hear.

15:29

And I think that I know for me, I was

15:31

kind of giddy with excitement and G, he

15:33

was a little bit more apprehensive with

15:35

this can't be real.

15:36

But that was for me, that's where the

15:37

story starts is when these two people

15:40

her and with her anxiety disorder and

15:42

and me with my kind of lackluster CIA

15:44

career

15:45

when we got pulled into this office that

15:48

was clearly outside of our league and

15:50

invited to do this operation um

15:54

without that first meeting, Shadow Cell

15:56

would have never happened.

15:57

So, from that moment onwards, how long

15:59

was it before you flew to the foreign

16:02

country in question?

16:04

And what was your objective when you got

16:06

to that foreign foreign country? So, I

16:08

guess it's like a sub-objective to find

16:10

the mole. And there was another main

16:12

objective which was going to help find

16:14

the mole. You got it. Yeah, I mean

16:16

you're using great terminology. There

16:17

were primary objectives and secondary

16:19

objectives. And the primary objective

16:21

was to build a new set of reporting

16:24

assets, a new source of intelligence.

16:27

Several new sources of intelligence in

16:29

Falcon, the actual country. And to to

16:32

help you frame what Falcon is, there's

16:33

only a handful of countries that are

16:35

true stark adversaries to the United

16:37

States. Every one of those countries has

16:40

limited to no diplomatic relationship

16:43

with the United States. That's how

16:44

hostile they are.

16:46

Any one of those countries could be

16:48

Falcon. The reason that we have to code

16:50

name the country is because CIA in

16:52

today's geopolitical world has has

16:54

demanded we don't disclose the name of

16:56

the country. So, we call it Falcon. What

16:58

are the United States adversaries where

16:59

we don't have any

17:01

relationship with them? There's

17:03

obviously like North Korea, there's

17:05

Russia, there's Iran we know of. Are

17:08

there any others? Cuba. Cuba. Mhm. Yeah,

17:11

there's and those are

17:13

um there's a mix there of countries that

17:15

we do have a relationship with, but it's

17:16

not a warm relationship versus countries

17:18

we have no relationship with. So, we

17:20

have no relationship with North Korea.

17:22

We have a cold relationship with Russia,

17:25

right? We have a cold relationship with

17:27

China. We have no relationship with

17:29

Iran. So, they're all considered hard

17:32

targets, but at various levels. Okay.

17:35

So, this the objective is the primary

17:38

objective is to build a new team in this

17:41

country.

17:42

But, the sub objective is in building

17:43

the team, you're going to find out,

17:45

hopefully, who the mole is because the

17:47

mole is going to make a mistake. The

17:49

mole's going to try to find us because

17:51

the mole's job is to prevent CIA from

17:56

collecting secrets about Falcon cuz the

17:58

mole is working for Falcon intelligence.

18:00

The mole is working for that country.

18:02

Right. The mole is part of the CIA, but

18:04

working for the adversarial country.

18:06

Bingo, which is the worst combination

18:08

you can have. Um so, some of the most

18:10

famous moles in history are Aldrich

18:12

Ames. Aldrich Ames was a CIA penetration

18:14

that worked for the Russians. Robert

18:16

Hanssen. Robert Hanssen was an FBI

18:18

penetration that worked for the

18:20

Russians. So, these are famous moles in

18:22

history. We were essentially being told

18:24

that these earth-shattering 1990s era

18:27

moles

18:29

were were still relevant, but now in

18:32

2010-ish,

18:35

there was a new one

18:36

that had made its way into CIA. And And

18:38

that's a big deal. So, it was a very

18:41

exciting reveal for me because it meant

18:44

that we were not just doing something

18:45

that was relevant and interesting inside

18:47

of CIA. We're doing something that is

18:49

quite possibly the most important work

18:52

that can be done inside CIA at this

18:54

moment in time. How did the CIA know

18:56

there was a mole?

18:58

There's a lot of complexity there that

19:00

is part of why they didn't want us to

19:02

write this book. But, what they have

19:04

allowed us to disclose is that a foreign

19:07

ally

19:08

contacted CIA and said, "We have

19:11

collected intelligence that suggests you

19:13

have a mole. You have somebody inside

19:17

your organization who's a turncoat, a

19:19

spy for somebody else. So, a foreign

19:21

ally warned CIA. Otherwise, CIA would

19:24

have had no idea. Okay, and foreign

19:26

allies are people like the the United

19:27

Kingdom, Canada, Canada, Australia,

19:30

Australia.

19:32

So, you can imagine the disruption that

19:33

that would make. Not only did we did CIA

19:36

proper not know they had a mole. It took

19:38

an ally to tell us.

19:41

And then when the ally told us, we have

19:43

to assume that the ally is sharing as

19:45

much biographical detail as possible.

19:48

So, they're telling you the name. Hey,

19:50

Bob is a spy in your organization. But

19:53

now that CIA officer is an American

19:56

citizen protected by American rights and

19:58

privileges.

19:59

And CIA obviously has no information to

20:02

show that that person's a spy except for

20:03

the word of some foreign ally, which is

20:05

still in the law in the eyes of the US

20:07

government, a foreigner is a foreigner,

20:09

ally or not. So, even if it is the UK or

20:12

Canadians telling us so-and-so is a spy,

20:15

until we have our own body of evidence,

20:17

we can't prosecute. That person can't be

20:19

fired, that person can't be discharged,

20:21

that person can't be sued, that person

20:22

can't be arrested. So, now CIA has this

20:25

mess

20:26

where they are actively losing

20:27

information,

20:29

actively losing

20:31

intel because of this mole.

20:33

>> Because of a mole, but they can't take

20:34

any action because they have to now

20:36

build a legal case against the mole to

20:39

prove that that person's actually

20:41

breaking the law. So, the ally that

20:43

calls the CIA and says you've got a mole

20:45

in your ranks,

20:47

they named to the person. Most likely.

20:49

Most likely they would have never made

20:50

the the notification without also

20:52

sharing the name, which is a courtesy we

20:54

do to others as well. If we come across

20:56

information that we know an MI6 officer

20:58

has been compromised or a Canadian's

21:01

CSIS officer has been compromised or an

21:03

ASIS officer in in Australia, we will

21:05

share as many biographical details as

21:07

possible. And did you share the name

21:10

Did when you were called into the room

21:11

that day, did they share the name with

21:13

you? No.

21:15

It's hard for people to wrap their minds

21:16

around the culture at CIA, and I get it

21:19

because how do you wrap your mind around

21:20

an organization you don't know? And the

21:23

only exact the only insight is from

21:24

movies. So, culturally CIA is a is a

21:28

group of

21:29

people who value secrets.

21:32

And that need to know is very important

21:35

inside those walls. It's just something

21:36

we toss around like movie jargon

21:38

outside, but inside CIA need to know is

21:40

very, very real.

21:41

And you are only briefed to the minimum

21:44

that you need to know.

21:45

So, inside of this tiny group of of spy

21:48

hunters, which is known as the the um

21:50

counterespionage group, CEG, inside this

21:53

very small group, they have the need to

21:56

know basically everything. And then as

21:58

you go out in rings from that group,

22:01

they reduce the information they share.

22:02

So, they might know the name, but then

22:04

when they share it to the next ring,

22:05

they just say, "Hey, there's an officer

22:08

who's in this office." And then it goes

22:10

to the next ring, "There's an officer in

22:11

this division." And then it goes to the

22:12

next ring. So, the the people talking to

22:14

us as senior leaders, the people talking

22:16

to us knew the minimum we needed to know

22:19

was that we were going to build new

22:20

operations,

22:21

but we were also going to be most likely

22:23

targeted by an own threat inside CIA.

22:26

That was why it mattered to us.

22:28

Interestingly, that decision is why we

22:30

had a First Amendment case with this

22:32

book at all because CIA was knowingly

22:35

putting our lives in danger of a foreign

22:37

adversary

22:39

by intentionally creating operations

22:41

that would tempt that mole to disclose

22:43

our identities. That was one of the

22:45

things I was thinking when I was reading

22:46

the book is you knew that you were being

22:48

sent to a adversarial country, and you

22:52

also had the knowledge that

22:54

working amongst you was a mole who was

22:57

revealing secrets about the CIA and

22:59

potentially yourselves to that foreign

23:01

country. Correct. So that foreign

23:03

country could have

23:05

pop

23:07

could have killed you. Absolutely. And

23:08

and that's the second kind of cultural

23:10

element that people don't understand

23:12

about CIA.

23:13

You don't really turn down an operation.

23:16

If you're invited

23:18

to take part in an operation,

23:20

you have the right to say no. But if you

23:23

say no, you're committing career

23:24

suicide.

23:26

Gihi and anybody who reads the book will

23:28

find this out. Gihi was

23:30

a stellar officer on a phenomenal

23:33

trajectory, doing incredible things.

23:35

Kind of really charting the course for

23:37

what targeters have become today.

23:40

For me, I proved to be a not very good

23:42

case officer.

23:44

And if there was anything I was really

23:45

hoping for, it was a second chance. So

23:47

when we were pulled into this meeting

23:50

and they said, "Hey, here's this

23:52

exciting opportunity. Here's an

23:53

operation that we're

23:56

we're literally inviting you to this

23:57

executive suite to invite you to this

23:59

operation. And we're going to put you

24:01

together and we need you to do this."

24:03

That's not That's not a situation that I

24:05

was going to say no to.

24:06

I think you considered saying no, but

24:08

for me,

24:10

it was it was a they knew me well enough

24:12

to know I was not going to turn that

24:13

down. Yeah, I mean, I think when you

24:15

have anxiety, you consider saying no to

24:16

everything. Yeah, yeah, yeah.

24:18

>> You're always thinking about the risk,

24:19

but I think that What was the risk that

24:21

you were thinking about? It is very real

24:24

that you can be disappeared by a foreign

24:26

adversary, that you can be

24:28

you know, killed by them with no

24:29

explanation, that you can be just

24:32

put in jail and then you never get out

24:33

because the government's not necessarily

24:35

going to come to your aid. And if they

24:37

do, it might be still maybe 20 years

24:39

before you're out of their prison. Every

24:41

sworn officer has plausible deniability,

24:44

meaning the president can plausibly deny

24:46

that you don't belong to whatever

24:48

organization you are claiming to belong

24:50

to. So a CIA officer

24:53

arrested in a Russian prison

24:55

can can avoid all questioning and say,

24:58

"Hold on guys, I'm actually CIA. You

25:00

caught me. Good job. Now please send me

25:02

home. Don't have a diplomatic incident."

25:04

The president has the right to say that

25:06

person is not CIA. Yeah. That person has

25:08

never worked for me. I don't know who

25:10

that person is. Uh that their American

25:12

passport might be verified, but but they

25:15

are

25:16

legally in your possession of of uh

25:22

you know, legal requirements. So, we we

25:24

don't really know who they are. So, so

25:26

just to clarify then, you

25:29

were being told you were going to be

25:30

flown, both of you, to a foreign

25:32

country. Mhm. An adversarial foreign

25:34

country. And you were told that there

25:35

was a mole amongst your your ranks that

25:38

was feeding information to the foreign

25:39

country that you were being flown to.

25:41

So, we they actually stationed us

25:44

in a neighboring country that was

25:47

friendly.

25:49

But we knew that Andy and anybody we

25:52

worked with would have to go into

25:55

Falcon. So, they flew us to a country

25:56

>> Falcon being the adversarial country.

25:58

the adversarial country. So, we actually

25:59

lived in a third country called Wolf.

26:01

But we were operating in both Wolf and

26:04

in Falcon. So, the danger was still

26:06

there. And then that's when Jihi's

26:07

targeter mind set in. And that's when

26:09

she started thinking through, "Well, how

26:12

could our operation be reverse

26:14

engineered by Falcon

26:16

and actually find us? And if we can

26:19

think like the enemy, we can stay one

26:21

step ahead of the enemy." So, the whole

26:22

idea of going to Wolf and building our

26:24

team from the very beginning, Jihi

26:26

started to architect how we could do

26:28

that in a way that would foil the

26:31

foil our aggressors from being able to

26:34

even discover our existence. And what

26:36

was the objective when you So, you've

26:37

got this sub-objective, which I

26:39

understand, which is to find the mole.

26:40

But the main objective is just to spy as

26:43

usual and collect information on this

26:44

adversarial country. Yes and no. The

26:47

main objective was to collect

26:49

information, but the spying as usual is

26:51

the part that was a no.

26:53

CIA specifically told us they didn't

26:55

want us to do

26:57

the standard spy MO. Mhm. Spying has

26:59

really been the same since the days of

27:01

Egypt, the ancient Egypt, right? You

27:03

find somebody who gives you information

27:05

about something that they have access to

27:06

and that's it and that's spying. Then

27:08

you turn it into a report and you pass

27:10

it up to somebody who reads it and they

27:11

make a decision.

27:13

They wanted a new a new kind of

27:14

mousetrap. They they wanted a new way of

27:16

doing espionage.

27:18

And when they deployed us to the

27:20

friendly country, that was their only

27:21

request was whatever you do there,

27:24

coordinate it with the local leadership

27:27

and then don't tell us because we have

27:30

to make sure that the mole doesn't learn

27:32

what you're doing.

27:34

That's going to be how we tempt the mole

27:36

to start probing around and asking

27:38

questions that are outside of the norm.

27:40

That's how we're going to reverse

27:41

engineer this and find the mole. So we

27:43

need you to go do something new and we

27:45

need it not to be standard. And don't

27:47

tell us. And don't tell us but tell your

27:49

leadership in the friendly country. The

27:51

the CIA leadership in the friendly

27:53

friendly country.

27:54

>> Correct. Yes. Okay.

27:56

>> Because the And he's going to tell or

27:58

she's going to tell them. No, so it's

28:00

completely compartmentalized. So

28:02

>> Need to know. Right. Because if we kept

28:05

all of our operations

28:07

um centered in Wolf, then in our in our

28:11

friendly country, then the mole would

28:14

never know what we were doing. So we

28:15

would be gathering intelligence which

28:17

would then be further compartmentalized

28:20

to maybe a specific office where like

28:21

one or two people at headquarters might

28:23

know about one particular operation and

28:25

then one or two people might know about

28:27

another operation. But it's because not

28:30

all of Falcon House would know,

28:33

the mole would not have access to any of

28:35

these new inform any of these new

28:37

intelligence sources and that's what was

28:39

really important. That's why they wanted

28:40

us to rebuild because he currently had

28:42

access to all of the legacy intelligence

28:45

sources. Okay.

28:46

>> So if he wanted to, you know, pass any

28:48

information to Falcon from all of our

28:51

legacy sources, he could. But, if he

28:53

doesn't have access to our new sources,

28:55

he can't pass any of that new

28:56

information on. And now, here we are,

28:58

we're able to gather more intelligence,

29:00

and then hopefully, if we're lucky, we,

29:02

you know, we strike gold on finding out

29:04

who he is or who he's working with or

29:06

other things. But, yeah,

29:07

compartmentalization was the is the key.

29:10

So, we were really very, um,

29:12

you know, uh, kind of siloed in Wolf.

29:15

I'm trying to understand how you doing

29:17

what you were doing was going to help

29:19

the CIA discover who the mole was.

29:22

One of the things in in

29:25

double agent operations, which is what

29:27

you're talking about when you talk about

29:28

a mole or a penetration, a double agent,

29:30

meaning I'm a sworn officer of CIA,

29:34

but then I've also agreed to work with

29:37

the Russians, the Chinese, the North

29:38

Koreans, the Cubans, whatever. That's a

29:40

double a double agent.

29:42

Double agent operations are very

29:44

difficult to maintain in long term

29:46

because if my information isn't relevant

29:50

to my foreign adversary anymore, if the

29:52

if I'm collecting secrets on Cuba,

29:55

but I'm being paid by the Russians,

29:57

the Russians may not care that I keep

29:58

collecting secrets on Cuba. So, they

29:59

might cut me off. And then all of a

30:01

sudden I'm a double agent, culpable of

30:03

crime, but without protection from

30:05

another country. So, when you think of

30:07

your Edward Snowdens, when you think of

30:08

some of your famous turncoats from the

30:10

United States, they flee to the country

30:13

that they were working for, ultimately.

30:15

So, if you don't have that escape path,

30:19

then it becomes very, very stressful and

30:20

scary for for a double agent.

30:23

So, what CIA was counting on is

30:26

the mole who was reporting our secrets

30:29

to Falcon,

30:31

if we could create new operations, and

30:34

that mole didn't have access to those

30:36

new operations, then the mole would

30:38

start to stretch. They would start to

30:40

make mistakes,

30:42

ask questions they shouldn't ask, steal

30:44

information, try to hack onto systems

30:45

they shouldn't get onto. And that's all

30:47

stuff that CIA can use to build a legal

30:49

case to arrest that person. But without

30:52

knowing, without having something that

30:54

that person has to stretch to collect,

30:57

they're not going to make a mistake. So

30:59

our job was to create something new so

31:01

that the mole would make a mistake that

31:03

CIA could track and that would build a

31:05

legal case that would allow CIA to

31:07

arrest an American citizen for

31:09

espionage.

31:10

Did the CIA have access to the

31:14

information the mole was sending back to

31:17

the enemy country? No.

31:19

That's one of the most dangerous parts

31:21

about double agent operations. We often

31:23

We have a lot of nicknames, a lot of

31:25

inside terminology, but we usually call

31:26

it the keys to the kingdom.

31:29

When you have a foreign penetration,

31:31

you have the keys to everything in that

31:34

foreign country's

31:36

um all of their secrets because you have

31:38

access to an intelligence officer who

31:39

can pull anything. So our double agent,

31:42

our mole, had access to essentially

31:44

everything related to Falcon that CIA

31:47

had. So CIA didn't know what he was

31:50

sharing, what he wasn't sharing, how

31:51

much he had been sharing, or even how

31:53

long he had been sharing it.

31:55

But they suspected he was sharing

31:57

something. Because there was something

32:00

that our ally picked up on.

32:02

Something that allowed them to identify

32:03

the person and communicated back. So you

32:05

land in this friendly country next to

32:08

the enemy country.

32:10

And do you have to adopt new aliases,

32:12

new names, new new stories? Do you have

32:14

to pretend that you're normal people

32:16

living a normal life?

32:18

You do. Um there's different ways that

32:20

you can craft it. So

32:22

um

32:23

Geehee's job as the targeter was to find

32:25

our targets in Falcon. A big part of

32:28

what we had to do when we got to Wolf,

32:30

our friendly country, was do whatever

32:32

the leadership there told us to do. So

32:34

CIA crafted everything for us to land in

32:37

the friendly country. Once we were in

32:39

the friendly country, then we had to

32:41

start crafting new identities, new

32:44

aliases, so that we could travel out of

32:46

the friendly country and into Falcon.

32:49

Into the enemy country. Mhm. But while

32:50

living in Falcon, we were, you know,

32:52

Chewie and Andrew Bustamante, newlywed

32:54

couple. Where we worked was covered.

32:57

Where did you work?

32:58

It's under cover. We we still can't

33:00

disclose it.

33:00

>> Yeah. Like as far as this enemy did you

33:02

like run a when you were in the enemy

33:03

country working

33:06

were you like running like a like a

33:08

coffee shop?

33:09

Or is it Yeah, when going into Falcon,

33:11

there were different um you had to have

33:13

a a different cover and a different

33:15

cutout. And we would use what's what

33:17

you're referring to is called commercial

33:19

cover or commercial activity. Meaning we

33:21

would act as if we were part of

33:23

commercial business going into and out

33:25

of the country. But you'd use your

33:26

normal names? No.

33:28

No. We This is one of the other things

33:30

that's really fascinating about the book

33:31

and one of the reasons that CIA pushed

33:33

back is we get to disclose whole new

33:35

levels of tradecraft that have never

33:36

been talked about in previous books.

33:39

So the tradecraft that we use here is is

33:41

something that the Brits actually call

33:44

um dry cleaning.

33:45

And what that means is we would clear

33:47

our path before we would go into Falcon.

33:51

So we're in a friendly country and we

33:53

need to go into a hostile country. In

33:56

order to go from the friendly country to

33:57

the hostile country, you can't go

33:59

directly. Because if you go directly,

34:02

the hostile country can track you back

34:03

to your friendly country. And then they

34:05

can send a team to to hurt you if they

34:08

need to in the friendly country. So

34:10

instead what you do is you create a

34:11

cleansing route. So you travel from the

34:13

friendly country to a neutral country.

34:16

And in that neutral country, you'll

34:17

change identities and then travel into

34:20

your target country. So now if the

34:23

hostile country tracks you, they track

34:24

you back to a neutral country and they

34:27

have no idea that you originated from a

34:29

friendly country. But if you go from a

34:32

friendly country to a neutral country,

34:34

when you get to the neutral country,

34:36

do you need like a new passport and

34:38

stuff? Because that neutral country,

34:39

presumably they they don't know that

34:40

you're spies. Correct. So, do you have

34:42

to have a new passport to then get on a

34:44

plane to fly into the Yes, and it's what

34:46

we would call a passport swap. And

34:48

there's different ways of doing a swap.

34:49

You can carry your own swap. You can

34:51

have somebody meet you to do a swap. You

34:52

can have a cachet where you hide a swap.

34:55

But that's the benefit of always using a

34:57

consistent

34:58

cleansing route because you can always

35:00

go back to the same neutral country. And

35:03

from the hostile country's point of

35:04

view, every time they track you, you

35:06

always go back to the same place. So,

35:08

they start to build a pattern of life,

35:11

what we call a pattern of life, where

35:12

they believe you're originating from

35:14

this country. When in fact, you're not.

35:16

So, you you you land in this friendly

35:19

country. You're making your way into the

35:21

hostile country.

35:23

What was your objective? What were you

35:24

trying to do in that hostile country?

35:26

The first thing we were trying to do was

35:28

find targets. Okay. And

35:31

we knew that as we found targets and

35:32

built targets, we would also need to

35:34

support the operations against those

35:37

targets. And there's a logistical

35:38

element to espionage where you need to

35:40

have encrypted phones. You need to have

35:42

satellite satellite phones or SIM cards.

35:45

You need to have money. You need to have

35:47

specialized gifts. Like there's there's

35:49

a there's a logistical supply chain that

35:51

needs to be built. Specialized gifts.

35:54

So, um things that are appealing to a

35:58

target that they may not be able to get

35:59

themselves. Gold bullion, high-end

36:02

liquors, child pornography,

36:05

uh foreign currency, whatever they need,

36:08

your job is to make sure they have a way

36:10

of getting it. Child pornography? Some

36:12

some targets, especially in the in the

36:14

world of drugs and uh and terrorism and

36:18

weapons,

36:20

they they feed off of the strangest

36:22

things.

36:23

So, the CIA CIA would supply that

36:26

pornography? In a way, um we would more

36:29

like facilitate the transfer. Some other

36:32

friendly country might actually be who

36:34

acquires it. So, for example, Germany

36:37

might actually uh have a raid where they

36:40

where they carry out a raid against a

36:41

pornographer and they have

36:44

terabytes of porn, right? And then the

36:46

UK might have a case where they need

36:48

porn to pay an Iranian.

36:51

So, now they can trade with BND, so the

36:53

BND can use this cachet of porn and they

36:57

can give it to the Brits who give it to

36:58

the Iranians and that can be a currency

37:00

of types.

37:04

Again, morally ambivalent, the goal is

37:07

to protect your people at the end of the

37:08

day,

37:09

right? So, when it comes down to it,

37:11

that's the same way CIA works. If we're

37:13

giving gold if we're giving

37:16

minted American gold coins

37:18

to an evil person in North Korea,

37:22

do we really care if it's keeping

37:23

Americans safe?

37:25

There are some people who would say,

37:26

yes, and there are other people who

37:27

would say, whatever the price is, let's

37:29

keep Americans safe.

37:30

So, tell me about what you did then. So,

37:32

you what was your what did you

37:33

accomplish while you were there and what

37:35

is the you talk in the book about using

37:37

terrorist tactics to build your

37:40

operation there. Can you you run me

37:42

through what is it what it is you

37:43

accomplished there and the role that

37:45

both of you played? So, I'll start it

37:47

and I'll let you take it over. But, the

37:50

the the book's title, Shadow Cell, is

37:53

really about the cell model and the

37:55

terrorist cell model that we recreated

37:58

in our friendly country so that we could

38:00

execute operations against our hostile

38:02

country

38:03

that mirrored tactics and techniques

38:06

that terrorists had used to foil

38:08

Americans for the last 20 years in the

38:09

global war on terror.

38:11

So,

38:12

what Ji and I learned is that CIA was

38:15

not very good at beating terrorists.

38:18

America was not very good at beating

38:19

terrorists. That's why after 20 years of

38:21

fighting in Afghanistan, we left and we

38:24

gave it back to the same terrorist group

38:25

that we went in there to fight.

38:27

We had learned a lot from fighting that

38:29

adversary, but we were the only country

38:31

in the world fighting the global war on

38:33

terror. The Russians, the Iranians, the

38:36

Chinese, the Cubans, the North Koreans,

38:38

none of them engaged in the war on

38:39

terror. So everything we had learned

38:41

from Al-Qaeda,

38:43

we were the only ones that learned it.

38:44

So we found that to be kind of a

38:46

competitive advantage. So we started

38:48

building our operations modeling our

38:50

operations off of the way the terrorists

38:52

structured their cells.

38:54

And we called our cell in Wolf the

38:58

shadow cell.

38:59

And we had to find the people, recruit

39:01

the people, and train the people inside

39:03

our cell. Our actual CIA peers, we had

39:06

to get them to learn how to run the same

39:08

model. That's really what the book

39:10

explains is how we built that and what

39:12

those people did. Because espionage is

39:15

not about one superhero overseas, it's

39:18

about a team of people doing incredible

39:20

things. And were those people on the

39:22

ground in the friendly country next to

39:24

the hostile country? Yes. And so did you

39:27

when you recruited these people to build

39:28

this team,

39:30

did you recruit them from America or

39:31

were you recruiting them within side

39:33

that friendly country? Inside of Wolf.

39:36

Everybody who was in the cell was

39:37

already working in Wolf. And the word

39:39

cell basically means team. Team. Right.

39:41

Team. So you built this team it in the

39:45

friendly country next door to the enemy

39:46

country and this team consisted of how

39:48

many people? Right. So James was our

39:50

senior most Yeah. case officer.

39:54

Tasha, Luke, and Beverly were our second

39:56

tour case officers. So they were more

39:58

junior. That's why they were hungry but

40:00

but still kind of uh

40:02

flexible. Whereas James was in James was

40:05

at a place in his career where if this

40:06

didn't work, his career would be tanked.

40:08

Mhm. And then Jihee and I were not case

40:11

officers. We were kind of the I was the

40:13

the mission planner if you will and

40:15

Jihee was the targeter. And then uh

40:18

Diana was our linguist, Will was our

40:20

tech support. And we had that was our

40:22

that was our cell. That was our little

40:23

group of people that would sit in the

40:24

bullpen. Now, it's important to note

40:26

that

40:28

none of them and

40:29

this was their primary mission. It was

40:31

our primary mission. For all of them,

40:34

helping us was just something they were

40:36

doing because they believed that if we

40:38

were successful, it would be good for

40:39

them. They had primary missions to do

40:42

all sorts of other things.

40:44

Oh, okay.

40:45

And were these people locals?

40:48

They're all Americans

40:49

and they're all Americans assigned to

40:51

Wolf. So, they're all American CIA

40:53

officers, all sworn officers that are

40:55

assigned to our friendly country in

40:57

various different covers to do various

40:59

different primary missions. Okay.

41:02

And how did you guys like communicate?

41:03

Did you like meet up for like dinner?

41:05

Like this stuff.

41:06

How does it work?

41:07

Yeah, I mean all of our communication

41:09

and hangouts were in the office because

41:10

we couldn't really be seen outside

41:12

together. We had a

41:13

we had what's known as a SCIF, a

41:15

specialized compartmented

41:17

information facility.

41:19

So, it was a it was a hardened

41:22

soundproof office that we could have

41:25

meetings in.

41:26

Couldn't the adversarial country like

41:27

watch you walking in there in the

41:28

morning?

41:29

The adversarial country arguably didn't

41:31

even know we were in Wolf because every

41:33

time they tracked anybody's travel, it

41:35

would take them to a different country.

41:36

Oh, so you were just people going to an

41:38

office. Yes. So, you could be doing

41:40

anything in there. Correct.

41:41

>> Yeah, and it's an office in a large

41:43

office building. So, we could really be

41:45

going anywhere. Okay, fine. So, it's

41:47

hard to track.

41:48

So, what was your what was your first

41:50

mission together as a as a team? Like

41:52

what were you what were you doing in the

41:53

enemy country? What was your objective?

41:55

To you were finding you were working as

41:57

a targeter to find interesting

41:59

individuals and then Andrew you were

42:00

predominantly trying to make contact

42:03

with those individuals. Sort of what my

42:05

because I couldn't as the node of the

42:09

of the cell, the node is a term that

42:12

we're using to say, I was the piece that

42:14

was exposed to CIA. So, the mole, if the

42:16

mole went hunting, the mole would find

42:19

me. I was the one that was exposed.

42:21

Okay. So, for me, it was important that

42:23

I actually didn't meet with any of the

42:24

targets that we had in Falcon. My job

42:27

was to go to Falcon to start sourcing

42:29

the information that she would use to

42:31

identify those individuals. Like, what

42:33

does that mean? So, uh whether it's

42:35

something stupid like a phone book or a

42:37

thumb drive, uh whether you're picking

42:38

up a dead drop from somebody else. So,

42:40

consider in Falcon, we would have

42:42

already had other case officers carrying

42:44

out operations. Yeah.

42:46

So, we might have a case officer who was

42:48

able to extract information from a

42:50

military database. And that military

42:52

database has all the weapons engineers

42:55

for Falcon's Air Force.

42:58

That case officer That spy. That spy

43:01

Mhm. That spy can collect a thumb drive.

43:03

Yeah. And then they can put that thumb

43:04

drive in what's known as a dead drop. A

43:06

dead drop would be something that you

43:07

hide anywhere in the in the country, in

43:09

a city, wherever.

43:10

>> Also, like in a bush. Yeah, like in a

43:11

bush.

43:12

I would then go into Falcon, and I would

43:14

go to that dead drop site, the bush.

43:16

>> So, you're going to the enemy country.

43:17

Right.

43:18

>> You'd go to the the bush. And take the

43:20

thumb drive and bring it back by our

43:22

cleansing route to Wolf, where I could

43:24

give it to Jihi. Jihi could then extract

43:26

the information from the thumb drive,

43:28

and now she has a list of all the

43:30

engineers who are part of the

43:32

enemy country's Air Force.

43:34

And then from there, she has a starting

43:36

point for her information to start

43:37

finding targets. Now, as she finds

43:40

targets, that's when we tap on our case

43:42

officers. James,

43:44

Tasha, Luke, Beverly, and we say, here's

43:47

somebody that we think would be

43:48

susceptible to you because you're a

43:51

middle-aged woman, you're an older man,

43:53

you're a younger man, you're a younger

43:55

woman. Right? We think that these people

43:57

might be susceptible to your interests,

44:01

your backgrounds, your voice, who knows

44:03

what. And we need you to target them.

44:05

And then we would send those

44:06

those spies into Falcon to meet the

44:09

targets that Jihi found.

44:10

Okay.

44:12

Uh okay, got you. So, the game of

44:14

espionage is not an easy game. It's a

44:17

fun game, but it's a it's a chess game,

44:19

not a checkers game. So, there's a lot

44:21

of moving pieces and a lot of moving

44:22

parts, and um for me it was always very

44:24

exciting, but I also understand that it

44:26

can be very difficult to to express it

44:28

well.

44:29

Was there ever a time when you felt most

44:32

at risk?

44:33

When you were in that hostile country?

44:36

At some point, it

44:38

my presence in Falcon, in the enemy

44:41

country, became known

44:43

to the local government in the enemy

44:45

country, and they dispatched a

44:47

surveillance team to track me. It was a

44:50

major turning point in our operation. We

44:52

kind of went from a place where we felt

44:54

like we were winning to a place where we

44:56

wondered if we were losing. We went from

44:58

a place where I felt very safe to a

44:59

place where I felt like I could

45:01

immediately be apprehended, and then all

45:03

the worst thoughts start to creep in.

45:05

Not necessarily about being shot.

45:07

Oftentimes a CIA officer being shot in a

45:09

foreign country is a welcome

45:11

experience, because being shot at least

45:13

means everything ends.

45:15

The worst is being captured and being

45:17

interrogated and being used for

45:19

diplomatic leverage and being used for

45:21

policy leverage and being being forced

45:24

to do

45:25

uh you know, into brainwashing and

45:26

propaganda videos. Like, that's a much

45:28

worse experience than than a clean

45:31

death.

45:32

You said earlier that it would have been

45:33

the mole that was exposed to your

45:35

presence and that knew that you were in

45:36

this enemy country. So, was it the mole

45:38

that told the enemy country? That's what

45:40

we believe. We don't have the evidence

45:43

to prove it, um but what CIA's

45:47

conclusion as well as the conclusion

45:48

inside of our own shadow cell is that

45:51

our operations had reached the place

45:53

where they were significant enough that

45:55

the mole took a risk

45:57

to find out that I was the exposed

46:00

member of the cell, and then the mole

46:02

reported my name to the hostile

46:04

country's police force.

46:07

So, you're now inside that hostile

46:08

country, the enemy country, and they

46:11

know that you're a US spy.

46:14

Was there a day when you realized that

46:16

they knew that you were a spy? Yes.

46:19

Well, there wasn't a day that I realized

46:21

that they were

46:22

that they knew I was CIA. There was a

46:24

day that I realized they were

46:26

surveilling me

46:27

as if I was a threat.

46:30

When you travel, when any business

46:31

person travels to a hostile country,

46:33

they're almost always surveilled. Their

46:36

hotel rooms can be rifled through.

46:38

There's There's people called bumbling

46:40

surveillance or watchers who will

46:42

usually follow you.

46:43

I'm not sure what your travel looks

46:45

like, but I can almost assure you that

46:46

if you travel to Russia, if you travel

46:47

to China, if you travel to Cuba, you had

46:49

a watcher. You had a surveillance team

46:51

Really? that was watching you.

46:52

>> Me? Yeah. Why? Because you're wealthy,

46:54

you're successful, you're an influencer,

46:56

you're of significance. At the very

46:58

least, they want to make sure that some

46:59

petty criminal doesn't hurt you in their

47:02

country cuz that could be a big deal.

47:03

>> Thank you. But

47:05

Please continue to surveil me. But at

47:07

worst, they could also be scraping your

47:08

cell phone to pull all of your contacts

47:10

off the cell phone so that they could

47:11

then reach out to any of the contacts

47:12

that you have on your cell phone. They

47:14

could scan and duplicate your hard drive

47:16

as you go through secondary or go

47:18

through immigration in a foreign

47:19

country. They can scan my hard drive as

47:21

I go through immigration? Absolutely.

47:24

We can do that here in the United

47:25

States, too.

47:26

What? So, if I land in the United

47:27

States, like they How do they do How

47:28

would they do that? So, there's a

47:30

There's

47:31

There's different authorities that exist

47:33

for different agencies. So, here inside

47:36

the United States, one of the

47:37

authorities that we give to our border

47:38

patrol is the authority to essentially

47:40

scrape data off of all of your

47:42

electronic devices. So, if you're uh

47:45

deemed a target of interest, and if

47:47

you're moved into what's known as a

47:48

secondary screening, they will separate

47:50

you from your bags. They'll actually

47:52

open your your bags. They might even

47:53

tell you to unlock your cell phone or

47:55

unlock your laptop. And then from there

47:58

with with technology that's proprietary

48:00

and technology that's also currently

48:01

commercially available, they can scrape

48:03

and scan your hard drive. Cuz I've been

48:05

through security before in various

48:08

countries and sometimes when I get to

48:09

the other end, there's a letter in my

48:11

suitcase. And the letter in my suitcase

48:13

says, "Hey, we had to go through your

48:14

bags for some reason."

48:16

>> If you had a technical If you had a

48:17

technical device in your bag along with

48:19

that letter, there's a good chance that

48:22

it was cloned.

48:24

But I didn't give them my password.

48:28

Sometimes they don't need your password.

48:29

Really? Oh, yeah.

48:33

How are they going to get into my my

48:34

laptop without my password? There's

48:35

ways.

48:37

So, yeah, there's password generators,

48:38

there's password cracking codes. Your

48:40

password is the I mean, I have somebody

48:42

I could call right now and within about

48:44

30 minutes we would probably have all of

48:46

your passwords that you use for all of

48:47

your devices in your personal home.

48:53

That's the end of the podcast, isn't it?

48:55

Good luck WITH THE BOOK.

48:58

CUZ I'M GOING TO HAVE TO ASK HIM FOR MY

48:59

PHONE.

49:03

AND THIS IS A BIT OF A TANGENT, BUT IT'S

49:04

AN IMPORTANT ONE. SO, WHAT devices do

49:05

you guys use if you have that knowledge

49:07

that it's really easy to break into

49:08

devices? Do you use the same devices

49:10

that I use? Yeah, I mean, for me I

49:12

assume that once you If you become a

49:15

target of interest, there's nothing you

49:17

can do to protect yourself. So, I use

49:19

devices that are actually easy to crack

49:21

and clone because I don't want my device

49:23

to get broken.

49:24

So, that when

49:26

the Chinese or the Russians choose to go

49:28

through some backdoor on my Android

49:29

system, my Android doesn't shut down.

49:32

Whereas, there are more complex systems

49:34

like a Glacier phone, where if somebody

49:35

penetrates your Glacier phone, this the

49:37

whole phone will shut down and you'll be

49:38

without a phone. Is there any phone or

49:40

device that's safe?

49:42

I would argue the answer is no. No. I

49:44

would say no, also. Because anything

49:46

that you create that claims to be safe

49:48

becomes priority number one for all the

49:51

adversaries out there cuz they know if

49:53

they can be the first ones to crack that

49:55

phone or crack that hard drive or crack

49:56

that operating system, then they have

49:59

the competitive advantage over everybody

50:01

else. Yeah, it's possible for something

50:03

to be safe for a short period of time,

50:04

but eventually it's going to get

50:06

cracked. They'll find a back door or

50:07

they'll figure out how to open it. And

50:09

it's not just foreign intelligence that

50:10

wants to do that, it's also all of your

50:11

criminal syndicates, it's all of your

50:13

dark web syndicates, everybody wants to

50:14

do it. So, whenever I see anybody come

50:16

out and promise that they have got the

50:18

new hardest device,

50:20

I just I don't believe it. It might be

50:22

hard, but that doesn't mean it's

50:24

impossible. Yeah, there are levels of

50:25

security, but nothing is 100% secure, at

50:28

least when it comes to technology. And

50:30

so, we just assume

50:32

that it's not secure. And so, you just

50:34

treat your device in that way. You know,

50:37

with whatever level of security is

50:38

convenient and makes you feel secure,

50:40

but knowing that at any point somebody

50:42

could just hack in from, you know, they

50:45

could hack in remotely, they could, you

50:47

know, scrape your drive when you're

50:48

going through immigration or if you're

50:50

in a hotel room, somebody comes in. I

50:51

mean, it's always possible.

50:52

>> steal your encryption key from somebody

50:54

else that you are having an encrypted

50:55

chat with. They didn't have to target

50:57

you. Do you use like cold storage? I.e.,

51:00

do you use like a a hard drive that's

51:01

not connected to the internet or

51:02

something? We will air gap. With what?

51:04

>> Air gap. Air gapping is cold storage,

51:06

like what you're talking about, where

51:07

you take something off the actual cloud,

51:10

take something off the internet, and it

51:11

just lives in a stand-alone server.

51:13

Whether that's a We have drives that we

51:15

save our information to that are that

51:17

are air gaps, they're not connected to

51:18

the internet, not connected to a cloud.

51:19

They're only connected whenever we

51:20

choose to transfer information. Um so,

51:23

we'll do things like that to keep our

51:24

information safe. But, the I think the

51:25

most important thing is that

51:28

if you

51:29

if you show, if you make yourself easy

51:32

to be hacked,

51:34

then you'll actually get hacked less,

51:36

because you're not a risk. They can see

51:39

what you have, they understand that

51:40

you're not important, and they move on

51:42

to the next target that's more more uh

51:45

clandestine or trying to hide.

51:47

Okay, so you you out, going back to the

51:49

story, you figure out that you're being

51:50

surveilled. How?

51:53

Just like the the whole idea of a

51:55

cleansing route through a third country,

51:57

that's a a piece of tradecraft that has

51:59

never been exposed before. I actually

52:01

get to teach a number of people, I get

52:02

to teach in the story how we do what's

52:04

known as a surveillance detection route.

52:06

So, the the core of surveillance

52:08

detection is understanding something

52:10

that we call multiple sites, multiple

52:12

sightings over a period of time. So, I

52:16

need to see the same person, the same

52:18

vehicle, the same face, the same

52:19

profile. Profile meaning, you know, tall

52:22

tall Caucasian male, mid-50s. I need to

52:25

see the same profile several times over

52:28

a period of time where I'm changing

52:29

locations.

52:31

So, what happens inside Shadow Cell is I

52:33

identify one car

52:36

that follows me through multiple turns

52:39

and then falls off, only to come back on

52:42

later on. That's kind of my first

52:44

indicator that there might be something

52:46

going on. So, then I go through this

52:48

route, a predetermined, preplanned route

52:51

through a city. And the only reason I'm

52:53

doing that route is so that I can drag

52:56

people along with me to see if they're

52:57

going to behave like surveillance. And

53:00

from that route, I find that it's not

53:01

just one car, it's actually two other

53:03

cars. And when I get out of my own

53:06

vehicle to walk on foot, there are very

53:08

specific people who then follow me on

53:11

foot. And then in the third part of the

53:13

surveillance detection route, I find

53:14

that same people who are following me on

53:16

foot are also the people driving the

53:18

cars that are following me inside

53:20

vehicles. So, most surveillance

53:22

detection routes are executed in this

53:24

very prescribed, very specific process

53:27

so that you can see who's actually

53:29

following you.

53:31

And you did that. You discover that

53:34

there's multiple people following you in

53:35

multiple vehicles.

53:37

And when you discover that, it's

53:39

terrifying.

53:39

>> Yeah, I was going to say you

53:40

>> It's absolutely terrifying. But, it's

53:42

comforting

53:44

because you know they're following you,

53:46

but they don't know that you know that

53:48

yet.

53:49

So, they still think that they are

53:51

discreet. They still think that that

53:53

you're operationally active, meaning

53:56

they're following you because they

53:57

expect you to commit espionage. They're

53:59

following you because they expect you to

54:01

meet with a source, do a dead drop,

54:03

acquire some kind of equipment that you

54:05

shouldn't have, right? They're waiting

54:07

for that. If they don't see that, then

54:10

they don't get the evidence that they

54:12

need. They don't win.

54:13

>> So, you go straight to a strip club or

54:14

something.

54:14

>> Exactly right. You go to a strip club,

54:16

you go to a library. I went to an arcade

54:18

in this book, and you go somewhere to

54:20

just waste their time. Because as long

54:22

as I'm collecting their information when

54:24

I come back to my friendly country, and

54:25

I meet with my shadow cell teammates, I

54:28

can now tell them this license plate is

54:30

a surveillance vehicle, this profile is

54:32

a surveillance vehicle. If you see a

54:34

woman or a man wearing these types of

54:35

clothing, this is a surveillant, right?

54:38

And we can

54:39

now we can build a database back in Wolf

54:42

that shares the surveillance team

54:43

members in Falcon. Were you scared when

54:45

you figured out that you were being

54:46

followed? I was terrified. I was

54:48

terrified because I had so many thoughts

54:51

going through my head from how did I

54:53

[ __ ] up

54:55

to what if I don't go home? I'm trying

54:57

to think about what they're going to do

54:59

as their next step. How long are they

55:00

going to follow me before they just say

55:01

[ __ ] it and just wrap me up?

55:04

Are they even going to wrap me up? Wrap

55:05

me up meaning meaning apprehend me,

55:07

capture me. Do they already have

55:09

evidence that shows that I'm committing

55:10

espionage, right? I haven't committed

55:12

espionage on this trip yet, but have

55:15

they seen me on a previous trip doing a

55:17

dead drop, retrieving a dead drop,

55:18

dropping a cell phone, taking a battery?

55:20

Like

55:20

what what do they know? I don't know

55:22

what they know.

55:23

And then you've got all this panic, and

55:25

at the same time you have to recall

55:29

3 and 1/2 hours of very specific

55:32

activity across a city to run an SDR. An

55:34

SDR? A surveillance detection route. You

55:36

have to recall I turn left on Front

55:38

Street. I go two blocks, I turn right on

55:41

22nd North, and then I turn left on an

55:43

alley. You have to recall this thing

55:45

that you memorized, that you work

55:46

through, and at the same time that you

55:48

have this spike of adrenaline panic. And

55:50

you were on your own? I was on my own

55:52

for that operation. So, you you go

55:53

through this route through the city that

55:55

you is predetermined for you to go down,

55:57

and presumably this particular route is

56:00

designed in such a way where

56:02

it gives you opportunities to expose

56:04

them.

56:06

You realize that you are being followed.

56:08

What do you do in that exact moment? The

56:10

first moment that I realized it was

56:11

true,

56:13

I had this

56:16

realization, this moment of fear and

56:20

vulnerability

56:23

where I just it was a very it was a

56:25

moment of self-loathing, where you just

56:28

you realize that you're not as good as

56:29

you think you are. And you realize that

56:31

however this happened,

56:34

you're the only one to blame for what

56:36

comes next.

56:38

In that kind of moment of humility,

56:41

I actually called Jihi.

56:43

In our alias identities that we had

56:46

built for these operations, we had

56:48

what's known as a throwaway phone or a

56:50

disposable telecommunications. And I

56:53

called her

56:54

and I gave her a coded message to let

56:56

her know

56:57

that

56:58

something was wrong. Cuz I wanted her to

57:00

know that something was wrong so that

57:01

she could take it back to the cell so

57:03

that they could start their systems on

57:05

their end to protect me if I did get

57:07

arrested, if I did get wrapped up, if I

57:08

did get shot. You gave her a coded

57:10

message? Via cell phone. What is that

57:12

coded message? Um the I think I just

57:15

called you and said I'm coming home

57:16

early.

57:16

>> Mhm.

57:18

You said you you called her and said I'm

57:19

coming home early. Yeah, which is a bad

57:21

sign because you would never come home

57:23

early from an operation ever.

57:26

So, as soon as I heard he was coming

57:27

home early, I knew that something was

57:29

wrong.

57:30

>> Take me into your world at that time.

57:32

The phone rings. I get the call on my

57:33

phone, my burner phone, and which was

57:36

unusual anyways. I mean, I always had it

57:38

because that was part of our like

57:40

communication plan was for us to do that

57:42

when we were apart. So, a burner phone

57:44

is a secondary phone that you just use

57:45

for these kind of things.

57:46

>> That's just for this. It's never used

57:48

for anything else. It's not connected to

57:49

a name.

57:51

Um and that's what keeps it anonymous

57:52

for us. And so, he calls and he says,

57:56

you know, "Hey, I'm coming home early."

57:58

And I'm like,

58:00

"Okay." Because you can't like if if the

58:03

line's being tapped, you can't be like,

58:05

"Oh my god, what's going on? Like, are

58:06

you okay?" because somebody's listening

58:08

to it. It has to sound like we knew that

58:10

his alias had a fiance. I was the

58:12

fiance. So,

58:13

you know, it was totally natural for

58:15

anybody listening in to to hear him say,

58:17

"Hey, I'm coming home early." So, then I

58:19

had to be like, "Oh, that's really

58:20

exciting. That's great. You know, I

58:22

can't wait to see you." And he's like,

58:23

"Okay, I love you." And then that's the

58:25

end of the conversation. And that's all

58:26

I get.

58:27

And so, after that's all I get from

58:30

Andy, I go back to the office. I'm

58:32

starting to look like scour all of our

58:34

cables. I go talk to James. Like, have

58:37

you heard anything? Like, is anything

58:38

happening? You started to scour all of

58:41

your cables. Yeah, so, you know, we have

58:43

our all of our databases, uh you know,

58:46

all the CIA databases. So, you know,

58:48

there's reporting that comes in all the

58:49

time um that you're, you know,

58:51

especially regional reporting that

58:53

you're privy to. And so, you know, I

58:55

talked to James because he was he had

58:56

more access than I did to things all

58:58

things Falcon. And so, I was like, "Have

59:00

you heard anything? Is there anything

59:02

weird going on?" And he said, "No." And

59:04

so, I started just kind of looking

59:06

through all of my stuff to see, you

59:07

know, was there any reporting that was

59:09

of somebody being captured or somebody,

59:12

you know, something going wrong? And

59:13

there was nothing. Um and so, Andy and I

59:16

have um

59:17

we created on our own just a it's called

59:19

a combo plan, a communication plan,

59:21

where you know, if anything ever

59:23

happens, you know, whether natural

59:24

disaster or, you know, espionage faux

59:27

pas, like we had a system of

59:30

communication where

59:31

you know, I wait 8 hours and you know,

59:34

check this

59:36

fake email that we share that's not

59:38

attributable and then he gives me a sign

59:40

of life and then we have these timings 8

59:42

hours, 12 hours, 24 hours, 48 hours

59:46

where all I need from him is a sign of

59:48

life to know that he's okay. And then

59:51

that also gives us the opportunity if it

59:52

were a natural disaster for example, to

59:54

put, you know, I meet me at this

59:56

location. So that that's an email

59:58

address that Andy emails. Yeah, so

60:00

>> Close. It's an email address that we

60:02

both have a login to and you create a

60:05

draft email inside of it. Oh, okay.

60:07

>> Also learned from terrorism. Also

60:09

learned from terrorism. Okay. Oh, is

60:10

that what terrorists do? Yeah. So they

60:12

create a draft email, they just leave it

60:13

there and someone else logs in and looks

60:15

at it. Yeah, so there's it's never sent,

60:17

so it never goes over the internet

60:18

really. Yeah, so we had this

60:20

communication plan in place, so even

60:21

though I was concerned and I couldn't

60:24

find anything to discover what was

60:26

happening, I knew we had this

60:27

communication plan in place. So I knew

60:29

that at some point he was going to give

60:31

me a sign of life and I couldn't do

60:33

anything

60:35

until that point. So you're you've

60:37

discovered that you've been discovered

60:39

by this adversarial country, you call

60:42

Jihi, you let her know that you're

60:43

coming home early, then what you do?

60:45

Then I have to plan my escape. So

60:48

another thing that people that movies

60:49

don't show you is that

60:51

when in the first effort to escape is

60:54

always self-rescue. It's always on the

60:56

part of the field officer alone to try

60:59

to escape. There's no Navy SEAL team,

61:02

there's no evacuation helicopter,

61:04

there's no high-speed

61:05

boat or or classy yacht just waiting for

61:08

you. You have to get yourself across

61:11

the country's border yourself

61:14

before you can hope for any kind of

61:16

e-back from there or what we call an

61:17

exfil.

61:19

So I knew knew it was on me to come up

61:21

with some evacuation plan. And I had to

61:23

come up with an evacuation plan that

61:25

wasn't going to let the surveillance

61:27

team know

61:28

that I knew I was under surveillance.

61:31

And you're still in the car at this

61:32

point? I'm I'm in between the car and on

61:34

foot uh

61:36

de- depending on where I am in the

61:37

surveillance detection route, right? It

61:39

was Surveillance Detection Routes

61:40

generally break into three phases. It's

61:43

in the first phase that you suspect that

61:46

you're under surveillance. It's in the

61:47

second phase that you confirm it. So,

61:49

it's in the second phase when I confirm

61:51

I am absolutely under surveillance.

61:52

That's when I contact G and G, and

61:54

that's when I start coming up with my

61:55

own self-rescue plan.

61:57

And then the third phase? The third

61:59

phase is a collection phase. You know

62:02

what you You know that you're under

62:03

surveillance. You know that you've

62:05

communicated to somebody that you're

62:06

under surveillance. And now the mission

62:08

becomes collect as much information as

62:10

you can about the surveillance team

62:12

before they realize that they're being

62:14

collected against. So, you you see this

62:16

car behind you, multiple cars behind

62:17

you, and the same people following you

62:20

on foot. Are you writing this down, or

62:22

are you just trying to memorize it?

62:23

>> At first, it's all memory. Um and we

62:25

have a methodology for trying to

62:27

memorize this stuff. We actually talk

62:28

about this in the book as well. You

62:29

start to come up with short codes to

62:31

describe the people.

62:33

Um and the codes that you come up with

62:35

mean something to you, but they wouldn't

62:36

mean anything if they were if they came

62:38

out in an interrogation, if they came

62:39

out in writing. So, like for you, I

62:41

might call you black t-shirt.

62:43

A black t-shirt means something to me.

62:45

So, if I see black t-shirt behind me

62:46

three times in the next 45 minutes in

62:48

three different parts of the city, I

62:50

know that I have an image for what black

62:52

t-shirt means. But when I write down

62:53

black t-shirt, nobody else knows what

62:55

that means.

62:56

When I see a woman, it was cold uh the

62:59

the season that I was carrying out these

63:00

operations. Um I saw a woman in

63:03

earmuffs, so I would call her earmuffs.

63:05

I saw a guy in a bomber jacket, so I

63:07

called him bomber jacket. And you just

63:08

recall these people. You You You blue

63:11

sedan, yellow SUV, right? White taxi

63:14

cab. You You start to come up with these

63:16

nicknames that mean something to you but

63:18

don't mean anything to anybody else. And

63:20

then when you get back to a place where

63:21

you can document your notes in detail,

63:24

you have a reference point to document

63:27

in detail. So, I start by memorizing.

63:30

When I got towards the end of my third

63:32

phase of surveillance detection, I

63:33

actually wrote down my notes

63:36

in the book it explains I went into a

63:38

like a clothing store

63:40

and then I started making notes in the

63:41

clothing store. Presumably, if somebody

63:43

came in and arrested me at that moment,

63:45

what they would see is a bunch of notes

63:47

about clothing. Earmuffs and black

63:48

t-shirts inside of a clothing store,

63:50

that's not espionage. But then when I

63:52

was able to actually get back to

63:54

to Wolf with my cell, then I was able to

63:57

deconstruct what black t-shirt meant.

64:00

Black t-shirt meant blackmail

64:03

with a goatee

64:04

approximately 165 65 lb 5 ft 11 in

64:10

38 years old.

64:12

So, how do you get from phase two of

64:15

your process of figuring out if you're

64:17

being followed to the arcade?

64:19

Like what was the Why did you go to the

64:21

arcade? So, I went to the arcade because

64:22

I was trying in a surveillance detection

64:25

route, one of the things that you're

64:26

actually trying to do is called bore or

64:28

lull your surveillance.

64:30

You never want to In movies, it makes it

64:32

look like you're trying to to ditch your

64:34

surveillance team. You're trying to lose

64:36

your tail. That's not what professionals

64:37

do. What professionals do is we drag the

64:39

tail. We keep the tail with us for as

64:41

long as possible. And one of the things

64:43

you do is you make yourself very

64:45

predictable. You move very slowly. You

64:49

hang out in public places, which makes

64:51

it very easy for them to observe you. I

64:53

was actually going to the arcade to try

64:55

to collect more information about my

64:57

surveillance team, but I was trying to

64:58

give them time and space so they could

65:00

observe me in a public setting.

65:03

It It backfired because what actually

65:05

ended up happening is that when I went

65:07

into the arcade, they lost me. They lost

65:10

sight of me, which put them into a

65:12

position where they started panicking to

65:13

try to find me, even though I was just

65:15

sitting inside the arcade.

65:19

I mean, it doesn't sound like it

65:20

backfired if they lost you. That's a

65:22

terrible thing when they lose you

65:23

because when they lose you, they start

65:25

to panic and they start to assume either

65:28

they made a mistake or you're a trained

65:29

officer.

65:30

If you're a trained officer, if that's

65:31

the conclusion that they make, they can

65:33

come in and arrest you. If they lose

65:35

you, then they start to make mistakes.

65:37

And when a surveillance team starts to

65:38

make mistakes, it means that they might

65:41

stumble across you. They might have two

65:43

different surveillance people find you

65:44

at the same time. And for for them,

65:47

that's a scary thing because for them,

65:49

they're trying not to be identified.

65:50

They're trying to be discreet. They're

65:52

trying to not be seen. So, when they in

65:55

this case in in the story that that we

65:57

share in Shadow Cell, when the

65:58

surveillance team broke into a

65:59

starburst, a starburst means they went

66:01

they broke ranks to try to find me in

66:03

the arcade. When they broke ranks to try

66:05

to find me, they presented themselves to

66:08

me in the arcade face-to-face. And it

66:11

was in that moment that I realized

66:14

they know that I see them

66:16

and I know that they see me

66:18

and

66:19

this is bad. You locked eyes with them.

66:24

Which you're never supposed to do.

66:25

You're never supposed to do. You're

66:26

never supposed to lock eyes with your

66:28

surveillance.

66:29

You're never supposed to lock eyes with

66:30

anybody who's a threat, ever.

66:33

Because that's threatening behavior,

66:34

right? That's one of the reasons that

66:36

people share strong eye contact with

66:39

peers is to show is a show of trust.

66:41

Well, whenever you're locking eyes with

66:43

somebody who's a threat, it's a it's a

66:44

sign of aggression or dominance. So,

66:46

whenever you're being surveilled, you

66:48

never want to make eye contact with your

66:50

surveillance team because your

66:51

surveillance team will see that eye

66:52

contact as a threat. When you say you

66:55

sort of bumped into them in that arcade,

66:57

what's the distance?

66:59

3 ft. 3 ft.

67:01

And and how long did you lock eyes with

67:03

each other? It felt like an eternity. In

67:04

reality, it was probably 2 and 1/2

67:06

seconds.

67:09

I mean two and a half seconds is a long

67:10

time.

67:10

>> Especially when you're trying not to be

67:12

seen. So, recreate that moment for me.

67:14

You're in the arcade pretending you're

67:15

playing with games, you turn a corner

67:17

It's horrible, man. It's a horrible It's

67:19

a horrible story. I'm I'm in the arcade.

67:22

I I'm I again, I think I'm doing

67:24

everything right. I'm like, "Oh, I'm in

67:25

the arcade. They watched me come in.

67:27

This gives They're probably taking a

67:28

smoke break outside. They've got nothing

67:30

to worry about." And I'm kind of going

67:32

from game to game and spending whatever

67:34

credits that I bought in the arcade. And

67:36

then I go to this

67:37

dinosaur hunting shooting game, right?

67:40

Almost like Big Buck Hunter or like

67:42

Jurassic Park. And I pick up a rifle

67:45

and I'm shooting at dinosaurs.

67:47

And I'm just killing time.

67:49

And then

67:50

the [ __ ] surveillance comes around

67:52

the back of the machine looking for me.

67:54

He comes around the back of the machine

67:56

and he sees me. And I'm holding a

67:57

[ __ ] gun. And I look at him and he

67:59

looks at me.

68:01

And that's that's when our two and a

68:03

half seconds happened. And I'm sitting

68:04

there and I'm like, "What just happened?

68:06

Why is Why did I just see bomber jacket

68:10

come around my video game console and

68:12

stare at me in the face?" And that's

68:13

when I kind of realized, "Oh my gosh,

68:15

like the team is in panic. I can see

68:17

multiple people in the team. They lost

68:19

me. They're trying to find me. Bomber

68:20

jacket just found me."

68:22

What did bomber jacket do when he looked

68:23

at you? His jaw dropped. He went slack.

68:26

Like he looked at me and he knew that he

68:28

had [ __ ] up, too.

68:30

And I looked at him and in my mind's

68:32

eye, I was just hoping that I didn't

68:33

look as stupid as he looked.

68:35

In that moment

68:37

is it true to say that you should have

68:39

just looked back at the dinosaur game as

68:40

fast as you possibly could? What I

68:42

should have done is I should have seen a

68:44

person come around the corner and just

68:45

kind of stayed in the game. That's what

68:46

anybody else would have done. Anybody

68:48

else would have just stayed in the game.

68:49

They're They're focused on the game.

68:50

They don't even realize there are people

68:51

walking around, right? But the fact that

68:53

I identified I saw him and then looked

68:56

at him and the fact that he saw me and

68:57

looked at me as two professionals on

69:00

opposite sides of the of the playing

69:02

field, we both made the same mistake. We

69:05

both made the mistake of showing our

69:07

recognition to our intended target.

69:11

And before we continue, you as far as

69:14

your alias was in that country, you were

69:15

called Alex Hernandez, right?

69:17

>> Correct.

69:17

>> And you were running a business called

69:19

Acme Commercial? Correct.

69:21

What was Acme Commercial supposed to be

69:22

doing as a company?

69:24

Acme Commercial was a company that was

69:25

built to source new disposable goods

69:30

from foreign countries for

69:33

uh for uh transport and distribution

69:36

across Western countries. And the

69:39

intelligence services build

69:41

a lot of fake businesses, you said.

69:43

>> Yes.

69:43

Yes, it's a it's

69:45

the easier it is to build a business,

69:47

the easier it is to collect information.

69:48

So, what we've discovered is that just

69:51

as anybody with $127 in their pocket can

69:53

create an LLC,

69:55

that's about how much money it takes to

69:56

start an intelligence operation. So, is

69:58

that um the CIA operates numerous fake

70:01

companies?

70:03

The The CIA also operates numerous real

70:05

companies, too.

70:06

Not just the CIA. I mean, every intel

70:08

organization

70:10

has commercial fronts. Every intel

70:12

organization. The CIA operates real

70:15

companies.

70:16

What does that mean? There are There are

70:18

real companies out there owned and

70:19

operated by CIA. In-Q-Tel is one of

70:21

those companies. It's a investment

70:24

vehicle where CIA invests money and

70:28

invests in new technology, and all the

70:29

technology that goes through In-Q-Tel

70:31

knows that it's going through the CIA.

70:32

Okay, that that's a that's that's public

70:35

though, right? But the

70:36

the ones that aren't public, so the CIA

70:38

will create a company

70:40

and then they will use that company to

70:43

pretend to be doing something in a

70:44

foreign foreign land, basically. But the

70:46

primary mission is intelligence. This is

70:48

one of the most fascinating things, not

70:50

only about CIA, but about all of your

70:51

first world intelligence organizations.

70:53

You've heard of what's known as the

70:54

black budget.

70:55

The The budget is the budget of

70:58

of um discretionary money that can be

71:02

spent on military and intelligence

71:04

operations that isn't tied to the

71:06

taxpayer.

71:07

So, it's a giant pot of money that isn't

71:09

tied to tax money. So, where does that

71:11

money come from?

71:13

Part of that money comes from anytime

71:15

law enforcement or intelligence agencies

71:17

seize assets. We seize cryptocurrency,

71:20

we seize drugs, we seize child

71:22

pornography, right? When we seize that

71:24

money

71:26

and we use it for other operations,

71:27

that's part of the black budget. The

71:29

other part of the black budget is when

71:31

an intelligence organization creates a

71:32

business and that business turns a

71:34

profit.

71:35

When that business turns a profit, where

71:36

does the profit go? It can't go to the

71:38

case officer, that person's being paid

71:40

on the US payroll. So, all that profit

71:42

goes into the black budget. Do you think

71:44

the CIA has some big profitable

71:46

businesses that it set up as fronts that

71:48

just like went really, really well? I

71:49

know it does. Really? I know it does.

71:51

The The CIA has businesses that it set

71:54

up that have gone wildly CIA also has

71:57

officers that built these businesses

72:00

that then were like, "Why the [ __ ] am I

72:01

at CIA?" And then they leave CIA and

72:04

they go on to run businesses instead.

72:06

I mean, a a couple of things popped into

72:08

my head as you said that. The first was

72:09

there's obviously a huge conversation at

72:11

the moment around TikTok

72:12

because TikTok was started in China,

72:15

it's become this massive sort of global

72:16

success

72:18

and I can't think of a better

72:20

company to have started than a platform

72:22

like TikTok where everybody's putting

72:23

their information and data in and it's

72:24

tracking your location. So, what what is

72:27

your perspective on something like

72:28

TikTok? Do you think TikTok's was

72:30

started as

72:32

a tool to spy? I don't believe TikTok

72:35

individually was started as a tool to

72:36

spy. I believe that what happened is

72:38

TikTok became wildly popular and the

72:41

government in China realized, "Hey,

72:44

everything in China belongs to the

72:45

government anyways. We can step in and

72:47

take advantage of this." That is also a

72:49

way that CIA and MI6 do business as

72:51

well. When a company does very well and

72:53

there's an intelligence benefit, they

72:55

will approach the company.

72:57

In a democracy, they can't force the

72:58

company to cooperate, but in a country

73:00

like China, they can. So, do you think

73:01

the social networks, a lot of the big

73:03

social networks, have been approached by

73:06

the CIA or the MI6 and asked to give

73:11

the information to them?

73:12

>> I would go a step further and say that

73:13

they've all been approached and that the

73:15

vast majority of them cooperate.

73:18

Is that a concern for the average

73:19

person? Not for the For the average

73:21

person, that's a benefit. The average

73:23

person is not being targeted, I promise

73:25

you. Like there's zero interest in for

73:28

the federal government and for the

73:30

intelligence community, there is

73:32

absolutely zero interest in the average

73:35

person.

73:35

>> who's cheating on their spouse or

73:37

avoiding $5,000 in taxes or who isn't

73:40

paying their parking bills, nobody cares

73:42

The federal government doesn't care

73:43

about that.

73:43

>> Well, you were doing some of that

73:44

targeting, right? Right.

73:45

>> So, did you ever work with any existing

73:48

company to give you information?

73:50

So, all of my data, depending on what

73:53

country I was working on, had different

73:56

sources. And some Some countries had

73:59

more sources than others, but they're

74:00

all sources I can't disclose, but

74:02

there's tons and tons of data that would

74:05

come in to me and then I had I worked on

74:08

a number of cases where I had to get

74:10

FISA requests. What's a FISA request?

74:12

>> request is when you want to

74:15

um collect information or take

74:17

information from somebody who is an

74:19

American citizen. And I just want to

74:21

remind people that American citizen,

74:24

most people who complain about, "Oh,

74:25

they're targeting American citizens."

74:26

are thinking about themselves. They're

74:28

looking at themselves in the mirror and

74:29

thinking, "Oh, they're targeting

74:30

American citizens." They're not thinking

74:32

about the Chinese person who just came

74:34

over or naturalized. They're not

74:36

thinking about the, you know, Iranian

74:38

who's been here for a long time and

74:39

naturalized, right? Like all of those

74:41

They're not thinking about, you know,

74:43

the the al-Qaeda member Yeah.

74:45

>> who claimed to be a refugee to get here

74:48

to get some sort of green card. Right.

74:50

So,

74:51

American citizenship, a lot of people

74:53

have that. And some of those people are

74:55

doing bad things. And some of those

74:57

people are adversaries

74:59

who have infiltrated the United States

75:01

and are here to gather intelligence to

75:03

get to the our adversaries, you know, or

75:06

are here to do bad things within the

75:07

country. And so, we have to get FISA

75:10

requests to get the data on them. And

75:12

what does that mean in in reality, a

75:14

FISA request? Does that mean that you

75:15

can go into their phone? It means that

75:17

you have proven

75:20

a link from that person to something

75:22

bad.

75:23

And you've given the you've given the

75:24

court enough evidence to say, "Hey,

75:26

look, this person's doing something bad

75:28

and we need to gather more data on

75:29

them." So, it just opens the kind of

75:31

data that you can get on that person.

75:33

>> What kind of data is that? You can get

75:35

on their phone. You can get into their

75:36

computer. You can get into their private

75:38

Google accounts. You can get into their

75:39

private Apple accounts. You can get

75:41

>> you can get access to. You can now use

75:43

it

75:44

to target them. So, you could get access

75:46

to their private Google accounts, their

75:48

private Apple accounts without their

75:50

passwords.

75:51

You would hack their passwords or steal

75:53

their passwords or Google retains their

75:56

passwords.

75:57

And Google would give it you the

75:58

password? It For many, many For most

76:01

cases, if it comes down to national

76:03

security, American companies will share

76:06

details. And that's what a FISA request

76:08

does is it's a judicial claim. It's a

76:10

judicial warrant, essentially, to say,

76:12

"You will let this service onto that

76:13

person's account." You You guys must

76:16

think that people like me live in

76:18

a certain state of uh

76:21

naivety and ignorance as to what's

76:22

actually going on. I wouldn't say it's

76:25

ignorance or naivety. I would say that

76:27

it's it's conditioned into you. You're

76:29

conditioned to believe that you have

76:31

privacy. So, the reality that we should

76:33

realize is that we we don't have

76:35

privacy.

76:36

It's not real. Privacy's not real.

76:38

No.

76:40

I mean,

76:41

you know, there's a level. Like

76:42

>> In in your when you get undressed in a

76:44

dark room

76:47

like that's yours? Usually, no one's

76:49

watching.

76:50

>> There's a good chance that you're not

76:51

being watched by the federal government.

76:53

If you're getting

76:56

There's a good chance.

76:58

You know, if you're sending, you know,

77:01

dirty emails to your girlfriend, that's

77:05

essentially I mean, it's private on the

77:07

surface.

77:08

>> Yeah. But not really forever private.

77:10

Somebody could access those. If you

77:12

write her dirty notes, that's way more

77:15

private

77:16

>> Especially if she crumples them up and

77:17

burns them. Burns them.

77:19

Like people just I think people take put

77:21

too much confidence

77:23

in technology and feel too confident in

77:25

the privacy of technology because

77:27

technology there's really nothing

77:29

private about it. To an extent, yes, but

77:31

if you think that nobody can ever look

77:32

at your stuff, that's wrong. Do you

77:34

think the CIA knew you were coming here

77:36

today?

77:38

I think the CIA knew we were coming on

77:40

Diary of a CEO, and I think they knew

77:42

that we were going to talk to you about

77:43

our book. How do you think they knew

77:44

that? Because we know that CIA, as well

77:47

as other intelligence services, as an

77:49

example, the United Arab Emirates, we

77:51

know that they have a dedicated person

77:52

that sits in their office that watches

77:54

us.

77:55

So, how would they know you were coming

77:56

here today?

77:57

Our emails, I mean, our emails, our

77:59

publisher's emails,

78:01

um our own text messages back and forth,

78:04

listening in on phone calls, any number

78:06

of things could have happened. Uh like

78:08

we've tried to have a very collaborative

78:10

relationship with CIA about this book

78:12

because we know how scared they are. We

78:14

know how nervous this book makes them.

78:17

So, we're trying to be extra

78:19

collaborative to let to give them peace

78:21

of mind like, "Hey, we're not about to

78:22

go out there and tell the world that

78:23

you're a bunch of animals and and

78:25

terrible anything." Um they've actually

78:27

read the book multiple times and and

78:30

still they're they're afraid that we're

78:31

going to somehow

78:33

like make them look bad because so many

78:35

of their officers have come out to

78:36

become authors

78:38

who

78:39

who make CIA look bad.

78:41

There was a couple of other things that

78:42

we aren't going to get back to the

78:43

arcade and what happened next, but

78:44

there's a couple of other things that

78:45

sprung to mind when you talked about how

78:47

people can make real businesses, fake

78:48

businesses, have various different

78:50

covers. The The next one was you

78:52

mentioned Edward Snowden earlier.

78:54

And in mentioning Edward Snowden, you

78:56

used him as an example of someone who

78:58

returns to the country that they were

79:00

working for the whole time.

79:03

So,

79:04

with Snowden in the Snowden case in in

79:06

specific, right? Whenever somebody flees

79:09

their own home country, Yeah.

79:12

nobody gives them

79:14

protection for free. Even in the United

79:15

States, we don't give anybody protection

79:17

for free. You have to earn it. You have

79:19

to share some sort of currency. And that

79:21

currency may not be cash dollars. That

79:23

currency might be information.

79:26

So, when Snowden leaked to The Guardian,

79:30

the

79:31

operations at NSA that were collecting

79:33

against American citizens, the same

79:34

American citizens that G he was just

79:35

talking about, right? Nobody cares about

79:37

Joe Bob. Everybody cares about, you

79:40

know, the person who's pretending to be

79:41

an American citizen, but is in fact a

79:43

terrorist threat.

79:45

When Snowden made his escape, his when

79:48

he fled the United States, he was

79:50

essentially trading classified

79:52

information, not just the the details of

79:54

the NSA case that he whistle blew, but

79:57

other confidential information that he

79:58

collected specifically as currency to

80:01

help him basically pay his way through

80:03

Hong Kong and into China or into into

80:06

Russia.

80:07

And so, he lives in Russia now? He's a

80:08

Russian citizen. I'm pretty sure he's

80:10

also received a Russian award for

80:12

heroism.

80:13

And you think he gave secrets to Russia

80:16

about the United States to to get that?

80:17

>> almost guarantee you, yeah. What he

80:19

gave, I don't know, but Russia wouldn't

80:21

give him that status unless he had given

80:24

them something in return.

80:26

And the other one who sprung to mind as

80:29

real business, fake, you know, real

80:31

business, become successful

80:34

is the

80:36

man on everyone's lips at the moment,

80:37

Jeffrey Epstein. Mhm.

80:40

So, Epstein's a fascinating case because

80:42

Epstein fits all of the primary

80:44

pillars of a foreign intelligence asset

80:48

collecting information on American

80:49

citizens.

80:51

Not an American spy

80:53

working for someone else. It's funny

80:55

because people keep thinking like CIA

80:56

killed him or people keep thinking that

80:57

he somehow worked for CIA or maybe even

81:00

worked for for Mossad.

81:03

What I see is the opposite, that he, if

81:05

anything, was working independently,

81:07

maybe even working for several company

81:09

or several countries, but collecting

81:11

information on US people.

81:13

Is that what you believe?

81:16

I think that he could have been that. I

81:17

don't know that I necessarily believe

81:19

that it's true.

81:20

Cuz he's a very successful business

81:22

person. He had lots of um successful

81:24

friends. Actually, I was interviewing

81:26

someone the other day and they said that

81:27

they met Jeffrey Epstein and Jeffrey

81:30

Epstein was really, really interested in

81:34

their physics and science discoveries

81:36

and wasn't interested at all in the

81:38

financier stuff that he was pretending

81:41

to or he was purporting to be involved

81:44

in and um this person said to me, it was

81:46

just really bizarre because he was only

81:48

interested in the the physics and

81:50

science discoveries we had at Harvard.

81:52

He wasn't particularly interested in

81:53

finance to me. And that person was was

81:55

like really shocked by that.

81:57

What I've learned working with wealthy

81:59

people and successful people is that

82:00

they're often very intelligent and

82:02

they're often misunderstood.

82:04

And part of the reason that they have

82:05

grown as successful as they have grown

82:07

is because they don't really fit in

82:08

anywhere else. If they would have fit in

82:09

somewhere else, they would have been

82:10

distracted by the area where they fit

82:12

in. Instead, they had to carve their own

82:14

interest, their own passions, their own

82:15

their own drive.

82:17

In many ways, when I look at Epstein,

82:19

that's that's what I see. I've also

82:20

worked with many wealthy people who have

82:21

gone to jail.

82:23

And when wealthy people go to jail

82:26

their whole identity crumbles and they

82:28

start to doubt themselves and they start

82:30

to have these irrational thoughts that

82:33

sound totally rational to them. I had a

82:35

client who was very wealthy, who was

82:37

going to jail after being found guilty

82:38

of a crime that that

82:40

arguably couldn't be proven, but the

82:42

court system was set up in such a way

82:43

that he was found guilty and he

82:45

literally thought that it would be

82:46

better if he if he cut off all ties to

82:49

his kids and just went to jail and then

82:51

even when he got out of jail and never

82:52

talked to his kids again.

82:54

Because that would be better than

82:56

shaming his children for the rest of

82:57

their life

82:58

>> Yeah. with the father who went to jail.

83:00

So, there's when I think about the

83:01

Epstein case and I think about a wealthy

83:03

powerful man who was having parties with

83:05

the world's elite and then he goes to

83:07

jail and he kills himself.

83:09

To me, that's not

83:10

an unbelievable series of events.

83:14

The whole thing with the island and the

83:15

underage sex and all this stuff and if

83:19

people just can't seem to shake the idea

83:20

that he wasn't extracting information

83:23

and then the fact that they won't

83:24

release the flight logs Mhm. or a a list

83:27

of the names of people that were

83:29

frequenting his

83:30

island or interacting with him also

83:32

raises another question mark about why

83:34

wouldn't the US government release that?

83:36

Why isn't Trump very quick to release

83:38

that information? There are lots of

83:40

secrets that are kept for lots of

83:42

reasons.

83:43

And when we talk about like if there's

83:45

anything that we've learned, need to

83:46

know,

83:48

the the need part is the driving part.

83:52

What is the need to know? There's plenty

83:54

of secrets the government has that it

83:55

tells the American people it doesn't

83:57

know.

83:58

It's just lying.

83:59

Of course it knows, but it's working the

84:02

common good to say, "If you knew what we

84:05

knew,

84:07

it could cause panic, it could cause

84:08

chaos, it could cause any number of

84:09

things." And in the United States, that

84:12

is one of the rights and privileges that

84:13

the federal government has. So, what do

84:15

you both think happened with the Jeffrey

84:17

Epstein situation? Cuz it smells fishy

84:19

to everybody. The fact that, you know,

84:21

Trump and uh Kash Patel and various

84:23

other White House officials were saying,

84:24

"We're going to release it the minute we

84:25

get in there." And then they get in

84:27

there and they say, "There's nothing to

84:29

release."

84:30

Mhm.

84:31

You You must cuz you understand this

84:32

much more than I would. You must see

84:34

like fingerprints of

84:36

what you think is actually going on

84:38

there or the real reasons they wouldn't

84:39

release it.

84:41

When I look at it through a lens of

84:42

probabilities,

84:44

the most probable

84:46

outcome is that somebody in the prison

84:50

was hired to hurt Jeffrey Epstein.

84:53

That's the most probable outcome. That

84:55

somebody outside was watching the

84:56

Epstein case and knew that Epstein may

84:58

or may not have compromising information

85:00

on them. And that wealthy,

85:03

well-connected person

85:05

paid to have a hit inside the prison.

85:07

That's just the To me, that's the most

85:08

probable result of things happening.

85:10

That explains the missing evidence, that

85:12

explains the videotapes, that explains

85:14

the stories inside the prison where

85:15

nobody can see what's going on. Also,

85:17

that's the most vulnerable place

85:20

for Epstein to have been neutralized.

85:23

That's how we would have run an

85:24

operation. But what Why wouldn't the

85:26

government release that? Why wouldn't

85:27

they say a prisoner killed killed him?

85:29

The government may not know that. Cuz if

85:32

a If a prisoner was paid to do it, they

85:34

may have covered their tracks well

85:35

enough. Or they may have paid a prisoner

85:37

and the guards to also cover the thing

85:39

up.

85:40

Jail's a nasty place. People forget how

85:42

nasty a place jail is. And jails are

85:43

commercial. They're not federal, for the

85:46

most part. So, it's a commercial

85:48

business that has all sorts of plausible

85:50

deniability that a federal business or

85:52

federal organization, federal building

85:55

doesn't have. So, that's To me, that's

85:57

the most probable series of events.

85:59

There's still a chance that any number

86:01

of the other conspiracies are true. But

86:03

when I think of what what I've seen,

86:06

what my clients have seen, what what I

86:09

would do if I was

86:10

in the shoes of a foreign adversary or a

86:12

foreign intelligence collection

86:14

operation dealing with a Jeffrey Epstein

86:15

type of situation,

86:17

that's how we would clean it up.

86:19

There was a a a press conference the

86:20

other day where the reporters asked the

86:21

Trump administration, "Does the

86:23

Department of Justice have any

86:24

indication that Jeffrey Epstein was

86:26

working with the US or a foreign

86:28

intelligence agency?

86:30

Or was he a spy of some kind?" And Pam

86:32

Bondi,

86:33

um

86:34

who works in the Trump administration

86:36

said,

86:37

"To him being an agent, I have no

86:40

knowledge about that. We can get back to

86:41

you on that." Two really important

86:43

things here.

86:44

If they did have information on that in

86:46

an active investigation, she would say,

86:48

"I have no knowledge on that."

86:50

She would lie to the American public.

86:51

That's what That's what you have to do

86:54

if you're trying to build a current

86:55

case. Because if they acknowledge, we

86:57

actually we have some reason to believe

86:59

that he might have been an agent. Now,

87:00

all of a sudden, everybody else out

87:01

there would start destroying evidence

87:03

and start hiding evidence and start and

87:05

start making the case much more

87:07

difficult. So, if they knew, they would

87:09

say they don't know. Do you think he was

87:11

an agent? I think he could have been. I

87:13

think he fits the model of a very good

87:15

reporting asset,

87:17

but I don't have enough evidence to say

87:18

that he was actually one. Do you think

87:20

he was?

87:21

I mean,

87:23

I think even if he was I don't know that

87:25

it matters is what I think. Like even if

87:28

he was, that doesn't mean that it's

87:30

connected because he was a lot of

87:31

things. So,

87:34

I I think

87:36

I think people are focused on it because

87:37

it's interesting because it would be

87:40

interesting if he was and it would be

87:41

interesting if there was this

87:42

conspiracy. I think that's why people

87:44

are focused on it, but I don't know that

87:46

it really matters because on the grand

87:47

scheme of things,

87:49

I mean, it could be a lot of things that

87:51

led, you know. Why are we talking about

87:53

a dead guy who's not reporting?

87:56

I think it's just the allure, right?

87:57

People want answers. Once the curiosity

87:58

gap's open, people need to fill it with

88:00

something.

88:00

>> Correct. When when what the intelligence

88:03

community believes is that in any given

88:05

moment, there are two penetrations of

88:07

every intelligence service.

88:09

So, why are we talking about the dead

88:11

guy that we don't know about when we're

88:13

not talking about the dozens of arrests

88:16

and cases that are made every year of

88:19

active moles, active penetrations that

88:21

are inside of our intelligence

88:22

community.

88:23

Every single one of you watching this

88:25

right now has something to offer,

88:26

whether it's knowledge, or skills, or

88:27

experience. And that means you have

88:29

value. Stand Store, the platform I

88:31

co-own, who are one of the sponsors of

88:32

this podcast, turns your knowledge into

88:34

a business through one single click. You

88:37

can sell digital products, coaching,

88:39

communities, and you don't need any

88:41

coding experience, either. Just the

88:42

drive to start. This is a business I

88:45

really believe in. And already $300

88:48

has been earned by creators, coaches,

88:50

and entrepreneurs just like you have the

88:51

potential to be on Stand Store. These

88:53

are people who didn't wait, who heard me

88:54

saying things like this, and instead of

88:56

procrastinating started building, then

88:58

launched something, and now they're

89:00

getting paid to do it. Stand is

89:01

incredibly simple and incredibly easy,

89:03

and you can link it with a Shopify store

89:05

that you're already using if you want

89:06

to. I'm on it, and so is my girlfriend,

89:08

and many of my team. So, if you want to

89:09

join, start by launching your own

89:11

business with a free 30-day trial. Visit

89:13

stevenbartlett.stand.store

89:16

and get yours set up within minutes.

89:19

So, take me back to the arcade. You You

89:20

lock eyes with this guy, the guy wearing

89:23

the What was he wearing?

89:24

>> jacket.

89:24

>> The bomber jacket.

89:26

What happens next? Once I realized that

89:28

we had both made the same mistake,

89:30

he darted off in one direction, and I

89:34

felt burned. Burned is the term that we

89:36

use whenever we are

89:38

spotted, identified as trained

89:40

intelligence officers.

89:42

Um but I didn't want to act on being

89:43

burned right away cuz our training says

89:45

that just just because you believe

89:47

something to be true, you can't act on

89:49

that truth. If you act on that truth,

89:50

then you're verifying to anybody

89:52

observing that you already know you

89:53

screwed up. So, I kind of

89:56

ambled around the arcade and played

89:58

another couple of games kind of

89:59

half-handed, half-hearted just to kill

90:02

some time before I left and finished my

90:04

SDR route, and finished my collection,

90:06

and went back to my back to my hotel for

90:09

the night. The whole process that I go

90:11

through during the surveillance

90:13

detection route, the whole process that

90:14

I go through to evacuate the country

90:16

safely is all part of the details that

90:18

we put inside Shadow Cell. But, the

90:20

feeling

90:21

that predominated that that dominated my

90:24

thought process was just this feeling of

90:26

failure. This feeling like

90:30

I was I was a bad spy. I'm bad at what I

90:33

do, bad at what I collect. When I think

90:35

I'm good, I'm not good. It was just this

90:37

humiliating and humbling experience. And

90:39

it wasn't helped as I went through the

90:42

process of writing the book. Cuz as

90:44

when you write a book, it's cathartic in

90:47

a way cuz it gets all this stuff out.

90:50

But, it's also this black and white kind

90:52

of stark reminder of all the things that

90:55

you've done wrong. What did you do

90:57

wrong?

90:59

Whatever I did that got caught was

91:01

wrong.

91:02

If they caught me on my own behaviors,

91:04

if the mole was the one that identified

91:07

me to them, then

91:10

I lost the ability to operate inside of

91:12

Falcon on that day.

91:13

I could no longer support the rest of

91:15

the Shadow Cell. I could no longer

91:16

support my team. I had a a role to play,

91:18

and I couldn't play that role anymore.

91:21

And

91:22

I think that's especially powerful to me

91:24

because

91:26

I mean, I'm not a case officer. I was

91:29

supposed to be a case officer.

91:32

But, I'm not because when CIA assessed

91:35

me for that job, they determined that I

91:37

wouldn't be good enough.

91:39

Okay, so you already had an insecurity

91:40

there. And that was the first year at

91:42

CIA. So, even though I built this career

91:45

and I had a chance to carry out this

91:46

operation, I got to do these amazing

91:47

things, all that plays out in the back

91:49

of my head is I wasn't good enough then.

91:51

I'm not good enough now. And one of the

91:53

things that the CIA does is they teach

91:55

you how to deal with head trash. Mhm.

91:57

What is head trash?

91:59

It's funny, actually. So, head trash is

92:02

all the terrible things that you say

92:03

about yourself in your head. That's the

92:05

the colloquial term that we use is head

92:06

trash. I'm not good enough. I'm ugly.

92:08

I'm fat. I wish my smile was better. Um,

92:12

you know, my I lost my true love when I

92:14

was 14. Whatever, right? My my parents

92:17

didn't love me because I wasn't a good

92:18

enough kid. Whatever it was. All those

92:20

things are head trash. They're they're

92:23

subjective

92:25

thoughts that you have because of your

92:27

experience that don't have any basis in

92:28

objective reality.

92:30

CIA teaches us how to deal with that to

92:32

a point. They teach us how to counter

92:35

that when we are operationally active so

92:38

that we don't get distracted by the head

92:39

trash going on. This is what happened

92:41

whenever I first knew I was under

92:42

surveillance.

92:43

They teach you how to handle stress,

92:46

mitigate uh

92:47

um cortisol levels in your bloodstream,

92:49

lower your heart rate so that you can

92:51

get back to the task at hand. How do

92:52

they do that?

92:53

Techniques like box breathing.

92:55

>> What's that? Uh box breathing is a

92:56

process that that's common in anxiety as

92:59

well.

92:59

>> Yeah, breathe in for four counts, hold

93:01

for four counts, breathe out for four

93:02

counts, breathe in for you know, just uh

93:04

It's breathing the various breathing

93:06

techniques where you breathe in for a

93:07

certain amount of time, you hold it for

93:08

a certain amount of time, you release it

93:09

for a certain amount of time. And and

93:11

the goal there is to reduce your heart

93:13

rate, to reduce your blood flow, to

93:15

reduce the speed at which the cortisol

93:17

that's being released from your brain

93:18

gets spread to the rest of your body.

93:19

So, you can start to take back your

93:22

physiological

93:24

movements and actions in a hope that it

93:26

also brings back your cognitive

93:27

functions and capabilities. So,

93:30

the visualization process, just like

93:31

when you're meditating and you visualize

93:33

a victory if you're a professional

93:34

athlete, if you visualize a beach if

93:36

you're stressing out at work. Like you

93:37

can visualize your way through an

93:39

operation, an operational sequence to

93:41

get yourself back to a place where

93:42

you're in control. So, they teach us how

93:44

to deal with that head trash, but what's

93:46

really interesting is CIA

93:48

relies on loyalty

93:51

in its people to keep them at CIA.

93:54

Because the worst thing for CIA is for a

93:56

CIA to realize how capable they actually

93:59

are.

94:00

Because when that officer realizes how

94:02

smart, how capable, how resilient, how

94:05

resourceful they really are, that person

94:07

can leave CIA and go do amazing things.

94:10

So, a big part of what CIA does is they

94:12

they train you to be operationally

94:15

useful,

94:16

but then they still condition you to be

94:20

like loyal and needy of outside

94:22

validation, specifically from them. So,

94:24

it's a very strange flywheel that

94:26

exists.

94:28

A lot of businesses are like that as

94:29

well.

94:30

It's not a healthy relationship, but

94:31

it's a very effective relationship.

94:34

So, you get back to your hotel. Are you

94:36

not at that point when you're back at

94:37

your hotel thinking, right, I'm going to

94:38

find like how to get through like the

94:39

restaurant kitchen door and like out the

94:41

back and I'll cycle back to

94:44

the front cuz I'd be up all night

94:45

thinking about going through that bloody

94:46

like restaurant kitchen. A big part of

94:48

that is what you do in the second phase

94:49

of your SDR. And I had those thoughts. I

94:51

thought about I could get on a

94:52

motorcycle, I could ride to a local

94:54

airfield, I could pay in cash for that

94:56

airfield person, like a little private

94:58

pilot to just fly me on a puddle hopper

95:00

puddle jumper somewhere where I walk

95:02

across on foot and then I can make a

95:03

phone call from another place. Like I

95:05

thought about all that all that [ __ ]

95:06

right?

95:07

The problem is

95:09

if you actually act on that and you're

95:11

being watched,

95:13

what sense does that make? The only

95:15

person who would do that kind of crazy

95:16

[ __ ] is somebody who's trying to escape

95:18

the country. So, what did you do?

95:20

I went back to the hotel. My plan was to

95:23

was to literally just leave. Was to walk

95:25

across the border like any other

95:27

law-abiding citizen and just evacuate.

95:30

Walk across the border?

95:32

Fly. I

95:33

to to leave like anybody else would

95:36

leave and just gamble that they're not

95:40

going to take me down. Right? The gam-

95:42

just gamble that I'm going to be more

95:45

boring than they will be confident and

95:47

that before they arrest Alex Hernandez

95:51

and make some sort of public

95:53

international incident,

95:55

they're going to think twice and they're

95:56

going to let me just leave.

95:58

What actually happened?

96:00

So, what actually happened is um I get

96:03

back to the hotel. I don't really sleep

96:04

at all. I try to use sleep techniques to

96:06

get me to sleep because I am certain

96:08

that at any given time someone's going

96:10

to burst through the door and just take

96:11

me down because they already know I'm

96:14

changing my flight. They already know

96:15

I'm I'm updating my itinerary. I've made

96:18

all the phone calls. I've worked it

96:19

through my company, right? My cover

96:21

company to get me home early. So,

96:25

I'm just waiting for someone to break

96:26

in. They never break in. I go to the

96:27

airport the next day and uh on the path

96:30

to the airport, I'm looking for

96:31

surveillance and I'm surveillance free.

96:34

And I get to the airport first thing in

96:35

the morning and I'm waiting and and like

96:36

every step I'm waiting for someone to

96:38

jump out of the dark shadows and take me

96:40

down and drag me off to prison.

96:43

And it just doesn't happen until I get

96:46

to the first entry point for the

96:49

airport, I show my passport, I show my

96:51

ticket, and then they move me into

96:52

secondary.

96:54

Secondary meaning where you try to leave

96:56

a country and the border patrol says

96:58

that you're not you can't leave through

97:00

the main gate. You have to go through a

97:02

second round of interview. So, they pull

97:04

me off into a secondary room and I go

97:05

through a light interrogation with two

97:08

local Falcon officers

97:10

at like 7:00 in the morning, first first

97:13

flight out, and and they're testing my

97:17

story and they're interrogating me to

97:18

understand what have I been doing in the

97:20

country, why did I change my flight.

97:22

They're going

97:24

through my my cover story. They're going

97:26

through my my uh meetings from the day

97:28

before. They're going through everything

97:29

two and three times, which is an it's an

97:31

interrogation technique to see if

97:32

somebody's lying. And I'm sitting there

97:34

going through this whole process

97:35

watching what almost feels like

97:38

like two untrained border patrol agents

97:43

trying to crack me. And it's uh it was a

97:46

funny feeling because

97:48

they were so bad at their job that it

97:50

made me feel confident in myself again.

97:53

Are you trained on how to deal with

97:54

those situations in terms of body

97:55

language and how you speak and

97:58

Absolutely. CIA trains us on how to deal

98:01

with uh interviews, how to deal with

98:02

interrogations, and even how to deal

98:04

with uh actual

98:06

um capture and and strategic almost like

98:10

enhanced interrogation, like what you

98:12

would call what we do call torture here

98:13

in the United States.

98:14

>> And so you from your training, what were

98:16

you implementing at that moment in time?

98:17

Mirroring is a big piece of what you're

98:19

supposed to do in an interrogation. So

98:21

So you want to you want to reflect back

98:23

to the interrogator what they expect to

98:26

see in a person of innocence. So you try

98:29

to keep your you keep yourself from

98:30

jittering, you you calm your nerves, you

98:34

try to match their curiosity. So if they

98:37

lean forward, you actually want to lean

98:39

forward, too. And if they lean back, you

98:41

want to lean back. And if they're using

98:42

their hands to talk, you want to use

98:43

your hands to talk. Because you want to

98:45

show them that you and them are the

98:48

same, that you're not better or worse or

98:50

guilty or anything else. So mirroring is

98:52

one of the techniques that we're using.

98:53

We also I also used minimum information.

98:56

There's a process called elicitation.

98:58

And you use different elicitation

99:00

techniques to get individuals to share

99:01

more information than they're supposed

99:03

to share.

99:04

One of those elicitation techniques is

99:06

silence.

99:07

So often times if you want someone to

99:09

speak, all you have to do is sit there

99:10

and be quiet because it will force them

99:12

to talk.

99:13

This is something that many interviewers

99:14

use, especially when they're Border

99:16

Patrol agents or when they're fit like

99:17

law enforcement or local law

99:19

enforcement. They'll just let somebody

99:21

kind of admit their guilt. So I'm for

99:23

me, they ask a question, I answer their

99:24

question, and then we sit there in

99:26

silence for as long as we need to sit

99:27

there until they ask their next

99:28

question, and then we sit there and and

99:30

I answer their question, we sit there in

99:31

silence again. And that's combating

99:33

elicitation is a technique that we call

99:35

counter elicitation. And that's just one

99:37

of several elicitation techniques that

99:39

interviewers can use. And that's useful

99:40

in everyday life, I guess, as well.

99:41

>> Absolutely.

99:42

In what context?

99:44

When you're dealing with a negotiation,

99:46

when you're dealing with a hostile

99:48

employee, when you're dealing with a

99:49

hard conversation, when you're trying to

99:51

find information in a in another person

99:53

who you think is holding information

99:55

back, elicitation techniques are

99:57

incredibly valuable. You can ask them a

99:59

question, you can ask them the same

100:00

question twice, that'll help you

100:02

identify whether or not they're lying.

100:03

If there's a gap in their two answers or

100:05

if they answer two different ways. And I

100:07

mean, I'm sure you've seen it as a you

100:09

you One of the things that makes you

100:10

such an effective host in your own house

100:13

here is that you use elicitation

100:17

techniques all the time. You ask

100:18

feeling-based questions. How did you

100:20

feel about this situation? Uh take me

100:23

back to that moment. How would If you

100:24

could If you could be king for a day,

100:27

what would you do? Right? These are all

100:28

very advanced elicitation techniques

100:30

because it gets people to express more

100:33

than they thought they would share.

100:34

So, you were in you're in that room in

100:36

that airport, these two very poorly

100:38

trained guards trying to get something

100:40

out of you. They don't get it out of

100:41

you. So, at some point they just let you

100:43

go. Correct. So, what ends up happening

100:45

is they they're arguing with each other

100:48

and I don't know why they're arguing. It

100:50

seems like uh from the from the pigeon

100:53

words that I can pick up,

100:55

one of them's talking about being busy

100:57

and not having enough time and this

100:58

doesn't make sense, and the other

101:00

person's talking about uh we have to do

101:03

this, this is required, etc. etc. I

101:05

don't actually know what they're saying

101:07

to each other, but I see that their

101:09

aggression with each other just keeps

101:11

going up. Almost like two colleagues who

101:13

are fighting, right?

101:15

But at the end of the day, they couldn't

101:17

hold me without either

101:20

releasing me back to my plane or moving

101:23

me into a place where they were going to

101:24

retain me long-term. So, when faced with

101:26

that kind of decision, they released me

101:28

back to my plane. And then, the biggest

101:31

stress that I had was not running to my

101:33

plane because as soon as they let me out

101:35

of the secondary interview, all I wanted

101:37

to do was like haul ass to my plane, get

101:41

on my plane, and feel safe.

101:43

But, I had to

101:44

continue to show that I was not a

101:46

trained officer.

101:48

And at this point, Jeheet, are you How

101:50

are you feeling back in the friendly

101:52

country? So, at this point, I still have

101:54

no idea what's happening. Um I

101:58

By the time I hear from him, he is in

102:00

the the cutout country on his way back.

102:03

So, I know he's left me a voicemail, and

102:05

I know he's out of Falcon, the enemy

102:08

country, which is great. But, I know

102:10

he's in that third country. So, I'm

102:11

like, okay, he should be on his way

102:12

home. But, until then, I mean, all of

102:15

this that he was going through, I didn't

102:16

find out until he actually returned

102:18

home. And then I hear this story, and

102:20

I'm like, what the hell?

102:23

Like, this is absolutely

102:25

like our worst nightmare, like what we

102:27

did not want to happen. And so,

102:29

immediately, we're like,

102:31

you know, we go into action. Like, first

102:33

it's like, I'm so happy you're home. And

102:34

then the next thing is, how did this

102:36

happen? And we just start taking action

102:38

into,

102:40

you know, investigating like, did we do

102:42

something wrong? Like, is there any any

102:45

mistake that we could have made? And we

102:46

have to research and go back through all

102:48

of our own stuff, and, you know, and

102:50

then we have to make the assessment of

102:51

can Andy ever go back in? You know, was

102:53

this really what we think it was, or

102:55

you know, is he safe to like, is his

102:58

alias safe?

102:59

You know, and then we have to make those

103:01

calls.

103:01

>> your assessment? Did you think he could

103:02

go back in? No.

103:04

It was too risky.

103:05

>> Yeah, we we assessed that Alex Hernandez

103:07

was burned. Was burned, yeah.

103:09

>> And we assume Alex Hernandez being your

103:12

undercover spy name. Correct. Alias,

103:14

yeah. The the operating alias that we

103:15

used. Uh and we assumed that the cutout

103:19

country, the third country that Alex was

103:20

traveling through, so anytime Falcon

103:23

wanted to track Alex, they would track

103:24

him back to that third country. Alex

103:27

would even use the Falcon airline to fly

103:30

back and forth between the third country

103:32

and Falcon. Specifically so that if

103:35

Falcon intelligence ever suspected Alex,

103:36

they would feel that much more

103:38

comfortable knowing that they had flight

103:39

manifests on him going back to a third

103:41

country.

103:42

So, we just assumed from our study that

103:44

Alex was fully burned. That that the

103:46

mole had come across either Alex's

103:48

operational history or the mole had come

103:50

across my true name operational history

103:52

and tied me to Alex. Whichever one it

103:54

was, Alex was burned. But, we also

103:56

assessed that everybody else who had

103:58

been traveling to Falcon

104:00

through the cell was still safe. Mhm.

104:03

So, you assessed that your shadow cell,

104:05

which was your team in the friendly

104:06

country, were all fine. Yeah. But, Alex

104:09

Hernandez, which was your alias, was

104:11

could no longer be used. Correct. The

104:13

And that was how the cell was built. The

104:15

cell was built where Alex Hernandez was

104:16

the tripwire.

104:17

Where the first person to be compromised

104:20

would be Alex, and that would be the

104:21

forewarning to everybody else so they

104:23

could start to turn up their operational

104:26

security.

104:28

So, does that mean it's it's game over

104:29

for you?

104:30

For me in Falcon, it's game over. I can

104:33

I can never go back. I can never go back

104:34

in my true name. I can never go back in

104:36

an alias name.

104:37

Um all of my biometrics, meaning my

104:39

fingerprints, my eye prints, like all of

104:42

that is most likely compromised. All of

104:44

Alex Hernandez

104:45

uh everything that I carried on me, all

104:47

the digital platforms that I carried on

104:48

me, which were all air-gapped and

104:50

isolated to just Alex, all of those

104:53

things we have to assume have been

104:54

collected and and and um synthesized and

104:58

reverse engineered. And you were running

104:59

a real fake business, right? It well,

105:01

yeah. I was I was a middle manager. I

105:03

was a middle manager in the very fake

105:05

business. Oh, you're a middle manager.

105:06

And that was a business set up by the

105:08

CIA.

105:09

Okay.

105:10

So, is that in part why you both decided

105:13

to leave the CIA?

105:15

Did Did the shadow cell operation end

105:18

at that moment?

105:20

After shortly after Andy was

105:22

compromised, we found out that we were

105:24

pregnant. And we were hoping to be able

105:26

to stay on at Wolf to continue because I

105:29

could have kept

105:31

doing everything exactly the same. Wolf

105:33

Wolf being the friendly country?

105:34

Exactly. And being in the friendly

105:36

country, I could have, you know, done

105:37

all my targeting from there, no problem.

105:39

And then we could have, you know, Andy

105:40

still could have helped, he just

105:42

couldn't travel into the enemy country

105:43

anymore. But headquarters decided that

105:47

we had been so successful, and we were

105:49

continuing to be successful by spreading

105:52

the cell model to these to the other

105:53

locations, that they wanted us to come

105:55

home to Washington, D.C. and train

105:59

officers, train newer officers back at

106:02

headquarters on how the cell model

106:04

worked and um the new techniques we had

106:06

come up with.

106:07

The worst part is

106:09

we had a conversation about

106:11

what meant more to us, CIA or family.

106:15

And without saying it, we were both

106:18

landing on CIA. And we start thinking,

106:21

how do we not give up CIA to have a

106:23

family? So, we approach the agency, and

106:26

we tell them,

106:27

you know, that we have this idea. If

106:29

you'll put us on light duty, just give

106:32

us some cush job for like 4 years. We'll

106:34

pump out our second baby, we'll get our

106:36

first one old enough to go to school,

106:39

we'll get our second one old enough for

106:40

a nanny, and then you can throw us back

106:42

into the fray.

106:44

They do that for other officers when

106:46

they're not successful officers. But

106:48

when you're a successful officer, they

106:49

have different plans, and they try to

106:51

just push you and push you and push you.

106:52

So, they rejected our offer, and they

106:54

said, "No, it's a soft duty." And they

106:56

put us back, and they told us, you know,

106:58

"G he's going to go to this office and

107:00

do this very sensitive thing, and you're

107:01

going to go do this other very sensitive

107:02

thing, and we don't your family's not

107:04

our problem." And it was at that moment,

107:06

I think, that we both realized

107:08

CIA is never going to let us focus on a

107:10

family. We're always going to be focused

107:12

on the mission. That's what their job

107:14

is. That's their number one purpose.

107:16

Where if if our number one purpose is to

107:17

be parents,

107:19

we need to make a change. What did the

107:21

Shadow accomplish

107:23

in terms of the information or strategic

107:27

objectives that it accomplished?

107:30

So, the Shadow Cell

107:33

really did do what what we started out

107:37

you know, what with the mission really

107:38

did complete the mission that we started

107:40

out to do. And that was to find new

107:43

intelligence sources and we were really

107:45

successful in doing that. And it

107:47

accomplished a secondary goal.

107:49

We didn't know the effectiveness that

107:51

the Shadow Cell had in ferreting out the

107:53

mole until after we had left CIA.

107:57

We found out that the mole that we had

107:58

been

108:00

plagued by was actually arrested by FBI

108:03

in I think it was 2019.

108:05

Mhm, it was later. So, but the case file

108:09

that had identified that mole started

108:11

all the way back with our operations.

108:13

So, it was successful in ferreting out

108:15

the mole. It was successful in building

108:16

new intelligence sources inside of

108:18

Falcon. It was successful in maintaining

108:21

the United States' intelligence

108:23

advantage against this adversary at a

108:25

time when all of our other operations

108:27

were compromised by the mole. I think

108:30

what G he's talking about is an

108:31

completely unexpected benefit

108:34

in that our model

108:36

seems to have become the foundation for

108:38

a massive restructuring at CIA in 2014,

108:42

just 2 years after our cell model, when

108:45

I was when I escaped Falcon.

108:47

2 years after that, John Brennan, then

108:50

director of CIA, rolled out a an entire

108:54

reorganization of CIA that was based off

108:56

of the same cell model that we had

108:58

built.

108:59

Was this the mole?

109:03

We cannot confirm or deny anything about

109:06

the mole. I will say this that if you if

109:08

you research the time that that man was

109:10

arrested, you'll find two other people

109:12

>> Mhm. who were also CIA moles at the same

109:15

period of time.

109:16

>> of time.

109:17

So, the work that you did overseas, um

109:21

you believe helped lead to the capture

109:23

of this mole?

109:25

The work that we did overseas, we

109:26

believe helped capture the mole that

109:28

that

109:29

Falcon House was out to capture. And do

109:32

you believe that the mole

109:35

leaked secrets to the enemy country that

109:39

ended up being the reason why they knew

109:41

that you were a spy? That was the

109:42

assessment that we reached inside our

109:44

own cell, as well as what the

109:47

Counterintelligence Center, which is the

109:49

covert espionage group that Yih-Yun was

109:50

talking about earlier, their conclusion

109:52

of the facts was the same. That we did

109:54

not make any error in our operations,

109:56

there was no no compromise in my

109:59

behavior, no compromise in my

110:00

operations, no compromise of our systems

110:02

or our communication methods, that the

110:04

only way that Falcon could have found

110:05

out about me was through a leak from the

110:07

mole.

110:08

How did the mole get caught in the end?

110:10

What did they do wrong? It's a great

110:12

question. So, um

110:14

FBI created a sting operation

110:17

based off of the intelligence that we

110:19

were able to collect through our

110:21

operations that that brought the mole

110:23

out. So, FBI created a series of sting

110:26

operations where they baited the mole

110:28

into coming back onto American

110:30

territory. And when the mole stepped

110:32

foot on American territory, they had

110:33

enough of a legal case that they could

110:35

arrest him at the airport and then

110:37

prosecute him in a court of law.

110:39

And what was discovered about the mole

110:41

and the work that they were doing and

110:43

how long they were doing it for and what

110:45

they were

110:46

being paid or given to do to snitch on

110:49

the United States?

110:51

So, the details that that I know that I

110:54

know we can share,

110:56

um they were paid hundreds of thousands

110:58

of dollars. They were not paid into the

110:59

millions, but they were paid hundreds of

111:01

thousands of dollars to provide

111:02

information on operations, officers,

111:06

assets, locations. They were witting,

111:10

meaning they knew that they were working

111:13

with a foreign intelligence agency. They

111:15

didn't believe they were working with a

111:17

company, they didn't believe they were

111:18

working for a research institute. They

111:20

knew they were working with a known

111:22

foreign intelligence organization.

111:25

Um, and that the original ally who gave

111:28

us the information about the mole, that

111:30

original ally actually also retained

111:33

incriminating data on the behaviors of

111:35

that person that were shared with the

111:36

with Department of Justice.

111:38

And so was this This was an individual

111:41

who was in the CIA who was approached by

111:44

this enemy country, and the enemy

111:46

country said to him, "If you give us

111:49

secrets on what the CIA are doing

111:51

against us, then we'll give you hundreds

111:52

of thousands of dollars." We'll give you

111:54

something. We'll give you cash at least

111:56

as part of it. We may also give you

111:58

other things. Here's the The nasty thing

111:59

about espionage is cash is usually only

112:02

one of several rewards.

112:04

There's also operations where where the

112:07

cash is there so that when you're

112:09

arrested,

112:10

the

112:11

your country that arrests you believe

112:13

that that's what your motivation was.

112:15

While all of your real money is kept in

112:16

a separate account that's saved within

112:19

the actual currency of the country that

112:20

you're serving. So this person, they

112:23

were in the CIA

112:26

as a mole leaking secrets about the CIA.

112:28

They then left at some point. And then

112:32

the FBI set up a trap to get them to

112:34

come back. Correct. When they left, did

112:37

they go to the adversarial country?

112:40

We can't confirm those details because

112:42

to confirm those details starts to give

112:45

more insight into who the mole was.

112:47

Okay, but they they managed to cuz I was

112:49

thinking I was just wondering if this

112:51

the other the enemy countries offered

112:52

them like lifetime protection or

112:54

something. They do. So your enemy

112:56

countries will offer you lifetime

112:57

protection, they'll offer you multiple

112:59

generations worth of payment. So even if

113:01

you're arrested, don't worry, your kids

113:03

will be taken care of and their kids

113:04

will be taken care of.

113:05

Uh, you've got citizenship, like the

113:07

case of Edward Snowden who has received

113:08

citizenship. Sometimes they offer

113:11

uh rewards and common and

113:13

accolades in their own home country.

113:15

There's a a number of very strange and

113:17

compelling

113:18

offers that come about from foreign

113:20

intelligence services. When you think

113:21

about a double agent, when you think

113:23

about a spy who turns on their own

113:25

country,

113:26

it's less about thinking that they're

113:27

paid to do it.

113:29

Spies aren't motivated usually by money.

113:33

We weren't motivated by money.

113:35

We're motivated by that that very

113:37

unhealthy relationship where you have to

113:40

be validated by somebody else.

113:43

And that same environment that CIA

113:45

creates where all of its internal

113:47

officers have to be able to fight their

113:48

own head trash, but still seek

113:50

validation from within their

113:52

organization, that unhealthy

113:55

relationship is something that can be

113:57

compromised and a foreign intelligence

113:59

service can find an intelligence officer

114:03

and fill that void for them and validate

114:05

for them and say, "You're talented and

114:08

you've got promise and you've got

114:09

potential and we see it and your own

114:11

home service doesn't understand how

114:12

important you are and your own home

114:13

service doesn't understand how valuable

114:15

you are. If you'll help us with this,

114:18

we can reward you

114:20

with money, we can reward you with

114:22

citizenship, we can reward your children

114:24

with future residency and with college

114:26

and and we can make you a very wealthy

114:28

person. All the things that you worked

114:29

for that your country would never give

114:31

you."

114:32

Did the mole admit

114:35

that they had been a mole?

114:38

I do not believe so. I don't believe so.

114:41

>> I also believe that that most espionage

114:44

cases, when they actually go to court,

114:47

they're not tried under the Espionage

114:49

Act. They're tried under some

114:51

gentler term, some gentler lesser

114:55

offense that is easier to prove, but

114:58

also helps the government protect its

115:00

reputation against being penetrated.

115:03

So, this individual, they left the CIA,

115:06

flew to this other country, they came

115:08

back, and they tried to rejoin the CIA

115:11

to get more information. Well, they

115:12

tried to rejoin a federal agency, and

115:14

that was that was how the FBI was able

115:17

to

115:18

to lure them, and how they were also

115:20

able to for for an interview. Yeah, for

115:22

an interview, and how they were able to

115:24

get them on American soil.

115:28

Interesting.

115:29

So, I do want to share that that your

115:31

curiosity right now

115:34

is a major issue with CIA, cuz they

115:38

already know they already know that very

115:41

smart people out there are going to know

115:43

that there's a way there must be a way

115:46

to reverse engineer

115:47

the whole story, who to find out who is

115:50

Falcon, or to find out where is Falcon,

115:52

to find out where is Wolf, to find out

115:53

who is who is the mole, right? And

115:56

what's going to be what's fascinating is

115:57

that

115:58

we

116:00

we have put every effort that we can

116:01

into the story to make sure that it's

116:03

not traceable

116:05

because

116:07

CIA had several penetrations at the same

116:10

time during our tenure at CIA. And

116:14

that's both depressing and encouraging

116:16

because it's encouraging

116:19

in that it shows that what we were doing

116:22

was parallel to what many other officers

116:25

were doing. We wrote the book Shadow

116:27

Cell, but that doesn't mean we were the

116:28

only two people that were tapped on the

116:29

shoulder to carry out experimental new

116:31

operations.

116:32

They could have asked five, seven, 12

116:34

other people to go carry out new

116:36

operations to try to ferret out this

116:39

multi-penetration

116:40

of CIA at the time.

116:43

But, it's also discouraging because

116:46

it's one of those areas that keeps these

116:48

stories from being shared because CIA

116:50

doesn't want the world to know that it

116:52

was penetrated by multiple people. It

116:54

doesn't want the world to know who those

116:55

people were. If it did, it would have

116:56

disclosed this long ago.

116:58

Well, obviously my research team tried

117:00

to figure out who it was.

117:04

And the Diary of a CEO research team is

117:05

not a team to take lightly, so I'm a

117:07

little bit afraid of to hear their

117:09

conclusions. Well, based on our own

117:10

research,

117:12

um we thought that the mole was likely

117:14

Jerry Chun Seng Lee, who spied for China

117:17

around the time of the book. Jerry began

117:20

spying for China after leaving the CIA,

117:22

then tried to rejoin the agency, was

117:24

allowed to leave the country by the FBI,

117:26

and was arrested in 2018 at the airport

117:28

when he returned to the USA.

117:31

Just like the mole in the book.

117:34

But, it also says here Andrew will not

117:35

comment

117:36

on whether he is actually the mole or

117:38

not.

117:40

So, there's no point asking you if

117:41

that's

117:43

if he is the mole.

117:47

We are under legal obligation to to

117:49

neither confirm neither confirm nor deny

117:52

uh the results of your research team,

117:53

but also the results of anybody else's

117:55

research if they reach out to us and and

117:57

ask for confirmation on who this who the

118:00

mole may or may not be.

118:01

>> Has

118:04

being in the CIA changed the way that

118:06

you view reality and human beings? Oh,

118:08

yeah. In what ways?

118:09

>> so. So, I love this question and I

118:12

really want you to be honest.

118:15

Can you please share with Steve how you

118:18

went from your college beliefs to your

118:21

post-CIA beliefs?

118:23

So, when I worked with refugees,

118:26

that was my first big turning point that

118:28

humans can be really nasty. Like, I grew

118:31

up Buddhist, and so it was always like,

118:34

"Humans have the potential to be

118:35

amazing." And I agree, that's true. But,

118:38

when I worked with refugees, I realized

118:39

that humans can be horrible. And you

118:42

were you know, I worked with Bosnians

118:44

and um

118:46

and I worked with uh refugees from

118:48

Rwanda, where

118:50

you know, their neighbors literally

118:51

turned on them. People who they had

118:53

grown up with literally the next day

118:55

came over with a machete or came over

118:57

with a gun and killed their family

118:59

members and chased them through forests

119:02

or through whatever.

119:03

And that can happen anywhere. That was

119:06

the first time that I realized that

119:08

anytime somebody says that can't happen

119:10

here, that's a lie. That can happen

119:14

anywhere. None of those people ever

119:16

thought "Oh yeah, that could happen

119:18

here." None of those people ever thought

119:19

that. People always think that can't

119:21

happen here. My neighbor would never do

119:23

that to me and that's not true. And then

119:25

when I worked for CIA, I you know, that

119:28

compounded the sense of like the world

119:31

behind the scenes is a dangerous place

119:34

and you can't fully I sound horrible

119:37

saying these things. You can't fully

119:39

trust anybody. I mean, the reason I'm

119:41

with Andy is because I trust Andy 100%.

119:46

But he might be the only person that I

119:48

trust everything that comes out of his

119:49

mouth.

119:49

>> You only trust me like 98%.

119:51

>> Well, you know, yeah, but I know I can

119:53

get that other 2% out of you, that's

119:54

why.

119:55

So, you know, you really

119:58

like you always have to

120:00

understand that people are a combination

120:03

of good and bad. And while I wish while

120:06

I would like to think that

120:08

people would always try to err to the

120:10

good, I always have to keep in mind that

120:13

people have a bad side to them and they

120:16

and there's any set of circumstances

120:19

that could trigger that. Do you think

120:21

we're in one such moment?

120:24

I think we're always in a moment. I

120:26

think some part of the world is always

120:28

in that moment. What about the United

120:29

States? Cuz I know Andy said when we had

120:31

the conversation the other day that he

120:32

was going to

120:33

try and leave the United States before

120:35

2026.

120:36

>> Well, it's not just me alone leaving.

120:37

Yeah. Well, maybe we have different

120:39

motivations, I don't know. Are you

120:40

staying, GG? Cuz he says he's leaving.

120:43

I've been the one who's been pushing to

120:44

leave for years.

120:45

>> Why? How would you sort of summarize the

120:47

situation that the like Western world

120:50

and the United States are in right now?

120:52

From your perspective, with what you

120:54

know.

120:55

Are these good times?

120:57

Jihi's was born in Venezuela. What was

121:00

Venezuela like in the '80s? Oh, it was

121:02

nice. It was one of the world's best

121:04

economies. It was a thriving democracy.

121:07

It was an excellent place. With a large

121:09

wealth gap. Jihi's parents

121:12

her father we came from a wealthy

121:13

family. A wealthy Venezuelan family.

121:16

That's how they moved to Japan. It's not

121:18

easy to pick up and move a family of

121:20

four to Japan or family of three and

121:22

then have a child in Japan, right? All

121:24

of that wealth

121:25

that they had in 1980 when Jihi was born

121:29

was gone

121:30

in 19 I just a few years later. Yeah, in

121:34

'80 '85 maybe.

121:36

Five years and Venezuela went from being

121:39

one of the most successful thriving

121:41

democracies with a strong economy, it

121:44

went from that to what it is now.

121:47

There is no shaking that reality from

121:49

Jihi or from her family.

121:51

So, if there's anybody in the United

121:54

States right now who is acutely aware of

121:56

how fast everything can go sour,

121:59

it's my wife and that's why what I

122:01

certainly find is this uncompromising

122:03

commitment to moving in large part

122:05

because you can't wed yourself to any

122:08

one system

122:10

unless you want to be available to the

122:13

detriment of that system.

122:15

Yeah, I believe in being mobile.

122:18

We rent, we don't buy.

122:23

As you might have been able to tell, I'm

122:24

absolutely fascinated by the psychology

122:27

behind high performing sports teams. I

122:29

think it started with my love for Sir

122:30

Alex Ferguson as a Manchester United

122:32

fan. So, when I was told about a new

122:34

Netflix series that covers the rise of

122:36

the Dallas Cowboys, it immediately

122:38

piqued my interest and this isn't

122:40

because I'm mad about American football.

122:42

I'm not. I don't even watch it. But I do

122:44

know about the Dallas Cowboys and for a

122:46

lot of Texans they're much more than a

122:47

sports team. I watched this series and

122:50

it is absolutely

122:52

brilliant. It centers on Jerry Jones, an

122:54

oil businessman with no football

122:56

background, who bought the Cowboys in

122:58

the late '80s and transformed them into

123:00

the most valuable sports franchise in

123:02

the world. It's all about how one guy

123:04

assembled a powerhouse team in the 1990s

123:08

made up of legendary players and coaches

123:10

and through fearless decision-making led

123:12

his team to three Super Bowl victories

123:15

and I really enjoyed it and I think you

123:16

might, too. Check out America's Team,

123:19

The Gambler and His Cowboys, which is

123:21

streaming right now only on Netflix. And

123:24

they now sponsor this podcast.

123:26

I've just invested millions into this

123:29

and become a co-owner of the company.

123:30

It's a company called Ketone-IQ

123:33

and the story is quite interesting. I

123:34

started talking about ketosis on this

123:36

podcast and the fact that I'm very low

123:38

carb, very very low sugar and my body

123:40

produces ketones which have made me

123:41

incredibly focused, have improved my

123:44

endurance, have improved my mood and

123:45

have made me more capable at doing what

123:47

I do here. And because I was talking

123:48

about it on the podcast, a couple of

123:50

weeks later these showed up on my desk

123:52

in my HQ in London. These little shots

123:55

and oh my god, the impact this had on my

123:59

ability to articulate myself, on my

124:01

focus, on my workouts, on my mood, on

124:04

stopping me crashing throughout the day

124:07

was so profound that I reached out to

124:08

the founders of the company and now I'm

124:10

a co-owner of this business. I highly,

124:13

highly recommend you look into this. I

124:14

highly recommend you look at the science

124:16

behind the product. If you want to try

124:17

it for yourself, visit ketone.com/steven

124:20

for 30% off your subscription order and

124:23

you'll also get a free gift with your

124:24

second shipment. That's

124:26

ketone.com/steven

124:29

and I'm so honored that once again a

124:30

company I own can sponsor my podcast.

124:34

Are there any particular skills

124:36

that people who are trying to be

124:37

successful in their average life cuz

124:39

this is called the Diary of a CEO.

124:41

That you learned through your time at

124:42

the CIA that you think are most useful

124:44

for people to be successful, however you

124:46

define that, in their day-to-day lives.

124:49

The first thing I want to say is that

124:52

our book Shadow Cell talks not

124:54

necessarily about awesome spies. It

124:57

talks about how we

125:00

went back to the basics. We went back to

125:02

foundational espionage. What we call at

125:05

CIA sticks and bricks.

125:08

We gave up all the technology. We gave

125:09

up all the fancy satellites. We gave up

125:11

all the drones and we went back to build

125:14

off of strong foundations. And we didn't

125:15

do that because we're smart. We did that

125:18

because the terrorist groups that won

125:21

the global war on terror

125:24

were using bricks and stones and sticks.

125:29

And they were winning over an American

125:31

Department of Defense that had a $900

125:34

billion budget every year.

125:37

We spent $8 trillion in the global war

125:40

on terror only to evacuate Afghanistan.

125:43

All of that happened because they were

125:45

using foundational tools that we

125:47

couldn't crack. And in the Shadow Cell,

125:49

that's all we did. We used foundational

125:51

tools that proved to dominate time after

125:55

time. And there's so much in everyday

125:57

life and there's so much in business

125:59

from marketing to sales to budgeting to

126:02

hiring practices to, you know, annual

126:05

and semi-annual reviews. There's so much

126:07

that businesses can take from this basic

126:08

idea of never let go of the foundations.

126:11

Never let go of your sticks and bricks.

126:13

What advice would you give to the

126:15

average person?

126:16

And generally just generally in their

126:17

life, you know, about how to live a good

126:19

life based on what you've seen, what you

126:20

know now and how you look at the world.

126:22

For me, a good life is a life spent

126:25

doing the things you want to do, the

126:27

things that bring you joy when you have

126:30

the age and the energy to do them.

126:33

It makes me super sad whenever I meet

126:36

people who wait until they're 60s and

126:38

they retire to be free, to try and

126:41

travel, and and that's when they focus

126:43

on learning the guitar, and that's when

126:44

they focus on art, and their body just

126:46

can't keep up with them. Their body

126:48

can't travel like it used to travel.

126:49

They have a shake in their hand. They

126:50

can't paint anymore. But they they

126:51

believed for 30 years that it would be

126:54

better when they retire instead of

126:56

acting on it right now.

126:58

And

127:00

for me it's it's all about finding joy

127:03

in the moment today. My son is 12. He

127:07

plays chess now. He wants to play video

127:09

games with me now. He wants to go deep

127:13

into details about his favorite manga

127:15

comics right now. All of that could be

127:17

different in 5 days.

127:19

My daughter is 7, doing handstands, and

127:21

doing cartwheels, and all she wants is

127:23

for Daddy to to give her a a shoulder

127:25

massage at night and tell embarrassing

127:27

stories about my childhood to her while

127:29

she falls asleep. That's what she wants

127:30

now. All that could be gone and never

127:33

come back in 6 months.

127:36

I have to do it now. If I don't do it

127:38

now, it'll never happen. I won't be able

127:40

to wait until I'm wealthy. I won't be

127:41

able to wait until I sell a company. I

127:43

won't be able to wait until I retire and

127:45

then try to get these moments back now.

127:47

So, what can I do? I ask myself every

127:49

day, what can I do right now

127:51

to maximize the joy that I get right now

127:54

because it's not just my joy that's

127:56

happening. It's also the joy that I'm

127:58

giving to the people who want my time

128:00

and space. My wife, my kids, my peers,

128:03

my clients. What can I do

128:06

to bring joy to myself will bring joy to

128:08

others. What is that about to say so

128:10

much to you? I can see it in I can see

128:12

it in your face. My life is filled with

128:14

people who failed to figure that out. My

128:16

life is filled with a with a mother who

128:19

kept waiting to to do the things that

128:21

she wanted to do, and now she still

128:23

doesn't get to do it. And grandparents

128:25

who retired poor, and family members who

128:28

retired poor, and people who died early,

128:30

and people who got hurt and can't walk,

128:32

and You know I called your mother?

128:35

We spoke to your mother. Did you call my

128:36

mom? Yeah, and when I asked her this

128:38

question, I said to I said to your

128:40

mother, I said um what's your

128:41

relationship like with Andy?

128:43

And she burst into tears. Did she

128:46

really? She went on to say how proud she

128:48

was of you, but it was telling that she

128:50

she burst into tears when she was asked

128:52

that particular question.

128:54

That's awesome.

128:55

I'm I'm glad that you called her. I I I

128:58

talked to GiGi about this often because

129:01

I don't I never had a relationship with

129:02

my father. And my relationship with my

129:04

stepfather was very bad. I go into some

129:06

of that in the book as well.

129:07

And uh

129:09

I as an adult

129:11

only project

129:13

negative assumptions on what they must

129:15

have intended because that's what I was

129:18

shaped to believe as a child.

129:20

I can't

129:21

confidently project positive

129:23

expectations on them because as a child

129:27

I never believed they were doing

129:28

anything positively. I believed my mom

129:30

was career focused, and I believed that

129:32

my mom didn't really want to be a mom. I

129:33

believed that my mom didn't really want

129:35

to be married to the man she was married

129:36

to, and that's what I believed as a kid.

129:38

So, now as an adult, that's my

129:40

foundation. GiGi's foundation with her

129:42

parents is completely different. Like

129:44

it's incredible now because

129:46

like the the disparity between my

129:48

negative thoughts of my youth and GiGi's

129:50

positive memories from her youth are

129:52

starkly contrasted, and that's why I

129:54

want to give my children something like

129:56

my what my wife had.

129:58

And what's your answer to that, GiGi?

130:01

In terms of what you want next.

130:03

So,

130:05

when I was younger, I was brought up

130:07

with this idea of

130:09

a destination. So, I did everything I

130:11

was supposed to do, got good grades in

130:13

school, went to college, went to grad

130:14

school, got a career with the federal

130:16

government. It was really good. And then

130:18

we left CIA.

130:20

And I was like, but I had made it. Like

130:22

I had I rode that train, I did

130:24

everything I was supposed to do, and I

130:26

made it. So, what are we doing now? And

130:28

it was a really hard transition for me.

130:31

But now that, you know, we have the kids

130:33

and we have our business,

130:35

you know, and I've gone through a lot of

130:36

therapy,

130:38

you know, I realized that

130:41

Andy has been right all along. It really

130:43

is

130:44

you never know what the next moment is

130:45

going to bring, and so you have to enjoy

130:47

every moment that you have right now.

130:50

You know, don't put off that trip until

130:52

next year, do it as soon as you can.

130:54

Don't,

130:55

you know,

130:56

like those dishes don't need to get

130:58

washed right now if your kid wants to

131:00

read a book with you. Like you can just

131:01

put that off for a little bit. Um so,

131:04

I've it's taken me a long time, but

131:07

Andy and I are now aligned on the like

131:09

live every moment with as much joy as

131:13

you can because

131:15

and to my

131:16

other point, like you you never know

131:19

when shit's going to hit the fan. So,

131:21

enjoy it now because you never know when

131:25

you might have to, you know, flee your

131:26

house cuz you're, you know, it catches

131:28

fire or flee the country because a war

131:30

breaks out or, you know,

131:31

>> Getting arrested in a foreign country.

131:33

Yeah, getting arrested in a foreign

131:34

country. And I'm a big believer of

131:36

seeing the where the writing on the

131:37

wall. I don't think that, you know, my

131:40

advice to people is don't be complacent.

131:42

Just like Andy said, you know, don't be

131:43

complacent in your business, but don't

131:45

be complacent in your life, either.

131:47

Like when be as before World War II

131:51

kicked off, there was tons of writing on

131:54

the wall of what was coming.

131:56

And people just kept thinking to

131:58

themselves, that can't happen here. It

132:01

can't get that bad, can it?

132:02

>> You trying to tell me something? So, the

132:04

writing on the wall for Americans is

132:05

that

132:06

we are transitioning into something new.

132:09

We will never go back to what we were.

132:11

And so, you either need to be a part of

132:15

creating the new America

132:17

>> Mhm. or you need to start thinking about

132:20

where else you're going to go.

132:22

Because the America we knew before no

132:24

longer exists, and it will never come

132:26

back.

132:27

This is new America now. So, you either

132:29

take part in it, or you leave. Okay. So,

132:32

what is old America under your

132:33

definition?

132:35

So,

132:37

old America,

132:38

you know, and I'm I'm not that old. So,

132:41

you know, old America in my lifetime has

132:43

been a series of

132:46

uh you know, the the government

132:48

appearing to work together, you know,

132:50

the appearing to do things,

132:52

you know, to improve the lives of

132:54

people,

132:56

but also, I think, becoming complacent

132:59

over time. Like, the last several terms

133:02

we've had

133:03

a strong executive that has slowly

133:05

become stronger, which I don't think is

133:07

the way that we should be going, but

133:09

that's what's happened.

133:10

And

133:12

a Congress who is constantly in

133:14

deadlocks, so nothing is happening. And

133:17

so, we continue like I mean, the other

133:18

the immigration problem. Why is the

133:20

immigration problem a problem? This

133:22

could have been fixed decades ago,

133:25

honestly. Like, decide what you want for

133:28

immigration. Decide what you want your

133:29

policy to be, right? And the policy,

133:32

clearly, I think most people agree,

133:34

isn't open doors. So, if it's not open

133:37

doors, what do you want? And then make

133:39

that policy happen. So, you know, I

133:42

think

133:43

I think we've had a history now of an

133:45

executive getting stronger. For some

133:46

reason, the American people want a

133:48

strong man. So, when you say the

133:50

executive, you mean the president?

133:52

>> yeah. The president's getting more power

133:54

to do things? Yes, because

133:56

>> For a period of time, it was because

133:57

Congress didn't want to make their own

133:59

decision, so they pushed the power to

134:01

the president. And then, in probably the

134:03

last 16 years, we've seen the president

134:06

take more power, execute more executive

134:09

orders. So, whether you like it or not,

134:11

we're in a period now where there's a

134:12

strong executive. When anybody gets

134:14

power, it's very unlikely they're going

134:16

to let it go. So, do you think Trump's

134:18

not going to go anywhere? I think the

134:20

executive,

134:22

Trump is the current executive, whoever

134:23

the next executive and the executive

134:24

after that, they will continue to retain

134:26

their executive powers.

134:27

>> Yeah.

134:28

It doesn't benefit them to let go of the

134:31

office of the executive's powers. So,

134:34

GG, if that's the old America where it

134:36

got slightly more complacent, there was

134:38

more power and

134:39

increasingly more power given to the

134:40

president,

134:41

>> Mhm. you're saying we're in a

134:42

transitional moment now.

134:44

>> Mhm. What does that new America look

134:46

like on the end of that transition in

134:48

your view? So, I don't think we have a

134:50

good idea of what it's going to look

134:52

like. I think the current administration

134:54

is taking a lot of risks that I find

134:57

interesting.

134:58

Interesting is a very

135:01

a muted word. What is the real word?

135:06

I mean, interesting is the real word

135:08

because I think that he's taking a lot

135:10

of risks that really break down

135:14

how how things have been for a long

135:17

time. So, you know, getting rid of you

135:19

know, pulling money from Medicaid and

135:21

Medicare, getting rid of USAID, you

135:23

know, transitioning from soft power to

135:25

hard power.

135:26

>> Hard power being dropping bombs in Iran.

135:27

Yes. Okay. So, we're giving more money

135:29

to military and we're taking money away

135:31

from you know, aid, basically. So, we're

135:35

making that shift. We're making, you

135:38

know, various economic shifts,

135:39

immigration shifts and I don't think we

135:42

I think there's a lot of unnecessary

135:44

panic about all of it because

135:47

whether I agree with his methods or not,

135:50

I think that that we just have to wait

135:52

for things to settle out. And

135:55

if something doesn't work, you know, I

135:56

think he's like the type of guy that's

135:58

going to take another risk and see if he

136:00

can fix it. Or that if it doesn't work

136:02

by the time the next administration

136:03

comes in,

136:04

they'll have to do something with it.

136:06

You know, like there nothing stops.

136:08

Everything keeps going. So,

136:11

you know, I I don't know that this I

136:12

don't know that America is heading for a

136:16

future that I want to be a part of. I

136:18

think that's for me, I think that's a

136:20

true statement.

136:22

But, I think there's a lot of Americans

136:25

out there who this is the path that they

136:26

want to take.

136:28

What is your perspective on everything

136:29

she he just said? The transition that's

136:31

happening right now is a transition

136:34

where we where the American people have

136:36

to decide how much they want to get

136:38

involved and how much they want to let

136:39

other people just do it for them.

136:42

And Donald Trump is a I'll do it for you

136:43

kind of guy.

136:45

And Joe Biden was also an I'll do it for

136:47

you kind of guy. And Obama was an I'll

136:50

do it for you kind of guy. And we are

136:52

electing people who will do it for us.

136:54

Do what for us?

136:55

>> Whatever Whatever nasty thing we don't

136:58

want to deal with. Budgeting,

137:01

currencies, hard work, foreign trade,

137:04

foreign relations, wars. We don't We

137:07

want to be able to just talk about it

137:09

without having any blood on our hands.

137:10

So, we push that responsibility to our

137:13

government. When in fact, our founding

137:15

fathers were the opposite. Our found Our

137:18

founding fathers were, "Hey, the blood

137:20

is on all of your hands. You tell us

137:23

what you want us to do. Do you want a

137:24

revolution?

137:26

Then let's go fight a revolution

137:27

together. Do you want to build a new

137:29

government? Then we'll build a new

137:30

government together. That's That's how

137:32

our country was supposed to be formed.

137:35

So,

137:36

when GiGi says that we're in a

137:38

transition and she doesn't know where

137:39

it's going, she is accurate. We don't

137:40

know what the future holds. Except, we

137:43

know the future holds more pain, for

137:45

sure.

137:46

Because we will either come out of this

137:49

through a painful transition that makes

137:51

us better,

137:52

or we will come out of this through a

137:54

less painful transition that leaves us

137:56

in a position that none of us want to be

137:58

in.

137:59

And then we're going to have to put in

138:00

more pain to fix it all again. And how

138:02

do you think the transition

138:04

levels out? Where do you think we end up

138:07

if you had to guess? I think that we

138:09

have a solid 60/40 right now. I think

138:11

there's a 60% chance that we don't like

138:14

where the transition ends, and then we

138:16

spend 15 to 25 years fixing it again.

138:19

Fixing our economy, fixing our

138:20

superpower status, fixing our foreign

138:22

relations, fixing our fixing our trust

138:24

of our own government.

138:26

I think there's a 40% chance that

138:29

the the decisive action Donald Trump is

138:31

taking right now

138:33

is adopted wide scale, and we actually

138:36

stimulate our economy, get people back

138:38

on the same page, and and move forward

138:40

in a way that keeps us one step ahead of

138:42

our of the threats that we see from

138:45

China, the disaster that we see

138:47

continuing to unfold in the Middle East,

138:49

the the precipice that we have come up

138:51

against in terms of geopolitics. There's

138:54

a chance that we come out of that, but I

138:55

think the dominant chance is that we

138:58

don't. And I I would say that that's not

139:00

just my opinion, that's the

139:02

opinion of economists of economists,

139:05

that's the opinion of foreign

139:07

foreign relation experts. There are

139:08

multiple people out there who are all

139:10

saying

139:11

that our budgetary decisions, our

139:13

foreign policy decisions, our military

139:15

infrastructure decisions, our economic

139:16

decisions are risky. Risky means there's

139:19

a chance they'll work, but it's a low

139:21

probability chance, not a high

139:22

probability chance. In such a scenario

139:24

then the economy would would be hurt,

139:26

and then there'd be more wars presumably

139:29

because if we're if the society becomes

139:31

more individualistic and focused on

139:33

themselves and nationalistic, then they

139:36

become more of an island, people get

139:37

more paranoid, they start building an

139:38

Trump says building like the he's

139:40

calling it the golden dome over the

139:42

United States so that he can fire any

139:44

rockets out of the air if anyone

139:45

attacks.

139:46

And then you kind of have to unravel

139:48

that and try and go the other way

139:49

potentially. Is that kind of what you're

139:50

saying? I try to do as much reading as I

139:52

can. I'm sure you're the same way. And

139:54

one of my gifts to myself is when I read

139:56

fiction. And I'm reading a book called

139:59

The The Left Hand of Darkness by a

140:01

sci-fi legend named Ursula K. Le Guin.

140:05

And it's a book from the '70s.

140:08

And I'm reading this book, and in it she

140:10

has this quote where she talks about

140:12

nationalism inside the the world of the

140:15

science fiction planet that she's on,

140:17

right? And the the quote is something

140:19

like, "Nationalism is not a product of

140:22

pride, it's a product of fear."

140:26

People aren't nationalistic because

140:28

they're proud of what they have.

140:30

They're nationalistic because they're

140:32

afraid that something might take away

140:35

what they have.

140:37

And anytime you are driven by fear,

140:39

you don't have the chance for true

140:41

happiness.

140:42

And what I found in that

140:44

that passage from the sci-fi book was

140:47

really very insightful to what I see

140:50

happening across the United States.

140:52

We're all nationalistic, left and right,

140:55

gay and straight, whether you whether

140:57

you are old or young, we're all

141:00

nationalistic. We all love our country.

141:03

But the things that's driving so much of

141:05

our nationalism is this fear of the

141:08

other side. Not a fear of the collapse

141:11

of our society, not the fear of some

141:12

rising power across the ocean, but for

141:14

some reason we're more afraid of our

141:16

neighbor

141:17

than we are afraid of the real threats

141:19

that are out there. Because at the end

141:20

of the day, they're

141:22

California and Mississippi have much

141:26

more in common

141:27

than the United States and China.

141:29

But for whatever reason, we get so

141:32

distracted and so confused with our own

141:33

infighting that we don't realize that

141:35

infighting is exactly what all of our

141:37

adversaries from Russia to North Korea

141:39

to Cuba to even even

141:42

uh

141:42

you know, Bulgaria, which is a NATO

141:44

country that's pro-Russia.

141:47

Our infighting just helps them. And and

141:49

what's the potential worst-case scenario

141:52

of that infighting? Because people think

141:53

okay it just means people are going to

141:54

pop off at each other on on X and

141:56

Twitter and social media and they're

141:58

going to scream at each other and then

142:00

Gridlock is the biggest challenge. I I

142:02

don't believe that we're going to be

142:03

going into any kind of civil war in the

142:04

United States. We're not going to shoot

142:05

each other. We're not going to go

142:07

machete our neighbors. Not now, but

142:10

gridlock is going to lead to economic

142:12

collapse. Economic collapse is going to

142:15

lead to very real individuals having

142:18

very real problems, which is going to

142:20

lead to an increase in criminal

142:22

activity. People will steal from each

142:24

other. People will steal from from

142:25

stores. People will, you know, lie and

142:28

hurt each other to try to take care of

142:30

their own. And as that society starts to

142:32

collapse and we become more and more

142:34

tribal again, all very predictable, all

142:36

all case studies that we've seen all

142:38

over the world, as we become more and

142:39

more tribal, then we will become fed

142:43

upon by our adversaries who don't have

142:46

the same problem. When you said gridlock

142:47

is the

142:49

the first sort of domino that falls

142:50

there, what is gridlock?

142:52

I see gridlock as policy gridlock. We

142:54

don't know how to move forward with

142:55

Israel. We don't know how to move

142:57

forward with the budget. We don't know

142:58

how to move forward with whether or not

143:00

we ratify these election results, right?

143:03

And in the in the time that we don't

143:05

know how to move forward, it creates an

143:07

opportunity for somebody else to bypass

143:09

the democratic process and just dictate

143:12

the outcome.

143:13

And that series of dictations makes it

143:15

so that the outcome is less

143:16

collaborative, less well thought out,

143:19

less well defined, less palatable for

143:22

more people, and then that distrust kind

143:24

of continues on. We do live in a moment

143:27

now where the distrust for government is

143:29

higher than it's been in a long time. We

143:31

see the we see the largest decline in

143:34

American currency that we've seen in

143:37

decades and in century in a in the

143:39

better part of a century. We see a lack

143:41

of public trust. We see consistent

143:44

presidential approval ratings below 50

143:46

for every president that comes through.

143:48

We we are in a place where the people

143:50

just don't trust their own government.

143:52

And I would say that that's not such a

143:54

big deal, except that we are the

143:57

wealthiest country in the world. We are

143:59

the largest

144:02

military in the world. We are the

144:04

largest producer of financial tools and

144:06

the largest producer of weapons. We are

144:08

a big [ __ ] deal

144:10

to not have our [ __ ] together.

144:14

Welcome to the United States.

144:17

Shadow Cell, an insider's account of

144:19

America's new spy war.

144:21

By Andrew Bustamante and G H Bustamante.

144:25

It is a fascinating book because usually

144:27

the public doesn't get to read books

144:29

like this.

144:30

Uh and for the reasons you said, because

144:32

they're so highly scrutinized and then

144:35

ultimately decided to be confidential by

144:37

the CIA, but this one managed to get

144:40

through. So, I highly recommend

144:41

everybody reads it. We've touched on

144:42

some of the surface-level elements of

144:44

this, but if you want the details of

144:45

what happened, then this is a book good

144:48

book to read. But it also just gives you

144:49

a window into a world that most of us

144:51

live in ignorance to cuz we don't we

144:53

don't realize these things happen. It's

144:54

actually from doing this podcast that I

144:57

that things that I thought were

144:58

conspiracy theories

145:00

became not conspiracy theories.

145:02

You know? Yes. Cuz before I started this

145:04

podcast and started to speak to people

145:06

like you and other guests that I've had,

145:07

I thought that while I was watching

145:09

podcasts and thinking that that's

145:10

[ __ ] no that's [ __ ] that

145:11

doesn't happen. This These are like

145:13

spies that that's not going to happen.

145:14

There's no way that like one country

145:15

spies on another.

145:17

There's no way that like, you know,

145:19

people go undercover into countries and

145:20

get secrets and do all these crazy

145:22

things. I thought that was movies.

145:23

But actually that happens and all

145:25

countries are doing it to each other.

145:26

And I imagine even the United States is

145:27

doing it to some of their allies. Like I

145:29

imagine the United States probably has

145:31

spies in the UK,

145:33

for example.

145:34

The The United States doesn't claim to

145:36

spy on the Five Eyes countries and the

145:38

Five Eyes have all claimed not to spy on

145:40

each other.

145:41

um, but that's just a claim.

145:45

We have a closing tradition on this

145:46

podcast where the last guest leaves a

145:47

question for the next guest, not knowing

145:49

who they're leaving it for.

145:50

And the question left for both of you to

145:52

answer individually is, how did a

145:54

mistake you made shift the trajectory of

145:58

your life in a way you could not have

146:00

predicted?

146:03

I would say that the mistake I made that

146:06

shifted the that truly shifted the

146:08

trajectory of my life was staying with

146:11

my ex-boyfriend for so long,

146:14

um, because

146:16

I we'd been together a year

146:19

and

146:21

I knew it then the relationship was

146:23

already troubled

146:25

and I was applying to the Peace Corps

146:27

right out of college,

146:28

but I also knew that

146:31

if I joined the Peace Corps and I went

146:33

overseas,

146:34

the relationship wouldn't survive. And

146:36

for some reason, I chose the

146:37

relationship over Peace Corps. And

146:39

because I chose the relationship over

146:41

the Peace Corps, I ended up going to

146:43

grad school so I could stay with him.

146:45

And then, because I went to grad school

146:48

and the relationship drained me of all

146:50

of my money,

146:52

I ended up applying to the CIA. And if I

146:55

hadn't been in that relationship,

146:58

I never would have joined the CIA, ever.

147:01

I never would have met Andy. I wouldn't

147:03

have the kids I have right now. I

147:04

wouldn't have the life I have right now.

147:06

So,

147:07

arguably a mistake to stay in a bad

147:10

relationship for 7 years, but I wouldn't

147:13

be where I am today without that.

147:17

It's hard for me to answer the question

147:19

because I I keep finding myself coming

147:21

to the same conclusion that Jihi came

147:23

to, that all of the mistakes that I

147:24

think about

147:26

making all led to a sequence of events

147:28

that brings me to where I am now.

147:31

So,

147:32

I'll actually give a more recent example

147:34

that is changing the course of my life

147:36

right now.

147:38

In 2023,

147:41

I hired the first executive

147:43

I hired the first executive into my

147:46

company, the first kind of equal

147:48

executive to me as a CEO.

147:50

And I hired that person because they

147:51

came well recommended. I hired that

147:54

person cuz they had a a long track

147:55

record of success. I hired that person

147:57

because they seemed to understand a lot

147:59

of things about business that I didn't

148:00

understand and it was time for for me to

148:02

scale and it was an important thing to

148:05

for me as a CEO to lead the charge by

148:07

hiring the right people.

148:09

And then in the following 16 months,

148:13

that person

148:15

lost the company individually

148:18

a half a million dollars and then put us

148:20

into debt almost another $215,000.

148:25

So, a giant $730-ish thousand dollar

148:28

mistake in one 16-month period of time.

148:32

And throughout that whole time, I I saw

148:35

the mistakes. I saw the errors and I

148:38

kept convincing myself not to take

148:40

action. I kept thinking, this is just

148:42

what scaling must look like. This person

148:43

must know what they're doing. Like, you

148:45

have to spend money to make money. Uh we

148:47

have to we have to prepare for the

148:48

future. Like, I kept rationalizing every

148:50

step. Oh, this was just a

148:51

misunderstanding. Oh, this was just a

148:53

this was something that will pay off 6

148:55

months from now.

148:57

And then, you know, that 16 months kind

149:00

of ended in March of this year.

149:03

And I'm staring at a healthy company

149:06

that has zero dollars in its checking

149:07

account that's carrying hundreds of

149:09

thousands of dollars in debt

149:11

and I realized I can't

149:14

let somebody else

149:16

try to do this cuz nobody cares as much

149:18

as I do. I'm the owner. I'm the CEO. The

149:21

company was built because of my passion

149:23

for the lessons and my passion for the

149:24

people that we serve. We are co-owners

149:26

of the company together. Jihi believes

149:28

in me and she trusts me and I can't

149:30

violate that trust by continuing to

149:32

think that somebody else can do it

149:34

better.

149:35

So,

149:37

I remove that person from their

149:38

position. I radically change the

149:39

company, and within 3 months, we are

149:43

back into a profitable statement. We are

149:45

months away from being able to pay off

149:47

all the debt that we had gathered. We'll

149:49

never get back the money that we lost in

149:50

all the failed investments, but we are

149:53

on a trajectory to go in a completely

149:55

different direction because I took hold

149:58

of my company and made it my company

150:00

again instead of thinking that I wasn't

150:03

qualified or wasn't capable or wasn't

150:05

good enough to be the CEO that built the

150:08

company, why wouldn't I be good enough

150:10

to be the CEO that grows the company? I

150:13

think a lot of young founders can relate

150:15

to that. I hear that story so often.

150:18

I hear that story all the time.

150:20

I've had it for many, many years of the

150:21

founder that starts a business and then

150:23

basically gets like gaslighted by oh,

150:25

this person's an executive. They've done

150:27

it for 26 years, so they must know what

150:29

they're doing. I'll give them a massive

150:30

salary. I'll give them control, and then

150:33

they make a set of decisions, which

150:34

because you you know, you've not walked

150:36

that path before, you're unable to have

150:38

high conviction as to whether those

150:39

decisions are good, but because they are

150:41

so expensive and their decisions are so

150:43

expensive, you kind of have to go with

150:45

it, and then eventually you realize at

150:47

some point that

150:49

just because someone has

150:51

worked in some interesting places or had

150:53

some previous interesting job titles

150:54

doesn't equip them for this challenge.

150:57

And especially when it's a small but

150:58

this is actually the paradox of it as

150:59

well. Like the mentality of success in

151:01

like big scale businesses is not the

151:03

mentality of success in like a

151:04

high-growth startup.

151:06

You know, where you're like

151:07

penny-pinching.

151:07

>> Yeah. Thank you so much. I super

151:10

enjoyable hearing the story. It was

151:11

actually much more

151:13

captivating reading your book than I

151:15

assumed it would be.

151:16

Um and I think that's because of the

151:18

level of detail you go into in the book,

151:20

which you just wouldn't have come across

151:21

before. So, really recommend everybody

151:23

goes and read it. And thank you again

151:24

for coming back here. And it's It's to

151:25

meet you, G He, cuz I've heard about you

151:26

before, but putting a face to the name

151:28

is is always useful. So, thank you so

151:30

much for being here and continue doing

151:31

what you're doing because you're opening

151:32

our eyes to a world that we would

151:33

otherwise not be able to see. So, thank

151:36

you both.

151:36

>> Thank you, sir.

151:37

>> Thank you.

151:38

This has always blown my mind a little

151:39

bit. 53% of you that listen to the show

151:42

regularly haven't yet subscribed to the

151:44

show. So, could I ask you for a favor?

151:46

If you like the show and you like what

151:47

we do here and you want to support us,

151:49

the free simple way that you can do just

151:50

that is by hitting the subscribe button.

151:52

And my commitment to you is if you do

151:54

that, then I'll do everything in my

151:55

power, me and my team, to make sure that

151:57

this show is better for you every single

151:59

week. We'll listen to your feedback,

152:01

we'll find the guest that you want me to

152:02

speak to, and we'll continue to do what

152:04

we do. Thank you so much.

Interactive Summary

The video features a conversation with former CIA officers Andrew and Jeehi Bustamante, who discuss their untold story of serving as spies in a dangerous operation to identify a mole within the agency. They explain the complexities of CIA operations, the concept of a 'Shadow Cell' model, and the challenges of maintaining a professional and personal life while under constant threat of being compromised by foreign adversaries.

Suggested questions

4 ready-made prompts