Former CIA Spies (NEW): Leave the USA Before 2030! The CIA Tried To Ban This Story!
4532 segments
When this story hits the airwaves, it's
going to transform people's opinion
about CIA and the depths to which CIA
will dive to collect intelligence that
protects Americans. So, one of its own
officers became a spy reporting our
secrets to a foreign adversary. My wife
and I were included in an operation to
bait the mole to make a mistake so that
the mole could be found and disclosed.
Your wife is here today and you've never
told this story before, have you? No.
And your curiosity right now is a major
issue with CIA because they don't want
the world to know who those people are.
It's a dangerous game.
Well, obviously my research team tried
to figure out who it was.
So, was this the mole?
Married CIA spies Andrew and Jeehi
Bustamante were tasked with unraveling
one of the greatest intelligence
operations in modern history. Their
untold story shows you how to build
trust, manipulate, and thrive under
pressure.
What actually happened?
A foreign ally contacted CIA and said,
"You have somebody inside your
organization sharing information on
operations, officers, assets to an enemy
country." They deployed us to the
country and crafted a new identities,
new aliases so that we could build new
sources of intelligence and try to find
the mole. And we were really successful
in doing that. Nobody felt like they
were in imminent danger, but then that
changed. My presence in the enemy
country became known. I called Jeehi and
said, "I'm coming home early." And from
that, I knew that something was wrong
because it is very real that you can be
disappeared by a foreign adversary.
Or worse, being captured and the
president can plausibly deny that you're
CIA. So, I had to try to escape the
country, but everything went wrong. And
what happens next? A horrible story.
So,
this is the first time I'm setting you
at home a challenge when you listen to
this episode. Can you figure out which
country Andrew and Jeehi were undercover
in as spies from what they say, but also
our team here figured out that the mole
in the CIA was one of these three
people.
Can you figure out from what they say
which person was the mole? It might make
sense for you at this moment to
screenshot these three faces and the
details below so you can remember their
profiles. And by the end of the
conversation, I want you to comment
below which country you thought Andrew
was undercover as a spy and which one of
these people was the mole within the
CIA?
Let's do this. Listen, to my regular
listeners, I know you don't like it when
I ask you to subscribe at the start of
these conversations. I don't like saying
I don't like it being in there. None of
us like it.
It's frustrating. Do you know what's
also frustrating? It's also frustrating
when I go into the back end of the
YouTube channel and I see that 56% of
you that listen frequently to this
podcast haven't yet subscribed. And so
many of you don't even know that you
haven't subscribed because I see in the
comment section you say to me, you got I
didn't even realize I didn't subscribe.
And that actually fuels the show. It's
basically like you're making a donation
to the show. So that's why I ask all the
time because it enables us to build and
build and build and build. And we're
going for the long term here. So all I'd
ask you is if you've seen the show
before and you like it, help me, help my
team here, hit the subscribe button and
we'll continue to build this show for
you. That's my promise. Thank you to all
of you guys that do subscribe. Means the
world to me.
Let's get on with the show.
Andrew,
you've never told this story before,
have you? No.
I have never told the story of my own
operational background. It's been It's
been something that CIA has forbidden
for a long time.
And what's written in this book has
taken you a long time to get approved by
the CIA. Correct. So all CIA officers
sign a lifetime secrecy agreement. And
that secrecy agreement gives CIA the
right to to approve or disapprove any
operational elements of our background
that are still classified and that fit
under this very kind of narrow rubric of
sources and methods, sources and methods
of active intelligence collection.
Because of my time at CIA, my work at
CIA, and the sensitivity of that work, I
just kind of assumed I would never be
able to talk about it. And then all that
changed with the first Trump
administration. What was the CIA's
response when you said that you wanted
to talk about what you're going to talk
about today?
Well, that's what's interesting. They
had two different responses. When I
first submitted the request in 2019 to
CIA to write about my operational
background, we went through kind of some
normal bureaucratic back and forth and
they ultimately said, "Yes, you can
write about it in in detail." And then
in 2021,
when we submitted the manuscript and it
was complete, the world started to
change. In 2022,
uh multiple major issues uh erupted
between major adversaries of the United
States and CIA came back and and removed
their previous permission. Uh they
basically said that in light of current
geopolitics, everything in the book was
now reclassified. How did you get the
CIA to change their mind so that you
could release this book and talk about
what you're going to talk about today?
We engaged with an attorney, one of the
top attorneys in the space of classified
information and publishing information.
So, the attorney believed that because
of the effort that my wife and I had put
into the book, CIA would back off. And
ultimately, that is what they did. When
we threatened them with a First
Amendment lawsuit, they came back and
said, "We don't want to go down that
road. We think we can collaborate on
this. We'll approve your book and you
can move forward."
Why do you think they didn't want you to
publish this book and the story to get
out? When this story hits the airwaves,
it's going to transform people's opinion
about CIA in two big ways.
First, they'll understand that CIA is
not what the movies portray it to be.
It's not superhuman spies who go out
there like James Bond or Jason Bourne
who are one man against the world.
That's not how espionage works.
Espionage is a team sport. You have
wins, you have losses. The second thing
is they'll actually they'll start to
understand the depths to which CIA will
dive to collect intelligence that
protects Americans. Inside this book we
talk about a mole that actually
penetrated CIA that CIA has never
acknowledged. Inside this book we talk
about new tactics that CIA learned from
terrorism and then used against our own
most strategic adversaries. I don't
think people recognize that CIA is
morally ambivalent to how it executes
espionage operations. The goal is to
keep Americans safe. When you say in
this book
you disclose that there was a mole
within the CIA. What does that mean for
someone that doesn't know what a mole in
the CIA is? One of the worst things that
can happen to an intelligence service is
that one of its own officers
becomes a spy for a foreign adversary.
That is what I'm referring to when I
talk about a mole.
And you were involved in that operation
to find the mole within the CIA.
Correct. More specifically, my wife and
I were included in in an operation to
kind of ferret out the mole, to bait and
and tempt the mole to make a mistake so
that the mole could be found and
disclosed. And your wife is here today.
Correct.
>> And we're going to bring her in and talk
to her as well. But for that for anyone
that doesn't know your backstory, which
would be pretty remarkable thing as
you've been on this channel now a few
times. Um could you give me a a
whistle-stop tour of your professional
background up until the point that you
met Chee Hee. Yeah, absolutely. So I'm
from a rural place in in Pennsylvania.
Uh I was like the only brown kid in a
white high school, but I ended up going
to an air a military academy. I went to
the Air Force Academy. And from the Air
Force Academy I go into the Air Force.
The Air Force teaches me how to fly.
They teach me a foreign language and
then they teach me about nuclear weapons
and nuclear missiles and I serve as a
nuclear missile officer in the Air
Force. So CIA picked me up uh and in my
first my first day on the job in CIA is
the day that I met my wife. Um, she was
sitting in the back of the classroom. I
of course worked my way to the front of
the classroom. And uh, and from there
our training just kind of overlapped and
we we became close. Well, G is here. So,
I'd like to hear his version of events.
Was there any inconsistency in the story
he told?
What was your perspective? There's
always another perspective. Are you
allowed to date in the CIA? Oh, yeah.
It's encouraged um, because
it's really hard when you're
keeping so many secrets
to date somebody outside of the CIA and
not be able to tell that cuz we had
friends who did that who did that. You
have to keep your whole life secret. So,
you're lying to them about where you're
going and what you do and
>> day. Day to day. Every single day. So,
you're building a relationship
and lying all the time. And it's really
difficult. So, if you date within the
CIA,
you know,
if you're in different divisions or
whatever, like maybe you can't talk
about everything in detail, but you at
least know what's going on. You know why
somebody's going TDY or where they're
going for a training um, session or We
can explain to each other. Like, "Hey,
I'm going to go work with the Spanish.
I'm going to go work with the with the
Canadians." Mhm. But, when you're dating
somebody on the outside, you can't say
those things. So, it becomes I'm going
on a business meeting. I'm going on a
trip. Crazy. And we've had many friends
who have had relationships explode or
melt down because the the partner starts
to ask very logical questions. We had
one good friend of ours who was an
outsider who was dating one of our good
friends who was an insider. And she
pulled me aside one day and she was
like, "You know, he goes on all these
business trips, but he never takes any
suits."
She's like, "I think he's cheating on
me." And I was like, "No, he's actually
going to a tactical training course
where you don't need to wear anything
except BDUs, but I can see your
concerns." So, you have to walk your
like there's a lot of walking people off
a cliff because they start to come to
the wrong conclusion
about what their actual partner is
doing.
What's your journey into the CIA? Mine
was kind of an unexpected journey
because I went into social work working
with survivors of torture from other
countries, with refugees, with
assignees. But before I got that job,
I'd actually I'd spent my entire last
year of grad school going to job fairs.
And I wanted what I really wanted was to
work for the federal government for like
the larger mission for the United
States, for like the people of the
United States. But then nobody was
calling me back. And I was like, okay. I
was like, I'll just submit an
application, like an online application
to CIA, which I thought was funny. And
then a few months later I got a call
back. She was like, come to the
information session. So I went in like a
random hotel with these like nondescript
signs outside. And you walk in and
you're like, I don't know if I'm in the
in the right place. And then they close
the door and they're like, welcome to
the CIA recruiting session. And you're
like, oh, this is so bizarre. And um Did
they tell you what your role is? Cuz I
know there's several different roles in
in the CIA. Mhm. Targeters began
uh during the war on terror.
And because what they initially did was
target individuals for capture or kill
for the military. Okay. So, what what
does that mean? They targeted people for
capture or kill for the military. So you
would Yeah.
find the person to capture or kill
>> Yes. in a foreign country. Yes.
And so, because, you know, everybody
else is doing their job of
you know, logistics or weapons or
fighting or strategy. So the targeter
position was really important because it
takes time to to go through all this
data to piece together this puzzle of
who is important, who is important to
capture, who's important to kill, and
how do you get to them? The how do you
get to them is the piece that like
everybody else wants to know, but they
don't really have time to do that in
their other jobs. So, they carved out
this targeter role so one person can do
all this research and identify in the
you know, terrorists
were really fascinating because they had
how their organizations were structured.
And so, you really needed somebody who
could look I mean it's like a like
targeting the mafia, right? Like
everybody has a role. Like there's a big
organization, everybody has a role. It
is in your favor if you're target if
you're going after them to find out who
who's who. Who's who, who's connected to
who, how can you get to different people
cuz you're never going to be able to
just get the top person right away. So,
how do you get there, right? And you
became a targeter. Yes. So, your job was
to figure out who to capture and kill.
Or capture or
>> Or kill.
And what was your role in the CIA? How
is your role different? Can you explain
it for a layman? Yeah, so where Gihi was
trying to find the individuals that were
of interest, my job was to learn what to
do after a targeter identified those
individuals. How do you actually meet
the person? How do you befriend the
person? How do you win their trust? How
do you collect their secrets? What's
known as a a field officer, an
operations officer, a case officer.
Those are the different terminologies
that we use internally. But you
essentially have every case is kind of
handed over from person to person. So,
raw information, sometimes open source
information is handed to a targeter who
creates a profile, a dossier, a
targeting package who hands it to an
operations officer who goes out and
actually makes that first contact. And
then when first contact is made, we pass
all the information back and it goes
back to all the same people to build the
next package for the next target. So,
Gihi would identify the individual and
then your job was to
fly overseas, go undercover, and make
first contact with that individual to
extract intelligence from them. And not
at first. By the time that CIA started
utilizing us as a tandem couple. A
tandem couple is a term that means a
married, truly married, CIA trained
couple. When we started becoming a
tandem couple, that's how we were a
one-two punch in for operations. Prior
to that, we were in separate offices and
separate divisions doing separate work.
So, we got along and we were
complementary because I understood the
challenges of her job and she understood
the challenges of my job, which made
both of us better
working with our counterparts in our
different offices. So, where where does
the story begin?
Andy.
You know, you you wrote this book to
tell a story. So, I'm asking you the
question. We usually I'd I'd I'd hazard
a guess where to start, but where does
this story begin?
From my perspective, the story really
starts on uh on I think it was a winter
day when we were both called in to a
counterintelligence office
that was a massive
oak table. It was a It was a senior
executive leadership type of room.
But, there were only three people there.
It was she, it was me, and it was the
leader of what's known as Falcon House,
which is this group of specialists
inside of CIA focused on one particular
adversary, an adversary that we've had
to code name Falcon to maintain
confidentiality with CIA. And so, Falcon
is a country, basically.
>> Falcon is a country, correct. And that
leader
revealed to us that they believed there
was a penetration, a mole,
that was inside of Falcon House, inside
of CIA,
and that they needed us to agree to do
an operation so that the mole will make
a mistake here. Cuz if the mole makes a
mistake here, we'll find him. But, we
can't have you be here cuz if you're
here, the mole will find you. And then
we don't know what happens if the mole
finds you. So, we're going to send you
across the world
to go work in this other country, Falcon
being the country, while we here as the
experts in Washington D.C. try to find
the mole.
And that was privileged information that
neither of us as junior officers ever
thought we would hear.
And I think that I know for me, I was
kind of giddy with excitement and G, he
was a little bit more apprehensive with
this can't be real.
But that was for me, that's where the
story starts is when these two people
her and with her anxiety disorder and
and me with my kind of lackluster CIA
career
when we got pulled into this office that
was clearly outside of our league and
invited to do this operation um
without that first meeting, Shadow Cell
would have never happened.
So, from that moment onwards, how long
was it before you flew to the foreign
country in question?
And what was your objective when you got
to that foreign foreign country? So, I
guess it's like a sub-objective to find
the mole. And there was another main
objective which was going to help find
the mole. You got it. Yeah, I mean
you're using great terminology. There
were primary objectives and secondary
objectives. And the primary objective
was to build a new set of reporting
assets, a new source of intelligence.
Several new sources of intelligence in
Falcon, the actual country. And to to
help you frame what Falcon is, there's
only a handful of countries that are
true stark adversaries to the United
States. Every one of those countries has
limited to no diplomatic relationship
with the United States. That's how
hostile they are.
Any one of those countries could be
Falcon. The reason that we have to code
name the country is because CIA in
today's geopolitical world has has
demanded we don't disclose the name of
the country. So, we call it Falcon. What
are the United States adversaries where
we don't have any
relationship with them? There's
obviously like North Korea, there's
Russia, there's Iran we know of. Are
there any others? Cuba. Cuba. Mhm. Yeah,
there's and those are
um there's a mix there of countries that
we do have a relationship with, but it's
not a warm relationship versus countries
we have no relationship with. So, we
have no relationship with North Korea.
We have a cold relationship with Russia,
right? We have a cold relationship with
China. We have no relationship with
Iran. So, they're all considered hard
targets, but at various levels. Okay.
So, this the objective is the primary
objective is to build a new team in this
country.
But, the sub objective is in building
the team, you're going to find out,
hopefully, who the mole is because the
mole is going to make a mistake. The
mole's going to try to find us because
the mole's job is to prevent CIA from
collecting secrets about Falcon cuz the
mole is working for Falcon intelligence.
The mole is working for that country.
Right. The mole is part of the CIA, but
working for the adversarial country.
Bingo, which is the worst combination
you can have. Um so, some of the most
famous moles in history are Aldrich
Ames. Aldrich Ames was a CIA penetration
that worked for the Russians. Robert
Hanssen. Robert Hanssen was an FBI
penetration that worked for the
Russians. So, these are famous moles in
history. We were essentially being told
that these earth-shattering 1990s era
moles
were were still relevant, but now in
2010-ish,
there was a new one
that had made its way into CIA. And And
that's a big deal. So, it was a very
exciting reveal for me because it meant
that we were not just doing something
that was relevant and interesting inside
of CIA. We're doing something that is
quite possibly the most important work
that can be done inside CIA at this
moment in time. How did the CIA know
there was a mole?
There's a lot of complexity there that
is part of why they didn't want us to
write this book. But, what they have
allowed us to disclose is that a foreign
ally
contacted CIA and said, "We have
collected intelligence that suggests you
have a mole. You have somebody inside
your organization who's a turncoat, a
spy for somebody else. So, a foreign
ally warned CIA. Otherwise, CIA would
have had no idea. Okay, and foreign
allies are people like the the United
Kingdom, Canada, Canada, Australia,
Australia.
So, you can imagine the disruption that
that would make. Not only did we did CIA
proper not know they had a mole. It took
an ally to tell us.
And then when the ally told us, we have
to assume that the ally is sharing as
much biographical detail as possible.
So, they're telling you the name. Hey,
Bob is a spy in your organization. But
now that CIA officer is an American
citizen protected by American rights and
privileges.
And CIA obviously has no information to
show that that person's a spy except for
the word of some foreign ally, which is
still in the law in the eyes of the US
government, a foreigner is a foreigner,
ally or not. So, even if it is the UK or
Canadians telling us so-and-so is a spy,
until we have our own body of evidence,
we can't prosecute. That person can't be
fired, that person can't be discharged,
that person can't be sued, that person
can't be arrested. So, now CIA has this
mess
where they are actively losing
information,
actively losing
intel because of this mole.
>> Because of a mole, but they can't take
any action because they have to now
build a legal case against the mole to
prove that that person's actually
breaking the law. So, the ally that
calls the CIA and says you've got a mole
in your ranks,
they named to the person. Most likely.
Most likely they would have never made
the the notification without also
sharing the name, which is a courtesy we
do to others as well. If we come across
information that we know an MI6 officer
has been compromised or a Canadian's
CSIS officer has been compromised or an
ASIS officer in in Australia, we will
share as many biographical details as
possible. And did you share the name
Did when you were called into the room
that day, did they share the name with
you? No.
It's hard for people to wrap their minds
around the culture at CIA, and I get it
because how do you wrap your mind around
an organization you don't know? And the
only exact the only insight is from
movies. So, culturally CIA is a is a
group of
people who value secrets.
And that need to know is very important
inside those walls. It's just something
we toss around like movie jargon
outside, but inside CIA need to know is
very, very real.
And you are only briefed to the minimum
that you need to know.
So, inside of this tiny group of of spy
hunters, which is known as the the um
counterespionage group, CEG, inside this
very small group, they have the need to
know basically everything. And then as
you go out in rings from that group,
they reduce the information they share.
So, they might know the name, but then
when they share it to the next ring,
they just say, "Hey, there's an officer
who's in this office." And then it goes
to the next ring, "There's an officer in
this division." And then it goes to the
next ring. So, the the people talking to
us as senior leaders, the people talking
to us knew the minimum we needed to know
was that we were going to build new
operations,
but we were also going to be most likely
targeted by an own threat inside CIA.
That was why it mattered to us.
Interestingly, that decision is why we
had a First Amendment case with this
book at all because CIA was knowingly
putting our lives in danger of a foreign
adversary
by intentionally creating operations
that would tempt that mole to disclose
our identities. That was one of the
things I was thinking when I was reading
the book is you knew that you were being
sent to a adversarial country, and you
also had the knowledge that
working amongst you was a mole who was
revealing secrets about the CIA and
potentially yourselves to that foreign
country. Correct. So that foreign
country could have
pop
could have killed you. Absolutely. And
and that's the second kind of cultural
element that people don't understand
about CIA.
You don't really turn down an operation.
If you're invited
to take part in an operation,
you have the right to say no. But if you
say no, you're committing career
suicide.
Gihi and anybody who reads the book will
find this out. Gihi was
a stellar officer on a phenomenal
trajectory, doing incredible things.
Kind of really charting the course for
what targeters have become today.
For me, I proved to be a not very good
case officer.
And if there was anything I was really
hoping for, it was a second chance. So
when we were pulled into this meeting
and they said, "Hey, here's this
exciting opportunity. Here's an
operation that we're
we're literally inviting you to this
executive suite to invite you to this
operation. And we're going to put you
together and we need you to do this."
That's not That's not a situation that I
was going to say no to.
I think you considered saying no, but
for me,
it was it was a they knew me well enough
to know I was not going to turn that
down. Yeah, I mean, I think when you
have anxiety, you consider saying no to
everything. Yeah, yeah, yeah.
>> You're always thinking about the risk,
but I think that What was the risk that
you were thinking about? It is very real
that you can be disappeared by a foreign
adversary, that you can be
you know, killed by them with no
explanation, that you can be just
put in jail and then you never get out
because the government's not necessarily
going to come to your aid. And if they
do, it might be still maybe 20 years
before you're out of their prison. Every
sworn officer has plausible deniability,
meaning the president can plausibly deny
that you don't belong to whatever
organization you are claiming to belong
to. So a CIA officer
arrested in a Russian prison
can can avoid all questioning and say,
"Hold on guys, I'm actually CIA. You
caught me. Good job. Now please send me
home. Don't have a diplomatic incident."
The president has the right to say that
person is not CIA. Yeah. That person has
never worked for me. I don't know who
that person is. Uh that their American
passport might be verified, but but they
are
legally in your possession of of uh
you know, legal requirements. So, we we
don't really know who they are. So, so
just to clarify then, you
were being told you were going to be
flown, both of you, to a foreign
country. Mhm. An adversarial foreign
country. And you were told that there
was a mole amongst your your ranks that
was feeding information to the foreign
country that you were being flown to.
So, we they actually stationed us
in a neighboring country that was
friendly.
But we knew that Andy and anybody we
worked with would have to go into
Falcon. So, they flew us to a country
>> Falcon being the adversarial country.
the adversarial country. So, we actually
lived in a third country called Wolf.
But we were operating in both Wolf and
in Falcon. So, the danger was still
there. And then that's when Jihi's
targeter mind set in. And that's when
she started thinking through, "Well, how
could our operation be reverse
engineered by Falcon
and actually find us? And if we can
think like the enemy, we can stay one
step ahead of the enemy." So, the whole
idea of going to Wolf and building our
team from the very beginning, Jihi
started to architect how we could do
that in a way that would foil the
foil our aggressors from being able to
even discover our existence. And what
was the objective when you So, you've
got this sub-objective, which I
understand, which is to find the mole.
But the main objective is just to spy as
usual and collect information on this
adversarial country. Yes and no. The
main objective was to collect
information, but the spying as usual is
the part that was a no.
CIA specifically told us they didn't
want us to do
the standard spy MO. Mhm. Spying has
really been the same since the days of
Egypt, the ancient Egypt, right? You
find somebody who gives you information
about something that they have access to
and that's it and that's spying. Then
you turn it into a report and you pass
it up to somebody who reads it and they
make a decision.
They wanted a new a new kind of
mousetrap. They they wanted a new way of
doing espionage.
And when they deployed us to the
friendly country, that was their only
request was whatever you do there,
coordinate it with the local leadership
and then don't tell us because we have
to make sure that the mole doesn't learn
what you're doing.
That's going to be how we tempt the mole
to start probing around and asking
questions that are outside of the norm.
That's how we're going to reverse
engineer this and find the mole. So we
need you to go do something new and we
need it not to be standard. And don't
tell us. And don't tell us but tell your
leadership in the friendly country. The
the CIA leadership in the friendly
friendly country.
>> Correct. Yes. Okay.
>> Because the And he's going to tell or
she's going to tell them. No, so it's
completely compartmentalized. So
>> Need to know. Right. Because if we kept
all of our operations
um centered in Wolf, then in our in our
friendly country, then the mole would
never know what we were doing. So we
would be gathering intelligence which
would then be further compartmentalized
to maybe a specific office where like
one or two people at headquarters might
know about one particular operation and
then one or two people might know about
another operation. But it's because not
all of Falcon House would know,
the mole would not have access to any of
these new inform any of these new
intelligence sources and that's what was
really important. That's why they wanted
us to rebuild because he currently had
access to all of the legacy intelligence
sources. Okay.
>> So if he wanted to, you know, pass any
information to Falcon from all of our
legacy sources, he could. But, if he
doesn't have access to our new sources,
he can't pass any of that new
information on. And now, here we are,
we're able to gather more intelligence,
and then hopefully, if we're lucky, we,
you know, we strike gold on finding out
who he is or who he's working with or
other things. But, yeah,
compartmentalization was the is the key.
So, we were really very, um,
you know, uh, kind of siloed in Wolf.
I'm trying to understand how you doing
what you were doing was going to help
the CIA discover who the mole was.
One of the things in in
double agent operations, which is what
you're talking about when you talk about
a mole or a penetration, a double agent,
meaning I'm a sworn officer of CIA,
but then I've also agreed to work with
the Russians, the Chinese, the North
Koreans, the Cubans, whatever. That's a
double a double agent.
Double agent operations are very
difficult to maintain in long term
because if my information isn't relevant
to my foreign adversary anymore, if the
if I'm collecting secrets on Cuba,
but I'm being paid by the Russians,
the Russians may not care that I keep
collecting secrets on Cuba. So, they
might cut me off. And then all of a
sudden I'm a double agent, culpable of
crime, but without protection from
another country. So, when you think of
your Edward Snowdens, when you think of
some of your famous turncoats from the
United States, they flee to the country
that they were working for, ultimately.
So, if you don't have that escape path,
then it becomes very, very stressful and
scary for for a double agent.
So, what CIA was counting on is
the mole who was reporting our secrets
to Falcon,
if we could create new operations, and
that mole didn't have access to those
new operations, then the mole would
start to stretch. They would start to
make mistakes,
ask questions they shouldn't ask, steal
information, try to hack onto systems
they shouldn't get onto. And that's all
stuff that CIA can use to build a legal
case to arrest that person. But without
knowing, without having something that
that person has to stretch to collect,
they're not going to make a mistake. So
our job was to create something new so
that the mole would make a mistake that
CIA could track and that would build a
legal case that would allow CIA to
arrest an American citizen for
espionage.
Did the CIA have access to the
information the mole was sending back to
the enemy country? No.
That's one of the most dangerous parts
about double agent operations. We often
We have a lot of nicknames, a lot of
inside terminology, but we usually call
it the keys to the kingdom.
When you have a foreign penetration,
you have the keys to everything in that
foreign country's
um all of their secrets because you have
access to an intelligence officer who
can pull anything. So our double agent,
our mole, had access to essentially
everything related to Falcon that CIA
had. So CIA didn't know what he was
sharing, what he wasn't sharing, how
much he had been sharing, or even how
long he had been sharing it.
But they suspected he was sharing
something. Because there was something
that our ally picked up on.
Something that allowed them to identify
the person and communicated back. So you
land in this friendly country next to
the enemy country.
And do you have to adopt new aliases,
new names, new new stories? Do you have
to pretend that you're normal people
living a normal life?
You do. Um there's different ways that
you can craft it. So
um
Geehee's job as the targeter was to find
our targets in Falcon. A big part of
what we had to do when we got to Wolf,
our friendly country, was do whatever
the leadership there told us to do. So
CIA crafted everything for us to land in
the friendly country. Once we were in
the friendly country, then we had to
start crafting new identities, new
aliases, so that we could travel out of
the friendly country and into Falcon.
Into the enemy country. Mhm. But while
living in Falcon, we were, you know,
Chewie and Andrew Bustamante, newlywed
couple. Where we worked was covered.
Where did you work?
It's under cover. We we still can't
disclose it.
>> Yeah. Like as far as this enemy did you
like run a when you were in the enemy
country working
were you like running like a like a
coffee shop?
Or is it Yeah, when going into Falcon,
there were different um you had to have
a a different cover and a different
cutout. And we would use what's what
you're referring to is called commercial
cover or commercial activity. Meaning we
would act as if we were part of
commercial business going into and out
of the country. But you'd use your
normal names? No.
No. We This is one of the other things
that's really fascinating about the book
and one of the reasons that CIA pushed
back is we get to disclose whole new
levels of tradecraft that have never
been talked about in previous books.
So the tradecraft that we use here is is
something that the Brits actually call
um dry cleaning.
And what that means is we would clear
our path before we would go into Falcon.
So we're in a friendly country and we
need to go into a hostile country. In
order to go from the friendly country to
the hostile country, you can't go
directly. Because if you go directly,
the hostile country can track you back
to your friendly country. And then they
can send a team to to hurt you if they
need to in the friendly country. So
instead what you do is you create a
cleansing route. So you travel from the
friendly country to a neutral country.
And in that neutral country, you'll
change identities and then travel into
your target country. So now if the
hostile country tracks you, they track
you back to a neutral country and they
have no idea that you originated from a
friendly country. But if you go from a
friendly country to a neutral country,
when you get to the neutral country,
do you need like a new passport and
stuff? Because that neutral country,
presumably they they don't know that
you're spies. Correct. So, do you have
to have a new passport to then get on a
plane to fly into the Yes, and it's what
we would call a passport swap. And
there's different ways of doing a swap.
You can carry your own swap. You can
have somebody meet you to do a swap. You
can have a cachet where you hide a swap.
But that's the benefit of always using a
consistent
cleansing route because you can always
go back to the same neutral country. And
from the hostile country's point of
view, every time they track you, you
always go back to the same place. So,
they start to build a pattern of life,
what we call a pattern of life, where
they believe you're originating from
this country. When in fact, you're not.
So, you you you land in this friendly
country. You're making your way into the
hostile country.
What was your objective? What were you
trying to do in that hostile country?
The first thing we were trying to do was
find targets. Okay. And
we knew that as we found targets and
built targets, we would also need to
support the operations against those
targets. And there's a logistical
element to espionage where you need to
have encrypted phones. You need to have
satellite satellite phones or SIM cards.
You need to have money. You need to have
specialized gifts. Like there's there's
a there's a logistical supply chain that
needs to be built. Specialized gifts.
So, um things that are appealing to a
target that they may not be able to get
themselves. Gold bullion, high-end
liquors, child pornography,
uh foreign currency, whatever they need,
your job is to make sure they have a way
of getting it. Child pornography? Some
some targets, especially in the in the
world of drugs and uh and terrorism and
weapons,
they they feed off of the strangest
things.
So, the CIA CIA would supply that
pornography? In a way, um we would more
like facilitate the transfer. Some other
friendly country might actually be who
acquires it. So, for example, Germany
might actually uh have a raid where they
where they carry out a raid against a
pornographer and they have
terabytes of porn, right? And then the
UK might have a case where they need
porn to pay an Iranian.
So, now they can trade with BND, so the
BND can use this cachet of porn and they
can give it to the Brits who give it to
the Iranians and that can be a currency
of types.
Again, morally ambivalent, the goal is
to protect your people at the end of the
day,
right? So, when it comes down to it,
that's the same way CIA works. If we're
giving gold if we're giving
minted American gold coins
to an evil person in North Korea,
do we really care if it's keeping
Americans safe?
There are some people who would say,
yes, and there are other people who
would say, whatever the price is, let's
keep Americans safe.
So, tell me about what you did then. So,
you what was your what did you
accomplish while you were there and what
is the you talk in the book about using
terrorist tactics to build your
operation there. Can you you run me
through what is it what it is you
accomplished there and the role that
both of you played? So, I'll start it
and I'll let you take it over. But, the
the the book's title, Shadow Cell, is
really about the cell model and the
terrorist cell model that we recreated
in our friendly country so that we could
execute operations against our hostile
country
that mirrored tactics and techniques
that terrorists had used to foil
Americans for the last 20 years in the
global war on terror.
So,
what Ji and I learned is that CIA was
not very good at beating terrorists.
America was not very good at beating
terrorists. That's why after 20 years of
fighting in Afghanistan, we left and we
gave it back to the same terrorist group
that we went in there to fight.
We had learned a lot from fighting that
adversary, but we were the only country
in the world fighting the global war on
terror. The Russians, the Iranians, the
Chinese, the Cubans, the North Koreans,
none of them engaged in the war on
terror. So everything we had learned
from Al-Qaeda,
we were the only ones that learned it.
So we found that to be kind of a
competitive advantage. So we started
building our operations modeling our
operations off of the way the terrorists
structured their cells.
And we called our cell in Wolf the
shadow cell.
And we had to find the people, recruit
the people, and train the people inside
our cell. Our actual CIA peers, we had
to get them to learn how to run the same
model. That's really what the book
explains is how we built that and what
those people did. Because espionage is
not about one superhero overseas, it's
about a team of people doing incredible
things. And were those people on the
ground in the friendly country next to
the hostile country? Yes. And so did you
when you recruited these people to build
this team,
did you recruit them from America or
were you recruiting them within side
that friendly country? Inside of Wolf.
Everybody who was in the cell was
already working in Wolf. And the word
cell basically means team. Team. Right.
Team. So you built this team it in the
friendly country next door to the enemy
country and this team consisted of how
many people? Right. So James was our
senior most Yeah. case officer.
Tasha, Luke, and Beverly were our second
tour case officers. So they were more
junior. That's why they were hungry but
but still kind of uh
flexible. Whereas James was in James was
at a place in his career where if this
didn't work, his career would be tanked.
Mhm. And then Jihee and I were not case
officers. We were kind of the I was the
the mission planner if you will and
Jihee was the targeter. And then uh
Diana was our linguist, Will was our
tech support. And we had that was our
that was our cell. That was our little
group of people that would sit in the
bullpen. Now, it's important to note
that
none of them and
this was their primary mission. It was
our primary mission. For all of them,
helping us was just something they were
doing because they believed that if we
were successful, it would be good for
them. They had primary missions to do
all sorts of other things.
Oh, okay.
And were these people locals?
They're all Americans
and they're all Americans assigned to
Wolf. So, they're all American CIA
officers, all sworn officers that are
assigned to our friendly country in
various different covers to do various
different primary missions. Okay.
And how did you guys like communicate?
Did you like meet up for like dinner?
Like this stuff.
How does it work?
Yeah, I mean all of our communication
and hangouts were in the office because
we couldn't really be seen outside
together. We had a
we had what's known as a SCIF, a
specialized compartmented
information facility.
So, it was a it was a hardened
soundproof office that we could have
meetings in.
Couldn't the adversarial country like
watch you walking in there in the
morning?
The adversarial country arguably didn't
even know we were in Wolf because every
time they tracked anybody's travel, it
would take them to a different country.
Oh, so you were just people going to an
office. Yes. So, you could be doing
anything in there. Correct.
>> Yeah, and it's an office in a large
office building. So, we could really be
going anywhere. Okay, fine. So, it's
hard to track.
So, what was your what was your first
mission together as a as a team? Like
what were you what were you doing in the
enemy country? What was your objective?
To you were finding you were working as
a targeter to find interesting
individuals and then Andrew you were
predominantly trying to make contact
with those individuals. Sort of what my
because I couldn't as the node of the
of the cell, the node is a term that
we're using to say, I was the piece that
was exposed to CIA. So, the mole, if the
mole went hunting, the mole would find
me. I was the one that was exposed.
Okay. So, for me, it was important that
I actually didn't meet with any of the
targets that we had in Falcon. My job
was to go to Falcon to start sourcing
the information that she would use to
identify those individuals. Like, what
does that mean? So, uh whether it's
something stupid like a phone book or a
thumb drive, uh whether you're picking
up a dead drop from somebody else. So,
consider in Falcon, we would have
already had other case officers carrying
out operations. Yeah.
So, we might have a case officer who was
able to extract information from a
military database. And that military
database has all the weapons engineers
for Falcon's Air Force.
That case officer That spy. That spy
Mhm. That spy can collect a thumb drive.
Yeah. And then they can put that thumb
drive in what's known as a dead drop. A
dead drop would be something that you
hide anywhere in the in the country, in
a city, wherever.
>> Also, like in a bush. Yeah, like in a
bush.
I would then go into Falcon, and I would
go to that dead drop site, the bush.
>> So, you're going to the enemy country.
Right.
>> You'd go to the the bush. And take the
thumb drive and bring it back by our
cleansing route to Wolf, where I could
give it to Jihi. Jihi could then extract
the information from the thumb drive,
and now she has a list of all the
engineers who are part of the
enemy country's Air Force.
And then from there, she has a starting
point for her information to start
finding targets. Now, as she finds
targets, that's when we tap on our case
officers. James,
Tasha, Luke, Beverly, and we say, here's
somebody that we think would be
susceptible to you because you're a
middle-aged woman, you're an older man,
you're a younger man, you're a younger
woman. Right? We think that these people
might be susceptible to your interests,
your backgrounds, your voice, who knows
what. And we need you to target them.
And then we would send those
those spies into Falcon to meet the
targets that Jihi found.
Okay.
Uh okay, got you. So, the game of
espionage is not an easy game. It's a
fun game, but it's a it's a chess game,
not a checkers game. So, there's a lot
of moving pieces and a lot of moving
parts, and um for me it was always very
exciting, but I also understand that it
can be very difficult to to express it
well.
Was there ever a time when you felt most
at risk?
When you were in that hostile country?
At some point, it
my presence in Falcon, in the enemy
country, became known
to the local government in the enemy
country, and they dispatched a
surveillance team to track me. It was a
major turning point in our operation. We
kind of went from a place where we felt
like we were winning to a place where we
wondered if we were losing. We went from
a place where I felt very safe to a
place where I felt like I could
immediately be apprehended, and then all
the worst thoughts start to creep in.
Not necessarily about being shot.
Oftentimes a CIA officer being shot in a
foreign country is a welcome
experience, because being shot at least
means everything ends.
The worst is being captured and being
interrogated and being used for
diplomatic leverage and being used for
policy leverage and being being forced
to do
uh you know, into brainwashing and
propaganda videos. Like, that's a much
worse experience than than a clean
death.
You said earlier that it would have been
the mole that was exposed to your
presence and that knew that you were in
this enemy country. So, was it the mole
that told the enemy country? That's what
we believe. We don't have the evidence
to prove it, um but what CIA's
conclusion as well as the conclusion
inside of our own shadow cell is that
our operations had reached the place
where they were significant enough that
the mole took a risk
to find out that I was the exposed
member of the cell, and then the mole
reported my name to the hostile
country's police force.
So, you're now inside that hostile
country, the enemy country, and they
know that you're a US spy.
Was there a day when you realized that
they knew that you were a spy? Yes.
Well, there wasn't a day that I realized
that they were
that they knew I was CIA. There was a
day that I realized they were
surveilling me
as if I was a threat.
When you travel, when any business
person travels to a hostile country,
they're almost always surveilled. Their
hotel rooms can be rifled through.
There's There's people called bumbling
surveillance or watchers who will
usually follow you.
I'm not sure what your travel looks
like, but I can almost assure you that
if you travel to Russia, if you travel
to China, if you travel to Cuba, you had
a watcher. You had a surveillance team
Really? that was watching you.
>> Me? Yeah. Why? Because you're wealthy,
you're successful, you're an influencer,
you're of significance. At the very
least, they want to make sure that some
petty criminal doesn't hurt you in their
country cuz that could be a big deal.
>> Thank you. But
Please continue to surveil me. But at
worst, they could also be scraping your
cell phone to pull all of your contacts
off the cell phone so that they could
then reach out to any of the contacts
that you have on your cell phone. They
could scan and duplicate your hard drive
as you go through secondary or go
through immigration in a foreign
country. They can scan my hard drive as
I go through immigration? Absolutely.
We can do that here in the United
States, too.
What? So, if I land in the United
States, like they How do they do How
would they do that? So, there's a
There's
There's different authorities that exist
for different agencies. So, here inside
the United States, one of the
authorities that we give to our border
patrol is the authority to essentially
scrape data off of all of your
electronic devices. So, if you're uh
deemed a target of interest, and if
you're moved into what's known as a
secondary screening, they will separate
you from your bags. They'll actually
open your your bags. They might even
tell you to unlock your cell phone or
unlock your laptop. And then from there
with with technology that's proprietary
and technology that's also currently
commercially available, they can scrape
and scan your hard drive. Cuz I've been
through security before in various
countries and sometimes when I get to
the other end, there's a letter in my
suitcase. And the letter in my suitcase
says, "Hey, we had to go through your
bags for some reason."
>> If you had a technical If you had a
technical device in your bag along with
that letter, there's a good chance that
it was cloned.
But I didn't give them my password.
Sometimes they don't need your password.
Really? Oh, yeah.
How are they going to get into my my
laptop without my password? There's
ways.
So, yeah, there's password generators,
there's password cracking codes. Your
password is the I mean, I have somebody
I could call right now and within about
30 minutes we would probably have all of
your passwords that you use for all of
your devices in your personal home.
That's the end of the podcast, isn't it?
Good luck WITH THE BOOK.
CUZ I'M GOING TO HAVE TO ASK HIM FOR MY
PHONE.
AND THIS IS A BIT OF A TANGENT, BUT IT'S
AN IMPORTANT ONE. SO, WHAT devices do
you guys use if you have that knowledge
that it's really easy to break into
devices? Do you use the same devices
that I use? Yeah, I mean, for me I
assume that once you If you become a
target of interest, there's nothing you
can do to protect yourself. So, I use
devices that are actually easy to crack
and clone because I don't want my device
to get broken.
So, that when
the Chinese or the Russians choose to go
through some backdoor on my Android
system, my Android doesn't shut down.
Whereas, there are more complex systems
like a Glacier phone, where if somebody
penetrates your Glacier phone, this the
whole phone will shut down and you'll be
without a phone. Is there any phone or
device that's safe?
I would argue the answer is no. No. I
would say no, also. Because anything
that you create that claims to be safe
becomes priority number one for all the
adversaries out there cuz they know if
they can be the first ones to crack that
phone or crack that hard drive or crack
that operating system, then they have
the competitive advantage over everybody
else. Yeah, it's possible for something
to be safe for a short period of time,
but eventually it's going to get
cracked. They'll find a back door or
they'll figure out how to open it. And
it's not just foreign intelligence that
wants to do that, it's also all of your
criminal syndicates, it's all of your
dark web syndicates, everybody wants to
do it. So, whenever I see anybody come
out and promise that they have got the
new hardest device,
I just I don't believe it. It might be
hard, but that doesn't mean it's
impossible. Yeah, there are levels of
security, but nothing is 100% secure, at
least when it comes to technology. And
so, we just assume
that it's not secure. And so, you just
treat your device in that way. You know,
with whatever level of security is
convenient and makes you feel secure,
but knowing that at any point somebody
could just hack in from, you know, they
could hack in remotely, they could, you
know, scrape your drive when you're
going through immigration or if you're
in a hotel room, somebody comes in. I
mean, it's always possible.
>> steal your encryption key from somebody
else that you are having an encrypted
chat with. They didn't have to target
you. Do you use like cold storage? I.e.,
do you use like a a hard drive that's
not connected to the internet or
something? We will air gap. With what?
>> Air gap. Air gapping is cold storage,
like what you're talking about, where
you take something off the actual cloud,
take something off the internet, and it
just lives in a stand-alone server.
Whether that's a We have drives that we
save our information to that are that
are air gaps, they're not connected to
the internet, not connected to a cloud.
They're only connected whenever we
choose to transfer information. Um so,
we'll do things like that to keep our
information safe. But, the I think the
most important thing is that
if you
if you show, if you make yourself easy
to be hacked,
then you'll actually get hacked less,
because you're not a risk. They can see
what you have, they understand that
you're not important, and they move on
to the next target that's more more uh
clandestine or trying to hide.
Okay, so you you out, going back to the
story, you figure out that you're being
surveilled. How?
Just like the the whole idea of a
cleansing route through a third country,
that's a a piece of tradecraft that has
never been exposed before. I actually
get to teach a number of people, I get
to teach in the story how we do what's
known as a surveillance detection route.
So, the the core of surveillance
detection is understanding something
that we call multiple sites, multiple
sightings over a period of time. So, I
need to see the same person, the same
vehicle, the same face, the same
profile. Profile meaning, you know, tall
tall Caucasian male, mid-50s. I need to
see the same profile several times over
a period of time where I'm changing
locations.
So, what happens inside Shadow Cell is I
identify one car
that follows me through multiple turns
and then falls off, only to come back on
later on. That's kind of my first
indicator that there might be something
going on. So, then I go through this
route, a predetermined, preplanned route
through a city. And the only reason I'm
doing that route is so that I can drag
people along with me to see if they're
going to behave like surveillance. And
from that route, I find that it's not
just one car, it's actually two other
cars. And when I get out of my own
vehicle to walk on foot, there are very
specific people who then follow me on
foot. And then in the third part of the
surveillance detection route, I find
that same people who are following me on
foot are also the people driving the
cars that are following me inside
vehicles. So, most surveillance
detection routes are executed in this
very prescribed, very specific process
so that you can see who's actually
following you.
And you did that. You discover that
there's multiple people following you in
multiple vehicles.
And when you discover that, it's
terrifying.
>> Yeah, I was going to say you
>> It's absolutely terrifying. But, it's
comforting
because you know they're following you,
but they don't know that you know that
yet.
So, they still think that they are
discreet. They still think that that
you're operationally active, meaning
they're following you because they
expect you to commit espionage. They're
following you because they expect you to
meet with a source, do a dead drop,
acquire some kind of equipment that you
shouldn't have, right? They're waiting
for that. If they don't see that, then
they don't get the evidence that they
need. They don't win.
>> So, you go straight to a strip club or
something.
>> Exactly right. You go to a strip club,
you go to a library. I went to an arcade
in this book, and you go somewhere to
just waste their time. Because as long
as I'm collecting their information when
I come back to my friendly country, and
I meet with my shadow cell teammates, I
can now tell them this license plate is
a surveillance vehicle, this profile is
a surveillance vehicle. If you see a
woman or a man wearing these types of
clothing, this is a surveillant, right?
And we can
now we can build a database back in Wolf
that shares the surveillance team
members in Falcon. Were you scared when
you figured out that you were being
followed? I was terrified. I was
terrified because I had so many thoughts
going through my head from how did I
[ __ ] up
to what if I don't go home? I'm trying
to think about what they're going to do
as their next step. How long are they
going to follow me before they just say
[ __ ] it and just wrap me up?
Are they even going to wrap me up? Wrap
me up meaning meaning apprehend me,
capture me. Do they already have
evidence that shows that I'm committing
espionage, right? I haven't committed
espionage on this trip yet, but have
they seen me on a previous trip doing a
dead drop, retrieving a dead drop,
dropping a cell phone, taking a battery?
Like
what what do they know? I don't know
what they know.
And then you've got all this panic, and
at the same time you have to recall
3 and 1/2 hours of very specific
activity across a city to run an SDR. An
SDR? A surveillance detection route. You
have to recall I turn left on Front
Street. I go two blocks, I turn right on
22nd North, and then I turn left on an
alley. You have to recall this thing
that you memorized, that you work
through, and at the same time that you
have this spike of adrenaline panic. And
you were on your own? I was on my own
for that operation. So, you you go
through this route through the city that
you is predetermined for you to go down,
and presumably this particular route is
designed in such a way where
it gives you opportunities to expose
them.
You realize that you are being followed.
What do you do in that exact moment? The
first moment that I realized it was
true,
I had this
realization, this moment of fear and
vulnerability
where I just it was a very it was a
moment of self-loathing, where you just
you realize that you're not as good as
you think you are. And you realize that
however this happened,
you're the only one to blame for what
comes next.
In that kind of moment of humility,
I actually called Jihi.
In our alias identities that we had
built for these operations, we had
what's known as a throwaway phone or a
disposable telecommunications. And I
called her
and I gave her a coded message to let
her know
that
something was wrong. Cuz I wanted her to
know that something was wrong so that
she could take it back to the cell so
that they could start their systems on
their end to protect me if I did get
arrested, if I did get wrapped up, if I
did get shot. You gave her a coded
message? Via cell phone. What is that
coded message? Um the I think I just
called you and said I'm coming home
early.
>> Mhm.
You said you you called her and said I'm
coming home early. Yeah, which is a bad
sign because you would never come home
early from an operation ever.
So, as soon as I heard he was coming
home early, I knew that something was
wrong.
>> Take me into your world at that time.
The phone rings. I get the call on my
phone, my burner phone, and which was
unusual anyways. I mean, I always had it
because that was part of our like
communication plan was for us to do that
when we were apart. So, a burner phone
is a secondary phone that you just use
for these kind of things.
>> That's just for this. It's never used
for anything else. It's not connected to
a name.
Um and that's what keeps it anonymous
for us. And so, he calls and he says,
you know, "Hey, I'm coming home early."
And I'm like,
"Okay." Because you can't like if if the
line's being tapped, you can't be like,
"Oh my god, what's going on? Like, are
you okay?" because somebody's listening
to it. It has to sound like we knew that
his alias had a fiance. I was the
fiance. So,
you know, it was totally natural for
anybody listening in to to hear him say,
"Hey, I'm coming home early." So, then I
had to be like, "Oh, that's really
exciting. That's great. You know, I
can't wait to see you." And he's like,
"Okay, I love you." And then that's the
end of the conversation. And that's all
I get.
And so, after that's all I get from
Andy, I go back to the office. I'm
starting to look like scour all of our
cables. I go talk to James. Like, have
you heard anything? Like, is anything
happening? You started to scour all of
your cables. Yeah, so, you know, we have
our all of our databases, uh you know,
all the CIA databases. So, you know,
there's reporting that comes in all the
time um that you're, you know,
especially regional reporting that
you're privy to. And so, you know, I
talked to James because he was he had
more access than I did to things all
things Falcon. And so, I was like, "Have
you heard anything? Is there anything
weird going on?" And he said, "No." And
so, I started just kind of looking
through all of my stuff to see, you
know, was there any reporting that was
of somebody being captured or somebody,
you know, something going wrong? And
there was nothing. Um and so, Andy and I
have um
we created on our own just a it's called
a combo plan, a communication plan,
where you know, if anything ever
happens, you know, whether natural
disaster or, you know, espionage faux
pas, like we had a system of
communication where
you know, I wait 8 hours and you know,
check this
fake email that we share that's not
attributable and then he gives me a sign
of life and then we have these timings 8
hours, 12 hours, 24 hours, 48 hours
where all I need from him is a sign of
life to know that he's okay. And then
that also gives us the opportunity if it
were a natural disaster for example, to
put, you know, I meet me at this
location. So that that's an email
address that Andy emails. Yeah, so
>> Close. It's an email address that we
both have a login to and you create a
draft email inside of it. Oh, okay.
>> Also learned from terrorism. Also
learned from terrorism. Okay. Oh, is
that what terrorists do? Yeah. So they
create a draft email, they just leave it
there and someone else logs in and looks
at it. Yeah, so there's it's never sent,
so it never goes over the internet
really. Yeah, so we had this
communication plan in place, so even
though I was concerned and I couldn't
find anything to discover what was
happening, I knew we had this
communication plan in place. So I knew
that at some point he was going to give
me a sign of life and I couldn't do
anything
until that point. So you're you've
discovered that you've been discovered
by this adversarial country, you call
Jihi, you let her know that you're
coming home early, then what you do?
Then I have to plan my escape. So
another thing that people that movies
don't show you is that
when in the first effort to escape is
always self-rescue. It's always on the
part of the field officer alone to try
to escape. There's no Navy SEAL team,
there's no evacuation helicopter,
there's no high-speed
boat or or classy yacht just waiting for
you. You have to get yourself across
the country's border yourself
before you can hope for any kind of
e-back from there or what we call an
exfil.
So I knew knew it was on me to come up
with some evacuation plan. And I had to
come up with an evacuation plan that
wasn't going to let the surveillance
team know
that I knew I was under surveillance.
And you're still in the car at this
point? I'm I'm in between the car and on
foot uh
de- depending on where I am in the
surveillance detection route, right? It
was Surveillance Detection Routes
generally break into three phases. It's
in the first phase that you suspect that
you're under surveillance. It's in the
second phase that you confirm it. So,
it's in the second phase when I confirm
I am absolutely under surveillance.
That's when I contact G and G, and
that's when I start coming up with my
own self-rescue plan.
And then the third phase? The third
phase is a collection phase. You know
what you You know that you're under
surveillance. You know that you've
communicated to somebody that you're
under surveillance. And now the mission
becomes collect as much information as
you can about the surveillance team
before they realize that they're being
collected against. So, you you see this
car behind you, multiple cars behind
you, and the same people following you
on foot. Are you writing this down, or
are you just trying to memorize it?
>> At first, it's all memory. Um and we
have a methodology for trying to
memorize this stuff. We actually talk
about this in the book as well. You
start to come up with short codes to
describe the people.
Um and the codes that you come up with
mean something to you, but they wouldn't
mean anything if they were if they came
out in an interrogation, if they came
out in writing. So, like for you, I
might call you black t-shirt.
A black t-shirt means something to me.
So, if I see black t-shirt behind me
three times in the next 45 minutes in
three different parts of the city, I
know that I have an image for what black
t-shirt means. But when I write down
black t-shirt, nobody else knows what
that means.
When I see a woman, it was cold uh the
the season that I was carrying out these
operations. Um I saw a woman in
earmuffs, so I would call her earmuffs.
I saw a guy in a bomber jacket, so I
called him bomber jacket. And you just
recall these people. You You You blue
sedan, yellow SUV, right? White taxi
cab. You You start to come up with these
nicknames that mean something to you but
don't mean anything to anybody else. And
then when you get back to a place where
you can document your notes in detail,
you have a reference point to document
in detail. So, I start by memorizing.
When I got towards the end of my third
phase of surveillance detection, I
actually wrote down my notes
in the book it explains I went into a
like a clothing store
and then I started making notes in the
clothing store. Presumably, if somebody
came in and arrested me at that moment,
what they would see is a bunch of notes
about clothing. Earmuffs and black
t-shirts inside of a clothing store,
that's not espionage. But then when I
was able to actually get back to
to Wolf with my cell, then I was able to
deconstruct what black t-shirt meant.
Black t-shirt meant blackmail
with a goatee
approximately 165 65 lb 5 ft 11 in
38 years old.
So, how do you get from phase two of
your process of figuring out if you're
being followed to the arcade?
Like what was the Why did you go to the
arcade? So, I went to the arcade because
I was trying in a surveillance detection
route, one of the things that you're
actually trying to do is called bore or
lull your surveillance.
You never want to In movies, it makes it
look like you're trying to to ditch your
surveillance team. You're trying to lose
your tail. That's not what professionals
do. What professionals do is we drag the
tail. We keep the tail with us for as
long as possible. And one of the things
you do is you make yourself very
predictable. You move very slowly. You
hang out in public places, which makes
it very easy for them to observe you. I
was actually going to the arcade to try
to collect more information about my
surveillance team, but I was trying to
give them time and space so they could
observe me in a public setting.
It It backfired because what actually
ended up happening is that when I went
into the arcade, they lost me. They lost
sight of me, which put them into a
position where they started panicking to
try to find me, even though I was just
sitting inside the arcade.
I mean, it doesn't sound like it
backfired if they lost you. That's a
terrible thing when they lose you
because when they lose you, they start
to panic and they start to assume either
they made a mistake or you're a trained
officer.
If you're a trained officer, if that's
the conclusion that they make, they can
come in and arrest you. If they lose
you, then they start to make mistakes.
And when a surveillance team starts to
make mistakes, it means that they might
stumble across you. They might have two
different surveillance people find you
at the same time. And for for them,
that's a scary thing because for them,
they're trying not to be identified.
They're trying to be discreet. They're
trying to not be seen. So, when they in
this case in in the story that that we
share in Shadow Cell, when the
surveillance team broke into a
starburst, a starburst means they went
they broke ranks to try to find me in
the arcade. When they broke ranks to try
to find me, they presented themselves to
me in the arcade face-to-face. And it
was in that moment that I realized
they know that I see them
and I know that they see me
and
this is bad. You locked eyes with them.
Which you're never supposed to do.
You're never supposed to do. You're
never supposed to lock eyes with your
surveillance.
You're never supposed to lock eyes with
anybody who's a threat, ever.
Because that's threatening behavior,
right? That's one of the reasons that
people share strong eye contact with
peers is to show is a show of trust.
Well, whenever you're locking eyes with
somebody who's a threat, it's a it's a
sign of aggression or dominance. So,
whenever you're being surveilled, you
never want to make eye contact with your
surveillance team because your
surveillance team will see that eye
contact as a threat. When you say you
sort of bumped into them in that arcade,
what's the distance?
3 ft. 3 ft.
And and how long did you lock eyes with
each other? It felt like an eternity. In
reality, it was probably 2 and 1/2
seconds.
I mean two and a half seconds is a long
time.
>> Especially when you're trying not to be
seen. So, recreate that moment for me.
You're in the arcade pretending you're
playing with games, you turn a corner
It's horrible, man. It's a horrible It's
a horrible story. I'm I'm in the arcade.
I I'm I again, I think I'm doing
everything right. I'm like, "Oh, I'm in
the arcade. They watched me come in.
This gives They're probably taking a
smoke break outside. They've got nothing
to worry about." And I'm kind of going
from game to game and spending whatever
credits that I bought in the arcade. And
then I go to this
dinosaur hunting shooting game, right?
Almost like Big Buck Hunter or like
Jurassic Park. And I pick up a rifle
and I'm shooting at dinosaurs.
And I'm just killing time.
And then
the [ __ ] surveillance comes around
the back of the machine looking for me.
He comes around the back of the machine
and he sees me. And I'm holding a
[ __ ] gun. And I look at him and he
looks at me.
And that's that's when our two and a
half seconds happened. And I'm sitting
there and I'm like, "What just happened?
Why is Why did I just see bomber jacket
come around my video game console and
stare at me in the face?" And that's
when I kind of realized, "Oh my gosh,
like the team is in panic. I can see
multiple people in the team. They lost
me. They're trying to find me. Bomber
jacket just found me."
What did bomber jacket do when he looked
at you? His jaw dropped. He went slack.
Like he looked at me and he knew that he
had [ __ ] up, too.
And I looked at him and in my mind's
eye, I was just hoping that I didn't
look as stupid as he looked.
In that moment
is it true to say that you should have
just looked back at the dinosaur game as
fast as you possibly could? What I
should have done is I should have seen a
person come around the corner and just
kind of stayed in the game. That's what
anybody else would have done. Anybody
else would have just stayed in the game.
They're They're focused on the game.
They don't even realize there are people
walking around, right? But the fact that
I identified I saw him and then looked
at him and the fact that he saw me and
looked at me as two professionals on
opposite sides of the of the playing
field, we both made the same mistake. We
both made the mistake of showing our
recognition to our intended target.
And before we continue, you as far as
your alias was in that country, you were
called Alex Hernandez, right?
>> Correct.
>> And you were running a business called
Acme Commercial? Correct.
What was Acme Commercial supposed to be
doing as a company?
Acme Commercial was a company that was
built to source new disposable goods
from foreign countries for
uh for uh transport and distribution
across Western countries. And the
intelligence services build
a lot of fake businesses, you said.
>> Yes.
Yes, it's a it's
the easier it is to build a business,
the easier it is to collect information.
So, what we've discovered is that just
as anybody with $127 in their pocket can
create an LLC,
that's about how much money it takes to
start an intelligence operation. So, is
that um the CIA operates numerous fake
companies?
The The CIA also operates numerous real
companies, too.
Not just the CIA. I mean, every intel
organization
has commercial fronts. Every intel
organization. The CIA operates real
companies.
What does that mean? There are There are
real companies out there owned and
operated by CIA. In-Q-Tel is one of
those companies. It's a investment
vehicle where CIA invests money and
invests in new technology, and all the
technology that goes through In-Q-Tel
knows that it's going through the CIA.
Okay, that that's a that's that's public
though, right? But the
the ones that aren't public, so the CIA
will create a company
and then they will use that company to
pretend to be doing something in a
foreign foreign land, basically. But the
primary mission is intelligence. This is
one of the most fascinating things, not
only about CIA, but about all of your
first world intelligence organizations.
You've heard of what's known as the
black budget.
The The budget is the budget of
of um discretionary money that can be
spent on military and intelligence
operations that isn't tied to the
taxpayer.
So, it's a giant pot of money that isn't
tied to tax money. So, where does that
money come from?
Part of that money comes from anytime
law enforcement or intelligence agencies
seize assets. We seize cryptocurrency,
we seize drugs, we seize child
pornography, right? When we seize that
money
and we use it for other operations,
that's part of the black budget. The
other part of the black budget is when
an intelligence organization creates a
business and that business turns a
profit.
When that business turns a profit, where
does the profit go? It can't go to the
case officer, that person's being paid
on the US payroll. So, all that profit
goes into the black budget. Do you think
the CIA has some big profitable
businesses that it set up as fronts that
just like went really, really well? I
know it does. Really? I know it does.
The The CIA has businesses that it set
up that have gone wildly CIA also has
officers that built these businesses
that then were like, "Why the [ __ ] am I
at CIA?" And then they leave CIA and
they go on to run businesses instead.
I mean, a a couple of things popped into
my head as you said that. The first was
there's obviously a huge conversation at
the moment around TikTok
because TikTok was started in China,
it's become this massive sort of global
success
and I can't think of a better
company to have started than a platform
like TikTok where everybody's putting
their information and data in and it's
tracking your location. So, what what is
your perspective on something like
TikTok? Do you think TikTok's was
started as
a tool to spy? I don't believe TikTok
individually was started as a tool to
spy. I believe that what happened is
TikTok became wildly popular and the
government in China realized, "Hey,
everything in China belongs to the
government anyways. We can step in and
take advantage of this." That is also a
way that CIA and MI6 do business as
well. When a company does very well and
there's an intelligence benefit, they
will approach the company.
In a democracy, they can't force the
company to cooperate, but in a country
like China, they can. So, do you think
the social networks, a lot of the big
social networks, have been approached by
the CIA or the MI6 and asked to give
the information to them?
>> I would go a step further and say that
they've all been approached and that the
vast majority of them cooperate.
Is that a concern for the average
person? Not for the For the average
person, that's a benefit. The average
person is not being targeted, I promise
you. Like there's zero interest in for
the federal government and for the
intelligence community, there is
absolutely zero interest in the average
person.
>> who's cheating on their spouse or
avoiding $5,000 in taxes or who isn't
paying their parking bills, nobody cares
The federal government doesn't care
about that.
>> Well, you were doing some of that
targeting, right? Right.
>> So, did you ever work with any existing
company to give you information?
So, all of my data, depending on what
country I was working on, had different
sources. And some Some countries had
more sources than others, but they're
all sources I can't disclose, but
there's tons and tons of data that would
come in to me and then I had I worked on
a number of cases where I had to get
FISA requests. What's a FISA request?
>> request is when you want to
um collect information or take
information from somebody who is an
American citizen. And I just want to
remind people that American citizen,
most people who complain about, "Oh,
they're targeting American citizens."
are thinking about themselves. They're
looking at themselves in the mirror and
thinking, "Oh, they're targeting
American citizens." They're not thinking
about the Chinese person who just came
over or naturalized. They're not
thinking about the, you know, Iranian
who's been here for a long time and
naturalized, right? Like all of those
They're not thinking about, you know,
the the al-Qaeda member Yeah.
>> who claimed to be a refugee to get here
to get some sort of green card. Right.
So,
American citizenship, a lot of people
have that. And some of those people are
doing bad things. And some of those
people are adversaries
who have infiltrated the United States
and are here to gather intelligence to
get to the our adversaries, you know, or
are here to do bad things within the
country. And so, we have to get FISA
requests to get the data on them. And
what does that mean in in reality, a
FISA request? Does that mean that you
can go into their phone? It means that
you have proven
a link from that person to something
bad.
And you've given the you've given the
court enough evidence to say, "Hey,
look, this person's doing something bad
and we need to gather more data on
them." So, it just opens the kind of
data that you can get on that person.
>> What kind of data is that? You can get
on their phone. You can get into their
computer. You can get into their private
Google accounts. You can get into their
private Apple accounts. You can get
>> you can get access to. You can now use
it
to target them. So, you could get access
to their private Google accounts, their
private Apple accounts without their
passwords.
You would hack their passwords or steal
their passwords or Google retains their
passwords.
And Google would give it you the
password? It For many, many For most
cases, if it comes down to national
security, American companies will share
details. And that's what a FISA request
does is it's a judicial claim. It's a
judicial warrant, essentially, to say,
"You will let this service onto that
person's account." You You guys must
think that people like me live in
a certain state of uh
naivety and ignorance as to what's
actually going on. I wouldn't say it's
ignorance or naivety. I would say that
it's it's conditioned into you. You're
conditioned to believe that you have
privacy. So, the reality that we should
realize is that we we don't have
privacy.
It's not real. Privacy's not real.
No.
I mean,
you know, there's a level. Like
>> In in your when you get undressed in a
dark room
like that's yours? Usually, no one's
watching.
>> There's a good chance that you're not
being watched by the federal government.
If you're getting
There's a good chance.
You know, if you're sending, you know,
dirty emails to your girlfriend, that's
essentially I mean, it's private on the
surface.
>> Yeah. But not really forever private.
Somebody could access those. If you
write her dirty notes, that's way more
private
>> Especially if she crumples them up and
burns them. Burns them.
Like people just I think people take put
too much confidence
in technology and feel too confident in
the privacy of technology because
technology there's really nothing
private about it. To an extent, yes, but
if you think that nobody can ever look
at your stuff, that's wrong. Do you
think the CIA knew you were coming here
today?
I think the CIA knew we were coming on
Diary of a CEO, and I think they knew
that we were going to talk to you about
our book. How do you think they knew
that? Because we know that CIA, as well
as other intelligence services, as an
example, the United Arab Emirates, we
know that they have a dedicated person
that sits in their office that watches
us.
So, how would they know you were coming
here today?
Our emails, I mean, our emails, our
publisher's emails,
um our own text messages back and forth,
listening in on phone calls, any number
of things could have happened. Uh like
we've tried to have a very collaborative
relationship with CIA about this book
because we know how scared they are. We
know how nervous this book makes them.
So, we're trying to be extra
collaborative to let to give them peace
of mind like, "Hey, we're not about to
go out there and tell the world that
you're a bunch of animals and and
terrible anything." Um they've actually
read the book multiple times and and
still they're they're afraid that we're
going to somehow
like make them look bad because so many
of their officers have come out to
become authors
who
who make CIA look bad.
There was a couple of other things that
we aren't going to get back to the
arcade and what happened next, but
there's a couple of other things that
sprung to mind when you talked about how
people can make real businesses, fake
businesses, have various different
covers. The The next one was you
mentioned Edward Snowden earlier.
And in mentioning Edward Snowden, you
used him as an example of someone who
returns to the country that they were
working for the whole time.
So,
with Snowden in the Snowden case in in
specific, right? Whenever somebody flees
their own home country, Yeah.
nobody gives them
protection for free. Even in the United
States, we don't give anybody protection
for free. You have to earn it. You have
to share some sort of currency. And that
currency may not be cash dollars. That
currency might be information.
So, when Snowden leaked to The Guardian,
the
operations at NSA that were collecting
against American citizens, the same
American citizens that G he was just
talking about, right? Nobody cares about
Joe Bob. Everybody cares about, you
know, the person who's pretending to be
an American citizen, but is in fact a
terrorist threat.
When Snowden made his escape, his when
he fled the United States, he was
essentially trading classified
information, not just the the details of
the NSA case that he whistle blew, but
other confidential information that he
collected specifically as currency to
help him basically pay his way through
Hong Kong and into China or into into
Russia.
And so, he lives in Russia now? He's a
Russian citizen. I'm pretty sure he's
also received a Russian award for
heroism.
And you think he gave secrets to Russia
about the United States to to get that?
>> almost guarantee you, yeah. What he
gave, I don't know, but Russia wouldn't
give him that status unless he had given
them something in return.
And the other one who sprung to mind as
real business, fake, you know, real
business, become successful
is the
man on everyone's lips at the moment,
Jeffrey Epstein. Mhm.
So, Epstein's a fascinating case because
Epstein fits all of the primary
pillars of a foreign intelligence asset
collecting information on American
citizens.
Not an American spy
working for someone else. It's funny
because people keep thinking like CIA
killed him or people keep thinking that
he somehow worked for CIA or maybe even
worked for for Mossad.
What I see is the opposite, that he, if
anything, was working independently,
maybe even working for several company
or several countries, but collecting
information on US people.
Is that what you believe?
I think that he could have been that. I
don't know that I necessarily believe
that it's true.
Cuz he's a very successful business
person. He had lots of um successful
friends. Actually, I was interviewing
someone the other day and they said that
they met Jeffrey Epstein and Jeffrey
Epstein was really, really interested in
their physics and science discoveries
and wasn't interested at all in the
financier stuff that he was pretending
to or he was purporting to be involved
in and um this person said to me, it was
just really bizarre because he was only
interested in the the physics and
science discoveries we had at Harvard.
He wasn't particularly interested in
finance to me. And that person was was
like really shocked by that.
What I've learned working with wealthy
people and successful people is that
they're often very intelligent and
they're often misunderstood.
And part of the reason that they have
grown as successful as they have grown
is because they don't really fit in
anywhere else. If they would have fit in
somewhere else, they would have been
distracted by the area where they fit
in. Instead, they had to carve their own
interest, their own passions, their own
their own drive.
In many ways, when I look at Epstein,
that's that's what I see. I've also
worked with many wealthy people who have
gone to jail.
And when wealthy people go to jail
their whole identity crumbles and they
start to doubt themselves and they start
to have these irrational thoughts that
sound totally rational to them. I had a
client who was very wealthy, who was
going to jail after being found guilty
of a crime that that
arguably couldn't be proven, but the
court system was set up in such a way
that he was found guilty and he
literally thought that it would be
better if he if he cut off all ties to
his kids and just went to jail and then
even when he got out of jail and never
talked to his kids again.
Because that would be better than
shaming his children for the rest of
their life
>> Yeah. with the father who went to jail.
So, there's when I think about the
Epstein case and I think about a wealthy
powerful man who was having parties with
the world's elite and then he goes to
jail and he kills himself.
To me, that's not
an unbelievable series of events.
The whole thing with the island and the
underage sex and all this stuff and if
people just can't seem to shake the idea
that he wasn't extracting information
and then the fact that they won't
release the flight logs Mhm. or a a list
of the names of people that were
frequenting his
island or interacting with him also
raises another question mark about why
wouldn't the US government release that?
Why isn't Trump very quick to release
that information? There are lots of
secrets that are kept for lots of
reasons.
And when we talk about like if there's
anything that we've learned, need to
know,
the the need part is the driving part.
What is the need to know? There's plenty
of secrets the government has that it
tells the American people it doesn't
know.
It's just lying.
Of course it knows, but it's working the
common good to say, "If you knew what we
knew,
it could cause panic, it could cause
chaos, it could cause any number of
things." And in the United States, that
is one of the rights and privileges that
the federal government has. So, what do
you both think happened with the Jeffrey
Epstein situation? Cuz it smells fishy
to everybody. The fact that, you know,
Trump and uh Kash Patel and various
other White House officials were saying,
"We're going to release it the minute we
get in there." And then they get in
there and they say, "There's nothing to
release."
Mhm.
You You must cuz you understand this
much more than I would. You must see
like fingerprints of
what you think is actually going on
there or the real reasons they wouldn't
release it.
When I look at it through a lens of
probabilities,
the most probable
outcome is that somebody in the prison
was hired to hurt Jeffrey Epstein.
That's the most probable outcome. That
somebody outside was watching the
Epstein case and knew that Epstein may
or may not have compromising information
on them. And that wealthy,
well-connected person
paid to have a hit inside the prison.
That's just the To me, that's the most
probable result of things happening.
That explains the missing evidence, that
explains the videotapes, that explains
the stories inside the prison where
nobody can see what's going on. Also,
that's the most vulnerable place
for Epstein to have been neutralized.
That's how we would have run an
operation. But what Why wouldn't the
government release that? Why wouldn't
they say a prisoner killed killed him?
The government may not know that. Cuz if
a If a prisoner was paid to do it, they
may have covered their tracks well
enough. Or they may have paid a prisoner
and the guards to also cover the thing
up.
Jail's a nasty place. People forget how
nasty a place jail is. And jails are
commercial. They're not federal, for the
most part. So, it's a commercial
business that has all sorts of plausible
deniability that a federal business or
federal organization, federal building
doesn't have. So, that's To me, that's
the most probable series of events.
There's still a chance that any number
of the other conspiracies are true. But
when I think of what what I've seen,
what my clients have seen, what what I
would do if I was
in the shoes of a foreign adversary or a
foreign intelligence collection
operation dealing with a Jeffrey Epstein
type of situation,
that's how we would clean it up.
There was a a a press conference the
other day where the reporters asked the
Trump administration, "Does the
Department of Justice have any
indication that Jeffrey Epstein was
working with the US or a foreign
intelligence agency?
Or was he a spy of some kind?" And Pam
Bondi,
um
who works in the Trump administration
said,
"To him being an agent, I have no
knowledge about that. We can get back to
you on that." Two really important
things here.
If they did have information on that in
an active investigation, she would say,
"I have no knowledge on that."
She would lie to the American public.
That's what That's what you have to do
if you're trying to build a current
case. Because if they acknowledge, we
actually we have some reason to believe
that he might have been an agent. Now,
all of a sudden, everybody else out
there would start destroying evidence
and start hiding evidence and start and
start making the case much more
difficult. So, if they knew, they would
say they don't know. Do you think he was
an agent? I think he could have been. I
think he fits the model of a very good
reporting asset,
but I don't have enough evidence to say
that he was actually one. Do you think
he was?
I mean,
I think even if he was I don't know that
it matters is what I think. Like even if
he was, that doesn't mean that it's
connected because he was a lot of
things. So,
I I think
I think people are focused on it because
it's interesting because it would be
interesting if he was and it would be
interesting if there was this
conspiracy. I think that's why people
are focused on it, but I don't know that
it really matters because on the grand
scheme of things,
I mean, it could be a lot of things that
led, you know. Why are we talking about
a dead guy who's not reporting?
I think it's just the allure, right?
People want answers. Once the curiosity
gap's open, people need to fill it with
something.
>> Correct. When when what the intelligence
community believes is that in any given
moment, there are two penetrations of
every intelligence service.
So, why are we talking about the dead
guy that we don't know about when we're
not talking about the dozens of arrests
and cases that are made every year of
active moles, active penetrations that
are inside of our intelligence
community.
Every single one of you watching this
right now has something to offer,
whether it's knowledge, or skills, or
experience. And that means you have
value. Stand Store, the platform I
co-own, who are one of the sponsors of
this podcast, turns your knowledge into
a business through one single click. You
can sell digital products, coaching,
communities, and you don't need any
coding experience, either. Just the
drive to start. This is a business I
really believe in. And already $300
has been earned by creators, coaches,
and entrepreneurs just like you have the
potential to be on Stand Store. These
are people who didn't wait, who heard me
saying things like this, and instead of
procrastinating started building, then
launched something, and now they're
getting paid to do it. Stand is
incredibly simple and incredibly easy,
and you can link it with a Shopify store
that you're already using if you want
to. I'm on it, and so is my girlfriend,
and many of my team. So, if you want to
join, start by launching your own
business with a free 30-day trial. Visit
stevenbartlett.stand.store
and get yours set up within minutes.
So, take me back to the arcade. You You
lock eyes with this guy, the guy wearing
the What was he wearing?
>> jacket.
>> The bomber jacket.
What happens next? Once I realized that
we had both made the same mistake,
he darted off in one direction, and I
felt burned. Burned is the term that we
use whenever we are
spotted, identified as trained
intelligence officers.
Um but I didn't want to act on being
burned right away cuz our training says
that just just because you believe
something to be true, you can't act on
that truth. If you act on that truth,
then you're verifying to anybody
observing that you already know you
screwed up. So, I kind of
ambled around the arcade and played
another couple of games kind of
half-handed, half-hearted just to kill
some time before I left and finished my
SDR route, and finished my collection,
and went back to my back to my hotel for
the night. The whole process that I go
through during the surveillance
detection route, the whole process that
I go through to evacuate the country
safely is all part of the details that
we put inside Shadow Cell. But, the
feeling
that predominated that that dominated my
thought process was just this feeling of
failure. This feeling like
I was I was a bad spy. I'm bad at what I
do, bad at what I collect. When I think
I'm good, I'm not good. It was just this
humiliating and humbling experience. And
it wasn't helped as I went through the
process of writing the book. Cuz as
when you write a book, it's cathartic in
a way cuz it gets all this stuff out.
But, it's also this black and white kind
of stark reminder of all the things that
you've done wrong. What did you do
wrong?
Whatever I did that got caught was
wrong.
If they caught me on my own behaviors,
if the mole was the one that identified
me to them, then
I lost the ability to operate inside of
Falcon on that day.
I could no longer support the rest of
the Shadow Cell. I could no longer
support my team. I had a a role to play,
and I couldn't play that role anymore.
And
I think that's especially powerful to me
because
I mean, I'm not a case officer. I was
supposed to be a case officer.
But, I'm not because when CIA assessed
me for that job, they determined that I
wouldn't be good enough.
Okay, so you already had an insecurity
there. And that was the first year at
CIA. So, even though I built this career
and I had a chance to carry out this
operation, I got to do these amazing
things, all that plays out in the back
of my head is I wasn't good enough then.
I'm not good enough now. And one of the
things that the CIA does is they teach
you how to deal with head trash. Mhm.
What is head trash?
It's funny, actually. So, head trash is
all the terrible things that you say
about yourself in your head. That's the
the colloquial term that we use is head
trash. I'm not good enough. I'm ugly.
I'm fat. I wish my smile was better. Um,
you know, my I lost my true love when I
was 14. Whatever, right? My my parents
didn't love me because I wasn't a good
enough kid. Whatever it was. All those
things are head trash. They're they're
subjective
thoughts that you have because of your
experience that don't have any basis in
objective reality.
CIA teaches us how to deal with that to
a point. They teach us how to counter
that when we are operationally active so
that we don't get distracted by the head
trash going on. This is what happened
whenever I first knew I was under
surveillance.
They teach you how to handle stress,
mitigate uh
um cortisol levels in your bloodstream,
lower your heart rate so that you can
get back to the task at hand. How do
they do that?
Techniques like box breathing.
>> What's that? Uh box breathing is a
process that that's common in anxiety as
well.
>> Yeah, breathe in for four counts, hold
for four counts, breathe out for four
counts, breathe in for you know, just uh
It's breathing the various breathing
techniques where you breathe in for a
certain amount of time, you hold it for
a certain amount of time, you release it
for a certain amount of time. And and
the goal there is to reduce your heart
rate, to reduce your blood flow, to
reduce the speed at which the cortisol
that's being released from your brain
gets spread to the rest of your body.
So, you can start to take back your
physiological
movements and actions in a hope that it
also brings back your cognitive
functions and capabilities. So,
the visualization process, just like
when you're meditating and you visualize
a victory if you're a professional
athlete, if you visualize a beach if
you're stressing out at work. Like you
can visualize your way through an
operation, an operational sequence to
get yourself back to a place where
you're in control. So, they teach us how
to deal with that head trash, but what's
really interesting is CIA
relies on loyalty
in its people to keep them at CIA.
Because the worst thing for CIA is for a
CIA to realize how capable they actually
are.
Because when that officer realizes how
smart, how capable, how resilient, how
resourceful they really are, that person
can leave CIA and go do amazing things.
So, a big part of what CIA does is they
they train you to be operationally
useful,
but then they still condition you to be
like loyal and needy of outside
validation, specifically from them. So,
it's a very strange flywheel that
exists.
A lot of businesses are like that as
well.
It's not a healthy relationship, but
it's a very effective relationship.
So, you get back to your hotel. Are you
not at that point when you're back at
your hotel thinking, right, I'm going to
find like how to get through like the
restaurant kitchen door and like out the
back and I'll cycle back to
the front cuz I'd be up all night
thinking about going through that bloody
like restaurant kitchen. A big part of
that is what you do in the second phase
of your SDR. And I had those thoughts. I
thought about I could get on a
motorcycle, I could ride to a local
airfield, I could pay in cash for that
airfield person, like a little private
pilot to just fly me on a puddle hopper
puddle jumper somewhere where I walk
across on foot and then I can make a
phone call from another place. Like I
thought about all that all that [ __ ]
right?
The problem is
if you actually act on that and you're
being watched,
what sense does that make? The only
person who would do that kind of crazy
[ __ ] is somebody who's trying to escape
the country. So, what did you do?
I went back to the hotel. My plan was to
was to literally just leave. Was to walk
across the border like any other
law-abiding citizen and just evacuate.
Walk across the border?
Fly. I
to to leave like anybody else would
leave and just gamble that they're not
going to take me down. Right? The gam-
just gamble that I'm going to be more
boring than they will be confident and
that before they arrest Alex Hernandez
and make some sort of public
international incident,
they're going to think twice and they're
going to let me just leave.
What actually happened?
So, what actually happened is um I get
back to the hotel. I don't really sleep
at all. I try to use sleep techniques to
get me to sleep because I am certain
that at any given time someone's going
to burst through the door and just take
me down because they already know I'm
changing my flight. They already know
I'm I'm updating my itinerary. I've made
all the phone calls. I've worked it
through my company, right? My cover
company to get me home early. So,
I'm just waiting for someone to break
in. They never break in. I go to the
airport the next day and uh on the path
to the airport, I'm looking for
surveillance and I'm surveillance free.
And I get to the airport first thing in
the morning and I'm waiting and and like
every step I'm waiting for someone to
jump out of the dark shadows and take me
down and drag me off to prison.
And it just doesn't happen until I get
to the first entry point for the
airport, I show my passport, I show my
ticket, and then they move me into
secondary.
Secondary meaning where you try to leave
a country and the border patrol says
that you're not you can't leave through
the main gate. You have to go through a
second round of interview. So, they pull
me off into a secondary room and I go
through a light interrogation with two
local Falcon officers
at like 7:00 in the morning, first first
flight out, and and they're testing my
story and they're interrogating me to
understand what have I been doing in the
country, why did I change my flight.
They're going
through my my cover story. They're going
through my my uh meetings from the day
before. They're going through everything
two and three times, which is an it's an
interrogation technique to see if
somebody's lying. And I'm sitting there
going through this whole process
watching what almost feels like
like two untrained border patrol agents
trying to crack me. And it's uh it was a
funny feeling because
they were so bad at their job that it
made me feel confident in myself again.
Are you trained on how to deal with
those situations in terms of body
language and how you speak and
Absolutely. CIA trains us on how to deal
with uh interviews, how to deal with
interrogations, and even how to deal
with uh actual
um capture and and strategic almost like
enhanced interrogation, like what you
would call what we do call torture here
in the United States.
>> And so you from your training, what were
you implementing at that moment in time?
Mirroring is a big piece of what you're
supposed to do in an interrogation. So
So you want to you want to reflect back
to the interrogator what they expect to
see in a person of innocence. So you try
to keep your you keep yourself from
jittering, you you calm your nerves, you
try to match their curiosity. So if they
lean forward, you actually want to lean
forward, too. And if they lean back, you
want to lean back. And if they're using
their hands to talk, you want to use
your hands to talk. Because you want to
show them that you and them are the
same, that you're not better or worse or
guilty or anything else. So mirroring is
one of the techniques that we're using.
We also I also used minimum information.
There's a process called elicitation.
And you use different elicitation
techniques to get individuals to share
more information than they're supposed
to share.
One of those elicitation techniques is
silence.
So often times if you want someone to
speak, all you have to do is sit there
and be quiet because it will force them
to talk.
This is something that many interviewers
use, especially when they're Border
Patrol agents or when they're fit like
law enforcement or local law
enforcement. They'll just let somebody
kind of admit their guilt. So I'm for
me, they ask a question, I answer their
question, and then we sit there in
silence for as long as we need to sit
there until they ask their next
question, and then we sit there and and
I answer their question, we sit there in
silence again. And that's combating
elicitation is a technique that we call
counter elicitation. And that's just one
of several elicitation techniques that
interviewers can use. And that's useful
in everyday life, I guess, as well.
>> Absolutely.
In what context?
When you're dealing with a negotiation,
when you're dealing with a hostile
employee, when you're dealing with a
hard conversation, when you're trying to
find information in a in another person
who you think is holding information
back, elicitation techniques are
incredibly valuable. You can ask them a
question, you can ask them the same
question twice, that'll help you
identify whether or not they're lying.
If there's a gap in their two answers or
if they answer two different ways. And I
mean, I'm sure you've seen it as a you
you One of the things that makes you
such an effective host in your own house
here is that you use elicitation
techniques all the time. You ask
feeling-based questions. How did you
feel about this situation? Uh take me
back to that moment. How would If you
could If you could be king for a day,
what would you do? Right? These are all
very advanced elicitation techniques
because it gets people to express more
than they thought they would share.
So, you were in you're in that room in
that airport, these two very poorly
trained guards trying to get something
out of you. They don't get it out of
you. So, at some point they just let you
go. Correct. So, what ends up happening
is they they're arguing with each other
and I don't know why they're arguing. It
seems like uh from the from the pigeon
words that I can pick up,
one of them's talking about being busy
and not having enough time and this
doesn't make sense, and the other
person's talking about uh we have to do
this, this is required, etc. etc. I
don't actually know what they're saying
to each other, but I see that their
aggression with each other just keeps
going up. Almost like two colleagues who
are fighting, right?
But at the end of the day, they couldn't
hold me without either
releasing me back to my plane or moving
me into a place where they were going to
retain me long-term. So, when faced with
that kind of decision, they released me
back to my plane. And then, the biggest
stress that I had was not running to my
plane because as soon as they let me out
of the secondary interview, all I wanted
to do was like haul ass to my plane, get
on my plane, and feel safe.
But, I had to
continue to show that I was not a
trained officer.
And at this point, Jeheet, are you How
are you feeling back in the friendly
country? So, at this point, I still have
no idea what's happening. Um I
By the time I hear from him, he is in
the the cutout country on his way back.
So, I know he's left me a voicemail, and
I know he's out of Falcon, the enemy
country, which is great. But, I know
he's in that third country. So, I'm
like, okay, he should be on his way
home. But, until then, I mean, all of
this that he was going through, I didn't
find out until he actually returned
home. And then I hear this story, and
I'm like, what the hell?
Like, this is absolutely
like our worst nightmare, like what we
did not want to happen. And so,
immediately, we're like,
you know, we go into action. Like, first
it's like, I'm so happy you're home. And
then the next thing is, how did this
happen? And we just start taking action
into,
you know, investigating like, did we do
something wrong? Like, is there any any
mistake that we could have made? And we
have to research and go back through all
of our own stuff, and, you know, and
then we have to make the assessment of
can Andy ever go back in? You know, was
this really what we think it was, or
you know, is he safe to like, is his
alias safe?
You know, and then we have to make those
calls.
>> your assessment? Did you think he could
go back in? No.
It was too risky.
>> Yeah, we we assessed that Alex Hernandez
was burned. Was burned, yeah.
>> And we assume Alex Hernandez being your
undercover spy name. Correct. Alias,
yeah. The the operating alias that we
used. Uh and we assumed that the cutout
country, the third country that Alex was
traveling through, so anytime Falcon
wanted to track Alex, they would track
him back to that third country. Alex
would even use the Falcon airline to fly
back and forth between the third country
and Falcon. Specifically so that if
Falcon intelligence ever suspected Alex,
they would feel that much more
comfortable knowing that they had flight
manifests on him going back to a third
country.
So, we just assumed from our study that
Alex was fully burned. That that the
mole had come across either Alex's
operational history or the mole had come
across my true name operational history
and tied me to Alex. Whichever one it
was, Alex was burned. But, we also
assessed that everybody else who had
been traveling to Falcon
through the cell was still safe. Mhm.
So, you assessed that your shadow cell,
which was your team in the friendly
country, were all fine. Yeah. But, Alex
Hernandez, which was your alias, was
could no longer be used. Correct. The
And that was how the cell was built. The
cell was built where Alex Hernandez was
the tripwire.
Where the first person to be compromised
would be Alex, and that would be the
forewarning to everybody else so they
could start to turn up their operational
security.
So, does that mean it's it's game over
for you?
For me in Falcon, it's game over. I can
I can never go back. I can never go back
in my true name. I can never go back in
an alias name.
Um all of my biometrics, meaning my
fingerprints, my eye prints, like all of
that is most likely compromised. All of
Alex Hernandez
uh everything that I carried on me, all
the digital platforms that I carried on
me, which were all air-gapped and
isolated to just Alex, all of those
things we have to assume have been
collected and and and um synthesized and
reverse engineered. And you were running
a real fake business, right? It well,
yeah. I was I was a middle manager. I
was a middle manager in the very fake
business. Oh, you're a middle manager.
And that was a business set up by the
CIA.
Okay.
So, is that in part why you both decided
to leave the CIA?
Did Did the shadow cell operation end
at that moment?
After shortly after Andy was
compromised, we found out that we were
pregnant. And we were hoping to be able
to stay on at Wolf to continue because I
could have kept
doing everything exactly the same. Wolf
Wolf being the friendly country?
Exactly. And being in the friendly
country, I could have, you know, done
all my targeting from there, no problem.
And then we could have, you know, Andy
still could have helped, he just
couldn't travel into the enemy country
anymore. But headquarters decided that
we had been so successful, and we were
continuing to be successful by spreading
the cell model to these to the other
locations, that they wanted us to come
home to Washington, D.C. and train
officers, train newer officers back at
headquarters on how the cell model
worked and um the new techniques we had
come up with.
The worst part is
we had a conversation about
what meant more to us, CIA or family.
And without saying it, we were both
landing on CIA. And we start thinking,
how do we not give up CIA to have a
family? So, we approach the agency, and
we tell them,
you know, that we have this idea. If
you'll put us on light duty, just give
us some cush job for like 4 years. We'll
pump out our second baby, we'll get our
first one old enough to go to school,
we'll get our second one old enough for
a nanny, and then you can throw us back
into the fray.
They do that for other officers when
they're not successful officers. But
when you're a successful officer, they
have different plans, and they try to
just push you and push you and push you.
So, they rejected our offer, and they
said, "No, it's a soft duty." And they
put us back, and they told us, you know,
"G he's going to go to this office and
do this very sensitive thing, and you're
going to go do this other very sensitive
thing, and we don't your family's not
our problem." And it was at that moment,
I think, that we both realized
CIA is never going to let us focus on a
family. We're always going to be focused
on the mission. That's what their job
is. That's their number one purpose.
Where if if our number one purpose is to
be parents,
we need to make a change. What did the
Shadow accomplish
in terms of the information or strategic
objectives that it accomplished?
So, the Shadow Cell
really did do what what we started out
you know, what with the mission really
did complete the mission that we started
out to do. And that was to find new
intelligence sources and we were really
successful in doing that. And it
accomplished a secondary goal.
We didn't know the effectiveness that
the Shadow Cell had in ferreting out the
mole until after we had left CIA.
We found out that the mole that we had
been
plagued by was actually arrested by FBI
in I think it was 2019.
Mhm, it was later. So, but the case file
that had identified that mole started
all the way back with our operations.
So, it was successful in ferreting out
the mole. It was successful in building
new intelligence sources inside of
Falcon. It was successful in maintaining
the United States' intelligence
advantage against this adversary at a
time when all of our other operations
were compromised by the mole. I think
what G he's talking about is an
completely unexpected benefit
in that our model
seems to have become the foundation for
a massive restructuring at CIA in 2014,
just 2 years after our cell model, when
I was when I escaped Falcon.
2 years after that, John Brennan, then
director of CIA, rolled out a an entire
reorganization of CIA that was based off
of the same cell model that we had
built.
Was this the mole?
We cannot confirm or deny anything about
the mole. I will say this that if you if
you research the time that that man was
arrested, you'll find two other people
>> Mhm. who were also CIA moles at the same
period of time.
>> of time.
So, the work that you did overseas, um
you believe helped lead to the capture
of this mole?
The work that we did overseas, we
believe helped capture the mole that
that
Falcon House was out to capture. And do
you believe that the mole
leaked secrets to the enemy country that
ended up being the reason why they knew
that you were a spy? That was the
assessment that we reached inside our
own cell, as well as what the
Counterintelligence Center, which is the
covert espionage group that Yih-Yun was
talking about earlier, their conclusion
of the facts was the same. That we did
not make any error in our operations,
there was no no compromise in my
behavior, no compromise in my
operations, no compromise of our systems
or our communication methods, that the
only way that Falcon could have found
out about me was through a leak from the
mole.
How did the mole get caught in the end?
What did they do wrong? It's a great
question. So, um
FBI created a sting operation
based off of the intelligence that we
were able to collect through our
operations that that brought the mole
out. So, FBI created a series of sting
operations where they baited the mole
into coming back onto American
territory. And when the mole stepped
foot on American territory, they had
enough of a legal case that they could
arrest him at the airport and then
prosecute him in a court of law.
And what was discovered about the mole
and the work that they were doing and
how long they were doing it for and what
they were
being paid or given to do to snitch on
the United States?
So, the details that that I know that I
know we can share,
um they were paid hundreds of thousands
of dollars. They were not paid into the
millions, but they were paid hundreds of
thousands of dollars to provide
information on operations, officers,
assets, locations. They were witting,
meaning they knew that they were working
with a foreign intelligence agency. They
didn't believe they were working with a
company, they didn't believe they were
working for a research institute. They
knew they were working with a known
foreign intelligence organization.
Um, and that the original ally who gave
us the information about the mole, that
original ally actually also retained
incriminating data on the behaviors of
that person that were shared with the
with Department of Justice.
And so was this This was an individual
who was in the CIA who was approached by
this enemy country, and the enemy
country said to him, "If you give us
secrets on what the CIA are doing
against us, then we'll give you hundreds
of thousands of dollars." We'll give you
something. We'll give you cash at least
as part of it. We may also give you
other things. Here's the The nasty thing
about espionage is cash is usually only
one of several rewards.
There's also operations where where the
cash is there so that when you're
arrested,
the
your country that arrests you believe
that that's what your motivation was.
While all of your real money is kept in
a separate account that's saved within
the actual currency of the country that
you're serving. So this person, they
were in the CIA
as a mole leaking secrets about the CIA.
They then left at some point. And then
the FBI set up a trap to get them to
come back. Correct. When they left, did
they go to the adversarial country?
We can't confirm those details because
to confirm those details starts to give
more insight into who the mole was.
Okay, but they they managed to cuz I was
thinking I was just wondering if this
the other the enemy countries offered
them like lifetime protection or
something. They do. So your enemy
countries will offer you lifetime
protection, they'll offer you multiple
generations worth of payment. So even if
you're arrested, don't worry, your kids
will be taken care of and their kids
will be taken care of.
Uh, you've got citizenship, like the
case of Edward Snowden who has received
citizenship. Sometimes they offer
uh rewards and common and
accolades in their own home country.
There's a a number of very strange and
compelling
offers that come about from foreign
intelligence services. When you think
about a double agent, when you think
about a spy who turns on their own
country,
it's less about thinking that they're
paid to do it.
Spies aren't motivated usually by money.
We weren't motivated by money.
We're motivated by that that very
unhealthy relationship where you have to
be validated by somebody else.
And that same environment that CIA
creates where all of its internal
officers have to be able to fight their
own head trash, but still seek
validation from within their
organization, that unhealthy
relationship is something that can be
compromised and a foreign intelligence
service can find an intelligence officer
and fill that void for them and validate
for them and say, "You're talented and
you've got promise and you've got
potential and we see it and your own
home service doesn't understand how
important you are and your own home
service doesn't understand how valuable
you are. If you'll help us with this,
we can reward you
with money, we can reward you with
citizenship, we can reward your children
with future residency and with college
and and we can make you a very wealthy
person. All the things that you worked
for that your country would never give
you."
Did the mole admit
that they had been a mole?
I do not believe so. I don't believe so.
>> I also believe that that most espionage
cases, when they actually go to court,
they're not tried under the Espionage
Act. They're tried under some
gentler term, some gentler lesser
offense that is easier to prove, but
also helps the government protect its
reputation against being penetrated.
So, this individual, they left the CIA,
flew to this other country, they came
back, and they tried to rejoin the CIA
to get more information. Well, they
tried to rejoin a federal agency, and
that was that was how the FBI was able
to
to lure them, and how they were also
able to for for an interview. Yeah, for
an interview, and how they were able to
get them on American soil.
Interesting.
So, I do want to share that that your
curiosity right now
is a major issue with CIA, cuz they
already know they already know that very
smart people out there are going to know
that there's a way there must be a way
to reverse engineer
the whole story, who to find out who is
Falcon, or to find out where is Falcon,
to find out where is Wolf, to find out
who is who is the mole, right? And
what's going to be what's fascinating is
that
we
we have put every effort that we can
into the story to make sure that it's
not traceable
because
CIA had several penetrations at the same
time during our tenure at CIA. And
that's both depressing and encouraging
because it's encouraging
in that it shows that what we were doing
was parallel to what many other officers
were doing. We wrote the book Shadow
Cell, but that doesn't mean we were the
only two people that were tapped on the
shoulder to carry out experimental new
operations.
They could have asked five, seven, 12
other people to go carry out new
operations to try to ferret out this
multi-penetration
of CIA at the time.
But, it's also discouraging because
it's one of those areas that keeps these
stories from being shared because CIA
doesn't want the world to know that it
was penetrated by multiple people. It
doesn't want the world to know who those
people were. If it did, it would have
disclosed this long ago.
Well, obviously my research team tried
to figure out who it was.
And the Diary of a CEO research team is
not a team to take lightly, so I'm a
little bit afraid of to hear their
conclusions. Well, based on our own
research,
um we thought that the mole was likely
Jerry Chun Seng Lee, who spied for China
around the time of the book. Jerry began
spying for China after leaving the CIA,
then tried to rejoin the agency, was
allowed to leave the country by the FBI,
and was arrested in 2018 at the airport
when he returned to the USA.
Just like the mole in the book.
But, it also says here Andrew will not
comment
on whether he is actually the mole or
not.
So, there's no point asking you if
that's
if he is the mole.
We are under legal obligation to to
neither confirm neither confirm nor deny
uh the results of your research team,
but also the results of anybody else's
research if they reach out to us and and
ask for confirmation on who this who the
mole may or may not be.
>> Has
being in the CIA changed the way that
you view reality and human beings? Oh,
yeah. In what ways?
>> so. So, I love this question and I
really want you to be honest.
Can you please share with Steve how you
went from your college beliefs to your
post-CIA beliefs?
So, when I worked with refugees,
that was my first big turning point that
humans can be really nasty. Like, I grew
up Buddhist, and so it was always like,
"Humans have the potential to be
amazing." And I agree, that's true. But,
when I worked with refugees, I realized
that humans can be horrible. And you
were you know, I worked with Bosnians
and um
and I worked with uh refugees from
Rwanda, where
you know, their neighbors literally
turned on them. People who they had
grown up with literally the next day
came over with a machete or came over
with a gun and killed their family
members and chased them through forests
or through whatever.
And that can happen anywhere. That was
the first time that I realized that
anytime somebody says that can't happen
here, that's a lie. That can happen
anywhere. None of those people ever
thought "Oh yeah, that could happen
here." None of those people ever thought
that. People always think that can't
happen here. My neighbor would never do
that to me and that's not true. And then
when I worked for CIA, I you know, that
compounded the sense of like the world
behind the scenes is a dangerous place
and you can't fully I sound horrible
saying these things. You can't fully
trust anybody. I mean, the reason I'm
with Andy is because I trust Andy 100%.
But he might be the only person that I
trust everything that comes out of his
mouth.
>> You only trust me like 98%.
>> Well, you know, yeah, but I know I can
get that other 2% out of you, that's
why.
So, you know, you really
like you always have to
understand that people are a combination
of good and bad. And while I wish while
I would like to think that
people would always try to err to the
good, I always have to keep in mind that
people have a bad side to them and they
and there's any set of circumstances
that could trigger that. Do you think
we're in one such moment?
I think we're always in a moment. I
think some part of the world is always
in that moment. What about the United
States? Cuz I know Andy said when we had
the conversation the other day that he
was going to
try and leave the United States before
2026.
>> Well, it's not just me alone leaving.
Yeah. Well, maybe we have different
motivations, I don't know. Are you
staying, GG? Cuz he says he's leaving.
I've been the one who's been pushing to
leave for years.
>> Why? How would you sort of summarize the
situation that the like Western world
and the United States are in right now?
From your perspective, with what you
know.
Are these good times?
Jihi's was born in Venezuela. What was
Venezuela like in the '80s? Oh, it was
nice. It was one of the world's best
economies. It was a thriving democracy.
It was an excellent place. With a large
wealth gap. Jihi's parents
her father we came from a wealthy
family. A wealthy Venezuelan family.
That's how they moved to Japan. It's not
easy to pick up and move a family of
four to Japan or family of three and
then have a child in Japan, right? All
of that wealth
that they had in 1980 when Jihi was born
was gone
in 19 I just a few years later. Yeah, in
'80 '85 maybe.
Five years and Venezuela went from being
one of the most successful thriving
democracies with a strong economy, it
went from that to what it is now.
There is no shaking that reality from
Jihi or from her family.
So, if there's anybody in the United
States right now who is acutely aware of
how fast everything can go sour,
it's my wife and that's why what I
certainly find is this uncompromising
commitment to moving in large part
because you can't wed yourself to any
one system
unless you want to be available to the
detriment of that system.
Yeah, I believe in being mobile.
We rent, we don't buy.
As you might have been able to tell, I'm
absolutely fascinated by the psychology
behind high performing sports teams. I
think it started with my love for Sir
Alex Ferguson as a Manchester United
fan. So, when I was told about a new
Netflix series that covers the rise of
the Dallas Cowboys, it immediately
piqued my interest and this isn't
because I'm mad about American football.
I'm not. I don't even watch it. But I do
know about the Dallas Cowboys and for a
lot of Texans they're much more than a
sports team. I watched this series and
it is absolutely
brilliant. It centers on Jerry Jones, an
oil businessman with no football
background, who bought the Cowboys in
the late '80s and transformed them into
the most valuable sports franchise in
the world. It's all about how one guy
assembled a powerhouse team in the 1990s
made up of legendary players and coaches
and through fearless decision-making led
his team to three Super Bowl victories
and I really enjoyed it and I think you
might, too. Check out America's Team,
The Gambler and His Cowboys, which is
streaming right now only on Netflix. And
they now sponsor this podcast.
I've just invested millions into this
and become a co-owner of the company.
It's a company called Ketone-IQ
and the story is quite interesting. I
started talking about ketosis on this
podcast and the fact that I'm very low
carb, very very low sugar and my body
produces ketones which have made me
incredibly focused, have improved my
endurance, have improved my mood and
have made me more capable at doing what
I do here. And because I was talking
about it on the podcast, a couple of
weeks later these showed up on my desk
in my HQ in London. These little shots
and oh my god, the impact this had on my
ability to articulate myself, on my
focus, on my workouts, on my mood, on
stopping me crashing throughout the day
was so profound that I reached out to
the founders of the company and now I'm
a co-owner of this business. I highly,
highly recommend you look into this. I
highly recommend you look at the science
behind the product. If you want to try
it for yourself, visit ketone.com/steven
for 30% off your subscription order and
you'll also get a free gift with your
second shipment. That's
ketone.com/steven
and I'm so honored that once again a
company I own can sponsor my podcast.
Are there any particular skills
that people who are trying to be
successful in their average life cuz
this is called the Diary of a CEO.
That you learned through your time at
the CIA that you think are most useful
for people to be successful, however you
define that, in their day-to-day lives.
The first thing I want to say is that
our book Shadow Cell talks not
necessarily about awesome spies. It
talks about how we
went back to the basics. We went back to
foundational espionage. What we call at
CIA sticks and bricks.
We gave up all the technology. We gave
up all the fancy satellites. We gave up
all the drones and we went back to build
off of strong foundations. And we didn't
do that because we're smart. We did that
because the terrorist groups that won
the global war on terror
were using bricks and stones and sticks.
And they were winning over an American
Department of Defense that had a $900
billion budget every year.
We spent $8 trillion in the global war
on terror only to evacuate Afghanistan.
All of that happened because they were
using foundational tools that we
couldn't crack. And in the Shadow Cell,
that's all we did. We used foundational
tools that proved to dominate time after
time. And there's so much in everyday
life and there's so much in business
from marketing to sales to budgeting to
hiring practices to, you know, annual
and semi-annual reviews. There's so much
that businesses can take from this basic
idea of never let go of the foundations.
Never let go of your sticks and bricks.
What advice would you give to the
average person?
And generally just generally in their
life, you know, about how to live a good
life based on what you've seen, what you
know now and how you look at the world.
For me, a good life is a life spent
doing the things you want to do, the
things that bring you joy when you have
the age and the energy to do them.
It makes me super sad whenever I meet
people who wait until they're 60s and
they retire to be free, to try and
travel, and and that's when they focus
on learning the guitar, and that's when
they focus on art, and their body just
can't keep up with them. Their body
can't travel like it used to travel.
They have a shake in their hand. They
can't paint anymore. But they they
believed for 30 years that it would be
better when they retire instead of
acting on it right now.
And
for me it's it's all about finding joy
in the moment today. My son is 12. He
plays chess now. He wants to play video
games with me now. He wants to go deep
into details about his favorite manga
comics right now. All of that could be
different in 5 days.
My daughter is 7, doing handstands, and
doing cartwheels, and all she wants is
for Daddy to to give her a a shoulder
massage at night and tell embarrassing
stories about my childhood to her while
she falls asleep. That's what she wants
now. All that could be gone and never
come back in 6 months.
I have to do it now. If I don't do it
now, it'll never happen. I won't be able
to wait until I'm wealthy. I won't be
able to wait until I sell a company. I
won't be able to wait until I retire and
then try to get these moments back now.
So, what can I do? I ask myself every
day, what can I do right now
to maximize the joy that I get right now
because it's not just my joy that's
happening. It's also the joy that I'm
giving to the people who want my time
and space. My wife, my kids, my peers,
my clients. What can I do
to bring joy to myself will bring joy to
others. What is that about to say so
much to you? I can see it in I can see
it in your face. My life is filled with
people who failed to figure that out. My
life is filled with a with a mother who
kept waiting to to do the things that
she wanted to do, and now she still
doesn't get to do it. And grandparents
who retired poor, and family members who
retired poor, and people who died early,
and people who got hurt and can't walk,
and You know I called your mother?
We spoke to your mother. Did you call my
mom? Yeah, and when I asked her this
question, I said to I said to your
mother, I said um what's your
relationship like with Andy?
And she burst into tears. Did she
really? She went on to say how proud she
was of you, but it was telling that she
she burst into tears when she was asked
that particular question.
That's awesome.
I'm I'm glad that you called her. I I I
talked to GiGi about this often because
I don't I never had a relationship with
my father. And my relationship with my
stepfather was very bad. I go into some
of that in the book as well.
And uh
I as an adult
only project
negative assumptions on what they must
have intended because that's what I was
shaped to believe as a child.
I can't
confidently project positive
expectations on them because as a child
I never believed they were doing
anything positively. I believed my mom
was career focused, and I believed that
my mom didn't really want to be a mom. I
believed that my mom didn't really want
to be married to the man she was married
to, and that's what I believed as a kid.
So, now as an adult, that's my
foundation. GiGi's foundation with her
parents is completely different. Like
it's incredible now because
like the the disparity between my
negative thoughts of my youth and GiGi's
positive memories from her youth are
starkly contrasted, and that's why I
want to give my children something like
my what my wife had.
And what's your answer to that, GiGi?
In terms of what you want next.
So,
when I was younger, I was brought up
with this idea of
a destination. So, I did everything I
was supposed to do, got good grades in
school, went to college, went to grad
school, got a career with the federal
government. It was really good. And then
we left CIA.
And I was like, but I had made it. Like
I had I rode that train, I did
everything I was supposed to do, and I
made it. So, what are we doing now? And
it was a really hard transition for me.
But now that, you know, we have the kids
and we have our business,
you know, and I've gone through a lot of
therapy,
you know, I realized that
Andy has been right all along. It really
is
you never know what the next moment is
going to bring, and so you have to enjoy
every moment that you have right now.
You know, don't put off that trip until
next year, do it as soon as you can.
Don't,
you know,
like those dishes don't need to get
washed right now if your kid wants to
read a book with you. Like you can just
put that off for a little bit. Um so,
I've it's taken me a long time, but
Andy and I are now aligned on the like
live every moment with as much joy as
you can because
and to my
other point, like you you never know
when shit's going to hit the fan. So,
enjoy it now because you never know when
you might have to, you know, flee your
house cuz you're, you know, it catches
fire or flee the country because a war
breaks out or, you know,
>> Getting arrested in a foreign country.
Yeah, getting arrested in a foreign
country. And I'm a big believer of
seeing the where the writing on the
wall. I don't think that, you know, my
advice to people is don't be complacent.
Just like Andy said, you know, don't be
complacent in your business, but don't
be complacent in your life, either.
Like when be as before World War II
kicked off, there was tons of writing on
the wall of what was coming.
And people just kept thinking to
themselves, that can't happen here. It
can't get that bad, can it?
>> You trying to tell me something? So, the
writing on the wall for Americans is
that
we are transitioning into something new.
We will never go back to what we were.
And so, you either need to be a part of
creating the new America
>> Mhm. or you need to start thinking about
where else you're going to go.
Because the America we knew before no
longer exists, and it will never come
back.
This is new America now. So, you either
take part in it, or you leave. Okay. So,
what is old America under your
definition?
So,
old America,
you know, and I'm I'm not that old. So,
you know, old America in my lifetime has
been a series of
uh you know, the the government
appearing to work together, you know,
the appearing to do things,
you know, to improve the lives of
people,
but also, I think, becoming complacent
over time. Like, the last several terms
we've had
a strong executive that has slowly
become stronger, which I don't think is
the way that we should be going, but
that's what's happened.
And
a Congress who is constantly in
deadlocks, so nothing is happening. And
so, we continue like I mean, the other
the immigration problem. Why is the
immigration problem a problem? This
could have been fixed decades ago,
honestly. Like, decide what you want for
immigration. Decide what you want your
policy to be, right? And the policy,
clearly, I think most people agree,
isn't open doors. So, if it's not open
doors, what do you want? And then make
that policy happen. So, you know, I
think
I think we've had a history now of an
executive getting stronger. For some
reason, the American people want a
strong man. So, when you say the
executive, you mean the president?
>> yeah. The president's getting more power
to do things? Yes, because
>> For a period of time, it was because
Congress didn't want to make their own
decision, so they pushed the power to
the president. And then, in probably the
last 16 years, we've seen the president
take more power, execute more executive
orders. So, whether you like it or not,
we're in a period now where there's a
strong executive. When anybody gets
power, it's very unlikely they're going
to let it go. So, do you think Trump's
not going to go anywhere? I think the
executive,
Trump is the current executive, whoever
the next executive and the executive
after that, they will continue to retain
their executive powers.
>> Yeah.
It doesn't benefit them to let go of the
office of the executive's powers. So,
GG, if that's the old America where it
got slightly more complacent, there was
more power and
increasingly more power given to the
president,
>> Mhm. you're saying we're in a
transitional moment now.
>> Mhm. What does that new America look
like on the end of that transition in
your view? So, I don't think we have a
good idea of what it's going to look
like. I think the current administration
is taking a lot of risks that I find
interesting.
Interesting is a very
a muted word. What is the real word?
I mean, interesting is the real word
because I think that he's taking a lot
of risks that really break down
how how things have been for a long
time. So, you know, getting rid of you
know, pulling money from Medicaid and
Medicare, getting rid of USAID, you
know, transitioning from soft power to
hard power.
>> Hard power being dropping bombs in Iran.
Yes. Okay. So, we're giving more money
to military and we're taking money away
from you know, aid, basically. So, we're
making that shift. We're making, you
know, various economic shifts,
immigration shifts and I don't think we
I think there's a lot of unnecessary
panic about all of it because
whether I agree with his methods or not,
I think that that we just have to wait
for things to settle out. And
if something doesn't work, you know, I
think he's like the type of guy that's
going to take another risk and see if he
can fix it. Or that if it doesn't work
by the time the next administration
comes in,
they'll have to do something with it.
You know, like there nothing stops.
Everything keeps going. So,
you know, I I don't know that this I
don't know that America is heading for a
future that I want to be a part of. I
think that's for me, I think that's a
true statement.
But, I think there's a lot of Americans
out there who this is the path that they
want to take.
What is your perspective on everything
she he just said? The transition that's
happening right now is a transition
where we where the American people have
to decide how much they want to get
involved and how much they want to let
other people just do it for them.
And Donald Trump is a I'll do it for you
kind of guy.
And Joe Biden was also an I'll do it for
you kind of guy. And Obama was an I'll
do it for you kind of guy. And we are
electing people who will do it for us.
Do what for us?
>> Whatever Whatever nasty thing we don't
want to deal with. Budgeting,
currencies, hard work, foreign trade,
foreign relations, wars. We don't We
want to be able to just talk about it
without having any blood on our hands.
So, we push that responsibility to our
government. When in fact, our founding
fathers were the opposite. Our found Our
founding fathers were, "Hey, the blood
is on all of your hands. You tell us
what you want us to do. Do you want a
revolution?
Then let's go fight a revolution
together. Do you want to build a new
government? Then we'll build a new
government together. That's That's how
our country was supposed to be formed.
So,
when GiGi says that we're in a
transition and she doesn't know where
it's going, she is accurate. We don't
know what the future holds. Except, we
know the future holds more pain, for
sure.
Because we will either come out of this
through a painful transition that makes
us better,
or we will come out of this through a
less painful transition that leaves us
in a position that none of us want to be
in.
And then we're going to have to put in
more pain to fix it all again. And how
do you think the transition
levels out? Where do you think we end up
if you had to guess? I think that we
have a solid 60/40 right now. I think
there's a 60% chance that we don't like
where the transition ends, and then we
spend 15 to 25 years fixing it again.
Fixing our economy, fixing our
superpower status, fixing our foreign
relations, fixing our fixing our trust
of our own government.
I think there's a 40% chance that
the the decisive action Donald Trump is
taking right now
is adopted wide scale, and we actually
stimulate our economy, get people back
on the same page, and and move forward
in a way that keeps us one step ahead of
our of the threats that we see from
China, the disaster that we see
continuing to unfold in the Middle East,
the the precipice that we have come up
against in terms of geopolitics. There's
a chance that we come out of that, but I
think the dominant chance is that we
don't. And I I would say that that's not
just my opinion, that's the
opinion of economists of economists,
that's the opinion of foreign
foreign relation experts. There are
multiple people out there who are all
saying
that our budgetary decisions, our
foreign policy decisions, our military
infrastructure decisions, our economic
decisions are risky. Risky means there's
a chance they'll work, but it's a low
probability chance, not a high
probability chance. In such a scenario
then the economy would would be hurt,
and then there'd be more wars presumably
because if we're if the society becomes
more individualistic and focused on
themselves and nationalistic, then they
become more of an island, people get
more paranoid, they start building an
Trump says building like the he's
calling it the golden dome over the
United States so that he can fire any
rockets out of the air if anyone
attacks.
And then you kind of have to unravel
that and try and go the other way
potentially. Is that kind of what you're
saying? I try to do as much reading as I
can. I'm sure you're the same way. And
one of my gifts to myself is when I read
fiction. And I'm reading a book called
The The Left Hand of Darkness by a
sci-fi legend named Ursula K. Le Guin.
And it's a book from the '70s.
And I'm reading this book, and in it she
has this quote where she talks about
nationalism inside the the world of the
science fiction planet that she's on,
right? And the the quote is something
like, "Nationalism is not a product of
pride, it's a product of fear."
People aren't nationalistic because
they're proud of what they have.
They're nationalistic because they're
afraid that something might take away
what they have.
And anytime you are driven by fear,
you don't have the chance for true
happiness.
And what I found in that
that passage from the sci-fi book was
really very insightful to what I see
happening across the United States.
We're all nationalistic, left and right,
gay and straight, whether you whether
you are old or young, we're all
nationalistic. We all love our country.
But the things that's driving so much of
our nationalism is this fear of the
other side. Not a fear of the collapse
of our society, not the fear of some
rising power across the ocean, but for
some reason we're more afraid of our
neighbor
than we are afraid of the real threats
that are out there. Because at the end
of the day, they're
California and Mississippi have much
more in common
than the United States and China.
But for whatever reason, we get so
distracted and so confused with our own
infighting that we don't realize that
infighting is exactly what all of our
adversaries from Russia to North Korea
to Cuba to even even
uh
you know, Bulgaria, which is a NATO
country that's pro-Russia.
Our infighting just helps them. And and
what's the potential worst-case scenario
of that infighting? Because people think
okay it just means people are going to
pop off at each other on on X and
Twitter and social media and they're
going to scream at each other and then
Gridlock is the biggest challenge. I I
don't believe that we're going to be
going into any kind of civil war in the
United States. We're not going to shoot
each other. We're not going to go
machete our neighbors. Not now, but
gridlock is going to lead to economic
collapse. Economic collapse is going to
lead to very real individuals having
very real problems, which is going to
lead to an increase in criminal
activity. People will steal from each
other. People will steal from from
stores. People will, you know, lie and
hurt each other to try to take care of
their own. And as that society starts to
collapse and we become more and more
tribal again, all very predictable, all
all case studies that we've seen all
over the world, as we become more and
more tribal, then we will become fed
upon by our adversaries who don't have
the same problem. When you said gridlock
is the
the first sort of domino that falls
there, what is gridlock?
I see gridlock as policy gridlock. We
don't know how to move forward with
Israel. We don't know how to move
forward with the budget. We don't know
how to move forward with whether or not
we ratify these election results, right?
And in the in the time that we don't
know how to move forward, it creates an
opportunity for somebody else to bypass
the democratic process and just dictate
the outcome.
And that series of dictations makes it
so that the outcome is less
collaborative, less well thought out,
less well defined, less palatable for
more people, and then that distrust kind
of continues on. We do live in a moment
now where the distrust for government is
higher than it's been in a long time. We
see the we see the largest decline in
American currency that we've seen in
decades and in century in a in the
better part of a century. We see a lack
of public trust. We see consistent
presidential approval ratings below 50
for every president that comes through.
We we are in a place where the people
just don't trust their own government.
And I would say that that's not such a
big deal, except that we are the
wealthiest country in the world. We are
the largest
military in the world. We are the
largest producer of financial tools and
the largest producer of weapons. We are
a big [ __ ] deal
to not have our [ __ ] together.
Welcome to the United States.
Shadow Cell, an insider's account of
America's new spy war.
By Andrew Bustamante and G H Bustamante.
It is a fascinating book because usually
the public doesn't get to read books
like this.
Uh and for the reasons you said, because
they're so highly scrutinized and then
ultimately decided to be confidential by
the CIA, but this one managed to get
through. So, I highly recommend
everybody reads it. We've touched on
some of the surface-level elements of
this, but if you want the details of
what happened, then this is a book good
book to read. But it also just gives you
a window into a world that most of us
live in ignorance to cuz we don't we
don't realize these things happen. It's
actually from doing this podcast that I
that things that I thought were
conspiracy theories
became not conspiracy theories.
You know? Yes. Cuz before I started this
podcast and started to speak to people
like you and other guests that I've had,
I thought that while I was watching
podcasts and thinking that that's
[ __ ] no that's [ __ ] that
doesn't happen. This These are like
spies that that's not going to happen.
There's no way that like one country
spies on another.
There's no way that like, you know,
people go undercover into countries and
get secrets and do all these crazy
things. I thought that was movies.
But actually that happens and all
countries are doing it to each other.
And I imagine even the United States is
doing it to some of their allies. Like I
imagine the United States probably has
spies in the UK,
for example.
The The United States doesn't claim to
spy on the Five Eyes countries and the
Five Eyes have all claimed not to spy on
each other.
um, but that's just a claim.
We have a closing tradition on this
podcast where the last guest leaves a
question for the next guest, not knowing
who they're leaving it for.
And the question left for both of you to
answer individually is, how did a
mistake you made shift the trajectory of
your life in a way you could not have
predicted?
I would say that the mistake I made that
shifted the that truly shifted the
trajectory of my life was staying with
my ex-boyfriend for so long,
um, because
I we'd been together a year
and
I knew it then the relationship was
already troubled
and I was applying to the Peace Corps
right out of college,
but I also knew that
if I joined the Peace Corps and I went
overseas,
the relationship wouldn't survive. And
for some reason, I chose the
relationship over Peace Corps. And
because I chose the relationship over
the Peace Corps, I ended up going to
grad school so I could stay with him.
And then, because I went to grad school
and the relationship drained me of all
of my money,
I ended up applying to the CIA. And if I
hadn't been in that relationship,
I never would have joined the CIA, ever.
I never would have met Andy. I wouldn't
have the kids I have right now. I
wouldn't have the life I have right now.
So,
arguably a mistake to stay in a bad
relationship for 7 years, but I wouldn't
be where I am today without that.
It's hard for me to answer the question
because I I keep finding myself coming
to the same conclusion that Jihi came
to, that all of the mistakes that I
think about
making all led to a sequence of events
that brings me to where I am now.
So,
I'll actually give a more recent example
that is changing the course of my life
right now.
In 2023,
I hired the first executive
I hired the first executive into my
company, the first kind of equal
executive to me as a CEO.
And I hired that person because they
came well recommended. I hired that
person cuz they had a a long track
record of success. I hired that person
because they seemed to understand a lot
of things about business that I didn't
understand and it was time for for me to
scale and it was an important thing to
for me as a CEO to lead the charge by
hiring the right people.
And then in the following 16 months,
that person
lost the company individually
a half a million dollars and then put us
into debt almost another $215,000.
So, a giant $730-ish thousand dollar
mistake in one 16-month period of time.
And throughout that whole time, I I saw
the mistakes. I saw the errors and I
kept convincing myself not to take
action. I kept thinking, this is just
what scaling must look like. This person
must know what they're doing. Like, you
have to spend money to make money. Uh we
have to we have to prepare for the
future. Like, I kept rationalizing every
step. Oh, this was just a
misunderstanding. Oh, this was just a
this was something that will pay off 6
months from now.
And then, you know, that 16 months kind
of ended in March of this year.
And I'm staring at a healthy company
that has zero dollars in its checking
account that's carrying hundreds of
thousands of dollars in debt
and I realized I can't
let somebody else
try to do this cuz nobody cares as much
as I do. I'm the owner. I'm the CEO. The
company was built because of my passion
for the lessons and my passion for the
people that we serve. We are co-owners
of the company together. Jihi believes
in me and she trusts me and I can't
violate that trust by continuing to
think that somebody else can do it
better.
So,
I remove that person from their
position. I radically change the
company, and within 3 months, we are
back into a profitable statement. We are
months away from being able to pay off
all the debt that we had gathered. We'll
never get back the money that we lost in
all the failed investments, but we are
on a trajectory to go in a completely
different direction because I took hold
of my company and made it my company
again instead of thinking that I wasn't
qualified or wasn't capable or wasn't
good enough to be the CEO that built the
company, why wouldn't I be good enough
to be the CEO that grows the company? I
think a lot of young founders can relate
to that. I hear that story so often.
I hear that story all the time.
I've had it for many, many years of the
founder that starts a business and then
basically gets like gaslighted by oh,
this person's an executive. They've done
it for 26 years, so they must know what
they're doing. I'll give them a massive
salary. I'll give them control, and then
they make a set of decisions, which
because you you know, you've not walked
that path before, you're unable to have
high conviction as to whether those
decisions are good, but because they are
so expensive and their decisions are so
expensive, you kind of have to go with
it, and then eventually you realize at
some point that
just because someone has
worked in some interesting places or had
some previous interesting job titles
doesn't equip them for this challenge.
And especially when it's a small but
this is actually the paradox of it as
well. Like the mentality of success in
like big scale businesses is not the
mentality of success in like a
high-growth startup.
You know, where you're like
penny-pinching.
>> Yeah. Thank you so much. I super
enjoyable hearing the story. It was
actually much more
captivating reading your book than I
assumed it would be.
Um and I think that's because of the
level of detail you go into in the book,
which you just wouldn't have come across
before. So, really recommend everybody
goes and read it. And thank you again
for coming back here. And it's It's to
meet you, G He, cuz I've heard about you
before, but putting a face to the name
is is always useful. So, thank you so
much for being here and continue doing
what you're doing because you're opening
our eyes to a world that we would
otherwise not be able to see. So, thank
you both.
>> Thank you, sir.
>> Thank you.
This has always blown my mind a little
bit. 53% of you that listen to the show
regularly haven't yet subscribed to the
show. So, could I ask you for a favor?
If you like the show and you like what
we do here and you want to support us,
the free simple way that you can do just
that is by hitting the subscribe button.
And my commitment to you is if you do
that, then I'll do everything in my
power, me and my team, to make sure that
this show is better for you every single
week. We'll listen to your feedback,
we'll find the guest that you want me to
speak to, and we'll continue to do what
we do. Thank you so much.
Ask follow-up questions or revisit key timestamps.
The video features a conversation with former CIA officers Andrew and Jeehi Bustamante, who discuss their untold story of serving as spies in a dangerous operation to identify a mole within the agency. They explain the complexities of CIA operations, the concept of a 'Shadow Cell' model, and the challenges of maintaining a professional and personal life while under constant threat of being compromised by foreign adversaries.
Videos recently processed by our community