HomeVideos

How To Fix Your Focus & Stop Procrastinating: Johann Hari | E114

Now Playing

How To Fix Your Focus & Stop Procrastinating: Johann Hari | E114

Transcript

3109 segments

0:00

you're not being present in your life

0:01

you're being present at all johan hari

0:04

he's been on a journey to understand

0:06

attention and why we seem to have so

0:09

little of it these days i know

0:11

something's really wrong but i don't

0:12

know what it is

0:14

and that's when i thought are we having

0:15

an attention and focus crisis if we are

0:17

why is it happening and most importantly

0:19

what can we do to get our brains back if

0:21

you've got all these smart engineers and

0:22

they've got one incentive how do i take

0:25

stephen's attention the absolute most i

0:27

can we need an attention movement to

0:29

reclaim our minds if our goal is as a

0:32

country to be a country that's

0:33

innovative my god a country of people

0:35

who can think is going to be innovative

0:36

country of adult people flicking between

0:38

whatsapp snapchat and tick tock ain't

0:41

going to be a place full of innovation

0:42

do you want your child to be able to

0:44

focus do you want your child to be able

0:45

to read books do you want your child to

0:47

be able to think deeply of course you do

0:49

okay we've got to fix the society and

0:51

culture to give them those things and we

0:53

absolutely can change them

0:55

quick one can you do me a favor if

0:57

you're listening to this and hit the

0:58

subscribe button the follow button

1:00

wherever you're listening to this

1:01

podcast thank you so much today

1:04

one of my favorite ever guests on this

1:06

podcast returns

1:08

and they return with a completely

1:10

different conversation for you

1:12

johan hari

1:14

what he wrote about mental health and

1:16

the causes of depression and anxiety and

1:18

meaningful connection

1:20

changed my life it's probably the number

1:22

one book i recommend and you've heard me

1:23

recommend on this podcast the book lost

1:26

connections but over the last several

1:28

years johan's been on a completely

1:30

different journey he's been on a journey

1:33

to understand attention and why we seem

1:36

to have so little of it these days but

1:38

why it's so fundamentally important for

1:40

our happiness our success and everything

1:43

in between we all know we're a

1:45

generation that are glued to our screens

1:48

and our phone

1:49

but what is the cost what is the cost of

1:51

things that actually matter how do we

1:54

change it why should we change it johan

1:56

went on that journey

1:58

the most remarkable entertaining

2:00

hilarious journey and he's unbelievable

2:03

maybe the best ever on this podcast

2:05

storyteller you're gonna absolutely love

2:08

this conversation and

2:10

entertainment aside

2:12

it might just change your life

2:14

so without further ado i'm stephen

2:16

bartlett and this is the diary of a ceo

2:18

i hope nobody's listening but if you are

2:21

then please keep this to yourself

2:24

[Music]

2:30

johan

2:31

first and foremost thank you for coming

2:33

back i it just dawned on me that you

2:34

visited here more than any other guest

2:37

you now have the record as three times

2:39

we've had i mean i'm officially the king

2:40

of your you're the king of my podcast

2:42

and my my first question to you is i

2:44

know how talented you are at writing and

2:46

how

2:47

um you could basically write about

2:50

anything if you wanted to because your

2:51

books have been so successful you're a

2:53

very very well acclaimed um author

2:55

so my first question is

2:57

and this is the question i asked myself

2:59

when i received your book from your

3:01

publisher is why did you decide to write

3:04

about attention when you could have

3:06

spent your life writing about anything

3:09

you know for years i had this feeling

3:12

like when i walked around in my friends

3:14

in myself

3:16

something was going badly wrong with our

3:18

ability to focus and pay attention and

3:19

every now and then i would see small

3:20

studies that seem to suggest this was

3:22

true there's a study of american college

3:24

students that found that now they only

3:27

focus on average on any one thing for 65

3:29

seconds there's a study of office

3:31

workers that found on average now office

3:34

workers only focus on one task for three

3:36

minutes

3:37

but i thought

3:39

people have always felt their attention

3:40

is getting worse right what happens as

3:42

you get older

3:43

you know your attention deteriorates and

3:45

you mistake your own deterioration for

3:47

the deterioration of the world around

3:48

you right you can read stories of monks

3:51

in the middle ages uh letters they wrote

3:52

to each other saying oh my attention

3:54

isn't what it used to be i'm worried

3:55

about this right so i just thought uh

3:57

everyone thinks this and then there was

3:58

a it was a moment that for me i thought

4:02

i do think there's something deeper

4:03

happening here

4:05

when he was nine my godson adam

4:08

developed this brief but really

4:09

freakishly intense obsession with elvis

4:11

i never found out why he must have seen

4:12

him on on youtube or the telly or

4:14

something and he he didn't know

4:16

that like elvis impersonation has become

4:18

this cheesy thing so he did it with this

4:20

totally like heart catching sincerity he

4:22

would sing viva las vegas and suspicious

4:25

minds and and all the kind of elvis

4:27

classics

4:28

and um

4:29

he kept getting me to tell him the story

4:31

of elvis that elvis is born in this

4:33

little town called tupelo in mississippi

4:36

and one of the poorest places in america

4:38

he's born and his twin brother died as

4:42

he was being born and as he was a little

4:44

boy his mother told him that if he

4:46

looked at the moon and he sang his

4:48

little brother could hear him so that's

4:49

why he became one of the reasons he

4:51

became such a great singer so i was

4:53

telling my god son this story and what

4:56

and i

4:57

obviously told him that elvis became

4:58

really famous and bought this palace

5:00

that he called graceland and one day i

5:02

was tucking tucking him in

5:04

and he said to me looked at me very

5:06

intensely and he said johann

5:07

will you take me to graceland one day

5:10

and i said yeah sure in the way you do

5:11

with little children you're just like

5:12

you know they're never gonna forget it

5:14

the next day and he said no do you

5:15

really promise will you take me to

5:17

graceland

5:18

and i said yeah i promise you

5:21

i didn't think about it again for 10

5:22

years until really everything had gone

5:25

wrong

5:26

so by the time adam was 19

5:29

he dropped out of school when he was 15

5:31

and he was

5:33

just spent he seemed to spend just all

5:35

his time alternating between his ipad

5:38

his laptop and his phone

5:40

and he seemed to live in this kind of

5:41

blur

5:42

of whatsapp and youtube and porn

5:46

and

5:46

it was like he had fragmented as a

5:48

person

5:49

it was like he was kind of whirring at

5:51

the speed of snapchat right you couldn't

5:53

have a conversation with him lasted more

5:54

than a few minutes he was very

5:56

intelligent decent not good person

5:59

but it was like nothing could gain any

6:00

friction in his mind and one day we were

6:03

sitting on my sofa

6:06

and i was looking at him doing this and

6:07

i was thinking god in the decade that

6:08

you've become a man

6:10

this has happened to so many people i

6:12

know okay this is the extreme end of the

6:14

spectrum but i could feel it happening

6:15

to myself right

6:17

things that require deep focus like

6:19

reading a book obviously i still do that

6:20

a huge amount but it felt like with

6:22

every year that passed that was more and

6:24

more like running up a down escalator

6:26

right some people can still get to the

6:27

top but and the escalator is getting

6:28

faster right

6:30

and i was looking at him and i thought i

6:31

have to break this routine i can't bear

6:33

to see this happen to him i can't bear

6:35

to feel this happened to myself and i

6:36

suddenly remembered when he'd been a

6:38

little boy and i said you know what

6:39

let's go to graceland

6:41

and he looked at me like what are you

6:42

talking about he didn't even remember

6:44

this elvis obsession and i was like no

6:46

i'll take you to graceland let's go

6:47

let's just leave but i'll take you on

6:49

one condition

6:51

which is that when we go there you leave

6:52

your phone in the hotel when we go out

6:54

right

6:55

because i can't take you there and just

6:57

you be looking at your phone the whole

6:58

time

6:59

so two weeks later we flew we went to

7:01

new orleans first but we left from

7:02

heathrow and we and we we flew out to

7:04

the south and when you arrive at the

7:06

gates of graceland now this is

7:08

pre-covered i imagine it's worse now but

7:10

when you arrive at the gates of

7:11

graceland there isn't a physical guide

7:13

to show you around anymore what happens

7:15

is they give you an ipad

7:16

and you put in uh little uh earphones

7:19

and the ipad shows you around so you

7:21

look at the ipad and it says go left and

7:22

then there's an actor telling you like

7:24

in this room and it explains all these

7:25

things and in each room you're in

7:28

there's like a representation of that

7:29

room on the ipad

7:31

so what happens is people walk around

7:33

graceland staring at their ipad right

7:36

so i'm walking around

7:38

surrounded by this kind of united

7:40

nations of blank-faced people from like

7:41

korea and canada and everywhere else and

7:44

no one is looking at the thing they've

7:46

traveled

7:47

to see right

7:48

and i'm getting more and more like tense

7:50

as i'm watching this and i'm trying to

7:52

make eye contact with someone to go like

7:53

oh you know

7:55

someone i'm waiting for someone else to

7:56

look up and go look we're the people who

7:57

traveled 3000 miles and actually looked

7:59

at the thing we traveled to

8:01

and finally i did make eye contact with

8:02

a guy and i smiled and i was about to

8:04

say exactly what i just said and then i

8:06

realized he'd only taken the earphones

8:08

out and put down the ipad so he could

8:10

take out his phone and take a selfie

8:12

and i was feeling more and more tense

8:14

and finally we got to the jungle room

8:16

which was elvis favorite room in

8:17

graceland it's just a kind of fake

8:20

jungle with loads of fake plants

8:22

and there's this couple next to me

8:25

and the man turned to his wife and said

8:27

honey look this is amazing

8:29

if you swipe left you can see the jungle

8:31

room to the left and if you swipe right

8:33

you can see the jungle room to the right

8:35

she goes oh wow and so she's swiping

8:37

left and right on her ipad and i look at

8:39

this guy and i said

8:40

right but sir there's an old-fashioned

8:42

form of swiping you can do

8:44

it's called turning your head because

8:46

we're actually in the jungle room right

8:48

you don't need to look at a digital

8:49

representation of it we're literally

8:51

here look it's in front of you and of

8:53

course this couple thought i was insane

8:55

not possibly not unreasonably and they

8:58

they walked off

8:59

and i turned to my godson to kind of

9:01

bond with him and laugh about isn't this

9:02

mad and he was just standing in a corner

9:05

looking at snapchat from because the

9:06

minute we le we landed he just was on

9:10

his phone constantly i remember when i

9:12

said to him i thought you said you

9:13

weren't going to use your phone he said

9:15

oh i thought you meant i won't take

9:16

phone calls i can't not use social media

9:18

right and it was he said it was a kind

9:20

of baffled sincerity as if i was asking

9:23

him to hold his breath or something i

9:25

got really angry and i said to him you

9:27

know you're frightened of missing out

9:29

but what this is doing is it's

9:30

guaranteeing you miss out you're not

9:32

being present in your life you're being

9:34

present

9:35

at all and he kind of stormed off again

9:37

not unreasonably i was being a bit angry

9:40

and so i stomped around graceland on my

9:41

own for a while and then that night i

9:43

found out we were staying in the

9:44

heartbreak hotel which is across the

9:45

street from graceland and i found him

9:47

there's a swimming pool that's shaped

9:49

like a guitar where they play all these

9:51

songs in a constant loop and i saw him

9:52

sitting there looking at his phone and i

9:54

went up to him

9:56

and i realized like a lot of anger my

9:59

anger at him was really angry at myself

10:00

i could feel these pressures happening

10:02

to me

10:03

i could feel my own attention and focus

10:04

fragmenting

10:06

and he just looked at his phone and said

10:08

i know something's really wrong

10:10

but i don't know what it is

10:11

and that's when i thought okay i need to

10:13

look into

10:15

are we having an attention and focus

10:16

crisis if we are why is it happening and

10:18

most importantly what can we do to get

10:20

our brains back

10:21

and what did you discover in terms of

10:23

the stats facts and figures around the

10:25

attention crisis is it a real thing

10:28

is it is it happening and and link to

10:30

that i guess what is the

10:32

what are we losing because of the

10:34

attention crisis

10:35

yeah so i ended up traveling all over

10:37

the world i interviewed 250 of the

10:39

leading experts in the world about

10:40

attention and focus and i went to just

10:42

places that have been really differently

10:44

affected by this so from moscow to miami

10:48

from a favela islamic in rio de janeiro

10:51

where attention had collapsed in a

10:52

particularly disastrous way to an office

10:55

in new zealand where they discovered

10:56

this amazing way to restore people's

10:58

attention and what i learned is so the

11:00

best way we could know if attention has

11:02

collapsed would be if for the last 150

11:04

years

11:05

every year scientists are given the same

11:07

kind of attention test to people and

11:09

then we'd be able to track it that way

11:10

no one did that so that that we don't

11:12

know that but i do think there's another

11:14

way we can reasonably conclude that this

11:16

is a real crisis so there's scientific

11:19

evidence for 12 different factors that

11:21

affect attention and focus but either

11:23

boost it or trash it

11:25

and there's good evidence that a lot of

11:27

these factors have been rising

11:30

throughout your lifetime and my lifetime

11:32

so i think it's fair to conclude

11:34

therefore that we are facing a real

11:36

crisis and there's various pieces of

11:38

evidence that do show collectively our

11:40

attention span really is shrinking so

11:43

and i think that leads to um we've got

11:46

to understand what's happening to us in

11:48

a very different way because when i felt

11:50

my attention fraying

11:52

my main response was to go into

11:55

you know just self-criticism just go

11:57

you're weak you're lazy you're not good

11:58

enough why aren't you strong enough to

11:59

resist these forms of distraction and

12:01

actually when you know that this is

12:02

happening to almost all of us

12:04

or in fact these factors are bearing on

12:06

all of us right they're affecting some

12:07

of us differently that made me realize

12:09

you've got to think about this in it in

12:10

a different way so there's a guy i went

12:12

to interview one of the leading experts

12:13

on children's attention problems in the

12:15

world a guy named professor joel nigg

12:17

who's uh in portland and oregon

12:20

and he said to me look think about

12:21

obesity right if you look at a beach

12:24

a photograph of a beach in britain in

12:26

1970 or in the us anywhere

12:30

everyone is by our standards either slim

12:33

or buff there's nobody who's what we

12:35

think of as fat right no one it's really

12:38

weird and it's not that fat people just

12:39

stayed at home right

12:41

what happened is if you look at 1970

12:43

there was almost no obesity in the

12:44

western world and then certain

12:47

absolutely crucial changes happened in

12:48

the way we live right our food supply

12:51

change people used to eat fresh and

12:53

nutritious food we moved to heavily

12:55

processed and ultra processed food which

12:57

affects your body in a very different

12:59

way and our city's completely changed so

13:01

you used to be able to bike and walk

13:04

to work to the places you wanted to go

13:06

in a lot of our cities that's now

13:07

impossible and as a result of these two

13:09

big changes and some other ones actually

13:11

stress right the more stressed you are

13:13

the more you want it comforting as a

13:14

result of these big changes obesity

13:17

exploded so it's not that individuals

13:19

got like weak or whatever we might

13:21

whatever the stigmatizing these people

13:22

say about overweight people

13:24

and

13:25

what professor nick said is something

13:27

very similar is happening with attention

13:29

there are changes in the way we live

13:31

that are pouring acid on everyone's

13:34

ability to pay attention

13:36

um the way he put it the kind of

13:37

technical term is that we have a an

13:39

attentional pathogenic culture a culture

13:42

in which it is very hard for all of us

13:44

to form and sustain deep focus this is

13:47

why um activities that require deep

13:50

forms of focus like reading a book have

13:51

just fallen off a cliff right in the

13:53

last 20 years

13:54

so what we've got to do is there's two

13:56

levels of response one is there are

13:58

individual responses there are changes

14:00

we can all make in our lives obviously i

14:02

talk about this a lot in the book stolen

14:04

focus about this there are changes we

14:05

can all make in our lives

14:08

there are also

14:10

big changes we need to make as a society

14:12

so we need to come together and demand

14:14

changes in the society that would make

14:16

it possible for us to make a lot of

14:17

these positive changes we want to make

14:18

so these two layers i mean i know

14:20

there's a lot there to um but okay so if

14:22

we were to agree that um attention has

14:25

decayed

14:26

what i really want to know is um like so

14:28

what what what is the cost to my life

14:31

outside of the fact that i might not

14:32

have as engaging relationships is there

14:34

any other cost to my productivity to

14:37

anything else that really really matters

14:38

to me yeah this is such an important

14:40

question i think there's two sort of

14:42

levels we need to think about it the

14:44

first is as an individual

14:46

if you can't focus and pay attention

14:48

your ability to achieve your goals

14:50

across the board diminishes right so you

14:54

want to set up a business you want to

14:55

write a book you want to learn how to

14:56

play the guitar

14:58

all of those things become much harder

15:00

if you can't focus and pay attention if

15:02

you're constantly pulled away by the you

15:04

know pings in your phone well let's say

15:06

you want to be a good parent

15:07

if you're constantly pulled away from

15:09

that if you're constantly distracted

15:11

your ability to do that so any goal you

15:13

have in your life

15:15

is diminished if you can't pay attention

15:18

and so that's the personal layer there's

15:20

also just a collective and social layer

15:22

if you live in a society where people

15:24

can't pay attention if you're surrounded

15:26

by people who can't pay attention our

15:28

ability to solve our collective problems

15:30

and we're facing a lot of collective

15:32

problems at the moment also breaks down

15:34

so attention is crucial for achieving

15:36

goals and problem solving and to me

15:39

those are the two of the most important

15:40

things in life right and you went to the

15:42

other one just being present with people

15:44

right you know if you can't be present

15:47

with people if you think about my godson

15:49

you can't form the deepest relationships

15:52

you have if most of us think about if i

15:54

said to you you know what's a moment

15:55

that's been deeply meaningful to you in

15:57

your life

15:58

it'll be a moment but very likely when

16:00

you are paying attention and other

16:01

people are paying attention to you right

16:03

it's a moment of shared focus a moment

16:05

of meaning

16:07

um we can't do that if we can't pay

16:08

attention so you become a sort of

16:11

stump of yourself there's a you know you

16:13

can sense that you might have been more

16:15

it chokes off growth and there's there's

16:17

kind of

16:18

there's a few ways of thinking about

16:20

this

16:21

there's an amazing expert on attention

16:23

called dr james williams who interviewed

16:24

in moscow it's a former google engineer

16:27

who said that there's a few kind of

16:29

different types of attention that we see

16:31

and we seem to be losing all of them so

16:33

the first type of attention is called

16:35

your spotlight right so let's say

16:36

there's a fridge in the corner of this

16:37

room let's say uh i want to go and get

16:40

two drinks from that and bring it to the

16:42

people in the other room right so my

16:44

spotlight i've got an immediate task go

16:46

and get the drinks take them to the

16:46

people in the other room now if i'm

16:48

constantly interrupted if i'm constantly

16:49

checking my text i might get to the

16:50

fridge get a little text forget why did

16:52

i go there again the guys in the room

16:54

are saying where the hell's johan why

16:55

has he not brought us this stuff so your

16:56

spotlight is your ability to home in on

17:00

an immediate task right

17:02

that is obvious we can all see how

17:04

that's being disrupted i can talk more

17:05

about that if you like

17:06

then there's what he calls your

17:08

starlight which is your more medium-term

17:10

goals so a medium-term goal might be you

17:13

know a goal that you obviously had a few

17:14

years ago i want to start a business

17:16

right that's a medium term goal it's

17:18

called starlight because when you're not

17:19

sure where you are you look up at the

17:20

stars and you're like oh you orientate

17:22

yourself by the stars right

17:24

that is being disrupted if your life is

17:26

full of distractions if your

17:29

consciousness is hijacked by really

17:31

petty goals or goals that are someone

17:33

else's goals like social media

17:36

you you can't you lose you begin to lose

17:39

your ability to formulate it's not just

17:41

you can't achieve the short-term tasks

17:43

you lose your ability to achieve your

17:44

longer-term tasks and the third form is

17:46

what james calls dr williams calls your

17:49

daylight which is how do you even know

17:51

that you want to set up a business how

17:53

do you even know what it means to be a

17:55

good dad how do you know what it means

17:56

to have a good life right

17:59

for to be able to see clearly a room has

18:01

to be flooded with daylight

18:03

and it's not just that we're losing our

18:05

short-term attention it's not just that

18:06

we're losing our medium-term attention

18:08

when those things happen

18:10

you you have less ability to make sense

18:12

of your own life you know he compared it

18:15

to on the internet a denial of service

18:17

attack where when someone wants to take

18:19

down a website they get you know many

18:20

thousands of computers to log on

18:22

simultaneously and the computer crashes

18:24

it's like we're experiencing that we're

18:26

so overloaded that your sense of like

18:28

who am i what do i want to do if you're

18:30

if your life is atrophied into 65 second

18:33

and three-minute chunks

18:35

how do you build a sense of where you

18:36

want to go and who you want to be you

18:38

begin to feel lost in your own life and

18:39

i think you can see that happening to

18:41

lots of people i certainly can and as

18:44

you were saying do you feel that for

18:45

yourselves oh 100

18:47

and as you were saying that i was

18:48

reflecting on um how difficult i find it

18:51

to just sit with my girlfriend and just

18:54

like pay attention and just try and

18:57

connect with her like how has your day

18:58

been without devices and screens and

19:01

there was a there was a big change we

19:03

made together where we kind of made a

19:04

rule that we would exclude devices from

19:07

certain parts of our life so we don't

19:08

have them in the bedroom if we're in if

19:09

we're in bed together we don't have

19:10

devices in there and um there'll be some

19:13

times where we commit to putting the

19:15

phones away and doing something

19:16

sometimes for seven hours so it'll be

19:18

like she'll say to me i want to do this

19:20

special type of dance that i've never

19:22

done before right

19:23

so put the phones away and as i'm doing

19:26

it especially at the start as we're

19:28

doing this like there's called contact

19:29

dance you wanted to do with me where you

19:31

always maintain one point of contact

19:34

i was just thinking about my phone and

19:36

then

19:36

you know i think we get into hour five

19:39

and six and i'm still thinking about my

19:40

phone and it's funny because i'm not

19:42

being present i'm not i'm actually kind

19:44

of like

19:45

complying with what she wants to do so

19:47

that i can get back to my phone and i

19:49

find that really really sad and it's

19:50

actually i can see how it would

19:51

jeopardize the chance of a really

19:53

meaningful connection in modern

19:55

relationships where you're never really

19:57

connected i think a lot of relationships

19:58

are actually more connected on social

20:00

media than they are in

20:02

in real life and i wonder if that's had

20:04

an adverse effect on the success of

20:05

relationships

20:06

this uh this this absence of focus and

20:09

attention

20:10

i think there's so many important things

20:12

in what you just said so what you've um

20:15

built for you and your girlfriend there

20:16

your first response is a good first

20:19

response which is um for an individual

20:21

level there's big collective ones as

20:23

well but an individual level a good

20:24

response is what's called pre-commitment

20:26

so what you do is you said you and your

20:28

girlfriend say we're gonna put our phone

20:30

away for seven hours right so you say it

20:32

in advance and there's a woman called

20:34

professor molly crockett at yale

20:36

university where i interviewed as kind

20:37

of expert on pre-commitment so

20:39

pre-commitment is we all know

20:41

there's all sorts of things you want to

20:42

do

20:43

that you know you might crack and give

20:45

in later and not achieve them right so i

20:48

don't want to eat any pringles right

20:49

because they make me even fatter than i

20:51

am right so the best form of

20:53

pre-commitment is when i go to the

20:54

supermarket don't buy the pringles right

20:56

because i buy the pringles and tell

20:58

myself i'll just have fun i'll have five

20:59

tonight and of course you get to 2am you

21:01

wake up you're [ __ ] chugging them

21:02

like homer simpson right so the one

21:05

point pre-commitment there is a don't

21:07

buy the pringles b

21:09

tell everyone you're not going to buy

21:10

the pringles because even just

21:11

articulating your goal out loud makes

21:14

you more likely to achieve it so you've

21:15

got one form of pre-commitment there

21:17

right you've said okay we're going to

21:18

say to each other we've got seven hours

21:20

now we're going to put the phone away

21:22

so that's a really good model of

21:24

pre-commitment but also

21:26

you've got to one of the challenges with

21:28

that which is your you know your you you

21:30

feel like your consciousness has been

21:31

hijacked by by these technologies and it

21:34

was really interesting researching this

21:36

because a lot of people when i say i've

21:37

done a book about attention and focus

21:39

they say oh you've written a book about

21:40

tech actually texts only about 20 of

21:43

what's going on i think although it's a

21:45

very important 20

21:47

and and it was really interesting

21:49

researching this because

21:50

actually

21:52

it's not

21:53

most of the problem is not inherent to

21:55

the technology

21:56

it's the result of something else which

21:58

is actually more fixable because you and

22:01

me we're not going to give away our

22:02

phones nor nor should we right we're not

22:04

going to abandon this technology

22:06

we could make the technology work for

22:08

our attention rather than against it so

22:10

i spent a lot of time in silicon valley

22:12

interviewing the people a lot of the

22:14

people who designed the world in which

22:15

we now live right

22:17

and really feel bad about it and

22:20

they are they have all the problems that

22:21

you me and everyone watching have

22:23

there's a really james williams the

22:24

google engineer who i just mentioned

22:26

there was an incredible moment when he

22:28

spoke at a tech conference so he's

22:29

speaking entirely to really influential

22:31

designers who are making the stuff that

22:33

we're all using and he said to them

22:36

is there anyone here in the audience

22:39

who wants to live in the world that

22:40

we're creating put up your hand

22:43

and not one of them did

22:44

another one of them tristan harris an

22:46

amazing

22:47

dissident in silicon valley who also

22:49

worked for google he worked on the gmail

22:51

team

22:52

when they were designing gmail and you

22:54

know spreading it to the whole world and

22:56

one day he was in the googleplex and one

22:58

of his colleagues said i've got an idea

23:00

because they were trying to figure out

23:01

figure out how to get more and more

23:02

people to use gmail more so one day i

23:05

had an idea he just said why don't we

23:06

make it

23:07

so that every time someone gets an email

23:09

their phone vibrates and everyone in the

23:11

team said that's a good idea

23:13

and tristan

23:15

a week later was walking around san

23:16

francisco

23:18

and just heard these vibrations

23:19

everywhere

23:21

and thought

23:22

[ __ ] we did that

23:24

and that's happening

23:25

everywhere within a few months he did

23:27

calculation

23:28

there were 11 billion distractions

23:31

every day being caused by his company

23:33

right so these people are really open to

23:36

there's a big obviously a big debate

23:38

about this

23:40

but there was a moment and there's lots

23:41

of things to say about it and lots of

23:43

techniques these social companies use to

23:45

maximally hijack your attention and we

23:47

can talk about those techniques and i

23:48

think there's loads we need to learn

23:50

about that but actually to me the most

23:52

important thing the root of this is to

23:54

understand that social media doesn't

23:55

have to work that way and the moment

23:57

that really helped me to understand it i

23:58

was really struggling with getting my

23:59

head around that if i open facebook

24:01

it'll tell me all sorts of things it'll

24:02

say oh it's you you make rob's birthday

24:05

today um this is something you said five

24:07

years ago

24:08

there's been a terrorist attack and look

24:10

these people have marked themselves as

24:11

safe i don't tell you all sorts of

24:12

things

24:13

what it won't do is something that

24:15

actually lots of people would really

24:16

love there's no button on facebook that

24:18

says

24:20

i'd like to meet up with my mates who's

24:22

free now who's nearby and available

24:24

right now that's technologically

24:26

unbelievably easy facebook could design

24:28

that in an hour right that would be

24:30

really popular i'm sure everyone

24:31

listening thinks yeah that'd be a really

24:32

handy thing to have um it doesn't exist

24:36

why does the market not provide it if

24:38

you follow the chain

24:40

from why the market doesn't provide it i

24:41

think you begin to understand some of

24:43

the ways our attention are being invaded

24:45

and how we can get it back

24:47

so when you open facebook facebook makes

24:50

money in two ways

24:52

first way is very obvious you see ads we

24:54

all understand how that works the second

24:56

way is much more valuable to facebook

24:59

everything you do on facebook everything

25:00

you like everything you dislike

25:02

everything you message to people is

25:04

scanned and sorted by their ai

25:06

technology

25:08

to build a profile of you right so let's

25:09

say that you like kylie minogue and

25:12

donald trump and you message your mum

25:14

going i've just bought a load of nappies

25:16

right okay so the ai is figuring out

25:17

okay this person is probably gay no

25:19

disrespect to heterosexual fans of kylie

25:20

probably out there this person's gay

25:23

they're quite right-wing and they've got

25:25

a baby because why would they be

25:26

messaging about nappies right so think

25:28

about thousands and thousands of data

25:30

points like that it's building up a very

25:32

complicated and detailed profile of you

25:35

which it then sells to advertisers so

25:37

they can target you because if you're if

25:38

you're

25:40

making nappies you don't want to send an

25:41

ad to me i don't have any children

25:42

you've wasted your money you want to

25:44

target your advertising so facebook is

25:46

making money

25:47

every moment you open it facebook makes

25:49

money through those two revenue streams

25:51

and every time you put

25:53

the facebook app down or you shut your

25:55

phone off

25:56

facebook loses money right or they don't

25:58

make the money they would make if you

26:00

carried on scrolling right that's it

26:01

that's their business model it's simply

26:03

that

26:04

once you understand that

26:06

you can see why there's no button that

26:07

says who's available and wants to meet

26:09

up now because if you push that button

26:11

and it said oh joe's around the corner

26:12

i'll go for a coffee with joe

26:14

you and joe would sit opposite each

26:16

other and talk to each other right well

26:18

then you're not on facebook they're

26:19

losing money their entire business model

26:22

as sean parker who was one of the first

26:23

investors in facebook said

26:25

our whole business model was to hack

26:27

people's attention we knew we were doing

26:30

it and we did it anyway so they have the

26:31

most sophisticated engineers in the

26:33

world

26:34

specifically working to figure out

26:36

maximally how to hack your attention but

26:39

the thing that blew my mind about this

26:41

because you can get into okay you talk

26:42

about that and

26:43

very often this is framed as

26:45

oh okay so is this an anti-tech or pro

26:48

are we pro-tech or anti-tech are we

26:50

it's completely wrong way to think about

26:52

it the question is not are you pro-tech

26:54

or anti-tech the question is what tech

26:57

working in whose interests right

27:00

because that business model which is

27:01

designed has to be about fracking your

27:04

attention that's that's the only way it

27:06

can work

27:07

is not the only business model for these

27:09

companies right so let's say acer asking

27:12

one of the who designed key aspects of

27:14

the internet that we now use amazing guy

27:17

said to me we should just ban that

27:19

business model right a business model

27:21

that is based on tracking you

27:22

surveilling you invading your attention

27:25

and selling that attention to the

27:26

highest bidder that is just an

27:28

inhuman way of doing it it's like lead

27:29

in pain

27:30

ban it so i said well what to all these

27:32

people what happens the day after we ban

27:34

it right so what do i open facebook and

27:36

it just says sorry close

27:39

no what would happen is all these

27:40

companies would have to move to other

27:41

business models which already exist so

27:43

one model might be subscription you know

27:45

like netflix we don't know how

27:46

subscription works or it might be that

27:48

we choose to own it together somewhere

27:50

beneath where we're sitting there's a

27:52

sewer right we own that sewer you and me

27:54

as taxpayers own that sewer together

27:56

because when we didn't have sewers we

27:58

had [ __ ] in the street and we got

27:59

cholera and people died and then

28:00

together we built the sewers and

28:02

together we own and maintain the sewers

28:04

because it's important for all of us now

28:05

it might be we want to say just like we

28:07

own the sewer pipes together we might

28:09

want to own the information pipes

28:11

together because at the moment we're

28:12

getting the equivalent of cholera for

28:14

our attention right but the key thing

28:16

about that is when you move to these

28:17

different models

28:18

instead of you being the product right

28:21

today you're not the customer of

28:23

facebook you're the product they sell to

28:24

advertisers

28:26

if we move to those different business

28:27

models suddenly you're the person they

28:29

want to please right if you want to pay

28:31

attention they could start des

28:33

redesigning facebook in all sort of ways

28:35

sorts of ways very practical ways i can

28:37

tell you about lots of them

28:39

that are designed not to hack your

28:40

attention but are designed to heal your

28:42

attention and designed to make your life

28:44

better she looks really interesting so

28:46

obviously my background is social media

28:48

so um been

28:50

knee deep in this industry for a long

28:51

long time and in 2019 mark zuckerberg

28:54

wrote a letter where he said he posted

28:56

on his facebook saying um we've done

28:59

some studies we've spoken to some people

29:01

and we've discovered that the timeline

29:04

is bad for you it's net negative

29:05

predominantly because of these highly

29:07

addictive very short viral videos i'm

29:10

gonna put my hands up that was part of

29:12

the company i built business model we

29:14

were we built we had huge huge facebook

29:16

pages some of which had tens of millions

29:18

of followers and we knew that if we

29:20

wanted a ton of views which would result

29:21

in a ton of followers we had to post

29:23

very very short highly engaging short

29:26

videos facebook that year

29:29

changed the timeline they killed that

29:31

bit that part of our business model

29:32

where these like super addictive viral

29:34

videos would no longer work and in their

29:36

little statement they said the things

29:37

that will now work are any content that

29:40

gets people to basically just have

29:41

conversation with each other so we then

29:43

tested that and buzzfeed tested that as

29:45

well buzzfeed posted some things and

29:47

discovered that if your post is dis

29:49

discussion worthy it will now do better

29:52

and so is facebook were apparently

29:53

trying to do the right thing

29:55

um

29:56

which cost them that year their revenues

29:58

i believe went down that year their

29:59

stock price definitely did and they

30:01

pointed to listen we made these changes

30:02

to our to our timeline

30:04

our news feed to try and make it more

30:05

healthy

30:06

something else emerged

30:08

and that thing which is now the dominant

30:10

force is called tick-tock and tick-tock

30:14

took the place of short addictive as

30:17

[ __ ] you don't even know your scrolling

30:19

videos and the way that i know it from

30:21

my social media background that tiktok

30:23

have fully owned that space is simple on

30:26

my tic toc now say i have a hundred

30:27

thousand followers a video can get 1 000

30:30

views or a million views the variance of

30:33

viewership is extreme what that means is

30:36

they are the algorithm is just taking

30:39

the most addictive things and saying

30:41

[ __ ] everything else it's like i'm not

30:43

gonna show your followers or the the

30:45

discovery feed the thing you posted that

30:47

wasn't addictive i'm just gonna grab the

30:49

viral stuff

30:50

that's super short and put that in the

30:52

feed so now i was talking to some of my

30:55

colleagues today fortunately i don't

30:56

actually use tik tok like i don't use it

30:58

myself i have a tick tock but i don't

31:00

use it myself to engage with friends and

31:02

every single one of my friends some of

31:04

them are sat in this room now some of

31:05

them are downstairs they describe their

31:07

relationship with tick-tock as like

31:09

as if it's heroin like i've never heard

31:11

a social network described in such a way

31:13

my friend dash who's like 35

31:15

he goes i'll just touch the app and he

31:18

goes an hour's gone and he's like i've

31:20

never seen anything like it so if

31:22

facebook change

31:24

my point here is that some i've seen how

31:26

someone else who just doesn't give a

31:28

[ __ ] will come and occupy that space

31:31

make a billion dollars and

31:33

um and run off and so i'm like oh you

31:36

know but this is why we you're totally

31:37

right this is why we need to look at the

31:39

business model for social media and

31:40

whether we allow or not of course

31:42

think about lead paint again right so

31:44

presumably there was a market leader in

31:45

lead paint in the 70s

31:48

and let's say the responsible paint just

31:50

would go you this individual company

31:52

needs to stop manufacturing lead paint

31:54

of course someone else would have just

31:55

come along and made lead paint that's

31:56

not the solution

31:57

solution is to say no no one can put

31:59

lead in paint right which is not to say

32:01

there can't be social media that

32:02

absolutely can social media has lots of

32:04

great things about it but it's about

32:06

saying do you have a business model that

32:08

is designed about maximally invading

32:10

people's attention

32:12

or do you have a business model

32:14

that's about uh giving people what they

32:16

want most people do not what like you're

32:18

saying your friends they push the button

32:20

and it's gone for now most people don't

32:21

want that right most tick tock users i

32:23

think about my nieces using tick tock

32:25

all the time she doesn't want that

32:26

either so at the moment we have a model

32:28

that's about hacking people and giving

32:30

them what they don't want to sell them

32:32

to advertisers when you get rid of that

32:34

business model which they won't do

32:35

spontaneously we have to make them do it

32:37

right

32:38

that it produces a completely different

32:40

dynamic i so i'm keen so you put your i

32:43

read in the book you basically put your

32:44

phone in a box and then

32:46

escaped to the phone you must have been

32:48

more productive than ever because of

32:49

this thing that people described called

32:51

being in the flow state right i imagine

32:52

if i'm distraction free then i'll be in

32:54

that flow state longer i i heard about

32:56

this concept of a flow state maybe about

32:58

a year or two ago and then i i could i

33:01

could relate to it because i've had

33:02

those moments in my work or when i'm

33:04

doing a certain activity specifically

33:06

more like monotonous activities or

33:08

repetitive activities where you get into

33:10

that state of flow where you're almost

33:11

doing it without thinking what is flow

33:14

and

33:15

how do you find it and what is the power

33:17

of being in one's flow state so a flow

33:20

state

33:21

is when you're everyone listening will

33:22

have experienced at some point in their

33:24

life a flow state is when you're doing

33:26

something that's really meaningful to

33:27

you and you really get into it

33:30

and your sense of time falls away your

33:32

sense of ego falls away and your

33:34

attention to it just feels effortless

33:37

right so one rock climber put it

33:40

it's like you get into flowing rock

33:41

climbing when you feel like you are the

33:43

rock you're climbing right so we all

33:46

will have had moments of flow in our

33:47

lives what's really important about flow

33:49

in relation to attention

33:51

is this is a power this is a capacity

33:53

that all human beings have

33:55

and it's a capacity

33:56

where

33:57

you can pay attention to something

33:59

deeply but it doesn't feel like an

34:01

effort right it's not like studying for

34:02

an exam where you're like

34:04

okay so napoleon was born there okay you

34:06

know you can you can pay attention that

34:08

way but that's an effort

34:09

flow is like a gusher of attention that

34:12

is inside all of us that that we can pay

34:15

so obviously mahali spent

34:17

professor chick sent me high he sent

34:19

spent 40 years of his life more than

34:21

actually 50 years of his life studying

34:23

flow states

34:24

how do they happen how do we maintain

34:26

them what ruins them

34:29

and and

34:30

he discovered lots of amazing things

34:31

about it he discovered that actually

34:32

flow states are really essential for

34:35

having a good life for feeling competent

34:37

for for good mental health

34:40

and he discovered he made lots of

34:41

discoveries but for me there were three

34:43

really important things he discovered

34:44

about how to get into a flow

34:46

state firstly you have to choose one

34:50

goal if you're trying to do lots of

34:51

things at the same time you will not get

34:53

into flow i can explain why later

34:56

that's really important you have to

34:58

choose one thing right

35:00

the second thing you have to do

35:03

is you have to choose a goal that is

35:04

meaningful to you if it's not meaningful

35:06

you'll never get into flow on it for me

35:08

it would be writing right but everyone

35:09

will have something

35:11

and thirdly

35:12

you need to choose something that is

35:15

ideally at the edge of your abilities so

35:17

let's say you're a rock climber let's

35:19

say you're a medium talent rock climber

35:21

right if you just clamber over garden

35:22

wall

35:23

you're not going to get into a state of

35:25

flow equally if you suddenly try and

35:27

climb mount kilimanjaro it's going to be

35:29

overwhelming you're also not going to

35:30

get into a state of flow what you want

35:32

to do is choose something that's a

35:34

little bit harder

35:36

than the thing the time you did last

35:37

time right so flow begins at the edge of

35:40

your abilities so you want those those

35:43

three things one clear goal it's got to

35:45

be meaningful to you and it's got to be

35:47

the edge of your abilities if you do

35:49

that you

35:51

there's no guarantee but you max

35:52

massively increase your chance of

35:54

getting into flow which is this form of

35:57

deep meaningful attention but mahali

35:59

also made a discovery he discovered this

36:01

in the late 80s

36:02

the um

36:04

there's something that absolutely

36:05

consistently ruins flow which is being

36:07

interrupted being distracted right just

36:09

kills flow dead which kills the deepest

36:12

form of attention and i think we're

36:13

really living

36:15

and mahali thought that we're really

36:16

living with a crisis of flow states now

36:19

what is the harm of interruption i i

36:22

read in your book about the the decaying

36:24

creativity and the time it takes to get

36:26

back into the task once you've done it

36:27

but is there a more sort of

36:29

um

36:30

consequential so if you want to

36:32

understand and this might sound when i

36:33

first describe it like a small effect

36:35

i'm going to explain how big it is

36:36

afterwards because don't feel big when

36:38

you're doing it so i went to interview

36:40

one of the leading neuroscientists in

36:41

the world of my name professor earl

36:42

miller who's mit the massachusetts

36:44

institute of technology

36:46

and professor miller said to me

36:48

you have to understand one crucial thing

36:49

about your brain my brain everyone's

36:51

brains

36:52

you can only think consciously about one

36:54

thing at a time

36:56

this is just a fundamental limitation of

36:58

the human brain human brain hasn't

37:00

changed in 40 000 years ain't going to

37:01

change any time soon you can only think

37:04

about one thing at a time

37:05

but we have fallen for a mass delusion

37:08

so the average teenager according to a

37:09

study by professor larry rosen believes

37:12

they can now follow seven forms of media

37:14

at the same time

37:15

so what happens when you believe you're

37:18

you're you're doing lots of things at

37:20

once so they get people into labs they

37:22

get them to do think they're doing lots

37:24

of things at once and see what happens

37:26

and it turns out

37:28

there are four

37:30

really big costs that happen

37:32

so the first is what's called the switch

37:35

cost effect

37:36

so let's say my phone is outside this

37:38

room but let's say i have my phone in my

37:40

pocket right let's say you were just

37:41

talking you spoke for a minute or two

37:43

what you said was really interesting

37:44

let's imagine that i had just taken out

37:46

my phone and glanced at my text messages

37:48

for a few seconds while you were doing

37:49

that right

37:50

kind of thing that happens all the time

37:52

you think oh i've just taken two seconds

37:54

and i'll

37:55

in that moment i have to refocus my

37:57

brain oh

37:58

um jess texted me oh right so that must

38:01

mean that her

38:02

mum needs to oh right okay you've got it

38:04

and then i have to re-focus on you wait

38:05

what was stephen just saying again

38:07

seems like a small effect it's not i'll

38:08

talk about how much it is in a minute

38:10

the the second uh cost it it brings in

38:14

is you start to make mistakes when

38:16

you're switching between things it

38:18

massively increases your error rate so

38:20

say that i'm i don't know doing my tax

38:21

return and i look at my text and i go

38:24

back to my tax return i'm much more

38:25

likely to make mistakes and that means i

38:26

have to go back and correct my mistakes

38:29

the third effect is on your memory so to

38:32

translate your experiences into memories

38:34

it takes mental effort right takes a

38:36

certain amount of brain power if your

38:38

brain is instead just jammed up with all

38:41

this switching

38:42

the evidence shows you're significantly

38:44

less likely to just remember what

38:45

happened you're less likely to remember

38:46

any of it and the the third effect is on

38:49

your creativity so

38:51

when you just have time to think

38:53

your brain naturally wanders and it will

38:56

roam over you know things people have

38:58

said to you in your life moments you've

39:00

had

39:01

things you've read a whole range of

39:03

things and it will start to make

39:04

connections between those things that's

39:06

actually what creativity is it's when

39:08

two ideas that have never been put

39:09

together go together and pop right you

39:11

know that's much better than me

39:12

but when your brain is jammed up with

39:14

switching

39:16

it just doesn't get the space to do that

39:17

right and i've heard that i'm thinking

39:20

speaking to president miller who's an

39:21

amazing man and just thinking

39:23

all right i get that but that's quite

39:25

small right when i looked at the studies

39:27

i was quite struck hewlett-packard you

39:29

know the people who make printers well

39:30

they're [ __ ] printers that always jam

39:32

in my experience but anyway

39:33

hewlett-packard did a quite small

39:35

experiment with their workers

39:37

so they split them into two groups and

39:39

the first group was told

39:41

just do whatever task you've got to do

39:42

today and you're not going to be

39:43

interrupted and the second group was

39:45

told just do your tasks today and they

39:46

were interrupted with emails and texts

39:48

right what was described as a heavy

39:50

amount of emails and texts

39:51

and then they just tested their iq

39:54

after either not being distracted or

39:56

being distracted what they found is the

39:59

people who have been distracted

40:01

tested are having 10 iq points lower

40:04

than the people who had not been

40:05

distracted right because it makes you

40:07

less intelligent constantly switching

40:09

the strain of that makes you less

40:11

intelligent and to give you a sense of

40:12

what 10 iq points means

40:14

if you and me smoke to spliff now

40:16

together

40:17

our iq would drop by about five points

40:20

so it's double just being heavily

40:22

interrupted it has double the effect on

40:24

your intelligence and attention as

40:26

getting stoned so you would be better

40:28

off sitting at your desk doing one thing

40:31

and smoking a spliff then sitting at

40:33

your desk not smoking a spliff and being

40:34

interrupted all the time there's a guy

40:36

called professor michael posner at the

40:37

university of oregon who found that if

40:39

you are distracted and pulled away

40:42

it takes you 20 and go back to the task

40:44

you were doing originally it takes you

40:46

23 minutes to get back to the same level

40:48

of focus as you had before right so

40:50

we're all our focus is being stolen the

40:52

book is called stolen focus for this

40:54

reason our focus is being stolen by

40:57

these forces that's just one of the

40:58

twelve there's loads of them but

41:00

we've got to understand this

41:02

and the other point i guess so you write

41:04

about in this book which is i was

41:06

surprised you linked to attention

41:07

because it wasn't an obvious link to me

41:08

was about

41:10

sleep

41:10

and and the decay in

41:13

um our sleeping

41:16

health over

41:17

decades and you you write that we're

41:20

sleeping less than ever before and we're

41:22

having worse sleep than ever before my

41:24

sleep is fairly good but it i think it's

41:26

decaying i'd say it's decaying um i

41:29

sleep with my phone in my bed first

41:31

thing i do when i wake up in the morning

41:32

i'm actually as i'm opening my eyes i'm

41:35

thinking about where i need to put my

41:36

hand to get the phone

41:38

like i'm visualizing where i think i

41:40

left it and my brain always knows my

41:42

brain's like it's over by your right

41:43

your right ear yeah yeah it always knows

41:45

where it is and then i wake up i look at

41:47

what's that

41:50

100 notifications 100 things um

41:53

what's the you know what's the cost of

41:55

this type of behavior which i think a

41:57

lot of people will resonate for and what

41:59

is the like macro trend in sleep health

42:02

yeah this is one of the 12 causes i

42:03

write about in in stolen focus that

42:05

really

42:06

uh the evidence was quite shocking

42:08

actually so i interviewed lots of

42:09

experts but i interviewed arguably the

42:11

leading expert in the world on sleep a

42:13

man named dr charles seisler who's at

42:14

harvard medical school he's taught

42:16

everyone from the boston red sox to the

42:18

secret service about about sleep

42:21

and he started to make this breakthrough

42:23

in 1981 so he

42:25

when charles was a medical school he was

42:27

taught

42:28

that um

42:30

basically when you're asleep your brain

42:32

is just inert it's not doing much so he

42:33

starts doing this research nothing to do

42:35

with sleep it was it's not really

42:37

doesn't matter what it's about but it

42:38

was about the time of day that the body

42:40

releases a particular hormone and to

42:42

study that he had to keep people awake

42:44

in a lab right for quite long periods of

42:46

time so he's working with them and he's

42:48

got all sorts of techniques for keeping

42:49

them awake like attention techniques and

42:51

he was just immediately struck when he's

42:53

doing this

42:54

how quickly and how dramatically

42:57

people's attention and ability to think

42:59

deteriorated as they stayed awake longer

43:01

if you're awake for 19 hours it doesn't

43:04

feel like very long

43:05

your attention and ability to think is

43:07

the same as if you were legally drunk

43:09

right so your your attention things that

43:11

would take

43:12

a fraction of a second when you're

43:15

refreshed and alert he was discovering

43:17

if you were awake for just a day we're

43:19

taking 12 seconds a staggering increase

43:21

in your ability to think so you start to

43:23

think oh i should study sleep i should

43:25

look into this and he began to do

43:27

a series of hugely groundbreaking

43:29

research on sleep what he did is he

43:31

pioneered putting together two bits of

43:32

technology there's a kind of technology

43:34

that can scan your eyes to see what

43:36

you're looking at and obviously there's

43:37

pet scans and things that can scan your

43:39

brain and see what's happening in your

43:40

brain

43:41

so he put this together

43:43

and he looked at people who were tired

43:45

not that tired but tired

43:47

um to see what they were looking at and

43:49

what was happening in their brain as

43:50

they looked at it and what he discovered

43:52

is that you when you're tired you could

43:54

appear to be awake

43:55

as awake as you and me seem now you can

43:57

be looking at people you can be talking

43:59

but parts of your brain have literally

44:01

gone to sleep it's called local sleep

44:03

because it's local to one part of the

44:05

brain right

44:06

which is kind of mind-blowing this helps

44:08

to explain why attention degrades

44:12

so rapidly when you're asleep and i was

44:14

trying why is that what's going on there

44:17

i mean it's also important to bear in

44:18

mind this is one of the ways we know

44:20

attention has got worse there's good

44:22

evidence that sleep has dramatically

44:24

deteriorated we sleep on average an hour

44:26

less

44:27

than people did in 1942 and children

44:30

sleep 80 minutes a night less than they

44:32

did a century ago so it's a staggering

44:35

there's been a 20 decline in adult sleep

44:36

in the last century incredible figures

44:39

and when you look at them they're kind

44:40

of mind-blowing um only 15 percent of

44:43

people wake up feeling refreshed so i

44:45

wanted to understand why is this right

44:47

what why does sleep affect our attention

44:49

so much one of people are interviewed

44:50

about this and looked at her research

44:52

very carefully it's an amazing woman

44:53

called professor roxanne prichard who's

44:55

at the university of minneapolis where i

44:57

interviewed her she explained to me when

44:59

you don't sleep your body interprets it

45:02

as an emergency it says something's

45:05

really wrong here right

45:07

he's not sleeping why isn't he sleeping

45:09

so it has all sorts of physiological and

45:11

psychological effects it raises your

45:13

heart rate it makes you crave more sugar

45:16

and fast food because it'll release

45:17

glucose quickly

45:18

it makes your heart beat faster and it

45:21

shuts down a lot of the creative parts

45:23

of your brain a lot of the more fertile

45:24

parts of your brain it's like it's an

45:25

emergency you haven't got time to worry

45:27

about that you know but what's happening

45:29

is lots of us effectively live in a

45:31

bodily emergency 23 percent of british

45:34

people sleep for five hours a night on

45:35

average staggering figures

45:38

and the reason this is important is

45:39

partly the bodily emergency and it's

45:41

partly

45:42

that what dr seisler had been taught at

45:44

medical school much earlier was wrong

45:47

sleep is not a passive process sleep is

45:50

an incredibly active process the way

45:52

roxanne put it to me professor prashad

45:55

is when you're sleeping you're repairing

45:58

your brain is rinsed with a a watery

46:01

fluid that carries away metabolic waste

46:03

it takes it down to your liver and gets

46:04

rid of it your brain repairs itself in

46:07

sleep the longer you sleep the better

46:09

and deeper the repairs are i mean there

46:11

are lots of other things that happen in

46:12

sleep that i talk about in the book as

46:13

well and we're not we're giving

46:15

ourselves time to repair we're not

46:17

giving ourselves time to rest and as a

46:20

result we're going around groggy

46:23

our brain isn't functioning to its full

46:25

potential so i'm saying to dr seisler

46:27

you know okay so we know that sleep's

46:29

got worse we know that sleep is crucial

46:31

for attention

46:32

um does that mean it is true to say that

46:35

we have got an attention crisis and he

46:37

said even if nothing else to change in

46:39

society and this is only one of the

46:40

twelve changes even if nothing else to

46:43

change in society that alone would be a

46:45

guarantee that we had an attention

46:46

crisis

46:47

so what do we do about it i i'm that

46:49

person i'm the

46:51

pathetic

46:52

um

46:53

i have pathetic sleeping habits for sure

46:55

for sure um so what can i do about it

46:58

you know removing my phone from the

46:59

bedroom aside the government or society

47:02

collectively deciding that

47:03

um we should they should impose better

47:06

professional

47:08

laws so that people aren't as

47:10

interrupted you know when they could be

47:11

sleeping etc what else can i do on a

47:13

real practical level so yeah at a

47:15

personal level there's plenty of

47:16

pre-commitment you can do so i would

47:17

recommend that you get a case save do

47:19

you know about them oh is that like a

47:20

safe that my phone goes in yeah so

47:22

basically it's a plastic safe with a lid

47:24

at the top you take the lid off you put

47:26

your phone in it you turn the dial at

47:27

the top and it'll lock away your phone

47:30

for anything you set it to between five

47:31

minutes and a week and if there's like a

47:33

fire or something you could easily smash

47:34

it but then you have to buy another

47:35

iphone and buy another case safe right

47:37

um so i would say an hour before you go

47:39

to bed put your phone in the case safe

47:42

and and then you can't again it's

47:44

pre-commitment you're binding yourself

47:46

so that when you're lying there in bed

47:47

and your mind's racing like oh [ __ ] i

47:49

forgot that email

47:50

too late you can't check it that's what

47:52

i do massively improve my sleep so it's

47:55

partly that that's one of the individual

47:57

changes there's also big tips and this

47:59

is one thing i recommend to you so i

48:01

went to new zealand to meet a guy called

48:03

andrew barnes so andrew uh grew up here

48:05

in london

48:06

and in the 80s he in 1987 he worked in

48:10

the city of london the financial

48:11

district uh just as the whole thing was

48:14

deregulated so the whole thing blows up

48:17

you know you've probably seen on the

48:18

news these images of like men in suits

48:21

and lots of hairspray like shouting at

48:23

each other buy buy sell cell and he was

48:26

one of those guys right and in that

48:28

world uh he was a young guy then

48:31

in in that world

48:33

you

48:34

you know this is the word language they

48:35

would have used it's not my language you

48:37

were a fool if you came to work later

48:39

than 7 30 in the morning and you were a

48:40

[ __ ] if you left before 7 30 at night

48:42

right so for half the year andrew never

48:45

saw the sun because he would had you

48:47

know leave at six o'clock in the morning

48:49

in the dark and he would get home at

48:50

nine o'clock in the morning and at nine

48:51

o'clock at night in the dark he didn't

48:53

have a good relationship with his

48:54

children he had to build that as an

48:55

adult this thing just consumed him

48:58

and he didn't like it

49:00

and wisely he quit

49:03

and he went to live in australia and

49:04

then new zealand and he became a very

49:05

successful businessman there and one day

49:07

in 2018 andrew was on a plane and he was

49:10

reading a business magazine

49:11

and he saw these quite shocking figures

49:13

which are accurate that basically they'd

49:15

done productivity research and they

49:16

discovered the average worker

49:19

sits at their desk for eight hours a day

49:20

says pre-coded obviously sits at their

49:22

desk eight hours a day but they are

49:23

actually only concentrating on their

49:25

work for three hours a day right which

49:27

are amazing figures right bad for

49:29

everyone bad for the worker their life

49:30

is passing them by bad for the employer

49:32

you know they're not getting good value

49:34

out of their employees and andrew did

49:36

this

49:37

andrew remembered this these moments

49:40

when he was working in the city and he

49:41

was exhausted and run down and he wasn't

49:44

having a life and he thought maybe my

49:46

workers are just really tired maybe

49:48

that's part of what's going on so he had

49:49

this this idea just came to him he said

49:52

if i

49:53

said the company's gonna move to a four

49:55

day week instead of a five day week for

49:57

exactly the same amount of money

49:59

and in return let's say my work is

50:01

matched this three hours a day

50:03

in return if my workers just did 45

50:06

minutes more every day of actually

50:08

concentrating

50:10

because they were better rested and so

50:11

on that would make up that then we'd be

50:13

in the same place for four hours four

50:14

days a week versus five so

50:17

andrew organized a conference call

50:19

he had uh

50:20

everyone on it

50:22

and he said

50:23

from now on i'm gonna pay you all the

50:24

same but we're gonna move to four days a

50:26

week we're gonna try it for three months

50:27

and see if it works if it works we'll

50:29

carry on doing it um andrew's head of hr

50:31

literally fell over it's like what is

50:33

this right and people even the people

50:35

who were gonna be the beneficiaries and

50:36

they were all the beneficiaries but even

50:37

the kind of lower level staff were like

50:39

is this a trick what's what's going on

50:41

how is this going to work so they spent

50:43

a few months preparing it actually made

50:45

them all think about productivity more

50:47

how are we going to make ourselves more

50:48

productive they came up with all sorts

50:50

of strategies some of them really simple

50:52

things like you know everyone has a

50:53

little pot on their desk you can put a

50:55

white flag in it when you've got the

50:56

white flag that means you don't want to

50:57

be interrupted things like that

51:00

and they tried it and uh

51:03

i interviewed everyone who worked in

51:04

their office in rotorua and this

51:06

experiment was studied by dr helen

51:08

delaney who's at the university of

51:10

auckland business school

51:12

and what they found is the company

51:14

achieved more in four days than they had

51:16

in five right productivity massively

51:19

went up stress massively went down

51:21

social media use at work massively went

51:23

down and it was fascinating talking to

51:24

the staff there about what they did one

51:26

of the things they did is they just

51:27

slept more some of them didn't take five

51:30

days i didn't take four days what they

51:31

did is they did five days but they did

51:32

six hours a day instead of eight hours a

51:34

day they slept more

51:37

they rested more

51:39

they were able to switch their brains

51:40

off from work which if you're going and

51:42

going and going is very very hard to do

51:46

and i remember interviewing them

51:46

thinking can this be true actually lots

51:48

of places have done these experiments

51:50

with four day weeks and a lot of tech

51:52

companies are offering it now as an

51:53

inducement but a lot of places did these

51:55

experiments

51:57

so microsoft in japan went to a four day

51:59

week their productivity went up by 40

52:02

toyota and gothenburg moved all their

52:04

mechanics to a six-hour day and they

52:06

produced a hundred and fourteen percent

52:08

more in in six hours than they had in

52:10

eight profits went up by 25

52:13

in a way it sounded too good to be true

52:14

right and i went to interview this guy

52:16

uh professor jeffrey pfeffer who's at

52:18

the university of stanford who's an

52:20

expert one of the leading experts in the

52:21

world on organizational behavior i was

52:23

saying well

52:24

how can that be

52:25

and he said look

52:27

it's not difficult ask any sports team

52:30

do you want your team to go onto the

52:31

pitch exhausted worn out

52:34

no

52:35

every sports fan wants their team to go

52:37

onto the pitch well rested well slept

52:40

you know so that experiment again we

52:43

won't always think about it at these two

52:44

levels what can individuals do there's a

52:46

lot

52:47

and there's the collective level where

52:48

we can make it possible for people to

52:50

make more personal changes

52:53

quick one

52:54

i can't talk about huel enough in my

52:55

life especially right now and it's

52:57

really interesting because what we tend

52:58

to see at this time of year

53:00

is the first thing that goes is our diet

53:03

quickly followed by our fitness and we

53:04

see that in the data across multiple

53:06

surveys people in the fourth quarter of

53:08

the year start indulging a little bit

53:10

more which is totally fine and they

53:12

start exercising a little bit less which

53:14

is totally fine

53:16

however a really useful crutch during

53:18

this period where the seasons have

53:20

changed and we're starting to behave a

53:21

little bit differently is making sure

53:23

your fridge is stocked with things that

53:24

are nutritionally complete healthy and

53:26

that are going to be convenient for you

53:27

to consume without compromising your

53:30

health and that is where ladies and

53:31

gentlemen

53:32

huel comes in and they now have four

53:35

brand new flavors they have the salted

53:37

caramel flavor absolutely love they have

53:40

the cinnamon swell flavor the number one

53:42

new flavor in my opinion which is really

53:43

surprising iced coffee caramel

53:46

and they have the strawberries and cream

53:47

flavor if you're going to try any of the

53:49

new flavors please do try the cinnamon

53:51

swirl and let me know what you think

53:52

it's an absolutely unexpected champion

53:53

of the new flavors

53:55

writers you're a writer that's one thing

53:57

you talk about you talk about why

53:59

reading is important and there's been a

54:01

macro decay in our reading and i

54:04

as i read that i thought why why

54:06

why is reading so important what role

54:09

does reading play we all consume

54:11

information digitally now why do we need

54:13

to go back to reading stuff

54:15

i think there's a few reasons um

54:18

and it's not again not a snooty

54:20

thing at all

54:22

so you're absolutely right that reading

54:23

is mass reading books has massively

54:25

declined um

54:26

57 of americans now never read a book in

54:29

any given year it's the first time in

54:30

the history of the american republic

54:31

that's the case we're

54:33

we're still a bit better than that in

54:34

britain but not not by much

54:36

and there's several people who really

54:37

helped me to understand this

54:40

and what that what that's doing to us

54:41

that's partly a symptom

54:43

of our declining attention and partly a

54:45

cause of it and i took a bit about how

54:47

saying to be a woman called professor

54:49

anne mangan is at stavanger university

54:50

in norway who's a professor of literacy

54:53

and probably the leading expert in the

54:54

world on on these questions

54:57

and she explained lots of things but

54:58

there's one very simple one you can do

54:59

studies have been loads of studies

55:01

showing this now

55:02

so you get group people you split them

55:04

randomly into two

55:05

the first group let's say you could do

55:06

it with my book you give one group of

55:08

people my book on the ipad like your

55:10

ipad there

55:11

and the other group you give the

55:12

physical book right and then you go back

55:14

to them a week a month a year later and

55:16

you just ask them questions about the

55:18

book

55:19

and it turns out

55:20

invariably the people who've read it on

55:23

the screen remember significantly less

55:25

and understand significantly less of

55:26

what they read this is a very well

55:28

proven effect it's called screen

55:29

inferiority it's such a big effect if

55:32

you take a ten-year-old child it's the

55:34

equivalent of two-thirds of their

55:36

progress in reading in a year

55:38

is lost when they're reading on a screen

55:40

it's that's how that's how much it

55:41

diminishes our ability to think

55:43

and it seems to be there's lots of

55:45

there's a big debate about why

55:47

but when you read let's say um you know

55:49

we opened

55:51

the bbc news site now and you me read

55:53

the same story when we read on a screen

55:56

what we tend to do is read in a sort of

55:59

skimming zed pattern you sort of skim

56:01

key words right

56:04

um

56:05

when you read a book generally we read

56:07

linearly we read from left to right you

56:09

know and you keep going

56:11

but part of the problem is if you spend

56:13

too much time reading on screens when

56:15

you read a book you start doing that

56:16

when you read books and it screws with

56:18

your ability to read books but the truth

56:20

is i think it's something more subtle

56:22

right so this marshall mcluhan was this

56:24

kind of professor in the 60s who said

56:26

this famous thing that i never

56:27

understood for years he said the medium

56:30

is the message right and what what he

56:31

meant was

56:33

when a new medium comes along he was

56:35

talking about television so a new way of

56:37

telling stories and thinking about the

56:38

world comes along

56:40

you know you could tell on your

56:41

television and you can watch the wire or

56:43

wheel of fortune or anything in between

56:44

right

56:46

the medium of television itself has a

56:48

message in it right irrespective of the

56:51

show you're watching on the television

56:53

so the medium of television the messages

56:54

the world is very fast it's all

56:57

happening at the same time

56:59

we can all think about things you get

57:00

from watching tv the way you feel if you

57:02

and i love tv things you feel when you

57:03

when you watch tv

57:06

but i think

57:07

there's a medium in the message of

57:10

social media right so think about

57:12

twitter

57:14

when you open twitter it doesn't matter

57:16

if you're donald trump bernie sanders or

57:18

i know bubba the love sponge right

57:20

there is a message you are absorbing

57:22

about how the world should be i would

57:24

say the message is firstly the world

57:27

should be interpreted and thought about

57:29

very quickly right

57:31

quick quick quick it should be

57:33

interpreted very briefly anything worth

57:35

saying can be said in very short little

57:37

bursts it's binary

57:39

exactly and what matters

57:42

the thing that is most important is

57:43

whether people immediately agree with

57:45

this very fast very short thing you've

57:48

said right that is the message hidden in

57:49

the medium of twitter right think about

57:51

instagram what's the message hidden in

57:53

the medium of instagram it's

57:55

um

57:56

what really matters is whether you look

57:58

good

57:58

and whether people like how you look

58:00

right that's it that's the message

58:02

what's the message in facebook

58:04

the message is okay friendship which is

58:07

the most precious human thing

58:09

friendship is looking at other people's

58:12

photographs of their life that you

58:13

should narrate your life to your friends

58:15

through images

58:17

and crave their likes and that that's

58:19

what friendship is mutually watching

58:21

each other's

58:22

carefully collected paparazzi images of

58:24

each other and liking them now

58:28

i think all those messages are wrong

58:31

that is a terrible way to live your life

58:33

right it is not true that life should be

58:35

interpreted quickly

58:38

actually if people immediately agree

58:40

with what you're saying

58:41

what you're saying probably didn't need

58:43

to be said at all right um yeah i like

58:46

pretty people instagram fine okay but if

58:48

that's the thing that you overweight

58:50

your life towards something's really

58:52

going wrong and friendship a true

58:54

friendship is nothing like a facebook

58:55

friendship but think about the message

58:58

the reason i say this in relation to

58:59

reading is think about the message in

59:01

the book right the printed book what

59:03

does a printed book say to you firstly

59:05

the world is complicated

59:07

and you might want to take a good bit of

59:09

time to think about one thing

59:12

secondly

59:13

it says

59:14

um you should slow down

59:16

slow down look at this thing that will

59:19

be saying the same thing 100 years from

59:21

now as it says right now right

59:23

and and thirdly it says

59:25

you might want to spend time thinking

59:27

about the inner lives of other people

59:30

because the inner lives of other people

59:31

are really interesting and you'll find

59:33

that they're like you in some ways and

59:34

unlike you in others right

59:36

so i would say take care what

59:38

technologies you absorb because over

59:41

time

59:42

your consciousness will come to resemble

59:44

those technologies you know you want to

59:46

have a life of meaning and purpose where

59:48

you engage with complex things where you

59:49

showed empathy where you showed love

59:51

these are not these are things that the

59:53

current model of social media absolutely

59:55

militates against and the books

59:58

help with they don't they're not the

59:59

solute you know they're not the sole

60:00

solution there's lots of things going on

60:01

but i i deeply believe in the medium of

60:04

the book i completely agree one of the

60:06

when i started writing my book i thought

60:08

it was insanity the concept of a book

60:09

because i'd grown up in that social

60:11

media area where you get instant

60:12

feedback etc etc and one of the like

60:14

really profound things i discovered with

60:16

a book is

60:18

because there's no comment section

60:21

no like really i think about a book if

60:23

it had a comment section below it the

60:25

comment section for a book exists on

60:27

some a website a million miles away

60:28

maybe in reviews and i really never look

60:30

at them so when someone's consuming it

60:32

they don't get to develop their opinion

60:34

based on consensus below and i've

60:36

noticed this so many times on instagram

60:38

if i post something and the top comment

60:41

takes on a certain narrative everyone

60:43

below will follow so if the top so i do

60:46

a post

60:47

people see it as it take it as it is you

60:49

can then see the behavior of them like

60:51

going into the comments section and the

60:53

minute a certain narrative emerges which

60:55

people find interesting everyone follows

60:58

that narrative and then if you i've done

60:59

it before like many years ago just

61:01

remove that comment or hide it

61:03

the narrative below changes and you can

61:05

see people actually deciding what they

61:07

think of what you're saying or whether

61:09

it's right or wrong based on the

61:10

consensus below i think it's even i

61:12

think you're absolutely right stephen i

61:13

don't know enough about comment sections

61:15

but i think in terms of commentary

61:17

online it's actually even worse than

61:19

what you just said in a lot of cases

61:21

and this is an effect of all the effects

61:23

i learned about in the book this is one

61:24

of the one that's that i think is most

61:26

harmful remember what we were saying

61:28

before which i know you know very well

61:29

that thing about the business model is

61:31

to keep people scrolling right minute

61:33

you stop scrolling they lose money all

61:35

their algorithms are designed with

61:37

literally one goal what will keep you

61:40

scrolling that's it that's the goal

61:41

right so as the algorithms in the ai

61:44

were figuring out what keeps people

61:46

scrolling

61:47

they bumped into they uncovered a human

61:50

quirk which is not the intention of

61:51

anyone at facebook or youtube or any of

61:53

these places

61:54

which is called it's a very well

61:56

documented psychological phenomenon

61:58

called negativity bias which is

62:00

basically means we will stare at

62:01

something negative longer than we will

62:03

stare at something positive anyone who's

62:04

ever been driving down the motorway and

62:06

passed a car crash knows exactly what

62:07

i'm talking about you stare at the car

62:09

crash longer than you stare at the

62:10

pretty flowers on the other side of the

62:12

road right and this is and this is

62:13

negatively biased goes very deep 10 week

62:16

old babies will stare longer an angry

62:18

face than a smiling face but when this

62:20

meets algorithms designed to maximize

62:23

the harvesting of attention this

62:24

produces a catastrophic effect and this

62:27

was this is not my view this is what

62:28

facebook itself found in its own

62:30

internal research which we've now had

62:32

leaked so imagine uh imagine this at

62:35

both a personal level and a political

62:36

level so imagine a teenager a group of

62:38

teenagers go to a party

62:40

one of them goes home

62:42

and on the bus on the way home they say

62:45

that was a really lovely party i enjoyed

62:47

it everyone looked great and they were

62:48

so nice

62:50

another teenager from the same party

62:52

posts

62:53

um

62:54

god karen looked like a right slag

62:56

tonight uh her boyfriend jim is a [ __ ]

62:59

what does the algorithm do

63:01

the second one

63:02

is more like the car crash people will

63:04

stare at it longer the algorithm will

63:06

promote it in the feed it will put it

63:08

much higher the nice one that's gonna be

63:11

way down if anyone sees it right now

63:13

that's disastrous enough at the level of

63:15

teenagers who've gone to a party now

63:16

imagine at a political level we don't

63:18

have to imagine it everyone listening

63:20

remembers who donald trump was so what

63:22

happened in the 2016 election what

63:23

happened in what's happening all over

63:26

the world every day all the time on

63:28

politics is we are being stoked to be

63:31

more angry

63:33

all the time the algorithms select for

63:35

anger because anger will keep you

63:37

scrolling right and that is destroying

63:40

our ability to solve problems and this

63:42

is not just my view in the wake of the

63:45

victory of brexit and donald trump

63:47

facebook internally set up a group of

63:50

its own data scientists called common

63:52

ground

63:53

and we now know what they found because

63:54

it was leaked and what their own data

63:57

scientists said is the facebook model

63:59

and the wider business model of social

64:01

media

64:02

inevitably causes division and

64:05

polarization that this was having

64:07

catastrophic effects it's partly what

64:08

fueled the genocide in myanmar

64:11

at burma um

64:13

and that this was in it was actually

64:15

very striking the way they put it this

64:16

was inherent to the facebook business

64:18

model and the only alternative was for

64:21

facebook to abandon its business model

64:23

and adopt what they called an

64:24

anti-growth model where they said we

64:26

won't grow as a company but we won't set

64:28

the cup world on fire right and there's

64:30

a very dry

64:31

the wall street journal who got leaked

64:33

it

64:33

they said their new story said

64:36

after he received this report mark

64:38

zuckerberg asked that he never be

64:39

brought any reports like this ever again

64:41

right so you know they know what they're

64:43

doing

64:44

the business model they're tied to their

64:46

business model they're only going to

64:47

stop doing it when we make them

64:49

but this machinery that is amping us up

64:51

into anger is just a personal first it

64:54

destroys attention when you're angry

64:56

it's much harder to pay attention we all

64:58

we've all had that experience but

64:59

there's good science for it as well

65:01

but also it's it's devastating for the

65:04

society

65:05

and we've got to deal with that i

65:07

remember doing a study i think it was

65:08

2017 i can't remember the year when

65:10

trump got elected which i presented to

65:12

coca-cola where i looked at hillary

65:13

clinton's online reach on crimson

65:15

hexagon versus trump's and it was like

65:17

12 he was reaching 12 times 12 to 15

65:20

times more people with his message

65:22

because it was centered in like really

65:23

polarizing inflammatory stuff and the

65:25

algorithm is just sending that whereas

65:27

indifference just doesn't move on social

65:29

media it's like a tree falling in the

65:30

forest with no one there well not even a

65:32

difference reasonable argument yeah who

65:34

cares you know like who's that going to

65:35

bang with it doesn't resonate with

65:37

anybody so the tribe can't pick it up

65:38

and move it for you so you're right like

65:40

the fear and anything sort of polarizing

65:42

moves really really well but i would say

65:44

i think it's a really important point

65:46

and i thought a lot about it when i was

65:47

working on stolen focus i think there

65:50

are obvious and i know you know this

65:51

much better than i do there are

65:54

huge other human motivators than fear

65:57

and anger

65:58

that we can that we can build algorithms

66:00

around right so more compelling than

66:02

fear though oh well at the moment

66:05

precisely because

66:07

this rage can be drilled into and

66:09

monetized

66:10

that's why we need regulations to stop

66:14

that hacking of the worst aspect of our

66:15

characters

66:17

which not to say there aren't legitimate

66:18

things to be angry about there are and

66:20

building algorithms around better things

66:22

right and and that's why you know people

66:25

in favor of progressive change like

66:27

ending racism in policing which is an

66:29

urgent cause

66:31

actually the emotion we appeal to most

66:33

is not rage the emotion we appeal to

66:35

most those of us who believe in that

66:37

cause

66:38

is hope and love and empathy right the

66:41

very

66:42

why why if you look at even if you think

66:44

about left-wing anger versus right-wing

66:46

anger why do these algorithms boost

66:49

right-wing anger much more than

66:50

left-wing anger and there's again this

66:52

is leaked by facebook we know this

66:55

it's because ultimately

66:57

when you're in favor of progressive

66:58

change you can't just be angry you have

67:01

to have a hopeful vision of the future

67:03

do you see what i mean yeah and we can

67:05

build this machinery around encouraging

67:08

and rewarding hope at the moment we have

67:10

it we're all plugged in to what maggie

67:12

haberman the new york times journalist

67:13

called an anger-based video game right

67:16

that's basically what twitter is and

67:18

facebook there's an amazing study by the

67:20

pew research institute that found that

67:21

for every word of moral outrage you add

67:24

to a facebook status update you double

67:27

the likes and shares right the words

67:29

that most supercharge sharing and views

67:31

on youtube

67:33

are hates destroys and obliterates right

67:37

now that is a machinery if you plug

67:40

people into that anger-based machinery

67:42

for large parts of the day the anger

67:44

doesn't go away when they put the phone

67:46

down right it's not like a release valve

67:48

it's like a it's like taking a an uh you

67:52

know a drug that amps you up right and

67:54

you're seeing that and that is degrading

67:56

our individual attention because angry

67:58

people pay attention much less well uh

68:00

it's dreading our ability to think but

68:01

it's also degrading our collective

68:02

attention right you see it's how we're

68:04

tribalizing around covid you can see

68:06

this in all sorts of ways the ways we're

68:08

tribalizing and turning on each other

68:11

about things that actually we have

68:12

perfectly sensible solutions to do you

68:14

think that it's anger-based machinery or

68:15

do you think it's plugging angry humans

68:17

into machinery because i i think i think

68:20

if you just created an algorithm which

68:21

just which had no bias at all and you

68:23

said

68:24

um

68:26

you know our objective as youtube is to

68:27

show you things that you click on more

68:30

it would only take a couple of days for

68:31

everyone's algorithm to be programmed to

68:33

show them fearful things because as you

68:35

said about the the fear bias we have and

68:38

the prehistoric evolutionary reasons why

68:41

we would want to know that there was a

68:43

line behind the rock versus one caring

68:46

if there was an ant behind the rock that

68:48

eventually because we are fear

68:50

avoiding humans we would we basically

68:52

would train in any algorithm eventually

68:54

just to show us the scary [ __ ] so there

68:56

are definitely and tristan harris i

68:58

talked to him a lot about this the

68:59

former google engineer there are lots of

69:01

alternative ways you can structure these

69:03

apps right so to give an obvious one

69:06

you could just turn off the youtube

69:07

recommendations it's not like before

69:09

they existed we were all going what will

69:11

i watch next what will i do we weren't

69:13

suddenly a lot just it's tristan says

69:15

just turn it off if the only way it can

69:17

work is that it [ __ ] people up

69:19

turn it off we don't need it it's not

69:20

that important or an alternative issue

69:23

and there are all sorts of other ways

69:24

the other ones could be structured so

69:26

twitter and we don't have to think

69:28

hypothetically twitter used to be

69:29

chronological right if you follow 200

69:31

people you open twitter the first thing

69:33

you would see is the most recent thing

69:35

that one of the 200 people you you

69:37

follow posted right you'll notice

69:39

twitter doesn't do that anymore it now

69:41

has an algorithm that selects precisely

69:43

for the things we're talking about means

69:44

twitter has become even more toxic and

69:46

even more hateful and it went wasn't

69:48

that good at the start right um

69:50

so again just go back to the

69:51

chronological even just going back to

69:53

the chronological algorithm you need a

69:54

lot more changes than that that in

69:56

itself you're right would be better so

69:57

there's all sorts of algorithms you'd

69:59

have to do to every technology company

70:02

though because no you don't this is the

70:04

thing you have to change the incentives

70:06

and then they will do it right at the

70:08

moment

70:09

all of their incentives you've got all

70:11

these smart engineers and they've got

70:12

one incentive how do i take steven's

70:15

attention the absolute most i can right

70:18

now

70:19

you change the incent they don't work

70:20

for you remember they work for the

70:22

advertisers who who

70:25

when the incentives change

70:27

then they're going to change then

70:29

obviously their behavior changes right

70:30

any business when their incentive

70:32

changes if they want to please you

70:33

rather than pleasing the advertiser then

70:35

of course the market will then provide

70:37

all sorts of ways the market the

70:38

competition at the moment the

70:39

competition is how do i maximally invade

70:40

your attention

70:41

if we move to a new business model the

70:43

competition is what does stephen

70:45

actually want if steven wants to know

70:47

where his friends are so we can have a

70:48

drink with them okay give him that

70:49

button what else does steven want steve

70:51

wants to meditate oh we'll give him that

70:52

button you can see how once they they're

70:54

figuring out what you want not what the

70:56

advertisers want then of course the

70:58

market begins to experiment and there'll

70:59

be a thousand innovations and maybe some

71:01

of those innovations will go awry and

71:02

have other negative effects and we'll

71:04

have to stop them doing that just like

71:06

you know there might be a new form of

71:07

paint that's even worse than lead paint

71:08

all right we'll ban that and we'll stick

71:10

with the one that doesn't screw people

71:11

up it feels like running around with the

71:13

uh with a fire extinguisher like

71:15

spring fight like absolutely will be

71:18

if we don't change the incentives yeah

71:19

right is that a government decision to

71:22

and what would the

71:23

legal intervention be it's pretty

71:26

straightforward you you ban the specific

71:28

mechanism of surveilling people in order

71:31

to harvest their education and sell that

71:32

to the it's not that's not complicated

71:34

it's not a legally difficult thing to do

71:35

it's a politically difficult thing to do

71:37

right we have to take on these companies

71:39

paul graham one of the leading silicon

71:41

valley investors

71:43

said the world would be far more

71:44

addictive in the next 40 years than it

71:46

was in the last 40. think about

71:48

something as simple a couple of simple

71:49

things facebook has already patented a

71:51

technology that could read your emotions

71:53

through your camera on your phone and

71:55

your laptop right

71:57

um you can see how that adds an extra

71:59

layer of how they can invade your

72:01

attention or think about something

72:02

called and i learned about this from

72:04

acer asking think about something called

72:06

style transfer really simple concept um

72:09

some people might have seen it in like

72:11

um

72:12

there's like machines that do it in

72:13

arcades in the us

72:14

so

72:15

you can take a photo any photo

72:18

and you can run it through a style

72:19

transfer program that will remake that

72:21

image in the style of vincent van gogh

72:24

or monet or you can name a painter right

72:27

so it'll just redo that picture in that

72:28

style the style transfer

72:30

but style transfer can be used in a very

72:32

different way

72:33

gmail totally legally now could scan all

72:36

of your gmail

72:38

at the ai would of course a human being

72:40

doesn't read it scan all of your gmail

72:42

and figure out the patterns of words and

72:45

the ways of talking that you reply to

72:48

you respond to most right

72:50

and then

72:51

it can sell that to advertisers so

72:54

advertisers know to approach you

72:56

using the kind of words that are

72:58

uniquely persuasive to you right now

73:01

that's going to happen if we don't

73:02

regulate that's that technology exists

73:05

um

73:06

imagine a thousand things like that are

73:08

going to be happening so it's not even

73:10

like we'll stay at the current level of

73:11

technological invasion there's

73:13

essentially a race on this aspect of the

73:14

attention crisis

73:16

between

73:18

the increasingly invasive forces of

73:20

technology which will get more and more

73:22

potent and are more potent this year

73:24

than they were last year

73:26

and would definitely be more potent a

73:27

year from now

73:28

there's that and then there's the

73:30

movement of people who are trying to

73:32

restrain this and to deal with the other

73:34

causes of the attention crisis and to me

73:36

it's a race right and it might seem like

73:38

a really big thing a movement what does

73:39

that mean when i think about that i

73:40

think about can i ask you that are you

73:42

optimistic

73:43

because i yeah i am absolutely not and

73:46

one of the the most compelling reasons

73:48

that i'm not optimistic about there

73:50

being any

73:51

um practical effective change is because

73:53

i watched the senate hearing when they

73:55

brought in mark zuckerberg and jack

73:57

dorsey and

73:58

the ceo of all these big companies jeff

74:00

bezos etc and the people who are making

74:03

the laws didn't have a [ __ ] clue

74:07

about

74:08

any social platform at all and it was

74:11

like parody in fact the videos went

74:13

viral on all social networks of these

74:17

plus 60 year old senators

74:19

trying to get their head around what

74:21

whatsapp was well they were basically

74:22

saying things like i can't find the

74:24

password for my phone well how do i get

74:26

it like bizarre

74:29

and you could see zuckerberg and dorsey

74:31

just like you could all if you look

74:33

close enough you'd see the smirk in the

74:35

corner of their mouth because they were

74:36

just like mentally bullying them they

74:38

have no idea about these technologies

74:40

and i'll be honest as someone that's

74:41

worked in this industry for a very long

74:43

time since probably

74:45

one of the few people that's been like

74:46

balls deep in this since it began

74:48

sometimes when i hear people speaking

74:49

about um

74:51

the risks

74:52

of technology and the data conversation

74:55

and all of these things

74:56

i think oh you just you've literally

74:57

just got your opinion from like reading

74:59

the newspaper and it's so much deeper

75:02

and if you just

75:03

flick that switch then

75:05

the cascading impact which you don't

75:07

understand because you can't see the

75:08

full picture is actually

75:10

this will just happen and so when i

75:12

think about the people making the laws

75:13

is kind of my conclusive point

75:15

they have no idea what they're talking

75:16

about like so you base and then the

75:18

conclusion is so you have to go and get

75:20

people from the industry to make the

75:22

laws i there is no way boris johnson

75:26

or anyone around boris johnson and i've

75:28

met some of these people could make any

75:32

real effective

75:33

change to legislation as you say when

75:36

you're talking about a race

75:38

in time

75:40

for that industry not to develop and

75:42

change and now you know they're probably

75:44

still trying to figure out the news feed

75:46

whereas these big corporations are now

75:48

talking about machine learning and ai

75:50

and they just will never keep up and

75:52

they've never been able to and now we've

75:53

got the metaverse coming and they

75:55

they're still trying to figure out if

75:56

snapchat is filters are okay and now

75:59

we're racing off into the metaverse

76:01

there's

76:01

in my opinion there is no possible

76:04

chance that technology and the pace of

76:06

change will

76:08

um be slower than the pace of effective

76:11

legislation

76:12

when i have that thought and that

76:13

thought obviously crosses my mind fairly

76:15

often

76:17

i think about something very specific

76:18

happen in my family will have happened

76:20

in your family will happen in the

76:21

families of everyone listening it's to

76:22

some degree

76:24

so i'm 42

76:26

when my grandmothers were 42 years old i

76:28

think about what the world was like

76:29

right so one of my grandmothers was a

76:30

working class scottish woman and one of

76:32

my grandmothers was a swiss woman living

76:34

on a mountain which is what would be

76:36

called sort of a peasant then right

76:38

it was legal for them to be raped by

76:39

their husbands

76:41

they were not allowed to have bank

76:42

accounts

76:43

because they were married women

76:45

in their own names

76:47

my swiss grandmother didn't even have

76:48

the vote

76:49

she needed written permission to work

76:51

outside the home which her husband would

76:52

not give her

76:54

at that time

76:56

nowhere in the world was there a woman

76:58

who ran a company

76:59

was there a woman who ran a country

77:01

there was one country

77:03

was there a woman who ran a police force

77:05

in fact there were almost no women

77:06

police officers senior women police

77:08

officers

77:09

in britain four percent of members of

77:11

parliament were women

77:13

every institution in the whole world was

77:15

run by men and had been since they were

77:17

created right

77:19

and because ordinary people

77:22

changed the culture that created

77:24

pressure on the politicians to change

77:26

the society so now

77:28

no politician would propose anything

77:30

like going back to 19 1962 1963

77:34

for women's rights it would be

77:35

unthinkable that even the most far-out

77:37

ukip candidate if they suggested that

77:39

would have to stand down right so it's

77:41

cultural change and just like the

77:43

feminist movement reclaim women's right

77:45

to their bodies and still has work to do

77:46

as we know

77:48

we need an attention movement to reclaim

77:50

our minds right we can do some of it

77:52

individually

77:53

but a lot of it we can do together at

77:54

the moment it's like someone is pouring

77:56

itching powder over us all day and then

77:59

the person pouring itching powder on us

78:00

is going

78:01

mate you might want to learn to meditate

78:03

it will stop you scratching so much

78:05

right i mean i'm in favor of meditation

78:06

it's a good thing

78:08

but someone's gonna have to take on the

78:09

[ __ ] who are pouring the itching

78:11

powder on us right

78:12

we've got to do both

78:14

so interesting because if you take on

78:15

the [ __ ] that are pouring the itching

78:16

powder there's like there's like

78:18

some knock-on effects i can see i was

78:20

thinking then about like why boris

78:22

johnson wouldn't want to impose

78:24

i was thinking as well about

78:25

recommendation algorithms which you

78:26

discussed um netflix has one youtube has

78:29

one tick tock has one everything

78:30

everything on my phone seems to have a

78:32

recommendation algorithm to get me to

78:33

buy something hang around longer

78:34

whatever trying to serve me better under

78:36

the guise of trying to serve me netflix

78:38

wants to serve you better because you

78:39

are the customer yeah so netflix doesn't

78:41

feed you in raging things netflix

78:43

doesn't show you the film that will wind

78:44

you up the most right because you are

78:46

the customer for netflix on facebook

78:48

tick tock and the others you're not the

78:49

customer

78:50

that's why it feeds you the stuff that

78:52

angers you maximally invades your

78:53

attention so there's an important

78:54

distinction between those two right and

78:56

then they're but they both have the same

78:59

incentive which is they say they are i

79:01

mean netflix famously said our only

79:03

competitor is sleepy yeah rex hastings

79:06

the head of netflix said that yeah yeah

79:08

so if like boris was to turn around

79:09

today and says i'm going to ban

79:10

recommendation algorithms or whatever

79:12

the issue he has is

79:15

it sounds like that would hurt our

79:17

chance of innovation in a global

79:19

landscape where other countries haven't

79:22

got those bans and so that would just

79:24

mean that uk tech companies were worse

79:26

yeah we've got to have bigger movements

79:27

but actually it's exact opposite a

79:29

society of people who can't focus can't

79:31

pay attention our thinking in 65 second

79:34

bursts

79:35

is not going to be an innovative society

79:37

right there's a reason why china

79:38

although i strongly oppose the communist

79:41

tyranny in china don't get me wrong why

79:43

china has just banned the amount of kids

79:45

or

79:46

very tightly restricted the amount of

79:47

time kids can spend on um video games

79:50

each week and don't allow any of these

79:53

algorithms on way about weibo and the

79:54

other things or

79:56

tightly regulate them would be more

79:57

accurate way of putting it right so if

79:59

our goal is as a country to be a country

80:01

that's innovative my god a country of

80:03

people who can think is going to be

80:04

innovative country of adult people

80:07

flicking between whatsapp snapchat and

80:09

tick tock ain't going to be a place full

80:11

of innovation right so i think

80:13

of course it's a job of explaining to

80:15

people if it was done out of the blue

80:16

now people would be baffled right so in

80:18

the same way that in you know

80:21

1962

80:22

um what you think about even just gay

80:24

people in 1962 literally nobody

80:27

including gay people suggested gay

80:28

marriage it wasn't saying anyone even

80:29

thought of right because it'd be like

80:31

it'd be so bizarre you know at that

80:33

point um well a little bit before that

80:35

being gay was a crime right

80:37

so

80:37

as you build you start to become more

80:39

sophisticated and have more ambitious

80:41

goals so at the moment we're starting

80:42

from a very basic level there's a really

80:44

interesting study that was done by a guy

80:46

called mahateri islami at the university

80:48

of illinois where he just got a load of

80:50

facebook users and just explained the

80:52

algorithm to them

80:53

and 62 of them didn't know what an

80:55

algorithm was before he taught them

80:56

through it one of them compared it to

80:58

the moment when keanu reeves in the

81:01

matrix finds out he's living in a

81:02

simulation right it blew their minds so

81:04

we're obviously a very basic level but

81:08

in terms of education because we haven't

81:10

been explaining i didn't know most of

81:11

this stuff before i did the research for

81:13

stolen focus and i didn't know about all

81:14

the other causes of uh things that are

81:16

invading our attention including some

81:18

that are much bigger actually than even

81:20

this so we have to do the work of

81:21

education we have to understand the

81:23

advantage i think we've got

81:25

is this isn't like explaining quantum

81:28

physics to someone right

81:30

we could stop anyone in the street here

81:32

in east london

81:33

and explain this to them and they are

81:35

going to get it right they can feel this

81:37

happening they can see it happening

81:38

around them so it's not that there's

81:44

in a sense the dissatisfaction and

81:45

unhappiness with all this is at the

81:47

surface

81:48

all we need to do is help people to

81:50

understand what they can do with that

81:51

dissatisfaction that this isn't just

81:54

it's not a personal failing on your part

81:55

it's really important people to

81:57

understand that if your response is

81:58

going ah

81:59

i'm just [ __ ] i'm weak i'm you know a

82:02

that's they would love you to think that

82:04

right they look they there's a constant

82:06

process of trying to transfer the blame

82:09

down to you right

82:11

so it's partly to understand it's not

82:13

your fault

82:14

it's partly to understand it's not even

82:16

the fault of technology it's the fault

82:19

of specific aspects about how our

82:21

technology works that we can change in

82:23

practical ways

82:25

that's those are the two things i think

82:26

it's really important to understand on

82:28

the about the current i mean there's

82:29

many other things and

82:31

other ways we can protect ourselves by

82:33

having more knowledge

82:34

but i think it's essential for us to

82:36

understand that because you're right

82:37

it's very easy to get into a

82:38

disempowered oh

82:40

this is so big but i'll tell you what my

82:42

grandmother's in 1962

82:44

would have a lot more reason to be to

82:46

think things could never change than we

82:47

do about tech right

82:49

i mean

82:50

it if you had shown my grandmother's my

82:53

niece's life it would have been

82:54

unthinkable these things can totally

82:56

change

82:57

james williams the google engineer i

82:58

quoted before said to me once you know

83:00

the axe existed for 1.4 million years

83:03

before anyone thought to put a handle on

83:05

it the entire web has only existed for

83:08

less than 10 000 days

83:10

we can change this thing if we want to

83:12

right we're humans and it's also about a

83:14

different disposition to this we're not

83:16

broken people and we are not

83:19

like

83:20

medieval peasants begging at the court

83:22

of king zuckerberg for a few little

83:24

crumbs of attention from his table we

83:26

are the free citizens of democracies we

83:29

own our minds we own our societies and

83:32

we can take them back if we want to we

83:34

have to decide do we value attention

83:36

people who've got children and there's

83:37

about a quarter of the book is about how

83:39

we're [ __ ] up our kids attention and

83:41

there's loads of really important things

83:42

we need to know about that that are very

83:43

different from how our schools work what

83:45

our kids eat to um the deprivation of

83:48

children being able to play but people

83:49

who've got children do you want your

83:51

child to be able to focus do you want

83:53

your child to be able to read books do

83:54

you want your child to be able to think

83:56

deeply do you want your life to have a

83:58

your child to have a life full of flow

83:59

states of course you do okay we've got

84:02

to fix the society and culture to give

84:04

them those things i feel like um

84:06

i feel like everyone listening to that

84:07

will agree and they'll all say that's a

84:09

problem i agree i want to make that

84:11

change but i think like

84:12

movements need a really specific

84:14

objective for people to rally around and

84:16

that objective is ultimately what

84:18

they're kind of taking to their

84:19

legislators or their politicians to say

84:21

this is the thing we want to change so i

84:22

would suggest three very specific if

84:24

we're going to have an attention a

84:25

movement an attention movement and

84:27

there's already lots of elements of this

84:29

fight going on and i

84:31

go through in the book how who peop who

84:33

they are and how people can join them

84:35

i would say initially three goals

84:37

uh ban this is called surveillance

84:39

capitalism ban the surveillance

84:41

capitalism business model just they

84:44

cannot track you invade you profile you

84:47

and sell your attention to advertisers

84:49

ban it very easy to do you can write

84:51

legislation in a day right

84:53

that's number one number two i would say

84:55

a four day working week the evidence is

84:57

very clear we are exhausted we are

84:58

overworked we are underslept

85:01

give people back time right covered was

85:04

the first time our society has slowed

85:05

down we've been accelerating for a long

85:07

time now we slowed down because of a

85:09

tragedy and of course none of us would

85:11

have wished for it to happen this way

85:13

but and of course there were many people

85:14

who were not able to slow down like

85:16

health workers

85:17

but

85:18

a lot of people found a real relief in

85:20

the slowness that came from covid right

85:22

we've got to slow the society down speed

85:26

destroys attention there's really good

85:28

evidence for this and the third thing is

85:30

we need to restore childhood

85:32

only 10 of children

85:34

play outside their home without adult

85:36

supervision

85:38

ever

85:38

play is how children learn to pay

85:40

attention it's how they learn to learn a

85:42

whole

85:44

body of skills come from play also just

85:46

exercise massively boosts your attention

85:48

and we've deprived our children of

85:50

exercise that's even before covid

85:52

obviously covered made it even worse for

85:53

all the obvious reasons so obviously

85:55

those are three very straightforward

85:56

goals two of them could be done with

85:58

legislation in a day right

86:01

now of course it takes a big fight to

86:02

prepare the ground for people to want

86:04

those things but they are achievable

86:06

they'll make our lives better not just

86:08

in terms of attention but in so many

86:09

ways so i'm optimistic in the sense that

86:11

there have been bigger challenges than

86:13

this yeah and human beings met those

86:15

challenges i also i think we have to be

86:17

optimistic because if we don't deal with

86:19

this

86:21

i don't think we can deal with the

86:22

bigger crises right think about the

86:23

climate crises

86:26

a group of people a species that cannot

86:29

pay attention that cannot focus

86:31

and that interacts primarily through

86:33

mediums that promote false claims and

86:36

lies so an mit study found that 19 of

86:39

the 20 most shared stories

86:41

on facebook in the 2016 election were

86:44

untrue like a false claim that the pope

86:46

could endorse donald trump 19 out of 20

86:49

just not true right

86:51

if we can't get

86:53

our focus and our ability to distinguish

86:57

uh

86:58

truth from falsehood back

87:01

how are we ever going to deal with the

87:02

climate crisis how are we ever going to

87:03

deal with

87:05

any of the problems that face us how we

87:06

can deal with our own personal problems

87:08

right we can't do that so this is the

87:10

necessary step we have to take

87:13

i think as individuals if you're facing

87:15

problems

87:17

the first step is

87:18

if you can't pay attention to the things

87:19

that matter

87:20

you're [ __ ] what can you do you can't

87:22

do anything you're just like a flailing

87:25

animal on a beach right um which is what

87:27

i always look like on a beach anyway but

87:29

um so

87:30

attention is the prerequisite to any

87:33

achievement i think

87:35

the last thing i was actually really

87:36

surprised to find in stolen focus was

87:38

you talking about food

87:40

in lost connections you talk about junk

87:42

values but in stolen focus you actually

87:44

talk about junk food and there's the

87:46

quote installed in focus where you say

87:48

we should endeavor to eat what our

87:50

grandparents would have eaten what they

87:52

would have considered real food

87:54

i loved that really resonates with me

87:56

and i've been i've been on a bit of a

87:57

crusade to try and live a little bit

87:58

more human and unless

88:00

20 20 maybe a little bit more

88:02

i don't know

88:04

9000 bc or whatever that was

88:06

so why why did you feel the need to talk

88:09

about junk food and food in a book about

88:12

attention this is one of the causes that

88:14

i learned about that i did not see

88:15

coming and it was only when i was

88:17

reading a lot of the science i was like

88:18

oh wait so there's

88:20

there's three ways in which the current

88:23

diet we eat which is completely

88:24

different to all humans before i was

88:26

eight i mean it's been an extraordinary

88:28

transformation in a very short period of

88:29

time

88:31

is is damaging our attention so dale

88:33

pinnock who's one of britain's leading

88:35

nutritionist you should um should have

88:36

him on actually he's really interesting

88:37

guy dale um so dale explained to me that

88:41

the and other scientists have shown that

88:43

the diet we eat

88:45

causes

88:46

very rapid release of energy and very

88:48

rapid crashes in energy which causes

88:51

brain fog which ruins your focus so say

88:53

for example you have and by the way i

88:55

want to say i'm completely hypocrite

88:56

saying this i literally had a mcdonald's

88:57

on the way here so just any sense of

88:59

superiority let's say you have frosties

89:01

and white bread right for breakfast what

89:03

that does is it releases a huge amount

89:05

of glucose gives you a massive rush of

89:06

energy feels great for about 20 minutes

89:08

and then you're sitting at your desk or

89:09

your kids sitting at their desk and the

89:11

glucose crashes and you're just in brain

89:13

fog right so one way is it the way dale

89:15

puts it is you know if you put

89:17

um rocket fuel into a mini it would go

89:20

really fast for a minute and then it

89:22

would just putter out and we're

89:23

basically doing that and as he put it to

89:25

me if you're eating sort of shitty

89:26

carbohydrates every meal

89:29

you're doing that to yourself again and

89:30

again and again all throughout the day

89:34

the second way in which it harms our

89:35

attention

89:36

our current diet deprives us of

89:38

nutrients that are necessary for your

89:40

brain to develop right there's an

89:41

interesting study by dutch scientists

89:44

where they got a bunch of kids they did

89:46

this several times and it replicated

89:47

well they got a bunch of kids

89:50

and they put one of them on what they

89:51

called an eliminationist diet where they

89:53

basically didn't eat any processed food

89:55

and the other group of kids just ate

89:56

normally and the kids that were put on a

89:59

on with cut out all the processed food

90:01

and all of that

90:02

that 70 of them had significant

90:05

improvements in their attention

90:06

and their average improvement in

90:08

detention was 50 so really big

90:10

improvement

90:12

the third cause

90:14

is that it's not just that our food

90:16

lacks things we need

90:18

is that it contains things that act on

90:20

us like drugs there's a really shocking

90:22

study on this it's done in southampton

90:24

here in britain in 2007. they got nearly

90:26

300 kids they were seven year olds and

90:29

12 year olds

90:30

and they split them into

90:33

two groups

90:35

and the first group was given a drink

90:37

that just contained

90:39

dyes that exist in normal food like m

90:42

m's you know synthetic dyes and the

90:45

other group i think i can't if it's just

90:46

water or it was some kind of flavoring

90:48

that doesn't contain these dyes

90:50

and then they were monitored and the

90:51

kids that drank the dyes that kitten

90:54

every day and i'm eating every day

90:56

were significantly more likely to have

90:58

attention problems struggle focusing so

91:01

you've got these three ways and you

91:02

mentioned you know this this big change

91:04

about how our ancestors i mean i

91:05

remember when i was a

91:06

as i said my my my dad's from

91:08

switzerland um i grew up on this in this

91:11

little hut in a mountain in switzerland

91:13

and when i was a kid it started when i

91:15

was nine

91:16

my dad that bastard sent me his very

91:18

nice man in many ways sent me every

91:20

summer to go and stay on this farm where

91:21

he'd he'd grown up he's like go to the

91:24

farm you've become a man he said um

91:28

and i would arrive there and to me this

91:30

was like i grew up in edward right

91:31

suddenly on a swiss mountain it's like

91:33

what's happening right

91:35

um

91:36

and i remember my so my grandparents ate

91:37

how almost all humans in almost all of

91:40

our history have eaten they would grow

91:42

their own food and they would kill their

91:43

own animals right and eat them

91:46

and i remember my my grandmother used to

91:48

just put food in front of me i remember

91:49

the i remember very clearly the first

91:50

day i was there looking at it because i

91:52

grew up you know i was raised mostly by

91:53

my scottish grandmother working class

91:55

scottish women i grew up eating

91:57

microwave chips and fried food and you

92:01

know i remember looking at the food my

92:02

swiss grandmother gave me

92:04

and literally saying

92:06

where is the food

92:08

this isn't food

92:09

and then just being completely puzzled

92:11

so for like two weeks i didn't i ate

92:12

almost nothing and then finally she

92:14

cracked and took me to the mcdonald's in

92:15

zurich which is pretty far away and i

92:17

remember i was sitting at mcdonald's and

92:19

her looking at it and her saying but

92:21

this isn't food what are you talking

92:23

about she just couldn't understand why i

92:25

would want to eat it and so in three in

92:27

two generations there was a huge change

92:30

we went from eating mostly fresh and

92:31

nutritious food to mostly most peop most

92:34

british and american people

92:36

most of their diet now consists of

92:38

processed or ultra processed food which

92:40

is just really different it's just very

92:42

different i mean the food writer michael

92:44

pollan who i know

92:46

said we shouldn't call it food we should

92:48

call it food-like substances

92:50

because it doesn't resemble food now

92:51

again this is one of the other causes

92:52

bit like the four day week

92:54

i can tell you all the facts

92:56

can i do it no

92:58

you know i mean i'm a bit better than i

93:00

was but only a bit so to um to end we're

93:03

going to continue with our new tradition

93:06

which is asking you the question that

93:08

our previous guest left for you

93:10

and the previous guest that sat here

93:11

wrote in the diary

93:18

what was

93:20

the best conversation

93:22

you ever had

93:24

and why

93:25

oh that's a very good question i'm not

93:27

meant to talk about this but i'll i'll

93:29

i'll talk a little bit about it

93:31

i

93:32

am getting emotional a bit emotional

93:33

about this uh try not to um

93:37

the last 10 years i've been researching

93:38

a book about

93:40

a series of crimes that have been

93:41

happening in las vegas and i'm not meant

93:43

to talk about it too much

93:47

and

93:48

there's a couple who lived beneath

93:51

caesar's palace in the drainage tunnel

93:52

beneath his palace

93:54

called tommy and shea who i got to know

93:56

incredibly well

93:58

who are two of the people i've most

93:59

loved in my life i remember standing

94:01

above where their tunnel is and shade

94:05

and shade just saying

94:08

all these people

94:10

they're so much closer to where we are

94:12

than they think

94:14

not just physically but

94:16

a few things go wrong

94:19

and

94:20

in that society you're in a [ __ ]

94:21

tunnel and i remember that night with

94:23

tommy and shay

94:26

and i must have heard that i think i was

94:27

with them for like 12 hours that day

94:30

uh

94:32

i think that's one of the best

94:33

conversations i've ever had there shay

94:35

is so wise

94:37

uh tommy is so f was so funny

94:43

and they taught me so much about

94:46

in all the years i knew them for how to

94:49

be a person and tommy was murdered last

94:51

year it's one of the reasons why i spent

94:52

a lot of the plague in vegas because

94:54

i've been trying to

94:55

help shay and figure out what's going on

94:58

what happened um

95:01

and

95:03

i think that's one of the best

95:04

conversations in my life i i think they

95:06

are

95:12

they they taught me to

95:15

think about life differently

95:17

and

95:17

every day i integrate some lesson that

95:20

tommy taught me and i think that's one

95:22

night i mean there's so many nights we

95:23

spent together but

95:24

that's one night that really stands out

95:27

for me i mean i can think of lots of

95:28

others but that's the one that

95:30

you know it's amazing the remarkable

95:31

thing about your writing which makes it

95:32

so engaging and compelling is it isn't

95:35

assigned to shouting facts and figures

95:36

at you which i just as someone that

95:38

struggles to read anyway i have to have

95:40

a captivating emotional journey to take

95:42

me through these subjects for me to be

95:44

able to ingrain them in my conscious so

95:46

um your books all do that especially

95:48

this one especially lost connections

95:50

which is one of my all-time favorite

95:51

books by the way but stolen focus is a

95:53

is a an amazing somewhat linked uh

95:57

sequel in many respects and on many

95:59

topics to that book and that was my

96:01

favorite ever and this is one of now one

96:02

of my favorite books as well because uh

96:04

it's one of the books that i managed to

96:05

actually read in the last year

96:08

because of the way you write and that's

96:09

a huge credit to you um there's a reason

96:11

i always bring you back on this podcast

96:13

i love these conversations great um and

96:15

you've been uh and off camera you're

96:17

you're

96:19

you know you probably should be a

96:20

comedian because you're so hilarious but

96:22

on camera you're such an intelligent

96:23

human being and

96:24

off camera you're funny you're

96:26

intelligent you're not so off-camera

96:28

but uh you're an incredible human being

96:29

and i love i love having you here so oh

96:31

thanks again for giving me this time and

96:33

i'm so i'm so glad that um we're able to

96:34

have this conversation because it's such

96:36

an important one and one that i need i

96:38

needed in my life i really appreciate

96:40

you how deeply you pay attention to the

96:41

book and um i'm meant to say or my

96:43

publishers will tell me let's do it that

96:46

um anyone who wants to know where to get

96:48

the audio book the ebook or the physical

96:49

book can go to stolenfocusbook.com and

96:52

on the website you can listen for free

96:54

to loads of the experts we talked about

96:55

like the guy who discovered flow states

96:57

uh

96:59

all these google experts

97:01

a ton of people

97:02

um i'm meant to read something where i

97:04

say like read it also i can't bring

97:06

myself to it makes me sound like a [ __ ]

97:08

something like you can find out what

97:09

stephen fry hillary clinton and many

97:12

other leading experts thought about the

97:13

book um something like that hillary

97:15

clinton's read the book she has she's

97:17

something a very nice

97:18

thing um

97:19

yeah

97:21

and lots i mean so sad there's there's

97:24

an alternate universe where hillary

97:25

clinton is in her second term as

97:26

president and unfortunately instead

97:28

she's in a world where she has to read

97:29

my book instead but um i would rather

97:31

live in the i'd rather live in a bit

97:32

where we got to skip trump but nevermind

97:34

um the yeah so and you can get the book

97:37

in all good bookshops you can even get

97:38

it in [ __ ] book shops and it's out right

97:40

now it's available it's just come out so

97:43

go and read it thank you so much steven

97:45

i really thank you

97:46

honestly that you came and did this

97:47

again

97:49

[Music]

97:58

[Music]

98:08

you

Interactive Summary

In this insightful conversation, Johan Hari, author of 'Stolen Focus', discusses the modern crisis of attention. He explains that our inability to focus is not a personal failure, but the result of twelve specific societal and cultural factors, including the business models of tech giants designed to hack human attention, sleep deprivation, and poor diet. Hari advocates for both individual changes and systemic solutions, such as banning surveillance capitalism, adopting a four-day work week, and protecting childhood through play, to reclaim our ability to think deeply and live more meaningful, innovative lives.

Suggested questions

4 ready-made prompts