HomeVideos

The REAL Reason God Forgives Murderers But Not You

Now Playing

The REAL Reason God Forgives Murderers But Not You

Transcript

606 segments

0:00

So, going back to this question I asked

0:01

about good people living a good life,

0:05

it it it seems to be the case that the

0:06

the Bible suggests that if you don't

0:08

believe in God, even if you lived a good

0:10

life, you go to hell. And hell is

0:12

described as not a nice place.

0:14

So, I I was thinking about the most kind

0:17

person I know that's lived her life to

0:18

be unbelievable, passed away. She didn't

0:20

believe. Does that mean she's in hell?

0:23

>> Well, you can't answer that. Let me just

0:26

say something here that

0:29

what scripture reveals is a very

0:32

interesting thing. That the only people

0:35

to whom Jesus talked about hell were

0:37

religious bigots

0:39

who were in danger of it.

0:41

>> [snorts]

0:42

>> He didn't talk about it to ordinary

0:44

folks who are struggling with

0:46

believing and trusting God and all the

0:48

rest. That's point number one.

0:50

>> What is What What are you What are you

0:51

implying there, sorry?

0:52

>> Well, what I'm implying there is that

0:56

we paint hell as something

1:00

ogre-like.

1:01

God stuffing and demon stuffing

1:05

bodies into hell when actually

1:08

I think Lewis got it right here, you

1:11

know, when he talks about this. That

1:14

hell is absence of God and it's chosen.

1:19

If a person doesn't want God in their

1:22

life, and I've known people like that,

1:24

and they choose it, God will give them

1:26

what they chose. Otherwise, God is going

1:29

to have to force his way into their

1:30

lives and they don't want him.

1:32

>> [snorts]

1:32

>> And here is the amazing thing to my mind

1:35

about Jesus and his attitude. He would

1:37

go places, he would heal people, he

1:40

would bring peace into their lives and

1:43

all the rest of it, but when folk saw

1:46

what he did and said, "Go. Leave us

1:49

alone." he went.

1:51

He didn't force his way into their

1:53

lives. And it seems to me that the one

1:57

example in the New Testament of a person

2:00

who

2:01

did not live a good life and neglected

2:03

the poor around him and ended

2:06

[clears throat]

2:08

in that place, there is no evidence that

2:11

he wanted out of it. What he said was,

2:15

"Please send Abraham to my brothers that

2:19

they don't come to this place." There's

2:20

no indication that he wanted out of it.

2:22

And I think this is a grim reality here

2:25

that when we use these words, we need to

2:28

be immensely careful.

2:31

You can choose

2:33

not to have God and God will honor that

2:36

choice and that is hell.

2:39

>> [snorts]

2:39

>> One of the things that I'm I grew up

2:41

believing because of the the Bible was

2:43

that if you repented

2:44

>> Yes.

2:45

>> which is, you know, to ask forgiveness,

2:46

admit your sins, etc., acknowledge God,

2:49

believe, then your sins would be

2:51

forgiven.

2:52

>> Mhm.

2:52

>> So, if someone was a serial killer for

2:55

their whole life and then repented at

2:57

the end of their life, would they be

2:58

forgiven and allowed into heaven? And I

3:00

guess this kind of links to the question

3:02

I just asked, which is if someone was a

3:03

doctor for their whole life

3:04

curing childhood cancer, but they didn't

3:07

believe,

3:08

they would theoretically be going to

3:09

this place described as hell.

3:10

>> Yeah. We can argue about cases like that

3:12

all the time. Neither of us is God. And

3:15

the way God deals with these people.

3:17

After all, next to Christ on the cross

3:19

were two thieves. Well, they were

3:21

terrorists, actually. They both

3:23

murdered, apparently. And one of them

3:26

railed [clears throat] against Jesus and

3:28

shouted and all this kind of thing and

3:30

the other

3:31

uh

3:32

simply said to him, "I deserve to be

3:34

here. Remember me when you come into

3:36

your kingdom." And Jesus turned to him

3:38

on the cross and said, "Today you will

3:41

be with me in paradise." And so that man

3:43

>> letter?

3:44

>> Yes. He in that sense, yes. And the

3:47

Apostle Paul, you know, was a murderer.

3:50

There are deep mysteries here. It's just

3:52

amazing.

3:53

I'll never forget looking through the

3:55

door of a Russian

3:57

uh security death row. I'd never been in

4:00

a death row before, and the stink, it

4:02

was just like a nightmare.

4:05

And because I was the only one of the

4:07

Brits who could speak Russian, I went up

4:09

to the door.

4:10

And a chap came over and looked at me,

4:13

gaunt and all this, and he was just

4:14

awaiting execution.

4:17

And what he said to me was this. He

4:19

said, "I deserve to be here." He killed

4:21

12 women or something. I can't remember

4:23

which.

4:24

And then his face just burst into a

4:28

uh what I can only describe as a ghastly

4:30

smile.

4:33

And he said, "I met Jesus here, and he

4:35

forgave me."

4:37

And you just

4:39

you go away with a very

4:43

burdened heart, I think.

4:45

And he said, "My colleague lying over

4:47

there is the same."

4:49

What do you make of it? I don't think

4:51

we're going to find out.

4:53

>> I don't know. I feel like I'm wired to

4:54

try I try and have to solve these

4:55

problems,

4:57

these big questions. I have to like

4:58

figure them out, or they'll just sit

5:00

there causing increasingly more

5:02

confusion, which pops me right on that

5:04

agnostic fence.

5:05

>> Yes, I would encourage you to

5:07

concentrate on the one that you think is

5:09

most important.

5:11

One at a time. And I I don't know

5:14

because

5:15

>> [gasps]

5:16

>> I've only met you. I think what you're

5:18

doing by

5:21

talking to people from different

5:23

backgrounds and so on, I'd love to be

5:26

able to say, "Here's where you must

5:28

look." But each one of us is so complex,

5:31

and what will answer the question for

5:33

you might not answer it for the person

5:36

sitting next to you.

5:37

>> Mhm.

5:37

>> [clears throat]

5:38

>> But don't stop exploring, I would say.

5:42

But I don't think you will.

5:43

>> No, I won't. That's for sure. Cuz I find

5:46

the the curious pursuit of truth in and

5:48

of itself a rewarding pursuit

5:50

irrespective of whether I ever find the

5:52

answers.

5:52

>> That's the key. A speech that made a

5:55

deep impression on me was given by

5:58

Alexander Solzhenitsyn when he was

6:00

pushed out of the Soviet Union. Do not

6:03

compromise with at least with lies. Live

6:06

not by lies. I think our generation

6:08

needs to hear that because one of the

6:13

great and tragic capacities of AI is the

6:16

spread of lies, deep fakes, all the rest

6:19

of it.

6:20

I've been subject to it myself in the

6:22

last month.

6:23

>> When you think about the impact that AI

6:26

is going to have on human purpose, we

6:27

talk a lot about job losses and

6:29

>> Yes.

6:29

>> um you know, white-collar workers,

6:30

entry-level roles. And then really like

6:32

everything else, if if you have a long

6:34

enough time horizon, it's conceivable

6:35

that many of the roles we all do today,

6:37

including maybe even as a podcaster,

6:39

um I think Spotify announced this month

6:40

that you're going to be able to generate

6:41

your own podcasts with AI.

6:43

Um

6:45

what is the high-level sort of

6:46

philosophical point we need to

6:48

understand about meaning and how to live

6:50

a good life uh in a world where some of

6:52

us might lose our jobs and have to

6:54

contend with change in a way that we've

6:57

not experienced before?

6:58

>> I think we just have to I mean, I have

7:01

children, grandchildren, all the rest of

7:03

it. And one of my sons has begun to ask

7:06

questions, "Dad, AI looks as if it's

7:08

going to replace my job."

7:10

>> [snorts]

7:10

>> Well, he's tech-savvy and he will rise

7:13

to it, I suspect. But all industrial

7:17

revolutions did this, but this is going

7:19

to do it on a scale never before seen.

7:21

And the tragedy [clears throat]

7:22

is

7:23

uh I was talking about this in South

7:25

Africa, and they said, "It's all very

7:27

well to tell us to reskill people,

7:29

but if you don't have the educational

7:31

infrastructure to do that,

7:33

you'll just force a much bigger divide

7:36

between the rich and the poor." They're

7:37

really worried about it.

7:40

I think the important thing, which is

7:42

why I wrote my books, is to inform and

7:45

get people thinking and get them

7:47

talking.

7:48

>> What is the conversation you want them

7:49

to be talking about?

7:51

>> I think it's a very wide-ranging

7:54

conversation. You know, there are

7:56

existential

7:57

things for people they're afraid.

8:00

>> Should they be?

8:02

>> Well, they should be afraid of some

8:04

things. I think the creeping advance of

8:07

totalitarianism is something that could

8:10

and go for us all.

8:12

If we're not very careful, it's

8:14

creeping, creeping, creeping and it's

8:16

being ruled out in parts of the world,

8:18

particularly China, but not only. I read

8:21

a very interesting report by Chinese

8:24

watcher

8:25

saying

8:26

"Beware you in the West, because the

8:29

only difference between us and you is

8:30

you've got all the technology, but not

8:32

yet a central government imposing it."

8:37

Not yet. Beware.

8:39

And I think we have to beware because we

8:41

are sleepwalking into this.

8:45

Sir Anthony Seldon, I don't know whether

8:46

you've come across him. He's a an

8:49

education is very highly regarded by

8:51

various governments. Has written a book

8:54

about AI as affecting education.

8:57

And of course, it's having a devastating

8:59

effect, as you know.

9:01

What is an essay?

9:04

Everybody's using AI and it's hard to

9:07

recognize whether it's AI or not now.

9:10

So that we're into a whole new world or

9:13

coming rapidly into it.

9:16

How do we know what is true and what

9:18

isn't?

9:19

A few weeks ago

9:21

I was contacted could a publisher

9:24

produce a transcript of a recent lecture

9:27

I'd given because they liked it so much.

9:29

Never heard of it. I looked it up,

9:32

discovered a website describing itself

9:34

as Lennox Logic.

9:36

And it was a picture of me, but it was

9:39

deep fact all the way through and AI

9:41

generated

9:43

material that I would never have said,

9:45

all politicized and everything else.

9:47

>> Is it conceivable that maybe, you know,

9:50

so much of this technology has promised

9:52

that it would make us more human and so

9:53

much of it failed. It made us more

9:54

isolated and lonely.

9:55

>> Oh, yes.

9:56

>> Is it conceivable that if a technology

9:58

comes along like AI, it will render us

10:01

um

10:02

useful for the things that humans are

10:04

uniquely positioned to do?

10:06

>> Yes.

10:08

>> As in, you know, being with each other

10:09

in the real world and relationships. And

10:11

is it conceivable that maybe we were

10:13

never meant to sit in front of screens

10:14

tap-a-tapping buttons and

10:15

>> Oh, I think that's absolutely true.

10:17

What's already exercising many people's

10:19

minds

10:20

in that direction.

10:21

>> And could that be a better life?

10:24

>> Well, how would I judge that?

10:26

>> I I guess when we Yeah, it's a good

10:28

point. Um

10:29

you know, I was thinking about this. I

10:30

was thinking, is this like the moment

10:31

where we kind of regress back to

10:36

how we used to live, our true maybe

10:38

human nature? Is that Is that what

10:40

happens here where, I don't know, we

10:42

spend more time with each other in the

10:43

real world and we

10:45

cuz that's what you know, that's very

10:46

human. And my Maslovian needs of

10:48

connection and touch and

10:49

>> Yeah, yeah. Well, you can you

10:51

you can demonstrate that. Look at these

10:54

groups of parents who have uh said to

10:57

their kids, "Look, we're going around

10:59

the country for a week

11:01

and we're taking your smartphones away."

11:04

And they grumble and say, "No, no, no."

11:06

And they come back after a week having

11:08

rediscovered nature. They don't want to

11:10

use their smartphones very much. Totally

11:12

transformed by touch and taste and

11:15

feeling. You see,

11:18

AI is a machine.

11:20

It doesn't have any of our five senses,

11:23

which are all connected with our

11:25

consciousness. It doesn't see.

11:27

It doesn't hear.

11:29

It doesn't taste.

11:30

>> When you say it doesn't

11:31

>> touch. It doesn't see.

11:34

>> Well, it can it can be programmed to

11:35

recognize patterns, but it has no

11:37

awareness of what the process of saying

11:39

is.

11:40

>> Does it need it?

11:41

>> Well, that's not the point. What I'm

11:43

saying is it's

11:45

distinctively human that we understand

11:47

what saying is. We know what saying red

11:50

is.

11:50

>> Do we?

11:51

>> The machine Yes, I think we do. I mean

11:53

we can philosophize all around it, but

11:56

it's a conscious experience

11:58

and consciousness from a scientific

12:00

perspective is called the hard problem.

12:03

No one knows what it is.

12:04

>> We don't understand it.

12:06

>> Yes, we can't you can't replicate it.

12:08

>> So, how do we know if

12:09

AI is conscious?

12:11

If the output is the same I I can point

12:14

an AI at this and say what is it and the

12:16

AI will say it's a mug and I can get a

12:18

human to walk in here and say what is

12:20

that and they'll go a mug.

12:22

Now, the output is the same.

12:23

>> Yes, but the understanding is not there.

12:26

>> And why does that part Why is that

12:28

critical?

12:29

>> Well, because there's a huge difference

12:32

in being a machine and responding to a

12:35

program created by others

12:37

and being aware of what you're doing

12:40

consciously. That's a totally higher

12:42

level of being.

12:43

>> I agree, but what does that matter in

12:45

this context?

12:47

>> Well,

12:48

>> One another way of asking these

12:49

questions actually visualize by what I

12:50

have in front of me here because one of

12:52

the big big debates around AI is is it

12:54

creative.

12:55

>> Yes, I know.

12:56

>> So, here we have a picture done by

13:00

a human.

13:01

>> Yes.

13:03

>> Here which is you know, picture of a

13:05

family and a dog and a and then we have

13:06

another picture here which is done by

13:09

AI.

13:10

>> Yes.

13:10

>> And we have another picture here which

13:11

is done by a different AI.

13:13

>> Yes.

13:14

>> Now, there's a debate that AI can't be

13:17

creative.

13:18

Now,

13:20

can AI be creative?

13:22

>> Well, if you call what's in front of you

13:24

as creative, then it can be.

13:27

But, it now comes down to the very big

13:29

question of what you actually mean by

13:31

creative.

13:32

>> [laughter]

13:33

>> Yeah.

13:34

>> You see, it can create things. It can

13:36

put things together that

13:38

haven't been in that form before, but

13:42

it's not aware of doing it. It doesn't

13:45

know that those are children.

13:48

Because it doesn't know.

13:49

>> But if I ask it what is that, it would

13:50

say a child.

13:51

>> Yes, but it doesn't know.

13:53

Like we know.

13:55

>> And does And this It goes back to the

13:56

same question, which is does

13:59

which is like what the process?

14:02

Why does the process [snorts]

14:04

matter if the output is identical?

14:07

>> Well, let me just say that that view is

14:12

exactly the view that Alan Turing took

14:15

at the beginning. And if you look at

14:17

what's often referred to as the AI

14:19

Bible, uh Peter Norvig and his

14:21

colleagues, he said, "Look,

14:23

we are not trying

14:26

to create a conscious machine. We

14:28

wouldn't even know what that meant."

14:30

>> Yeah.

14:30

>> We are happy

14:32

with the imitation game.

14:34

And that's good enough for us. We're not

14:36

trying to do it. But you see,

14:38

the conscious side involves all that

14:41

appreciation of life and nature and

14:44

beauty and so on that we can see some

14:46

meaning in, but also there's another

14:48

thing.

14:49

There's a consciousness

14:51

of other people.

14:53

And there's God consciousness. I don't

14:56

think AI anywhere near that. Machines,

15:00

there are certain things they cannot do

15:02

even potentially that the human mind can

15:04

do. So, there's no way a machine is ever

15:07

going to be able to simulate a human

15:08

mind completely. But that's difficult.

15:11

That's difficult mathematics and all the

15:13

rest of it, and it's highly

15:14

controversial.

15:15

>> Why is it an important conversation to

15:17

have that

15:19

it is conscious or not conscious when

15:20

the the output is is the same.

15:23

>> Yes, I I can see the question, but if

15:26

you want to live in a reductive universe

15:29

which ends up being meaningless, well,

15:31

then you can go that way. There's not

15:32

nothing to stop you. But it seems to me

15:35

there are enough indicators

15:37

within nature, within science, within

15:39

our human experience

15:41

that tell us there's a bigger world.

15:45

And this is the right and left brain

15:47

stuff. We're back to McGilchrist again.

15:49

He would He would His stuff on AI is

15:52

very strong. He thinks it's really

15:55

dangerous because it's ruining

15:58

all this side of the brain and the

16:00

richness

16:01

of human experience and it's in danger

16:03

of destroying it.

16:05

He actually invites people to come and

16:07

fight with him.

16:09

>> [snorts]

16:09

>> So in such a world, what is it that

16:10

makes humans um what is it that makes us

16:13

special?

16:15

Is it that those human things we talked

16:16

about relational

16:17

>> Oh, I think so. Yes, absolutely. And the

16:20

fact that you and I can have a

16:21

conversation like this.

16:23

>> You could have this conversation with

16:24

AI.

16:26

>> Not the same way. AI is pretty thin

16:28

still. You can have a conversation of

16:31

sorts, but remember who's responsible

16:34

for its capacity? Humans.

16:36

It's something made in the image of

16:38

humans and that's a dangerous thing. I'd

16:41

prefer

16:42

I'd prefer to remain with something made

16:43

in the image of God.

16:45

>> It's interesting cuz we almost we're

16:46

getting to a point where there's going

16:47

to probably be some like ethical

16:49

questions around

16:50

>> Oh, they're already here.

16:51

>> But I mean around robotics.

16:53

>> Oh, everywhere.

16:54

>> You know in the same way that many of us

16:55

feel quite empathetic towards like

16:57

trees.

16:58

>> Yes, yes.

16:59

>> And we feel empathetic towards animals.

17:00

>> Yes.

17:01

>> Um now trees haven't got a brain, but

17:03

just cutting down a tree needlessly, I

17:06

think would annoy a lot of people

17:07

because it's

17:08

>> It would annoy me.

17:09

>> Yeah, it would annoy me, too. And I

17:11

think it's almost going to get to a

17:12

point where like

17:13

you know,

17:15

people are going to start asking similar

17:16

questions around

17:18

>> Robots.

17:19

>> Which is

17:22

It's an interesting question.

17:23

>> It is. It is.

17:24

>> Let me ask you a final question then,

17:25

which is what is the the most important

17:28

thing we haven't talked about that we

17:30

should have talked about as it relates

17:32

to

17:33

all of the work in these tangential

17:34

subjects.

17:36

>> Oh, I can't answer that. That

17:39

>> [laughter]

17:40

>> Perhaps the most important thing is

17:42

finding the trigger that will help you

17:44

to take a step forward into

17:48

into faith, into the Christian faith.

17:52

And

17:54

I would just encourage you to keep

17:56

asking your questions in the open way

17:58

you've done, and I have regarded it an

18:01

honor to

18:03

have this discussion, and I hope very

18:05

much it won't be the last one. But age

18:07

may prevent that. But thank you very

18:09

much.

18:10

>> We have a closing tradition where the

18:13

last guest leaves a question for the

18:14

next not knowing who they're leaving it

18:15

for.

18:19

And the question that's left for you

18:24

in a world with so many challenges, what

18:27

can we do to restore hope and trigger

18:30

engagement?

18:33

>> Give people a real basis for hope that

18:36

transcends this world.

18:39

And the only place I know where to find

18:41

that

18:43

is in Christ and in Christianity.

18:47

>> John, thank you. One of the one of the

18:49

most compelling

18:50

arguments for uh

18:53

God that you've presented and your way

18:56

of seeing the world and being

18:58

is not actually necessarily anything

18:59

you've written in your books or not not

19:00

necessarily anything you've said. It is

19:02

it is actually

19:04

you.

19:05

>> [laughter]

19:06

>> And uh you you you have a certain peace

19:11

and contentment

19:13

that I rarely see in people that I

19:16

interview, but I often see and I've

19:18

almost always seen

19:20

in the Christians that I've interviewed.

19:23

And this is a interesting phenomenon for

19:24

me. I interviewed Wesley Huff recently.

19:26

Do you know Wesley Huff?

19:27

>> Yes. Yes. Canadian.

19:29

>> Yeah.

19:29

>> Wesley is a bright cookie.

19:31

>> Yeah, he was very much he gave me the

19:32

same feeling as you. Just like feels

19:33

like a really happy person. Very sort of

19:35

content, rounded, well

19:36

>> There are not many of us.

19:37

>> Yeah, but it seems to be a trend that

19:39

you know, a lot of the Christian

19:40

apologists that I've interviewed have

19:41

that

19:42

anchoring that

19:43

>> Yeah.

19:44

>> so many of us are looking for.

19:45

>> There's a real sense of that.

19:48

You know,

19:50

I sit in front of many people and of

19:52

course they often ask me questions I

19:54

don't even understand, but

19:58

in life, that peace is very important to

20:02

me. And also, what we started with.

20:06

When I look at you,

20:08

I see someone who's of infinite value

20:10

made in the image of God. And so what I

20:13

say to you or think about you is hugely

20:16

[snorts] important to me.

20:18

And I wish you well.

20:21

>> Thank you. If you love The Diary of a

20:23

CEO, Brandon, and you watch this

20:24

channel, please do me a huge favor.

20:26

Become part of the 15% of the viewers on

20:29

this channel that have hit the subscribe

20:31

button. It helps us tremendously and the

20:33

bigger the channel gets, the bigger the

20:34

guests.

Interactive Summary

This conversation explores deep philosophical and theological questions, focusing on the nature of hell, divine forgiveness, and the role of faith in a modern, technology-driven world. The dialogue addresses concerns about AI, truth, and the human search for meaning, ultimately highlighting the contrast between machine intelligence and the unique, conscious, and relational nature of humans as beings created in the image of God. The conversation concludes with a reflection on how faith provides a transcendent basis for hope and inner peace.

Suggested questions

3 ready-made prompts