HomeVideos

How to Quiet the Ruminative Mind and Avoid The Traps of Self-Help — Tim Ferriss

Now Playing

How to Quiet the Ruminative Mind and Avoid The Traps of Self-Help — Tim Ferriss

Transcript

1786 segments

0:00

You want to play soccer, but first

0:02

you're going to read all the textbooks

0:04

and get a master's degree and PhD in

0:06

soccer. And then you're going to

0:08

practice dribbling and penalty shots and

0:10

so on by yourself. And you want to

0:12

become as perfect a player as possible

0:15

by yourself before you ever actually get

0:17

on the field and play the game of

0:18

soccer. And you can start to believe

0:20

that you're playing soccer by yourself.

0:23

There's always more room for

0:25

improvement. You're never going to be

0:27

perfect. And if you get caught in that

0:30

trap, which is the partial trap of

0:33

self-help, you're always polishing this

0:37

self and you never actually [ __ ] play

0:39

soccer.

0:46

>> Tim Ferrris, welcome back to the show.

0:48

>> Thank you, sir. Nice to be back. Nice to

0:50

see you.

0:51

>> Likewise. Let me ask you a a a

0:54

ridiculously basic question, but I think

0:57

maybe deceptively um simple. I actually

1:00

never know how to say. Is it deceptively

1:02

complex or deceptively simple? Anyway,

1:04

um my question really is how are you?

1:06

Like how you doing these days? Um uh

1:09

you've you've

1:11

>> you've publicly kind of gone on a on a

1:14

ride um with your own uh talking about

1:17

your own stuff, some of it quite heavy.

1:19

So, I'm just curious like how how are

1:21

you?

1:23

>> That is a both deceptively simple and

1:26

complex question. My answer thankfully

1:29

is really straightforward. Better than

1:31

ever. I feel absolutely fantastic. We

1:33

could dive into how and why that's the

1:36

case if you'd like. But I would say

1:40

keeping it short and sweet for the

1:42

moment, I would say fantastic, better

1:45

than ever. mind, body, soul, psycho,

1:48

emotionally,

1:49

muscular, skeletally.

1:53

Uh really feeling uh holistically very

1:57

good, optimistic,

1:59

and

2:00

we could keep going. So, I'll let you

2:03

take that anywhere you'd like to.

2:06

>> I love to hear it. And uh seriously, I

2:08

really do love to hear it. And I would

2:10

be curious to follow up and hear from

2:12

you like what what has brought you to

2:15

this point.

2:16

>> Mhm. Yeah, I would say a few things. So,

2:20

one of the risks of

2:24

personal development or let's just call

2:26

it more broadly self-help is that it can

2:30

very easily become self-infatuation or

2:33

self-obsession.

2:35

And the

2:38

counterbalance to that, the bet that

2:42

offsets it isun,

2:45

it's very simple, relationships. Really

2:47

doubling down, tripling down on

2:48

relationships. We are evolved to be a

2:50

social species. And whenever you are in

2:54

isolation physically or simply in

2:57

thought loops in your own head, that

2:58

tends to catalyze or

3:02

worsen tremendously any type of

3:05

instability or OCD or depression or

3:09

anxiety or fill-in- thelank psychiatric

3:11

condition. So

3:13

my

3:15

policies that which were already in

3:17

place last time we spoke that I have

3:20

really

3:22

continued to invest into are doing a

3:27

past year review every year looking at

3:30

my top relationships that are nourishing

3:33

energizing energy in as opposed to

3:35

energy out and then blocking out time in

3:39

advance for the entire year for extended

3:42

periods of time with those people. Now,

3:44

extended will depend on your

3:45

circumstances. For me, that could be

3:47

anywhere from a long weekend to a week

3:50

spending, say, 5 days in the wilderness

3:53

in Montana with some of my oldest,

3:55

closest friends, etc., etc. And that

4:00

will do. Not to denigrate therapy in any

4:02

way, but sometimes talking more about

4:07

your problems if it were to solve all of

4:09

your problems would have worked already.

4:11

And there's a place for talk therapy.

4:13

There's a place for talk therapy, but it

4:16

is not, nor does it need to be the only

4:18

tool in the toolkit. So simply spending

4:21

time around your silly, dumb, amazing

4:24

friends and laughing, whether it's

4:27

around a bottle of wine or a meal or a

4:30

campfire really, really goes a long way.

4:32

So that's one piece of it.

4:34

Second piece is to maybe uh hit a

4:40

familiar thread is very consistent

4:43

meditation

4:45

typically twice daily 10 minutes very

4:48

very straightforward

4:50

in my case and then also if we're going

4:54

out to the edges a bit technologically

4:57

speaking

4:58

there is something that some of your

5:01

listeners may have never heard of which

5:02

is accelerated TMS. TMS stands for

5:06

transcranial magnetic stimulation. It's

5:08

a type of brain stimulation

5:10

that has existed for decades. But the

5:13

hardware and the software, everything

5:16

about these technologies has improved

5:18

dramatically in the last 5 to 10 years,

5:20

particularly in I would say the last 5

5:22

years thanks to certain researchers like

5:25

Nolan Williams out of Stanford who sadly

5:28

passed away in the last 6 months and

5:30

others. But what accelerated TMS looks

5:34

like is typically up to, let's just call

5:38

it maybe one or two years ago.

5:40

Accelerated TMS takes

5:44

what you might do in conventional TMS

5:47

over several months where you go in and

5:49

you you have this paddle put against

5:51

your head. It produces a magnetic field

5:55

that just to keep it very simple either

5:59

uh excites or inhibits certain parts of

6:02

your brain, certain types of circuitry.

6:05

And that can be applied to depression,

6:08

it can be applied to neurodeenerative

6:10

diseases. In fact, in some cases, it can

6:13

be applied to anxiety, OCD, and so on

6:16

depending on the target where where you

6:18

place these coils.

6:20

And in the case of accelerated TMS,

6:23

you're taking what you might do over 3 4

6:25

5 months and you're compressing it into

6:27

one week. So every hour on the hour, 10

6:31

hours a day for one week, you're going

6:34

in and getting, let's just call it a few

6:37

minutes, 3 to 9 minutes of pulses on

6:40

your brain. And then you take 50 minutes

6:42

off, you go back in, you get hit again.

6:45

And that has been referred to at least

6:48

in one format, the Saint protocol. S A I

6:51

N T. They've shied away from it, but it

6:54

was developed at Stanford. And the Saint

6:56

protocol in many, let's call them

7:00

patients produces

7:02

70 80% remission of depression that is

7:06

quite durable. It's not one shot, you're

7:10

done.

7:11

Typically, people will, let's just say,

7:13

do a 5-day sequence. Then they might go

7:15

in and have one to three-day booster

7:20

sequences 3 months, 6 months later. Um,

7:24

and

7:25

this technology has tremendous effects.

7:28

I've experimented with this over the

7:29

last handful of years, and the first

7:32

time I did it, it had near miraculous

7:35

results. I had I went from having

7:41

severe and I've been officially

7:43

diagnosed so this is not uh just

7:45

throwing it around loosely but you know

7:46

moderate severe OCD with lots of

7:49

rumination. I'm not flipping light

7:50

switches or washing my hands but I have

7:52

these ruminative loops that I get caught

7:54

in. People I'm sure some listening can

7:57

identify with this where you just can't

7:59

turn off these kind of compulsive

8:00

thought loops. Could be a grudge, could

8:03

be a fear, could be something you're

8:04

planning for, could be a conversation

8:06

you need to have. It just loops and

8:07

loops and loops, which causes insomnia,

8:09

which causes

8:11

uh fatigue and just general

8:15

uh the general wearing down of the

8:17

system, which leads to depression.

8:19

That's I've realized that's my sequence.

8:20

It actually starts with anxiety, not

8:22

depression out of the gate. And I was

8:25

having, let's just call it seven, eight

8:28

out of 10 symptoms when I went in to the

8:31

first treatment I did of 5 days. That's

8:34

really severe for people who are

8:37

not clear. Like, it's really, really

8:39

severe. Like, it's affecting every

8:40

aspect of my life. Had the treatment,

8:43

there was a delayed onset. And even the

8:45

scientists most involved with this don't

8:46

really have a great explanation for how

8:48

or why this would happen. But nothing

8:50

really happened for 2, three weeks. and

8:52

then

8:54

flipped a switch and had basically zero

8:57

anxiety, zero rumination for let's call

9:00

it 3 to 4 months. I've never experienced

9:02

anything like it. And that includes

9:03

psychedelic assisted therapies which I

9:04

know very well and have supported a lot

9:07

of science u underlying.

9:10

Now this is a bit of a long answer I

9:12

realize but for people who are

9:13

interested I really recommend the

9:14

conversation I did with Nolan Williams.

9:16

Then there are different types of

9:18

hardware. But I tried it then with

9:20

boosters several times afterwards. Null

9:23

effect. Zero. Didn't work.

9:25

>> And I started to

9:29

lose hope again because I thought this

9:31

was going to be a replicable,

9:34

reliable tool that I could use. I was so

9:37

excited.

9:39

And then I did a hailmary kind of last

9:42

ditch

9:44

round with the accelerated TMS recently.

9:47

I did this in Northern California. And

9:51

instead of doing 5 days, so keep in mind

9:53

it's like, let's just call it 3 months

9:55

of TMS gets compressed into 5 days.

9:58

Instead of doing five days, I did one

10:00

day, but I predosed with something

10:04

called descloer.

10:06

And descerion

10:09

or DCS as it's sometimes referred to in

10:12

the literature is a in many ways an

10:15

antiquated antibiotic that used to be

10:18

used for tuberculosis

10:21

uh and sometimes urinary tract

10:23

infections which affects the NMDA

10:26

receptors in such a way. I think it's a

10:28

partial antagonist. It might be an

10:30

agonist so don't quote me on it. But the

10:32

the point is this this little drug that

10:36

is not typically used anymore

10:40

is a catalyst for neuroplasticity.

10:43

And when you take this beforehand,

10:46

you can do something like one day of

10:49

accelerated TMS. And sometimes the

10:52

results are better than what you

10:53

previously, let's just call it seven

10:55

years ago, would get from 3, four

10:57

months. And I did one day and Dan

11:01

this time around boom it was just like a

11:04

switch basically the next day and it has

11:07

now been 2 or 3 months and I don't want

11:11

to set expectations that it'll be this

11:13

way for everyone. It seems to be

11:15

particularly effective

11:17

yes for depression but it seems to be

11:20

particularly effective in a very small

11:22

sample size at this point for anxiety

11:25

and OCD. uh and

11:29

man it's just it's just a different

11:31

life. It is a different life. So all of

11:33

those things in combination plus the

11:35

basics right the kind of basic

11:37

macronutrients of health exercise

11:40

etc etc etc diet and so on um are just

11:45

are just doing their job together. The

11:48

last one I'll throw in and then I'll

11:49

shut up because I realize this has

11:50

turned into a TED talk is um

11:54

intermittent ketosis. So, the ketogenic

11:58

diet and ketosis overall, which can be

12:02

achieved a few different ways, which I'm

12:04

in right now, is absolutely phenomenal

12:09

for addressing a lot of psychiatric

12:11

pains, psycho emotional pains that are

12:15

failing to be treated by medication. And

12:17

there's something called metabolic

12:18

psychiatry. Chris Palmer out of Harvard

12:21

and other have have looked at this very

12:22

closely. All right. Thanks for coming to

12:26

my TED talk.

12:28

>> I just want to assure you TED talks are

12:30

welcome here. Yeah, you're a podcaster,

12:32

you know. Uh um long answers are fine.

12:36

>> Um so please delete that sheep

12:38

sheepishness from from your mind. Um

12:40

>> all right, we'll do

12:42

>> I have a million follow-up questions.

12:43

Let me just say just high level,

12:47

a different life. Those three words

12:49

really

12:50

>> I just makes me very happy to hear that.

12:53

>> Thank you.

12:54

>> What's going on?

12:55

>> Thank you. Thank you, Dan. Yeah, it's it

12:57

is impossible, I think, to overstate the

13:01

difference between an 8 out of 10 of

13:05

nonstop ruminative

13:08

monkey mind with a fixation on things

13:11

that are anxiety producing to getting to

13:14

like a one or two out of 10. Like those

13:16

are two different lived experiences.

13:18

They are not

13:20

>> they they are so far apart from each

13:22

other. It's it's really remarkable.

13:25

>> So you mentioned transranial is it

13:28

magnetic stimulation? TMS

13:29

>> magnetic stimulation. Mhm.

13:32

>> I will drop a link in the show notes for

13:35

people who want to listen to Tim's uh

13:37

conversation with Nolan Williams. Um but

13:39

I with the caveat of course that you're

13:41

you're not the the the researcher doing

13:44

you know the the world's leading expert.

13:46

You're you're um more of the guinea pig

13:48

and the the patient. But can you tell us

13:51

like a little bit more about how is is

13:54

TMS widely available? Is it a thing that

13:57

average people can access? And also like

13:59

how strong is the evidence?

14:02

>> All right. I'm happy to tackle that with

14:05

as you said the disclaimer. I am not a

14:08

doctor nor do I play one on the internet

14:10

but I do spend a lot of time in these

14:15

waters. So what I'll say is that the

14:17

evidence for TMS broadly there decades

14:21

of evidence with different applications

14:24

of TMS

14:26

and then if as we look at accelerated

14:29

TMS there's actually I would say very

14:31

compelling body of evidence

14:34

once we get into the the vanguard which

14:38

is always risky right you don't

14:40

necessarily want to be one of the first

14:41

hundred monkeys shot into space but in

14:43

this particular case the pain was great

14:45

enough that I decided to opt in. Then

14:47

you're getting into the bleeding edge

14:49

which is this descloer

14:53

DCS plus TMS. That's very much at the

14:57

outer reaches. I would say at least

15:00

based on the clinic that I went to

15:03

and maybe overall for all I know I am

15:06

one of perhaps 60 patients with

15:11

OCD/ generalized anxiety disorder who

15:14

have been treated that way. So it's a

15:16

very small number. In terms of

15:19

accessibility, there are let me start

15:21

from the top in in no particular order,

15:24

but I'll just say that

15:26

there's a hardware stack. So, the the

15:29

two companies that I'm most familiar

15:30

with which make hardware that I've used

15:33

myself are Brainsway, that's one

15:36

company, and then another one is Mag

15:39

Venture. and the the hardware are

15:43

different, but I know people who have

15:46

responded very well to both of them,

15:48

right? So, you can

15:50

>> you can vet certain providers, I would

15:53

say. Not saying this is the only way.

15:55

I'm not saying it's fair. Perhaps there

15:57

are other technologies out there, but

16:00

there there, as you would expect, is a

16:03

is a fair there's a fair bololis of fly

16:07

by night operations that are promising

16:09

miracles and offering quote unquote TMS

16:12

that is actually not following any

16:13

protocol whatsoever. And u I I think

16:17

that's very unethical. But Brainsway,

16:20

Mag Venture are two types of hardware.

16:23

And then you really want to look it is

16:26

it is available is the short answer.

16:28

Accelerated TMS is available in a lot of

16:30

major cities. It is not as widely

16:33

distributed as I would like uh because

16:37

it is generally not covered by

16:39

insurance. Accelerated TMS is generally

16:41

not covered. TMS,

16:44

let's just call it conventional TMS is

16:46

often covered by insurance depending on

16:48

the indication. But accelerated TMS

16:52

where you're basically taking a week off

16:54

work and just getting your brains up 10

16:56

hours a day for five days straight

16:58

typically not covered. And uh part of

17:03

why I'm so excited about the

17:05

implications

17:07

if the data scale and are robust and

17:10

show

17:13

comparable or superior results with the

17:15

with this pre-administration of this

17:17

drug is that the ability of anyone

17:21

whether they are average

17:24

uh less kind of financially stable or

17:27

very well healed of taking one day off

17:30

of work is not only logistically so much

17:34

easier if they're able to pre-administer

17:37

with this DCS, but it should be much

17:41

less expensive. Right? So, I'm hoping

17:43

even if people have to pay out of pocket

17:45

that these breakthroughs, hopefully

17:48

they're breakthroughs with uh

17:50

combination therapies of TMS,

17:52

accelerated TMS and descarerian will

17:55

will really make it much more widely

17:57

available. That's my hope. It's going to

17:59

take a little while, but it it it is

18:00

available. I know there are clinics in,

18:02

for instance, New York. I know there are

18:04

clinics in California and Chicago that

18:08

are credible. Um, they may exist in

18:10

other places as well.

18:11

>> The other thing you mentioned in terms

18:13

of, you know, having a different life is

18:15

is your focus on relationships. I I saw

18:18

myself in that answer. You know, that

18:20

was a thing I there was a kind of

18:22

desertification or desertification, I

18:25

don't know how you pronounce that, of my

18:26

social life for many years because I was

18:28

such a careerist and such a workaholic

18:30

and then in recent years have really

18:33

turned that around and I see

18:35

>> such a massive difference in my mental

18:38

health. I'm curious like you mentioned

18:40

that in recent years you've at the top

18:42

of every year you kind of make a plan to

18:44

see the people who to use the cliche

18:47

fill your cup. Um,

18:49

>> had you gone through a period like I

18:51

like I did where there was a a certain

18:53

amount of isolation or um in in

18:57

attention to this to this lever.

19:00

>> Oh, for sure. And I think there were a

19:04

few different reasons for that. Uh, I

19:07

don't know if hindsight's 2020, but I

19:09

think it's easier to see from my vantage

19:11

point now that and it's a balancing act

19:15

because there's there's compulsive

19:17

socializing because you are

19:21

incredibly uncomfortable or afraid of

19:24

being alone or with yourself,

19:28

>> right? There's compulsive socializing to

19:30

distract yourself, like protect yourself

19:33

from yourself, which is problematic.

19:37

And then there's compulsive isolation.

19:38

And I would say I probably leaned far

19:42

more towards the compulsive isolation.

19:44

And there were two reasons for that. One

19:47

was workcoholism back in the day, for

19:50

sure. and I just

19:54

felt like I was more effective, able to

19:56

produce, more able to focus on business,

19:59

finances, whatever it might be in

20:00

isolation. And there might be some truth

20:02

to that.

20:04

Then I would say there was also this

20:07

belief

20:09

that I think at the time was really

20:13

implicit. I don't think I explicitly

20:15

grasped it, which was, and I've I've

20:18

written this incredibly long essay that

20:21

maybe I'll publish at some point, but

20:24

talking about some of the dangers of

20:26

self-help, and one of them is the

20:29

following, which ties into what we're

20:31

talking about and leaning towards

20:32

isolation.

20:34

this implicit belief or explicit that

20:38

you need to work on yourself and fix

20:40

yourself and quote unquote do the work

20:43

and then you'll be ready to interact

20:44

with other people and have a significant

20:47

relationship and engage with your family

20:50

if that is an option or you want it to

20:53

be an option etc etc. So, in effect, the

20:57

the analogy that I've drawn for some

21:00

friends is

21:03

you want to play soccer, but first

21:05

you're going to read all the textbooks

21:07

and get a master's degree and PhD in

21:09

soccer. And then you're going to

21:11

practice dribbling and penalty shots and

21:13

so on by yourself.

21:15

And and you want to become as perfect a

21:19

player as possible by yourself before

21:21

you ever actually get on the field and

21:23

play the game of soccer. and you can

21:24

start to believe that you're playing

21:27

soccer by yourself. There's always more

21:29

room for improvement. You're never going

21:32

to be perfect. And if you get caught in

21:35

that trap, which is the partial trap of

21:39

self-help, you're always polishing this

21:43

self.

21:45

And it can become this real recursive

21:47

dangerous trap, this fixation on the

21:49

self.

21:51

And you never actually [ __ ] play

21:52

soccer.

21:56

And at a point you start to believe that

22:00

you are but you're not. You're

22:02

simulating by yourself life but not

22:06

actually engaging with life. And I have

22:11

who knows maybe this is a function of

22:12

getting older. I don't think so

22:14

necessarily but for so many decades I

22:18

was interested in the cutting edge the

22:19

cutting edge of everything. and I still

22:21

am, but I've become interested equally

22:26

in things that have lasted millennia

22:29

or more than millennia. And

22:33

I recommend if you're trying to learn

22:37

how the latest LLMs differ from one

22:39

another, etc., You also spend some time

22:41

looking at evolutionary biology and

22:43

studying the things that we have evolved

22:47

to optimize for to experience and man

22:53

it's just like I think it was regonomics

22:55

right it it's the economy stupid it's

22:57

the relationship stupid right if you

22:59

don't have like physical contact with

23:00

people if you don't have these in real

23:03

life physical experiences if you model

23:06

that in animals they become a complete

23:08

disaster

23:10

Right? They exhibit the same types of

23:12

behaviors that we now see spiking in

23:15

humans. Anxiety, depression, lethargy,

23:18

sitting in a cage, not doing anything.

23:20

Like, we need this type of contact. Um,

23:24

so I I'd say that I've sort of offset

23:27

the bleeding edge with the very very

23:29

super dull edge of things that have

23:32

lasted a long time.

23:33

>> Amen.

23:35

Um, you you you mentioned and this may

23:39

what the question I'm about to ask might

23:41

bring us back to your unpublished essay

23:43

about the dangers of self-help. Um, but

23:46

you you mentioned the word optimizing

23:47

and in some way in some ways I kind of

23:50

think of you as like the protooptimizer.

23:53

Um, you know, 4hour work week and um,

23:57

and I'm just curious where you are on

24:01

self-optimization

24:03

now.

24:05

Yep. I would say that I still

24:10

focus on certain areas to optimize. I

24:14

still pull certain le levers. And

24:19

what I would say I have become

24:23

much better at and it takes practice.

24:26

It's gonna sound so rudimentary is

24:29

asking simply what are you optimizing

24:33

for before you optimize?

24:36

What why are you optimizing?

24:39

And it's easy I would say particularly

24:44

if you are being shaped by social media

24:48

which seems to basically offer you the

24:51

seven dead layer cardinal sins on a

24:54

silver platter. you get to take your

24:56

pick your poison.

24:58

If you're being shaped by that, then you

25:00

can end up optimizing without a

25:03

direction necessarily or a question. You

25:05

haven't interrogated the direction. And

25:07

that could be because you're following

25:10

someone online who's a multi-billion

25:12

dollar real estate developer/serial

25:15

entrepreneur/fill-in-theblank.

25:17

And the chase for money is on,

25:20

but that never really gets interrogated.

25:22

I think the 4-hour work week does a good

25:24

job of of breaking down kind of work for

25:27

work's sake and money for money's sake.

25:30

So for me, I have three relatives right

25:32

now with rapidly progressing Alzheimer's

25:35

disease,

25:37

including those who do not have the

25:40

genotype.

25:42

If we look at say APOE status, right?

25:44

They're APOE 33 whereas I'm ApoE34. So

25:48

that's scary. There are other factors to

25:50

consider for Alzheimer's.

25:52

I am doing things to

25:56

try not to die from something that is

25:58

hopefully preventable on the uh from the

26:01

perspective of cardiac health,

26:03

cardiovascular health and then also

26:06

trying to mitigate my risk of

26:08

neurodeenerative

26:10

uh disease and

26:12

that's why I'm in ketosis right now for

26:15

instance and you know jury's out on some

26:18

of this but very plausibly there are

26:20

mechanisms by

26:22

going into ketosis on a fairly regular

26:24

basis for a few weeks at a time. Let's

26:27

just say in my case, two or three times

26:28

a year

26:30

may have neuroprotective effects, also

26:34

anti-cancer effects. And people can

26:36

listen to my interviews with Dominic

26:37

Dagustinino, who's a researcher out of

26:39

Florida, or other people for the the

26:43

science behind this. And it's it's it's

26:46

a it's also an intervention. And this

26:48

comes back to your question about

26:50

optimizing that is very very wellstudied

26:53

in the sense that

26:56

I I have very high confidence that the

26:59

downside risk is low and very

27:01

manageable. Whereas if you're just

27:03

mainlining GLP1 agonists,

27:07

amazing results that we've seen in the

27:09

literature so far, but have we had

27:11

anyone on these for 10 20 years? No. Uh

27:14

at least not 20 years. Maybe some of the

27:18

one of the first monkeys shot into space

27:20

like me with the accelerated TMS and the

27:22

DCS has been on for that period of time.

27:24

And that doesn't mean don't use GLP1

27:26

agonist, but understand that there are a

27:28

lot of unknown unknowns. With the

27:30

ketogenic diet, it's like look kids, the

27:33

ketogenic diet and its modern

27:35

incarnation using heavy cream or other

27:37

types of fats was designed for epileptic

27:41

children, right? And this goes back

27:43

probably a hundred years at this point

27:45

if not 100 years close to it.

27:48

>> And uh humans have the metabolic

27:51

machinery to go into ketosis and have

27:53

had that machinery for millennia upon a

27:56

millennia upon millennia. So that would

27:58

be an example of something that

28:01

passes it passes the test for me of

28:07

this seemingly credible upside potential

28:10

even if we don't understand all the

28:11

mechanisms limited downside potential

28:15

uh that I can offset with certain

28:16

prescription drugs let's just say

28:18

because I'm a cholesterol hyperabsorber

28:21

and okay great we're going to do that

28:23

intermittent fasting would be another

28:25

one so e during ketosis is or outside of

28:27

ketosis. The one thing that has most

28:30

dramatically changed

28:33

my blood tests with respect to

28:37

specifically insulin sensitivity

28:40

and avoiding pre-diabetes which runs

28:43

rampant in my family. intermittent

28:45

fasting. In my case, that means I'm

28:48

eating within an 8 hour window each day,

28:51

typically like might be even a little

28:53

shorter, like 2:00 p.m. to 8:00 p.m. And

28:56

that's it. I just don't eat until 2:00

28:58

p.m. or 3:00 p.m. And for some folks,

29:01

it's probably argue arguably better for

29:03

you if you do like a 12:00 noon to 8:00

29:06

p.m. kind of eating window. It's also

29:09

called timerestricted feeding. There's a

29:11

lot of good science for this, not just

29:14

in animal models, but in humans. And the

29:18

results I've seen from that are just

29:20

absolutely incredible. And it's so

29:22

simple because you don't actually need

29:24

to change what you eat. You're just

29:26

changing when you eat. Um, so those

29:29

would be two that people might think of

29:33

as optimizing. And then I'm taking a

29:35

handful of prescription drugs to offset

29:38

the cardiovascular risk because it

29:42

doesn't matter if I am eating an all-fat

29:44

diet, an all-p protein diet, a vegan

29:47

diet, a fill-in-theblank diet.

29:50

There are certain biomarkers that are

29:53

just trash. They're so bad.

29:57

And that seems to be just straight from

30:00

the code, straight from DNA. And for

30:03

that reason, I'm like, "Ah, I'm no

30:04

spring chicken anymore. You know what? I

30:06

think I'll just bite the bullet and and

30:08

take some of these." And if it's helpful

30:10

for folks, the way I think about that,

30:12

because I think I I have, and I'm

30:15

partially to blame for this, cuz I did a

30:16

lot of really out there stuff in say the

30:18

4-hour body, which much of which most of

30:21

which stands up to scrutiny now, 15

30:23

years later. But I was pushing the

30:26

envelope with that.

30:28

When for instance I talk with my doctors

30:31

now and I'll this is only going to take

30:32

another minute or two but it might be

30:34

helpful to people. The first thing is if

30:36

you have a blood test and something is

30:39

out of range

30:41

my recommendation would be before you

30:44

get on 12 different drugs to deal with

30:46

it. And if it's an emergency, it's an

30:47

emergency. But if it's not an emergency,

30:50

right, like your triglycerides are are

30:52

high. All right. Well, it's probably not

30:54

going to kill you in the next week. My

30:56

recommendation would be talk to your

30:59

doctor, replicate the test, do the test

31:02

again the next week, maybe on a

31:04

different day, and see if you can

31:08

replicate the error. Because for

31:11

instance, if you had a heavy weekend of

31:13

drinking or ate a fatty meal the night

31:16

before and then you do your blood test 8

31:20

a.m. the next morning, fasted, well,

31:23

you might look like you're on the road

31:25

to having a heart attack in 2 months,

31:27

but actually it was just behavior and

31:29

diet. So, replicate replicate. And

31:33

uh that would be number one, right? like

31:36

don't base the outcome of the like the

31:40

basketball match on one photograph. Like

31:43

try to try to get tested more frequently

31:46

and pay attention to when you're getting

31:48

tested. So if you're for instance coming

31:50

back to the example I gave, if you're if

31:53

you're taking your test, your blood test

31:55

on Monday mornings, make sure your next

31:57

test that you're comparing it to is also

31:59

on Monday morning. If it's Wednesday

32:01

morning, it might be completely

32:03

different. By the way, if it's something

32:04

like cortisol, testosterone, etc., these

32:07

things have dural cycles, they really

32:10

fluctuate throughout the day. So, if you

32:11

get a test at uh 8:00 a.m. I've seen

32:16

this with friends of mine who male

32:18

friends who get a test at like 8:00 a.m.

32:20

Uh, and I have to interrogate how they

32:22

did things for them to Sherlock Holmes

32:24

this, but they do they do a test,

32:27

they're concerned about their

32:28

testosterone levels or the free

32:29

testosterone. They take a test at 8:00

32:30

a.m. looks great. They do another test

32:34

three months later, six months later.

32:35

They do it at 11:00 a.m. and it's

32:39

200 points lower. Looks crazy. And it's

32:43

not crazy. They don't actually, in this

32:45

case, this guy had no problem. He was

32:46

about to get on all sorts of hormone

32:48

replacement therapy and all this stuff

32:50

that is is pretty powerful. And I said,

32:54

"Go back, do it at 8 a.m. again, 2

32:57

weeks. Let's see what happens." Guess

32:59

what? It was the same as the first test.

33:01

So that that's step number one. And then

33:05

when I'm looking at possible

33:07

interventions for me, again, I'm not a

33:09

doctor. Don't play one on the internet.

33:10

But the way I approach it, and people

33:12

get very little guidance on this, right,

33:15

is most doctors are overstretched,

33:18

right? They get 11 minutes per patient.

33:20

The easiest thing for them to do is say,

33:22

"Look, this guy has a problem or this

33:24

gal has a problem. If we throw these

33:26

three drugs at it, it's probably going

33:28

to fix it. My job as far as I'm

33:30

concerned, as far as my time allows, is

33:32

to keep this person from dying. Okay,

33:33

start these three drugs.

33:36

But what I have tried to do, and I did

33:38

this with my own particular

33:41

uh cardiac situation,

33:44

and I think Boston Health is the testing

33:46

that I did to get a more granular

33:47

understanding of things with a little

33:49

higher resolution.

33:51

But since I am a cholesterol

33:53

hyperabsorber,

33:55

that affects that informs the type of

33:58

drug I might take. Doesn't necessarily

34:00

have to be something like a statin. And

34:02

there were three or four drugs that I

34:04

was was suggested to take. And I said,

34:06

what is the longest studied of these

34:09

with the best side effect profile that

34:12

is the most innocuous that I can start

34:14

with? And we can do another test in two

34:16

months. This is not an emergency. I'm

34:18

not about to have a pulmonary ambolism

34:20

or heart attack. Don't have any arteries

34:23

blocked. Like what is it? And it was in

34:26

my case, not everybody, something called

34:28

a zettobe, otherwise known as zedia.

34:31

Very well studied, very well tolerated.

34:33

I said, "Let me try this in case I am a

34:36

hyperresponder because sometimes you can

34:38

be a hyperresponder or a non-responder."

34:41

But I was like, "Let me just try it

34:42

out." And statistically very unlikely

34:45

that I would be, the doctor said.

34:47

Nonetheless, tried it. 2 months later,

34:49

retest. Guess what? I'm a

34:51

hyperresponder. So, I was able to use

34:54

the minimum effective dose for

34:56

medication and ultimately added one more

34:59

thing. But how many decades of possible

35:03

side effects did I just spare myself

35:05

>> by doing basically like one and a half

35:08

drugs instead of starting with four or

35:09

five and doing that indefinitely from

35:11

that point forward? when you're dealing

35:13

with your doctors, to what extent do you

35:16

consult AI? I have found personally that

35:20

talking to a chatbot has been incredibly

35:24

helpful. Now, with the caveat that they

35:26

hallucinate and they [ __ ] things up all

35:28

the time and so I'm not taking it as

35:30

gospel, but I am running I'm in because

35:33

your chatbot doesn't get bored of you

35:35

and doesn't have a um

35:38

an 11 minute window to talk to you. So

35:40

you you can really spend a lot of time

35:42

and then what I found is that I can then

35:45

run what I've learned by my doctors. Um

35:50

is is that an experience you've had?

35:53

>> Oh, for sure. And I do use AI and these

35:58

LLM a lot. Uh, what I would say is that

36:03

if you're going to do something like

36:04

that, my recommendation would be, and

36:07

I'll give a shameless plug just because

36:09

I'm involved with this company. I think

36:10

they're doing great things, but you

36:12

could use something like a chat GPT, but

36:13

there's some tools that are designed for

36:15

learning. Like there's there's one

36:16

called Obo, OBE.com.

36:20

Get some basic literacy, just the ABCs

36:24

of basic medical terminology

36:27

that would be helpful for understanding

36:29

things like blood tests. Just it's like

36:32

a hundred words, maybe 200 words,

36:35

perhaps at the very very tippity top. If

36:37

you want to be an overachiever,

36:40

develop an understanding of the basic

36:43

vocabulary

36:44

so that you can also discuss these

36:46

things in shortorthhand with your

36:48

doctors. Right? All right. So once you

36:50

develop basic medical literacy, you

36:53

could also use that to learn how to read

36:57

studies, right? Learn how to read a

37:00

scientific abstract in a study. Uh that

37:03

would be one of the best investments you

37:05

could ever make with your time.

37:07

spend an afternoon doing that or two

37:09

afternoons. Holy [ __ ] the ROI on that

37:11

is unbelievable. Like the number of

37:13

medical problems averted, the number of

37:16

medical procedures averted, the number

37:18

of

37:20

nonobvious solutions found that my basic

37:24

literacy has helped to to sort of uh

37:30

solve for is unbelievable. It doesn't

37:33

take very long. So, I would I would use

37:34

the tools to kind of do that first and

37:36

then I would say because that'll help

37:38

you with prompts like the answers are

37:40

only going to be as good as your

37:41

prompts. So,

37:43

>> once you've done that, then I use I use

37:45

AI all the time. Uh, and there there's

37:48

an expression which has been helpful for

37:49

me. Uh,

37:52

uh, I tend to I I can run pretty hot. I

37:55

think that's chilled out a lot, but I

37:57

can run pretty hot. I'm typically very

38:00

impatient. I have been since I was like

38:02

a toddler and uh the expression is don't

38:07

attribute to malice what you can

38:08

attribute to incompetence right but it

38:11

goes further than that right because

38:12

just because doesn't some you know

38:13

somebody doesn't reply to you doesn't

38:15

mean it's a personal fraud just because

38:16

someone does something stupid and they

38:18

answer one of your questions out of the

38:19

three you emailed them you can be like a

38:22

uh you can get really wound up but I

38:25

would go further than that which is

38:27

don't attribute to malice or

38:28

incompetence what can be explained by a

38:30

busy schedule, right? People are busy.

38:33

Everybody's busy. Nobody, by the way, AI

38:35

is not going to give us more free time

38:37

just to like this whole idea of like the

38:40

future of living in this leisure society

38:43

where everybody can crochet and do

38:45

sudoku all day and make you know

38:48

mandelas on the floor. It's just

38:49

compatently ridiculous for reasons we

38:52

can get into.

38:53

the what what you can do right is you

38:58

can after developing this basic literacy

39:00

you can go in and then you can ask

39:03

questions that your doctors may not have

39:05

time for. Uh I am always checking for

39:09

contraindications between medications

39:11

and also supplements because doctors

39:15

will miss these. They will miss them.

39:18

They might not miss the most obvious,

39:19

but there are some that are not as

39:22

obvious. For instance, like there are

39:25

sleep medications like Trazadone which

39:27

really affect the serotonin system. It's

39:29

effectively, this is an overstatement,

39:31

but it's effectively a failed

39:33

anti-depressant. So, if you don't know

39:35

that, and it's not technically exactly

39:39

an SSRI like a Prozac, but there are

39:41

some similarities. If you don't know

39:42

that

39:44

because you're quote unquote taking a

39:46

sleep medication and then you go out and

39:48

take something that's contraindicated

39:49

for this entire class of sort of uh

39:53

serotonin specific anti-depressants like

39:55

you can get yourself into trouble. So I

39:58

will regularly check for

40:00

contraindications.

40:02

That's one thing I do. I have friends

40:04

who have uploaded their whole genome to

40:07

some of these LLMs and asked for

40:09

insights and they've they've identified

40:11

some remarkable things. Um the risk in

40:16

doing all of this is that you may

40:19

uncover issues that if you are prone to

40:22

anxiety

40:24

for a lot of reasons I'm kind of

40:26

inoculated against this with medical

40:28

stuff because I've spent so much time in

40:30

the the medical and scientific worlds.

40:33

But uh I'll give you an example. Another

40:35

thing that I do once a year or twice a

40:37

year is a full body MRI. And there are

40:40

companies that do do this. I think

40:42

biograph is the highest level. Prenuvo

40:46

is also pretty good, but I've seen a

40:48

couple of people have cancers missed,

40:50

which isn't great. So,

40:53

if you get a full body MRI and you are

40:55

over the age of 40, you're going to find

40:58

something. You're probably going to find

41:00

some type of internal cyst. You might

41:02

find, if you had, as a friend of mine

41:05

did, like a small brain aneurysm. Like,

41:08

you you're probably going to find

41:10

something. And the question is,

41:14

can you handle that? Can you handle

41:17

either doing something about it, which

41:19

is presumably why why you're doing it in

41:20

the first place, or can you deal with

41:24

the overwhelming likelihood

41:26

statistically that the doc the doctor's

41:28

going to say, "Yeah, we found X, Y, or

41:29

Z. You don't need to do anything about

41:31

it. We'll just keep an eye on it."

41:33

Are you going to be able to handle that

41:35

without becoming a stress case who's

41:37

going combing through LLMs and WebMD all

41:40

day making yourself crazy? Anyway, I'll

41:43

stop there. But yes, I use these tools

41:46

all the time. If you're going to use one

41:48

tool, use another tool to fact check it.

41:51

So, if you get something from Chat GPT,

41:55

absolutely have that thing

41:56

cross-examined by Claude or another

41:59

tool, right? I do not trust these tools

42:02

with their first answers.

42:04

>> Just on the pan scan thing, the full

42:05

body MRI, I'm u the ultimate um this is

42:11

a bit of an aside, but I have figured

42:13

out the ultimate health hack, which is

42:16

marry a doctor um because she can't get

42:20

out of here and I ask her a lot of

42:21

questions. Um, but she uh she is really

42:25

against these pan scans for the very

42:27

reason that you just stated, which is

42:29

you will find something and it may

42:31

stress you out or it may put you in the

42:34

market for a procedure you don't need.

42:36

Um,

42:38

>> yeah. So, it's it's it's interesting the

42:40

the P the differing POVs on this. Um,

42:43

but let me

42:44

>> Oh, sorry. Did you want to say something

42:45

on that? No, I was going to say it's uh

42:50

it's like be uh one of my favorite

42:52

quotes is be suspicious of what you

42:54

want. That's a roomy quote going way

42:55

back. It's like we think that we want

42:58

all of the health information we can

43:00

possibly get, but you should be a little

43:02

skeptical and suspicious of that if

43:05

you've never dealt with a huge amount of

43:07

health information at high resolution.

43:11

So, yeah, it's it's it's a very personal

43:13

thing in my case.

43:15

you know, psychologically this

43:17

particular type of kind of data

43:19

overwhelm I'm pretty good with.

43:21

>> So, I asked before about where you are

43:23

with optimizing now, and you you you you

43:26

listed a bunch of you said you're more

43:28

surgical now and how and how you

43:31

optimize, and you listed a bunch of

43:32

areas, including um uh um how you eat.

43:38

Um,

43:40

you did put out a a podcast in August of

43:42

2025 talking about some of your

43:45

rethinking of optimizing. Um, I'd just

43:48

be curious like where are you at with

43:49

that now?

43:50

>> Yeah. I mean, I I think that

43:54

optimizing

43:57

is the how, right? Broadly speaking,

43:59

right? So, optimizing is how you do

44:02

something.

44:03

Much more important than how you do

44:06

something is the few somethings that you

44:09

choose in the first place to do. Right?

44:11

So this applies to learning quickly.

44:13

This applies to making a lot of money.

44:15

This applies to getting in great shape.

44:18

Like what you do in a sense matters a

44:22

lot more than how you do anything. You

44:25

can get very very very good, very

44:27

optimized, very efficient at doing

44:29

something unimportant. That does not

44:31

make it important. just makes you very

44:33

good at doing something that you

44:34

probably shouldn't be doing in the first

44:36

place. And I think modern productivity

44:41

porn is

44:43

sort of indiscriminate in how it applies

44:47

optimizing to everything and everything,

44:49

right? There's some very funny uh we

44:52

don't have to link to them, but kind of

44:54

morning routines that are these YouTube

44:56

videos that are like four or five hours

44:57

long, right? of people going through

45:00

their day.

45:02

There's a point at which your morning

45:04

routine just turns into like a 5 hour

45:06

warm-up uh for life each day. And

45:11

uh that's obviously a really extreme

45:13

example, but for me I if you were to

45:16

have a nanny cam like hidden in a little

45:18

stuffed like stuffed bear in my house,

45:22

my office,

45:24

this Airbnb where I am right now, and

45:27

you watched me on any given day, you

45:28

would just be like, "What is this guy

45:31

doing?" I mean, it's like a a poorly

45:33

programmed Roomba. Like I don't Is this

45:35

like the Blair Witch Project? like it

45:38

doesn't seem to be doing much work. Like

45:40

what is he doing? And the part of the

45:44

reason I can get away with that is that

45:47

I think I am very good at measuring

45:51

twice and cutting once. In this context,

45:53

what that means is I'm spending a lot of

45:56

time looking at doing 8020 analysis,

46:00

asking myself, you know, what can I do

46:02

that is not easily replicated by someone

46:05

else that I find easier to do than other

46:08

people, which is kind of a shortcut to

46:10

finding things that you're good at that

46:12

you will also have the endurance for

46:14

because you're kind of it's easier for

46:17

you or you're obsessed with it. Okay,

46:18

what am I obsessed with? What am I doing

46:20

at my off hours? Okay, let me try to

46:21

find a ven diagram of that and then

46:24

focus on those things. I'll test it for

46:28

a very short period of time to see if it

46:31

if number one I can sustain it if I am

46:34

actually as good as I thought I would be

46:36

and I don't I need to be the best in the

46:38

world but you know better than average

46:41

and then over time as I'm throwing a lot

46:44

against the wall and then I'm looking

46:46

back and saying okay I tried these three

46:49

things or I made these four investments

46:51

I had these assumptions at the time did

46:52

they pan out why or why not and then

46:56

course correcting. They're actually very

46:58

very very very few things you have to

47:00

get right

47:02

in my opinion to have an incredible

47:04

life. You don't need to be great at a

47:09

lot of things is my perspective. It's

47:12

like look if I remember talking to Jerry

47:14

Seinfeld

47:15

and uh one of his conclusions was if you

47:19

lift weights and do transendental

47:20

meditation that'll solve pretty much all

47:22

your problems. That's just, and I'm

47:25

paraphrasing, but it wasn't too far from

47:27

that. He's like, if you lift weights and

47:28

do TM, it will solve most of your

47:30

problems. And I like that because I

47:34

think there's a whole hell of a lot of

47:36

truth to it, that distilling down, and

47:41

it makes life seem

47:44

much more manageable,

47:47

right? If people feel like they have to

47:49

win this super ultra decathlon of life

47:51

where instead of 10 sports there are 150

47:54

sports you have to be good at. Who is

47:56

who's going to actually surmount that

47:57

and cope with it? Well, nobody. So for

48:00

me it's like look

48:03

if I had to just pull a rabbit out of a

48:05

hat right now to pick a few, I'd be like

48:06

read non-violent communication. Like

48:08

figure out how to talk to people without

48:12

sounding overly defensive or aggressive.

48:15

Okay.

48:17

like life

48:19

unless we're going to be a monk of some

48:21

type or a nun like and even then

48:24

probably there's some crazy internal

48:26

politics at the hamlet in China if you

48:28

want you know the abbot you're going to

48:30

have to deal with that abbot uh so work

48:33

on your communication right take that

48:36

very seriously as like the connective

48:37

tissue for everything

48:40

don't invest in things you don't

48:42

understand

48:43

it's like when in doubt like read a few

48:46

books on like

48:49

lowcost index funds in the S&P 500. Like

48:52

go look at the graph over the last 5,

48:55

10, 15, 20 years. Like you might have

48:57

some hard dips here and there, but if

48:59

you're trying to get fancy and invest in

49:00

like individual AI stocks, like wow.

49:03

Like maybe you'll pick Amazon and Google

49:05

out of all the trash there is right now,

49:06

but most of us won't. I don't think I

49:09

can do it. Uh lift weights, right? Try

49:14

to do some zone 2 training where it's

49:16

like you you could speak in single

49:18

sentences but you don't really want to

49:19

do that for like 30 to 60 minutes a few

49:22

times a week. Okay.

49:26

And then like don't eat processed crap

49:28

like Michael Michael Pollen rules,

49:30

right? It's like if your grandmother

49:31

wouldn't recognize the ingredients,

49:33

don't eat it. Okay. Try that. Like I

49:36

think I think you'll do pretty well.

49:37

>> Hard to argue with any of that. Um and

49:40

it and I think the question I'm going to

49:42

ask next is apppropo. Um

49:46

you one of your current projects is

49:48

called the no book. Um

49:51

>> and uh you uh the book as Tim has uh

49:55

pointed out may come out in 10 years

49:58

because he's working on it slowly but he

49:59

has released a couple of chapters online

50:01

and I've read at least one of them um

50:04

and it's really interesting. Um uh so

50:08

before I say too much, maybe you could

50:11

describe what is the notebook and and

50:13

why are you writing it if if only

50:16

slowly.

50:17

>> Yeah. Yeah. I have an 800page draft

50:19

right now. So it's going to need to get

50:21

whittleled down a little bit. But the

50:23

notebook started something like boy 6

50:27

years ago where I noticed a lot of

50:30

people in my audience, my listeners, my

50:33

readers struggling with focus and saying

50:37

no. Because fundamentally

50:40

like the the road to where you want to

50:42

be in life is

50:45

the sort of the Wizard of Oz, you know,

50:49

golden brick road is saying yes to a few

50:52

things. A few things, right? There are

50:56

really there are just a few things you

50:58

have to get right. And then the the

51:00

guardrails for that are that's that's

51:03

the yes road. And it's very few things.

51:06

the guardrails for that are no, you have

51:08

to say no the entire way. And

51:13

I was I was writing this book. I reached

51:15

out to a bunch of my my friends. These

51:17

are very accomplished friends in this

51:19

case to ask them for their

51:21

recommendations. I thought they would

51:22

help me write this thing and they were

51:23

like, "Oh my god, are you kidding me?

51:25

Like this is the biggest pain in my

51:27

life. Please send me an early copy when

51:30

you can." So my friends were there were

51:32

there were a few who were actually very

51:33

helpful, but the vast majority were

51:34

like, "Oh my god, I thought that life

51:36

was going to get easier. It has only

51:38

gotten harder with respect to saying

51:40

no." And uh and I it just became this

51:43

massive project. So I put it I put it on

51:45

the back burner. And then a friend of

51:48

mine, Neil Strauss, some people might

51:49

recognize that name. He's written

51:50

something like 10 New York Times

51:52

bestsellers. He wrote The Dirt. He's

51:54

written these biographies of Molly Crew

51:56

and like all these celebrities. and he

51:57

also wrote The Game and Emergency and

52:01

many other books. And he's terrible at

52:04

saying no, it turns out. And he was

52:07

busting my balls about not writing this

52:10

book. And he kept harassing me about

52:11

finishing it. And he was actually kind

52:13

of creating a kurfuffle over a group

52:16

dinner after a few drinks. And I was

52:18

just like, "Neil, if you want to read

52:20

this book so badly, why don't you just

52:22

help me finish writing it?" And I

52:24

thought that put it to bed. And then the

52:25

next day when he we all sobered up, he

52:27

was like, you know, if you're serious,

52:29

why don't we talk about it? And

52:32

at the same time, I was noticing with

52:34

social media, certainly with AI, it's

52:37

going to get a thousand times worse. The

52:39

ability, well, first of all, like the

52:42

external forces that want to distract

52:44

you are almost

52:48

unbeatable. I mean, it's it's it's

52:50

incredible how sophisticated they are.

52:52

Secondly, the way that enables self

52:55

interruption and distraction is

52:57

something that humanity has never seen

52:59

before.

53:00

And there is this incredible pain in

53:05

terms of paradox of choice, right? What

53:07

should I do? Who should I listen to?

53:09

What should I watch? What should I pay

53:10

attention to? That is fracturing the

53:14

psyches of people. And this, by the way,

53:16

does not discriminate geographically,

53:18

does not discriminate economically. It's

53:20

like up and down the chain, left, right,

53:23

front, center, everywhere. Uh, so I the

53:27

problems just seem to be getting bigger

53:29

and bigger and bigger. So wrote this

53:32

book with Neil basically as the the

53:35

student. And what's what's fun about it,

53:37

I think it's my most entertaining and

53:40

hilarious book in a way because

53:44

I'm giving Neil these assignments and

53:46

then he'll try them, but it'll be like

53:48

passive aggressive and he'll screw one

53:50

up or he like he'll he'll actually not

53:52

do 50% of the assignment and then I'll

53:54

follow up and he'll have all this guilt.

53:57

But we have real examples of like emails

53:59

he tried to send, text messages he's

54:02

trying to send. He's trying everything

54:03

in the book and learning as he goes. And

54:08

I would say uh there are a few people

54:12

who have proof read the whole thing and

54:14

they proof read it like a year ago and

54:17

they've they've come back and and these

54:19

are fans of my stuff who've read my

54:20

other books and they're like this book

54:22

has had a huge impact on my life and

54:25

they still give me examples. So to to

54:28

then answer the question of well what

54:31

exactly is the book talking about? The

54:33

book is talking about how to say no in a

54:37

world of compulsive yes. Right? But what

54:43

I've what I've what's important to note

54:45

about this is that this is also true

54:49

with the 4-hour body and like why that

54:52

worked for so many people when other

54:54

books kind of diet exercise books had

54:56

failed. It's not enough to just have a

54:59

couple of index cards or templates for

55:03

doing exercise for saying no. If that

55:06

would have worked it would have worked

55:08

already, right?

55:10

And sure, I can give examples, and I

55:13

give tons of examples of lines that are

55:15

helpful for saying no, like Martha Beck,

55:17

who is like Oprah Winfreyy's life coach

55:19

and is an amazing woman in her own right

55:21

for a lot of reasons. U she turned me

55:24

down for something and I include these

55:25

real nos, right? Cuz I kept my favorite

55:30

declines and people like rejections over

55:32

10 years and and so I share a bunch of

55:35

them. And she said to me, "I really wish

55:38

I could, but I can't do the life

55:40

Tetris." Right? I'm like, "Do the life

55:42

Tetris." And I was like, "Wow, that is

55:44

so good. You're not explaining. You're

55:47

not defending. You're not giving a bunch

55:49

of stuff that someone can try to

55:50

negotiate around. It's just like, hey, I

55:53

really wish I could. I just can't do

55:54

life Tetris." And so, I give examples

55:57

like that, but that is not enough. Uh

56:00

once you start really digging into why

56:02

people have trouble saying no, it's not

56:05

only because they lack templates. It's

56:07

because of certain core beliefs,

56:11

which are thoughts we take to be true to

56:13

kind of quote Byron Katy

56:16

and philosophies they have that they're

56:18

not even aware of that make it almost

56:20

impossible to say no. Right? And that

56:23

could relate to FOMO. It could be

56:25

related to a very scarcity-minded

56:28

limited number of opportunities, right?

56:30

A belief that you can't generate

56:32

opportunities yourself. You have to wait

56:34

for things to come as inbound. It could

56:38

relate to and I hit these very early on

56:40

and actually I think they're in the

56:41

sample chapters that people can get. Uh

56:43

if if people go to tim.blog/nobook

56:46

so tim.blog is the actual URL/nowbook,

56:50

one word. I think it's like 30 or 40

56:53

pages of the book that will get into

56:56

this, but a lot of folks will say, "I'm

56:58

too nice for that." Okay, we unpack that

57:01

because there's a lot there, right? Must

57:03

be nice for Tim or fill in the blank

57:06

because they're already successful. I

57:08

don't have that luxury, right? Okay,

57:09

well, let's actually double click on

57:11

that and start to interrogate some of

57:13

these beliefs and on and on and on. So

57:18

saying no in a durable way like really

57:21

developing a toolkit which as far as I'm

57:24

concerned is like a self-preservation

57:26

necessity. Now when I first started it 6

57:29

years ago I was like if people really

57:31

want to get kind of 10x results in their

57:33

life and continue to apply the things

57:35

from the 4-hour work like 8020 etc. they

57:39

really need to have a reliable tool here

57:42

for saying no. Now looking at social

57:45

media AI, social media enabled AI, blah

57:48

blah blah blah blah. What it's going to

57:50

do to inboxes, messaging, etc. with

57:53

personalization, spam, you fill in the

57:55

blank that are indistinguishable from

57:56

humans. Uh this is it's this is like

58:00

knowing how to breathe. As far as I'm

58:02

concerned, you have to have a toolkit

58:03

like this or you're just going to get

58:04

you're going to be roadkill, I think.

58:07

And I that sounds probably very

58:08

dramatic, but it's like I'm sitting in

58:10

Silicon Valley right now for my first

58:12

trip here for a few weeks um of in

58:15

duration in like 8 years. I'm telling

58:18

you guys, the stuff that's coming is

58:20

going to be amazing. It's going to be

58:21

incredible. It's also just going to be

58:25

it's going to be catastrophic for I

58:27

think a lot of minds that are unprepared

58:30

with the proper toolkits. So saying no

58:33

is important.

58:34

>> Agreed. And it's a huge struggle for me.

58:36

You have a beautiful phrase in your book

58:38

uh promiscuous over commitment and I um

58:42

am really really guilty of that. You

58:45

also there's another nice phrase you you

58:46

you say the book will help you build a

58:48

benevolent failank uh protective wall of

58:51

troops to guard your goals. Uh

58:55

we don't have time to talk about all of

58:57

the tools in there but is there a tool

59:00

in particular you think that is that

59:01

would be very very powerful for people?

59:04

>> Yes absolutely. Um, so there a lot of

59:07

folks have perhaps heard the apocryphal

59:09

story of and I think I I I give proper

59:12

credit in the book and this is one of

59:15

the chapters that people can get. Um, so

59:17

there's plenty of value that people can

59:19

get from the from the free stuff, but I

59:21

mean I'm not even selling it yet, so

59:22

maybe I'll give away more. But the uh

59:25

the the one of the culprits, one of the

59:32

biggest causal factors for why people

59:34

have trouble saying no is they don't

59:37

have big enough yeses to defend,

59:41

>> right? And for instance, if you don't

59:44

have like if you had a brand new child,

59:47

if you had or someone you loved, god

59:50

forbid, had a serious cancer diagnosis,

59:52

if you had tiger by the tail and knew

59:56

that you were working on a business, I'm

59:58

using an extreme example on purpose that

60:00

could be worth billions of dollars, you

60:02

would not have trouble saying no to

60:03

things,

60:05

right? And so then like we go back to

60:10

the other end of the spectrum. It's like

60:12

well if you don't have really clearly

60:14

defined big yes yeses

60:18

that get you excited that have the

60:20

potential for huge payoff not

60:22

necessarily financially

60:24

and you're kind of searching around your

60:27

inbox for things to answer. Right? When

60:31

people send you an invite to a dinner or

60:34

they want to have coffee to pick your

60:36

brain or it could be anything, a costume

60:40

party you don't want to go to. That's a

60:41

real example from Neil actually.

60:46

And

60:48

you're going to say yes because what's

60:51

scarier than having lots of little

60:54

promiscuous overcommitments? It's a big

60:57

void.

60:58

>> Right? So the apocryphal story that I

61:01

was hinting at um is the story of the

61:05

professor who comes in and this I I want

61:07

to say this was from originally Steven

61:10

Cvy or maybe Steven Cvy adapted it

61:12

>> the seven habits of highly effective

61:14

people I believe was the book

61:16

>> and it might have been in his teaching

61:18

and not in the books themselves but the

61:20

the story is along these lines.

61:22

professor goes in and he puts out on the

61:26

desk in front of the students like a

61:28

large mason jar, a handful of big rocks,

61:32

right? Like like three or four, a bunch

61:35

of gravel and then a bunch of sand. And

61:38

he challenges the students, asks them

61:41

first how they would fit as much as

61:44

possible into the mason jar. And they

61:47

try different approaches. And if you put

61:49

in the sand first, you get a little bit

61:50

of gravel. can't fit the rocks, right?

61:53

You put in the gravel first. Um,

61:56

actually, um, let me make sure I'm

61:58

getting this right. All right, we'll

62:00

we'll snip that part. So, let me let me

62:02

start that over again. Right. So, if you

62:03

put in the sand first, then you get a

62:05

little bit of gravel in, can't fit the

62:07

rocks. Okay. Well, ditto. If you put the

62:10

gravel in first, then you put in the

62:12

sand, maybe you fit one rock. Okay. And

62:16

ultimately

62:18

the lesson is you have to put in the big

62:21

rocks first, then the gravel fits around

62:24

that and then you can fit in the sand.

62:27

In the version that I tell, I make it I

62:30

I make a modification to that and I say

62:33

no matter what they do, there's still

62:35

sand left over on the table. And I think

62:38

the lesson is if you're looking at this

62:41

in terms of commitments, right, the big

62:43

rocks are those kind of life-changing

62:45

yeses, the few things you need to

62:47

protect on that golden road to get

62:49

really where you want to be. Then the

62:51

gravel to me are like the smaller but

62:54

critical things you need to do. Got to

62:56

file your taxes, got to do A, B, or C.

63:00

And then the sand is all that extraneous

63:02

stuff, mostly distractions. So you can

63:04

fit some of it, but if you schedule all

63:07

that stuff first, it's going to crowd

63:09

out the gravel or it's certainly at the

63:12

very least going to crowd out all the

63:13

big yeses, right? And so in the in the

63:17

sample chapters, I just walk people

63:19

through how I do this past year review,

63:23

right? and like how I actually pick the

63:26

big yeses because the the book on no

63:30

is equally a book on h to answer the

63:34

question how the hell in a world of

63:38

infinite options in a world of

63:41

temptation around every corner do you

63:44

pick a few things to focus on that are

63:48

really high leverage how do you do it

63:50

like that seems like a it's a simple

63:53

question, but it's actually a very hard

63:55

question to answer. Um, and so I would

63:58

say that if you're having trouble saying

64:01

no, underneath that probably is the fact

64:06

that you don't have a you don't have big

64:08

enough yeses that are worth defending.

64:11

Uh, and then there's a lot that leads

64:12

from that, right? There are ways how do

64:14

you commit to a yes and ensure against

64:18

reneggging or something else? Um, and

64:22

there's also like this is intended to be

64:24

hopefully like all of my books a very

64:26

practical book, right? So, what happens

64:29

when you screw up, right? There's an

64:31

entire chapter on how to renegotiate

64:33

commitments after you have already

64:35

overcommitted because guess what? If you

64:37

have that tendency, you're going to

64:39

overcommit. You're going to look at your

64:41

calendar for the next few weeks or month

64:43

and say, "Good lord, I'm screwed."

64:48

And then what do you do? you're going to

64:50

have to have some very potentially

64:52

uncomfortable conversations. So, we're

64:54

learning to renegotiate commitments is

64:58

also an art form that is going to be

65:00

included in it. Uh but fundamentally,

65:03

it's it's

65:05

big yeses worth defending.

65:08

Um I would say is another one. And sure,

65:11

there are lots of things that you can do

65:13

that you could do today. You don't have

65:15

to look at any of these chapters, right?

65:18

It's like I have not had social media on

65:20

my phone in 3 years.

65:23

>> Uh why? Because I feel like you are

65:27

bringing a butter knife to a gunfight if

65:31

you have these tools on your phone. Uh

65:35

and if it's too scary to unplug for

65:40

a, you know, 3 years, you don't have to

65:42

commit to that. I didn't in the

65:44

beginning. It's like do a one or two

65:46

week social media fast at least on your

65:50

phone. So I can still access social

65:52

media if I need a hit of the heroin. I

65:55

can still access social media through my

65:57

laptop, but it adds enough friction that

65:59

I'm not going to end up looking at

66:01

Instagram while I'm on the toilet and

66:02

wondering why I can't feel my legs 40

66:05

minutes later. Right? It's going to

66:06

avoid that type of thing. or the

66:09

compulsive sort of dopamine scratching

66:11

whenever you have free 30 seconds

66:13

jumping into social media. This is not

66:16

good for your ability to focus. It's not

66:18

good for your ability to single task.

66:20

It's not good for your mental health

66:22

when you always have that escape.

66:25

It's it's I mean, look, I'm telling

66:27

people things they probably agree with

66:30

but perhaps haven't implemented, right?

66:31

So, you can do something like that. You

66:33

can use an app like Freedom. There's an

66:34

app called Freedom that you can use to

66:36

block certain things for certain periods

66:38

of time. I mean there are these

66:41

technical tools that you can use. Uh but

66:46

at the very base

66:49

you can't use more window dressing

66:52

technical tricks to fix like fundamental

66:55

problems with goal selection. Big yes is

66:58

worth defending

67:00

and core beliefs. Right? If I say no to

67:04

this person, they're something bad is

67:06

going to happen

67:09

and they're not going to like me.

67:11

They'll stop inviting me to things. Like

67:13

if you have these and that is going to

67:16

what, right? You have to ask and then

67:17

what? And then what? Right? I'm going to

67:19

end up alone. Okay. Well, these are

67:22

these are sort of Rubicons you need to

67:23

get comfortable crossing in the sense

67:25

that my experience is this is also

67:27

Neil's experience. He had tons of fears

67:30

as did I in the beginning stages. It's

67:32

like when you start to stand up for the

67:36

things that are important in your life,

67:39

uh I think this is a Dr. Seuss quote,

67:41

but it's like the people who mind don't

67:43

matter and the people who matter don't

67:44

mind. Like you actually do a lot of

67:47

pruning in your life that you should do

67:49

anyway. And it's a it's a forcing

67:52

function for that.

67:54

>> That's so interesting. It really is

67:56

about courage in the end. Um

67:59

>> it is. And you can train that. You can

68:01

train that. It's not something you are

68:04

born with or without. Like that is

68:06

something

68:08

through actually understanding

68:11

what your fears represent and like

68:14

what's underneath them. It could be from

68:15

childhood. It doesn't necessarily have

68:17

to be. But when you start to actually

68:19

examine them, there's an exercise people

68:21

could do today also they can find. I did

68:23

a TED talk on this called fear setting.

68:25

You start to do fear setting around

68:27

these fears. You defang them. And guess

68:30

what? Suddenly you have this thing that

68:32

others might call courage. But what it

68:34

is is it's clarity.

68:37

It's clarity around the actual downside

68:40

which is limited versus the upside

68:44

of protecting these big yeses over a

68:46

year two or three. And I will say, not

68:49

to continue to beat this dead horse, but

68:52

with all of the noise that is here, but

68:55

that is coming with AI, it's going to be

68:57

10, 100, a thousand times worse within 2

68:59

years.

69:01

If you can single task on important

69:03

things for not even 4 hours a day, 2

69:07

hours a day without interruption, you

69:09

are going to be from the perspective of,

69:13

let's just say, an attention economy in

69:15

the top 1% of performers.

69:17

H

69:18

>> it's it's uh it's never been easier and

69:21

it's never been harder in a way.

69:23

>> I'm going to lose you in 9 minutes. So,

69:25

I do want to make sure I quickly ask you

69:27

about Coyote uh another projects. Uh

69:31

this is a game that you've uh um uh

69:35

designed. Can you what is it and why?

69:38

>> Yeah. Yeah. So, Coyote

69:41

is a is a it's a tiny little card game

69:44

that I designed with uh some of my

69:47

friends at Exploding Kittens, which

69:48

people might recognize. They have a lot

69:50

of very very popular games. And uh it's

69:55

a it's a fun family game. It's it's

69:58

something like, if you could imagine,

70:00

charades meets hot potato meets uh brain

70:04

teaser. something that I I hope uh at

70:07

some point I'd actually like to do a

70:08

clinical study on this but you know

70:10

makes you just a little bit smarter and

70:12

the people who play uh it is it is a um

70:17

casual card game you can learn in a few

70:18

minutes each game lasts about 10 minutes

70:20

and the reason I created it I always

70:22

wanted to make a game number one and

70:26

I ch this is actually a good

70:28

illustration of some of the stuff that

70:29

is in the book that'll come out in you

70:31

know 100 years uh but people can apply

70:33

it today which is uh I choose projects

70:39

based on

70:42

which projects will allow me to win even

70:45

if they fail. What does that mean?

70:48

>> Uh

70:50

I assume that any project could fail for

70:53

reasons totally outside of my control.

70:54

It's happened before. It'll happen

70:56

again. Happens to people every day. And

71:00

so how am I then choosing things to

71:02

commit to? Well, generally I'm, you

71:04

know, I'm doing all these two week

71:06

experiments on various things like the

71:07

diet and this that and the other thing.

71:08

With projects, it's kind of like a

71:10

six-month commitment, right? I'm looking

71:12

at like a 6 to 12-month project where I

71:14

really go allin. By the way, that makes

71:17

it easier to say no to things when

71:19

you're doing a sprint as opposed to a

71:21

very slow walking marathon. So, I'm

71:24

committing to something that I think

71:25

will be 6 to 12 months. And I am

71:28

optimizing for

71:30

what I will learn, right? the density of

71:33

learning

71:34

and also the relationships that I'll

71:37

deepen or develop. So it could be with

71:38

new people, could be with people I

71:40

already know

71:41

with the belief that those relationships

71:45

and those skills or knowledge will

71:48

transcend that project even if the

71:50

public hates it. Even if in my case, for

71:53

instance, China tariffs for a nine a

71:57

game that sold for $9 or $10 coming from

71:59

China, that that just kills the

72:01

economics, right? So, not that this was

72:03

ever a money-making thing for me, but

72:05

it's like there are things that came up

72:07

that made this suddenly much harder from

72:10

a kind of business perspective. And

72:14

thank God I checked those other boxes,

72:16

right? Because uh fortunately, it's got

72:18

like 9.7 or 9.8 eight stars on Amazon

72:20

and it's available everywhere and it's

72:22

doing really well. But what I really

72:25

care about is like Alan Lee, who's the

72:27

co-founder and CEO of Exploding Kittens,

72:30

has become a super close friend. He was

72:32

a good friend beforehand. We're even

72:33

closer now. This guy's one of the most

72:35

amazing polymaths I've ever met in my

72:37

life. Awesome, hilarious guy. And I have

72:40

learned so much about mass retail, you

72:43

know, the Walmarts and Targets and so

72:45

on. I've learned so much about how you

72:47

have to play the politics and the game

72:48

of thrones with that. I've learned about

72:50

overseas manufacturing. I've learned

72:52

about you name it, right? I've learned

72:54

so much. And those are the reasons for

72:56

me picking this. And if you look at, for

72:58

instance, there's a blog post people can

72:59

find for free. Angel investing, like

73:02

investing in early stage companies,

73:03

which is like 90% of my net worth, which

73:06

I started well before I could quote

73:07

unquote afford it. uh there's a blog

73:10

post called uh I think it's creating a

73:14

real world MBA which explains kind of

73:16

how I approached it which was the same

73:19

way I approached this learning and

73:22

relationships that I think will

73:24

transcend that project and snowball over

73:28

time so that it's very hard to lose long

73:31

term but the but coming back to the game

73:33

itself I mean look if if you've got kids

73:37

in between the ages of let's say I most

73:41

It says 10 on the box, but really it's

73:43

kind of like age eight if your kids are

73:45

pretty smart to like age 15. This is

73:48

kind of a no-brainer. Like the game

73:49

works really really well. Adults also

73:52

really like it. So, it's not just for

73:53

kids. But if you've got some kids around

73:56

or adults who don't care being a little

73:58

goofy, then um I think it's a really

74:02

simple, fun game that hopefully does

74:05

something cognitive for folks as well.

74:07

That was kind of the goal.

74:09

and Coyote. You can just Yeah. Coyote

74:11

game. You can find it everywhere.

74:13

>> It is always an enormous pleasure to

74:14

talk to you, Tim. And I know you say no

74:17

to most [ __ ] so thank you. Thank you

74:18

for saying yes to this.

74:20

>> Yeah, I love what you do, man. I love

74:22

what you do. Uh, one of my very close

74:24

friends who's a professor at a very

74:27

wellrespected university had pains in

74:30

his body. this just horrible pervasive

74:34

pain in joints in his body for years and

74:37

years. Started using 10% Happier,

74:40

meditating every day, and it was like

74:42

boom, within 4 weeks, pains went away.

74:44

Crazy. I have some theories on that. I

74:46

think it's actually might be

74:47

synchronized breathing and and vag nerve

74:49

stimulation, but that's a separate

74:51

conversation. Um, and uh, I just think

74:55

you put a lot of uh, you're very

74:57

thoughtful and you do a lot of good in

74:59

the world. So, it's always and I just

75:01

enjoy hanging out. So, it's always a a

75:03

pleasure to connect.

Interactive Summary

Tim Ferriss shares his journey to significantly improved well-being, emphasizing that personal growth requires active engagement with life rather than continuous self-polishing in isolation. His transformation is attributed to prioritizing strong relationships, maintaining a consistent meditation practice, and utilizing advanced neuro-stimulation techniques like accelerated Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS), especially when enhanced by D-cycloserine (DCS) to boost neuroplasticity. He also incorporates intermittent ketosis and fasting into his routine for health optimization. Ferriss advocates for a deliberate approach to self-optimization, urging individuals to first define *what* and *why* they are optimizing. He discusses the judicious use of AI for health information, while cautioning against its potential to induce anxiety. Additionally, he introduces his upcoming 'No Book,' which provides strategies for saying no in an increasingly distraction-saturated world, highlighting the importance of protecting crucial 'big yeses' (core life goals) as a vital self-preservation skill in the age of AI.

Suggested questions

5 ready-made prompts