HomeVideos

Alibaba's Joe Tsai on US-China Rivalry, AI Future, Owning the Nets/Liberty, Caitlin Clark's Impact

Now Playing

Alibaba's Joe Tsai on US-China Rivalry, AI Future, Owning the Nets/Liberty, Caitlin Clark's Impact

Transcript

686 segments

0:00

[Music]

0:01

For people who don't know who he is,

0:03

please give us an introduction to Joe

0:05

Sat. He's the owner of the Nets and he's

0:07

now chairman of Alibaba. We like

0:10

innovation from the bottom up.

0:11

>> Alibaba just dropped their secret

0:13

weapon, Quinn 2.5 max. Alibaba surged 14

0:17

1.5% overnight, beat estimates on nearly

0:19

every metric. A massive rally alone this

0:21

year, adding about 100 billion to the

0:24

stock's value. You have to have a growth

0:26

mindset when you compete.

0:30

Ladies and gentlemen, please welcome Joe

0:33

Sai.

0:40

[Music]

0:42

>> Hey, my man. Good to see you.

0:44

>> Good to see you, brother.

0:46

>> How are you?

0:46

>> Good to see you.

0:46

>> Good to see you,

0:47

>> David. How are you?

0:49

>> The Brooklyn Nets.

0:52

>> Brooklyn Nets.

0:53

>> Nets and the New York Liberty.

0:54

>> And the New York Liberty. Exactly. It's

0:56

not easy running a team, is it?

0:58

>> It's uh not easy at all.

1:01

>> Not easy at all

1:02

>> because

1:04

uh a basketball any professional team is

1:07

uh both a uh business and also it's an

1:10

institution. You need to keep the fan

1:12

base happy. So there's sort of this

1:14

church and state element.

1:15

>> Yeah.

1:16

>> It's almost like running a news

1:17

organization.

1:18

>> Yeah, there it is. Can we uh maybe start

1:20

with the WNBA and we can shift to

1:22

business and we can shift to basketball,

1:23

but I think Caitlin Kark is out for the

1:25

season and there's just been a lot of

1:27

controversy and attention that the WNBA

1:29

is getting. What has it done right? What

1:31

has it done wrong? Did the has the

1:33

league been doing enough to protect her

1:34

as a as a star in the face of the

1:36

league? It's been a almost a microcosm

1:39

for just a social discussion. Do you

1:41

want to just talk about that as what you

1:43

see?

1:43

>> Clayton Clark definitely had an effect

1:45

on uh the WNBA. All the metrics went up.

1:48

So, this was last season, right, when

1:51

she first came into the league from

1:53

college. And uh uh we've seen all of our

1:56

metrics from viewership, ticket sales,

2:00

sponsorship, everything went up like

2:02

almost 4x 4x.

2:05

>> 4x,

2:06

>> right?

2:06

>> I mean, that's incredible.

2:07

>> That's incredible. So, so the so the

2:10

economic impact that she's made to the

2:12

league is is extraordinary.

2:14

>> Undeniable.

2:14

>> Undeniable. But because of who she is,

2:17

um, you know, she's a a little bit of a

2:19

different, uh, kind of player. You know,

2:23

she is a she's a point guard. She's

2:24

she's a smaller player. Uh, the knock on

2:27

her was was she going to be able to

2:29

withstand all the physicality of the

2:31

league, and she's proven that she's able

2:33

to do to do that. Um, unfortunately,

2:36

there's been uh I think I think it's

2:39

always good to have rivalries, right? uh

2:41

you know she she has this rivalry with

2:43

Angel Ree that dated back to college.

2:45

But some people would like to pit it as

2:48

uh a kind of a racial thing or is it uh

2:52

you know this or that. I um I think we

2:55

need to look past that uh and just look

2:57

at the skill set that's being brought

2:58

into the league now. We have so many

3:00

great college players. I mean uh the the

3:03

the rookie of the year potential

3:06

candidate uh is Sonia Citron. Have you

3:09

ever heard of her before she came into

3:11

the league? I mean, no, she I think she

3:13

just uh broke the record for the highest

3:16

three-point uh shooting percentage in

3:18

the league. Uh so, you know, you you see

3:21

tremendous amount of talent and I think

3:24

uh you you ask what have what have they

3:27

done, right? I I don't I think it's a

3:29

matter of just uh a confluence of good

3:31

things coming into the league.

3:32

>> And what about the NBA? So you guys did

3:35

just an enormous

3:36

>> Yeah. Just let me let me just But but

3:38

the one thing that's really changed that

3:40

is prior to the Kaylin Clark uh season

3:45

uh your average fan base that watches

3:48

ESPN basically you guys are not watching

3:52

women's basketball. Maybe some some of

3:54

them follow college but certainly not

3:57

the WNBA. But now your average ESPN fan

4:00

base, they are watching the mainstream

4:03

sports fan base are watching the

4:04

>> I think she's a I I have an observation

4:07

about this and you and I are old school

4:08

basketball heads, you know, watching

4:10

having watched the 80s and 90s and

4:12

Patrick Euing and Charles Barkley. It's

4:14

more physical. They're tougher in the

4:16

WNBA. And every time LeBron goes up and

4:19

he gets fouled and he's just and he's

4:22

flopping all the time.

4:22

>> How does he do it? You know, it's a

4:25

foul. It's a foul. So maybe you could

4:27

comment on LeBron being like

4:29

>> or just generally the NBA product

4:31

actually.

4:31

>> Yeah. The I mean the NBA and then

4:33

they're so tough and they're throwing

4:35

each other around. It's a better game.

4:38

>> The NBA product is great.

4:40

>> Um I I I don't think it's fair to

4:42

compare whether uh the men's league is

4:44

more less physical than the women's

4:45

league or more one the other the I mean

4:48

they're both very physical. I mean if

4:49

you are sitting there on the floor you

4:52

are watching physicality.

4:54

>> Sure. uh and and also athleticism,

4:56

right? But the game has, you know, the

4:59

NBA has this uh uh committee called the

5:02

competition committee. So I I got put on

5:03

the competition committee. They call me

5:06

and they say, "Joe Joe, we want, you

5:07

know, want to be on the competition

5:09

committee, you know, it's about rules

5:10

about, you know, like what is this

5:12

transition, take foul?" So the committee

5:15

is every season they're they make these

5:17

tweak changes. They make changes to

5:20

refing to make the product better. I

5:22

mean, when I got the call, I'm like, you

5:24

want me to sit on the committee with

5:26

Jason Kidd, Chris Paul, and uh Coach K?

5:30

Like, what do I know about basketball

5:32

that can, you know, really

5:34

>> be smarter than them? But, uh, but what

5:37

I've seen is uh I've said to ads so the

5:40

competition committee should be called

5:42

the product committee because that is

5:44

the product the fans see on the floor.

5:46

If you change, let's say if you change

5:47

the three-point line,

5:49

>> that is a product decision. sound

5:51

competition.

5:52

>> Should they?

5:53

>> Is it too?

5:54

>> I I don't think so. I don't think so.

5:56

>> When you watch the the Boston Celtics

5:58

throw up 43 threes in a game, you think

6:00

it's a good product?

6:01

>> I think it's a great product because

6:02

there are 18 different ways you can

6:04

throw up 43 threes in a game.

6:06

>> Okay, let's uh transition to Alibaba for

6:09

a second. It's an incredible journey you

6:12

and Jack Ma and the whole story has it's

6:15

I mean it's written in books and there's

6:17

just tremendous lore but can you take us

6:19

back to your mindset? I mean I think

6:21

we've heard it's well documented Jack's

6:23

mindset but how you got involved what

6:25

you were thinking in that moment the

6:27

risk you were taking. I was just

6:29

mesmerized by Jack's personality. uh

6:32

every people see the public side of Jack

6:35

which is very charismatic but what I saw

6:38

was he was able to instill faith in

6:40

people. I mean, he had a when I walked

6:42

into his apartment, there were like 12

6:45

to 15 sort of very young people roughly,

6:48

you know, uh, students that were just

6:52

coming out of college and Jack was kind

6:54

of the teacher that's 10 years older and

6:57

he's able to communicate. He's able to

6:59

paint a a very strong vision. Uh, that

7:03

was the part that I really signed on to.

7:05

His ability to lead is an amazing

7:08

ability and you know he's a teacher uh

7:11

by training he taught at Zojang

7:14

University he taught English actually

7:16

you know teachers in a way make natural

7:19

leaders uh because a you have to

7:21

communicate well and b you can identify

7:25

talent I think a lot of teachers love to

7:28

see their students and say oh this kid

7:31

is gonna do really well so they write a

7:33

recommendation they do whatever And also

7:36

teachers are have enough humility that

7:39

they're willing, they're very happy if

7:41

their students go off and then they come

7:44

back and become more successful than

7:45

they are. And in a comp in building a

7:47

company, you need to be able to

7:49

accommodate all sorts of people that are

7:50

smarter than you are. And that's that's

7:52

really important. There was a phase I

7:54

guess in the maybe the early 2010s where

7:57

it was a lot of it felt like tremendous

8:00

freewheeling capitalism in China where

8:02

there was just a just a Cambrian

8:04

explosion of incredible entrepreneurs

8:06

yourself and Jack and all these others

8:07

pony and then I think almost starting

8:11

with the antipo it things changed a

8:14

little bit. Can you walk us through the

8:16

dynamics of how that changed and then I

8:18

think it all kind of leads to you know

8:20

the lot of foreign direct investment

8:21

into the Chinese ecosystem has changed

8:23

pretty dramatically. Just give us a

8:25

sense of what has happened over that arc

8:27

that you've been in it working in it

8:30

observing it.

8:30

>> Alibaba has been around for 26 years. I

8:34

would say the first 15 years were it was

8:37

a complete free market kind of you know

8:40

way of growth and uh uh we built a lot

8:44

of business organically and then you we

8:48

went into a phase where there was

8:49

extreme competition uh everybody wanted

8:52

to do e-commerce why it's because if you

8:55

have traffic online e-commerce was the

8:58

best way to monetize your traffic and

9:00

and today in today's market we have five

9:02

or very very strong competitors

9:05

including the parent company of Tik Tok

9:07

bite dance they are doing e-commerce

9:09

they're not known as an e-commerce

9:10

company but they are one of our fiercest

9:12

competitors so there's a you go through

9:15

a a a period of extreme competition and

9:18

then the government felt that this

9:21

sector has gotten out of line a little

9:24

bit first there's too much competition

9:27

and then there are some uh platforms

9:29

that have exhibited monopolistic

9:32

behavior

9:33

So then there was a uh you know people

9:36

may call it a crackdown whatever more

9:38

regulations came in regulations some of

9:40

the regulations are very good actually

9:42

they protected privacy uh uh anti-

9:45

monopoly type uh regulation and uh uh

9:49

now we kind of are in a new normal where

9:53

uh we are we believe that the regulatory

9:57

environment is more predictable. We know

9:59

what the red lines are uh and we we know

10:02

where to go and where not to go and it's

10:05

actually made uh a a a better operating

10:08

environment because of the predict

10:10

predictability of it. On a geopolitical

10:12

level, it seems to be the rhetoric in

10:14

the United States. What they keep

10:16

drilling into Americans is to look at

10:19

China as an existential threat to

10:22

America that we're rivals that we cannot

10:24

operate and lead the world to

10:27

prosperity.

10:28

What do you think?

10:31

>> I I I

10:33

don't agree with that view of uh the

10:36

world. I'd be interested in your view,

10:38

David.

10:38

>> I mean, I don't believe in that either.

10:39

I mean, I'm I don't know why this has to

10:42

be the only dialogue we have is that we

10:45

are bitter rivals.

10:46

>> Yeah. I mean, look at this. the I I

10:49

think I I I could understand why sitting

10:52

here in America you look at the rise of

10:54

China over the last 20 years 25 years uh

10:57

China has become strong in terms of um

10:59

manufacturing that's why it's such an

11:01

export juggernaut it has become because

11:04

of the economic development it's uh you

11:07

know China has become a technology

11:10

juggernaut as well and the fear is well

11:13

all that stuff economic strength and

11:15

technology strength is going to flow

11:18

into military strength and that becomes

11:21

kind of a national security issue. I I

11:23

understand that. I I get it. Uh but I

11:26

think it's um uh it uh I these are the

11:30

two largest economies in the world and I

11:34

think you just need to take a step back

11:35

and say well yeah on the one hand we

11:37

should compete with China right that's

11:39

fine we our comp the hyperscalers

11:42

companies compete with the Chinese

11:44

internet companies globally um but then

11:46

on the other hand there there is just so

11:49

many trouble spots in the world uh that

11:52

what did President Trump say that he

11:54

stopped Seven wars, right?

11:56

>> Yeah.

11:56

>> Okay. Well, China has didn't start any

11:59

of them. China has not started a war in

12:02

the last how many years? You know, 30

12:04

years, 40 years. Um I think uh China was

12:08

part of the uh Korean war. Uh maybe the

12:12

Vietnam war, but that was uh a long time

12:14

ago in history. Uh so in a way China you

12:18

know if you observe the behavior of the

12:21

the Chinese people and the Chinese state

12:23

it's a very peaceful nation. China cares

12:26

about econ its own economic development.

12:29

They care about uh the well-being of its

12:32

citizens and uh I think there's a lot of

12:35

friction in in the in the course of

12:37

competition where China feels that the

12:39

United States is trying to contain China

12:42

and and stop the rise of China

12:43

economically. Just speaking about the

12:45

the welfare of its citizens. Um you

12:48

mentioned bite dance. I think there was

12:49

reported bite 10's revenue just passed

12:51

meta's revenue. I mean it's a

12:53

juggernaut.

12:54

>> It's a private company so I don't know.

12:56

You were telling Yeah.

12:56

>> Yeah. They actually released it but

12:59

>> um

13:00

>> one of the core products Tik Tok it's a

13:02

fundamentally different product here

13:04

than in than in China. And because of

13:06

that regulation and a focus on the

13:08

welfare of its citizens, there's like

13:09

strict rules in terms of the content and

13:12

the curation and the algorithms. Whereas

13:14

here, you know, it's like cat videos and

13:17

like, you know, all kinds of nonsense.

13:19

Although now I noticed that Tik Tok put

13:21

a STEM section inside of Tik Tok in the

13:24

American product for whatever reason.

13:26

There's a wherewithal that China has to

13:28

think about its citizenry like that. And

13:31

I'm just curious, how do we embrace more

13:34

of that principle because that sort of

13:37

gets lost in this?

13:38

>> Such a good question. Yeah. What can we

13:39

learn from China? Yeah.

13:40

>> Yeah. What should we be doing more of

13:42

that China does? Well, first education.

13:46

I mean, you have a extremely highly

13:49

educated population. And you know, you

13:52

talk to every Chinese parent, they want

13:54

their kids to take the ent college

13:56

entrance exam and get into the best

13:58

universities.

14:00

you know, if they want to send their

14:02

kids away to school, they want to go to

14:03

the Ivy League or Stanford or, you know,

14:06

all of that. So, I I think I think the

14:10

emphasis on education, I think there are

14:12

some structural issues here in the

14:13

United States, like the teachers union

14:15

that is getting in the way, but uh

14:21

uh but there are no teachers unions in

14:23

China. So, David, what's your David? I'm

14:27

curious looking at this um not in any

14:30

official capacity but kind of the same

14:33

question Chimath and I are sort of um

14:36

probing about here. What is your take on

14:39

America and China succeeding together?

14:41

And are we destined to be in conflict

14:44

with this country forever or is there a

14:46

path forward with our incredible amazing

14:50

dynamic President Trump?

14:53

Well, I think you know, Professor

14:55

Mirshimer explained it at all in some of

14:57

the last year that the US and China are

14:59

in a high-tech competition. They're in a

15:01

security competition, economic

15:02

competition. And the the reason is

15:05

because China's become rich and

15:06

powerful. And the United States does not

15:08

tolerate pure competitors. We want to be

15:10

the number one country. We want to be

15:11

the most powerful country. The balance

15:13

of power is to some degree a zero- sum

15:16

game. Economics are not, but power is.

15:19

And the the history of the United States

15:21

is we want to be number one and we don't

15:23

we don't like having pure competitors.

15:24

And I mean that's the bottom line. Now I

15:26

mean there are good reasons for this. We

15:28

live in a an Arctic world meaning

15:30

there's no higher authority. If you get

15:32

in trouble in the global system you

15:34

can't call 911. And so countries

15:38

privilege their survival over all their

15:40

considerations. And the way to survive

15:42

in the international system is to be

15:44

powerful. and you measure your power

15:46

based on the gap between you and the

15:48

next most powerful country. And I think

15:51

that 20 years ago, China wasn't seen as

15:53

a threat because it wasn't rich and

15:54

powerful, but now it is. And I think

15:57

that's what's led to a much more hawkish

15:59

environment in Washington. And I, you

16:01

know, I can't disagree with all of it

16:03

because I think it's very important that

16:05

the United States win the AI race. We

16:07

don't want China, for example, to

16:09

dominate in AI or or in chips. We want

16:12

the as Americans, we want the United

16:14

States to be the most powerful country.

16:15

Now, if I were Chinese, I would want

16:17

China to be the most powerful country.

16:19

And I don't have any resentment towards

16:21

Chinese people who want their country

16:23

the most powerful country. So, um

16:24

there's no animosity in saying this, but

16:27

I want the US to be the most powerful

16:29

country. And you know, in my little part

16:32

of the world, that means winning the AI

16:33

race.

16:35

>> Can I respond to that?

16:37

>> Yeah.

16:38

>> Yeah. Uh I I think it's really important

16:40

that the uh as an you you know you as a

16:44

patriotic American, you want America to

16:45

win. Uh but I think when it comes to AI,

16:49

there's no such thing as winning the

16:51

race. I think it's a long marathon. And

16:55

you know, you could just see by these

16:56

model companies, uh every week there's a

16:59

model that's leading, but then the next

17:01

week another model overtakes them,

17:03

right? So uh and the other thing is it's

17:06

um AI is one of those uh we haven't

17:09

figured out what is the business model

17:11

is but in our business in e-commerce we

17:14

have a marketplace model with network

17:16

dynamics but I'm not sure if the

17:19

development of models has those uh

17:22

network effects that means winner take

17:25

all right so I don't think AI is a

17:29

winner take all uh field I think what My

17:33

definition of winning,

17:36

you know, is not who comes up with the

17:38

strongest AI model, but who can adopt it

17:42

faster. And I think uh uh people here in

17:47

the United States uh a lot of resources

17:50

should go into adoption and diffusion of

17:54

the technology as opposed to just

17:57

plowing you know bill I mean literally

17:59

each of the hyperscaler companies is in

18:02

each of them is investing something like

18:04

$80 billion a year. But you know I I

18:08

think if you look at China a couple

18:10

things are going on. Number one, China

18:12

has espoused open- source. Um, and and

18:15

second, uh, a lot of the companies

18:17

including ourselves have launched models

18:20

that are smaller. You know, not the

18:23

trillion parameter models, but you know,

18:25

we have a model that's 1.7 billion

18:27

parameters, another that's four, another

18:29

that's 8 billion for like mobile devices

18:32

and laptops. So, so with these types of

18:36

uh uh development uh I think it's more

18:39

conducive to faster adoption. Uh you

18:42

want AI to proliferate.

18:44

>> So, so now you know you look at China ch

18:47

you know I'm not saying China

18:49

technologically is winning in the model

18:51

war. Uh but in terms of the actual

18:54

application and also people benefiting

18:56

from AI, it is uh has made a lot of uh

19:00

uh development. Uh I I've seen a survey

19:04

uh of Chinese firms last year only 8%

19:07

have are using AI were were using AI in

19:11

their business. Uh now that number is

19:14

approaching half 50%. So so the adoption

19:18

rate has been fairly uh fast and I think

19:23

that the two countries AI is such an

19:25

important element of life. It's almost

19:28

like air.

19:29

>> Right.

19:29

>> Right. And uh why would any one country

19:33

say we have a sole claim to to air? We

19:36

we we should uh there's so many things

19:38

that AI can do that that that could you

19:40

know in medicine in in biology uh that

19:43

you know we we I think there's a lot of

19:46

room for cooperation. Joe, one of the

19:48

key questions that everybody asks when

19:50

we talk about AI and whether you spin

19:52

your own models, which you do, which

19:53

you've done a good job, and some people

19:55

just take them off the shelf, is the

19:57

actual net impact in the operations of

20:00

the business. Does it change the number

20:02

of people you hire? At what level does

20:04

it change it? Does it change the

20:05

efficiency? Does it change the way you

20:06

think about certain jobs? What's the

20:08

practical

20:10

application that it's doing for you guys

20:12

on the ground inside of Alibaba?

20:14

>> Yeah. Um the uh I I would definitely

20:18

made our uh operations more more

20:20

efficient. So we we actually can don't

20:23

have to hire as many people. Um I'm

20:26

still I'm on on this sort of uh mission

20:28

to uh write our quarterly earnings

20:30

release with AI uh and and maybe just

20:33

have a model, right?

20:34

>> Yeah. Yeah. Put Yeah. And and also put

20:36

uh AI on the on the analyst conference

20:39

call. See if people can, you know, tell

20:41

the difference. Uh but anyway then then

20:44

they'll get rid of everybody in the

20:45

finance department. Um but uh the the

20:48

most the biggest impact AI has made is

20:52

with our uh we incorporate AI into all

20:55

of our uh consumerf facing apps. So

20:57

we're in e-commerce, we're in maps, uh

21:00

we have a food food delivery business,

21:03

uh and uh once once you infuse AI, uh

21:06

the consumer have a massively better

21:08

experience and that generate more user

21:11

base for us. So so we're seeing the

21:13

impact uh from the uh sort of the the

21:17

uplift on the on the revenue side.

21:18

>> Is is the workforce then naturally

21:20

attritting as more and more of the

21:22

workload is done? Yeah, it we haven't

21:24

you know announced any layoffs because

21:26

of AI but I think um uh you know I keep

21:30

asking our our engineering leads about

21:33

how uh how much of the code is written

21:36

by AI today. I think the answer I get is

21:39

all over the map depending on which

21:41

department you make you you ask but I

21:44

think it's maybe 30%. at this point

21:46

>> already.

21:48

>> Yeah,

21:48

>> already

21:49

>> I'm doing kind of a weighted average of

21:52

the different

21:53

>> Yeah,

21:54

>> Alibaba is an enormous business. Uh it's

21:56

in so many countries around the world.

21:59

>> How do you build a culture? How do you

22:00

manage like just the insanity of having

22:03

so many employees, so many needs, so

22:05

many issues? How do you deal with it?

22:07

>> Uh focus. Uh so I came into the chair,

22:10

you know, I was sort of kind of phasing

22:12

out. I was focused on the Brooklyn Nets.

22:15

Then about a year and a half ago, I came

22:17

back into the chairmanship of the

22:18

company. Uh the first thing I said is we

22:21

we can't talk about our company as being

22:23

in six different businesses. It's just

22:25

too confusing. Uh we're in two

22:27

businesses, e-commerce and cloud

22:29

computing, you know, with an AI element

22:31

in it. Those are our two businesses,

22:33

core business and and so having that

22:36

focus was absolutely crucial to get our

22:38

people, our teams to focus and uh and

22:43

execute. Maybe end with just

22:46

forecast for the season,

22:50

>> the whole league or just the Brooklyn

22:51

Nets.

22:52

>> Maybe just the Nets.

22:54

>> Well, I have to say we're in a we're in

22:56

a we're in a rebuilding year. Um we

22:59

>> You have a lot of picks.

23:00

>> We've spent all of our picks. We picked

23:02

We have five for draft picks this past

23:05

summer. Uh we have one pick uh in 2026

23:09

and we hope to get a good pick. So you

23:10

can uh you can predict uh what kind of

23:14

strategy we will use uh uh for the

23:16

season. But we have a we have a very

23:18

young team. So

23:19

>> we were talking to Dar on the last panel

23:22

on

23:23

how China is a bit different in how it

23:25

looks at autonomy, self-driving. There

23:28

are tests going on there, but they want

23:30

to also make sure that there is

23:32

tranquility and peace in the country and

23:34

people don't lose those jobs, those

23:36

driver jobs. And so what's the climate

23:39

in China? What do the Chinese working

23:42

class think when they see self-driving

23:44

cars and they see tens of millions of

23:47

people employed as drivers? There have

23:49

been protests already in Wuhan and

23:51

protests in China are a very rare thing.

23:54

Um based on what I know, I could be

23:56

wrong. I have a superficial knowledge.

23:58

Obviously, you have a deep knowledge.

24:00

What can you tell us a little bit about

24:02

how you know the the government and the

24:04

people of China think of this incredible

24:07

revolution and the impact on jobs? I

24:10

think the government is all in um

24:13

embracing it and uh in fact the

24:16

government just a few weeks ago launched

24:18

a kind of a AI plus policy uh and they

24:22

say in 2030 which is 5 years from now

24:25

they want to see 90% penetration of AI

24:29

agents and devices and things like that

24:31

in in society. That's what the

24:33

government has publicly officially said.

24:36

just an all-in just

24:37

>> just just all in. Um there's really not

24:40

a lot of talk about uh uh people AI

24:44

replacing human jobs. Uh maybe there's

24:47

isolated

24:48

incidents. Uh but in general there is an

24:51

anxiety about jobs. Uh uh China

24:55

graduates about 10 million uh college

24:58

graduates every year. uh and today if

25:01

you look at the youth unemployment rate

25:04

uh which is age between 16 and 24

25:07

including graduates

25:09

it's 18%.

25:11

It's actually quite high. Uh so there's

25:13

a lot of anxiety about about that. uh it

25:16

partly it's because the economy uh is

25:19

even though the overall uh conditions of

25:22

the uh of the Chinese economy is is

25:25

pretty good in terms of infrastructure

25:27

access to energy and all those things

25:30

but there is still a malaise right now

25:33

because China has gone through the last

25:36

four or five years of a property slump

25:39

uh everybody's uh average uh home prices

25:42

are down like 30% so there's a very

25:45

negative neative wealth effect and

25:47

that's uh still lingering.

25:49

>> Just quickly, is there any fear of AGI

25:51

in China? You know what I mean by that?

25:53

That out of control super intelligence.

25:55

Is that is that a fear or is that just

25:56

an American thing? I um we

26:01

people in government don't um talk about

26:04

it too much because they believe that uh

26:08

they could control it uh better maybe

26:11

better than in a you know society here

26:14

in in the US. Um but there's some some

26:18

some lingering fears. Um but you know I

26:21

was just listening to Denny's uh about

26:24

you know he's predicting 5 to 10 years

26:27

but if he's saying 5 to 10 years I think

26:31

AGI is probably 20 years from now and uh

26:36

uh and and it's because the the emphasis

26:39

is on the word general. You have to be

26:41

able to your AI has to be able to

26:43

generalize uh and apply uh principles to

26:48

scenarios that you've never seen before.

26:50

Right,

26:51

>> Joe? Thank you very very much.

26:54

>> Great to see you.

26:55

[Applause]

26:56

[Music]

26:57

Thank you. Thank you. Thank you.

26:59

Pleasure. Thank you.

27:01

Fantastic. Thank you, brother.

Interactive Summary

The video features a conversation with Joe Tsai, chairman of Alibaba and owner of the Brooklyn Nets, covering diverse topics including his leadership experiences in business and sports, the rise of the WNBA, the shifting economic and regulatory landscape in China, and the strategic importance of AI adoption.

Suggested questions

4 ready-made prompts