Alibaba's Joe Tsai on US-China Rivalry, AI Future, Owning the Nets/Liberty, Caitlin Clark's Impact
686 segments
[Music]
For people who don't know who he is,
please give us an introduction to Joe
Sat. He's the owner of the Nets and he's
now chairman of Alibaba. We like
innovation from the bottom up.
>> Alibaba just dropped their secret
weapon, Quinn 2.5 max. Alibaba surged 14
1.5% overnight, beat estimates on nearly
every metric. A massive rally alone this
year, adding about 100 billion to the
stock's value. You have to have a growth
mindset when you compete.
Ladies and gentlemen, please welcome Joe
Sai.
[Music]
>> Hey, my man. Good to see you.
>> Good to see you, brother.
>> How are you?
>> Good to see you.
>> Good to see you,
>> David. How are you?
>> The Brooklyn Nets.
>> Brooklyn Nets.
>> Nets and the New York Liberty.
>> And the New York Liberty. Exactly. It's
not easy running a team, is it?
>> It's uh not easy at all.
>> Not easy at all
>> because
uh a basketball any professional team is
uh both a uh business and also it's an
institution. You need to keep the fan
base happy. So there's sort of this
church and state element.
>> Yeah.
>> It's almost like running a news
organization.
>> Yeah, there it is. Can we uh maybe start
with the WNBA and we can shift to
business and we can shift to basketball,
but I think Caitlin Kark is out for the
season and there's just been a lot of
controversy and attention that the WNBA
is getting. What has it done right? What
has it done wrong? Did the has the
league been doing enough to protect her
as a as a star in the face of the
league? It's been a almost a microcosm
for just a social discussion. Do you
want to just talk about that as what you
see?
>> Clayton Clark definitely had an effect
on uh the WNBA. All the metrics went up.
So, this was last season, right, when
she first came into the league from
college. And uh uh we've seen all of our
metrics from viewership, ticket sales,
sponsorship, everything went up like
almost 4x 4x.
>> 4x,
>> right?
>> I mean, that's incredible.
>> That's incredible. So, so the so the
economic impact that she's made to the
league is is extraordinary.
>> Undeniable.
>> Undeniable. But because of who she is,
um, you know, she's a a little bit of a
different, uh, kind of player. You know,
she is a she's a point guard. She's
she's a smaller player. Uh, the knock on
her was was she going to be able to
withstand all the physicality of the
league, and she's proven that she's able
to do to do that. Um, unfortunately,
there's been uh I think I think it's
always good to have rivalries, right? uh
you know she she has this rivalry with
Angel Ree that dated back to college.
But some people would like to pit it as
uh a kind of a racial thing or is it uh
you know this or that. I um I think we
need to look past that uh and just look
at the skill set that's being brought
into the league now. We have so many
great college players. I mean uh the the
the rookie of the year potential
candidate uh is Sonia Citron. Have you
ever heard of her before she came into
the league? I mean, no, she I think she
just uh broke the record for the highest
three-point uh shooting percentage in
the league. Uh so, you know, you you see
tremendous amount of talent and I think
uh you you ask what have what have they
done, right? I I don't I think it's a
matter of just uh a confluence of good
things coming into the league.
>> And what about the NBA? So you guys did
just an enormous
>> Yeah. Just let me let me just But but
the one thing that's really changed that
is prior to the Kaylin Clark uh season
uh your average fan base that watches
ESPN basically you guys are not watching
women's basketball. Maybe some some of
them follow college but certainly not
the WNBA. But now your average ESPN fan
base, they are watching the mainstream
sports fan base are watching the
>> I think she's a I I have an observation
about this and you and I are old school
basketball heads, you know, watching
having watched the 80s and 90s and
Patrick Euing and Charles Barkley. It's
more physical. They're tougher in the
WNBA. And every time LeBron goes up and
he gets fouled and he's just and he's
flopping all the time.
>> How does he do it? You know, it's a
foul. It's a foul. So maybe you could
comment on LeBron being like
>> or just generally the NBA product
actually.
>> Yeah. The I mean the NBA and then
they're so tough and they're throwing
each other around. It's a better game.
>> The NBA product is great.
>> Um I I I don't think it's fair to
compare whether uh the men's league is
more less physical than the women's
league or more one the other the I mean
they're both very physical. I mean if
you are sitting there on the floor you
are watching physicality.
>> Sure. uh and and also athleticism,
right? But the game has, you know, the
NBA has this uh uh committee called the
competition committee. So I I got put on
the competition committee. They call me
and they say, "Joe Joe, we want, you
know, want to be on the competition
committee, you know, it's about rules
about, you know, like what is this
transition, take foul?" So the committee
is every season they're they make these
tweak changes. They make changes to
refing to make the product better. I
mean, when I got the call, I'm like, you
want me to sit on the committee with
Jason Kidd, Chris Paul, and uh Coach K?
Like, what do I know about basketball
that can, you know, really
>> be smarter than them? But, uh, but what
I've seen is uh I've said to ads so the
competition committee should be called
the product committee because that is
the product the fans see on the floor.
If you change, let's say if you change
the three-point line,
>> that is a product decision. sound
competition.
>> Should they?
>> Is it too?
>> I I don't think so. I don't think so.
>> When you watch the the Boston Celtics
throw up 43 threes in a game, you think
it's a good product?
>> I think it's a great product because
there are 18 different ways you can
throw up 43 threes in a game.
>> Okay, let's uh transition to Alibaba for
a second. It's an incredible journey you
and Jack Ma and the whole story has it's
I mean it's written in books and there's
just tremendous lore but can you take us
back to your mindset? I mean I think
we've heard it's well documented Jack's
mindset but how you got involved what
you were thinking in that moment the
risk you were taking. I was just
mesmerized by Jack's personality. uh
every people see the public side of Jack
which is very charismatic but what I saw
was he was able to instill faith in
people. I mean, he had a when I walked
into his apartment, there were like 12
to 15 sort of very young people roughly,
you know, uh, students that were just
coming out of college and Jack was kind
of the teacher that's 10 years older and
he's able to communicate. He's able to
paint a a very strong vision. Uh, that
was the part that I really signed on to.
His ability to lead is an amazing
ability and you know he's a teacher uh
by training he taught at Zojang
University he taught English actually
you know teachers in a way make natural
leaders uh because a you have to
communicate well and b you can identify
talent I think a lot of teachers love to
see their students and say oh this kid
is gonna do really well so they write a
recommendation they do whatever And also
teachers are have enough humility that
they're willing, they're very happy if
their students go off and then they come
back and become more successful than
they are. And in a comp in building a
company, you need to be able to
accommodate all sorts of people that are
smarter than you are. And that's that's
really important. There was a phase I
guess in the maybe the early 2010s where
it was a lot of it felt like tremendous
freewheeling capitalism in China where
there was just a just a Cambrian
explosion of incredible entrepreneurs
yourself and Jack and all these others
pony and then I think almost starting
with the antipo it things changed a
little bit. Can you walk us through the
dynamics of how that changed and then I
think it all kind of leads to you know
the lot of foreign direct investment
into the Chinese ecosystem has changed
pretty dramatically. Just give us a
sense of what has happened over that arc
that you've been in it working in it
observing it.
>> Alibaba has been around for 26 years. I
would say the first 15 years were it was
a complete free market kind of you know
way of growth and uh uh we built a lot
of business organically and then you we
went into a phase where there was
extreme competition uh everybody wanted
to do e-commerce why it's because if you
have traffic online e-commerce was the
best way to monetize your traffic and
and today in today's market we have five
or very very strong competitors
including the parent company of Tik Tok
bite dance they are doing e-commerce
they're not known as an e-commerce
company but they are one of our fiercest
competitors so there's a you go through
a a a period of extreme competition and
then the government felt that this
sector has gotten out of line a little
bit first there's too much competition
and then there are some uh platforms
that have exhibited monopolistic
behavior
So then there was a uh you know people
may call it a crackdown whatever more
regulations came in regulations some of
the regulations are very good actually
they protected privacy uh uh anti-
monopoly type uh regulation and uh uh
now we kind of are in a new normal where
uh we are we believe that the regulatory
environment is more predictable. We know
what the red lines are uh and we we know
where to go and where not to go and it's
actually made uh a a a better operating
environment because of the predict
predictability of it. On a geopolitical
level, it seems to be the rhetoric in
the United States. What they keep
drilling into Americans is to look at
China as an existential threat to
America that we're rivals that we cannot
operate and lead the world to
prosperity.
What do you think?
>> I I I
don't agree with that view of uh the
world. I'd be interested in your view,
David.
>> I mean, I don't believe in that either.
I mean, I'm I don't know why this has to
be the only dialogue we have is that we
are bitter rivals.
>> Yeah. I mean, look at this. the I I
think I I I could understand why sitting
here in America you look at the rise of
China over the last 20 years 25 years uh
China has become strong in terms of um
manufacturing that's why it's such an
export juggernaut it has become because
of the economic development it's uh you
know China has become a technology
juggernaut as well and the fear is well
all that stuff economic strength and
technology strength is going to flow
into military strength and that becomes
kind of a national security issue. I I
understand that. I I get it. Uh but I
think it's um uh it uh I these are the
two largest economies in the world and I
think you just need to take a step back
and say well yeah on the one hand we
should compete with China right that's
fine we our comp the hyperscalers
companies compete with the Chinese
internet companies globally um but then
on the other hand there there is just so
many trouble spots in the world uh that
what did President Trump say that he
stopped Seven wars, right?
>> Yeah.
>> Okay. Well, China has didn't start any
of them. China has not started a war in
the last how many years? You know, 30
years, 40 years. Um I think uh China was
part of the uh Korean war. Uh maybe the
Vietnam war, but that was uh a long time
ago in history. Uh so in a way China you
know if you observe the behavior of the
the Chinese people and the Chinese state
it's a very peaceful nation. China cares
about econ its own economic development.
They care about uh the well-being of its
citizens and uh I think there's a lot of
friction in in the in the course of
competition where China feels that the
United States is trying to contain China
and and stop the rise of China
economically. Just speaking about the
the welfare of its citizens. Um you
mentioned bite dance. I think there was
reported bite 10's revenue just passed
meta's revenue. I mean it's a
juggernaut.
>> It's a private company so I don't know.
You were telling Yeah.
>> Yeah. They actually released it but
>> um
>> one of the core products Tik Tok it's a
fundamentally different product here
than in than in China. And because of
that regulation and a focus on the
welfare of its citizens, there's like
strict rules in terms of the content and
the curation and the algorithms. Whereas
here, you know, it's like cat videos and
like, you know, all kinds of nonsense.
Although now I noticed that Tik Tok put
a STEM section inside of Tik Tok in the
American product for whatever reason.
There's a wherewithal that China has to
think about its citizenry like that. And
I'm just curious, how do we embrace more
of that principle because that sort of
gets lost in this?
>> Such a good question. Yeah. What can we
learn from China? Yeah.
>> Yeah. What should we be doing more of
that China does? Well, first education.
I mean, you have a extremely highly
educated population. And you know, you
talk to every Chinese parent, they want
their kids to take the ent college
entrance exam and get into the best
universities.
you know, if they want to send their
kids away to school, they want to go to
the Ivy League or Stanford or, you know,
all of that. So, I I think I think the
emphasis on education, I think there are
some structural issues here in the
United States, like the teachers union
that is getting in the way, but uh
uh but there are no teachers unions in
China. So, David, what's your David? I'm
curious looking at this um not in any
official capacity but kind of the same
question Chimath and I are sort of um
probing about here. What is your take on
America and China succeeding together?
And are we destined to be in conflict
with this country forever or is there a
path forward with our incredible amazing
dynamic President Trump?
Well, I think you know, Professor
Mirshimer explained it at all in some of
the last year that the US and China are
in a high-tech competition. They're in a
security competition, economic
competition. And the the reason is
because China's become rich and
powerful. And the United States does not
tolerate pure competitors. We want to be
the number one country. We want to be
the most powerful country. The balance
of power is to some degree a zero- sum
game. Economics are not, but power is.
And the the history of the United States
is we want to be number one and we don't
we don't like having pure competitors.
And I mean that's the bottom line. Now I
mean there are good reasons for this. We
live in a an Arctic world meaning
there's no higher authority. If you get
in trouble in the global system you
can't call 911. And so countries
privilege their survival over all their
considerations. And the way to survive
in the international system is to be
powerful. and you measure your power
based on the gap between you and the
next most powerful country. And I think
that 20 years ago, China wasn't seen as
a threat because it wasn't rich and
powerful, but now it is. And I think
that's what's led to a much more hawkish
environment in Washington. And I, you
know, I can't disagree with all of it
because I think it's very important that
the United States win the AI race. We
don't want China, for example, to
dominate in AI or or in chips. We want
the as Americans, we want the United
States to be the most powerful country.
Now, if I were Chinese, I would want
China to be the most powerful country.
And I don't have any resentment towards
Chinese people who want their country
the most powerful country. So, um
there's no animosity in saying this, but
I want the US to be the most powerful
country. And you know, in my little part
of the world, that means winning the AI
race.
>> Can I respond to that?
>> Yeah.
>> Yeah. Uh I I think it's really important
that the uh as an you you know you as a
patriotic American, you want America to
win. Uh but I think when it comes to AI,
there's no such thing as winning the
race. I think it's a long marathon. And
you know, you could just see by these
model companies, uh every week there's a
model that's leading, but then the next
week another model overtakes them,
right? So uh and the other thing is it's
um AI is one of those uh we haven't
figured out what is the business model
is but in our business in e-commerce we
have a marketplace model with network
dynamics but I'm not sure if the
development of models has those uh
network effects that means winner take
all right so I don't think AI is a
winner take all uh field I think what My
definition of winning,
you know, is not who comes up with the
strongest AI model, but who can adopt it
faster. And I think uh uh people here in
the United States uh a lot of resources
should go into adoption and diffusion of
the technology as opposed to just
plowing you know bill I mean literally
each of the hyperscaler companies is in
each of them is investing something like
$80 billion a year. But you know I I
think if you look at China a couple
things are going on. Number one, China
has espoused open- source. Um, and and
second, uh, a lot of the companies
including ourselves have launched models
that are smaller. You know, not the
trillion parameter models, but you know,
we have a model that's 1.7 billion
parameters, another that's four, another
that's 8 billion for like mobile devices
and laptops. So, so with these types of
uh uh development uh I think it's more
conducive to faster adoption. Uh you
want AI to proliferate.
>> So, so now you know you look at China ch
you know I'm not saying China
technologically is winning in the model
war. Uh but in terms of the actual
application and also people benefiting
from AI, it is uh has made a lot of uh
uh development. Uh I I've seen a survey
uh of Chinese firms last year only 8%
have are using AI were were using AI in
their business. Uh now that number is
approaching half 50%. So so the adoption
rate has been fairly uh fast and I think
that the two countries AI is such an
important element of life. It's almost
like air.
>> Right.
>> Right. And uh why would any one country
say we have a sole claim to to air? We
we we should uh there's so many things
that AI can do that that that could you
know in medicine in in biology uh that
you know we we I think there's a lot of
room for cooperation. Joe, one of the
key questions that everybody asks when
we talk about AI and whether you spin
your own models, which you do, which
you've done a good job, and some people
just take them off the shelf, is the
actual net impact in the operations of
the business. Does it change the number
of people you hire? At what level does
it change it? Does it change the
efficiency? Does it change the way you
think about certain jobs? What's the
practical
application that it's doing for you guys
on the ground inside of Alibaba?
>> Yeah. Um the uh I I would definitely
made our uh operations more more
efficient. So we we actually can don't
have to hire as many people. Um I'm
still I'm on on this sort of uh mission
to uh write our quarterly earnings
release with AI uh and and maybe just
have a model, right?
>> Yeah. Yeah. Put Yeah. And and also put
uh AI on the on the analyst conference
call. See if people can, you know, tell
the difference. Uh but anyway then then
they'll get rid of everybody in the
finance department. Um but uh the the
most the biggest impact AI has made is
with our uh we incorporate AI into all
of our uh consumerf facing apps. So
we're in e-commerce, we're in maps, uh
we have a food food delivery business,
uh and uh once once you infuse AI, uh
the consumer have a massively better
experience and that generate more user
base for us. So so we're seeing the
impact uh from the uh sort of the the
uplift on the on the revenue side.
>> Is is the workforce then naturally
attritting as more and more of the
workload is done? Yeah, it we haven't
you know announced any layoffs because
of AI but I think um uh you know I keep
asking our our engineering leads about
how uh how much of the code is written
by AI today. I think the answer I get is
all over the map depending on which
department you make you you ask but I
think it's maybe 30%. at this point
>> already.
>> Yeah,
>> already
>> I'm doing kind of a weighted average of
the different
>> Yeah,
>> Alibaba is an enormous business. Uh it's
in so many countries around the world.
>> How do you build a culture? How do you
manage like just the insanity of having
so many employees, so many needs, so
many issues? How do you deal with it?
>> Uh focus. Uh so I came into the chair,
you know, I was sort of kind of phasing
out. I was focused on the Brooklyn Nets.
Then about a year and a half ago, I came
back into the chairmanship of the
company. Uh the first thing I said is we
we can't talk about our company as being
in six different businesses. It's just
too confusing. Uh we're in two
businesses, e-commerce and cloud
computing, you know, with an AI element
in it. Those are our two businesses,
core business and and so having that
focus was absolutely crucial to get our
people, our teams to focus and uh and
execute. Maybe end with just
forecast for the season,
>> the whole league or just the Brooklyn
Nets.
>> Maybe just the Nets.
>> Well, I have to say we're in a we're in
a we're in a rebuilding year. Um we
>> You have a lot of picks.
>> We've spent all of our picks. We picked
We have five for draft picks this past
summer. Uh we have one pick uh in 2026
and we hope to get a good pick. So you
can uh you can predict uh what kind of
strategy we will use uh uh for the
season. But we have a we have a very
young team. So
>> we were talking to Dar on the last panel
on
how China is a bit different in how it
looks at autonomy, self-driving. There
are tests going on there, but they want
to also make sure that there is
tranquility and peace in the country and
people don't lose those jobs, those
driver jobs. And so what's the climate
in China? What do the Chinese working
class think when they see self-driving
cars and they see tens of millions of
people employed as drivers? There have
been protests already in Wuhan and
protests in China are a very rare thing.
Um based on what I know, I could be
wrong. I have a superficial knowledge.
Obviously, you have a deep knowledge.
What can you tell us a little bit about
how you know the the government and the
people of China think of this incredible
revolution and the impact on jobs? I
think the government is all in um
embracing it and uh in fact the
government just a few weeks ago launched
a kind of a AI plus policy uh and they
say in 2030 which is 5 years from now
they want to see 90% penetration of AI
agents and devices and things like that
in in society. That's what the
government has publicly officially said.
just an all-in just
>> just just all in. Um there's really not
a lot of talk about uh uh people AI
replacing human jobs. Uh maybe there's
isolated
incidents. Uh but in general there is an
anxiety about jobs. Uh uh China
graduates about 10 million uh college
graduates every year. uh and today if
you look at the youth unemployment rate
uh which is age between 16 and 24
including graduates
it's 18%.
It's actually quite high. Uh so there's
a lot of anxiety about about that. uh it
partly it's because the economy uh is
even though the overall uh conditions of
the uh of the Chinese economy is is
pretty good in terms of infrastructure
access to energy and all those things
but there is still a malaise right now
because China has gone through the last
four or five years of a property slump
uh everybody's uh average uh home prices
are down like 30% so there's a very
negative neative wealth effect and
that's uh still lingering.
>> Just quickly, is there any fear of AGI
in China? You know what I mean by that?
That out of control super intelligence.
Is that is that a fear or is that just
an American thing? I um we
people in government don't um talk about
it too much because they believe that uh
they could control it uh better maybe
better than in a you know society here
in in the US. Um but there's some some
some lingering fears. Um but you know I
was just listening to Denny's uh about
you know he's predicting 5 to 10 years
but if he's saying 5 to 10 years I think
AGI is probably 20 years from now and uh
uh and and it's because the the emphasis
is on the word general. You have to be
able to your AI has to be able to
generalize uh and apply uh principles to
scenarios that you've never seen before.
Right,
>> Joe? Thank you very very much.
>> Great to see you.
[Applause]
[Music]
Thank you. Thank you. Thank you.
Pleasure. Thank you.
Fantastic. Thank you, brother.
Ask follow-up questions or revisit key timestamps.
The video features a conversation with Joe Tsai, chairman of Alibaba and owner of the Brooklyn Nets, covering diverse topics including his leadership experiences in business and sports, the rise of the WNBA, the shifting economic and regulatory landscape in China, and the strategic importance of AI adoption.
Videos recently processed by our community