Google search lies by default: this is worse than useless...
218 segments
Hey everybody, how's it going? Hope you
having a lovely day. Welcome to today's
episode of How You Getting [ __ ] I'm
your host, Louis Rossmann. You may have
heard that AI is more dangerous than a
nuclear weapon. And sometimes I agree
when I hear these words. The thing is,
being dangerous does not mean being
good. I'll give you an example. Let's
say we're talking about the military.
Blackberry here could be more dangerous
than a nuclear weapon if she took the
controls of a fighter jet while the
fighter jet was over enemy territory.
There are many things that Blackberry
could do as she tries to be cute and
roll around and get food that and
Steve's own experience, as my old data
recovery technician and manager can tell
you, if Blackberry goes in the desk
where data recovery is being done, she
actually can be exceptionally dangerous.
But that doesn't mean that that's
necessarily a good thing. And one of the
things that I see here is that it's it
is indeed dangerous if you have
something that's being relied on for a
more and more segments of society to
figure out whether somebody is a good
fit for a job, whether or not, I don't
know, a school in Iran should get bombed
that's filled with children, to have AI
make the decisions when it is so dumb
that it thinks that my channel has
sponsors. So, I got an email a few days
ago asking me if I would look into
something that Ground News has in their
privacy policy. And the email was a bit
pointed, and to be clear, there were
some comments in my community post about
this saying, "Oh, it's not an email like
that. Good. I wish more people send
emails like that to YouTubers that took
sponsors. I wish more people held the
people that take 10 or 20 or 60,000
dollars for a sponsor and then don't
come back to their audience to let them
know that that sponsor was a scam
accountable for what they did. Thank you
for doing that." The only problem here
is that
not true.
YouTuber and right to repair advocate
Louis Rossmann has frequently discussed
Ground News on his channel. Oh, really?
Both covering consumer rights stories
aggregated by the platform and
occasionally partnering with the news
companion service as a sponsor. Rossmann
often recommends Ground News to his
viewers. No, he [ __ ] doesn't. He
never has. I have never, in over 4,000
[ __ ] videos, ever mentioned Ground
News. And when you see how [ __ ]
stupid this is, when I hit show more,
it's literally showing videos from other
[ __ ] people. It's not even like I
said the word Ground News or I said I
hate Ground News or I made a joke
because I've joked before saying this
video was sponsored by uBlock Origin,
which is a joke because I want to get
more people to block ads. Like I'm not
sponsored by an open-source web browser
plugin. This isn't even me. I don't even
know this person. They they hated one
upper echelon like that that's not me.
That's not even close to me. I think we
just need to roll with it and start
making up stories about Louis Rossmann
like he's the most interesting man in
the world. Like how he operates a black
market maple syrup smuggling operation.
In his spare time he gives lectures on
ancient Egyptian history while knitting
sweaters. After releasing his
multi-platinum country album, he
traveled to New Zealand to climb Mount
Kilimanjaro. Don't forget the spaceship
he was navigating and single-handedly
saved the whole crew with the now
famously known Rossmann maneuver from
flying straight into the sun.
And and somebody made a point that we
should stop calling these hallucinations
and start calling them what they are
more accurately, which is delusions. Cuz
hallucination for it sounds kind of
cool. It sounds like something that
happens when you're on an acid trip.
Whereas delusion just sounds like
me at the age of 70 thinking that like
Britney Spears or Ariana Grande want to
go out with me. Delusion is much more
pointed. It's much more insulting and in
my opinion, it's much more appropriate.
You have And the thing that I asked here
with my my last line of this post, I
wonder how many of you have been denied
employment because the AI scanning your
resume made up something about you.
Because as you know, many human
resources departments now use AI to look
through resumes and they use this to
sort through people and figure out if
they're going to get a job. Imagine if
you lost the opportunity to get a great
job that you were qualified for and the
best applicant because the AI literally
made something up about you. I can live
with the idea of an AI making a decision
that I wouldn't agree with. It's much
more difficult pill to swallow that it
just made something up about you whole
cloth and it's still [ __ ] there. And
I'm very curious how long it's going to
take for this search result on Google to
return something else. Not only do I not
have a sponsor of Ground News, I have
not had a sponsor
Oh, wow. This is This is [ __ ] funny.
I just hit F5 and look what shows up.
Right to repair advocate often
collaborates with and provides
commentary for Ground News.
Google elucidated that I'm sponsored by
Ground News. That just showed up. I'm
very curious to see how long the
[ __ ] is going to stay up. I have not
had a sponsor on this channel for the
entire time I've had my YouTube channel.
I joined YouTube in 2011. It's 2026. I
have had zero sponsors. And that's very
important to me. The reason I like
having no sponsors is because you know
when you're listening to me say
something that it's coming from me. I'm
not thinking about how a brand is going
to perceive something that I say, nor am
I thinking about how future or other
brands that may fund my lifestyle are
going to perceive what I have to say. I
care about whether I can live with the
things that I say in this channel. If I
can live with the things I say, I'm
good. But this has always been a
discussion between me and the audience.
Nobody else. And I like it that way.
With a channel that has 450, 550 million
views at this point, I have missed out
on millions of dollars. If I'm being
real here, not shouting out somebody
every single video for the 3,000, 4,000
plus [ __ ] videos I've done over the
years, I have missed out an absolute
minimum of 1 to 2 million dollars. I
speak to other people on this platform
that have sponsorships on a regular
basis. And they tell me sometimes what
they get offered. Somebody got offered
almost $800,000. I'm not going to say
who. To do a couple of shorts showing
how Chat GPT can help you make cool
things on their YouTube channel. There's
a lot of [ __ ] money that I have
missed out on by doing this. And one of
the benefits of that though is the
reputation. I missed out on millions of
dollars, but at the very least I have a
trustworthy reputation. Whether or not
you agree or disagree with the things
that I say, whether or not you like or
dislike me, the things that I say are
said because I believe them to be true,
not because I am trying to say something
to cater to a sponsor or not say
something to cater to a sponsor. Because
what you don't say is as important as
what you do say. So when Google comes
out and has this [ __ ] in their
[ __ ] results, that essentially takes
the thing that literally has cost me
millions of dollars and throws it down
the toilet. Because I don't know how
many other brands they're doing this
for. How many other brands have they
claimed that I have been [ __ ]
sponsored by when I have not. This is
literally the number one benefit of
those millions of dollars that I have
missed out on over the past 15 years by
never doing an ad read on this channel.
That I have a reputation that whether
you like me or you dislike me, whether
you think that I'm an [ __ ] or you
think that I'm a hero, that what I say
is what I say. I believe it. I say it
regardless of what anybody else is going
to think about it. My conversation with
the audience is untouched by what some
advertiser or marketer may think of what
I have to say. The number one thing that
comes out of the millions of dollars
that I missed out on is my reputation.
And right here, Google is getting rid of
that on the first [ __ ] result with
[ __ ] that isn't even true.
[ __ ] you.
Ask follow-up questions or revisit key timestamps.
Louis Rossmann discusses the dangers and reliability issues of AI, specifically highlighting how AI tools can generate false information or 'delusions' about individuals. He uses his own experience as an example, where a search engine incorrectly claimed he had sponsorships with a company, which contradicts his long-standing policy of not accepting any sponsorships on his channel to maintain his editorial independence and integrity.
Videos recently processed by our community