HomeVideos

Dan Dreyfus: The Next AI Bottleneck is Copper

Now Playing

Dan Dreyfus: The Next AI Bottleneck is Copper

Transcript

661 segments

0:00

We've got Dan Drifus on the show. He's

0:02

with Fortnite Capital.

0:03

>> We're going to be measuring human

0:05

progress by how much electricity we

0:07

consume. The semiconductor industry, I

0:10

view that as an industrial or

0:12

infrastructure company. I mean, it's

0:13

effectively a factory. We try to figure

0:16

out where the world is going and then we

0:19

try to figure out what we're going to

0:21

need to get there.

0:23

In the next 10 minutes, I am going to

0:26

try to teach you about critical

0:28

minerals, commodities, our incredibly

0:33

fragile infrastructure here in the US

0:35

that is going to require trillions and

0:38

trillions of dollars of investment if we

0:41

want to achieve our technological

0:44

objectives, our reshoring,

0:47

re-industrialization objectives, and our

0:49

national security and military

0:52

objectives. news. But first, a little

0:53

bit of history.

0:55

We are at a very significant inflection

0:59

point right now in US economic growth

1:03

and what it's going to look like. really

1:06

from the early 2000s until just a few

1:10

years ago, the US went through

1:12

effectively what I think was an economic

1:14

miracle where we created so much growth,

1:17

so much market cap, so much value

1:22

without really having to invest any

1:24

capital at all. I mean, think of all the

1:26

companies that were created with no

1:27

capital. You had Google with the search

1:30

engine. You had Meta with social media.

1:32

They bought WhatsApp for $30 billion

1:34

with 12 employees, you know, no capital

1:37

whatsoever. You had the streaming

1:38

platforms. You had the food delivery

1:40

platforms. You had Apple computer which

1:43

was Capital Light created trillions of

1:44

market cap. You had software as a

1:46

service. Absolutely no capital required

1:49

to create all that value. And at the

1:52

same time we were creating these

1:54

companies, at the same time we were

1:57

doing that, we were literally tearing

2:00

down all of our critical infrastructure

2:04

and moving it overseas to China. So we

2:08

were really doubling down on that

2:10

capital light mentality. But then it

2:12

sort of started to come back to bite us,

2:14

right? We had COVID, we had the Russia

2:16

Ukraine conflict, we had the tariffs,

2:18

now we have the Iranian conflict. And

2:21

every time we had one of these

2:22

geopolitical flare-ups,

2:25

inflation spiked like a rocket. You need

2:28

a telescope to see how high inflation

2:30

went. And it never came down. And the

2:32

reason for that is we let our supply

2:35

chains get way too fragile and way too

2:39

weak. And there's no resiliency in the

2:42

supply chains. And now we're at this

2:44

inflection point where we want to

2:48

reshore everything that we tore down and

2:50

moved to China. We want to

2:51

re-industrialize. We have this

2:53

technological compute revolution that is

2:57

infinitely more infrastructure intensive

3:00

than compute was in the last

3:02

generations. And this is creating this

3:06

really wild demand shock for

3:08

infrastructural critical minerals

3:10

commodities at the same time where

3:13

there's a supply shock because we just

3:14

haven't invested in this stuff for so

3:16

long

3:18

now.

3:21

There are so many capital cycles going

3:23

on at the same time. I've never seen

3:25

this many going on at the same time in

3:27

my career. We have the aerospace cycle.

3:30

Boing and Airbus have a trillion dollars

3:32

of backlog over the next 10 years. Now

3:34

throw in the space economy which is

3:36

going to compete for the exact same

3:38

materials and backlog that Boeing and

3:41

Airbus are trying to source. We have the

3:44

grid right anytime it gets a little bit

3:47

cold in Texas. The Eurot the Texas

3:49

grid's not connected not connected to

3:51

the rest of the US grid. Every time it

3:53

gets a little bit cold that grid shuts

3:54

down and they're freezing in the dark.

3:56

Then we've got, you know, here in

3:59

California,

4:01

Paradise, California, that power line

4:03

that caught on fire and killed 300

4:06

people. Did you know that that power

4:09

line was over 106 years old? There's

4:11

parts of the grid in this country that

4:13

are over 106 years old. And here in

4:16

California, if half the people buy

4:17

electric cars or there's robo taxis and

4:19

we all go and plug them in at 6:00 p.m.

4:21

after work and turn up the air

4:23

conditioning, we're just going to kill

4:24

the grid. Boom. We're going to kill it.

4:26

We're all going to be sitting in the

4:27

dark. So, the grid barely works for what

4:30

we need it for right now. And we haven't

4:32

even started talking about the tsunami

4:34

of demand, electricity demand that AI is

4:37

going to bring. And there's power

4:38

generation. You know, we've let China go

4:41

and build multiples more power

4:43

generation than what we have here. And

4:46

this is a trillion dollar plus capital

4:48

cycle. That's probably going to be a

4:50

trillion dollars every 10 years for the

4:52

next 30 years. data centers. This is now

4:54

a trillion dollars per year. Per year,

4:57

all infrastructure, all all commodities.

5:00

Then there's semifabs. Um the CPU is

5:04

making a huge resurgence. CPU intensity

5:06

is is going up like a rocket. And and I

5:09

I bet you this number is way too low.

5:11

$750 billion. I bet you that's going to

5:13

be measured in the trillions. And then

5:15

there's defense, right? Everybody, you

5:18

know, Taiwan's turned into a porcupine.

5:20

Japan's raising their defense budgets.

5:21

Europe's raising their defense budgets,

5:23

the US raising their defense budgets.

5:26

What the similarity is amongst all of

5:30

these end markets is none of them will

5:33

work without critical minerals. None of

5:38

it. None of this can happen. And so

5:40

here's the problem.

5:43

Last April,

5:45

China announced that they were going to

5:49

cut off exports of some critical

5:52

materials to the US. Samarium,

5:54

Gandelinium, Turbium, Dprosium, Lutium,

5:56

Scandium, Yitriium, herbium, silver,

5:58

just cut it off.

6:00

And we're close to a lot of big

6:03

industrial supply chains.

6:05

and the cut off of Samrium cobalt

6:08

magnets, we learned that the Ford Motor

6:10

Company was within days, literally days

6:13

of their entire production line shutting

6:15

down, the whole Ford Motor Company. And

6:18

same with McDonald Douglas, too, by the

6:20

way. And this put people in the

6:22

Department of War, Department of Energy

6:24

into a panic.

6:27

And to their credit,

6:30

they're doing something really

6:32

aggressive and really important. They

6:34

are now going around to small resource

6:37

owners across the US and into Canada and

6:42

they're knocking on the doors of these

6:43

companies that were left for dead in the

6:45

last 20 years and they're saying here is

6:48

three pieces of paper. The first piece

6:50

of paper is an equity check that we're

6:52

investing into your company so that you

6:54

can go and start converting your

6:55

resource into a mine.

6:58

And then the company says, "Oh, that's

7:00

great. Wow, that's that's that's a

7:02

shock. But you know, the problem is I've

7:03

been waiting on my permit for the last

7:04

20 years. Nobody wants to give me a

7:06

permit. They say, "Oh, look at the

7:07

second piece of paper. There's your

7:08

permit. Go and start building right

7:10

now." And then they show them a third

7:12

piece of paper and then the company

7:14

says, "What's this?" And they say, "This

7:17

is an offtake agreement. Take or pay

7:20

with a minimum floor price that's going

7:21

to guarantee you a very high internal

7:24

rate of return on your project where you

7:26

can keep all the upside above the

7:28

minimum price. But here's a minimum

7:30

price that you can go out and raise a

7:31

bunch of capital to get this thing

7:33

fasttracked and up and running. Now,

7:35

China has an absolute grip. It's

7:38

absolute on all of these critical

7:40

minerals.

7:42

And it's going to take at least 10

7:44

years, probably 20 to catch up. But we

7:46

got to start somewhere because we just

7:48

can't have China leading over us and

7:51

squeezing our testicles every time that

7:53

we don't do something that they don't

7:54

like and say, "We're going to cut off

7:56

your exports. So, we're going to cough

7:57

our exports of critical minerals and you

7:58

guys are going to freeze in the dark.

8:00

So, I give a lot of credit to the

8:02

administration for doing this. And

8:03

really, you know, I've done commodities

8:04

now for 25 years and I've never seen

8:07

something like this happen before. It's

8:09

truly what I call a vuja day moment,

8:11

which is the overwhelming feeling that

8:13

none of this has ever happened before.

8:17

So, here's copper. This is the king of

8:19

metals. This is just one example. We

8:20

need copper for everything. You know, if

8:22

we want clean energy, you know, solar

8:24

power per megawatt takes five amounts

8:26

five times the amount of copper than a

8:28

typical base load CCGT gas fired

8:31

turbine. Same with wind, seven times the

8:33

copper uh data centers for a 1 gawatt AI

8:37

factory. Now, you need 50,000 tons of

8:40

copper per gawatt. And we're going to

8:42

start building 15 gawatts of these

8:44

things per year. Per year. So 50,000

8:47

tons per gigawatt and 15 gawatt is

8:49

750,000 tons of copper that we're going

8:51

to need for these things. Do you know

8:52

what the copper supply was last year? It

8:55

grew only 500,000 tons. And this is just

8:57

the data centers. Then electric cars,

8:59

you know, if we're going to have robo

9:00

taxis everywhere, an electric car

9:02

consumes five or six times the copper

9:03

than a traditional internal combustion

9:05

engine. And then there's the military.

9:08

In the Ukraine Russia conflict, did you

9:11

know that we used more explosives than

9:14

in all of World War II? Did you know

9:17

that? And the artillery shells of these

9:20

explosives, guess what they're made of?

9:22

One of them's called the copper head.

9:24

Very cleverly named after a poisonous

9:26

snake. They're all made of copper. Do

9:27

you think we go into the battlefield and

9:29

recycle that copper? No. That copper's

9:31

gone. So, we need this these metals for

9:34

everything that we do. Now, where are we

9:37

going to get it? Going back in human

9:39

history to Mohenjo Daro,

9:43

we have mined 700 million tons of

9:47

copper. 700 million tons of copper over

9:50

the past 10,000 years. Now, 80% of that

9:53

copper, we could probably get it all

9:55

back if we wanted, but what we'd have to

9:58

do is we'd have to tear down this

9:59

building. We'd have to rip up the grid.

10:01

We'd have to tear down the buildings in

10:03

Europe, in Japan, in China. And we could

10:05

get all that copper back. Sure. Then

10:08

we'd be doing this conference in a tent.

10:10

So how are we going to get it? Well,

10:17

right now copper demand is 30 million

10:19

tons per year. About 4 million of that

10:22

supply comes from recycled copper.

10:24

Copper the rest of it is 26 million tons

10:26

is mined. And if we just grow in line

10:30

with GDP, so forgetting about data

10:32

center upside, forgetting about green

10:34

energy, solar upside, just growing at

10:37

GDP like we used to. Now listen

10:39

carefully. That means over the next 18

10:43

years,

10:44

we're going to need 700 million tons of

10:46

copper. Over the next 18 years, we're

10:49

going to need as much copper as we mined

10:51

in the last 10,000 years. That means

10:55

we're going to need five worldclass mega

10:57

tier one mines coming online every

10:59

single year. And you can go and gro this

11:02

or chat GPT this. You can count on one

11:05

hand and have some fingers left over

11:09

uh the number of tier one mines that are

11:10

coming on between now and the end of the

11:12

decade. So I don't know what they're

11:14

going to do because it takes 7 to 12

11:16

years to build a copper mine. The

11:18

existing copper mines are dying. You

11:20

know, the big mines in Chile over a

11:21

hundred years old. The grades are

11:23

depleting.

11:24

And um this is going to be a major major

11:28

challenge and an upcoming bottleneck

11:30

right today. All the rage is in memory

11:33

and HBM and NAND prices are going

11:35

vertical because that's the bottleneck.

11:37

Now if you want to look around the

11:38

corner and see the next bottleneck

11:40

coming, I strongly urge you to look at

11:43

copper.

11:45

And so um here we are. A supply shock

11:49

meets a demand shock. Commodity cycles

11:52

typically last 15 years. and have

11:54

multiple hundreds% of upside. We're only

11:56

a few years into this. This is just

11:58

really getting started. And I want to

12:00

say one more thing, right? We spoke

12:03

about demand.

12:04

We're having this demand shock. We spoke

12:06

about supply. But what we haven't spoken

12:09

about is how we're destroying the value

12:12

of the US dollar. Since co we have

12:15

absolutely destroyed the value of our

12:17

fiat currencies. Today we have $40

12:20

trillion of government debt that's

12:21

growing at $2 and a half trillion

12:23

dollars every year. On top of that we

12:25

have a hundred trillion dollars of

12:27

discounted present value of the future

12:30

social liabilities. So Medicare,

12:32

Medicaid, Social Security, pensions

12:34

that's also growing by $2.5 trillion a

12:37

year. So you have two half trillion of

12:38

growth on the federal debt, $2.5

12:40

trillion of growth on the social

12:41

liabilities. The US government only has

12:44

$5.5 trillion of tax receipts every

12:46

year. And so what's going to happen the

12:48

next time we have a recession where tax

12:49

receipts go down and spending has to go

12:51

up, we're going to print giga dollars.

12:54

And in the 1970s, we had this problem as

12:57

well. And the way we did it is we just

12:58

debased the currency through some

13:00

inflation, through some growth. And the

13:02

currency lost 70% of its purchasing

13:04

power. And commodities and hard assets

13:07

and infrastructure will protect your

13:10

purchasing power in that kind of

13:11

environment. Go and look it up in the

13:13

1970s. What was the best performing

13:15

asset class by a mile?

13:19

That's your homework. So with that, uh,

13:22

thank you and, uh, look forward to

13:24

chatting with you guys.

13:25

>> Shabbat, I think on the prediction show

13:29

you, um, did was your call I forget

13:32

which category it was, but you

13:33

definitely had

13:34

>> I thought the best performing asset was

13:35

going to be copper. Yeah.

13:36

>> Yeah. Pretty

13:38

>> And that's before I talked to Dan.

13:39

>> That's right.

13:40

>> Which is saying something. Well, you

13:41

know, I I think the copper price is

13:42

easily going to double from here. I

13:44

mean, I've seen I've seen malibdinum go

13:46

from a dollar a pound to $33 a pound.

13:48

So, a double is no big deal.

13:50

>> Yeah.

13:50

>> And so,

13:52

>> take a take a step back. You said

13:53

something really interesting backstage,

13:55

which is if you look at everything that

13:57

we're doing right now, we're barely

14:00

going to keep up with just the natural

14:04

energy demands of of humanity, right?

14:07

just explain that thesis the way that

14:09

you framed it in the back.

14:10

>> So, here's the issue. We have not

14:13

invested

14:14

in upgrading and modernizing and

14:16

hardening the electric grid since post

14:18

World War II. We just let it go. You

14:21

know, the last two, three, four

14:23

administrations were sleepwalking and

14:26

haven't done anything to harden this

14:28

infrastructure. Now, if we simply just

14:32

want to achieve our objectives to

14:34

re-industrialize,

14:35

reshore, electrify, when I say

14:38

electrify, that just means replacing

14:40

your old gas boilers in these buildings

14:42

with heat pumps, which every commercial

14:43

building is doing. It means, you know,

14:46

electric car penetration going up. It

14:48

means using your your your electronic

14:51

devices more. Not even talking about AI.

14:54

Not even talking about AI. We're going

14:57

to have shortfalls. just from that.

14:59

>> Just from living our life.

15:00

>> Just from living our lives.

15:01

>> So, what happens? Blackouts, brownouts,

15:04

>> blackouts, brownouts, and we're going to

15:07

have to

15:07

>> rising electricity prices.

15:09

>> Rising electricity prices. But, you

15:11

know, you brought up a really great

15:12

point I thought on one of your shows

15:15

where you were talking about how the

15:18

utilities are just really gooseing up

15:21

the cost to do everything so that they

15:23

can report to their regulator and earn

15:24

that ROE on the higher capital base.

15:27

What's really interesting I think is

15:28

really underappreciated

15:30

is that's where all the inflation is

15:32

coming from. It's from the transmission

15:33

and distribution from the utility

15:35

because power prices over the last 20

15:37

years, even after the rise we've just

15:39

had, power prices are still down.

15:41

They're definitely down in real terms,

15:43

>> but they haven't really gone up much in

15:44

absolute terms. And so when you're

15:47

talking about going up,

15:49

>> making it is still cheap. It's getting

15:51

expensive.

15:53

You're getting it to people because you

15:55

know the labor the labor by far in a way

15:57

is the biggest bottleneck. Craft labor,

15:59

right? What do we tell all our kids to

16:00

do

16:01

>> you know in in the last 10 or 15 years

16:04

they liber

16:05

the northeast? Yeah. Big mistake. And so

16:09

I'm curious um from the audience in your

16:12

homes how many people have put up solar

16:16

andor power walls? How many people have

16:18

actually done that? So that's about half

16:21

the crowd. How many people, second

16:23

question, are planning to do that in the

16:25

next year or two. Okay. So that's

16:27

another 20%. So it's pretty obvious this

16:30

is obviously a fluent crowd. They are

16:33

routing around the grid. Is the solution

16:36

to this energy independence in the

16:40

>> great you know the home in the business?

16:43

Businesses are not waiting for the

16:44

government. So maybe the grid is going

16:46

to be like this weird archaic

16:49

infrastructure and it's just going to be

16:51

a groundup solution.

16:52

>> Well, you're going to need the grid no

16:54

matter what for industrial use. I mean,

16:55

that's that that's the foundation of

16:57

industrial use. I mean, the scale of

16:59

what we have to do just for industrial

17:01

use. Here's a good stat for you. So, a 1

17:03

gawatt AI factory if you wanted to do

17:07

all solar, right? And I'm a big solar

17:08

bull, okay? If you want to do all solar,

17:10

because solar's capacity factor is 20%

17:13

because the sun doesn't shine all the

17:14

time. With a capacity factor at 20%, a 1

17:16

gawatt data center needs 5 gawatts of

17:19

solar. Each gawatt of solar takes up

17:22

7,000 acres. So at 5 gawatt, that's

17:25

35,000 acres. That's bigger than San

17:27

Francisco. So where are you going to

17:28

find the people? You know, where you

17:30

going to find that's that's the biggest

17:31

bottleneck we have, by the way, is craft

17:32

labor.

17:33

>> Yeah. What about generally scarcity

17:35

breeds innovation? there's been a

17:37

conversation or I've seen some startups

17:39

that are talking about new technology

17:41

and mining to access I think

17:44

traditionally rare earth uh is kind of

17:46

the pitch but everything we need is in

17:49

the earth below us it's just that we

17:50

only mine the stuff that's on the

17:52

surface is the the general thesis is

17:55

there a set of innovations that you

17:56

think are coming to market that are

17:58

going to ultimately unleash more

18:01

productivity than we see because we're

18:03

still using the same technology we did

18:04

100 years ago to get this stuff out of

18:07

the ground

18:07

>> for for some commodities. Yes. You you

18:09

brought up rare earths. So So coming out

18:11

of the 14th century, there were these

18:13

guys called alchemists. Remember then

18:14

they said they could turn lead into

18:16

gold. And back then the periodic table

18:18

was just four elements. There was water,

18:21

there was fire, there was air, and there

18:24

was earth. Now fire, you could figure

18:27

out what it was. The air was pretty

18:28

pure. The water was pure. But every time

18:30

they saw something in the earth, they

18:32

didn't know what it was. They called it

18:34

a rare earth. And so rare earths are

18:38

everywhere and the technology to extract

18:40

rare earths is going to allow us to have

18:43

a huge abundance of them. But the

18:44

problem is processing them. That's the

18:47

problem. The Chinese have all the

18:49

technological knowhow to convert what

18:52

you take out of the ground and convert

18:54

it into something that we can use. And

18:57

so there's always going to be, you know,

19:00

some element of conversion that you're

19:02

going to need with something like

19:04

copper. the market is so big that it's

19:06

really difficult to find a technology

19:08

that could solve that problem overnight.

19:10

>> And if we are having just to thread a

19:12

couple of topics we've been talking

19:13

about on the pod incessantly about if we

19:16

do have uh this rivalry with China and

19:20

they are the provider and that's the

19:22

brittle part of the supply chain we can

19:25

solve the problem of job displacement

19:28

not apocalypse displacement.

19:31

people in America who want jobs. These

19:33

are going to be incredibly high-paying

19:34

jobs. And we can start bringing the fabs

19:38

from Taiwan here, which we're doing. And

19:40

we're going to bring both to North

19:41

America and I understand South America

19:43

from a friend of mine who's got an

19:45

automated um mining um system. Uh Adams

19:51

Travis, we're going to be able to just

19:53

create a large number of jobs here. So

19:56

maybe you could talk a little bit about

19:58

what impact we keep talking about how

20:02

behind America is, but what happens to

20:05

China if we stop buying

20:08

>> here and we start

20:10

>> building what you said is is is very

20:13

important for this whole jobs debate.

20:16

The craft labor that we're going to need

20:18

is going to be

20:20

almost limitless for what we have to

20:23

build. And there's really no other way

20:27

around it, right? The the you know, in

20:30

many ways, like look what happened in

20:32

the 2000s, right? We tore down all our

20:36

factories and moved them to China. And

20:38

who got killed by that? It was the blue

20:41

collar craft labor. It created all kinds

20:43

of unintended consequences. Fentanel,

20:45

uh, you know, wealth gaps.

20:47

>> Pennsylvania.

20:49

You know, the coasts were making all the

20:50

money in the heart of the country. the

20:51

salt of the earth was was getting

20:53

killed. What's ironic today is that same

20:57

part of the middle country, those people

20:58

that got displaced are now getting entry

21:01

level salaries. You know, if you go to

21:03

Quana University and you're top of your

21:05

class, you're starting out at 150 grand

21:07

right out of high school. And the jobs

21:09

that they're doing, ironically, are the

21:12

jobs that may or may not be displacing

21:15

some of the early, you know, lower level

21:17

white collar labor. And so, so the

21:19

tables the tables have totally turned.

21:20

And so look, it's it's an it's an

21:23

efficient market. The jobs are going to

21:24

flow where the money is and the money

21:26

right now is is really coming into this

21:28

area.

21:28

>> Can we talk about a couple of other

21:30

areas? What's your take on

21:32

uh other forms of energy? Not gas, coal,

21:35

nuclear, hydrocarbons.

21:38

I mean the demand pool seem like if just

21:40

based on this maybe the most reductive

21:43

takeaway is everything.

21:46

But then how do you Dan differentiate

21:49

like why were you why did you say for

21:51

example you're super bullish solar? What

21:53

are your thoughts on nuclear? How do you

21:54

trade all these off these different

21:56

sources of energy?

21:57

>> So we're we're swimming in natural gas

21:59

in this country. We can build solar uh

22:03

you know that's that's not the

22:05

bottleneck and nuclear you know we we

22:08

can't really build it. We can't even

22:10

build the containment vessels in this

22:11

country. The Koreans can do it but we

22:12

can't do that here. So there's always

22:15

going to be these big bottlenecks in the

22:17

system. And whether you're talking about

22:18

solar, whether you're talking about NAT

22:20

gas, whether you're talking about

22:21

uranium, we're going to have the raw

22:24

inputs like the natural gas that we

22:25

drill from the ground. But what we're

22:27

going to be short of is the critical

22:29

minerals to build the nuclear power

22:31

plants. We're going to be short the

22:33

silver, for example, to build these

22:36

solar panels, especially if we start

22:37

launching data centers in space, right?

22:40

These are going to consume incredible

22:42

amounts of silver. But right now the

22:43

silver supply demand dynamic is we

22:45

consume a billion2 ounces a year. We

22:46

supply a billion ounces a year. So

22:48

there's a 200 million ton deficit per

22:50

year and we only have 600 million of

22:52

above ground inventory left. So the

22:53

clock's ticking. We got three years left

22:55

guys before we just stock out. And then

22:57

the solar story is where do you get the

22:59

silver for the photovoltaic cells? So

23:02

for our kids and for the country

23:05

generation tool belt for us allocating

23:08

get some exposure to copper silver

23:10

minerals and then there's a bunch of

23:11

service providers in and around that

23:14

area that we should be investigating

23:15

over the next year.

23:16

>> Don't forget the labor the service

23:18

providers that's a big one.

23:19

>> Okay. How do you allocate capital?

23:21

You're at the front end of owning what

23:23

mines and production but then also the

23:25

end use cases. Like how do you decide

23:27

where to not play? Because a lot of

23:29

these things, it looks like these are

23:31

incredible end markets, but you can get

23:32

run over. Like if you're in the wrong

23:34

part of the market,

23:36

there's supply shocks, there's supply

23:38

shaping by China, there's price dumping.

23:40

It can be all obvious and you could make

23:42

you could lose a lot of money, too.

23:44

>> Yeah. Look, you really have to

23:45

understand supply chains. And I think I

23:47

think to a lot of people out there, the

23:49

supply chains are this sort of weird

23:51

mystical concept. And I still think a

23:53

lot of urban Americans still think a ham

23:55

sandwich comes from the refrigerator.

23:57

and they don't think about the 30

23:58

million pigs every month that are

23:59

getting slaughtered outside of Chicago.

24:01

>> Don't get free started.

24:03

>> But, you know, you got to understand

24:05

where the pinch points are in the supply

24:07

chain, number one. And number two, I

24:09

think you have to really make sure that

24:10

you're not going to get technologically

24:12

disrupted where you can find, you know,

24:14

I think this was to Freeberg's point

24:15

where you can find something that's

24:16

going to replace that tightness in the

24:18

supply chain.

24:19

>> Give it up for Dan.

24:20

>> Well done. Very, very informative.

24:25

Thanks, bro.

Interactive Summary

Dan Drifus from Fortnite Capital discusses the critical inflection point of US infrastructure and the massive demand shock for critical minerals, commodities, and electricity. Due to decades of underinvestment and reliance on fragile global supply chains, particularly from China, the US now faces significant challenges in supporting sectors like AI, defense, and grid modernization. Dan highlights the central role of copper and other critical minerals, the looming labor shortage in skilled trades, and the necessity of re-industrializing to ensure national security and long-term economic stability in a landscape of rising debt and potential currency devaluation.

Suggested questions

5 ready-made prompts