HomeVideos

"Epstein IRAN Link!" - Julian BLASTS the Clintons, Latest Files & DOJ Coverup | 393

Now Playing

"Epstein IRAN Link!" - Julian BLASTS the Clintons, Latest Files & DOJ Coverup | 393

Transcript

2557 segments

0:00

It makes me sick how uncomfortable it's

0:02

getting for many of them and I do not

0:04

stand for that at all and I will call

0:05

that out. But I got no love for the

0:09

Israeli government and there's every

0:10

piece of evidence to see that. Look no

0:13

further than the fact that this was

0:15

reported I believe in Israeli outlets,

0:17

American outlets. You know, obviously

0:19

there's fog of war stuff, but the

0:22

Israelis were spying on the Trump

0:24

administration's communications with

0:26

Iran where they're trying to talk about

0:28

peace. And Netanyahu called Trump

0:31

reportedly to make sure he didn't

0:33

negotiate peace.

0:38

[ __ ] you.

0:42

What's up everybody? Welcome back to

0:44

another episode of The Great Society

0:46

Show. I am Julian Dory.

0:47

>> And I'm Joey DeFe. How you doing?

0:49

>> How you doing? We got some pretty

0:52

important things going on in the world

0:53

right now, but we always do like to have

0:55

fun here. That said, there's certainly

0:56

going to be some serious moments today,

0:58

as there has to be anytime we cover this

1:00

Epstein case or those affforementioned

1:03

current events because [ __ ] is going

1:06

crazy out there. And

1:09

I am genuinely worried about where this

1:12

could lead. And I'm going to get into

1:14

the whole historical theorizing as to

1:17

why that is the case for this particular

1:20

Iran situation versus say the Ukraine

1:24

war which is also something that was a

1:26

huge problem when when it first came up

1:28

and continues to be a problem but does

1:30

not have the same ramifications as what

1:33

we are facing right now. But I had

1:36

talked last week on this now weekly

1:38

extra episode we have going where DEF

1:41

and I sit here and break down the

1:42

Epstein files and go through things that

1:44

are going on in the world. I had told

1:46

you that everything we are seeing

1:49

including what was at the time an

1:51

impending attack on Iran was nothing but

1:53

a distraction and it was a distraction

1:56

from what is the biggest story of my

1:58

lifetime in these Epstein files.

2:00

something where you know we see behind

2:03

the candalabra if you will and we

2:06

understand exactly I shouldn't even say

2:09

exactly but we have an understanding

2:11

that the way the world works is actually

2:13

closer to the way the people who used to

2:15

be labeled conspiracy theorists did

2:17

theorize and in many cases correctly so

2:20

at least on a 30,000 foot view in the

2:22

airway but before I get into this I did

2:27

something pretty interesting this past

2:29

weekend.

2:30

>> Lay it on us.

2:31

>> Yeah. Now, I unfortunately got to blue

2:34

balls you a little bit and say I I can't

2:36

go into full details yet. you're going

2:38

to be able to see this end of April,

2:41

beginning of May on a TV network, but I

2:45

had mentioned I was going to go out and

2:47

film something regarding Epstein with

2:51

Andy Bamante, who is your resident on

2:53

camera, still in the CIA, CIA spy,

2:56

certainly never left the agency, but

2:58

friend of mine as well.

3:00

What I will say is that I was genuinely

3:05

shocked by what we ended up filming. And

3:10

they're going to have me talk about it

3:12

in the buildup to when it actually comes

3:14

out and talk about it in detail. So, I'm

3:16

not going to go there yet, but I will

3:18

put it this way.

3:20

One of the major pieces of criticism

3:22

that Andy Booamante fairly gets, by the

3:26

way, very fair that he gets this outside

3:28

of being actively in CIA and possibly

3:30

propagandizing for them certainly. But

3:32

one of the major pieces of

3:36

hate that he gets out there is that he

3:39

has never seen a conspiracy theory that

3:41

he couldn't poo poo and go like this and

3:43

be like, "No, no, it's just

3:44

incompetence. It's not real."

3:48

I will just put it to you this way. When

3:50

we sat down and filmed what we filmed

3:52

about Epstein,

3:54

I was stunned to see him go completely

3:57

the opposite way. I mean, he went to

4:02

what would have previously been

4:03

described as like 4chan land. Now it's

4:06

much more normal in a way, but I was

4:09

sitting there genuinely stunned on

4:12

camera going, "You,

4:15

you of all people are telling me that

4:18

you're finding this about the you, Andy,

4:21

like what the [ __ ] What got into you? I

4:23

love it, but what got into you?" And I'm

4:26

not going to say yet what we

4:27

investigated other than it was something

4:30

to do with

4:34

uh how can I say this? How can I say

4:36

this without giving it away?

4:38

>> I don't know if you can.

4:39

>> I don't know if I can either, but it had

4:41

something to do with Epstein's

4:48

connections

4:50

and the abilities that that afforded him

4:52

even at his lowest moments.

4:55

>> That's a pretty good way of putting it,

4:56

right?

4:57

>> Yeah. And I could say that you called me

4:58

afterwards and um you I know when you're

5:02

being very genuine about something and

5:04

you were like, "My world has been turned

5:07

upside down." Hey guys, three quick

5:09

things. Number one, if you haven't

5:11

subscribed, please subscribe. It's a

5:12

huge, huge help. Number two, if you'd

5:14

like to join my Patreon for early

5:16

uncensored releases of the full

5:18

episodes, you can join via the link in

5:19

my description or in the pin comment

5:21

below. And number three, if you'd like

5:23

to join my clipping community for a

5:24

chance to make content from the show and

5:26

make money, you can join via the Discord

5:28

link in my description below. Like, we

5:30

got in there and we talked on camera

5:33

about the case in general for like over

5:35

an hour of which they're going to use

5:37

like 3 minutes of that. It was a great

5:38

conversation. But then he laid on me

5:41

what we were there to investigate.

5:42

Because when he asked me to do this two

5:44

months ago, he's like, "I want to do it

5:45

like you do your podcast. I'm not going

5:46

to tell you what specifically I'm

5:49

investigating Ron Epstein, but let's

5:50

just get in there and do it. So, he lays

5:52

on me what we're going to be

5:53

investigating. And I was like, "Okay,

5:55

cool."

5:56

>> And then he did something and showed me

5:59

a bunch of things, including a lot of

6:01

government documents, and then began to

6:03

demonstrate certain things related to

6:05

those. And very slowly, I went from very

6:09

back and forth talkative with him to

6:11

genuinely shell shocked and quiet.

6:15

And towards the end it was like a crisis

6:18

of I mean it was like almost like as it

6:21

relates to the case itself like

6:22

existential like what the what the [ __ ]

6:25

like if this is the case then nothing's

6:27

real. So wild [ __ ] as I said I got to

6:31

blue bulge you a little bit but you're

6:33

going to want to see that when it comes

6:35

out. Certainly certainly interesting. So

6:38

I think it was a cool experience. We're

6:39

going to watch to see how the certain TV

6:42

network cuts it up. But I want to make

6:44

sure that's done right because we filmed

6:46

for [ __ ]

6:47

>> 7 hours.

6:48

>> That's lame,

6:49

>> you know. And

6:50

>> they should do something with the like

6:51

if you do an hour recording, even if

6:53

they don't put it on the the TV program,

6:56

they should like put it on the YouTube

6:58

or like do something with it.

6:59

>> I think Andy I can't confirm this fully,

7:02

but just based on some stuff he was

7:04

saying, I think Andy's probably talking

7:06

to them about that because he's got a

7:08

big YouTube, too. Yeah. Yeah. And that

7:09

would also be great for transparency, by

7:11

the way, which is something, you know,

7:13

Andy could definitely use some help in

7:14

that department.

7:15

>> Yeah. Instills trust into legacy

7:17

institutions.

7:18

>> Well, I don't think anyone's ever going

7:19

to trust Andy,

7:20

>> but you know what I'm saying. Even them

7:22

doing that, you're like, "Oh, okay. I'll

7:24

trust you guys a bit."

7:25

>> Yes.

7:25

>> Transparency.

7:26

>> Yes. So, that is going to be very

7:28

interesting. But this week, we are I'm

7:31

putting out this episode on Saturday.

7:33

this week on Monday or Tuesday, you are

7:35

going to see the first half of the

7:39

Epstein Survivor Sitdown. I know you

7:41

guys have been patient about that. That

7:43

is coming now. I've had so many current,

7:45

literally current of the moment event

7:47

podcast coming in that like I've had to

7:49

get these things out. So, that one with

7:52

the Epstein Survivor, which she was

7:54

awesome, that's coming out. And then we

7:56

are also going to have an episode with

7:57

Chris Hansen, who is exactly the Chris

8:00

Hansen you're thinking of in here. And

8:02

certainly good time to have him in given

8:05

everything going on. But great guy

8:07

>> and we had a good time.

8:08

>> Yeah.

8:12

>> Hello.

8:14

>> Have a seat, Chris.

8:15

>> I'm looking for the Julian Dory podcast.

8:17

>> Is that why you're here?

8:18

>> That's what the transcript said.

8:22

>> I think's got some messages that say

8:24

otherwise.

8:24

>> Oh, really?

8:25

>> Yeah.

8:25

>> Well, stop stealing my line.

8:28

>> He's the real deal, Deaf.

8:30

>> Oh, I What? I I didn't say he wasn't.

8:32

>> He's He's real as they come.

8:34

>> Yeah. Like he

8:37

That guy doesn't miss a beat.

8:38

>> Yeah. Hell of a career.

8:39

>> Yes.

8:40

>> Like relevant as ever, you know, still

8:43

doing his thing.

8:44

>> Yep.

8:45

>> Hats off.

8:46

>> But like I said, I'm going to get to a

8:48

bunch of the Iran war breakdown at the

8:50

end. And for me personally, I kind of

8:52

want to put that on there as like a time

8:54

capsule. I want to look back on it a

8:56

year from now, two years from now, 5

8:57

years from now, see where the world is

8:59

and see how much of it makes sense

9:02

because I do have a lot of thoughts on

9:04

it and I take it very very seriously.

9:06

But you know, John Kiryaku when he was

9:08

in here recording with me February 20th

9:11

and we put out that episode on Monday

9:12

the 23rd. On that Friday, February 20th,

9:15

he made his report that Trump had made

9:17

up his mind to attack Iran. And he had

9:20

said it would happen Monday or Tuesday.

9:21

It ended up happening Friday. But

9:23

everything he said about who was against

9:25

it, Trump being fully mind made up and

9:27

the joint chiefs of staff on board

9:29

completely was correct. And we were John

9:32

and I were both hoping that his source

9:34

would be incorrect, but I knew that was

9:38

probably wishful thinking. So we are now

9:42

seeing where that is. And

9:45

as of the time of this recording, I

9:47

mean, you know, they're talking about

9:49

putting boots on the ground in the

9:51

Pentagon and moving the goalpost. I'll

9:53

get to it later, but it is it is

9:55

genuinely genuinely very very scary to

9:58

me. But let's let's get to the late and

10:02

not at all great, horrible, disgusting

10:04

Jeffrey Epstein and dig into this case

10:06

because we will not be distracted by any

10:10

[ __ ] we see in the world. Whether it

10:11

be something dumb like throwing us

10:13

probably fake alien files and not the

10:16

real thing, which we need to push for

10:17

the real thing eventually, but that's

10:18

for another day. or something very

10:21

serious like Iran because man de it's

10:24

[ __ ] great timing to start a Middle

10:26

East war so that Twitter goes up in a up

10:29

in a bunch about everything that's

10:30

happening while we got all these files

10:32

floating around and while they're while

10:34

they're deleting a lot of files too

10:35

that's pretty crazy right

10:37

>> yeah a lot of coincidences

10:38

>> total coincidence

10:40

>> total coincidence

10:42

but with Jeffrey Epstein you know if you

10:45

listen to my show and some of the

10:47

amazing people that we've been

10:48

privileged to have in here. Whenever I

10:52

have in people who are more on the

10:55

geopolitics side, who also are studious

10:58

of history, a common topic that has

11:01

often come up, I dating all the way back

11:02

to episode 43 with Mac Keach is the

11:06

fourth turning. Now, some of you

11:08

listening right now who are longtime

11:10

fans, you have heard me explain this

11:11

before. A lot of you who are listening

11:15

who have found the show through the solo

11:18

episodes like this in recent weeks,

11:20

perhaps you haven't. So, apologies to

11:22

the people that have heard this before.

11:24

But for everyone else, I think it's

11:25

important to have some context as to

11:27

what the Fourth Turning is. And as I say

11:29

that, Def, I just realized I forgot the

11:31

names of the author. It's like Strauss

11:33

and Howal, but I want to make sure I get

11:35

that right. So, The Fourth Turning is a

11:38

book that was written in the mid '9s.

11:40

maybe was like 96 97 by some historian

11:43

sociologists. Yes. William Strauss and

11:45

Neil How one of them is deceased. The

11:48

other one is still alive and I'd like to

11:50

get the other one in. But it's one of

11:54

the greatest most preient and also

12:00

scary optimistic I I don't really know

12:02

how to describe it books

12:04

>> ever written. And here's why I say that.

12:08

One of the problems with historians is

12:11

that they'll do an amazing job

12:13

researching history and going through it

12:16

and reporting on it and sourcing

12:17

everything and stuff like that. It's not

12:18

to take a shot at them, but what will

12:21

often happen is they get so immersed in

12:24

studying maybe a particular period in

12:26

history or you know a broad range of

12:28

history depending on who they are that

12:30

this cognitive bias comes in that makes

12:33

them believe that they are therefore apt

12:36

to be able to predict the future

12:38

perfectly. And unfortunately what

12:40

happens then is they often change the

12:43

patterns that exist right in front of

12:45

them without realizing that what these

12:48

guys Strauss and how did is they

12:51

basically looked at history. They found

12:54

a pattern that I'm going to explain in a

12:56

minute and they went like this. They

12:58

like picked it up and they just almost

13:00

like you know something hot and fresh

13:02

out of the oven that you don't want to

13:04

[ __ ] with. They just lifted it up and

13:05

then went all Yep. put it right there

13:07

and backed away and just said just just

13:10

look at this. We're not going to change

13:11

anything. We're just we're looking at

13:13

what happened. We're moving it right

13:14

here. Don't blame us. Don't shoot the

13:16

messenger. And what they found is that

13:21

over the past four centuries, three,

13:23

four centuries in particularly, though

13:25

it could go back further and I believe

13:27

they said that in the book. It's been a

13:29

while since I read it. Over the past 3

13:31

four centuries, there have been societal

13:34

patterns that repeat themselves in 80 to

13:37

85 year cycles. Now, you can also, I

13:41

believe, look at this in cycles around

13:43

the world in particular and find a fit.

13:46

But for the purposes of this

13:47

conversation, we are going to talk about

13:49

America, which has also been the rising

13:51

empire during the time period that we

13:53

are talking about. So, h where do I want

13:56

to start? Start at the top here. These

13:58

80 to 85 year cycles are generational.

14:00

All right, we'll we'll start with this

14:02

part. Essentially, they break it down

14:04

into four different generations that

14:06

exist roughly, you know, 21 years at a

14:08

time. So, you have four age groups at

14:11

any given time. Age 0 to 21, 22 to 43 or

14:18

44,

14:20

45 to 66, and 67 and above. Okay? And

14:26

each of these age groups

14:28

based on when they are born in the cycle

14:31

is given a name. So let's relate it to

14:34

our current age groups that we know. The

14:36

age group that is 66 and older, 67 and

14:39

older right now are the boomers. And the

14:42

boomers are what these guys term as the

14:45

prophets. Okay? These generations are

14:48

going to repeat themselves every four

14:49

over and over again. So the most recent

14:51

prophets are the boomers. These are

14:53

people that are born in the postcrisis

14:56

time and rise come of age meaning 0 to

15:00

21 during the time when the quote

15:03

unquote empire or winners of the

15:06

previous crisis is building itself up.

15:09

The next generation after that, so think

15:12

Gen X are what are called the nomads.

15:15

This is a generation that comes of age 0

15:18

to 21 during a time period. You see

15:21

everything's in fours here. So, we're in

15:22

the second generation and the second

15:24

time period right now. Hold that

15:25

thought. They come of age during a time

15:28

period called the awakening, which is

15:30

like the post boom excitement time

15:32

period. And it's where society turns

15:34

inward and starts to look at itself

15:37

while it's now been settled as the power

15:40

post crisis and starts to look at its

15:42

own wounds or its own flaws. So, think

15:44

the hippie movement, Vietnam, all that.

15:47

That's when the nomads are growing up

15:49

and coming of age. The third generation

15:52

is called the heroes. And the heroes

15:54

come of age 0 to 21 during a time in

15:57

which

15:59

basically it's the brewing time of a

16:02

crisis. So these are the millennials who

16:04

were born between 1981 and around 1996

16:07

1997 and they grow up in a in the time

16:12

when things are starting to get frothy.

16:15

They don't go all the way there but

16:16

things are starting to get to wait a

16:18

minute.

16:20

this might be getting a little out of

16:21

control. And and you could you could say

16:24

that while they're growing up, that time

16:26

period would certainly you couldn't say,

16:29

you will say it's it's true. That time

16:31

period, for example, with our

16:32

millennials would include 911,

16:37

the dot boom,

16:40

the war in Iraq, the G-WAD, if you will,

16:43

>> Occupy Wall Street,

16:45

>> Occupy Wall Street, which was post what,

16:47

defe the financial crisis. Y

16:49

>> and you know that's kind of what it is.

16:53

And it and it blends over into a fourth

16:56

time period called the crisis period

16:58

which is the climax if you will. And the

17:01

generation that grows up during this

17:03

period is the artist generation which

17:05

you can characterize as Gen Z. They are

17:08

growing up during a time where things

17:10

are really really hard and it generally

17:15

scars their outlook on the world for

17:17

life. If if you want a recent example of

17:19

that is the one before Gen Z, it would

17:22

have been the silent generation who grew

17:23

up in the Great Depression and World War

17:26

II.

17:27

Obviously, that's going to that's going

17:29

to impact how you look at things. That's

17:31

why my grandma to this day, you know,

17:34

writes down how much an orange is at the

17:37

store, whether it was 69 cents or 89

17:40

cents or whatever, because she's from

17:41

the silent generation, and that's what

17:43

she knows. And so what I laid out there

17:46

were the four generations and the four

17:47

different cycles.

17:49

If you're tracking me, what that means

17:51

is that in each cycle,

17:54

a generation exists in the same cycle

17:57

every time. Meaning the prophets, the

17:59

boomers are always coming of age post

18:01

crisis. They are always then going out

18:04

into the workforce and getting starting

18:06

to get some power in the world, meaning

18:08

between 22 and 43 years old during the

18:11

awakening period, right? which can also

18:14

mean a lot of success for the economy

18:15

during that period while there's a lot

18:17

of civil unrest and strife again think

18:20

like Vietnam and all that [ __ ] the

18:22

hippie movement and then they are in

18:25

power meaning like pre-retirement at the

18:28

peak of their game during a burgeoning

18:31

frothy time building into a crisis. So

18:33

when the millennials are are children

18:35

and then they're retired when the crisis

18:38

happens. Whenever there's a crisis, it

18:40

is always the nomad generation, which is

18:43

the generation coming after the

18:46

prophets. So, think Gen X. They are

18:48

always the generation that is in power.

18:50

They're between 44 and 66 years old,

18:53

something like that in that time period.

18:55

And and that's where we are right now.

18:57

Which, by the way, because ages have

18:59

changed over time. I'm I'm going to show

19:01

this pattern in a minute historically

19:03

and how it matches up. because ages have

19:05

changed over time, you know, that can

19:07

also overlap now with like some boomers

19:09

still being in power. Donald Trump's a

19:11

boomer, Joe Biden was a boomer, right?

19:13

Because people are living longer. So,

19:15

that does need to be taken into account,

19:17

but the idea stays the same. Now, you

19:19

talk about this 80 to 85 year period and

19:22

how that could work out. And I am

19:24

bringing this back to Epstein, trust me,

19:25

just bear with me.

19:28

Think about American history just dating

19:30

back to the beginning of our country,

19:32

which is in its 250th year right now.

19:38

The Revolutionary War took place from

19:40

roughly 1775 to 1783.

19:44

80 to85 years later, the Civil War took

19:47

place from 1861 to 1865.

19:51

80 to 85 years later, World War II took

19:55

place for America from 1941 until 1945.

20:00

80 to 85 years later lands us smack

20:04

right between 2020 and 2026,

20:08

which is right where we are. Okay, this

20:11

happens over and over and over again.

20:14

And each thing each thing, why am I

20:16

saying thing? Each crisis moment is

20:19

precipitated by the buildup. You heard

20:20

me say a few minutes ago that the

20:22

buildup to our current crisis period.

20:24

And I might have misstated like what

20:26

generation that was in. So, apologies if

20:28

I did that, but you get the idea of like

20:31

the things that lead you into the crisis

20:33

moment.

20:35

Over the past 25 years, we have watched

20:38

our towers come down one mile from here

20:40

in New York on 911. We have watched that

20:44

dot boom. We have watched the Iraq war

20:47

and the endless wars that crashed our

20:49

economy, crashed our morale and ended

20:52

obviously horribly in a full cycle that

20:54

was I guess capstoned by the 2021

20:58

Afghanistan pull out which was

21:00

devastating to watch. We have watched

21:02

the global financial crisis happen which

21:05

not only crashed the whole economy and

21:07

affected the whole world but it also

21:10

created the biggest separation of wealth

21:13

gap in maybe world history. I'm saying

21:16

that off the top of my head so my

21:18

statisticians out there can go check

21:20

that for me. But essentially what it

21:22

meant is that everyone from middle class

21:24

America, which is what built America,

21:27

lost all their life savings and then

21:29

really had nothing to gain it back with

21:31

when the economy recovered. Whereas rich

21:33

people who lost a lot, the elites if you

21:36

will, had more money to be able to

21:38

invest and put to work in the years

21:40

after 2008 so that they could make the

21:43

big rip up in the stock market as it

21:46

happened. Then you have the political

21:48

unrest. as Dee said correctly, the

21:50

Occupy Wall Street movement and Tea

21:52

Party movements having at the happening

21:54

at the same time that give rise to

21:57

Donald Trump and that whole movement,

21:59

Donald Trump versus what I will say is

22:01

like a Bernie Sanders populism movement

22:03

as Bernie should have been the

22:07

Democratic nominee in 2016 very clearly

22:10

like that was what the will of the

22:12

people in my opinion at the time based

22:13

on what we saw happen with it basically

22:15

being rigged against him. And in the

22:17

middle of that, by the way, you have

22:19

2014 Maidan with Russia and Ukraine.

22:24

>> That sets the stage for what would

22:26

become the Ukraine war, which broke out

22:29

in late February 2022. Now,

22:35

I thought of something when I was

22:36

filming with Andy, and I couldn't

22:38

believe I hadn't thought of this before,

22:39

because I always think about the fourth

22:40

turning and how things get kicked off.

22:43

And I thought about the last cycle with

22:45

World War II and I was asking myself

22:48

roughly what was the precrisis frothy

22:51

moment that set everything off. It was

22:54

actually something that was like way

22:56

beyond the pale because you know by the

22:59

way if you can patternize this stuff

23:01

like the 0809 financial crisis what was

23:03

80 years before that?

23:07

>> Black Monday.

23:09

>> Well that was 87 but you're on the right

23:11

track. the stock market crash. Stock

23:12

market crash

23:12

>> in 29. Yeah, exactly. So even like the

23:16

financial precipitations can be right in

23:18

line. Like that's how weirdly simulated

23:21

we are as humans. So I was thinking of

23:24

what was the moment that bled open World

23:28

War II.

23:30

And there were two answers. The first

23:32

one is the Treaty of Versailles which

23:35

happened right after the conclusion of

23:37

World War I. It basically

23:41

[ __ ] Germany into the next century,

23:44

which to be clear, Germany needed to pay

23:46

for World War I and and what they had

23:48

done. I mean, they had also inflated the

23:50

[ __ ] out of their currency. I mean,

23:51

there was there was a mess there, but it

23:53

set them up to fail. And if you read

23:55

Devil's Chessboard, guys like John

23:57

Foster Dulles and Allan Dulles were very

23:59

involved with that. and it created a

24:02

power vacuum in Germany where a guy like

24:06

Hitler could end up rising and that's

24:10

obviously a huge breaking point. But

24:12

then I thought some more and I tried to

24:14

think of like a person and I was like

24:17

holy [ __ ] the answer's always been

24:18

there. It's like something we all know

24:20

in passing. France Ferdinand the

24:24

Archduke of Austrohungary Austria

24:26

Hungary however the [ __ ] you say it.

24:28

When you look at World War I, and by the

24:31

way, I would highly recommend people go

24:32

back and listen to Dan Carlin's full

24:34

podcast on World War I. One of the

24:36

greatest things I've ever heard in my

24:37

life. It is the forgotten war. And I

24:40

don't want to understate it either.

24:41

Like, we always talk about World War II,

24:44

which is the war to end all wars at this

24:46

time.

24:48

>> But World War I, not only was it no

24:50

joke, it was it was brutal. Can we

24:52

actually pull up the

24:55

the deceased numbers in World War I def

24:57

because it's that's actually really

25:00

it's it's crazy and and the percentage

25:02

of the earth at the time. 40 million

25:04

total casualties, wounded and dead with

25:06

deaths ranging from 15 to 22 million and

25:09

the world was smaller than it was during

25:11

World War II. So I mean it it was

25:13

devastating what happened. But when the

25:15

Archduke France Ferdinand was

25:17

assassinated in 1914, it set off a

25:22

series of events that put into place

25:25

World War I and caused places like

25:28

Germany to declare war on Russia and

25:30

everything goes. It's not like France

25:33

Ferdinand sitting in that [ __ ] car or

25:36

I don't even think it was a car. It was

25:37

it was a horseback carriage or whatever.

25:39

It's not like, you know, he [ __ ]

25:41

knew, damn, if they hit me like the

25:42

whole world's going to end. and we're

25:44

all going to war. But that is the

25:46

butterfly effect, the domino that

25:48

happened. And so I went back to the

25:51

fourth turning and I thought about the

25:52

patterns and I thought about all the

25:54

things that built up to where we are in

25:58

the current crisis period right now

26:00

which Strauss and how by the way to give

26:02

them credit in the book the fourth

26:04

turning this again is written in 95 or

26:06

96 something like that.

26:07

>> Yep.

26:08

>> They said there would be a major

26:10

financial crisis. They did not know

26:12

what, but some sort of crisis occurring

26:14

between 2005 and 2010. They nailed that.

26:17

And they said that a crisis period would

26:19

occur between 2020 and 2030. So, let's

26:24

go back a minute. Jeffrey Epstein is

26:27

found dead in his jail cell in August

26:32

2019.

26:34

Okay.

26:37

What happens after that? thief.

26:41

Coid9

26:43

COVID 19 civil unrest to follow the

26:47

mandates mass hysteria

26:51

just over two years later two and a half

26:53

years later Ukraine Russia a year and a

26:56

half after that October 7th and the

26:58

following war in Gaza

27:01

in the middle of that Shinszo AB former

27:05

leader of Japan assassinated

27:07

>> y

27:08

>> an assassination attempt happened on

27:10

Donald Trump east, you know, you're

27:11

talking east and west here. And

27:12

Shinszoab was an ally in the east, by

27:15

the way. That's an important

27:17

distinction. Trump narrowly misses being

27:21

killed on the campaign trail.

27:24

We have the AI takeover come in.

27:28

We have now an Iran war breaking out in

27:30

the Middle East that quite literally and

27:33

figuratively, all the above separates

27:36

east and west potentially. And as we are

27:38

recording this right now, we don't know

27:39

how much more this is going to escalate.

27:41

But it is very scary, which leads to the

27:43

idea that nuclear weapons, which somehow

27:45

have been avoided since 1945 at the

27:48

beginning of this whole cycle, by the

27:49

way,

27:50

are now something that's on the table.

27:53

And no, they're not coming from Iran.

27:57

And in the middle of all this, Jeffrey

27:59

Epstein himself

28:01

is clearly a part of what we have

28:03

referred to many times and will continue

28:05

to

28:07

as the super government s the thing that

28:11

Tucker Carlson came up with where he

28:13

describes the presidents, the world

28:15

leaders, the leaders of economy, the

28:18

leaders of industry as one layer below a

28:21

fixer layer of wealthy people who tell

28:23

those people what to do working for a

28:25

top layer which are bankers. and

28:27

technocrats and the people who actually

28:28

run the world silently behind the

28:31

scenes. And that is symbolism for the

28:35

wealth gap. I already mentioned the

28:38

exponentially growing wealth gap. The

28:43

the ability of a small few to gather

28:46

more assets of the of the earth than

28:48

ever before.

28:50

and parallels with the fall of Rome when

28:53

it comes to the elite class separating

28:55

from the people of an empire that has

28:57

stretched too big to manage.

29:00

So I was sitting with Andy and I

29:02

realized or I shouldn't say realized, I

29:05

theorized

29:07

that Jeffrey Epstein is [ __ ] France

29:09

Ferdinan.

29:10

>> That set off the whole kitten

29:13

kaboodleoodle of things we've seen. And

29:14

I actually want to give a ton of credit

29:17

to Eddie Bravo

29:20

who in the words of Tim Dylan, friend of

29:21

the show, he's been he's actually been

29:25

following cuz like you have public

29:26

subscribers and unless he texted me like

29:28

a year ago. He's like, "Yo, Eddie Bravo

29:30

subscribed to us." So, shout out Eddie

29:31

Eddie Bravo. But Eddie went on a podcast

29:34

with Joe Rogan in 2024 and predicted

29:37

that World War III would happen, which

29:39

to be clear, it hasn't happened yet.

29:40

However, there would be World War III

29:42

burgeoning from the Middle East as a

29:44

result of the elites getting exposed in

29:47

the Epstein Pedo scandal and wanting to

29:49

cover it up as a distraction. Oh my god,

29:51

where have we heard that before?

29:54

So far so good, Eddie. So, shout out on

29:57

that. But we are seeing all this come

30:00

together at once. And also, Def, I have

30:04

two links right up there. Let's pull up

30:06

the first one, the billionaire link.

30:08

This just this is a quick

30:10

>> overview of an idea. So

30:13

>> rather than I'm I'm reading off the

30:14

screen right now from a screen grab that

30:16

was posted on Twitter by Grizzy. Is that

30:18

right, De?

30:19

>> Yep.

30:19

>> Okay. So

30:22

rather than just solely a US phenomenon,

30:24

Oxom's paper demonstrates that a rise in

30:27

oligarchy is undermining societies

30:29

worldwide. Think elites. Oxfam's fund

30:32

reports finds the collective wealth of

30:34

billionaires last year surged by 3.5

30:37

trillion, almost equivalent to the total

30:39

wealth held by the bottom half of

30:40

humanity, 4.1 billion people. How could

30:43

that possibly end badly? The number of

30:44

billionaires topped 3,000 last year for

30:46

the first time with the richest Elon

30:48

Musk becoming the first ever to surpass

30:51

half a trillion dollars. More on that in

30:53

a second. Billionaires are 4,000 times

30:55

more likely to hold political office

30:56

than ordinary people. The $3.5 trillion

31:00

increase rise in billionaires wealth

31:02

would be enough to eradicate extreme

31:04

poverty 26 times over. This is what

31:06

happens when society splits down the

31:09

middle. Now, as just a quick aside, I

31:11

want to come back to Elon Musk. We've

31:13

talked about him on here. We will talk

31:14

about him again. He still hasn't

31:16

answered questions related to his emails

31:17

with Jeffrey Epstein. We read them in

31:19

episode 381.

31:21

It doesn't appear he went to the island.

31:23

We do have proof in the files that he

31:24

did meet with Epstein though and

31:26

obviously he was going back and forth

31:28

with him personally in emails which is

31:30

not a great look and I do think he has

31:32

to answer for that. Elon Musk is also a

31:35

guy who bought X and regardless of what

31:37

you think of his opinions or whatever,

31:40

you know, that platform and social media

31:43

in general was censoring the [ __ ] out of

31:44

people. And since he did that, it is

31:46

inarguable that not only did that

31:50

clearly change X, it has, in addition to

31:53

some other things happening since then,

31:55

cleared things on other platforms as

31:57

well. I can see things on Instagram that

31:59

never would have passed even two years

32:01

ago or a year ago. And I don't take that

32:04

for granted. That may not hold up, but I

32:07

give Elon, whether he's the richest guy

32:09

in the world or not, a ton of credit for

32:12

that. That said,

32:15

Elon Musk doesn't shut up about the

32:17

Ukraine war.

32:19

And I got no problem with that. We've

32:21

been funing the [ __ ] out of that.

32:22

There's almost two million casualties

32:24

there. It's a mess. It should not be

32:26

understated what a mess that is and a

32:29

failure of the world to fix that

32:31

situation and actually try to come to a

32:34

peace solution. Elon Musk talks about it

32:36

all the goddamn time. As of the time of

32:39

this recording on Thursday evening,

32:41

again, this episode's coming out

32:42

Saturday, I've not heard one word about

32:45

this Iran war.

32:48

Not one word.

32:51

And that's really interesting to me.

32:54

Really interesting. Now, friend of the

32:56

show, RZ Verk, who's been on the show a

32:58

couple times, great guy, simulation

33:01

theorist from MIT, put out a reply tweet

33:04

where someone talked about that, where

33:06

he said, "Refer to Elon's episode on

33:09

Rogan, I guess the latest one, where he

33:13

said there are certain things that if he

33:15

talked about it, he believes he would be

33:19

assassinated."

33:21

That's good.

33:23

And wasn't XAI meeting to consult with

33:26

um

33:27

>> Oh, no.

33:27

>> Israel like a month ago?

33:31

>> That's real. I think I had showed that

33:32

to you when we were hanging

33:34

>> and he's trying to consult them to make

33:36

Israel quote like the AI superpower.

33:41

>> Yes, I could I could pull that up.

33:42

>> No, you are correct. Netanyahu talked

33:44

about he had a personal meeting with

33:46

Elon Musk to make Israel a

33:48

>> Yeah.

33:48

>> AI superpower. It's just it's just and

33:52

AI superpower I should say.

33:54

>> It's just fascinating to me that as of

33:57

this time he's not commenting on that

33:59

because again this is no slight at the

34:02

lives being lost in Russia and Ukraine

34:03

right now which again is a disgrace

34:05

that's still going on. But like this is

34:08

a way bigger deal potentially in Iran if

34:11

it somehow deescalates and I will give

34:13

credit to parties involved. If it does,

34:16

I would be very happy if that is what

34:18

happens here. Then we can avert some

34:21

issues. But

34:24

we're talking some civilizational things

34:26

here. So to round out the point about

34:29

France Ferdinand, if you've ever seen

34:31

that meme, and I know Elon's used this

34:33

meme of the dude standing in front of

34:34

the domino.

34:35

>> Yeah.

34:36

>> I don't know if you can find that

34:37

picture, De.

34:38

>> I'll find it. Yeah. And you just see all

34:39

the stacks behind him and it's like when

34:41

you're about to push something, the

34:42

whole butterfly effect is going to

34:44

[ __ ] blow up and explode.

34:46

>> Yeah, there you go. Yeah, De's got it

34:48

right here where where the guy's about

34:50

to push it over. So, everyone sees that.

34:57

That's Epstein.

34:59

That was France Ferdinand,

35:03

but that's Epstein. Yeah. You want to go

35:06

back to the revolution and see the

35:07

buildup to that? at the the World War I

35:09

before the Revolution, look no further

35:11

than the French Indian War.

35:13

French and Indian War

35:16

at all. Everything happens in these

35:19

patterns. That's why the fourth turning

35:20

is so effective. But I had never thought

35:23

of Epstein in the context of the fourth

35:24

turning. And now I can't [ __ ] unsee

35:26

it. So keep your eye on that. And again,

35:30

I'm hoping to see us avert the final

35:34

coming of a crisis that we're talking

35:35

about. When when you have, by the way,

35:37

when you have people talking about

35:38

biblical war, I'll talk about this more

35:40

later.

35:41

>> Oh, yeah.

35:41

>> That scares the [ __ ] out of me.

35:42

>> Me, too, brother.

35:43

>> All right. This is this is where

35:45

>> I want everyone to practice their

35:47

organized religion freely. And again,

35:50

most people use that for a great thing

35:52

and get inner peace. And I think that's

35:54

awesome. But when war decisions, as they

35:56

unfortunately have always been made, are

35:58

being made on the basis of betting that

36:02

you're right about the afterlife, which

36:03

if there's one thing we all have [ __ ]

36:05

in common besides the fact that we're

36:07

going to die, it's that we don't know

36:08

what happens when we do,

36:10

but you're going to bet on that with

36:12

people's lives here on this earth. [ __ ]

36:14

that. And [ __ ] you.

36:21

Now, Steve, now that we got that out of

36:23

the way,

36:26

my favorite,

36:28

and I say this, seriously, my favorite

36:31

to say, I already know you're going to

36:32

say

36:32

>> of all time.

36:33

>> Yeah.

36:35

>> Came out of retirement involuntarily

36:39

this past week. And that is not an

36:41

endorsement of this person as a person.

36:43

In fact, if there is a hell, he's on a

36:45

one-way trip there. But I am telling

36:47

you, there is no greater show on earth

36:51

than William Jefferson Clinton.

36:53

>> Y

36:54

>> because this is a man who even with his

36:56

shaking, I don't know, pre-P Parkinson's

36:59

old man [ __ ] charm that he still has

37:01

on,

37:03

>> he says things in a way and in a

37:06

delivery and in a physical act to the

37:10

point that yes, we know it's a complete

37:12

lie. It's a verifiable lie. But you

37:16

believe that he believes it.

37:18

>> Yeah.

37:19

>> And god damn it, he does.

37:22

So, first of all,

37:24

I do actually have to say this cuz last

37:26

week there was something I didn't know.

37:28

And I said it and we're always going to

37:29

be fair. I'm going to correct the record

37:31

cuz Hillary actually pointed this out

37:33

cuz both Hillary and Bill were deposed

37:36

this week by the House GOP at their home

37:38

in Chapaqua to go through their ties to

37:40

Jeffrey Epstein. I had said it was very

37:43

disappointing to me that elites like

37:47

Wexner and the Clintons were getting to

37:50

do their depositions on their turf. Now,

37:53

I still haven't checked out the Wexner

37:55

thing and the backstory there, but I can

37:57

speak on the Clintons. The Clintons

37:59

wanted to do this in DC, and it was

38:01

actually James Comr from the Republican

38:03

party who said, "No, no, no, no, no.

38:06

You're going to do it behind closed

38:07

doors in Chapaqua at your house." And so

38:11

Hillary complained about that

38:13

immediately after after the deposition

38:15

publicly. And I actually was like, you

38:18

know what? Yeah, she's right. I I would

38:21

have rather seen this done in DC just

38:22

like everyone else, too. But that was a

38:25

decision of the opposing party. I don't

38:27

know why

38:28

>> they should have to face the music just

38:30

like Pam Bondi did, just like all these

38:32

people do and should. Obviously, they're

38:35

looking to call Bill Gates and all these

38:37

different people now. Sarah Kell like

38:40

before the committee over I guess like

38:42

April, May, and June. We're hearing that

38:44

I guess like more to come on the

38:46

confirmations, but like they're going to

38:47

go in front of the public right now as

38:50

it stands. These guys should go in front

38:52

of them, too. But it was apparently not

38:55

the Clinton's decision for once. There

38:57

was also, by the way, before I I get

38:59

into some of the videos to break this

39:00

down, thief, there was a story in the

39:06

Atlantic that gave a behind the scenes.

39:08

And you know, I read everything.

39:11

Obviously, there is left and right bias

39:14

depending on any publication you're

39:16

reading. And there's so much information

39:18

floating around about this case that

39:20

anything you do have to take with a

39:22

grain of salt where it's not proven by a

39:24

[ __ ] EFA and a bunch of numbers

39:26

document injustice.gov. Okay, so let

39:28

let's just say it out front. But this

39:30

article looked into the backstory of how

39:32

this came to be like this story going

39:36

public and going through Congress via

39:38

Thomas Massie and Ro Kana. And I've I've

39:42

said it multiple times now, you know,

39:45

because obviously the Trump

39:46

administration is in power. Trump is

39:48

involved with the story because he knew

39:49

Jeffrey Epstein and the cover up's been

39:51

gross. But, you know, once again, give

39:54

the Democrats zero credit here. All of

39:56

their administrations have covered this

39:58

up, starting with the Clintons who were

39:59

[ __ ] a part of it. All of their

40:01

congressmen and senators have covered

40:03

this up for years. They, this story

40:06

actually, again from the Atlantic, which

40:08

is more of a left-leaning outlet,

40:10

reported literally what their

40:12

calculation was behind the scenes. Ro

40:13

Kana was being told not to do it by

40:16

people cuz he would appear as a

40:17

conspiracy theorist. And to his credit,

40:19

he was like, "Fuck that. It's not a

40:20

conspiracy. It's real. This guy existed.

40:22

He raped a lot of kids and no one's

40:24

answered for it. They got an answer for

40:26

it." So, credit to him. Obviously,

40:28

Thomas Massie did the same thing and

40:30

they cover that in this story. Thomas

40:32

Massie coming from the right side. But

40:34

when it talked about like it was showing

40:36

all the resistance Massie got in the

40:38

Republican party, which was really

40:40

gross, but we've already kind of

40:41

outlined that, so I don't need to go

40:42

into that again. When it talked about

40:44

the Democrats, though, all the older

40:47

Democrats were against doing anything

40:48

about it and wrote it off as conspiracy

40:50

crap, which very cold take, guys. The

40:54

younger Democrats who are less connected

40:56

to Clinton, in fact, not connected at

40:58

all, only got on board when they saw

41:02

that internal polling showed that it

41:05

would be a popular thing to do, which is

41:08

just such a [ __ ] you know, that's

41:10

what they reported in the piece. If

41:12

that's not such a [ __ ] indictment on

41:14

Washington DC, that that that that's why

41:16

when you see guys like Ted Lou who lies

41:20

like a mattress every time he opens his

41:22

[ __ ] [ __ ] mouth, when you see a guy

41:24

like that getting W's here because he

41:27

gets to read from a document that

41:28

already has the answer for him and it's

41:30

politically expedient for him to do so,

41:32

[ __ ] him. You know, I'll look at the

41:34

information because unfortunately

41:35

sometimes he's reading the information.

41:37

Sometimes it's actually real. But like,

41:39

see, we're not giving these people

41:41

credit. You you don't get to cover

41:42

things up for three decades, four

41:44

decades, whatever it's been, and then be

41:47

like, "Oh, well, now, you know, now

41:49

we're doing it." No, it's just expedient

41:51

politically now for you to do it. And I

41:54

I just found that story, again, if true,

41:57

it's from a lot of reports from sources

41:59

on the inside, so I encourage you guys

42:00

to go read it yourself and make your own

42:02

conclusions. But I found that story

42:03

particularly stomach turning and just

42:07

another example of how why when I have

42:10

to drive anywhere within the area code

42:12

of Washington DC, I make sure the

42:14

navigator takes me on the roads that go

42:16

around it.

42:19

[ __ ] hate that place. No disrespect

42:21

to the people that live there.

42:22

>> I'm sure

42:23

>> it's all right.

42:24

>> I'm sure you like it. It's

42:25

>> all right.

42:26

>> You won't find me there very much. Okay.

42:28

I think I've been there like twice in my

42:30

life. That's two times too many. Yeah,

42:32

it's it's all right. DC, you're not

42:34

>> Don't Don't do that, De. You know you

42:35

hate it.

42:36

>> No, that's what I'm saying. I'm saying

42:38

that I've only been there once or twice.

42:39

It ain't nothing special. You're not

42:41

missing much.

42:42

>> Okay. Can you pull up the first video?

42:44

We don't even need We need no sound.

42:47

>> This is a good This is a good video.

42:48

>> This is what and make it full screen.

42:49

This is just all top, which by the way,

42:52

keep it put it full screen and keep it

42:54

on pause. We got to We We got

42:56

>> Look at the first frame.

42:57

>> Yeah, we got to look at the optics here.

43:00

So, real quick before I go into this

43:02

video, you see the woman to the right

43:05

right there?

43:06

>> Uhhuh. We know her.

43:07

>> You know what her name is?

43:09

>> Cheryl.

43:10

>> Cheryl Mills. Cheryl Mills was basically

43:14

like Hillary Clinton's chief of staff

43:16

when she was Secretary of State. She was

43:17

Bill Clinton's attorney back in the

43:19

impeachment days. She'd been around them

43:22

forever. Let's X out of the full screen

43:25

for a second. We're going to hold that

43:26

for a sec. I know you're [ __ ] ready

43:28

to roll, but you know,

43:31

you would think

43:33

you you would you would just think you

43:35

would even give the Clintons like this

43:38

grace of credit that like they would

43:40

think about this ahead of time. If

43:42

you're going to go do subpoenaed

43:45

testimony on your relationship with

43:47

Jeffrey Epstein, that includes 25 to 27

43:49

flights, a lot of hot tubs, places

43:51

around the world, women in pictures with

43:53

you, including some who are underage,

43:56

and 18 17 18 known trips into your White

43:59

House through the back door. Not not a

44:01

good look, by the way. They help fund

44:02

the Clinton initiative. We'll get to

44:04

that in a minute. If you're going to do

44:06

that and put on your performance, if you

44:10

will,

44:12

do you know how many great qualified

44:14

lawyers someone like the Clintons could

44:16

not only afford to hire because they're

44:18

worth hundreds of millions of dollars,

44:19

but they they are connected to to hire?

44:22

You and I both know it's it's it's

44:24

unlimited. Okay.

44:26

Yet they pick Cheryl Mills, who of all

44:29

people, in addition to being at the

44:31

middle of the [ __ ] email scandal with

44:33

Hillary, in addition to being at the

44:34

middle of the Benghazi scandal with

44:36

Hillary, in addition to being in the

44:37

middle of the impeachment scandal, which

44:39

involved a [ __ ] [ __ ] in the Oval

44:41

Office with a woman who was very, very

44:43

young. More on that later, you know, you

44:45

would think that that alone would be

44:48

enough to be like, you know, maybe we'll

44:49

get someone else besides Cheryl to sit

44:51

next to us on this camera. But it's

44:54

worse than that. You got the email, def.

44:57

>> Yeah, I'm pulling it.

44:58

>> Cheryl Mills, I sent it to you in text.

45:01

Okay.

45:02

>> Cheryl Mills is in the Epstein files.

45:04

Like, you literally can't make this [ __ ]

45:06

up. She is in the Epstein files talking

45:09

with her girl Gilan Maxwell and going

45:13

back and forth. The other one, Steve, to

45:14

actually show the emails. There were

45:16

three I sent you.

45:19

But she is she's going back and forth

45:21

with Gilan Maxwell who is at the very

45:23

middle of the testimony they're doing.

45:25

He has that up on the screen right now.

45:29

So what is the first one to Cheryl Mills

45:32

from GMAX? Hey, I'm currently in my

45:34

bikini in Palm Beach. I'm trying not to

45:36

make you jealous or anything. Carol is

45:38

great. Actually, she may be gone for too

45:40

long as she may come to work well if my

45:44

deal goes through. I'm not dumb. It took

45:47

me so long to make one girlfriend. I'm

45:49

not prepared to lose her. And Cheryl

45:52

goes,

45:54

what did she respond? Is today really

45:57

your birthday? It's your birthday of one

45:59

of my greatest friends, and it would not

46:01

at all be surprising that you shared it.

46:03

So, happy birthday, darling. I'll have

46:06

to do a bit of thinking. That's from

46:08

Cheryl, right?

46:12

>> Hate for you being in Palm Beach. if it

46:15

weren't your birthday, I'll catch you,

46:18

I'll call you what you really are for

46:21

being there. I don't even know what that

46:23

means, but basically they're going back

46:24

and forth as friends. So, you would

46:26

think the Clintons would be like, you

46:27

know, Cheryl, set this one out. We'll

46:29

just hire any other [ __ ] attorney

46:32

from New York City. And then Cheryl

46:34

Mills, here's another email just pulled

46:36

up. Cheryl Mills subject, you are

46:38

unbelievable to what appears to be Gueen

46:41

Maxwell.

46:43

Actually, I don't want to say that

46:44

because this one's redacted. This is a

46:46

separate email, but it is to someone

46:48

redacted,

46:50

which is interesting. But Cheryl Mills

46:52

says says, "Only you can take a picture

46:55

that makes me look good. Thank you. I

46:58

love you." Exo. Not ideal. Not ideal to

47:02

have her in there for sure. But let's go

47:04

back to the video. I blue balls everyone

47:06

with beef.

47:08

This is William Jefferson Clinton

47:12

with his old man charm

47:16

being handed pictures

47:19

being handed pictures

47:22

with Jeffrey Epstein from over the

47:24

years. And I love how like now cuz he's

47:27

older and has like a lot of health

47:28

problems especially his mouth. He's just

47:31

like he's just like he's got the old man

47:32

glasses. He's got the glasses. Yep. Yep.

47:35

But play this.

47:38

I tweeted this out the other night and

47:40

then it actually a lot of people were

47:41

tweeting it out. A little plagiarism

47:42

going on there.

47:44

>> But she tries to take it away from him

47:45

and goes, "Don't look at this, Bill."

47:46

And he's like, "No, give it back. Give

47:48

it back." [ __ ] is reminiscing on

47:51

the good old days. He is looking at this

47:54

going, "Oh my god, that was a great time

47:56

out in Bahrain. I remember Jeff Oh,

48:00

Jeffrey, we were getting after it as

48:02

well. Look at that." and he crosses his

48:03

arms just like what a memory that's good

48:06

right there.

48:08

>> So like

48:10

but I will say this about Bill Clinton.

48:11

If there's one person who has ever given

48:14

absolutely zero [ __ ] you know, besides

48:16

Donald J. Trump, it's Bill Clinton. You

48:19

know, these these are two guys in that

48:21

respect, two peas in a pod. But Bill

48:24

Clinton also said something really

48:25

interesting about his relationship with

48:27

Gilan Maxwell that is tying right into

48:29

the supra government idea. It is the

48:32

second link there. You know what one I'm

48:34

talking about. Def. Let's pull that up

48:35

and allow

48:37

President Clinton to do the talking on

48:40

it. Full screener. Boom. Boom.

48:45

Was her friend not Epstein's friend. Is

48:48

that accurate?

48:50

>> I would I'd say that it was accurate to

48:53

say that I felt closer to her than him.

48:55

>> To Gilen.

48:56

>> And for the record, why was that?

49:00

because I had seen her more and because

49:03

she was very good friends with Elyn

49:06

Rothschild and his wife Lynn

49:10

whom I knew and was in regular touch

49:12

with you.

49:13

>> She stated that President Clinton was

49:15

perfect. So

49:18

there's also that pause at the end where

49:19

he stares him down whom I knew and was

49:22

in regular touch with

49:27

former United States president who also

49:30

presided over probably like to this

49:32

point economically, socially, culturally

49:35

regardless of whether he was the guy the

49:38

reason for this or not. That's not what

49:39

I'm saying. But he presided over the

49:41

1990s, which I would say was probably

49:42

the best time in American history to

49:44

this point,

49:46

being in regular touch with Ainda

49:49

Rothschild and saying it so openly, just

49:51

as we saw Wexner say that so openly,

49:53

just as we as we have seen them so

49:55

openly, hiring one fixer named Jeffrey

49:58

Epstein to do their bidding around the

50:00

world and tell people like Peter Teal

50:02

that he works for them. And then he's

50:04

correct in saying that, referring to

50:05

Jeffrey Epstein's email to Peter Teal in

50:07

2016 where he specifically says that

50:11

it doesn't exactly help the uh

50:15

tamp down the conspiracy theories, if

50:17

you will, about banker wars

50:20

and things like that.

50:22

It's just very interesting to see a name

50:26

of a prominent banking family that we

50:28

know the history of that people

50:30

generally never [ __ ] say out loud.

50:32

people who operate in the shadows.

50:35

It's very interesting to see it

50:39

actually unforcibly

50:43

explicitly mentioned by such powerful

50:45

people on camera left and right

50:47

recently. Les Wexner did not have to

50:50

bring them up in his deposition. He

50:52

brought them up personally when they

50:54

were asking him about why he hired

50:55

Jeffrey Epstein. He mentioned that he

50:57

spoke to I forget which Roth trial it

50:59

was. It might have been Evelyn actually.

51:01

>> David

51:03

No, no,

51:03

>> no. It might have been Evelyn, but I

51:05

don't don't quote me on that. Which is

51:06

exactly who Clinton just said. That's

51:08

pretty interesting. And he mentioned how

51:10

he Yeah. He said Ellie de Rothschild. So

51:12

I think that's the same person, you

51:15

know, and he volunteered that

51:17

information. Clinton just volunte.

51:24

That's fascinating to me. Very

51:26

fascinating to me. You see the liked

51:30

them. Uh, you know what, thief?

51:32

>> Yeah. What do you What do you think of

51:34

that?

51:34

>> Let's take a look at this one, cuz he

51:36

got caught on this one. Pause it and

51:38

let's get volume before we start it so

51:40

we can get the full question. All right,

51:42

volume's there. Full screen. Boom. Go.

51:45

>> Witnesses who testified in the Epstein

51:47

cases that Epstein said, uh, you quote

51:50

like them young. Why would Epstein say

51:52

that about you?

51:53

>> Are you asking his opinion?

51:55

>> You're asking him to think about why Mr.

51:57

Epste would say something.

51:58

>> Why would Why would Epstein say that

52:00

about?

52:00

>> She's asking you to try to be in Mr.

52:02

Epstein's mind and guess at what Mr.

52:04

Epste would have thought about.

52:06

>> Clinton likes them young referring to

52:07

girls.

52:12

>> First of all,

52:16

that's not true.

52:18

>> What's not true? that I have any

52:25

interest in underage.

52:27

>> I didn't say underage. I said I said

52:28

young.

52:29

>> But it's still not true.

52:31

>> Is an intern young?

52:35

>> Yes.

52:36

>> Okay.

52:37

>> In my age, anybody younger than I.

52:39

>> Did you know Jeffrey Epstein instructed

52:41

a witness to deny you were ever on his

52:43

island?

52:45

>> He didn't have to since I was never

52:47

there. Did you ever uh travel to Zoro

52:49

Ranch?

52:51

>> Is that the one in New Mexico?

52:52

>> Yes.

52:52

>> No.

52:53

>> Okay. Have you ever flown on anyone

52:55

else's private jet 26 times or more for

52:57

overseas trips?

53:02

>> I have flown as many miles on other

53:05

jets, but never with as many stops.

53:07

>> He knows the miles.

53:08

>> How many other people's planes have you

53:10

used like Epstein 26 times or miles,

53:14

etc.?

53:16

>> I don't know. I did for with Steve Bing

53:18

who's now deceased

53:21

and probably with four fellows.

53:23

>> Okay.

53:24

>> So maybe about a half dozen billionaires

53:26

total. So

53:28

>> um how many dinners did you have with uh

53:30

Glenn Maxwell or Jeffrey Epstein in

53:32

attendance?

53:33

>> She's asking to the best of your

53:34

recollection.

53:35

>> I have no idea.

53:37

>> Okay. Did you ever discuss sexual

53:38

misconduct allegations made against you

53:41

with Epste or Maxwell?

53:42

>> Never. Did Epstein or Maxwell ever offer

53:44

to help manage or silence women who made

53:46

sexual misconduct allegations against

53:48

you?

53:49

>> No.

53:50

>> Did Epstein or Maxwell ever offer

53:51

financial support directly or indirectly

53:53

to legal defense funds related to

53:55

impeachment proceedings or civil actions

53:57

against you?

53:58

>> Not to my knowledge.

53:59

>> Do you think a young girl massaging a

54:01

president is unusual?

54:03

>> So, are you asking his opinion?

54:05

>> Well, there's massage by a young woman.

54:07

And I'm asking if he thinks it's unusual

54:09

that a president, sitting president of

54:10

the United States, leader of the free

54:12

world, that it'sual. Are you speaking to

54:14

Are you talking to the the instance of

54:16

the unusual back massage that occurred

54:20

while he was not president? I'm just

54:21

trying to understand. You said a

54:22

president of the United States,

54:23

>> former president.

54:24

>> Thank you. Just trying to make sure

54:26

we're correcting the time.

54:28

>> No, I don't need to. I'm actually trying

54:29

to make sure that as you

54:30

>> clear he said he said he was a sitting

54:33

president.

54:33

>> Excuse me. Could we just please go one

54:35

at a time? Thank you. You said a sitting

54:36

president. I want you to be clear so

54:38

that when he answers the record. Is it

54:40

unusual?

54:43

>> Objection.

54:43

>> I have no idea if it's unusual.

54:45

>> Objection. Calls for speculation.

54:46

>> I figured. Do you ever uh did you ever

54:49

think that all these women around

54:50

Jeffrey Epstein or Gileain Maxwell was

54:52

odd, unusual, weird, or creepy?

54:57

>> There weren't all that many around when

54:58

I was there.

54:59

>> How many would you say is all not all

55:01

that many? I think on this big plane

55:05

that was working long hours, having two

55:08

to four people on there, I thought was,

55:10

as far as I knew, they were all helping

55:13

>> flight attendants and tank tops and

55:15

jeans,

55:16

>> right?

55:17

>> No.

55:17

>> Do you believe you were a victim of a

55:20

Jeffrey Epstein intel operation?

55:23

>> Do you think that you might have been

55:25

caught up in some of what he was maybe

55:27

potentially doing?

55:29

>> Excuse me, Congress. Which question are

55:32

you asking?

55:32

>> I'm asking operation.

55:34

>> First of all, I don't

55:35

>> some type of intel operation. I'm just

55:37

curious because it's been speculated on

55:38

today and yesterday that he may have

55:41

been an intel asset. Do you think

55:43

perhaps knowing what we know now, uh,

55:45

the proclivity of it all that he may

55:47

have been targeting you as part of an

55:49

intel operation?

55:50

>> I doubt it. Okay. um in 2019 you stated

55:55

>> that's you could see you could see so

55:57

when he was asked the intel question

55:59

there at the end at the at the beginning

56:00

of that little part his whole forehead

56:03

shifted when she asked him if he had

56:05

been a target and then when he said I

56:07

doubt it and again I'm not a body

56:09

language expert but these are some

56:10

pretty common ones spitting out and I'd

56:12

love to get some of the body language

56:13

people on YouTube to break this down but

56:16

when he said I doubt it right there he

56:18

squinted his eyes real tight now at the

56:20

beginning of that clip when He's asked

56:22

if he likes him young and then gets

56:24

wrapped around the Lewinsky right away,

56:26

which he should have seen that one

56:27

coming. Old Bill would have seen that

56:28

one coming, but older Bill doesn't. You

56:32

could see the [ __ ] nervousness

56:35

setting in and he was getting very

56:36

uncomfortable. And then

56:38

>> he locked the [ __ ] in and Cheryl came in

56:41

and he was answering things real

56:43

confident with that little slide look

56:45

up.

56:46

>> Came in like his auntie.

56:47

>> Yeah. And that's the thing, guy like

56:49

him, he can lie like a mattress and

56:52

really get himself into a mind state

56:53

where he's like, "All right, I'm going

56:55

to do it, but I'm going to believe it."

56:57

And that's what it is.

56:58

>> Where do you think they did that in

57:00

their house?

57:01

>> You know, I was wondering that it's like

57:03

>> got the microphones and everything.

57:04

>> It's got the grand deas there.

57:06

>> What do you think goes through his head

57:07

as they're setting up production? like

57:09

as he's like in his robe having a coffee

57:11

and they're setting the table and the

57:13

lights and the audio and he's just like

57:16

[ __ ] they're going to try and fry me in

57:18

here.

57:19

>> Showtime.

57:24

>> You look might fine.

57:25

>> Yeah. Yeah. Makes a sly comment turns.

57:28

>> Yeah. Yeah. Yeah.

57:29

>> He's just the dog.

57:32

>> And if we got to play the Mark Middleton

57:34

thing. So Mark Middleton is the White

57:36

House aid who was directly connected to

57:39

many of the visits of Jeffrey Epstein in

57:42

the White House who

57:45

uh unalived himself

57:47

>> by hanging himself

57:52

not laughing at the fact that he's dead.

57:53

I'm laughing at the circumstances.

57:55

believe it was, we're gonna find out in

57:57

the clip in a second, but hanging

57:58

himself from a tree while simultaneously

58:02

taking a shotgun to his chest, which

58:05

>> wow,

58:06

>> I mean, what an acrobatic way to leave

58:09

this earth, if I may say so myself.

58:11

Let's play this

58:12

>> right here, DeF.

58:15

Oh, man.

58:19

>> Are you aware that Mr. Middleton

58:20

committed suicide?

58:22

>> Yes, I am. 2022. Um he was found dead at

58:27

Hefner Ranch um approximately 30 miles

58:31

from his home in Little Rock. He was

58:33

discovered hanging from a tree by an

58:35

extension cord around his neck with a

58:37

self-inflicted gunshot wound to the

58:40

chest. So he was shot and hung.

58:43

>> Um do you

58:44

>> He's like Yeah. He nods.

58:46

What do you have any any information

58:49

that leads you to suspect that he was

58:52

that he did not that he did something

58:54

other than commit suicide?

58:56

>> No.

58:59

>> Okay.

58:59

>> Do you have any concerns that he wanted

59:01

to say that this was in relation to his

59:04

knowledge or relationship with Jeffrey

59:05

Epstein

59:06

>> given the date?

59:09

>> But the president has already testified

59:11

to the fact that he was unaware that Mr.

59:13

Epste was visiting the White House. So

59:14

are you asking him then as to what he

59:16

would have known?

59:17

>> I'm asking when you heard about the

59:18

death knowing about the things that have

59:20

been you know at this point it's all

59:23

over the news seeing that he has

59:25

committed suicide. Have you ever have

59:27

you ever had any conversations with

59:28

people about whether or not this that

59:30

there's any relationship between the

59:32

two?

59:33

>> Oh no. No one's ever suggested it to me.

59:36

>> Okay. Thank you.

59:38

>> Go to Google, [ __ ]

59:40

Yeah. that that was I mean they really

59:42

came with hard balls and like we were

59:44

listening to Nancy Mace earlier when she

59:46

was questioning him. She didn't stutter

59:48

once. I mean I was I was very impressed

59:51

with how on the ball a lot of a lot of

59:55

the footage I I heard was from from the

59:57

people interviewing him. And yeah,

59:59

something like that should be brought

60:00

up. People joke about the Clinton body

60:03

count, but people die around them and

60:05

they die in very weird circumstances,

60:07

including that one I think being the

60:08

weirdest. like, "Oh, yeah, he hung

60:10

himself with an extension cord and shot

60:12

himself in the chest." Sure, that's

60:15

logical. But there is another subplot

60:19

that has happened over the past couple

60:20

weeks with Bill Clinton that is

60:22

completely inexplicable to me and it's

60:24

very suspicious and it involves Donald

60:26

Trump.

60:28

Donald Trump and Bill Clinton we know

60:29

were friends at one point. We know

60:31

they're both dogs. You know, it's not

60:33

illegal to be a dog, but it's certainly

60:36

illegal to be a dog if it's around

60:38

underage women. So that's

60:40

>> around puppies.

60:40

>> Yeah, understand. You can be a dog

60:43

around some other dogs, but not around

60:45

them puppies.

60:47

Sorry.

60:51

All right, let's bring it back, folks.

60:53

Reel it back in. Anyway, that was that

60:56

was good, though.

60:57

>> That was it was good.

60:58

>> It was good. It was good.

61:00

It's f because like you got to have fun

61:02

in life even when things are

61:06

very very bad. But it is what it is.

61:09

That said, Donald Trump and Bill Clinton

61:13

could not possibly be friends after

61:16

Trump ran for president because Trump

61:20

decided immediately upon running in 2015

61:23

to turn his guns on Hillary and use

61:25

those guns also, and I mean that

61:28

figuratively, not literally,

61:30

to go after Bill. I mean, when Trump was

61:33

even late in the campaign when he was

61:35

caught with the grabb tape, his apology

61:37

video 15 seconds in said, "Yeah, I

61:40

apologize. It's so bad, but Bill Clinton

61:42

raped people. He's horrible." And if you

61:46

remember,

61:48

a couple that was a Friday night. A

61:51

couple nights after that was a Sunday

61:53

where it was the second presidential

61:54

debate. This is October

61:57

2016. I think that debate was like

61:59

October 9th. And Donald Trump, showman

62:01

that he is, shocked the world by holding

62:03

a press conference unannounced right

62:06

before the debate, which was going to be

62:08

in an intimate setting where he would be

62:10

about 10 ft from Bill Clinton, sitting

62:11

right there supporting his wife,

62:13

business partner, I should probably say.

62:15

But, you know, Donald Trump held a press

62:17

conference with all the women who had

62:19

publicly accused Bill Clinton of rape in

62:22

the past, and it was I've never seen

62:24

anything like that in my life. And then

62:27

he goes in to the debate and he has to

62:30

apologize at the beginning. This is the

62:32

one where he's like standing behind

62:33

Hillary

62:35

like staring down at her and it gets to

62:38

him and and he's doing his like kind of

62:40

halfass apology and then he goes but

62:43

Bill Clinton and I think he even pointed

62:45

Bill Clinton raped women and there's an

62:48

image of Clinton. I don't know if we can

62:50

pull it up de but Clinton Trump debate

62:54

eyes. There's an image of him staring

62:57

back like death itself that Donald Trump

63:00

accused him of that on international

63:03

television in the biggest stakes debate

63:06

in the world. And I said, "Yeah, that's

63:08

it right there. Bill with his with his

63:11

daughter." They were both sitting right

63:12

there and he's just staring at Trump

63:14

like he just crossed a Rubicon that is

63:18

beyond anything he had ever imagined.

63:20

And I say that because

63:23

you are never going to [ __ ] be

63:25

friends with someone like that under any

63:28

circumstances ever for the rest of

63:30

eternity, let alone your time here on

63:32

Earth. I think we can all agree on that.

63:34

Any friendship that may or may not have

63:37

still existed, and it definitely didn't

63:39

still exist at that point, is dead,

63:41

gone, finished. You're done. And yet, a

63:45

very interesting subplot has happened

63:47

here where out of nowhere after over a

63:49

decade of shredding the Clintons inside

63:52

and out. Donald Trump went on camera two

63:54

weeks ago in some interview with

63:55

someone, I don't remember who, and he

63:57

was asked about Bill Clinton. And he

63:59

goes, you know, I still like Bill

64:00

Clinton. I I I don't like everyone going

64:02

after him. I'm paraphrasing right here,

64:04

but he said, "I still like Bill

64:05

Clinton." Like, what the [ __ ] What do

64:08

you mean you still like BILL CLINTON?

64:10

THE GUY YOU CALLED A RAPIST ON

64:11

INTERNATIONAL TV and held a press

64:13

conference with all the women that have

64:14

accused him. LIKE, NO YOU DON'T. I'M NOT

64:17

EVEN SAYING YOU'RE WRONG about that

64:18

either. BUT LIKE, YOU'RE NOT FRIENDS

64:22

WITH HIM. SO, it's also interesting that

64:25

when Bill and Hillog are ready to go

64:27

down with the ship and take everyone

64:29

with him, including Trump, that's where

64:31

the Tim Dylan song COMES IN.

64:33

>> WE FED HER TO THE SHARK, RIGHT? That you

64:36

know what? World's ending. Our world's

64:37

ending. might as well tear it all down

64:40

with us, including Donald. Like, that's

64:42

our last act. You would think that he'd

64:46

take the chance to do that.

64:49

Defund the tape. I I I hate this but

64:52

because I don't believe I should inject

64:54

anything but I do not want to leave the

64:57

impression

65:00

but since there was no follow-up

65:01

question

65:03

he never the President Trump never this

65:06

is 20 something years ago never said

65:09

anything to me to make me think he was

65:11

involved in anything in profit with

65:13

regard to

65:14

>> to Epcene either he he just didn't

65:19

>> All right That's the truth. You know,

65:21

>> Wait, wait, wait.

65:23

>> As I said earlier,

65:28

the only conversation I have with

65:29

President Trump about this was in the

65:32

early 2000s.

65:35

And I have no information

65:38

that he did anything wrong. I just want

65:42

it all out there. I want every

65:43

>> I want it all out there. Look at him

65:45

holding his arms.

65:46

>> See where we are.

65:47

>> Okay.

65:49

He said the the first part right there

65:52

especially the second part I can't

65:53

confirm this but because that was from a

65:55

later point like it cut off halfway and

65:56

went to a later point from the

65:58

deposition but the first one he

65:59

interjected that it was voluntary he was

66:02

not asked about that but he wanted to go

66:04

on record and say he had no information

66:07

that Donald Trump could have possibly

66:10

been attached to Jeffrey Epstein based

66:12

on what he knew. So you have two guys

66:15

who have publicly

66:17

had

66:19

beef

66:21

to the nth degree that makes Diddy and

66:23

50 Cent look like child's play.

66:25

>> That's actually a really that's a bad

66:27

way to put it, but you know what I mean.

66:32

Sorry. It is.

66:34

And now

66:37

they're both going out of their way to

66:38

say the other guy's all right. If you

66:41

are not sketched out by that or

66:43

suspicious of that, yeah, I don't know

66:45

what's stuck in your eyes or your ears.

66:48

Unclog them.

66:50

That was the craziest thing that

66:52

happened because of what Trump said a

66:55

couple weeks ago. That dynamic is

66:57

insane.

67:00

Now, that's a lot of the highlights of

67:02

Bill. There was another thing like I'm

67:04

not going to get too deep into this but

67:05

it's confirmed on Jmail through the

67:07

justice department drops of the Epstein

67:10

files but like at one point Epstein was

67:12

trying to help Clinton you know fix up

67:16

his SEO online and get negative stories

67:19

taken out about him which you know just

67:21

shows you the closeness of the

67:22

relationship and also it's in the emails

67:24

with where Genan Maxwell talks about how

67:26

she helped found the Clinton Global

67:28

Initiative talking about it very

67:30

flippantly that's confirmed confirmed as

67:33

well. And we also have the picture, can

67:35

we pull it up, de? It's right there

67:37

under Hillary of Gilen at the Hillary at

67:40

the Chelsea Clinton wedding, daughter of

67:42

the Clintons. She's just leaning right

67:45

over looking at Bill taking Chelsea down

67:47

the aisle. And of course, as Hillary's

67:51

going to put it, had no idea she was

67:54

there.

67:56

So

67:57

she said she testified that she had like

68:00

no relationship with Gilen Maxwell. I

68:02

believe she called Gueen Maxwell a plus

68:04

one and she wouldn't have known who the

68:05

plus one is. And then Twitter

68:07

investigators found out that she would

68:08

have known who the plus one was at that

68:10

wedding based on previous public

68:12

comments, right? You saw that as well. I

68:14

don't I don't want to get too caught in

68:15

like the [ __ ] you know, cat fight

68:18

with that, but very clear that that was

68:20

a lie under oath.

68:23

Wait, one more. Bill Clinton thing. You

68:26

see the one where it says, "Have you

68:27

ever lied?"

68:28

>> Yeah.

68:29

>> This is a 9-second clip. Just pull this

68:30

up. So, Bill Clinton is asked the

68:33

following on camera about whether or not

68:37

he has ever lied under oath in the

68:40

deposition.

68:42

Here we go.

68:43

>> Um, first question I have for you, Mr.

68:45

President. Uh, have you ever lied under

68:47

in a deposition?

68:48

>> No.

68:50

>> Have you ever lied while under oath?

68:52

>> No.

68:53

Um, first,

68:54

>> okay, so he he was he was quite

68:56

literally impeached for doing that. So

68:58

that that is perjury right there. But

69:00

like that's what they do. They just lie.

69:02

And so Clinton, Hillary Clinton

69:04

testifying that like she never knew

69:06

Gilen Maxwell also testifying that she

69:08

never knew Jeffrey Epste when Jeffrey

69:10

Epste is in the emails talking about

69:12

her, talking about what she looks like

69:14

in person and stuff, which she was

69:16

actually flattered when she heard that

69:18

part. I don't know if you saw that, De.

69:19

She's like, I won't argue with that.

69:20

when he said, "I look better in person,"

69:22

which would imply he's [ __ ] seen her

69:24

a bunch in person. He is being invited

69:26

to events that are that are in the

69:28

emails that are money fundraisers for

69:30

Hillary Clinton. And there are all kinds

69:33

of reports, unverified at this point,

69:34

that the Clintons spent a lot of time at

69:36

Zoro Ranch. And you heard in an earlier

69:39

video, Bill Clinton explicitly deny he

69:41

was like, "The one in New Mexico?" Nope.

69:42

Never been there. So again, we got this

69:45

all on record now. And it's going to be

69:46

interesting to see if evidence comes out

69:48

that is directly against what they're

69:50

saying, which would mean that they would

69:51

be charged with perjury and it's open to

69:53

the American people because we have now

69:55

all seen this. And you would think

69:57

that'd be a pretty slam dunk case to be

69:59

able to put through. But there is

70:04

there's there's two clips of Hillary I

70:06

want to go through real quick. Before I

70:08

say that, Lauren Boowbert took a picture

70:12

of Hillary like secretly in the

70:15

deposition and Hillary flipped out about

70:18

it on camera. I'm not going to play the

70:20

clip because we're not going to have

70:21

time to do that, but like Hillary had a

70:23

right to flip out about that. Like she

70:26

did it to send it to [ __ ] Betty Benny

70:28

Johnson to get social media clout and

70:30

whatever. And this was, you know, the

70:33

Republicans are the ones who asked for

70:34

the private hearing. So, like it's just

70:38

when politicians are trying to use their

70:41

little spot for social media clout, like

70:44

we're doing something wrong here. And

70:46

and you got to call that out. That was

70:48

just [ __ ] stupid. I mean, I

70:49

appreciate it getting the picture

70:51

selfishly, but like

70:52

>> you're you're not helping the situation

70:54

doing that. But

70:56

>> there's a video where she's asked about

70:59

Anthony Weiner in the last 50 seconds.

71:02

It's a long video. I I particularly want

71:04

to get to the last get to like three.

71:07

>> Yep. Right there. Let's do it.

71:10

>> My list.

71:13

>> That's okay. We're asking all sorts of

71:15

things here.

71:15

>> You certainly are. You certainly are.

71:17

Certainly are.

71:18

>> We're just trying to get the truth out

71:19

to the American people. Some clarity.

71:20

>> Very helpful.

71:22

Um, are you aware of any files um that

71:25

were on Anthony Weiner's laptop um in a

71:28

folder that was titled in uh insurance

71:32

life insurance um with a um zip file

71:36

titled travel

71:38

like the chairman's ruling in the scope.

71:41

Is this within the scope, Mr. Chairman?

71:43

>> Chairman rules that it's not within the

71:44

scope.

71:44

>> Mr. Chairman, based on what you said in

71:46

the public hearing, is this within the

71:48

scope?

71:48

>> We can go off to record for a moment.

71:50

>> Mr. Chairman, is this within the scope?

71:52

>> Off the record and can talk.

71:54

>> Look at those eyes, bro.

71:57

So, no proof of anything there, but we

72:01

have had many reports about the contents

72:03

of Anthony Weiner's laptop. And

72:06

obviously, Anthony Weiner was married to

72:08

Huma Abodine, who was and still is

72:11

Hillary Clinton's right hand. She's now

72:13

married to Alex Soros. That's not weird

72:15

at all. And you know, he he's definitely

72:18

not playing for her team either. It's

72:20

it's just, you know,

72:21

>> oh man,

72:22

>> just saying. But

72:23

>> that that was I mean, you see her whole

72:27

body [ __ ] contorting. She came up and

72:29

got in it like she was ready to fight.

72:31

And then those eyes before that off

72:33

record could [ __ ] kill. So, it'll be

72:37

interesting to see if that string gets

72:39

pulled on more because there have been

72:41

some horrific reports about what's on

72:43

there.

72:45

Now, there there's a lot of stuff that I

72:48

have outlined that we're going to do

72:50

next week instead because there's one

72:52

thing I want to hit before Iran

72:56

and talking about that that that is

72:58

important because as I said at the

73:00

outset, they will do anything to

73:02

distract from things like this. This

73:04

affects everyone in government,

73:06

bureaucracy. Everyone's a strong word.

73:08

It affects many powerful people in

73:09

government, bureaucracy, industry, and

73:12

society at large, including the society

73:14

of the supra government that you don't

73:16

see. And very conveniently, since the

73:19

strikes in Iran that began late Friday

73:22

night, early Saturday morning,

73:25

we have seen the DOJ

73:28

verifying deleted files. In fact, I

73:30

believe deep, they confirmed

73:33

the f I I have a link right there where

73:35

where the DOJ confirmed it themselves.

73:37

DOJ confirms 47,635

73:40

Epstein files have been removed per the

73:42

Independent and that is from March 4th

73:44

in the middle of all this Iran hysteria.

73:46

>> That's great. That's great.

73:47

>> And they're going to continue to do this

73:49

and they're already in violation of

73:50

federal law for withholding the final 3

73:52

million documents which include a lot

73:54

between the years of 1999 and 2001.

73:56

That's not weird at all.

73:57

>> Oh, we got some new ones.

73:58

>> Yeah. And then Oh, what' they do? They

74:00

gave us They're releasing 47,000 more

74:02

withheld Jeffrey Epstein documents by

74:04

the end of the week. Similar number, by

74:06

the way. It's almost like they're trying

74:07

to zero sum game it.

74:08

>> Take and get.

74:08

>> Yeah, we'll take the ones we don't want

74:10

out there, which by the way, the public

74:12

has probably screenshotted a lot of

74:13

that. So, too late people, just like

74:15

they got Howard Lutnik, our friend,

74:17

pictured on the island. They tried to

74:19

get that one down, but Jmail still had

74:20

it. Can we Google Letic Island picture?

74:24

>> God, I LOVE THIS GUY.

74:26

>> GOD, I LOVE THIS GUY. You can't even

74:28

make this stuff up. But this is what

74:30

they're going to do. If we take our eye

74:32

off the ball, this is what we're going

74:33

to do on this show. We are going to

74:34

cover current events. We are going to go

74:36

through it. That is the format that

74:37

we're doing with the solo shows and

74:39

obviously it happens sometimes with with

74:41

the guest shows. It's been happening

74:42

more than usual recently because the

74:44

world's so crazy where we literally do a

74:46

current event and cover it and then I do

74:47

a lot of podcasts that are stories and

74:49

all different types of topics and having

74:51

fun. Like that's what it is. But we will

74:54

continue to cover this story no matter

74:57

what's going on in addition to other

74:59

things because if we don't that's what

75:02

they want. So, as we get information, we

75:04

will do it because they're going to

75:05

continue to try to cover this up. And

75:07

there is Howard on the [ __ ] island.

75:10

That does appear to be his sons next to

75:12

him on the left. I'm going to guess the

75:15

guy on the right. I don't know this. I

75:17

don't know either of these things, but

75:18

people out there maybe can verify, is

75:20

perhaps the

75:22

male from the other couple he mentioned

75:24

in that famous now infamous 2012 email

75:27

to Jeffrey Epste talking about visiting

75:28

the island. and Twitter slleuth were

75:31

able to pinpoint the fact that in this

75:33

picture off camera they are standing

75:35

right next to the temple,

75:38

the famous Epstein island temple. And so

75:41

the DOJ tried to take this down in the

75:43

middle of all this Iran hysteria by the

75:45

way, like right in the buildup to it.

75:47

And luckily Jmail existed and still had

75:49

it. But they are going to continue to do

75:51

this just like the FBI opened a file on

75:53

Epstein in 1991 and closed it in 1993.

75:56

We found that out from the files, right?

75:59

Conveniently, when Bill Clinton got into

76:01

office, by the way, and then never

76:03

opened a case on him for another 12

76:06

years when he was finally investigated.

76:09

They do all this right in front of you

76:11

and they're going to continue to do it

76:13

if you accept it and allow it to happen.

76:17

I will not, but I'm one [ __ ] pebble

76:20

on the water out here in YouTube. I can

76:24

control what I can control, but that

76:26

ain't much. It's going to require

76:27

everyone else out there taking part in

76:30

in not letting something like this die

76:32

and and continuing to report on the

76:34

information as we get it, which comes

76:35

out like a log flume every day, even

76:37

though we we're still missing so many

76:39

documents that they haven't released

76:41

illegally.

76:43

And even though many things are still

76:44

redacted illegally, including stuff that

76:46

is beyond what Roana was able to confirm

76:48

publicly was redacted when he listed

76:51

some of the names like we still have a

76:54

treasure trove worth of information to

76:56

piece together and put together with

76:58

what we have been giving and we have to

77:00

continue to do that. So there are some

77:02

people doing amazing amazing work on

77:04

Twitter and I'm following a lot of it. I

77:08

am going to be having Henry Abbott in

77:09

here. By the way, before I get to this

77:10

next point, I want to say this. Henry

77:12

Abbott is the guy that I've shouted out

77:14

many times on the show for years who is

77:16

an MBA reporter who basically fell down

77:20

a rabbit hole back in 2021 when he just

77:23

wanted to investigate the links between

77:25

Apollo Global who owned had part of the

77:28

ownership of like two or three different

77:29

NBA franchises at the time and their

77:32

connections to Jeffrey Epstein. It

77:34

turned into this 21 chapter Odyssey on

77:37

his on his blog True Hoop that

77:43

effectively laid out the ties of Epstein

77:45

going all the way back to the [ __ ]

77:47

Treaty of Versailles. And I've cited the

77:49

work so many times over the years

77:51

because it's incredible. But Henry

77:52

finally actually heard it on the podcast

77:54

with John Curyaku and was really

77:56

excited. So I finally got to talk with

77:58

him. Great guy. he's going to be coming

78:00

on and we will discuss all that work and

78:03

try to open up some loops so that you

78:04

guys out there can work with the

78:06

information that he's put together

78:08

because he also told me this. I hope

78:11

he's okay with me saying this, but he's

78:13

going back to the case. Look at some

78:16

stuff. So,

78:17

>> let's go.

78:18

>> Yeah, he just went right the dude

78:19

basically like hit a walk-off home run

78:21

with the Epstein thing and then went

78:23

back to reporting about the NBA.

78:24

>> He's just like cracking his fingers like

78:27

[ __ ] we got work to do. Yeah, here we

78:29

go. Here we go again.

78:30

>> Here we go again.

78:33

>> But that's that's going to be cool. I'm

78:35

very much looking forward to it. But let

78:36

let's

78:37

>> let's get to this Iran war. That is the

78:41

word our president is using and what's

78:43

going on here because once again,

78:47

this is a prime example of many things

78:49

being true at the same time. Now, you

78:52

guys have heard me talk about

78:55

how much I really do take it seriously

78:58

to be as journalistically balanced as

79:02

possible. We obviously represent all

79:04

viewpoints in this studio. There's no

79:06

greater example than literally having

79:08

Roya Hakian backtoback with Ian Carol in

79:12

episodes 307 and 308. You got the very

79:14

pro-Israel and very against Israel back

79:17

toback. Like, that is how I do my show

79:19

as best I can. I'm not perfect, but I do

79:22

take that part seriously and I will

79:24

continue to do that. There is a picture

79:27

though in my studio up there. If you can

79:28

hit camera five for a second, th I don't

79:30

know if people can see it,

79:32

>> but it's up if you're looking at me on C

79:34

Oh, camera five's off. Okay.

79:36

>> Well, there's a picture up there behind

79:39

me that was in my very first studio, my

79:42

parents house as well, that shows a

79:44

picture of Walter Kronite. And by the

79:47

way, Walter Kronhite took a [ __ ]

79:48

drive by hit in the Epstein files.

79:50

There's a picture of of him talking with

79:52

Jeffrey Epste, which was really sad, but

79:53

he was old. There's no there's no

79:55

there's no emails regarding him or

79:57

anything like that. So, we're going to

79:58

hope everything's okay there. That said,

80:01

Walter Kronite, for people who don't

80:03

know, is the most famous newscaster to

80:05

ever live. He is the man who famously

80:07

delivered the glasses off remark with

80:11

the broken voice. President Kennedy has

80:14

died. and, you know, told the world that

80:18

the president had been assassinated

80:20

officially back in 1963. But there was

80:23

actually something I learned about in

80:24

history class, I think in high school,

80:27

might have been middle school, but was

80:29

definitely by high school that always

80:31

stuck with me about a very difficult

80:34

decision that Kronhite made. And that

80:37

was as he was reporting on the Vietnam

80:40

War, eventually he started going over to

80:42

Vietnam and he saw the war for what it

80:44

was, a farce. and a catastrophe with

80:47

corruption and all kinds of problems and

80:49

an unjust war. And the evidence mounted

80:53

so significantly that it got to a point

80:56

to where he said there's no case for the

80:59

other side. It's it's gone. This is what

81:03

it is. And I don't even think he got to

81:04

the whole fact that the Gulf of Tonkan

81:06

was a false flag. He didn't even know

81:07

that. I'm pretty sure at the time. But

81:10

everything else he could see what it

81:12

was. And he made a very difficult

81:14

decision that I think about a lot. And

81:17

that is as a man who had been purely the

81:20

news literally in just a great voice and

81:23

delivery deliver what had happened that

81:25

day without any words or inter or

81:28

interjection of opinions. This is a man

81:30

who was around for the dawn of news on

81:32

TV when there were two or three [ __ ]

81:34

channels. He made a decision on his

81:37

reports from Vietnam to begin actually

81:42

with evidence

81:45

clearly interjecting some sort of

81:47

opinion, if you will, based on that

81:49

evidence that the war was unjust and

81:51

wrong. And he helped get that story to

81:54

the American people who already had a

81:56

huge problem with the war, but to get it

81:59

over the top eventually such that the

82:01

war finally ended. And I think about

82:04

this a lot because he made a very

82:06

difficult slippery slope decision that I

82:08

believe was the right decision, but it

82:10

opened the door for things like 20 plus

82:12

years later CNN and Fox and things that

82:16

call themselves news, but are really

82:18

just narrative driven [ __ ]

82:22

It allowed them to be born and hide

82:25

behind the word news while having clear

82:27

opinions that brainwash the American

82:29

people and out of the direction. And so

82:32

I've always thought about that a lot.

82:34

And I knew at some point in my career,

82:41

there could be a moment, not as dramatic

82:42

as [ __ ] Walter Kronhite being on the

82:44

ground in Vietnam. Let's not, you know,

82:46

have delusions of grander here, but

82:48

there could be some moments where

82:50

certain stories get to a point to where

82:51

you have to say things based on evidence

82:54

that are clearly reality regardless of

82:56

where that lands. And people are going

82:58

to take it how they take it. And so I

83:00

will refer to the Secretary of State

83:02

Marco Rubio, the Speaker of the House,

83:05

Mike Johnson, and the President of the

83:07

United States, Donald Trump. In

83:09

particular, the first two though

83:10

explicitly. The third one, Donald Trump

83:13

a little more implicitly, but that's

83:15

being nice. It was pretty much explicit

83:17

saying this week that the reason the

83:20

United States attacked Iran is because

83:22

Israel had told them, "We are going in

83:25

first to attack. [ __ ] you. We're doing

83:28

it." which was going to put a bullseye

83:30

on United States bases and therefore our

83:33

troops and our assets and the United

83:35

States therefore felt forced to attack.

83:39

I say that because the evidence is clear

83:42

and it's always been clear that this is

83:45

Israel's war. This is not our own war.

83:49

There is no good evidence to the

83:51

contrary.

83:53

take people like Benjamin Netanyahu at

83:57

their word. Benjamin Netanyahu has been

84:01

bloodthirstily

84:03

yearning for this direct quote on the

84:05

yearning part. He didn't say

84:06

bloodthirsty, but he said yearning for

84:08

over 40 years.

84:12

He has wanted to invade Iran for over 40

84:14

years. You can run the tape of him

84:15

saying Iran is a year or a week away

84:17

from a nuclear bomb for the last 30 plus

84:19

years. You can run the tape of him

84:21

testifying in 2002 that says, "You must

84:23

attack Iraq and then you must attack

84:25

Iran. They are developing nuclear

84:28

weapons and they will be a threat to

84:29

America and the world order moving

84:31

forward."

84:34

He's been saying this forever.

84:37

And he told our president, "Fuck you.

84:40

We're going."

84:43

He told him that

84:45

at the same time that our president and

84:48

everyone, let's not just let's not

84:50

single out Trump here. We've been

84:51

listing off a bunch of people over the

84:52

past several weeks are facing the most

84:55

existential crisis of the elite class in

84:58

the history of probably America with

85:00

these Epstein files

85:02

which implicate Israel. They certainly

85:04

implicate the CIA as well to be clear.

85:06

But Jeffrey Epstein was working with

85:08

MSAD and he was working with them in a

85:12

dominant capacity. I will say that I

85:15

still believe that in the evidence that

85:16

he was most dominantly working with MSAD

85:20

over CIA. It's very clear he was working

85:22

with CIA. It's very clear that that may

85:24

go back longer than I first thought for

85:28

sure and we will continue to investigate

85:30

all those loops. But this is a man who

85:32

was born in America, rose up in a very

85:35

weird version of the American dream,

85:37

certainly on a lot of things sus

85:39

suspiciously handed to him in this

85:40

country

85:42

and worked against its interests with a

85:45

foreign nation that claims at all times

85:47

to be our greatest ally. that pays 93 of

85:49

our 100 senators lobbying money to say

85:52

those exact words, sends them over to

85:54

[ __ ] Israel to talk about how we need

85:57

to protect our greatest ally at all

85:58

[ __ ] costs, and goes to primary

86:01

people like Thomas Massie when they dare

86:03

step out of line and say otherwise.

86:05

They've done it again and again and

86:07

again. Of course, I'm talking about

86:08

Apac. There's also the Republican Jewish

86:10

Coalition. And I say that because all of

86:12

these organizations unfortunately

86:15

give an awful name, an unfair name to

86:20

all Jewish people around the world. You

86:23

have a radical section of them that I

86:26

will refer to as like the Zionist

86:28

Israeli government and their Zionist

86:30

supporters around the world which in

86:33

some cases are Christians in other cases

86:35

are Jewish people that then speak for

86:38

the entire diaspora which is completely

86:41

unfair

86:42

and the madman campaign

86:47

that they have led into this war is

86:50

disgusting. Now, I said there's multiple

86:53

thoughts to be held at the same time

86:55

here, so we're going to hold them. I

86:57

will not shed a tear over Ayat Kame

87:00

being dead. This was an awful man. Iran

87:03

is a nation of approximately 92 million

87:05

people. They have lived under an iron

87:07

fist for the last 47 years.

87:10

They have been tortured, imprisoned, and

87:12

killed by their government, which duped

87:15

them into a revolution in 1979 with

87:17

false promises that they changed on day

87:19

one.

87:21

And the IRGC

87:23

is a horrible organization of people and

87:26

I have said it publicly a million times

87:28

and I will continue to say it.

87:31

I strongly hope the Iranian people rise

87:34

up and take them out of power. Now

87:36

listen to how I said that. That's how

87:37

I've always said it because the reality

87:40

is the world is a very complicated place

87:45

and I feel things very viscerally but

87:48

there are dictators. There are tyrants

87:51

and there are innocent civilians who

87:53

die. It is a horrible thing. That does

87:58

not mean that foreign nations like us,

88:01

the United States,

88:04

are therefore in a position to make

88:06

things better by going in and doing

88:08

regime change.

88:10

Gaddafi was a bad guy in Libya. Look

88:13

what happened when we did that. Saddam

88:16

Hussein was an awful guy in Iraq. I

88:19

would argue ISIS was a lot worse. That's

88:21

what came after.

88:24

Regime changes cause chaos. They ferment

88:26

chaos. And in many ways, that's the

88:28

point. That's what your intelligence

88:30

operations do. That's what the CIA does.

88:32

Let's not single out MSAD here. That's

88:34

what CIA does. That's what MSAD does. At

88:36

the very least, it's what factions of

88:38

them do.

88:43

And we are seeing it play out once

88:44

again. And we are seeing it play out at

88:47

the best of a country that has wanted to

88:49

use us, the Americans on the front lines

88:53

to fight their wars.

88:56

And so I do hope the Iranian people

89:00

overthrow their regime. And I hope it

89:02

happens after we [ __ ] pull our troops

89:04

right the [ __ ] out of there. As of the

89:06

time of this recording, there are six

89:08

confirmed deaths of American soldiers.

89:12

You know how much I care about our

89:14

military, guys. you know how how much

89:16

reverence I treat them with when they

89:17

come in here. I love these guys and I

89:19

will fully admit I take their opinions I

89:22

give their opinions way more leeway than

89:25

anyone else because they've earned it.

89:26

They've done something that I never did.

89:28

They volunteered to go serve their

89:30

country. Many of them obviously who are

89:32

in here fought on the front lines, lost

89:33

friends. These are sacrifices that I

89:37

have never understood and that I hold in

89:39

the utmost highest regard.

89:42

And so when I see some of those guys,

89:44

including kids, there was a 20-year-old

89:46

in there who was killed, killed in a war

89:50

that

89:52

was completely unnecessary,

89:55

started on a lie. They Iran does not

89:57

have nuclear weapons. They're nowhere

89:59

close to it. I'm disgusted by that when

90:02

I see that. Again, I'd love the Iranian

90:05

regime gone. There's a lot of other

90:06

things at play here. They have partnered

90:08

on oil with China and Russia and other

90:11

places. This is literally geographically

90:13

and figuratively the center of the east

90:16

west conflict playing out right here.

90:18

They are now looking at closing the

90:19

straight of Hormos.

90:21

Probably saying that wrong. That you

90:23

know is going to cause massive economic

90:25

implications. By the way, that's why we

90:27

did Venezuela. They were just preparing

90:29

for the oil right there. Funny how we

90:30

invaded Venezuela like two days after

90:32

Netanyahu is hanging out with Trump at

90:34

Mara Lago for New Year's.

90:37

You know,

90:39

>> gas prices are still going up, too.

90:42

>> Yeah. Yeah. And and and Trump was like,

90:44

"It'll be worth it to protect Israel."

90:46

>> Listen, to see something from Israel's

90:48

perspective, yes, Iran is in some ways a

90:53

a serious serious threat to them.

90:58

They are not to the United States.

91:01

Okay? We we've seen it again and again.

91:03

paper tiger.

91:05

They come out, they say death to

91:07

America, death to Israel. They do all

91:09

this stuff and then when we hit him with

91:10

anything, they don't do [ __ ] all about

91:12

it.

91:13

Okay, we've seen it. I mean, look at

91:16

January 2020. We took out Kasim

91:18

Solommani. I remember getting reports

91:21

behind the scenes about how up in arms

91:23

people in the White House were that

91:24

Trump did that. They thought it was so

91:26

careless.

91:27

And the Iranians blinked. They bombed a

91:29

US base or something. I don't even

91:31

remember if we lost any people. No, I'm

91:33

pretty sure they they bomb.

91:34

>> Check that. I don't want to mess that

91:36

up, but you get the point. They ain't

91:40

like that, bro.

91:42

And so

91:46

the thing about Iran

91:50

is that they're an enemy. They're

91:53

horrible people, but they tell you

91:57

they're your enemy.

91:59

They They don't hide it. They stand

92:01

right outside your house. Not literally,

92:03

they stand across the world looking at

92:05

your house on a [ __ ] screen and do

92:08

their propaganda and say death to

92:10

America. And I can appreciate that. I

92:13

know where they stand. Not excusing it.

92:15

Think it's horrible. I know where they

92:17

stand.

92:18

They're a wolf. A wolf that don't got a

92:21

lot of bite when it comes to us, but

92:22

they're a wolf.

92:24

On the contrary,

92:27

when I see a country force all of our

92:28

politicians to give hostage videos

92:30

basically to say how much they love it

92:32

and that they're their greatest ally,

92:35

continually forcing us into wars that

92:37

are not in our interest and costing our

92:40

guys' lives at their behest and

92:44

blackmailing our people with things like

92:45

the Epstein files, which also again

92:48

CIA's got blame in that too. Let's not

92:50

just point the finger at Israel. But

92:52

when I see that, that to me is a wolf in

92:56

sheep's clothing. They come to you and

92:58

they tell you you're their friend. They

93:00

walk in your front door. They eat dinner

93:01

with you. Maybe they sit on your lap and

93:04

let you pet them. They tell you it was a

93:07

great meal. And then when they need to

93:11

eat you, they eat you.

93:13

And I'm seeing way too many patterns

93:15

with that with the Israeli government.

93:16

And I will say it that way. It's the

93:17

Israeli government. I will never

93:19

collectively hold people responsible for

93:21

that. That's not what it is. We know a

93:24

lot of the people in Israel don't

93:25

support Netanyahu's government and that

93:27

those are the hardliners. Those are the

93:28

greater Israel people. But to see this

93:31

play out as it is, you have to realize

93:35

the world is based on power dynamics.

93:38

All right. Iran,

93:40

they ain't like that economically. I

93:44

mean, we shut him off from the world.

93:45

Scott Bent bragged about all, you know,

93:47

Treasury Secretary bragged about all the

93:49

new sanctions he put on him a few months

93:50

ago or whatever it was, which forced the

93:53

economy into turmoil. He bragged about

93:55

sending their currency to basically

93:57

zero, put the people in the streets, and

93:58

then the regime, which is tyrannical,

94:00

killed all the people. The regime

94:02

deserves no exoneration for that to be

94:05

clear, but also like who's causing that

94:06

and laughing about it.

94:09

Does that sound like we're the good guys

94:11

there? It it doesn't to me.

94:14

>> No.

94:17

So

94:18

you need to realize something like this

94:21

has massive implications. Iran does not

94:23

have nukes. Israel does.

94:26

They're of course the only country that

94:28

doesn't admit it.

94:31

Used it used our stuff to get it in the

94:33

60s. Verified new. Look it up.

94:38

But I don't appreciate the sheep

94:41

clothing on the wolf.

94:43

And there needs to be a serious

94:45

conversation

94:47

about

94:48

the hijacking that the Israeli

94:51

government is doing

94:53

of not just our decision-m here, but of

94:56

the Jewish people around the world

94:59

because I I it makes me sick how

95:01

uncomfortable it's getting for many of

95:03

them. And I do not stand for that at

95:05

all. And I will call that out. But I got

95:08

no love for the Israeli government. And

95:10

there is every piece of evidence to see

95:12

that. Look no further than the fact that

95:15

this was reported, I believe, in Israeli

95:17

outlets, American outlets. You know,

95:19

obviously there's fog of war stuff, but

95:22

the Israelis were spying on the Trump

95:24

administration's communications with

95:26

Iran where they're trying to talk about

95:28

peace and Netanyahu called Trump

95:31

reportedly to make sure he didn't

95:34

negotiate peace.

95:38

[ __ ] you.

95:43

I'm not suicidal. I never have been. I

95:45

love my life.

95:48

Things are going great.

95:51

I hope this war ends peacefully for all

95:53

parties involved, including Israel. And

95:54

I hope it ends quickly. And I hope new

95:56

leadership can come in there because I

95:58

know a lot of their people want it. And

95:59

I will support the Israeli people in

96:01

getting new new leadership over there

96:03

for sure. But it's on you guys. Just

96:05

like it's on the people of Iran to

96:07

overthrow your government, it's on the

96:09

Israeli people to look at doing that,

96:11

too.

96:13

We'll close it there and I'll see you

96:14

guys next week.

Interactive Summary

This video discusses the ongoing geopolitical tensions, particularly focusing on the Iran conflict, and connects it to the Jeffrey Epstein case and broader societal patterns. It delves into the 'Fourth Turning' theory, a generational cycle of societal upheaval, and argues that current events align with this framework. The discussion highlights the alleged manipulation by the Israeli government, the role of powerful elites, and the media's potential to distract from significant issues like the Epstein files. The video also touches upon the testimonies and legal proceedings related to the Epstein case, including the depositions of Bill and Hillary Clinton, and examines the suspicious deaths of individuals connected to the case. Finally, it critiques the media's role in shaping narratives and calls for transparency and critical thinking amidst global instability.

Suggested questions

5 ready-made prompts