HomeVideos

Anya Parampil : Is the United States taking care of Venezuela?

Now Playing

Anya Parampil : Is the United States taking care of Venezuela?

Transcript

119 segments

0:00

can also see if you look carefully to

0:03

the right of that epicenter is

0:04

>> Karacus.

0:06

>> Uh you can see it if you look carefully

0:08

that of course uh is the uh is the

0:11

capital. So after

0:14

uh the United States kidnapped President

0:16

Maduro and his wife from their bedroom

0:19

in the middle of the night. This is

0:21

months ago. This is January now. They

0:23

still didn't lift the sanctions. They

0:26

have uh lifted some specialized

0:30

sanctions to allow for business

0:32

contracts and oil deals the way the US

0:35

government sees fit. But there wasn't a

0:36

blanket lifting of sanctions. No. On top

0:38

of that, there are billions of dollars,

0:41

I think roughly $30 billion of just

0:43

Venezuelan assets frozen in accounts in

0:47

the United States and abroad that we've

0:50

basically stolen since recognizing a

0:52

shadow government there that we haven't

0:54

given back. to the government. The IMF

0:57

has announced a plan to release some

1:00

frozen Venezuelan assets in order to go

1:03

toward disaster relief. You can assume

1:06

that that I mean with the history of uh

1:08

foreign aid groups in Venezuela, it it

1:11

is usually a pretty corrupt game. Uh and

1:14

that's just I think what we could expect

1:16

to come uh from uh the contracts that

1:20

the US is dictating are going to be

1:22

going to the the players in the United

1:24

States that that our government would

1:26

like to see happen. You have already an

1:28

expose at the gray zone recently

1:30

published by my husband where we

1:32

discussed how Mauricio Clav Corrone, a

1:35

figure who's not even in the Trump

1:37

administration, is pretty much acting as

1:40

a private business negotiator, what he

1:42

just calls himself the Jared Kushner of

1:44

Latin America, pretty much cutting these

1:45

deals. I'm sure he's going to step in

1:47

and have a big role to play in this kind

1:50

of a aid response. I if if the US and

1:54

its allies are going to be managing it

1:56

and releasing assets under the

1:58

>> I would argue that uh a sanction

2:02

that prevents a country from buying

2:04

lifesaving equipment is a war crime. I

2:07

mean it's a little late to buy trucks

2:08

and bulldozers now 3 days after the

2:11

earthquake hit. They should have existed

2:14

and been possessed by the government

2:16

before that. According to President

2:17

Trump, the United States was going to

2:20

take care of Venezuela after we

2:22

kidnapped its president.

2:25

>> And in some ways, I would say that we

2:27

are in the in and and not in a way that

2:29

the Venezuelan people have a necessarily

2:32

a say in. uh and that is now we're

2:36

seeing the US consolidating the advances

2:38

its own military has made in terms of

2:40

its presence in Venezuela since Maduro

2:43

was ousted on January 23rd. Southcom and

2:46

US military forces have announced that

2:48

they will be leading the aid response on

2:52

the ground in Venezuela. So what you

2:54

have is a de facto collapse of the

2:56

state. The state is unable to respond to

2:59

the crisis because it's paralyzed,

3:01

because it doesn't even have control of

3:03

its international assets, hasn't been

3:05

allowed to buy proper machinery and

3:07

equipment. And now the US military comes

3:10

in and sets up its aid and distribution.

3:12

It's it's a de facto regime change on on

3:16

the basis of a shista government in

3:19

power. And what we have to remember,

3:22

judge, is that this line was already

3:24

crossed following the ouster of Maduro

3:27

in on January 3rd. Since then, the

3:30

United States conducted a US military

3:33

strike on sovereign Venezuelan

3:35

territory, killing Nino Guerrero, the

3:38

man that they claim as head of this

3:39

group, Trend Aragua, which you've

3:41

covered, we've discussed on this show,

3:43

was a USbacked group that wasn't really

3:45

functioning as a legitimate narco group,

3:48

but for some reason became the the

3:50

favored bogeyman of the Trump

3:51

administration and Marco Marco Rubio in

3:54

order to justify continued intervention

3:56

in Venezuela and bombings off the coast

3:58

of Venezuela. that led up to Maduro's

4:01

arrest. And so now the US having

4:04

conducted that strike already clearly a

4:07

flagrant violation of Venezuelan

4:08

sovereignty is using this earthquake to

4:13

increase its presence in Venezuela. And

4:16

this is happening at a time, as you

4:18

mentioned, when neighboring countries

4:20

are also suddenly changing course from

4:23

acting as independent

4:26

uh Latin American nations to saying,

4:30

"Look, we're just going to have our our

4:33

our policies uh dictated by the State

4:36

Department." And I'm talking about

4:37

Colombia. I'm talking about Ecuador.

4:40

These are countries, Ecuador as well,

4:42

that have already begun uh coordinating

4:44

with US military operations on their own

4:46

territory. So, this is something that is

4:48

set, I think, to expand in the region

4:50

beyond Venezuela's borders, perhaps even

4:53

all the way up to Mexico.

Interactive Summary

The video discusses the United States' continued influence and intervention in Venezuela following the ouster and kidnapping of President Maduro. The speaker argues that US sanctions have crippled the Venezuelan government's ability to respond to disasters, as billions in assets remain frozen, while the US military steps in to manage aid distribution, which is described as a de facto regime change. Furthermore, the discussion touches on how the US is pressuring neighboring Latin American countries to align their policies with the State Department.

Suggested questions

3 ready-made prompts