Essentials: Optimize Your Exercise Program with Science-Based Tools | Jeff Cavaliere
1027 segments
Welcome to Huberman Lab Essentials,
where we revisit past episodes for the
most potent and actionable science-based
tools for mental health, physical
health, and performance.
I'm Andrew Huberman and I'm a professor
of neurobiology and opthalmology at
Stanford School of Medicine. And now for
my discussion with Jeff Cavalier. Jeff,
such a pleasure for me to have you here.
>> I'm glad to be here. It's amazing.
>> I'm a longtime consumer of your content.
I've learned a tremendous amount about
fitness, both in the weight room,
cardio, nutrition, things that I've
applied for over a decade. One of your
mantras is uh you know, if you want to
look like an athlete, train like an
athlete. And I think that's something
really special that sets aside what you
do from what a lot of other um very
well-qualified people do. What's the
sort of contour of a basic program that
anybody could think about as a starting
place? I I think it's like a 6040 split
which would be leaning towards uh weight
training you know strength and and and
uh and then you know the conditioning
aspect be about 40%. So if you look at
it over the course of a training week, I
mean five days in a gym would be a great
task. And obviously not in the gym, it
could be done at home, but three days
strength training Monday, Wednesday,
Friday, conditioning, Tuesday, Thursday,
you know, two days. It's a it's a pretty
easy roundabout way to split that up. Of
course, depending upon training goals
and as you said, the aesthetic goals
like that will shift dramatically. But
if you want to see the benefits of both,
that's probably the the effective dose
for strength training and the effective
dose for conditioning at the bare
minimum level. If we try to keep our
workouts to an hour or less, if
possible, now depending upon the split
that you're following, if you're on a
total body split, there's just going to
be more that has to be done in a given
amount of time. But in general, when
you're not focused on that one aspect,
but the overall health picture, then you
can get the job done in in under in
under an hour. And again, I always say
on top of if if you want to look like an
athlete, train like an athlete, is you
can either train long or you can train
hard, but you can't do both. As you
start to get older, it's the length of
the workout that actually causes more
problems than the intensity of what
you're doing. Particularly if you're
warmed up properly, like you said, I
found personally that my warm-up has had
to become more of an integral part of my
my workout than it ever has before. In
terms of splits, you mentioned splits.
And so for those who aren't familiar
with this uh term splits, it's really uh
which body parts are you training on
which days. I've seen you discuss, you
know, three days a week, whole body
workouts. I've heard of splits like a
pushing one day, uh pulling another day,
legs another day, a day off, repeat. I
mean, there's so many variations on
this. What's governing the the split? Uh
>> for me, the first rule is will you stick
to it? I don't particularly like full
body splits. I don't necessarily like to
have to train everything. Now, of
course, the volumes will come down per
muscle group. But if you don't like to
do that and you actually don't look
forward to your workout because you're
dreading having to do everything and
feeling maybe too fatigued by the time
your workout's over or the fact that
those generally do take a little bit
longer and don't fit into your schedule,
I don't care how effective the split is.
A split not done is not effective. So,
you need to find one that fits. So maybe
you go into an alternative option like a
um a push pull legs like you mentioned.
That could be done either one cycle
through the week on a Monday, Wednesday,
Friday split or it could be twice in a
week. So you're actually training six
times, you know, where where you repeat
it. You know, pull push legs, pull push
legs or or you know, uh you know,
however you want to do it with either a
day off in between the three days or at
the end of the six days. Um and again,
that actually impacts your schedule.
I've broken that down before where it's,
you know, if you put it in between the
three days, it's good because you're
giving yourself an extra rest day in
between, but it starts to shift that day
off every week as we wrap around. So,
for those guys that were choosing that
seven-day schedule out of convenience in
our heads, you know, it starts to mess
with that off day. So, others like to
just keep it predictably, let's say on a
Sunday and train six days in a row. Um,
but that's a but that's a a better way
to maybe group similar muscle actions
together, which I think I I definitely
prefer that because if I'm going to be
training, you know, pulling movements,
at least there there's a synergy between
them and I feel like I'm looking to
achieve one goal that day. Um, and then
I mean quite honestly, you can go back
to the bros split days and those those
still work effectively. There's a reason
why they worked in the past. Like I
think that science shows that there's
smarter ways to do them these days. Like
you can you can come back and hit a
related muscle. So you could do let's
say biceps on one day and then come back
two days later and do back realizing
again synergy between the the exercises
there. Your biceps are going to get
reimulated again. So you could figure
out ways to make that work. But the
thing that I think is is effective there
is that tends to be one of the ones that
people like the most because they can go
in, they get their pump, they feel good
that it's it's pretty solely focused on
one muscle group.
>> Is that the definition of a bro split?
One
>> one muscle group a day. Yeah.
>> I see. So it's very much geared towards
strength and aesthetics. Really
maximizing chest.
>> Probably probably more more aesthetics
than strength. Yeah. in terms of the
mixing up of cardiovascular training and
resistance training. Um, same day,
different day, which one should come
first, which one should come second? So,
again, I I I think that the, you know,
the bare minimum is probably twice a
week in terms of cardiovascular if you
want to have some semblance of
cardiovascular conditioning, but I think
most people who actually need it more or
want to pursue it more than that are
going to need more time to do that. So,
um, at some point it can't just be
relegated to a day off or a day off from
the from the weight training workouts.
So, at some point it has to occur on the
same day, you know, and in that case I
just like to put it at the end of the
workout because you don't want to in any
way compromise the weight training
workout. The intensity of those workouts
is important. I just like to, you know,
put that at at the end realizing that
even if my effort level is lower or my
output is lower, if it's still placing a
demand on my cardiac output to get that
conditioning effect because I'm
fatigued, it still has a demand on my
cardiac output. So, it's still achieving
its goal, but it didn't interfere with
my main goal of being able to increase
my performance in the gym. And in terms
of the form of cardiovascular training,
I've seen you um do a number of I have
to say very impressive high-intensity
interval type work rather than uh on the
treadmill or out jogging for 30 45
minutes. Is that because you prefer
higher intensity um higher heart rate
type um training? If if we could blend
function across these realms and not
have such a delineation between this is
my weight training and this is my
conditioning but figure out a way to to
blend them together. I always think that
you've get you've got a better
opportunity to get that more
well-rounded result. And I like to kind
of mix up that straight conditioning
work and also some of the footwork, you
know, drills. Like we have we we have
some high expectations for guys that
come into our programs like to just do
some footwork drills
>> like ladders
>> like ladders or or line drills or
something and you know what happens
people become intrigued and interested
like I never I haven't tried this since
uh high school you know and they become
interested in just the challenge of it
and as we become almost distracted by
the challenge we're now like finding
ourselves conditioning you know and and
I always think that's an important part
that sometimes you got to draw people in
um to get to show them what they might
be interested in and from the output or
the effect of it. I just think that when
you're able to blend some of some, you
know, still maintain some of that
strength training into the exercise. So,
as you mentioned, let's say I'm doing
some kind of a push-up or a burpee. I
mean, there is there is a um an anorobic
component to that that is going to be
helpful um that then rather than just
walking or just jogging. Um not to not
to say that that isn't an effective
means for strict cardiac conditioning.
It's a it's one of the ways that we've
had for, you know, centuries, you know,
to do it. But I just think that if we
can blend it, then it becomes maybe a
little bit more interesting and you get
some of those crossover benefits and it
doesn't become so segmented in terms of
what we're trying to do. One of the most
important things I learned from you so
over the years was that if you can flex
your bicep to the point where it hurts a
little bit, like it almost feels like a
cramp or a cramp, or you can flex your
calf to the point where it really cramps
up a little bit, almost feels like it's
nodding up, that's a pretty good
indication that you're going to be able
to stimulate that muscle well under load
if you're doing the movement properly.
How did you arrive at this kind of cramp
test, the cavalier test as I'll call it?
during my workouts, even as a as a young
kid just starting out, I wanted to know
what was supposed to be doing the work.
Once you do that and you start to seek
that out and say, "Okay, well, if the
bicep is what's supposed to be doing the
work, then I want to make sure the
biceps doing the work, right?" So, I
would seek out ways to make that happen
better. And when I was able to do that,
I could feel the stronger contraction. I
was no visionary. I just felt like I I
knew that that was going to be better
for me if the muscle I was trying to
grow was being stressed more. When I was
attempting to do this across different
exercises, I would notice that what I
could do potentially on a curl where my
arm is up, you know, where you asking me
to flex my bicep, that position I
couldn't do if I was, you know, doing a
concentration curl or I couldn't carry
over to a cable curl. And that shouldn't
really change, right? Because the
function is still largely the same.
there's still elbow flexion, there's
still supernation. Like, why am I not
able to do it there? And that's when it
sort of clued into me that like your
mind muscle connection on not just your
mind with one muscle, but on every
exercise matters and it varies from
exercise to exercise. There's a term I
like to call muscularity, you know,
which is a difference, right? It's the
level of sort of resting tone in the
muscle that improves dramatically. You
know, if you can learn how to just start
to engage that muscle better, the
muscularity, the the resting tone of
that muscle is harder. It's more alive.
It's all driven from being able to
connect better neurologically with the
muscle that you're trying to train. When
you're trying to go and create muscle
hypertrophy or even this muscularity
that I talk about, you need to seek ways
to make it feel more uncomfortable,
right? If you don't feel the discomfort,
then you're doing something wrong. And
uh I struggle to this day on certain
muscle groups to still do that even
knowing what I'm trying to work. It's
very difficult for some muscles and for
certain people to do this on certain
muscles. But as you mentioned, practice
does help. And the more you become, you
know, consistent and deliberate with
what you're trying to do, the more of an
of a result you actually get. How do you
assess recovery at the local level,
meaning at the level of the muscles? So
we'll talk about soreness and getting
better, stronger, more repetitions, etc.
And then at the systemic level, at the
level of the nervous system,
>> different muscles recover at different
rates. You may have a bicep that's able
to be trained that can be trained again
the next day, you know, and then the
next day and then maybe you need a day
off after that. That can vary from
person to person for sure and it can
vary from muscle to muscle in that
person over the course of time as you
mentioned because the systemic recovery
is going to impact all those muscles
anyway. But let's say you're
systemically recovering, every muscle
itself is going to have a recovery rate.
And I think that using muscle soreness
as a guideline for that is is one of the
only tools we have in terms of the local
level. That's the one that most people
can relate to and easily identify and
then use that as a guideline. And if
you're training when you're really sore,
um it's probably not a great idea. But
as far as the the uh the systemic, you
know, recovery, grip strength is very
very much tied to performance and
recovery. And when I was at the Mets, we
used to actually take grip strength
measurements as a baseline in spring
training all the time. Now, obviously,
as a baseball player, you're gripping a
bat, your pitcher, you're gripping a
ball. Like, you know, grip having good
grip strength is important. So, if we
notice somebody had a very weak grip,
it's just a good focal point of a
specialized training component for their
>> You do this every day with those guys?
No, we would do in spring training, we
do sort of a baseline entry level
measurement and then we would we would
measure it throughout the season, maybe
once every two weeks or three weeks and
and and you know the idea there was to
measure the recovery. We have found that
with one of those scales, those
old-fashioned bathroom scales, it's a
great tool for just squeezing the the
the uh the scale with your hands and
seeing what type of output you could
get. Imagine the last time you were sick
or when you or just try this, you know,
the next time you wake up in the
morning. When you first wake up in the
morning, you're still groggy. Try to
squeeze your hand. Try to make a fist as
hard as you can. You're going to sit
there angry at your fist because it
won't contract as hard as you know it
can. You don't have the ability to just
create the output. And that is because
in that state, you're still sleepy.
You're still fatigued. You know, you're
you're not even awake at the you know,
the whole level at this point. So, when
you start to measure that on a daily
basis, you can get a pretty good sense
of where you're at. And I think when
people start to see a drop off of 10% or
so or or even greater of of their grip
output, um you really should skip the
gym that day because I don't think
there's much you're going to do there
that's going to be that that beneficial
even if it is the day to train legs or
whatever day it is. I mean there
certainly are more sophisticated tools
too as a as a PT. You know, we have uh
uh hand grip dynamometers. You know, we
can we can measure one side at a time
table, but that comes at a cost. Those
are pretty expensive devices. But if
it's listen, if you were an athlete, you
know, the the 200 300 bucks it cost to
have one of those would be well worth,
you know, the added investment.
>> When's the best time to stretch for
particular types of results? And maybe
you could define some of the different
types of stretching.
>> In general, the two basic forms of
stretching are active stretching and
passive stretching. And your passive
stretching is done with the goal of
trying to create an increase uh in u the
flexibility of the muscle. So whether
you're actually increasing the length of
that muscle, you know, more so what
you're doing is increasing the resist or
decreasing the resistance of that muscle
to want to stay at a certain level of
flexibility. When we can sort of take
the brakes off and allow that muscle to
to allow us more range of motion, we're
inherently increasing flexibility
without necessarily having to increase
the length of that muscle. That is
usually done at a time far away from
your workout because there is a period
of recalibration that is needed after
doing this because you're disrupting the
length tension relationship of the
muscle that causes you to not
necessarily be able to rely on these
I've talked about before stored motor
engrams in your mind in terms of this is
the pattern for how I swing a golf club
say you know and now introducing a
little bit of flexibility or added
flexibility or range because of the
stretch stretching I did before. It
takes maybe a hole or two or three to
match up again. Oh, this is the this is
what he's trying to do. That golf swing
thing that I remembered again. Like it's
not remembering the every component like
I have to bend my right wrist back 10°
and then I have to bend my elbow and I
have to break like your body stores
these patterns for motor efficiency. So,
and when I have to start matching up
that stored pattern with what's feeling
new because of the increased range, I
can impair performance. And again, it
could happen even in a gym workout where
you're talking about your first, second
set, third set, um, where maybe the
repercussions aren't as big because I'll
just do a few extra sets. But in
performance, if you screw up your first
three rounds, you're playing on a PJ
tour and you shoot, you know, you're six
over after three, you're you're you're
done, you know? So we relegate that as I
mentioned sort of towards the end of the
day when it's not going to impact
performance but even maybe have the
additional benefit of creating the the
feeling of length or the increase or
decrease in resistance to this length um
at a time when I know my body is going
to try to tend to heal and heal shorter
never longer but heal shorter. So if I
can introduce a little bit of that extra
uh length or or decrease resistance to
to that length it's a better time to do
it. So I think it promotes a a better
recovery.
>> I'm intrigued by this concept of heal
shorter. So part of the healing and
recovery process means a shortening of
the muscles. This is the tensing up in
sleep. Could you elaborate just a bit on
that?
>> Basically, you know what what's been
shown is that when the the repair
process, muscular repair from, let's
say, strength training during the day,
the repair process usually results in a
muscle that is slightly shorter rather
than increased in length. you know,
muscles prefer to sort of ratchet their
way down into that that uh contraction.
So, when you're sleeping, it it tends to
air on the side of shorter rather than
longer when ideally, we don't really
want that. We want to maintain as much
of that length because with more length,
we actually have more leverage. So,
again, it's just making a a conscious
choice to do it at a time of the day
that makes a little bit more sense.
Dynamic stretching is really not done
for that purpose of trying to create any
type of increasing the the potential
length as you said of the muscle, but
more so the readiness of the muscle to
perform and increasing, you know,
exploring the ends of that range of
motion in a more dynamic way. So you're
not hanging out there and disrupting
that length tension relationship, but
just sort of touching the ends of those
barriers so that when you feel movement
again, it feels looser, it feels more
ready. and and obviously at the same
time warming up, blood flow, all the
benefits we get from just warming up in
general. So like you know that's that's
a series you've probably seen a bunch of
times but like you know leg swings and
butt kicks and you know lunge walking
lunges and those are the drills that
people will do prior to training that
are both excitatory in terms of just the
nervous system but also helpful for just
the general warm-up of the body because
the blood flow but from a muscle
readiness standpoint not impairing the
performance while at the same time
exploring the increased ranges. When I
was working with Antonio Brown, I
remember like he would spend 20 minutes,
30 minutes on all dynamic work. And I've
never seen anybody spend that long on
their dynamic work, but like he said he
just didn't feel right and ready to go
unless he did a lot of that. And I mean,
you know, his his dynamic stretching
routine would be a workout for most
everybody. There's one exercise and one
particular motion that I'd like to um
discuss for a moment because I believe
that learning about this cautionary note
from you is one of the reasons that I've
maintained steady training for 30 years
with no major injury. Uh knock on wood.
Um and that's the upright row. I learned
from you that the upright road
compromises uh some important aspects of
our shoulder mechanics and could be
actually sort of a dangerous movement in
some ways. But so I've always made it a
point now on the basis of of this advice
to really strive for um external
rotation. M
>> please tell us about internal external
rotation. Why this is so important not
just for weight training but as in terms
of posture and mechanics and and not
looking like a a melted candle or
partially melted candle.
>> The shoulder has the most mobility in
the body of any of any joint, but it's
also got the least stability, right?
There's always that trade-off of
mobility and stability. So your
stability comes from, you know, certain
muscle groups. And one of the ones that
the only muscle group that actually
externally rotates the shoulder is going
to be the rotator cuff. Okay? And unless
you are devoted to training through
external rotation and exercises that are
going to externally rotate the shoulder,
you're not training that function. And
it's so easy for us in everyday life,
especially those that aren't training,
to not ever really undergo any of those
stresses that could be beneficial to
counteracting what happens freely and
naturally, which is internal rotation.
So when you think about the imbalance
created just by nature and how we live
our lives, internal rotation far far far
outweighs external rotation. So you need
to address it. And the reason why you
need to address it is because you need
to normalize those biomechanics of the
shoulder if you want their long-term
health. And one of the functions of the
shoulder is to raise our arm up over our
head. And if we do that from an
internally rotated position, we're going
to have a higher likelihood of creating
stress inside that joint. in order to
get normal mechanics and free up the
joint maximally inside, you need to
externally rotate as you raise the arm
up. So, if your muscles aren't firing
and they're not necessarily um as strong
as the internal rotation bias that pulls
them in, you're asking for trouble every
time you do that. Well, this exercise is
literally putting you in elevation in
internal rotation. And if you were to
walk into a PT office and someone said,
"I think he's got an impingement. Will
you diagnose him?" There's a test called
a Hawkins Kennedy test. And I would put
you in the position, I know we're not
visible at this point through the
podcast, but I'll put you in this
position here where I have your arm
elevated and your hand pretty much under
your chin, pushing downward on that to
create that internal shoulder rotation.
Pretty much the exact position that
we're in when we're holding a bar in in
an upright row. Some will say, "Well,
just don't go so high. Go only up to the
level of the chest." But you're still in
this internally rotated position. The
the thing that I think frustrates me the
most about the exercise is that I have
an alternative. And the alternative does
the same thing in terms of helping the
muscles grow by simply fixing the
biomechanics of the exercise, but just
allowing the hands to go higher than the
elbows. So instead of the elbows being
higher than the hand, which drives you
into internal rotation, if the elbow is
lower than the hand, the hand being
higher here, I'm in external rotation.
And I could do something called a high
pull and still get the same abduction of
the arm and still get the same benefits
of the shoulders, the delts, and the
traps without having to undergo any of
the stresses that would come from the
somewhat awkward movement of an upright
row. And people will argue, this is the
way they argue, that I've done this for
30 years and I've never hurt myself. And
I always say yet,
like listen, the goal is to not hurt
yourself ever. So even if you it's sort
of like you know the championship game
you know you might play the game of your
life but if you lose you lost and when
you get into the end of the you know the
record books you still lost. So even if
you had the game in your life you lost I
don't care if you do it for 30 years no
pain you're still doing it and there's
no pain. I'm giving you an option that's
going to give you the same results in
the exercise that you're seeking. That's
why you're doing the exercise without
the the possibility of having the you
know the bad outcome come from it. The
body is like a mirror image. The hip is
like the shoulder, right? The ankle is
the wrist. The foot is the hand. Like
they're they they fun. The knee is the
elbow. They're two hinge joints. They
function that way. Well, with the
shoulder, you've got that mobility that
comes from having all that freedom of
motion, but the stability is lacking.
Well, the same thing with the hip. like
you've got mobility, but if you don't
fully stabilize it by training all the
muscles of the hip and if you don't
strengthen the external rotation of the
hip, then you know you've you're you're
going to have issues like it's not
biomechanically going to work the same
way. If you think of the body as a
series of, you know, bands, you know,
pulling in different directions at
different levels of tension, you know,
you're being pulled into one direction
or the other just by the balance of
tension from one weak area to one
dominantly tight area. And you need to
make sure that you can sort of balance
this out in order to eliminate some of
the adaptations and compensations that
happen. One of the great uh tools that I
I picked up from your content which has
benefited uh I know a huge number of
people is I think I used to hold uh
weights sometimes in the in the tips of
my fingers as opposed to in the meat of
the palm of my hands and I had elbow
pain. Turns out toward the end of my
pull-ups or my bicep work I was letting
the weight or the bar drift into my
fingertips. and the mere um shift to
making sure that my knuckles were well
over the bar or that the weight was
really in the meat of my palms has
completely ameliated that for reasons
that you point out and maybe you could
just share with us why that is. When you
grip a bar, whether it be through a curl
or whether it be and this is mostly
pulling exercises because the tendency
for the bar is going to be to fall out
of your hand, not like with a pushing
exercise where it's kind of you you're
pushing your hand into the bar. So on a
bench press say um that bar can drift
just by gravity doing doing its thing or
fatigue of the the hand grip strength
can start to drift further away towards
the the distal digits right through
those through those last couple knuckles
that we have on our hands though our
hand can still hold it there the muscles
are not equipped to handle those types
of loads and it could start at dumbbell
weight you know 40 lb 30 lb you know
even 25 pounds for some depending upon
their overall strength levels. But then
when you start to apply it to something
like your body weight with a chin up,
right? Because that's natural for the
bar to somewhat kind of float down
towards your fingertips. And it actually
is a little bit easier to perform the
exercise with that sort of like false
grip, like a little hook grip at the end
because you're not going to engage the
forearms into the exercise. You're not
going to start pulling down.
But at the same time, while it could
help you to perform them better by
getting the back more activated, if you
have weakness in these muscles, because
it's not it's not a thing that happens
to every this not one of those upright
row type things where I think this is h
happening to everybody. This is
happening to people that have these
inherent weaknesses in in the these
muscles. You or or haven't done enough
of the gripping in the for in the meat
of the hand, you know, for long enough.
But it starts to put that stress on
these muscles that are illquipped to do
this and it to handle this and it starts
to particularly on that fourth finger
you know which is part of the muscle we
call the FDS of flexor digitorum that is
just too much for it to handle and that
comes all the way down and meets right
at the medial elbow right on that spot
that you can say feels like someone's
knifing you right in the middle in that
medal elbow and and medial epicondilitis
or they call it golfer's elbow is
something that a lot of us deal with in
in the gym. It's one of the most common
inflammatory conditions people get from
the gym. And it all comes from this
positioning of the dumbbell or barbell
or hand on a pull-up bar over time. So,
the easiest thing to do is just grip
deeper so that what you're doing is
you're using, you know, more leverage
from the palm to encapsulate the bar or
the dumbbell or whatever. and you're not
putting that pressure really distally
right on that last digit because that's
where the that FDS muscle is most
strained. So you you're just almost
eliminating that from the equation. and
and and it's one of those exercises that
the load can exceed its capacity pretty
quickly. So that like, you know, maybe
it's only capable of handling 30 lb and
then when you're doing a chin-up and it
goes and it drifts so far that it's now
you, let's say you're a 200lb guy,
you've got, let's say, 100 lb through
one arm and 100 lb. This is simple
simplified math that obviously is offset
by other muscles, but 100 lb through one
arm, 100 lbs to the other. 100 lbs off
of a muscle that can handle 30, it's not
going to take many repetitions to strain
it. and you're going to feel that maybe
by the time that sets over or certainly
by the time that workout's over or the
next day you wake up and you've got that
notable stabbing pain. Whenever someone
feels that, the best thing would be to
determine, okay, what exercises would I
do that were pulling and where the bar
could have drifted deeper into further
from the meat of my palm into my fingers
and figure out a way to deepen that
grip. When that happens though, the best
thing to do with most of these
inflammatory conditions is not do any of
that stuff for a little while. There's
so many other options that you can do
that will train similar muscles or even
the same motion and not cause that
stress. So, I mean, a cable curl would
be much easier to do that on than, let's
say, a chin-up where you don't have the
control over the weight like you do by
moving a pin on a stack. I do have a
question about precision of
recordkeeping. Do you keep a training
journal? Uh, do you recommend people
keep training journals? I think that
anything you can do to increase your
awareness of your performance and also
give yourself some objective goal.
Whenever we have an objective goal, it's
a lot easier to actually obtain it. When
you're just there to get a pump and
you're just there to lift how you feel
that day, um you have to be incredibly
disciplined in all other aspects of your
workout in order to make that effective.
Anything you can do to increase your
awareness of it and keep you on track
with that is like I'm endorsing fully.
Maybe we could talk about principles
around nutrition. What tends to work?
What tends not to work? And um yeah, how
should we think about nutrition?
>> My approach is like I've always been
sort of a low sugar
lower fat guy. That is the best approach
for I believe again in my opinion
personally for the overall big picture
because though the people can take
exclusionary approaches to nutrition and
taking carbs out or you know you know
eating only fats and proteins or again
I'm not saying it doesn't work for you
and if it's the first thing that
actually allowed you to gain control of
your nutrition to the point where you
actually saw results and got to a
healthier weight then I always say then
do it. then do it. But just make sure
it's something you can do forever and
doesn't bring upon other repercussions.
I think that non-exclusionary approaches
to diets are the the most sustainable
for the rest of your life. And when I
and all I'm interested in from a
nutrition standpoint is something that's
sustainable in terms of what you do eat.
How do you structure that? Um, in terms
of when you look down at a plate, you've
done these, you described this before,
but I think it's just a beautifully
simple description because I think a lot
of people don't want to do calorie
counting and all this. And
>> I have what I like what I call a plate
method. And it's just it's just simple
because it works for me. When you have
your plate, you just simply look at it
as like a like a clock, right? And um if
you just make a 920 on the clock, so one
arm goes over to the nine and one of the
arms goes over to 20. because you know
you're going to make a line towards
12:00 too. And the largest portion is
going to be your fibrous carbohydrates.
So that's the the the you know the green
vegetables, right? So whether it be
broccoli or Brussels sprouts or
asparagus, those are the ones that give
us a lot of the micronutrients we need.
They're the ones that are generally you
know accepted as more healthy. Um and
they're also going to provide the fiber
that's going to be both beneficial in
terms of its uh impact on insulin and
also just through filling you up, right?
And then I take the next largest portion
of that and I devote that towards
protein. And I think it's really
important especially for anybody active.
Um the more active you are, the more you
embark on trying to build muscle, you're
going to need to have protein in every
meal. So I have that. And again, you
know, we're talking cleaner sources of
protein, but like I I am you'll never
find like boiled chicken on my plate.
I'll have some sort of fish or chicken
or but I they'll it will be it will be
cooked in a way that's that's like, you
know, it's got maybe some sauce on it or
it's got some maybe it's tomato sauce,
anything to just make it a little bit
more palatable and interesting without
blowing the value of the meal. And then
that last portion is where I put my
starchy carbohydrates. And again, that's
the part that some people will say
exclude them entirely because they're
not healthy or they don't work for you
or they're not, you know, beneficial
long term. For me, like most people, my
body craves those carbohydrates. I
choose things like sweet potatoes, which
is my favorite, you know, or I'll have
um rice or I'll have pasta. I will have
those things. I'm not excluding them,
but I don't put them in the portions
that you would generally find. No plan
is going to work if you're eating stuff
you don't like. It's not going to work
forever. Nothing will. You have to
really enjoy what you're eating. As long
as these these uh variations of this
meal are something that you really enjoy
and there are limited versions of them,
the reproducibility of that is simple.
If everyone listening to this podcast
can figure out their nutrition issues,
this whole world will be different. That
is like one of the largest sources of
disease and and pain and discomfort
because people really struggle with
nutrition. What are your thoughts in
terms of the the nutrition science, the
train the training related effects of um
the post-training meal? Is it something
you think people should pay attention
to? I'm not very dogmatic about what
specifically to eat pre or post, you
know, workout, but I do think you should
have protein um surrounding your your
training, whether that be ahead of time
or after. Protein could be a little bit
hard to digest for some people. So, if
you do that pre-workout and then you're
finding your workouts slogging because
you don't feel good, then certainly you
put that after your meal. But this whole
concept of the urgency of time has
thankfully been removed and we can just
learn to eat a little bit more uh you
know responsibly. And even as far as
pre-workout supplements, a lot of people
don't take them. A lot of people don't
like them. They don't take them. They
don't like they're not necessarily even
being used as the nutritive side of the
pre-workout. They're just more used to
fuel the workout. Um
>> for me it's water and um some form of
caffeine.
>> Yeah. I mean it's whatever you know
again I think it's important I do think
it's important to maintain a high level
of output. So if your pre-workout
nutrition requires a stimulant in order
to help you do that or if your
pre-workout nutrition is causing you to
have a harder time to train because
you're feeling full or stomach ache or
something else then then that that's not
achieving what you're trying to do. The
ultimate goal is to still be able to
perform at the highest level. So,
whatever your nutrition is required to
allow you to still do that, that is
probably the most important factor of
all of it. I hate to say, but it's a lot
less scientific than we want to make it.
And as it seems to be, coming back often
times like the thing that works for you
is really the most important thing
because ultimately getting your ass in
there and doing what you do is is really
the thing that provides the best
benefit. I think when you hear things
like this that like hey that will work
and that will work too and that this
will work too you know rather than the
dogmatic one way only approach um which
can become discouraging for people um
then I think it becomes a little bit
uplifting like well I've never tried
that I've actually never tried a total
body split I've never tried you know
that style of eating like it becomes
encouraging you might want to explore
and then you might finally get locked in
and say I really like this and then
you're off and running
>> on behalf of myself and all the
listeners, I really want to thank you.
And what I love about all of this now
that you've given us is that there's a
there's a backbone of logic, you know,
and and some consistent themes indeed
about consistency. And but the the the
logical backbone, I think, is what um
will enable people to really show up to
the table and stay there uh for training
consistently over time. I'm happy I was
able to make it work cuz I really I've
been watching your stuff for a while and
I really I love the science of it. I
like the way you think. I'm just really
fortunate that I was able to do it.
>> Well, I feel very gratified in hearing
that and and honored to have you here.
So, thank you so much.
>> Thank you.
Ask follow-up questions or revisit key timestamps.
This episode of Huberman Lab Essentials features a discussion with Jeff Cavalier, focusing on actionable science-based tools for fitness, mental health, and performance. They delve into training splits, emphasizing the importance of adherence and finding a program that fits an individual's lifestyle. The conversation also covers the integration of cardiovascular and resistance training, the nuances of stretching (active vs. passive, dynamic vs. static), and recovery strategies. A significant portion is dedicated to understanding muscle activation through the "Cavalier test" (inducing a muscle cramp to ensure proper engagement) and the concept of "muscularity." They also discuss injury prevention, highlighting the risks associated with the upright row and emphasizing shoulder mechanics, external rotation, and proper grip techniques to avoid elbow pain. Nutritional advice is provided through the "plate method," focusing on fibrous carbohydrates, protein, and starchy carbohydrates in balanced proportions, with an emphasis on sustainability and enjoyment. The importance of pre- and post-workout nutrition is also touched upon, with a focus on protein intake and listening to one's body.
Videos recently processed by our community