HomeVideos

Why Nobody Wants to Hear You Over Explain

Now Playing

Why Nobody Wants to Hear You Over Explain

Transcript

387 segments

0:00

So sometimes when I work with people who

0:01

have ADHD, right, or on the spectrum or

0:05

have ADHD, I see this problem where, you

0:08

know, they explain why they did

0:10

something, right? So, oh, I forgot this

0:13

thing or it slipped my mind or I know I

0:14

was supposed to pick this up. Like they

0:16

make some kind of mistake and then they

0:18

offer an explanation. And sometimes the

0:20

explanation is I've got ADHD. And then

0:21

the problem is like when they try to

0:24

explain themselves, people interpret it

0:27

as defensiveness. They do get

0:29

emotionally activated. They get

0:31

defensive, right? That does happen. Like

0:33

you feel defensive. You're like, "Look,

0:34

you're not listening to me. Here's

0:36

here's what's going on." And the problem

0:38

is that when you get defensive, often

0:40

times people in a weird way are less

0:43

likely to listen to you. That the more

0:45

you try to explain your side, the more

0:48

you get punished for having a good

0:50

explanation. You know, this is not work

0:52

I've done a whole lot, but like

0:53

sometimes I'll have someone who is on

0:55

the autism spectrum or is neurodeiverse,

0:57

let's say, and they find themselves in

0:59

these like weird traps of social

1:01

interaction. So, how do you handle

1:03

criticism without getting defensive when

1:06

you make a mistake? How do you offer

1:10

mitigating circumstances and have them

1:12

received? That's what we're going to

1:13

talk about today. So, a couple of things

1:15

to understand. If you're neurodeiverse,

1:17

your empathic circuits are going to be

1:20

different, right? This is why I think

1:22

Richard Barkley cites this research. I

1:24

could be wrong about it, but I think

1:25

I've seen a paper very similar about

1:27

how, you know, if you've got ADHD by the

1:28

time you're in the second grade, one

1:30

study found that 0% of kids get invited

1:32

to birthday parties if they have ADHD in

1:34

the second grade. I mean, that's not

1:35

true globally, but like it shows that

1:37

people with ADHD have a lot of social

1:39

impairment. Okay, autism also has social

1:42

impairment. So, when we engage in these

1:44

social interactions, we're kind of at a

1:46

disadvantage. And then on top of that

1:48

there's another element of this which is

1:50

emotional dysregulation and

1:52

hyperactivation of our lyic system. So

1:55

one of the key things there's one uh

1:56

hypothesized subtype of ADHD which is

1:59

emotional dysregulation subtype. So what

2:01

this means is when you get attacked the

2:03

stress response the fear the paranoia

2:05

all those kinds of things actually

2:07

escalate. So you get you feel very

2:09

attacked and you have to defend

2:11

yourself. So you kind of lose control of

2:13

that emotion as well. And then as they

2:15

attack you, you get defensive. As you

2:18

get defensive, it doesn't work, right?

2:20

Because when someone attacks you and you

2:22

get defensive, like sometimes it can

2:23

work, but oftentimes it doesn't work.

2:25

It's not the best strategy. So, what do

2:26

we do about this, right? Because often

2:28

times getting defensive just gets people

2:30

more pissed at you. It sounds like

2:31

you're making an excuse. There are two

2:33

or three things that we need to do. The

2:35

first is understand what triggers the

2:37

highest amount of defensiveness. When

2:39

someone makes a claim about you that is

2:42

tied to your identity, the defensiveness

2:45

will skyrocket. Okay? So when someone

2:47

calls you stupid, if you have a

2:51

psychological vulnerability, oh my god,

2:53

maybe I'm stupid. And it can be buried

2:55

real deep, you will protest very

2:58

prodigiously, right? So that when

3:00

someone makes fun of us or calls us out

3:03

on something, it is our own

3:04

psychological vulnerabilities, right? So

3:07

that's a psychological vulnerability. So

3:08

I have to get defensive around it. If

3:10

you look at the difference between

3:12

people who can't take criticism and

3:14

people who can take criticism, it has to

3:16

do with whether the criticism ties to

3:18

their identity. Can I be a smart person

3:21

who makes a mistake or does a mistake

3:24

make me stupid? So we see this in a

3:26

really good way in in narcissism, right?

3:28

A great example of this. An event

3:31

becomes an identity. Since you

3:33

oversalted this food, I am a terrible

3:37

cook. So if you are trying to not get

3:40

defensive with people, the first thing

3:42

that you should ask yourself is what

3:43

does this criticism say about me? And if

3:47

your mind does the work of tying a

3:49

criticism to an identity, the

3:51

defensiveness will activate at a very

3:54

high level. So that's where there is

3:55

some amount of work that we can do to

3:57

tease these things apart. Let me

3:59

separate this out, right? So I can be a

4:01

smart person who made a mistake. It

4:03

doesn't mean I'm a stupid person. So, in

4:05

the ADHD guide, I there's a couple of

4:07

videos about how ADHD leads to

4:09

depression because when we grow up with

4:11

something like ADHD or autism, it shapes

4:14

our perception of our self. And undoing

4:17

that identity based conclusion is very

4:20

important. Now, the second thing that

4:21

when I'm working, so that's one thing

4:23

that I try to do with them, help them

4:24

understand, okay, like why are you

4:25

defensive about this? What about this

4:27

makes you think about is is a

4:28

vulnerability about yourself? What does

4:30

this say about you as a person? And the

4:32

moment that it defines you as a person,

4:34

that's when you're going to get a lot of

4:35

defensiveness. And then when we get

4:38

defensive, now we get to the second

4:40

part, which is how to actually handle

4:42

the interaction. Despite making

4:43

literally a thousand YouTube videos, it

4:45

seems like people are still struggling

4:47

with focus and motivation. And that's

4:50

why we're launching a doing stuff

4:52

bundle. It starts with Dr. K's Guide to

4:54

ADHD, which breaks down the science

4:56

behind picking a task and actually

4:58

following through with it. We're also

5:00

including an action focused planner, a

5:03

meditation journal, and access to our

5:05

meditation tracks feature, which is

5:07

designed to help people develop a

5:09

meditative practice that works for them

5:12

that you can easily stick to over time

5:14

because progress comes from actually

5:16

doing stuff, not just watching content.

5:19

So, check out the bundle below.

5:24

So, when someone criticizes me and I get

5:26

defensive, hey, this food is too salty.

5:29

No, it's not. Now, this person has a

5:31

complaint which I'm not receiving. So,

5:34

when a human being sends a signal and

5:37

that signal is not received, what does

5:39

the human being do? They increase the

5:41

volume or they stop communicating. And

5:44

usually it happens in that order. No, it

5:47

is too salty. It is too salty. It is too

5:49

salty. Whatever. I'm never coming over

5:51

again. I'm never talking to you again.

5:52

I'm going to ghost you. I'm going to

5:53

block you. I'm done. See, when we are

5:54

trying to be defensive, we are trying to

5:56

shut down their attack. We're trying to

5:58

shut down their attack because their

5:59

attack hurts us in our soul, right? So,

6:02

how do we shut down the attack? Because

6:04

defensiveness actually causes them to

6:06

double down. And when they double down,

6:08

right, their first invasion was repelled

6:11

and so they're going to invade again.

6:12

And then we double down with our

6:13

defensiveness. So, how do we disarm

6:15

their attack? We actually accept their

6:18

criticism. We try to use empathy, right?

6:21

What does it feel like? What what is it

6:22

like for this food to be too salty? Help

6:24

me understand that. We try to understand

6:26

their situation. Can you tell me a

6:27

little bit more? Great sentence to use.

6:30

Great question to ask. What do you mean

6:31

by that? It's too salty. What do you

6:33

mean? What the do you mean by that?

6:34

It's too salty. Right? But invite them

6:36

to speak more. So if you look at human

6:39

relationships, you know, if we get into

6:41

it takes two to argue. So when I say

6:43

something and you contradict me and then

6:45

I double down and then you double down

6:46

and then I triple down and you triple

6:48

down. Tension requires like pulling on

6:50

both ends. Conflict requires pushing on

6:52

both ends. Like does that kind of make

6:54

sense? So the right way to manage this

6:55

is to actually validate their

6:57

experience. Oh, is it too salty? Let me

7:00

try it. Right? So if you sort of become

7:02

a little bit loose, if you sort of

7:04

accept what they have to say, which by

7:06

the way, you can only do if you don't

7:08

tie it to your identity, right? That's

7:09

why it's so hard to do because we make

7:11

this uh tie to our identity. Oh my god,

7:13

I did screw this up. So what was the

7:15

mistake that I made? Oh, I didn't send

7:17

out the PowerPoint on time. Now, here's

7:19

the other cool thing that you can do

7:20

once you sort of say, tell me a little

7:22

bit more about that. Explain that to me.

7:23

like let me understand what what went

7:25

wrong here. Try to really hear them out.

7:27

We want to encourage them to talk

7:29

without pushing back. Okay. Then there's

7:33

another interesting thing that we can

7:34

do. We can turn an a defensive excuse.

7:38

We can pick up mileage. We can turn it

7:40

into an advantage by outlining our

7:43

corrective behavior. This is where your

7:46

side of the story comes in. It feels

7:47

pretty unsatisfying to not share our

7:50

side. And just take the criticism of

7:52

other people. Okay, so this is where

7:54

okay, like so this was a situation I I

7:56

didn't send the PowerPoint out on time.

7:58

Turns out that I had a really rough

7:59

weekend. You know, my kid was sick all

8:01

week. Um, I need to do a better job of

8:04

being more careful on Monday morning

8:06

when I've had a rough weekend. So, you

8:08

can mention the excuse, but the right

8:10

way to calm someone down is to highlight

8:12

the corrective action that you're

8:14

planning on taking. Acknowledge the

8:16

circumstances. acknowledge your

8:18

situation, but use that that

8:21

defensiveness, use that excuse, use that

8:24

circumstance as a way forward, right?

8:27

What are you going to do to fix it next

8:29

time? That's what most people want to

8:31

hear. That's what calms most people

8:32

down. And for from your perspective, I

8:35

mean, you can do this in two ways. You

8:36

can do that this as an actual learning,

8:39

which will help you not make the mistake

8:41

again, or you can use it as appeasement.

8:43

So, I would actually try to learn from

8:45

your mistakes. And this is the really

8:47

cool thing. Instead of being defensive

8:48

about your mistakes, if you learn from

8:50

your mistakes, you stop making them.

8:52

See, defensiveness invalidates the

8:54

mistake to begin with. It's an excuse,

8:56

not my problem, not my fault. And y'all

8:58

tell me, when there's someone in your

9:00

life who does not take responsibility

9:02

for their mistakes, what is the

9:04

likelihood that they make the mistake

9:06

again? Now there's one version of I've

9:08

seen this specifically with people with

9:09

ADHD and autism neurodiversity where

9:12

there's one unhealthy version of this

9:15

which is when someone sort of defaults.

9:16

So when when you have when you grow up

9:18

neurodeiverse often times you have a lot

9:20

of self-esteem problems and when you

9:22

have self-esteem problems it can be very

9:24

easy or almost like reflexive to accept

9:28

the criticism that anyone sends your

9:30

way. Some people actually do this and

9:32

they swing the pendulum so far that oh

9:34

yeah of course it's my fault. I'm an

9:35

idiot. My identity is that I make

9:38

mistakes. So, anytime you tell me I'm

9:40

making a mistake, I just I take it in.

9:42

And they learn this adaptation because

9:44

they learn that if they argue, they

9:46

lose. So, instead, what I'm going to do

9:48

is I'm going to just take your criticism

9:50

whole scale. Now, this creates another

9:52

problem because once you basically never

9:54

push back on someone's criticism,

9:57

they're more likely to critic criticize

9:59

you again. They will start assigning

10:00

blame for their mistakes onto you. I've

10:02

seen this as well. And this is why a lot

10:04

of times when I work with people, they

10:05

feel like they can't win. If they defend

10:07

themselves, people get mad at them. If

10:10

they accept all of the responsibility,

10:11

they always get blamed for everything.

10:13

So, it's kind of like a lose-lose

10:14

situation, right? So, I think the right

10:16

way to handle this is actually within

10:18

yourself. So, it is shoring up that

10:22

internal vulnerability, disconnecting

10:24

the action from the identity, developing

10:27

that sense of confidence and

10:29

self-esteem. Because if you just accept

10:30

the blame that everyone sends your way,

10:32

you're never going to develop

10:33

confidence. Second thing is to

10:35

incorporate constructive criticism.

10:37

Alter what you're going to do. Try to

10:40

stop making a mistake. And when these

10:42

two things come together, that is when

10:45

you will know when to accept criticism

10:47

and when to push back. When I have very

10:49

low self-esteem, I push back 100%. Out

10:51

of an a defensive posture and out of an

10:54

accepting posture. Does that kind of

10:56

make sense? So once I develop

10:57

confidence, once I can look at what my

11:00

mistakes are and own my mistakes, I can

11:02

say, "Oh yeah, I did do this. I I did

11:05

send I didn't submit the PowerPoint on

11:07

time, but you were supposed to get me

11:09

the PowerPoint on Thursday morning. I

11:11

didn't get it until Saturday morning."

11:12

So this was a situation where the

11:15

PowerPoint was delayed and it so

11:16

happened that this weekend things were

11:19

kind of crazy. If things were not crazy,

11:20

I may have been able to get it in on

11:22

time, but you also didn't get the

11:23

PowerPoint in on Thursday when you were

11:25

supposed to, right? And then they will

11:27

get defensive and then you can be

11:29

validating for that, right? So, and then

11:31

a really good thing, a very useful thing

11:33

to do is to sort of ask people like,

11:35

okay, like where are we now? Right? And

11:37

like here's what I'm planning on

11:39

changing. What are what are you planning

11:40

on changing? Just ask that question.

11:42

It's a way to signal to someone, I'm not

11:45

taking all the responsibility for this.

11:46

Now, this too, I know this is going to

11:48

get kind of weird. This we also have to

11:50

be careful about, and this is why, like

11:52

I don't know if this makes sense, but

11:54

you can provide people with dialogue on

11:55

the internet of what they should say,

11:57

there's always a case in which it

11:58

doesn't work. And here's the example of

12:00

that. If you are very narcissistic and

12:03

you make a mistake, you are always going

12:05

to ask the other person what they can do

12:06

differently. Have you guys ever been on

12:08

the receiving end of this where someone

12:09

screws up and they're like, "Yeah, I did

12:10

this, but what are you going to do? This

12:12

is your fault, too." Even when the blame

12:14

is predominantly on their end, they

12:16

shift some of the blame to you because

12:17

they can't take all of the blame. And so

12:19

this is why social interactions are

12:21

hard, there's absolutely a way to work

12:23

through them, right? So we want to

12:25

validate what their concern is. We

12:27

really do want to hear them out and that

12:29

is our advantage because then we won't

12:31

make that mistake again. It improves our

12:33

performance. It improves our relations.

12:35

That becomes hard because of our sense

12:37

of identity. Our identity is caught up

12:39

in a mistake. And if we're not careful,

12:41

we'll swing the pendulum too far on the

12:43

other side. We'll accept responsibility

12:44

for everything. So, we don't want to do

12:45

that. So, how do you find that balance?

12:47

You develop that confidence. You own

12:50

your mistakes. And there may be an

12:52

another element of pointing out theirs,

12:55

too. But that only works if you do it as

12:59

the third step, right? I got to hear

13:02

them out first, own mine, and then I can

13:05

point out yours. A lot of defensiveness

13:07

is you criticize me, but you didn't send

13:10

it to me on Thursday. So, there's a it's

13:12

so simple. There's a sequence. Criticize

13:15

somebody else after you've owned up to

13:17

what you did wrong. It be way better

13:19

received.

Interactive Summary

The video discusses why people, particularly those with ADHD or on the autism spectrum, often react defensively to criticism, explaining that it often stems from social impairment, emotional dysregulation, and the tendency to tie criticism to one's identity. Defensiveness, however, is counterproductive as it makes others less likely to listen and escalates conflict. The speaker suggests strategies to handle criticism effectively: first, by separating actions from identity (a mistake doesn't define a person), and second, by managing the interaction itself. This involves validating the critic's experience, using empathy, inviting them to elaborate, and outlining corrective actions rather than just offering excuses. The video also warns against the extremes of always being defensive or always accepting all blame, which can lead to self-esteem issues or being blamed for everything. The ideal approach involves developing self-confidence, owning one's mistakes, and then, if appropriate, pointing out the other party's role, but always in a specific sequence: hear them out, own your part, then address theirs.

Suggested questions

7 ready-made prompts

Recently Distilled

Videos recently processed by our community