HomeVideos

"We will ruin your life" -Microsoft

Now Playing

"We will ruin your life" -Microsoft

Transcript

298 segments

0:00

Now, I know most of my videos about

0:01

Microsoft tend to be a little bit more

0:03

nitpicky uh or making fun of a

0:06

situation. Like, look at this graph

0:07

right here. You see how it starts off at

0:09

pretty much zero and then just in the

0:10

last year completely exploding. Well,

0:13

what is this graph? Well, this is the

0:14

Google trends for GitHub alternatives.

0:17

Normally, I'd make a video and we'd all

0:19

GitHub what? Oh, they suck. But this

0:24

time, this video it's a little

0:25

different. Okay, I want you to take a

0:27

look at this picture. I know, anime

0:29

waifu. Some of you pretty excited. Calm

0:31

down. This is not an exciting topic.

0:33

Okay, this picture right here is nothing

0:35

but distilled fear for Microsoft. For

0:37

you, probably something different.

0:39

Distilled something completely

0:40

different. But for Microsoft, absolutely

0:42

the most terrifying image they've seen

0:45

in years. Now, if you're not chronically

0:47

online and I'm your new source, which a

0:49

lot of you say that, uh, if that's the

0:51

case, then this image, you're probably

0:52

going, "Well, what what's so scary?

0:54

What's so scary about a little anime

0:56

waifu?" is we all know what happens when

0:58

you see an anime waifu, right? Either

1:00

whatever's coming up next is going to be

1:02

just singlehandedly the dumbest thing

1:04

you've ever heard in your entire

1:06

lifetime or from the most cracked

1:08

engineer you've ever seen in your

1:10

lifetime. Well, it turns out it's the

1:12

second one. Okay, it's the very very

1:15

cracked because what you're seeing is

1:17

the nightmare eclipse account. Six zero

1:20

days in six weeks and one big grudge.

1:23

This individual is releasing zero days

1:26

that are absolutely devastating once a

1:29

week for the last 6 weeks. They have

1:31

been banned off of GitHub. They just got

1:33

done being banned off of GitLab. They

1:35

are losing and de being deplatformed

1:38

constantly by releasing these huge zero

1:41

days. Now, if you're anything like me,

1:42

you probably go, okay, well, like

1:44

releasing zero days, that's that's bad,

1:47

right? I mean, I'm not a huge security

1:49

guy, so I can't tell you a lot about

1:50

security. Uh, but I can tell you that it

1:53

seems bad, right? Releasing out stuff

1:54

that could potentially get just your

1:56

average mom and pa hacked or have some

1:58

of their assets stolen. Yeah, that

2:00

sounds that sounds pretty bad. But when

2:03

you start learning about this story,

2:04

when you start learning about Microsoft,

2:07

I think you're going to be a little bit

2:09

surprised. And maybe, just maybe, you'll

2:11

go, "Oh, this story's a bit different."

2:14

Now, before we get to the Nightmare

2:16

Eclipse anime waifu, we first need to

2:18

say thank you to the sponsors.

2:21

I know a lot of you have agents and

2:22

you're letting them run around on the

2:24

internet on your computer. Stop it.

2:27

That's the easiest way to shoot yourself

2:28

in the foot. This is why you need

2:30

today's video sponsor, Colonel.sh,

2:33

the crazy fast and open-source infra for

2:36

your AI agents to access the internet.

2:38

It takes under 30 milliseconds to spin

2:41

up one or 1,000 cloud browsers for your

2:43

agents, and authentication is

2:45

automatically handled. Right now, over

2:48

3,000 teams already use this in

2:50

production, including Framer and Cash

2:52

App. So, quit nerfing your agents and

2:54

give them a real browser. Head on over

2:55

to colonel.sh and let them use the

2:58

internet.

2:59

WELCOME BACK. SO, FIRST, let's just like

3:02

learn a little bit about kind of the

3:03

backstory or what's going on and then

3:05

we're going to see some of the reactions

3:06

which is going to make you kind of have

3:08

a a kind of a 180 about what's going on.

3:10

So, first off, Nightmare Eclipse, Dead

3:12

Eclipse, Chaotic Eclipse, or Just

3:14

Eclipse, is a malicious actor who has

3:16

released six Windows zeroday exploits

3:18

since early April 2026 in what multiple

3:21

researchers described as an escalating

3:24

retaliatory campaign against Microsoft.

3:26

Eclipse doesn't fit neatly into the

3:28

traditional threat intelligence

3:29

categories. They don't appear to be

3:31

seeking profits, advancing a social

3:33

cause, or pursuing geopolitical

3:35

objectives. In other words, just pure

3:38

chaos. Like they're literally out there

3:42

for the love of the game. They appear to

3:44

be a single security researcher driven

3:46

by a personal vengeance deliberately

3:48

unleashing dangerous exploits that

3:50

others are now using in real world

3:52

attacks. Defenders and researchers

3:54

should respond to nightmare eclipse as

3:55

seriously as any other threat actor.

3:57

Even though they operate alone and

3:59

outside the usual ecosystem. And of

4:01

course the list of their exploits. Blue

4:03

Hammer, Red Sun, Undefend, Yellow Key,

4:06

Green Plasma, Mini Plasma, and several

4:09

of them unpatched. If you're interested

4:12

more in kind of some of the backstory

4:14

and like how they're coming up with the

4:16

names, you can check out the link in the

4:18

description. But the part that's pretty

4:19

interesting is that the actor identity

4:21

is unknown, but people believe this is

4:23

an insider. They believe it is a former

4:26

Microsoft employee. Nightmare Eclipse

4:28

also alleges that personnel directly

4:30

threatened them from Microsoft Security

4:32

Response Center. I was told personally

4:35

by them that they will ruin my life and

4:37

they did. All right, so that's kind of

4:39

like where we stand on what we know

4:41

about this situation. And so for me, I

4:44

was, you know, you could see that

4:45

there's some sort of personal grievance,

4:47

some sort of vendetta going on here. But

4:49

still, I still kind of feel bad about

4:51

Zero Days being released just proof of

4:53

concept right into the wild because

4:55

people will end up getting hurt.

4:56

Granted, that's still true, but now I'm

4:58

starting to learn a lot of things about

5:00

Microsoft Security Response Center, and

5:02

I think you should probably know about

5:03

them, too. Last time I dealt with

5:05

Microsoft Security Response Center, I

5:07

found a command injection vulnerability

5:08

present for a decade in context menus.

5:11

Not highly critical, but still

5:12

exploitable. MSRC did not reward the

5:15

bounty, nor did they attribute a CVE to

5:17

this finding because it doesn't meet

5:19

their criteria as vulnerability that

5:21

requires an immediate security update.

5:22

However, it was fixed a month later in

5:25

Windows 11 Canary. So, taking credit and

5:28

pretending like it's not a big deal and

5:29

not paying somebody. My last submission

5:31

to MSRC was for a Defend Guard bypass. I

5:34

learned my lesson from prior drawn out

5:36

submissions. So, I included a 90-day

5:38

window this time. MSRC responded saying

5:40

that I met their bar and they would fix

5:43

it, but asked me to withhold disclosure

5:45

for another 90 days because they needed

5:47

a few extra months to fix it. I agreed

5:49

on the condition that they issue a CVE

5:51

to which they agreed. After the agreed

5:53

upon patch Tuesday a few months later, I

5:56

couldn't find any mention in the CVE

5:58

list. So, I reached out to MSRC to

6:00

inquire. It turns out they changed their

6:01

minds, deciding it did not meet their

6:03

bar for servicing, yet patched it

6:05

anyways. Since it didn't meet their bar,

6:07

they didn't issue a CVE. MSRC strung me

6:10

along a few extra months to keep me

6:11

quiet and then broke their word. Huh.

6:14

So, again, they effectively strung

6:16

somebody along and didn't give them

6:18

credit, effectively refusing to pay

6:20

them. Kind of seems like a A little bit

6:22

of a reoccurring theme, don't you think?

6:24

Last time I dealt with MSRC, responsibly

6:26

disclosed an issue with a legacy OT that

6:28

allowed me to spray passwords at

6:30

redacted endpoint and avoid smart

6:31

lockout. Received an email 5 months

6:33

after initial case opening. Doesn't meet

6:36

the bar for servicing. Microsoft

6:37

silently fixed and closed the case. Huh.

6:41

You know, it's almost like you're

6:43

starting to see a pattern here. And if

6:45

you check out VX underground, apparently

6:47

there's a maybe a little bit more that

6:49

we don't understand. It turns out that

6:52

Microsoft Security Response Center is

6:55

actually somehow this center that is

6:58

just really disservicing the security

7:00

researchers out there. They are

7:02

completely ignoring them and or they're

7:04

just taking their work, silently fixing

7:06

it, not responding, doing all sorts of

7:08

stuff that just massively decentizes the

7:11

entire security research world. And this

7:14

has been going on for years. It's been

7:16

going on for so long that look at this

7:19

right here. LA, this is in August 2023.

7:22

Okay, this is 3 years ago. Last week,

7:25

Senator Ron Widen sent a letter to the

7:27

Cyber Security and Infrastructure

7:29

Security Agency, the Department of

7:31

Justice, and Federal Trade Commission

7:32

asking they hold Microsoft accountable

7:34

for repeated pattern of negligent cyber

7:37

security practices, which has enabled

7:39

the Chinese espionage against the United

7:41

States government. According to the data

7:43

from Google project zero, Microsoft

7:45

products have accounted for an aggregate

7:47

42.5%

7:49

of all zero days discover since 2014. So

7:53

it turns out this has been going on for

7:54

years. They are negligent. They have

7:55

been the government has been getting

7:57

involved now and people are just

8:00

absolutely fed up. So whatever has

8:02

happened to Nightmare Eclipse, obviously

8:04

there's probably a bigger backstory than

8:06

we realize. Now we may not get the

8:08

entire story, but we do know how

8:09

Microsoft is going to respond. a shared

8:12

responsibility protecting customers

8:14

through coordinated vulnerability

8:15

disclosure. In other words, you need to

8:17

do these kind of responsible disclosures

8:19

or else whatever they say in here is

8:21

going to happen. Now, they obviously are

8:23

acknowledging this eclipse uh

8:25

vulnerabilities that have been

8:26

happening. In recent weeks, several zero

8:28

day vulnerabilities have been publicly

8:29

disclosed. Now, if you go down here, you

8:31

can see that they list out a couple of

8:33

those right there, including no links to

8:35

green plasma or mini plasma. But even

8:37

further down right here, look at this

8:39

line. Our digital crimes unit will

8:42

continue bringing cases against these

8:44

actors and those who that enable their

8:47

criminal activity, coordinating as

8:49

needed with law enforcement around the

8:51

world. In other words, if you don't

8:53

responsibly disclose, they're going to

8:56

bring the longhand of justice against

8:58

you. They're actually out there being

9:00

like, "Yo, it's actually a crime not to

9:02

tell us where we have messed up. We're

9:04

probably going to completely

9:05

disincentivize people. We're probably

9:07

going to take their work. We're probably

9:09

not going to give them credit as we have

9:11

on multiple occasions. We're probably

9:12

not even going to give them money. But

9:14

you know what? If you don't do right by

9:16

us, then that's actually evil, wrong,

9:18

and deserves to be punished, and you

9:19

should be thrown in some sort of uh

9:22

concrete box with metal bars because

9:25

you're the bad person. You know, me just

9:27

being like a complete novice. I'm a

9:29

complete novice in this area. I don't

9:30

know how to hack. I one time found a

9:32

vulnerability that was super super duper

9:34

massive, but that's because I I stumbled

9:36

ass backwards into it completely by

9:38

accident. I've never really done any

9:40

sort of serious security researching.

9:42

And so I don't actually understand the

9:43

world that's out there. But from all the

9:45

private messages I have received even

9:48

about this specific topic, Microsoft has

9:50

been hands down dealing people dirty for

9:53

over a decade. it appears at least

9:56

that's if I are if I'm to believe all

9:58

the stories I've been told and some of

10:00

them are from quite credible people.

10:02

Anyways, I wanted to make this video

10:03

because I feel like it's just super

10:05

unfair how they're treating people and I

10:07

don't think a lot of people even know

10:09

that this is happening. It's honestly

10:12

it's a pretty responsible disclosure

10:14

thing of me to do to let people know

10:16

just how bad this organization is. Okay.

10:19

Hey, I'm not I'm not Hey, I I'm doing

10:21

this for the love of the game. Okay. The

10:23

name is the primogen.

Interactive Summary

The video explores the case of 'Nightmare Eclipse', a malicious actor releasing a series of zero-day exploits against Microsoft. While the release of these exploits is dangerous, the video highlights a systemic issue regarding how Microsoft's Security Response Center (MSRC) treats security researchers. The creator discusses numerous accounts of researchers being ignored, strung along, or denied credit and payment for their vulnerabilities, suggesting that Microsoft's dismissive behavior has created a hostile environment that disincentivizes responsible disclosure.

Suggested questions

3 ready-made prompts