HomeVideos

Puck News’ Ioffe on How Europe Might React to Iran Attack

Now Playing

Puck News’ Ioffe on How Europe Might React to Iran Attack

Transcript

71 segments

0:00

We've talked about American trustworthiness in future negotiations.

0:03

We've talk about how this could impact other conflicts as other world leaders.

0:06

Watch this. You know, we saw what happened in

0:08

Afghanistan and it had a knock on effect in other places.

0:11

A lot of leaders possibly with Putin making the decision to go into Ukraine.

0:14

What does this conflict do for other conflicts around the world?

0:19

Oh, I think, you know, watching this, I was reminded of the winter of 2021,

0:27

2022, when the U.S. was trying to engage with Russia

0:33

diplomatically for months, going back and forth in diplomatic negotiations

0:39

over Ukraine. I was there in Geneva with Blinken and

0:41

Lavrov when he still had a job. There you go.

0:44

Right. And the Russians were saying people were

0:47

saying the Russians are negotiating in good faith.

0:50

They're going to invade anyway. And the Russians said, no, we have no

0:53

plans. We have no plans to invade Ukraine.

0:56

We really are trying to, you know, and Ukraine cannot be a naito.

1:00

They can just not be a naito. We're negotiating in good faith.

1:04

And it turned out, no, they were not. This was just a way to it, like a box

1:08

ticking exercise. They were going to invade anyway.

1:12

And I can't help but be reminded of that this morning, that these negotiations,

1:17

it seemed like were you know, they were asking the impossible of Iran while

1:22

building up these forces in the region. Kind of like China time.

1:25

Yeah, but like Chekhov's gun you know like if you if you put that stuff there,

1:30

it has to go off, right? You have to you have to use it.

1:32

And yes, buying time because of course our resources were stretched thin.

1:37

The the air carrier, the aircraft carrier, Gerald Ford was in Venezuela.

1:42

We've been a little busy in Venezuela. Yeah.

1:44

And it needed time to get to the Middle East.

1:46

So because the president wants to be seen as a man of action, wants to think

1:51

of himself as a man of action. We've been two months without military

1:54

intervention. You know, it's a long time.

1:57

It's funny you mention I talk I was talking to a Republican who was on the

2:01

National City Council in the first Trump administration, and he said to me, this

2:04

is why you don't move your firepower to Venezuela, because you can't take your

2:08

eye off the Middle East because you always need that firepower in the Middle

2:11

East. I look at this statement that we're

2:12

getting right now from Emmanuel Macron of France Chancellor Friedrich Mertz and

2:16

Prime Minister Keir Starmer in reaction to all of this, condemning the military

2:20

action that Iran has taken in the past, but noting we did not participate in

2:23

these strikes but are in close contact with our international partners.

2:26

And Julia, on that point, I'm curious how you see what's happened here

2:30

reverberating around European capitals. And again, we had hoped to bring you on

2:34

here to talk about Ukraine on the fourth anniversary of the invasion there.

2:39

Still very much Europe's focus now having to navigate this one in which the

2:42

US not unilaterally, but with Israel, has gone about and made this attack.

2:46

Well, I think to me that was one of the hints that Trump was going to do this

2:50

anyway, because a lot of our European partners and allies do still have

2:54

contacts with the Iranian regime, do have diplomatic a diplomatic presence in

2:59

Iran. And we could have them act as our

3:01

proxies and have for years. Exactly.

3:03

And we could have used their help in this if we had been actually

3:07

negotiating. And I think this is yet another

3:10

sidelining of Europe, another kind of trying to relegate them to irrelevance.

3:15

I think this administration sees them as weak and feckless and probably

3:19

effeminate, given how this administration tends to view things.

3:24

And as for our allies, I think it's interesting that the Saudis came out and

3:28

said they support this, the Canadians, the Canadians as well.

3:31

Mark Carney has been very critical of the president of a statement in front of

3:33

me saying he supports the U.S. acting to prevent Iran from obtaining a

3:37

nuclear weapon and preventing its regime from further threatening international

3:39

peace and security. So I think what I think is interesting

3:43

here. CARNEY you remember he spoke at Davos

3:46

and said we're basically out of this. You guys have been using our alliance as

3:50

a tool against us. We're out of Pax Americana, essentially

3:53

peace guys, but now they're on board. The Australians are on board.

3:58

And I think what this is the signal this is likely sending to Trump is, yeah,

4:03

these guys talk a big game, but they're still going to support us anyway.

4:07

And I think this is just just like Venezuela reinforced this, just like his

4:12

airstrikes in Iran in June reinforced this idea is that he can get away with

4:17

things. If he just pushes hard enough, people

4:19

will go along with it no matter what.

Interactive Summary

The discussion analyzes the trustworthiness of American negotiations, drawing parallels to the Russia-Ukraine conflict where Russia feigned diplomacy before invading. It highlights how U.S. military resource allocation, such as the aircraft carrier's deployment to Venezuela, can impact readiness for other global conflicts, particularly in the Middle East. The conversation then covers the reactions of European partners, who are seen as being sidelined by the U.S. administration, and the eventual support from key allies like Saudi Arabia, Canada, and Australia, despite prior criticisms. This support, the speaker suggests, may embolden the U.S. to continue assertive actions.

Suggested questions

4 ready-made prompts