The US Macroeconomic Picture | Bloomberg Surveillance
898 segments
Bloomberg Audio Studios podcasts radio
news.
This is the Bloomberg Surveillance
Podcast. Catch us live weekdays at 7
a.m. Eastern on Apple CarPlay or Android
Auto with the Bloomberg Business App.
Listen on demand wherever you get your
podcasts or watch us live on YouTube. we
are advantage and particularly that
we're not under the time pressure of the
Fed decides to have someone that's been
a foundation of our thinking about our
central bank and bills notes and bonds.
Bob Michael joins us now. CIO, head of G
GFIC.
What? What?
>> Global fixed income currency and
commodities. Got them all. Got them all.
G.
>> He attended every restaurant in the new
building and they gave him that
honorarium. JP Morgan Investment
Management. Do you know what worse
strategy is yet?
>> Other than to set up task forces, it's
not clear. How long will it take based
on the history of central bankers?
Powell for example.
>> Um we think his hand will be forced
sooner than he likes it. Clearly by
having the task force come back at year
end. He wants to glide into 2027 without
having to do much. But the markets move,
the economy moves. Uh the summers tend
to be a crucible of intensity. Uh so we
think by the September meeting he's
going to have a plan. I got to get I got
to get this in. It's too important.
Paul's got a million smart questions.
I'm assuming James Diamond hates task
forces with a passion. What do you
expect to get out of a task force plural
from the Fed?
>> Well, it depends who's leading them and
who's on them. I think they'll come back
with very thoughtful ideas. Um, in the
end, you don't set up task forces unless
you already know the answer. So he he
knows the answer. It's just a matter of
seeing if he can pin it on the task
force or just go ahead and say do it
this way.
>> Bronze it folks what you just heard
there. Absolutely perfect.
>> Tom, I don't want to say Bob is old
here, but let's just say been around the
block once or twice. Look at this note.
The US bond market looks fair value. We
expect a 10-year US Treasury to trade
between 4 and 1/8 and 4 and 5/8. He's
quoting great fraction. I mean, who does
that anymore? But Bob Michael, talk to
us about that 10-year. I mean, it it
feels like we are where we are, and
that's kind of where the market feels
pretty comfortable here. Um, what do we
do here with in with rates here where
where they are?
>> Well, in 2 and 1/2 months, we went from
390 to to close to 470 and and both of
those proved to be extremes. We're
somewhere in the middle. We're pricing
in one possibly two Fed rate hikes. I
think four and 58 covers you for two
rate hikes. I think when you get down to
four and an eighth, probably you don't
have enough yield in the market to cover
you for a rate hike or two. Um so we're
saying the bond market looks pretty
good. Uh right now it has a repricing.
Uh the Fed, if they come in and lean
into growth and inflation pressures,
they don't need to do a lot. Maybe one
or two maintenance hikes, join the other
central banks, but that's about it. How
much credit risk are you taking these
days in your
>> We're taking a lot. We had our
investment quarterly last week. We
tried, as bond investors do, to poke
holes in the economy and prove that
either it's about to collapse or or melt
up in a fireball of growth and
inflation. And instead, what we saw is
that businesses are rationally putting
together capex plans. There's a lot
going on. When we think about sovereigns
away from the US, they're also thinking
about investing. Everyone wants energy
security. Everyone wants defense of
their borders. Everyone has to invest in
AI. So these are things that will keep
the underlying trend rate of the global
economy going.
>> Does that include emerging markets as
well?
>> Well, emerging markets are the pleasant
surprise of the year so far. Um, here is
yet another shock that they survive.
They survived the Fed's 525 basis point
rate hikes never happened before. They
survived CO um and now they're uh
surviving an oil shock. Um it's a little
bit more nuanced. We had owned the
energy exporters. We've now gone back to
the importers. Uh but when you look at
the way China was able to cut imports of
oil and repurpose how they get energy,
it it tells us that the emerging markets
are have maybe have developed faster
than we want to give the term emerging
markets credit for.
>> Well, that's across America and
worldwide. Bob Michael of JP Morgan here
uh perspective from Bill's notes and
bonds of course dragging it over to the
equity markets as well. So I skim Foli
weekly prospects comes out every Friday
evening. I've got to pause with a
beverage of my choice Paul to read Foli
and the team. Okay.
>> Uh and what to say and I'm sorry it's a
pretty balanced view and I'm hearing
from you a balanced view. Bill Aman is
out today with a retweet of a plus+ on
hyperscalers from a guy out of Unicredit
in Slovenia. is well there's all this
heat this ferment this this this this
smoke and mirrors debate about AI you
guys are doing business in it how are
the bonds the debt of AI hyperscalers
being digested by the public well so far
they've been digested pretty well I
think we've all seen when a new
technology revolution comes along it's
not all over in one or two years it
tends to run for a decade and the first
half of that decade is where the capex
um gets invested and the second half is
where you get the payback, right? Um the
hyperscalers have very pristine balance
sheet. So the amount of debt that
they're adding is hardly noticeable on
their leverage metrics.
>> Do you look at them as a tunch now, an
initial gazillion dollar tunch and then
there'll be a second one into 27 and a
third. You mean is it going to stagger
forward 20 here, 20 there, 20 down the
road? Well, you look at what some of
them have raised and you wonder where it
is other than sitting in cash or some
sort of short duration account because
they aren't fully spent yet. So, yeah,
it's possible they'll be back next year.
I think they have to start spending what
they've raised so far and that takes
some time.
>> How do you think about all this
technology
debt coming to the marketplace? because
this is these companies haven't
historically been in your market raising
capital. Um but it seems to have been
wellreceived so far. We're impressed
because certainly you get worried that
trillions of dollars of debt um could
overwhelm the market. When we look at
the um Bloomberg aggregate bond index,
it's 40 trillion. So a couple trillion
here is not a lot of money. It's maybe
about 5% and that couple trillion will
come in over 3 or 4 years. We've also
been impressed about how intelligent the
hyperscalers have been. They've
diversified across markets. They've
issued some in euros, some in Canada
dollars. There will be some in Mexico
peso uh and some in Japanese yen. And
then they've gone to some hybrid
structures uh to finance the data
centers. So JP Morgan gets 500,000
applications for summer roles.
>> Oh wow.
>> And they weed it out with an acceptance
rate frankly under 1% to 4,000 summer
interns. Bob Michaels got to wander into
a room with a bunch of emotional,
really, really smart, really competent
kids. What's your first message to them?
Um my first message is the way to
differentiate yourself is to make use of
the current tools that are available in
the marketplace that you know the senior
investors in the platform aren't really
that skilled at. So AI is one when I
came into the industry it was electronic
spreadsheets do that and secondly
observe what's going on. You'll see who
the leaders are and the traits that are
characteristic of them. You'll also see
people who you feel well because of
their characteristics and traits.
They're being held back. So keep your
eyes open and observe.
>> I really emphasize the last thing you
just said is forget about trying to find
wonderful people like Kelsey Barrow is
just an idea. Figure out the people that
aren't getting it done. That's the
biggest lesson from an intern. Now, you
didn't mention this that part of the
training of a JP Morgan intern is to
master the Bloomberg Professional
Service.
>> Of course, that's a good
>> tool
in technology. So,
>> okay, we send them for training.
We see him here every day.
>> Bob Michael lecturing on the Bloomberg
terminal to interns, the chairs at JP
Morgan. He drives all of fixed income.
Stay with us. More from Bloomberg
Surveillance coming up after this.
You're listening to the Bloomberg
Surveillance Podcast. Catch us live
weekday afternoons from 7 to 10:00 a.m.
Eastern.
>> Listen on Apple CarPlay and Android Auto
with the Bloomberg Business App or watch
us live on YouTube.
>> I got a line item on Madison Square
Garden Sport Group at capital
expenditures.
That doesn't include what it's going to
cost to keep my
>> Jaylen
>> in my household. It's not Jaylen, it's
my
>> Jayen. I understand.
>> Chris Morangi is our Nick's expert here.
We're throwing you could join us today.
Uh CIO of Value at Cabelli Funds. Just
throat he could come by. You have talked
forever about Madison Square Garden
Sports. How do you respond after what
we've all witnessed over the last 90
days?
>> Well, I still have Nick's fever, still
living off of it. Uh, you know, you
mentioned Bitcoin earlier. I don't know
that Mario would have called it rat
poison. We're not, but we're not we're
not involved. We'd rather buy sports
teams. They're great stores of value.
They actually are good businesses.
Capital Light, they're tribal uh
audiences. They um allow them to exert
pricing power. And winning helps, but
it's not everything. Um, you know,
>> how much does winning help? Where do you
see that on the income statement? Well,
it definitely has created more Knicks
fans, including in my household. It
seems like your household,
>> my children,
>> but but you know, I'm not sure the
Knicks are worth materially more today
than they were a month ago. They are the
most valuable franchise in the NBA. Um,
you know, you're paying at $400. The
stock went from $250 to $400 this year.
24 million shares, a little bit of debt.
Um, that's an enterprise value of 10
billion. The Knicks are worth at least
10 billion based on the Lakers selling
for that much earlier this year. And you
get your Rangers for free. Is that why
James Dolan is splitting up the the
teams?
>> Well, lots of theories about that. Um,
one is to give them financial
flexibility. There is this thing, and I
won't go too deep into it at 9:00 in the
morning, but 162M, it's a new provision
of the tax code, which makes it more
expensive to keep players.
>> Speaking of, we have to bring in our
Knicks expert, Alexis Kristoff with
Chris Moreni.
>> Hey, you know, we kept Shamut. How
excited are we about that?
>> I'm excited about that.
>> We didn't think that was going to
happen.
>> We'd like to Yeah. bring it back. They
want to keep the core the core five
starters I think next year. So very
exciting.
>> Chris want to ask you about um Comcast
big announcement yesterday um splitting
apart the company the NBC Universal uh
from the core cable broadband business
there. What do you think the strategy is
there and how do you guys think?
>> Well, it's a trend splitting companies.
Um you know in 2009 I was here cheering
on Brian Roberts who absolutely stole
NBC from GE
>> trough multiples trough cash. the world
has changed and it's changed a lot. This
split is not a surprise. The timing is a
little bit of a surprise. Um but you
know it definitely gives them increased
uh flexibility. I think you'll see more
consolidation particularly on the cable
side. The joke in among media investment
bankers is every 5 years Brian gets a
niche and he needs to go out and do
something big. What do you think he
wants to do in this new world order? I
can't imagine he's splitting these
companies up and putting new bringing
Mr. Angelus back
>> right
>> to retire. Well, Michael Angelquez is a
deal guy. Yes. Uh and so that's not
missed. Um telecom companies need scale.
You know, again, probably 10 years ago,
I would have been talking about the
broadband hedge, which is to use
Netflix. You need fast broadband that
was only provided at the time by the
cable companies. That moat has been
breached. Yep. Uh by fiber from the
telephone companies as well as now fixed
wireless. And you got more guys coming
over that that moat from space.
>> Okay.
your heritage here with Gabelli and I
was a huge huge interest in GAB years
ago. You guys own media. So I think CNN
is with CBS. What's NBC Universal going
to do? They have it's out in the
zeitgeist. Rich Greenfield's talking it
up. I mean they got to mate with
somebody, right?
>> Well, yeah. And and there are a lot of
pieces. Obviously, they did the spin-off
of Versent at the very beginning of the
year. We all remember they have another
network um in business. Um but yes, they
they have kept most of the sports um
business, the cable networks, including
MS Now and and CNBC. They have their own
path. We love their their CEO. We all
like the stock and buying the stock. C
NBC is a bit different. Um obviously the
parks business, which probably the most
business within NBC.
>> Yep.
>> Um but listen, there are Netflix has
shown its hand. They want to buy
probably. So do some of the other big
tech companies.
>> All right, let's step back just broadly.
How are you guys at Fabelli looking at
the markets these days?
>> So, you know, there's we're in a bubble
everywhere somewhere. It's just a
question of where we are in that bubble.
I think we have we're still mid innings
to use the sports analogy. Um still tons
of money obviously going into capex.
That's what's fueled the market.
Earnings estimates have gone up. They've
gone up more than the market and um so
we're we're we're trying to focus on
>> industries that we know uh inflation
conduits, etc. So, no, no change in what
we do.
>> So, I know you guys are really bottoms
up. Look at value, fair market value,
private market value. Where do you see
value out there? Because it seems like
it's that's tough to do.
>> Yeah, I mean it's still down market,
down cap, which was a wasteland for
many, many years. It's where we started
really finding value. Still there and
the indices have been dominated by
semis.
>> Did you ever do a conference call with
David Weston? like you're on the phone.
Chris Morangi Gabelli.
>> What a what a wonderful quarter. Mr.
Weston, did you ever do that?
>> I don't think we got around to that. We
can do it right now.
>> We do it right now. Joining us, David
Weston, I want to get to your really
important interview with Paul Krugman.
David Weston, but this is just too much
media here right now. I mean, I'm I'm
sorry. We have a consolidation of
American media. David Weston, where are
we in five years given your experience
at ABC in Bloomberg? Well, I think it is
consolidation. I think that's right. I
mean, you know about this better than I
do probably. But the thing you've seen
with streaming, the big move is
technological. It's streaming. Streaming
has taken over thanks to Netflix and now
we have YouTube. And the one thing we've
learned about streaming, I think, is you
need a lot of content. You need a huge
library. That's why Bob Iger bought Fox,
right, to get really bulk up a lot. And
I think that's what they've got to do
for MS. I heard you talk about NBC. So,
Chris, what does what does YouTube do?
It's all about I mean, they're in C I
talked to our people. They're back from
can. Did you ever go to Can I have been
>> Did you go to K?
>> I have missed that one.
>> Well, there was there's a thing called
Vipcom that you had to go to every year
where I don't want to hear. Well,
YouTube is first at the Carlton, by the
way, Tom down the coret. That's where
you stay. YouTube is the biggest media
company in the world, which people
forget about, but I think it's more than
just streaming. It's live. It's live in
sports like this program. You know, it's
>> Rob Schwarz.
>> Live is the new moat. I stole the quote
from him. Talk about live.
>> You can't skip it. I mean, people love
to listen to replays of what you're
doing here, but it's worth most when we
listen to you live. Uh, and that's why
what advertisers are paying up for, and
that's why we subscribe. David, back in
your remitt, you were in ABC News for a
long time. Where does network news, I
mean, where are we here? And I I look at
Paramount and they CBS and CNN. I don't
know how that works, but
>> So, do you want an answer for my heart
or for my head?
>> Yeah, both.
>> There's two different answers.
>> Surveillance.
>> Heart. It's going to be great and we're
going to be really important and network
news is going to offer our head. I don't
understand the business plan.
>> I just don't get it.
>> Uh and we've seen this, by the way, this
goes all the way back to cable. I mean,
I when I when I went to run ABC News, uh
Fox News had not yet started. MSNBC had
just started, right?
>> And so they came over, but there's been
one innovation after the other that just
eroded the business plan. So there's no
moat around the business anymore. You
can't charge unless there's scarcity. Uh
I absolutely agree with live on sports
particularly sports. And I'll say Tom,
you and Paul, when it comes to markets,
I mean there's some scarcity there you
want, but other than that, there's just
you can't charge for it. And as a
result, what you're seeing, I think, is
a version of AM radio infecting its way
into broadcast uh network news. That's
what you're seeing.
>> I would defer to David, but I actually
think that with this polarization of the
country, you are seeing MS Now take out
one side, Fox has the other, and it's a
battle for the middle. CNN is fading.
News Nation is coming into there. Maybe
the network's
>> You have to have an opinion. CNN prided
themselves and right Matt Winkler and
Michael Bloomberg have said we're going
to do a news organization where people
don't know what Paul Sweeney thinks okay
or maybe they don't know what I think
but is there a middle ground available
Chris Morangi or you going to only win
with a polarization
>> well again using the fire analogy in my
heart I wish that was the world in my
head I don't think
>> it's the answer is it's never happened
yet when you're talking about general
news uh what happened here at Bloomberg
was unique ique in that if you go left
or right when it comes to money, you're
going to be out of business because you
know it's either right or wrong. The
market's up or it's down and you know
you can't get opinion. When you talk
about general news then you can have
opinions whether are right and left.
>> Uh across America and worldwide we're
continuing our conversation. Thrilled to
have David Weston Weston with us with
his work at ABC and of course now with
Wall Street Week at Bloomberg and Chris
Morangi with us with Gabelli even better
three media pros Paul Sweeney with all
of his work over the decades.
>> Hey Chris at Fox they've seem to stake
their company and I would argue pretty
successfully on their news and their
branded news and sports. Is that enough?
Well, you know, Rupert acted first on
this by selling his entertainment
business to Disney. I'm not sure Disney
or Comcast uh would have I think they
probably both would have replayed that
if we could go back in history.
>> Um you know, they've taken a run at Roku
or are buying Roku, which was a little
bit of a surprise to to the street um
because they're trying to find a
business model for what they have left.
>> Um and um I wouldn't doubt them. They're
very good. They're very uh agile. So,
we'll see how that plays out.
>> Clyde Davis uh has died at 94. Ted
Turner recently John Malone iconic and
Gabelli was so attached to uh TCOMA.
Where's that? Where's the next
generation of those people or was that
old time lost?
>> I don't know what the next generation
obviously we have next generations of
some of those families, but I'm not sure
we have the mogul that we once had, the
Summoners and the John's.
>> Yeah.
>> And Rupert's still around obviously as
John. He's active, but he's active in a
different way.
>> I got to get this in, folks, because
David Wesson's just killing it. Did you
just have a conversation with Paul
Krugman?
>> We did.
>> The lawyer. What did you learn? I saw
the headline from your people. David has
people. You have people. Weston has
people basic a person. Not a people. A
person
is coming around to supporting a Trump
tariff regime.
>> Well, well, I think that may be a little
too much, but it was interesting. He
said he was actually uncomfortable with
where he is when it comes particularly
with automobiles on tariffs because he
would like to be a free trader and he
said he and other people he knows are
very uncomfortable. He thinks that it
will not sustain at this point given
what China is doing. There have to be
some sort of protective tariffs or we
will just lose our auto industry.
>> This is critical folks because this is
Krugman's wheelhouse. This is how he won
the Nobel Prize. Chris Mangi Mario
Gabelli started out as an auto analyst.
Are you guys long China EV?
>> We're very worried about it. Um, look,
we still own we still like a lot of the
um car parts companies that are sort of
agnostic to the platform. Not as much as
we were, you know, 50 years ago. We
turned 50 this year. So
>> Oh, okay.
>> You don't look at Mario. Well, I'm 50,
too. Mario's a little older than that,
but our firm almost as old as me.
>> Yeah, that's right.
>> This has been wonderful. Thank you to
the two of you so much for uh coming in
this morning. Chris Morangi with all of
his leadership at Cabelli and David
Weston. Stay with us. More from
Bloomberg Surveillance coming up after
this.
>> You're listening to the Bloomberg
Surveillance Podcast. Catch us live
weekday afternoons from 7 to 10:00 a.m.
Eastern.
>> Listen on Apple CarPlay and Android Auto
with the Bloomberg Business App or watch
us live on YouTube.
>> We're going to do this interview
differently. Ellen Wald is senior fellow
at Atlanta Council and I can go to where
where's Brent crude going or what's a
gallon of gas going to do. We have a
treasure. She wrote a book a number of
years ago called Saudi Inc. and it
directly folds into the tapestry the
culture of the Arab clash against
Persia. I think of Valley Nar's
wonderful new book on Iran. Joining us
now Ellen water book is must readad
Saudi Inc. Ellen, reset now the arch
Sunni Shia split in the world after this
war.
>> So I I do think that while the the Sunni
Shia split is is very important in a
religious sense, um I do think that
politically it's probably becoming less
of an issue and we've seen that in a
number of fronts. Um, you know, I think
that the most prominent is really the
Iranian support for um, Hamas. Hamas is
a predominantly Sunni group, it it grew
out of the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt,
which is a very Sunni based group. Um,
and so we're really seeing, I think,
that that um, while there are very
distinct religious differences between
Iran and Saudi Arabia, I think they're
very profound culturally, they're very
profound religiously. um Sa you know
Iranian clerics do not look to the
Saudis as a source of religious
legitimacy or religious authority which
is something that other uh Sunni
countries do. Um but I do think that we
are seeing the growth and and prominence
in fact of um kind of mixed areas. Look
at the United Arab Emirates. This is a
region that has traditionally, you know,
it is it is a a Sunni um, you know,
country, but it is um, traditionally
very close to Iran and Persia. And I
think we're seeing that playing out in
real time as a lot of these Gulf
countries are kind of caught between uh,
Iran's orbit on one hand and Iran as a
growing regional par power and, you
know, on the other hand um, their
traditional allies. Do the Arab Sunnis,
let's start with the Truchial States and
go up to Kuwait, do they consider the
United States still a steadfast ally?
>> Uh, I do think that that is a question
that um the answer to that is is is
going to be coming very quickly. I think
that they were um initially they did
consider the US to be a very steadfast
ally especially um you know the the UAE
they have been working very closely with
the US to establish you know nuclear
power plants which have been very
important to their overall um you know
energy growth um they've really become
very close with Israel which has brought
a number of very positive uh economic
benefits for them and yet at the same
time I do think that they felt somewhat
abandoned and still feel abandoned uh
because they believe very strongly that
Iran should not control the straight of
hormones. Iran should not pay tolls uh
or should not demand tolls or any kind
of um you know fees for passage to the
straight of moves and if the United
States gives in on this in any form uh
it's a sign to the UAE that the United
States is not a partner that will
support them and I think that we will
see them make some very um important
choices in the coming months uh that
that have to do with this if they don't
believe that the US will defend free
passage in the straight of moves.
They're going to build pipelines to get
around it. Uh and they're not going to
necessarily depend on the US politically
or or diplomatically.
>> Ellen, a lot of traders are saying,
"Hey, you you you wind this war down and
oil just from a supply and demand
perspective, it's gone back down to 50,
if not even lower by the end of the
year." How do you think about that?
I think that um there's a lot of
optimism there in terms of um oil
returning to somewhat normal flows out
of the Persian Gulf and that's really
not happening. Yes, we've seen a lot of
oil exit the the Persian Gulf recently.
We're not seeing nearly as many tankers
come back in. I think that the new
normal is going to look like a ferry
service. We're going to see a couple of
of services that will basically ferry
oil out of the street of Hormuz to
tankers that sit outside. So more oil
will leave than necessarily we see
tankers in but this process will be more
expensive. It will take longer. Uh and I
also think that um China's demand
China's buying patterns have not
returned to where they were before. If
China decides, hey, we're no longer
interested in you know buying that extra
4 million, 5 million or so barrels a
day, then uh yeah, we're going to be in
a big oil glut because the world is used
to China's demand being elevated like
that. Uh if China does return to that
then I do think that oil at 50 is a bit
low.
>> Ellen Walt, thank you so much. Senior
fellow of the Atlantic Council, her
definitive book Saudi uh Inc. Stay with
us. More from Bloomberg Surveillance
coming up after this.
>> You're listening to the Bloomberg
Surveillance Podcast. Catch us live
weekday afternoons from 7 to 10:00 a.m.
Eastern. Listen on Apple CarPlay and
Android Auto with the Bloomberg Business
App or watch us live on YouTube.
>> She is wellqualified for a larger
perspective. Not so much the cliche of
60,000 ft, but just where are we now? Uh
with Parchmentata Warden of Colombia in
the hugely prestigious UCLA uh reach in
trade and international relations, Tani
Fukulele joins us from Met Life. our
international relations now in the time
of Trump the cacophony of news we're
facing is our trade is our international
linkages are they forever broken or can
we still move forward with American
exceptionalism
>> broken is a strong word I think and but
I would say that it's a concern it's a
concern in terms of our international
trade how that affects our ability to
get the things that we need at the right
price. Right? Inflation is one of those
concerns that without with these
shifting global trade patterns, we're
not going to necessarily be able to get
to that 2% in inflation uh for some time
just because of all the changes to the
global economy, the supply shocks that
continue to come,
>> the endless supply shocks. What does the
demand side look like? Paul keeps
telling me the restaurants are packed.
>> Yeah, the demand side is strong. um
whether that's you know just the top 20%
or the top 19% or the top 1% or whatever
on the macroeconom macroeconomic front
you you've got a strong consumer overall
in aggregate and you've got strong
corporations right corporate profits are
are going from strength to strength
let's see what happens next quarter but
for sure they're they've done extremely
well and that also supports the economy
>> how's the consumer doing out there Um,
again, the consumer seems pretty darn Is
it just as simple as if the consumer's
got a job, the consumer's okay?
>> That and inflation not being at 9%
helps, right? So, we had um we had
problems because of inflation. Consumer
consumer says they the consumers say
they're unhappy
>> um but they don't spend like they're
unhappy. And that's the important
difference, right? And they are still,
you know, they they say you can inflate
def uh you can inflate debt away. That's
what happened during the pandemic and
they're still at on aggregate again at
relatively low debt levels and debt
service ratios. So there's there's
bandwidth there.
>> We've got oil back down to $70 a barrel
from 100 plus. Does that mean my
inflation concerns are done? Um I think
there's a long there's a bit of a tale
there um for in terms of how that passes
through the rest of the economy. My big
concern though is really more about the
intersection of AI
price pressures and energy prices. So
yes, there's a little bit there because
of the straight of hormones, but there's
a lot there because of um AI demand for
all sorts of things, chips, computers,
blah blah blah, but especially also very
much energy.
>> But the heart and soul of Met Life, your
work, Drew Madison's work in that is to
get away from the blah blah blah and
say, "Here's where we are in three years
or five years." Do you look at AI as a
blah blah blah, I love that for can I
steal that? I'll steal that. But if if
you look at the blah blah blah, is it
all a productivity enhancer and a net
positive for our nation 3 years 5 years
out?
>> I I would say yes. But how we get there
is is certainly not a smooth and easy
path. Uh clearly there's massive gains
to be had from productivity. But if you
think about let's say we are something
like in 1998 or so in terms of the 1996
1998 in terms of the dot boom you didn't
really see you know you you played
around with things you thought it was
kind of cool the internet but you didn't
really have the productivity benefits
until a decade or so later
>> you were so on you you played around
with it that perfectly captures 1995.
So,
Fed Chairman Walsh, what was your
initial read of his first statement, his
first press conference, and kind of the
direction here?
>> Yeah, so I think he's um I mean, the
result of it has been um very much in
line with what I think works to his
advantage. He didn't say very much in
the in the statement, in his press
conference. He tried not to say very
much. he didn't provide a um press a b a
dot and I think all of those things are
in his line of trying to say less um as
a as the Fed chair. Um I think the
markets took that as hey we knew he was
a hawk all along. Let's go. Um but I'm a
little bit worried about the future
because I think he wants to be he wants
to play it more close to the vest but
this isn't 20 2011 anymore. Now we've
got the social media era where if you
don't speak, everybody else will fill in
for in that vacuum for you. You know,
all the Fed ch all the Fed um uh
governors, the presidents, every
commentator out there, all the you know,
and that's that's where um playing it
close to the vest may not work when it
did a couple year couple decades ago.
>> It's a really great observation that the
social media the communications are, you
know, they're trying to do a green span
worsh comparison.
>> Yeah. And you know it's just doesn't
>> two different worlds.
>> Tonnie, thank you so much. Tonnie Fui,
never enough time, senior director,
economic and market strategy, Metife.
>> This is the Bloomberg Surveillance
Podcast, available on Apple, Spotify,
and anywhere else you get your podcasts.
Listen live each weekday, 7 to 10:00
a.m. Eastern on Bloomberg.com, the
iHeart Radio app, TuneIn, and the
Bloomberg Business App. You can also
watch us live every weekday on YouTube
and always on the Bloomberg terminal.
Ask follow-up questions or revisit key timestamps.
This episode of Bloomberg Surveillance features a deep dive into global macroeconomics, fixed income, media industry shifts, and international relations. Bob Michael of JP Morgan discusses the bond market outlook and the role of task forces at the Fed, while Chris Morangi of Gabelli analyzes the media landscape, including Comcast's restructuring and the potential for industry consolidation. Furthermore, Ellen Wald provides insights into Middle Eastern geopolitical shifts and oil market dynamics, and Tani Fukulele from MetLife covers consumer strength, AI impacts, and the challenges of central bank communication in the modern social media era.
Videos recently processed by our community