HomeVideos

The US Macroeconomic Picture | Bloomberg Surveillance

Now Playing

The US Macroeconomic Picture | Bloomberg Surveillance

Transcript

898 segments

0:02

Bloomberg Audio Studios podcasts radio

0:06

news.

0:12

This is the Bloomberg Surveillance

0:14

Podcast. Catch us live weekdays at 7

0:17

a.m. Eastern on Apple CarPlay or Android

0:19

Auto with the Bloomberg Business App.

0:22

Listen on demand wherever you get your

0:24

podcasts or watch us live on YouTube. we

0:27

are advantage and particularly that

0:28

we're not under the time pressure of the

0:30

Fed decides to have someone that's been

0:32

a foundation of our thinking about our

0:35

central bank and bills notes and bonds.

0:38

Bob Michael joins us now. CIO, head of G

0:41

GFIC.

0:44

What? What?

0:45

>> Global fixed income currency and

0:47

commodities. Got them all. Got them all.

0:49

G.

0:50

>> He attended every restaurant in the new

0:52

building and they gave him that

0:53

honorarium. JP Morgan Investment

0:56

Management. Do you know what worse

0:58

strategy is yet?

1:01

>> Other than to set up task forces, it's

1:03

not clear. How long will it take based

1:06

on the history of central bankers?

1:07

Powell for example.

1:09

>> Um we think his hand will be forced

1:11

sooner than he likes it. Clearly by

1:14

having the task force come back at year

1:16

end. He wants to glide into 2027 without

1:20

having to do much. But the markets move,

1:22

the economy moves. Uh the summers tend

1:25

to be a crucible of intensity. Uh so we

1:29

think by the September meeting he's

1:31

going to have a plan. I got to get I got

1:33

to get this in. It's too important.

1:34

Paul's got a million smart questions.

1:37

I'm assuming James Diamond hates task

1:40

forces with a passion. What do you

1:43

expect to get out of a task force plural

1:46

from the Fed?

1:47

>> Well, it depends who's leading them and

1:50

who's on them. I think they'll come back

1:52

with very thoughtful ideas. Um, in the

1:55

end, you don't set up task forces unless

1:58

you already know the answer. So he he

2:01

knows the answer. It's just a matter of

2:04

seeing if he can pin it on the task

2:06

force or just go ahead and say do it

2:08

this way.

2:09

>> Bronze it folks what you just heard

2:11

there. Absolutely perfect.

2:13

>> Tom, I don't want to say Bob is old

2:14

here, but let's just say been around the

2:17

block once or twice. Look at this note.

2:18

The US bond market looks fair value. We

2:21

expect a 10-year US Treasury to trade

2:23

between 4 and 1/8 and 4 and 5/8. He's

2:26

quoting great fraction. I mean, who does

2:29

that anymore? But Bob Michael, talk to

2:32

us about that 10-year. I mean, it it

2:34

feels like we are where we are, and

2:35

that's kind of where the market feels

2:36

pretty comfortable here. Um, what do we

2:39

do here with in with rates here where

2:42

where they are?

2:43

>> Well, in 2 and 1/2 months, we went from

2:45

390 to to close to 470 and and both of

2:49

those proved to be extremes. We're

2:51

somewhere in the middle. We're pricing

2:53

in one possibly two Fed rate hikes. I

2:57

think four and 58 covers you for two

3:00

rate hikes. I think when you get down to

3:02

four and an eighth, probably you don't

3:04

have enough yield in the market to cover

3:06

you for a rate hike or two. Um so we're

3:08

saying the bond market looks pretty

3:10

good. Uh right now it has a repricing.

3:14

Uh the Fed, if they come in and lean

3:16

into growth and inflation pressures,

3:19

they don't need to do a lot. Maybe one

3:21

or two maintenance hikes, join the other

3:23

central banks, but that's about it. How

3:26

much credit risk are you taking these

3:27

days in your

3:28

>> We're taking a lot. We had our

3:30

investment quarterly last week. We

3:33

tried, as bond investors do, to poke

3:36

holes in the economy and prove that

3:38

either it's about to collapse or or melt

3:41

up in a fireball of growth and

3:43

inflation. And instead, what we saw is

3:46

that businesses are rationally putting

3:48

together capex plans. There's a lot

3:51

going on. When we think about sovereigns

3:54

away from the US, they're also thinking

3:56

about investing. Everyone wants energy

3:59

security. Everyone wants defense of

4:01

their borders. Everyone has to invest in

4:04

AI. So these are things that will keep

4:06

the underlying trend rate of the global

4:08

economy going.

4:09

>> Does that include emerging markets as

4:11

well?

4:12

>> Well, emerging markets are the pleasant

4:15

surprise of the year so far. Um, here is

4:18

yet another shock that they survive.

4:20

They survived the Fed's 525 basis point

4:24

rate hikes never happened before. They

4:26

survived CO um and now they're uh

4:30

surviving an oil shock. Um it's a little

4:33

bit more nuanced. We had owned the

4:36

energy exporters. We've now gone back to

4:39

the importers. Uh but when you look at

4:41

the way China was able to cut imports of

4:45

oil and repurpose how they get energy,

4:48

it it tells us that the emerging markets

4:51

are have maybe have developed faster

4:53

than we want to give the term emerging

4:56

markets credit for.

4:57

>> Well, that's across America and

4:58

worldwide. Bob Michael of JP Morgan here

5:01

uh perspective from Bill's notes and

5:03

bonds of course dragging it over to the

5:04

equity markets as well. So I skim Foli

5:07

weekly prospects comes out every Friday

5:09

evening. I've got to pause with a

5:11

beverage of my choice Paul to read Foli

5:13

and the team. Okay.

5:14

>> Uh and what to say and I'm sorry it's a

5:17

pretty balanced view and I'm hearing

5:18

from you a balanced view. Bill Aman is

5:21

out today with a retweet of a plus+ on

5:25

hyperscalers from a guy out of Unicredit

5:28

in Slovenia. is well there's all this

5:31

heat this ferment this this this this

5:33

smoke and mirrors debate about AI you

5:37

guys are doing business in it how are

5:39

the bonds the debt of AI hyperscalers

5:43

being digested by the public well so far

5:46

they've been digested pretty well I

5:49

think we've all seen when a new

5:51

technology revolution comes along it's

5:54

not all over in one or two years it

5:56

tends to run for a decade and the first

5:59

half of that decade is where the capex

6:01

um gets invested and the second half is

6:04

where you get the payback, right? Um the

6:06

hyperscalers have very pristine balance

6:08

sheet. So the amount of debt that

6:10

they're adding is hardly noticeable on

6:13

their leverage metrics.

6:14

>> Do you look at them as a tunch now, an

6:16

initial gazillion dollar tunch and then

6:19

there'll be a second one into 27 and a

6:22

third. You mean is it going to stagger

6:23

forward 20 here, 20 there, 20 down the

6:26

road? Well, you look at what some of

6:29

them have raised and you wonder where it

6:32

is other than sitting in cash or some

6:35

sort of short duration account because

6:38

they aren't fully spent yet. So, yeah,

6:40

it's possible they'll be back next year.

6:43

I think they have to start spending what

6:45

they've raised so far and that takes

6:47

some time.

6:48

>> How do you think about all this

6:50

technology

6:51

debt coming to the marketplace? because

6:52

this is these companies haven't

6:55

historically been in your market raising

6:57

capital. Um but it seems to have been

6:59

wellreceived so far. We're impressed

7:02

because certainly you get worried that

7:04

trillions of dollars of debt um could

7:07

overwhelm the market. When we look at

7:08

the um Bloomberg aggregate bond index,

7:13

it's 40 trillion. So a couple trillion

7:16

here is not a lot of money. It's maybe

7:18

about 5% and that couple trillion will

7:21

come in over 3 or 4 years. We've also

7:24

been impressed about how intelligent the

7:26

hyperscalers have been. They've

7:28

diversified across markets. They've

7:30

issued some in euros, some in Canada

7:32

dollars. There will be some in Mexico

7:34

peso uh and some in Japanese yen. And

7:37

then they've gone to some hybrid

7:39

structures uh to finance the data

7:41

centers. So JP Morgan gets 500,000

7:46

applications for summer roles.

7:48

>> Oh wow.

7:49

>> And they weed it out with an acceptance

7:51

rate frankly under 1% to 4,000 summer

7:55

interns. Bob Michaels got to wander into

7:58

a room with a bunch of emotional,

8:01

really, really smart, really competent

8:03

kids. What's your first message to them?

8:06

Um my first message is the way to

8:09

differentiate yourself is to make use of

8:13

the current tools that are available in

8:15

the marketplace that you know the senior

8:18

investors in the platform aren't really

8:20

that skilled at. So AI is one when I

8:23

came into the industry it was electronic

8:26

spreadsheets do that and secondly

8:28

observe what's going on. You'll see who

8:31

the leaders are and the traits that are

8:35

characteristic of them. You'll also see

8:38

people who you feel well because of

8:41

their characteristics and traits.

8:43

They're being held back. So keep your

8:45

eyes open and observe.

8:47

>> I really emphasize the last thing you

8:48

just said is forget about trying to find

8:50

wonderful people like Kelsey Barrow is

8:53

just an idea. Figure out the people that

8:55

aren't getting it done. That's the

8:56

biggest lesson from an intern. Now, you

8:59

didn't mention this that part of the

9:00

training of a JP Morgan intern is to

9:03

master the Bloomberg Professional

9:05

Service.

9:06

>> Of course, that's a good

9:06

>> tool

9:08

in technology. So,

9:10

>> okay, we send them for training.

9:13

We see him here every day.

9:15

>> Bob Michael lecturing on the Bloomberg

9:16

terminal to interns, the chairs at JP

9:20

Morgan. He drives all of fixed income.

9:22

Stay with us. More from Bloomberg

9:24

Surveillance coming up after this.

9:33

You're listening to the Bloomberg

9:35

Surveillance Podcast. Catch us live

9:37

weekday afternoons from 7 to 10:00 a.m.

9:39

Eastern.

9:40

>> Listen on Apple CarPlay and Android Auto

9:42

with the Bloomberg Business App or watch

9:44

us live on YouTube.

9:46

>> I got a line item on Madison Square

9:48

Garden Sport Group at capital

9:51

expenditures.

9:53

That doesn't include what it's going to

9:55

cost to keep my

9:56

>> Jaylen

9:58

>> in my household. It's not Jaylen, it's

10:00

my

10:00

>> Jayen. I understand.

10:01

>> Chris Morangi is our Nick's expert here.

10:03

We're throwing you could join us today.

10:05

Uh CIO of Value at Cabelli Funds. Just

10:08

throat he could come by. You have talked

10:10

forever about Madison Square Garden

10:13

Sports. How do you respond after what

10:16

we've all witnessed over the last 90

10:18

days?

10:19

>> Well, I still have Nick's fever, still

10:20

living off of it. Uh, you know, you

10:22

mentioned Bitcoin earlier. I don't know

10:23

that Mario would have called it rat

10:25

poison. We're not, but we're not we're

10:27

not involved. We'd rather buy sports

10:28

teams. They're great stores of value.

10:30

They actually are good businesses.

10:32

Capital Light, they're tribal uh

10:34

audiences. They um allow them to exert

10:36

pricing power. And winning helps, but

10:38

it's not everything. Um, you know,

10:40

>> how much does winning help? Where do you

10:41

see that on the income statement? Well,

10:44

it definitely has created more Knicks

10:46

fans, including in my household. It

10:48

seems like your household,

10:49

>> my children,

10:49

>> but but you know, I'm not sure the

10:51

Knicks are worth materially more today

10:53

than they were a month ago. They are the

10:55

most valuable franchise in the NBA. Um,

10:57

you know, you're paying at $400. The

10:59

stock went from $250 to $400 this year.

11:01

24 million shares, a little bit of debt.

11:03

Um, that's an enterprise value of 10

11:05

billion. The Knicks are worth at least

11:06

10 billion based on the Lakers selling

11:08

for that much earlier this year. And you

11:10

get your Rangers for free. Is that why

11:11

James Dolan is splitting up the the

11:13

teams?

11:14

>> Well, lots of theories about that. Um,

11:16

one is to give them financial

11:17

flexibility. There is this thing, and I

11:18

won't go too deep into it at 9:00 in the

11:20

morning, but 162M, it's a new provision

11:22

of the tax code, which makes it more

11:24

expensive to keep players.

11:25

>> Speaking of, we have to bring in our

11:27

Knicks expert, Alexis Kristoff with

11:30

Chris Moreni.

11:32

>> Hey, you know, we kept Shamut. How

11:34

excited are we about that?

11:35

>> I'm excited about that.

11:36

>> We didn't think that was going to

11:37

happen.

11:37

>> We'd like to Yeah. bring it back. They

11:39

want to keep the core the core five

11:41

starters I think next year. So very

11:43

exciting.

11:43

>> Chris want to ask you about um Comcast

11:47

big announcement yesterday um splitting

11:49

apart the company the NBC Universal uh

11:52

from the core cable broadband business

11:54

there. What do you think the strategy is

11:56

there and how do you guys think?

11:57

>> Well, it's a trend splitting companies.

11:59

Um you know in 2009 I was here cheering

12:02

on Brian Roberts who absolutely stole

12:04

NBC from GE

12:06

>> trough multiples trough cash. the world

12:08

has changed and it's changed a lot. This

12:10

split is not a surprise. The timing is a

12:11

little bit of a surprise. Um but you

12:13

know it definitely gives them increased

12:15

uh flexibility. I think you'll see more

12:17

consolidation particularly on the cable

12:19

side. The joke in among media investment

12:21

bankers is every 5 years Brian gets a

12:24

niche and he needs to go out and do

12:25

something big. What do you think he

12:27

wants to do in this new world order? I

12:29

can't imagine he's splitting these

12:31

companies up and putting new bringing

12:33

Mr. Angelus back

12:34

>> right

12:34

>> to retire. Well, Michael Angelquez is a

12:37

deal guy. Yes. Uh and so that's not

12:39

missed. Um telecom companies need scale.

12:42

You know, again, probably 10 years ago,

12:43

I would have been talking about the

12:45

broadband hedge, which is to use

12:46

Netflix. You need fast broadband that

12:48

was only provided at the time by the

12:49

cable companies. That moat has been

12:51

breached. Yep. Uh by fiber from the

12:54

telephone companies as well as now fixed

12:55

wireless. And you got more guys coming

12:57

over that that moat from space.

12:59

>> Okay.

13:00

your heritage here with Gabelli and I

13:02

was a huge huge interest in GAB years

13:06

ago. You guys own media. So I think CNN

13:09

is with CBS. What's NBC Universal going

13:12

to do? They have it's out in the

13:14

zeitgeist. Rich Greenfield's talking it

13:16

up. I mean they got to mate with

13:18

somebody, right?

13:19

>> Well, yeah. And and there are a lot of

13:20

pieces. Obviously, they did the spin-off

13:22

of Versent at the very beginning of the

13:23

year. We all remember they have another

13:25

network um in business. Um but yes, they

13:28

they have kept most of the sports um

13:29

business, the cable networks, including

13:31

MS Now and and CNBC. They have their own

13:34

path. We love their their CEO. We all

13:35

like the stock and buying the stock. C

13:37

NBC is a bit different. Um obviously the

13:40

parks business, which probably the most

13:41

business within NBC.

13:43

>> Yep.

13:43

>> Um but listen, there are Netflix has

13:46

shown its hand. They want to buy

13:47

probably. So do some of the other big

13:49

tech companies.

13:50

>> All right, let's step back just broadly.

13:53

How are you guys at Fabelli looking at

13:55

the markets these days?

13:57

>> So, you know, there's we're in a bubble

14:00

everywhere somewhere. It's just a

14:01

question of where we are in that bubble.

14:03

I think we have we're still mid innings

14:05

to use the sports analogy. Um still tons

14:08

of money obviously going into capex.

14:10

That's what's fueled the market.

14:10

Earnings estimates have gone up. They've

14:12

gone up more than the market and um so

14:14

we're we're we're trying to focus on

14:17

>> industries that we know uh inflation

14:19

conduits, etc. So, no, no change in what

14:22

we do.

14:22

>> So, I know you guys are really bottoms

14:24

up. Look at value, fair market value,

14:28

private market value. Where do you see

14:29

value out there? Because it seems like

14:31

it's that's tough to do.

14:32

>> Yeah, I mean it's still down market,

14:34

down cap, which was a wasteland for

14:36

many, many years. It's where we started

14:37

really finding value. Still there and

14:39

the indices have been dominated by

14:41

semis.

14:42

>> Did you ever do a conference call with

14:43

David Weston? like you're on the phone.

14:46

Chris Morangi Gabelli.

14:48

>> What a what a wonderful quarter. Mr.

14:50

Weston, did you ever do that?

14:52

>> I don't think we got around to that. We

14:53

can do it right now.

14:54

>> We do it right now. Joining us, David

14:56

Weston, I want to get to your really

14:57

important interview with Paul Krugman.

14:59

David Weston, but this is just too much

15:01

media here right now. I mean, I'm I'm

15:04

sorry. We have a consolidation of

15:07

American media. David Weston, where are

15:09

we in five years given your experience

15:11

at ABC in Bloomberg? Well, I think it is

15:14

consolidation. I think that's right. I

15:15

mean, you know about this better than I

15:16

do probably. But the thing you've seen

15:18

with streaming, the big move is

15:19

technological. It's streaming. Streaming

15:21

has taken over thanks to Netflix and now

15:23

we have YouTube. And the one thing we've

15:25

learned about streaming, I think, is you

15:27

need a lot of content. You need a huge

15:29

library. That's why Bob Iger bought Fox,

15:31

right, to get really bulk up a lot. And

15:34

I think that's what they've got to do

15:36

for MS. I heard you talk about NBC. So,

15:38

Chris, what does what does YouTube do?

15:40

It's all about I mean, they're in C I

15:42

talked to our people. They're back from

15:44

can. Did you ever go to Can I have been

15:48

>> Did you go to K?

15:49

>> I have missed that one.

15:50

>> Well, there was there's a thing called

15:52

Vipcom that you had to go to every year

15:54

where I don't want to hear. Well,

15:56

YouTube is first at the Carlton, by the

15:59

way, Tom down the coret. That's where

16:01

you stay. YouTube is the biggest media

16:02

company in the world, which people

16:03

forget about, but I think it's more than

16:05

just streaming. It's live. It's live in

16:07

sports like this program. You know, it's

16:09

>> Rob Schwarz.

16:11

>> Live is the new moat. I stole the quote

16:13

from him. Talk about live.

16:15

>> You can't skip it. I mean, people love

16:17

to listen to replays of what you're

16:19

doing here, but it's worth most when we

16:21

listen to you live. Uh, and that's why

16:23

what advertisers are paying up for, and

16:25

that's why we subscribe. David, back in

16:27

your remitt, you were in ABC News for a

16:30

long time. Where does network news, I

16:32

mean, where are we here? And I I look at

16:35

Paramount and they CBS and CNN. I don't

16:38

know how that works, but

16:40

>> So, do you want an answer for my heart

16:41

or for my head?

16:42

>> Yeah, both.

16:43

>> There's two different answers.

16:44

>> Surveillance.

16:45

>> Heart. It's going to be great and we're

16:46

going to be really important and network

16:48

news is going to offer our head. I don't

16:50

understand the business plan.

16:52

>> I just don't get it.

16:53

>> Uh and we've seen this, by the way, this

16:55

goes all the way back to cable. I mean,

16:57

I when I when I went to run ABC News, uh

17:00

Fox News had not yet started. MSNBC had

17:03

just started, right?

17:04

>> And so they came over, but there's been

17:06

one innovation after the other that just

17:08

eroded the business plan. So there's no

17:10

moat around the business anymore. You

17:11

can't charge unless there's scarcity. Uh

17:13

I absolutely agree with live on sports

17:16

particularly sports. And I'll say Tom,

17:19

you and Paul, when it comes to markets,

17:21

I mean there's some scarcity there you

17:23

want, but other than that, there's just

17:24

you can't charge for it. And as a

17:26

result, what you're seeing, I think, is

17:27

a version of AM radio infecting its way

17:31

into broadcast uh network news. That's

17:34

what you're seeing.

17:34

>> I would defer to David, but I actually

17:36

think that with this polarization of the

17:38

country, you are seeing MS Now take out

17:40

one side, Fox has the other, and it's a

17:42

battle for the middle. CNN is fading.

17:44

News Nation is coming into there. Maybe

17:46

the network's

17:47

>> You have to have an opinion. CNN prided

17:49

themselves and right Matt Winkler and

17:51

Michael Bloomberg have said we're going

17:53

to do a news organization where people

17:55

don't know what Paul Sweeney thinks okay

17:58

or maybe they don't know what I think

18:00

but is there a middle ground available

18:03

Chris Morangi or you going to only win

18:05

with a polarization

18:06

>> well again using the fire analogy in my

18:09

heart I wish that was the world in my

18:10

head I don't think

18:11

>> it's the answer is it's never happened

18:13

yet when you're talking about general

18:15

news uh what happened here at Bloomberg

18:18

was unique ique in that if you go left

18:20

or right when it comes to money, you're

18:22

going to be out of business because you

18:24

know it's either right or wrong. The

18:25

market's up or it's down and you know

18:27

you can't get opinion. When you talk

18:28

about general news then you can have

18:30

opinions whether are right and left.

18:32

>> Uh across America and worldwide we're

18:34

continuing our conversation. Thrilled to

18:36

have David Weston Weston with us with

18:38

his work at ABC and of course now with

18:40

Wall Street Week at Bloomberg and Chris

18:41

Morangi with us with Gabelli even better

18:44

three media pros Paul Sweeney with all

18:47

of his work over the decades.

18:48

>> Hey Chris at Fox they've seem to stake

18:52

their company and I would argue pretty

18:54

successfully on their news and their

18:56

branded news and sports. Is that enough?

19:00

Well, you know, Rupert acted first on

19:03

this by selling his entertainment

19:04

business to Disney. I'm not sure Disney

19:06

or Comcast uh would have I think they

19:10

probably both would have replayed that

19:11

if we could go back in history.

19:13

>> Um you know, they've taken a run at Roku

19:15

or are buying Roku, which was a little

19:16

bit of a surprise to to the street um

19:18

because they're trying to find a

19:19

business model for what they have left.

19:21

>> Um and um I wouldn't doubt them. They're

19:23

very good. They're very uh agile. So,

19:25

we'll see how that plays out.

19:26

>> Clyde Davis uh has died at 94. Ted

19:29

Turner recently John Malone iconic and

19:32

Gabelli was so attached to uh TCOMA.

19:36

Where's that? Where's the next

19:38

generation of those people or was that

19:40

old time lost?

19:42

>> I don't know what the next generation

19:43

obviously we have next generations of

19:44

some of those families, but I'm not sure

19:46

we have the mogul that we once had, the

19:48

Summoners and the John's.

19:50

>> Yeah.

19:50

>> And Rupert's still around obviously as

19:51

John. He's active, but he's active in a

19:53

different way.

19:53

>> I got to get this in, folks, because

19:55

David Wesson's just killing it. Did you

19:57

just have a conversation with Paul

19:59

Krugman?

19:59

>> We did.

20:00

>> The lawyer. What did you learn? I saw

20:02

the headline from your people. David has

20:04

people. You have people. Weston has

20:06

people basic a person. Not a people. A

20:10

person

20:11

is coming around to supporting a Trump

20:15

tariff regime.

20:16

>> Well, well, I think that may be a little

20:17

too much, but it was interesting. He

20:19

said he was actually uncomfortable with

20:21

where he is when it comes particularly

20:23

with automobiles on tariffs because he

20:26

would like to be a free trader and he

20:27

said he and other people he knows are

20:29

very uncomfortable. He thinks that it

20:30

will not sustain at this point given

20:32

what China is doing. There have to be

20:34

some sort of protective tariffs or we

20:35

will just lose our auto industry.

20:38

>> This is critical folks because this is

20:40

Krugman's wheelhouse. This is how he won

20:43

the Nobel Prize. Chris Mangi Mario

20:45

Gabelli started out as an auto analyst.

20:48

Are you guys long China EV?

20:50

>> We're very worried about it. Um, look,

20:51

we still own we still like a lot of the

20:53

um car parts companies that are sort of

20:56

agnostic to the platform. Not as much as

20:58

we were, you know, 50 years ago. We

21:00

turned 50 this year. So

21:01

>> Oh, okay.

21:02

>> You don't look at Mario. Well, I'm 50,

21:05

too. Mario's a little older than that,

21:06

but our firm almost as old as me.

21:09

>> Yeah, that's right.

21:10

>> This has been wonderful. Thank you to

21:11

the two of you so much for uh coming in

21:13

this morning. Chris Morangi with all of

21:15

his leadership at Cabelli and David

21:17

Weston. Stay with us. More from

21:19

Bloomberg Surveillance coming up after

21:22

this.

21:29

>> You're listening to the Bloomberg

21:31

Surveillance Podcast. Catch us live

21:33

weekday afternoons from 7 to 10:00 a.m.

21:35

Eastern.

21:35

>> Listen on Apple CarPlay and Android Auto

21:38

with the Bloomberg Business App or watch

21:40

us live on YouTube.

21:41

>> We're going to do this interview

21:42

differently. Ellen Wald is senior fellow

21:44

at Atlanta Council and I can go to where

21:47

where's Brent crude going or what's a

21:48

gallon of gas going to do. We have a

21:50

treasure. She wrote a book a number of

21:52

years ago called Saudi Inc. and it

21:54

directly folds into the tapestry the

21:58

culture of the Arab clash against

22:01

Persia. I think of Valley Nar's

22:03

wonderful new book on Iran. Joining us

22:06

now Ellen water book is must readad

22:08

Saudi Inc. Ellen, reset now the arch

22:13

Sunni Shia split in the world after this

22:18

war.

22:19

>> So I I do think that while the the Sunni

22:22

Shia split is is very important in a

22:25

religious sense, um I do think that

22:28

politically it's probably becoming less

22:30

of an issue and we've seen that in a

22:32

number of fronts. Um, you know, I think

22:35

that the most prominent is really the

22:36

Iranian support for um, Hamas. Hamas is

22:40

a predominantly Sunni group, it it grew

22:43

out of the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt,

22:45

which is a very Sunni based group. Um,

22:48

and so we're really seeing, I think,

22:50

that that um, while there are very

22:52

distinct religious differences between

22:54

Iran and Saudi Arabia, I think they're

22:56

very profound culturally, they're very

22:58

profound religiously. um Sa you know

23:01

Iranian clerics do not look to the

23:04

Saudis as a source of religious

23:06

legitimacy or religious authority which

23:08

is something that other uh Sunni

23:11

countries do. Um but I do think that we

23:13

are seeing the growth and and prominence

23:15

in fact of um kind of mixed areas. Look

23:18

at the United Arab Emirates. This is a

23:20

region that has traditionally, you know,

23:22

it is it is a a Sunni um, you know,

23:25

country, but it is um, traditionally

23:27

very close to Iran and Persia. And I

23:30

think we're seeing that playing out in

23:32

real time as a lot of these Gulf

23:33

countries are kind of caught between uh,

23:36

Iran's orbit on one hand and Iran as a

23:39

growing regional par power and, you

23:41

know, on the other hand um, their

23:43

traditional allies. Do the Arab Sunnis,

23:46

let's start with the Truchial States and

23:47

go up to Kuwait, do they consider the

23:51

United States still a steadfast ally?

23:54

>> Uh, I do think that that is a question

23:57

that um the answer to that is is is

24:00

going to be coming very quickly. I think

24:02

that they were um initially they did

24:04

consider the US to be a very steadfast

24:06

ally especially um you know the the UAE

24:10

they have been working very closely with

24:12

the US to establish you know nuclear

24:14

power plants which have been very

24:15

important to their overall um you know

24:18

energy growth um they've really become

24:21

very close with Israel which has brought

24:23

a number of very positive uh economic

24:25

benefits for them and yet at the same

24:27

time I do think that they felt somewhat

24:30

abandoned and still feel abandoned uh

24:33

because they believe very strongly that

24:36

Iran should not control the straight of

24:38

hormones. Iran should not pay tolls uh

24:40

or should not demand tolls or any kind

24:43

of um you know fees for passage to the

24:45

straight of moves and if the United

24:47

States gives in on this in any form uh

24:50

it's a sign to the UAE that the United

24:53

States is not a partner that will

24:56

support them and I think that we will

24:57

see them make some very um important

25:00

choices in the coming months uh that

25:02

that have to do with this if they don't

25:04

believe that the US will defend free

25:06

passage in the straight of moves.

25:08

They're going to build pipelines to get

25:10

around it. Uh and they're not going to

25:12

necessarily depend on the US politically

25:15

or or diplomatically.

25:17

>> Ellen, a lot of traders are saying,

25:19

"Hey, you you you wind this war down and

25:22

oil just from a supply and demand

25:24

perspective, it's gone back down to 50,

25:26

if not even lower by the end of the

25:28

year." How do you think about that?

25:31

I think that um there's a lot of

25:33

optimism there in terms of um oil

25:37

returning to somewhat normal flows out

25:39

of the Persian Gulf and that's really

25:41

not happening. Yes, we've seen a lot of

25:43

oil exit the the Persian Gulf recently.

25:45

We're not seeing nearly as many tankers

25:48

come back in. I think that the new

25:49

normal is going to look like a ferry

25:51

service. We're going to see a couple of

25:53

of services that will basically ferry

25:55

oil out of the street of Hormuz to

25:57

tankers that sit outside. So more oil

25:59

will leave than necessarily we see

26:01

tankers in but this process will be more

26:02

expensive. It will take longer. Uh and I

26:05

also think that um China's demand

26:09

China's buying patterns have not

26:10

returned to where they were before. If

26:12

China decides, hey, we're no longer

26:14

interested in you know buying that extra

26:16

4 million, 5 million or so barrels a

26:19

day, then uh yeah, we're going to be in

26:21

a big oil glut because the world is used

26:24

to China's demand being elevated like

26:27

that. Uh if China does return to that

26:30

then I do think that oil at 50 is a bit

26:32

low.

26:33

>> Ellen Walt, thank you so much. Senior

26:34

fellow of the Atlantic Council, her

26:36

definitive book Saudi uh Inc. Stay with

26:39

us. More from Bloomberg Surveillance

26:41

coming up after this.

26:50

>> You're listening to the Bloomberg

26:51

Surveillance Podcast. Catch us live

26:53

weekday afternoons from 7 to 10:00 a.m.

26:56

Eastern. Listen on Apple CarPlay and

26:58

Android Auto with the Bloomberg Business

27:00

App or watch us live on YouTube.

27:02

>> She is wellqualified for a larger

27:05

perspective. Not so much the cliche of

27:07

60,000 ft, but just where are we now? Uh

27:11

with Parchmentata Warden of Colombia in

27:14

the hugely prestigious UCLA uh reach in

27:17

trade and international relations, Tani

27:19

Fukulele joins us from Met Life. our

27:22

international relations now in the time

27:24

of Trump the cacophony of news we're

27:27

facing is our trade is our international

27:30

linkages are they forever broken or can

27:33

we still move forward with American

27:35

exceptionalism

27:37

>> broken is a strong word I think and but

27:40

I would say that it's a concern it's a

27:44

concern in terms of our international

27:46

trade how that affects our ability to

27:50

get the things that we need at the right

27:52

price. Right? Inflation is one of those

27:55

concerns that without with these

27:57

shifting global trade patterns, we're

28:00

not going to necessarily be able to get

28:01

to that 2% in inflation uh for some time

28:05

just because of all the changes to the

28:08

global economy, the supply shocks that

28:10

continue to come,

28:11

>> the endless supply shocks. What does the

28:13

demand side look like? Paul keeps

28:15

telling me the restaurants are packed.

28:18

>> Yeah, the demand side is strong. um

28:20

whether that's you know just the top 20%

28:22

or the top 19% or the top 1% or whatever

28:26

on the macroeconom macroeconomic front

28:29

you you've got a strong consumer overall

28:32

in aggregate and you've got strong

28:34

corporations right corporate profits are

28:37

are going from strength to strength

28:39

let's see what happens next quarter but

28:41

for sure they're they've done extremely

28:43

well and that also supports the economy

28:47

>> how's the consumer doing out there Um,

28:49

again, the consumer seems pretty darn Is

28:51

it just as simple as if the consumer's

28:53

got a job, the consumer's okay?

28:55

>> That and inflation not being at 9%

28:58

helps, right? So, we had um we had

29:02

problems because of inflation. Consumer

29:04

consumer says they the consumers say

29:06

they're unhappy

29:08

>> um but they don't spend like they're

29:09

unhappy. And that's the important

29:11

difference, right? And they are still,

29:14

you know, they they say you can inflate

29:16

def uh you can inflate debt away. That's

29:19

what happened during the pandemic and

29:21

they're still at on aggregate again at

29:24

relatively low debt levels and debt

29:26

service ratios. So there's there's

29:29

bandwidth there.

29:30

>> We've got oil back down to $70 a barrel

29:33

from 100 plus. Does that mean my

29:35

inflation concerns are done? Um I think

29:37

there's a long there's a bit of a tale

29:39

there um for in terms of how that passes

29:42

through the rest of the economy. My big

29:44

concern though is really more about the

29:46

intersection of AI

29:49

price pressures and energy prices. So

29:52

yes, there's a little bit there because

29:54

of the straight of hormones, but there's

29:56

a lot there because of um AI demand for

30:01

all sorts of things, chips, computers,

30:03

blah blah blah, but especially also very

30:06

much energy.

30:06

>> But the heart and soul of Met Life, your

30:08

work, Drew Madison's work in that is to

30:10

get away from the blah blah blah and

30:12

say, "Here's where we are in three years

30:13

or five years." Do you look at AI as a

30:16

blah blah blah, I love that for can I

30:18

steal that? I'll steal that. But if if

30:21

you look at the blah blah blah, is it

30:23

all a productivity enhancer and a net

30:27

positive for our nation 3 years 5 years

30:30

out?

30:31

>> I I would say yes. But how we get there

30:35

is is certainly not a smooth and easy

30:38

path. Uh clearly there's massive gains

30:40

to be had from productivity. But if you

30:42

think about let's say we are something

30:45

like in 1998 or so in terms of the 1996

30:50

1998 in terms of the dot boom you didn't

30:53

really see you know you you played

30:54

around with things you thought it was

30:56

kind of cool the internet but you didn't

30:58

really have the productivity benefits

31:01

until a decade or so later

31:02

>> you were so on you you played around

31:04

with it that perfectly captures 1995.

31:09

So,

31:11

Fed Chairman Walsh, what was your

31:13

initial read of his first statement, his

31:16

first press conference, and kind of the

31:17

direction here?

31:18

>> Yeah, so I think he's um I mean, the

31:21

result of it has been um very much in

31:26

line with what I think works to his

31:28

advantage. He didn't say very much in

31:31

the in the statement, in his press

31:33

conference. He tried not to say very

31:35

much. he didn't provide a um press a b a

31:38

dot and I think all of those things are

31:41

in his line of trying to say less um as

31:45

a as the Fed chair. Um I think the

31:48

markets took that as hey we knew he was

31:50

a hawk all along. Let's go. Um but I'm a

31:56

little bit worried about the future

31:57

because I think he wants to be he wants

31:59

to play it more close to the vest but

32:02

this isn't 20 2011 anymore. Now we've

32:05

got the social media era where if you

32:07

don't speak, everybody else will fill in

32:09

for in that vacuum for you. You know,

32:12

all the Fed ch all the Fed um uh

32:15

governors, the presidents, every

32:17

commentator out there, all the you know,

32:19

and that's that's where um playing it

32:22

close to the vest may not work when it

32:24

did a couple year couple decades ago.

32:25

>> It's a really great observation that the

32:28

social media the communications are, you

32:30

know, they're trying to do a green span

32:32

worsh comparison.

32:33

>> Yeah. And you know it's just doesn't

32:35

>> two different worlds.

32:36

>> Tonnie, thank you so much. Tonnie Fui,

32:38

never enough time, senior director,

32:39

economic and market strategy, Metife.

32:42

>> This is the Bloomberg Surveillance

32:44

Podcast, available on Apple, Spotify,

32:47

and anywhere else you get your podcasts.

32:50

Listen live each weekday, 7 to 10:00

32:52

a.m. Eastern on Bloomberg.com, the

32:55

iHeart Radio app, TuneIn, and the

32:57

Bloomberg Business App. You can also

33:00

watch us live every weekday on YouTube

33:02

and always on the Bloomberg terminal.

Interactive Summary

This episode of Bloomberg Surveillance features a deep dive into global macroeconomics, fixed income, media industry shifts, and international relations. Bob Michael of JP Morgan discusses the bond market outlook and the role of task forces at the Fed, while Chris Morangi of Gabelli analyzes the media landscape, including Comcast's restructuring and the potential for industry consolidation. Furthermore, Ellen Wald provides insights into Middle Eastern geopolitical shifts and oil market dynamics, and Tani Fukulele from MetLife covers consumer strength, AI impacts, and the challenges of central bank communication in the modern social media era.

Suggested questions

4 ready-made prompts