This Is How Big Money Is Trading the War in Iran | Odd Lots
1058 segments
Bloomberg Audio Studios podcasts, radio,
news.
>> Hello and welcome to another episode of
the OddLots podcast. I'm Joe Weisenthal.
>> And I'm Tracy Aloway.
>> Tracy, we're recording this March 25th,
2026. It's 9:10 a.m. And the
>> Are you going to do the seconds as well?
>> No, but the reason I do mention the
time, the cash trading and the stock
market hasn't opened. The reason I
mentioned the time is not just because
things are moving fast, but to establish
we've had market moving headlines
already this morning. Oh, absolutely. So
just in the last like 15 20 minutes we
got some headlines attributed to the
FARS news agency out of Iran saying
there is no interest in talks there's no
interest in ceasefire the US position
about pursuing a ceasefire is illogical
that moved futures down a little bit
we're you know it's a cliche you know
headline driven market you hear that a
lot the last several weeks have felt
like the headline driven market to drive
all headline driven market
>> no it really I know it's a cliche but it
really is a headline driven market and I
think part of the issue here is because
no one's entirely sure what the goals
are when it comes to Iran, it's really
hard to judge progress of the conflict
on any sort of fundamental basis, right?
So all you can look at is basically what
Trump and the other two sides are saying
and so you get these big reactions every
time they tweet something or post on
truth social and then tend to contradict
each other.
>> Absolutely. And you know I do think look
there is this extreme level of
skepticism from almost any headline you
get out of the US white house.
>> I think if you go back to the post
liberation day environment particularly
with the sort of modest
with China you would get these headlines
we're talking and then the Chinese would
put out a headline we're not talking but
then it turns out that there was a
little bit more talk than what maybe the
Chinese side had admitted to. So often I
think as much as you dis as many people
are inclined to disbelieve headlines, I
don't think people disbelieve them
entirely.
When Trump said yesterday that the
Iranians had sent him a prize that was
extremely valuable and it's like I mean
that's tough to take seriously. But is
there some modest signal? I don't know.
It's really tough. It's really tough.
But I, you know, I just want to say two
other things real quickly on this, which
is that even with the headlines today
about Iran rejecting ceasefire, futures
are still up. So it's not like people
have like completely, oh, nothing's
happening. And for all the talk about,
and we've had multiple guests and I
they're the smartest people in the world
talk about, oh, oil is going to surge
the longer this goes on. As of the time
we're talking about this, Brent crude is
still right around or just under $100.
We haven't had the mega surge yet. So, I
like to take markets seriously even if
sometimes I don't always understand what
they're doing.
>> Well, the big question to me is whether
or not markets are still in denial,
right? And you see people talking about
like, oh,
>> people are being very optimistic about
the future. I saw the Morgan Stanley
report saying that corporate profits
were going to go up later this year. the
oil price. Again, we're talking about
the closure of the straight of Hormuz,
which is the sort of thought experiment
that has bedeled oil analysts for
decades. And yet, you know, the reaction
has been kind of muted.
>> Meanwhile, in the rates market, there's
a lot going on there, too. And you still
have a lot of bond traders who are very
reluctant to price out the possibility
of a rate cut later this year.
>> Completely. And it feels like the idea
of a rate cut, at least for now, does
not seem anywhere near the quote table.
But yeah, anyway, so how do traders even
like make sense of this headline? How do
they know what headlines to believe? Why
does there sometimes seem to be this gap
between what a lot of people think the
market should be and where it actually
is? Very excited to say we have uh one
of the most plugged in people that we
know is someone who is talking to people
who move serious money every single day.
He goes around the world and he has
dinners with them and he talks to them
about their trades. He even brought us a
nice gift which is uh his tour a tour.
It is the cover the macro dinners 2026
tour with a nice Deutsche Bank logo.
>> But you should read some of those cities
just to give an idea
>> the dates of the macro dinner tour. Jan
4th London Jan 21 Geneva Jan 29th Milan
Miami Budapest London New York City
Montreal Copenhagen Riad Doha Dubai etc.
You get the idea. He's always talking to
people and he is the one of the most
plugged in people that we talk to. We
are going to be speaking of course to
the one and only Ozan Tarman, vice chair
of global macro at Deutsche Bank. So,
uh, Ozan, thank you for coming back on
OddLots.
>> Joe and Tracy, it's an absolute
pleasure. Highlights of the week, very
close to where I used to live in New
York City as well.
>> Uh, it's great having you here in
studio. It's a pretty wild market to
trade, I assume.
>> Very, very wild market to trade. And on
the t-shirt, unfortunately, for example,
this Riyad Qatar Dubai leg that I was
looking forward to. We'll see what
happens.
>> Oh, right.
>> We'll see. We'll see. We'll see what
happens with uh with that. But not
necessarily untradeable. Still traders
always smell things, always have a sense
of where the paint is, where the
momentum is. Even uh walking in now, I
became a veteran of this wonderful show.
I was thinking this time around we
should really say Wednesday night.
>> Yeah, that's right. you know one I I I
know that what I can say now one day
later may look a little bit different
etc etc but still walking in now
obviously it's a bit cliche to say it
takes two to tango or taco three maybe
but that being said at the moment the
pain trade the momentum trade is for
this equity rally and oil fall to
continue there are many unfortunately I
have told all my clients france wounded
hurt players out there certainly in race
market certainly on front end
>> so people are reluctant to take fresh
bets but as I constantly hold these
conversations roundts I do get the sense
that now getting to know the president
well as well people did expect this we
won the war I won the war mission
accomplished moment which he's trying to
do in a few ways then the big debate is
yes and we do get these spikes of equity
sire oil lower at the end as you rightly
said even brand is lower than 100 than
we should talk VT VI is even lower
>> but do you fade it or not that's what it
boils down to another big true cliche is
what does Iran do what does Iran say as
we speak because of fars like you said
Israel 12 said these talks are happening
farce Iran said no we're still waiting
which one to fade that's the big
question mark my gut feel from what I
sense from the clients is there is room
for a squeeze here in equities sire oil
over lower but the tail risk is very
very fat.
>> Yeah.
>> Wait. So talk to us more about
positioning. I mean going into this war
I think everyone was pretty much
expecting rate cuts later in the year
oil prices nothing dramatic there
certainly. Did everyone just change very
very quickly and now we're left with
positioning that can lead to a bigger
squeeze higher?
>> Very relevant question. I want to take
us back to February 27, the night before
the attack on Iran. Again, I was
visiting Palm Beach and Miami and the
feel couldn't be more different. The
main obsession focus of the US client
base, the key players was AI research
something big is going to happen.
Schumer how 50% of white color jobs
could be lost in 12 to 18 months. So
finally not only rate cut expectations
were increasing we were we were getting
bull flatteners. So even long end was
coming down Thursday Friday it was
around 405 and I do remember before Iran
US 10 year close topic 3.93
and cannot be named but some one of
those more legendary France clients of
mine comes to me with an email ozan we
nailed this this that bond is the new
gold.
>> We need to talk about our friend gold as
well.
One more thing, another good friend. I
did bring this on paper because it's
very very telling. This guy sends me a
message I think the Tuesday or Wednesday
before Iran. The multi-illium question
is can the rest of the world isolate
itself from this destruction? I'm not
sure. He was talking more about the AI
fears. Another observation today reminds
me of early February 2020. While we all
saw people falling over in China, it
became clear by the day that we're about
to see a pandemic. The S&P made new
alltime high. The same is today with
Iran. Nobody cares. I mean,
>> yeah,
>> rings so true through now, right?
>> Actually, let's talk about gold and
positioning for a second. The last time
we had you on was September, and one of
the themes of that was uh the relentless
bid into gold. And whenever we frame a
conversation, I'm like, God, this is
going to be the top. It was not the top,
even close. So, that was uh gold was
around 3,800 ounce during that episode.
It got over $5,500 an ounce in early
February. As of yesterday, we saw a
10day gold selloff. How much is this
just about all these different trades
not working at once? The steepener trade
not working at once, the oil trade not
working at the same time, and
essentially a lot of players being
forced to liquidate the one big winning
thing that they had in their portfolio.
>> Very much so. And look, I love you guys,
but on the last show as well, uh when we
all started with gold media, gold media,
I was very, you know, happily politely
answering, but in my mind, I was saying
this is an orange sign of course. And
then I listen to our show. We listen. So
I'm like risk on this works. Risk of
this works. I'm like Joe Tracy like it
has to be something that comes from the
left field that gets the whole thing
>> unwound. And even though the guy says
here Iran people look at nobody cares.
The repercussions on the position is
just like you said that people to get
out of all winners
>> and gold was a big winner. Emerging
markets were big winners. Yeah. So that
was the first trigger and then another
story now once you are in this position
once you realize it's not days it's not
weeks this is going to continue on and
on petro dollar countries other people
start selling their winners to build
defense mechanisms I mean it's almost
like public reporting in terms of China
my motherland Turkey India they have
these gold reserves for a reason so
that's another reason Why first
technicals you go after your winner and
then fundamentally some of these strong
hands
>> for understandable reasons
>> are selling them everything happened
back to Tracy's question so people were
all into these bare flatten steepeners
first then they believed in bull
flatteners because everything was all
rates were coming down then you get into
this world and thanks were jumping onto
it Monday after Iran warflation
warflation this is serious inflation
expectations will increase it's not as
simple as finding the next Venezuela
jersey and my god from like getting
ready for cuts discussion one two or
maybe three in Fed at least hold ECB and
certainly cut Bank of England look where
we are now for a while we've priced in
four hikes for Bank of England and ECB
we're right below three now for both
that's huge that means seats are lost
pods are closed
>> are closed how many times have you heard
the word liquidation
or you know a pod shop blowing up in the
past few weeks
>> a lot unfortunately right capulation and
I teach all our young stars or mentors
so after the cliche is oh investment
bank will do well trading floor will do
well because you know be offer fear no
not like that after a while there's
really something called bad volatility
and this is bad volatility from these
crazy headlines being that much slaves
to what somebody says at Friday 10 p.m.
to Saturday 11 p.m.
Also um this much of liquidation and
capitation after a while people say the
best thing is uh blank piece of paper
less trading and let's watch that's why
your opening question some people see
this market as untradable
but unfortunately in times like this
especially if you're not wounded somehow
flat is the new up if you have survived
these are the moments to make the
difference who knows who knows Joe maybe
this is right around April 9, 2025
moment. This is when may maybe this is
right around the around the dip and we
will remember it like the time we we
were able to look through it. I have my
doubts, but maybe
>> what is a pain trade and why is why is
that a useful concept?
>> Very good questions. You know, you you
know what triggers me? a pain I mean
it's not the ideal definition maybe
because you don't want your clients and
friends to be in pain but a lot of it
even before the days of quant trading
crowding out positioning is so important
for this market after a while it can
become as important as a fundamental
factor after a while you do feel that in
these echo chambers players almost want
to believe because of the pricing
fundamentals on what they're talking
about so pain trade is when that hurt
gets a belief in a trade so much and
when it works just the other way around.
I mean what happens to gold is a big one
because for a long time it was unshaken
but sometimes even
>> smaller instances
>> like for the past 15 to 18 months we
really believed that big dollar would
trade soft what I mean by that is either
because of h ratios dollization
dollar wouldn't be the safe haven that
it used to be it would make sense to
sell dollars whenever one has a chance
now all of a sudden because of Iran
because of people building up selling
their winners to go to safe heavens. If
we trade towards the 110 111 before
120121
that's a much less talked about pain
trade why because it's going to further
shake places like rest of the world
emerging markets Korea etc etc and of
course it opens conversation right
sometimes you say sometimes pain trade
is so obvious sometimes some say no this
you know that trade is there for a
reason consensus is going to continue to
work you develop a market you trade on
it
>> on the dollar and this is related to
gold as well you do seem to be in this
weird situation where like, okay, people
are liquidating the successful trades to
raise cash, go neutral, whatever. But at
the same time, you still have plenty of
people talking about diversification
away from the US. And you could make a
very strong argument that given what's
happening in the oil market right now,
maybe you don't want to only price that
in dollars. Maybe you want to start
thinking about other currencies. How are
people thinking about the I guess like
US exceptionalism trade at the moment
because there's two crossurrens
>> for sure. It's moving from US
exceptionalism selling your US assets to
more hedge ratios. It it definitely
moved. Let's put it that way.
>> Again at the beginning of January,
February, all these events one after
another. Venezuela, Greenland. My god,
so much happened in 3 months.
>> Tell us about it. Pow Powell's case
again, not necessarily selling your USS,
but buying more, buying less, increasing
your H ratios had become fashionable.
But you're very right, Tracy. My partner
in success, one of them, George Seros,
head of our FX strategy, he has this, we
love George, we all do. He has this um
rough formula. Euro dollar roughly 2/3
oil price, one/3 gas price. It should
have traded around 11250 113 as we
speak. It doesn't. Part of the reason is
exactly this. Despite what oil is doing,
despite what gas is doing, people do
want to own a little bit less dollars.
But unfortunately as I sit here as I
come to my oddlas every 3 months or so
vice chair Dece bank proudly waving my
blue make Europe great again hat it's in
trouble a bit whether this world you
know takes another one week two week two
months the wounds will stay the wounds
will especially stay in oil and gas
prices we disrupt the supply enough and
the big importers the ones who need
those oil and gas price is lower is
Europe. So in an understanding way
talking about when consensus starts
becoming more sense in these roundts and
beyond it's becoming a bit fashionable
to start questioning the European
equities European credits. Funny enough
it doesn't show as much yet in the FX
but watch out for the equity and credit
angle of this Europe trade. So this is
this is really important which is that
basically okay there is this long-term
pessimism about Europe but there had
been some optimism recently and cheaper
energy prices certainly helped the
relative competitiveness and
profitability of the domestic industrial
giants and so forth. But we're going to
probably be regardless of the length of
the war in a period of structurally
higher energy prices and that continues
to build to the negative side of Europe.
So let's talk a little bit more about
oil because
>> exactly
>> if you just talk to the oil analysts who
I love like their hair is on fire right
now and they pro you know this is
cataclysm but Brent crude not only is it
well off its highs from a week ago it's
not even anywhere close to its highs in
2022
>> at the peak of the inflation I mean we
got at one point in March 2022 Brent
crude was at 139 we're below 99 actually
right now when I'm talking about this
the thing is like, oh, you closed the
straight of Hormuz, oil just exploded,
etc. We all know it. We all see it.
There is nothing that any of us, you can
like be online all day and talk to all
the energy experts. You are like, you do
not know more information than the
market does. So, talk to us like how
you're thinking about oil and the fact
that there does seem to be this gap
between the hair on fire rhetoric of the
oil knowowers versus the prices which
are high, but even by the scale of the
last 5 years, not insane. I was as as
the question was coming I was preparing
my next note to read but first of all on
the oil and fire we all see and respect
Jeff Curry what he said about
molecules and interesting people are
watching right did you see the tweet of
head of Iran parliament
>> oh yeah
he made he he used the you can't print
molecule this is another thing he also
referred to another thing as fake news
everyone around the world is now talking
the same that actually reminds me of a
friend who visited Afghanistan and he
met some people working for the Taliban
and like they started WhatsAppapping him
like Pepe the frog memes and they called
him a soy boy and stuff like that like
everyone talks the same way anyway that
a bit of a divergence but
>> a little bit depressing that this is the
common language
>> now this is the lingua frank of the
internet we all
>> everyone says warlation everyone say
etc etc all but talk more but but this
physical versus paper the paper trading
is very very important so this friend of
mine an ex-colague I worked with him for
decades big commodity trader now a dear
client and you know one of these guys
who he he talks math so MIT Russia's MIT
etc he sends me a message and we are now
even one more week late this is last
week
>> and he doesn't do ozan high all the time
ozan high onmus if it's not starting to
open in one month now three weeks the
world has a huge huge huge problem and
this is not ozan this guy doesn't say
>> Qatar LNG will need months to restart
once hormos is clear and in oil we have
10 mibes of shutins already and Asian
refiners are very very start pipelines
to rate C would take years and also
Arnata Panacea etc et talks about
hoodies so I get it brand versus what
WTI WTI is trading even better etc etc
but especially if the likes of Fars is
correct
>> if we have a lot of talk but one way or
another this hormos is only two three
tanks you know
>> one Indian tank, one China tank. I do
fear that these guys warning us about
physical delivery maybe more, right?
>> Yeah. And look, of course, and I get the
logic, but the people in the oil market
who are trading, whether they're
speculators, whether they're hedge
funds, whether they're real oil
companies who are having to hedge
production, they have a lot of money at
the line. They know all of this. There
is nothing that can be said about the
longer this goes on, blah blah blah, the
more they get shut in, blah blah. We're
running out of storage. It's going to
take time to rebuild. There's nothing
that could be said. And yet here we are
at the
>> and I respect their approach as well.
This comes back to also why equities
haven't sold off that much. Why credit
hasn't sold off that much at the end of
the day. Okay, it may not be Venezuela.
We didn't find the dirty but I think
people do believe that this squeeze
longer squeeze will come and it's not
that easy to fade. So whether it's
Islamabad, whether it's Vance meeting
somebody in Islamabad, whether president
I wouldn't be surprised in two days
saying I need one more week and you know
creating a delay. People do believe that
in 3 months time, 6 months time that's
the forward oil market as well. We will
not be talking about this. We will be
talking much more about AI or private
credits. That's why the tail is big.
That's why okay another I'm I'm choosing
my words carefully as well but marines
are approaching we're talking about car
island
>> these French clients talk to that ex
general this ex general some claim that
taking control of foremost once marines
are there may not be that difficult
imagine that going wrong imagine you
know of course lives being lost but even
Joe one or two ships getting hit these
are not these are not army professionals
driving those ships these people people
on payroll. So even on one gas ship, one
oil ship hit,
>> things can get out of hand very very
quickly. And that's why, by the way,
let's link it back to markets. Okay, you
have a point. Oil brand is still below
100. But look what ECB and Bank of Bank
of England pricing did and they're not
backing away. They're saying Madame
Lagard today.
>> Of course, like she she sounded calm.
She didn't say I embrace the three hike
pricing, I will hike. But she did say we
will be we're watching this. So, uh,
>> back to the 2020 analogies. People don't
want to be seen late.
>> Mhm.
>> Things can move very, very fast.
>> I do want to talk about private credit
because I think it's important and it's
kind of gotten overshadowed by the Iran
situation for obvious reasons. But just
going back to the Taliban and Soy Boys,
which is a sentence I never thought I
would say on this podcast. I mean this
is the first like major conflict related
market event where we have both sides to
some extent using AI generated memes and
content to for you know propaganda
purposes to express their point of view
on how the conflict is going and what
they're trying to achieve. I am very
curious on a trading floor, if you're a
big investor, when Iran tweets like a
Lego video showing Trump doing something
or showing their reaction to Trump doing
something. Are traders watching those
and thinking seriously about them?
>> Thinking seriously about them? I I don't
know. But and they're watching, they are
forwarding each other the the things.
But the more key thing is, yeah, people
do start to weed out the more credible
sources or the more credible reverse
signs in this day and age. We all
translate from Arabic very very quickly.
We do compare what a US source says on a
potential Islamabad meeting versus what
an Iranian source says. After all, you
do get a sense that which Iranian source
seems to be more connected than the
other. All of these things are
I'm not going to say it makes our job
easier, but it makes our job even more
spicy, complicated in a way. We do have
Yeah, the I completely get you. Lego and
memes is one extreme. Not very useful.
But on the on the useful side,
>> yeah, there's the the Iranian credible
journalist is right there on the table
>> tweeting and telling you, "Look at that.
Look at this." That helps. You know, I'm
thinking about your shirt again and the
dinners that are scheduled in the Gulf
region that may or may not happen, which
brings me, you know, you're someone who
is extremely plugged into money in that
area and there's this question of like,
does something change in the trajectory
about the business of Dubai? There was a
headline about Millennium. Did you see
that?
>> I saw it. They may move some traders to
Jersey, which okay, cards on the table.
Like Dubai, not probably. I've never
been.
>> I doubt it's my cup of tea.
>> I feel like say with some certainty that
Dubai is more fun than
>> Well, this is what I'm saying. It looks
nicer than what I imagine the island of
Jersey is, which I just imagine is very
gray and bleak all the time. I don't
know but I assume like you know do you
think there's any of the talk about is
there going to be a real trajectory in
the amount of money flowing into the
golf
>> is that really and flowing in and out
short-term and medium-term answer
medium-term of course I do I have some
dear friends there beyond the this
industry other other industries like
direct analogy when I come to uh New
York obviously you see your clients but
you see your friends in Dubai you have
to give even more time because There has
been such a move for
>> different funds, taxes, you you know the
deal. People do have short-term memory.
Do remember COVID. But at the same time,
of course, this will have an effect.
Other areas may try to get some of that
influence. Maybe some of those people go
back to London. Maybe places like Milan,
other areas of Asia gets more
interesting. Absolutely. Heart goes out
to them. But at the same time, it
affects the sentiment as well. By the
way, part of the reason why many people
got the whole Iranian thing wrong.
>> Yeah.
>> Warflation, all that. It was that too.
So, not only from that Friday night,
Saturday morning of attack to Monday, we
didn't get a dirty, you know, the way I
put it, you know, upd.
But Iran immediately began hitting GCC.
Lifestyles got affected that affects
sentiment. So way before the worries
about inflation and warflation and
supply change supply change sentiment
got affected right there. So my hope and
thinking a year from now when we do the
show again the effect and power of Dubai
and Qatar will still be there but yes in
the short term u it's not going away.
It's it's it's an it's an important
market moving factor. By the way, did
you see that um Dulce Rodriguez is going
to be speaking in Miami at a investment
conference backed by Saudi Arabia? I'm
just saying they don't make communists
like they used to.
Let's talk private credit because we
have all these headlines coming out
about redemption requests and a bunch of
funds limiting those as is their right
in the fund documentation. However, I am
starting to get frustrated with this
knee-jerk response which is you see all
these headlines, you know, Aries, Apollo
curbing withdrawals and then everyone in
private credit is like, well, this is
fine. This is a feature of the system.
It's not a bug and obviously investors
should have read the docs and this is
exactly what's supposed to happen.
Whereas to me, it seems very clear there
is stress in private credit regardless
of what's actually happening with
withdrawals. And if you think about
private credit as this huge asset class
that was growing enormously in recent
years and was a major source of credit
and financing for companies in America,
then it seems very clear to me that what
we should be talking about right now is
a potential tightening of financial
conditions as some of that demand starts
to eb away. How are you thinking about
the private credit space? And when
you're doing your meetings with
investors, I'm very curious how much
time is spent on private credit versus
Iran right now.
>> Right before Iran, it was all about
private credit and AI of the world. Now,
as immediate headline to you last night
when I did a small round table, of
course, it all started with Iran, but I
did make sure that we went to private
credit and I'm with you Tracy. The
immediate reaction there from directly
involved people to more macro tourists,
it's not systemic. It's not systemic.
It's not 2008 maybe 2001 that yeah we
smile at each other that to me
immediately a bit of an orange sign okay
I understand so it's it all seems
orderly withdrawals are orderly etc etc
but headlines are not going away if
anything they are definitely hiding
behind Iran at the moment it would be
almost all what we would be talking
about especially in US if it wasn't for
Iran and by the way because of that my
blue hat would would have done much
better than US so that's another sad
thing right it's quote unquote US and
Israel's war, but Europe and UK and rest
of the world gets hurt more. But anyway,
these are the new cards we're dealt
with. The key thing to watch is at the
moment they claim it's orderly, you get
your money. If it feels more and more
like this, A B C, you see the headlines,
you're not going to be able to get your
money for a while. Then first time you
mention my binky, I'm very curious to
see what he says tonight on my macro
dinner. It's a Wednesday macro dinner,
big macro dinner tonight. is he's still
sticking to his 8,000. Why? If people
cannot take their money away from
private credit and have to sell
something liquid, then watch out for
public credit that has been very
>> resilient and of course watch out public
equity. So I'm watching that space very
very carefully. I do understand why they
immediately say it's not systemic. I get
it but you know okay maybe it's not 2008
but it's maybe something between this
2001 to 2008 also it's very into say
yeah it's not leverage is not there
thank god we may not see the northern
rock BBC scenes of 2007208 all these
cues and stuff it's a more quote unquote
1% problem but what if it spreads and
spreads and some of the big US banks
start lending less to these friends
what if insurance companies get hit more
and more. Watch this space. I think it's
a bit too superficial to say it's not
systemic.
>> It's going to be okay. It's almost like
uh the bank crisis of two years ago in
this place. I'm more worried than that.
>> You know, one of the things we're
talking about is this very violent rates
move and war inflation and so forth. But
one of the things that's emerged in the
last few weeks is there's growing
evidence that actually inflation was
reacelerating even prior to the start of
the war. And so when we look at these
moves, we might attribute some of them
to the war itself and the pasture of oil
prices and the military spending and
that of course Trump gets another $200
billion for defense. That's more
spending. That's inflationary. But maybe
like could it be that that is actually
not the story that the bigger story in
rates is simply that the data showing
that through the end of February there
is more evidence that inflation was not
heading down to 2% as many people had
maybe wish casted
>> and that's a really blow to my heart in
terms of expectations and stuff right
because quote unquote we almost had them
on on Feb 27
>> close we had a good thing going it was a
hurricane it was a hurricane obviously
much more important market it's a
tragedy for humanity war etc but for the
market as well it was a hierarchy ty was
at 393 if that NFP printed like that
maybe we would be talking 370s etc now
genie is completely out of the bottle
for very understandable reasons another
reason another world I want to relate to
related to inflation and before we wrap
up
>> this whole rationing that's a big watch
out for Europe for in Asia if this
continues like this if my uh Russia MIT
friend is right about and the and the
problems after a Oh, I mean people are
already talking about look at
Philippines headlines today for their
airlines. We may very soon be at a point
when some of these Asian countries can
say look I need to give energy and fuel
to my very important famous company but
much more important than that I need to
give fuel and energy and electricity to
my households. Sorry I have to choose.
Yeah,
>> in Europe we may be told maybe you know
don't use that air conditioning too much
work from home more travel less back to
my t-shirt sadly uh Dubai Qatar may be
postponed for understandable reasons but
what about Asia all these airline prices
will will shoot up maybe for work I will
go but for leisure maybe there will be
one less trouble all of this stuff will
hurt growth at the same time it will
need you rationing means more fiscal
measures means more inflation
expectations. So, you know, I'm not in
love with the word stackflation, but
also I'm a rational guy. My job is to
smell the market. Yeah, it's uh we woke
up that station fear.
>> Tarman, thank you so much for coming
back on Oddlos. Thank you for the
t-shirts.
>> Absolutely.
>> Always appreciate checking in with you
and um we'll talk to you again soon.
Next quarter, we'll do our quarterly
checking next time. I'd love
>> Wait, will you put us on the t-shirt as
one of your stops? I should
>> you guys are the highlights.
>> Thanks.
>> Yeah, thank you so much.
>> I always love catching up with Ozan. I
just find it, you know, it's just
incredibly useful to talk to someone
who's always talking to people. For
sure.
>> Right. Like that is a valuable thing in
its own right. Ozan has very interesting
perspectives, but to be able to just
like channel his like his brilliant MIT
friend, what the people said at the
macro dinner last night, always very
useful.
>> You know, also to Ozan's point about
actual capacity cuts in Asia and Europe.
So, you know, because I travel a lot and
I've lived in different places, I'm on
all these different random emailing
lists for like services
>> and flights and airlines and
transportation and things like that. And
I am starting to get the fuel sir charge
email. So, I got one from an Australian
car service that I used once ages ago. A
lot of Indian airlines are starting to
add fuel search charges. Like, you can
see it coming and it's happening
actually like pretty quickly.
>> I just don't want to travel right now,
especially with all the lines you see in
the US. No, seriously.
>> Well, that's a separate issue.
>> I know it's a separate issue, but it's
like I just want to cancel as much as I
can.
>> I'll remind you of that the next time
we're debating whether or not to go to
an external event and you're like,
"Yeah, I want to go. I don't want to go
right now. I don't want to go to
anything. But anyway, seriously, you
know, I do think like this is the thing
that I think about a lot, which is that
I've always been a take market seriously
and sometimes take them literally guy.
And I actually really don't like
>> I know you're a secret EMH bro.
>> Yeah. Not even so secret. And I really
don't like, you know, there will be a
headline from the White House and oil
will go down and everyone will say, "Oh,
they're people are so stupid. They're
being, you know, the investors are so
stupid. and traders are so stupid.
There's a lie, whatever. And like I
don't know about that. But like my point
is there's a lot of money on the line
for people who are paid to take this
very seriously.
>> And if oil is trading below 100, I take
that seriously and I want to understand
why there's the gap because there's
nothing that all of us online and in the
media know that the people with a lot of
money on the line don't know. Right?
This is a a fact. And I do think that's
a very interesting point that the people
with a lot at stake. Yeah, oil is high,
but it's certainly not at the hair on
fire levels that either that we even saw
in 2022.
>> Well, my guess is that what we're seeing
also is a divorce between the financial
and the physical.
>> That's true.
>> Right. So, you can tra you can trade oil
futures and assume that they're not
going to have to take delivery at some
point. But at the same time, if you're
after the physical barrels, like you
can't get those at the moment. So, I
don't even know how that like actually
relates to price. There's apparently
some price that we see Rory Johnston is
always quoted about the actual physical
price in Oman and it's like
significantly high but the two
eventually have to merge right like they
cannot remain disconnected.
>> Yeah, but not for not for a while. So I
think that disconnect is kind of like
what's in focus at the moment.
>> Well, if you're trading front month oil,
you have about a month, right?
>> Yeah. Okay, fine. But like I think
people are betting on like
>> I don't have to worry about it for a
month. That's what I'm saying.
>> Very plausible. It's it's certainly a
very very difficult unusual time. I mean
>> Oh, totally. And this is the other thing
to your point like it is very true that
the outcome of all of this basically
hinges on three players and one player
in particular and at any moment in time
you could have someone come out and
announce a ceasefire at which point to
Ozan's comments earlier like you could
see an almighty rally just because of
positioning going into this. you could
see a squeeze like without an agreement.
And so I think like that's also where a
lot of the nervousness is coming from
like no one wants to be caught
completely offside if the conflict
suddenly ends.
>> You know, uh Ozan used the term bad and
I think that makes sense which is okay
on one hand the trading desks sure
there's a lot of activity in some sense
and so that is a source of profit. On
the other hand, this is the type of
environment where it's like maybe you
just want to stay away. You want to keep
positions light. If you have a position,
you don't want to like go all in or
anything like that.
>> I'm imagining a trader like staring at
the VIX curve and going bad vault bad.
>> All right. Shall we leave it there?
>> Let's leave it there.
>> This has been another episode of the Odd
Thoughts podcast. I'm Tracy Aloway. You
can follow me at Tracy Aloway.
>> And I'm Joe Weisenthal. You can follow
me at the stalwart. Follow our guest
Ozan Tarman. He's at Ozan Karman. Follow
our producers Carmen Rodriguez at Carmen
Armano Bennett at Dashbot and Kalebrooks
at Kalebrooks. And for more OddLots
content, go to bloomberg.com/odlotss.
We have a daily newsletter and all of
our episodes. You can chat about all
these topics 24/7 in our Discord,
discord.gg/odlots.
>> And if you enjoy OddLots, if you like it
when we bring on Ozan to talk about his
binky, then please leave us a positive
review on your favorite podcast
platform. And remember, if you are a
Bloomberg subscriber, you can listen to
all of our episodes absolutely adree.
All you need to do is find the Bloomberg
channel on Apple Podcast and follow the
instructions there. Thanks for
listening.
Ask follow-up questions or revisit key timestamps.
In this episode of the OddLots podcast, Joe Weisenthal and Tracy Alloway discuss the current headline-driven market with Ozan Tarman, Vice Chair of Global Macro at Deutsche Bank. They examine the disconnect between geopolitical tensions involving Iran and the relatively muted reactions in oil prices and equity markets. Tarman explains the concept of the pain trade, the liquidation of winning assets like gold to cover losses in rates, and emerging stresses in private credit. The discussion also covers the potential for stagflation as energy prices and military spending contribute to re-accelerating inflation.
Videos recently processed by our community