HomeVideos

This Is How Big Money Is Trading the War in Iran | Odd Lots

Now Playing

This Is How Big Money Is Trading the War in Iran | Odd Lots

Transcript

1058 segments

0:02

Bloomberg Audio Studios podcasts, radio,

0:06

news.

0:18

>> Hello and welcome to another episode of

0:20

the OddLots podcast. I'm Joe Weisenthal.

0:23

>> And I'm Tracy Aloway.

0:25

>> Tracy, we're recording this March 25th,

0:28

2026. It's 9:10 a.m. And the

0:30

>> Are you going to do the seconds as well?

0:32

>> No, but the reason I do mention the

0:34

time, the cash trading and the stock

0:37

market hasn't opened. The reason I

0:38

mentioned the time is not just because

0:40

things are moving fast, but to establish

0:43

we've had market moving headlines

0:45

already this morning. Oh, absolutely. So

0:46

just in the last like 15 20 minutes we

0:49

got some headlines attributed to the

0:51

FARS news agency out of Iran saying

0:53

there is no interest in talks there's no

0:55

interest in ceasefire the US position

0:57

about pursuing a ceasefire is illogical

1:00

that moved futures down a little bit

1:02

we're you know it's a cliche you know

1:04

headline driven market you hear that a

1:06

lot the last several weeks have felt

1:08

like the headline driven market to drive

1:10

all headline driven market

1:12

>> no it really I know it's a cliche but it

1:14

really is a headline driven market and I

1:15

think part of the issue here is because

1:17

no one's entirely sure what the goals

1:20

are when it comes to Iran, it's really

1:23

hard to judge progress of the conflict

1:25

on any sort of fundamental basis, right?

1:28

So all you can look at is basically what

1:31

Trump and the other two sides are saying

1:33

and so you get these big reactions every

1:36

time they tweet something or post on

1:38

truth social and then tend to contradict

1:40

each other.

1:41

>> Absolutely. And you know I do think look

1:43

there is this extreme level of

1:45

skepticism from almost any headline you

1:47

get out of the US white house.

1:49

>> I think if you go back to the post

1:52

liberation day environment particularly

1:54

with the sort of modest

1:57

with China you would get these headlines

1:59

we're talking and then the Chinese would

2:01

put out a headline we're not talking but

2:03

then it turns out that there was a

2:04

little bit more talk than what maybe the

2:07

Chinese side had admitted to. So often I

2:10

think as much as you dis as many people

2:12

are inclined to disbelieve headlines, I

2:14

don't think people disbelieve them

2:15

entirely.

2:17

When Trump said yesterday that the

2:20

Iranians had sent him a prize that was

2:22

extremely valuable and it's like I mean

2:25

that's tough to take seriously. But is

2:28

there some modest signal? I don't know.

2:31

It's really tough. It's really tough.

2:33

But I, you know, I just want to say two

2:34

other things real quickly on this, which

2:36

is that even with the headlines today

2:37

about Iran rejecting ceasefire, futures

2:40

are still up. So it's not like people

2:41

have like completely, oh, nothing's

2:43

happening. And for all the talk about,

2:46

and we've had multiple guests and I

2:48

they're the smartest people in the world

2:49

talk about, oh, oil is going to surge

2:51

the longer this goes on. As of the time

2:53

we're talking about this, Brent crude is

2:55

still right around or just under $100.

2:58

We haven't had the mega surge yet. So, I

3:01

like to take markets seriously even if

3:03

sometimes I don't always understand what

3:05

they're doing.

3:06

>> Well, the big question to me is whether

3:08

or not markets are still in denial,

3:10

right? And you see people talking about

3:11

like, oh,

3:13

>> people are being very optimistic about

3:14

the future. I saw the Morgan Stanley

3:16

report saying that corporate profits

3:18

were going to go up later this year. the

3:21

oil price. Again, we're talking about

3:24

the closure of the straight of Hormuz,

3:26

which is the sort of thought experiment

3:28

that has bedeled oil analysts for

3:30

decades. And yet, you know, the reaction

3:32

has been kind of muted.

3:34

>> Meanwhile, in the rates market, there's

3:36

a lot going on there, too. And you still

3:38

have a lot of bond traders who are very

3:40

reluctant to price out the possibility

3:43

of a rate cut later this year.

3:45

>> Completely. And it feels like the idea

3:48

of a rate cut, at least for now, does

3:50

not seem anywhere near the quote table.

3:53

But yeah, anyway, so how do traders even

3:56

like make sense of this headline? How do

3:57

they know what headlines to believe? Why

4:00

does there sometimes seem to be this gap

4:02

between what a lot of people think the

4:04

market should be and where it actually

4:05

is? Very excited to say we have uh one

4:09

of the most plugged in people that we

4:10

know is someone who is talking to people

4:12

who move serious money every single day.

4:15

He goes around the world and he has

4:16

dinners with them and he talks to them

4:17

about their trades. He even brought us a

4:19

nice gift which is uh his tour a tour.

4:22

It is the cover the macro dinners 2026

4:25

tour with a nice Deutsche Bank logo.

4:27

>> But you should read some of those cities

4:28

just to give an idea

4:29

>> the dates of the macro dinner tour. Jan

4:31

4th London Jan 21 Geneva Jan 29th Milan

4:35

Miami Budapest London New York City

4:37

Montreal Copenhagen Riad Doha Dubai etc.

4:39

You get the idea. He's always talking to

4:41

people and he is the one of the most

4:44

plugged in people that we talk to. We

4:46

are going to be speaking of course to

4:47

the one and only Ozan Tarman, vice chair

4:49

of global macro at Deutsche Bank. So,

4:52

uh, Ozan, thank you for coming back on

4:54

OddLots.

4:54

>> Joe and Tracy, it's an absolute

4:56

pleasure. Highlights of the week, very

4:58

close to where I used to live in New

4:59

York City as well.

5:00

>> Uh, it's great having you here in

5:02

studio. It's a pretty wild market to

5:04

trade, I assume.

5:05

>> Very, very wild market to trade. And on

5:07

the t-shirt, unfortunately, for example,

5:09

this Riyad Qatar Dubai leg that I was

5:12

looking forward to. We'll see what

5:14

happens.

5:14

>> Oh, right.

5:15

>> We'll see. We'll see. We'll see what

5:16

happens with uh with that. But not

5:18

necessarily untradeable. Still traders

5:21

always smell things, always have a sense

5:23

of where the paint is, where the

5:25

momentum is. Even uh walking in now, I

5:28

became a veteran of this wonderful show.

5:31

I was thinking this time around we

5:32

should really say Wednesday night.

5:34

>> Yeah, that's right. you know one I I I

5:36

know that what I can say now one day

5:38

later may look a little bit different

5:40

etc etc but still walking in now

5:44

obviously it's a bit cliche to say it

5:46

takes two to tango or taco three maybe

5:50

but that being said at the moment the

5:52

pain trade the momentum trade is for

5:55

this equity rally and oil fall to

5:58

continue there are many unfortunately I

6:01

have told all my clients france wounded

6:03

hurt players out there certainly in race

6:06

market certainly on front end

6:08

>> so people are reluctant to take fresh

6:11

bets but as I constantly hold these

6:14

conversations roundts I do get the sense

6:17

that now getting to know the president

6:20

well as well people did expect this we

6:23

won the war I won the war mission

6:25

accomplished moment which he's trying to

6:26

do in a few ways then the big debate is

6:30

yes and we do get these spikes of equity

6:33

sire oil lower at the end as you rightly

6:36

said even brand is lower than 100 than

6:38

we should talk VT VI is even lower

6:40

>> but do you fade it or not that's what it

6:42

boils down to another big true cliche is

6:45

what does Iran do what does Iran say as

6:47

we speak because of fars like you said

6:50

Israel 12 said these talks are happening

6:52

farce Iran said no we're still waiting

6:55

which one to fade that's the big

6:56

question mark my gut feel from what I

6:59

sense from the clients is there is room

7:02

for a squeeze here in equities sire oil

7:05

over lower but the tail risk is very

7:07

very fat.

7:08

>> Yeah.

7:09

>> Wait. So talk to us more about

7:10

positioning. I mean going into this war

7:13

I think everyone was pretty much

7:14

expecting rate cuts later in the year

7:18

oil prices nothing dramatic there

7:20

certainly. Did everyone just change very

7:24

very quickly and now we're left with

7:25

positioning that can lead to a bigger

7:27

squeeze higher?

7:28

>> Very relevant question. I want to take

7:30

us back to February 27, the night before

7:33

the attack on Iran. Again, I was

7:35

visiting Palm Beach and Miami and the

7:38

feel couldn't be more different. The

7:41

main obsession focus of the US client

7:45

base, the key players was AI research

7:49

something big is going to happen.

7:50

Schumer how 50% of white color jobs

7:53

could be lost in 12 to 18 months. So

7:56

finally not only rate cut expectations

7:59

were increasing we were we were getting

8:01

bull flatteners. So even long end was

8:03

coming down Thursday Friday it was

8:05

around 405 and I do remember before Iran

8:08

US 10 year close topic 3.93

8:12

and cannot be named but some one of

8:13

those more legendary France clients of

8:15

mine comes to me with an email ozan we

8:18

nailed this this that bond is the new

8:20

gold.

8:21

>> We need to talk about our friend gold as

8:22

well.

8:24

One more thing, another good friend. I

8:26

did bring this on paper because it's

8:28

very very telling. This guy sends me a

8:30

message I think the Tuesday or Wednesday

8:31

before Iran. The multi-illium question

8:33

is can the rest of the world isolate

8:35

itself from this destruction? I'm not

8:37

sure. He was talking more about the AI

8:38

fears. Another observation today reminds

8:41

me of early February 2020. While we all

8:44

saw people falling over in China, it

8:45

became clear by the day that we're about

8:47

to see a pandemic. The S&P made new

8:49

alltime high. The same is today with

8:51

Iran. Nobody cares. I mean,

8:53

>> yeah,

8:53

>> rings so true through now, right?

8:54

>> Actually, let's talk about gold and

8:56

positioning for a second. The last time

8:57

we had you on was September, and one of

8:59

the themes of that was uh the relentless

9:02

bid into gold. And whenever we frame a

9:04

conversation, I'm like, God, this is

9:06

going to be the top. It was not the top,

9:08

even close. So, that was uh gold was

9:10

around 3,800 ounce during that episode.

9:12

It got over $5,500 an ounce in early

9:14

February. As of yesterday, we saw a

9:17

10day gold selloff. How much is this

9:21

just about all these different trades

9:23

not working at once? The steepener trade

9:25

not working at once, the oil trade not

9:28

working at the same time, and

9:29

essentially a lot of players being

9:31

forced to liquidate the one big winning

9:33

thing that they had in their portfolio.

9:35

>> Very much so. And look, I love you guys,

9:37

but on the last show as well, uh when we

9:40

all started with gold media, gold media,

9:42

I was very, you know, happily politely

9:45

answering, but in my mind, I was saying

9:46

this is an orange sign of course. And

9:48

then I listen to our show. We listen. So

9:51

I'm like risk on this works. Risk of

9:53

this works. I'm like Joe Tracy like it

9:55

has to be something that comes from the

9:57

left field that gets the whole thing

9:59

>> unwound. And even though the guy says

10:02

here Iran people look at nobody cares.

10:04

The repercussions on the position is

10:07

just like you said that people to get

10:09

out of all winners

10:11

>> and gold was a big winner. Emerging

10:13

markets were big winners. Yeah. So that

10:16

was the first trigger and then another

10:19

story now once you are in this position

10:22

once you realize it's not days it's not

10:24

weeks this is going to continue on and

10:26

on petro dollar countries other people

10:29

start selling their winners to build

10:33

defense mechanisms I mean it's almost

10:36

like public reporting in terms of China

10:39

my motherland Turkey India they have

10:41

these gold reserves for a reason so

10:43

that's another reason Why first

10:45

technicals you go after your winner and

10:47

then fundamentally some of these strong

10:49

hands

10:50

>> for understandable reasons

10:51

>> are selling them everything happened

10:53

back to Tracy's question so people were

10:55

all into these bare flatten steepeners

10:58

first then they believed in bull

11:00

flatteners because everything was all

11:02

rates were coming down then you get into

11:04

this world and thanks were jumping onto

11:05

it Monday after Iran warflation

11:08

warflation this is serious inflation

11:10

expectations will increase it's not as

11:12

simple as finding the next Venezuela

11:14

jersey and my god from like getting

11:18

ready for cuts discussion one two or

11:21

maybe three in Fed at least hold ECB and

11:25

certainly cut Bank of England look where

11:28

we are now for a while we've priced in

11:30

four hikes for Bank of England and ECB

11:32

we're right below three now for both

11:35

that's huge that means seats are lost

11:38

pods are closed

11:40

>> are closed how many times have you heard

11:42

the word liquidation

11:43

or you know a pod shop blowing up in the

11:45

past few weeks

11:46

>> a lot unfortunately right capulation and

11:49

I teach all our young stars or mentors

11:52

so after the cliche is oh investment

11:55

bank will do well trading floor will do

11:56

well because you know be offer fear no

12:00

not like that after a while there's

12:01

really something called bad volatility

12:04

and this is bad volatility from these

12:06

crazy headlines being that much slaves

12:08

to what somebody says at Friday 10 p.m.

12:10

to Saturday 11 p.m.

12:13

Also um this much of liquidation and

12:15

capitation after a while people say the

12:19

best thing is uh blank piece of paper

12:21

less trading and let's watch that's why

12:25

your opening question some people see

12:27

this market as untradable

12:30

but unfortunately in times like this

12:32

especially if you're not wounded somehow

12:34

flat is the new up if you have survived

12:37

these are the moments to make the

12:40

difference who knows who knows Joe maybe

12:41

this is right around April 9, 2025

12:44

moment. This is when may maybe this is

12:47

right around the around the dip and we

12:49

will remember it like the time we we

12:51

were able to look through it. I have my

12:53

doubts, but maybe

13:10

>> what is a pain trade and why is why is

13:13

that a useful concept?

13:14

>> Very good questions. You know, you you

13:16

know what triggers me? a pain I mean

13:18

it's not the ideal definition maybe

13:20

because you don't want your clients and

13:21

friends to be in pain but a lot of it

13:24

even before the days of quant trading

13:27

crowding out positioning is so important

13:29

for this market after a while it can

13:32

become as important as a fundamental

13:34

factor after a while you do feel that in

13:39

these echo chambers players almost want

13:41

to believe because of the pricing

13:43

fundamentals on what they're talking

13:45

about so pain trade is when that hurt

13:47

gets a belief in a trade so much and

13:50

when it works just the other way around.

13:52

I mean what happens to gold is a big one

13:54

because for a long time it was unshaken

13:56

but sometimes even

13:58

>> smaller instances

14:00

>> like for the past 15 to 18 months we

14:03

really believed that big dollar would

14:06

trade soft what I mean by that is either

14:08

because of h ratios dollization

14:12

dollar wouldn't be the safe haven that

14:14

it used to be it would make sense to

14:17

sell dollars whenever one has a chance

14:20

now all of a sudden because of Iran

14:22

because of people building up selling

14:25

their winners to go to safe heavens. If

14:27

we trade towards the 110 111 before

14:30

120121

14:32

that's a much less talked about pain

14:35

trade why because it's going to further

14:37

shake places like rest of the world

14:39

emerging markets Korea etc etc and of

14:43

course it opens conversation right

14:44

sometimes you say sometimes pain trade

14:45

is so obvious sometimes some say no this

14:48

you know that trade is there for a

14:49

reason consensus is going to continue to

14:51

work you develop a market you trade on

14:54

it

14:54

>> on the dollar and this is related to

14:56

gold as well you do seem to be in this

14:58

weird situation where like, okay, people

14:59

are liquidating the successful trades to

15:02

raise cash, go neutral, whatever. But at

15:06

the same time, you still have plenty of

15:08

people talking about diversification

15:10

away from the US. And you could make a

15:12

very strong argument that given what's

15:14

happening in the oil market right now,

15:16

maybe you don't want to only price that

15:18

in dollars. Maybe you want to start

15:20

thinking about other currencies. How are

15:22

people thinking about the I guess like

15:24

US exceptionalism trade at the moment

15:27

because there's two crossurrens

15:28

>> for sure. It's moving from US

15:31

exceptionalism selling your US assets to

15:34

more hedge ratios. It it definitely

15:36

moved. Let's put it that way.

15:38

>> Again at the beginning of January,

15:40

February, all these events one after

15:41

another. Venezuela, Greenland. My god,

15:44

so much happened in 3 months.

15:46

>> Tell us about it. Pow Powell's case

15:49

again, not necessarily selling your USS,

15:52

but buying more, buying less, increasing

15:54

your H ratios had become fashionable.

15:57

But you're very right, Tracy. My partner

15:59

in success, one of them, George Seros,

16:01

head of our FX strategy, he has this, we

16:03

love George, we all do. He has this um

16:06

rough formula. Euro dollar roughly 2/3

16:09

oil price, one/3 gas price. It should

16:10

have traded around 11250 113 as we

16:14

speak. It doesn't. Part of the reason is

16:16

exactly this. Despite what oil is doing,

16:19

despite what gas is doing, people do

16:21

want to own a little bit less dollars.

16:24

But unfortunately as I sit here as I

16:27

come to my oddlas every 3 months or so

16:29

vice chair Dece bank proudly waving my

16:32

blue make Europe great again hat it's in

16:35

trouble a bit whether this world you

16:38

know takes another one week two week two

16:41

months the wounds will stay the wounds

16:44

will especially stay in oil and gas

16:46

prices we disrupt the supply enough and

16:50

the big importers the ones who need

16:53

those oil and gas price is lower is

16:55

Europe. So in an understanding way

16:58

talking about when consensus starts

17:00

becoming more sense in these roundts and

17:02

beyond it's becoming a bit fashionable

17:05

to start questioning the European

17:07

equities European credits. Funny enough

17:10

it doesn't show as much yet in the FX

17:12

but watch out for the equity and credit

17:15

angle of this Europe trade. So this is

17:17

this is really important which is that

17:19

basically okay there is this long-term

17:22

pessimism about Europe but there had

17:24

been some optimism recently and cheaper

17:26

energy prices certainly helped the

17:28

relative competitiveness and

17:30

profitability of the domestic industrial

17:32

giants and so forth. But we're going to

17:35

probably be regardless of the length of

17:37

the war in a period of structurally

17:39

higher energy prices and that continues

17:42

to build to the negative side of Europe.

17:44

So let's talk a little bit more about

17:47

oil because

17:48

>> exactly

17:48

>> if you just talk to the oil analysts who

17:50

I love like their hair is on fire right

17:52

now and they pro you know this is

17:55

cataclysm but Brent crude not only is it

17:58

well off its highs from a week ago it's

18:01

not even anywhere close to its highs in

18:03

2022

18:04

>> at the peak of the inflation I mean we

18:06

got at one point in March 2022 Brent

18:09

crude was at 139 we're below 99 actually

18:12

right now when I'm talking about this

18:13

the thing is like, oh, you closed the

18:15

straight of Hormuz, oil just exploded,

18:17

etc. We all know it. We all see it.

18:19

There is nothing that any of us, you can

18:21

like be online all day and talk to all

18:23

the energy experts. You are like, you do

18:25

not know more information than the

18:27

market does. So, talk to us like how

18:29

you're thinking about oil and the fact

18:30

that there does seem to be this gap

18:32

between the hair on fire rhetoric of the

18:34

oil knowowers versus the prices which

18:36

are high, but even by the scale of the

18:38

last 5 years, not insane. I was as as

18:41

the question was coming I was preparing

18:43

my next note to read but first of all on

18:46

the oil and fire we all see and respect

18:49

Jeff Curry what he said about

18:52

molecules and interesting people are

18:54

watching right did you see the tweet of

18:56

head of Iran parliament

18:58

>> oh yeah

18:59

he made he he used the you can't print

19:02

molecule this is another thing he also

19:04

referred to another thing as fake news

19:07

everyone around the world is now talking

19:09

the same that actually reminds me of a

19:11

friend who visited Afghanistan and he

19:13

met some people working for the Taliban

19:15

and like they started WhatsAppapping him

19:17

like Pepe the frog memes and they called

19:19

him a soy boy and stuff like that like

19:21

everyone talks the same way anyway that

19:23

a bit of a divergence but

19:24

>> a little bit depressing that this is the

19:26

common language

19:27

>> now this is the lingua frank of the

19:28

internet we all

19:29

>> everyone says warlation everyone say

19:32

etc etc all but talk more but but this

19:34

physical versus paper the paper trading

19:37

is very very important so this friend of

19:39

mine an ex-colague I worked with him for

19:41

decades big commodity trader now a dear

19:44

client and you know one of these guys

19:46

who he he talks math so MIT Russia's MIT

19:50

etc he sends me a message and we are now

19:53

even one more week late this is last

19:55

week

19:55

>> and he doesn't do ozan high all the time

19:58

ozan high onmus if it's not starting to

20:01

open in one month now three weeks the

20:04

world has a huge huge huge problem and

20:06

this is not ozan this guy doesn't say

20:08

>> Qatar LNG will need months to restart

20:10

once hormos is clear and in oil we have

20:12

10 mibes of shutins already and Asian

20:15

refiners are very very start pipelines

20:18

to rate C would take years and also

20:19

Arnata Panacea etc et talks about

20:22

hoodies so I get it brand versus what

20:26

WTI WTI is trading even better etc etc

20:29

but especially if the likes of Fars is

20:32

correct

20:33

>> if we have a lot of talk but one way or

20:35

another this hormos is only two three

20:37

tanks you know

20:38

>> one Indian tank, one China tank. I do

20:41

fear that these guys warning us about

20:44

physical delivery maybe more, right?

20:46

>> Yeah. And look, of course, and I get the

20:48

logic, but the people in the oil market

20:51

who are trading, whether they're

20:52

speculators, whether they're hedge

20:54

funds, whether they're real oil

20:56

companies who are having to hedge

20:57

production, they have a lot of money at

20:59

the line. They know all of this. There

21:02

is nothing that can be said about the

21:04

longer this goes on, blah blah blah, the

21:06

more they get shut in, blah blah. We're

21:08

running out of storage. It's going to

21:09

take time to rebuild. There's nothing

21:11

that could be said. And yet here we are

21:13

at the

21:14

>> and I respect their approach as well.

21:16

This comes back to also why equities

21:18

haven't sold off that much. Why credit

21:20

hasn't sold off that much at the end of

21:21

the day. Okay, it may not be Venezuela.

21:24

We didn't find the dirty but I think

21:25

people do believe that this squeeze

21:28

longer squeeze will come and it's not

21:30

that easy to fade. So whether it's

21:32

Islamabad, whether it's Vance meeting

21:34

somebody in Islamabad, whether president

21:38

I wouldn't be surprised in two days

21:40

saying I need one more week and you know

21:42

creating a delay. People do believe that

21:45

in 3 months time, 6 months time that's

21:46

the forward oil market as well. We will

21:49

not be talking about this. We will be

21:50

talking much more about AI or private

21:52

credits. That's why the tail is big.

21:55

That's why okay another I'm I'm choosing

21:59

my words carefully as well but marines

22:01

are approaching we're talking about car

22:03

island

22:04

>> these French clients talk to that ex

22:06

general this ex general some claim that

22:09

taking control of foremost once marines

22:11

are there may not be that difficult

22:14

imagine that going wrong imagine you

22:16

know of course lives being lost but even

22:18

Joe one or two ships getting hit these

22:21

are not these are not army professionals

22:24

driving those ships these people people

22:26

on payroll. So even on one gas ship, one

22:30

oil ship hit,

22:31

>> things can get out of hand very very

22:33

quickly. And that's why, by the way,

22:34

let's link it back to markets. Okay, you

22:37

have a point. Oil brand is still below

22:40

100. But look what ECB and Bank of Bank

22:42

of England pricing did and they're not

22:44

backing away. They're saying Madame

22:46

Lagard today.

22:47

>> Of course, like she she sounded calm.

22:50

She didn't say I embrace the three hike

22:52

pricing, I will hike. But she did say we

22:54

will be we're watching this. So, uh,

22:57

>> back to the 2020 analogies. People don't

23:00

want to be seen late.

23:02

>> Mhm.

23:03

>> Things can move very, very fast.

23:05

>> I do want to talk about private credit

23:07

because I think it's important and it's

23:08

kind of gotten overshadowed by the Iran

23:10

situation for obvious reasons. But just

23:13

going back to the Taliban and Soy Boys,

23:16

which is a sentence I never thought I

23:18

would say on this podcast. I mean this

23:21

is the first like major conflict related

23:24

market event where we have both sides to

23:28

some extent using AI generated memes and

23:32

content to for you know propaganda

23:34

purposes to express their point of view

23:36

on how the conflict is going and what

23:38

they're trying to achieve. I am very

23:40

curious on a trading floor, if you're a

23:42

big investor, when Iran tweets like a

23:45

Lego video showing Trump doing something

23:49

or showing their reaction to Trump doing

23:51

something. Are traders watching those

23:54

and thinking seriously about them?

23:57

>> Thinking seriously about them? I I don't

23:59

know. But and they're watching, they are

24:01

forwarding each other the the things.

24:02

But the more key thing is, yeah, people

24:05

do start to weed out the more credible

24:09

sources or the more credible reverse

24:11

signs in this day and age. We all

24:14

translate from Arabic very very quickly.

24:16

We do compare what a US source says on a

24:20

potential Islamabad meeting versus what

24:22

an Iranian source says. After all, you

24:26

do get a sense that which Iranian source

24:28

seems to be more connected than the

24:30

other. All of these things are

24:33

I'm not going to say it makes our job

24:35

easier, but it makes our job even more

24:38

spicy, complicated in a way. We do have

24:41

Yeah, the I completely get you. Lego and

24:43

memes is one extreme. Not very useful.

24:45

But on the on the useful side,

24:47

>> yeah, there's the the Iranian credible

24:49

journalist is right there on the table

24:51

>> tweeting and telling you, "Look at that.

24:53

Look at this." That helps. You know, I'm

24:55

thinking about your shirt again and the

24:57

dinners that are scheduled in the Gulf

25:00

region that may or may not happen, which

25:02

brings me, you know, you're someone who

25:04

is extremely plugged into money in that

25:07

area and there's this question of like,

25:10

does something change in the trajectory

25:12

about the business of Dubai? There was a

25:14

headline about Millennium. Did you see

25:15

that?

25:16

>> I saw it. They may move some traders to

25:18

Jersey, which okay, cards on the table.

25:21

Like Dubai, not probably. I've never

25:23

been.

25:24

>> I doubt it's my cup of tea.

25:26

>> I feel like say with some certainty that

25:29

Dubai is more fun than

25:30

>> Well, this is what I'm saying. It looks

25:32

nicer than what I imagine the island of

25:34

Jersey is, which I just imagine is very

25:37

gray and bleak all the time. I don't

25:38

know but I assume like you know do you

25:42

think there's any of the talk about is

25:44

there going to be a real trajectory in

25:46

the amount of money flowing into the

25:47

golf

25:48

>> is that really and flowing in and out

25:51

short-term and medium-term answer

25:53

medium-term of course I do I have some

25:55

dear friends there beyond the this

25:57

industry other other industries like

25:59

direct analogy when I come to uh New

26:02

York obviously you see your clients but

26:04

you see your friends in Dubai you have

26:06

to give even more time because There has

26:08

been such a move for

26:10

>> different funds, taxes, you you know the

26:13

deal. People do have short-term memory.

26:15

Do remember COVID. But at the same time,

26:17

of course, this will have an effect.

26:19

Other areas may try to get some of that

26:22

influence. Maybe some of those people go

26:24

back to London. Maybe places like Milan,

26:27

other areas of Asia gets more

26:28

interesting. Absolutely. Heart goes out

26:31

to them. But at the same time, it

26:32

affects the sentiment as well. By the

26:34

way, part of the reason why many people

26:36

got the whole Iranian thing wrong.

26:38

>> Yeah.

26:39

>> Warflation, all that. It was that too.

26:41

So, not only from that Friday night,

26:44

Saturday morning of attack to Monday, we

26:46

didn't get a dirty, you know, the way I

26:48

put it, you know, upd.

26:53

But Iran immediately began hitting GCC.

26:56

Lifestyles got affected that affects

26:59

sentiment. So way before the worries

27:02

about inflation and warflation and

27:04

supply change supply change sentiment

27:06

got affected right there. So my hope and

27:10

thinking a year from now when we do the

27:13

show again the effect and power of Dubai

27:16

and Qatar will still be there but yes in

27:19

the short term u it's not going away.

27:21

It's it's it's an it's an important

27:23

market moving factor. By the way, did

27:25

you see that um Dulce Rodriguez is going

27:27

to be speaking in Miami at a investment

27:30

conference backed by Saudi Arabia? I'm

27:32

just saying they don't make communists

27:33

like they used to.

27:50

Let's talk private credit because we

27:52

have all these headlines coming out

27:53

about redemption requests and a bunch of

27:56

funds limiting those as is their right

27:59

in the fund documentation. However, I am

28:02

starting to get frustrated with this

28:03

knee-jerk response which is you see all

28:05

these headlines, you know, Aries, Apollo

28:07

curbing withdrawals and then everyone in

28:10

private credit is like, well, this is

28:11

fine. This is a feature of the system.

28:14

It's not a bug and obviously investors

28:15

should have read the docs and this is

28:17

exactly what's supposed to happen.

28:19

Whereas to me, it seems very clear there

28:22

is stress in private credit regardless

28:24

of what's actually happening with

28:26

withdrawals. And if you think about

28:27

private credit as this huge asset class

28:29

that was growing enormously in recent

28:31

years and was a major source of credit

28:35

and financing for companies in America,

28:37

then it seems very clear to me that what

28:39

we should be talking about right now is

28:41

a potential tightening of financial

28:43

conditions as some of that demand starts

28:47

to eb away. How are you thinking about

28:49

the private credit space? And when

28:51

you're doing your meetings with

28:52

investors, I'm very curious how much

28:54

time is spent on private credit versus

28:57

Iran right now.

28:58

>> Right before Iran, it was all about

29:00

private credit and AI of the world. Now,

29:02

as immediate headline to you last night

29:04

when I did a small round table, of

29:06

course, it all started with Iran, but I

29:08

did make sure that we went to private

29:09

credit and I'm with you Tracy. The

29:12

immediate reaction there from directly

29:14

involved people to more macro tourists,

29:17

it's not systemic. It's not systemic.

29:19

It's not 2008 maybe 2001 that yeah we

29:23

smile at each other that to me

29:24

immediately a bit of an orange sign okay

29:26

I understand so it's it all seems

29:29

orderly withdrawals are orderly etc etc

29:31

but headlines are not going away if

29:33

anything they are definitely hiding

29:35

behind Iran at the moment it would be

29:37

almost all what we would be talking

29:39

about especially in US if it wasn't for

29:41

Iran and by the way because of that my

29:43

blue hat would would have done much

29:45

better than US so that's another sad

29:47

thing right it's quote unquote US and

29:49

Israel's war, but Europe and UK and rest

29:51

of the world gets hurt more. But anyway,

29:53

these are the new cards we're dealt

29:54

with. The key thing to watch is at the

29:57

moment they claim it's orderly, you get

30:00

your money. If it feels more and more

30:02

like this, A B C, you see the headlines,

30:06

you're not going to be able to get your

30:07

money for a while. Then first time you

30:10

mention my binky, I'm very curious to

30:12

see what he says tonight on my macro

30:14

dinner. It's a Wednesday macro dinner,

30:15

big macro dinner tonight. is he's still

30:18

sticking to his 8,000. Why? If people

30:20

cannot take their money away from

30:22

private credit and have to sell

30:24

something liquid, then watch out for

30:26

public credit that has been very

30:29

>> resilient and of course watch out public

30:31

equity. So I'm watching that space very

30:34

very carefully. I do understand why they

30:36

immediately say it's not systemic. I get

30:38

it but you know okay maybe it's not 2008

30:41

but it's maybe something between this

30:43

2001 to 2008 also it's very into say

30:47

yeah it's not leverage is not there

30:49

thank god we may not see the northern

30:51

rock BBC scenes of 2007208 all these

30:54

cues and stuff it's a more quote unquote

30:57

1% problem but what if it spreads and

31:00

spreads and some of the big US banks

31:02

start lending less to these friends

31:06

what if insurance companies get hit more

31:09

and more. Watch this space. I think it's

31:12

a bit too superficial to say it's not

31:14

systemic.

31:15

>> It's going to be okay. It's almost like

31:17

uh the bank crisis of two years ago in

31:19

this place. I'm more worried than that.

31:22

>> You know, one of the things we're

31:23

talking about is this very violent rates

31:25

move and war inflation and so forth. But

31:29

one of the things that's emerged in the

31:30

last few weeks is there's growing

31:32

evidence that actually inflation was

31:34

reacelerating even prior to the start of

31:36

the war. And so when we look at these

31:39

moves, we might attribute some of them

31:40

to the war itself and the pasture of oil

31:43

prices and the military spending and

31:45

that of course Trump gets another $200

31:48

billion for defense. That's more

31:50

spending. That's inflationary. But maybe

31:52

like could it be that that is actually

31:54

not the story that the bigger story in

31:56

rates is simply that the data showing

32:00

that through the end of February there

32:01

is more evidence that inflation was not

32:03

heading down to 2% as many people had

32:06

maybe wish casted

32:08

>> and that's a really blow to my heart in

32:10

terms of expectations and stuff right

32:11

because quote unquote we almost had them

32:13

on on Feb 27

32:15

>> close we had a good thing going it was a

32:18

hurricane it was a hurricane obviously

32:20

much more important market it's a

32:21

tragedy for humanity war etc but for the

32:24

market as well it was a hierarchy ty was

32:26

at 393 if that NFP printed like that

32:29

maybe we would be talking 370s etc now

32:32

genie is completely out of the bottle

32:33

for very understandable reasons another

32:35

reason another world I want to relate to

32:38

related to inflation and before we wrap

32:39

up

32:40

>> this whole rationing that's a big watch

32:42

out for Europe for in Asia if this

32:44

continues like this if my uh Russia MIT

32:47

friend is right about and the and the

32:49

problems after a Oh, I mean people are

32:51

already talking about look at

32:52

Philippines headlines today for their

32:54

airlines. We may very soon be at a point

32:57

when some of these Asian countries can

32:59

say look I need to give energy and fuel

33:02

to my very important famous company but

33:06

much more important than that I need to

33:07

give fuel and energy and electricity to

33:09

my households. Sorry I have to choose.

33:12

Yeah,

33:13

>> in Europe we may be told maybe you know

33:16

don't use that air conditioning too much

33:18

work from home more travel less back to

33:21

my t-shirt sadly uh Dubai Qatar may be

33:25

postponed for understandable reasons but

33:27

what about Asia all these airline prices

33:30

will will shoot up maybe for work I will

33:32

go but for leisure maybe there will be

33:34

one less trouble all of this stuff will

33:37

hurt growth at the same time it will

33:39

need you rationing means more fiscal

33:42

measures means more inflation

33:44

expectations. So, you know, I'm not in

33:47

love with the word stackflation, but

33:48

also I'm a rational guy. My job is to

33:51

smell the market. Yeah, it's uh we woke

33:54

up that station fear.

33:56

>> Tarman, thank you so much for coming

33:58

back on Oddlos. Thank you for the

33:59

t-shirts.

34:00

>> Absolutely.

34:00

>> Always appreciate checking in with you

34:02

and um we'll talk to you again soon.

34:05

Next quarter, we'll do our quarterly

34:06

checking next time. I'd love

34:08

>> Wait, will you put us on the t-shirt as

34:09

one of your stops? I should

34:12

>> you guys are the highlights.

34:15

>> Thanks.

34:15

>> Yeah, thank you so much.

34:29

>> I always love catching up with Ozan. I

34:31

just find it, you know, it's just

34:33

incredibly useful to talk to someone

34:35

who's always talking to people. For

34:36

sure.

34:36

>> Right. Like that is a valuable thing in

34:38

its own right. Ozan has very interesting

34:40

perspectives, but to be able to just

34:42

like channel his like his brilliant MIT

34:44

friend, what the people said at the

34:46

macro dinner last night, always very

34:48

useful.

34:48

>> You know, also to Ozan's point about

34:50

actual capacity cuts in Asia and Europe.

34:53

So, you know, because I travel a lot and

34:55

I've lived in different places, I'm on

34:56

all these different random emailing

34:58

lists for like services

35:00

>> and flights and airlines and

35:02

transportation and things like that. And

35:04

I am starting to get the fuel sir charge

35:07

email. So, I got one from an Australian

35:09

car service that I used once ages ago. A

35:13

lot of Indian airlines are starting to

35:15

add fuel search charges. Like, you can

35:17

see it coming and it's happening

35:19

actually like pretty quickly.

35:20

>> I just don't want to travel right now,

35:22

especially with all the lines you see in

35:24

the US. No, seriously.

35:25

>> Well, that's a separate issue.

35:26

>> I know it's a separate issue, but it's

35:28

like I just want to cancel as much as I

35:30

can.

35:30

>> I'll remind you of that the next time

35:32

we're debating whether or not to go to

35:34

an external event and you're like,

35:35

"Yeah, I want to go. I don't want to go

35:37

right now. I don't want to go to

35:38

anything. But anyway, seriously, you

35:40

know, I do think like this is the thing

35:42

that I think about a lot, which is that

35:44

I've always been a take market seriously

35:47

and sometimes take them literally guy.

35:49

And I actually really don't like

35:51

>> I know you're a secret EMH bro.

35:53

>> Yeah. Not even so secret. And I really

35:55

don't like, you know, there will be a

35:57

headline from the White House and oil

35:59

will go down and everyone will say, "Oh,

36:02

they're people are so stupid. They're

36:04

being, you know, the investors are so

36:05

stupid. and traders are so stupid.

36:07

There's a lie, whatever. And like I

36:08

don't know about that. But like my point

36:10

is there's a lot of money on the line

36:12

for people who are paid to take this

36:14

very seriously.

36:15

>> And if oil is trading below 100, I take

36:18

that seriously and I want to understand

36:20

why there's the gap because there's

36:22

nothing that all of us online and in the

36:25

media know that the people with a lot of

36:27

money on the line don't know. Right?

36:28

This is a a fact. And I do think that's

36:31

a very interesting point that the people

36:32

with a lot at stake. Yeah, oil is high,

36:35

but it's certainly not at the hair on

36:37

fire levels that either that we even saw

36:39

in 2022.

36:40

>> Well, my guess is that what we're seeing

36:43

also is a divorce between the financial

36:46

and the physical.

36:46

>> That's true.

36:47

>> Right. So, you can tra you can trade oil

36:49

futures and assume that they're not

36:51

going to have to take delivery at some

36:53

point. But at the same time, if you're

36:54

after the physical barrels, like you

36:57

can't get those at the moment. So, I

36:59

don't even know how that like actually

37:01

relates to price. There's apparently

37:02

some price that we see Rory Johnston is

37:04

always quoted about the actual physical

37:06

price in Oman and it's like

37:08

significantly high but the two

37:09

eventually have to merge right like they

37:11

cannot remain disconnected.

37:12

>> Yeah, but not for not for a while. So I

37:14

think that disconnect is kind of like

37:17

what's in focus at the moment.

37:18

>> Well, if you're trading front month oil,

37:20

you have about a month, right?

37:21

>> Yeah. Okay, fine. But like I think

37:23

people are betting on like

37:25

>> I don't have to worry about it for a

37:27

month. That's what I'm saying.

37:28

>> Very plausible. It's it's certainly a

37:30

very very difficult unusual time. I mean

37:34

>> Oh, totally. And this is the other thing

37:36

to your point like it is very true that

37:39

the outcome of all of this basically

37:41

hinges on three players and one player

37:44

in particular and at any moment in time

37:46

you could have someone come out and

37:48

announce a ceasefire at which point to

37:50

Ozan's comments earlier like you could

37:52

see an almighty rally just because of

37:54

positioning going into this. you could

37:56

see a squeeze like without an agreement.

37:59

And so I think like that's also where a

38:02

lot of the nervousness is coming from

38:03

like no one wants to be caught

38:05

completely offside if the conflict

38:08

suddenly ends.

38:09

>> You know, uh Ozan used the term bad and

38:12

I think that makes sense which is okay

38:15

on one hand the trading desks sure

38:17

there's a lot of activity in some sense

38:19

and so that is a source of profit. On

38:22

the other hand, this is the type of

38:23

environment where it's like maybe you

38:25

just want to stay away. You want to keep

38:26

positions light. If you have a position,

38:29

you don't want to like go all in or

38:30

anything like that.

38:31

>> I'm imagining a trader like staring at

38:33

the VIX curve and going bad vault bad.

38:36

>> All right. Shall we leave it there?

38:37

>> Let's leave it there.

38:38

>> This has been another episode of the Odd

38:40

Thoughts podcast. I'm Tracy Aloway. You

38:42

can follow me at Tracy Aloway.

38:43

>> And I'm Joe Weisenthal. You can follow

38:45

me at the stalwart. Follow our guest

38:47

Ozan Tarman. He's at Ozan Karman. Follow

38:50

our producers Carmen Rodriguez at Carmen

38:52

Armano Bennett at Dashbot and Kalebrooks

38:55

at Kalebrooks. And for more OddLots

38:57

content, go to bloomberg.com/odlotss.

38:59

We have a daily newsletter and all of

39:01

our episodes. You can chat about all

39:03

these topics 24/7 in our Discord,

39:05

discord.gg/odlots.

39:08

>> And if you enjoy OddLots, if you like it

39:10

when we bring on Ozan to talk about his

39:12

binky, then please leave us a positive

39:14

review on your favorite podcast

39:16

platform. And remember, if you are a

39:18

Bloomberg subscriber, you can listen to

39:19

all of our episodes absolutely adree.

39:22

All you need to do is find the Bloomberg

39:24

channel on Apple Podcast and follow the

39:26

instructions there. Thanks for

39:27

listening.

Interactive Summary

In this episode of the OddLots podcast, Joe Weisenthal and Tracy Alloway discuss the current headline-driven market with Ozan Tarman, Vice Chair of Global Macro at Deutsche Bank. They examine the disconnect between geopolitical tensions involving Iran and the relatively muted reactions in oil prices and equity markets. Tarman explains the concept of the pain trade, the liquidation of winning assets like gold to cover losses in rates, and emerging stresses in private credit. The discussion also covers the potential for stagflation as energy prices and military spending contribute to re-accelerating inflation.

Suggested questions

6 ready-made prompts