AI is Destroying the Market?
518 segments
So recently, it's not just software as a
service stocks going down, but
everything related to software is going
down. Even financial stocks, cyber
security stocks, payment technology
stocks, and even private credit is going
down. So what's going on? Is the world
as we know it coming to an end? Or is
this another great investment
opportunity? Let me break it down.
Service Now, Salesforce, Palo Alto,
Crowd Strike, Visa, Mastercard, S&P
Global. These are some of the highest
quality businesses in the world that
have been compounding machines for
decades. But recently, this year,
they've been collapsing double digits.
Why? Because there's now a widespread
panic that Agentic AI could put all
these great companies out of business.
and change the world as we know it
forever. So, is this fact or is this
fantasy?
Well, let's find out what this is all
about. Now, all this started when
Anthropic released Claude Co-work. In
case you don't know, Antropic is the
major competitor of OpenAI. Now, who
owns Anthropic? Well, their major
shareholders are actually Amazon,
Google, and Microsoft. That's right.
Microsoft is two timing. They own both
Open AI and Anthropic. And Anthropic has
a very powerful large language model
called Claude, which I use by the way. I
think they are very good for financial
stuff, right? So, a couple of weeks ago,
they launched Claude Cowwork, which is
an agentic AI tool that allows the AI to
read and write to your files in your
computer. It autonomously breaks down
complex work into smaller tasks and can
generate Excel, spreadsheets, PowerPoint
presentations, and formatted documents
autonomously. In fact, I'm using it a
lot uh in my own work. But what spooked
investors is that it also shipped
pre-built plugins spanning HR, design,
engineering, operations, and financial
analysis. In other words, it's like an
agent that can do all these things for
you. For example, in the in the context
of HR, Claude Co-work can autonomously
uh screen resumeums. It can draft
onboarding documents. It can organize
employee records for financial analysis.
It can pull data from all kinds of
sources from fact set from S&P Global,
from Bloomberg. It can synthesize
reports and build Excel models in
seconds. In terms of operations, co-work
can organize files. They can generate
status reports. They can process
documents again in in in minutes. Now,
you saw how fast I was able to generate
that Excel table from a clot. what would
normally take many many hours took less
than 5 minutes. So the market is kind of
like freaking out saying that if now
people can generate so much productivity
they can do so many things autonomously
then they don't need all these software
companies anymore. They don't need
Salesforce. They don't need Service Now.
They don't need Adobe. They don't need
into it because we can do everything
ourselves
within minutes uh for for like $50 a
month or even less. Now to me that
sounds really far-fetched. It sounds
ridiculous. It's like saying that
someone invented a microwave oven so I'm
never going to a restaurant anymore.
That all restaurants will be destroyed.
No more restaurants in the world. It
sounds ridiculous, right? But then it
spread not just from software companies
per se, but it spread to financial data
companies where people are now saying
that with Claude it can pull all this
information, it can generate all this
financial analysis. Why do I need
Bloomberg? Why do I need S&P Global? Why
do I need Moody's? Why do I need Fax?
And so all these companies are going
down double digits as well. And then
private credit companies, BDC's that
lend money to these software companies,
they're now saying that they're not
going to get their money back, right? So
all these private credit companies, even
the good ones, the high quality ones
like Apollo and Blue Owl and Aries, they
all collapsing as well. And then
recently this spread to cyber security
companies. Why? Again, it's all Claude's
fault because recently Claude released
this thing called Claude Code Security
that's able to scan databases, code
databases and find bugs in the system
and patch those bugs automatically. So
now people are saying, "Oh, with that I
can secure my own database. I can secure
my own company with clawed security. Why
do I need to pay money for Palo Alto or
Crowd Strike or Forinet? They all going
to die. All these companies are all
dropping like they're worth nothing. And
again, that sounds ridiculous. That's
like saying that someone invented a home
alarm system. So guess what? We don't
need the police force anymore. Defund
the police. Again, that sounds
ridiculous because again, claw code
security. Yes, it can scan for bugs in a
database, but it can't protect your
company in live environments the way
that Crowd Strike or Palo Alto can where
it can detect hackers uh in your
computer system where it can stop
ransomware in real time. And then to add
to the fear, Citrini Research, they
published this article that went viral.
And the summary of the article is that
we're all going to die, right? So what
it's saying is that in the next two
years AI agents are going to cause a
massive displacement of white collar
workers. Millions of people will lose
their jobs. The unemployment rate will
go to more than 10%. And with people
having no jobs, they can't spend money.
Consumption drops and so the economy
will go into a severe depression and
companies will not be able to make much
money as well because they can't sell to
anyone because no one's buying. And so
they're going to lay off even more
people. They're going to use even more
AI to automate and it's going to be a
vicious cycle that leads to the end of
the economy as we know it, right? And
the other thing that they said is that
in a few years we are going to use AI
agents to do all our buying and all our
buying online autonomously. So imagine
you and I we no longer go shopping. We
no longer buy things online. We t our
agents that will go out there. It will
book hotels, book restaurants, it will
go online shopping. It will pay our
insurance autonomously without us
intervening and it will always find the
cheapest price. So companies will their
margins will all collapse and these
agents because they want to have the
best deal, they will route all our
payments through stable coins and bypass
the traditional Visa Mastercard rails
network. And in fact, people took it
seriously. And that's why Visa,
Mastercard, American Express crashed
because of this article. So, is this
fantasy or reality? I think it's all
fantasy. For example, my wife loves the
process of shopping. Do you think she's
going to get an agent to go and buy the
cheapest clothes for her? No way. Right?
But all kidding aside, Visa and
Mastercard, they don't just move money.
I mean, there are many ways to move
money, right? But the reason banks and
merchants they use Visa and Mastercard
is because of the trust factor 60 years
of trust that's built into their payment
technology that creates this compliance
infrastructure. They are able to detect
fraud in payments. There's dispute
resolution and all these things that
stable coins they don't provide.
Remember there's always a big gap
between narrative and actual real world
deployment results. In fact, there was a
study a rigorous randomized control
trial by METR, the model evaluation and
threat research, which is a nonprofit
research institute based in Berkeley.
They found that when 16 experienced
open-source developers use used AI
tools, they actually took 19% longer to
complete the coding task. Why? Because
yes, AI accelerates the code generation.
AI can write code very fast. It can
create Excel templates very fast like
what I showed you. But code review
capacity remains flat which means humans
must still review the code. They must
still review the results of the output
and that creates a review bottleneck
where cues will grow and deployment
delays increase and productivity gains
that were there initially actually
evaporate. In fact, Google's own report
found that every 25% increase in AI
adoption showed a 1.5% dip in delivery
speed and a 7.2% drop in system
stability. So, you still need humans to
to review the data. And I showed you
earlier how fast it was to create that
Excel spreadsheet, but you can bet
there'll be hallucinations. There'll be
inaccuracies. I still have have to
manually review it, my team to review
it, right? And if you don't know, a lot
of companies are actually quietly
rehiring the workers they fired because
of the AI excuse. For example, Clarona
replaced 700 employees with AI, but
their quality of work declined.
Customers complained and they had to
rehire back the humans. IBM laid off
8,000 workers to implement autom
automation, especially in their HR
division, using an AI robot instead. But
the bot was unable to perform task
requiring empathy and subjectivity and
eventually they rehired the HR workers
back. Textport and Forester predicted
that half of AI attributed layoffs will
be quietly rehired finding that 55% of
companies that executed AIdriven layoffs
now regret it. And I actually asked my
own staff this question. So I own
several companies. the main companies,
Adam Cool Learning Technologies Group,
we've got Pyana Profits, we've got
Activate Education, we've got growth
catalyst. So I am a co-owner of all
these companies and we've been doing
this for over 20 years and I recently
asked my group CEO and my managing
director of Pirana Profits, I say, "Hey,
we are using AI all the time. We use
agentic AI. We use generative AI in in
our companies. do we foresee reducing
our staff headcount over the next three
to five years and they said Adam no in
fact business is doing so well we're
growing so much that we need to hire a
lot more people right so I don't buy
that narrative that AI will replace many
many workers because if the business
does well that you still need workers
because AI is there to complement and to
augment our work so it's like the old
saying AI to me AI will not replace may
not replace you but someone who knows AI
will replace you in your job okay but
you can't dispute the fact that job
growth has been anemic especially in the
US so for example they just did the jobs
revision and they found that the total
new jobs last year in 2025 after
revision was only 181,000 jobs created
That's very very low. Compared to 2024,
there were 1.4 million jobs created. So
last year the job creation was the
weakest job growth since co. Well, a
spark of good news is that the latest
report showed that in January this year
2026 uh job growth has jumped again
130,000.
So what are the real culprits for the
weak job growth? It is not actually AI.
So what has been found is that companies
that have been laying off workers and
not hiring workers, they've used AI as
an excuse, but it's not AI, at least not
yet. But the three real reasons for weak
job growth is
trade policy uncertainty because of
tariffs. Number two, immigration
collapse, shrinking the labor supply in
the US, and the Deutsch and federal
government cuts. These are the three
real reasons. There are no signs of
largecale job displacement due to AI.
Well, at least not yet or not for the
foreseeable future. Although again, jobs
with more AI exposure has seen slower
job growth. So in a nutshell what I'm
saying is that this panic selling of
great companies like Microsoft, like
Salesforce, like Service Now, like Palo
Alto, like like S&P Global. It's the
same as past sell-offs. It is
irrational. It doesn't really make
sense, which is good for investors
because like Charlie Manga said, the
reason we are so rich is because people
are so often wrong. The reason I've been
able to make so much money over the
years is because of the shortsightedness
and the stupidity of the market. Now,
not too long ago, if you remember,
actually it was quite long ago. It's
been seven years. COVID was seven years
ago. My god, how time flies. If you
recall, seven years ago, uh when COVID
struck, the IMF chief said that the
pandemic will unleash the worst
recession since the Great Depression.
And what did people do? a panic from the
narrative. Oh my god, WE'RE GOING TO
DIE. SELL, RIGHT? They dump all their
stock and they thought the world as we
knew it was going to come to an end. And
if you recall, which were the stocks
that were doing well? Zoom, right?
Because they said, "Hey, no one's going
to the office anymore. We're all going
to to to to meet via Zoom and everyone's
going to stay at home and they're going
to exercise using Pelatin
um the exercise equipment." That was the
narrative. But what has happened today?
Oh, by the way, they said that
commercial real estate will collapse.
Banks will collapse, right? What
happened? No, there was no depression.
Banks have done very well. Real estate
has recovered, especially REITs have
recovered significantly. And Zoom and
Pelatin have collapsed. So, the same
thing is happening right now. It's the
same fear, the same narrative. So, have
I been buying recently? Yeah, you bet.
Almost every single day, I've been
buying stocks of great companies in the
market. Now, as always, I can't always
predict the exact bottom of a correction
or of a pullback. And so, I buy slowly
in trenches. And this is not a
recommendation or advice for you to buy
because we have got different financial
objectives. We've got different time
horizons. I've got a long-term time
horizon. Even if it drops more in the
short term, it doesn't bother me when I
buy great companies because I know over
time these companies will rebound back
to new highs and continue compounding
for decades to come. So, what are some
of the companies I've added? Well,
obviously the no-brainer is Microsoft.
Duh. Okay. Now, there have been fears
that uh Open AI that owns Chat GPT, they
could be in trouble, right? They're
trying to get an IPO to raise funds, but
they're burning so much cash. So, is
there a possibility that Open AI could
go bust? Well, I think yes. In fact, I
won't be surprised if Open AI doesn't
really work out. But I don't think
they're going to go bust. What's going
to happen is they're probably going to
be taken over by Microsoft where
Microsoft will absorb all their
intellectual property and so and so
forth. And yes, Microsoft will take a
hit. They will take a loss. And will
there could there be a short-term drop
in the share price if that happens?
Yeah, possibly. But in the long run,
they will benefit from it. And
ultimately, if Anthropic, for example,
you know, and Gemini kills open AI,
which I think is possible, I don't
really care. Why? Because I own Google
that owns Gemini. I own Amazon. I own
Google that also owns Anthropic. So in
other words, whoever wins,
I win. Okay. But I think the company
that could be the most affected if Open
AI goes down is Oracle. Uh because
they've got very high debt and a lot of
exposure uh to OpenAI. Will Nvidia be
hit? Yeah. But it won't be hit that
hard, right? They may take a bit of a
write off. Uh their investments are a
few billion. Nothing to them, right?
they can always sell the capacity
elsewhere. But anyway, so that's another
reason why Microsoft has been going down
the fears that OpenAI are in trouble,
which I don't dispute. I think they're
in trouble because personally for me, I
don't use Chat GPT anymore. No, I use
Claw. I use Gemini. All right, because
they they are more powerful. So anyway,
all right. But I I've been buying
Microsoft because I think at this price
it's it's a really good deal. But again,
could it go even lower? Sure, it is
possible. So I buy in trenches. I buy
slowly and I've got a lot more that I
could buy in the later part of the year.
So, currently Microsoft's intrinsic
value is $557,
is selling at $400
and is currently uh under undervalued.
And you can see that it's a great
business, right? Extremely predictable,
extremely profitable. You know, it's got
one of the strongest modes in the world
and one of the strongest financial
strengths, right? I've also been buying
Palo Alto which of course is the company
that has got the strongest mode and
leadership in the cyber security
industry.
So I asked myself this question over the
long run is cyber security a growth
industry? Does every company in the
world big and small needs cyber security
to prevent against hacking and
ransomware? The answer is yes. Right? So
I definitely want to have a big position
in cyber security companies and I want
to buy the strongest ones. What are the
strongest ones? Palo Alto is one of
them. Of course, Crowd Strike. You know,
I would love to buy Crowdstrike because
it's dropped quite a bit. But I haven't
guessed why because it is still
overvalued, right? Oh, it went slightly
undervalued right now. Hey, sorry. This
is Nvidia. What am I talking about?
Crowd Strike. My bad. Oh, Nvidia just
announced great results and uh the stock
I think went up slightly right now. Look
at Crowdstrike. I love Crowd Strike.
Great company. I do own shares in it. I
want to buy more and it's dropped uh
it's dropped quite a bit because of this
narrative but not really enough because
again the intrinsic value is 332
and right now it's the share price is
still above the intrinsic value. Well,
in a way, there's nothing to wrong to
buy now because you're paying fair
price. Uh, but you know, for me, I'm
very conservative. I like to buy it if I
get a bigger discount. So, I've been
selling cash secured puts on Crowd
Strike and hoping that Crowd Strike
could go lower and then I I get assigned
the shares because I like this company.
But currently, it's it's not not that
cheap even though it's dropped quite a
bit. What are other companies have
dropped a lot? Um, Amazon has dropped
but that has rebounded a bit. Meta has
dropped a lot. That's really undervalued
as well. But more connected to this
selloff, obviously it's a software
companies like Service Now, which I've
covered in my previous video. This is a
great company. All right. And I think
that ultimately they're going to be one
of the biggest beneficiaries
uh of AI. And look at it. It's now
selling at freaking half price, right?
It's it's 206 valuation. It's selling
$104. And look at it. It's got one of
the strongest fundamentals out there.
Again, this is not a recommendation for
you to buy. This is sharing about my
thought process of how I analyze
businesses and my own investments, which
again, I'm investing in these over the
long run. It's not a short-term trade.
So, short-term, it could still go lower.
That's why I dollar cost average. I hope
this video has been useful to clarify
and to bring some sanity to you in a
time when it may not make sense. It's
like, you know, all these are great
companies. Why are they dropping?
Doesn't make sense. Well, I hope that
now you understand. So, stay safe and
stay rational and may the markets be
with you. If you want to catch my latest
videos, click on the subscribe button
right now. Click on the bell so you get
instant notifications once I upload my
latest video. If you want to check out
my online courses, go on to
piranhaprofits.com
where you're going to learn how to
invest and how to trade the financial
markets and create an income from all
around the world. If you want to join my
live Wealth Academy program, go on to
wealthacademy global.com and find out
more about how you can learn investing
and trading live online. This is Adam
Coup and may the markets be with
Ask follow-up questions or revisit key timestamps.
The video discusses the recent panic-driven sell-off in software, financial, cybersecurity, and payment technology stocks, which the speaker attributes to widespread fear surrounding Agentic AI, specifically Anthropic's Claude Co-work. Investors are concerned that AI's ability to automate complex tasks will render many traditional software and service companies obsolete, potentially leading to job displacement and economic depression. However, the speaker argues this panic is irrational, comparing it to past market fears like the COVID-19 recession predictions. He highlights that real-world AI deployment often faces bottlenecks (human review, inaccuracies), leading to companies rehiring workers previously replaced by AI. The speaker emphasizes that AI complements human work and is not the primary cause of weak job growth, which he attributes to trade policy, immigration, and government cuts. Viewing the current market downturn as an investment opportunity, he reveals he is buying stocks in high-quality companies like Microsoft, Palo Alto, and Service Now, which he believes are significantly undervalued and will continue to compound in the long term, regardless of which AI platform ultimately prevails.
Videos recently processed by our community