HomeVideos

AI is Destroying the Market?

Now Playing

AI is Destroying the Market?

Transcript

518 segments

0:00

So recently, it's not just software as a

0:02

service stocks going down, but

0:03

everything related to software is going

0:05

down. Even financial stocks, cyber

0:07

security stocks, payment technology

0:09

stocks, and even private credit is going

0:11

down. So what's going on? Is the world

0:14

as we know it coming to an end? Or is

0:16

this another great investment

0:18

opportunity? Let me break it down.

0:30

Service Now, Salesforce, Palo Alto,

0:33

Crowd Strike, Visa, Mastercard, S&P

0:37

Global. These are some of the highest

0:39

quality businesses in the world that

0:41

have been compounding machines for

0:43

decades. But recently, this year,

0:45

they've been collapsing double digits.

0:47

Why? Because there's now a widespread

0:49

panic that Agentic AI could put all

0:52

these great companies out of business.

0:54

and change the world as we know it

0:56

forever. So, is this fact or is this

0:59

fantasy?

1:01

Well, let's find out what this is all

1:03

about. Now, all this started when

1:05

Anthropic released Claude Co-work. In

1:07

case you don't know, Antropic is the

1:09

major competitor of OpenAI. Now, who

1:11

owns Anthropic? Well, their major

1:13

shareholders are actually Amazon,

1:15

Google, and Microsoft. That's right.

1:17

Microsoft is two timing. They own both

1:19

Open AI and Anthropic. And Anthropic has

1:23

a very powerful large language model

1:25

called Claude, which I use by the way. I

1:27

think they are very good for financial

1:30

stuff, right? So, a couple of weeks ago,

1:33

they launched Claude Cowwork, which is

1:35

an agentic AI tool that allows the AI to

1:39

read and write to your files in your

1:42

computer. It autonomously breaks down

1:44

complex work into smaller tasks and can

1:46

generate Excel, spreadsheets, PowerPoint

1:48

presentations, and formatted documents

1:50

autonomously. In fact, I'm using it a

1:52

lot uh in my own work. But what spooked

1:55

investors is that it also shipped

1:57

pre-built plugins spanning HR, design,

2:02

engineering, operations, and financial

2:04

analysis. In other words, it's like an

2:06

agent that can do all these things for

2:08

you. For example, in the in the context

2:11

of HR, Claude Co-work can autonomously

2:16

uh screen resumeums. It can draft

2:18

onboarding documents. It can organize

2:20

employee records for financial analysis.

2:23

It can pull data from all kinds of

2:25

sources from fact set from S&P Global,

2:27

from Bloomberg. It can synthesize

2:29

reports and build Excel models in

2:32

seconds. In terms of operations, co-work

2:35

can organize files. They can generate

2:36

status reports. They can process

2:38

documents again in in in minutes. Now,

2:42

you saw how fast I was able to generate

2:44

that Excel table from a clot. what would

2:47

normally take many many hours took less

2:49

than 5 minutes. So the market is kind of

2:52

like freaking out saying that if now

2:53

people can generate so much productivity

2:56

they can do so many things autonomously

2:59

then they don't need all these software

3:01

companies anymore. They don't need

3:03

Salesforce. They don't need Service Now.

3:04

They don't need Adobe. They don't need

3:06

into it because we can do everything

3:08

ourselves

3:09

within minutes uh for for like $50 a

3:13

month or even less. Now to me that

3:15

sounds really far-fetched. It sounds

3:17

ridiculous. It's like saying that

3:18

someone invented a microwave oven so I'm

3:22

never going to a restaurant anymore.

3:24

That all restaurants will be destroyed.

3:27

No more restaurants in the world. It

3:28

sounds ridiculous, right? But then it

3:31

spread not just from software companies

3:33

per se, but it spread to financial data

3:36

companies where people are now saying

3:37

that with Claude it can pull all this

3:40

information, it can generate all this

3:42

financial analysis. Why do I need

3:44

Bloomberg? Why do I need S&P Global? Why

3:47

do I need Moody's? Why do I need Fax?

3:50

And so all these companies are going

3:52

down double digits as well. And then

3:55

private credit companies, BDC's that

3:59

lend money to these software companies,

4:01

they're now saying that they're not

4:02

going to get their money back, right? So

4:04

all these private credit companies, even

4:06

the good ones, the high quality ones

4:08

like Apollo and Blue Owl and Aries, they

4:12

all collapsing as well. And then

4:14

recently this spread to cyber security

4:17

companies. Why? Again, it's all Claude's

4:19

fault because recently Claude released

4:22

this thing called Claude Code Security

4:25

that's able to scan databases, code

4:29

databases and find bugs in the system

4:32

and patch those bugs automatically. So

4:35

now people are saying, "Oh, with that I

4:37

can secure my own database. I can secure

4:40

my own company with clawed security. Why

4:42

do I need to pay money for Palo Alto or

4:45

Crowd Strike or Forinet? They all going

4:47

to die. All these companies are all

4:48

dropping like they're worth nothing. And

4:51

again, that sounds ridiculous. That's

4:52

like saying that someone invented a home

4:55

alarm system. So guess what? We don't

4:58

need the police force anymore. Defund

5:00

the police. Again, that sounds

5:02

ridiculous because again, claw code

5:04

security. Yes, it can scan for bugs in a

5:06

database, but it can't protect your

5:08

company in live environments the way

5:10

that Crowd Strike or Palo Alto can where

5:14

it can detect hackers uh in your

5:17

computer system where it can stop

5:19

ransomware in real time. And then to add

5:22

to the fear, Citrini Research, they

5:25

published this article that went viral.

5:27

And the summary of the article is that

5:29

we're all going to die, right? So what

5:31

it's saying is that in the next two

5:33

years AI agents are going to cause a

5:36

massive displacement of white collar

5:39

workers. Millions of people will lose

5:41

their jobs. The unemployment rate will

5:42

go to more than 10%. And with people

5:45

having no jobs, they can't spend money.

5:47

Consumption drops and so the economy

5:49

will go into a severe depression and

5:52

companies will not be able to make much

5:53

money as well because they can't sell to

5:54

anyone because no one's buying. And so

5:56

they're going to lay off even more

5:58

people. They're going to use even more

5:59

AI to automate and it's going to be a

6:01

vicious cycle that leads to the end of

6:03

the economy as we know it, right? And

6:07

the other thing that they said is that

6:08

in a few years we are going to use AI

6:11

agents to do all our buying and all our

6:14

buying online autonomously. So imagine

6:16

you and I we no longer go shopping. We

6:19

no longer buy things online. We t our

6:21

agents that will go out there. It will

6:24

book hotels, book restaurants, it will

6:26

go online shopping. It will pay our

6:29

insurance autonomously without us

6:32

intervening and it will always find the

6:34

cheapest price. So companies will their

6:36

margins will all collapse and these

6:39

agents because they want to have the

6:40

best deal, they will route all our

6:42

payments through stable coins and bypass

6:45

the traditional Visa Mastercard rails

6:48

network. And in fact, people took it

6:50

seriously. And that's why Visa,

6:52

Mastercard, American Express crashed

6:55

because of this article. So, is this

6:57

fantasy or reality? I think it's all

6:59

fantasy. For example, my wife loves the

7:03

process of shopping. Do you think she's

7:05

going to get an agent to go and buy the

7:07

cheapest clothes for her? No way. Right?

7:11

But all kidding aside, Visa and

7:13

Mastercard, they don't just move money.

7:15

I mean, there are many ways to move

7:16

money, right? But the reason banks and

7:19

merchants they use Visa and Mastercard

7:21

is because of the trust factor 60 years

7:25

of trust that's built into their payment

7:28

technology that creates this compliance

7:31

infrastructure. They are able to detect

7:33

fraud in payments. There's dispute

7:36

resolution and all these things that

7:38

stable coins they don't provide.

7:39

Remember there's always a big gap

7:41

between narrative and actual real world

7:44

deployment results. In fact, there was a

7:47

study a rigorous randomized control

7:50

trial by METR, the model evaluation and

7:53

threat research, which is a nonprofit

7:55

research institute based in Berkeley.

7:57

They found that when 16 experienced

8:00

open-source developers use used AI

8:02

tools, they actually took 19% longer to

8:06

complete the coding task. Why? Because

8:09

yes, AI accelerates the code generation.

8:12

AI can write code very fast. It can

8:14

create Excel templates very fast like

8:16

what I showed you. But code review

8:19

capacity remains flat which means humans

8:21

must still review the code. They must

8:24

still review the results of the output

8:28

and that creates a review bottleneck

8:30

where cues will grow and deployment

8:33

delays increase and productivity gains

8:36

that were there initially actually

8:38

evaporate. In fact, Google's own report

8:40

found that every 25% increase in AI

8:42

adoption showed a 1.5% dip in delivery

8:46

speed and a 7.2% drop in system

8:50

stability. So, you still need humans to

8:52

to review the data. And I showed you

8:54

earlier how fast it was to create that

8:56

Excel spreadsheet, but you can bet

8:59

there'll be hallucinations. There'll be

9:00

inaccuracies. I still have have to

9:02

manually review it, my team to review

9:05

it, right? And if you don't know, a lot

9:08

of companies are actually quietly

9:10

rehiring the workers they fired because

9:13

of the AI excuse. For example, Clarona

9:16

replaced 700 employees with AI, but

9:19

their quality of work declined.

9:21

Customers complained and they had to

9:23

rehire back the humans. IBM laid off

9:26

8,000 workers to implement autom

9:29

automation, especially in their HR

9:32

division, using an AI robot instead. But

9:35

the bot was unable to perform task

9:37

requiring empathy and subjectivity and

9:40

eventually they rehired the HR workers

9:43

back. Textport and Forester predicted

9:45

that half of AI attributed layoffs will

9:49

be quietly rehired finding that 55% of

9:52

companies that executed AIdriven layoffs

9:55

now regret it. And I actually asked my

9:59

own staff this question. So I own

10:03

several companies. the main companies,

10:05

Adam Cool Learning Technologies Group,

10:07

we've got Pyana Profits, we've got

10:09

Activate Education, we've got growth

10:11

catalyst. So I am a co-owner of all

10:14

these companies and we've been doing

10:16

this for over 20 years and I recently

10:18

asked my group CEO and my managing

10:20

director of Pirana Profits, I say, "Hey,

10:22

we are using AI all the time. We use

10:24

agentic AI. We use generative AI in in

10:27

our companies. do we foresee reducing

10:31

our staff headcount over the next three

10:34

to five years and they said Adam no in

10:37

fact business is doing so well we're

10:39

growing so much that we need to hire a

10:41

lot more people right so I don't buy

10:45

that narrative that AI will replace many

10:48

many workers because if the business

10:50

does well that you still need workers

10:52

because AI is there to complement and to

10:55

augment our work so it's like the old

10:58

saying AI to me AI will not replace may

11:03

not replace you but someone who knows AI

11:06

will replace you in your job okay but

11:09

you can't dispute the fact that job

11:12

growth has been anemic especially in the

11:15

US so for example they just did the jobs

11:18

revision and they found that the total

11:20

new jobs last year in 2025 after

11:23

revision was only 181,000 jobs created

11:28

That's very very low. Compared to 2024,

11:30

there were 1.4 million jobs created. So

11:34

last year the job creation was the

11:36

weakest job growth since co. Well, a

11:39

spark of good news is that the latest

11:41

report showed that in January this year

11:44

2026 uh job growth has jumped again

11:48

130,000.

11:50

So what are the real culprits for the

11:53

weak job growth? It is not actually AI.

11:55

So what has been found is that companies

11:58

that have been laying off workers and

12:00

not hiring workers, they've used AI as

12:03

an excuse, but it's not AI, at least not

12:06

yet. But the three real reasons for weak

12:10

job growth is

12:13

trade policy uncertainty because of

12:15

tariffs. Number two, immigration

12:17

collapse, shrinking the labor supply in

12:20

the US, and the Deutsch and federal

12:22

government cuts. These are the three

12:24

real reasons. There are no signs of

12:26

largecale job displacement due to AI.

12:29

Well, at least not yet or not for the

12:31

foreseeable future. Although again, jobs

12:34

with more AI exposure has seen slower

12:37

job growth. So in a nutshell what I'm

12:39

saying is that this panic selling of

12:42

great companies like Microsoft, like

12:44

Salesforce, like Service Now, like Palo

12:47

Alto, like like S&P Global. It's the

12:51

same as past sell-offs. It is

12:55

irrational. It doesn't really make

12:57

sense, which is good for investors

12:59

because like Charlie Manga said, the

13:01

reason we are so rich is because people

13:03

are so often wrong. The reason I've been

13:06

able to make so much money over the

13:08

years is because of the shortsightedness

13:11

and the stupidity of the market. Now,

13:15

not too long ago, if you remember,

13:16

actually it was quite long ago. It's

13:18

been seven years. COVID was seven years

13:20

ago. My god, how time flies. If you

13:22

recall, seven years ago, uh when COVID

13:25

struck, the IMF chief said that the

13:28

pandemic will unleash the worst

13:31

recession since the Great Depression.

13:33

And what did people do? a panic from the

13:35

narrative. Oh my god, WE'RE GOING TO

13:36

DIE. SELL, RIGHT? They dump all their

13:39

stock and they thought the world as we

13:41

knew it was going to come to an end. And

13:43

if you recall, which were the stocks

13:45

that were doing well? Zoom, right?

13:47

Because they said, "Hey, no one's going

13:49

to the office anymore. We're all going

13:50

to to to to meet via Zoom and everyone's

13:54

going to stay at home and they're going

13:55

to exercise using Pelatin

13:58

um the exercise equipment." That was the

14:01

narrative. But what has happened today?

14:04

Oh, by the way, they said that

14:05

commercial real estate will collapse.

14:07

Banks will collapse, right? What

14:09

happened? No, there was no depression.

14:11

Banks have done very well. Real estate

14:14

has recovered, especially REITs have

14:16

recovered significantly. And Zoom and

14:19

Pelatin have collapsed. So, the same

14:23

thing is happening right now. It's the

14:25

same fear, the same narrative. So, have

14:28

I been buying recently? Yeah, you bet.

14:30

Almost every single day, I've been

14:31

buying stocks of great companies in the

14:34

market. Now, as always, I can't always

14:37

predict the exact bottom of a correction

14:40

or of a pullback. And so, I buy slowly

14:42

in trenches. And this is not a

14:45

recommendation or advice for you to buy

14:47

because we have got different financial

14:49

objectives. We've got different time

14:50

horizons. I've got a long-term time

14:52

horizon. Even if it drops more in the

14:54

short term, it doesn't bother me when I

14:56

buy great companies because I know over

14:58

time these companies will rebound back

15:01

to new highs and continue compounding

15:04

for decades to come. So, what are some

15:06

of the companies I've added? Well,

15:07

obviously the no-brainer is Microsoft.

15:10

Duh. Okay. Now, there have been fears

15:13

that uh Open AI that owns Chat GPT, they

15:18

could be in trouble, right? They're

15:20

trying to get an IPO to raise funds, but

15:23

they're burning so much cash. So, is

15:25

there a possibility that Open AI could

15:27

go bust? Well, I think yes. In fact, I

15:30

won't be surprised if Open AI doesn't

15:32

really work out. But I don't think

15:34

they're going to go bust. What's going

15:36

to happen is they're probably going to

15:37

be taken over by Microsoft where

15:39

Microsoft will absorb all their

15:41

intellectual property and so and so

15:43

forth. And yes, Microsoft will take a

15:46

hit. They will take a loss. And will

15:47

there could there be a short-term drop

15:49

in the share price if that happens?

15:50

Yeah, possibly. But in the long run,

15:53

they will benefit from it. And

15:56

ultimately, if Anthropic, for example,

15:59

you know, and Gemini kills open AI,

16:02

which I think is possible, I don't

16:04

really care. Why? Because I own Google

16:07

that owns Gemini. I own Amazon. I own

16:11

Google that also owns Anthropic. So in

16:14

other words, whoever wins,

16:17

I win. Okay. But I think the company

16:20

that could be the most affected if Open

16:23

AI goes down is Oracle. Uh because

16:27

they've got very high debt and a lot of

16:29

exposure uh to OpenAI. Will Nvidia be

16:33

hit? Yeah. But it won't be hit that

16:36

hard, right? They may take a bit of a

16:37

write off. Uh their investments are a

16:40

few billion. Nothing to them, right?

16:42

they can always sell the capacity

16:43

elsewhere. But anyway, so that's another

16:45

reason why Microsoft has been going down

16:47

the fears that OpenAI are in trouble,

16:50

which I don't dispute. I think they're

16:52

in trouble because personally for me, I

16:53

don't use Chat GPT anymore. No, I use

16:56

Claw. I use Gemini. All right, because

16:59

they they are more powerful. So anyway,

17:01

all right. But I I've been buying

17:02

Microsoft because I think at this price

17:04

it's it's a really good deal. But again,

17:06

could it go even lower? Sure, it is

17:08

possible. So I buy in trenches. I buy

17:11

slowly and I've got a lot more that I

17:13

could buy in the later part of the year.

17:15

So, currently Microsoft's intrinsic

17:16

value is $557,

17:19

is selling at $400

17:21

and is currently uh under undervalued.

17:24

And you can see that it's a great

17:26

business, right? Extremely predictable,

17:27

extremely profitable. You know, it's got

17:30

one of the strongest modes in the world

17:32

and one of the strongest financial

17:34

strengths, right? I've also been buying

17:36

Palo Alto which of course is the company

17:40

that has got the strongest mode and

17:42

leadership in the cyber security

17:44

industry.

17:46

So I asked myself this question over the

17:48

long run is cyber security a growth

17:51

industry? Does every company in the

17:53

world big and small needs cyber security

17:56

to prevent against hacking and

17:57

ransomware? The answer is yes. Right? So

18:01

I definitely want to have a big position

18:03

in cyber security companies and I want

18:05

to buy the strongest ones. What are the

18:06

strongest ones? Palo Alto is one of

18:08

them. Of course, Crowd Strike. You know,

18:10

I would love to buy Crowdstrike because

18:12

it's dropped quite a bit. But I haven't

18:14

guessed why because it is still

18:16

overvalued, right? Oh, it went slightly

18:20

undervalued right now. Hey, sorry. This

18:21

is Nvidia. What am I talking about?

18:23

Crowd Strike. My bad. Oh, Nvidia just

18:25

announced great results and uh the stock

18:28

I think went up slightly right now. Look

18:30

at Crowdstrike. I love Crowd Strike.

18:32

Great company. I do own shares in it. I

18:34

want to buy more and it's dropped uh

18:37

it's dropped quite a bit because of this

18:39

narrative but not really enough because

18:43

again the intrinsic value is 332

18:46

and right now it's the share price is

18:49

still above the intrinsic value. Well,

18:51

in a way, there's nothing to wrong to

18:53

buy now because you're paying fair

18:55

price. Uh, but you know, for me, I'm

18:58

very conservative. I like to buy it if I

19:00

get a bigger discount. So, I've been

19:02

selling cash secured puts on Crowd

19:04

Strike and hoping that Crowd Strike

19:07

could go lower and then I I get assigned

19:10

the shares because I like this company.

19:12

But currently, it's it's not not that

19:14

cheap even though it's dropped quite a

19:15

bit. What are other companies have

19:18

dropped a lot? Um, Amazon has dropped

19:20

but that has rebounded a bit. Meta has

19:22

dropped a lot. That's really undervalued

19:24

as well. But more connected to this

19:26

selloff, obviously it's a software

19:28

companies like Service Now, which I've

19:30

covered in my previous video. This is a

19:32

great company. All right. And I think

19:34

that ultimately they're going to be one

19:36

of the biggest beneficiaries

19:38

uh of AI. And look at it. It's now

19:40

selling at freaking half price, right?

19:42

It's it's 206 valuation. It's selling

19:44

$104. And look at it. It's got one of

19:47

the strongest fundamentals out there.

19:50

Again, this is not a recommendation for

19:51

you to buy. This is sharing about my

19:54

thought process of how I analyze

19:56

businesses and my own investments, which

19:59

again, I'm investing in these over the

20:02

long run. It's not a short-term trade.

20:03

So, short-term, it could still go lower.

20:06

That's why I dollar cost average. I hope

20:09

this video has been useful to clarify

20:11

and to bring some sanity to you in a

20:15

time when it may not make sense. It's

20:17

like, you know, all these are great

20:19

companies. Why are they dropping?

20:20

Doesn't make sense. Well, I hope that

20:22

now you understand. So, stay safe and

20:25

stay rational and may the markets be

20:27

with you. If you want to catch my latest

20:29

videos, click on the subscribe button

20:31

right now. Click on the bell so you get

20:33

instant notifications once I upload my

20:35

latest video. If you want to check out

20:37

my online courses, go on to

20:39

piranhaprofits.com

20:41

where you're going to learn how to

20:42

invest and how to trade the financial

20:44

markets and create an income from all

20:46

around the world. If you want to join my

20:49

live Wealth Academy program, go on to

20:51

wealthacademy global.com and find out

20:54

more about how you can learn investing

20:55

and trading live online. This is Adam

20:57

Coup and may the markets be with

Interactive Summary

The video discusses the recent panic-driven sell-off in software, financial, cybersecurity, and payment technology stocks, which the speaker attributes to widespread fear surrounding Agentic AI, specifically Anthropic's Claude Co-work. Investors are concerned that AI's ability to automate complex tasks will render many traditional software and service companies obsolete, potentially leading to job displacement and economic depression. However, the speaker argues this panic is irrational, comparing it to past market fears like the COVID-19 recession predictions. He highlights that real-world AI deployment often faces bottlenecks (human review, inaccuracies), leading to companies rehiring workers previously replaced by AI. The speaker emphasizes that AI complements human work and is not the primary cause of weak job growth, which he attributes to trade policy, immigration, and government cuts. Viewing the current market downturn as an investment opportunity, he reveals he is buying stocks in high-quality companies like Microsoft, Palo Alto, and Service Now, which he believes are significantly undervalued and will continue to compound in the long term, regardless of which AI platform ultimately prevails.

Suggested questions

4 ready-made prompts

Recently Distilled

Videos recently processed by our community