HomeVideos

Joe Rogan Experience #2430 - Jay Anderson

Now Playing

Joe Rogan Experience #2430 - Jay Anderson

Transcript

5362 segments

0:01

Joe Rogan podcast. Check it out.

0:04

>> The Joe Rogan Experience.

0:06

>> TRAIN BY DAY. JOE ROGAN PODCAST BY

0:08

NIGHT. All day.

0:12

>> We're live. What's happening, [music]

0:13

man? Nice to meet you.

0:14

>> Hey, it's great to meet you as well,

0:16

Joe. I uh really really appreciate you

0:18

taking me out here.

0:18

>> Oh, my pleasure. I've enjoyed your

0:20

content for quite a while now. So, it's

0:22

>> Well, I'd be interested to know when was

0:24

it that you first started getting

0:25

interested in what I was doing? What

0:26

kind of subject? What topic? Wish I

0:29

remembered

0:30

>> cuz I know you followed me for a couple

0:31

years. It was before the Cafra pyramid

0:33

scans and stuff like

0:34

>> you know I'm into the UFO subject and

0:36

things like that but I wasn't sure.

0:38

>> Well, it's all the silly [ __ ] that I

0:39

love. [laughter]

0:40

>> I hear you.

0:41

>> Silly and serious at the same time.

0:43

Ancient civilizations, mysteries, and

0:45

obviously aliens.

0:47

>> Oh, yeah. And it's all cotangent. It all

0:49

connects together. That's

0:50

>> I think so, too. We actually played a

0:52

clip uh we had did a podcast yesterday

0:54

with uh Dr. Michael Masters.

0:56

>> Love him. Yeah, I've told him a couple

0:58

times.

0:58

>> Very fun, very smart guy, very

1:00

interesting guy. But we played uh we

1:02

were talking about the he has a theory

1:04

that aliens are human beings in the

1:07

future. It's very strange theory

1:09

>> um

1:10

>> based on like kind of the

1:11

anthropological

1:12

>> view and the physiology and how that

1:14

might have happened over time.

1:15

>> And there's also what what was the

1:17

model? There's the many worlds theory

1:19

and then what was his model? There's a

1:21

different one that the the concept is

1:23

you could if you lived in the future,

1:25

you could go back in time and it would

1:27

not affect the future because everything

1:28

that's supposed to happen is already

1:29

happening and you were supposed to go

1:31

back anyway.

1:32

>> Okay.

1:33

>> Interesting. Okay. [laughter]

1:36

>> I try to get my head. But anyway, during

1:38

that time I asked him about the

1:40

tridactyl mummies and then we played

1:41

your clip.

1:42

>> Oh, okay.

1:43

>> Yeah. We played the clip that showed all

1:44

the scans. We talked about Jesse

1:46

Michaels and how he went down to Peru

1:48

and actually touched those things and

1:49

was there with them and how surreal it

1:51

was.

1:51

>> Yeah, I was in Peru recently not to go

1:53

and see the Nazca mummies. I wish I

1:55

could have seen them. I was out there to

1:56

look at all the megalithic studies and

1:58

the excavations going on at Saxo Woman,

2:00

which is an incredible megalithic site

2:02

in Kusco. But the Nazca mummies, I mean,

2:05

what's interesting about it is that

2:06

obviously you're going to have a big

2:07

knee-jerk reaction to something that's

2:09

so incredibly profound as the idea of

2:11

these being non-human intelligences that

2:13

are mummified. But when you actually

2:15

look at the CT scans and the X-rays, you

2:17

start to realize that this can't be

2:19

faked. You can't fake bone cartilage.

2:21

You can't fake capillaries and heart

2:23

valves and a fetus inside the body. So,

2:26

>> it's so nuts,

2:27

>> dude. It's crazy. Some of them have eggs

2:29

inside them. Some of them have fetuses.

2:30

Like,

2:31

>> it looks like the eggs are big like

2:33

inside them. And these are small beings.

2:35

These ones are meant to be like the

2:37

little kind of like 60 cm beings with

2:39

like three eggs inside them. Then you

2:41

got the big one, Monserat, which has an

2:43

actual fetus, like a baby not in an egg.

2:45

So, it's like, if these are all real, it

2:49

does feel like there was some sort of

2:50

genetic experimentation going on where

2:53

they're just churning out prototypes of

2:54

some form.

2:55

>> Do you think that's it? Or do you think

2:56

that there used to be another type of,

3:00

for lack of a better word, primate?

3:02

>> Well, the thing is,

3:03

>> is that a primate? I mean, what is that?

3:05

I mean, some of them they're leaning

3:06

more towards like reptilian anthropod

3:09

kind of lineage. So, like the bigger

3:11

ones seem to be more mamalian, whereas

3:13

the smaller ones with the eggs are

3:15

sharing reptilian traits. So, it's like

3:17

there are all these different variations

3:19

with these different bodies, different

3:21

kind of like physiological um

3:23

characteristics, which is why it's like,

3:25

okay, well, is this one lineage or is

3:26

this just someone kind of like tweaking?

3:28

All right, well, that one failed, that

3:29

one's not working. This one grew wings

3:31

or I [ __ ] that one off. Like, you

3:33

know, it's just weird. is that so your

3:35

thought is that these are the products

3:37

of experiments.

3:38

>> I mean if you look at Jesse when Jesse

3:40

Michaels did his documentary one thing

3:42

he mentioned I can't remember um where

3:44

he got this from but he was saying that

3:46

the original translation of the area of

3:48

Nazca from the original language was

3:50

like the area of experiment and genetic

3:54

cloning or it was like a really strange

3:57

definition for the actual area that kind

3:59

of says experimentation and genetic

4:02

modification. And I can't remember the

4:04

exact quote, but this was something that

4:05

he brought up in the documentary. I was

4:07

like, "Huh?" Okay.

4:08

>> Then you have all of these various

4:10

different examples.

4:11

>> Can you I ask you, yeah, who said that?

4:14

Who called it that?

4:15

>> So Jesse, when Jesse Michaels put out

4:18

his documentary, there was just a scene

4:19

in it. Now, my memory is failing me a

4:21

little bit, but there's a scene in here

4:22

where he was talking about the Nazca

4:24

region, and he said that the original in

4:26

the original language, this translates

4:29

roughly to the area of experimentation

4:32

and genetics of some form.

4:34

>> But how do they know what those terms

4:36

were?

4:37

>> I I agree. I agree. But it's just a

4:38

weird little caveat that he brought up

4:40

in the documentary. I'm not quite He'd

4:42

probably be rolling his eyes at me now

4:43

like, "Dude, I actually [ __ ] know

4:44

exactly what this is." Like [laughter]

4:46

making you look like an idiot. Yeah, I'm

4:47

butchering it. But I do that all the

4:49

time. Oh, for sure. But I but just the

4:51

fact that these things exist and they

4:53

exist in an area of the world which is

4:55

full of mystery. I mean the megalithic

4:57

sites around there like I said that's

4:59

what I was out there for to see these

5:00

different megalithic sites and the

5:01

Nazcalines

5:02

>> and uh you know saxwoman and in the

5:04

sacred valley you just have like

5:07

incredibly complex architecture. You

5:09

know rosecourt granite diorite andite

5:12

these incredibly hard stones like in

5:14

Egypt. But honestly, I find Peru even

5:16

more baffling than Egypt with the

5:18

architecture because of just the the

5:20

level of interlocking precision that you

5:22

see and the the fact that it looks like

5:24

they've softened the stone in Sax Woman.

5:26

It looks like marshmallows like all

5:27

squished together and it just invokes a

5:30

lot of different theories from people

5:31

about how they were actually

5:32

manipulating the stone.

5:33

>> Yeah. Because it doesn't seem like it

5:35

was just carved. No.

5:37

>> Right. Like it it does seem like there's

5:39

some areas where chunks are have been

5:42

removed from, you know, the quaries, but

5:45

when they're all pieced together, when

5:47

you see those weird like curvatures to

5:50

it, it's like, what were you guys do?

5:51

And perfect precision.

5:53

>> Perfect precision. And like sometimes

5:55

you'll see like these corners where just

5:56

a tiny bit of stone is jutting up and

5:59

then the other two are connecting into

6:00

it. It's like this is such a ridiculous

6:01

level of complexity for an apparent 600y

6:04

year ago bronze age bronze chisels and

6:07

stone hammer tool wielding civilization

6:10

and and also in Peru is what I find very

6:12

interesting is you've got a brilliant

6:14

visual contrast to use when you look at

6:17

what is the Inca work which is the rough

6:19

cut stone the mortar brick using walls

6:21

like this is all present in Peru next to

6:24

the megalithic sites and the mainstream

6:27

will attribute all of this to the Inca

6:29

of 600 years ago go. But you'll see that

6:31

the stone walls that are rough cut and

6:34

use cement and mortar, they're still

6:35

standing. They're pretty pristine.

6:37

They're looking good next to megalithic

6:39

multi-tonon slabs of granite that are

6:41

broken to pieces and strewn across the

6:43

hillside. So, it just looks like there

6:45

was a lot of desolation, potentially

6:47

geological trauma in this area and then

6:50

these people, the Inca, discovered these

6:52

sites, built around them. You can see in

6:54

like the cracks and corners of all these

6:56

megaliths that there's like stone walls

6:57

that they've tried to kind of, you know,

6:59

reinforce. It's very visually obvious

7:02

actually when you go out to these

7:03

places.

7:03

>> Isn't it fascinating that people aren't

7:05

willing to consider the possibility that

7:07

this is from an older time like that?

7:08

It's heresy.

7:10

>> It's just such a knee-jerk reaction,

7:12

man. Like I think at the end of the day,

7:14

we're still using models from like

7:15

1800's explorers, right? And it's

7:18

[laughter] like what the [ __ ] Like

7:19

we've moved forward. There's a lot of

7:21

contradicting evidence and data in a lot

7:24

of these countries whether it be you

7:25

know Gobeclete in Turkey or the

7:27

potential infrastructure below the Giza

7:29

plateau and then the incredible uh

7:32

megaliths in Saxa in Peru like Sax

7:34

woman. It just feels like what we're

7:37

doing is rehashing the same status quo

7:40

orthodoxy and it's coming up against a

7:43

everpiling higher mountain of evidence.

7:46

And one of the cool things that I got to

7:47

do out in Peru was go to Saxa Woman

7:51

where they've got current archaeological

7:52

digs going on uh through the Chinkana

7:55

project which is a archaeological team

7:57

out there and they're doing digs and

7:58

they have actually discovered below like

8:02

10 meters down into the ground precision

8:04

carved blocks of stone that are coming

8:06

out of the earth and this is where in

8:08

this region in Kusco the Andian legends

8:11

are that there is a vast labyrinth below

8:14

ground connecting Kusco to Saxa woman

8:16

connecting Saxa woman to the sacred

8:17

valley all spreading out across the

8:19

Andian mountain range and this is like

8:21

an old legend this is what the shamans

8:23

and the you know sacred keepers of

8:25

knowledge would say in Peru we're

8:27

finding evidence for it we're literally

8:29

going underground now and seeing that

8:31

there are actually really precise

8:34

elements of infrastructure below Sako

8:36

woman and they're just beginning to

8:38

uncover this I was one of the first to

8:40

go down there and actually see these

8:41

blocks myself and it's just like this is

8:44

happening Now that you know we're

8:46

actually getting to a place where we can

8:47

start to validate some of these

8:49

forgotten myths and folklores or if you

8:51

want to call them conspiracies or

8:52

pseudocience from the archaeological

8:54

side of things, it's being evidenced

8:56

now.

8:57

>> That [clears throat] that's mad. So

9:00

these tunnels and c like what what is

9:02

exactly the structure that's supposed to

9:05

be down there and what have they

9:06

discovered? So, it's it's supposed to be

9:08

called the Chinkana, like the labyrinth,

9:10

and there's a few different chinkana

9:12

entrances around the range.

9:13

>> How big is it supposed to be?

9:15

>> Vast, multiple kilometers. It's

9:16

stretching from down Sax of Woman down

9:19

into Cusco and then off into the Andian

9:20

mountain range to the Sacred Valley.

9:22

>> It's very similar to some of the stuff

9:24

that they found in Egypt. That's banana.

9:26

>> Yes. And then what's interesting is you

9:28

have the same hallmarks and signatures

9:30

that you see in Egypt. So, you see the

9:31

stone knobs, you know, these little

9:33

protrusions that you get. I'm I'm

9:35

addicted to those, man, because they are

9:36

all over the world.

9:37

>> Do you have any theories?

9:38

>> I mean, I've listened to a lot of

9:40

theories. I I certainly think that the

9:43

>> We should show an image of it for people

9:45

that are don't know what we're talking

9:47

about.

9:47

>> Stone.

9:48

>> There's all of these incredible massive

9:51

stones that have been somehow or another

9:54

moved from a quarry sometimes that were

9:56

hundreds of miles away. They all have

9:58

these weird nubs on them and no one

10:01

knows what they are. And there's a bunch

10:03

of theories like maybe they help them

10:04

move these things. You see them all over

10:06

the place

10:08

>> and no one quite knows what those are.

10:11

>> India, you see them in um Egypt, you see

10:15

them in Peru. This is in Ole and

10:16

Tentambo in the Sacred Valley.

10:17

>> Missing this is one of the things that's

10:19

so infuriating about people that are

10:21

arrogant about gatekeeping information

10:24

and being the only ones that are allowed

10:26

to distribute the truth. Air quotes.

10:28

We're missing so much. There's no way

10:30

you really know. huge gaps of knowledge.

10:32

>> We're missing so much. And more time

10:35

goes on, as Graham Hawk Graham Hancock

10:37

always says, [ __ ] just keeps getting

10:39

older.

10:40

>> And now they just pushed back the use of

10:42

fire by 300,000 plus years.

10:44

>> Yeah. Yeah.

10:45

>> Okay.

10:45

>> Yeah. Exactly.

10:46

>> Like it just keeps going. It's not going

10:47

forward. It's going backwards over and

10:50

>> and anatomically modern humans, I think,

10:52

have gone much further back now in time.

10:54

They're looking at 800,000 years. And

10:56

so, you know, plus plus

10:57

>> plus possibly even a million. Th this is

10:59

what weirds me out about about these

11:00

creatures. Like human beings have gotten

11:03

to the point multiple times where we

11:05

were almost extinct. Uh the Toba volcano

11:08

I think we got down to

11:10

>> god was it

11:12

>> 7,000 people. Is that like the low

11:14

estimate?

11:14

>> Damn. Really?

11:15

>> Yeah. Yeah. It was it's a crazy story.

11:17

Like super volcanoes are unbelievably

11:19

devastating to just all life, you know,

11:22

because it just changes the temperature

11:24

of the earth, the entire surface,

11:25

whatever doesn't get blasted out of the

11:27

the ground by the actual volcano itself.

11:30

All the other stuff on the other side of

11:32

the world gets [ __ ] Like it's just it

11:33

just ruins everything. We got down to

11:35

like a few thousand people.

11:37

>> And then there was another time where

11:39

one of these guys came, God, I forgot

11:40

who that was as well. They were we were

11:42

talking about the the reality of uh

11:47

glaciation, right? And about what

11:49

happens during ice ages and how

11:50

devastating it can be.

11:51

>> And they were saying that we had gotten

11:54

at least multiple times in the history

11:56

of the earth to the point where it was

11:57

incapable of sustaining life.

11:59

>> Wow.

11:59

>> That within a few, you know, like

12:02

whatever parts per million of carbon

12:04

dioxide are necessary to support plant

12:06

life, we literally got to the part where

12:08

there was almost impossible to support

12:10

life. and then it rebounded and

12:12

everything's fine. So, there's so much

12:13

we don't know. This is so crazy to try

12:17

to pretend, you know, that people 600

12:19

years ago make this because we know

12:21

people 600 years ago lived there. We

12:23

have a lot of archaeological evidence

12:24

and we have

12:26

>> but you have weird structures on top of

12:28

obviously much more intricate and

12:31

complex structures.

12:32

>> Yeah. And again, they share the same

12:34

signatures as places like in Egypt and

12:36

they think you're a

12:37

>> cook. Yeah, they do. And it's just a

12:39

knee-jerk reaction. It's it's again it's

12:40

adherence to a status quo and and you

12:42

know you get channeled through a very

12:44

kind of fine wall in academia and I I

12:47

think that it can it can be a real

12:49

detriment actually to opening up your uh

12:52

ideas and and being a little bit more

12:54

expansive with what could be possible

12:55

because you do get put into a very

12:57

restrictive uh format in in the

12:58

traditional academic sense. And

13:00

obviously you have, you know, the

13:01

pressures of of funding and and things

13:03

like this, and it's you're not going to

13:04

get the funding if you're talking about

13:05

this crazy [ __ ] And it's just like a

13:06

self-fulfilling

13:08

uh censoring, you know. Um but with the

13:11

rise of alternative media,

13:13

>> we're changing the game a bit because

13:15

you can actually put a voice out there.

13:16

You can put an idea out there. It's not

13:18

completely stonewalled by the academic

13:19

circle. They can't actually prevent

13:21

people from discussing these ideas in an

13:23

open media format like this,

13:25

>> right? And if you put a video like you

13:26

did on X or on YouTube, people can like

13:28

like the video that you did on the

13:30

aliens, whatever they are, whatever they

13:32

are, people can see the CT scans.

13:34

>> You see the CT scans and you you're

13:36

automatically go, "Wait a minute. This

13:38

is 12,200 years old."

13:39

>> Yeah.

13:40

>> You're telling me someone faked this,

13:42

1200 years ago.

13:43

>> Like I don't think they could fake that

13:44

now. You don't I don't think they could.

13:46

>> Hollywood special effects guys, but then

13:48

the composition of the actual the bones

13:50

and everything like cartilage and muscle

13:52

tissue and

13:53

>> how would you fake that? Uh, circling

13:54

back, I texted Jesse to ask him for some

13:57

insight on what he asked for.

13:58

>> So, what he sent me was a screenshot of

14:01

a book where he got it from. I had to

14:03

translate

14:04

>> translation here shows

14:07

>> science of insemination.

14:08

>> Yeah. Jumano, I guess, is the local

14:10

word. Local word for what [laughter]

14:12

that area is called.

14:13

>> Right. Right. Right.

14:13

>> And this is a book he found from that

14:15

area, I think. And that says, Yeah.

14:17

Laboratory of insemination and cloning.

14:20

>> What?

14:21

>> That's what I'm saying. Look at all

14:22

these terms they use. Yuma is semen. You

14:26

may it will verb to inseminate. Yumage

14:30

the science of insemination. Yumage wise

14:34

inseminator. Yuma scion or clone.

14:38

>> This is what I'm saying bro.

14:39

>> Jume to clone. Jumage the science of

14:42

cloning. And Jupage wise cloner.

14:46

>> So basically

14:47

>> what the [ __ ] [laughter] man?

14:49

>> You know it's there. It's um it's

14:51

interesting and then obviously

14:53

>> go back to that please again

14:54

>> you get alongside this kind of

14:56

description you have these bodies you

14:58

have this architecture

15:00

>> mad yeah like this was dude [laughter]

15:02

this was like one little 10-second clip

15:04

in his documentary and it just made me

15:05

perk up like wait a minute what

15:07

>> the name of the place is like a

15:09

laboratory of insemination and cloning

15:12

>> and you're getting a smorgish board of

15:14

different beings coming out of this area

15:16

right like what

15:16

>> Jesse does add I think he's speculating

15:19

somewhat on the ethmology. Not

15:21

definitive, but

15:22

>> Right. Right. Right. But yeah, I mean

15:24

it's there.

15:24

>> That's why Jesse's better at this than

15:26

me. I'M LIKE, [laughter] IT'S CLEAR.

15:28

>> IT'S DONE. IT'S THERE.

15:30

>> WOW.

15:31

>> It is interesting. Yeah, it is

15:34

interesting. And I think it does, you

15:35

know, leads into what was happening on

15:38

this planet a long time ago.

15:39

>> It does. And it leads to like my point

15:41

was when I was getting to the whole

15:43

super volcano thing,

15:44

>> what if something happened that wiped

15:46

that species out? Right? Like clearly

15:48

there's no more Neandertols, right? We

15:50

they [clears throat] whatever happened,

15:51

whether it was us or disease or whatever

15:54

killed them off, they don't exist

15:55

anymore. We only have evidence that

15:56

people interbred with them.

15:58

>> What What is that thing? Is that thing

16:00

maybe one of us? Like another kind of

16:02

human? Like look, another kind of

16:04

primate, you know? Look how different we

16:06

are than Reese's monkeys, right? Like

16:09

we're all primates. We're so [ __ ]

16:11

different. Why would we assume that the

16:13

ones that we found so far, including

16:15

like

16:16

>> what did they find? Dennis Ovenans like

16:17

15 years ago or something like that,

16:19

>> right? Right.

16:19

>> And then Homo Julian's, what was that

16:21

one that was just a few years ago? Like

16:23

they keep finding these new versions of

16:26

people. Not new obviously, no,

16:28

>> but long extinct versions of people.

16:31

>> I think it's possible. And I also think

16:32

that there's a, you know, a potential.

16:34

What if what if a a particular subroot

16:37

species of homminid decided to opt in

16:39

for subterranean living and they escaped

16:42

a lot of the surface world traumas and

16:44

were actually able to kind of maintain

16:45

their society? I mean, look at all of

16:47

the weird evidence we have for these

16:48

vast underground. Darren C. would love

16:50

to go there. My god, what

16:53

just released a video on it. It's

16:55

bananas.

16:55

>> Could you imagine renovating your house

16:57

and [ __ ] finding that?

16:58

>> Renovating your house and finding

17:00

there's a room for 20,000 people under

17:02

your house. Would you say anything?

17:05

>> I don't know.

17:06

>> Yeah,

17:06

>> I'd have to think about where I live.

17:08

Depends on where I live. You live in a

17:09

place where the government could just

17:10

come and take your house.

17:11

>> Yeah. I'd be worried about that.

17:12

>> I would say it if I was in America, but

17:13

even I was in America. What if I really

17:15

like my house and now my house is

17:17

connected to heritage, right? And

17:18

[laughter]

17:18

>> what the [ __ ] archaeologists want to

17:20

come? Like, get out of my yard. [snorts]

17:21

>> Exactly. Exactly. But like, yeah, I

17:23

think about this and I think about all

17:25

of these different Good. No, I'm happy

17:27

to hear that. Happy to hear that. But

17:30

it's um it's interesting. And then you

17:32

have, you know, the strange stories like

17:34

from the Hopi tribe about the ant people

17:36

that came during a time of cataclysm and

17:38

they brought them underground and then

17:40

they brought them back up. And there's a

17:42

few like that. There was a really uh

17:44

interesting podcast. It was years ago. I

17:46

remember seeing this where they'd

17:47

brought these two Amazonian shamans on

17:49

the podcast like full headdress. They

17:51

spoke their own tribal language. They

17:53

needed an interpreter in the room and

17:55

the guy asked them what they thought

17:56

about aliens and they didn't understand

17:59

the question. didn't know what he meant

18:01

by alien. He was like thumbming through

18:03

this book and he put up a picture of a

18:05

gray and the tribes and went, "Oh,

18:07

that's Makwabu. That's Makwabu." And

18:10

they had a whole story about how this

18:12

was a human that became an ant that

18:14

lives underground and it can appear in

18:15

the divine light, but you should be very

18:18

careful with this being because it will

18:20

take your soul underground and you need

18:21

a very good shaman to bring your soul

18:23

back. And they were taking it real

18:24

seriously. Like, yeah. Yeah, dude.

18:27

[laughter]

18:29

So, it's like these tribal cultures,

18:31

they know, man. They they [ __ ] know.

18:33

>> Well, I think they have I think there's

18:35

a an ancient memory in people. I think

18:37

it's one of the reasons why these uh

18:39

post-apocalypse movies are so popular.

18:41

>> There's a lot there's a lot of

18:42

post-apocalypse movies where, you know,

18:44

like

18:44

>> people they they they figure out how to

18:46

make houses out of wood again and they

18:49

they're surviving and they make little

18:50

encampments and they fight off the

18:52

intruders from the outside. You know,

18:54

real like uh Walking Dead type [ __ ] with

18:56

no zombies.

18:57

>> Yeah. Yeah, I think there's a memory in

19:00

us of the surviving humans. I think

19:03

there's a memory

19:04

>> and I think we probably have been

19:06

through some terrible moments in the

19:09

earth's history where there was a

19:11

>> enormous disaster and we are the

19:13

ancestors of the survivors and I don't

19:15

think there was a lot of survivors.

19:17

>> No. In fact, I heard you talking about

19:19

that the other day where you were um

19:21

saying about like the and it's something

19:23

I agree with the necessity for um post

19:27

cataclysm, post-apocalypse,

19:30

the the strong men would inherit the

19:31

earth. You know,

19:32

>> monsters would inherit

19:33

>> monsters would inherit the earth, right?

19:35

And and so if you if we really were a

19:38

hyper advanced Atlantean type

19:39

civilization prior to this,

19:42

>> um maybe even more matriarchal than

19:44

patriarchal,

19:46

it would make sense that when things

19:48

fall apart obviously and now you need to

19:51

survive in the wild, the strong men and

19:54

the the you know savaged guys would

19:57

inherit the earth because they would be

19:58

the ones who would be able to uh you

20:00

know push through that type of

20:02

environment. And then if if that is the

20:04

case and you fast forward to where we

20:05

are now, look at our incredibly

20:07

competitive hyper kind of aggressive

20:10

culture that we have. It would make

20:12

sense that this was formed through the

20:13

seeds of trauma and through the seeds of

20:15

having to fight for survival and you

20:18

know recovering what was lost.

20:20

>> Yes. Which also makes sense why the past

20:23

the further you go back the more

20:25

barbaric these people are

20:26

>> you're dealing and you're like well it

20:28

took a while for people to learn maybe

20:31

but maybe you know you're you're dealing

20:33

with people that had to

20:35

>> they they probably had to cannibalize.

20:38

>> I mean they probably had to eat

20:39

everything they could. There was only a

20:40

few thousand of them left. If we really

20:43

got hit by asteroids, like if the

20:44

younger dus [clears throat] is correct,

20:46

>> it makes sense that it would take like

20:48

5,000 years for civilization to emerge

20:50

again

20:51

>> because that seems to be what happened.

20:53

It seems to be like you have the

20:55

literally the scraggliest survivors and

20:58

then eventually the earth gets back to

21:01

normal, but in even then it takes

21:04

thousands of years for people to just

21:07

have a semblance of what we're

21:09

experiencing today in terms of

21:10

civilization. And that's why prehistory

21:13

is so fascinating and the the Neolithic

21:15

in the stone age because okay so this is

21:17

a time when we were just basic hunter

21:19

gatherers. We had no you know

21:22

intelligence, no language, no real

21:25

understanding of the world according to

21:27

the mainstream. But this is where you

21:28

have multi-tonon geodetically aligned

21:32

solar equinox and and uh um what's the

21:38

lunar alignment? Um, I've completely

21:40

just blanked just cuz I'm a little bit

21:41

nervous of being on here, but [laughter]

21:43

um, like you know, like equinox

21:44

alignments and and like alignments to

21:46

the to the sun and the moon uh,

21:48

mathematically geodetically aligned to

21:50

what look like toic currents like

21:52

electromagnetic flows beneath the

21:53

ground. A lot of these stonehenes and

21:55

dolmans are placed on places where you

21:57

have strong electromagnetic

21:59

concentrations and just the the the

22:03

package of um mathematics and

22:06

engineering and stone crafting and the

22:08

knowledge of the sun and the stars and

22:10

your placement on the planet to create

22:12

things like you know Stonehenge and

22:14

these other areas in the world. How how

22:17

can you do that if you're just hunter

22:19

gatherers coming out of you know

22:21

animalistic behavior? it doesn't make

22:23

any sense. And then we kind of regress

22:25

as we go further into history and you

22:27

know the the stonework becomes less

22:29

impressive. The things become less

22:31

accurate. And I find that very

22:33

interesting. How is it at the beginnings

22:34

of our history some of the most

22:36

impressive structures exist?

22:38

>> Exactly. It doesn't make any sense. No.

22:40

>> And just Egypt alone with the

22:41

conventional timeline of 2,500 BC for

22:44

the Great Pyramid doesn't make any

22:45

sense.

22:46

>> No, it doesn't. I think that they most

22:47

likely settled around those pyramids.

22:50

most likely settle around them and and

22:51

you know the scans if these can be

22:53

validated fully and empirically with

22:55

digs and confirmation physically then

22:57

that changes everything.

22:59

>> It changes everything and you're seeing

23:01

a lot of people spaz out online.

23:03

>> Oh yeah,

23:03

>> it's [laughter] wonderful to watch.

23:06

>> It's been wonderful to watch because

23:07

when people are under pressure, the real

23:09

character gets revealed and they're

23:11

under a lot of pressure right now

23:12

because those scans that radio

23:14

tomography or whatever the [ __ ] it is,

23:15

>> synthetic capture radar. Yeah. It's

23:17

super accurate with stuff that we know

23:19

exists.

23:20

>> Yes,

23:20

>> that's what's a real problem for these

23:22

people. You want to believe it exists

23:24

when it can map out all these chambers

23:27

in the pyramid. You want to believe it

23:28

exists when it can map out things that

23:30

that we know that exist 50 ft

23:32

underground. You want to map you're

23:33

you're cool with that.

23:34

>> Yeah. Yeah. But one kilometer of

23:35

subterranean Oh, no. No. Also,

23:38

>> multiple scans from multiple

23:40

>> over 200.

23:41

>> Yes. It's all the same message. They're

23:44

getting the same message. There's

23:45

pillars. Enormous pillars. They have

23:48

coils around them. [snorts] What pillars

23:52

with coils? All of them have coils.

23:55

>> And the whole structure is like almost 2

23:57

kilometers deep into the earth.

23:58

>> It's obscene. It's obscene. Like

24:00

literally as well, like 2 km of

24:02

infrastructure. It's like the whole

24:03

underground like people with copper

24:06

tools. Help me out.

24:07

>> And that was my frustration when it

24:09

first came out because when it came out,

24:10

obviously I did I did some like research

24:12

into the people involved in the Caffra

24:14

pyramid team. I found Filipo Beyond. I

24:16

found his harmonic SAR website where it

24:18

has listed the things like the Mosul Dam

24:20

in Iraq and the Grand Saso laboratory in

24:22

Italy, places that they had actually

24:23

done scans prior to even the Great

24:26

Pyramid, which was peer-reviewed. Their

24:28

2020 uh scan of the Great Pyramid was a

24:30

peer-reviewed paper. And then you fast

24:32

forward to now where they've got these

24:34

ones and you have people like, you know,

24:35

Flint Dibble and Pierce Morgan going,

24:36

"It's [ __ ] It's pseudocience. It's

24:38

never been done before. It's never been

24:39

tested." It's like, it has been done. It

24:42

has been tested. It's actually got a

24:43

patent. It's been peer- reviewviewed in

24:44

a paper.

24:45

>> Military applications, military

24:47

applications. And Filipo Beyond, he

24:48

works for the Italian government. Like

24:49

he's not some idiot. He's a very, very

24:51

intelligent man. And he can speak on the

24:54

science of this like, you know,

24:55

articulately. So

24:57

>> he works on top secret projects with the

24:58

Italian military.

24:59

>> I don't know if you caught like that

25:00

little scene in Jesse. He's like,

25:02

>> he didn't even say a [ __ ] word, man.

25:04

Like, could you not talk about that? He

25:06

just looks at him like, "Okay, we'll

25:07

just figure that out."

25:09

>> Like that. That's That's when you know,

25:11

man. That's when you know. But I mean

25:13

what whatever this is, everyone should

25:16

be fascinated. You shouldn't be

25:17

dismissing this if that's not even your

25:19

field of expertise. It just shows what

25:21

kind of a [ __ ] weirdo you are.

25:23

>> Like what you should be doing is going,

25:25

>> "Okay, how many scans do you have?

25:27

>> Yeah,

25:28

>> you have 200 scans of this.

25:30

>> Show me more.

25:32

>> Show me more. Tell me what's going on.

25:33

We should probably figure out what that

25:34

is." If imagine if the pyramids didn't

25:36

exist or imagine if it's like, you know,

25:38

the Sphinx at one point in time was

25:40

mostly covered with sand. Let's just

25:41

imagine some crazy scenario where the

25:44

entire pyramid structure is covered in

25:45

sand and nobody knows it exists and then

25:48

someone comes along and does a scan of

25:50

the surface the ground and says

25:52

>> you're not going to [ __ ] believe this

25:54

but there's some [ __ ] under there. Now

25:55

what if everybody goes that's ridiculous

25:57

that's preposterous and they don't look

25:59

>> and they don't look. We never find the

26:01

thing that we all agree exists because

26:03

you can go there, you can visit,

26:05

>> right?

26:05

>> It's there. Right. If that didn't exist,

26:08

you'd never [ __ ] believe in a million

26:10

years there's a structure with 2,300,000

26:13

stones that's perfectly aligned, the

26:15

true north, south, east, and west. And

26:16

you're dating it to somewhere around

26:18

4,000.

26:18

>> I mean, that sounds like some

26:19

pseudocience conspiracy talk to me, Joe.

26:21

>> Sounds like kookiness. Why is it more

26:23

kooky to say these people not only were

26:25

this advanced, they were even more

26:28

advanced?

26:29

>> Way more. They were down into the ground

26:31

2 km. It might have been a power

26:34

station.

26:35

Well, you know, Filippo thinks that he

26:38

seems to think that the spirals might

26:40

have actually been tied to hydrarology

26:42

and uh using mechanical stress and the

26:46

pisoelectric materials used in the great

26:48

pyramid and the plateau itself because

26:51

what you have is a very interesting

26:52

coupling between uh limestone and and

26:55

rose granite. So limestone is a very

26:57

good amplifier of acoustics and rose

26:59

granite is uh becomes electrical

27:02

pisoelectric under mechanical stress and

27:04

acoustics are a form of mechanical

27:05

stress. So there's like a certainly

27:07

something to be said about the fact that

27:09

the pyramids are acoustically tuned like

27:11

they're incredible inside the acoustics

27:12

and they've done lots of measurements

27:13

and experiments on on validating that

27:15

that it almost seems to go up in a

27:17

perfect scale up to the king's chamber.

27:19

Um, and then the king's chamber itself,

27:21

I believe, is focused around 110 to 115

27:24

hertz, which is interesting for

27:26

neurological uh reasons in terms of

27:27

influencing the brain. But on top of

27:30

that, you have again this incredible

27:32

coupling between limestone and rose

27:33

quartz granite where under the right

27:35

conditions, you absolutely could get

27:36

energetic responses from that. But as

27:39

well as this, you have the hydraological

27:41

knowledge, which is really quite

27:42

impressive. And when you look at places

27:44

like the Osiran in Abidos, which is a

27:47

kind of um sunken down temple, we call

27:51

everything a temple or a sacred site,

27:52

but we really don't know, do we? It

27:54

could be functional sites. Could be a

27:55

power plant of some form, like you said.

27:57

>> And uh the Assyrian in Abbidos next to

28:00

it, you have the seti, the first temple,

28:01

which is incredible. It's beautiful and

28:03

full of calligraphy and hieroglyphics.

28:05

And then you have this bare faceless

28:07

megalithic place called the Abid um the

28:09

Oyeran which has sunken down into the

28:11

ground perpetually filled with water. So

28:13

they've tried to pump it out and it just

28:15

fills back up again because it's

28:17

connected down into the uh into the

28:18

water table. And there's all these

28:20

different shafts and hydraological kind

28:21

of um components in this site that they

28:24

don't understand the full function of.

28:25

And then you look at places like um the

28:27

Great Pyramid where you go down to the

28:29

bottom of the Great Pyramid, you have

28:31

like the kind of core and this whole

28:33

area looks like it's been water eroded

28:34

as if it was flooded out repeatedly and

28:37

use some sort of uh like a pump or some

28:39

sort of like sequencing area where you,

28:40

you know, push water in and then let it

28:42

out, push water in and let it out. And

28:44

so Filippo thinks that maybe these

28:47

spirals bringing water up and if you're

28:50

a thousand meters down, you're tapping

28:52

into like ancient aquifers. So you could

28:54

be drawing up a really impressive amount

28:56

of like ancient ancient water. And I

28:59

just wonder if same with Peru, there's

29:01

something incredibly important about

29:03

accessing this kind of water at the real

29:06

depths of the earth. And they seem to

29:07

have a real interest in doing that. So

29:09

perhaps the pyramids are in some way

29:11

like I mean if these spirals are real,

29:12

it's like a plug, isn't it? It's like

29:14

plugged into the earth, connected down

29:16

into these aquifers. Perhaps it was

29:18

utilizing uh water as an energetic

29:21

medium through the materials. I would

29:23

recommend to anybody to check out

29:24

Christopher Dunn's work.

29:25

>> Oh, fantastic.

29:26

>> Uh I had him on the podcast and he

29:28

explained to us his theory. He's an

29:30

engineer. Yeah. And he started studying

29:33

the structure of the pyramid and his

29:36

conclusion was the entire thing was

29:38

probably used to generate energy.

29:40

>> And it's like what? And but when he

29:43

breaks it down in terms of I'll butcher

29:44

the math if I even try, but in terms of

29:46

the dimensions, the way it's made, and

29:48

the fact that you could have something

29:49

that was down in the basement that was

29:50

somehow or another creating a resonance,

29:52

>> right? Right. Right.

29:53

>> That would have this effect, the shafts

29:55

that go out straight out into space, and

29:57

the fact that there's evidence that they

29:59

they would possibly use these shafts to

30:02

pour chemicals in and it would create

30:04

gases and

30:06

>> Well, this is pretty nuts. It is nuts.

30:08

But, you know, I was when I was uh not

30:09

the last time I was out in Egypt, but

30:11

the time before then, I was out there

30:12

with a guy called Jeffrey Drum. Uh he's

30:13

got a YouTube channel called the Land of

30:15

Chem. And he's all about this in terms

30:17

of the chemical mass manufacturing that

30:19

he believes was going on in the pyramids

30:20

and these other areas. And uh we filmed

30:23

all of the uh all of the coverage of

30:25

that if anyone wants to go and see it on

30:26

our on my YouTube channel. um taking us

30:29

through areas in the Giza plateau where

30:31

you have an incredible concentration on

30:33

the Giza plateau of iron veins and they

30:36

all seem to be emanating from the

30:38

pyramids. So if you go around the

30:40

pyramids you'll see these iron vein

30:42

networks that are flowing out from the

30:44

central point and these iron veins are

30:46

heading down into what are called these

30:49

boat pits.

30:50

>> When you say iron veins so like

30:51

>> iron ore iron ore is it it's not on the

30:54

surface it's deep in the ground. Well, I

30:56

mean, there's some on the surface, so

30:57

you can actually see the snaking kind of

30:59

veins of iron that's kind of rusted out

31:01

and oxidized, and you can you can make

31:03

it out, but surely it must be deeper as

31:05

well, but it seems to be stretching out

31:07

from the pyramids down into these

31:09

>> contaminating from the pyramids.

31:11

>> So, his theory is that they built the

31:12

pyramid going deep.

31:13

>> Yeah. Yeah. His theory is that they

31:15

built the pyramids on top of these iron

31:16

veins, particularly because this place

31:18

was getting lightning strikes uh

31:20

frequently and they were using Yeah, I

31:23

know. I know. I know. It's a giant

31:25

lightning rod,

31:26

>> dude. I mean, these things are built in

31:28

a way and they were gold capped at one

31:30

point like high

31:31

>> and gold is a really good conductor

31:33

>> conductor of electricity for electronics

31:35

>> and the Giza plateau is covered in these

31:38

conductive iron vein networks which the

31:40

pyramids do seem to be built upon. Now,

31:42

this is, you know, his personal theory,

31:44

but he, you know, he's an American who's

31:45

been living out in Cairo now for about

31:47

six or seven years, I believe. He's been

31:49

he just decided to up and move out there

31:50

and dedicate his life to exploring these

31:52

places. And so he took us across uh you

31:54

know all of these amazing areas and and

31:56

showed us things I'd never seen before

31:58

in Egypt. Um but his theory on on the on

32:01

the pyramids is similar to Christopher

32:03

Dunn in terms of some form of chemical

32:05

manufacturing taking place. And if you

32:07

know um the original name for Egypt was

32:10

ChemT

32:15

is the beginning of chemistry and

32:16

alchemy. So this is where one of the

32:18

root words where we then got chemistry

32:20

and alchemy from. So, it is the land of

32:22

chemistry and alchemy. And

32:23

>> that's bananas.

32:26

>> There you go. Is this uh

32:28

>> from his video?

32:29

>> Oh, this is one of his videos. Great.

32:30

>> This is the iron ore.

32:31

>> So, these are the Yeah, I believe he's

32:33

probably highlighting the iron veins and

32:34

these iron veins head out into what are

32:36

called boat pits, which they believed in

32:38

the mainstream uh interpretation.

32:41

>> You're freaking me out with the land of

32:42

Kem. That's that is crazy. But when did

32:44

they name that? I don't know when it was

32:47

named that, but it was originally

32:48

referenced as Kemet in some of the

32:50

ancient Greek. And you know there's

32:53

there's there's reference to it being

32:55

called chemt

32:57

>> and it really means the same thing.

32:59

>> It's what people believe is the

33:01

continuation of alchemy and chemistry

33:02

because you get so much alchemy from

33:04

Egypt and obviously this is the place

33:06

where you get Hermes tismaistice and

33:08

hermeticism and the philosopher stone

33:10

kind of leaks out from these types of

33:12

areas. So I I think that there is a lot

33:14

to suggest this. Plus we actually know

33:16

in the mainstream that they were

33:16

incredible chemists like regardless of

33:18

you know exotic forms of chemistry that

33:20

we know they were using acids and natron

33:22

baths and things like this. Like the

33:24

Egyptians knew what they were doing even

33:26

from the perspective that we understand

33:28

regardless of getting a little bit

33:29

deeper into it. But yeah.

33:30

>> Right. And you're talking about

33:32

Egyptians like Cleopatra times.

33:34

>> Right. So like we know that they were

33:36

doing it. Exactly.

33:36

>> Historically.

33:37

>> Exactly. Yeah. That's that's why it's so

33:40

strange. Like if this structure is

33:43

proved to be real, if they start an

33:44

excavation and they they have

33:47

irrefutable proof. Like without a doubt

33:50

there's some man-made structures that

33:52

are beyond description underneath the

33:55

ground. What happens now? Like what does

33:57

everybody do? Like what what do all

33:59

these dorks that think that that's a

34:01

tomb?

34:03

What do [laughter] you

34:04

>> What do you do? What do you do to all

34:06

those dorks that think like it makes

34:08

sense that they built that? It was a

34:10

national pastime. It's a national

34:13

project. Come on, bro.

34:15

>> Settle the [ __ ] down.

34:16

>> I think at that point you have you you

34:18

have to

34:19

>> Well, I think the pyramids uniquely

34:20

stand as uh like an intelligence desk

34:25

>> because they are so crazy when you have

34:29

stones that are so large that are taken

34:31

from quaries hundreds of miles away,

34:33

>> 500 miles away. A lot of these people

34:35

supposedly didn't even have the wheel.

34:37

>> So what is this? What? You don't think

34:39

this is crazy? Like this isn't this

34:41

isn't like, oh, we know they use the

34:44

wood from these trees to build these

34:46

homes. Like this is bananas.

34:48

>> Whole level.

34:48

>> This is something that would take us

34:50

hundreds of years today to build.

34:55

>> And one of the things that is said so

34:57

much, but I guess it's kind of shrugged

34:58

off just because it's said so much, but

34:59

it's actually a really important point

35:01

to highlight. There are no [ __ ]

35:02

hieroglyphs in the pyramids. Not one.

35:04

There's not a single symbol, not a

35:06

single element of what we would

35:08

understand to be dynastic Egypt. And and

35:10

so like you have this incredible

35:11

contradiction when you go to places like

35:12

the Valley of the Kings and the Valley

35:14

of the Queens, gold, and you know, it's

35:16

adorned in patterns. You can't see a

35:18

square inch of stone where there isn't

35:20

something filled to venerate these

35:22

people. And yet the pyramids are bare

35:26

bare. And you know, when you go inside

35:28

them, you're going to go to Egypt,

35:29

right? You're going to go

35:30

>> eventually. Yeah. Yeah. But when you

35:31

when you go inside them, it just feels

35:33

mechanical. It feels functional. It's,

35:36

you know, big port colasses of rose

35:40

granite and these shafts going off

35:42

perfectly vertical off into you can't

35:44

even see. And there's nothing about it

35:46

that feels spiritual orerary at all.

35:51

Just looking at it, it looks to me like

35:54

an advancement of what we are that's

35:58

almost like indescribable. Like a

35:59

thousand-year advancement of where we

36:02

are currently to build something like

36:03

that, right?

36:04

>> It seems so nuts.

36:06

>> And there's obviously stuff that doesn't

36:07

seem as nuts. It's just beautiful and

36:09

impressive, right?

36:10

>> You know, just like the coliseum in Rome

36:12

is

36:12

>> or like, you know, the cropolis.

36:16

You know, all those things are

36:17

fascinating and incredible

36:20

>> craftsmanship and engineering and

36:22

architecture. Amazing. Yeah. But then

36:23

there's Egypt and you go, "Shut the [ __ ]

36:25

up." Like, "What is that? That's nuts."

36:27

>> Yeah. And I resent the idea that we're

36:29

like taking it away from them. It's

36:30

like, "Let's just be logical about this

36:32

and actually assess the toolkit and

36:34

assess the capabilities and then look at

36:35

the evidence of what we're seeing."

36:37

>> Also, we're not because it's people that

36:39

lived in the same place. So, it's

36:41

literally just the older versions of

36:42

them,

36:43

>> right? It's not like you're saying, you

36:44

know, Chinese people came and they did

36:46

it all and then they flew back. No,

36:48

that's not what anybody's saying. We're

36:49

just saying more ancestors. Your

36:52

ancestors, not just the timeline's off.

36:55

The timeline seems funky. Clearly, there

36:57

were some amazing things that the

36:59

Egyptians did during the accepted

37:01

timeline. [clears throat] I mean, they

37:02

were a fascinating culture all through

37:05

till the end, right?

37:07

>> But the when you go really far back,

37:09

whatever that is is nuts. Mhm.

37:12

>> And when you're saying that you know

37:13

exactly when it was dated when there's

37:15

so much evidence of just today modern

37:18

doing these reconstructions and fixing

37:22

and all the the the the the feet of the

37:24

Sphinx and they're covering it with new

37:26

[ __ ] rocks. Like they've always been

37:28

doing renovations. They always do. So

37:31

all this stuff that you're saying like

37:32

we got a piece of wood from inside one

37:34

of the cracks like [ __ ] that doesn't

37:36

mean anything. Exactly.

37:37

>> You can't date those rocks.

37:38

>> No. Unless you get under those

37:41

[ __ ] to the bottom and take a

37:43

chunk of organic material from deep

37:45

underneath that thing so you can know

37:47

when the first stones are placed. You

37:49

don't know. You're guessing.

37:51

>> And I I think that that's why we're

37:54

coming to a point now where there's such

37:56

resistance from the mainstream when you

37:58

see scans like this because they they've

38:00

built themselves into a wall. It would

38:01

you basically have to admit, yeah, we

38:03

we're just [ __ ] wrong. You're you

38:05

also see like you know

38:07

>> them confronted by real evidence. Yeah.

38:09

>> Like real evidence. And like just when

38:12

someone takes you for a walk inside the

38:14

king's chamber and you look up at those

38:16

stones that somehow they got like how

38:18

high are they in the sky?

38:19

>> Mhm.

38:19

>> How high are they in the ceiling? How

38:20

high are they? Do you remember?

38:22

>> Oh god. No, I don't. Sorry.

38:23

>> Well, 80 ton stones

38:25

>> 80 tons in the king's chamber. 80 tons.

38:27

>> How tall? Let's look.

38:28

>> And that's near the apex. That is near

38:30

the apex.

38:31

>> Jamie, please put this into perplexity.

38:33

How tall is the ceiling inside the

38:37

king's chamber in the Great Pyramid?

38:40

>> Cuz these things are perfectly placed in

38:42

there. Like even if you drag those

38:45

somehow or another across the mountains

38:48

for 500 miles and got it to the pyramid,

38:50

how the [ __ ] did you get it up there?

38:52

>> Exactly.

38:52

>> How'd you get them all to line up? How

38:54

many people got squished?

38:56

[clears throat]

38:56

>> Chamber itself spans 10.5 meters long by

38:59

5.2 m wide. How tall is the ceiling?

39:03

uh 19 feet. But it's also but it's also

39:06

near the top of the pyramid. It's

39:07

incredibly high up in the pyramid as

39:08

well. They had to lift it to that point.

39:09

>> You have to you have to get these 80 ton

39:12

blocks 19 ft and then place them

39:15

perfectly.

39:16

>> And and there's absolutely again there's

39:17

nothing kingly about the king's chamber

39:20

at all. It's just completely a bare room

39:23

of rose granite with this sarcophagus

39:26

coming up out of the out of the floor

39:27

with a huge chunk um missing. And

39:30

actually, if you look at where that huge

39:31

chunk is missing and you turn around and

39:33

you look at the wall, there's actually a

39:34

massive impact uh on the wall. There's

39:36

like a big part of the wall that's been

39:38

broken off. So, it makes you wonder if

39:39

maybe that was jettisoned off at some

39:41

point from, you know, power or, you

39:42

know,

39:43

>> what do you think is in that the what

39:44

they call the sarcophagus? Do you have a

39:46

theory? Does anybody have a

39:47

>> I've been inside it. There's nothing

39:48

inside of it. It's

39:49

>> You got in it?

39:50

>> Yeah. I've laid I laid down inside of

39:52

it. It's kind of creepy.

39:52

>> With a grandmaster of the Templar Order

39:54

chanting over me.

39:56

>> Oh, fun.

39:56

>> Yeah. That was my first trip to Egypt.

39:59

[laughter] You can take a video of that

40:00

and put it up on X and no one's ever

40:03

gonna take you seriously, right? Well,

40:04

this guy's a [ __ ] cook. [laughter]

40:07

>> I am I am a cook.

40:09

>> Well, you have to be, you know. Yeah,

40:10

>> you have to be a cook to really enjoy

40:13

this.

40:13

>> And you have to be on the fringe and and

40:15

also I think some of the, you know, most

40:17

impressive scientists and creators have

40:19

been people on the fringe who are

40:20

laughed at by all their peers. Well,

40:22

especially now because the way the way

40:26

universities work is essentially there's

40:28

a person that is the most important

40:30

person in [clears throat] that field,

40:31

right, at that university. And there's a

40:33

bunch of people that want grants and

40:34

there's a bunch of people that want to

40:35

play nice, they want their career, they

40:37

want tenure, and you got to be careful

40:38

whose toes you step on. And if this one

40:41

guy is the gatekeeper of or a group of

40:44

guys like him at various universities or

40:45

the gatekeepers to this information,

40:47

you're going to come up with the current

40:48

bottleneck problem that we see where

40:50

people are not just unwilling but

40:52

aggressively attacking people that

40:54

question this. Which is why they called

40:56

Graham Hancock show the most dangerous

40:58

show on television. Like that is so

41:00

crazy. You have so many shows where

41:01

people get murdered.

41:02

>> That's the best way to make a show go

41:04

viral though, isn't it? Best way to make

41:05

a show go viral. Don't [ __ ] watch

41:06

this show. You know what I mean? Great

41:08

job on the people. did a great job.

41:10

>> But it does bring up a a disturbing and

41:12

and worrying element of it. Just how

41:14

quickly the mainstream media in various

41:17

outlets all aligned at once to call him

41:20

everything from a racist to a

41:22

pseudocientist to a conspiracy theorist.

41:24

And you know, it is an alarming kickback

41:27

that he's taken in his stride

41:29

profoundly. Profoundly.

41:30

>> He's a wonderful guy.

41:31

>> He's great. I can't wait to speak to

41:32

him. I literally missed him by like 3

41:34

days when I went out to Peru. I was

41:35

gutted.

41:36

>> He was my first real guest.

41:38

>> Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah, he was, wasn't

41:39

he?

41:39

>> Yeah. Me and [laughter] him and Duncan,

41:41

we had so much fun.

41:42

>> Oh my god, that must have been flew. I

41:43

need to rewind right from England. We uh

41:46

got him to drive to my house. And then

41:48

once he got to my house, we ordered

41:50

pizza. We all ate pizza and I couldn't

41:52

believe I'm hanging out with Graham

41:53

Hancock. I was so giddy. It was like one

41:56

of the first actual guests.

41:58

>> Giddy moments. Like, yeah, you're just

42:00

like, I can't believe I'm actually

42:00

sitting with this dude. Yeah, because

42:02

the guest before that had mostly been

42:04

comics, right? Or some person that I

42:06

thought was interesting, you know, some

42:07

guy that I met at the comedy store. I'm

42:09

like, "What do you do? You're a

42:10

therapist and what do you give people?

42:12

How's it [laughter] work? Come on over.

42:13

>> Come and talk to me about it."

42:14

>> Yeah. I did a lot of those. But he was,

42:16

I think, the first real guest.

42:18

>> Was there like a a choice, like a

42:19

conscious decision for you to kind of

42:21

like evolve it from just, you know,

42:22

comedians talking shop to actually

42:24

getting different guests on from a

42:26

variety of subjects? Because I know

42:27

you're a curious person. And you've

42:28

probably been researching these things

42:30

even at the point before you were doing

42:32

that kind of podcast cuz well clearly

42:34

you were but yeah like what was the

42:35

natural evolution of that for you?

42:37

>> Well I was always into books about

42:39

ancient history and whether it's you

42:42

know like modernly you know commonly

42:44

accepted narrative or Graham Hancock

42:46

stuff. But I got into Graham Hancock

42:48

stuff I think in the '9s Fingerprints of

42:51

the Gods came out and I [ __ ] loved

42:54

it. I I was so fascinated by I couldn't

42:56

shut the [ __ ] up about it. tell people

42:58

like you got to see this. Like I think

43:00

this guy's right. I I think we're we are

43:02

a history with amnesia or a race with

43:04

amnesia.

43:05

>> And then um of course [snorts] I watched

43:08

Chariots of the Gods, that film, which I

43:10

thought was very kooky and fun. It's

43:13

very campy and fun. And here's the thing

43:15

about that. I dismissed it for a long

43:18

time and I said it's nonsense. And I was

43:22

I actually had lunch once. Eric

43:23

Weinstein took me to uh lunch at Peter

43:26

Teal's house where we talked to uh

43:30

>> Von Danakin and Right. Right.

43:32

>> It was fun fun conversation like

43:34

interesting. I'm talking to he's a

43:36

fullon true believer

43:38

>> von Danakin.

43:39

>> Yeah. Yeah. Fully

43:40

>> of the alien theory the ancient aliens

43:42

theory and back see I've gone in like

43:44

multiple stages in my cognitive

43:47

dissonance [laughter]

43:48

>> and for a while I was all in with the

43:51

aliens.

43:51

>> I hear you. I'm the same though. Then

43:53

for a while I was like, "No, no, no.

43:55

There was an advanced civilization and

43:56

we're just a rebuilding of that

43:57

civilization and that's probably why

44:00

we're so barbaric." And now I'm like,

44:02

"Why am I why are they mutually

44:04

exclusive?"

44:05

>> It could be a mix.

44:05

>> Yeah. I don't think they are mutually

44:07

exclusive.

44:07

>> At one point the gods walked amongst us,

44:10

you know, like

44:11

>> and that's when I see the things like

44:12

the tridactyl mummies and I'm like,

44:14

"Okay, okay, okay. What is that? What

44:16

are we talking? Why is why is Peru so

44:18

weird? Why do they have artwork that you

44:19

can only see from the sky?" Like there's

44:21

a lot of weird [ __ ] going on here. Like

44:23

don't don't be so quick to jump.

44:25

>> Exactly.

44:26

>> My point is like I I've always been

44:29

fascinated by

44:31

>> stories. First of all, um any subject

44:34

that makes you ridiculous for

44:35

considering it. I'm always like,

44:37

>> "What's that about? Why why is that

44:40

ridiculous that itch a little bit?" Even

44:42

the cookie ones like ghosts,

44:44

>> Bigfoot, all the cookie ones.

44:46

>> Like why? What's the What's the

44:47

resistance? Why did Russian astronaut

44:50

tell me a Bigfoot story?

44:51

>> Yeah, he I mean, pinch of salt, but he

44:55

uh he claimed that he had been told this

44:57

by a military guy out in out in Russia

45:00

that a uh they were they were in the

45:03

wreck room of this like Air Force base.

45:05

And apparently, this is according to

45:08

this Russian astronaut trainer at the

45:10

Yuri Gagarin Space Center in Moscow. And

45:13

he said that this uh this Yeti Sasquatch

45:16

type being apparently just walted in

45:18

like just walked into their wreck room,

45:21

helped itself to some water from the

45:23

water uh thing, waved, and then

45:26

vanished.

45:28

I don't know.

45:31

So this guy, what was his job?

45:33

>> He was a trainer of astronauts at the

45:35

Yori Gagarin Space Center in Star City,

45:37

Moscow. Bro, they probably dosed him up

45:39

with so many [ __ ] They did

45:41

>> MK Ultra drugs.

45:42

>> Yeah. I I mean,

45:43

>> if you're you're holding on to that kind

45:45

of information,

45:45

>> an interesting story.

45:46

>> They probably experiment on [snorts]

45:47

you.

45:48

>> Mhm.

45:48

>> Yeah.

45:49

>> I probably gave that guy some I've never

45:51

given the the Sasquatch thing. It's uh

45:54

it's due course in in researching it to

45:56

be honest. I've been very dismissive of

45:57

that. But maybe it's I mean maybe you

45:59

know I mean like the demographic years I

46:01

used to have a Sasquatch Bigfoot

46:03

footprint like a cast like a plaster

46:06

cast on the desk [laughter] that uh rest

46:08

in peace Dr. Jeffrey Meldrum. He just

46:11

recently died.

46:12

>> I had him on the as a guest on the show

46:14

once too. He's a he's so crazy. I told

46:16

him I asked him if he was so crazy but

46:18

in a wonderful way. [clears throat] I

46:20

said if if you could cut a finger off

46:22

>> to know that Sasquatch was real, would

46:24

you do it? He was like yes instantly.

46:26

What the [laughter] [ __ ] dude? That's

46:28

your finger. Don't say yes to that. Just

46:31

the information just comes out. You

46:33

don't have to lose a [laughter] finger.

46:34

>> Damn it.

46:35

>> Just sitting there with half a finger.

46:37

>> I think Bigfoot was a real thing.

46:39

>> Yeah.

46:39

>> I think that's why there's so like

46:41

>> Do you think it was just like some sort

46:42

of like branch of creature? Cuz so many

46:44

people think it's like an

46:44

interdimensional being or

46:46

>> It could be that too, but I think it's

46:47

Gigantopithecus initially.

46:50

Gigantopithecus was an absolute real

46:52

thing that we didn't [clears throat]

46:53

even know existed until the I believe it

46:54

was the 20s. Yeah, around then

46:56

>> guy find it teeth in an apothecary shop

46:58

in China and then they started

46:59

researching it and finding where the dig

47:01

sites were

47:02

>> and you know they found jawbones that

47:04

indicate that it was bipeedal. So this

47:06

is a bipeedal homminid that's 8 to 10 ft

47:08

tall. What is that? That's Bigfoot.

47:10

>> That is Bigfoot

47:11

>> and that's probably and also this thing

47:13

100% lived around modern human beings.

47:16

Like what we are today, it lived around

47:18

us. So imagine you see one of those

47:21

things. Well, first of all, you're going

47:23

to [ __ ] run like hell. You're gonna

47:24

have stories. This thing lives in the in

47:27

the woods or in the jungle. Stay out of

47:28

this spot. That's where this thing

47:30

lives. And that's going to be passed on

47:31

from generation to generation to

47:33

generation until even after they're

47:35

gone. Now it's just a whisper. Now it's

47:37

just a thing. It's now it's a mystery

47:38

man that lives in the woods.

47:40

>> Are are there like are they like

47:41

antiquated Bigfoot stories like outside

47:44

of just modern? Yes.

47:45

>> Yeah. Oh, without a doubt. Especially

47:47

Native American cultures. That's what's

47:49

interesting is like Native American

47:51

tribes. There's multiple obviously many

47:53

different tribes, many different

47:54

languages, right?

47:55

>> Yeah.

47:56

>> They all have a word for this thing that

48:00

let's put this into perplexity. Yeah.

48:02

>> How many different Native American names

48:06

are there for for Bigfoot?

48:08

>> Cuz I believe Sasquatch is a Native

48:10

American. I don't know which tribe had

48:12

that, but there's multiple different

48:14

names for this hairy creature that lives

48:17

in the woods. But they don't have names

48:19

for like a giraffe that lives in the

48:21

woods. They don't have like other

48:22

mystical animals, mythical creatures.

48:25

They just have this one.

48:26

>> Yeah.

48:27

>> And this one is a [ __ ] weird one.

48:29

>> Well, that's what I mean with the

48:30

interdimensional aspect. It's treated

48:32

differently than just an animal even

48:33

from like these

48:34

>> that might be real, too. This is part of

48:36

the problem. It's like

48:38

>> we might be dealing with multiple

48:39

different things. It might not even be

48:42

Gigantopithecus.

48:44

>> Saskat Skookum. That's right. I've heard

48:46

that. Omar. That's right. There was a

48:47

movie called Omar. The guy who did the

48:49

American Werewolf in

48:50

>> what? That's just the last words you say

48:51

when you see Bigfoot. Oh my.

48:53

>> Yeah. [laughter]

48:55

>> Uh Chai Tanka. Big big elder brother.

49:00

>> 70 to 80 names.

49:01

>> Wicked cannibal. Oh boy. Wendago.

49:05

Wicked. Yeah, Windo. I've heard that

49:06

one. Windo.

49:07

>> Yeah, I've heard that one. and

49:10

how to say that

49:14

>> big god and that's a Navajo name. So

49:16

there's a bunch of different there's a

49:18

bunch underneath that too.

49:19

>> Yeah. Like say about 70 to 80 names when

49:21

accounting for variance across 50

49:23

tribes.

49:24

>> Okay. So what is that?

49:25

>> And it's the same with the alien graves

49:26

like the ant people you know.

49:28

>> Well and then it brings the same thing

49:30

like brings us to the same subject of

49:33

what if there is a way to traverse

49:35

dimensions? What if this is not some as

49:38

simple as something gets in a spaceship

49:40

and it comes here from another planet?

49:41

What if it's coming from another place?

49:43

And what if that doorway is open to

49:44

other things? And what if some of those

49:47

things are a Sasquatch? Like and under

49:50

the right conditions, this pathway is

49:53

open. And you maybe it's not even

49:55

something that actually exists, but you

49:57

can see exists in our tangible timeline,

50:00

but you can see under heavy stress,

50:03

under like anxiety. And imagine what

50:05

gets you more stressed out than being in

50:07

the woods at night, right? The woods at

50:09

night creates a lot of anxiety for

50:10

people because there's all these sounds

50:12

and you're looking around. It's dark.

50:14

You're vulnerable. Especially if you

50:16

live in real woods, like woods that have

50:18

predators in them. It's sketchy. And I

50:20

[clears throat] bet there's different

50:23

states of mind that you would if if

50:26

there are if is if there's some sort of

50:28

a possibility, some sort of a way that a

50:32

an intelligent creature can get to a

50:34

point where it has the technology to

50:36

access other dimensions. It can go into

50:39

other spaces.

50:42

>> Would you even be able to see it all the

50:44

time? Would you only be able to see it

50:46

if you were like under a highly anxious

50:49

state in the woods? You're kind of a

50:52

little freaked out. You're more open to

50:53

weird things and then it senses that and

50:56

communicates with you.

50:58

>> Well, we are.

50:59

>> It sounds kooky.

51:00

>> We're dominated by our perception and we

51:03

have such a narrow bandwidth of visual

51:05

perception. You know, you get up the

51:06

whole light spectrum and look at visible

51:08

light. Just this tiny corridor of

51:10

visible light that we're able to see.

51:12

Obviously, we've developed IR and, you

51:14

know, different and if you film the

51:15

night sky with infrared, you get weird

51:18

[ __ ] You get these orbs and things that

51:20

seem to fly by. And um I think that it

51:23

is a perceptual thing because the reason

51:26

I even started my YouTube channel is

51:28

because I've had my own experiences with

51:31

UFO type phenomena that were entirely um

51:35

initiated by me. Like I asked for them

51:38

to come and and they did. See, that

51:41

sounds kooky. I'll take that clip and I

51:43

dismiss you immediately. This guy's wait

51:45

for it.

51:45

>> But this is one of the things that

51:46

people have been saying for a long time

51:49

is that there's there's actual groups of

51:50

people and there was even some guy who

51:52

was like

51:54

>> somehow or another connected to the

51:55

government. Um that was saying that they

51:58

lead these people out. They go out into

51:59

the desert and they have a like some

52:02

sort of a secret frequency. He didn't

52:05

want to discuss it that they can push

52:07

out. they can send out the secret

52:09

frequency and it'll call them in and

52:12

that other people have done it simply by

52:14

willing them in. That's what I do.

52:16

>> So sitting there and putting out this

52:18

message that you're trying to

52:19

communicate with them and then

52:21

eventually they show up.

52:22

>> Yeah. I I I can't speak to

52:24

technologically assisted psionics and

52:26

all that kind of stuff, but um do you

52:28

want to hear my UFO story? Okay. First

52:31

of all, where did you come up with this

52:32

idea on your own or did you hear about

52:34

people doing this? No, I I uh I heard of

52:36

it from someone who's a quite polarizing

52:39

figure in the UFO community. I know

52:40

you've spoken to him, Dr. Steven Greer.

52:42

Um but I

52:43

>> polarizing people are right sometimes.

52:46

>> He's right on this.

52:47

>> Yeah, they could be right on a lot of

52:48

things.

52:48

>> He's right on this. And you know, I uh I

52:51

know that a lot of people have issues

52:52

with with Greer, but I he was actually

52:55

my intro into the UFO subject. So, I'll

52:56

tell you the story. [clears throat]

52:58

Sorry about my throat. Let me just take

53:00

a sip of water, actually. So um

53:04

this was uh

53:05

>> how did he find out about it?

53:07

>> It's a good question. Um he had a

53:09

near-death experience believe and from

53:11

that was actually apparently

53:13

communicated to and shown things that

53:15

when he came out of that experience he

53:17

became

53:17

>> a samadei type you know teacher and you

53:20

know got profoundly interested origin

53:22

story

53:22

>> brilliant origin story. Um [laughter]

53:24

my origin story was that I was really

53:26

bored during co no so like honestly

53:28

though um it was actually in 2019 that I

53:31

had these experiences and I I do think

53:34

that it's very important to lay a bit of

53:37

foundational groundwork because I think

53:38

a lot of people will recognize this as

53:40

well and it's something that you

53:41

mentioned with Bigfoot being in a high

53:43

stress environment in the forest maybe

53:45

that changes your perception and uh I I

53:48

think that there's a degree of trauma

53:49

and a degree of intense emotional uh

53:52

moments that can bring about paran

53:53

paranormal experiences. I don't know

53:55

why, but it does seem to be something

53:57

that a lot of people relate to. Yes, I

53:59

was in a very dark time. Yes, I was

54:00

having a very traumatic time or yes, I

54:02

was going through something and then

54:03

this happened. And so, for me, um I was

54:07

in my third year of university and

54:09

struggling. Just had a whole mix of

54:12

personal issues going on. Um so, I I

54:14

ended up kind of dropping out before I

54:16

finished and uh was just in a really bad

54:19

rut. And my dad was worried about me and

54:22

he uh he said look I'm I'm out in this a

54:24

bit of a long story but it's important

54:25

to lay this foundation I think before I

54:27

talk about what I actually experienced

54:28

because it plays in. Um my dad was

54:30

worried he he was out in France at the

54:32

time and he said look do you want to

54:33

come out and stay at this place with me

54:34

and just you know kind of relax and

54:36

bring yourself back to normal. I was

54:37

like yeah okay. So I came out and uh he

54:39

was like uh I've got these books that

54:41

I've been reading. I think they'd be

54:42

really beneficial for you. Um you should

54:45

read them. I was like okay like you know

54:47

I don't see how a book's going to

54:48

change. Did he often recommend books?

54:50

>> Not massively. No. In fact, no. No. This

54:53

was the only time he recommended books,

54:54

which is interesting. Um, and they were

54:57

a series of books called Conversations

54:58

with God by Neil Donald Walsh. Have you

55:01

ever heard of them?

55:01

>> No.

55:02

>> Okay. So, it's interesting. It kind of

55:04

ties into, I suppose, the chneled works,

55:06

things that people believe they receive.

55:08

>> Oh, wait a minute. I have heard of this.

55:10

>> He's quite well known. He's quite well

55:11

known. Um he, you know, was a he was a

55:14

radio DJ, broke his neck in a car

55:16

accident, became homeless, finally

55:18

managed to get back on his feet, but was

55:19

still struggling, wrote an angry letter

55:21

to God, and then apparently woke up at

55:22

3:00 in the morning and was having like

55:24

voices literally telling him to write

55:26

things down as he wrote all of this

55:27

down. And this became conversations with

55:29

God. It's literally a dialogue of him

55:31

asking questions and him receiving

55:33

answers, which he interpreted as from

55:34

God. Now, that is intense. And I'm

55:36

definitely not here to say this is a

55:38

Bible and everyone should read it.

55:39

However, it was incredibly impactful for

55:42

me at that time. The things that I was

55:43

reading about, it was a very different

55:45

idea of God, universal consciousness,

55:47

leaning towards more than some weird

55:49

patriarchal cloud living figure that

55:51

just never made sense to me. So, it it

55:53

got me in and I was reading it and it

55:54

helped tremendously, weirdly enough, um,

55:57

which I didn't expect. And that put me

55:59

on a path towards researching

56:01

metaphysics and philosophy and and

56:03

science and consciousness and and that's

56:05

where it really started for me. But then

56:07

a couple years down the line, I found

56:10

myself in another depression in a sense

56:11

because I felt like I'd accumulated a

56:13

lot of information about various

56:14

different topics that I thought were

56:16

like these big questions and big answers

56:17

and big esoteric things. And I just got

56:20

to a point I was like none of this is

56:21

actually helping me in my life. In fact,

56:23

I'm actually feeling like [ __ ] worse

56:24

for looking into all of this thing and I

56:26

don't know how this is going to benefit

56:28

me. So I was sitting on my bed one night

56:30

and I just I guess you could call it a

56:32

prayer. I just sat on my bed and said

56:34

out loud to the universe, like I I need

56:36

something that validates all of this.

56:39

Like, if I'm meant to be looking into

56:40

these big picture questions about the

56:43

universe and consciousness, if there's

56:44

something tangible here, like I I I need

56:47

to know and I want evidence and I'm

56:49

ready for it. So, give me it. I want

56:50

that. And then a week later, my best

56:54

friend at the time, he was like, "Uh,

56:55

hey, I've I was watching this

56:57

documentary. You've got to check it out.

56:58

It's called Unagnowledged by this guy

57:00

called Dr. Steven Greer." And this was

57:01

my first introduction to the UFO

57:02

subject. So I was like, "Okay, cool."

57:04

Sit down, watch that. Very good

57:06

documentary. All of these different, you

57:07

know, highlevel officers and missile

57:10

launch guys talking about UFOs. It got

57:12

me in. And then near the end of that is

57:15

when he brings up this concept of C5,

57:18

you know, initiating contact with these.

57:20

You can actually have your own

57:22

experiences by getting into a particular

57:24

meditative state.

57:26

If I hadn't been making that request on

57:28

my bed the week prior, I probably just

57:30

would have watched that documentary and

57:32

gone about my life. But it felt like a

57:34

very strong message to me personally

57:37

because I've been asking for something

57:38

to validate these ideas around

57:40

consciousness. Now there's a guy saying,

57:42

"Yeah, you can actually have an

57:44

experience by going out and attempting

57:46

to, you know, ask for one."

57:47

>> So talk me through the process of

57:49

actually doing that.

57:51

>> So [clears throat] he has

57:52

>> Did you get it on the first try? No, he

57:54

>> How many How many times did you try?

57:56

>> It's It was a weird gradual thing where

57:59

things were happening in the sky that

58:02

were enough to keep me going out but not

58:04

enough for me to be like, "Okay, this is

58:06

legit."

58:07

>> So, like, how many times did you go out

58:08

before it worked?

58:09

>> Uh, before I saw what I really really

58:12

saw, um, probably about a month of going

58:15

out.

58:15

>> Damn, that's commitment.

58:16

>> But I was seeing things, but they but

58:18

they weren't

58:19

>> it it was kind of just enough to make me

58:21

like, okay, What are we seeing?

58:24

>> Lots of what the contact community call

58:27

flash bulbs. Flashes of light in the

58:29

night sky in a void of space repeatedly

58:32

without any discernable object attached

58:33

to it. Just one flash. And then

58:37

>> send a thought, another flash,

58:39

>> send a thought, another flash.

58:41

>> And this happened multiple times. I've

58:42

been someone who watches the night sky

58:44

all my life. I'm used to seeing

58:45

satellites. I know what flares are.

58:48

>> Maybe an hour or two hours, you know.

58:50

>> And so you sit down. Are you seated?

58:53

>> No, I I usually be standing with my neck

58:56

crane to the sky, but I would be

58:58

>> Why don't I get a lounge chair?

58:59

>> I know.

59:00

>> Meditative.

59:01

>> I know. I don't know. I don't think

59:03

about things properly sometimes when I

59:05

do.

59:05

>> Just lay down on the ground.

59:06

>> Just lay on the grass.

59:07

>> You get a better view of the sky.

59:08

>> Yeah. But it's cold in England and it

59:10

was mildwy on the floor.

59:13

>> Get a tarp. Yeah. Yeah. But but I was um

59:16

I was essentially because of again being

59:20

asking asking the universe for

59:21

something. The universe seemed to be

59:23

giving me some sort of response. It kind

59:24

of lit a fire up under me and I started

59:26

going outside and honestly a lot of

59:28

people like even Gria has this

59:30

incredibly uh you know complicated

59:32

method using samadi and you know doing

59:35

various things. I didn't do any of that.

59:36

I just breathed in through the nose and

59:39

out through the mouth until I felt very

59:40

calm and then began to very clearly

59:43

model my thoughts around the concept of

59:45

I want something to respond to me and

59:47

then I would essentially visualize that

59:49

that was emanating from me that these

59:51

thoughts were emanating from me and it

59:53

didn't take very long before I'd have

59:55

flashes of light in the sky that just

59:57

seemed weird because I've never seen

59:58

anything like that or an incredible

60:00

influx of what look and behave like

60:02

satellites but just at an incredibly

60:04

high level where it's just like what

60:06

what's going on here? And it just felt

60:09

like a a kind of stepby-step progression

60:12

until in August of 2019, I had four

60:15

incredibly vivid and real experiences

60:17

with orange orbs of light. Um, really

60:21

profound.

60:22

>> What was that? What happened?

60:24

>> So, I was outside at this point. It

60:27

become my routine. It was in the summer

60:29

of August and it was relatively warm.

60:31

So, I was out doing this quite a lot,

60:33

seeing little flashes, seeing things in

60:35

the sky, trying to figure out what

60:36

exactly it was that I was seeing. And um

60:39

I was standing at the back of my garden

60:41

looking towards my house, night sky,

60:43

crystal clear, and uh I saw at the

60:47

beginning a flash of light in in the

60:49

corner of the sky. So, I looked over and

60:51

I saw this flash, another flash, another

60:54

flash, and it was just blinking, but it

60:56

was static in space. And then it started

60:59

moving down. every time it blinked, it

61:01

would move further down. And I was

61:02

observing this and then it settled above

61:05

two stars and kind of created the the

61:07

apex of a triangle. And it was just

61:09

flashing above these two stars. And I

61:11

was watching this for a while and it

61:13

happened for long enough where I just

61:15

decided, all right, I'm just thank you,

61:18

whatever you are. I'm just going to keep

61:19

panning around the sky here and looking

61:21

around. And as I panned my head, I saw

61:23

that there was a cloud, but I didn't

61:25

really look at it. And I turn around

61:27

here, come back, and I see this cloud

61:29

again. And this time I really look at

61:32

it. And this cloud, Joe, had so strange.

61:36

It's like a dark cloud. Um, but when you

61:38

stared at it, it had a staticky

61:40

appearance. It's very hard to describe

61:42

other than imagine a light overlay of TV

61:44

static. There was particles. It was

61:47

agitated. It was shimmering. Something

61:50

not a cloud. Like certainly not anything

61:51

I've ever seen in my life. And if we

61:54

pretend this microphone is my house and

61:56

this cloud is here, it's drifting this

61:58

way. So eventually it's going to drift

62:00

past my house and go this way, at least

62:02

according to its natural trajectory.

62:04

It gets to my house and it does a right

62:08

angle turn and it starts coming towards

62:10

me. So eventually it's going to be above

62:12

my head. This cloudlike formation,

62:15

>> a cloud does a right angle turn in the

62:17

sky.

62:17

>> Abrupt as in 90 degrees. It's going like

62:20

this. And now it's going like this

62:22

towards you. High up in the sky, but

62:24

it's now in my path. Complete 90 degree

62:28

shift from its trajectory. And I saw it

62:30

like a jarring. Now it's going this way.

62:32

Okay. So, at this point, I'm rooted in

62:34

place. I'm not really scared, but I'm

62:37

shocked at the fact that this thing did

62:39

what it just did. And I'm watching as

62:41

it's coming closer and closer, you know,

62:45

towards where I'm going to be.

62:46

Eventually, it's directly above my head.

62:49

It sounds so crazy and you know Terrence

62:51

McKenna said something like this. He was

62:52

like you know if you tell the

62:54

unvarnished truth about a UFO experience

62:56

you'll be taken for a fool. It's like

62:58

it's true. You know if you if you just

63:00

tell people what really happened but

63:02

this is what really happened. So this

63:04

cloud comes above my head

63:06

>> as it's directly above my head. this

63:08

cloud

63:10

like sucked into itself as if there was

63:12

a central vacuum, a central point where

63:14

it just got sucked into itself and it

63:16

revealed a triangle formation of about

63:21

25 maybe 30 orange orbs of light in a

63:26

triangle.

63:27

And this triangle basically the cloud

63:30

went triangle was revealed. It kept

63:33

moving. I had to turn around and watch

63:35

as it went off in this direction. And as

63:38

I was watching it, I could see that some

63:40

of these orbs were actually swapping

63:43

formation, swapping position in this

63:46

formation.

63:47

And that was the first time I saw them.

63:49

I saw them three other occasions, all

63:51

within the space of a month after this.

63:53

Weirdly enough, I woke up the next day,

63:55

and this is the only element of the

63:58

story, as crazy as the whole thing

63:59

sounds, is the only element that makes

64:00

me personally uncomfortable. Um, I was

64:03

getting out of the shower and as I was

64:05

drying myself off, immediately

64:07

immediately noticed where this tattoo is

64:10

now. There was a triangle mark of three

64:13

red three red marks. One here, one here,

64:15

one here. Very vivid like in like the

64:18

>> And you covered it up with a tattoo.

64:20

>> Well, [laughter]

64:21

it faded. It faded over it. I have taken

64:24

pictures of it. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah.

64:25

>> Is it clear? Can I see it?

64:27

>> Uh, I can try and find them. Yeah. I

64:29

haven't got my internet on right now. Um

64:32

Jamie, if you go onto my ex account and

64:35

just type in uh

64:39

Jay Anderson marks on arm, maybe that

64:42

will come up. I'm sorry. I should have

64:44

really sent that ahead of time, but I do

64:45

have images online. People have seen

64:46

them and I've discussed it many times.

64:48

Um

64:48

>> did it look like a wound? Did it look

64:51

like a tattoo?

64:52

>> So, three red marks, no bump, no scab,

64:57

no itching, no feeling of discomfort.

65:00

There was a slight shine to them as if

65:03

it was almost like a healed over burn.

65:06

And this was very vivid. It didn't

65:09

dissipate for over a year. It was on my

65:12

arm for about a year before it faded

65:14

away and eventually faded away. And then

65:16

I got homeisters tattooed on my arm. But

65:19

uh um weirdly enough, I got this tattoo

65:21

and then got invited to Egypt. Weirdly,

65:24

but yeah, I had these experiences. Um, I

65:27

had another experience where they came

65:29

down and hovered above my house.

65:31

>> Can I ask you this? So, these orbs,

65:33

there's

65:34

>> There you go. There you go.

65:35

>> Wow.

65:35

>> Thanks, Jamie. Thanks for that.

65:37

>> That is weird.

65:38

>> It looks like you burned three

65:39

cigarettes on your

65:40

>> That's what some [ __ ] online

65:41

definitely claimed, but I didn't.

65:43

>> That's what I would say, too, if I was

65:44

an [ __ ] online.

65:45

>> Yeah. Yeah. [laughter]

65:46

>> Um,

65:47

>> that's crazy.

65:48

>> Yeah. This this I noticed it

65:50

immediately. I I'm not particularly

65:52

comfortable with it. I don't know what

65:54

it really means. I really I you know I'm

65:57

a bit of I'm a bit of an idiot Joe cuz

65:59

like I you know I should have gone to a

66:00

dermatologist. I should have like

66:01

actually had thing someone look at it

66:03

>> branded but like cattle son.

66:04

>> Well that's kind of what I think and at

66:06

the same time can I

66:07

>> let's keep an eye on this one.

66:08

>> Can I even be mad at them? I was like

66:10

show me show me. Give me evidence. I

66:11

want to sign. [ __ ] it. Fine then.

66:13

>> Right.

66:14

>> There you go dude.

66:14

>> I would say whatever that is on your

66:16

arm. Who knows? Maybe a dermatologist

66:17

could explain it. It's just a

66:18

coincidence. But the the actual thing

66:21

itself is far more interesting to me.

66:23

And like cuz one of the things that

66:25

people always say is if they were out

66:27

there, what wouldn't we see them? Like

66:29

god, if they could come here from

66:30

another dimension or if they can come

66:32

here from another planet or another

66:33

solar system, don't you think they could

66:35

probably hide? Like we're pretty good at

66:37

hiding. Like don't you think like we

66:40

have we have technology right now like

66:43

the stealth bomber stuff [clears throat]

66:44

that uh diminishes the radar signal.

66:48

Exactly. Like you can't you can't pick

66:50

them up on radar. So,

66:53

why would it be impossible to somehow

66:55

another manipulate your visual field,

66:57

project what looks like clouds on the

66:59

outside? We know that we can do stuff

67:01

like that with plasma. Like, they can

67:03

they have these plasma things that can

67:05

spin in the sky. It's weird. They can

67:07

make objects out of them.

67:09

>> I wonder if that was plasma. I actually

67:11

do wonder if this was a form of

67:12

self-organizing plasma. Uh because

67:14

that's definitely something that people

67:15

have looked into quite

67:16

>> maybe plasma has intelligence.

67:18

>> Yes.

67:18

>> There's some Yeah.

67:19

>> Yes. and and that you know perhaps these

67:22

are a form of individuated plasmic

67:25

intelligences that can interact and and

67:27

one thing that's very interesting about

67:28

that there was a brilliant paper

67:29

actually I did a I did a video on it um

67:32

it's like 11 different scientific

67:33

institutes looking at um the idea of

67:36

self-organizing plasma and intelligent

67:38

plasma and they were using some

67:40

references like do you know the STS75

67:42

NASA missions where the tether broke and

67:44

you had all these strange things going

67:46

around the tether

67:47

>> yes

67:47

>> so that's dismissed as ice particles and

67:49

things like that. Have you ever seen the

67:51

motion tracking version of that where

67:52

someone actually attached the flight

67:54

paths of each object so you can see the

67:56

flight path?

67:56

>> No.

67:57

>> That's crazy because then

67:59

>> if Yeah, I'm sure if if Jamie looked up

68:01

um weird flight path

68:04

>> lights are going towards that thing and

68:06

checking it out.

68:07

>> Yeah. So this is um you know this is a

68:09

gigantic tether. I think it's like 2 km

68:11

long or something. It's absolutely

68:12

insane. It broke away from the ship and

68:14

as it broke away you had these um well

68:18

what some people believe to be UFOs or

68:20

plasmic uh intelligences or if you're uh

68:23

on the mainstream side you'd say these

68:24

are ice particles. There you go. If you

68:26

go slightly further back slightly

68:28

further back they go s just as that

68:30

green one starting up. This is the

68:32

flight path. So if you just take it back

68:33

to the beginning of that um and this is

68:36

where they've attached the flight paths

68:37

and you will see complete 90 degree

68:39

turns. you'll see absolute stops and

68:41

reversals of change

68:43

and it's incredible.

68:47

>> I wonder if it's just a kind of life

68:49

that we

68:50

>> I truly think that's the case exist

68:53

lives in space.

68:54

>> I think so. I really do.

68:55

>> Like the things they find at these

68:57

volcanic vents at the bottom of the

68:58

ocean. They're like, "Oh, we didn't even

69:00

know that something could survive down

69:01

here."

69:02

>> There could be a type of life that

69:04

survives in the void of space. And it

69:06

just it wouldn't be a biological thing.

69:08

It would be some form of energy or

69:10

light.

69:10

>> This is apparently what all the spooks

69:12

were telling Tom Dong when he went to

69:14

the Pentagon that there's amieebas in

69:15

space the size of whales and like you

69:17

know that these things were essentially

69:19

they told him. Yeah. I remember I

69:21

remember when he was on he was on fade

69:22

to black and he was talking about you

69:24

know that there are these amiebas in

69:25

space that are like you know

69:26

>> but why would they tell him and then he

69:27

goes on those shows and tells like I I I

69:31

feel like that's the type of guy that

69:32

you tell some things that you want to

69:34

get out.

69:35

>> Yeah. And it doesn't necessarily have to

69:38

be true.

69:38

>> No. No.

69:39

>> A matter of fact, it's more fun if it's

69:40

not true. And and make him say as much

69:43

kooky [ __ ] as possible

69:45

>> so that the stuff that he's going to say

69:47

that's true looks ridiculous.

69:48

>> And now all of those guys that gave him

69:50

that information are on the age of

69:51

disclosure.com.

69:52

>> Exactly.

69:53

>> We should trust them, right? [laughter]

69:54

>> Yeah.

69:55

>> We should trust all of these government

69:56

spooks.

69:57

>> It's fun. If you're playing, it's like

70:00

the world is a gigantic escape room.

70:03

[laughter]

70:04

>> Yeah, dude. You're playing a bunch of

70:06

weird puzzles and you're trying to

70:08

figure it out, but nothing is what it

70:10

seems.

70:10

>> I think it seems nothing's as it seems.

70:12

I I think with um with Tom Delong and

70:15

the UFO [clears throat] subject and to

70:17

the stars academy and all the things

70:18

that have happened since like 2017, New

70:20

York Times, it's um I have I have

70:23

opinions on it because I think I might

70:25

be the first guest that you've had on

70:27

that wasn't already uh quite

70:29

established. So, I've had to work my way

70:31

up through social media, through the

70:33

interactions in the community, to, you

70:35

know, personal relations with people

70:36

that aren't big names or anything like

70:38

that. Um, you know, I've had to work my

70:40

way up it. So, I've seen and been

70:42

exposed to things that perhaps people

70:44

like Jeremy Corbell and others who are

70:45

already quite big names haven't seen

70:47

because they're too big. They don't need

70:48

to be on social media looking at [ __ ]

70:50

comments or like, you know, what's going

70:51

on in the X space. But if you are like

70:54

that, you start to notice things. And so

70:58

what's interesting to me, despite what

71:00

anyone wants to say about Steven Greer,

71:02

and I've got my own issues with Steven

71:03

Greer, what's interesting to me is that

71:05

the only person really who was making

71:07

noise prior to TTSA was Steven Greer. He

71:10

was the one that was putting out Netflix

71:11

documentaries that were getting seen by

71:13

millions of people all over the world.

71:15

And he was saying, you know, these are

71:18

blackbudget illegal programs. This is a

71:21

anti-ongressional crime against

71:23

humanity. We need to be busting down the

71:25

doors. This is, you know, not not

71:26

exactly what they would want to hear if

71:28

they were inside the national security

71:29

state. There's this guy out there saying

71:30

this. What do you do about that? Well,

71:34

do you know how Tom Dong got linked up

71:36

at the very beginning to all of this?

71:38

>> No.

71:38

>> So, he's always been a UFO guy and

71:41

because of his background and, you know,

71:43

the money, he was able to secure

71:45

connections and uh he was very friendly

71:47

with Greer. He was best buds with Greer

71:49

at one point. In fact, there's a video

71:50

of him when he's quite young and he's

71:53

pointing out all of the witness uh UFO

71:55

witness tapes that he's got on his uh on

71:57

his in his library and he's like, you

71:59

know, these are all I'm I'm holding on

72:00

to these for a guy. He's got like 50

72:02

whistleblowers. He's bringing this all

72:03

out and this is before Grier, you know,

72:04

kind of made the announcement. So it's

72:06

obviously Greer and um Tom Delong's on

72:09

Fade to Black in I want to say 2015

72:11

talking about this where he tells the

72:13

story of how a friend of his at Loheed

72:16

Martin calls him up and says, "Hey,

72:18

we're having a family and friends meet

72:20

and greet over over at Loheed Martin.

72:22

Would you want to introduce the bosses

72:24

to the stage?" And he said, "Yeah, but I

72:27

want 10 minutes with your bosses

72:29

afterwards." And they were like, "Okay."

72:32

And so he went and he introduced him on

72:34

stage and then he tells a story of being

72:36

taken through, you know, these white

72:37

noise corridors and down into this place

72:39

where eventually he was chilling with

72:41

the guys at Skunk Works and, you know,

72:43

these big directors are all sitting in

72:45

this room. They're like, "Okay, what

72:46

what is it you want to talk about?" This

72:48

is where he pitches to the Stars Academy

72:49

of Arts and Science and this framework.

72:52

And what's interesting is on the radio

72:54

when he's talking about this, he's

72:55

saying you have to approach these guys

72:58

like you want to be of service. You

72:59

know, I was saying I'm being of service.

73:01

I want to I want to help. I want to

73:02

help. So, you've got a disruptive rogue

73:06

person out there, Steven Greer, saying

73:08

all this stuff causing commotion. What

73:11

do we do about that? I have no idea.

73:13

Suddenly, in walks a rockstar. Use me.

73:16

Because that's basically what he said.

73:18

Use me. I'm happy to do whatever it I am

73:20

your conduit into the public. Now, no

73:22

disrespect to Tom. I've met him. He's a

73:23

lovely guy and he's very passionate

73:25

about the subject. But I do think he was

73:26

used. And what you get from there is the

73:30

tutor the stars academy platform.

73:31

Suddenly you have this official kind of

73:34

green lit disclosure very soft

73:35

disclosure that's nothing like Steven

73:37

Greer's disclosure and we're all being

73:40

encouraged to partake and support in

73:42

this very what what should we say

73:44

curated method of soft disclosure for

73:47

the people. I think that they were very

73:49

worried about what type of disruptive

73:51

truths might come out before it was time

73:53

to talk about them. And then suddenly

73:54

Tom Dong was a very useful medium for

73:57

communicating this. And when you see

73:59

things like the Wikileaks emails between

74:01

him and John Podesta where he's

74:03

literally saying this is about

74:05

bolstering uh PR for the

74:07

military-industrial complex from a

74:09

disenfranchised youth and you know the

74:10

generations of youth today don't trust

74:12

the government. We want to change that.

74:13

We want to change the perception of the

74:15

military and the government. He's

74:16

literally emailing John Podesta about

74:18

this. So it's very clear that at the

74:20

very least he was willing to be the

74:23

messenger of whatever message they

74:24

wanted to give him. And it just so

74:26

happens that that message completely

74:28

counteracts what Greer is talking about

74:30

in terms of classified black budget

74:31

programs that have already cracked

74:32

reverse engineering. We cracked

74:34

anti-gravity in October 1954. You know

74:36

this kind of stuff. It's like complete

74:38

reversal of that narrative.

74:39

>> Interesting.

74:40

>> Yeah.

74:41

>> Interesting. Well, makes sense. That's

74:43

the what's the term? Useful idiots.

74:44

>> Useful idiot.

74:45

>> Yeah. They they love doing that. And

74:48

>> you know, I've said it before, I'll say

74:50

it again. I know I've had people on this

74:51

podcast that were doing that with me.

74:53

>> And I know they were coming on saying a

74:55

bunch of nonsense. But you have to let

74:57

them talk cuz

74:58

>> it all the truth comes out in the wash.

75:00

>> For sure.

75:01

>> And uh I think what's interesting about

75:03

the age of disclosure is this narrative

75:06

uh of

75:09

the reality of what happened. If if it

75:12

did happen, there's lying to Congress.

75:15

there's misappropriation of funds,

75:16

you're going to need amnesty. And so

75:18

this is the narrative. This narrative is

75:20

we need amnesty. It's like

75:22

>> it's kind of a smart way to do it,

75:24

right? Do it in a documentary. Have all

75:26

these people that are probably

75:28

implicated in some way. Say we need

75:29

amnesty. All these people that say that

75:32

they know about these programs with

75:34

amnesty is important because

75:35

>> you know people been

75:37

>> but we what they've been doing really if

75:39

they have been doing what they we assume

75:41

they've been doing. We we assume they've

75:43

retrieved crashed UFOs and they've

75:45

backgineered them. We assume they've

75:47

used that technology. We assume they're

75:49

aware that there's nonhuman

75:50

intelligences that are far beyond our

75:52

technological capabilities and that we

75:54

interact with them. You've you've

75:56

committed a crime against humanity by

75:59

not telling people that

76:00

>> because we

76:04

we all operate under the assumption that

76:07

we have an understanding of what our

76:10

role is in this this ecosystem of life.

76:13

And if our role is not even remotely at

76:16

the apex, if we are being visited and

76:19

manipulated and if we're actually a

76:22

product of experiments,

76:24

you should [ __ ] tell us. You can't

76:27

you [laughter] guys can't be hanging out

76:29

at Rathon in the [ __ ] conference

76:31

room.

76:32

>> You believe this [ __ ] like with your

76:34

gold Rolexes on you [ __ ]

76:37

>> Right. [laughter]

76:39

>> Tell them.

76:40

>> But we can't handle the truth, right?

76:42

They are right with the amnesty thing. I

76:44

think that's the pathway. Look, these

76:46

not these guys are not going to What

76:48

they stole, they stole. Okay? What they

76:50

did, they did. What the the lying to

76:52

Congress, the lies have been told. Let's

76:54

[ __ ] find out what the truth is.

76:56

These guys, they're whatever they did,

76:58

they did. Okay? You didn't stop it then.

77:00

Let it go. The more important thing is,

77:02

let's find out if this is real. That's

77:04

more important than everything for the

77:06

race, for the human race, the entire

77:08

human race

77:09

>> and for science and technology to f to

77:12

have all this stuff locked down like

77:14

that and not allow the great young minds

77:16

that are coming up right now to have

77:18

access to this. It's crazy. You're

77:20

you're you're wasting one of the most

77:22

valuable resources that we have with

77:25

secrecy.

77:26

>> I think there's so many different

77:27

reasons why they might want to keep this

77:29

a secret in terms of breakthrough energy

77:31

and propulsion systems. Like there's so

77:33

many different implications to that,

77:34

right?

77:35

>> Massively disruptive.

77:36

>> Massively disruptive. And and you know,

77:37

could you imagine some like whacked out

77:39

[ __ ] dude with a zero point energy

77:41

device? Like

77:41

>> or you imagine some guy who's running an

77:43

oil company who finds out that they're

77:44

about to do something like that. Like

77:46

the [ __ ] you are like, how about this

77:47

guy at MIT that just got got

77:49

assassinated in his home?

77:51

>> Dude, that's the wet works in the

77:53

corporate world is very real. I think

77:55

>> this is very real. [clears throat] This

77:56

guy was he one of the more disturbing

78:00

theories he had was that not only is the

78:04

shift of the the magnetic poles that

78:07

here I'll I'll send it to you Jamie but

78:09

as his his take on it was that the shift

78:12

of the mag magnetic poles is necessary

78:15

>> in order to maintain uh

78:18

>> well I don't want to [ __ ] it up

78:20

>> or like a natural earth cycle that has

78:22

to happen. I'm sorry. I'm I'm trying to

78:23

think and look it up at the same time.

78:25

>> Are you good?

78:26

>> Here it is.

78:28

I'll send it to you, Jamie.

78:36

Sorry for the dead air, folks. Okay, so

78:39

it says um

78:41

the assassinated MIT plasma scientist

78:43

warned that Earth requires periodic

78:46

magnetic reversals to sustain its field.

78:49

>> Interesting. No reversal equals no

78:51

dynamo equals the magnetic field

78:53

dissipates. The last time this happened

78:56

in this in the tweet it says Noah's

78:58

flood. [laughter]

79:00

>> So,

79:01

>> oh, Sunweather man. Oh, I know both

79:02

these guys.

79:03

>> This guy who has this

79:05

>> whistleblower. Yeah, I've got him on.

79:07

>> Is that not loading

79:09

>> the clip?

79:10

>> Plasma physics 101 fluid description.

79:13

>> It seems like the clip's not Okay, let's

79:15

hear what he has to say. It's really

79:16

interesting [ __ ] [clears throat] man.

79:18

Um you mentioned that um

79:22

uh the earth the earth's magnetic field

79:24

was uh constant in the last uh

79:29

billion years.

79:30

>> So yeah um is it right that the earth

79:35

has lost 10% of its magnetic field in

79:38

the last 150 years and how come?

79:42

>> So excellent question Alec thank you. Uh

79:46

so when I say the the earth's magnetic

79:50

field has remained roughly constant what

79:52

I mean is if you look over longish time

79:56

scales it's its magnitude is roughly

80:00

constant but of course it varies right

80:02

and it reverses sometimes right and

80:05

those reversals of the earth it's

80:07

magnetic field so we know reversal

80:09

meaning the north pole becomes the south

80:10

pole and vice versa so those happen and

80:14

there's even interesting interesting

80:16

stories you can tell about how those

80:17

reversals of the earth's magnetic field

80:20

correlate with many ice ages and things

80:22

like this. Okay, but the the sort of the

80:25

idea is that if you average over these

80:29

periodic reversals, right, or

80:31

fluctuations, the amplitude of the field

80:33

has remained roughly constant. Okay? And

80:36

the idea is that if there was no

80:39

induction, if there was no dynamo

80:41

working, you would you and I wouldn't be

80:45

talking, right? The magnetic field would

80:46

have diffused very quickly, right? In

80:48

within 10^ the 5 years, the earth would

80:50

be left without a magnetic field and the

80:53

earth's magnetic field protected from

80:55

cosmic radiation, right? And if you were

80:58

open to that radiation, we well, you

81:01

wouldn't be here, like I said, nor would

81:02

I.

81:04

>> Yeah. Thank you very much.

81:07

Wild. And they just put bullets into

81:10

that dude.

81:10

>> Well, and like you know,

81:12

>> it could listen, it could have been a

81:13

robbery. We don't know. I mean,

81:15

Massachusetts has a lot of robberies.

81:17

>> They've got a lot of

81:18

>> It's one of them East Coast liberal run

81:20

cities. It's got a crime problem.

81:22

>> Completely [ __ ]

81:23

>> And I'm sure, you know, as a MIT

81:27

professor, he's probably lived nice.

81:30

>> Yeah. I mean, it's possible.

81:31

>> It's possible. But it also is possible

81:32

that somebody killed him. And imagine if

81:35

they killed him because he's telling us,

81:36

"Hey, Earth's about to reverse its

81:38

magnetic poles and we might be [ __ ] A

81:40

cataclysm might be coming."

81:42

>> Well, this is this is what I think there

81:44

was a knowledge of in deep antiquity

81:46

that there was a knowledge of cycles of

81:48

earth cycles and they were preparing for

81:50

it. You know, why why are these

81:52

structures built in a way that's

81:54

anti-seismic that's like resistant to

81:56

incredible force, right?

81:57

>> You know, the amount

81:59

>> Sax woman is such a good example of

82:01

that.

82:01

>> It's really an incredible example. I

82:03

mean, the the level of ingenuity and

82:05

also the fact that they're finding that

82:07

these walls go way deeper, right?

82:08

Because not just the excavation where

82:10

they're going deep down and finding new

82:12

blocks of stone, but just the walls,

82:14

there's key excavations going on around

82:15

the walls. They just keep going down.

82:17

So, it's like this place was buried.

82:19

Maybe a lot of earth push up and and you

82:21

know, submerged into the ground.

82:23

Clearly, this place experienced some

82:25

form of global upheaval. And what's

82:28

really weird about a place like Peru for

82:30

example is that prior to the well at the

82:35

end of the last glacial maximum around

82:36

19,000 years ago when the earth started

82:39

to warm up again there were certain

82:42

climatologically stable corridors and

82:45

Peru was one of those areas which was

82:47

actually quite climatologically stable.

82:48

M

82:49

>> so at the end of the um LGM the last

82:52

glacial maximum to the younger dry it's

82:55

about 6,000 plus which is 6,000 and

82:57

change now we've taken ourselves from

83:00

horse and card to supercomputers in less

83:02

than 150 years so the idea that areas of

83:06

the world that had stability for about

83:08

6,000 years couldn't create something

83:11

incredible and then the younger dus

83:12

comes and it takes it all away for the

83:15

most part it's very provocative in Peru

83:18

because of again the existence of the

83:20

Inca structures that are very quite

83:22

pristine actually and and still standing

83:24

very simple and yet they are surrounded

83:26

by broken megaliths and you know

83:28

multi-tonon structures that have

83:30

>> gone through incredible damage

83:32

>> and what I was getting at what I was

83:34

saying about that area is the way the

83:36

stones are interlocked would protect it

83:38

against earthquakes

83:39

>> yeah dissipate the force through all of

83:40

these different areas it allows for the

83:42

force for the kinetic force to dissipate

83:44

through the structure instead of it

83:45

being focused and blowing apart one area

83:47

of it so it's clearly done for the

83:48

purposes of trying to prevent massive

83:51

amounts of force. Where would they get

83:53

that type of a concept from?

83:56

>> It makes me wonder. It makes me wonder

83:57

if they did have a knowledge of great

83:58

cycles, you know, like the Adam and Eve

84:00

story. You know, that whole thing that

84:01

was like classified by the CIA for a

84:03

minute. The Adam and Eve story.

84:04

>> It was classified by the CIA.

84:06

>> It was listed on their freedom of

84:07

information at library.

84:08

>> Oh, right. What was that again? It was a

84:09

it was a deep uh research into cycles,

84:12

great cycles of cataclysmic destruction

84:14

on Earth by a guy called his name was

84:16

Chan Thomas, but I think that was a

84:17

pseudonym for a fake not real name. And

84:19

he actually had at the beginning of it

84:20

like um a series of people he had listed

84:24

who without whom this book would not be

84:25

possible and it was like you know top

84:27

fivear generals and like it's [laughter]

84:29

like okay so you know this uh this guy

84:31

had the you know Chan Thomas the Adam

84:33

and Eve story. It's all about this great

84:35

cyclical cataclysm that does take place

84:37

every what was it like 12,000 years or

84:40

something like that and that the

84:41

ancients had a knowledge of this and I

84:42

think that this is something that we

84:44

will probably begin to realize is that

84:46

somewhere in deep antiquity there was a

84:48

level of knowledge that is very

84:50

contradictory to what we understand now

84:52

and I think places like Peru places like

84:54

Egypt and others um Malta Gobeclete of

84:57

course it's becoming very palpable that

85:00

there was something before this

85:01

>> also when you see the spikes of the

85:03

Earth's temperature when you see those

85:04

ups and downs, those glaciers and those

85:07

warming periods like what is there a

85:09

uniform time in between those spikes

85:12

>> in terms of

85:13

>> is it like predictable?

85:14

>> I don't know.

85:15

>> Is it like every 12,000 years it gets a

85:17

little funky?

85:17

>> I imagine it's probably

85:18

>> for about 12,000 years comes back right.

85:21

>> This is but this is again this is one of

85:22

the things that people in like you know

85:24

the conspiracy world would say they're

85:25

keeping from us. They're keeping this

85:26

knowledge. Yes, there are 12,000 year

85:28

cycles and we are just not being allowed

85:30

to know that knowledge. But that seems

85:32

weird. I don't know.

85:33

>> Well, well, they have models of the

85:36

past. Exactly. You know, from core

85:37

samples and things along those lines,

85:39

but we do know that it's never static.

85:41

And we do know that there have been

85:42

these periods and they do look like

85:45

like, you know, a strange graph. It's

85:47

not a flat line like, oh, look, it's all

85:50

getting warmer. No, it's it's always

85:51

crazy. So, like, what is causing these

85:53

dips and these rises and these these

85:56

weird periods that seem to be rhythmic?

85:59

You know what I'm saying? It's not like

86:01

there's an immense time of heating and

86:03

then a small time of cooling and then uh

86:07

No, it's it's up and down and up and

86:09

down.

86:09

>> Well, it's it's almost like the

86:10

heartbeat of the planet, isn't it? You

86:11

know, you look at the planet as a

86:13

>> as a some form of conscious entity as

86:16

certainly capable of producing conscious

86:18

beings on top of it. So, I wonder about

86:19

that and the mcelial network and you

86:21

know, these these kind of elements to

86:23

the planet that almost seem like

86:24

neurological architecture. Well, even if

86:26

you could look from from afar, if you

86:28

could like have the concept of the

86:29

earth, like the water's moving, the

86:31

clouds are moving.

86:32

>> Yeah. Yeah. Exactly. Exactly.

86:34

>> It's like a live thing almost. Yeah.

86:36

>> Obviously, it's not moving because it's

86:38

tissue, but that doesn't mean that

86:40

there's not a force that's all connected

86:44

and working in harmony.

86:46

>> Exactly. Yeah.

86:46

>> Yeah. I mean that's why I think plasmic

86:48

intelligence is very interesting because

86:50

it's this idea that a self-organizing

86:52

plasmic structure could in some way

86:55

create consciousness inside of it and we

86:57

don't understand where consciousness

86:58

comes from. We still don't. So it's very

87:00

open to the idea of possibility and you

87:02

know I've spoken to some pretty

87:03

interesting

87:04

>> scientists like Dr. Salvatore Pais. He's

87:07

the guy that was responsible for the,

87:08

you know, the UFO, US Navy UFO patents

87:10

that got put out a few years back, like

87:13

underwater, undersea

87:15

>> uh plasmic generators and things like

87:17

this. He was a US space force uh

87:20

engineer and uh he is very much of the

87:23

opinion that plasma itself is capable of

87:26

becoming conscious, not conscious on its

87:28

own. But 99% of the observable universe

87:30

is made out of plasma. 99%. Okay. Isn't

87:34

it weird how we get taught about solids,

87:37

gases, and liquids, but not plasma, the

87:39

fourth state of matter? That's 99% of

87:42

the universe. Why aren't we taught about

87:43

that in school?

87:44

>> That's weird.

87:44

>> Weird, right? Do you ever do you ever

87:46

remember being taught plasma in school?

87:48

>> Well, when did they start learning that?

87:50

>> Well, I mean, I don't know, but it's

87:52

certainly be before my time in school. I

87:55

didn't get taught it. You know what I

87:56

mean?

87:57

>> So, why would they are you are you

88:00

saying that they perhaps are hiding

88:02

this? I think that there's things within

88:04

plasma physics that are so novel and

88:06

exotic like these self-organizing EVOs,

88:09

exotic vacuum objects, and the science

88:12

that they're studying in. Have you ever

88:13

heard of the Sapphire Project?

88:15

>> No.

88:15

>> It's kind of gone quiet now. Hal Putoff

88:17

got involved with it for a minute where

88:19

they're you know claiming to bottle the

88:21

stars and they're creating these plasmic

88:23

uh you know um self-organizing plasmas

88:25

inside these chambers that they were

88:27

claiming could transform metals from one

88:30

metal into gold or you know like

88:31

transmutation of elements and complete

88:34

revolution of propulsion and energy and

88:36

then it just fizzles out.

88:38

>> I always wondered about that.

88:41

>> Why were people really trying to make

88:42

gold? Did that seems so crazy that you

88:46

think you could make something like

88:47

that? And I always wonder, did maybe

88:50

somebody used to make it and they have

88:53

like this story of how people used to

88:55

make gold? Like if there was like

88:57

imagine the caps of the Great Pyramids

89:00

are in gold, right? And some

89:02

>> what if they're made that gold,

89:04

>> right?

89:04

>> Right. What if what if they had gotten

89:07

to it's not impossible to assume like if

89:10

the earth creates gold, it's not

89:13

impossible to think that we could take

89:14

the elements of the earth and create

89:15

gold as well.

89:16

>> There's got to be a way to do it.

89:17

>> Got to be a way to do it.

89:18

>> Is there a way to create gold currently?

89:20

>> I don't know. That's a good question.

89:22

>> Let's uh put that into our sponsor

89:24

perplex look.

89:26

>> And [clears throat] how do you make

89:26

gold?

89:27

>> I changed the

89:27

>> Well, let me show you what I asked

89:29

first. Uh the alchemy history of gold

89:32

and it automatically brought up ancient

89:34

Egypt metallurgy.

89:35

>> Okay.

89:36

>> Blending four classical elements.

89:38

>> Whoa.

89:38

>> So there is some sort of

89:40

>> air, fire and water and you make gold.

89:42

[laughter]

89:42

>> It spread to to Greco and Roman texts

89:45

via the Islamic world in the 8th century

89:48

>> where they made experimental methods.

89:49

Sulfur. I mean gold plating is maybe

89:52

what they're getting at. I don't know if

89:53

that's

89:54

>> unless they were trying to create gold.

89:56

A lot of a lot of alchemy is is also

89:59

kind of personal alchemy, alchemy of the

90:01

soul. And so it's not always necessarily

90:03

meant as a physical thing, turning base

90:06

metals into gold. It's more about

90:08

turning you base human into a golden

90:11

person. Like a lot of the times in

90:13

alchemy, it's more about the personal um

90:16

development of your spirit and your soul

90:18

mixed together with science.

90:20

>> They're clearly talking about metallergy

90:21

here.

90:22

>> Oh yeah. I mean like right here. Yeah.

90:23

So, but I mean if you if gold was a

90:25

valuable if it was a valuable part of

90:28

technology, which it is,

90:30

>> and it had conducting

90:32

aspects to it, [clears throat]

90:33

>> it's very conducive or it's very it's

90:36

good at conducting.

90:37

>> Conductive. Yeah.

90:38

And you can make it

90:41

modern methods. Particle accelerators

90:42

like CERN's large hydron collider

90:45

achieve this by slamming lead nuclei

90:47

together in near miss collisions

90:48

generating intense electromagnetic

90:50

fields that eject three protons from the

90:52

lead 82 protons to form gold 79 protons.

90:55

Wow.

90:56

>> The Alys experiment detected up to

90:57

89,000 gold nuclei per second during

91:01

lead runs totaling or lead runs. I'm not

91:05

sure which one. uh totaling 29

91:07

picoggrams over years. Trillions of

91:09

times less than needed for visible

91:11

amounts. Whoa, that's crazy. [laughter]

91:13

Trillions of times less than needed for

91:16

visual amounts.

91:18

>> Early 1980, Glenn Seabberg transmuted

91:20

bismouth into gold isotope using carbon

91:23

and neon beams at Lawrence Berkeley Lab.

91:25

>> So maybe they used the pyramids for

91:27

lightning strikes to create gold with

91:28

iron ore streams and next thing you

91:30

know, you get gold. That's why they had

91:32

so much gold.

91:33

>> I mean, who knows? [laughter] Who knows

91:35

what they figured out?

91:36

>> But we should be able to ask these

91:37

questions and not be

91:38

>> Well, it's certainly fascinating. It's

91:40

certainly fascinating that people have

91:42

been obsessed with the possibility of

91:43

making gold.

91:44

>> Obviously, it's because gold is rare and

91:46

very valuable. But here's the question.

91:48

Why is gold very valuable? It you can't

91:51

make a weapon out of it. Like how did it

91:53

rise to prominence? Isn't there like

91:55

some like translations that are, you

91:57

know, from like the old Samaran

91:58

Babylonian text where it's kind of like

91:59

we were made to mine gold for the

92:02

>> That's all Zachariah Zachariah Sitchin,

92:04

right?

92:04

>> Yeah. Zachariah Sitchin though is very

92:06

controversial. I'm too stupid to know

92:08

who's right, but I do know that I always

92:10

when I talk about Zachariah, I always

92:12

talk about the website.com.

92:14

[laughter]

92:15

>> So there's a website where it seems like

92:16

he was the only one that was buying into

92:19

that. And you know when I talked to Wes

92:21

Huff, he doesn't even think that

92:23

Zachariah Sitchin could actually read

92:25

Sumerian. Just [ __ ] guessing.

92:27

>> Well, it might be, you know, I don't

92:31

want to disparage the great man because

92:33

he's not with us anymore, but he might

92:35

not have been totally honest. Or he

92:36

might have been convinced. You know,

92:37

some people just become true believers.

92:39

>> Yeah. No, for sure.

92:40

>> What he's saying essentially is that he

92:42

tried to learn Sumerian. Wes knows many

92:44

different ancient languages. Like he's

92:45

brilliant, brilliant guy. He's like, I

92:48

couldn't figure it out. I couldn't

92:50

figure it out. I couldn't do it. Now,

92:52

obviously, there have been translations

92:54

of Samrian. There are people that can do

92:56

it. It's incredibly difficult. And it's

92:59

also apparently not related to any other

93:01

languages cuz And it's so ancient. It's

93:03

weird. And then the Cunia form and all

93:05

that stuff. It's like

93:06

>> good luck, right?

93:08

>> Good luck figuring out what they were

93:09

saying.

93:10

>> I know. I always wondered how you'd like

93:11

actually kind of come to those positions

93:13

on it. It's it is incredibly complex and

93:16

the only people that really know are the

93:18

people that are that deep into it that

93:20

they can read it as well

93:22

>> and they don't seem to agree with him.

93:24

But at the end of the day, like whatever

93:27

whatever was going on over in that part

93:29

of the world, they had a lot of

93:31

discussions of things that came from the

93:33

sky. Yeah.

93:34

>> They had a detailed map of the solar

93:36

system,

93:37

>> which is very weird. a 5,000 plus year

93:39

old detailed map of the solar system

93:42

>> with all the planets, Jupiter, Mars,

93:44

Earth. It's like, what's that?

93:46

>> Yeah. How are you achieving this?

93:48

>> What are these giant people with monkeys

93:50

on their laps

93:51

>> and like, you know, Gilgamesh holding a

93:53

lion like it's a little cat? Yeah. In

93:55

loads of statues. And, you know,

93:56

>> why all these dudes have wings?

93:58

>> Very, very typically dismissed as kind

94:00

of like, you know, um, oh, it was just

94:01

a, you know, an intellectual giant,

94:03

right? You know, giant of of power and

94:05

regality. It's like, okay, but there's a

94:06

lot of them. There's a lot of references

94:07

all across the world to these giants.

94:09

So, you know, I I find that very

94:10

interesting. And um you know, like the

94:13

reality of fossils.

94:15

>> Yeah.

94:15

>> This is the reality of fossils. There is

94:17

a tiny tiny amount of all the things

94:20

that die that leave a fossil,

94:22

>> right?

94:23

>> Most things don't leave a fossil when

94:25

they die. They get absorbed by the

94:26

earth, eaten by by scavengers,

94:29

>> bacteria, you rot away, the sun bleaches

94:32

your bones, and it's over. within a few

94:34

hundred years there's nothing left.

94:36

Occasionally you get lucky and someone

94:39

or a dinosaur gets falls into a bog and

94:43

you get evidence but if you don't get

94:46

that evidence it doesn't mean it didn't

94:47

exist

94:48

>> you know and exactly the giant one is a

94:50

weird one.

94:51

>> It is a weird one.

94:52

>> It's a weird one

94:53

>> because there's [clears throat] so many

94:55

depictions in ancient literature of

94:57

giants of giant beings and you got to

94:59

wonder okay are we talking about like

95:00

men from Iceland right? Are we talking

95:02

about giants that are just enormous

95:04

human beings? Like those

95:05

>> big chads?

95:06

>> But those dudes that do those strong man

95:08

competitions, they all like the

95:10

mountain.

95:10

>> Yeah, man.

95:11

>> Those guys all live in Iceland. They're

95:12

all from Iceland. What the [ __ ] is that

95:14

about

95:14

>> exactly? Well, yeah. What is that about?

95:17

>> Vikings,

95:17

>> right? [laughter]

95:18

>> They were the Vikings and that's what's

95:19

left.

95:20

>> But is it that? Are we talking about

95:22

that? Or are we talking about another

95:24

race of human that's even larger?

95:27

>> And if they found it, do they tell us?

95:30

Like they tell us about certain they

95:32

tell us about Dennis Oovven similar to

95:33

us. They tell us about Homo Julian

95:35

similar to us just a little bit bigger.

95:38

They found a [ __ ] 4 foot skull.

95:41

>> Do they tell us?

95:42

>> Well, it's like there's like snippets,

95:43

isn't there, from the black and white

95:44

days, 1920s where the Smithsonian kind

95:46

of very quickly covered things up and

95:48

like this is very much the

95:49

>> They had giant bones bones from a giant

95:51

human.

95:52

>> Yeah, there seems to be. And there's

95:53

there's all these Native American

95:54

stories about giant redheaded humans

95:56

>> and and you know in the burial mounds

95:58

supposedly.

95:59

>> But here's the thing is like this is the

96:02

real question. Would if if archaeologist

96:05

stumbled upon a 4ft head

96:07

>> and they were under the you know the

96:09

guidance of the university would they

96:10

shut it down?

96:11

>> That's such a good question.

96:12

>> Would they release it? I I I am

96:14

fascinated by the fact that I have to

96:16

ask that question because I would assume

96:17

that if archaeologists found of course

96:19

they would release it. We have found

96:21

evidence of a giant, like a giant human

96:23

being. And this might be one the first

96:26

one we find. It might have been a whole

96:28

race of them that existed 20,000 years

96:30

ago.

96:32

>> Yeah. I I

96:33

>> would they tell us?

96:34

>> I don't know, Joe. I don't

96:35

>> That's what's weird is we don't know if

96:36

they would tell us.

96:37

>> I don't know if they would tell us.

96:38

>> They might not. The government might

96:39

step in and say you are not allowed.

96:42

>> Well, that's the thing is it might

96:43

supersede just academic circles and

96:45

archaeology. It might get a little bit

96:47

more serious. Why? with the implications

96:49

of our ancient history and you know what

96:51

exactly was taking place. I I am

96:53

fascinated by some areas that seem to

96:55

have a level of kind of like theologic

96:58

reference to them. So you know you know

96:59

the book of Enoch and the Watchers and

97:01

they descend down on Mount Herman in

97:03

Balbeck right so that's Balbeck which is

97:06

uh Balbeck the lord of the Becka Valley

97:09

and Bal the storm god like the one that

97:11

everyone you know talks about the

97:12

sacrifices to Bal. Um

97:14

>> it's also the place that has these

97:15

insane trillion stones. I was just about

97:17

to mention them. Yeah, that's it. The

97:18

trillans. The tran stones.

97:20

>> 800 to 1,000 tons.

97:22

>> 800 to a,000 tons a piece

97:25

>> and they're not even laying on the

97:26

ground.

97:27

>> No, they've been lifted up. They've been

97:28

lifted up quite significantly. And and

97:30

this is the thing, man. It's like, you

97:32

know, some somewhere like this. So,

97:33

you've got this weird story about this

97:35

is a basically 30 miles away from there

97:37

is Mount Herman where the where the

97:38

watchers apparently came down from the

97:40

sky. [ __ ] And then [laughter] you got

97:42

these impossible blocks in this and the

97:45

quarry there as well. the quarry there

97:47

you have like the stone of the pregnant

97:48

woman which is like 1,250 tons and

97:52

there's another one there that's like

97:53

1,500 tons like these were never fully

97:55

excavated but they're there getting

97:57

ready and they've just been documented

97:58

in situ but then yeah 300 meters up the

98:01

road or less is the temple of Jupiter

98:04

which again mainstream academics will

98:06

attribute to first century Romans but

98:08

the first century Romans had like wooden

98:10

pulleys and like little wooden cranes

98:12

like this is insane this is a 800 to

98:15

a,000 ton one block, three of them that

98:17

were lifted up. I think it's like at

98:19

least like 20 m or something, you know.

98:22

[laughter]

98:24

You know,

98:25

>> Jamie, can you please show us a photo of

98:26

it? I always love looking at these,

98:27

>> especially if you can find one with a

98:29

human being standing in it like um

98:31

Corsetti if he's like,

98:34

it's phenomenal how big these are.

98:37

>> It's so crazy.

98:38

>> It freaks me out. It's so crazy to think

98:40

that they we believe they used some sort

98:44

of stone tools, copper tools,

98:46

>> man like

98:47

>> and pulleys to get this place and you

98:50

got it out of the quarry. How?

98:52

>> Well, and then

98:53

>> yeah.

98:54

>> Oh, so that's that's a brilliant place.

98:56

So that's Oint Peru. Fantastic area. Um

98:58

which I'll be showing in my next episode

99:00

of Ancient Technology.

99:01

>> It's the Trillium Stones.

99:02

>> Trilith.

99:03

>> Trilith. I can't say that wrong.

99:05

[laughter]

99:05

>> Trilith. The trilith stones.

99:07

>> Trilithan stones. Yeah. Balbeck.

99:09

>> And what one of the interesting things

99:10

that Corsetti was saying is like that's

99:11

not even a place where they take a lot

99:12

of tourists to. Okay. So there it is.

99:14

[laughter] So you see the person and

99:16

then look above how big those stones

99:17

are.

99:18

>> This is not sensible to attribute to

99:21

first century Romans.

99:22

>> No. Go back to just the Lebanon ones.

99:23

That's it. They are so big.

99:26

>> That one. And then there's a good black

99:27

and white one we see with the yellow.

99:29

Yeah. There you go. These two little

99:30

dudes sitting on top of them.

99:32

>> Crazy.

99:33

>> Absolutely phenomenal. And then you know

99:35

the the um the smaller blocks on top

99:37

that is first century Romans. Absolutely

99:39

without a doubt. There is obvious

99:40

evidence of the temple of Jupiter. Yeah.

99:42

They built it on top of an ancient

99:44

ancient foundation which they were not

99:46

capable of doing.

99:47

>> Probably a landing pad.

99:49

>> That's [laughter] what so many people

99:50

say that you know whenever I post like

99:51

any it's like here's a landing pad for

99:54

the spaceship.

99:54

>> Landing pad for ships.

99:56

>> But what's crazy about that as well?

99:57

Just a real quick aside. Well, not even

99:59

an aside. is an addition to that is that

100:01

okay so the mainstream attributes this

100:02

to first century Romans but then the

100:05

Romans liked to brag about all the

100:07

things they did and 3rd century Romans

100:09

bragged about the Lateran obelisk that's

100:12

now sitting in Rome and the Lateran

100:14

obelisk is about 350 to 400 tons that's

100:16

the heaviest recorded lift in Roman

100:19

history these are 800 to a,000 tons they

100:22

never even mentioned them [sighs] so

100:24

it's weird that we attribute it to

100:26

Romans but it's because we within our

100:28

model for history. We can't not if we're

100:30

going to listen to academics, right? So,

100:32

you have to then invoke fringe theories.

100:35

>> I had Rep. Luna on the podcast

100:37

>> and she's the one who really got me to

100:39

read The Book of Enoch.

100:40

>> She's She's digging in.

100:41

>> Oh, yeah. She's

100:42

>> She's digging in.

100:42

>> She's all in on the UFOs.

100:44

>> I know she [laughter] is. I tell her who

100:46

I mean, are is she useful to them? You

100:48

know, the whole thing. Maybe. Maybe.

100:50

It's hard to know. But when I started

100:53

reading it now, if that was included in

100:55

the Bible, if they had because it really

100:57

is was rabbis that decided that it

100:59

didn't jive with the Torah, right?

101:01

>> Right. Right.

101:01

>> And so they said, "No, no, no. This

101:02

one's too crazy."

101:03

>> If that was in the Bible and that's what

101:05

we were taught, [laughter]

101:07

>> things would be different.

101:07

>> Can you imagine Sunday church, the

101:10

watchers came down and made But

101:11

meanwhile, that is in the same area of

101:14

>> Kuman

101:16

>> written down as the book of Isaiah. Mhm.

101:19

>> So all these things that are included in

101:21

the Bible,

101:23

that's that's there. It's all in the

101:25

same word. Why are we ignoring some of

101:26

it? Like that's really crazy. Why

101:28

ignoring the stuff that seems the most

101:29

kooky?

101:31

>> Again, I think that there's probably u

101:33

maybe disagreements because I mean, you

101:35

know, there's so so much change for the

101:37

biblical cannon from all of these

101:39

different, you know, councils like the

101:40

council of Nika, all these different uh

101:43

censorings and changing of of the of the

101:45

of the Bible. It's probably personal

101:48

issue. It could be something as simple

101:49

as just someone who personally did not

101:51

believe that. It's like that's [ __ ]

101:52

Remove that. That's not real. There's no

101:54

way they were giants. But I love how at

101:56

the beginning of the Bible, it's like

101:57

there were giants in those times and the

101:58

times before.

101:59

>> Yeah.

101:59

>> Anyway,

102:00

>> all over.

102:01

>> Moving on. Never mention it again like

102:03

in any sort of real context other than

102:04

like, you know, David and Goliath in a

102:06

few situations. But no, I I really am

102:09

starting to wonder if there was a giant

102:12

race that was on this. Dude, I really

102:14

do. the Native American depictions

102:16

alone.

102:16

>> Yeah.

102:17

>> There there's too much story too many

102:19

stories of enormous men that they had to

102:22

kill.

102:22

>> Yeah. Yeah. And they and they their

102:24

history, their oral tradition goes so

102:26

far back.

102:27

>> Yeah. I mean, imagine we're talking

102:28

10,000 now that we know that human

102:30

beings lived in North America 22,000

102:32

plus years ago, right? So the the the

102:35

>> fossilized footprints that they found in

102:38

um New Mexico. So that's 22,000 years.

102:41

So imagine if 22,000 years ago these

102:44

things were a real thing. How many of

102:45

them have you found? You haven't found

102:47

any bones of humans from 22,000 years

102:49

ago in North America. Have you? No.

102:51

Right. So why?

102:55

>> Exactly.

102:55

>> Does the Smithsonian have them? These

102:57

[ __ ] [sighs] If they really do

102:59

have a giant down there,

103:01

>> I think I think they probably do, Joe.

103:02

>> Can you imagine if there's like a

103:04

there's a tomb that you have to go into?

103:05

It's like a vault. The guy cranks open

103:07

the vault.

103:08

>> It's like the history version of Area

103:09

51. You see a [ __ ] head the size of

103:11

this table and you're like, "What?

103:13

>> That's what we're dealing with. That's

103:15

what we're dealing with." Yeah.

103:17

>> Yeah. And we had to kill him off.

103:19

>> Maybe.

103:19

>> Which totally makes sense. Why would you

103:21

let that [ __ ] live,

103:22

>> right?

103:22

>> You got a 10ft tall, 12ft tall.

103:24

>> That's a problem.

103:25

>> Yeah. 2,000lb human that eats people.

103:28

>> That is a problem. I wonder, you know,

103:31

always get this because like the

103:32

watchers themselves are never described

103:34

as giant beings, right? I I wonder where

103:36

the giant came into the equation

103:39

compared to them.

103:40

>> Maybe maybe they were slight aliens like

103:42

alien grays or something. And you know,

103:45

>> well, look at the disc description of

103:47

the Nephilim. How they destroyed

103:48

[clears throat] everything. Yeah.

103:49

>> Like they created this this thing that

103:51

consumed everything and destroyed

103:52

everything including mankind. Like

103:55

>> what does that sound like?

103:56

>> It sounds like us.

103:57

>> That sounds like us.

103:57

>> It sounds like us,

103:58

>> right? And also like you're saying

103:59

mankind. Like mankind. What are you

104:01

saying? Are you saying aliens? Are you

104:03

like what? Who wrote this? Yeah. Like

104:04

what is mankind? Like what does that

104:06

term mean? I bet you're not saying man.

104:08

I bet you're probably using an ancient

104:09

language to describe whatever the

104:12

dominant force was at the time that's

104:14

writing all this down. What are we

104:16

talking about?

104:17

>> What is these watchers? They mated with

104:20

humans. So what are they?

104:22

>> And they created something that

104:23

destroyed everything. What? So okay,

104:26

what is that? What are you talking

104:28

about? And doesn't that sound exactly

104:29

like humans? Like what do we do? We

104:31

[ __ ] destroy everything. We destroy

104:33

everything. We light things on fire. We

104:35

suck all the fish out of the ocean. We

104:36

throw our garbage in it.

104:38

>> We're We are so destructive.

104:40

>> And we're so consuming. We consume,

104:43

you know. We're one of the only animals

104:44

that dies because we eat too much.

104:46

>> Yeah. Right. Right.

104:47

>> Right. We're one of the only animals.

104:48

>> Exactly. Yeah. Well, and we're one of

104:50

the only We are the only example on this

104:53

planet of the level of intelligence that

104:55

we have. I mean, it's just phenomenal. I

104:57

mean really quite phenomenal when you

104:59

consider all of the various avenues of

105:01

evolution that have been given the

105:02

opportunity.

105:03

>> We have a massive leap

105:06

>> phenomenal leap but a leap that has to

105:07

in some way have been intervened with in

105:10

my opinion. I mean it's such a quantum

105:12

leap in our ability of cognition and the

105:14

brain size. I mean I I do find the stone

105:16

ape theory very interesting and and you

105:17

know the concept of

105:19

>> uh using psychedelics and I think

105:20

there's a role to play in that for sure.

105:21

But I uh I just think that when you when

105:24

you have such a novel uh trajectory

105:27

change from every other creature, every

105:29

other animal on this planet, that that

105:31

tells me that there is something

105:32

fundamentally accelerated in in humans.

105:34

And whether that can just be put down to

105:36

shamanic use of psychedelics, I don't

105:38

know. I think that when you invoke again

105:39

all of these various theologic stories,

105:41

it becomes clear that something was

105:42

interfacing with us. And and perhaps at

105:44

one point we were interfacing with them.

105:47

And there was a communication and a

105:49

relation that has since long degraded

105:52

after, you know, cataclysmic outreaches.

105:54

And, you know,

105:54

>> I think the evolution that came out of

105:57

psychedelics and and primitive man was

106:01

the escape from the barbaric nature of

106:03

our roots.

106:04

>> Right. Right. Right.

106:04

>> I don't think it's necessarily the

106:06

development of the human brain. Mhm.

106:08

>> I think it's probably a way to Well,

106:11

also a way to use the human brain with

106:15

its primate background, but soften the

106:17

ego.

106:18

>> Right.

106:18

>> Right.

106:19

>> And and and endorse a feeling of

106:21

community like and promote the feeling

106:23

of community and love and the

106:25

connectiveness that you get from

106:26

psychedelics. will allow you to traverse

106:29

the timelines between incredibly

106:31

barbaric hunter gatherers with stone tip

106:34

tools to agrarian societies where people

106:38

are all living together and cooperating

106:41

and it makes sense.

106:43

>> But the what doesn't make sense is the

106:45

giant leap to being a human in the first

106:47

place.

106:48

>> No,

106:48

>> it's kooky.

106:49

>> It is. It is

106:50

>> and it's in the Bible. [laughter]

106:52

At least it's in the book of Enoch.

106:54

That's the crazy part about it is that

106:56

they literally describe what we're and

106:59

not just us like many people have

107:00

theorized like have we been a product

107:03

are we a product of genetic

107:04

manipulation? Are we a product of

107:06

accelerated evolution?

107:08

Well, again, my my own experiences, I I

107:11

just feel like there is there is quite

107:14

obviously a vast intelligence spectrum

107:18

out there in my opinion. And I think it

107:20

goes beyond our own perception of space

107:22

and time. And I I think that there are

107:24

likely things that can come in from, you

107:26

know, realms that we just don't really

107:28

believe are real, like the astral and

107:30

and, you know, even the realm of the

107:32

imagination is an interesting thing.

107:34

What is this place inside of our heads

107:35

that we can instantaneously create

107:37

anything we want and all things

107:38

including everything on this table once

107:40

came from inside someone's mind? Like we

107:42

are excretors of ideas into reality. We

107:45

kind of render reality into something

107:48

that nothing else does. And I think that

107:50

there is a spark within us that speaks

107:52

to what people would call a divine spark

107:54

for sure. And maybe that is a divine

107:56

spark. Maybe it's a highly intelligent

107:57

race that intervened and gave us that

107:59

spark. But we are entirely different.

108:02

And I I do think that as we begin to get

108:05

deeper and deeper into kind of like the

108:07

the physics of of of our reality and our

108:10

fundamental connection to it, we start

108:11

realizing that our physiology, our body

108:13

is like an antenna. It's like a

108:15

technology. It's an instrument for

108:17

picking up on signals and perhaps even

108:19

consciousness itself. I don't know if

108:21

you're familiar with microtubules and

108:23

the orchestrated objective reduction

108:25

theory by Stuart Ham and Sir Roger

108:26

Penrose.

108:27

>> How many times you bring that up to

108:28

people and they go, "Oh yeah, I know

108:29

what you're talking about.

108:30

>> Oh, I know exactly what you're talking

108:31

about." Well, I hang out with some weird

108:32

[ __ ] people, but I I I just uh

108:34

thought [laughter] thought it might have

108:35

come. I definitely have heard Duncan

108:37

Trussell say to you, "Microtubials,

108:38

man."

108:39

>> Yes,

108:39

>> microtubules. No. So, I I did an

108:41

interview with um an anesthesiologist

108:44

called Stuart Hamof, and him and Sir

108:46

Roger Penrose developed a model called

108:49

the orchestrated objective reduction

108:51

theory or orc O looking at microtubules,

108:55

which are these tiny helical structures

108:57

inside our neurons. And I forget the

108:59

exact metric, but it's something

109:00

ridiculous like 10,000 microtubules per

109:03

neuron. So it's just, you know, this

109:05

incredible architecture of these tiny

109:08

little helical structures that

109:10

apparently are so small that they

109:11

interact with quantum vibrations in

109:13

fields. That's how fine and tiny they

109:15

are. And the reason I bring this up is

109:17

because I think that we're getting

109:18

deeper now with things like the oro

109:20

theory into looking at the structures

109:23

within humanity that actually seem to be

109:25

receiving nodes or receptive nodes for

109:27

energy that could then be translated

109:29

into consciousness. The whole idea of

109:31

are we generating consciousness from our

109:34

brain or are we we receiving

109:36

consciousness and we're just a conduit

109:38

for it. Yes. And I think the evidence is

109:40

getting a little bit more clearer that

109:41

we're a conduit. And I just wonder if

109:43

that's evolution naturally or if that's,

109:45

you know, interaction from these others

109:47

that have come and meddled with our

109:48

genealogy.

109:50

>> It's a good question that we'll have to

109:51

ponder when I come back from peeing.

109:53

>> You do that.

109:54

>> Let's Yeah,

109:54

>> we'll pause.

109:55

>> No worries. [laughter]

109:56

>> All right, we're back. Well, Jamie uh

109:59

brought something up which is a really

110:00

interesting video that I took when I was

110:02

out in Sakara in Egypt again with

110:04

Jeffrey Drum. He was taking me through

110:06

and um yeah, this is an awesome place.

110:08

So just for context before we play it,

110:10

yeah, take it back to the beginning. Um,

110:13

this is inside the pyramid of Ununas in

110:16

Sakara and this is deep down inside of

110:18

it, inside what they call the burial

110:20

chamber. Now you see all of these, you

110:21

know, amazing Arabic artwork that's been

110:24

quite, you know, relatively crudely

110:26

scratched in. Now you see that glow,

110:28

that's actually calsite crystal and

110:30

that's limestone. Now, the entire back

110:32

of this chamber, like this wall, the

110:34

back wall, the other wall, and the

110:36

ceiling and the floor is made out of a

110:38

slab of calsite crystal. But what's

110:40

really interesting about this is that

110:43

when you take a flashlight and you put

110:45

it in a certain angle on this wall,

110:48

something very interesting appears.

110:52

Boom.

110:54

>> Huh.

110:54

>> Anwise invisible

110:57

etching of an individual. You can see

111:00

the navl, the belly button, and the

111:03

arms. And this is completely invisible

111:06

until you get that flashlight. Now,

111:07

these have been actually

111:09

smoothed. Oh, there we go. That's promo

111:11

for my uh for my uh episode, but these

111:14

have actually been smoothed into the

111:15

calsite crystal itself. And then

111:17

obviously these Arab Aramaic writings

111:20

and pictographs have been scratched on

111:22

afterwards. Clearly, this is the

111:24

original artwork of this chamber, but

111:27

it's not perceptible

111:29

without a very specific angle of light

111:32

that creates the shadows. And these are

111:33

on the other side of the wall as well. I

111:35

think in this clip maybe he doesn't show

111:37

it, but um very very strange. Now, this

111:41

entire uh pyramid is acoustically

111:44

profound. I mean, the the uh acoustics

111:46

inside of this are unbelievable. the

111:49

amount of echo that you get and the

111:51

entire Sakara site. We went around it

111:54

and I mean my god it's a weird site man.

111:56

You've got again just incredibly huge

112:00

slabs of rose quartz granite. And

112:02

there's one area that's like on the

112:04

other side of the pyramid, not even near

112:05

the entrance, which is just this huge

112:07

port cullis um made of granite with

112:10

interlocking pieces where it clearly

112:12

another piece of stone was slid between

112:14

them. But this is nowhere even connected

112:16

to the pyramid infrastructure and they

112:18

don't say anything about it. Strewn

112:20

across this entire place, you've got

112:22

huge blocks of granite with drill holes

112:24

in them. You can see the striation marks

112:26

going all the way through them. And his

112:28

opinion, Jeffre, and I think there's

112:30

merit to it because in Cairo Museum,

112:34

there's a little cabinet of uh

112:37

laboratory equipment like jugs and

112:40

apothecary bottles that were recovered

112:42

from Sakara, including a little plate.

112:45

Um there's like a little plaque. This

112:47

wasn't included. This is put into the

112:48

actual exhibition, but it's tucked into

112:50

the corner of Cairo Museum. You have to

112:51

find it. You have to really look for it.

112:53

There's a little plaque saying that the

112:55

uh the area of Sakara was a laboratory.

112:58

And again, like this completely

113:00

contradicts all of the things that they

113:01

say about ancient Egypt, but it's in the

113:03

Cairo Museum. It's literally written as

113:05

the ancient laboratory of Sakara. And

113:08

so, you know, what's going on there? Why

113:10

why is there a contradiction like that

113:12

that's being acknowledged? And it's um

113:14

it's it's truly just a incredible place

113:16

with these shadow figures and the

113:18

acoustic resonance of the site, the rose

113:20

granite. So, why do you think that it

113:22

was originally these carvings were in

113:25

the wall and then they wrote on it

113:26

afterwards?

113:27

>> Well, I think it's just another case of

113:29

a later civilization coming across an

113:31

incredibly amazing place and and carving

113:34

on it. Maybe they didn't even see these

113:35

figures because you have to have a very

113:37

specific type of light to actually be

113:38

able to see them. You have to get it at

113:40

that angle. It's possible.

113:40

>> You can't detect by looking at it that

113:42

there's some variation.

113:43

>> I mean, you can see when you actually

113:45

know what you're looking at,

113:46

>> but barely anything. It's like really

113:48

hard to perceive. So maybe they didn't

113:50

even know that these things were down

113:52

there when they went. There's another

113:53

part of this when you're going through

113:54

the chambers where it's rose granite,

113:56

rose granite, and then plaster where

113:58

you've got hieroglyphics put on the top

114:00

and you can actually see the plasters

114:02

kind of bleeding off into the rose

114:03

granite. So it feels like they found it.

114:05

They slapped some hieroglyphs on it.

114:07

They, you know, put their own veneration

114:08

around it, but it was not an original

114:10

structure of the Egyptians. Once again,

114:12

a place that they found and settled

114:13

around. But it's just weird that in the

114:16

Cairo Museum, you have like this tiny

114:18

little shelf full of beers and measuring

114:20

jug type things and it says that the lab

114:23

complex of Sakara, it just doesn't make

114:26

any sense in comparison to what they're

114:27

trying to tell us is the reality of this

114:29

place. So that's, you know, that's

114:31

weird.

114:32

>> It's all weird.

114:33

>> It's it's all weird. [laughter]

114:34

>> Yeah. That that's why the

114:38

the bottleneck of talking about this

114:41

stuff is so infuriating. This is the

114:43

same place, by the way, we have the

114:44

Capium, you know, the 80 ton boxes that

114:46

are precision marble top, the ones that

114:47

Christopher Dunn went down into and was

114:49

like, "These have been

114:50

>> machined." Machined.

114:51

>> Pull up a photo of those, please.

114:53

They're strange.

114:54

>> Mhm.

114:55

>> It's like, what what do you think they

114:56

were doing with those things? Like, what

114:58

are what was the purpose?

115:00

>> Well, you know what's interesting is

115:01

>> what was the drill?

115:02

>> They they were um

115:04

>> So, these things are absolutely

115:06

incredible.

115:07

>> And there's a few questions with this

115:09

one. If you go on to that image, um,

115:12

zoom out, just go to that image on the

115:13

right where you've got the entrance,

115:14

just the entrance into the, yeah, this

115:15

one here. So, this is, you know, this is

115:17

the entrance into the cereapium or the

115:18

serapium, however you want to pronounce

115:20

it. It's a subterranean labyrinth, and

115:22

these corridors are extremely small.

115:24

There's actually a half finished um, a

115:26

half-finished one sitting in the middle

115:28

of a corridor, and you can kind of

115:30

really get a scope for the size, but

115:32

these are 70 ton 70 to 80 ton um,

115:36

granite sarcophagi. uh they attribute it

115:40

to the Apis bulls. They say that there

115:42

was a you know a cult around this region

115:44

that venerated the apis bulls and that

115:46

these were burial chambers for the apis

115:48

bulls. But you know the you know what's

115:50

funny about that is the only the only

115:51

thing that they have to evidence this is

115:53

no no bones of bulls or anything like

115:56

that. What they have is a single

115:58

hieroglyph on one of these um one of

116:00

these boxes of a bull. That's it. They

116:03

have a hieroglyph with a bull on it. And

116:05

that's why they attribute it to the Apis

116:07

bulls. Regardless of the fact that these

116:08

are precision carved 80 to, you know, 70

116:11

to 80 ton granite marble top smoothed

116:13

boxes with even more precision inside.

116:16

They're even more precise on the inside,

116:18

which is strange. You wouldn't

116:19

necessarily need them to be that precise

116:21

if they're justery boxes. But the

116:24

precision is actually more impressive

116:25

internally than it is externally. And um

116:28

>> how long would it take to make one of

116:30

those?

116:31

>> Good question. Make it move it. Put it

116:32

in place. That bull's long dead. Let it

116:35

go.

116:35

>> Let it go.

116:37

>> Years by the time you finish that thing.

116:40

>> That's crazy.

116:40

>> These things are nuts, man. Absolutely

116:42

nuts.

116:43

>> And this is one of the big things that

116:45

Christopher Dunn saw and was just like,

116:46

"No, no, there's just no way."

116:48

>> Look at the people standing next to

116:50

those stones.

116:51

>> I've been I've been inside one of these

116:52

>> that someone moved it there and then put

116:54

that other one on top of it.

116:55

>> Unbelievable.

116:56

>> When, who, how.

116:58

>> Yeah. And again, like, you know,

116:59

>> to say that's not a mystery is nuts.

117:02

>> It is nuts. And and and also, if you go

117:04

on that image where they're shining a

117:05

light and someone's leaning on it on

117:07

like the right hand side. Yeah, that one

117:09

there. So, so many of these um the boxes

117:12

themselves are is so precise, but the

117:14

actual writing is extremely crude. It's

117:16

been scratched on. It's basically just

117:17

been scratched on. And a lot of them, it

117:20

kind of feels like, as a lot of these

117:21

pharaohs did, they just went and slapped

117:23

a cart on it. I own this. This is mine.

117:25

Right.

117:26

>> And so, you know, the the exterior work

117:29

contradicts the advancement of the

117:31

actual box itself. It doesn't make

117:33

sense. There's only one in here that's

117:35

actually got 3D actual carved in

117:38

artwork, and that one actually does make

117:40

sense. But these ones are all chicken

117:41

scratch. It's just been scratched on,

117:43

>> of course, which is what people do.

117:45

>> Which is what people do.

117:46

>> I mean, a lot of history of human beings

117:49

doing that to ancient things.

117:51

>> Yeah. If you go on that third image,

117:52

actually, that's an interesting image

117:53

because you've got these such low

117:55

quality. That's a shame. But you can

117:56

actually see these dimples where they've

117:58

smoothed out the stone. And what's weird

118:00

about this is that so if these were

118:03

boxes, you would expect the external to

118:05

be the most impressive because that's

118:06

what people are going to see, right? But

118:08

instead, you actually have a lot of mal

118:10

foration on the boxes. And one of the

118:12

theories about this, and this is

118:13

something that There we go. It's a good

118:14

example of this. One of the theories

118:16

about this and one that Jeffrey Drum

118:17

brought up for me is that whatever was

118:20

going on inside of these cases, the

118:23

exterior had to have absolutely zero

118:26

critical imperfections. So any cracks,

118:29

anything that was problematic would have

118:31

been dissolved out, smoothed away. And

118:33

you have this this weird kind of

118:35

dimpling on a lot of these. And

118:37

somewhere you can actually see a crack

118:38

where the crack's been removed and it's

118:40

been kind of smoothed out. And then

118:42

inside it's like 90 degree just perfect.

118:46

And so it just kind of contradicts the

118:48

idea of it being for the you know aery

118:50

purpose. You'd expect the outside to be

118:52

absolutely perfect and and beautiful but

118:54

it's not. It's all kind of malshaped and

118:56

as if they were trying to remove any

118:58

sort of cracks, anything that could

118:59

cause a structural problem and then

119:02

inside they're perfect. So it it does

119:04

make me wonder about the real purpose

119:06

behind these.

119:06

>> Why why are you assuming that it would

119:08

be cracks? Why wouldn't it just be that

119:10

they didn't have a need to finish the

119:12

top of it?

119:13

>> Because some of them finished carpentry.

119:15

>> Well, some of them are finished quite

119:17

profoundly and then you have others that

119:18

have got these big dimples in them where

119:21

it just looks like they were trying to

119:23

remove anything that might have been a

119:25

critical like damage to the structure.

119:28

Obviously, this is guesswork.

119:31

>> The the purpose of that would be to keep

119:32

it from cracking all

119:33

>> to keep it from cracking all the way

119:34

through. I just find it very interesting

119:36

that the inside is more impressive than

119:38

the outside for something that's meant

119:39

to be, you know, viewed as aerary box

119:41

for

119:42

>> right an enormous box.

119:43

>> An enormouserary box.

119:45

>> Has does anybody have a wacky farout

119:47

theory of what they were actually for?

119:49

>> I mean, there's always some I mean, one

119:51

of them I find interesting is the idea

119:52

that they could be like some form of

119:53

like a sound bath, like an isolatory

119:55

chamber where they would go into and and

119:57

have like some form of experiences.

119:59

>> Yeah. You got to count on someone to

120:01

move [clears throat] that [ __ ] thing.

120:02

like, you know, it's it's [laughter]

120:04

>> there's such there's such a strong

120:06

there's such a a strong evidential trail

120:09

of of acoustic sciences in the ancient

120:11

past, especially um archo acoustics in

120:14

terms of the actual architecture itself.

120:15

Like the pyramids, they're designed to

120:17

resonate like um one [clears throat] of

120:20

the most sorry,

120:22

one of the most interesting places that

120:24

I've been to in terms of um looking at

120:26

the acoustics of places as well is

120:28

Malta, the island of Malta. And the

120:30

island of Malta is very interesting

120:32

because when the Bronze Age settlers

120:34

from Sicily and other areas of Italy

120:36

came over to Malta for the first time,

120:38

they discovered an island that was

120:40

absolutely littered with megalithic

120:42

sites. And Malta has got the highest

120:43

concentration of megalithic sites in the

120:45

world. But there were no people. They

120:47

all gone. No one knows who they were. It

120:49

was just a land full of these incredible

120:51

megalithic temples. And one in

120:53

particular called the Hypergem of

120:55

Halffleeni. Now the hypergem is

120:57

fascinating, dude. It's a subterranean

121:01

huge huge uh temple temple that was

121:05

discovered by road workers and they were

121:07

literally just chipping away at the road

121:09

and then it collapsed in and they find

121:11

this huge what they call a necropolis

121:12

because they found hundreds of skeletons

121:15

down here. This thing is incredible.

121:17

This is all carved out of the limestone

121:20

and it is a overlapping geometric series

121:24

of chambers that is so obviously

121:27

acoustically tuned that if you actually

121:29

um if you wanted to search hypergem

121:32

acoustics, it will come up with studies

121:34

where they've noticed that this is

121:36

absolutely a deliberately acoustically

121:39

tuned complex. Go on the actual website,

121:41

not not images. That's an interesting

121:42

one. whether or not it's entirely

121:45

accurate. Someone's comparing the

121:46

HyperGM to the human ear specifically

121:48

because of the fact that this place

121:50

absolutely is acoustically tuned to

121:52

resonate between 110 and 115 hertz which

121:55

is the bandwidth to activate certain

121:57

brain states like alpha and theta brain

122:00

where you can get into more meditative

122:02

states of consciousness. And only 20% of

122:05

this site is accessible to the public.

122:07

70% of it's locked off. And they treat

122:09

it like a skiff. They take your phone,

122:11

they take your camera, you can't bring

122:12

any audio recording devices into it,

122:14

nothing. Very curated tour for like, you

122:16

know, 30 minutes and then out.

122:18

>> Why is 70% of it locked off?

122:20

>> That's a great question. They they say

122:23

it's for preservation of the site

122:25

because it's such a delicate neolithic.

122:26

It's prehistoric. They believe it's

122:28

prehistoric. Um, and again, this speaks

122:30

to what was going on in prehistory

122:32

because this is a acoustically profound

122:34

series of chambers that have been carved

122:36

out of the limestone bedrock by people

122:38

that we attribute bone antler tools to,

122:42

you know, chipping away at it with bone

122:43

antler tools and they made something as

122:45

profound.

122:45

>> So, when you say prehistoric,

122:47

>> well, they they they dated to I think

122:48

about 5,000 years ago. About five Yeah.

122:52

Mainstream. Mainstream.

122:53

>> What?

122:53

>> Mainstream. Yeah. Yeah. um

122:55

>> carved

122:56

>> carved it's it's it's

122:57

>> carved out of the bedrock

122:58

>> out of the bedrock

122:59

>> out of the bedrock. It's huge huge

123:02

thing. And what's even weirder about it

123:05

>> is that they found all these elongated

123:06

skulls at the bottom of it. And one of

123:09

I've seen one personally. I went to the

123:11

Museum of Valleta in Malta and saw one

123:13

of these elongated skulls. What's very

123:16

interesting about these skulls is that

123:18

they actually lack the sagittal suture

123:20

that we have going down the back of the

123:22

head. So you know we have this uh this

123:24

sagittal suture which pushes the growth

123:26

plates together as you come through the

123:27

birth canal. Um not that one uh

123:32

the third one the sorry the fourth one

123:36

that one and then there's other images

123:37

which are actually the one below it

123:39

where you've got skulls recovered from

123:40

the hypergem. Yeah. So this is the

123:42

elongated skull. It's only got the

123:44

horizontal horizontal suture no vertical

123:47

suture which is what all humans have a

123:49

vertical sagittal suture. Um, now

123:51

apparently

123:53

hundreds of elongated skulls were

123:55

discovered in the Hyper GM, but only a

123:56

couple of them are on display in

123:58

Valleta. And I've got a couple of

123:59

friends who are in Have you heard of the

124:01

Knights of Malta?

124:02

>> No.

124:02

>> It's a kind of a secret order, a bit

124:04

like Freemasonry. It's spawned from the

124:06

Vatican. The Vatican basically threw

124:08

these people into Malta and said, "Fuck

124:09

off, and go do your weird stuff over

124:11

there." But now it's a very connected,

124:13

you know, kind of like with the Vatican

124:15

order. Uh, the Knights, the Knights of

124:16

Malta. Very powerful. A very powerful

124:19

group. um

124:21

very much in the geopolitical world

124:23

world stage and a friend of mine who's

124:26

within that uh was like yeah they bring

124:28

out this book once a year in the Valleta

124:30

Museum and uh it's detailing the skulls

124:34

of the hypergeim and apparently tells a

124:36

story of how the locals would throw

124:39

bodies down there because there are

124:41

beings down there that they wanted to

124:43

prevent from coming up to the surface

124:45

and this is the strange thing is the

124:46

hypergeim is full of normal human bodies

124:49

hundreds not buried with respect but

124:52

just piled down there and then also

124:54

elongated skulls. And the story is

124:56

according to this very ancient book that

124:58

they bring out and put out once a year.

124:59

You have to be lucky to catch it. Um it

125:02

apparently describes that they were

125:04

using this as a place to discard bodies

125:06

to prevent these creatures from coming

125:08

up to the surface.

125:09

>> So they were feeding them.

125:10

>> Feeding them feeding them.

125:11

>> So when people would die, they would

125:12

just throw them down that hole. Or when

125:13

people were bad people

125:14

>> maybe. Yeah. Yeah. throw him down that

125:16

hole to to

125:17

>> So these elongated skull things were

125:19

eating people.

125:20

>> Well, that's that's you know the

125:21

connections we might make from that kind

125:23

of connotation from these books. But

125:25

that's that's certainly something that

125:26

is rolled out in the Valleta Museum once

125:28

a year if you get to go there and see

125:29

it.

125:30

>> Um so you know

125:31

>> is that like an ancient version of

125:32

Scientology [laughter] like somebody

125:35

make all this up

125:36

>> dude I don't know but well I mean in

125:38

terms of

125:39

>> very strange that there's

125:40

>> the hyperge human skeletons down there.

125:43

Oh yeah. I mean, I did find a profound

125:44

amount of them, which is why the

125:46

mainstream labels it as a necropolis,

125:48

but there's no burial respect being

125:50

done. It was just piles of bodies. Like

125:51

piles of bodies, dude. Um, and and

125:54

again, it's just so profound. So,

125:56

>> this is called the oracle room.

125:57

>> Yes, the oracle room. Yeah, this is

125:59

where the sound concentrates. The

126:01

>> description I found here, uh, these two

126:03

paragraphs, I guess it's going to be a

126:04

little long, but it's not that long.

126:05

During testing, a deep male voice tuned

126:07

to these frequencies stimulated a

126:09

resonance phenomenon throughout the hypo

126:11

gamm creating bone chilling effects. It

126:13

was reported that the sounds echoed for

126:15

up to 8 seconds. Archaeologist Fernando

126:18

Comria or Combra Coimbra Coimbra said

126:22

that he felt the strong the sound

126:24

crossing his body at high speed leaving

126:27

a sensation of relaxation. When it was

126:29

repeated, the sensation returned and he

126:32

also had the illusion that the sound was

126:34

reflected from his body to the ancient

126:37

red ochre paintings on the walls. One

126:40

can only imagine the experience in

126:41

antiquity, standing when in what must

126:45

excuse [clears throat] me in what must

126:46

have been somewhat odorous dark and

126:48

listening to ritual chant while low

126:51

light flickered over the bones of one's

126:53

departed loved ones. Holy [ __ ]

126:56

>> Yeah, dude.

126:57

that [clears throat] uh might have felt

126:58

like what drugs do to us.

127:00

>> Yeah. So,

127:01

>> oh, so they made a drug house.

127:03

>> He goes on to state, yeah, under right

127:04

circumstances, ancient populations were

127:06

able to obtain different states of

127:08

consciousness without the use of drugs

127:09

or chemical substances

127:11

>> or maybe in this Monroe Institute of

127:16

Applied Sciences and Binaural Beats way

127:19

way before we were around. This is the

127:22

it's called psycho acoustic

127:23

architecture. the idea that ancient

127:25

architecture is designed in a way to

127:27

propagate acoustics that affect the

127:28

human brain.

127:29

>> Now imagine this is 5,000 years ago and

127:34

where did you learn that from? Right?

127:36

>> How did you do that?

127:37

>> Did you fail? Did you learn where's

127:40

what's the science?

127:41

>> And another interesting

127:42

>> how do you know

127:43

>> element is um there are a lot of temple

127:45

sites in Malta that look weirdly similar

127:48

to New Graange in Ireland. And New

127:51

Graange is another psychoacoustic

127:54

temple, if you want to call it a temple.

127:55

It's a huge mound if you look it up. Um,

127:58

but within it they've done again

128:00

acoustic studies and it propagates uh

128:02

infrasound sound below the threshold of

128:04

human hearing and that's the stuff that

128:06

reverberates through your chest cavity

128:07

through your bone structure. That's what

128:09

that guy is describing. It's infrasonic

128:11

sound. You know when you're like

128:13

>> this is it?

128:13

>> Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. And there's a

128:15

>> How old is that?

128:17

>> Oh god. Again, Neolithic. I don't know

128:19

the exact date, but it's Neolithic. And

128:20

these spiral patterns are in the

128:22

hypergeim. Those those spiral patterns

128:23

are in the hypergeim in red ochre. This

128:25

is Ireland. The same structure. The that

128:29

very famous um Irish this this, by the

128:32

way, is incredible because it's

128:33

completely singular. There's no break in

128:34

the line. That's a very hard piece of

128:36

geometry to actually create um at the

128:39

time as well. It's extremely complex

128:41

because all of this feeds into itself.

128:43

There's no break in that line. It's a

128:44

very complex geometry. But that same

128:46

type of geometry is also found in the

128:48

hypergeim and it's found in red ochre on

128:51

the painting. These swirling these

128:52

swirling kind of motifs. So it's very

128:55

interesting. You have these weird

128:57

correlations between places that were

128:58

separated by entire oceans in Neolithic

129:01

time.

129:01

>> Do you think that represents sound

129:03

waves?

129:03

>> Yes. Yeah. I think it's about the flow

129:05

of acoustics, the flow of of of of

129:07

movement and and sound. And that was

129:09

perhaps their interpretation or perhaps

129:11

they had a visual hallucination that

129:13

gave them the idea of it being this kind

129:15

of like swirling pattern. But yeah, I I

129:17

I find this yeah, this is Ireland. And

129:19

um there's just some striking

129:21

similarities between places like this in

129:22

places in Malta. So again, it just leads

129:25

into the idea that there was perhaps,

129:26

you know, a globally maritime connected

129:28

civilization that was using these

129:30

psychoacoustic attributions in sights to

129:33

produce novel effects of consciousness.

129:35

you know, inducing uh brain hemisphere

129:37

synchronization just like they're trying

129:38

to do in my ass with the CIA.

129:41

>> And here's the real question. How did

129:43

they learn how to

129:44

>> How did they learn how to do that?

129:44

>> And how long did it take before you

129:46

figured out how to carve that out of a

129:48

mountain?

129:48

>> Yeah, exactly. You know, these are the

129:50

questions that are absolutely not being

129:51

answered by our understanding of

129:53

history. These are the, you know, the

129:54

red ochre um uh the the more rough ones

129:58

are the ones in the hypergem. Incredibly

130:01

old. also also a very good

130:04

>> Yeah. Like

130:05

>> it's it's nuts.

130:06

>> Is that is that that other cultures have

130:08

that as well, right? Those spirals.

130:10

>> Yeah. Yeah. So that's what I mean. So

130:11

that right there is also in New Graange

130:14

in Ireland like pretty much the same.

130:16

It's not just two places. There's some

130:19

other places in the world.

130:20

>> The swirling motif is one of the oldest.

130:22

I mean it is one of the oldest. There's,

130:23

you know, it's everywhere. But the

130:25

implication of it being about sound is

130:27

very interesting when you find it

130:29

represented in places that are

130:30

absolutely acoustically tuned from

130:32

prehistory.

130:34

>> Weird.

130:34

>> Yeah, dude. Like, you know, it's weird.

130:36

There's another one in Peru called

130:38

Shaven Deont, which is a um there's a

130:41

temple built above it. This is another

130:42

thing that you find. I mean this one in

130:43

in Malta they haven't done this but you

130:45

do definitely seem to find layering like

130:47

gam padang in Indonesia where you have

130:49

like the original structure below and

130:51

people are just piling up on top of it

130:53

over time. So in Shav Hunter in Peru you

130:55

have this amazing temple site but below

130:57

ground is a labyrinth of corridors that

131:00

also propagate acoustics to the point

131:02

where it brings up infrasound. So below

131:04

this is a is an infrasonic laboratory

131:07

essentially of labyrinthium passages

131:08

that we used for ritual acoustics. And

131:11

they actually found inside of this conch

131:13

shells that had been purposefully

131:14

re-engineered to produce a new harmonic

131:16

when blown into them. Like they had

131:18

actually changed them into a different

131:20

>> go in the acoustic chambers and blow the

131:22

con shells and someone would obviously

131:24

be walking through this perhaps as a a

131:26

form of right of passage.

131:28

>> Could you imagine going back in time

131:31

these [ __ ] people were up to being a

131:33

fly on the wall?

131:34

>> I wish we could. Yeah. So that you know

131:36

it's not incredibly profound

131:37

stonemasonry, but it does produce

131:40

infrasonic reverberation. They have

131:42

proven that and looked it up and and

131:44

yeah, the conch shells were found there

131:46

that have got all of these designs on

131:47

them and have been purposefully changed

131:49

to produce a different sound. So there

131:51

is a there is a clear lineage of

131:53

acoustic science way before acoustic

131:55

science was acoustic science, you know,

131:56

at least to our terms. So brings up big

131:59

questions. and the fact that it was

132:00

influencing consciousness. I think that

132:02

we just had an incredibly intelligent

132:04

but shamanically orientated society at

132:07

one point. You know, we were using our

132:09

human ingenuity, but we were using it to

132:12

create effects more spiritually aligned

132:14

than anything else. And you know, these

132:16

are all chambers for inducing expanded

132:19

states of consciousness.

132:20

>> The real question though is what

132:21

technology were they utilizing for the

132:23

construction? That's the real question,

132:25

especially when you get to the

132:25

megalithic stuff.

132:26

>> Yeah.

132:27

>> What were they doing? Like what is this?

132:29

cuz this is not what we're saying it is.

132:31

There's no way this is stone tools.

132:32

There's no way this is copper. This is

132:34

something nutty.

132:35

>> Well, that's why the nubs are

132:36

interesting because it it almost seems

132:38

like this the stone was being softened

132:40

and perhaps like you know if you were

132:42

pulling a spoon out of hot toffee. You'd

132:44

get that pullback, right? You get like a

132:46

little kind of protrusion that they do

132:49

and then they don't. That's what's

132:50

really weird about it. Especially in

132:51

Peru. Peru has so many stone nubs. Like

132:54

there's a place in Peru called the the

132:55

Kikancha which is like uh the the kind

132:58

of main temple in Kusco the sun temple

133:01

and you know these precision there's

133:03

various layers of architecture in Peru

133:06

albeit it's all being attributed to the

133:08

Inca which is weird rough cut stonework

133:11

then the weird megalithic kind of

133:13

smooshed together stones then you have

133:15

what's called Ashla stonework which is

133:17

where it's like a bunker if you look at

133:21

the it's it's it's spelled with a you Q

133:24

O R I K A N C H A KI Kcha. Um if you

133:31

look it up like and and look in Yeah. So

133:33

you have to go inside it really to

133:35

really get this um the bunkers inside of

133:38

it. These look at the wall on the

133:40

outside actually real quick before you

133:41

do that. Um if you click on one of these

133:42

images and just enlarge it. Um

133:46

uh the third the first one's probably

133:48

the best one. Yeah. So that's Ashla

133:49

Stonework. That bottom bit that is

133:51

original. This was built by the

133:52

concistadors, right? The rest of it's

133:54

been built up by the concistadors from

133:56

Spain. But this original stonework is

133:59

also represented inside with these

134:01

incredible bunkers. So if you type in

134:03

like bunker, it's got yeah like um this

134:06

image here like I the level of precision

134:10

on these is is absolutely phenomenal. I

134:13

mean we're talking just complete precise

134:15

fitting stones. Not globular like saxo

134:18

woman like marshmallows but just precise

134:20

blocks like these bunkers here. Yeah.

134:22

Like down here. This is all original

134:24

work and then they built a you know

134:26

Spanish inspired temple over the top of

134:28

it. Um

134:29

>> so what you're asserting is that this

134:31

was here first.

134:32

>> Yes. Yeah. Yeah. This this stuffy was

134:33

here first. Like this stuff was

134:34

absolutely here first. And if you look

134:35

up there's a there's a little nub little

134:37

stone nub right at the top there. And

134:39

they but some of these walls have like

134:42

10 nubs on them. Like one here, one

134:43

here, one here. And then there's none.

134:45

So it's like they were smoothing out

134:46

some of them, leaving others. Some have

134:49

speculated that it's a form of language

134:51

because in Peru the Inca, do you know

134:53

what the Inca language was? They're like

134:55

written language. It was called Kipu and

134:57

it wasn't written. It was pieces of

134:59

string with knots on them in different

135:00

colors. That was that was the historical

135:02

language. So it was literally like a

135:04

line of different strings, different

135:06

lengths, different colors with little

135:07

knots in them which corresponded to

135:10

data. And most of this was lost by the

135:12

Spanish concisadors cuz they went over

135:14

there and was like, "Burn this [ __ ]

135:15

Burn this pagan nonsense." Yeah, this is

135:17

this was their language.

135:19

>> Oh my god.

135:19

>> This was their language. And it just

135:21

made me wonder, obviously this is a

135:22

complete guess, but it just made me

135:24

wonder if like the stone nubs are stone

135:26

kipu.

135:27

>> Is it a stone version with all these

135:29

different nubs on different places and

135:31

different areas? Cuz it just feels like

135:33

especially in the kodicans, which is a

135:35

temple. This is a regal temple. Why

135:37

would you leave the nubs on? like you

135:39

said, why wouldn't they smooth these

135:40

down? So, it's almost like it's it's

135:42

meant to tell us something and they're

135:44

left in very specific areas. Then in

135:46

Peru, you get stone nubs protruding

135:48

straight out of bedrock.

135:49

>> That's what weirds me out is that it's

135:51

not just on the crafted stones, but like

135:53

a sheer rock face that's been obviously

135:55

kind of quarried down by some unknown

135:58

technique without any chisel marks just

135:59

straight. And then you have like a group

136:02

of nubs coming out of the stone. So Peru

136:05

is is just full of contradictory

136:07

architecture and I think that you know

136:10

the Spanish went over there and they saw

136:13

places like Saxo Woman and they

136:14

attributed to the Inca you know they

136:16

attributed the Inca the Inca the Andian

136:17

shamans say it's not the Inca you the

136:20

Inca themselves to the Spanish

136:21

concisador said it's we found these

136:23

places but we take the words of the

136:26

Spanish concisadors and we apply it to

136:28

our knowledge set and we teach that and

136:30

it's just like I was saying to you

136:30

before we we're basing so much of our

136:32

history off of like the word of people

136:34

from like the 1800s when clearly we're

136:36

seeing contradictions of that even in as

136:38

Graeme Hancock would certainly say the

136:40

oral traditions of the local region. The

136:43

people are saying differently but we're

136:45

listening to the foreigners who went

136:46

over there and destroyed things and

136:47

burnt things and burnt the keeper and

136:48

went back and taught us what their

136:50

civilization is all about. It doesn't

136:51

make any sense.

136:53

>> Wow.

136:53

>> But yeah, Peru's Peru is fascinating,

136:55

dude. Peru Peru is one of the most

136:57

interesting places I've ever been. And

136:58

it has it had the same level of

137:02

discovery of

137:04

>> not like Egypt.

137:05

>> No.

137:05

>> No. I mean like there are there are

137:07

areas in Peru. In fact, shout out to my

137:09

friend Ral Blei from Pillars of the

137:12

Past. He's a guy who's out there in Peru

137:14

literally just going out into the middle

137:15

of nowhere. He's found pyramid sites in

137:18

the middle of nowhere that have

137:19

absolutely zero um uh recording, no

137:23

excavation, no study, no name, just

137:26

there. They they don't exist in the

137:27

record, but they're out there in the

137:28

middle of nowhere in Peru. And and so

137:31

like Peru has

137:32

>> many.

137:33

>> He found a pretty impressive complex

137:35

actually. Um [laughter] he found a

137:37

pretty impressive complex. He's got

137:38

videos of it like drone footage.

137:39

>> So it's one of the places where you

137:41

could actually still be a real explorer

137:42

and find things for the first time.

137:43

>> Yeah. If you if you want to go off into

137:44

the Andian mountains, like he's finding

137:46

stuff in the Andi high up in the

137:48

mountains that nobody's documented. Like

137:50

nobody's seeing it. He's a real, you

137:53

know, real adventurer. But it just

137:54

proves that yeah, like you said, the

137:55

there are still places like this where

137:57

you can do discovery.

137:58

>> That's Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Peruse.

138:00

>> That is really nice.

138:01

>> And then obviously you have the Amazon

138:02

rainforest and like you know all of the

138:04

things that could be in there through

138:05

LAR. We're already seeing so much

138:07

geometry, so much evidence that there

138:08

was a massive amount of civilization

138:10

going on in that jungle. So you know

138:12

this is you know getting very

138:14

interesting to me. And again, this weird

138:17

climatological stability through the

138:19

last glacial maximum, the younger

138:21

driest, this period of about 6,000 years

138:23

where they had access to development

138:25

without being disturbed. So, you know,

138:27

you have these incredible anti-seismic,

138:29

anti-earquake megalithic structures in

138:31

Peru, using materials that they

138:33

shouldn't have been able to use, using

138:34

multi-tonon stones. That's an

138:36

interesting area. Although, I will say

138:37

that it's made out of tough, which is

138:39

volcanic rock, very easy to cut because

138:41

it's actually compressed ash. So, that's

138:43

a really cool place, but it's it's not

138:45

as mind-blowing in terms of how they cut

138:47

the rock because it's extremely soft

138:50

rock. But, um,

138:51

>> so this is doable.

138:53

>> This is this is doable. This is doable.

138:55

But, there are other things. In fact, if

138:57

we could could you go on my YouTube

138:59

channel real quick? Um,

139:02

this is this is there's an area in Sax

139:04

Woman which has got um there's a diorite

139:06

outcrop which is a incredibly hard

139:08

stone. Um there's a measurement of

139:11

hardness scale that goes up to 10 with

139:12

diamond being the hardest and diorite

139:14

sits at about 6.5 to 7 out of 10 whereas

139:18

bronze sits at 3 to 3.5 out of 10. So

139:20

you know there's a discrepancy with the

139:22

hardness of the material to start with

139:24

>> but um in this video.

139:26

>> Yes. So there's um if you go back to the

139:28

beginning sorry I wish I could see the

139:30

screen. Um

139:33

it's oh it's going to be difficult I

139:35

think. Keep it playing though. I'll I'll

139:37

I'll talk about this and they will come

139:39

up in a moment, I'm sure, but all across

139:40

Peru, you have these incredibly precise

139:42

cuts into bedrock with very little

139:44

evidence of any sort of chisel marks and

139:46

no real understanding of how they were

139:48

able to excavate it. you know, these

139:50

incredible just voids into the rock. But

139:53

there's one area in particular, this is

139:54

just the beginning of my video, but

139:55

there's one area in particular um in Sax

139:58

Woman, which is this gigantic um in

140:01

fact, you could probably just type it in

140:03

if you typed in Saxawan um diorite

140:07

steps or something like that.

140:08

>> Sax woman is not the easiest word.

140:10

>> I know. [laughter]

140:11

Saq s a s a y sax.

140:16

>> Okay.

140:16

>> Wan w a ma n. Yeah. sucks a woman. Uh,

140:20

diorite

140:22

steps. Uh, diorite spelled. Sorry, mate.

140:26

Yeah. D I O R I T E.

140:29

>> Damn it.

140:30

>> It's all right, brother. But I mean,

140:31

like we're I think we're actually

140:33

getting

140:34

>> I just I'm trying to listen while I'm

140:36

typing and it's

140:36

>> No, I know. It's all right, dude. But um

140:39

yeah, so yes. Uh yes, that's the one. So

140:42

the this this is diorite. This is

140:45

incredibly hard stone. To give some

140:47

context, you know, the the the the

140:50

stones that sax a woman are extremely

140:52

impressive, but they are made of

140:52

limestone, a little bit softer, bit more

140:54

workable. This is impossible. If you can

140:57

find a HD I've got a 4K video of this,

140:59

like that's why I wanted to see it in

141:01

that video, but if you can find a HD

141:03

image, it's shined like a marble top.

141:06

Like these are just precision cut into

141:09

this huge outcrop of diorite, which they

141:11

actually believe was a magma burst. So,

141:14

a huge blob of magma came bursting out

141:16

of the out of the ground and formed into

141:19

this huge stone mound that's adjacent to

141:21

Saxa woman and you've got cuts like this

141:23

where it's just insanely perfect. And

141:27

this is not possible with a Bronze Age

141:29

toolkit. This to me is actually more

141:31

interesting in in some ways than Sax

141:33

Woman itself because it's just a

141:35

complete contradiction of the Bronze Age

141:37

tools. You shouldn't be able to do that

141:39

on diorite.

141:40

>> Yeah, it's wild. I mean, how long did

141:42

that take?

141:44

>> And it's smoothed down to a point where

141:45

it's like shiny.

141:47

>> And what did they do? Why?

141:48

>> And what's the purpose of it? Why? Like,

141:50

and and there's all these effort

141:51

involved in doing something like that.

141:53

>> Yeah. There's all these weird little

141:54

cuts into the stone like that. And

141:56

across Peru, you just find like, you

141:58

know, these voids where it's just like a

142:00

90° cut into stone with perfect finish

142:02

and no sign of chiseling.

142:04

>> And the weird thing is the back is

142:05

smooth, too.

142:06

>> And the back is also smooth. How'd you

142:07

get it out of there?

142:07

>> Dude, this is the thing, man. I just

142:09

find that so like fascinating. This is

142:12

what really

142:13

>> clearly seems like there's a lost

142:15

technology.

142:15

>> Yeah. Yeah.

142:16

>> That these ancient people had figured

142:18

something out. They probably existed for

142:20

thousands of years. They're probably

142:22

really advanced just in a different

142:23

pipeline. Yeah. They went in a different

142:25

highway.

142:26

>> I will say this and and I'm sure you'll

142:27

be happy that I'm bringing him up. There

142:29

is one guy out there who's trying his

142:31

best to prove how they were liquefying

142:34

Stone and then bringing it back. And I

142:36

only know his ex handle, which is faux

142:39

mahun, like fo m- a hu n. Um I I can't

142:43

remember his actual name, but I've been

142:44

talking to him. I'm thinking of actually

142:45

going out to visit him and film him

142:47

doing this, but he's been demonstrating

142:49

making teddy bear casts of rose granite

142:52

and things like this. And for a long

142:54

time, he wasn't revealing how he was

142:55

doing it. So I kind of just was like,

142:56

"Whatever, dude. Like I don't think that

142:58

you're actually doing this." But he's

143:00

now actually revealed his secret

143:02

ingredient, which is slaked lime. like

143:04

this slaked lime which was very easy to

143:06

make for them and water glass which

143:08

again is something that they could have

143:10

made. I don't know the science behind

143:11

this to be fair. So I'm just going to

143:12

briefly say that I think he's got some

143:15

provocative ideas here because he's

143:17

actually adding like this water glass

143:18

and slaked lime to like you know m um

143:22

mixed up compounds of granite or

143:24

limestone like crushed up granite

143:26

crushed up limestone adding the slake

143:27

lime adding the water glass and then

143:30

it's solidifying into solid granite like

143:32

within 6 hours.

143:33

>> What?

143:33

>> Yeah. and he's got like literal like

143:34

teddy bear cast like you know different

143:36

like cookie cutter casts of solid

143:38

granite and so there's a potential that

143:41

it's really simple but totally been

143:44

overlooked you know it's just using the

143:46

the right compounds the right components

143:49

and the right stone mixture again how do

143:50

they learn this but it you know it's not

143:52

definitive but he he's one of the only

143:55

people I've seen that's actually

143:56

presented actual evidence that could

143:57

explain how they were doing this and

143:59

it's relatively simple ingredients

144:01

>> that would account for some things Yes.

144:04

The enormous. Okay. So, this guy.

144:07

>> Yeah. So, he's um I think so if you go

144:10

up and just make sure he's actually the

144:11

right person.

144:12

>> Yes. Yes. There we go. Marcel,

144:13

>> brilliant idea to create artificial

144:15

granite with nothing as an additive to

144:18

water glass. The latter being the glue

144:20

between original granite grains. Why?

144:22

Because I realize we need full

144:24

transparency. In order to clearly see

144:26

the original granite grains like quartz,

144:29

we need a fake quartz as a binder. Well,

144:32

nothing did not work because the outside

144:35

layer prevented the thing to get hard

144:38

inside.

144:40

Oh, well, nothing did not work. I guess

144:42

I don't know how he's saying that. Now,

144:44

what we are seeing is made with a secret

144:46

additive. Let's call it almost nothing.

144:49

That did not change the transparency of

144:51

the water glass, but forced it to set

144:53

from the inside. So, remember this is

144:55

the wannabe binder only of artificial

144:58

granite, not granite itself.

145:00

It's very interesting. And he's revealed

145:02

that it's slaked lime, this secret

145:04

ingredient. For a while, he wasn't

145:05

saying what it is, and now he said it's

145:06

slaked lime. So, I'm actually going to

145:07

go out to He lives in Budapest. I'm

145:09

going to go out to Budapest and actually

145:10

film uh him doing this to to see if

145:12

he's, you know, right about this. He's

145:15

actually, I think, one of the

145:16

originators of the whole Natron theory,

145:18

which I haven't dived too deep into, but

145:19

it's one of the explanations behind it

145:21

melting the stone. So, I started paying

145:22

more attention to him once I was in Peru

145:24

and he was messaging me saying, you

145:26

know, this is what I think is going on

145:28

here. is they were using these

145:30

ingredients to uh to melt the stone.

145:31

Well, to to solidify crushed up stone

145:34

and uh create molds. My issue

145:37

>> Yeah. My my one one issue

145:39

>> to crush up the stones. That seems like

145:41

it'd be harder than moving them.

145:42

>> Maybe using harder rocks like you know

145:43

just like smash smash but yeah exactly.

145:45

You need to I mean how much stone

145:46

smashing would you need to do to create

145:47

saxan all these areas?

145:49

>> 80 tons of smash

145:51

>> plus plus every single block is

145:54

different. You'd be talking about

145:56

millions of molds. Like if we're talking

145:57

about molds here, then every single

146:00

block is completely different. So you

146:01

need an individual mold for each one. So

146:03

yeah, compelling idea. Does it answer

146:05

it? No. Nothing ever seems to fully

146:08

answer it. But it's, you know,

146:09

compelling that he's trying to actually

146:10

find a way to solidify uh the stone and

146:13

it seems to be working. Whether it

146:15

explains all of it, I I don't know. But

146:17

there's certainly a lot of people that

146:18

will say that, you know, this is the

146:20

definitive explanation behind it. I I

146:22

don't think that. But

146:23

>> the thing that these compelling amazing

146:25

sites have in common is that they are so

146:27

spectacular. No one really has a logical

146:30

explanation. That's it's

146:32

>> one of the coolest things about the most

146:34

ancient of sites is that it it forces

146:37

you to go wait even the best people

146:40

don't

146:40

>> defies probability. Yeah,

146:42

>> it defies probability. It's truly truly

146:45

uh fascinating, man.

146:46

>> It was a national project. [laughter]

146:49

>> So simple. I get it now.

146:51

>> Yeah, I know, man. And like that's the

146:52

thing is like you know this outdated

146:54

kind of dismissal of everyone on the

146:56

outside of the academic. Yeah.

146:58

Gatekeeping. You know he wants to say

146:59

he's not a gatekeeper. He clearly is.

147:01

>> It's not yours buddy.

147:02

>> Did you know he came through the Ed

147:04

Casey Foundation?

147:05

>> Wonderful.

147:06

>> He did. Zahawas originated in the Ed

147:08

Casey Foundation. So he got funded. And

147:11

weirdly enough he was actually quite pro

147:13

these ideas until about the mid '9s. So

147:15

there's like a 1993 quote from him at a

147:19

university in Cairo where he was saying

147:20

something along the lines of uh there

147:22

are tunnels underneath the Sphinx that

147:24

lead down into greater structures and

147:26

when we truly understand this we will

147:27

understand the real builders of the

147:29

pyramids. That was the last time he said

147:31

anything close to that post 1993 about

147:34

1993 and be 96. But after that complete

147:38

polar opposite 90 degree change I wonder

147:39

what happened to Zahi. [sighs]

147:43

>> Who knows? I don't understand why if you

147:45

really want that place to get more

147:48

money, more tourism, more people

147:50

interested in it,

147:52

right? Like

147:53

>> I mean [laughter] just be open to all of

147:56

these people that are like yourself and

147:58

like Graham Hancock. Why wouldn't you

148:00

not be open to these people and their

148:02

ideas? Like they're they're clearly very

148:05

well-versed

148:06

>> like Ben Van Kirkwick.

148:07

>> Oh yeah, he's brilliant.

148:08

>> He's incredible.

148:09

>> Fantastic guy.

148:10

>> He's an encyclopedia of information

148:11

about Egypt. And why would you not want

148:13

that guy exploring publicly and also

148:17

reaching millions of people by the way?

148:19

>> Why wouldn't you want that?

148:20

>> It doesn't make any sense.

148:22

>> I think there's like a maybe like a bit

148:23

of a cultural arrogance like who do you

148:25

think you are westerer coming over here

148:27

and teaching us about our history. I

148:29

think there's a level of that like you

148:30

know at least on a surface layer before

148:32

you get into the deeper implications of

148:33

you know Freemason secret societies

148:35

keeping things from us. My true fear is

148:37

that it's people just have this desire

148:39

to be the one in charge of stuff,

148:41

>> right? And the desire to be right. They

148:44

want to be they never want to be proven

148:46

wrong.

148:46

>> And who's this guy? Who's this podcaster

148:48

who's coming on and telling me what my

148:50

country's heritage is? And you know, I

148:52

think

148:52

>> but the problem with that is like even

148:54

mainstream archaeologists are angry

148:56

about it,

148:57

>> right?

148:57

>> Like,

148:57

>> right. Well, everyone gangs together,

148:59

you know, they all gang together. It's

149:00

group think.

149:01

>> Well, it's also there's a lot of [ __ ]

149:03

in archaeology. A lot of [ __ ] I've

149:05

noticed that

149:05

>> [ __ ] people.

149:06

>> I've noticed that

149:07

>> they just there's it's such a bad look

149:10

for the profession.

149:11

>> It really is because immature

149:14

>> like snarky

149:15

>> shitty comments.

149:17

>> Yeah, I know.

149:17

>> Like

149:18

>> espersions of racism. Shut up. It's it's

149:22

it's a really gross field in terms of

149:24

like some of the humans around. It came

149:26

through the toxicity of the UFO

149:27

community, which is like so bad. And uh

149:30

[laughter]

149:30

you know, I thought it would be yeah, a

149:32

lot of cooks, but also just a lot of bad

149:34

actors and hackers and people that want

149:35

to um you know, one one thing on the UFO

149:38

subject actually, which I I do think is

149:40

worth noting uh because like I said to

149:42

you, I think I'm one of the first people

149:43

that you've had on that had to actually

149:45

make their way through the social media

149:46

interactions. And one of the things that

149:48

a lot of us noticed and I have to give

149:50

credit to a couple of people like Red

149:52

Panda Koala and Tupac on Twitter, two

149:56

very good researchers that have been

149:57

highlighting this is that when um the

150:02

whole kind of 2017 narrative and Lzando

150:06

and Chris Mel and all these guys started

150:07

coming out, obviously we were all

150:09

extremely excited about it. Over time,

150:12

you know, there were some issues like

150:14

some contradictions. Lu Alzando

150:16

especially has contradicted himself

150:17

quite a lot and uh some of us started to

150:21

get a little bit suspicious of these

150:23

people and just started asking

150:24

questions. It didn't take long for us to

150:27

be targeted by a pretty significant

150:30

network online of people that were

150:32

trying to hack and dox us. And uh people

150:35

like he hasn't put his actual name out

150:37

there, but people like Red Panda Koala

150:39

was doxed online, had his family house

150:41

put out online, photos of his underage

150:44

sister put out online by a group of

150:47

individuals who are all very closely

150:50

connected to Lu Lazando.

150:53

And this is something that you would not

150:54

notice outside of being in the minutia

150:57

of X because you would see these troll

150:59

accounts, these really nasty troll

151:02

accounts that were all being followed by

151:04

Lou. And when they were having their

151:06

accounts shut down and reinstated, Lou

151:09

was one of the first people following

151:10

them. Some people have actually come out

151:12

about this group now and revealed

151:14

screenshots of DMs where they're in

151:16

private conversations with people like

151:18

Lou and Gary and you know some of these

151:20

other guys who I got connected to early

151:22

on very early on. And I got some of the

151:24

first interviews with these people and

151:25

was very pro it until I started

151:27

realizing they were very much trying to

151:29

control the narrative and there were you

151:30

know things you couldn't speak about

151:32

can't talk about uh you know reverse

151:34

engineering or or or uh consciousness

151:37

initiated contact anything to do with

151:38

Greer as completely poisonous. Um

151:41

Luzando was actually he he called he

151:43

called Greer and a couple of other

151:45

people terrorists. He said I wouldn't

151:46

negotiate with terrorists when asked

151:48

about Steven Greer. Um, but what people

151:51

have dubbed this as is the UFO hate

151:52

group. This is very well known online,

151:54

the UFO hate group. And it's a group of

151:55

people that are so savagely in favor of

151:59

people like Lou and this kind of

152:00

modernized narrative that if you even go

152:03

half an inch, like I really gained my

152:06

accolades in the UFO community, people,

152:08

you know, really praising me for the

152:09

interviews I was getting until I started

152:11

asking a few questions about people like

152:12

Lou and suddenly I get an absolute

152:15

mastrom of hatred from people that were

152:17

once really, you know, enjoying my

152:19

content. And I'm quite lucky. I haven't

152:22

been targeted so heavily. Some people

152:24

have had their lives ruined by these

152:26

people who were all connected to

152:28

individuals like Lou. And Lou actually

152:31

said that he came to burn you off to the

152:32

ground. Like he actually said that in an

152:34

article. He was like, "I want to burn

152:35

you. I want to destroy it."

152:37

>> When did he say that?

152:38

>> Oh, it was like in like a few years

152:39

back. Now you can get

152:40

>> Why did he say it? What was the context?

152:42

>> Um I think it was just about the way in

152:44

which the UFO community has, you know,

152:46

been misrepresenting the phenomena and

152:48

like the confusing spaghetti junction of

152:50

narratives. Isn't he just kind of I want

152:51

to know a hard reset.

152:53

>> Doesn't that kind of actually make sense

152:54

to say?

152:55

>> Does he Does he know things?

152:56

>> Well, you don't think he knows things?

152:58

>> What does he know?

152:58

>> I don't know.

152:59

>> Exactly. Right. They all know something,

153:01

but none of them can tell us. And they

153:03

all knew it from someone else and

153:04

someone else told them and they knew it

153:05

and they know this and like, dude, I was

153:07

so in love with all of this. I You have

153:09

to understand that I was truly I was a

153:11

believer. I was like, "This is amazing.

153:13

I had my orb experiences so I had a bias

153:15

already. I was like, I'm ready to

153:16

believe in whatever you're saying." It

153:18

took me a while to start actually

153:19

realizing that this is not going in the

153:21

direction I think it should be going and

153:22

that there's a heavily curated narrative

153:24

and if you try and question the

153:25

narrative, you will be punished by group

153:28

think. It felt like honestly I started

153:30

to feel like I was in a COVID cult for

153:32

ufology where you just can't talk about

153:35

Lu Alzando in a bad light regardless of

153:37

the fact that this man has gone on stage

153:39

and presented literal fake UFO photos to

153:42

the public which have been debunked in

153:43

less than 24 hours and he had to admit

153:46

that they were fake because of the

153:48

debunks, but people are just happy to

153:50

forget these things happened. like he

153:51

went up in a congressional setting and

153:54

held up a UFO photo that was proven to

153:57

just be uh fields like agricultural

154:00

fields. Yes, this is a fake. This that's

154:03

not a shadow. That's a darker field next

154:06

to the lighter field. These are two

154:07

circles. And this was proven. He had to

154:11

admit it. He had to This is in a

154:13

congressional setting. This man

154:15

apparently ran the Advanced Aerospace

154:17

Threat Identification Program. I call

154:19

[ __ ] I don't believe he did because

154:20

he seems like more of a government

154:22

stoogge and he feels like someone that

154:24

would be sent out to do what he admits

154:26

he was doing. Counter intelligence. He's

154:27

a counter intelligence,

154:28

counterterrorism, counter espionage guy.

154:30

I'm not a UFO guy. I'm a

154:32

counterterrorism counter espionage guy.

154:33

>> He's also one of the guys calling for

154:35

amnesty, right?

154:36

>> Oh, how surprising. Yeah. Yeah, exactly.

154:39

Color me shocked. Yeah. No, he is like,

154:40

you know, color me shocked.

154:41

>> Does he say that in the Because a lot of

154:43

them do say it. I want to make sure that

154:44

he actually said that in the age of

154:46

disclosure.

154:46

>> I'll be perfectly honest with you, Joe.

154:47

I haven't even [ __ ] watched it cuz

154:48

I'm just not interested in that element

154:50

of the UFO subject anymore. I've been

154:51

burned by these guys. I've had Gary

154:53

Nolan emailing me like, "Why aren't you

154:54

on the team anymore? Why don't you like

154:55

be a team player?" It's like, "Because

154:57

you're literally telling me that I can't

154:58

tell my own [ __ ] truth. You're

155:00

censoring me and saying that I'm not

155:02

being a team player just because I have

155:04

>> censoring you about what in particular?"

155:06

>> Well, I was

155:07

>> or attempting to get you to stop talking

155:09

about

155:10

>> specifically. primarily there seems to

155:13

have been a bit of an issue with the way

155:14

that I've been talking about Lou and his

155:16

association with ATIP because I think

155:18

that ATIP was actually a cutout. It

155:20

wasn't a real uh program and it was a

155:22

cutout that was actually created

155:24

for to the stars academy and ORSAP which

155:28

was more of a kind of uh you know

155:29

precursor program wasn't being run by uh

155:32

lazando that's the advanced weapon

155:34

application space program I forgot the

155:36

actual acronym now ATIP is meant to be

155:39

lose and I just think that I have to be

155:42

careful but a very prominent journalist

155:45

in the UFO community literally told me

155:46

that Lou told him that that this is this

155:49

was all created for to the stars academy

155:51

as like a way to, you know, generate a

155:54

an understandable structure. Here's this

155:56

guy. He's, you know, running ATIP. I

155:59

have an issue with the idea that someone

156:01

like Lu Lzando can go to the New York

156:03

Times and say that the Secretary of

156:06

Defense wasn't being briefed on UFOs and

156:08

I'm the one that was running a program

156:10

when people like Julian Assange and

156:12

Edward Snowden are being thrown to the

156:13

wolves for just revealing standard

156:16

national security issues. This is meant

156:17

to be even deeper, right? this is black

156:18

black budget. This guy can just roll out

156:20

to the New York Times seems a little bit

156:22

planned, seems a little bit curated and

156:24

forced. So I started asking those

156:26

questions and especially when things

156:28

like this were happening where there

156:29

were discrepancies where he's bringing

156:30

up images that are being debunked. It

156:31

was like who is this guy? You know, who

156:33

is this guy really? And then his book

156:35

comes out and he's talking about being

156:36

the the torture zar in in Guantanamo Bay

156:40

and you know that the people there

156:41

called him the Darth Vader of the United

156:43

States. This is in his book, you know,

156:44

that he he admitted they called him the

156:46

tortazar of Guantanamo Bay because, you

156:48

know, he ran Camp Platinum at Guantanamo

156:50

Bay, Black Site, CIA Blackite.

156:51

>> Whoa.

156:52

>> Yeah. So, you know, um he actually had

156:55

in his book that the he was known as the

156:58

the Darth Vader of the United States by

156:59

certain people and and the torches are

157:01

of Guantanamo Bay. I don't really trust

157:04

people like this who, you know,

157:06

waterboarded people for a living and and

157:08

are now trying to tell me what's going

157:10

on in the UFO subject. Well, let's let's

157:12

ask this question. What what purpose

157:15

would there be to muddy the narrative if

157:18

you wanted to have a government agent

157:21

come out and have what you're claiming

157:24

is like a fake disclosure? Like a

157:26

government narrated disclosure? What

157:28

would be the purpose of that?

157:29

>> What are they all asking for, Joe?

157:31

>> Money.

157:32

>> Amnesty.

157:33

>> Amnesty.

157:34

>> Amnesty. And what was happening before

157:36

that is you had someone like Steven

157:38

Greer just saying, "These people need to

157:40

go to jail." And that was the only big

157:42

voice in the UFO community.

157:43

>> Maybe they're offering a window to

157:45

possible disclosure, though. Maybe we

157:47

give him this [ __ ] amnesty. If we

157:49

don't, what happens? Nothing. It keeps

157:50

going the same way it's been going.

157:52

There's no actual disclosure. We keep

157:54

talking about it. It gets nuts. It It's

157:57

It gets to the point where it's driving

157:58

you crazy. Like, I don't even want to

157:59

hear about any [ __ ] UFOs till you

158:01

show me one. But if it's a real subject

158:05

and the only thing that's keeping us

158:06

from learning this real subject is that

158:08

and so they're trying to push out this

158:10

narrative of amnesty, I'll bite. What

158:14

are we talking about? I think for me

158:16

again coming up through it and just

158:17

seeing how these people actually act

158:19

when you challenge them and the fact

158:20

that there were absolutely organized

158:22

groups of um quite frankly quite

158:25

mentally unstable people that were very

158:26

easily misled into believing they're

158:28

important

158:29

>> who are getting brought into these

158:30

signal chats these private group chats

158:32

and you know I'm in I'm in touch with

158:34

Lazando, you know, I'm one of those

158:35

guys. I'm being brought in and you know

158:37

they tried to do that. Yeah. useful

158:39

idiot and like there's a lot of them and

158:41

you know there's a few people out there

158:42

that are extremely dark individuals like

158:44

we're talking like you know connected to

158:46

all sorts of weird Satanism groups and

158:47

Lou's just there of selfies like hanging

158:49

out with these guys like he's a dodgy

158:51

dude I don't care he's like you know I'm

158:53

freaked out even saying this on the Joe

158:55

Rogan you know he's like he's going to

158:57

remote view my brain or something but at

158:58

the same time he is a dodgy guy like

159:00

he's shady

159:01

>> but you do believe in the existence of

159:03

these things

159:04

>> dude I've had orbs hover over my house

159:05

like yeah like reversing

159:07

>> what do you think is that there is a

159:09

clear decision somewhere in our

159:12

government to muddy the water and to put

159:15

out this narrative that these

159:18

whistleblowers are trying to tell

159:20

everybody. So to slowly trickle this

159:22

stuff out there and then float out

159:24

amnesty which is a big part of the age

159:26

of disclosure documentary really the

159:28

first time I've ever heard anybody like

159:30

where everyone uniformly talks about

159:32

that one particular subject.

159:34

>> Yeah. Like I I think that that's the

159:36

that's the the goal is to create a

159:38

curated self-disclosure that does the

159:40

very best to paint the government in the

159:42

best possible light and allows them to

159:44

actually kind of not face too much

159:46

punishment for what's been going on in

159:47

the legacy programs. Again, if you only

159:49

had someone like Steven Greer out there,

159:51

uh he he was offering a completely

159:53

different thing. We need to punish these

159:54

people like they are criminals. They've

159:56

ruined humanity for a hundred years of

159:58

stagnating technological progress.

160:00

>> You got a little testy. Got a little

160:01

testy with that. should have should have

160:03

taken a little softer tone. [laughter]

160:06

>> Sorry.

160:07

>> No, I'm saying with him like maybe if he

160:09

did that maybe they would have uh

160:11

>> Yeah. Right. Not so defensive like [ __ ]

160:13

They want to lock us up.

160:14

>> Yeah. But that's it. That's why

160:15

>> as soon as you say you're going to lock

160:16

someone up for what they did, they're

160:17

going to say I didn't do anything. Yeah.

160:18

And they're going to keep saying that.

160:19

>> But that's why they got rid of him.

160:20

That's why they got rid of him. That's

160:22

why Gary Nolan, who was originally with

160:24

Greer, then changed over to Two Stars

160:26

Academy. And they poached quite a few

160:27

people from his team and brought him

160:29

over to TTSA. um and he became a pariah.

160:32

Um you know, again, he's you know, he

160:33

says a lot of things that quite frankly

160:35

I don't agree with, but um I I just

160:38

think that basically they tried to

160:39

overtake the narrative and they needed

160:41

government representatives to run this.

160:44

And I just again

160:45

>> it's how they do everything. Why would

160:46

we be shocked that they do it about

160:48

something this important? Especially if

160:50

there is lying to Congress, the

160:51

misappropriation of funds, and for sure

160:54

some fraud.

160:56

>> For sure. You're talking about a [ __ ]

160:58

ton of money.

160:59

One thing um one thing that does

161:01

interest me though is the ARV the alien

161:04

reproduction vehicle the flux liner.

161:06

Have you heard of this? Oh,

161:07

>> you know about Mark McCandish and the

161:09

alien reproduction vehicle. Oh well

161:11

that's something you should

161:12

>> if you type in ARV flux liner you'll get

161:14

this image right away. Um this is one of

161:17

the avenues that I would actually pay

161:19

attention to and think okay I think

161:21

something's going on here. Um Mark

161:23

McAdish was an aerospace illustrator for

161:26

the US Air Force. That's the Yeah. So

161:29

the actual

161:29

>> Oh, I have seen this.

161:30

>> Yeah, of course you have. It's very

161:32

classic. And that one that's blue with

161:35

the writing all over it. That's what was

161:36

held up at the 2001 national press

161:39

conference organized by Dr. Steven

161:41

Greer. Again, like you know, this isn't

161:43

new. Like to be fair to Dr. Greer, he

161:45

brought like over 50 witnesses on live

161:48

television during the national press

161:50

conference and one of them was Mark

161:51

McCandish

161:53

uh military illustrator who drew this uh

161:55

sketch. A friend of mine has a version

161:58

of this framed in his house.

162:00

>> So do I. [laughter]

162:01

>> I need to get one. We need to get one

162:03

for the studio.

162:03

>> You can literally get one on Etsy for

162:05

like a hundred bucks. It's like a big

162:07

one on Etsy. Um but so this is

162:10

important. Mark McCandish.

162:12

>> Um he actually ended up taking his own

162:15

life.

162:15

>> Go that back to that again.

162:17

>> What about it?

162:17

>> I want to read the heading. It says,

162:19

"According to this documentary, we had

162:21

this the technology for faster than

162:23

light travel and zero point energy for a

162:25

very long time. Let's pretend this is

162:27

true. How do we know the UAPs we sent

162:30

aren't ours and more modern build?"

162:33

>> The person who made this documentary

162:34

died of an aggressive form of cancer not

162:38

long after making it. He was quite a

162:39

young man as well, documentary filmmaker

162:41

who made this. But um Mark McCandish,

162:44

military illustrator, he had a friend

162:47

called Brad Sorenson. Now Brad Sorenson

162:49

was a government guy, aerospace uh

162:53

engineer, Loheed Martin, had quite an

162:55

extensive portfolio. And Brad Sorenson

162:58

goes to his buddy one day, Mark Mandal,

163:00

and he says, "I was shown something and

163:02

I want you to draw it. I'm going to

163:03

describe it to you in great detail, and

163:05

I want you to create the illustration."

163:07

Brad Sorenson says that I think it was

163:08

in like the the 70s or like early late

163:10

60s or early 70s that he was um invited

163:13

to a private air show at Loheed Martin

163:16

by an individual who was a good friend

163:18

of his in the in the military who was

163:19

higher up than him. And apparently this,

163:21

you know, he didn't have the what they

163:23

call the tickets, the the right

163:24

classifications to actually get access

163:26

to this um private air show, but his

163:28

friend brought him um because he had the

163:30

tickets. And essentially they bring him

163:34

into a hanger in Loheed Martin where

163:37

three large sources of varying size were

163:41

hovering a few feet off of the ground.

163:43

They were described as instantaneous

163:45

nuclear payload delivery systems. That's

163:47

the way that they were actually

163:48

classifying them. had a nickname for a

163:50

mant instantaneous nuclear payload

163:52

delivery systems. Like the idea that you

163:53

could just instantaneously deliver a

163:55

nuclear payload to anywhere in the

163:56

world.

163:57

>> Oh my god.

163:58

>> Yeah. Um which is again one of the

164:00

reasons why they might keep this stuff

164:01

secret. Um the the ships were nicknamed

164:04

mama bear, baby bear, and papa bear.

164:07

>> Oh my god.

164:08

>> Yeah. Um, what's really interesting

164:10

about this is that Brad Sorenson has

164:12

never gone public,

164:14

but I was in the room when he was phoned

164:17

and I've heard him say things that have

164:20

never been on the record before. Um, no

164:22

one's ever contacted Brad Sorenson. Mark

164:24

Mckandlish took his own life a number of

164:26

years ago. His closest friends would say

164:28

that that was not anything untoward.

164:32

It's hard to know. I didn't know the

164:33

man. All I know is this is the man that

164:35

produced an incredibly profound

164:36

illustration and then eventually took

164:38

his own life. Um but his friend Brad

164:40

Sorenson has never gone public ever.

164:42

Never. I have got quite a few contacts

164:44

now because of my research and you know

164:46

affiliations that I've managed to gain

164:48

with people in like the US Navy and you

164:50

know intel and uh a good friend of mine

164:52

who was able to actually find his number

164:55

and get in touch with Brad Sorenson. I

164:58

was present when he was phoned and uh

165:01

you know my friend introduces himself to

165:02

him and he'd never spoken to him before

165:05

and they were just talking shop first of

165:08

all he said that he wanted to reach out

165:10

to him because he'd heard about him

165:11

through various stories online but you

165:14

know anyway to cut the long story short

165:16

he asked him my friend asked him about

165:18

Mark Mckandlish in this alien

165:20

reproduction vehicle and Brad Sorenson

165:23

went off on quite a diet tribe actually

165:26

uh very angry

165:27

about Mark and how he said that I gave

165:31

this man the keys to the kingdom and he

165:34

went out and told the whole [ __ ]

165:35

world and I will never do that because

165:39

my employers

165:41

will fry me. He said they will [ __ ]

165:43

fry me if I speak out about this but I

165:47

am capable of building and designing an

165:49

aircraft that can go 210 times the speed

165:51

of light.

165:56

Yeah, he reiterated that multiple times.

165:59

>> What?

166:01

>> Yeah, I um

166:02

>> What year was this?

166:04

>> I've sat on this for a couple of years.

166:05

It's about two years ago that my friend

166:07

phoned him.

166:08

>> Um

166:10

Yeah. I was I

166:11

>> instantaneous nuclear payload delivery.

166:15

>> Yeah. Yeah. I mean, you can imagine

166:17

that's how the national security system

166:18

would actually look at this. Not as an

166:20

exploratory vessel, but let's be honest.

166:22

What is this? It's a payload delivery

166:24

system that's instantaneous. Let's be

166:25

honest. That's what they would look at

166:26

it as, right? Another reason to keep it

166:28

secret pro probably.

166:30

>> Um, but that was, you know, I I I would

166:32

love to get him on record. I don't know

166:33

if you ever will, Brad, if you're

166:34

listening to this. I would like to get

166:35

you on record. But he uh Yeah, he he

166:39

said that he said that he can design a

166:42

craft that goes 210 times the speed of

166:43

light. And this is the guy that gave

166:46

Mark McCandish the illustrations to

166:48

create that ARV. So, it's just weird.

166:51

[laughter]

166:52

I mean,

166:53

>> it's weird, dude.

166:54

>> This is the real question. What would

166:56

civilization be like had this stuff not

166:58

been kept secret,

167:00

>> right?

167:00

>> What What if we had access to that kind

167:03

of energy, whatever that thing is

167:05

operating on?

167:07

>> Could you imagine if you had access to

167:08

that energy and you're watching all

167:09

these idiots burn coal? Like, what are

167:11

you doing?

167:11

>> What are you doing?

167:12

>> But you can't say anything.

167:13

>> Yeah.

167:14

>> Have a instantaneous

167:15

>> I would delivery system.

167:17

>> I'd hate to be these people. I'd hate to

167:19

be these people. Imagine sitting there

167:20

knowing that we have access to these

167:22

kind of technology.

167:22

>> Also like this desire to tell people

167:24

something that's really important to

167:25

humanity. They can't all be complete

167:27

sociopaths.

167:28

>> Maybe they do like they screen them for

167:30

that reason. You know what I mean? Like

167:31

they have to be a certain personality

167:33

type. They don't give a [ __ ] about

167:34

humanity.

167:34

>> I think I think honestly I think at

167:36

highest levels of these especially these

167:39

um military corporations, I think you

167:41

just have to become that anyway by force

167:44

of nature.

167:44

>> Yeah. Like we're going to kill 100,000

167:46

people today.

167:47

>> Mhm. Yeah. Exactly. I mean, how

167:49

emotionally attached can you possibly be

167:51

in that kind of

167:51

>> big task oriented

167:52

>> position. So, you know, the Yeah, the

167:54

ARV is a provocative one for me. And to

167:57

be honest, man, I think a lot of this I

167:58

mean, it's called the ARV, the alien

168:00

reproduction vehicle. And maybe we have

168:02

had alien crashed vehicles, but I'm more

168:05

tempted to believe that Nicola Tesla's

168:07

work was taken by the US government.

168:10

John G. Trump, Trump's uncle from MIT,

168:12

was the one that actually oversaw all of

168:14

that. You know that? Yeah.

168:15

>> Yeah. He actually looked at all that.

168:16

You know, he found a correspondence

168:18

between Nicola Tesla and British and

168:21

Russian uh royalty, like the high top

168:23

levels of Britain Russian royalty about

168:25

them acquiring a super weapon of

168:26

incredible power. There's a video, I

168:29

actually posted it on X of John G. Trump

168:31

a vintage video of him talking about

168:32

coming across these correspondent

168:33

letters that he never found the true um

168:37

method of the secret weapon or what it

168:39

was but there was correspondence between

168:41

the king and Russian Zars about

168:44

acquiring it from Nicola Tesla. So I

168:47

think that they took things from Tesla,

168:48

his electromagnetism studies, I think

168:51

people like T Towns and Brown, um you

168:53

know, these original ideas of being able

168:56

to use field induction to create

168:58

positive lift. This is something that

169:00

was being looked at by humans. You don't

169:02

need to invoke flying saucers crashing

169:04

from Alpha Century for that. Maybe it

169:06

happened, but I would be more on the

169:09

line that we've done it ourselves. We've

169:10

done it ourselves. The Yeah, some of it.

169:13

The Cold War happened. Cold War

169:14

paranoia, and we've never got rid of it.

169:15

all the iron walls came up around that

169:17

and it's a case of how do we kind of get

169:19

rid of all this legacy program uh you

169:22

know stoving and stove piping because of

169:24

cold war paranoia. It's too late now

169:26

because we're in 2025 and you got to try

169:28

and tell us that you've got zero point

169:29

energy

169:30

>> you know we've been flying around in

169:31

[ __ ] Wright brothers planes for 100

169:33

years and [ __ ] [laughter] like are you

169:34

kidding me? Like it's not going to go

169:36

down well. So amnesty, right?

169:38

>> Amnesty. [laughter]

169:39

>> [ __ ] It might be the only way.

169:40

>> It might be the only way. And if it is

169:42

the only way, that's fine. But like I

169:43

said, I do have

169:44

>> It sucks that they're not going to get

169:46

punished for crimes, but so what? At

169:48

least we are not being punished by being

169:51

withheld.

169:52

>> Exactly.

169:52

>> Information being withheld that I think

169:54

would change the course of humanity in

169:56

probably a fantastic way.

169:57

>> But I do feel I feel like the world

169:58

would have to become a more heavily

170:00

controlled place for these types of

170:01

technologies to come out. Do you know

170:02

what I mean? Like

170:03

>> I was trying to wrap this up on a high

170:04

note. [laughter]

170:05

>> Digital ID coming up.

170:07

>> Well, this that's all I'm saying. Like

170:08

you know the control structures around

170:10

something like free energy would have to

170:12

be quite profound because of the things

170:13

we were saying about some psycho with a

170:14

ZP device. So

170:16

>> like look what just happened in Bondai

170:18

Beach in Australia. Imagine if you have

170:19

access to that. If everybody has access

170:22

to that, especially off the internet,

170:23

you figure out how to design one. It's

170:25

not that hard.

170:25

>> The world will have to become a more

170:27

restrictive place for these things to

170:28

come out for public

170:29

>> benefit. Now people are going to think

170:30

you're a fed

170:32

>> for saying that. [laughter]

170:34

>> Listen, man. I I really enjoyed this

170:35

conversation. It was a lot of fun. It's

170:37

been real good

170:37

>> and your content is excellent. So,

170:39

please tell everybody how they can watch

170:41

more of your stuff.

170:41

>> Yeah, I I'm I've got a terrible business

170:43

acumen. So, I just have two channels,

170:45

uh, Project Unity on YouTube and the

170:48

Project Unity on X. And if you want to

170:50

follow me and subscribe,

170:51

>> I think that's a good model. It's

170:53

quality stuff and it's building a

170:55

following just literally based on being

170:57

good

170:57

>> for real.

170:58

>> So, thank you, brother. Appreciate it.

170:59

Thank you so much, dude.

171:00

>> All right, we'll do it again.

171:01

>> Yes. Goodbye, everybody. Bye-bye.

171:07

>> [music]

Interactive Summary

This video features a discussion about ancient civilizations, extraterrestrial life, and unexplained phenomena. The conversation touches upon the theory that aliens might be future humans, the concept of parallel universes, and the possibility of time travel. A significant portion of the dialogue focuses on the

Suggested questions

21 ready-made prompts