Joe Rogan Experience #2430 - Jay Anderson
5362 segments
Joe Rogan podcast. Check it out.
>> The Joe Rogan Experience.
>> TRAIN BY DAY. JOE ROGAN PODCAST BY
NIGHT. All day.
>> We're live. What's happening, [music]
man? Nice to meet you.
>> Hey, it's great to meet you as well,
Joe. I uh really really appreciate you
taking me out here.
>> Oh, my pleasure. I've enjoyed your
content for quite a while now. So, it's
>> Well, I'd be interested to know when was
it that you first started getting
interested in what I was doing? What
kind of subject? What topic? Wish I
remembered
>> cuz I know you followed me for a couple
years. It was before the Cafra pyramid
scans and stuff like
>> you know I'm into the UFO subject and
things like that but I wasn't sure.
>> Well, it's all the silly [ __ ] that I
love. [laughter]
>> I hear you.
>> Silly and serious at the same time.
Ancient civilizations, mysteries, and
obviously aliens.
>> Oh, yeah. And it's all cotangent. It all
connects together. That's
>> I think so, too. We actually played a
clip uh we had did a podcast yesterday
with uh Dr. Michael Masters.
>> Love him. Yeah, I've told him a couple
times.
>> Very fun, very smart guy, very
interesting guy. But we played uh we
were talking about the he has a theory
that aliens are human beings in the
future. It's very strange theory
>> um
>> based on like kind of the
anthropological
>> view and the physiology and how that
might have happened over time.
>> And there's also what what was the
model? There's the many worlds theory
and then what was his model? There's a
different one that the the concept is
you could if you lived in the future,
you could go back in time and it would
not affect the future because everything
that's supposed to happen is already
happening and you were supposed to go
back anyway.
>> Okay.
>> Interesting. Okay. [laughter]
>> I try to get my head. But anyway, during
that time I asked him about the
tridactyl mummies and then we played
your clip.
>> Oh, okay.
>> Yeah. We played the clip that showed all
the scans. We talked about Jesse
Michaels and how he went down to Peru
and actually touched those things and
was there with them and how surreal it
was.
>> Yeah, I was in Peru recently not to go
and see the Nazca mummies. I wish I
could have seen them. I was out there to
look at all the megalithic studies and
the excavations going on at Saxo Woman,
which is an incredible megalithic site
in Kusco. But the Nazca mummies, I mean,
what's interesting about it is that
obviously you're going to have a big
knee-jerk reaction to something that's
so incredibly profound as the idea of
these being non-human intelligences that
are mummified. But when you actually
look at the CT scans and the X-rays, you
start to realize that this can't be
faked. You can't fake bone cartilage.
You can't fake capillaries and heart
valves and a fetus inside the body. So,
>> it's so nuts,
>> dude. It's crazy. Some of them have eggs
inside them. Some of them have fetuses.
Like,
>> it looks like the eggs are big like
inside them. And these are small beings.
These ones are meant to be like the
little kind of like 60 cm beings with
like three eggs inside them. Then you
got the big one, Monserat, which has an
actual fetus, like a baby not in an egg.
So, it's like, if these are all real, it
does feel like there was some sort of
genetic experimentation going on where
they're just churning out prototypes of
some form.
>> Do you think that's it? Or do you think
that there used to be another type of,
for lack of a better word, primate?
>> Well, the thing is,
>> is that a primate? I mean, what is that?
I mean, some of them they're leaning
more towards like reptilian anthropod
kind of lineage. So, like the bigger
ones seem to be more mamalian, whereas
the smaller ones with the eggs are
sharing reptilian traits. So, it's like
there are all these different variations
with these different bodies, different
kind of like physiological um
characteristics, which is why it's like,
okay, well, is this one lineage or is
this just someone kind of like tweaking?
All right, well, that one failed, that
one's not working. This one grew wings
or I [ __ ] that one off. Like, you
know, it's just weird. is that so your
thought is that these are the products
of experiments.
>> I mean if you look at Jesse when Jesse
Michaels did his documentary one thing
he mentioned I can't remember um where
he got this from but he was saying that
the original translation of the area of
Nazca from the original language was
like the area of experiment and genetic
cloning or it was like a really strange
definition for the actual area that kind
of says experimentation and genetic
modification. And I can't remember the
exact quote, but this was something that
he brought up in the documentary. I was
like, "Huh?" Okay.
>> Then you have all of these various
different examples.
>> Can you I ask you, yeah, who said that?
Who called it that?
>> So Jesse, when Jesse Michaels put out
his documentary, there was just a scene
in it. Now, my memory is failing me a
little bit, but there's a scene in here
where he was talking about the Nazca
region, and he said that the original in
the original language, this translates
roughly to the area of experimentation
and genetics of some form.
>> But how do they know what those terms
were?
>> I I agree. I agree. But it's just a
weird little caveat that he brought up
in the documentary. I'm not quite He'd
probably be rolling his eyes at me now
like, "Dude, I actually [ __ ] know
exactly what this is." Like [laughter]
making you look like an idiot. Yeah, I'm
butchering it. But I do that all the
time. Oh, for sure. But I but just the
fact that these things exist and they
exist in an area of the world which is
full of mystery. I mean the megalithic
sites around there like I said that's
what I was out there for to see these
different megalithic sites and the
Nazcalines
>> and uh you know saxwoman and in the
sacred valley you just have like
incredibly complex architecture. You
know rosecourt granite diorite andite
these incredibly hard stones like in
Egypt. But honestly, I find Peru even
more baffling than Egypt with the
architecture because of just the the
level of interlocking precision that you
see and the the fact that it looks like
they've softened the stone in Sax Woman.
It looks like marshmallows like all
squished together and it just invokes a
lot of different theories from people
about how they were actually
manipulating the stone.
>> Yeah. Because it doesn't seem like it
was just carved. No.
>> Right. Like it it does seem like there's
some areas where chunks are have been
removed from, you know, the quaries, but
when they're all pieced together, when
you see those weird like curvatures to
it, it's like, what were you guys do?
And perfect precision.
>> Perfect precision. And like sometimes
you'll see like these corners where just
a tiny bit of stone is jutting up and
then the other two are connecting into
it. It's like this is such a ridiculous
level of complexity for an apparent 600y
year ago bronze age bronze chisels and
stone hammer tool wielding civilization
and and also in Peru is what I find very
interesting is you've got a brilliant
visual contrast to use when you look at
what is the Inca work which is the rough
cut stone the mortar brick using walls
like this is all present in Peru next to
the megalithic sites and the mainstream
will attribute all of this to the Inca
of 600 years ago go. But you'll see that
the stone walls that are rough cut and
use cement and mortar, they're still
standing. They're pretty pristine.
They're looking good next to megalithic
multi-tonon slabs of granite that are
broken to pieces and strewn across the
hillside. So, it just looks like there
was a lot of desolation, potentially
geological trauma in this area and then
these people, the Inca, discovered these
sites, built around them. You can see in
like the cracks and corners of all these
megaliths that there's like stone walls
that they've tried to kind of, you know,
reinforce. It's very visually obvious
actually when you go out to these
places.
>> Isn't it fascinating that people aren't
willing to consider the possibility that
this is from an older time like that?
It's heresy.
>> It's just such a knee-jerk reaction,
man. Like I think at the end of the day,
we're still using models from like
1800's explorers, right? And it's
[laughter] like what the [ __ ] Like
we've moved forward. There's a lot of
contradicting evidence and data in a lot
of these countries whether it be you
know Gobeclete in Turkey or the
potential infrastructure below the Giza
plateau and then the incredible uh
megaliths in Saxa in Peru like Sax
woman. It just feels like what we're
doing is rehashing the same status quo
orthodoxy and it's coming up against a
everpiling higher mountain of evidence.
And one of the cool things that I got to
do out in Peru was go to Saxa Woman
where they've got current archaeological
digs going on uh through the Chinkana
project which is a archaeological team
out there and they're doing digs and
they have actually discovered below like
10 meters down into the ground precision
carved blocks of stone that are coming
out of the earth and this is where in
this region in Kusco the Andian legends
are that there is a vast labyrinth below
ground connecting Kusco to Saxa woman
connecting Saxa woman to the sacred
valley all spreading out across the
Andian mountain range and this is like
an old legend this is what the shamans
and the you know sacred keepers of
knowledge would say in Peru we're
finding evidence for it we're literally
going underground now and seeing that
there are actually really precise
elements of infrastructure below Sako
woman and they're just beginning to
uncover this I was one of the first to
go down there and actually see these
blocks myself and it's just like this is
happening Now that you know we're
actually getting to a place where we can
start to validate some of these
forgotten myths and folklores or if you
want to call them conspiracies or
pseudocience from the archaeological
side of things, it's being evidenced
now.
>> That [clears throat] that's mad. So
these tunnels and c like what what is
exactly the structure that's supposed to
be down there and what have they
discovered? So, it's it's supposed to be
called the Chinkana, like the labyrinth,
and there's a few different chinkana
entrances around the range.
>> How big is it supposed to be?
>> Vast, multiple kilometers. It's
stretching from down Sax of Woman down
into Cusco and then off into the Andian
mountain range to the Sacred Valley.
>> It's very similar to some of the stuff
that they found in Egypt. That's banana.
>> Yes. And then what's interesting is you
have the same hallmarks and signatures
that you see in Egypt. So, you see the
stone knobs, you know, these little
protrusions that you get. I'm I'm
addicted to those, man, because they are
all over the world.
>> Do you have any theories?
>> I mean, I've listened to a lot of
theories. I I certainly think that the
>> We should show an image of it for people
that are don't know what we're talking
about.
>> Stone.
>> There's all of these incredible massive
stones that have been somehow or another
moved from a quarry sometimes that were
hundreds of miles away. They all have
these weird nubs on them and no one
knows what they are. And there's a bunch
of theories like maybe they help them
move these things. You see them all over
the place
>> and no one quite knows what those are.
>> India, you see them in um Egypt, you see
them in Peru. This is in Ole and
Tentambo in the Sacred Valley.
>> Missing this is one of the things that's
so infuriating about people that are
arrogant about gatekeeping information
and being the only ones that are allowed
to distribute the truth. Air quotes.
We're missing so much. There's no way
you really know. huge gaps of knowledge.
>> We're missing so much. And more time
goes on, as Graham Hawk Graham Hancock
always says, [ __ ] just keeps getting
older.
>> And now they just pushed back the use of
fire by 300,000 plus years.
>> Yeah. Yeah.
>> Okay.
>> Yeah. Exactly.
>> Like it just keeps going. It's not going
forward. It's going backwards over and
>> and anatomically modern humans, I think,
have gone much further back now in time.
They're looking at 800,000 years. And
so, you know, plus plus
>> plus possibly even a million. Th this is
what weirds me out about about these
creatures. Like human beings have gotten
to the point multiple times where we
were almost extinct. Uh the Toba volcano
I think we got down to
>> god was it
>> 7,000 people. Is that like the low
estimate?
>> Damn. Really?
>> Yeah. Yeah. It was it's a crazy story.
Like super volcanoes are unbelievably
devastating to just all life, you know,
because it just changes the temperature
of the earth, the entire surface,
whatever doesn't get blasted out of the
the ground by the actual volcano itself.
All the other stuff on the other side of
the world gets [ __ ] Like it's just it
just ruins everything. We got down to
like a few thousand people.
>> And then there was another time where
one of these guys came, God, I forgot
who that was as well. They were we were
talking about the the reality of uh
glaciation, right? And about what
happens during ice ages and how
devastating it can be.
>> And they were saying that we had gotten
at least multiple times in the history
of the earth to the point where it was
incapable of sustaining life.
>> Wow.
>> That within a few, you know, like
whatever parts per million of carbon
dioxide are necessary to support plant
life, we literally got to the part where
there was almost impossible to support
life. and then it rebounded and
everything's fine. So, there's so much
we don't know. This is so crazy to try
to pretend, you know, that people 600
years ago make this because we know
people 600 years ago lived there. We
have a lot of archaeological evidence
and we have
>> but you have weird structures on top of
obviously much more intricate and
complex structures.
>> Yeah. And again, they share the same
signatures as places like in Egypt and
they think you're a
>> cook. Yeah, they do. And it's just a
knee-jerk reaction. It's it's again it's
adherence to a status quo and and you
know you get channeled through a very
kind of fine wall in academia and I I
think that it can it can be a real
detriment actually to opening up your uh
ideas and and being a little bit more
expansive with what could be possible
because you do get put into a very
restrictive uh format in in the
traditional academic sense. And
obviously you have, you know, the
pressures of of funding and and things
like this, and it's you're not going to
get the funding if you're talking about
this crazy [ __ ] And it's just like a
self-fulfilling
uh censoring, you know. Um but with the
rise of alternative media,
>> we're changing the game a bit because
you can actually put a voice out there.
You can put an idea out there. It's not
completely stonewalled by the academic
circle. They can't actually prevent
people from discussing these ideas in an
open media format like this,
>> right? And if you put a video like you
did on X or on YouTube, people can like
like the video that you did on the
aliens, whatever they are, whatever they
are, people can see the CT scans.
>> You see the CT scans and you you're
automatically go, "Wait a minute. This
is 12,200 years old."
>> Yeah.
>> You're telling me someone faked this,
1200 years ago.
>> Like I don't think they could fake that
now. You don't I don't think they could.
>> Hollywood special effects guys, but then
the composition of the actual the bones
and everything like cartilage and muscle
tissue and
>> how would you fake that? Uh, circling
back, I texted Jesse to ask him for some
insight on what he asked for.
>> So, what he sent me was a screenshot of
a book where he got it from. I had to
translate
>> translation here shows
>> science of insemination.
>> Yeah. Jumano, I guess, is the local
word. Local word for what [laughter]
that area is called.
>> Right. Right. Right.
>> And this is a book he found from that
area, I think. And that says, Yeah.
Laboratory of insemination and cloning.
>> What?
>> That's what I'm saying. Look at all
these terms they use. Yuma is semen. You
may it will verb to inseminate. Yumage
the science of insemination. Yumage wise
inseminator. Yuma scion or clone.
>> This is what I'm saying bro.
>> Jume to clone. Jumage the science of
cloning. And Jupage wise cloner.
>> So basically
>> what the [ __ ] [laughter] man?
>> You know it's there. It's um it's
interesting and then obviously
>> go back to that please again
>> you get alongside this kind of
description you have these bodies you
have this architecture
>> mad yeah like this was dude [laughter]
this was like one little 10-second clip
in his documentary and it just made me
perk up like wait a minute what
>> the name of the place is like a
laboratory of insemination and cloning
>> and you're getting a smorgish board of
different beings coming out of this area
right like what
>> Jesse does add I think he's speculating
somewhat on the ethmology. Not
definitive, but
>> Right. Right. Right. But yeah, I mean
it's there.
>> That's why Jesse's better at this than
me. I'M LIKE, [laughter] IT'S CLEAR.
>> IT'S DONE. IT'S THERE.
>> WOW.
>> It is interesting. Yeah, it is
interesting. And I think it does, you
know, leads into what was happening on
this planet a long time ago.
>> It does. And it leads to like my point
was when I was getting to the whole
super volcano thing,
>> what if something happened that wiped
that species out? Right? Like clearly
there's no more Neandertols, right? We
they [clears throat] whatever happened,
whether it was us or disease or whatever
killed them off, they don't exist
anymore. We only have evidence that
people interbred with them.
>> What What is that thing? Is that thing
maybe one of us? Like another kind of
human? Like look, another kind of
primate, you know? Look how different we
are than Reese's monkeys, right? Like
we're all primates. We're so [ __ ]
different. Why would we assume that the
ones that we found so far, including
like
>> what did they find? Dennis Ovenans like
15 years ago or something like that,
>> right? Right.
>> And then Homo Julian's, what was that
one that was just a few years ago? Like
they keep finding these new versions of
people. Not new obviously, no,
>> but long extinct versions of people.
>> I think it's possible. And I also think
that there's a, you know, a potential.
What if what if a a particular subroot
species of homminid decided to opt in
for subterranean living and they escaped
a lot of the surface world traumas and
were actually able to kind of maintain
their society? I mean, look at all of
the weird evidence we have for these
vast underground. Darren C. would love
to go there. My god, what
just released a video on it. It's
bananas.
>> Could you imagine renovating your house
and [ __ ] finding that?
>> Renovating your house and finding
there's a room for 20,000 people under
your house. Would you say anything?
>> I don't know.
>> Yeah,
>> I'd have to think about where I live.
Depends on where I live. You live in a
place where the government could just
come and take your house.
>> Yeah. I'd be worried about that.
>> I would say it if I was in America, but
even I was in America. What if I really
like my house and now my house is
connected to heritage, right? And
[laughter]
>> what the [ __ ] archaeologists want to
come? Like, get out of my yard. [snorts]
>> Exactly. Exactly. But like, yeah, I
think about this and I think about all
of these different Good. No, I'm happy
to hear that. Happy to hear that. But
it's um it's interesting. And then you
have, you know, the strange stories like
from the Hopi tribe about the ant people
that came during a time of cataclysm and
they brought them underground and then
they brought them back up. And there's a
few like that. There was a really uh
interesting podcast. It was years ago. I
remember seeing this where they'd
brought these two Amazonian shamans on
the podcast like full headdress. They
spoke their own tribal language. They
needed an interpreter in the room and
the guy asked them what they thought
about aliens and they didn't understand
the question. didn't know what he meant
by alien. He was like thumbming through
this book and he put up a picture of a
gray and the tribes and went, "Oh,
that's Makwabu. That's Makwabu." And
they had a whole story about how this
was a human that became an ant that
lives underground and it can appear in
the divine light, but you should be very
careful with this being because it will
take your soul underground and you need
a very good shaman to bring your soul
back. And they were taking it real
seriously. Like, yeah. Yeah, dude.
[laughter]
So, it's like these tribal cultures,
they know, man. They they [ __ ] know.
>> Well, I think they have I think there's
a an ancient memory in people. I think
it's one of the reasons why these uh
post-apocalypse movies are so popular.
>> There's a lot there's a lot of
post-apocalypse movies where, you know,
like
>> people they they they figure out how to
make houses out of wood again and they
they're surviving and they make little
encampments and they fight off the
intruders from the outside. You know,
real like uh Walking Dead type [ __ ] with
no zombies.
>> Yeah. Yeah, I think there's a memory in
us of the surviving humans. I think
there's a memory
>> and I think we probably have been
through some terrible moments in the
earth's history where there was a
>> enormous disaster and we are the
ancestors of the survivors and I don't
think there was a lot of survivors.
>> No. In fact, I heard you talking about
that the other day where you were um
saying about like the and it's something
I agree with the necessity for um post
cataclysm, post-apocalypse,
the the strong men would inherit the
earth. You know,
>> monsters would inherit
>> monsters would inherit the earth, right?
And and so if you if we really were a
hyper advanced Atlantean type
civilization prior to this,
>> um maybe even more matriarchal than
patriarchal,
it would make sense that when things
fall apart obviously and now you need to
survive in the wild, the strong men and
the the you know savaged guys would
inherit the earth because they would be
the ones who would be able to uh you
know push through that type of
environment. And then if if that is the
case and you fast forward to where we
are now, look at our incredibly
competitive hyper kind of aggressive
culture that we have. It would make
sense that this was formed through the
seeds of trauma and through the seeds of
having to fight for survival and you
know recovering what was lost.
>> Yes. Which also makes sense why the past
the further you go back the more
barbaric these people are
>> you're dealing and you're like well it
took a while for people to learn maybe
but maybe you know you're you're dealing
with people that had to
>> they they probably had to cannibalize.
>> I mean they probably had to eat
everything they could. There was only a
few thousand of them left. If we really
got hit by asteroids, like if the
younger dus [clears throat] is correct,
>> it makes sense that it would take like
5,000 years for civilization to emerge
again
>> because that seems to be what happened.
It seems to be like you have the
literally the scraggliest survivors and
then eventually the earth gets back to
normal, but in even then it takes
thousands of years for people to just
have a semblance of what we're
experiencing today in terms of
civilization. And that's why prehistory
is so fascinating and the the Neolithic
in the stone age because okay so this is
a time when we were just basic hunter
gatherers. We had no you know
intelligence, no language, no real
understanding of the world according to
the mainstream. But this is where you
have multi-tonon geodetically aligned
solar equinox and and uh um what's the
lunar alignment? Um, I've completely
just blanked just cuz I'm a little bit
nervous of being on here, but [laughter]
um, like you know, like equinox
alignments and and like alignments to
the to the sun and the moon uh,
mathematically geodetically aligned to
what look like toic currents like
electromagnetic flows beneath the
ground. A lot of these stonehenes and
dolmans are placed on places where you
have strong electromagnetic
concentrations and just the the the
package of um mathematics and
engineering and stone crafting and the
knowledge of the sun and the stars and
your placement on the planet to create
things like you know Stonehenge and
these other areas in the world. How how
can you do that if you're just hunter
gatherers coming out of you know
animalistic behavior? it doesn't make
any sense. And then we kind of regress
as we go further into history and you
know the the stonework becomes less
impressive. The things become less
accurate. And I find that very
interesting. How is it at the beginnings
of our history some of the most
impressive structures exist?
>> Exactly. It doesn't make any sense. No.
>> And just Egypt alone with the
conventional timeline of 2,500 BC for
the Great Pyramid doesn't make any
sense.
>> No, it doesn't. I think that they most
likely settled around those pyramids.
most likely settle around them and and
you know the scans if these can be
validated fully and empirically with
digs and confirmation physically then
that changes everything.
>> It changes everything and you're seeing
a lot of people spaz out online.
>> Oh yeah,
>> it's [laughter] wonderful to watch.
>> It's been wonderful to watch because
when people are under pressure, the real
character gets revealed and they're
under a lot of pressure right now
because those scans that radio
tomography or whatever the [ __ ] it is,
>> synthetic capture radar. Yeah. It's
super accurate with stuff that we know
exists.
>> Yes,
>> that's what's a real problem for these
people. You want to believe it exists
when it can map out all these chambers
in the pyramid. You want to believe it
exists when it can map out things that
that we know that exist 50 ft
underground. You want to map you're
you're cool with that.
>> Yeah. Yeah. But one kilometer of
subterranean Oh, no. No. Also,
>> multiple scans from multiple
>> over 200.
>> Yes. It's all the same message. They're
getting the same message. There's
pillars. Enormous pillars. They have
coils around them. [snorts] What pillars
with coils? All of them have coils.
>> And the whole structure is like almost 2
kilometers deep into the earth.
>> It's obscene. It's obscene. Like
literally as well, like 2 km of
infrastructure. It's like the whole
underground like people with copper
tools. Help me out.
>> And that was my frustration when it
first came out because when it came out,
obviously I did I did some like research
into the people involved in the Caffra
pyramid team. I found Filipo Beyond. I
found his harmonic SAR website where it
has listed the things like the Mosul Dam
in Iraq and the Grand Saso laboratory in
Italy, places that they had actually
done scans prior to even the Great
Pyramid, which was peer-reviewed. Their
2020 uh scan of the Great Pyramid was a
peer-reviewed paper. And then you fast
forward to now where they've got these
ones and you have people like, you know,
Flint Dibble and Pierce Morgan going,
"It's [ __ ] It's pseudocience. It's
never been done before. It's never been
tested." It's like, it has been done. It
has been tested. It's actually got a
patent. It's been peer- reviewviewed in
a paper.
>> Military applications, military
applications. And Filipo Beyond, he
works for the Italian government. Like
he's not some idiot. He's a very, very
intelligent man. And he can speak on the
science of this like, you know,
articulately. So
>> he works on top secret projects with the
Italian military.
>> I don't know if you caught like that
little scene in Jesse. He's like,
>> he didn't even say a [ __ ] word, man.
Like, could you not talk about that? He
just looks at him like, "Okay, we'll
just figure that out."
>> Like that. That's That's when you know,
man. That's when you know. But I mean
what whatever this is, everyone should
be fascinated. You shouldn't be
dismissing this if that's not even your
field of expertise. It just shows what
kind of a [ __ ] weirdo you are.
>> Like what you should be doing is going,
>> "Okay, how many scans do you have?
>> Yeah,
>> you have 200 scans of this.
>> Show me more.
>> Show me more. Tell me what's going on.
We should probably figure out what that
is." If imagine if the pyramids didn't
exist or imagine if it's like, you know,
the Sphinx at one point in time was
mostly covered with sand. Let's just
imagine some crazy scenario where the
entire pyramid structure is covered in
sand and nobody knows it exists and then
someone comes along and does a scan of
the surface the ground and says
>> you're not going to [ __ ] believe this
but there's some [ __ ] under there. Now
what if everybody goes that's ridiculous
that's preposterous and they don't look
>> and they don't look. We never find the
thing that we all agree exists because
you can go there, you can visit,
>> right?
>> It's there. Right. If that didn't exist,
you'd never [ __ ] believe in a million
years there's a structure with 2,300,000
stones that's perfectly aligned, the
true north, south, east, and west. And
you're dating it to somewhere around
4,000.
>> I mean, that sounds like some
pseudocience conspiracy talk to me, Joe.
>> Sounds like kookiness. Why is it more
kooky to say these people not only were
this advanced, they were even more
advanced?
>> Way more. They were down into the ground
2 km. It might have been a power
station.
Well, you know, Filippo thinks that he
seems to think that the spirals might
have actually been tied to hydrarology
and uh using mechanical stress and the
pisoelectric materials used in the great
pyramid and the plateau itself because
what you have is a very interesting
coupling between uh limestone and and
rose granite. So limestone is a very
good amplifier of acoustics and rose
granite is uh becomes electrical
pisoelectric under mechanical stress and
acoustics are a form of mechanical
stress. So there's like a certainly
something to be said about the fact that
the pyramids are acoustically tuned like
they're incredible inside the acoustics
and they've done lots of measurements
and experiments on on validating that
that it almost seems to go up in a
perfect scale up to the king's chamber.
Um, and then the king's chamber itself,
I believe, is focused around 110 to 115
hertz, which is interesting for
neurological uh reasons in terms of
influencing the brain. But on top of
that, you have again this incredible
coupling between limestone and rose
quartz granite where under the right
conditions, you absolutely could get
energetic responses from that. But as
well as this, you have the hydraological
knowledge, which is really quite
impressive. And when you look at places
like the Osiran in Abidos, which is a
kind of um sunken down temple, we call
everything a temple or a sacred site,
but we really don't know, do we? It
could be functional sites. Could be a
power plant of some form, like you said.
>> And uh the Assyrian in Abbidos next to
it, you have the seti, the first temple,
which is incredible. It's beautiful and
full of calligraphy and hieroglyphics.
And then you have this bare faceless
megalithic place called the Abid um the
Oyeran which has sunken down into the
ground perpetually filled with water. So
they've tried to pump it out and it just
fills back up again because it's
connected down into the uh into the
water table. And there's all these
different shafts and hydraological kind
of um components in this site that they
don't understand the full function of.
And then you look at places like um the
Great Pyramid where you go down to the
bottom of the Great Pyramid, you have
like the kind of core and this whole
area looks like it's been water eroded
as if it was flooded out repeatedly and
use some sort of uh like a pump or some
sort of like sequencing area where you,
you know, push water in and then let it
out, push water in and let it out. And
so Filippo thinks that maybe these
spirals bringing water up and if you're
a thousand meters down, you're tapping
into like ancient aquifers. So you could
be drawing up a really impressive amount
of like ancient ancient water. And I
just wonder if same with Peru, there's
something incredibly important about
accessing this kind of water at the real
depths of the earth. And they seem to
have a real interest in doing that. So
perhaps the pyramids are in some way
like I mean if these spirals are real,
it's like a plug, isn't it? It's like
plugged into the earth, connected down
into these aquifers. Perhaps it was
utilizing uh water as an energetic
medium through the materials. I would
recommend to anybody to check out
Christopher Dunn's work.
>> Oh, fantastic.
>> Uh I had him on the podcast and he
explained to us his theory. He's an
engineer. Yeah. And he started studying
the structure of the pyramid and his
conclusion was the entire thing was
probably used to generate energy.
>> And it's like what? And but when he
breaks it down in terms of I'll butcher
the math if I even try, but in terms of
the dimensions, the way it's made, and
the fact that you could have something
that was down in the basement that was
somehow or another creating a resonance,
>> right? Right. Right.
>> That would have this effect, the shafts
that go out straight out into space, and
the fact that there's evidence that they
they would possibly use these shafts to
pour chemicals in and it would create
gases and
>> Well, this is pretty nuts. It is nuts.
But, you know, I was when I was uh not
the last time I was out in Egypt, but
the time before then, I was out there
with a guy called Jeffrey Drum. Uh he's
got a YouTube channel called the Land of
Chem. And he's all about this in terms
of the chemical mass manufacturing that
he believes was going on in the pyramids
and these other areas. And uh we filmed
all of the uh all of the coverage of
that if anyone wants to go and see it on
our on my YouTube channel. um taking us
through areas in the Giza plateau where
you have an incredible concentration on
the Giza plateau of iron veins and they
all seem to be emanating from the
pyramids. So if you go around the
pyramids you'll see these iron vein
networks that are flowing out from the
central point and these iron veins are
heading down into what are called these
boat pits.
>> When you say iron veins so like
>> iron ore iron ore is it it's not on the
surface it's deep in the ground. Well, I
mean, there's some on the surface, so
you can actually see the snaking kind of
veins of iron that's kind of rusted out
and oxidized, and you can you can make
it out, but surely it must be deeper as
well, but it seems to be stretching out
from the pyramids down into these
>> contaminating from the pyramids.
>> So, his theory is that they built the
pyramid going deep.
>> Yeah. Yeah. His theory is that they
built the pyramids on top of these iron
veins, particularly because this place
was getting lightning strikes uh
frequently and they were using Yeah, I
know. I know. I know. It's a giant
lightning rod,
>> dude. I mean, these things are built in
a way and they were gold capped at one
point like high
>> and gold is a really good conductor
>> conductor of electricity for electronics
>> and the Giza plateau is covered in these
conductive iron vein networks which the
pyramids do seem to be built upon. Now,
this is, you know, his personal theory,
but he, you know, he's an American who's
been living out in Cairo now for about
six or seven years, I believe. He's been
he just decided to up and move out there
and dedicate his life to exploring these
places. And so he took us across uh you
know all of these amazing areas and and
showed us things I'd never seen before
in Egypt. Um but his theory on on the on
the pyramids is similar to Christopher
Dunn in terms of some form of chemical
manufacturing taking place. And if you
know um the original name for Egypt was
ChemT
is the beginning of chemistry and
alchemy. So this is where one of the
root words where we then got chemistry
and alchemy from. So, it is the land of
chemistry and alchemy. And
>> that's bananas.
>> There you go. Is this uh
>> from his video?
>> Oh, this is one of his videos. Great.
>> This is the iron ore.
>> So, these are the Yeah, I believe he's
probably highlighting the iron veins and
these iron veins head out into what are
called boat pits, which they believed in
the mainstream uh interpretation.
>> You're freaking me out with the land of
Kem. That's that is crazy. But when did
they name that? I don't know when it was
named that, but it was originally
referenced as Kemet in some of the
ancient Greek. And you know there's
there's there's reference to it being
called chemt
>> and it really means the same thing.
>> It's what people believe is the
continuation of alchemy and chemistry
because you get so much alchemy from
Egypt and obviously this is the place
where you get Hermes tismaistice and
hermeticism and the philosopher stone
kind of leaks out from these types of
areas. So I I think that there is a lot
to suggest this. Plus we actually know
in the mainstream that they were
incredible chemists like regardless of
you know exotic forms of chemistry that
we know they were using acids and natron
baths and things like this. Like the
Egyptians knew what they were doing even
from the perspective that we understand
regardless of getting a little bit
deeper into it. But yeah.
>> Right. And you're talking about
Egyptians like Cleopatra times.
>> Right. So like we know that they were
doing it. Exactly.
>> Historically.
>> Exactly. Yeah. That's that's why it's so
strange. Like if this structure is
proved to be real, if they start an
excavation and they they have
irrefutable proof. Like without a doubt
there's some man-made structures that
are beyond description underneath the
ground. What happens now? Like what does
everybody do? Like what what do all
these dorks that think that that's a
tomb?
What do [laughter] you
>> What do you do? What do you do to all
those dorks that think like it makes
sense that they built that? It was a
national pastime. It's a national
project. Come on, bro.
>> Settle the [ __ ] down.
>> I think at that point you have you you
have to
>> Well, I think the pyramids uniquely
stand as uh like an intelligence desk
>> because they are so crazy when you have
stones that are so large that are taken
from quaries hundreds of miles away,
>> 500 miles away. A lot of these people
supposedly didn't even have the wheel.
>> So what is this? What? You don't think
this is crazy? Like this isn't this
isn't like, oh, we know they use the
wood from these trees to build these
homes. Like this is bananas.
>> Whole level.
>> This is something that would take us
hundreds of years today to build.
>> And one of the things that is said so
much, but I guess it's kind of shrugged
off just because it's said so much, but
it's actually a really important point
to highlight. There are no [ __ ]
hieroglyphs in the pyramids. Not one.
There's not a single symbol, not a
single element of what we would
understand to be dynastic Egypt. And and
so like you have this incredible
contradiction when you go to places like
the Valley of the Kings and the Valley
of the Queens, gold, and you know, it's
adorned in patterns. You can't see a
square inch of stone where there isn't
something filled to venerate these
people. And yet the pyramids are bare
bare. And you know, when you go inside
them, you're going to go to Egypt,
right? You're going to go
>> eventually. Yeah. Yeah. But when you
when you go inside them, it just feels
mechanical. It feels functional. It's,
you know, big port colasses of rose
granite and these shafts going off
perfectly vertical off into you can't
even see. And there's nothing about it
that feels spiritual orerary at all.
Just looking at it, it looks to me like
an advancement of what we are that's
almost like indescribable. Like a
thousand-year advancement of where we
are currently to build something like
that, right?
>> It seems so nuts.
>> And there's obviously stuff that doesn't
seem as nuts. It's just beautiful and
impressive, right?
>> You know, just like the coliseum in Rome
is
>> or like, you know, the cropolis.
You know, all those things are
fascinating and incredible
>> craftsmanship and engineering and
architecture. Amazing. Yeah. But then
there's Egypt and you go, "Shut the [ __ ]
up." Like, "What is that? That's nuts."
>> Yeah. And I resent the idea that we're
like taking it away from them. It's
like, "Let's just be logical about this
and actually assess the toolkit and
assess the capabilities and then look at
the evidence of what we're seeing."
>> Also, we're not because it's people that
lived in the same place. So, it's
literally just the older versions of
them,
>> right? It's not like you're saying, you
know, Chinese people came and they did
it all and then they flew back. No,
that's not what anybody's saying. We're
just saying more ancestors. Your
ancestors, not just the timeline's off.
The timeline seems funky. Clearly, there
were some amazing things that the
Egyptians did during the accepted
timeline. [clears throat] I mean, they
were a fascinating culture all through
till the end, right?
>> But the when you go really far back,
whatever that is is nuts. Mhm.
>> And when you're saying that you know
exactly when it was dated when there's
so much evidence of just today modern
doing these reconstructions and fixing
and all the the the the the feet of the
Sphinx and they're covering it with new
[ __ ] rocks. Like they've always been
doing renovations. They always do. So
all this stuff that you're saying like
we got a piece of wood from inside one
of the cracks like [ __ ] that doesn't
mean anything. Exactly.
>> You can't date those rocks.
>> No. Unless you get under those
[ __ ] to the bottom and take a
chunk of organic material from deep
underneath that thing so you can know
when the first stones are placed. You
don't know. You're guessing.
>> And I I think that that's why we're
coming to a point now where there's such
resistance from the mainstream when you
see scans like this because they they've
built themselves into a wall. It would
you basically have to admit, yeah, we
we're just [ __ ] wrong. You're you
also see like you know
>> them confronted by real evidence. Yeah.
>> Like real evidence. And like just when
someone takes you for a walk inside the
king's chamber and you look up at those
stones that somehow they got like how
high are they in the sky?
>> Mhm.
>> How high are they in the ceiling? How
high are they? Do you remember?
>> Oh god. No, I don't. Sorry.
>> Well, 80 ton stones
>> 80 tons in the king's chamber. 80 tons.
>> How tall? Let's look.
>> And that's near the apex. That is near
the apex.
>> Jamie, please put this into perplexity.
How tall is the ceiling inside the
king's chamber in the Great Pyramid?
>> Cuz these things are perfectly placed in
there. Like even if you drag those
somehow or another across the mountains
for 500 miles and got it to the pyramid,
how the [ __ ] did you get it up there?
>> Exactly.
>> How'd you get them all to line up? How
many people got squished?
[clears throat]
>> Chamber itself spans 10.5 meters long by
5.2 m wide. How tall is the ceiling?
uh 19 feet. But it's also but it's also
near the top of the pyramid. It's
incredibly high up in the pyramid as
well. They had to lift it to that point.
>> You have to you have to get these 80 ton
blocks 19 ft and then place them
perfectly.
>> And and there's absolutely again there's
nothing kingly about the king's chamber
at all. It's just completely a bare room
of rose granite with this sarcophagus
coming up out of the out of the floor
with a huge chunk um missing. And
actually, if you look at where that huge
chunk is missing and you turn around and
you look at the wall, there's actually a
massive impact uh on the wall. There's
like a big part of the wall that's been
broken off. So, it makes you wonder if
maybe that was jettisoned off at some
point from, you know, power or, you
know,
>> what do you think is in that the what
they call the sarcophagus? Do you have a
theory? Does anybody have a
>> I've been inside it. There's nothing
inside of it. It's
>> You got in it?
>> Yeah. I've laid I laid down inside of
it. It's kind of creepy.
>> With a grandmaster of the Templar Order
chanting over me.
>> Oh, fun.
>> Yeah. That was my first trip to Egypt.
[laughter] You can take a video of that
and put it up on X and no one's ever
gonna take you seriously, right? Well,
this guy's a [ __ ] cook. [laughter]
>> I am I am a cook.
>> Well, you have to be, you know. Yeah,
>> you have to be a cook to really enjoy
this.
>> And you have to be on the fringe and and
also I think some of the, you know, most
impressive scientists and creators have
been people on the fringe who are
laughed at by all their peers. Well,
especially now because the way the way
universities work is essentially there's
a person that is the most important
person in [clears throat] that field,
right, at that university. And there's a
bunch of people that want grants and
there's a bunch of people that want to
play nice, they want their career, they
want tenure, and you got to be careful
whose toes you step on. And if this one
guy is the gatekeeper of or a group of
guys like him at various universities or
the gatekeepers to this information,
you're going to come up with the current
bottleneck problem that we see where
people are not just unwilling but
aggressively attacking people that
question this. Which is why they called
Graham Hancock show the most dangerous
show on television. Like that is so
crazy. You have so many shows where
people get murdered.
>> That's the best way to make a show go
viral though, isn't it? Best way to make
a show go viral. Don't [ __ ] watch
this show. You know what I mean? Great
job on the people. did a great job.
>> But it does bring up a a disturbing and
and worrying element of it. Just how
quickly the mainstream media in various
outlets all aligned at once to call him
everything from a racist to a
pseudocientist to a conspiracy theorist.
And you know, it is an alarming kickback
that he's taken in his stride
profoundly. Profoundly.
>> He's a wonderful guy.
>> He's great. I can't wait to speak to
him. I literally missed him by like 3
days when I went out to Peru. I was
gutted.
>> He was my first real guest.
>> Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah, he was, wasn't
he?
>> Yeah. Me and [laughter] him and Duncan,
we had so much fun.
>> Oh my god, that must have been flew. I
need to rewind right from England. We uh
got him to drive to my house. And then
once he got to my house, we ordered
pizza. We all ate pizza and I couldn't
believe I'm hanging out with Graham
Hancock. I was so giddy. It was like one
of the first actual guests.
>> Giddy moments. Like, yeah, you're just
like, I can't believe I'm actually
sitting with this dude. Yeah, because
the guest before that had mostly been
comics, right? Or some person that I
thought was interesting, you know, some
guy that I met at the comedy store. I'm
like, "What do you do? You're a
therapist and what do you give people?
How's it [laughter] work? Come on over.
>> Come and talk to me about it."
>> Yeah. I did a lot of those. But he was,
I think, the first real guest.
>> Was there like a a choice, like a
conscious decision for you to kind of
like evolve it from just, you know,
comedians talking shop to actually
getting different guests on from a
variety of subjects? Because I know
you're a curious person. And you've
probably been researching these things
even at the point before you were doing
that kind of podcast cuz well clearly
you were but yeah like what was the
natural evolution of that for you?
>> Well I was always into books about
ancient history and whether it's you
know like modernly you know commonly
accepted narrative or Graham Hancock
stuff. But I got into Graham Hancock
stuff I think in the '9s Fingerprints of
the Gods came out and I [ __ ] loved
it. I I was so fascinated by I couldn't
shut the [ __ ] up about it. tell people
like you got to see this. Like I think
this guy's right. I I think we're we are
a history with amnesia or a race with
amnesia.
>> And then um of course [snorts] I watched
Chariots of the Gods, that film, which I
thought was very kooky and fun. It's
very campy and fun. And here's the thing
about that. I dismissed it for a long
time and I said it's nonsense. And I was
I actually had lunch once. Eric
Weinstein took me to uh lunch at Peter
Teal's house where we talked to uh
>> Von Danakin and Right. Right.
>> It was fun fun conversation like
interesting. I'm talking to he's a
fullon true believer
>> von Danakin.
>> Yeah. Yeah. Fully
>> of the alien theory the ancient aliens
theory and back see I've gone in like
multiple stages in my cognitive
dissonance [laughter]
>> and for a while I was all in with the
aliens.
>> I hear you. I'm the same though. Then
for a while I was like, "No, no, no.
There was an advanced civilization and
we're just a rebuilding of that
civilization and that's probably why
we're so barbaric." And now I'm like,
"Why am I why are they mutually
exclusive?"
>> It could be a mix.
>> Yeah. I don't think they are mutually
exclusive.
>> At one point the gods walked amongst us,
you know, like
>> and that's when I see the things like
the tridactyl mummies and I'm like,
"Okay, okay, okay. What is that? What
are we talking? Why is why is Peru so
weird? Why do they have artwork that you
can only see from the sky?" Like there's
a lot of weird [ __ ] going on here. Like
don't don't be so quick to jump.
>> Exactly.
>> My point is like I I've always been
fascinated by
>> stories. First of all, um any subject
that makes you ridiculous for
considering it. I'm always like,
>> "What's that about? Why why is that
ridiculous that itch a little bit?" Even
the cookie ones like ghosts,
>> Bigfoot, all the cookie ones.
>> Like why? What's the What's the
resistance? Why did Russian astronaut
tell me a Bigfoot story?
>> Yeah, he I mean, pinch of salt, but he
uh he claimed that he had been told this
by a military guy out in out in Russia
that a uh they were they were in the
wreck room of this like Air Force base.
And apparently, this is according to
this Russian astronaut trainer at the
Yuri Gagarin Space Center in Moscow. And
he said that this uh this Yeti Sasquatch
type being apparently just walted in
like just walked into their wreck room,
helped itself to some water from the
water uh thing, waved, and then
vanished.
I don't know.
So this guy, what was his job?
>> He was a trainer of astronauts at the
Yori Gagarin Space Center in Star City,
Moscow. Bro, they probably dosed him up
with so many [ __ ] They did
>> MK Ultra drugs.
>> Yeah. I I mean,
>> if you're you're holding on to that kind
of information,
>> an interesting story.
>> They probably experiment on [snorts]
you.
>> Mhm.
>> Yeah.
>> I probably gave that guy some I've never
given the the Sasquatch thing. It's uh
it's due course in in researching it to
be honest. I've been very dismissive of
that. But maybe it's I mean maybe you
know I mean like the demographic years I
used to have a Sasquatch Bigfoot
footprint like a cast like a plaster
cast on the desk [laughter] that uh rest
in peace Dr. Jeffrey Meldrum. He just
recently died.
>> I had him on the as a guest on the show
once too. He's a he's so crazy. I told
him I asked him if he was so crazy but
in a wonderful way. [clears throat] I
said if if you could cut a finger off
>> to know that Sasquatch was real, would
you do it? He was like yes instantly.
What the [laughter] [ __ ] dude? That's
your finger. Don't say yes to that. Just
the information just comes out. You
don't have to lose a [laughter] finger.
>> Damn it.
>> Just sitting there with half a finger.
>> I think Bigfoot was a real thing.
>> Yeah.
>> I think that's why there's so like
>> Do you think it was just like some sort
of like branch of creature? Cuz so many
people think it's like an
interdimensional being or
>> It could be that too, but I think it's
Gigantopithecus initially.
Gigantopithecus was an absolute real
thing that we didn't [clears throat]
even know existed until the I believe it
was the 20s. Yeah, around then
>> guy find it teeth in an apothecary shop
in China and then they started
researching it and finding where the dig
sites were
>> and you know they found jawbones that
indicate that it was bipeedal. So this
is a bipeedal homminid that's 8 to 10 ft
tall. What is that? That's Bigfoot.
>> That is Bigfoot
>> and that's probably and also this thing
100% lived around modern human beings.
Like what we are today, it lived around
us. So imagine you see one of those
things. Well, first of all, you're going
to [ __ ] run like hell. You're gonna
have stories. This thing lives in the in
the woods or in the jungle. Stay out of
this spot. That's where this thing
lives. And that's going to be passed on
from generation to generation to
generation until even after they're
gone. Now it's just a whisper. Now it's
just a thing. It's now it's a mystery
man that lives in the woods.
>> Are are there like are they like
antiquated Bigfoot stories like outside
of just modern? Yes.
>> Yeah. Oh, without a doubt. Especially
Native American cultures. That's what's
interesting is like Native American
tribes. There's multiple obviously many
different tribes, many different
languages, right?
>> Yeah.
>> They all have a word for this thing that
let's put this into perplexity. Yeah.
>> How many different Native American names
are there for for Bigfoot?
>> Cuz I believe Sasquatch is a Native
American. I don't know which tribe had
that, but there's multiple different
names for this hairy creature that lives
in the woods. But they don't have names
for like a giraffe that lives in the
woods. They don't have like other
mystical animals, mythical creatures.
They just have this one.
>> Yeah.
>> And this one is a [ __ ] weird one.
>> Well, that's what I mean with the
interdimensional aspect. It's treated
differently than just an animal even
from like these
>> that might be real, too. This is part of
the problem. It's like
>> we might be dealing with multiple
different things. It might not even be
Gigantopithecus.
>> Saskat Skookum. That's right. I've heard
that. Omar. That's right. There was a
movie called Omar. The guy who did the
American Werewolf in
>> what? That's just the last words you say
when you see Bigfoot. Oh my.
>> Yeah. [laughter]
>> Uh Chai Tanka. Big big elder brother.
>> 70 to 80 names.
>> Wicked cannibal. Oh boy. Wendago.
Wicked. Yeah, Windo. I've heard that
one. Windo.
>> Yeah, I've heard that one. and
how to say that
>> big god and that's a Navajo name. So
there's a bunch of different there's a
bunch underneath that too.
>> Yeah. Like say about 70 to 80 names when
accounting for variance across 50
tribes.
>> Okay. So what is that?
>> And it's the same with the alien graves
like the ant people you know.
>> Well and then it brings the same thing
like brings us to the same subject of
what if there is a way to traverse
dimensions? What if this is not some as
simple as something gets in a spaceship
and it comes here from another planet?
What if it's coming from another place?
And what if that doorway is open to
other things? And what if some of those
things are a Sasquatch? Like and under
the right conditions, this pathway is
open. And you maybe it's not even
something that actually exists, but you
can see exists in our tangible timeline,
but you can see under heavy stress,
under like anxiety. And imagine what
gets you more stressed out than being in
the woods at night, right? The woods at
night creates a lot of anxiety for
people because there's all these sounds
and you're looking around. It's dark.
You're vulnerable. Especially if you
live in real woods, like woods that have
predators in them. It's sketchy. And I
[clears throat] bet there's different
states of mind that you would if if
there are if is if there's some sort of
a possibility, some sort of a way that a
an intelligent creature can get to a
point where it has the technology to
access other dimensions. It can go into
other spaces.
>> Would you even be able to see it all the
time? Would you only be able to see it
if you were like under a highly anxious
state in the woods? You're kind of a
little freaked out. You're more open to
weird things and then it senses that and
communicates with you.
>> Well, we are.
>> It sounds kooky.
>> We're dominated by our perception and we
have such a narrow bandwidth of visual
perception. You know, you get up the
whole light spectrum and look at visible
light. Just this tiny corridor of
visible light that we're able to see.
Obviously, we've developed IR and, you
know, different and if you film the
night sky with infrared, you get weird
[ __ ] You get these orbs and things that
seem to fly by. And um I think that it
is a perceptual thing because the reason
I even started my YouTube channel is
because I've had my own experiences with
UFO type phenomena that were entirely um
initiated by me. Like I asked for them
to come and and they did. See, that
sounds kooky. I'll take that clip and I
dismiss you immediately. This guy's wait
for it.
>> But this is one of the things that
people have been saying for a long time
is that there's there's actual groups of
people and there was even some guy who
was like
>> somehow or another connected to the
government. Um that was saying that they
lead these people out. They go out into
the desert and they have a like some
sort of a secret frequency. He didn't
want to discuss it that they can push
out. they can send out the secret
frequency and it'll call them in and
that other people have done it simply by
willing them in. That's what I do.
>> So sitting there and putting out this
message that you're trying to
communicate with them and then
eventually they show up.
>> Yeah. I I I can't speak to
technologically assisted psionics and
all that kind of stuff, but um do you
want to hear my UFO story? Okay. First
of all, where did you come up with this
idea on your own or did you hear about
people doing this? No, I I uh I heard of
it from someone who's a quite polarizing
figure in the UFO community. I know
you've spoken to him, Dr. Steven Greer.
Um but I
>> polarizing people are right sometimes.
>> He's right on this.
>> Yeah, they could be right on a lot of
things.
>> He's right on this. And you know, I uh I
know that a lot of people have issues
with with Greer, but I he was actually
my intro into the UFO subject. So, I'll
tell you the story. [clears throat]
Sorry about my throat. Let me just take
a sip of water, actually. So um
this was uh
>> how did he find out about it?
>> It's a good question. Um he had a
near-death experience believe and from
that was actually apparently
communicated to and shown things that
when he came out of that experience he
became
>> a samadei type you know teacher and you
know got profoundly interested origin
story
>> brilliant origin story. Um [laughter]
my origin story was that I was really
bored during co no so like honestly
though um it was actually in 2019 that I
had these experiences and I I do think
that it's very important to lay a bit of
foundational groundwork because I think
a lot of people will recognize this as
well and it's something that you
mentioned with Bigfoot being in a high
stress environment in the forest maybe
that changes your perception and uh I I
think that there's a degree of trauma
and a degree of intense emotional uh
moments that can bring about paran
paranormal experiences. I don't know
why, but it does seem to be something
that a lot of people relate to. Yes, I
was in a very dark time. Yes, I was
having a very traumatic time or yes, I
was going through something and then
this happened. And so, for me, um I was
in my third year of university and
struggling. Just had a whole mix of
personal issues going on. Um so, I I
ended up kind of dropping out before I
finished and uh was just in a really bad
rut. And my dad was worried about me and
he uh he said look I'm I'm out in this a
bit of a long story but it's important
to lay this foundation I think before I
talk about what I actually experienced
because it plays in. Um my dad was
worried he he was out in France at the
time and he said look do you want to
come out and stay at this place with me
and just you know kind of relax and
bring yourself back to normal. I was
like yeah okay. So I came out and uh he
was like uh I've got these books that
I've been reading. I think they'd be
really beneficial for you. Um you should
read them. I was like okay like you know
I don't see how a book's going to
change. Did he often recommend books?
>> Not massively. No. In fact, no. No. This
was the only time he recommended books,
which is interesting. Um, and they were
a series of books called Conversations
with God by Neil Donald Walsh. Have you
ever heard of them?
>> No.
>> Okay. So, it's interesting. It kind of
ties into, I suppose, the chneled works,
things that people believe they receive.
>> Oh, wait a minute. I have heard of this.
>> He's quite well known. He's quite well
known. Um he, you know, was a he was a
radio DJ, broke his neck in a car
accident, became homeless, finally
managed to get back on his feet, but was
still struggling, wrote an angry letter
to God, and then apparently woke up at
3:00 in the morning and was having like
voices literally telling him to write
things down as he wrote all of this
down. And this became conversations with
God. It's literally a dialogue of him
asking questions and him receiving
answers, which he interpreted as from
God. Now, that is intense. And I'm
definitely not here to say this is a
Bible and everyone should read it.
However, it was incredibly impactful for
me at that time. The things that I was
reading about, it was a very different
idea of God, universal consciousness,
leaning towards more than some weird
patriarchal cloud living figure that
just never made sense to me. So, it it
got me in and I was reading it and it
helped tremendously, weirdly enough, um,
which I didn't expect. And that put me
on a path towards researching
metaphysics and philosophy and and
science and consciousness and and that's
where it really started for me. But then
a couple years down the line, I found
myself in another depression in a sense
because I felt like I'd accumulated a
lot of information about various
different topics that I thought were
like these big questions and big answers
and big esoteric things. And I just got
to a point I was like none of this is
actually helping me in my life. In fact,
I'm actually feeling like [ __ ] worse
for looking into all of this thing and I
don't know how this is going to benefit
me. So I was sitting on my bed one night
and I just I guess you could call it a
prayer. I just sat on my bed and said
out loud to the universe, like I I need
something that validates all of this.
Like, if I'm meant to be looking into
these big picture questions about the
universe and consciousness, if there's
something tangible here, like I I I need
to know and I want evidence and I'm
ready for it. So, give me it. I want
that. And then a week later, my best
friend at the time, he was like, "Uh,
hey, I've I was watching this
documentary. You've got to check it out.
It's called Unagnowledged by this guy
called Dr. Steven Greer." And this was
my first introduction to the UFO
subject. So I was like, "Okay, cool."
Sit down, watch that. Very good
documentary. All of these different, you
know, highlevel officers and missile
launch guys talking about UFOs. It got
me in. And then near the end of that is
when he brings up this concept of C5,
you know, initiating contact with these.
You can actually have your own
experiences by getting into a particular
meditative state.
If I hadn't been making that request on
my bed the week prior, I probably just
would have watched that documentary and
gone about my life. But it felt like a
very strong message to me personally
because I've been asking for something
to validate these ideas around
consciousness. Now there's a guy saying,
"Yeah, you can actually have an
experience by going out and attempting
to, you know, ask for one."
>> So talk me through the process of
actually doing that.
>> So [clears throat] he has
>> Did you get it on the first try? No, he
>> How many How many times did you try?
>> It's It was a weird gradual thing where
things were happening in the sky that
were enough to keep me going out but not
enough for me to be like, "Okay, this is
legit."
>> So, like, how many times did you go out
before it worked?
>> Uh, before I saw what I really really
saw, um, probably about a month of going
out.
>> Damn, that's commitment.
>> But I was seeing things, but they but
they weren't
>> it it was kind of just enough to make me
like, okay, What are we seeing?
>> Lots of what the contact community call
flash bulbs. Flashes of light in the
night sky in a void of space repeatedly
without any discernable object attached
to it. Just one flash. And then
>> send a thought, another flash,
>> send a thought, another flash.
>> And this happened multiple times. I've
been someone who watches the night sky
all my life. I'm used to seeing
satellites. I know what flares are.
>> Maybe an hour or two hours, you know.
>> And so you sit down. Are you seated?
>> No, I I usually be standing with my neck
crane to the sky, but I would be
>> Why don't I get a lounge chair?
>> I know.
>> Meditative.
>> I know. I don't know. I don't think
about things properly sometimes when I
do.
>> Just lay down on the ground.
>> Just lay on the grass.
>> You get a better view of the sky.
>> Yeah. But it's cold in England and it
was mildwy on the floor.
>> Get a tarp. Yeah. Yeah. But but I was um
I was essentially because of again being
asking asking the universe for
something. The universe seemed to be
giving me some sort of response. It kind
of lit a fire up under me and I started
going outside and honestly a lot of
people like even Gria has this
incredibly uh you know complicated
method using samadi and you know doing
various things. I didn't do any of that.
I just breathed in through the nose and
out through the mouth until I felt very
calm and then began to very clearly
model my thoughts around the concept of
I want something to respond to me and
then I would essentially visualize that
that was emanating from me that these
thoughts were emanating from me and it
didn't take very long before I'd have
flashes of light in the sky that just
seemed weird because I've never seen
anything like that or an incredible
influx of what look and behave like
satellites but just at an incredibly
high level where it's just like what
what's going on here? And it just felt
like a a kind of stepby-step progression
until in August of 2019, I had four
incredibly vivid and real experiences
with orange orbs of light. Um, really
profound.
>> What was that? What happened?
>> So, I was outside at this point. It
become my routine. It was in the summer
of August and it was relatively warm.
So, I was out doing this quite a lot,
seeing little flashes, seeing things in
the sky, trying to figure out what
exactly it was that I was seeing. And um
I was standing at the back of my garden
looking towards my house, night sky,
crystal clear, and uh I saw at the
beginning a flash of light in in the
corner of the sky. So, I looked over and
I saw this flash, another flash, another
flash, and it was just blinking, but it
was static in space. And then it started
moving down. every time it blinked, it
would move further down. And I was
observing this and then it settled above
two stars and kind of created the the
apex of a triangle. And it was just
flashing above these two stars. And I
was watching this for a while and it
happened for long enough where I just
decided, all right, I'm just thank you,
whatever you are. I'm just going to keep
panning around the sky here and looking
around. And as I panned my head, I saw
that there was a cloud, but I didn't
really look at it. And I turn around
here, come back, and I see this cloud
again. And this time I really look at
it. And this cloud, Joe, had so strange.
It's like a dark cloud. Um, but when you
stared at it, it had a staticky
appearance. It's very hard to describe
other than imagine a light overlay of TV
static. There was particles. It was
agitated. It was shimmering. Something
not a cloud. Like certainly not anything
I've ever seen in my life. And if we
pretend this microphone is my house and
this cloud is here, it's drifting this
way. So eventually it's going to drift
past my house and go this way, at least
according to its natural trajectory.
It gets to my house and it does a right
angle turn and it starts coming towards
me. So eventually it's going to be above
my head. This cloudlike formation,
>> a cloud does a right angle turn in the
sky.
>> Abrupt as in 90 degrees. It's going like
this. And now it's going like this
towards you. High up in the sky, but
it's now in my path. Complete 90 degree
shift from its trajectory. And I saw it
like a jarring. Now it's going this way.
Okay. So, at this point, I'm rooted in
place. I'm not really scared, but I'm
shocked at the fact that this thing did
what it just did. And I'm watching as
it's coming closer and closer, you know,
towards where I'm going to be.
Eventually, it's directly above my head.
It sounds so crazy and you know Terrence
McKenna said something like this. He was
like you know if you tell the
unvarnished truth about a UFO experience
you'll be taken for a fool. It's like
it's true. You know if you if you just
tell people what really happened but
this is what really happened. So this
cloud comes above my head
>> as it's directly above my head. this
cloud
like sucked into itself as if there was
a central vacuum, a central point where
it just got sucked into itself and it
revealed a triangle formation of about
25 maybe 30 orange orbs of light in a
triangle.
And this triangle basically the cloud
went triangle was revealed. It kept
moving. I had to turn around and watch
as it went off in this direction. And as
I was watching it, I could see that some
of these orbs were actually swapping
formation, swapping position in this
formation.
And that was the first time I saw them.
I saw them three other occasions, all
within the space of a month after this.
Weirdly enough, I woke up the next day,
and this is the only element of the
story, as crazy as the whole thing
sounds, is the only element that makes
me personally uncomfortable. Um, I was
getting out of the shower and as I was
drying myself off, immediately
immediately noticed where this tattoo is
now. There was a triangle mark of three
red three red marks. One here, one here,
one here. Very vivid like in like the
>> And you covered it up with a tattoo.
>> Well, [laughter]
it faded. It faded over it. I have taken
pictures of it. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah.
>> Is it clear? Can I see it?
>> Uh, I can try and find them. Yeah. I
haven't got my internet on right now. Um
Jamie, if you go onto my ex account and
just type in uh
Jay Anderson marks on arm, maybe that
will come up. I'm sorry. I should have
really sent that ahead of time, but I do
have images online. People have seen
them and I've discussed it many times.
Um
>> did it look like a wound? Did it look
like a tattoo?
>> So, three red marks, no bump, no scab,
no itching, no feeling of discomfort.
There was a slight shine to them as if
it was almost like a healed over burn.
And this was very vivid. It didn't
dissipate for over a year. It was on my
arm for about a year before it faded
away and eventually faded away. And then
I got homeisters tattooed on my arm. But
uh um weirdly enough, I got this tattoo
and then got invited to Egypt. Weirdly,
but yeah, I had these experiences. Um, I
had another experience where they came
down and hovered above my house.
>> Can I ask you this? So, these orbs,
there's
>> There you go. There you go.
>> Wow.
>> Thanks, Jamie. Thanks for that.
>> That is weird.
>> It looks like you burned three
cigarettes on your
>> That's what some [ __ ] online
definitely claimed, but I didn't.
>> That's what I would say, too, if I was
an [ __ ] online.
>> Yeah. Yeah. [laughter]
>> Um,
>> that's crazy.
>> Yeah. This this I noticed it
immediately. I I'm not particularly
comfortable with it. I don't know what
it really means. I really I you know I'm
a bit of I'm a bit of an idiot Joe cuz
like I you know I should have gone to a
dermatologist. I should have like
actually had thing someone look at it
>> branded but like cattle son.
>> Well that's kind of what I think and at
the same time can I
>> let's keep an eye on this one.
>> Can I even be mad at them? I was like
show me show me. Give me evidence. I
want to sign. [ __ ] it. Fine then.
>> Right.
>> There you go dude.
>> I would say whatever that is on your
arm. Who knows? Maybe a dermatologist
could explain it. It's just a
coincidence. But the the actual thing
itself is far more interesting to me.
And like cuz one of the things that
people always say is if they were out
there, what wouldn't we see them? Like
god, if they could come here from
another dimension or if they can come
here from another planet or another
solar system, don't you think they could
probably hide? Like we're pretty good at
hiding. Like don't you think like we
have we have technology right now like
the stealth bomber stuff [clears throat]
that uh diminishes the radar signal.
Exactly. Like you can't you can't pick
them up on radar. So,
why would it be impossible to somehow
another manipulate your visual field,
project what looks like clouds on the
outside? We know that we can do stuff
like that with plasma. Like, they can
they have these plasma things that can
spin in the sky. It's weird. They can
make objects out of them.
>> I wonder if that was plasma. I actually
do wonder if this was a form of
self-organizing plasma. Uh because
that's definitely something that people
have looked into quite
>> maybe plasma has intelligence.
>> Yes.
>> There's some Yeah.
>> Yes. and and that you know perhaps these
are a form of individuated plasmic
intelligences that can interact and and
one thing that's very interesting about
that there was a brilliant paper
actually I did a I did a video on it um
it's like 11 different scientific
institutes looking at um the idea of
self-organizing plasma and intelligent
plasma and they were using some
references like do you know the STS75
NASA missions where the tether broke and
you had all these strange things going
around the tether
>> yes
>> so that's dismissed as ice particles and
things like that. Have you ever seen the
motion tracking version of that where
someone actually attached the flight
paths of each object so you can see the
flight path?
>> No.
>> That's crazy because then
>> if Yeah, I'm sure if if Jamie looked up
um weird flight path
>> lights are going towards that thing and
checking it out.
>> Yeah. So this is um you know this is a
gigantic tether. I think it's like 2 km
long or something. It's absolutely
insane. It broke away from the ship and
as it broke away you had these um well
what some people believe to be UFOs or
plasmic uh intelligences or if you're uh
on the mainstream side you'd say these
are ice particles. There you go. If you
go slightly further back slightly
further back they go s just as that
green one starting up. This is the
flight path. So if you just take it back
to the beginning of that um and this is
where they've attached the flight paths
and you will see complete 90 degree
turns. you'll see absolute stops and
reversals of change
and it's incredible.
>> I wonder if it's just a kind of life
that we
>> I truly think that's the case exist
lives in space.
>> I think so. I really do.
>> Like the things they find at these
volcanic vents at the bottom of the
ocean. They're like, "Oh, we didn't even
know that something could survive down
here."
>> There could be a type of life that
survives in the void of space. And it
just it wouldn't be a biological thing.
It would be some form of energy or
light.
>> This is apparently what all the spooks
were telling Tom Dong when he went to
the Pentagon that there's amieebas in
space the size of whales and like you
know that these things were essentially
they told him. Yeah. I remember I
remember when he was on he was on fade
to black and he was talking about you
know that there are these amiebas in
space that are like you know
>> but why would they tell him and then he
goes on those shows and tells like I I I
feel like that's the type of guy that
you tell some things that you want to
get out.
>> Yeah. And it doesn't necessarily have to
be true.
>> No. No.
>> A matter of fact, it's more fun if it's
not true. And and make him say as much
kooky [ __ ] as possible
>> so that the stuff that he's going to say
that's true looks ridiculous.
>> And now all of those guys that gave him
that information are on the age of
disclosure.com.
>> Exactly.
>> We should trust them, right? [laughter]
>> Yeah.
>> We should trust all of these government
spooks.
>> It's fun. If you're playing, it's like
the world is a gigantic escape room.
[laughter]
>> Yeah, dude. You're playing a bunch of
weird puzzles and you're trying to
figure it out, but nothing is what it
seems.
>> I think it seems nothing's as it seems.
I I think with um with Tom Delong and
the UFO [clears throat] subject and to
the stars academy and all the things
that have happened since like 2017, New
York Times, it's um I have I have
opinions on it because I think I might
be the first guest that you've had on
that wasn't already uh quite
established. So, I've had to work my way
up through social media, through the
interactions in the community, to, you
know, personal relations with people
that aren't big names or anything like
that. Um, you know, I've had to work my
way up it. So, I've seen and been
exposed to things that perhaps people
like Jeremy Corbell and others who are
already quite big names haven't seen
because they're too big. They don't need
to be on social media looking at [ __ ]
comments or like, you know, what's going
on in the X space. But if you are like
that, you start to notice things. And so
what's interesting to me, despite what
anyone wants to say about Steven Greer,
and I've got my own issues with Steven
Greer, what's interesting to me is that
the only person really who was making
noise prior to TTSA was Steven Greer. He
was the one that was putting out Netflix
documentaries that were getting seen by
millions of people all over the world.
And he was saying, you know, these are
blackbudget illegal programs. This is a
anti-ongressional crime against
humanity. We need to be busting down the
doors. This is, you know, not not
exactly what they would want to hear if
they were inside the national security
state. There's this guy out there saying
this. What do you do about that? Well,
do you know how Tom Dong got linked up
at the very beginning to all of this?
>> No.
>> So, he's always been a UFO guy and
because of his background and, you know,
the money, he was able to secure
connections and uh he was very friendly
with Greer. He was best buds with Greer
at one point. In fact, there's a video
of him when he's quite young and he's
pointing out all of the witness uh UFO
witness tapes that he's got on his uh on
his in his library and he's like, you
know, these are all I'm I'm holding on
to these for a guy. He's got like 50
whistleblowers. He's bringing this all
out and this is before Grier, you know,
kind of made the announcement. So it's
obviously Greer and um Tom Delong's on
Fade to Black in I want to say 2015
talking about this where he tells the
story of how a friend of his at Loheed
Martin calls him up and says, "Hey,
we're having a family and friends meet
and greet over over at Loheed Martin.
Would you want to introduce the bosses
to the stage?" And he said, "Yeah, but I
want 10 minutes with your bosses
afterwards." And they were like, "Okay."
And so he went and he introduced him on
stage and then he tells a story of being
taken through, you know, these white
noise corridors and down into this place
where eventually he was chilling with
the guys at Skunk Works and, you know,
these big directors are all sitting in
this room. They're like, "Okay, what
what is it you want to talk about?" This
is where he pitches to the Stars Academy
of Arts and Science and this framework.
And what's interesting is on the radio
when he's talking about this, he's
saying you have to approach these guys
like you want to be of service. You
know, I was saying I'm being of service.
I want to I want to help. I want to
help. So, you've got a disruptive rogue
person out there, Steven Greer, saying
all this stuff causing commotion. What
do we do about that? I have no idea.
Suddenly, in walks a rockstar. Use me.
Because that's basically what he said.
Use me. I'm happy to do whatever it I am
your conduit into the public. Now, no
disrespect to Tom. I've met him. He's a
lovely guy and he's very passionate
about the subject. But I do think he was
used. And what you get from there is the
tutor the stars academy platform.
Suddenly you have this official kind of
green lit disclosure very soft
disclosure that's nothing like Steven
Greer's disclosure and we're all being
encouraged to partake and support in
this very what what should we say
curated method of soft disclosure for
the people. I think that they were very
worried about what type of disruptive
truths might come out before it was time
to talk about them. And then suddenly
Tom Dong was a very useful medium for
communicating this. And when you see
things like the Wikileaks emails between
him and John Podesta where he's
literally saying this is about
bolstering uh PR for the
military-industrial complex from a
disenfranchised youth and you know the
generations of youth today don't trust
the government. We want to change that.
We want to change the perception of the
military and the government. He's
literally emailing John Podesta about
this. So it's very clear that at the
very least he was willing to be the
messenger of whatever message they
wanted to give him. And it just so
happens that that message completely
counteracts what Greer is talking about
in terms of classified black budget
programs that have already cracked
reverse engineering. We cracked
anti-gravity in October 1954. You know
this kind of stuff. It's like complete
reversal of that narrative.
>> Interesting.
>> Yeah.
>> Interesting. Well, makes sense. That's
the what's the term? Useful idiots.
>> Useful idiot.
>> Yeah. They they love doing that. And
>> you know, I've said it before, I'll say
it again. I know I've had people on this
podcast that were doing that with me.
>> And I know they were coming on saying a
bunch of nonsense. But you have to let
them talk cuz
>> it all the truth comes out in the wash.
>> For sure.
>> And uh I think what's interesting about
the age of disclosure is this narrative
uh of
the reality of what happened. If if it
did happen, there's lying to Congress.
there's misappropriation of funds,
you're going to need amnesty. And so
this is the narrative. This narrative is
we need amnesty. It's like
>> it's kind of a smart way to do it,
right? Do it in a documentary. Have all
these people that are probably
implicated in some way. Say we need
amnesty. All these people that say that
they know about these programs with
amnesty is important because
>> you know people been
>> but we what they've been doing really if
they have been doing what they we assume
they've been doing. We we assume they've
retrieved crashed UFOs and they've
backgineered them. We assume they've
used that technology. We assume they're
aware that there's nonhuman
intelligences that are far beyond our
technological capabilities and that we
interact with them. You've you've
committed a crime against humanity by
not telling people that
>> because we
we all operate under the assumption that
we have an understanding of what our
role is in this this ecosystem of life.
And if our role is not even remotely at
the apex, if we are being visited and
manipulated and if we're actually a
product of experiments,
you should [ __ ] tell us. You can't
you [laughter] guys can't be hanging out
at Rathon in the [ __ ] conference
room.
>> You believe this [ __ ] like with your
gold Rolexes on you [ __ ]
>> Right. [laughter]
>> Tell them.
>> But we can't handle the truth, right?
They are right with the amnesty thing. I
think that's the pathway. Look, these
not these guys are not going to What
they stole, they stole. Okay? What they
did, they did. What the the lying to
Congress, the lies have been told. Let's
[ __ ] find out what the truth is.
These guys, they're whatever they did,
they did. Okay? You didn't stop it then.
Let it go. The more important thing is,
let's find out if this is real. That's
more important than everything for the
race, for the human race, the entire
human race
>> and for science and technology to f to
have all this stuff locked down like
that and not allow the great young minds
that are coming up right now to have
access to this. It's crazy. You're
you're you're wasting one of the most
valuable resources that we have with
secrecy.
>> I think there's so many different
reasons why they might want to keep this
a secret in terms of breakthrough energy
and propulsion systems. Like there's so
many different implications to that,
right?
>> Massively disruptive.
>> Massively disruptive. And and you know,
could you imagine some like whacked out
[ __ ] dude with a zero point energy
device? Like
>> or you imagine some guy who's running an
oil company who finds out that they're
about to do something like that. Like
the [ __ ] you are like, how about this
guy at MIT that just got got
assassinated in his home?
>> Dude, that's the wet works in the
corporate world is very real. I think
>> this is very real. [clears throat] This
guy was he one of the more disturbing
theories he had was that not only is the
shift of the the magnetic poles that
here I'll I'll send it to you Jamie but
as his his take on it was that the shift
of the mag magnetic poles is necessary
>> in order to maintain uh
>> well I don't want to [ __ ] it up
>> or like a natural earth cycle that has
to happen. I'm sorry. I'm I'm trying to
think and look it up at the same time.
>> Are you good?
>> Here it is.
I'll send it to you, Jamie.
Sorry for the dead air, folks. Okay, so
it says um
the assassinated MIT plasma scientist
warned that Earth requires periodic
magnetic reversals to sustain its field.
>> Interesting. No reversal equals no
dynamo equals the magnetic field
dissipates. The last time this happened
in this in the tweet it says Noah's
flood. [laughter]
>> So,
>> oh, Sunweather man. Oh, I know both
these guys.
>> This guy who has this
>> whistleblower. Yeah, I've got him on.
>> Is that not loading
>> the clip?
>> Plasma physics 101 fluid description.
>> It seems like the clip's not Okay, let's
hear what he has to say. It's really
interesting [ __ ] [clears throat] man.
Um you mentioned that um
uh the earth the earth's magnetic field
was uh constant in the last uh
billion years.
>> So yeah um is it right that the earth
has lost 10% of its magnetic field in
the last 150 years and how come?
>> So excellent question Alec thank you. Uh
so when I say the the earth's magnetic
field has remained roughly constant what
I mean is if you look over longish time
scales it's its magnitude is roughly
constant but of course it varies right
and it reverses sometimes right and
those reversals of the earth it's
magnetic field so we know reversal
meaning the north pole becomes the south
pole and vice versa so those happen and
there's even interesting interesting
stories you can tell about how those
reversals of the earth's magnetic field
correlate with many ice ages and things
like this. Okay, but the the sort of the
idea is that if you average over these
periodic reversals, right, or
fluctuations, the amplitude of the field
has remained roughly constant. Okay? And
the idea is that if there was no
induction, if there was no dynamo
working, you would you and I wouldn't be
talking, right? The magnetic field would
have diffused very quickly, right? In
within 10^ the 5 years, the earth would
be left without a magnetic field and the
earth's magnetic field protected from
cosmic radiation, right? And if you were
open to that radiation, we well, you
wouldn't be here, like I said, nor would
I.
>> Yeah. Thank you very much.
Wild. And they just put bullets into
that dude.
>> Well, and like you know,
>> it could listen, it could have been a
robbery. We don't know. I mean,
Massachusetts has a lot of robberies.
>> They've got a lot of
>> It's one of them East Coast liberal run
cities. It's got a crime problem.
>> Completely [ __ ]
>> And I'm sure, you know, as a MIT
professor, he's probably lived nice.
>> Yeah. I mean, it's possible.
>> It's possible. But it also is possible
that somebody killed him. And imagine if
they killed him because he's telling us,
"Hey, Earth's about to reverse its
magnetic poles and we might be [ __ ] A
cataclysm might be coming."
>> Well, this is this is what I think there
was a knowledge of in deep antiquity
that there was a knowledge of cycles of
earth cycles and they were preparing for
it. You know, why why are these
structures built in a way that's
anti-seismic that's like resistant to
incredible force, right?
>> You know, the amount
>> Sax woman is such a good example of
that.
>> It's really an incredible example. I
mean, the the level of ingenuity and
also the fact that they're finding that
these walls go way deeper, right?
Because not just the excavation where
they're going deep down and finding new
blocks of stone, but just the walls,
there's key excavations going on around
the walls. They just keep going down.
So, it's like this place was buried.
Maybe a lot of earth push up and and you
know, submerged into the ground.
Clearly, this place experienced some
form of global upheaval. And what's
really weird about a place like Peru for
example is that prior to the well at the
end of the last glacial maximum around
19,000 years ago when the earth started
to warm up again there were certain
climatologically stable corridors and
Peru was one of those areas which was
actually quite climatologically stable.
M
>> so at the end of the um LGM the last
glacial maximum to the younger dry it's
about 6,000 plus which is 6,000 and
change now we've taken ourselves from
horse and card to supercomputers in less
than 150 years so the idea that areas of
the world that had stability for about
6,000 years couldn't create something
incredible and then the younger dus
comes and it takes it all away for the
most part it's very provocative in Peru
because of again the existence of the
Inca structures that are very quite
pristine actually and and still standing
very simple and yet they are surrounded
by broken megaliths and you know
multi-tonon structures that have
>> gone through incredible damage
>> and what I was getting at what I was
saying about that area is the way the
stones are interlocked would protect it
against earthquakes
>> yeah dissipate the force through all of
these different areas it allows for the
force for the kinetic force to dissipate
through the structure instead of it
being focused and blowing apart one area
of it so it's clearly done for the
purposes of trying to prevent massive
amounts of force. Where would they get
that type of a concept from?
>> It makes me wonder. It makes me wonder
if they did have a knowledge of great
cycles, you know, like the Adam and Eve
story. You know, that whole thing that
was like classified by the CIA for a
minute. The Adam and Eve story.
>> It was classified by the CIA.
>> It was listed on their freedom of
information at library.
>> Oh, right. What was that again? It was a
it was a deep uh research into cycles,
great cycles of cataclysmic destruction
on Earth by a guy called his name was
Chan Thomas, but I think that was a
pseudonym for a fake not real name. And
he actually had at the beginning of it
like um a series of people he had listed
who without whom this book would not be
possible and it was like you know top
fivear generals and like it's [laughter]
like okay so you know this uh this guy
had the you know Chan Thomas the Adam
and Eve story. It's all about this great
cyclical cataclysm that does take place
every what was it like 12,000 years or
something like that and that the
ancients had a knowledge of this and I
think that this is something that we
will probably begin to realize is that
somewhere in deep antiquity there was a
level of knowledge that is very
contradictory to what we understand now
and I think places like Peru places like
Egypt and others um Malta Gobeclete of
course it's becoming very palpable that
there was something before this
>> also when you see the spikes of the
Earth's temperature when you see those
ups and downs, those glaciers and those
warming periods like what is there a
uniform time in between those spikes
>> in terms of
>> is it like predictable?
>> I don't know.
>> Is it like every 12,000 years it gets a
little funky?
>> I imagine it's probably
>> for about 12,000 years comes back right.
>> This is but this is again this is one of
the things that people in like you know
the conspiracy world would say they're
keeping from us. They're keeping this
knowledge. Yes, there are 12,000 year
cycles and we are just not being allowed
to know that knowledge. But that seems
weird. I don't know.
>> Well, well, they have models of the
past. Exactly. You know, from core
samples and things along those lines,
but we do know that it's never static.
And we do know that there have been
these periods and they do look like
like, you know, a strange graph. It's
not a flat line like, oh, look, it's all
getting warmer. No, it's it's always
crazy. So, like, what is causing these
dips and these rises and these these
weird periods that seem to be rhythmic?
You know what I'm saying? It's not like
there's an immense time of heating and
then a small time of cooling and then uh
No, it's it's up and down and up and
down.
>> Well, it's it's almost like the
heartbeat of the planet, isn't it? You
know, you look at the planet as a
>> as a some form of conscious entity as
certainly capable of producing conscious
beings on top of it. So, I wonder about
that and the mcelial network and you
know, these these kind of elements to
the planet that almost seem like
neurological architecture. Well, even if
you could look from from afar, if you
could like have the concept of the
earth, like the water's moving, the
clouds are moving.
>> Yeah. Yeah. Exactly. Exactly.
>> It's like a live thing almost. Yeah.
>> Obviously, it's not moving because it's
tissue, but that doesn't mean that
there's not a force that's all connected
and working in harmony.
>> Exactly. Yeah.
>> Yeah. I mean that's why I think plasmic
intelligence is very interesting because
it's this idea that a self-organizing
plasmic structure could in some way
create consciousness inside of it and we
don't understand where consciousness
comes from. We still don't. So it's very
open to the idea of possibility and you
know I've spoken to some pretty
interesting
>> scientists like Dr. Salvatore Pais. He's
the guy that was responsible for the,
you know, the UFO, US Navy UFO patents
that got put out a few years back, like
underwater, undersea
>> uh plasmic generators and things like
this. He was a US space force uh
engineer and uh he is very much of the
opinion that plasma itself is capable of
becoming conscious, not conscious on its
own. But 99% of the observable universe
is made out of plasma. 99%. Okay. Isn't
it weird how we get taught about solids,
gases, and liquids, but not plasma, the
fourth state of matter? That's 99% of
the universe. Why aren't we taught about
that in school?
>> That's weird.
>> Weird, right? Do you ever do you ever
remember being taught plasma in school?
>> Well, when did they start learning that?
>> Well, I mean, I don't know, but it's
certainly be before my time in school. I
didn't get taught it. You know what I
mean?
>> So, why would they are you are you
saying that they perhaps are hiding
this? I think that there's things within
plasma physics that are so novel and
exotic like these self-organizing EVOs,
exotic vacuum objects, and the science
that they're studying in. Have you ever
heard of the Sapphire Project?
>> No.
>> It's kind of gone quiet now. Hal Putoff
got involved with it for a minute where
they're you know claiming to bottle the
stars and they're creating these plasmic
uh you know um self-organizing plasmas
inside these chambers that they were
claiming could transform metals from one
metal into gold or you know like
transmutation of elements and complete
revolution of propulsion and energy and
then it just fizzles out.
>> I always wondered about that.
>> Why were people really trying to make
gold? Did that seems so crazy that you
think you could make something like
that? And I always wonder, did maybe
somebody used to make it and they have
like this story of how people used to
make gold? Like if there was like
imagine the caps of the Great Pyramids
are in gold, right? And some
>> what if they're made that gold,
>> right?
>> Right. What if what if they had gotten
to it's not impossible to assume like if
the earth creates gold, it's not
impossible to think that we could take
the elements of the earth and create
gold as well.
>> There's got to be a way to do it.
>> Got to be a way to do it.
>> Is there a way to create gold currently?
>> I don't know. That's a good question.
>> Let's uh put that into our sponsor
perplex look.
>> And [clears throat] how do you make
gold?
>> I changed the
>> Well, let me show you what I asked
first. Uh the alchemy history of gold
and it automatically brought up ancient
Egypt metallurgy.
>> Okay.
>> Blending four classical elements.
>> Whoa.
>> So there is some sort of
>> air, fire and water and you make gold.
[laughter]
>> It spread to to Greco and Roman texts
via the Islamic world in the 8th century
>> where they made experimental methods.
Sulfur. I mean gold plating is maybe
what they're getting at. I don't know if
that's
>> unless they were trying to create gold.
A lot of a lot of alchemy is is also
kind of personal alchemy, alchemy of the
soul. And so it's not always necessarily
meant as a physical thing, turning base
metals into gold. It's more about
turning you base human into a golden
person. Like a lot of the times in
alchemy, it's more about the personal um
development of your spirit and your soul
mixed together with science.
>> They're clearly talking about metallergy
here.
>> Oh yeah. I mean like right here. Yeah.
So, but I mean if you if gold was a
valuable if it was a valuable part of
technology, which it is,
>> and it had conducting
aspects to it, [clears throat]
>> it's very conducive or it's very it's
good at conducting.
>> Conductive. Yeah.
And you can make it
modern methods. Particle accelerators
like CERN's large hydron collider
achieve this by slamming lead nuclei
together in near miss collisions
generating intense electromagnetic
fields that eject three protons from the
lead 82 protons to form gold 79 protons.
Wow.
>> The Alys experiment detected up to
89,000 gold nuclei per second during
lead runs totaling or lead runs. I'm not
sure which one. uh totaling 29
picoggrams over years. Trillions of
times less than needed for visible
amounts. Whoa, that's crazy. [laughter]
Trillions of times less than needed for
visual amounts.
>> Early 1980, Glenn Seabberg transmuted
bismouth into gold isotope using carbon
and neon beams at Lawrence Berkeley Lab.
>> So maybe they used the pyramids for
lightning strikes to create gold with
iron ore streams and next thing you
know, you get gold. That's why they had
so much gold.
>> I mean, who knows? [laughter] Who knows
what they figured out?
>> But we should be able to ask these
questions and not be
>> Well, it's certainly fascinating. It's
certainly fascinating that people have
been obsessed with the possibility of
making gold.
>> Obviously, it's because gold is rare and
very valuable. But here's the question.
Why is gold very valuable? It you can't
make a weapon out of it. Like how did it
rise to prominence? Isn't there like
some like translations that are, you
know, from like the old Samaran
Babylonian text where it's kind of like
we were made to mine gold for the
>> That's all Zachariah Zachariah Sitchin,
right?
>> Yeah. Zachariah Sitchin though is very
controversial. I'm too stupid to know
who's right, but I do know that I always
when I talk about Zachariah, I always
talk about the website.com.
[laughter]
>> So there's a website where it seems like
he was the only one that was buying into
that. And you know when I talked to Wes
Huff, he doesn't even think that
Zachariah Sitchin could actually read
Sumerian. Just [ __ ] guessing.
>> Well, it might be, you know, I don't
want to disparage the great man because
he's not with us anymore, but he might
not have been totally honest. Or he
might have been convinced. You know,
some people just become true believers.
>> Yeah. No, for sure.
>> What he's saying essentially is that he
tried to learn Sumerian. Wes knows many
different ancient languages. Like he's
brilliant, brilliant guy. He's like, I
couldn't figure it out. I couldn't
figure it out. I couldn't do it. Now,
obviously, there have been translations
of Samrian. There are people that can do
it. It's incredibly difficult. And it's
also apparently not related to any other
languages cuz And it's so ancient. It's
weird. And then the Cunia form and all
that stuff. It's like
>> good luck, right?
>> Good luck figuring out what they were
saying.
>> I know. I always wondered how you'd like
actually kind of come to those positions
on it. It's it is incredibly complex and
the only people that really know are the
people that are that deep into it that
they can read it as well
>> and they don't seem to agree with him.
But at the end of the day, like whatever
whatever was going on over in that part
of the world, they had a lot of
discussions of things that came from the
sky. Yeah.
>> They had a detailed map of the solar
system,
>> which is very weird. a 5,000 plus year
old detailed map of the solar system
>> with all the planets, Jupiter, Mars,
Earth. It's like, what's that?
>> Yeah. How are you achieving this?
>> What are these giant people with monkeys
on their laps
>> and like, you know, Gilgamesh holding a
lion like it's a little cat? Yeah. In
loads of statues. And, you know,
>> why all these dudes have wings?
>> Very, very typically dismissed as kind
of like, you know, um, oh, it was just
a, you know, an intellectual giant,
right? You know, giant of of power and
regality. It's like, okay, but there's a
lot of them. There's a lot of references
all across the world to these giants.
So, you know, I I find that very
interesting. And um you know, like the
reality of fossils.
>> Yeah.
>> This is the reality of fossils. There is
a tiny tiny amount of all the things
that die that leave a fossil,
>> right?
>> Most things don't leave a fossil when
they die. They get absorbed by the
earth, eaten by by scavengers,
>> bacteria, you rot away, the sun bleaches
your bones, and it's over. within a few
hundred years there's nothing left.
Occasionally you get lucky and someone
or a dinosaur gets falls into a bog and
you get evidence but if you don't get
that evidence it doesn't mean it didn't
exist
>> you know and exactly the giant one is a
weird one.
>> It is a weird one.
>> It's a weird one
>> because there's [clears throat] so many
depictions in ancient literature of
giants of giant beings and you got to
wonder okay are we talking about like
men from Iceland right? Are we talking
about giants that are just enormous
human beings? Like those
>> big chads?
>> But those dudes that do those strong man
competitions, they all like the
mountain.
>> Yeah, man.
>> Those guys all live in Iceland. They're
all from Iceland. What the [ __ ] is that
about
>> exactly? Well, yeah. What is that about?
>> Vikings,
>> right? [laughter]
>> They were the Vikings and that's what's
left.
>> But is it that? Are we talking about
that? Or are we talking about another
race of human that's even larger?
>> And if they found it, do they tell us?
Like they tell us about certain they
tell us about Dennis Oovven similar to
us. They tell us about Homo Julian
similar to us just a little bit bigger.
They found a [ __ ] 4 foot skull.
>> Do they tell us?
>> Well, it's like there's like snippets,
isn't there, from the black and white
days, 1920s where the Smithsonian kind
of very quickly covered things up and
like this is very much the
>> They had giant bones bones from a giant
human.
>> Yeah, there seems to be. And there's
there's all these Native American
stories about giant redheaded humans
>> and and you know in the burial mounds
supposedly.
>> But here's the thing is like this is the
real question. Would if if archaeologist
stumbled upon a 4ft head
>> and they were under the you know the
guidance of the university would they
shut it down?
>> That's such a good question.
>> Would they release it? I I I am
fascinated by the fact that I have to
ask that question because I would assume
that if archaeologists found of course
they would release it. We have found
evidence of a giant, like a giant human
being. And this might be one the first
one we find. It might have been a whole
race of them that existed 20,000 years
ago.
>> Yeah. I I
>> would they tell us?
>> I don't know, Joe. I don't
>> That's what's weird is we don't know if
they would tell us.
>> I don't know if they would tell us.
>> They might not. The government might
step in and say you are not allowed.
>> Well, that's the thing is it might
supersede just academic circles and
archaeology. It might get a little bit
more serious. Why? with the implications
of our ancient history and you know what
exactly was taking place. I I am
fascinated by some areas that seem to
have a level of kind of like theologic
reference to them. So you know you know
the book of Enoch and the Watchers and
they descend down on Mount Herman in
Balbeck right so that's Balbeck which is
uh Balbeck the lord of the Becka Valley
and Bal the storm god like the one that
everyone you know talks about the
sacrifices to Bal. Um
>> it's also the place that has these
insane trillion stones. I was just about
to mention them. Yeah, that's it. The
trillans. The tran stones.
>> 800 to 1,000 tons.
>> 800 to a,000 tons a piece
>> and they're not even laying on the
ground.
>> No, they've been lifted up. They've been
lifted up quite significantly. And and
this is the thing, man. It's like, you
know, some somewhere like this. So,
you've got this weird story about this
is a basically 30 miles away from there
is Mount Herman where the where the
watchers apparently came down from the
sky. [ __ ] And then [laughter] you got
these impossible blocks in this and the
quarry there as well. the quarry there
you have like the stone of the pregnant
woman which is like 1,250 tons and
there's another one there that's like
1,500 tons like these were never fully
excavated but they're there getting
ready and they've just been documented
in situ but then yeah 300 meters up the
road or less is the temple of Jupiter
which again mainstream academics will
attribute to first century Romans but
the first century Romans had like wooden
pulleys and like little wooden cranes
like this is insane this is a 800 to
a,000 ton one block, three of them that
were lifted up. I think it's like at
least like 20 m or something, you know.
[laughter]
You know,
>> Jamie, can you please show us a photo of
it? I always love looking at these,
>> especially if you can find one with a
human being standing in it like um
Corsetti if he's like,
it's phenomenal how big these are.
>> It's so crazy.
>> It freaks me out. It's so crazy to think
that they we believe they used some sort
of stone tools, copper tools,
>> man like
>> and pulleys to get this place and you
got it out of the quarry. How?
>> Well, and then
>> yeah.
>> Oh, so that's that's a brilliant place.
So that's Oint Peru. Fantastic area. Um
which I'll be showing in my next episode
of Ancient Technology.
>> It's the Trillium Stones.
>> Trilith.
>> Trilith. I can't say that wrong.
[laughter]
>> Trilith. The trilith stones.
>> Trilithan stones. Yeah. Balbeck.
>> And what one of the interesting things
that Corsetti was saying is like that's
not even a place where they take a lot
of tourists to. Okay. So there it is.
[laughter] So you see the person and
then look above how big those stones
are.
>> This is not sensible to attribute to
first century Romans.
>> No. Go back to just the Lebanon ones.
That's it. They are so big.
>> That one. And then there's a good black
and white one we see with the yellow.
Yeah. There you go. These two little
dudes sitting on top of them.
>> Crazy.
>> Absolutely phenomenal. And then you know
the the um the smaller blocks on top
that is first century Romans. Absolutely
without a doubt. There is obvious
evidence of the temple of Jupiter. Yeah.
They built it on top of an ancient
ancient foundation which they were not
capable of doing.
>> Probably a landing pad.
>> That's [laughter] what so many people
say that you know whenever I post like
any it's like here's a landing pad for
the spaceship.
>> Landing pad for ships.
>> But what's crazy about that as well?
Just a real quick aside. Well, not even
an aside. is an addition to that is that
okay so the mainstream attributes this
to first century Romans but then the
Romans liked to brag about all the
things they did and 3rd century Romans
bragged about the Lateran obelisk that's
now sitting in Rome and the Lateran
obelisk is about 350 to 400 tons that's
the heaviest recorded lift in Roman
history these are 800 to a,000 tons they
never even mentioned them [sighs] so
it's weird that we attribute it to
Romans but it's because we within our
model for history. We can't not if we're
going to listen to academics, right? So,
you have to then invoke fringe theories.
>> I had Rep. Luna on the podcast
>> and she's the one who really got me to
read The Book of Enoch.
>> She's She's digging in.
>> Oh, yeah. She's
>> She's digging in.
>> She's all in on the UFOs.
>> I know she [laughter] is. I tell her who
I mean, are is she useful to them? You
know, the whole thing. Maybe. Maybe.
It's hard to know. But when I started
reading it now, if that was included in
the Bible, if they had because it really
is was rabbis that decided that it
didn't jive with the Torah, right?
>> Right. Right.
>> And so they said, "No, no, no. This
one's too crazy."
>> If that was in the Bible and that's what
we were taught, [laughter]
>> things would be different.
>> Can you imagine Sunday church, the
watchers came down and made But
meanwhile, that is in the same area of
>> Kuman
>> written down as the book of Isaiah. Mhm.
>> So all these things that are included in
the Bible,
that's that's there. It's all in the
same word. Why are we ignoring some of
it? Like that's really crazy. Why
ignoring the stuff that seems the most
kooky?
>> Again, I think that there's probably u
maybe disagreements because I mean, you
know, there's so so much change for the
biblical cannon from all of these
different, you know, councils like the
council of Nika, all these different uh
censorings and changing of of the of the
of the Bible. It's probably personal
issue. It could be something as simple
as just someone who personally did not
believe that. It's like that's [ __ ]
Remove that. That's not real. There's no
way they were giants. But I love how at
the beginning of the Bible, it's like
there were giants in those times and the
times before.
>> Yeah.
>> Anyway,
>> all over.
>> Moving on. Never mention it again like
in any sort of real context other than
like, you know, David and Goliath in a
few situations. But no, I I really am
starting to wonder if there was a giant
race that was on this. Dude, I really
do. the Native American depictions
alone.
>> Yeah.
>> There there's too much story too many
stories of enormous men that they had to
kill.
>> Yeah. Yeah. And they and they their
history, their oral tradition goes so
far back.
>> Yeah. I mean, imagine we're talking
10,000 now that we know that human
beings lived in North America 22,000
plus years ago, right? So the the the
>> fossilized footprints that they found in
um New Mexico. So that's 22,000 years.
So imagine if 22,000 years ago these
things were a real thing. How many of
them have you found? You haven't found
any bones of humans from 22,000 years
ago in North America. Have you? No.
Right. So why?
>> Exactly.
>> Does the Smithsonian have them? These
[ __ ] [sighs] If they really do
have a giant down there,
>> I think I think they probably do, Joe.
>> Can you imagine if there's like a
there's a tomb that you have to go into?
It's like a vault. The guy cranks open
the vault.
>> It's like the history version of Area
51. You see a [ __ ] head the size of
this table and you're like, "What?
>> That's what we're dealing with. That's
what we're dealing with." Yeah.
>> Yeah. And we had to kill him off.
>> Maybe.
>> Which totally makes sense. Why would you
let that [ __ ] live,
>> right?
>> You got a 10ft tall, 12ft tall.
>> That's a problem.
>> Yeah. 2,000lb human that eats people.
>> That is a problem. I wonder, you know,
always get this because like the
watchers themselves are never described
as giant beings, right? I I wonder where
the giant came into the equation
compared to them.
>> Maybe maybe they were slight aliens like
alien grays or something. And you know,
>> well, look at the disc description of
the Nephilim. How they destroyed
[clears throat] everything. Yeah.
>> Like they created this this thing that
consumed everything and destroyed
everything including mankind. Like
>> what does that sound like?
>> It sounds like us.
>> That sounds like us.
>> It sounds like us,
>> right? And also like you're saying
mankind. Like mankind. What are you
saying? Are you saying aliens? Are you
like what? Who wrote this? Yeah. Like
what is mankind? Like what does that
term mean? I bet you're not saying man.
I bet you're probably using an ancient
language to describe whatever the
dominant force was at the time that's
writing all this down. What are we
talking about?
>> What is these watchers? They mated with
humans. So what are they?
>> And they created something that
destroyed everything. What? So okay,
what is that? What are you talking
about? And doesn't that sound exactly
like humans? Like what do we do? We
[ __ ] destroy everything. We destroy
everything. We light things on fire. We
suck all the fish out of the ocean. We
throw our garbage in it.
>> We're We are so destructive.
>> And we're so consuming. We consume,
you know. We're one of the only animals
that dies because we eat too much.
>> Yeah. Right. Right.
>> Right. We're one of the only animals.
>> Exactly. Yeah. Well, and we're one of
the only We are the only example on this
planet of the level of intelligence that
we have. I mean, it's just phenomenal. I
mean really quite phenomenal when you
consider all of the various avenues of
evolution that have been given the
opportunity.
>> We have a massive leap
>> phenomenal leap but a leap that has to
in some way have been intervened with in
my opinion. I mean it's such a quantum
leap in our ability of cognition and the
brain size. I mean I I do find the stone
ape theory very interesting and and you
know the concept of
>> uh using psychedelics and I think
there's a role to play in that for sure.
But I uh I just think that when you when
you have such a novel uh trajectory
change from every other creature, every
other animal on this planet, that that
tells me that there is something
fundamentally accelerated in in humans.
And whether that can just be put down to
shamanic use of psychedelics, I don't
know. I think that when you invoke again
all of these various theologic stories,
it becomes clear that something was
interfacing with us. And and perhaps at
one point we were interfacing with them.
And there was a communication and a
relation that has since long degraded
after, you know, cataclysmic outreaches.
And, you know,
>> I think the evolution that came out of
psychedelics and and primitive man was
the escape from the barbaric nature of
our roots.
>> Right. Right. Right.
>> I don't think it's necessarily the
development of the human brain. Mhm.
>> I think it's probably a way to Well,
also a way to use the human brain with
its primate background, but soften the
ego.
>> Right.
>> Right.
>> And and and endorse a feeling of
community like and promote the feeling
of community and love and the
connectiveness that you get from
psychedelics. will allow you to traverse
the timelines between incredibly
barbaric hunter gatherers with stone tip
tools to agrarian societies where people
are all living together and cooperating
and it makes sense.
>> But the what doesn't make sense is the
giant leap to being a human in the first
place.
>> No,
>> it's kooky.
>> It is. It is
>> and it's in the Bible. [laughter]
At least it's in the book of Enoch.
That's the crazy part about it is that
they literally describe what we're and
not just us like many people have
theorized like have we been a product
are we a product of genetic
manipulation? Are we a product of
accelerated evolution?
Well, again, my my own experiences, I I
just feel like there is there is quite
obviously a vast intelligence spectrum
out there in my opinion. And I think it
goes beyond our own perception of space
and time. And I I think that there are
likely things that can come in from, you
know, realms that we just don't really
believe are real, like the astral and
and, you know, even the realm of the
imagination is an interesting thing.
What is this place inside of our heads
that we can instantaneously create
anything we want and all things
including everything on this table once
came from inside someone's mind? Like we
are excretors of ideas into reality. We
kind of render reality into something
that nothing else does. And I think that
there is a spark within us that speaks
to what people would call a divine spark
for sure. And maybe that is a divine
spark. Maybe it's a highly intelligent
race that intervened and gave us that
spark. But we are entirely different.
And I I do think that as we begin to get
deeper and deeper into kind of like the
the physics of of of our reality and our
fundamental connection to it, we start
realizing that our physiology, our body
is like an antenna. It's like a
technology. It's an instrument for
picking up on signals and perhaps even
consciousness itself. I don't know if
you're familiar with microtubules and
the orchestrated objective reduction
theory by Stuart Ham and Sir Roger
Penrose.
>> How many times you bring that up to
people and they go, "Oh yeah, I know
what you're talking about.
>> Oh, I know exactly what you're talking
about." Well, I hang out with some weird
[ __ ] people, but I I I just uh
thought [laughter] thought it might have
come. I definitely have heard Duncan
Trussell say to you, "Microtubials,
man."
>> Yes,
>> microtubules. No. So, I I did an
interview with um an anesthesiologist
called Stuart Hamof, and him and Sir
Roger Penrose developed a model called
the orchestrated objective reduction
theory or orc O looking at microtubules,
which are these tiny helical structures
inside our neurons. And I forget the
exact metric, but it's something
ridiculous like 10,000 microtubules per
neuron. So it's just, you know, this
incredible architecture of these tiny
little helical structures that
apparently are so small that they
interact with quantum vibrations in
fields. That's how fine and tiny they
are. And the reason I bring this up is
because I think that we're getting
deeper now with things like the oro
theory into looking at the structures
within humanity that actually seem to be
receiving nodes or receptive nodes for
energy that could then be translated
into consciousness. The whole idea of
are we generating consciousness from our
brain or are we we receiving
consciousness and we're just a conduit
for it. Yes. And I think the evidence is
getting a little bit more clearer that
we're a conduit. And I just wonder if
that's evolution naturally or if that's,
you know, interaction from these others
that have come and meddled with our
genealogy.
>> It's a good question that we'll have to
ponder when I come back from peeing.
>> You do that.
>> Let's Yeah,
>> we'll pause.
>> No worries. [laughter]
>> All right, we're back. Well, Jamie uh
brought something up which is a really
interesting video that I took when I was
out in Sakara in Egypt again with
Jeffrey Drum. He was taking me through
and um yeah, this is an awesome place.
So just for context before we play it,
yeah, take it back to the beginning. Um,
this is inside the pyramid of Ununas in
Sakara and this is deep down inside of
it, inside what they call the burial
chamber. Now you see all of these, you
know, amazing Arabic artwork that's been
quite, you know, relatively crudely
scratched in. Now you see that glow,
that's actually calsite crystal and
that's limestone. Now, the entire back
of this chamber, like this wall, the
back wall, the other wall, and the
ceiling and the floor is made out of a
slab of calsite crystal. But what's
really interesting about this is that
when you take a flashlight and you put
it in a certain angle on this wall,
something very interesting appears.
Boom.
>> Huh.
>> Anwise invisible
etching of an individual. You can see
the navl, the belly button, and the
arms. And this is completely invisible
until you get that flashlight. Now,
these have been actually
smoothed. Oh, there we go. That's promo
for my uh for my uh episode, but these
have actually been smoothed into the
calsite crystal itself. And then
obviously these Arab Aramaic writings
and pictographs have been scratched on
afterwards. Clearly, this is the
original artwork of this chamber, but
it's not perceptible
without a very specific angle of light
that creates the shadows. And these are
on the other side of the wall as well. I
think in this clip maybe he doesn't show
it, but um very very strange. Now, this
entire uh pyramid is acoustically
profound. I mean, the the uh acoustics
inside of this are unbelievable. the
amount of echo that you get and the
entire Sakara site. We went around it
and I mean my god it's a weird site man.
You've got again just incredibly huge
slabs of rose quartz granite. And
there's one area that's like on the
other side of the pyramid, not even near
the entrance, which is just this huge
port cullis um made of granite with
interlocking pieces where it clearly
another piece of stone was slid between
them. But this is nowhere even connected
to the pyramid infrastructure and they
don't say anything about it. Strewn
across this entire place, you've got
huge blocks of granite with drill holes
in them. You can see the striation marks
going all the way through them. And his
opinion, Jeffre, and I think there's
merit to it because in Cairo Museum,
there's a little cabinet of uh
laboratory equipment like jugs and
apothecary bottles that were recovered
from Sakara, including a little plate.
Um there's like a little plaque. This
wasn't included. This is put into the
actual exhibition, but it's tucked into
the corner of Cairo Museum. You have to
find it. You have to really look for it.
There's a little plaque saying that the
uh the area of Sakara was a laboratory.
And again, like this completely
contradicts all of the things that they
say about ancient Egypt, but it's in the
Cairo Museum. It's literally written as
the ancient laboratory of Sakara. And
so, you know, what's going on there? Why
why is there a contradiction like that
that's being acknowledged? And it's um
it's it's truly just a incredible place
with these shadow figures and the
acoustic resonance of the site, the rose
granite. So, why do you think that it
was originally these carvings were in
the wall and then they wrote on it
afterwards?
>> Well, I think it's just another case of
a later civilization coming across an
incredibly amazing place and and carving
on it. Maybe they didn't even see these
figures because you have to have a very
specific type of light to actually be
able to see them. You have to get it at
that angle. It's possible.
>> You can't detect by looking at it that
there's some variation.
>> I mean, you can see when you actually
know what you're looking at,
>> but barely anything. It's like really
hard to perceive. So maybe they didn't
even know that these things were down
there when they went. There's another
part of this when you're going through
the chambers where it's rose granite,
rose granite, and then plaster where
you've got hieroglyphics put on the top
and you can actually see the plasters
kind of bleeding off into the rose
granite. So it feels like they found it.
They slapped some hieroglyphs on it.
They, you know, put their own veneration
around it, but it was not an original
structure of the Egyptians. Once again,
a place that they found and settled
around. But it's just weird that in the
Cairo Museum, you have like this tiny
little shelf full of beers and measuring
jug type things and it says that the lab
complex of Sakara, it just doesn't make
any sense in comparison to what they're
trying to tell us is the reality of this
place. So that's, you know, that's
weird.
>> It's all weird.
>> It's it's all weird. [laughter]
>> Yeah. That that's why the
the bottleneck of talking about this
stuff is so infuriating. This is the
same place, by the way, we have the
Capium, you know, the 80 ton boxes that
are precision marble top, the ones that
Christopher Dunn went down into and was
like, "These have been
>> machined." Machined.
>> Pull up a photo of those, please.
They're strange.
>> Mhm.
>> It's like, what what do you think they
were doing with those things? Like, what
are what was the purpose?
>> Well, you know what's interesting is
>> what was the drill?
>> They they were um
>> So, these things are absolutely
incredible.
>> And there's a few questions with this
one. If you go on to that image, um,
zoom out, just go to that image on the
right where you've got the entrance,
just the entrance into the, yeah, this
one here. So, this is, you know, this is
the entrance into the cereapium or the
serapium, however you want to pronounce
it. It's a subterranean labyrinth, and
these corridors are extremely small.
There's actually a half finished um, a
half-finished one sitting in the middle
of a corridor, and you can kind of
really get a scope for the size, but
these are 70 ton 70 to 80 ton um,
granite sarcophagi. uh they attribute it
to the Apis bulls. They say that there
was a you know a cult around this region
that venerated the apis bulls and that
these were burial chambers for the apis
bulls. But you know the you know what's
funny about that is the only the only
thing that they have to evidence this is
no no bones of bulls or anything like
that. What they have is a single
hieroglyph on one of these um one of
these boxes of a bull. That's it. They
have a hieroglyph with a bull on it. And
that's why they attribute it to the Apis
bulls. Regardless of the fact that these
are precision carved 80 to, you know, 70
to 80 ton granite marble top smoothed
boxes with even more precision inside.
They're even more precise on the inside,
which is strange. You wouldn't
necessarily need them to be that precise
if they're justery boxes. But the
precision is actually more impressive
internally than it is externally. And um
>> how long would it take to make one of
those?
>> Good question. Make it move it. Put it
in place. That bull's long dead. Let it
go.
>> Let it go.
>> Years by the time you finish that thing.
>> That's crazy.
>> These things are nuts, man. Absolutely
nuts.
>> And this is one of the big things that
Christopher Dunn saw and was just like,
"No, no, there's just no way."
>> Look at the people standing next to
those stones.
>> I've been I've been inside one of these
>> that someone moved it there and then put
that other one on top of it.
>> Unbelievable.
>> When, who, how.
>> Yeah. And again, like, you know,
>> to say that's not a mystery is nuts.
>> It is nuts. And and and also, if you go
on that image where they're shining a
light and someone's leaning on it on
like the right hand side. Yeah, that one
there. So, so many of these um the boxes
themselves are is so precise, but the
actual writing is extremely crude. It's
been scratched on. It's basically just
been scratched on. And a lot of them, it
kind of feels like, as a lot of these
pharaohs did, they just went and slapped
a cart on it. I own this. This is mine.
Right.
>> And so, you know, the the exterior work
contradicts the advancement of the
actual box itself. It doesn't make
sense. There's only one in here that's
actually got 3D actual carved in
artwork, and that one actually does make
sense. But these ones are all chicken
scratch. It's just been scratched on,
>> of course, which is what people do.
>> Which is what people do.
>> I mean, a lot of history of human beings
doing that to ancient things.
>> Yeah. If you go on that third image,
actually, that's an interesting image
because you've got these such low
quality. That's a shame. But you can
actually see these dimples where they've
smoothed out the stone. And what's weird
about this is that so if these were
boxes, you would expect the external to
be the most impressive because that's
what people are going to see, right? But
instead, you actually have a lot of mal
foration on the boxes. And one of the
theories about this, and this is
something that There we go. It's a good
example of this. One of the theories
about this and one that Jeffrey Drum
brought up for me is that whatever was
going on inside of these cases, the
exterior had to have absolutely zero
critical imperfections. So any cracks,
anything that was problematic would have
been dissolved out, smoothed away. And
you have this this weird kind of
dimpling on a lot of these. And
somewhere you can actually see a crack
where the crack's been removed and it's
been kind of smoothed out. And then
inside it's like 90 degree just perfect.
And so it just kind of contradicts the
idea of it being for the you know aery
purpose. You'd expect the outside to be
absolutely perfect and and beautiful but
it's not. It's all kind of malshaped and
as if they were trying to remove any
sort of cracks, anything that could
cause a structural problem and then
inside they're perfect. So it it does
make me wonder about the real purpose
behind these.
>> Why why are you assuming that it would
be cracks? Why wouldn't it just be that
they didn't have a need to finish the
top of it?
>> Because some of them finished carpentry.
>> Well, some of them are finished quite
profoundly and then you have others that
have got these big dimples in them where
it just looks like they were trying to
remove anything that might have been a
critical like damage to the structure.
Obviously, this is guesswork.
>> The the purpose of that would be to keep
it from cracking all
>> to keep it from cracking all the way
through. I just find it very interesting
that the inside is more impressive than
the outside for something that's meant
to be, you know, viewed as aerary box
for
>> right an enormous box.
>> An enormouserary box.
>> Has does anybody have a wacky farout
theory of what they were actually for?
>> I mean, there's always some I mean, one
of them I find interesting is the idea
that they could be like some form of
like a sound bath, like an isolatory
chamber where they would go into and and
have like some form of experiences.
>> Yeah. You got to count on someone to
move [clears throat] that [ __ ] thing.
like, you know, it's it's [laughter]
>> there's such there's such a strong
there's such a a strong evidential trail
of of acoustic sciences in the ancient
past, especially um archo acoustics in
terms of the actual architecture itself.
Like the pyramids, they're designed to
resonate like um one [clears throat] of
the most sorry,
one of the most interesting places that
I've been to in terms of um looking at
the acoustics of places as well is
Malta, the island of Malta. And the
island of Malta is very interesting
because when the Bronze Age settlers
from Sicily and other areas of Italy
came over to Malta for the first time,
they discovered an island that was
absolutely littered with megalithic
sites. And Malta has got the highest
concentration of megalithic sites in the
world. But there were no people. They
all gone. No one knows who they were. It
was just a land full of these incredible
megalithic temples. And one in
particular called the Hypergem of
Halffleeni. Now the hypergem is
fascinating, dude. It's a subterranean
huge huge uh temple temple that was
discovered by road workers and they were
literally just chipping away at the road
and then it collapsed in and they find
this huge what they call a necropolis
because they found hundreds of skeletons
down here. This thing is incredible.
This is all carved out of the limestone
and it is a overlapping geometric series
of chambers that is so obviously
acoustically tuned that if you actually
um if you wanted to search hypergem
acoustics, it will come up with studies
where they've noticed that this is
absolutely a deliberately acoustically
tuned complex. Go on the actual website,
not not images. That's an interesting
one. whether or not it's entirely
accurate. Someone's comparing the
HyperGM to the human ear specifically
because of the fact that this place
absolutely is acoustically tuned to
resonate between 110 and 115 hertz which
is the bandwidth to activate certain
brain states like alpha and theta brain
where you can get into more meditative
states of consciousness. And only 20% of
this site is accessible to the public.
70% of it's locked off. And they treat
it like a skiff. They take your phone,
they take your camera, you can't bring
any audio recording devices into it,
nothing. Very curated tour for like, you
know, 30 minutes and then out.
>> Why is 70% of it locked off?
>> That's a great question. They they say
it's for preservation of the site
because it's such a delicate neolithic.
It's prehistoric. They believe it's
prehistoric. Um, and again, this speaks
to what was going on in prehistory
because this is a acoustically profound
series of chambers that have been carved
out of the limestone bedrock by people
that we attribute bone antler tools to,
you know, chipping away at it with bone
antler tools and they made something as
profound.
>> So, when you say prehistoric,
>> well, they they they dated to I think
about 5,000 years ago. About five Yeah.
Mainstream. Mainstream.
>> What?
>> Mainstream. Yeah. Yeah. um
>> carved
>> carved it's it's it's
>> carved out of the bedrock
>> out of the bedrock
>> out of the bedrock. It's huge huge
thing. And what's even weirder about it
>> is that they found all these elongated
skulls at the bottom of it. And one of
I've seen one personally. I went to the
Museum of Valleta in Malta and saw one
of these elongated skulls. What's very
interesting about these skulls is that
they actually lack the sagittal suture
that we have going down the back of the
head. So you know we have this uh this
sagittal suture which pushes the growth
plates together as you come through the
birth canal. Um not that one uh
the third one the sorry the fourth one
that one and then there's other images
which are actually the one below it
where you've got skulls recovered from
the hypergem. Yeah. So this is the
elongated skull. It's only got the
horizontal horizontal suture no vertical
suture which is what all humans have a
vertical sagittal suture. Um, now
apparently
hundreds of elongated skulls were
discovered in the Hyper GM, but only a
couple of them are on display in
Valleta. And I've got a couple of
friends who are in Have you heard of the
Knights of Malta?
>> No.
>> It's a kind of a secret order, a bit
like Freemasonry. It's spawned from the
Vatican. The Vatican basically threw
these people into Malta and said, "Fuck
off, and go do your weird stuff over
there." But now it's a very connected,
you know, kind of like with the Vatican
order. Uh, the Knights, the Knights of
Malta. Very powerful. A very powerful
group. um
very much in the geopolitical world
world stage and a friend of mine who's
within that uh was like yeah they bring
out this book once a year in the Valleta
Museum and uh it's detailing the skulls
of the hypergeim and apparently tells a
story of how the locals would throw
bodies down there because there are
beings down there that they wanted to
prevent from coming up to the surface
and this is the strange thing is the
hypergeim is full of normal human bodies
hundreds not buried with respect but
just piled down there and then also
elongated skulls. And the story is
according to this very ancient book that
they bring out and put out once a year.
You have to be lucky to catch it. Um it
apparently describes that they were
using this as a place to discard bodies
to prevent these creatures from coming
up to the surface.
>> So they were feeding them.
>> Feeding them feeding them.
>> So when people would die, they would
just throw them down that hole. Or when
people were bad people
>> maybe. Yeah. Yeah. throw him down that
hole to to
>> So these elongated skull things were
eating people.
>> Well, that's that's you know the
connections we might make from that kind
of connotation from these books. But
that's that's certainly something that
is rolled out in the Valleta Museum once
a year if you get to go there and see
it.
>> Um so you know
>> is that like an ancient version of
Scientology [laughter] like somebody
make all this up
>> dude I don't know but well I mean in
terms of
>> very strange that there's
>> the hyperge human skeletons down there.
Oh yeah. I mean, I did find a profound
amount of them, which is why the
mainstream labels it as a necropolis,
but there's no burial respect being
done. It was just piles of bodies. Like
piles of bodies, dude. Um, and and
again, it's just so profound. So,
>> this is called the oracle room.
>> Yes, the oracle room. Yeah, this is
where the sound concentrates. The
>> description I found here, uh, these two
paragraphs, I guess it's going to be a
little long, but it's not that long.
During testing, a deep male voice tuned
to these frequencies stimulated a
resonance phenomenon throughout the hypo
gamm creating bone chilling effects. It
was reported that the sounds echoed for
up to 8 seconds. Archaeologist Fernando
Comria or Combra Coimbra Coimbra said
that he felt the strong the sound
crossing his body at high speed leaving
a sensation of relaxation. When it was
repeated, the sensation returned and he
also had the illusion that the sound was
reflected from his body to the ancient
red ochre paintings on the walls. One
can only imagine the experience in
antiquity, standing when in what must
excuse [clears throat] me in what must
have been somewhat odorous dark and
listening to ritual chant while low
light flickered over the bones of one's
departed loved ones. Holy [ __ ]
>> Yeah, dude.
that [clears throat] uh might have felt
like what drugs do to us.
>> Yeah. So,
>> oh, so they made a drug house.
>> He goes on to state, yeah, under right
circumstances, ancient populations were
able to obtain different states of
consciousness without the use of drugs
or chemical substances
>> or maybe in this Monroe Institute of
Applied Sciences and Binaural Beats way
way before we were around. This is the
it's called psycho acoustic
architecture. the idea that ancient
architecture is designed in a way to
propagate acoustics that affect the
human brain.
>> Now imagine this is 5,000 years ago and
where did you learn that from? Right?
>> How did you do that?
>> Did you fail? Did you learn where's
what's the science?
>> And another interesting
>> how do you know
>> element is um there are a lot of temple
sites in Malta that look weirdly similar
to New Graange in Ireland. And New
Graange is another psychoacoustic
temple, if you want to call it a temple.
It's a huge mound if you look it up. Um,
but within it they've done again
acoustic studies and it propagates uh
infrasound sound below the threshold of
human hearing and that's the stuff that
reverberates through your chest cavity
through your bone structure. That's what
that guy is describing. It's infrasonic
sound. You know when you're like
>> this is it?
>> Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. And there's a
>> How old is that?
>> Oh god. Again, Neolithic. I don't know
the exact date, but it's Neolithic. And
these spiral patterns are in the
hypergeim. Those those spiral patterns
are in the hypergeim in red ochre. This
is Ireland. The same structure. The that
very famous um Irish this this, by the
way, is incredible because it's
completely singular. There's no break in
the line. That's a very hard piece of
geometry to actually create um at the
time as well. It's extremely complex
because all of this feeds into itself.
There's no break in that line. It's a
very complex geometry. But that same
type of geometry is also found in the
hypergeim and it's found in red ochre on
the painting. These swirling these
swirling kind of motifs. So it's very
interesting. You have these weird
correlations between places that were
separated by entire oceans in Neolithic
time.
>> Do you think that represents sound
waves?
>> Yes. Yeah. I think it's about the flow
of acoustics, the flow of of of of
movement and and sound. And that was
perhaps their interpretation or perhaps
they had a visual hallucination that
gave them the idea of it being this kind
of like swirling pattern. But yeah, I I
I find this yeah, this is Ireland. And
um there's just some striking
similarities between places like this in
places in Malta. So again, it just leads
into the idea that there was perhaps,
you know, a globally maritime connected
civilization that was using these
psychoacoustic attributions in sights to
produce novel effects of consciousness.
you know, inducing uh brain hemisphere
synchronization just like they're trying
to do in my ass with the CIA.
>> And here's the real question. How did
they learn how to
>> How did they learn how to do that?
>> And how long did it take before you
figured out how to carve that out of a
mountain?
>> Yeah, exactly. You know, these are the
questions that are absolutely not being
answered by our understanding of
history. These are the, you know, the
red ochre um uh the the more rough ones
are the ones in the hypergem. Incredibly
old. also also a very good
>> Yeah. Like
>> it's it's nuts.
>> Is that is that that other cultures have
that as well, right? Those spirals.
>> Yeah. Yeah. So that's what I mean. So
that right there is also in New Graange
in Ireland like pretty much the same.
It's not just two places. There's some
other places in the world.
>> The swirling motif is one of the oldest.
I mean it is one of the oldest. There's,
you know, it's everywhere. But the
implication of it being about sound is
very interesting when you find it
represented in places that are
absolutely acoustically tuned from
prehistory.
>> Weird.
>> Yeah, dude. Like, you know, it's weird.
There's another one in Peru called
Shaven Deont, which is a um there's a
temple built above it. This is another
thing that you find. I mean this one in
in Malta they haven't done this but you
do definitely seem to find layering like
gam padang in Indonesia where you have
like the original structure below and
people are just piling up on top of it
over time. So in Shav Hunter in Peru you
have this amazing temple site but below
ground is a labyrinth of corridors that
also propagate acoustics to the point
where it brings up infrasound. So below
this is a is an infrasonic laboratory
essentially of labyrinthium passages
that we used for ritual acoustics. And
they actually found inside of this conch
shells that had been purposefully
re-engineered to produce a new harmonic
when blown into them. Like they had
actually changed them into a different
>> go in the acoustic chambers and blow the
con shells and someone would obviously
be walking through this perhaps as a a
form of right of passage.
>> Could you imagine going back in time
these [ __ ] people were up to being a
fly on the wall?
>> I wish we could. Yeah. So that you know
it's not incredibly profound
stonemasonry, but it does produce
infrasonic reverberation. They have
proven that and looked it up and and
yeah, the conch shells were found there
that have got all of these designs on
them and have been purposefully changed
to produce a different sound. So there
is a there is a clear lineage of
acoustic science way before acoustic
science was acoustic science, you know,
at least to our terms. So brings up big
questions. and the fact that it was
influencing consciousness. I think that
we just had an incredibly intelligent
but shamanically orientated society at
one point. You know, we were using our
human ingenuity, but we were using it to
create effects more spiritually aligned
than anything else. And you know, these
are all chambers for inducing expanded
states of consciousness.
>> The real question though is what
technology were they utilizing for the
construction? That's the real question,
especially when you get to the
megalithic stuff.
>> Yeah.
>> What were they doing? Like what is this?
cuz this is not what we're saying it is.
There's no way this is stone tools.
There's no way this is copper. This is
something nutty.
>> Well, that's why the nubs are
interesting because it it almost seems
like this the stone was being softened
and perhaps like you know if you were
pulling a spoon out of hot toffee. You'd
get that pullback, right? You get like a
little kind of protrusion that they do
and then they don't. That's what's
really weird about it. Especially in
Peru. Peru has so many stone nubs. Like
there's a place in Peru called the the
Kikancha which is like uh the the kind
of main temple in Kusco the sun temple
and you know these precision there's
various layers of architecture in Peru
albeit it's all being attributed to the
Inca which is weird rough cut stonework
then the weird megalithic kind of
smooshed together stones then you have
what's called Ashla stonework which is
where it's like a bunker if you look at
the it's it's it's spelled with a you Q
O R I K A N C H A KI Kcha. Um if you
look it up like and and look in Yeah. So
you have to go inside it really to
really get this um the bunkers inside of
it. These look at the wall on the
outside actually real quick before you
do that. Um if you click on one of these
images and just enlarge it. Um
uh the third the first one's probably
the best one. Yeah. So that's Ashla
Stonework. That bottom bit that is
original. This was built by the
concistadors, right? The rest of it's
been built up by the concistadors from
Spain. But this original stonework is
also represented inside with these
incredible bunkers. So if you type in
like bunker, it's got yeah like um this
image here like I the level of precision
on these is is absolutely phenomenal. I
mean we're talking just complete precise
fitting stones. Not globular like saxo
woman like marshmallows but just precise
blocks like these bunkers here. Yeah.
Like down here. This is all original
work and then they built a you know
Spanish inspired temple over the top of
it. Um
>> so what you're asserting is that this
was here first.
>> Yes. Yeah. Yeah. This this stuffy was
here first. Like this stuff was
absolutely here first. And if you look
up there's a there's a little nub little
stone nub right at the top there. And
they but some of these walls have like
10 nubs on them. Like one here, one
here, one here. And then there's none.
So it's like they were smoothing out
some of them, leaving others. Some have
speculated that it's a form of language
because in Peru the Inca, do you know
what the Inca language was? They're like
written language. It was called Kipu and
it wasn't written. It was pieces of
string with knots on them in different
colors. That was that was the historical
language. So it was literally like a
line of different strings, different
lengths, different colors with little
knots in them which corresponded to
data. And most of this was lost by the
Spanish concisadors cuz they went over
there and was like, "Burn this [ __ ]
Burn this pagan nonsense." Yeah, this is
this was their language.
>> Oh my god.
>> This was their language. And it just
made me wonder, obviously this is a
complete guess, but it just made me
wonder if like the stone nubs are stone
kipu.
>> Is it a stone version with all these
different nubs on different places and
different areas? Cuz it just feels like
especially in the kodicans, which is a
temple. This is a regal temple. Why
would you leave the nubs on? like you
said, why wouldn't they smooth these
down? So, it's almost like it's it's
meant to tell us something and they're
left in very specific areas. Then in
Peru, you get stone nubs protruding
straight out of bedrock.
>> That's what weirds me out is that it's
not just on the crafted stones, but like
a sheer rock face that's been obviously
kind of quarried down by some unknown
technique without any chisel marks just
straight. And then you have like a group
of nubs coming out of the stone. So Peru
is is just full of contradictory
architecture and I think that you know
the Spanish went over there and they saw
places like Saxo Woman and they
attributed to the Inca you know they
attributed the Inca the Inca the Andian
shamans say it's not the Inca you the
Inca themselves to the Spanish
concisador said it's we found these
places but we take the words of the
Spanish concisadors and we apply it to
our knowledge set and we teach that and
it's just like I was saying to you
before we we're basing so much of our
history off of like the word of people
from like the 1800s when clearly we're
seeing contradictions of that even in as
Graeme Hancock would certainly say the
oral traditions of the local region. The
people are saying differently but we're
listening to the foreigners who went
over there and destroyed things and
burnt things and burnt the keeper and
went back and taught us what their
civilization is all about. It doesn't
make any sense.
>> Wow.
>> But yeah, Peru's Peru is fascinating,
dude. Peru Peru is one of the most
interesting places I've ever been. And
it has it had the same level of
discovery of
>> not like Egypt.
>> No.
>> No. I mean like there are there are
areas in Peru. In fact, shout out to my
friend Ral Blei from Pillars of the
Past. He's a guy who's out there in Peru
literally just going out into the middle
of nowhere. He's found pyramid sites in
the middle of nowhere that have
absolutely zero um uh recording, no
excavation, no study, no name, just
there. They they don't exist in the
record, but they're out there in the
middle of nowhere in Peru. And and so
like Peru has
>> many.
>> He found a pretty impressive complex
actually. Um [laughter] he found a
pretty impressive complex. He's got
videos of it like drone footage.
>> So it's one of the places where you
could actually still be a real explorer
and find things for the first time.
>> Yeah. If you if you want to go off into
the Andian mountains, like he's finding
stuff in the Andi high up in the
mountains that nobody's documented. Like
nobody's seeing it. He's a real, you
know, real adventurer. But it just
proves that yeah, like you said, the
there are still places like this where
you can do discovery.
>> That's Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Peruse.
>> That is really nice.
>> And then obviously you have the Amazon
rainforest and like you know all of the
things that could be in there through
LAR. We're already seeing so much
geometry, so much evidence that there
was a massive amount of civilization
going on in that jungle. So you know
this is you know getting very
interesting to me. And again, this weird
climatological stability through the
last glacial maximum, the younger
driest, this period of about 6,000 years
where they had access to development
without being disturbed. So, you know,
you have these incredible anti-seismic,
anti-earquake megalithic structures in
Peru, using materials that they
shouldn't have been able to use, using
multi-tonon stones. That's an
interesting area. Although, I will say
that it's made out of tough, which is
volcanic rock, very easy to cut because
it's actually compressed ash. So, that's
a really cool place, but it's it's not
as mind-blowing in terms of how they cut
the rock because it's extremely soft
rock. But, um,
>> so this is doable.
>> This is this is doable. This is doable.
But, there are other things. In fact, if
we could could you go on my YouTube
channel real quick? Um,
this is this is there's an area in Sax
Woman which has got um there's a diorite
outcrop which is a incredibly hard
stone. Um there's a measurement of
hardness scale that goes up to 10 with
diamond being the hardest and diorite
sits at about 6.5 to 7 out of 10 whereas
bronze sits at 3 to 3.5 out of 10. So
you know there's a discrepancy with the
hardness of the material to start with
>> but um in this video.
>> Yes. So there's um if you go back to the
beginning sorry I wish I could see the
screen. Um
it's oh it's going to be difficult I
think. Keep it playing though. I'll I'll
I'll talk about this and they will come
up in a moment, I'm sure, but all across
Peru, you have these incredibly precise
cuts into bedrock with very little
evidence of any sort of chisel marks and
no real understanding of how they were
able to excavate it. you know, these
incredible just voids into the rock. But
there's one area in particular, this is
just the beginning of my video, but
there's one area in particular um in Sax
Woman, which is this gigantic um in
fact, you could probably just type it in
if you typed in Saxawan um diorite
steps or something like that.
>> Sax woman is not the easiest word.
>> I know. [laughter]
Saq s a s a y sax.
>> Okay.
>> Wan w a ma n. Yeah. sucks a woman. Uh,
diorite
steps. Uh, diorite spelled. Sorry, mate.
Yeah. D I O R I T E.
>> Damn it.
>> It's all right, brother. But I mean,
like we're I think we're actually
getting
>> I just I'm trying to listen while I'm
typing and it's
>> No, I know. It's all right, dude. But um
yeah, so yes. Uh yes, that's the one. So
the this this is diorite. This is
incredibly hard stone. To give some
context, you know, the the the the
stones that sax a woman are extremely
impressive, but they are made of
limestone, a little bit softer, bit more
workable. This is impossible. If you can
find a HD I've got a 4K video of this,
like that's why I wanted to see it in
that video, but if you can find a HD
image, it's shined like a marble top.
Like these are just precision cut into
this huge outcrop of diorite, which they
actually believe was a magma burst. So,
a huge blob of magma came bursting out
of the out of the ground and formed into
this huge stone mound that's adjacent to
Saxa woman and you've got cuts like this
where it's just insanely perfect. And
this is not possible with a Bronze Age
toolkit. This to me is actually more
interesting in in some ways than Sax
Woman itself because it's just a
complete contradiction of the Bronze Age
tools. You shouldn't be able to do that
on diorite.
>> Yeah, it's wild. I mean, how long did
that take?
>> And it's smoothed down to a point where
it's like shiny.
>> And what did they do? Why?
>> And what's the purpose of it? Why? Like,
and and there's all these effort
involved in doing something like that.
>> Yeah. There's all these weird little
cuts into the stone like that. And
across Peru, you just find like, you
know, these voids where it's just like a
90° cut into stone with perfect finish
and no sign of chiseling.
>> And the weird thing is the back is
smooth, too.
>> And the back is also smooth. How'd you
get it out of there?
>> Dude, this is the thing, man. I just
find that so like fascinating. This is
what really
>> clearly seems like there's a lost
technology.
>> Yeah. Yeah.
>> That these ancient people had figured
something out. They probably existed for
thousands of years. They're probably
really advanced just in a different
pipeline. Yeah. They went in a different
highway.
>> I will say this and and I'm sure you'll
be happy that I'm bringing him up. There
is one guy out there who's trying his
best to prove how they were liquefying
Stone and then bringing it back. And I
only know his ex handle, which is faux
mahun, like fo m- a hu n. Um I I can't
remember his actual name, but I've been
talking to him. I'm thinking of actually
going out to visit him and film him
doing this, but he's been demonstrating
making teddy bear casts of rose granite
and things like this. And for a long
time, he wasn't revealing how he was
doing it. So I kind of just was like,
"Whatever, dude. Like I don't think that
you're actually doing this." But he's
now actually revealed his secret
ingredient, which is slaked lime. like
this slaked lime which was very easy to
make for them and water glass which
again is something that they could have
made. I don't know the science behind
this to be fair. So I'm just going to
briefly say that I think he's got some
provocative ideas here because he's
actually adding like this water glass
and slaked lime to like you know m um
mixed up compounds of granite or
limestone like crushed up granite
crushed up limestone adding the slake
lime adding the water glass and then
it's solidifying into solid granite like
within 6 hours.
>> What?
>> Yeah. and he's got like literal like
teddy bear cast like you know different
like cookie cutter casts of solid
granite and so there's a potential that
it's really simple but totally been
overlooked you know it's just using the
the right compounds the right components
and the right stone mixture again how do
they learn this but it you know it's not
definitive but he he's one of the only
people I've seen that's actually
presented actual evidence that could
explain how they were doing this and
it's relatively simple ingredients
>> that would account for some things Yes.
The enormous. Okay. So, this guy.
>> Yeah. So, he's um I think so if you go
up and just make sure he's actually the
right person.
>> Yes. Yes. There we go. Marcel,
>> brilliant idea to create artificial
granite with nothing as an additive to
water glass. The latter being the glue
between original granite grains. Why?
Because I realize we need full
transparency. In order to clearly see
the original granite grains like quartz,
we need a fake quartz as a binder. Well,
nothing did not work because the outside
layer prevented the thing to get hard
inside.
Oh, well, nothing did not work. I guess
I don't know how he's saying that. Now,
what we are seeing is made with a secret
additive. Let's call it almost nothing.
That did not change the transparency of
the water glass, but forced it to set
from the inside. So, remember this is
the wannabe binder only of artificial
granite, not granite itself.
It's very interesting. And he's revealed
that it's slaked lime, this secret
ingredient. For a while, he wasn't
saying what it is, and now he said it's
slaked lime. So, I'm actually going to
go out to He lives in Budapest. I'm
going to go out to Budapest and actually
film uh him doing this to to see if
he's, you know, right about this. He's
actually, I think, one of the
originators of the whole Natron theory,
which I haven't dived too deep into, but
it's one of the explanations behind it
melting the stone. So, I started paying
more attention to him once I was in Peru
and he was messaging me saying, you
know, this is what I think is going on
here. is they were using these
ingredients to uh to melt the stone.
Well, to to solidify crushed up stone
and uh create molds. My issue
>> Yeah. My my one one issue
>> to crush up the stones. That seems like
it'd be harder than moving them.
>> Maybe using harder rocks like you know
just like smash smash but yeah exactly.
You need to I mean how much stone
smashing would you need to do to create
saxan all these areas?
>> 80 tons of smash
>> plus plus every single block is
different. You'd be talking about
millions of molds. Like if we're talking
about molds here, then every single
block is completely different. So you
need an individual mold for each one. So
yeah, compelling idea. Does it answer
it? No. Nothing ever seems to fully
answer it. But it's, you know,
compelling that he's trying to actually
find a way to solidify uh the stone and
it seems to be working. Whether it
explains all of it, I I don't know. But
there's certainly a lot of people that
will say that, you know, this is the
definitive explanation behind it. I I
don't think that. But
>> the thing that these compelling amazing
sites have in common is that they are so
spectacular. No one really has a logical
explanation. That's it's
>> one of the coolest things about the most
ancient of sites is that it it forces
you to go wait even the best people
don't
>> defies probability. Yeah,
>> it defies probability. It's truly truly
uh fascinating, man.
>> It was a national project. [laughter]
>> So simple. I get it now.
>> Yeah, I know, man. And like that's the
thing is like you know this outdated
kind of dismissal of everyone on the
outside of the academic. Yeah.
Gatekeeping. You know he wants to say
he's not a gatekeeper. He clearly is.
>> It's not yours buddy.
>> Did you know he came through the Ed
Casey Foundation?
>> Wonderful.
>> He did. Zahawas originated in the Ed
Casey Foundation. So he got funded. And
weirdly enough he was actually quite pro
these ideas until about the mid '9s. So
there's like a 1993 quote from him at a
university in Cairo where he was saying
something along the lines of uh there
are tunnels underneath the Sphinx that
lead down into greater structures and
when we truly understand this we will
understand the real builders of the
pyramids. That was the last time he said
anything close to that post 1993 about
1993 and be 96. But after that complete
polar opposite 90 degree change I wonder
what happened to Zahi. [sighs]
>> Who knows? I don't understand why if you
really want that place to get more
money, more tourism, more people
interested in it,
right? Like
>> I mean [laughter] just be open to all of
these people that are like yourself and
like Graham Hancock. Why wouldn't you
not be open to these people and their
ideas? Like they're they're clearly very
well-versed
>> like Ben Van Kirkwick.
>> Oh yeah, he's brilliant.
>> He's incredible.
>> Fantastic guy.
>> He's an encyclopedia of information
about Egypt. And why would you not want
that guy exploring publicly and also
reaching millions of people by the way?
>> Why wouldn't you want that?
>> It doesn't make any sense.
>> I think there's like a maybe like a bit
of a cultural arrogance like who do you
think you are westerer coming over here
and teaching us about our history. I
think there's a level of that like you
know at least on a surface layer before
you get into the deeper implications of
you know Freemason secret societies
keeping things from us. My true fear is
that it's people just have this desire
to be the one in charge of stuff,
>> right? And the desire to be right. They
want to be they never want to be proven
wrong.
>> And who's this guy? Who's this podcaster
who's coming on and telling me what my
country's heritage is? And you know, I
think
>> but the problem with that is like even
mainstream archaeologists are angry
about it,
>> right?
>> Like,
>> right. Well, everyone gangs together,
you know, they all gang together. It's
group think.
>> Well, it's also there's a lot of [ __ ]
in archaeology. A lot of [ __ ] I've
noticed that
>> [ __ ] people.
>> I've noticed that
>> they just there's it's such a bad look
for the profession.
>> It really is because immature
>> like snarky
>> shitty comments.
>> Yeah, I know.
>> Like
>> espersions of racism. Shut up. It's it's
it's a really gross field in terms of
like some of the humans around. It came
through the toxicity of the UFO
community, which is like so bad. And uh
[laughter]
you know, I thought it would be yeah, a
lot of cooks, but also just a lot of bad
actors and hackers and people that want
to um you know, one one thing on the UFO
subject actually, which I I do think is
worth noting uh because like I said to
you, I think I'm one of the first people
that you've had on that had to actually
make their way through the social media
interactions. And one of the things that
a lot of us noticed and I have to give
credit to a couple of people like Red
Panda Koala and Tupac on Twitter, two
very good researchers that have been
highlighting this is that when um the
whole kind of 2017 narrative and Lzando
and Chris Mel and all these guys started
coming out, obviously we were all
extremely excited about it. Over time,
you know, there were some issues like
some contradictions. Lu Alzando
especially has contradicted himself
quite a lot and uh some of us started to
get a little bit suspicious of these
people and just started asking
questions. It didn't take long for us to
be targeted by a pretty significant
network online of people that were
trying to hack and dox us. And uh people
like he hasn't put his actual name out
there, but people like Red Panda Koala
was doxed online, had his family house
put out online, photos of his underage
sister put out online by a group of
individuals who are all very closely
connected to Lu Lazando.
And this is something that you would not
notice outside of being in the minutia
of X because you would see these troll
accounts, these really nasty troll
accounts that were all being followed by
Lou. And when they were having their
accounts shut down and reinstated, Lou
was one of the first people following
them. Some people have actually come out
about this group now and revealed
screenshots of DMs where they're in
private conversations with people like
Lou and Gary and you know some of these
other guys who I got connected to early
on very early on. And I got some of the
first interviews with these people and
was very pro it until I started
realizing they were very much trying to
control the narrative and there were you
know things you couldn't speak about
can't talk about uh you know reverse
engineering or or or uh consciousness
initiated contact anything to do with
Greer as completely poisonous. Um
Luzando was actually he he called he
called Greer and a couple of other
people terrorists. He said I wouldn't
negotiate with terrorists when asked
about Steven Greer. Um, but what people
have dubbed this as is the UFO hate
group. This is very well known online,
the UFO hate group. And it's a group of
people that are so savagely in favor of
people like Lou and this kind of
modernized narrative that if you even go
half an inch, like I really gained my
accolades in the UFO community, people,
you know, really praising me for the
interviews I was getting until I started
asking a few questions about people like
Lou and suddenly I get an absolute
mastrom of hatred from people that were
once really, you know, enjoying my
content. And I'm quite lucky. I haven't
been targeted so heavily. Some people
have had their lives ruined by these
people who were all connected to
individuals like Lou. And Lou actually
said that he came to burn you off to the
ground. Like he actually said that in an
article. He was like, "I want to burn
you. I want to destroy it."
>> When did he say that?
>> Oh, it was like in like a few years
back. Now you can get
>> Why did he say it? What was the context?
>> Um I think it was just about the way in
which the UFO community has, you know,
been misrepresenting the phenomena and
like the confusing spaghetti junction of
narratives. Isn't he just kind of I want
to know a hard reset.
>> Doesn't that kind of actually make sense
to say?
>> Does he Does he know things?
>> Well, you don't think he knows things?
>> What does he know?
>> I don't know.
>> Exactly. Right. They all know something,
but none of them can tell us. And they
all knew it from someone else and
someone else told them and they knew it
and they know this and like, dude, I was
so in love with all of this. I You have
to understand that I was truly I was a
believer. I was like, "This is amazing.
I had my orb experiences so I had a bias
already. I was like, I'm ready to
believe in whatever you're saying." It
took me a while to start actually
realizing that this is not going in the
direction I think it should be going and
that there's a heavily curated narrative
and if you try and question the
narrative, you will be punished by group
think. It felt like honestly I started
to feel like I was in a COVID cult for
ufology where you just can't talk about
Lu Alzando in a bad light regardless of
the fact that this man has gone on stage
and presented literal fake UFO photos to
the public which have been debunked in
less than 24 hours and he had to admit
that they were fake because of the
debunks, but people are just happy to
forget these things happened. like he
went up in a congressional setting and
held up a UFO photo that was proven to
just be uh fields like agricultural
fields. Yes, this is a fake. This that's
not a shadow. That's a darker field next
to the lighter field. These are two
circles. And this was proven. He had to
admit it. He had to This is in a
congressional setting. This man
apparently ran the Advanced Aerospace
Threat Identification Program. I call
[ __ ] I don't believe he did because
he seems like more of a government
stoogge and he feels like someone that
would be sent out to do what he admits
he was doing. Counter intelligence. He's
a counter intelligence,
counterterrorism, counter espionage guy.
I'm not a UFO guy. I'm a
counterterrorism counter espionage guy.
>> He's also one of the guys calling for
amnesty, right?
>> Oh, how surprising. Yeah. Yeah, exactly.
Color me shocked. Yeah. No, he is like,
you know, color me shocked.
>> Does he say that in the Because a lot of
them do say it. I want to make sure that
he actually said that in the age of
disclosure.
>> I'll be perfectly honest with you, Joe.
I haven't even [ __ ] watched it cuz
I'm just not interested in that element
of the UFO subject anymore. I've been
burned by these guys. I've had Gary
Nolan emailing me like, "Why aren't you
on the team anymore? Why don't you like
be a team player?" It's like, "Because
you're literally telling me that I can't
tell my own [ __ ] truth. You're
censoring me and saying that I'm not
being a team player just because I have
>> censoring you about what in particular?"
>> Well, I was
>> or attempting to get you to stop talking
about
>> specifically. primarily there seems to
have been a bit of an issue with the way
that I've been talking about Lou and his
association with ATIP because I think
that ATIP was actually a cutout. It
wasn't a real uh program and it was a
cutout that was actually created
for to the stars academy and ORSAP which
was more of a kind of uh you know
precursor program wasn't being run by uh
lazando that's the advanced weapon
application space program I forgot the
actual acronym now ATIP is meant to be
lose and I just think that I have to be
careful but a very prominent journalist
in the UFO community literally told me
that Lou told him that that this is this
was all created for to the stars academy
as like a way to, you know, generate a
an understandable structure. Here's this
guy. He's, you know, running ATIP. I
have an issue with the idea that someone
like Lu Lzando can go to the New York
Times and say that the Secretary of
Defense wasn't being briefed on UFOs and
I'm the one that was running a program
when people like Julian Assange and
Edward Snowden are being thrown to the
wolves for just revealing standard
national security issues. This is meant
to be even deeper, right? this is black
black budget. This guy can just roll out
to the New York Times seems a little bit
planned, seems a little bit curated and
forced. So I started asking those
questions and especially when things
like this were happening where there
were discrepancies where he's bringing
up images that are being debunked. It
was like who is this guy? You know, who
is this guy really? And then his book
comes out and he's talking about being
the the torture zar in in Guantanamo Bay
and you know that the people there
called him the Darth Vader of the United
States. This is in his book, you know,
that he he admitted they called him the
tortazar of Guantanamo Bay because, you
know, he ran Camp Platinum at Guantanamo
Bay, Black Site, CIA Blackite.
>> Whoa.
>> Yeah. So, you know, um he actually had
in his book that the he was known as the
the Darth Vader of the United States by
certain people and and the torches are
of Guantanamo Bay. I don't really trust
people like this who, you know,
waterboarded people for a living and and
are now trying to tell me what's going
on in the UFO subject. Well, let's let's
ask this question. What what purpose
would there be to muddy the narrative if
you wanted to have a government agent
come out and have what you're claiming
is like a fake disclosure? Like a
government narrated disclosure? What
would be the purpose of that?
>> What are they all asking for, Joe?
>> Money.
>> Amnesty.
>> Amnesty.
>> Amnesty. And what was happening before
that is you had someone like Steven
Greer just saying, "These people need to
go to jail." And that was the only big
voice in the UFO community.
>> Maybe they're offering a window to
possible disclosure, though. Maybe we
give him this [ __ ] amnesty. If we
don't, what happens? Nothing. It keeps
going the same way it's been going.
There's no actual disclosure. We keep
talking about it. It gets nuts. It It's
It gets to the point where it's driving
you crazy. Like, I don't even want to
hear about any [ __ ] UFOs till you
show me one. But if it's a real subject
and the only thing that's keeping us
from learning this real subject is that
and so they're trying to push out this
narrative of amnesty, I'll bite. What
are we talking about? I think for me
again coming up through it and just
seeing how these people actually act
when you challenge them and the fact
that there were absolutely organized
groups of um quite frankly quite
mentally unstable people that were very
easily misled into believing they're
important
>> who are getting brought into these
signal chats these private group chats
and you know I'm in I'm in touch with
Lazando, you know, I'm one of those
guys. I'm being brought in and you know
they tried to do that. Yeah. useful
idiot and like there's a lot of them and
you know there's a few people out there
that are extremely dark individuals like
we're talking like you know connected to
all sorts of weird Satanism groups and
Lou's just there of selfies like hanging
out with these guys like he's a dodgy
dude I don't care he's like you know I'm
freaked out even saying this on the Joe
Rogan you know he's like he's going to
remote view my brain or something but at
the same time he is a dodgy guy like
he's shady
>> but you do believe in the existence of
these things
>> dude I've had orbs hover over my house
like yeah like reversing
>> what do you think is that there is a
clear decision somewhere in our
government to muddy the water and to put
out this narrative that these
whistleblowers are trying to tell
everybody. So to slowly trickle this
stuff out there and then float out
amnesty which is a big part of the age
of disclosure documentary really the
first time I've ever heard anybody like
where everyone uniformly talks about
that one particular subject.
>> Yeah. Like I I think that that's the
that's the the goal is to create a
curated self-disclosure that does the
very best to paint the government in the
best possible light and allows them to
actually kind of not face too much
punishment for what's been going on in
the legacy programs. Again, if you only
had someone like Steven Greer out there,
uh he he was offering a completely
different thing. We need to punish these
people like they are criminals. They've
ruined humanity for a hundred years of
stagnating technological progress.
>> You got a little testy. Got a little
testy with that. should have should have
taken a little softer tone. [laughter]
>> Sorry.
>> No, I'm saying with him like maybe if he
did that maybe they would have uh
>> Yeah. Right. Not so defensive like [ __ ]
They want to lock us up.
>> Yeah. But that's it. That's why
>> as soon as you say you're going to lock
someone up for what they did, they're
going to say I didn't do anything. Yeah.
And they're going to keep saying that.
>> But that's why they got rid of him.
That's why they got rid of him. That's
why Gary Nolan, who was originally with
Greer, then changed over to Two Stars
Academy. And they poached quite a few
people from his team and brought him
over to TTSA. um and he became a pariah.
Um you know, again, he's you know, he
says a lot of things that quite frankly
I don't agree with, but um I I just
think that basically they tried to
overtake the narrative and they needed
government representatives to run this.
And I just again
>> it's how they do everything. Why would
we be shocked that they do it about
something this important? Especially if
there is lying to Congress, the
misappropriation of funds, and for sure
some fraud.
>> For sure. You're talking about a [ __ ]
ton of money.
One thing um one thing that does
interest me though is the ARV the alien
reproduction vehicle the flux liner.
Have you heard of this? Oh,
>> you know about Mark McCandish and the
alien reproduction vehicle. Oh well
that's something you should
>> if you type in ARV flux liner you'll get
this image right away. Um this is one of
the avenues that I would actually pay
attention to and think okay I think
something's going on here. Um Mark
McAdish was an aerospace illustrator for
the US Air Force. That's the Yeah. So
the actual
>> Oh, I have seen this.
>> Yeah, of course you have. It's very
classic. And that one that's blue with
the writing all over it. That's what was
held up at the 2001 national press
conference organized by Dr. Steven
Greer. Again, like you know, this isn't
new. Like to be fair to Dr. Greer, he
brought like over 50 witnesses on live
television during the national press
conference and one of them was Mark
McCandish
uh military illustrator who drew this uh
sketch. A friend of mine has a version
of this framed in his house.
>> So do I. [laughter]
>> I need to get one. We need to get one
for the studio.
>> You can literally get one on Etsy for
like a hundred bucks. It's like a big
one on Etsy. Um but so this is
important. Mark McCandish.
>> Um he actually ended up taking his own
life.
>> Go that back to that again.
>> What about it?
>> I want to read the heading. It says,
"According to this documentary, we had
this the technology for faster than
light travel and zero point energy for a
very long time. Let's pretend this is
true. How do we know the UAPs we sent
aren't ours and more modern build?"
>> The person who made this documentary
died of an aggressive form of cancer not
long after making it. He was quite a
young man as well, documentary filmmaker
who made this. But um Mark McCandish,
military illustrator, he had a friend
called Brad Sorenson. Now Brad Sorenson
was a government guy, aerospace uh
engineer, Loheed Martin, had quite an
extensive portfolio. And Brad Sorenson
goes to his buddy one day, Mark Mandal,
and he says, "I was shown something and
I want you to draw it. I'm going to
describe it to you in great detail, and
I want you to create the illustration."
Brad Sorenson says that I think it was
in like the the 70s or like early late
60s or early 70s that he was um invited
to a private air show at Loheed Martin
by an individual who was a good friend
of his in the in the military who was
higher up than him. And apparently this,
you know, he didn't have the what they
call the tickets, the the right
classifications to actually get access
to this um private air show, but his
friend brought him um because he had the
tickets. And essentially they bring him
into a hanger in Loheed Martin where
three large sources of varying size were
hovering a few feet off of the ground.
They were described as instantaneous
nuclear payload delivery systems. That's
the way that they were actually
classifying them. had a nickname for a
mant instantaneous nuclear payload
delivery systems. Like the idea that you
could just instantaneously deliver a
nuclear payload to anywhere in the
world.
>> Oh my god.
>> Yeah. Um which is again one of the
reasons why they might keep this stuff
secret. Um the the ships were nicknamed
mama bear, baby bear, and papa bear.
>> Oh my god.
>> Yeah. Um, what's really interesting
about this is that Brad Sorenson has
never gone public,
but I was in the room when he was phoned
and I've heard him say things that have
never been on the record before. Um, no
one's ever contacted Brad Sorenson. Mark
Mckandlish took his own life a number of
years ago. His closest friends would say
that that was not anything untoward.
It's hard to know. I didn't know the
man. All I know is this is the man that
produced an incredibly profound
illustration and then eventually took
his own life. Um but his friend Brad
Sorenson has never gone public ever.
Never. I have got quite a few contacts
now because of my research and you know
affiliations that I've managed to gain
with people in like the US Navy and you
know intel and uh a good friend of mine
who was able to actually find his number
and get in touch with Brad Sorenson. I
was present when he was phoned and uh
you know my friend introduces himself to
him and he'd never spoken to him before
and they were just talking shop first of
all he said that he wanted to reach out
to him because he'd heard about him
through various stories online but you
know anyway to cut the long story short
he asked him my friend asked him about
Mark Mckandlish in this alien
reproduction vehicle and Brad Sorenson
went off on quite a diet tribe actually
uh very angry
about Mark and how he said that I gave
this man the keys to the kingdom and he
went out and told the whole [ __ ]
world and I will never do that because
my employers
will fry me. He said they will [ __ ]
fry me if I speak out about this but I
am capable of building and designing an
aircraft that can go 210 times the speed
of light.
Yeah, he reiterated that multiple times.
>> What?
>> Yeah, I um
>> What year was this?
>> I've sat on this for a couple of years.
It's about two years ago that my friend
phoned him.
>> Um
Yeah. I was I
>> instantaneous nuclear payload delivery.
>> Yeah. Yeah. I mean, you can imagine
that's how the national security system
would actually look at this. Not as an
exploratory vessel, but let's be honest.
What is this? It's a payload delivery
system that's instantaneous. Let's be
honest. That's what they would look at
it as, right? Another reason to keep it
secret pro probably.
>> Um, but that was, you know, I I I would
love to get him on record. I don't know
if you ever will, Brad, if you're
listening to this. I would like to get
you on record. But he uh Yeah, he he
said that he said that he can design a
craft that goes 210 times the speed of
light. And this is the guy that gave
Mark McCandish the illustrations to
create that ARV. So, it's just weird.
[laughter]
I mean,
>> it's weird, dude.
>> This is the real question. What would
civilization be like had this stuff not
been kept secret,
>> right?
>> What What if we had access to that kind
of energy, whatever that thing is
operating on?
>> Could you imagine if you had access to
that energy and you're watching all
these idiots burn coal? Like, what are
you doing?
>> What are you doing?
>> But you can't say anything.
>> Yeah.
>> Have a instantaneous
>> I would delivery system.
>> I'd hate to be these people. I'd hate to
be these people. Imagine sitting there
knowing that we have access to these
kind of technology.
>> Also like this desire to tell people
something that's really important to
humanity. They can't all be complete
sociopaths.
>> Maybe they do like they screen them for
that reason. You know what I mean? Like
they have to be a certain personality
type. They don't give a [ __ ] about
humanity.
>> I think I think honestly I think at
highest levels of these especially these
um military corporations, I think you
just have to become that anyway by force
of nature.
>> Yeah. Like we're going to kill 100,000
people today.
>> Mhm. Yeah. Exactly. I mean, how
emotionally attached can you possibly be
in that kind of
>> big task oriented
>> position. So, you know, the Yeah, the
ARV is a provocative one for me. And to
be honest, man, I think a lot of this I
mean, it's called the ARV, the alien
reproduction vehicle. And maybe we have
had alien crashed vehicles, but I'm more
tempted to believe that Nicola Tesla's
work was taken by the US government.
John G. Trump, Trump's uncle from MIT,
was the one that actually oversaw all of
that. You know that? Yeah.
>> Yeah. He actually looked at all that.
You know, he found a correspondence
between Nicola Tesla and British and
Russian uh royalty, like the high top
levels of Britain Russian royalty about
them acquiring a super weapon of
incredible power. There's a video, I
actually posted it on X of John G. Trump
a vintage video of him talking about
coming across these correspondent
letters that he never found the true um
method of the secret weapon or what it
was but there was correspondence between
the king and Russian Zars about
acquiring it from Nicola Tesla. So I
think that they took things from Tesla,
his electromagnetism studies, I think
people like T Towns and Brown, um you
know, these original ideas of being able
to use field induction to create
positive lift. This is something that
was being looked at by humans. You don't
need to invoke flying saucers crashing
from Alpha Century for that. Maybe it
happened, but I would be more on the
line that we've done it ourselves. We've
done it ourselves. The Yeah, some of it.
The Cold War happened. Cold War
paranoia, and we've never got rid of it.
all the iron walls came up around that
and it's a case of how do we kind of get
rid of all this legacy program uh you
know stoving and stove piping because of
cold war paranoia. It's too late now
because we're in 2025 and you got to try
and tell us that you've got zero point
energy
>> you know we've been flying around in
[ __ ] Wright brothers planes for 100
years and [ __ ] [laughter] like are you
kidding me? Like it's not going to go
down well. So amnesty, right?
>> Amnesty. [laughter]
>> [ __ ] It might be the only way.
>> It might be the only way. And if it is
the only way, that's fine. But like I
said, I do have
>> It sucks that they're not going to get
punished for crimes, but so what? At
least we are not being punished by being
withheld.
>> Exactly.
>> Information being withheld that I think
would change the course of humanity in
probably a fantastic way.
>> But I do feel I feel like the world
would have to become a more heavily
controlled place for these types of
technologies to come out. Do you know
what I mean? Like
>> I was trying to wrap this up on a high
note. [laughter]
>> Digital ID coming up.
>> Well, this that's all I'm saying. Like
you know the control structures around
something like free energy would have to
be quite profound because of the things
we were saying about some psycho with a
ZP device. So
>> like look what just happened in Bondai
Beach in Australia. Imagine if you have
access to that. If everybody has access
to that, especially off the internet,
you figure out how to design one. It's
not that hard.
>> The world will have to become a more
restrictive place for these things to
come out for public
>> benefit. Now people are going to think
you're a fed
>> for saying that. [laughter]
>> Listen, man. I I really enjoyed this
conversation. It was a lot of fun. It's
been real good
>> and your content is excellent. So,
please tell everybody how they can watch
more of your stuff.
>> Yeah, I I'm I've got a terrible business
acumen. So, I just have two channels,
uh, Project Unity on YouTube and the
Project Unity on X. And if you want to
follow me and subscribe,
>> I think that's a good model. It's
quality stuff and it's building a
following just literally based on being
good
>> for real.
>> So, thank you, brother. Appreciate it.
Thank you so much, dude.
>> All right, we'll do it again.
>> Yes. Goodbye, everybody. Bye-bye.
>> [music]
Ask follow-up questions or revisit key timestamps.
This video features a discussion about ancient civilizations, extraterrestrial life, and unexplained phenomena. The conversation touches upon the theory that aliens might be future humans, the concept of parallel universes, and the possibility of time travel. A significant portion of the dialogue focuses on the
Videos recently processed by our community