MacBook Pro M5 vs M5 Pro - These Results are INSANE!
287 segments
So, then, guys, a lot of you are
wondering, how much more powerful is the
baseline M5 Pro compared to the baseline
M5 MacBook Pro? Well, today, what I want
to do is I want to compare both of these
models. I've got the likes of an M5
MacBook Pro here, and I've also got the
M5 Pro MacBook Pro with the baseline
configurations. This is the one with the
lowest amount of CPU GPU cores, and also
the one with 24 GB of RAM, 1 TB hard
drive. And then the same here, this is
the same standard M5 chip, the one with
the 10-core CPU, 10-core GPU, also 1 TB
storage, but 16 GB of RAM. So, today,
what I'm going to do is I'm going to
compare both of these machines to see
what they are like in performance-wise,
cuz design-wise and everything, they're
pretty much identical. So, let's take a
look, then. And the first thing I
decided to do for you guys is I decided
to compare the storage speeds. Let's see
what the difference is that we have
right here. Well, we can see that
straight away, using Blackmagic read
speed, that obviously the likes of the
M5 Pro is faster. And this was expected.
At the end of the day, it's using PCIe 5
here for the M5 Pro for the storage
speed, so it's far, far faster, and you
can see the difference here. We are
talking around about a 91% increase in
just read speed, and about an 81%
increase in write speed on the M5 Pro.
Now, what I am going to shout out here
is the M5 standard also got a massive
boost this time round when we got it
released back in October last year. It
used to be around again about half this.
It used to around to be about the 3,000
kind of mark there, 3,000 MB. So, even
at 6,000 MB, so that is super fast.
Remember, the M4 Pro is around about
that speed, and that's no slouch,
either, with its read or write speed.
But, just to let you guys know, just the
difference here that obviously the M5
Pro is definitely way faster, but
whether you're going to utilize all that
speed, that is the big question here. I
don't think many people are going to
utilize that fast disk speed, especially
with the chip that's inside of this
machine. But then, after this, the next
question is, what about CPU performance
in both these machines? I think this is
one of the big key differences.
[clears throat] So, obviously, you got
the M5 Pro and the M5, and I ran things
like Geekbench. I've also ran things
like Cinebench to see what we got in
single and multi-core score. Have a look
at the results right here. So, you can
see that obviously in single-core score,
they are basically identical cuz at the
end of the day, they're using the same,
you know, single cores here. They You
just get more of them in the M5 Pro. So,
yeah, essentially, it is literally neck
and neck here. Nothing really whatsoever
any differences. But in Geekbench
multi-core, obviously, you can see the
difference here. That obviously, we're
getting about a 56% increase here in
speed in multi-core performance on the
M5 Pro to the M5. But do remember again,
what we're getting here on the M5
standard, this was very similar to what
we got with the M4 Pro, you know, this
time last year. So, yeah, it's still
super fast. And you know, it's amazing
to think that even though when we had
the original M1, this used to get like a
score of about 8,000 or 8,500. It's
about the same speed now that we get
with say a MacBook Neo. So, it's crazy
to think how much has increased over
those 5 years. But yeah, what I would be
saying is that obviously, there is
definitely an increase there. It's the
same with Cinebench as well. Exactly the
same score for single-core, you know,
727.
But for the multi-core score, that
obviously, yeah, you are seeing an
increase there here up to 61%.
Obviously, Cinebench and Geekbench run
their benchmarking tools differently,
but yeah, this is what we're getting in
the speeds. But then, the next question
is, what about say GPU performance?
Well, again, I've done the likes of
Geekbench. I've also done Steel Nomad
Light, and I've also ran Cyberpunk 2077
on both of these machines at high
settings with their metal effects for
built for the machines. And let's have a
look to see what we got that in scores
and frames per second.
So, we can see that with Geekbench
metal, that obviously the M5 Pro, yeah,
it's always going to be out in front
here. I'm going to say it. So, no
surprises, but how much? It's about 84%
more quicker than what we had before.
And the same with still Nomad light in
the matter of frames per second. This
actually uses quite a lot of that ray
tracing kind of cores and bits and
pieces. But, yeah, we got 66.6 frames
per second compared to 38.5.
That is a big boost what we are getting
here. Mainly because we have so many
more GPU cores inside the likes of the
M5 Pro. But, there again, with the
Cyberpunk 2077, obviously there is a
massive boost here as well. It's over
double the amount of frames we are
getting here. 110 frames per second
compared to 54. Again, I think it's all
of those extra sort of GPU cores. What
we are getting here it is making a big
advantage for this machine. But, then
next of all, you guys are probably
wanting, "What about some AI bits and
pieces? What's happening there?" Well, I
ran things like Diffusion B, as you can
see here to generate a picture of
English countryside on a sunrise. And I
also ran, you know, the latest Llama 3.2
free beer to see how many tokens per
second we got. And here are the results.
We can see that in Diffusion B, that
obviously, you know, quicker here. So,
slower, the smaller the chart is better
in this sense. So, we can see the M5
took 12. You know, 6 seconds to create
this picture. It's not bad at all. But,
the M5 Pro took 7.3 seconds to generate
the exact same picture. That's a 42%
increase. Whereas where we got with
Llama, then obviously, you can see that
obviously we are making more tokens per
second. The M5 Pro, it's about a 45%
increase there. So, you can see it's
around about the same amount of
percentage increase for AI capabilities
on both of these machines. But then the
next question is what about creator
workflows and creator workspace? What
about things like Blender with Party Tug
and also the likes of say let's say
exporting 10 raw pictures into JPEG and
also running things like Final Cut Pro
going into ProRes 422 and also into
HEVC. Well, I've run these tests and
let's have a look at the results right
here. Well, we can see straight away
Party Tug it took 57 seconds to render
this image whereas M5 Pro took 37
seconds. So yeah, 20 second difference
there is far faster. Same with
Pixelmator obviously the 10 raw pictures
to JPEG it took 88 seconds on the M5 and
the M5 Pro took 60 seconds. That's more
CPU bound and then obviously the kind of
export that we did in Final Cut Pro 422
8-minute video export M5 did it in 39
seconds M5 Pro did it in 26 seconds. So
yeah, that is definitely faster there.
But then look at the HEVC export there.
This one's not so different because they
use basically the same media engine
cores. This is more using the memory
bandwidth to the advantage I'd say more
cuz obviously the media cores are
exactly the same in both these machines
but you can see that obviously the M5
actually managed to export this in 194
seconds and then the M5 Pro took 208
seconds. So what was quite interestingly
was that the M5 Pro was a little bit
slower. Now just in case you want to
know I ran this test three times and
this was the median score. But whether
this is a glitch or something I'm not
too sure but what I'm basically saying
this is the closest result. Really
there's not going to be much difference
here in the HEVC export. That's what I'm
just going to say there. But then after
doing all these tests you guys probably
want to know well how does thermals you
know do in these machines cuz obviously
the likes of the M5 MacBook Pro only has
one fan inside whereas the M5 Pro well
we actually have two fans inside. So,
let's see what we got with cooling. So,
what I did was I ran with Cinebench,
again doing a 10 minute, and as you can
see right here, I checked out the
internal sensors, and I also checked out
the likes of say doing a thermal camera.
And let's look at the results. So, what
we can see right here that obviously we
push this all up that the M5 was about
105°, but so was the M5 Pro on the
internal sensors. This is what it was
saying, but when I was using the thermal
camera to actually measure the middle of
the keyboard area, you could see the M5
was actually ever so slightly hotter, 1°
C
more or 2° F
more if that. And yeah, it was nothing
really in it whatsoever. Obviously, the
M5 Pro is more powerful, generating more
heat, but you do have those two fans.
Whereas, the M5 doesn't create as much
heat cuz it's not as powerful, but
there's only one fan. Really,
personally, I would say it's neck and
neck here. But, the next question you
want to know is, well, how well did
battery life do after all of these
tests? When I first started these tests,
both these machines had 100% battery.
Also, the battery counts on these were
very similar to each other. So, yeah,
not much difference there. But, let's
have a look at them the percentage after
running these tests what we had.
Well, we can see that the M5 had 43%
battery, whereas the M5 Pro, well, that
had 35%
battery left. So, definitely the M5 has
a better battery life cuz obviously it's
only got one fan. Also, it's less cores
as well. So, yeah, it's definitely
better in that sense. But, what I would
say to take away from all of these
testings today is that obviously, yeah,
paying that $500 more does make a
difference, but it's not saying that the
M5 is not capable. The M5 is more than
capable of doing a lot of these things.
Look at that Diffusion B example that I
was talking about earlier. You know, we
were talking just a matter of seconds
difference. It's the same with a HEVC
export and also, you know, the ProRes
kind of export there. There was not much
in it whatsoever. It really, really
depends, you know, what you're going to
be using these machines for. If you are
going to be all day constantly using pro
apps non-stop, then obviously the M5 Pro
is going to be good. But if you're
using, say, pro apps a couple of times a
day or, you know, once or twice a week,
then obviously, you know, even the M5 is
going to be absolutely fine. Or even
MacBook Air, you never know, that might
even be fine for you, too. But the main
difference is that you have seen what we
are getting here in the M5 Pro and the
M5. But really, guys, that is it. It's
time to wrap up the video. So, if you
have enjoyed watching it today, please
do press the like button. As always, you
want to hear the latest Apple news,
reviews, and comparisons, make sure you
subscribe to the channel and hit that
notification bell. Until next time,
guys, I'll see you really soon. Take
care. Bye-bye.
Ask follow-up questions or revisit key timestamps.
This video provides a comprehensive performance comparison between the baseline M5 MacBook Pro and the baseline M5 Pro MacBook Pro. Through various benchmarks including storage speed, CPU/GPU tasks, AI generation, and creator workflows, the host examines whether the higher-tier model's performance justifies the extra cost, ultimately suggesting that while the M5 Pro is faster, the baseline M5 is highly capable for most users.
Videos recently processed by our community