HomeVideos

Destroying A Reactor On Purpose: The SPERT Nuclear Test

Now Playing

Destroying A Reactor On Purpose: The SPERT Nuclear Test

Transcript

282 segments

0:00

The 1950s and 60s were a wild time for

0:04

exploring the limits of experimental

0:06

technology. Be it running a campaign of

0:09

sonic boom tests over city, exploding a

0:12

nuclear device above some soldiers,

0:15

or crazy contraptions. I'm looking at

0:18

you, the atomic landmine.

0:20

But one such subject that keeps on

0:21

appearing

0:23

in this time period was the desire to

0:25

stress test to destruction a nuclear

0:28

reactor. I mean, I can't blame anyone. I

0:30

would like to see a test reactor go boom

0:33

in a controlled environment, I must add.

0:36

Well, today is just that. The USA

0:40

destructive testing a nuclear reactor.

0:42

And no, before you comment, this video

0:44

isn't a re-upload. I haven't covered

0:47

this particular event before, which

0:49

means yes, the USA deliberately blew up

0:52

multiple reactors for the lols. I mean,

0:55

science. So much so that this is my

0:57

fourth video on such an experimental

0:59

series of tests.

1:01

I think I'm going to have to make a

1:02

playlist now, aren't I? So this week's

1:04

video is about the interestingly named

1:07

SPERT reactor destruction experiment. My

1:11

name is John, and welcome to Chain

1:13

Reaction Difficult. Get it? Like chain

1:15

reaction. I know. I'll see myself out.

1:27

This video went to being posted wasn't

1:28

by YouTube, Patreon, and Coffee members.

1:30

If you want to get access to the

1:31

channel's videos, you can get them for

1:32

just £1 per month. And as always, the

1:34

links will be in the pinned comment

1:35

below.

1:36

SPERT 1.

1:38

So the layout of our video today might

1:40

be a little bit different, where I'll go

1:42

through the SPERT reactor destruction

1:45

test, followed by the other

1:46

non-destructive ones.

1:49

Although different from the norm,

1:51

hopefully you guys will enjoy it. Also,

1:53

because why not, I'm going to do a SPERT

1:55

count, as you're going to hear this a

1:57

lot today.

1:59

We are already on four.

2:03

Our story begins in the probably best

2:05

time to be a nuclear research scientist,

2:08

the 1950s. And the more explosively

2:12

drawn engineers, arguably out of all the

2:14

reactor test programs,

2:16

our subject today was a peak program

2:21

opportunity.

2:22

This is the SPURT program, which is

2:24

short for Special Power Excursion

2:26

Reactor Test Program.

2:28

The name kind of gives it away as to

2:30

what the project was really about. You

2:32

see, a reactor excursion is not

2:34

something you normally want to happen to

2:36

your reactor.

2:38

And it's not an excursion like a nice

2:40

family outing. In reactor terms, it's

2:43

something like Chernobyl number four

2:46

deciding against being not exploded.

2:49

That was a power excursion. So, our

2:51

subject today was a type of destructive

2:54

testing to find out and learn about the

2:57

limits of reactor design. The Atomic

3:00

Energy Commission in the United States

3:02

in the late 1940s established a reactor

3:05

safety program. This would result in a

3:08

few different experimental programs, one

3:10

of which was between Argonne National

3:12

Laboratory and the Phillips Petroleum

3:15

Company. This began around August 1954,

3:19

which would involve

3:20

the excursion studies with the emphasis

3:23

to be on the general field of reactor

3:26

safety.

3:27

Now, during this period, another set of

3:29

experiments were underway. This was the

3:31

BORAX-1 experiments, which, if you

3:33

remember in my video about them,

3:35

resulted in the destruction of the

3:37

reactor. Although on purpose for the

3:39

name of science, it was more an

3:41

experiment born out of opportunity.

3:43

I.E., we have an old reactor, let's blow

3:45

it up and see what kind of deal it is.

3:48

That was SPURT number one.

3:50

The plan was from the start to end up

3:53

with the destructive test.

3:56

Now, the first reactor was rather

3:58

creatively named Spert 1. It was to

4:00

influence the following reactors in the

4:02

program. It began construction around

4:04

February 1955, being started up in July

4:08

of the same year.

4:10

Following the completion of 1,

4:13

2 and 3 would also be constructed over

4:16

the following 2 years, but we'll come

4:18

back to them in a bit later on in the

4:19

video. Now, Spert 1 was an unpressurized

4:23

water moderated reactor

4:25

with aluminum plate-type fuel using 25

4:29

fuel assemblies of 92% enriched uranium

4:33

fuel inside a 10-ft diameter by 16-ft

4:37

deep carbon steel tank. The water was

4:39

kept higher than the core assembly by

4:41

around 4 ft, meaning it was fully

4:44

submerged when in operation.

4:46

The reactor wisely had control rods, of

4:49

which it had four assemblies made up of

4:51

a pair of rods of boron.

4:54

In addition to this, two transient rods

4:56

were in the center of the core. These

4:58

were also control rods of sorts, but

5:00

were used to initiate and stop power

5:02

transients by removal or insertion from

5:05

the core.

5:06

The Spert was located in the National

5:09

Reactor Testing Station in Idaho. The

5:11

reactor control room was 1/2 mile away

5:13

from the open spicy water container.

5:16

The reactor was used for power excursion

5:19

events

5:20

up to the point

5:21

just before destruction. These tests

5:24

involved rapid removal insertion of the

5:26

transient rods in order to create

5:28

violent power spikes.

5:30

Valuable information was gleaned from

5:31

these experiments, which would influence

5:33

future reactor designs. They found that

5:35

the fuel plates would experience warping

5:38

in certain high-temperature conditions,

5:40

even during the very short test runs of

5:42

just a few milliseconds.

5:44

Although valuable, we aren't really here

5:47

for that. We're here for the destructive

5:49

test.

5:52

The SPERT one destruction test.

5:55

After torturing the reactor for a few

5:57

years, it was finally decided to put it

5:59

out of its misery with a destructive

6:01

test that would take place in November

6:02

1962.

6:04

SPERT one had to be modified for

6:06

deliberate non-togethering of the

6:07

reactor. This was done by installing a

6:09

pneumatically operated transient rod

6:12

ejector system that could lob the rods

6:14

out of the core in just 85 milliseconds.

6:17

This could create such a high spike in

6:20

power that well, the whole thing would

6:22

just destroy itself. The site

6:25

was set up ready for the test, but the

6:27

scientists would have to wait 2 weeks

6:29

until the weather was preferable.

6:31

Eventually, the experiment was set and

6:34

began on the 5th of November, 1962.

6:37

Pre-experiment ground-level dose

6:39

measurements on a grid system

6:41

extended downwind from the reactor

6:43

building.

6:44

And in addition to this, cloud tracking

6:47

by airplane was done. The destructive

6:49

test would begin at 12:25 p.m. with the

6:52

transient rods being ejected from the

6:55

reactor core.

6:56

Instantly, a massive bang rang out from

6:58

the site and a plume of reactor coolant

7:00

water shot out 80 ft into the sky.

7:04

The TV feed from the cameras aimed at

7:06

the core suddenly dropped out as the

7:07

spicy water splashed them.

7:10

The control rod drive system failed,

7:12

stopping action of of the reactor

7:14

control rods. A spike

7:16

of power was observed followed by a

7:18

drop-off.

7:20

All remaining water from the tank would

7:21

have to be pumped out remotely via

7:24

remote control operated sump pumps, and

7:27

around 4 hours after the big bang, the

7:29

first personnel were allowed back on

7:30

site.

7:32

The reactor's building roof was bent

7:33

upwards from the intense heat and

7:35

pressure of the water blasting out the

7:37

top of the reactor core.

7:39

The radiation level, about 10 ft from

7:41

the normal core center was around 25

7:44

roentgens per hour.

7:46

Some other radiation measurements showed

7:49

dose levels of up to 1.1 roentgens an

7:52

hour at roof level directly above the

7:54

vessel.

7:56

Further out, 85 milliroentgens an hour

7:59

at 5 ft

8:01

from the edge of the vessel and approx

8:02

two milliroentgens per hour at floor

8:05

level about 50 ft in front of the

8:07

reactor building.

8:09

The reactor was severely damaged with

8:11

the core and its fuel elements bent.

8:14

They found that the destructive pressure

8:15

pulse that destroyed the reactor

8:17

originated from the center of the core

8:19

in front and to the right of the

8:21

transient rods. It would be experimented

8:23

on over the following years

8:26

with various other types of experiments

8:28

with the damaged reactor. It would

8:30

eventually be shut down around 1964

8:33

and the decontamination and cleanup of

8:35

the site would begin in the 1980s after

8:37

the area was used for another series of

8:40

this time non-destructive reactor

8:42

testing.

8:44

But what about the other SPURTS?

8:46

The other SPURTS.

8:48

SPURT two would be built upon the

8:51

lessons from SPURT one. But instead of

8:53

being an open tank, the reactor would be

8:55

more complex and closer to what would be

8:57

used in more commercial settings. It was

9:00

a closed loop pressure water reactor

9:03

that could run on either heavy or light

9:05

water.

9:06

It would test transients and power

9:08

spikes like its predecessor but would

9:10

not be tested to destruction. The site

9:12

for SPURT two was south and east of that

9:16

of SPURT one and it would run from 1960

9:18

to 1964.

9:20

Next came up the SPURT three. This ran

9:22

from 1958 to 1964 and again tested

9:25

transient situations. The design was

9:28

closer still to commercial reactors and

9:31

was designed to test pressures of

9:34

extreme amounts up to 2,500

9:37

PSI.

9:38

And finally came SPERT IV. This ran from

9:41

1962 all the way up to 1970 and like its

9:45

first predecessor, it was an open pool

9:48

designed aimed at testing low water

9:51

conditions during low coolant situations

9:54

and leaks.

9:55

After four, the program was retired.

9:58

Now to read more about the subject, I've

10:00

included all the reports in the pink

10:02

comment below for all the juicy

10:04

technical aspects.

10:05

So that's my video on the SPERT reactor

10:07

test.

10:10

I think we've got to around 18 or 19 on

10:12

the SPERT count. Oh, actually now it's

10:14

going to be 19 or 20 now.

10:16

It's going to be a zero on my scale and

10:18

this is what I got from my root cause

10:19

analysis card. Do you agree? Let me know

10:21

in the comments below.

10:23

This is a Plain English Production. All

10:24

videos on the channel are Creative

10:25

Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License.

10:27

Plain English videos produced by me,

10:28

John, in the currently

10:30

not so bad corner of South London, UK.

10:32

All that's left to say is thank you very

10:33

much for watching and now it's the

10:34

music. Play us out, please.

10:39

>> [music]

10:49

[music]

10:58

[music]

11:07

[music]

11:23

[music]

Interactive Summary

This video explores the SPERT (Special Power Excursion Reactor Test) program conducted by the USA in the 1950s and 60s to study reactor safety through controlled power excursions, including the deliberate destruction of the SPERT-1 reactor in 1962.

Suggested questions

3 ready-made prompts