HomeVideos

Movement Practice to Strengthen Your Mind-Body Connection | Ido Portal

Now Playing

Movement Practice to Strengthen Your Mind-Body Connection | Ido Portal

Transcript

4296 segments

0:00

Discipline is very important, but it's

0:02

similar to the wall in learning to do a

0:04

handstand. If you use the wall one way

0:08

where you're all the time pushing

0:09

yourself off of the wall, try to catch

0:11

your handstand, you become reliant on

0:14

the wall. But there is a different

0:15

approach. We can use the wall but pull

0:19

off of it which comes from the other end

0:22

from our hands from the connection to

0:24

the ground. That does not necessitate

0:26

the wall. This is the correct way to use

0:29

discipline. You should use it as a

0:31

scaffolding as a way to get things going

0:34

like write that book. But inside the

0:36

process, you must make sure you don't

0:38

lean hard into it. You don't leave

0:41

everything for it to dictate and you

0:44

bring some playfulness, some relaxation,

0:48

some deep choice. I want to do this.

0:53

Welcome to the Hubberman Lab podcast,

0:54

where we discuss [music] science and

0:56

science-based tools for everyday life.

1:00

[music]

1:02

I'm Andrew Huberman and I'm a professor

1:04

of neurobiology and opthalmology at

1:06

Stanford School of Medicine. My guest

1:08

today is Ido Portal. Ido Portal is a

1:11

world-renowned movement teacher and the

1:13

founder of movement culture, which is an

1:15

integrative practice for developing the

1:17

self that combines physical and mental

1:19

practice. Today we discuss how anyone

1:22

can practice movement, deliberate

1:24

awareness, and even language and other

1:26

forms of communication in ways that

1:28

explore and expand your capabilities and

1:30

your understanding and sense of self.

1:33

>> [snorts]

1:33

>> Now, Ido is not anti-ex exercise or

1:35

anti-fitness, but what sets him apart as

1:37

a movement teacher and why so many

1:39

professional athletes, dancers, and

1:41

people around the world continually seek

1:43

out his teachings is his ability to show

1:45

people unique ways for how to go about

1:48

their daily life in ways that truly

1:50

expand both their mind and their body as

1:52

well as their athletic performance in

1:54

the case of athletics. Today, we discuss

1:56

unique meditation practices, ways to

1:59

build discipline and access willpower.

2:01

And by the way, what the difference

2:02

between discipline and willpower is and

2:05

how to use play as an extremely potent

2:07

way to rewire your default operating

2:09

systems in everything you do. If you

2:12

like so many other people typically

2:14

think about movement practices as for

2:16

strength or endurance or mobility, well,

2:18

today you're in for a surprise because

2:20

Ido explains how the transitions between

2:22

brain states and physical states are

2:24

linked and are fertile ground for

2:26

extremely rapid neuroplasticity and that

2:29

they can help you truly understand how

2:30

your mind and body are organized and can

2:32

function better. Today's conversation is

2:35

a truly special one. I have to be clear.

2:37

It's not philosophical. It's not

2:39

theoretical. It's a practical

2:41

exploration of movement, awareness,

2:43

language, and cognition that is rooted

2:46

in science and has real world

2:47

implications for all of us. Edo is a

2:50

truly unique human being, teacher, and

2:52

friend. And it was an honor to host him

2:54

again. So, prepare to learn. Before we

2:57

begin, I'd like to emphasize that this

2:58

podcast is separate from my teaching and

3:00

research roles at Stanford. It is

3:02

however part of my desire and effort to

3:04

bring zero cost to consumer information

3:05

about science and science related tools

3:08

to the general public. In keeping with

3:09

that theme, today's episode does include

3:12

sponsors. And now for my discussion with

3:14

Ido Portal. Idor Portal, welcome back.

3:18

>> Thank you.

3:19

>> So happy to see you again, my friend.

3:20

>> Good to see you.

3:21

>> You've aged backwards, so doing

3:24

something right now. You haven't aged at

3:26

all. What have you been up to lately? I

3:28

have many questions but I want to know

3:29

what what what's been your first thought

3:32

on waking most consistently over the

3:34

last you know year or so

3:38

the same thing always the same thing the

3:41

most important thing that exists that

3:43

there is that that's how my system

3:47

operates but getting that that change

3:51

that deep transformation in people in

3:54

myself

3:57

Why? Why are we missing it? What is what

4:00

is required

4:02

that's always been there and changes its

4:05

face, but it's the same one.

4:09

When you wake up, do you open your eyes

4:12

right away or do you ever spend some

4:14

time in that liinal state between

4:16

[clears throat] asleep and awake?

4:18

>> I'm sometimes spend some time there. I

4:21

experienced also sleep paralysis before

4:24

and various inetweens

4:27

>> where you're wide awake but the body is

4:29

still paralyzed. Yeah.

4:30

>> Yeah. When you sit a lot when when you

4:32

meditate a lot and and other practices

4:35

and somatic practices again you get to

4:38

know the territory and you can stabilize

4:42

fragile states more easily. So crossing

4:45

into that boundary of the sleep it

4:47

becomes

4:49

a slow-mo journey that you can pause

4:52

that you can you know spend time at any

4:55

point in interesting I do yoga nidra

5:00

non-sleep deep rest and there are

5:01

moments where I can feel myself falling

5:03

asleep and it literally feels like

5:05

falling and then you can kind of catch

5:07

yourself in these liinal states. Rick

5:09

Rubin once said to me, he said, "If uh

5:13

if you wake up from a like a bad dream,

5:16

a nightmare, just move your body and

5:20

look around the room. If you wake up

5:22

from a dream you were really enjoying

5:24

and you want to go back in, keep your

5:26

eyes closed." And I think what he's

5:29

talking about is more or less what

5:30

you're talking about, the ability to

5:32

kind of forward and reverse out of these

5:35

transition states. Usually the the

5:38

common way that people live and the

5:39

common person has a very

5:43

simplified

5:45

perception of these states of this the

5:49

granularity.

5:50

>> Mhm.

5:51

>> So they're difficult to stabilize. So it

5:55

becomes very binary black white sleep

5:58

you know like you you relax someone they

6:01

fall asleep. That's what happens when

6:04

there is not a lot of experience.

6:06

Everything is immediately going there.

6:08

But there is a lot of benefit in heading

6:10

to sleep and taking a sharp left just

6:14

before.

6:15

>> Tell me about that and how one might um

6:17

practice that.

6:19

>> Well, the sleep there is a kind of a way

6:22

where we can inverse the relationship.

6:26

This is the sleeping state which is

6:28

discussed in various authors and the

6:31

waking sleep and then the sleep has a

6:34

benefit because there is an openness

6:38

towards something else. So heading

6:40

directly to sleep and then navigating

6:44

from there is very powerful to reset the

6:47

system to change the schemes these rigid

6:50

schemes that we sometimes have the rigid

6:52

schemas

6:54

the models that we're running when they

6:56

become too rigid when they're surrounded

6:58

by a hard membrane

7:00

when they oversimplify

7:02

and there is this bas basian reduction

7:06

um you got to pop out of it somehow. So

7:09

psychedelics is one way and there are

7:12

other ways but the sleep every day is

7:15

key because it's a a very different

7:18

status and way of being and way of

7:21

experiencing which we experience daily

7:24

and uh we can use that transition part

7:27

and the thing itself as well. Do you

7:29

ever intentionally get up in the middle

7:31

of the night to just experience being

7:35

mostly awake but somewhat asleep just to

7:39

experience what that what that's like?

7:42

>> Yeah, I did before. Various practices

7:45

use that kind of instruction. Uh people

7:49

uh some people might be familiar with

7:51

the lucid dreaming or the the dream yoga

7:53

or the sleep yoga what is called various

7:56

practices and waking up in the middle of

7:58

the night also allows you to

8:02

appreciate something else something

8:04

different. Sometimes it happens and you

8:07

can manipulate it into somewhere and

8:10

sometimes you can do it on purpose.

8:12

Nowadays with all the longevity talk and

8:15

all this direction we we sometimes don't

8:18

capitalize on such things but uh

8:21

sometimes there is more to be gained

8:22

with a bad night's sleep than with a

8:24

good night's sleep.

8:25

>> Uh in [clears throat] 2015 to 20 I would

8:29

say 2018 I was uh very busy but I was

8:34

mourning the death of my graduate

8:36

adviser. was very close with her um

8:39

unusually close for a graduate adviser

8:41

and student

8:42

>> [clears throat]

8:42

>> um very maternal

8:45

her to me relationship knew her kids I'm

8:48

friends with her husband and kids still

8:50

and um she died in 2014 and I was really

8:53

distraught about it and someone

8:56

recommended to me uh that I set an alarm

9:00

for the middle of the night somewhere

9:02

between 3:00 and 4:00 a.m. and I just

9:04

get up and and try grieving then. And at

9:08

first I thought like that sounds like

9:09

the worst thing to do. I'm like no I

9:12

have no protection then you know my

9:14

forebrain is shut down. I'm that's when

9:16

I normally would be entering more REM

9:18

sleep. And I tried it. It was very

9:21

interesting. It definitely allowed for

9:22

more intense morning but it had a very

9:25

interesting effect where I no longer had

9:27

the challenge of like falling asleep and

9:29

waking up. I had this like designated

9:31

period in my sleep. did a lot of crying

9:33

between 3:00 am and 5:00 am and in many

9:37

ways I I feel like it worked. Who knows

9:40

in some cultures it's like the veil of

9:43

suppression is is pulled back. Our

9:46

defenses are way way down in those

9:48

hours.

9:49

>> That's the point.

9:50

>> Yeah. these membranes that are

9:53

surrounding various systems inside of us

9:56

and and models that we are running that

9:58

are protecting them. This uh marov

10:01

blankets

10:03

the this filters that can rigidify and

10:07

and don't allow a lot in to simplify

10:10

things for the model so we can survive

10:12

so we can do things. And then in when

10:15

you change when you go into those times

10:18

to those change the scenario radically,

10:22

you increase your chances of opening up

10:24

of recalculating of allowing the model

10:27

to recalibrate.

10:30

And again, people nowadays that they use

10:32

extreme means, it doesn't necessarily

10:35

mean that it works. Sometimes sometimes

10:38

you need the micro dosages

10:40

[clears throat]

10:40

>> and a practice around it. repetition,

10:44

not a huge event of intensity, but a a

10:48

repeating mellow event, gentle event. I

10:52

can relate to I started a prayer

10:53

practice before sleep over two and a

10:56

half years ago, and I'm haven't been

10:58

missed a single night. Um, and some

11:00

nights I fall asleep while I'm praying

11:02

and wake up and continue. And um I tell

11:05

myself that the consistency is like

11:09

worth something on those nights cuz I I

11:11

feel sort of badly like my mind's

11:12

drifting and then okay but I haven't

11:14

missed you know it's it's all in the if

11:16

I fall asleep get out of bed and and do

11:18

it and then get back in bed. With

11:20

respect to these microp practices micro

11:22

doing as it were uh I know you're a

11:26

proponent of med meditation

11:28

um people often will talk about how long

11:31

they meditate. Do you have a practice

11:33

where you will just stop for a moment or

11:36

two or a minute or or is it for you a

11:39

meditation practice a long extended

11:41

thing and how often are you doing that?

11:43

Oh, I think there are advantages to to

11:47

both ends of the spectrum

11:49

cuz the the long meditation thing, the

11:52

the retreats, the strong determination

11:56

seats, many hours or you know many days,

12:00

they definitely [sighs]

12:03

load the trampoline and and and create

12:05

an effect. But also you become dependent

12:10

on it and it's hard later to drag this

12:13

into other areas of life which is not

12:15

often discussed and mentioned in

12:17

relation to meditation.

12:19

I didn't start to meditate because I

12:21

wanted to sit. I wanted to take the

12:24

state and to apply it into my life. So

12:31

that is a moment where you can

12:33

integrate. You can take the depth and

12:35

you can take also very short periods of

12:38

practice and apply this micro dosages

12:42

and try to get a change in the defaults

12:46

of this your state and your way of

12:48

being.

12:50

Eventually people ask me why I practice

12:53

so much is because I'm aiming for 24

12:55

hours a day.

12:57

So if you're practicing 8 hours a day or

12:59

10 hours a day, this is the unofficial

13:02

side of the practice. And this micro

13:04

practices are very helpful for that. A

13:07

good practice to do is not to take your

13:11

mind off of something like a problem

13:15

that you have to solve.

13:17

to walk around and

13:20

try to remember that thing. Try to keep

13:24

it in front of you as much as you can.

13:27

Which means the only thing you can be

13:28

blamed for is if you caught yourself

13:31

>> not focusing on that and you didn't

13:34

bring yourself back to the problem at

13:36

hand. Then you are to be blamed.

13:38

Anything else is fine. [clears throat]

13:41

>> And that is a very powerful practice. We

13:43

we can solve incredibly difficult

13:45

problems, overcome obstacles, transform

13:48

ourselves.

13:50

And we've moved away from such ways of

13:52

doing and ways of being.

13:55

It's an unfortunate reality, but tap

13:57

water often contains contaminants that

14:00

negatively impact our health. In fact, a

14:02

2020 study by the Environmental Working

14:04

Group estimated that more than 200

14:06

million Americans are exposed to PAS

14:08

chemicals, also known as forever

14:10

chemicals, through drinking of tap

14:12

water. These forever chemicals are

14:14

linked to serious health issues such as

14:16

hormone disruption, gut microbiome

14:18

disruption, fertility issues, and many

14:20

other health problems. The Environmental

14:22

Working Group has also shown that over

14:25

122 million Americans drink tap water

14:27

with high levels of chemicals known to

14:29

cause cancer. It's for all these reasons

14:31

that I'm thrilled to have Rora as a

14:33

sponsor of this podcast. I've been using

14:34

the Aurora countertop system for almost

14:36

a year now. Rurora's filtration

14:38

technology removes harmful substances,

14:40

including endocrine disruptors and

14:42

disinfection byproducts, while

14:44

preserving beneficial minerals like

14:45

magnesium and calcium. It requires no

14:47

installation or plumbing. It's built

14:49

from medical grade stainless steel. And

14:51

its sleek design fits beautifully on

14:53

your countertop. In fact, I consider it

14:54

a welcome addition to my kitchen. It

14:56

looks great and the water is delicious.

14:58

If you'd like to try Rora, you can go to

15:00

roora.com/huberman

15:02

and get an exclusive discount. Again,

15:04

that's roar. Ra.com/huberman.

15:08

Today's episode is also brought to us by

15:10

ROA. I'm excited to share that Roka and

15:12

I recently teamed up to create a new

15:14

pair of red lens glasses. These red lens

15:17

glasses are meant to be worn in the

15:18

evening after the sun goes down. They

15:21

filter out shortwavelength light that

15:22

comes from screens and from LED lights,

15:24

which are the most common indoor

15:26

lighting nowadays. I want to emphasize

15:28

Roa Red Lens glasses are not traditional

15:30

blue blockers. They do filter out blue

15:32

light, but they filter out a lot more

15:34

than just blue light. In fact, they

15:35

filter out the full range of

15:37

shortwavelength light that suppresses

15:39

the hormone melatonin. By the way, you

15:40

want melatonin high in the evening and

15:42

at night. Makes it easy to fall and stay

15:44

asleep. And those short wavelengths

15:47

trigger increases in cortisol. Increases

15:49

in cortisol are great in the early part

15:51

of the day, but you do not want

15:52

increases in cortisol in the evening and

15:54

at night. These Roka Red Lens glasses

15:56

ensure normal, healthy increases in

15:58

melatonin and that your cortisol levels

16:01

stay low, which is again what you want

16:03

in the evening and at night. If you'd

16:05

like to try ROA, go to roka.com. That's

16:08

roka.com and enter the code hubman to

16:11

save 20% off your first order. Again,

16:13

that's roa.com and enter the code hubman

16:16

at checkout. We've done a few episodes

16:20

in the last year on or that touched on

16:23

meditation. Uh we had Richie Davidson

16:25

who's one of the like real pioneers of

16:27

studying the neuroscience of meditation

16:29

and he said that when people start a

16:31

meditation practice traditional sitting

16:34

meditation close their eyes focus on

16:36

third eye center breathing etc redirect

16:39

attention that they see a statistically

16:41

significant increase in anxiety across

16:44

that early phase and in some ways he

16:47

said that's a real value of the

16:49

practice. It's really about stress

16:50

inoculation, the stress that comes from

16:52

forcing oneself to sit still. But

16:55

eventually it does seem to give way if

16:57

people practice regularly to some other

16:59

kind of uh channel of consciousness that

17:02

is very useful to apply in the rest of

17:04

one's life.

17:06

>> Sounds [clears throat] like that second

17:08

channel is the one that you're after.

17:10

>> Yeah. this anxiety, this under reduced

17:13

state in a way, the failure to adjust

17:18

the membrane, this protective membrane

17:21

around the model, whatever model it is,

17:23

if it's the body scheme, if it's the

17:26

emotional schema or or the conceptual

17:29

schema, you're in an underreduced state.

17:32

So everything bombers you and you're

17:34

bleeding resources metabolically, right?

17:38

And that's anxiety. That's why all

17:40

almost always anxiety over a long

17:43

duration will turn into depression.

17:45

You're bleeding resources.

17:47

So adjusting simplifying that's a

17:51

critical moment. Of course lowering the

17:53

bar of the task is a very important

17:58

tool. Microtasks

18:00

and I'm not just talking about the

18:02

classical sitting meditation. I'm using

18:05

everything. For me, it's all the same

18:09

tasks with tennis balls, with a with a

18:11

stick. I I'll use anything because my

18:15

intention is not to get the success in

18:17

the specifics, is to get the

18:21

transformation

18:23

much deeper. So, it's almost irrelevant.

18:26

I'll use whatever I need to use to get

18:28

that going.

18:30

And so I think meditation many ways

18:33

sometimes becomes too dogmatic in that

18:35

sense.

18:36

>> Yeah, we've already touched on sort of

18:38

liinal states transition from sleep to

18:40

waking or waking to sleep and trying to

18:44

just catch oneself and pause in those

18:46

like you said maybe reverse maybe pause

18:48

there hover there. I'm fascinated by

18:51

this peculiar place we are with science

18:55

where we know a lot more about sleeping

18:58

states can describe phase one phase two

19:00

phase three slow wave deep sleep REM

19:02

sleep the fraction that you get

19:03

depending on the night before vivid

19:05

dreams versus non vivid dreams

19:08

we know barely anything scientifically

19:14

about waking states in comparison to

19:16

sleeping states I mean we talk alpha

19:18

waves beta waves theta waves but It's

19:20

very rudimentary. Like right now,

19:23

I assure you there's no scientific paper

19:26

that could describe the state that we're

19:28

in. We could say, oh, the these alpha

19:30

waves or these, you know, percentage of

19:33

activity in one brain area or another. I

19:36

think that the definition of different

19:39

waking states is going to come into

19:42

science from outside of science. someone

19:44

will study it. But I've been waiting for

19:46

somebody to say like this is uh like are

19:49

we in stage one of focused attention

19:51

right now? Stage four. Nobody can ex um

19:54

point to this which is should bother

19:57

people. Like we're we're really far

19:59

behind even a descriptive understanding

20:02

of where we're at. Like I feel calm

20:04

right now despite drinking caf so much

20:06

caffeine. You're clearly externally

20:09

calm. I imagine you're internally calm.

20:11

But what would you describe like your

20:13

state? How should people start to peel

20:15

back the layers and get a better

20:17

understanding of the state they're in?

20:18

Because I think there's real value to

20:19

this in waking states. And I don't have

20:21

a language for it, but you've spent a

20:24

lot more time thinking about mindbody

20:26

states than I have. I think there is a a

20:29

a m a mistake or a direction that we

20:33

took asking who we are

20:38

instead of asking what we are which can

20:40

really serve this. There is a need of

20:44

almost a a rudimentary map of what is

20:50

what is needed what is here how do I map

20:54

this what am I observing even you can't

20:57

refine what you can't define but not in

20:59

the sense of this verbal definition but

21:01

some kind of an internal definition some

21:04

kind of a boundary drawn some kind of a

21:08

selection

21:10

the selected thing the selected state

21:13

the differentiation

21:16

without this

21:19

what am I seeing when I look inside

21:21

listen to your body

21:23

I don't believe in that

21:26

>> portal doesn't believe in listen to your

21:27

body right what do you listen to

21:29

>> what are you listening

21:30

>> your heartbeat your what does that mean

21:33

>> it's corrupted you're too corrupted to

21:36

listen to your body

21:37

>> those are the most corrupted people

21:39

usually

21:40

>> the people who are saying listen to your

21:41

body.

21:42

>> Yes. I think it that whole verbiage

21:45

comes from this notion and the quite

21:49

pioneering although I would say somewhat

21:52

outof-date book the body keeps the score

21:54

I think is it was an important book best

21:56

title of any book you could imagine in

21:59

the psychology space because it's so

22:00

catchy um and I want to give proper

22:03

respect to um Bessel [clears throat]

22:05

for doing that book and it was early but

22:08

I think that embedded in people's minds

22:11

that like experiences we have live as

22:16

pain, discomfort or blockages and that

22:20

the [clears throat] solutions come from

22:21

releasing that pain, discomfort and

22:23

blockage. Erggo, if I'm feeling good,

22:28

things are moving through. I'm making

22:29

progress. I'm moving away from that

22:31

historical bad thing. And if I'm feeling

22:34

it again, it's still alive in me and it

22:37

needs to be released. That's the kind of

22:39

premise.

22:40

>> Yeah. And there a lot of data to support

22:41

that chronic stress can harm the body

22:43

and so forth. So those things those

22:44

ideas sort of took off. But I also agree

22:46

they sort of they've kind of hit a wall

22:49

in um 2020 or so. We go well what like

22:53

what do you mean? Well it's in the

22:54

fascia really like is it in the fascia

22:57

or are we just like talking about

22:58

fascia? And and I love all of that stuff

23:00

as an exploration but I think we are at

23:03

a place where we really need to ask

23:05

better questions.

23:06

>> Yeah. Yeah. It's a it's it it sounds

23:09

very corrupted again. And we know so

23:12

much about

23:14

the framing of things, excitement

23:17

versus, you know, very negative states

23:19

that it's so similar. It's so close

23:23

that it cannot make sense. We cannot

23:25

work from that place. And and also

23:28

working from our likes and dislikes.

23:30

What do I want to do? We just watch this

23:33

thing. You just need to do what you want

23:36

to do. I believe that's the last thing

23:39

for you to do.

23:40

>> Right. Um, you know, I was referring to

23:42

before we came in here, we watched two

23:44

short films. The first one is a one that

23:46

was u put out in 2014 about this guy,

23:50

real life guy slow-mo. uh we'll put a

23:52

link to it who uh guy who essentially

23:55

gave up his life as a physician and say

23:57

rollerblades very slowly on one leg down

24:00

the boardwalk in Pacific Beach San Diego

24:03

to touch into

24:05

what he describes as a mild euphoria and

24:08

altered state he's totally sober clearly

24:11

very very smart and the other film we'll

24:15

talk about several times uh which

24:17

hopefully will be out in the not too

24:18

distant future so we can all see a

24:20

beautiful film that's being made about

24:23

IDO and movement culture called the

24:25

architecture of practice. Correct.

24:28

>> Internal architecture.

24:28

>> The internal architecture of practice.

24:30

Excuse me. Um trust me folks, you want

24:33

to see this when it comes out. It's it's

24:35

visually beautiful and content uh rich.

24:39

It's it's spectacular.

24:41

>> Thank you.

24:41

>> There's something really special there.

24:43

Uh for sure. But I wrote down actually

24:46

play versus discipline. I think for some

24:50

people it would be helpful

24:52

to try and uh operationalize a bit of

24:56

what we're going to go to today. And I

24:59

know you're not a fan of like morning

25:01

routine or this or that, but I can

25:02

imagine walking toward a practice of any

25:05

kind, a workout of any kind, making

25:08

scrambled eggs

25:10

as either I'm going to approach approach

25:12

this from a with a sense of play or I'm

25:15

going to approach this with a sense of

25:17

discipline. I'm going to try and find

25:19

some friction, some edges that force me

25:22

to rewire something. Now, play can help

25:25

rewire, discipline can help rewire, but

25:27

of your waking hours, what percentage of

25:30

time do you spend in kind of a playful

25:33

explorative state, like kind of keep it

25:35

light and loose versus, you know, I know

25:37

you're also a believer in like there's

25:39

really value to putting up mental or

25:42

physical or both corridors so that your

25:45

system, your whole system improves

25:48

because at those friction points is

25:50

where plasticity

25:51

can be triggered. I think both of these

25:54

things and also the relation to

25:57

motivation

25:58

in in both of them are

26:03

required scaffoldings

26:06

that we have to use at certain points in

26:08

time but are not the essential

26:12

will

26:14

that connection to what we we don't know

26:19

nothing about that we have researched

26:22

that deeply in v various spheres but

26:26

often we just replace pure will with

26:30

discipline

26:32

or with motivation but once I motivated

26:35

myself I don't need will anymore and if

26:38

I dis if I discipline myself into doing

26:42

something I also hijack the opportunity

26:46

playfulness it brings a direction and a

26:50

flavor of something else a different way

26:53

to interact with something. How do we

26:56

start to look at that? What is the basic

26:59

requirement? I don't want to do this.

27:04

Without this requirement, I can't

27:06

research will

27:09

now if I hijack it, if I take the

27:13

process and I distort it, I use

27:14

discipline,

27:16

then again, I'm out of the game. Or if I

27:19

motivate myself, same problem.

27:22

Playfulness try to walk a different path

27:24

a little bit.

27:28

Maybe it's not it quite. It's not the

27:30

will that search for a will that you

27:33

know many authors and and practitioners

27:36

have looked for because it's so elusive.

27:39

But it's definitely something to

27:41

cultivate and we've talked about it the

27:43

last time we met

27:46

and it brings about so many positive

27:48

things. I think people should first

27:52

develop discipline

27:55

and use motivation and also research

27:59

playfulness which is a lot more tricky

28:01

for people uh these days.

28:04

It brings with it

28:07

incredible benefits. The aesthetic

28:10

intensities that are missing from our

28:12

lives, awe,

28:15

curiosity, this deep sense of curiosity,

28:18

these things can allow us to totally

28:21

transform the emotional schema which is

28:24

stuck rigid.

28:27

This model of ourselves that is often

28:31

times

28:32

rigidifies all the way to depression.

28:35

The most tricky situation of all the

28:38

total bankruptcy of that budget of those

28:43

resources.

28:46

So something like awe

28:49

which happens also in psychedelics.

28:51

Isn't this a huge part of the

28:53

psychedelic thing? What about

28:56

experiencing all regularly in a directed

28:59

targeted and practiced way?

29:03

It can be cold showers and hot shower an

29:08

experience on the sensory level. It can

29:10

be something that is more related to the

29:12

environment like sky gazing. Incredible

29:15

practice. 10 minutes a day. Your eyes

29:17

cannot grab onto things. So and it can

29:21

be and very important conceptual

29:25

or reading poetry or certain types of

29:30

stories or literature touches that so

29:34

all of this comes along with playfulness

29:37

our interaction with things I treat this

29:41

as a playful thing

29:42

>> so if I think about it it's almost

29:44

always present because it allows me not

29:48

to rigidify myself in front of the

29:51

challenge. I'm working with athletes or

29:53

work in cinema or do some project or

29:55

work with a government body or or a

29:57

military organization. I bring

30:00

playfulness.

30:01

Playfulness allows me to go much

30:04

further, much deeper. My discipline

30:09

wouldn't get me there.

30:11

>> It got me certain places. Who got there

30:15

to that place? I discovered that it

30:17

wasn't me because I use discipline. So,

30:20

it's often leaving you kind of out the

30:23

totality of you.

30:24

>> I am very very intrigued by this play

30:28

versus discipline uh thing. So many

30:32

years spent I wouldn't say punching the

30:34

clock but you know there just things you

30:36

have to do because experiments have to

30:38

be done in this time in this way. one

30:40

can develop a a real sense of an ability

30:42

to push through and to do things and

30:45

beautiful stuff can come out of what I

30:46

call chop wood carry water. It's just

30:48

like phase is like okay we're just going

30:50

to chop wood carry water but this play

30:53

thing is really powerful. I had this

30:55

experience when I lived in San Diego. My

30:58

lab started there and I I used to

31:01

commute really far to work cuz I my home

31:04

was um in an area that I really liked

31:07

and that I could afford far from campus

31:09

and the traffic was just brutal. Anyone

31:12

that's ever driven in San Diego, these

31:13

big wide eight lane freeways and and I

31:16

like listening to music, so I would

31:17

drive and I remember one morning just

31:19

being so frustrated with the drive even

31:21

though traffic was moving. And I've only

31:23

had this experience once and I just

31:25

decided I'm gonna just [clears throat]

31:27

slalom the car to work. And I wasn't

31:31

speeding. I'm like slaloming the car.

31:33

I'm listening to music and I'm like this

31:36

is the way to go to work. I can remember

31:38

this one commute is a real standout

31:40

experience in my life of like and I

31:43

thought why don't I do this all the

31:44

time?

31:45

>> The old frog crosses the street video

31:47

game.

31:48

>> Right. Exactly. Exactly. So, I'm just,

31:50

you know, and I get to work and I do

31:52

thing and and this was one instance. I

31:54

don't think I've ever done it again. And

31:56

I like to drive, but I never

31:58

deliberately turn on like I'm going to

31:59

take an ordinary experience that I do

32:01

every single day that usually is kind of

32:04

like loathe or mildly irritated at

32:08

traffic. I'm just going to enjoy this

32:09

experience. I think now that it would be

32:12

so great to just be able to apply that

32:14

to all these different little

32:15

transitions. Oddly enough, I also have

32:18

flashbulb like memories of being in

32:21

Yusede where I've spent a lot of time.

32:22

I've hiked a lot of the peaks in Yusede.

32:24

I love it. I live lived and worked up

32:26

there when I was in college and I just

32:28

adore. You know what? I remember the

32:30

great vistas and great peas that I had

32:34

urinating in the woods. I like have like

32:36

flashb memories of like and there's

32:38

something there. I think it's just the

32:40

calm and relaxation like oh like I'm

32:42

just a creature peeing in the woods, you

32:44

know. And uh as one does, you know, when

32:47

you when you count just thinking like

32:49

this is awesome. I have these like my

32:51

life is great. It's so weird that these

32:53

micro experiences that occupy like 10 to

32:56

15 seconds or a minute depending on how

32:58

much water you drink, right? One commute

33:01

could grab like real mental real estate

33:04

in our brain. There's something there.

33:06

And I know people are probably like,

33:07

"This is crazy." But I think most people

33:10

would probably describe like kind of odd

33:12

flashbulb memories that they have of

33:13

things that are kind of trivial.

33:15

>> Did you notice that the the quality of

33:18

those memories

33:20

>> cuz you recall them and it they it has a

33:23

flavor and a texture and a resolution

33:25

which is different than other things

33:28

which sometimes are should have been a

33:30

lot more detailed. And it comes and

33:33

goes, but we can become a lot more

33:36

deliberate about it. And it represents a

33:39

certain presence

33:41

in that specific scenario of a

33:45

heightened it's a heightened presence

33:47

thing. Why? Those are questions. But

33:50

playfulness opens the door for that.

33:53

Some of my best seats, my best

33:55

meditations were using a playful

33:58

approach.

33:59

Similarly to how you navigate the

34:02

traffic, [gasps]

34:03

you can use it writing your book.

34:05

>> I tried that. It was very diff I will

34:07

tell you it was very difficult because

34:09

there's aspects of the book that are

34:11

very technical. There are aspects that I

34:12

really want to get communicate things in

34:15

a certain way. I definitely tried to

34:16

relax myself. Um Cal Newport who's a

34:20

sort of a guy who's a big proponent of

34:22

of deep work uh staying away from

34:24

technology to you know writing by hand,

34:27

typewriter, this kind of thing. He said

34:29

uh and I tried this. He said to approach

34:30

work with um kind of a languid

34:33

intentionality kind of relaxed but with

34:36

a direction. I tried it. I have to

34:38

scruff myself and bring myself to it

34:40

even though I want to do it and I just

34:42

like have to like like I imagine I'm

34:44

like doing this

34:45

>> but that deep belief

34:46

>> Yeah.

34:47

>> is already a self-fulfilling prophecy

34:50

cuz you perceive yourself as that

34:52

person. This is the way for you to do

34:55

things.

34:55

>> Mhm. And I'm similar but I've glimpsed

34:58

something else.

35:00

Yes, I I also I'm the disciplinary

35:04

person. I'm a person of great work ethic

35:06

and

35:08

this is how I came about. But then I

35:10

discovered it doesn't matter because

35:15

how you write that book using that

35:17

approach it leaks into your words

35:21

and it's a different way of doing

35:24

things. you're not going to write

35:27

doniote in this way. So I appreciate

35:31

that and I also want to say come back to

35:34

that thing this scaffolding the the fact

35:38

that we have used discipline for such a

35:40

long time is very positive we need that

35:45

first thing is to get things done I'm

35:48

the practice person I'm the met person

35:50

you do it or you talk about it so

35:53

discipline is very important but it's

35:55

similar to the wall in learning to do a

35:58

handstand if you Use the wall one way

36:02

where you're all the time pushing

36:03

yourself off of the wall. Try to catch

36:05

your handstand.

36:06

You become reliant on the wall. Notice

36:09

what I said. You push yourself off of

36:11

the wall. But there is a different

36:13

approach. We can use the wall but pull

36:17

off of it. Not quite push oursel off of

36:20

it but pull off of it which comes from

36:23

the other end from our hands from the

36:25

connection to the ground. that does not

36:28

necessitate a wall. So I can pull myself

36:31

when I feel myself falling forward later

36:33

on. This is the correct way to use

36:36

discipline. You should use it as a

36:39

scaffolding as a way to get things going

36:41

like write that book. But inside the

36:44

process, you must make sure you don't

36:46

lean hard into it. You don't leave

36:48

everything for it to dictate. And you

36:52

bring some playfulness, some relaxation,

36:56

some deep choice. I want to do this.

37:00

It's so elusive.

37:02

It's so tiny. Our life didn't leave any

37:05

room for it anymore. We don't even

37:07

recognize when will come to visit us.

37:10

And here is the big shocker. It was for

37:12

me that I discovered one does not

37:15

develop the will.

37:19

The will never gets developed.

37:22

It's only get exposed.

37:25

Discipline gets developed. That's what

37:27

we mistaken will for. We call it will

37:30

will power etc.

37:33

But when a child is born with a problem,

37:37

when you're facing such a situation,

37:40

discipline might not be enough for you

37:43

to do what is necessary. or when a child

37:46

is born normal and you simply don't feel

37:50

love for that child that occurs a lot

37:54

what do I do now do I discipline myself

37:57

I need a different quality and I need to

38:01

research it and I need to open up space

38:03

for it in my life space to practice it

38:05

because it's not going to come from

38:07

somewhere else and the practice will not

38:09

develop it but it will expose an

38:12

invisible thread it's a sequentiality

38:15

I always do what I said I'm going to do,

38:20

but not by disciplinary action, but by

38:23

having a beautiful evasive sequence like

38:26

you moving around the traffic, finding

38:28

your way there. You never stopped

38:31

looking for the best route. It's a very

38:34

different approach than just pushing the

38:37

gas pedal forward.

38:38

>> Yeah. What's interesting is the traffic

38:41

example, while trivial, it hopefully

38:43

describes a process that people could

38:45

relate to. Not only did I not lose

38:47

energy from it, but I might have even

38:50

picked up some energy.

38:52

>> Beautiful.

38:53

>> And the commute was exactly the same. So

38:56

there's something in that experience and

38:57

I and you're explaining it beautifully.

39:00

This distinction between the will,

39:03

willpower, the expression of the will

39:06

and then discipline. Maybe we can define

39:09

the difference a little bit more so that

39:12

I can understand

39:14

when I'm in

39:17

discipline mode versus um exposing

39:21

willpower. You said you can build

39:22

discipline, you can't build the will.

39:24

The will is a is a fixed unit but a

39:27

hidden one, a very elusive one. [snorts]

39:31

uh we can discuss it more and we will

39:33

expose some things but we will not be

39:35

successful in a binary fashion. We won't

39:38

get it. The only way to get even a

39:41

critical mess with that concept is self

39:45

practice looking for that quality in

39:48

your life and I already mentioned that

39:51

the first requirement is to do things

39:53

you don't want to do which you're also a

39:56

big believer in from a variety of

39:58

reasons.

40:00

All of them are not as important as this

40:04

because they go to serve this layer,

40:07

this corrupted self, this success in

40:10

this area. This is not important. What

40:13

is important is you not all those

40:16

things. And will is actually that

40:19

representation of you. The totality, the

40:24

harmonious combination of all that you

40:27

are comes together and hence you can be

40:30

reliable. You have a sequence. You found

40:34

a way. You cannot push this forward. You

40:38

cannot force this. So you need first a

40:40

situation which you cannot you don't

40:42

want to do. So I tell people here is the

40:45

first requirement of this new practice

40:48

practice of will.

40:50

You have to wait for a moment. You don't

40:52

want to do the task. That's the first

40:54

thing. Not to go to the ice bath now.

40:58

This is a different process and will get

41:00

you somewhere else. Come up with a task

41:05

that only sometimes you don't want to

41:07

do. It's a crucial difference. And wait

41:10

for that moment. In that moment, catch

41:13

yourself. And there you have to

41:16

investigate. There there is a very fine

41:19

little game. It comes back to that

41:22

playfulness that we have to play. Do not

41:25

force into it. Don't jailbreak it. Don't

41:30

push hard into it. Second problem, do

41:33

not motivate yourself to do it. Don't

41:35

put any YouTube clips. Don't mention

41:37

slogans.

41:40

Relax yourself.

41:43

Essential component. Do not rigidify in

41:46

front of the task. If you do, lower the

41:49

bar. Find the task that has this right

41:51

dosage and build up gradually and

41:54

slowly. I like to use things like

41:57

difficult physical postures

42:00

like holding your arms out for 5

42:03

minutes. It's enough. Just straight arms

42:05

out. Some people can take it further

42:09

or 3 minutes or doing a horse stance and

42:13

then wait for a critical moment when I'm

42:16

tired. A lot of these things are very

42:18

useful. So I've grown to practice those

42:20

things before I at the end of the day

42:24

when I'm checking out that is the moment

42:26

where I bring it about. And then you

42:29

have to research and you have to find a

42:32

thread, a way to get this going again

42:36

and again and again with this gentle

42:38

quality, this playfulness, this softness

42:41

and slowly increase the bar. What will

42:44

you discover? Your will is sufficient is

42:47

like a mosquito's fart. That's the power

42:50

of our will. Even incredibly powerful

42:53

people because they only use discipline.

42:56

So their will is totally they don't know

42:58

how to identify it. They don't know how

42:59

to put it together. So you got to do

43:01

stuff that is so easy relatively easy

43:06

that you're not interested in doing it.

43:08

And that's why we don't develop will. So

43:11

these are some of the discoveries that I

43:13

I had with myself and trying to bring

43:16

about this quality because like you I

43:18

did a lot of stuff with powering

43:21

through. I think the value of a physical

43:23

practice um is probably obvious to

43:26

people or more intuitive like okay um

43:30

for some people ex exercise working out

43:33

movement practice perhaps there'll be

43:35

days when they want to do it there'll be

43:37

days when they don't want to do it if I

43:38

understand correctly

43:41

the idea is to get right up to that edge

43:44

and then instead of throwing oneself

43:47

across that threshold or getting enough

43:50

caffeine in yourself to get across cross

43:51

that threshold or doing hyper cyclic

43:53

hyperventilation breathing to get all

43:55

the things to kick up adrenaline talking

43:59

about getting right there relaxing and

44:02

almost letting yourself sort of drift

44:03

across but am I pushing a little bit am

44:07

I giving myself a nudge like to keep

44:09

going okay so I don't expect myself to

44:11

just default into it okay do you still

44:14

have to do that I mean you've been doing

44:15

movement practice many years are there

44:18

days when you feel that resistance And

44:21

you have to kind of nudge yourself

44:22

course if I don't feel the resistance I

44:26

don't have will. I don't develop will

44:27

and I don't have will. The whole point

44:30

of will is that it only comes to visit

44:32

and it's only necessary when there is a

44:34

resistance.

44:35

>> So you see those as opportunities

44:37

>> as well.

44:38

>> Mhm.

44:39

>> As well. But this is this is the trick.

44:41

But the to answer your question, my

44:43

answer might be a bit trickier than what

44:45

most people assume.

44:47

They want the remove of the the removal

44:51

of the problem and will that's the whole

44:54

point of will

44:55

>> right not to remove the problem and not

44:57

to also jailbreak it

45:00

and you've described it beautifully

45:03

and imagine even that clip that you saw

45:07

or over the last years things that you

45:10

saw me you see me do they're not

45:13

impressive anymore

45:15

I can still kick up here and do a one-

45:17

arm and stand in the center of the room.

45:19

My body looks different by choice and

45:23

how I move is different because I

45:25

discovered this is not going anywhere.

45:28

I've already been there. I've already

45:31

done that. I've used motivation,

45:34

discipline, this quality. I'm looking

45:38

for something much more powerful, but

45:40

much more gentle as well. So I had to go

45:43

back to baby steps and to play that game

45:47

that you you just mentioned beautifully,

45:50

the edge. Stand at the edge

45:54

and it has to be an edge. You're almost

45:56

not sure if you choose that task whether

45:59

it's difficult enough or not. It's not

46:01

the only practice. It's just another

46:03

flavor that is important for us to

46:05

practice. I still practice my

46:06

discipline. I still practice extremely

46:08

difficult things. But it's an important

46:11

flavor that I missed.

46:13

>> Mhm.

46:14

>> And I think most people are missing it.

46:16

They have no interest in doing it. It's

46:18

too easy. They don't understand the

46:21

point is not in the task at all. The

46:23

point is is in the quality that

46:25

develops, the attribute that develops

46:27

inside of us, which is one of the most

46:29

important basic attributes. I want to

46:32

know when I'm going to war with you,

46:35

whatever war that is, that you're

46:37

reliable to have a word.

46:40

And that cannot rely on caffeine or on

46:45

on discipline. And and you can play this

46:47

game. I'm right now extremely

46:48

jet-lagged. So I'm I'm very tired. So I

46:52

play this game with myself. I I have

46:54

this little internal smile here in my

46:58

jaw inside. I I I play I pay attention

47:02

to what is going on in the internal

47:04

realm, this interceptive thing and I

47:08

play a game. Before I used to kind of

47:10

push against it, harden against it and

47:13

push through whatever needs to be done

47:16

and so this way of practicing taught me

47:18

a lot.

47:20

>> I'd like to take a quick break and

47:22

acknowledge our sponsor AG1. AG1 is a

47:25

vitamin mineral probiotic drink that

47:27

also includes prebiotics and adaptogens.

47:30

I discovered AG1 way back in 2012, long

47:33

before I ever had a podcast, and I've

47:35

been taking it every day since. The

47:37

reason I started taking AG1, and the

47:39

reason I still take it every day, is

47:40

because AG1 is, to my knowledge, the

47:42

highest quality and most comprehensive

47:44

of the foundational nutritional

47:46

supplements on the market. AG1 is

47:48

designed to support things like gut

47:49

health, immune health, and overall

47:51

energy. And it does so by helping to

47:53

fill any gaps that you might have in

47:55

your daily nutrition. I get asked pretty

47:57

much all the time, if I could only take

47:59

one supplement, what should that

48:00

supplement be? And my answer is always

48:02

AG1. It has just been so helpful for

48:05

supporting all aspects of physical

48:07

health, mental health, and performance.

48:09

If you would like to try AG1, you can go

48:11

to drinkag1.com/huberman

48:14

to get a special offer. For a limited

48:16

time, AG1 is giving away a free bottle

48:18

of their new Omega-3 co-enzyme Q10

48:20

product. Omega-3 and co-enzyme Q10 are

48:22

known to support cardiovascular health,

48:25

cellular health and energy, generally,

48:27

brain health, and much more. I

48:29

personally take them both every day.

48:31

Again, go to drinkaga1.com/huberman

48:34

to get a free bottle of the new Omega-3

48:36

co-enzyme Q10 with your first AG1

48:38

subscription. Yeah, I'm I'm very

48:41

intrigued by this this notion of of play

48:44

because I do think that it's energy

48:47

conserving if not energy building. And

48:50

it's kind of incredible, right? I mean,

48:52

we know that neuroplasticity is

48:54

triggered by friction points, you know,

48:55

some level of autonomic arousal. How why

48:58

else would the nervous system change if

48:59

it can do what it needs to do? You need

49:01

a change in the millu, the chemical

49:03

environment. But if one can get it from

49:05

play, that's awesome because the other

49:09

thing takes literally adrenaline,

49:11

norepinephrine. Yes, we love dopamine,

49:13

but that little cocktail of

49:15

catacolamines as we call them, that is

49:18

energy. That's chi. That's the It's

49:20

energetically costly to be in that

49:22

state. Play is a different cocktail. It

49:25

includes some of those, but it includes

49:27

some other stuff, too. We know this

49:28

neurochemically. So, I'm not just

49:30

speaking in metaphors. And it does seem

49:33

to open something up. And it's a sounds

49:36

so subtle. I'm going to be playful about

49:38

this really important thing, this

49:40

challenging thing versus I'm going to

49:42

just, you know, I'm going to just drill

49:44

into this. the rigidity that comes about

49:47

is is almost instantaneous

49:49

>> and it's more representative of you in

49:53

the way that I see this word you self I

49:58

because again that that the use of that

50:00

cocktail that the jailbreaking

50:04

is a very it removes something from

50:08

engaging it it numbs something. So here

50:12

this is the most crucial point. We get

50:14

to transform ourselves

50:17

by choosing to do something deeply

50:21

saying I want to do this in the moment

50:25

that you don't want to do this to find

50:28

that paradoxical thing. It's a

50:30

multistability. You have to be able to

50:33

glimpse these two things to feel this

50:35

emotional contradiction and to remain

50:38

functional without collapsing to remain

50:40

functional and moving forward leaning

50:43

forward into the direction. This is a

50:46

critical way of doing this is a a big

50:49

passion of mine in the last years cuz I

50:52

realized it's so crucial such a missing

50:55

component

50:57

and having listened to you and and and

51:00

various people that you brought along

51:02

really helped me helped me see it to

51:05

understand it to look at the scientific

51:09

side and the anatomy and the and the way

51:11

that we are constructing these models

51:14

and to see if that match matches my

51:16

experience and what exactly is missing

51:18

and where am I lying to myself in that

51:20

sense. So it turned out to be a valuable

51:24

insight.

51:25

>> It's come up before on a few podcasts

51:27

and you may have heard this but I'll

51:28

just briefly describe we have a finally

51:31

thanks to the work largely of my

51:33

colleague Joe Parveves at Stanford. We

51:34

have a neurological understanding of

51:37

tenacity and willpower and the

51:39

plasticity that is this anterior mids

51:41

singulate cortex that gets activated

51:42

when we don't want to do something and

51:44

we force ourselves to do it and that

51:46

structure enlarges and it becomes easier

51:48

to access and so we you know in that

51:50

sense the the discipline piece really

51:52

can be built up

51:54

>> definitely

51:54

>> the recognition that oh I don't want to

51:56

do this feels a lot like the I don't

51:57

want to do that and I was able to do

51:59

that that anterior midsulate cortex can

52:02

go to work on a number of things it's a

52:04

it's a real thing. We don't yet have the

52:09

coralate structure for the play piece.

52:11

>> Definitely

52:11

>> and it may be distributed, right? We

52:13

always want to think there's a

52:14

structure, the amygdala, fear, inter

52:16

midsulate cortex, tenacity, but these

52:18

are circuit phenomena. But but it would

52:20

be so nice to be able to find a neural

52:22

coralate because there does seem to be

52:24

something very special about people in

52:27

their 70s, 80s, 90s who

52:30

>> they're in the longevity game clearly

52:33

and they're taking great care of their

52:35

bodies and their minds, but there's a

52:37

playful spirit in there that

52:40

is never discussed in this whole

52:42

longevity thing, but it's clearly very

52:45

very crucial. hard to research that of

52:48

course from obvious reasons it's much

52:50

more easier to to research this

52:52

discipline right

52:53

>> to be playful

52:56

I I want to I want to give something

53:00

positive we all meet this quality even

53:03

many of us believe I never am in this

53:07

state investigate

53:10

>> investigate into your past like you

53:13

mentioned this moment of driving but I I

53:16

want to tell you something.

53:19

Investigate yesterday. It was also there

53:23

for moments. For brief moments, you can

53:25

always and by studying this, you would

53:27

help yourself because it is always

53:30

present. It's almost guaranteed to be

53:33

there even in extremely depressed

53:36

people. Part of the problem of

53:38

depression is this rigidity

53:40

to change to to recognize these positive

53:44

moments, right? and to to to transform

53:46

the model. So we don't end up harvesting

53:51

it but it's there. It's an important

53:54

thing because without

53:57

learning the flavor and the texture of

53:59

that we have no chance of approaching

54:03

that developing this playfulness this

54:05

will this softness about things that can

54:08

do a lot. There's a third bin which I

54:12

think people default to including myself

54:14

right I think about discipline will or

54:18

laziness sloth and wasting time. Right

54:21

now we're talking about using discipline

54:24

or a mode of play to do something. These

54:26

days it seems a lot of having a good

54:29

life is about not doing certain things.

54:32

mostly for most people not having your

54:36

consciousness and your body pulled into

54:39

algorithms. You know, I'm a fan of

54:41

social media. I learn there. I

54:44

[clears throat] see you there. I try and

54:46

teach there. But there is a way in which

54:49

our body shape, our mental shape can be

54:52

structured around this wheel of infinite

54:56

stimuli. That's how I think about it

54:57

now. Now when I go into uh social media,

55:01

I think about it as a wheel of infinite

55:03

stimula. Like a rat in an experiment. If

55:06

I want to keep that rat engaged, just

55:08

give it this, give it that. Doesn't like

55:09

this, give it that. I mean, that's the

55:10

algorithm. I try and see myself in it so

55:13

that I can navigate it with some

55:14

intentionality like, oh, this is

55:16

interesting. I'm actually quite

55:17

inspired. I'm not just saying this by

55:20

the content you've put up over the

55:21

years. I really think hard about the

55:23

I've gone and looked up authors. You

55:24

know, your philosophers and many things

55:26

I don't know. So I I follow up on those.

55:29

In the domain of strength training,

55:32

there's this guy Tom Havland. I think he

55:34

was used to be Australian special

55:35

forces. He only posts from the back. He

55:37

doesn't disclose his identity. Very

55:39

large guy. Um doing zer squats, you

55:42

know, where the bar is in the crook of

55:43

the elbow with, you know, 500 plus

55:45

pounds with pauses and it's very, you

55:48

know, if you really impressive feats of

55:51

strength. So I see and learn and

55:54

inspired by things I see in social

55:55

media. Sends me down the path of

55:58

learning. I didn't even know what a zer

55:59

squat was until recently. It's kind of

56:01

cool. Like I know the crooks of elbows

56:03

could hold that much. And the core

56:04

bracing is really interesting. But a lot

56:07

of my life these days is about no this

56:10

is not a stimulus space I want to spend

56:13

time in. I'm 50 now. I don't know how

56:16

long I'll live. Hopefully a long time.

56:18

But allocation of energy is like 90% of

56:23

the game of life, right? Maybe more. So

56:27

when you think about practices for

56:30

resisting

56:31

doing something, the no-go as we say in

56:34

neuroscience, not go tasks, but no go.

56:37

How do you think about pulling back in a

56:41

playful way? That's a little bit harder.

56:43

Beautiful question and very important

56:47

thing to to look at to examine and I I

56:50

can offer my my personal experiences

56:53

that's the only thing that I can but

56:56

again the pullback deleting the app

57:00

you know take something off throwing

57:03

your phone on the rooftop

57:04

>> done it done it

57:05

>> that's why I mentioned it cuz you told

57:07

me last time we met

57:08

>> yeah when I used to have to write grants

57:10

I would either give my phone to my

57:12

students early days and I'd say if I

57:13

asked for that back before 5:00 p.m.

57:16

today, everyone in lab gets a $100 bill.

57:19

I didn't have the money to do that. I

57:22

didn't ask for it back by 5 or throw it

57:25

on the roof and go get it later. And

57:27

this action, I'm not against it. May

57:30

maybe it sounds like it's jailbreaking

57:33

something, but it's a required moment.

57:38

One of the first thing with will

57:41

is the recognition that we're not in

57:43

contact with it that we don't possess

57:45

and we should verify it for ourselves by

57:48

trying to do things

57:50

which are definitely possible and we

57:54

can't we can't do them.

57:56

>> Mhm. [clears throat] How do I pull back

58:00

in this way? Isn't this good to delete

58:04

the app?

58:06

It's a way of

58:08

paying upfront.

58:11

It's painful and it's costly. It's

58:14

expensive. It's a required thing. Part

58:18

of me say

58:20

I'm not sure I'll be here in a few more

58:23

moments. I'm going to take this action.

58:26

It reminds me of I have great fear of

58:28

heights.

58:29

>> You?

58:29

>> Yeah. It reminds me when I went to

58:33

bungee jump the first time with friends

58:36

decades ago in Greece and I'm climbing

58:38

up there and I'm watching down this tiny

58:40

swimming pool from the crane and I

58:43

realized in that moment there is no way

58:46

I'm jumping down and the other part of

58:49

me realized there is no way I'm climbing

58:52

down

58:53

the girl screaming down there you know

58:56

and I I just stood there and I just I

58:58

just kind of threw myself forward. I

59:00

jailbreed it years after I've I redone

59:04

it with a different quality.

59:07

I softened into it.

59:09

>> Mhm. [clears throat]

59:10

>> And I found a way to

59:13

come down feeling this great

59:17

pain, physical pain, and at the same

59:20

time the multi-stability feel a

59:23

softness, a wave of softness passing

59:25

through me as tiny as it was. So when

59:27

I'm pulling back it's very important

59:30

that I interact with this action also in

59:33

that way that I don't force myself in a

59:36

sad mazoistic way that I don't do this

59:39

action from that place maybe it's the

59:42

beginning of the process maybe it's

59:43

something that is a required stepping

59:45

stone something that you have to do but

59:47

later you learn to soften into it and

59:51

eventually you can leave the app you

59:53

don't delete it and it's there and you

59:56

keep on softening as it jumps calling

60:00

you back again and again and again and

60:01

you've developed this feedback. You've

60:03

changed, you've transformed your model

60:06

and there is a new reaction

60:09

to that stimulus and you relax. When

60:12

when the stimulus calls your name, you

60:15

recognize it, note it, and the first

60:18

thing that you do, you soften yourself,

60:20

you relax, you put a little smile on,

60:23

and only then do you go back to the task

60:25

at hand. You change the way instead of

60:28

saying no, I don't want to go back into

60:31

social media now. I want to work on my

60:33

book and forcing yourself back. You take

60:35

another extra step.

60:38

Oh, it's calling my name again.

60:42

I note it. I recognized it. I soften

60:45

myself. And only then do I go back to

60:47

the test at hand. The outcome would be

60:49

totally different. Millions of times

60:51

forward. Done again and again. you would

60:54

be amazed by the difference.

60:57

>> I absolutely get what you're saying that

60:59

there's something about paying attention

61:02

to the subtle trans subtle ripples like

61:06

they're these ripples and that language

61:08

of the subtle ripples of consciousness

61:10

makes it sound like I'm trying to be

61:11

poetic, but I I really can't find a

61:14

better language than these like subtle

61:16

ripples. It's the same thing, I believe,

61:20

as noticing the transition between

61:23

asleep and awake. Just a little bit more

61:25

each day. Maybe some days you miss it.

61:27

You just pop up and go into the day and

61:28

then you I missed I missed the there

61:30

were these ripples in between. But

61:32

catching them, this is one of the most

61:35

important attributes

61:37

also in the physical body that I believe

61:39

is totally missing from our physical

61:41

modern movement, culture, physical

61:44

practice. Granularity. I call it bodily

61:48

resolution in the application to the

61:50

body. Notice I'm not talking about

61:53

mobility or definitely not about

61:56

flexibility. There is a certain

61:59

refinement and with it a certain

62:02

complexity

62:04

that if it's not challenged by novelty

62:07

and by certain qualities of attention,

62:09

there is a deterioration of the model.

62:11

There is a simplification. There is a

62:14

hardening of the body schema. It becomes

62:17

more black and whitish and living in

62:20

this physical form becomes hell.

62:23

[snorts] The same thing happens in the

62:25

emotional schema in the emotional model

62:27

of ourselves. And the same thing happens

62:29

on the conceptual or intellectual

62:32

abstraction model.

62:34

The same thing happen in the social

62:36

schema. The same thing happen on the

62:38

spatial schema. If you don't continue to

62:42

make it detailed and to appreciate the

62:45

details, you will have a deterioration.

62:48

You're moving up or down. There is no

62:51

status quo that it's never stable.

62:53

Hence, guess what? Most people going to

62:56

the gym, doing these runs,

63:00

they totally lost something and they

63:02

don't even know. They're not as they

63:05

were as children. They don't look like

63:08

that. Kung Fu master in Beijing, 5:00 am

63:11

at the park walking with the stout of a

63:15

a child. We like to mention blue zones,

63:19

but we don't you don't look like the

63:22

blue zones. We like to mention the

63:24

importance of muscle mass for longevity,

63:26

but which muscle mass are you talking

63:28

about? Not that muscle mass. It's a

63:31

different quantity.

63:34

So we kind of moved away from those fine

63:39

things and the refinement of them is

63:42

very very important emotionally the

63:45

emotional granularity

63:47

to recognize it's so important.

63:51

Depression puts everything into the

63:53

black and white thing. So it's the

63:56

extreme and then the other side is very

63:59

high resolution of emotional

64:02

appreciation and perception

64:05

that can turn against you but only when

64:08

the conceptual layer comes and

64:10

manipulates that information. But as

64:12

long as it stays within the

64:14

nondiscursive

64:17

the the raw Yeah. the raw thing coming

64:21

from this alostostatic

64:24

system. The the the the the

64:27

way that we define our state like

64:31

poetry. That's why also reading poetry

64:34

helps and and reading literature helps

64:36

in this way. It makes you a lot more

64:38

complex. And now you discover it's not a

64:42

good or bad thing anymore, but you're

64:46

playing a different game. And here is

64:47

the playfulness back. Mhm. Because I'm

64:50

even playing game with that.

64:53

Oh, I'm I feel bad. I feel good. I feel

64:58

neutral. That thing starts to open up. I

65:02

abandon this and I go back to the body.

65:06

And that's why I like to send people

65:09

back to the body. The eye is a lot more

65:13

this than what we think it is,

65:15

especially meditators, etc. is not up

65:19

here. And of course they're talking

65:22

about it the way of the heart and you

65:24

know the har the danten etc. But

65:29

you can see when somebody is

65:32

embodied

65:33

there are signs there are cues to it in

65:36

the way that people move in the way that

65:38

they are here. [snorts] And I I often

65:41

don't see those those those clues and

65:45

then there is a great deterioration. So

65:48

I I don't care so much about structures

65:50

these days about muscle mass about you

65:53

know the joint protective things the

65:56

connective tissue or whatever because I

65:57

believe the model deteriorates way

66:00

before and the consequences come after

66:02

once the model has degraded the

66:05

simulation now we are in trouble and now

66:08

the the the structural effects are just

66:10

following that years forward decades

66:12

forward and then we discover it it's too

66:14

late

66:15

words are dangerous

66:17

like the spinal column. Do you know how

66:20

many spines this destroyed?

66:23

Countless. It's not a column. And

66:26

treating it like a column destroys our

66:29

spine. It's the way that I model myself.

66:31

Even in my words, I can I can sense that

66:35

I can feel that different languages have

66:37

different words for those things and

66:39

clues are there. the lack of

66:41

appreciation of fine micro actions

66:44

inside the torso in between the ribs, we

66:47

don't appreciate it.

66:49

The way that we distribute

66:52

pressure in the body practices that I

66:55

engage with, that I teach, that I work

66:57

with, they're very powerful, but we

66:59

don't leave room for that. We want to

67:01

go, we want to do something quickly,

67:03

crudely, and we deteriorate.

67:06

And then we go to the protocols. We go

67:09

to the help help me and and yeah there

67:13

is some help the there is definitely

67:16

some help there but to lift it into a

67:19

meaningful healing is not often done. I

67:24

I believe because the practice is

67:26

missing the notion of high resolution

67:29

versus low resolution language

67:33

movement and awareness. Maybe we just

67:35

kind of grab those three and I know

67:37

there there are others. I think about

67:38

this a lot. Uh let's start with

67:40

language. Lisa Feldman Barrett, who's a

67:43

psychologist, I would also consider

67:45

somewhat of a neuroscientist because she

67:47

collaborates with neuroscientists and is

67:49

studies emotion. And she's been very

67:51

clear and it's absolutely true that in

67:54

cultures where there's many words to

67:57

describe different aspects of sadness,

67:59

aspects of happiness, even some

68:02

extremely specific circumstances. is

68:04

like there's a Japanese word, forgive

68:05

me, I don't remember, for the the

68:07

sadness one feels after a bad haircut.

68:10

The more nuance and specificity, the

68:14

less likely people are going to default

68:17

to I'm sad, I'm depressed, just kind of

68:20

like throw themselves in the broad bin.

68:22

And uh I refer to it as the

68:25

emojification

68:26

of

68:28

>> mental life. I'm happy. I'm sad. I'm

68:30

depressed. I do think that it's nice to

68:32

have a range of language ability so you

68:36

can talk to people of different

68:38

backgrounds. Some people are more

68:40

hyperverbal than others. a colleague of

68:42

mine at uh NYU um Tony Mauvshin who runs

68:45

the center for neuroscience. He's he

68:47

described an intellectual beautifully

68:49

and you certainly uh fit this

68:51

description which is an intellectual is

68:54

somebody who can talk about and work

68:56

with a concept or something at multiple

68:59

levels of granularity that are

69:01

appropriate for the conversation. like

69:03

we're going pretty deep today peeling

69:05

back layers looking you know if you have

69:07

three minutes you know it's a different

69:09

conversation but I think as you said

69:12

this is the advantage of reading more

69:14

challenging books at times or kids books

69:17

which are very simple in essence but

69:20

deliver the message in with in very

69:22

succinctly

69:23

>> generally right so I think there's real

69:25

value to working up and down the ladder

69:28

in language and having that at one's

69:30

disposal

69:31

>> and here is Another practice we go back

69:34

to being pragmatic,

69:36

ambiguity,

69:39

incompleteness.

69:42

Do you bring it about?

69:45

>> Not having to have everything resolved.

69:47

>> No.

69:47

>> And not only in the terms of problem

69:50

solving or or or or a physical what we

69:53

call kinetic coins. This is great. This

69:57

develops movement intelligence.

69:58

Something that I work with a lot.

70:00

reading puzzling symbolic texts,

70:04

parallels,

70:06

difficult to resolve things and maybe

70:09

never resolve things or movies, watch

70:11

Tarovski,

70:13

Hodorovski,

70:14

it's a very different experience than

70:16

Hollywood or watching contemporary dance

70:20

that is contemporary in the sense that I

70:22

can't define it. It's happening right

70:24

now and I'm not sure what I'm even

70:26

watching here. I've been taken to some

70:29

contemporary dance where I thought I

70:31

don't know what I'm watching.

70:32

>> Yeah. And the first time I went to wash,

70:34

I said, "I don't like it." Yes.

70:36

>> And I'm gonna come back. [laughter]

70:38

>> That was the distinguishing factor

70:39

between you and me. But I've since

70:40

developed a real appreciation uh for uh

70:44

there are some forms of dance that um

70:47

Eric Jarvis was a guest on the podcast

70:49

neuroscientist who was uh going to be

70:51

part of the Alvin

70:53

Dance Company took a hard left turn into

70:56

neuroscience and studies language and

70:58

will say this will a relevant tangent.

71:02

The species of birds that can talk are

71:05

also the ones that can dance. And he

71:08

thinks bodily movement

71:10

based on the genetics. He studies the

71:12

genetics of language and the same genes

71:15

that are in these speech areas are

71:18

strongly expressed in very similar

71:21

motifs

71:22

>> in the areas of movement. So he thinks

71:24

bodily movement is the fundamental

71:26

language. I'll just leave it at that. I

71:28

need to get you two in the same room at

71:30

some point and then I won't just want to

71:32

be there listening. If everything

71:34

depends on language, we also have to be

71:36

careful because then the granularity of

71:39

language will be the limiting factor and

71:42

it's huge pieces. So this like playing

71:45

with play the the not Lego, you know,

71:49

there was technical Lego, the small

71:50

little bits. I love this.

71:52

>> There was a normal Lego and then there

71:54

was a the the big one, the big chunks

71:57

that you started from. So, it's like

71:59

you're working with these

72:01

words are corrupted

72:04

and they're corrupting us and they're

72:07

supposed to be containers, but they

72:09

don't they're not containers. They're

72:11

more pointers,

72:13

but we've lost what they're pointing at.

72:15

The simulacum versus the sim simulation.

72:20

Simulation is something that creates a

72:24

model of something real. simulacum

72:28

is now disconnected. There is not

72:31

anymore that real thing. When I

72:33

investigated this deeply with myself, I

72:35

don't believe there is an inherent

72:37

difference between these two, but there

72:39

is definitely critical masses that can

72:42

be achieved. For example,

72:45

the sensory thing, sensor, sensory motor

72:48

thing is a lot less corrupted than the

72:51

conceptual schema. Even that is not

72:55

reality. The senses don't bring reality.

72:58

They model reality. They are simulation

73:02

machines.

73:02

>> Everything we experience is an

73:04

abstraction of what our senses are

73:07

pulling into our brain.

73:09

>> Which means

73:10

ignoring uniqueness,

73:13

erasing differences for the sake of

73:16

communicating it to the system even on

73:19

the level of sensation because it would

73:21

be overwhelming.

73:24

We would be crushed

73:26

by reality if the band wage is opened

73:29

fully.

73:30

>> Certainly if it was opened all at once.

73:32

I mean I'm um

73:33

>> this is also what happens with

73:34

psychedelics by the way. Sometimes

73:36

>> too much pours in. Yeah.

73:38

>> There there is a bandage expansion

73:40

>> too much cross talk. I mean we should

73:42

acknowledge this you know so in the

73:44

studies of psilocybin and it's um where

73:47

it has been shown to improve major

73:50

depression the typical outcome is you

73:53

know scan before

73:57

I should mention this is you know

73:58

therapy assisted psychedelic um

74:00

experience not just recreational therapy

74:03

therapy therapy therapy with

74:05

psychedelics therapy therapy therapy

74:08

therapy with psychedelic we're talking

74:10

about psilocybin here therapy Y therapy

74:11

therapy therapy therapy. Not just head

74:14

into the woods, eat a bunch of

74:15

mushrooms, talk to your friends. The

74:17

most consistent observation in the brain

74:20

is a lot more connectivity between areas

74:22

that weren't communicating prior to

74:24

that, which can offer new opportunities

74:26

for insight, new opportunities for um

74:30

it's literal integration and the

74:32

unmasking of connections that were there

74:34

but were more or less suppressed. This

74:36

can be a really good thing. It can also

74:38

be a really bad thing. One of the

74:41

hallmark definitions of psychosis is

74:43

clang associations where people with

74:45

schizophrenia or other forms of

74:46

psychosis will say, you know, this is a

74:48

really cool cup up. So everything's

74:51

moving up or stock market, you know, and

74:53

they they just follow the language in a

74:55

meaningless way that any non-sychotic

74:58

person says all they're doing is

75:00

following the rhyming of the words.

75:02

>> Those are not good connections to

75:03

follow. If you want to be functional in

75:04

the world, you might write an

75:06

interesting

75:07

book using that tool. consciously, but

75:10

these people live in that reality. So,

75:13

the pouring in and the cross

75:15

connectivity, the plasticity, it's it's

75:17

not always a good thing. I'd like to

75:20

take a quick break and acknowledge one

75:21

of our sponsors, Element. Element is an

75:24

electrolyte drink that has everything

75:26

you need and nothing you don't. That

75:28

means the electrolytes, sodium,

75:29

magnesium, and potassium, all in the

75:31

correct ratios, but no sugar. Proper

75:33

hydration is critical for brain and body

75:36

function. Even a slight degree of

75:38

dehydration can diminish your cognitive

75:40

and physical performance. It's also

75:42

important that you get adequate

75:43

electrolytes. The electrolytes, sodium,

75:45

magnesium, and potassium are vital for

75:47

the functioning of all cells in your

75:49

body, especially your neurons or your

75:51

nerve cells. Drinking element makes it

75:53

very easy to ensure that you're getting

75:54

adequate hydration and adequate

75:56

electrolytes. My days tend to start

75:59

really fast, meaning I have to jump

76:00

right into work or right into exercise.

76:03

So, to make sure that I'm hydrated and I

76:04

have sufficient electrolytes, when I

76:06

first wake up in the morning, I drink 16

76:08

to 32 ounces of water with an element

76:10

packet dissolved in it. I also drink

76:12

Element dissolved in water during any

76:14

kind of physical exercise that I'm

76:15

doing, especially on hot days when I'm

76:17

sweating a lot and losing water and

76:19

electrolytes. Element has a bunch of

76:21

great tasting flavors. In fact, I love

76:23

them all. I love the watermelon, the

76:24

raspberry, the citrus, and I really love

76:26

the lemonade flavor. So, if you'd like

76:28

to try Element, you can go to

76:29

drinkelement.com/huberman

76:32

to claim a free element sample pack with

76:34

any purchase. Again, that's

76:35

drinkelement.com/huberman

76:38

to claim a free sample pack. In terms of

76:41

movement, I absolutely agree. I think

76:43

that um people who are not exercising

76:45

enough, not moving enough, not walking

76:47

enough are starting to approximate a

76:49

C-shape internally rotated. We see that

76:52

if people are taking on an exercise

76:54

program, which I think is generally

76:56

healthy, walking more, hopefully doing

76:59

some movement that gets their heart rate

77:00

up, hopefully list lifting some objects

77:03

that are outside their ability so then

77:04

they get stronger and so forth. Okay,

77:06

great. Should people do all of that and

77:10

then start to think about

77:13

the other syllables and vowels and and

77:17

uh language of movement and incorporate

77:19

that into their life or if given the

77:22

choice should people start with

77:26

many many forms of movement and the

77:28

reason I ask this is a very practical

77:30

one. Many people will say, "Well, this

77:32

all sounds great, but I got to get up in

77:34

the morning, make myself breakfast, take

77:36

my kids to school, do all my things. I

77:38

get 30 minutes. I need to get my heart

77:40

rate up. Got to get my zone 3, four. I

77:42

now have to lift things." You're telling

77:44

me now I have to pay attention to the

77:46

subtle ripples of movement, you know?

77:48

So, I could see either argument being

77:51

true that just like check off the boxes.

77:55

heart health, muscle health, ligaments,

77:57

fight deterioration,

77:59

add something on top of that versus no,

78:01

let's treat the whole system as having a

78:04

lot more opportunity there and start

78:06

there no matter where you are. That's

78:09

that's a practical question embedded in

78:11

a somewhat intellectual conversation.

78:13

>> I'll push back.

78:15

>> Mhm.

78:16

>> The question is already corrupted.

78:18

First, it's a exercise approach to

78:21

physicality.

78:23

I have 30 minutes a day and what do you

78:26

do with the rest of your time? That is

78:29

the push back.

78:30

>> Mhm.

78:32

>> What do we do that is so important that

78:36

we don't have time to pay attention to

78:39

the ripples of movement when we are

78:41

living our lives, cooking, doing?

78:45

When you're listening to me, are you

78:47

fully engaged and listening to me? Now

78:51

we are not using this time well.

78:56

Even highly productive people actually

78:58

those are often the case.

79:02

They are never

79:04

using the time well in the sense of that

79:07

presence.

79:09

So what I'm suggesting is a paradigm

79:12

shift

79:13

in the way that I view my physicality at

79:16

all. the way that I view my day today,

79:18

my being when I'm listening to you. I'm

79:22

not running after these words in my head

79:25

and

79:27

I'm also in the physical experience of

79:30

what is occurring right now and and I

79:32

developed this through my practice. We

79:34

need better education and we need better

79:36

tools

79:38

and this is the new limiting factor.

79:42

Even AI recognizes it more and more and

79:45

it will I predict become the crucial

79:48

component. The body the sensory

79:53

symbols

79:55

that are popping out

79:57

when a symbol comes to our mind that

80:01

that that that

80:03

impression those impressions that are

80:05

they are so important

80:08

without them there is nothing. And we've

80:11

tried to go down to the the root of it.

80:14

I've I've spent a lot of time reading

80:16

about this and figuring out what is the

80:18

raw currency of

80:22

cognition of that ab ob abstraction

80:25

schema. And I've heard many answers.

80:28

There is the the primal or primitive

80:30

semantics this point of view like

80:33

something that is under language. And

80:36

there is this um point of view from

80:39

phenomenology

80:40

and that this this area or or there is

80:43

the invariance something that does not

80:46

change no matter how you look at it

80:47

that's the most crucial basic element

80:50

but the best answer that I found is this

80:53

drawing a boundary

80:55

selecting which means when I look at you

80:59

I select you from the environment

81:03

I create a boundary inside my

81:05

simulation. This is the most as as

81:07

George Spencer Brown talks about this in

81:10

laws of form. This is the the act of

81:13

differentiation.

81:15

This creates the most basic thought

81:18

matter. It's a thing now. And the

81:21

unselected state which also represents

81:23

the the entropy second law of

81:26

thermodynamics the the soup that wants

81:28

to pull us back

81:30

is

81:32

the other side. So this selection and

81:35

the unselected state which are

81:37

codependent of course

81:40

they are the very root of of things. So

81:45

when we play this game of paying

81:48

attention and the quality of it we are

81:52

interacting

81:54

underneath the problems with the system.

81:58

We are going to the and I'm talking

82:01

about this open presence pre- language

82:05

thing that must inform the language

82:07

formation anyways it doesn't come from

82:09

anywhere so there must be something

82:11

underneath and and I'm sure you can

82:15

teach me a lot about that a lot more

82:17

than what I researched myself but the

82:20

experience of it myself is very

82:22

important to try to find that gentle

82:27

layer

82:29

and to try to interact with it. This

82:31

will transform the body schema and we

82:34

have to teach it to children when we

82:37

come about and some cultures maintain it

82:39

to a larger degree and of course it

82:41

depends on the language and on other

82:42

habits. This is below exercise. This is

82:46

and then I use exercise very efficiently

82:49

when you have that when the model is

82:52

addressed. I do this work with athletes.

82:55

I do this work with grandmas. I do this

82:57

work with Alzheimer patients, with

83:00

musicians.

83:01

This is very potent.

83:04

So stop trying to fit me into something

83:08

corrupted in that sense. I'm telling the

83:10

world in that physical sense of I got to

83:13

fit into this fitness practice. I got to

83:16

fit into this exercise idea because when

83:19

I'm looking deeper, I don't see a lot of

83:22

promise there. Those are positive

83:24

manipulations. They can be definitely,

83:26

but we need to go further. And we're not

83:29

because we stay with that 30 minutes a

83:32

day idea.

83:35

And this is everywhere. You don't need

83:36

to become like me, a practitioner of

83:38

movement all day. In the official side,

83:40

it becomes the unofficial practice. Your

83:43

way of being, your way of doing things.

83:46

I turn everything into this. the way

83:48

that I drink from the cup, the way that

83:51

I sit right now, the way that I'm

83:53

listening, and it's coming from the

83:55

official side of my practice. I had to

83:57

learn it in a structured way and then to

84:00

pull it back into my life. Much more

84:03

important than to learn to meditate.

84:05

Much more potent because it is

84:07

meditation in the deep sense of the

84:09

word.

84:10

>> You mentioned Alzheimer's. Um,

84:13

there are more and more scientific

84:15

findings all the time showing that loss

84:18

of vision, subtle or severe, loss of

84:22

hearing, subtle or severe, can either

84:27

accelerate or maybe even cause some of

84:31

the um deprivation

84:34

symptoms of Alzheimer's, memory

84:36

deprivation, uh, this kind of thing. And

84:38

it makes good sense, right? Right? It's

84:41

unfortunate, but it makes good sense.

84:43

Meaning,

84:44

if there are fewer inputs to the system,

84:46

the system is deprived by definition,

84:49

and then the system starts working with

84:50

deprived inputs and it degrades. And in

84:53

Alzheimer's, they like to mention that

84:55

the feedback is damaged.

84:57

>> But they threw the baby with the

84:59

bathwater. Even when the feedback is

85:02

damaged, it's not a monochromatic thing,

85:05

black and white. You got to continue to

85:07

challenge the system.

85:09

When I tear

85:11

a muscle, my rotator cuff, I rehab

85:15

myself by going back into motion. I

85:17

don't put a cast on. I treat Alzheimer's

85:20

in the same way. I practice. And this is

85:24

incredibly powerful. Like loading the

85:27

skeleton for osteoporosis.

85:30

Forget about the nutritional

85:32

side of things. Lift something heavy for

85:35

God's sake. pound the ground in in the

85:39

right dosages and ways. It it is a lot

85:42

more potent.

85:45

>> We have to change our way of looking at

85:48

things here. This thing here is called

85:51

practice. This is a school. Life is not

85:54

for living. Life is for practicing. It

85:58

is a place. It's a school we came to.

86:01

Maybe spiritually you can take it there

86:03

as well. But I'm talking even

86:05

neurologically.

86:06

That's who we are. That's what we are.

86:09

And viewing yourself in this way is very

86:12

very potent. And it will not take your

86:14

life away. You don't need more than 30

86:17

minutes a day. It will enrich the

86:19

current life that you have. But you have

86:22

to educate yourself and you have to go

86:24

deeper into these concepts in order to

86:26

apply it correctly. That's my belief in

86:28

in regards to this and I've seen it.

86:31

>> Beautifully put. I could not agree more.

86:34

uh we are in a curriculum of life and

86:36

our nervous system and all the rest of

86:38

us is being shaped by that and we have

86:40

agency about what we bring in. Thank

86:43

you. I see it on you. It's clear to me.

86:46

It's very clear who's practicing and

86:49

who's not. On some level when you meet

86:52

people, if you're practicing yourself,

86:54

if you're in this practice, if you're

86:56

under this load, in this conscious

87:00

interaction, choice, with suffering,

87:02

with friction, with difficulties, but

87:04

also with awe, with curiosity, with all

87:07

those things in a directed way, not in a

87:10

way that holds on to who I am. Doesn't

87:13

matter who I am currently. I'm not

87:16

interested in that. I am not my friend

87:20

in that sense. There is a place in me

87:22

that I recognize this is not my friend.

87:26

But it doesn't turn into a beatdown. It

87:28

doesn't turn into this. It's very

87:30

important that the the multistability is

87:33

held and then I can I can become I

87:39

practice myself into the next day. I

87:42

practice myself into the next moment.

87:44

And this is the crucial moment. So when

87:47

I'm doing podcasts or whatever, I use

87:50

it. I manipulate the situation for my

87:53

practice and for the practice of others

87:55

because I believe it's so important. Our

87:58

life depends on it. I could not agree

88:02

more. I

88:04

you know I brought back to this notion

88:06

of uh language, movement and awareness.

88:09

Um and maybe just for sake of of

88:11

understanding and this will be an

88:13

incomplete analogy but if people could

88:14

imagine that um there's levels of

88:17

coarseness with within each of those

88:19

let's call it you know neuroscientists

88:22

would call it like big spatial scale

88:23

like I can flap my elbows or I can move

88:26

my fingers more subtly like so subtle

88:28

motion versus big motion right um in

88:32

language I can I can [clears throat]

88:34

grunt I can me you know I can woo you

88:38

you know, or I can articulate using more

88:42

sophisticated language if if I have

88:45

knowledge and access to those and you

88:47

build that up through experience. Yeah,

88:49

you can go look things up and do that.

88:51

In the realm of awareness,

88:54

it's similar, right? You can grab big

88:57

pieces of the room all at once. You

89:00

there, the table, the cameras, producer

89:02

off to my left, all of it. Or I can home

89:05

in on a small space, right? But there's

89:07

also, and I'm obsessed with this,

89:08

there's also the time domain. How we

89:11

choose to segment our experience is

89:15

something that I find so incredible. Can

89:18

lie back, look at the clouds, and just

89:20

watch this big cloud move through my

89:22

visual field over the course of minutes,

89:25

an hour, or I can watch for every little

89:29

subtle ripple of a leaf if I choose. And

89:33

uh Dhacker Kelner who studies awe, he's

89:35

at UC Berkeley, said everyday awe

89:38

experiences are very accessible if we

89:41

allow ourselves to move from fine scale

89:43

to large scale or large scale to fine

89:46

scale and back again. It's in the

89:48

transition between the two in space.

89:51

>> Yeah, he said he nailed it. Space and in

89:54

time. I was like, you know, a lot of

89:56

things happen on this podcast and useful

89:59

tools come up and interesting

90:00

conversations come up, but in talking

90:02

with Derer and now talking to you, it's

90:04

like th this is the experience of life

90:08

that we're getting shaped on and we have

90:10

control.

90:12

And so as a last point, my audience is

90:14

thinking let your guest speak. I but I

90:16

just want to throw this out because when

90:18

I think about going online, which is

90:20

where people spend a significant amount

90:22

of their conscious awareness now, their

90:24

time, I ask myself, is this a

90:28

lowresolution or a highresolution

90:31

event?

90:32

>> And someone once asked me recently, uh,

90:35

do you have Tik Tok? And I said, I don't

90:37

like Tik Tok. He said, why not? And I

90:39

said, I don't like Tik Tok because I

90:40

don't like that sound at the end.

90:44

Why? It's low resolution.

90:47

It feels like a highly pixelated

90:50

auditory sound. Whereas like a not

90:53

trying to be poetic here, but like we

90:55

have these redwing blackbirds in

90:57

California and in the evening when they

90:58

get ready to settle down, they make this

91:01

incredible sound. It's very brief, but

91:03

it's rich and it's so beautiful. anyone

91:06

who ever has the chance to hear it is is

91:08

spectacular. Then I realize all the

91:10

information on Tik Tok is low

91:12

resolution.

91:14

It's kind of for idiots and if you only

91:18

look at that, you'll become an idiot.

91:21

And I realized I'm probably consuming

91:23

some other sensory input that is

91:27

disproportionate

91:28

to what I should be and it's going to

91:31

make me an idiot. So it doesn't mean one

91:33

has to spend time in the deep philosophy

91:36

of of you know the most intricate

91:38

philosophers. I mean I listen to punk

91:40

rock music. I like it because it's raw.

91:42

I like it. I like three chord Raone

91:44

songs. But I also love classical music.

91:48

I think it's important to step through

91:50

from coarse to fine. And I feel like

91:53

what you've been talking about for years

91:54

in terms of movement is has something

91:58

perhaps to do with this. Forgive me for

92:00

going long, but no, I'm happy to see you

92:02

again. And this is kind of what we do.

92:04

>> Yeah, this is beautiful. I I I take a

92:07

lot from it and I like this the the the

92:10

transition importance. Something makes

92:13

me think that we talked about the

92:16

schemas, the these models,

92:18

but another way to look at it is

92:23

a a stomach

92:25

digestive

92:27

systems. Why? In the sense that they

92:30

require nutrients.

92:32

You got to feed them.

92:35

And then

92:37

the quality of those nutrients, the

92:40

gross, the fine, the micronutrients, the

92:43

macronutrients.

92:45

Like for example, emotionally, I don't

92:48

feel well. Let's say what do I tell

92:50

people? What are you feeding yourself?

92:52

What is your emotional food?

92:56

emotional foods that are important that

92:58

I bring into the practice of my students

93:00

of myself. One, discomfort. We've

93:03

mentioned it. It's important. It's clear

93:04

why

93:07

emotional contradiction.

93:09

Two,

93:11

I love you and I hate you. For example,

93:14

when you work with boxing, when when you

93:16

let people have this physical and you

93:18

can point at it, look up. Watch what

93:21

happened now.

93:23

I love you and I hate you and I feel it.

93:26

I can the multistability.

93:30

Another one is the aesthetic intensity

93:32

that we talked about bringing moments of

93:35

awe of curiosity but also of melancholy

93:39

or or many other intensities that are

93:42

important.

93:43

We've removed this from our lives, from

93:45

our movies, from our books,

93:49

definitely online,

93:51

you know, as you pointed,

93:54

we took it away. So, of course, we're

93:56

not feeding ourselves those things.

93:59

Restraint,

94:01

stimulating, and requiring restraint,

94:05

very important quality.

94:07

All those are practices for me. Those

94:11

are nutrients that I want to feed my

94:13

emotional state. The same thing I have

94:15

for my intellectual faculty, schema,

94:19

the conceptual, the abstraction. How do

94:22

I become smarter? What is thought? Is

94:25

thought just this knee-jerk reactions,

94:28

these levers, this associative quality?

94:31

Is this thought? I refuse to accept it.

94:34

>> That's not thought. So, you're you're

94:36

lucky. Uh you're not lucky. you uh you

94:38

are right to refuse it. Uh we could talk

94:41

about thoughts and what they are. I

94:42

actually have a segment in my book. I'm

94:44

not trying to advertise my book that's

94:45

all about how to think about thinking so

94:48

that you can literally control your

94:50

thinking. Use thinking as a tool, not

94:54

just have it be this like wherever you

94:56

go some dynamic attractor states. The

94:59

neuroscientists say you just kind of

95:00

fall like a clang association in a

95:02

psychotic person. Yeah. is just they're

95:04

they drop into a groove of of thought

95:07

that is disjointed, makes no sense to

95:10

the rest of us. Many people, including

95:12

myself, sometimes we live in those modes

95:14

of thought that are equally psychotic.

95:17

We just don't express it, but they're

95:19

psychotic because we're taking something

95:21

as valuable as like a a beautiful

95:24

vehicle and we're just kind of using it

95:26

to like

95:27

>> prop something up at the side of the

95:29

house. My colleague Carl Dyeroth, one of

95:32

the best neuroscientists alive, maybe

95:35

ever, um when he told me that every

95:38

night after he put his five kids to

95:41

sleep, [laughter] you know, he would go

95:43

and sit and force himself to think in

95:48

complete sentences as a practice.

95:51

>> I remember you told me before I was

95:53

humbled and I thought,

95:55

>> "Oh, that is the that is hard. That is a

96:00

smart person.

96:00

>> He's a very smart person.

96:01

>> That's an intelligent person.

96:02

>> He's a very intelligent person.

96:04

>> That sounds like it. It comes from that

96:07

place of knowing like, you know, I never

96:10

I I almost never truly think. It's rare.

96:15

>> He taught himself to think.

96:17

>> Yeah.

96:17

>> Yeah.

96:18

>> Without realizing it, without realizing

96:20

that you're just playing a different

96:22

game in that sense that it's it's hard

96:25

to develop it. And again what are the

96:27

practices that we engage with you know

96:29

we need those things nutrients so it's

96:32

stomachs the emotional faculty is a

96:35

stomach it's digestion and it asks you

96:38

feed me

96:39

>> and you got to take care of it there is

96:40

metabolism involved there is a

96:42

protection layer there is immunity to it

96:45

right there is the marov boundary around

96:48

it the membrane there is a model to it

96:51

simulates things out but so it's also a

96:54

very important way to Look at it. And of

96:56

course the body movement nutrients. What

97:00

is the quality of that? If you look at

97:02

those gym practices, those

97:04

weightlifting, they're of very very low

97:07

quality in terms of movement. Every

97:09

dancer will tell you that. Every athlete

97:12

of a high level will tell you that.

97:14

Where did we move to a ridiculous

97:16

situation where our athletes are

97:19

learning and are inspired by the fitness

97:23

people instead of the fitness people be

97:26

learning and be inspired by the the

97:29

athletes the the movement people.

97:30

>> Uh tell me more because I I certainly

97:33

like if I love to watch track and field

97:35

during the Olympics um and it's amazing

97:38

to see these athletes move and their

97:40

different shapes and their different

97:42

personalities like the sprinters. This

97:44

is I still marvel at these races boil

97:47

down to sometimes hundredths of a second

97:50

and they'll wear flashy jewelry

97:54

[laughter]

97:54

without question slows them down. This

97:57

is the least aerodynamic thing you could

97:58

possibly do.

97:59

>> There are more important things than

98:01

that

98:01

>> and they're willing to do give up the

98:03

potential time advantage to show their

98:07

bravado. Now the distance runners where

98:10

typically it doesn't get down to

98:12

hundredths of a second. It can typically

98:16

the margins between first, second, and

98:18

third place are wider.

98:22

They're not wearing any jewelry. There's

98:25

no And their personalities are much more

98:27

subdued. Fascinating.

98:30

>> You're telling me that the athletes are

98:32

paying attention to the fitness people?

98:34

>> Yeah, of course.

98:35

>> That seems crazy. Why? That's Do you

98:37

don't you see it? Boxers training like

98:39

fitness people. They're fitness

98:42

athletes. They're not boxers these days.

98:44

Why social media? Why? What is there

98:48

approachable calls the attention?

98:52

I don't know why you brought me in

98:54

today,

98:56

but it might be one of the less times if

98:58

not the last time as it becomes less and

99:01

less

99:04

what the attention calls for.

99:06

>> I don't know. I think I believe that the

99:10

the system that is human curiosity

99:14

which drives a lot of social media, not

99:17

all of it. I do think that when you have

99:20

a lot of low resolution stuff, the

99:23

signal to noise becomes people

99:28

our senses I almost said this earlier

99:30

but our sensory apparatus whether or not

99:32

it's our skin or our smell or our vision

99:33

or our hearing as you know has levels of

99:36

granularity. The receptive fields as we

99:38

call them go from very fine to uh to

99:42

very coarse. We love the feeling of a

99:43

hug with somebody we love. We also love

99:45

the feeling of a light caress,

99:48

you know, or just a hand on ours. These

99:50

things matter and they're part of our

99:52

experience. And even without being aware

99:54

of that desire for it, we have it's it's

99:56

it's a drive. I think I do think people

100:00

like to learn and they like to think.

100:02

Some people perhaps not. They're lazy.

100:04

But I believe that the sorts of things

100:06

that you talk about and do, the real

100:08

effort, like the movie that you showed

100:10

earlier of you, this incredible movie,

100:13

like the amount of care that went into

100:15

that right now relatively brief. It

100:18

might be longer going forward. The

100:20

amount of care is what makes that high

100:23

signal to noise.

100:25

>> Thank you for that calming and and and

100:29

positive words. They are important and

100:31

they they touch my heart as well. And I

100:33

know personally with you I feel this.

100:36

I'm talking about this exposure. This is

100:41

great exposure.

100:43

It's not not possible anymore to talk

100:46

about certain things and certain sizes.

100:50

And I know you are a person who is

100:53

challenged by that tremendously because

100:55

you went huge and at the same time your

100:58

original search

101:02

is not going to serve that. This is not

101:05

the motive. This is not the deep thing

101:07

that drives you. So

101:11

I'll always be available and and and

101:15

free to come for a wonderful

101:16

conversation with you. But I I I lament

101:20

sometimes the situation with the masses

101:24

and the public and where a lot of

101:26

attention that the big viral things are

101:28

going to in the sense that

101:32

it's it's sad. It's it's very very

101:36

pricey. It's very expensive. despite

101:39

your and my attempts to enrichen the the

101:42

conversations out there and um uh the

101:46

younger generation whose brains were

101:48

more plastic in this phase of of

101:51

lowresolution

101:53

overload. But I trust that there there's

101:57

the hunger's there and they'll they'll

101:59

rescue themselves. They're going to

102:01

realize it. They're they're starting to

102:02

realize it. Maybe this isn't the best

102:04

analogy, but pornography is is

102:07

quite available online. And I think

102:09

there's still a hunger for movies and

102:12

about real romance and relationships.

102:15

>> I think, you know, interesting romances

102:17

and relationships

102:18

>> of their [clears throat] own and and to

102:20

know that that still exists in the

102:22

world. I think there's a crudeness to

102:23

things, but I hear you. And there's a

102:26

new generation coming up who hopefully

102:27

are

102:29

>> listening in like, hey, and have their

102:31

own, you know, desire for for multiple

102:34

layers of granularity.

102:36

>> Good. Yeah, we we just need to invest in

102:39

that. I'm I'm I'm trying my best to to

102:42

invest in that. But I've moved away from

102:46

doing certain things and exposing

102:48

certain things cuz I believe there is no

102:52

no way there, no path there into the

102:54

real I want to help. I want to really

102:57

help

102:58

people myself.

103:01

But it takes a certain

103:04

process to get to that critical moment

103:06

of being able to actually help and

103:08

transform. It's not as easy as just

103:11

offering the help, putting it out there,

103:14

not as it was. It used to be, but the

103:16

game is different. We had a guest on,

103:19

he's a psychiatrist, uh Dr. K, Indian

103:21

guy. We were talking about um meditation

103:24

and he described a meditation that is

103:26

super interesting that I'm sure you've

103:28

done many times and but for me was

103:30

novel. He said try meditating for just 5

103:33

minutes but instead of paying attention

103:36

to the inhale and the exhale pay

103:38

attention to the pause in between the

103:41

two

103:42

>> as a way to start to notice transition

103:44

points and it's a way of kind of dialing

103:46

in the spotlight of attention. Boom.

103:48

Boom. and you can kind of release in

103:50

between as opposed to just trying to

103:52

constantly focus on the breath. What are

103:54

your thoughts on on these kinds of like

103:56

noticing transitions

103:59

between setting down the phone, getting

104:00

up, getting on the phone, maybe even

104:03

between swipes if people have to do it

104:05

that way, but ideally this would be done

104:06

in terms of a movement practice as well,

104:09

an emotional practice.

104:10

>> Before I even talk about it, you know

104:12

what? What is the discovery of that

104:14

practice?

104:17

There is no point where the pendulum

104:20

changes direction.

104:23

>> No transitional moment

104:25

where the this reaches this zero point

104:28

and and

104:30

that's what you discover as you're

104:33

following this more and more and more

104:34

and more. It opens up. It opens up and

104:37

this pulls you in. And that's why it's

104:40

such a powerful practice.

104:42

[snorts]

104:44

And this is available in many places.

104:46

It's the multi-stability again.

104:50

For example, right now I really have to

104:52

pee.

104:55

And inside this sensation,

104:58

which funny enough I didn't know, but I

105:03

kind of loved to practice as a child. I

105:07

didn't realize that I'm the that it's

105:09

unique.

105:12

And I believe it's also related to my

105:14

willpower in a way. No, I don't need to

105:17

go to the toilet yet. I would hold and

105:20

[snorts] I would recognize inside of it

105:22

a certain pleasure. Maybe maybe a

105:25

pleasure of the release that will come.

105:28

It's [clears throat] similar to the

105:29

orgasm. It has something similar to this

105:32

burning. The first time you have an

105:34

orgasm, you're not sure it's painful.

105:36

It's it's pleasurable. You're still in

105:38

that multi-stability.

105:40

So in that sense the kumbaka is very

105:43

similar. So it's a type of practice not

105:46

the only type you can do it with a lot

105:47

of things goosebumps feeling cold inside

105:51

the sensation of coldness. There is a

105:53

heat

105:54

>> underneath that's why the body creates

105:57

this thing and I've I've seen it. I

105:59

remember a time I was doing a standing

106:02

meditation in

106:05

in yelling up in Australia standing

106:07

inside shallow water and the sun was

106:10

coming down became very cold and I

106:12

remember I was there for an hour

106:13

standing and just this realization the

106:16

beginning it's like oh it's cold

106:19

and then I start no I'm going to stay

106:22

and by staying and by investigating

106:25

closer and closer I discovered this heat

106:27

inside and when

106:29

grab a glimpse of it. Boop, the cold was

106:33

gone.

106:34

And now I locked, you know, the old

106:37

woman and the young woman, the

106:38

multi-stability, the visual thing. I

106:40

locked into the other side.

106:42

>> And I was able to see it

106:44

>> and then I was [clears throat] able to

106:46

bring back the cold and to see both.

106:51

This is a practice that I engage with

106:53

with rhythms, poly rhythms,

106:57

with movements,

106:59

with reading certain conceptual

107:01

materials that are requiring this with

107:03

meditation with and and it requires keen

107:06

observation and it's very very powerful

107:08

practice.

107:10

Even a push-up, I practice it doing

107:13

push-ups.

107:15

You can think of a push-up. You can you

107:17

can experience it as a push but you can

107:20

also experience it as a pull which is by

107:23

the way closer to reality. One thing is

107:26

for certain you're describing

107:28

beautifully

107:30

the

107:32

antagonistic nature of every neural

107:35

circuit that we are aware of. Flexor

107:37

extensor being the most obvious. Right?

107:39

When we flex our bicep or whatever

107:41

hamstring, the opposite muscle, the

107:44

extensor relaxes and vice versa.

107:47

But they're intricately related in their

107:49

in their function. Like it's not they're

107:51

totally independent, right? The ability

107:54

to see dark edges is contingent on your

107:57

ability to see light edges.

107:59

>> Super imposition. Everything is

108:01

superimposed.

108:02

>> Everything's pushpull. this uh

108:04

ventromedial hypothalamus right Dulin's

108:07

work with uh David Anderson showed if

108:10

you people for years had stimulated this

108:13

brain area and in cats and rats and

108:15

monkeys and bats and they would see that

108:18

sometimes they would get rage and

108:20

sometimes they would get mounting in

108:22

sexual behavior even of inanimate

108:24

objects. Dulin comes in, develops

108:27

genetic tools to separate out the salt

108:30

and pepper of these different neurons

108:32

and shows that these are two

108:34

antagonistic sets of neurons in the same

108:36

structure that drive either mating or

108:39

attack. And then she gets the

108:41

opportunity to put them into competition

108:43

with one another. And what she discovers

108:45

and other people discover by monitoring

108:47

the activity of these neurons is when

108:49

you drive the mating activity, the the

108:52

potential for firing in these other

108:54

neurons is suppressed but then it comes

108:56

back higher. The firing of these neurons

108:59

that drive aggression suppressed then

109:02

the main after some period of time

109:05

mating it subsides then the aggression

109:06

comes back and we don't like these are

109:09

uncomfortable notions for people to

109:10

think about. That's just one example,

109:12

but also eating versus the desire to

109:15

naughty. Everything's a push pull in the

109:17

circuitry of the brain, even in

109:18

cognition. So, I I totally uh love, very

109:24

crude way to put it, but I totally love

109:27

the idea that

109:30

exploring what feels like an extreme

109:33

sensory experience is actually an

109:36

exploration of of the opposite side of

109:38

the seessaw. It's awesome that you could

109:40

touch into that

109:41

>> and you can directly connect to it by

109:44

taking a multistable entity and

109:47

observing it.

109:49

Any entity is multistable entity but

109:52

there are ones that are clearly that

109:54

like listening to a poly rhythm to two

109:56

rhythms at the same time and spending

109:59

time watching it from one perspective

110:02

and then from another perspective and

110:04

switching back and forth that switching

110:06

again. It's extremely powerful. This is

110:08

stuff I use with fighters because if you

110:12

can't hear the various rhythms,

110:15

you're not the DJ and the DJ controls

110:17

the party, you're going to get knocked

110:20

out. But if you can view all these

110:24

complex rhythms that are there present

110:27

in the footwork and in the breath and in

110:29

the body and in the blinking of the

110:31

eyes. And if you're sensitive to it, you

110:34

can [clears throat] be a lot more

110:37

aligned with that and manipulate it for

110:40

your needs.

110:41

So this is extremely powerful practice.

110:44

Certain texts, they don't allow you to

110:46

grab a hold.

110:47

>> Mhm.

110:48

>> My favorite is Horge Luis Bores,

110:51

>> the Argentine.

110:52

>> Yes.

110:52

>> My father would be very happy that you

110:54

said that. Yeah. the absolute master,

110:56

the man who was

110:59

the big priest of the cult of books, the

111:02

ultimate, the blind librarian. What can

111:05

be more than that? The man who read

111:07

everything when it was still possible to

111:09

read everything, who knew everything.

111:13

And what did he leave us? These

111:15

incredible practices, short stories, but

111:19

they are challenging. And they changed

111:22

my body when I read them. They changed

111:25

me again and again and again. And they

111:27

transform you. And they're multi-stable.

111:31

And they're examining things in a way

111:33

that makes you transform.

111:36

I used to fill my hot tub with extremely

111:40

hot water,

111:43

unbearable, and read the short story

111:46

while being in there. In the worst times

111:49

of my life, I use this and and the the

111:53

physical discomfort and it's short

111:56

stories. You can do it. It's a certain

111:58

length of time. Somehow together I I

112:01

like to relax into that combination and

112:03

it was awe. It was I always came out

112:06

different from that experiences.

112:09

I also used it just normally. I use it

112:13

with students in events and there are

112:15

other authors but it's just an example

112:18

to feel real remorse in order to change

112:22

change my ways to to to truly not to

112:26

beat myself up not to make this yeah

112:29

this this Jewish thing that the Catholic

112:31

perfected

112:33

hatch

112:34

>> or flagagulate yourself yeah

112:36

>> not this but true remorse it's like

112:40

that was bad

112:43

bad on me that shouldn't have done that.

112:46

That's that's not who I want to be and

112:49

and from that place

112:52

hitting this rock bottom and immediately

112:54

climbing up from that. So it doesn't

112:57

stay within that to so we we don't I

113:00

don't think people tell me thank you in

113:02

the end of teachings events but how

113:06

often do I feel real gratitude

113:08

we don't interact we don't feel they

113:10

don't sense it no one can blame them but

113:13

they've desensitized themselves from

113:16

this whole granularity of emotions and

113:20

so we need to bring it back we need to

113:22

bring it back we need to go to train it

113:25

back like losing your sense of smell

113:28

because of COVID or something.

113:32

People ask me what shall I do? I said

113:33

train it back. And that's you know I I I

113:38

don't I don't know the neurology of it

113:39

but it's clear to me. It's like what's

113:41

the answer to any question? Practice. So

113:43

I just send them to practice and it

113:45

works. gradual, progressive,

113:50

pleasantly visual, pleasing enough, etc.

113:56

I'd like to take a quick break and

113:57

acknowledge our sponsor, Function.

114:00

Function provides over 160 advanced lab

114:03

tests to give you a clear snapshot of

114:05

your bodily health. This snapshot gives

114:07

you insights into your heart health,

114:08

your hormone health, autoimmune

114:10

function, nutrient levels, and much

114:12

more. They've also recently added access

114:14

to advanced MRI and CT scans. Function

114:17

not only provides testing of over 160

114:20

biomarkers key to your physical and

114:21

mental health. It also analyzes these

114:24

results and provides recommendations for

114:26

improving your health from top doctors.

114:28

For example, in a recent test with

114:30

function, I learned that some of my

114:31

blood lipids were slightly out of range.

114:34

As a result, I decided to start

114:35

supplementing with nattokinise, which

114:37

can naturally help reduce LDL

114:39

cholesterol. And it did. In a follow-up

114:41

test, I could confirm that this strategy

114:43

worked. My blood lipids are now back

114:45

exactly where I want them. Comprehensive

114:47

lab testing of the sort that function

114:49

offers is just so important for health.

114:51

I mean, how else are you going to know

114:52

what's going on under the hood? And

114:54

while I've been doing blood work for

114:55

years, it used to be timeconuming,

114:57

complicated, and expensive. In fact, I

114:59

used to spend thousands of dollars per

115:01

year trying to get this kind of data.

115:03

And the data, frankly, were not all that

115:05

good. But now with Function, it's

115:07

extremely easy and affordable. A

115:09

function membership is only a dollar a

115:11

day, $365 a year. And if you think about

115:14

the information it provides and the

115:15

health challenges it helps you avoid and

115:17

the proactive things that it can do for

115:19

you to enhance your health, I truly look

115:21

at it as a savings. To learn more, visit

115:24

functionhealth.com/huberman

115:26

and use the code hubberman for a $50

115:28

credit towards your membership. Again,

115:30

that's functionhealth.com/huberman.

115:34

the ability to um really acknowledge

115:38

real remorse, guilt, regret. Uh that's

115:44

hard. I totally agree. Um there's

115:47

enormous power in it. Um and yet one

115:51

can't do it in order to extract the

115:53

power like that get keeps you away from

115:55

the feeling. I had to spend, as we were

115:57

talking about earlier, some time in my

116:00

life just thinking about the times I

116:05

genuinely failed,

116:07

that I was a coward, that I made the

116:11

wrong choice. I don't feel a lot of

116:14

power from saying it. It just is what it

116:16

is.

116:18

And that's like where the uh the benefit

116:21

is just like sitting in there and then

116:23

somehow one is able to move on from it.

116:26

>> I'm with you. I don't know many people

116:30

who talk about it. I'm the same. I'm

116:32

saying to people I'm a coward. I'm a I'm

116:34

a coward. That's who I am. Like that's

116:37

who I was many times in my life. I I've

116:40

made the wrong choices. Again, I'm not

116:43

beating myself up over it. I I've made

116:46

my peace with it

116:48

>> but I've had to glimpse it to change

116:51

something and maybe it won't be enough

116:54

maybe I'll need this process again but

116:57

so remorse is crucial have to be part of

117:00

the practice practice of remorse remorse

117:03

of conscious

117:05

that is also not available not there we

117:09

can cultivate the process of it we can

117:11

devote time to it we can um we can

117:15

design practices for it. Grieving is

117:18

also another one right it's so

117:22

difficult. One time somebody told me a

117:25

meditation teacher he told me I griefed

117:28

my father's death for 20 minutes

117:32

and that's it. I was done. But those 20

117:37

minutes people push away for a lifetime.

117:41

and and even if the you know not it's

117:43

not exactly the truth I like to use that

117:46

that story still

117:48

so to interact with it and to be capable

117:51

and to invite these things into our life

117:54

also takes

117:56

practice lately I've been I wouldn't say

117:59

forcing myself I would say nudging

118:01

myself into

118:03

um allowing some grief over the passage

118:07

of time not regrets about certain

118:10

decisions That's a separate line of

118:12

exploration. But just acknowledging I

118:15

think with all this stuff about health

118:17

and longevity and I certainly feel

118:19

vigorous. I feel great. But time has

118:22

passed. And that doesn't mean thinking

118:25

about the past. Just really

118:27

acknowledging that I I and the reason I

118:29

got to it is I felt like I was

118:31

suppressing something like there was

118:34

some lie in my head about my

118:37

representation of time.

118:40

And when I spend some tough moments

118:44

really like it does, as great as I feel

118:47

at 50, I truly feel better than I did in

118:49

my 30s if I think in terms of vigor and

118:51

understanding of life and all that. But

118:54

the fact that there's no doover

118:57

and that I actually don't want to live

118:59

in the delusion that I have forever. I

119:02

think that's a huge mistake. That was a

119:04

heavy moment and I'm probably still

119:06

grieving it. I can kind of sense it a

119:08

little bit. It comes up as a kind of odd

119:10

constellation of feelings. But by

119:12

acknowledging that I was a coward in

119:14

certain perhaps many circumstances, it's

119:17

actually allowed me to be much braver in

119:19

leaning into the stuff that sucks.

119:22

It's such a weird thing and it almost

119:24

sounds like we're, you know, like you're

119:27

constructing this. It's a real thing.

119:30

And I think the real key if anyone wants

119:31

to try it is to not go do the

119:35

acknowledge where you were wrong so that

119:37

you can not feel it anymore. You have to

119:39

go into it with the almost acceptance

119:42

that you might stay there forever, but

119:43

of course you won't, right? It's like

119:45

this it's like this bullshitting of self

119:48

that is useful. You know, earlier you

119:52

were talking about sensory

119:54

desensitization.

119:56

And it's so funny you said that because

119:58

we took a brief break uh to relieve our

120:01

bladders. Um and I was walking back and

120:05

I thought I got to tell the Charlie

120:07

Gilbert story. The Charlie Gilbert story

120:10

is the following. Charlie Gilbert was is

120:13

a very renowned neuroscientist.

120:16

Uh he was at the Rockefeller University

120:18

in New York. And I'll never forget as a

120:21

graduate student, he came and you do

120:23

these lunches with the visiting speaker

120:26

and they bring lunch out and the lunch

120:28

isn't great, but it wasn't terrible and

120:30

it was fairly nutritious. And typically

120:33

the speaker eats, but they mostly talk.

120:35

And I'll never forget,

120:37

he said, "No, I'm not eating lunch. I'm

120:40

going to my favorite restaurant tonight

120:42

in Napa." I said, "Is it going to be a

120:45

big meal?" He said, "No, not at all, but

120:47

I want my senses to be tuned to the

120:51

subtlety of every bit of it." And I

120:53

said, "Is the food rich?" I'd never

120:56

really been at that point in my life to

120:57

a really nice restaurant, and I assumed

120:59

I still haven't been to the one he's

121:00

referring to, but I assumed that the

121:02

food would be really rich. And he said,

121:04

"No, that's the point. The food is just

121:06

delicious, but it's not overcome with

121:09

flavor, like the food you're eating

121:11

right now." And I looked and it was like

121:13

turkey sandwiches and some chips or

121:14

something, you know, graduate student

121:16

fair, some salads. And I asked him, I

121:20

was like, "What do you mean?" He said,

121:21

"When you're hungry, you are able to

121:23

pick up on all sorts of subtleties and

121:26

pleasures and aversions to what you

121:28

don't like. You're allowed to not like

121:30

food, even when you're paying a lot of

121:31

money for it. In fact, you're in those

121:34

circumstances, you're particularly

121:35

allowed to send things back. People

121:37

don't realize this." And he said, "I'll

121:40

never forget." He said, "This pertains

121:43

to most all experiences in life." And I

121:46

was like, "Whoa,

121:48

wow." Well, he's from New York City and

121:51

very sophisticated clearly, but what he

121:53

was describing is exactly what we're

121:56

talking about, what you're talking

121:57

about, that if we dull our senses, we

122:01

miss all of it. We miss the the

122:04

difference between crude and refined.

122:07

It's not just like this ability to get

122:09

into this like ultra refined state.

122:12

This was before intermittent fasting

122:14

became a thing. So, beautiful story,

122:16

>> man. He nailed it. I can't take any

122:18

credit for. He just nailed it. I just

122:20

have a good memory for things that like

122:22

stand out. So, now I want to talk about

122:27

relationships.

122:29

something I didn't anticipate we were

122:31

going to talk about. But before we came

122:32

in here today, we were sort of

122:34

reflecting on what our

122:37

happy lives currently are. And

122:40

you said something and I'm going to get

122:42

the language wrong, so forgive me, but

122:44

it's sort of like the exploration of

122:47

relationship also involves this

122:49

opportunity to explore all these

122:50

different dimensions and the transitions

122:53

between them. And it's a like a vast

122:56

probably infinite landscape between two

122:59

people. I think I'm starting to get my

123:01

head around that one.

123:03

>> Tell me more and how you think about it.

123:05

You don't have to reveal any details of

123:07

your personal life. I just it's such a

123:10

great framework.

123:12

Can an argument that you didn't want to

123:15

have become the point of enrichment?

123:18

Let's start by

123:20

we are robbing against things

123:24

to be not to rub against things.

123:29

Being is that is this rubbing mapping

123:32

yourself by rubbing against things.

123:35

Relationships are very powerful for

123:37

that.

123:40

Alone you're also rubbing against things

123:42

but just different things. It's also a

123:45

practice to be alone and both of them

123:47

are very important. But when you relate

123:52

you become

123:54

this is being it's a relationship thing.

123:57

Everything exists only as a form of a

124:00

relationship.

124:01

Now this is the big picture. Of course

124:04

now we can take it into the the human

124:06

relationships and some of these things

124:08

are not going to be so easy to digest. I

124:11

believe the make or break element is we

124:16

are together in this game.

124:19

Not one against the other. It's not a

124:22

pingpong

124:24

but it is a game an infinite game in

124:28

that sense that we want to sustain the

124:30

play. It's not a finite scenario where

124:32

we want to finish, we want to win, we

124:34

want to we want to continue

124:36

and we have to create this practice

124:39

shared practice. How to be in this game

124:43

of evolution, of transformation, of

124:45

insight

124:48

together. It's not a fixed point. I

124:51

cannot come from the place of I am XY Z.

124:56

I'm already a finished product in that

124:58

sense. If the other side is a finished

125:01

product in their mind, it can't work.

125:05

That's why it's the make or break. Not

125:08

sexual attraction,

125:11

not love in that sense of that chemical

125:13

concoction,

125:15

romantic love, but this element. And

125:19

it's true for every meaningful

125:22

relationship and I believe also for

125:24

romantic relationships. And then around

125:26

them you got to wrap the other sides.

125:29

The physical love which is the sexual

125:31

attraction the romantic emotional one

125:35

and a higher concept of love. Not one

125:38

that we speak through lawyers if you say

125:41

the wrong thing after you know 30 years

125:44

of marriage. What kind of love is that?

125:48

That trans that breaks like this that

125:50

switches that is this is no love.

125:53

But really this meta concept of love

125:58

meta as well. So relationships are a

126:02

form of a practice together

126:06

and they must be cultivated as such.

126:09

We're using each other but we're helping

126:12

each other as well. And we're together

126:14

in this game going through life's

126:17

experiences,

126:19

crisis,

126:21

helping each other,

126:23

bringing kids or not bringing kids.

126:27

This is a core piece and I don't often

126:31

hear it

126:33

pointed as a central element

126:37

that seems to be a good partner for

126:40

that. Usually it's a good partner for

126:42

something else which is all good

126:44

respect. Should respect it. But this is

126:46

the make or break for long-term

126:49

relationship.

126:50

I love the one who loves to practice. It

126:56

can rob people really the wrong way. But

126:58

now you understand why it is said in

127:01

this way. This is the love that that

127:03

choice that deep choice in you. Okay,

127:05

you're a partner. Now we can go. We are

127:09

here at this practice. We are not

127:11

against each other. We are supportive of

127:14

each other. And we play this game. I

127:17

need your attention.

127:19

I need your presence.

127:21

I can't have you check out. And there is

127:24

this infinite game that we play that

127:27

might finish at a certain moment, but it

127:29

just actually changes its face. It never

127:31

finishes.

127:32

>> I love it. And I feel obligated to raise

127:36

a an example of relational

127:41

dynamics that's outside of romance,

127:43

which is of all things uh The Grateful

127:46

Dead. Um a good friend who's an amazing

127:50

uh punk rock musician uh encouraged me

127:53

to listen to The Grateful Dead. I didn't

127:55

have an aversion to it, but um I didn't

127:59

have a tendency to want to play it. Now

128:02

I'm I really like it. I don't know if

128:03

I'm like into it, but I really like it.

128:05

So, I watched a few documentaries about

128:07

the Grateful Dead. I They come from my

128:09

hometown. They used to hang out at a

128:12

music store near where I grew up. They

128:13

were around until they weren't. Even

128:16

went to some shows. In this documentary

128:18

about the Grateful Dead, they talk about

128:20

the amazing chemistry that this band

128:22

had. Just the amazing chemistry and why

128:25

people literally followed them around

128:27

the world.

128:29

And then they talk about why it

128:31

suffered, why the chemistry fell apart

128:34

at a certain point and then maybe it was

128:36

restored. And it was one word. They

128:39

asked what happened. They said cocaine.

128:43

But then what they said next was cocaine

128:46

made people very focused on their own

128:49

goal directed behavior. And even though

128:52

everyone was playing together and they

128:54

all knew the songs and they were paying

128:56

attention,

128:58

someone or several people were kind of

129:01

vying for something that was more about

129:03

them as opposed to the chemistry and

129:06

dynamics

129:07

because cocaine is mainly a dopamine

129:10

related thing. just kind of speaks to

129:12

the fact that like if we lean too hard

129:14

into it's not just about like me

129:16

thinking but in terms of like

129:18

advancement like got to get to this

129:20

place the group doesn't necessarily move

129:24

forward and so we need leaders but it's

129:27

more like this dynamic subordination

129:29

where there's like a like a flock flock

129:31

of birds moving forward and then one

129:32

replaces and I feel like in any kind of

129:35

relationship whether or not it's two or

129:37

more in a work situation um or maybe

129:41

even romantic relationship between two

129:43

people that there's some some sense of

129:46

of this kind of subordinating the the

129:49

the eye

129:50

>> in the deep sense of it in the neurology

129:52

part of it we are sharing kind of a the

129:56

alostostasis the the body budget we are

129:59

sharing it right so it's like it's a way

130:01

for us to metab to be metabolically

130:04

bringing in more resources

130:06

>> so that's even the neurological reality

130:09

of it

130:10

>> that's Why also grief is so devastating

130:13

because it removes in a moment huge

130:16

amount of resources right all of a

130:18

sudden it's pulled out of you

130:21

as if it's not really the the the

130:25

hoftter talks about this this the loop

130:27

is still there it's it's part it's part

130:30

of your loop already it's integrated but

130:32

there is the resource part

130:36

and how am I going to face these

130:39

challenges without that person. It's

130:42

highly related to the grieving thing.

130:44

It's not removed from it. It's it's

130:47

maybe the core of it. Not often

130:49

mentioned again in relation to grief,

130:52

but it's it's a very

130:54

egotistical thing has [snorts] to

130:57

operate in such a way along the lines of

131:00

music. Um, for the longest time I've had

131:03

this question and I'm hoping you can

131:05

help me shed some light on the the

131:07

answer which is there are some forms of

131:11

music I think of like Bob Dylan certain

131:14

um songs that Joe Strummer from the

131:16

Clash sang there going to be other

131:18

examples that I'm not aware of but

131:19

everyone will know what I'm talking

131:21

about in a moment where the words if

131:23

read literally make no sense but somehow

131:27

they seem to reveal like a fundamental

131:30

truth that people can relate to. And

131:33

when I say fundamental, I mean people

131:34

seem to agree that there's something

131:36

important there. It sounds important.

131:39

And it's not just because it sounds

131:40

beautiful or melodic. Like there's

131:42

something important there. And that

131:44

maybe, just maybe, these songs are

131:46

tapping into some

131:49

language of the nervous system or of

131:52

whatever human experience that that we

131:53

don't have a word for, we don't have a

131:55

concept to pin to. And my question is,

131:59

is there an analogous phenomenon in

132:02

movement?

132:03

>> Most definitely. There is an aesthetic

132:06

value to it beyond the the symbolic

132:10

significance.

132:12

That's why we are hitting constantly

132:15

this this glass ceiling. We cannot break

132:18

through because we're approaching

132:20

everything from the intellect from this

132:23

this this place and and it does not

132:25

carry certain pieces with it. I can't do

132:29

it in this way. This is not

132:30

understanding. I cannot reach

132:32

understanding in this way. I only reach

132:34

knowing

132:36

understanding is much bigger. It's much

132:39

more visceral. It's much more bodily and

132:42

emotional and musical and rhythmical.

132:45

And there is an aesthetic value to the

132:47

word

132:49

when I say slippery. And in a song even

132:52

more there is rhythmicality. There is

132:54

moments there is silences that are

132:56

placed correctly. And that's why good

132:59

music. Tom Waits is Tom Waits. He brings

133:04

that thing always present in all these

133:07

different ways. It's so diverse and it's

133:09

so powerful. It affected so many genres

133:12

and people and it's the mastery of that

133:16

instead of the AI strip down give me the

133:21

recipe I make it and the cake doesn't

133:24

taste good and I follow the recipe to a

133:27

tea there is missing components and some

133:30

of them we know about and we can talk

133:32

about but most of them we will never

133:35

find

133:37

so the magic that's why the magic is in

133:40

The doing, the magic is in the

133:42

practicing.

133:43

And that's why sitting here is very

133:45

different than doing this on screen.

133:48

>> And [clears throat] we share something.

133:49

Our bodies are communicating in all

133:51

these ways that you know about. And all

133:54

our senses are engaged and we're sharing

133:57

this space and we're tuning forks are

134:00

aligning in all these rhythms. And so

134:03

it's different. We can't

134:06

keep coming back to this illusion that

134:12

we can put it together if we take all

134:14

the ingredients that we know of because

134:17

there are more ingredients that we don't

134:19

know of and the good news we can

134:22

interact with it directly by engaging

134:24

with the practice with the motion with

134:27

the body. So body movement,

134:30

human movement carries huge amount of

134:34

that. It's not the same

134:37

for me to do a movement like this. And

134:40

now I do it with a different focus point

134:43

of awareness of attention. I totally

134:45

transformed the neurology of it and the

134:47

effects of it on myself and on the

134:51

environment as well. To watch a dance

134:53

performance live is extremely different

134:55

than to it actually doesn't make any

134:57

sense to watch a music video in that

135:01

sense of movement because it's there is

135:04

a critical mess in relation to human

135:06

movement which is not reached there

135:08

other things okay you can do something

135:12

music is arguable right like to listen

135:16

to Tom weights live is maybe that's a

135:19

totally different thing I never did I

135:21

never had the chance but I I would love

135:23

to maybe that will transform

135:26

my experience of it totally we have to

135:30

give attention to these and a place for

135:33

these x quantities like sister Korita

135:37

Kenchi mentioned this always leave a

135:39

room for x quantities the unknown

135:41

quantities because you can not leave

135:45

room for them it's not like they're

135:48

always there no in some ways in some

135:50

stratas of how we approach things. We

135:54

don't leave room for it.

135:57

It's important.

135:58

>> I'm struck by the um the artists, the

136:02

practitioners, whether it's movement,

136:04

dance, or visual art, or music that tap

136:08

into this to something that

136:11

language alone can't tap into, that um

136:15

film alone can't tap into. And the the

136:17

example that I often go to because I

136:20

think well because I like the work so

136:22

much is like a Rothco you know which

136:25

most people would say is just you know

136:27

couple blobs of color couple squares or

136:29

rectangles but um the vision scientist

136:32

in me and I'm not the one that that

136:34

unpacked this but a guy named Beville

136:36

Conway who's uh at NIH explained this

136:39

best that what Rothkco was able to do

136:43

was because he eliminated the frame

136:47

And there's no white that he combined

136:52

colors in ways that when you look at it,

136:55

any Rothkco, you're seeing colors that

136:57

you've never seen before because of the

136:59

way color space interacts. But here's

137:02

the interesting thing. It's not clear to

137:03

me that Rothkco understood that as he

137:05

was doing it. So, it does seem like some

137:08

people are they're able to kind of

137:11

scratch and dig and create around

137:13

something that they feel I don't know

137:15

what they're feeling, but they get to

137:16

some fundamental truth that becomes the

137:19

signature of what they're doing. Maybe

137:21

Andy Warhol did it with his kind of like

137:23

play on marketing and branding and and

137:26

it's in the end it becomes very simple

137:28

like what pops out is very simple but it

137:31

feels like a like a macronutrient

137:35

>> of experience and you go I can't get

137:37

that anywhere else. I can't just look at

137:40

a Campbell soup can. But seeing them

137:42

like arranged that way, I can appreciate

137:43

something completely different about

137:45

marketing more generally or brand or

137:47

visual art or color in the case of

137:49

Rothkco. I'm going to draw you into

137:52

something that you really know a lot

137:54

about. Actually, it's related to art.

137:58

What are these great artists?

138:01

Well, the practitioners, and I'm a

138:03

broken record with it, they realize

138:05

things much earlier because they're in

138:08

the experience. What did they realize?

138:11

The eyes don't operate like a camera.

138:15

That's the wrong model. When I look at

138:17

your face, all the pixels are not equal.

138:22

And I move my eyes in a certain way that

138:26

constructs you. So what do these great

138:28

artists did?

138:31

They did deformed

138:33

wrong paintings,

138:36

but they move in front of your eyes.

138:40

The perspective is wrong. The the hand

138:44

is placed incorrectly, but it respects

138:46

the way that our brain looks at it. And

138:50

this only came much later in terms of

138:53

understanding why. Because we have all

138:55

these distortions from great artists. If

138:57

they wanted to do it right, they would

138:59

have done it right, hyper realistic,

139:01

etc.

139:03

This is a crucial thing. Our models, the

139:07

neuromuscular model is another one. The

139:10

skeletal neuromuscular model, the fascia

139:14

skeletal neuromuscular model. And you

139:16

can expand it more and more. And they're

139:19

all the time replaced. And it's

139:20

important that we replace them. But

139:23

there is something even more important.

139:26

the realization that all models are

139:28

wrong but some are useful. that that

139:32

quote I use it a lot in the sense that I

139:36

need to switch up my models to useful

139:40

models at this current moment

139:43

and understand that this model will also

139:45

be wrong in essence but it doesn't mean

139:47

that I have a choice I have to use

139:50

models there is no choice about it so

139:53

when we are creating this art and we are

139:56

respecting this it's a representation of

139:59

these deeper models

140:01

For me as an example in the physical

140:04

body there is something about

140:07

fluid mechanics and pressure changes and

140:10

liquidity of the body that is was a huge

140:14

leap in how I moved compared to the old

140:19

balls and levers thing and it started up

140:24

here in in this understand

140:28

that's not how things work.

140:31

From there my whole body changed

140:34

for the better.

140:36

>> When did that occur?

140:38

>> That shift

140:38

>> in the recent decade a bit more looking

140:42

for these models of like how is the body

140:45

constructed? What is the right way of

140:48

running? What is the don't tell me how

140:51

the body is constructed? I'm not

140:53

interested. These people are not

140:55

actually even moving eventually. And

140:57

again, you don't need to test it there.

140:59

You're not wet tested often. So, it's

141:01

not representative of a high level of

141:03

movement. Somebody who engages with it

141:07

will tell you.

141:10

So, I slowly realized

141:13

the fault is not in the way that we are

141:17

structured or in the practice, the way

141:20

that we are practicing. It is in the

141:22

model. It is in the way that we think of

141:25

movement to begin with

141:28

that makes everything

141:30

your back pain can go away from from a

141:34

change of the model. It's the most

141:35

powerful thing that I can give

141:38

physically to someone. So to work with

141:41

models,

141:43

to refine them, to change them, to

141:46

switch them around is important for the

141:48

artist, for the health, longevity, for

141:52

cognition, for problem solving, for

141:56

everything. It it keeps coming back to

141:59

this most important thing. So rather

142:02

than think about fascia or muscle or

142:07

connective tissue,

142:09

sounds to me like you're thinking about

142:12

certainly how all the pieces fit

142:13

together. And I've I've heard you say

142:15

this before. It's it's more about the

142:17

organization of all these pieces,

142:20

>> the relationships,

142:21

>> the relationships,

142:23

>> how they relate. This realization that

142:26

especially in the body schema, it's

142:29

immediately changeable.

142:32

In the emotional schema, in the abstract

142:35

one, it's a lot slower of a process. But

142:37

if I hold this cup, I immediately

142:39

change. It's so quick to change the

142:41

body. This is something that Moshe Feld

142:44

and Christ realized a long time ago.

142:46

People still don't appreciate, don't

142:48

understand the power of that work. We've

142:50

desensitized ourselves.

142:52

>> What do you think is the crux of that

142:54

work that hopefully this conversation

142:56

can get people reading and looking at

142:58

that more deeply? Uh I confess I haven't

143:00

spent a lot of time with it. Very

143:02

little. In fact,

143:02

>> awareness through movement in that sense

143:06

the same thing that I'm practicing. I

143:08

I've learned a lot from him. Not

143:11

personally, of course. He died when I

143:14

was four years old. But in in the sense

143:16

of don't tell me how I'm built,

143:20

let me build myself. Let me model

143:23

myself. I can refreshen how my shoulder

143:28

is with the right approach and it's

143:31

extremely powerful when you can interact

143:33

with it. The problem is again many times

143:36

people don't want to interact with it.

143:39

You bring them to the water but they

143:41

don't want to drink. That's why I keep

143:44

coming back to this crucial component.

143:48

First realize that you don't want first

143:51

that realization is already precious and

143:53

then from there you know the the old

143:58

Pinocchio illusion

144:01

stimulation of the bicep tendon when

144:03

touching your nose. You don't know this

144:05

one.

144:06

>> There are a few versions of it. It's a a

144:09

pretty common one. You touch your nose

144:11

and somebody stimulates with a vibration

144:14

gun the tendon and your nose become

144:17

longer. You feel as if your nose become

144:20

longer. Or there is this version.

144:22

You know this one. Put your finger

144:25

against mine

144:28

and do this.

144:32

>> Oh yeah. It's very bizarre. It's hard to

144:35

know what what where my finger stops and

144:37

yours begins. And another version of the

144:39

Pinocchio illusion is we sit in front of

144:41

each other. I rub my nose and I rub your

144:45

nose at the same time or I tap my nose

144:48

and I and I tap your nose and again this

144:50

distortions. What does it show you? The

144:53

change that you're after is immediately

144:56

available.

144:57

>> Mhm.

144:58

>> We can It's so potent. It's it's now

145:01

you're in depression. You're in a bad

145:03

state. I can flip you now. chemically

145:06

you know that you can do that

145:09

but we can do this not chemically and we

145:11

can do this in a longlasting way and we

145:13

can transform how we experience but it

145:16

takes a certain quality of the how we

145:20

practice that has to be built through

145:22

education through connection

145:25

and then applied correctly.

145:27

This is the most powerful thing I know

145:31

this interaction with the models and the

145:33

transformation of the models more than

145:35

any structural approach more than

145:37

anything else. We have to invest in it.

145:40

We have to work on our models like for

145:43

example your bodily model, your

145:44

emotional model, the schema and your

145:48

abstraction model, social model etc. We

145:52

have a point a a point of leverage as

145:55

our committee asked for and we can lift

145:57

the world. We can change our reality.

146:00

This is the promise of being a

146:03

practitioner being in [clears throat]

146:04

practice and learning that everything is

146:07

possible that everything is malleable,

146:09

everything is adaptable.

146:11

I love that you mentioned that the

146:14

movement and sensory maps are very

146:17

dynamic because the plasticity is so

146:20

fast in part because it's revealing what

146:22

are ordinarily cloaked connections. You

146:26

know, it's it's not the growth of a new

146:27

connection yet. The connections are

146:29

there, we just don't know how to access

146:30

them. So certain forms of movement and

146:33

sensation like you said like the hot

146:35

bath and and reading a short story or

146:38

poem it sitting at that transition point

146:42

and and having to deal with those two

146:44

what previously were incompatible

146:46

experiences

146:48

unmasks a a a capacity that somebody has

146:52

right then.

146:53

>> Beautiful. And there's no question that

146:55

doing it repeatedly will lead to

146:57

strengthening of that unmasking like

146:59

make it more robust. Let me tell you

147:01

something about that that I want to

147:03

share to help people. In my past ways, I

147:07

would have looked at it and said, "Ah,

147:09

it's not potent. It's a cool moment, but

147:12

it's not potent. It's not going." Now, I

147:15

learned there is another category,

147:18

another way of looking at it. I don't

147:20

need high

147:24

volume, high intensity only to

147:27

transform. There is another important

147:30

more important maybe freshness.

147:33

>> A moment of freshness can transform you

147:36

irrevocably.

147:38

And that is something that I was blind

147:40

to cuz I was a hard worker. So I didn't

147:43

realize that I just need a fresh moment.

147:45

Just a moment where things look

147:46

different, feel different. I experience

147:49

my body differently. And I've had these

147:51

experiences in the past and I've lost

147:53

them. They've

147:55

leaked between my fingers.

147:58

And the reason is I didn't note them. I

148:01

didn't stop to give them the power by

148:05

noting it to myself, by paying attention

148:08

to it. What we pay attention to grows.

148:12

So we don't necessarily need a thousand

148:14

reps

148:16

as we think like in order for it to

148:18

lift. Maybe you have a pain in your

148:20

shoulder and you experience it as a form

148:23

of hardness that you cannot penetrate,

148:26

you cannot sense well into it. And maybe

148:28

through a certain practice of attention,

148:30

I bring a moment of freshness and then

148:32

the pain is back again. The past self, I

148:36

would say that was nice, but it's not

148:38

going to solve my problem. Now I know,

148:40

no, this can really solve my problem.

148:44

This is how people with incredible

148:47

challenges can work through things. This

148:50

can take you above and beyond any kind

148:52

of discipline, volume, intensity

148:55

approach can. And I started to respect

148:58

this and look for these moments of

149:00

freshness.

149:02

One reason that I'm so reassured by

149:04

everything you're saying and and

149:06

reassured by the idea that there's going

149:09

to be a return to a deep interest in uh

149:13

complexity and and really parsing things

149:16

as well as the realization that what

149:17

sounds really complex is actually it's

149:19

it's simple, but it's in the gaps

149:21

between everything else that's been

149:23

described. Right? People are like, I can

149:25

see why people like sets and reps

149:27

because there's no ambiguity

149:29

and the ambiguity is hard to embrace and

149:32

it almost starts to sound like be like

149:33

water, you know, well like okay that

149:36

sounds great but you know be like water

149:38

Bruce Lee like but that he did a lot of

149:40

sets and reps too I have to imagine.

149:43

Yeah,

149:43

>> I think that it's a basic human drive to

149:45

want to understand at least oneself. And

149:47

by [clears throat]

149:49

trying to do that, we immediately become

149:51

neuroscientists, psychologists,

149:53

philosophers. It kind of stems out from

149:55

there. There's no way to understand

149:56

one's own life and self and people

149:58

around you without having some interest

149:59

in in these things. And

150:02

the idea that what seems like subtle

150:07

is actually so potent is such an

150:10

important idea. I'm so glad you raised

150:12

it. I I haven't ever had that thought

150:14

specifically, but now that you say it,

150:16

I'm like this. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. I

150:18

start thinking about it. So, I'm

150:19

learning from you right now. And And I

150:22

think I'm not alone in that. I know I'm

150:24

not alone in that because we think of

150:27

peak experiences as like the thing, but

150:30

by definition, those peak experiences

150:32

can't come very often. And I think a lot

150:34

of the uh depression, the the sense of a

150:37

lack of meaning comes from like just

150:40

waiting for like the next big thing that

150:44

if you have enough of those, you

150:45

eventually realize that they have some

150:47

potency, but they're not like life, you

150:50

know?

150:51

>> So, as a daily practice with movement, I

150:53

mean, you talked over the years and we

150:54

talked last time and you know, like

150:56

there's this great video of you online.

150:57

And I love the one where you put on a

150:58

backpack and you move through a crowded

151:00

city trying not to uh make contact with

151:02

anybody as a way to just move your body

151:04

differently. And some people might look

151:06

at that and say, "Okay, well, okay, he

151:08

could do that. I'm not going to do

151:08

that." But the commute example I gave

151:11

earlier, it's just a different version

151:14

of it. I think that if people could

151:17

start to see their body as this vehicle

151:19

that they have so much agency over,

151:23

I think people would still exercise.

151:26

They want those health benefits. But if

151:28

they were to start incorporating small

151:30

amounts of movement practice, even just

151:33

with their hands or their toes or

151:35

whatever, you know,

151:36

>> and if you can do it while exercising,

151:39

>> it's it's it's about a transformation of

151:42

the whole perspective. I I also

151:44

exercise.

151:46

It's about

151:48

changing the paradigm. Everything is an

151:50

opportunity. And again, like I told you,

151:53

like you can do push-ups or bench

151:54

presses. And by putting attention into

151:57

the fact that you're pulling the bar

152:00

close, not just pushing it away. While

152:03

you're pushing it away, you can you

152:05

transform something. And I know it

152:07

sounds as if ah what's that going to do

152:10

because the corrupted self jumps again

152:12

and wants this immediate result this or

152:15

that. But anyways, you're doing those

152:17

bench presses.

152:19

So you don't need to change that. You

152:21

don't need to start to do some weird toe

152:23

and finger exercises.

152:25

>> It's about educating oursel how to

152:27

approach almost every scenario just like

152:29

you did with the traffic jam.

152:32

Playfulness is one thing that we

152:33

mentioned. Observation and presence are

152:37

key. What starts to clear its space is

152:42

this quality of scatteredness.

152:47

multiple things that are switching, you

152:51

know, all this starts to become and

152:54

again remorse hyper expensive.

152:57

>> They are much more evil than what we

153:00

think is evil.

153:03

We put evil still in this category far

153:07

away. Evil is the indifference to those

153:10

things, those little moments that they

153:14

steal our lives.

153:16

And it's very hard to get rid of it.

153:18

It's very hard to to let go of it. But

153:20

there is a promise in every moment. I

153:23

start now in the way that I'm talking to

153:26

you, in the way that I'm listening in

153:29

and I remind myself. And this brings me

153:32

to that quality

153:34

remembering what is important,

153:37

cultivating that.

153:40

How much did you invest in certain

153:42

concepts? tremendously and that's why

153:45

they're present in your life. If you

153:48

don't invest in these concepts, don't

153:50

expect things to change. Start there.

153:53

Wake up, think about it, watch this

153:56

episode or others or go down the and do

153:59

it attentively.

154:01

Make notes for yourself. Keep coming

154:03

back to it again and again. Start this

154:06

will start a process. Without this,

154:09

there is no promise. Without this, yeah,

154:11

it's true. The corrupted self is right.

154:13

It's not going to work. It's too far

154:16

away. I don't know what to do. I'm

154:18

freezing altogether. And I can give you

154:20

some protocol and we've talked about it

154:22

before.

154:23

You can hang and you can do spinal waves

154:26

and you can spend some time in the squat

154:29

essentially stretching the body open

154:32

compressing the body fully. Those are

154:34

the hang and the squat and the spinal

154:36

waves which is the connecting bit. This

154:37

is great and great practices that I

154:39

share with people. And there is more

154:41

certain games, certain playfulness, but

154:44

those are the specifics. That's not

154:46

where the heart of things is. The

154:48

approach is what produce those things

154:50

and what will produce many others. And

154:53

we have to invest in that

154:56

remembering in making it important for

154:58

ourselves.

155:00

That's the the make or break for me.

155:03

Would you be willing to indulge us with

155:06

um some reflections on different

155:09

athletes and sports or maybe sports? We

155:12

don't have to get into specific athletes

155:14

unless you want. Um before we came in to

155:17

record, you were talking about air

155:19

sense.

155:20

I've never heard of air sense. Um we're

155:23

talking about

155:24

>> skaters word a different word for it

155:26

maybe.

155:27

>> Well, I don't even know that they're

155:29

aware that they do it, you know. Uh, we

155:32

were, it was just a brief conversation

155:33

to give people context. It was a brief

155:35

conversation about how some

155:36

skateboarders look particularly

155:38

impressive like this kid, he's a grown

155:41

man now, Antoine Dixon, who was it

155:44

amazing when he was a young kid, still

155:46

is. He did a bit of a comeback recently.

155:48

He's phenomenal skateboarder. But if you

155:52

watch him, he's doing things that other

155:54

people do, some things other people

155:56

don't do, but his arms never like really

156:00

fly up. his hands don't go up. So, he's

156:02

doing his knees sometimes are up near

156:04

his ears as he's doing things. He's

156:06

catching everything. A lot of people can

156:07

do that, but he has this amazing ability

156:09

to keep his hands and arms down

156:12

throughout

156:14

the the entire um trick.

156:16

>> But you're amazed by this because he

156:20

doesn't

156:21

recalibrates, rebalances.

156:23

>> He doesn't look like he has to use his

156:25

arms in order to pop really high. he

156:27

doesn't have to kind of explode out of

156:28

that squatted position. He somehow

156:30

managed to put it into his uh the rest

156:33

of his body and it looks awesome. We'll

156:36

put a clip to something. There's

156:37

actually a really terrific bio about his

156:39

personal comeback against addiction and

156:42

what he's done with himself. It's just a

156:44

an amazing story and just but his

156:46

ability is just it's kind of like if you

156:48

look at like you know Jordan you know

156:51

dunking in his prime is like something's

156:54

different. Yes, he's jumping high. Yes,

156:55

he's jumping far. Yes, he's got his

156:57

tongue out and he's like signature

156:59

Jordan and but there's it's the way the

157:01

whole thing is put together. So, it's a

157:03

little bit harder to describe. I should

157:04

just send people to a clip. And you were

157:06

talking about across sports this notion

157:08

of air sense that some athletes just

157:12

have this ability to orient and move

157:16

through the air. Can you tell me more

157:17

about that and some examples that um

157:20

resonate with you

157:22

>> and you because you have this

157:23

>> to a certain extent. Mhm.

157:25

>> There are others who have it much better

157:27

than me, but

157:29

I I grew up doing acrobatics in Capoa

157:32

and flipping and doing these things. And

157:35

very early on, you get to I got the

157:38

realization of, oh, there is these

157:41

people that are very coordinated,

157:43

they're very organized, they're very

157:45

well oriented as long as that they're in

157:48

this normal vertical situation touching

157:52

the ground. But once they're in the air,

157:54

they have no idea where they are.

157:56

[laughter]

157:57

And then others can navigate this

157:59

scenario

158:00

which is clearly unique.

158:03

>> So we started to call it air sense.

158:07

Trampolinists are the most extreme

158:10

example of it. And nowadays high level

158:13

extreme athlete skateboarders they use

158:16

trampoline a lot. [snorts] And those in

158:19

the know, they know because this is one

158:21

of the most basic tools.

158:23

Uh, and different pits, landing pits

158:27

made of foam pieces where you can fly

158:29

with your bike or your skateboard off of

158:31

a ramp and you don't need to land and

158:35

you get to develop this sensation in the

158:38

air. When is it time to open up? When is

158:41

it time to change your shape? So since

158:44

the propriception is available all the

158:48

time,

158:51

is it the vestibular side of things that

158:53

makes it a unique scenario? Is it a

158:56

certain gift or or or a a a capacity

159:01

with the vestibular system? I wanted to

159:03

ask you,

159:04

>> what would you think it is? If we're

159:07

really thinking about time in the air,

159:10

we have to talk about Tom Char, who's

159:12

this phenom of a skateboarder who, you

159:16

know, I'm sure some people, most

159:17

everyone's heard of Tony Hawk. If you

159:19

took Tony and you combined him with like

159:21

Danny Wei, who's probably easily one of

159:23

the best skate vertical skateboarders

159:26

ever, built the mega first mega ramps

159:28

and did that or Bob Burnquist, like

159:30

these guys that like go just huge uh

159:33

innovators do it. Tom um and a kid named

159:36

Jimmy Wilkins I represent the

159:40

the latest generation of but in my

159:44

opinion anyway

159:46

the greatest vertical skateboarders that

159:48

have ever lived because

159:50

>> of their ability to have so much

159:52

control, speed, technical ability

159:58

to do things that typically were only

159:59

done on the street like kick flips, heel

160:01

flips to board slide, smacking the board

160:04

on the way back into the ramp. No hand.

160:06

So, ollieing, not grabbing, doing all of

160:09

these things bigger,

160:12

faster,

160:14

cleaner,

160:16

but also

160:18

an order of magnitude in every one of

160:20

those dimensions. And so, if I think

160:23

about like Tom, I've seen Tom and Jimmy

160:25

firsthand doing these things. I think

160:28

the

160:30

they go faster than everybody else. They

160:33

pump harder and they go faster into

160:35

this. So clearly they're willing to

160:37

spend more time in the air. Danny was

160:38

like this. Like Danny and Bob Burns were

160:40

willing to spend more time in the air

160:44

even if it was a simple trick. So it's

160:45

not necessarily they're spinning around

160:47

a lot. Like people tend to over uh like

160:51

overemphasize like how many spins. It's

160:53

a 900, a 1200. Like there's something

160:55

impressive to that. But um what's far

160:59

more impressive to me anyway would be

161:01

like Jimmy Wilkins, his mom's a

161:03

ballerina.

161:05

I think his father's an orchestra

161:06

conductor

161:07

>> and when Jimmy does a handless, so we

161:11

call an oi on vert where you don't smack

161:12

the tail like a handless air. His back

161:15

knee touches the board and he's guiding

161:17

the board with his back knee. He has the

161:19

hip mobility to be able to do that. He

161:22

didn't train it. It's just how he's

161:23

built. So, I think it's a combination of

161:25

things, but what makes it look so

161:28

amazing

161:29

is how fast he's going. And you don't

161:32

realize it. You just think how high he's

161:34

going. But the height comes from the

161:35

speed.

161:36

>> Here there are a few things inside

161:38

hiding.

161:39

>> Mhm.

161:39

>> Which which I would love to unpack

161:41

further. First is the speed and power

161:46

when it's mentioned in those fields must

161:49

be differentiated from the physiological

161:52

speed and power. I remember the first

161:54

time I read the the book of Leonid aray,

161:59

professor archive, the legendary Soviet

162:02

gymnastics trainer and in his book he

162:05

mentions the vertical jumps of the

162:07

Olympic Soviet male team. I think the

162:11

best was something that I did at the age

162:13

of 13.

162:15

But people are still under the

162:16

impression that gymnasts have good

162:19

jumps. They're rebounders.

162:22

>> They use the floor springs very well.

162:27

Skateboard similar.

162:28

>> Mhm.

162:29

>> Power-wise, strengthwise, nothing. There

162:32

is nothing there. It's the willingness

162:35

to go into that speed and to exit from

162:38

the ramp. And the willingness comes from

162:40

a confidence which comes from a certain

162:43

capacity to orient in space. That's my

162:46

suspicion.

162:46

>> No, you're absolutely right. You nailed

162:48

it. And uh Jimmy and Tom will hear this

162:50

and appreciate. There's only

162:52

historically I left out one legend that

162:54

isn't mentioned as often as you know

162:57

Tony Hawk or or Danny or Bob Burnquist

163:00

um who is truly amazing that they both

163:03

sort of capture some of the essence of

163:05

and that's Chris Miller who it's the

163:08

same thing. And none of these guys are

163:09

are physically very very large. They're

163:11

very slight. Um so they don't have a lot

163:13

of body weight to throw around. Um but

163:17

although Danny got strong, he broke his

163:20

neck surfing when we were younger and um

163:22

came back with a with a thick neck and

163:25

and doing strength training. He worked

163:26

with Paul Paul Czech

163:28

>> um and built himself back up to be

163:30

really resilient because he was

163:33

>> jumping the Great Wall of China doing

163:34

these kinds of things on broken ankles.

163:36

It's like you need some resilience.

163:37

Multiple knee replacements. He's a

163:39

gladiator. He's like evil conval

163:40

combined with the gladiator. But if you

163:43

watch Tom Char or Jimmy, they don't look

163:47

like they're throwing themselves into

163:49

it. But that's why it looks so graceful

163:52

and fast is that there but there is no

163:54

hesitation.

163:55

>> And the other part to explore in this is

163:58

comes from the father of biomechanics

164:02

Bernstein.

164:03

you know the Soviet government there is

164:05

this legendary urban legend. Maybe it's

164:08

true, maybe not. But there is I I

164:10

believe it it it might be true. The

164:12

Soviet government brought him in to

164:15

improve productivity in workers and he

164:19

was the father of motion capture. He's

164:22

the man who came up with it. He put

164:24

these globes and used an old school

164:28

camera to capture

164:31

the motion and study the biomechanics.

164:35

And they brought him to this factory and

164:38

one employee,

164:41

let's say, was producing

164:43

200 perfect pieces in an hour. And then

164:47

the average was 150 pieces. And they

164:51

asked him, why? What's so special? He

164:54

put these sensors on the arm. He let's

164:57

say it's with a hammer working with a

164:59

sledgehammer. What did he discover?

165:02

There is more variety

165:05

in the trajectories

165:07

for the worker that gets more pieces

165:10

perfectly done.

165:11

>> More variety.

165:12

>> Correct. Notice what is the variety

165:14

where it is in the trajectory

165:18

of the various joints.

165:20

But the end result has less variety.

165:24

[clears throat]

165:24

>> It is more perfect.

165:25

>> Mhm.

165:26

>> That brings me back to the

165:27

skateboarders. I believe from my

165:30

experience there is something like a

165:32

meta movement. A movement

165:35

that when it's developed correctly, it's

165:38

capable of achieving the task in any

165:41

condition. This is the difference

165:43

between a boxer's jab

165:46

and a kung fu punch.

165:49

How do you develop a boxer's jab? From

165:51

the first day, somebody interrupts it.

165:53

You're not throwing punches in the air

165:55

or on the makiwara.

165:57

>> Someone parries it or

165:58

>> someone parries it, moves it, you know,

166:00

you miss you. From the first day, you

166:02

use it as a tool under these chaotic

166:04

conditions.

166:06

>> So, you develop it. When you look at a

166:08

boxer's punch, most people will be more

166:10

impressed with the karate guy, with the

166:13

kung fu guy because on the air it looks

166:16

much crisper. We don't people don't

166:19

appreciate boxing. They appreciate

166:21

Jackie Chan movies. That is much easier

166:24

the the the the visual side of this

166:27

fighting. But it's not the real thing in

166:30

this sense. It's not adaptable. It's not

166:33

alive.

166:35

This is the Instagram reality. Another

166:37

problem. It has destroyed the real deal.

166:43

Now I can put a camera on and I can

166:46

practice here for two hours until I get

166:48

one good rep. I capture it and I put it

166:50

online. But when I meet these people and

166:52

it's time to move,

166:55

no it's not happening.

166:58

So in this sense the skateboarder faces

167:02

every time a fresh [laughter]

167:04

scenario altogether different and must

167:06

be present and adapted the meta

167:10

technique to the situation. It's not to

167:13

be perfect in the way that you are like

167:16

the discipline push hard and perfect it.

167:19

There is an aspect of it. The

167:22

stabilization of performance must resist

167:25

certain interruptions but must not

167:27

ignore other interruptions.

167:29

>> It brings to mind a couple of important

167:31

things. Um right now there are a lot of

167:34

very very impressive skateboarders,

167:35

young and old, male and female. um

167:38

[clears throat] some like just to

167:40

mention like this young girl Reese

167:42

Nelson is just a phenom and her style is

167:46

great and she's different than a lot of

167:49

the young kids that are like really

167:51

flippity and go big. She's a vert

167:52

skateboarder. And there are a lot of

167:54

skateboarders now that can do things

167:56

big, fast, flip, twist, lip tricks. Like

168:01

they can do all of that on on the street

168:04

tr also. But there's some that just look

168:07

like robots. They're just technicians.

168:09

They And cuz I was going to say that

168:12

when in a line where there's no break in

168:14

the editing, that's where the

168:15

[clears throat] real magic comes through

168:16

cuz they have to line things up properly

168:19

trick to trick. It's not just like one

168:21

hit.

168:22

>> Totally different athletes.

168:23

>> Totally different athletes. But there

168:25

are some vert skateboarders and some

168:26

street skateboarders that they still

168:28

just look robotic and they just and it

168:30

it's almost like it's too perfect. And

168:33

it's real. It's too perfect, but that's

168:35

not what

168:38

real like the the cool thing about

168:39

skateboarding is that it rewards a bit

168:41

of that like you said, approaching

168:44

things from different angles, but the

168:45

end point still sticks. And that's the

168:48

real magic. And there's one other person

168:49

I have to throw into the mix because

168:51

growing up this guy he he was like the

168:53

real evil conval and he's still a

168:56

legend. He hasn't hit a bad injury and

168:59

so he he actually brought himself back

169:00

from paralysis. He can bike now and

169:02

skateboard a bit. Great artist. Amazing.

169:05

Super nice guy. His name is John

169:07

Cardiel. I was fortunate enough to know

169:09

John a bit and uh we're still friendly.

169:11

although I haven't seen him in years

169:13

sort of online we're we're friendly but

169:15

I got to see him firsthand years ago and

169:17

he was one of these people that it

169:19

looked like everything was chaos around

169:23

him but he could go bigger and further

169:26

and he's the opposite of Antoine's like

169:28

hands flailing and like the amazing

169:30

thing was

169:32

the the speed the energy and the I don't

169:35

want to say imperfection cuz it was

169:37

perfect in its variety of like entry

169:40

points But he's he's still revered many

169:44

many years later and probably always

169:46

will be. And so there are certain things

169:48

like skateboarding

169:49

>> beautiful where it's still celebrated to

169:52

not just be perfect never miss and and

169:55

these guys that I'm I'm referring to and

169:56

Reese um and there are others of course

169:59

um it's like real poetry

170:03

uh but sometimes it's heavy metal

170:04

poetry.

170:05

>> Yeah.

170:05

>> Yeah. It's beautiful and also it breaks

170:10

the aesthetic. [clears throat] The

170:12

aesthetics and the performance they walk

170:15

hand in hand to a certain degree but not

170:18

beyond that. And it's a slippery slope.

170:21

I warn people don't try to beautify your

170:25

movements. You will destroy them. The

170:28

beauty is a side effect.

170:30

>> Mhm.

170:30

>> It's an effect. It shouldn't be a cause.

170:33

This is what happened to our asses.

170:37

[laughter]

170:38

Where does it come from? It comes from a

170:40

person who can jump high, who can

170:42

sprint, who is productive, and it it's

170:46

attractive. Now, it's just the end

170:49

result.

170:50

>> It's like uh the exercise equivalent of

170:53

plastic surgery.

170:54

>> Yeah. And we found a way, a better way.

170:57

We always find a better way to get what

170:59

we want. We want the aesthetics. So we

171:02

found a way training way how to boost

171:04

this to create the shelf the I don't

171:06

know what all this yeah the

171:09

but this is a terrible mistake in many

171:13

ways when you look forward

171:17

you can develop the glutes

171:20

but don't disconnect them functionality

171:22

without function is in this case very

171:25

costly

171:28

and you start to get a pirated product

171:32

that is eventually too good to be true.

171:36

In that sense, what you mentioned is

171:39

very interesting and we start to

171:41

separate. Also, you see it in tricks,

171:44

tricking phenomenons, sports that

171:47

started to develop. Have you seen those

171:49

kids who can do the juggle like football

171:52

players, like soccer players? They can

171:55

do things that no soccer player can do.

171:58

But I cannot play in the World Cup. Now

172:02

this shows you the difference. One, I

172:04

transform myself

172:07

to the challenges that I'm presented.

172:10

Two, I transform the environment or the

172:12

field to fit myself.

172:16

So in this case, I control all the

172:18

parameters of my skateboarding and it

172:21

becomes perfect yet robotic. Diego

172:24

Armando Maradona used to warm up with

172:28

the shoelaces open. I used to love it.

172:31

Showing you the whole scenario is open.

172:34

I can still function.

172:37

Fighting is a very important field in

172:40

that sense for movement perspective. I'm

172:42

not a fighter but my interaction with

172:44

fighting I used to think it was so ugly,

172:49

so ungraceful that the movement quality

172:51

was so low.

172:53

They cannot do nothing well. These real

172:56

fighters, MMA fighters, they don't punch

173:00

well. They don't kick well. Nothing that

173:03

they do is of high movement quality. And

173:06

yet,

173:08

they'll kill you. They solve the

173:11

problem.

173:14

They're not about perfecting. They're

173:16

not car mechanics. They're drivers. and

173:20

they will drive a Toyota and will defeat

173:22

you with a Lamborghini.

173:24

This is what they do. And there are

173:26

certain fields like that. And

173:27

skateboarding comes from that because

173:29

it's the street. Everything always

173:32

changes. The sidewalks, the heights,

173:34

your mood, your state of being, the

173:36

shoes.

173:38

And there was grace in being able to

173:40

navigate that chaos and become chaos.

173:43

Not to control it, to make an order off

173:45

of it. So this is what you feel. Ah it's

173:50

not it. And I feel it a lot with many

173:52

movement fields. Look, look, it's so

173:54

beautiful. And we even became

173:56

desensitized for this beauty which is

173:58

good because in the future this will

174:00

open the door again for real movement,

174:04

real performance, real presence and then

174:07

beauty is part of this equation but not

174:10

the it's not the everything. It's not

174:13

all about it. It's almost like it

174:15

becomes an emergent property of all the

174:17

I don't want to call them imperfections

174:19

because they're not there. It's it's

174:20

it's there's something that's real about

174:24

what you're describing and what I'm

174:25

attempting to describe, but I I

174:27

stumbled. I tried to provide examples.

174:29

I'll provide some links, but uh if you

174:31

ever want to get a little bit scared,

174:33

you want your amygdala activated a

174:35

little bit vicariously

174:37

um and see what real chaos upon chaos

174:41

harnessed into something beautiful is.

174:43

although I don't re recommend actually

174:44

doing it is go on to YouTube and put

174:47

GX1000 and watch these kids bomb hills

174:49

in San Francisco. Um

174:52

>> I've seen some

174:52

>> they're like yelling get out of the way.

174:55

Like they're not setting it up so that

174:56

the streets clear. I mean it's super

174:58

crazy hazardous and one of those kids

175:00

ended up dying years ago skitching

175:03

holding on to the back of a a vehicle.

175:05

But nonetheless, I mean they're maniacs

175:07

of a certain kind. Um, and

175:11

there's something about embracing the

175:14

uncertainty.

175:16

You know, I I have to say, uh, Edido,

175:18

uh, I did not expect we were going to go

175:20

where we went today, [laughter] but I

175:22

would be remiss if I didn't say, and I

175:25

take no credit for this, I really want

175:26

to give you due credit, is that

175:30

everything you just described about

175:33

allowing for different entry points and

175:35

coming to a a place that nails it, like

175:39

that's you. And that's in some sense

175:43

the best of podcasting. It's we don't

175:46

have a script. We didn't come in here. I

175:49

didn't even show you what was on this

175:50

sheet of paper. I looked at it a few

175:51

times, made some adjustments. It's

175:53

improv to some extent. But it takes a

175:56

special kind of person to be able to do

175:59

what you do in the physical space to be

176:02

able to articulate about that but also

176:04

to pull in from so many areas of

176:07

philosophy, psychology, physiology,

176:10

neuroscience. By the way, your

176:11

description of the eyes not as cameras.

176:14

Like the reason I didn't yap about that

176:16

is cuz you nailed it. I couldn't have

176:18

given a lecture [laughter] like that

176:19

truly. And um you're one of these people

176:22

that when you speak, people learn. And

176:26

it's transformed my experience. I go up

176:28

and down the stairs a couple times a

176:30

night lately to check on my puppy. And I

176:33

still can't go up or downstairs without

176:35

thinking about the way I go up and

176:37

downstairs ever since we recorded in my

176:39

house. Gosh, probably three maybe four

176:43

years ago, five years ago. In any case,

176:46

>> it's not an invasion into my

176:47

consciousness. It's it's a real gift.

176:50

And I I know people will come away with

176:53

these gifts. And I really want to

176:54

encourage people to think about leaning

176:56

into these subtle ripples, the spaces.

176:58

This isn't just language. It's the magic

177:01

that really makes life so much better.

177:04

So I'm very grateful to you. I really,

177:06

really am. And please come back again.

177:09

>> Thank you. Thank you. Truly enjoyed

177:11

that.

177:12

>> Thank you for joining me for today's

177:13

discussion with Ido Portal. To learn

177:15

more about his work and to find links to

177:18

the various things we discussed, please

177:19

see the show note caption. If you're

177:21

learning from and or enjoying this

177:22

podcast, please subscribe to our YouTube

177:24

channel. That's a terrific zerocost way

177:26

to support us. In addition, please

177:28

follow the podcast by clicking the

177:30

follow button on both Spotify and Apple.

177:32

And on both Spotify and Apple, you can

177:34

leave us up to a fivestar review. And

177:36

you can now leave us comments at both

177:38

Spotify and Apple. Please also check out

177:40

the sponsors mentioned at the beginning

177:41

and throughout today's episode. That's

177:43

the best way to support this podcast. If

177:46

you have questions for me or comments

177:47

about the podcast or guests or topics

177:49

that you'd like me to consider for the

177:50

Huberman Lab podcast, please put those

177:52

in the comment section on YouTube. I do

177:54

read all the comments. For those of you

177:56

that haven't heard, I have a new book

177:58

coming out. It's my very first book.

178:00

It's entitled Protocols, an operating

178:02

manual for the human body. This is a

178:04

book that I've been working on for more

178:05

than 5 years, and that's based on more

178:06

than 30 years of research and

178:09

experience. And it covers protocols for

178:11

everything from sleep to exercise to

178:14

stress control protocols related to

178:16

focus and motivation. And of course, I

178:18

provide the scientific substantiation

178:21

for the protocols that are included. The

178:23

book is now available by pre-sale at

178:25

protocolsbook.com.

178:27

There you can find links to various

178:29

vendors. You can pick the one that you

178:30

like best. Again, the book is called

178:32

Protocols, an operating manual for the

178:34

human body. And if you're not already

178:36

following me on social media, I am

178:38

Huberman Lab on all social media

178:40

platforms. So that's Instagram, X,

178:42

Threads, Facebook, and LinkedIn. And on

178:45

all those platforms, I discuss science

178:46

and science related tools, some of which

178:48

overlaps with the content of the

178:49

Hubberman Lab podcast, but much of which

178:51

is distinct from the information on the

178:53

Hubberman Lab podcast. Again, it's

178:55

Huberman Lab on all social media

178:57

platforms. And if you haven't already,

178:58

subscribe to our Neural Network

179:00

newsletter. The neural network

179:01

newsletter is a zerocost monthly

179:03

newsletter that includes podcast

179:05

summaries as well as what we call

179:06

protocols in the form of one to

179:08

three-page PDFs that cover everything

179:10

from how to optimize your sleep, how to

179:12

optimize dopamine, deliberate cold

179:13

exposure. We have a foundational fitness

179:16

protocol that covers cardiovascular

179:17

training and resistance training. All of

179:19

that is available completely zero cost.

179:22

You simply go to hubermanlab.com, go to

179:24

the menu tab in the top right corner,

179:25

scroll down to newsletter, and enter

179:27

your email. And I should emphasize that

179:29

we do not share your email with anybody.

179:31

Thank you once again for joining me for

179:33

today's discussion with Ido Portal. And

179:36

last but certainly not least, thank you

179:38

[music] for your interest in science.

Interactive Summary

In this episode, Andrew Huberman interviews Ido Portal, a renowned movement teacher, to discuss how physical practice, playfulness, and movement can be used as practical tools to rewire our brains and enhance self-understanding. They cover a range of topics, including the limitations of rigid discipline, the transformative power of 'play,' the exploration of liminal states like those between sleep and wakefulness, and how to approach daily tasks with more granular awareness and adaptability.

Suggested questions

3 ready-made prompts