Playstation stops providing physical games; this means nothing. Your enemy is DRM, not digital media
247 segments
Hey, everybody. How's it going? Hope you
having a lovely day. Welcome to today's
episode of How You Getting [ __ ] I'm
your host, Louis Rossmann. And today
we're going to be talking about Sony
discontinuing the idea of having
physical media for your games and why I
don't care. Many of you may be thinking,
"Louis, why don't you care about this?
Don't you care about ownership? I can't
believe you said that you don't care
that Sony is not giving you a physical
copy of your game anymore." Honestly,
couldn't give a [ __ ] Completely
irrelevant, in my opinion, and I'm going
to show you why. This is something that
I see happening in the car community
when people start talking about uh
vehicles that are not fixable or
vehicles that spy on you. I've gone over
this in older videos where people will
bring up how Tesla has a computer in it
and the Tesla is spying on you and these
damn unfixable electric cars and these
damn unfixable Teslas. And one of the
things that they are missing out on and
one of the things that annoys me when I
hear those statements is by getting all
the hate on Tesla. And to be clear, Elon
Musk deserves a lot. If you did just if
you just look up the word Tesla or Elon
Musk on my channel, you will find I am
not a fanboy by any means. But the issue
that I have with this is that when you
put all of the pressure on this one
person, it allows everybody else to use
that person as a pinata and then take
cover for the actual anti-consumer
actions being taken by every other car
company. Jim Farley, the CEO of Ford,
was recently talking about how you
shouldn't be fixing your car within the
warranty period. He was fearmongering
over it while he was talking with the
president of the United States along
with other car industry executives and
trying to get rid of this thing called
the Repair Act, which would make it
easier for independent mechanics to be
able to get access to what they need to
fix vehicles. And he said that they
could kill you. It could kill you if you
fix a modern car. Now, he was not
talking about a Tesla Model 3, nor was
he talking about the Ford Mach-E, which
is one of their models of electric car.
He was talking about the Bronco, which
is an internal combustion engine car.
So, when people in my comments start
going back and forth about how electric
cars are horrible and Tesla is horrible
and all this other stuff, I'm not saying
there's no stupid [ __ ] with electric
cars. I'm not saying there's not a lot
of problems with them. But you're giving
cover to traditional automakers that
make internal combustion engine vehicles
primarily to be able to do the same
[ __ ] When General Motors introduced
technology that was spying on everybody
in their cars, they They doing it on
both their gasoline cars and their
electric cars. And because they were in
Tesla, it wasn't really getting noticed
as much. When Ford says that you
shouldn't be able to fix your car, this
is only now starting to become something
that is going mainstream because people
are focusing on the wrong thing. And
when you talk about physical games, yes,
Sony does like to take things away from
you that you already bought and paid
for. They recently did this where they
said as of September 1st, 2026, because
play has no limits, you will no longer
be able to watch any of your previously
purchased Studio Canal content. But they
can do that to physical media, too.
Exhibit A, The Crew, the game that
started the stop killing games movement.
That's a physical disc.
Do you care that you have the physical
disc? Does having a copy of the disc
make any change? What matters is digital
rights management and required
connectivity to an online server. That
can take any form. I would much rather
have a game that has no DRM, no
requirement to connect to a server that
I don't have a physical copy of than I
would a game that I get a physical copy
of. Having a physical copy of a game
does absolutely [ __ ] nothing to
ensure that the game remains playable
over time. And that is my point. When I
see people getting angry over not having
a physical game, you shouldn't care. You
should be able to download your game
that you get the code to and burn it to
a DVD or a Blu-ray disc if you want or
play it off of your hard drive. You
should be fine having an only digital
copy of your game. You should be excited
that you have a digital-only copy of
your game. The problem is not the fact
that you don't have a physical copy of
it anymore. The problem is that they
come with digital rights management that
does not allow you to do what you want
with what you bought and paid for. And
the other problem with it is that it
requires connectivity to an online
server in order to work. As long as the
product requires connectivity to an
online server in order to work, whether
it came in the form of a DVD, a
cartridge, a Blu-ray, a kitty, if
Blackberry required a connection to a
cloud server in order to work, if
Blackberry came with digital rights
management, she would not be my kitty
and I would not be her human. In order
for you to have ownership of what you
bought and paid for, it's not just about
having something that's shiny that you
can see in your hand. It is about buying
products that are not sold with this
type of crap. I'll give you an example,
GOG, Good Old Games, gog.com. These are
games that are sold with no DRM. You can
go to gog.com right now and you can buy
games that are digital rights management
free. No DRM, these are games that you
can download and that you can copy and
that you can burn to a piece of physical
media yourself. I was told that games on
GOG are DRM free, is that true? You can
burn the installer parts to discs and
you'll get a prompt to switch discs.
Actually playing the games from disc
will vary from game to game, but yeah,
you can actually buy games at this point
in time that don't have digital rights
management. Now, when you buy games from
those websites, you won't get physical
media, but because they don't have
digital rights management on them, you
can make your own physical media of the
game and you can play it however you
want. The game will work in 2026, the
game will work next year, the game will
work in 2036, the game will work in 2096
if the world is still here by then.
And that's what matters. I want to make
sure that everybody watching this video
keeps their eye on the ball. Whether or
not you have access to physical media
does not matter at all. You can make
your own physical media of the game.
Just because you can hold the game in
your hand does not mean that they won't
take it away from you. And the proof is
right [ __ ] there. Demand that the
games that you purchase don't have
digital rights management on them. Stop
buying games if they have digital rights
management on them and stop playing
things that require connectivity to
somebody else's server in order to work.
It's one thing if it's a choice to
connect to their server, it's another if
it's a requirement.
The only game that I play that requires
connection to somebody else's server
back in the day was Dota 2
cuz it was free.
I never made a microtransaction in that
game, I never viewed an ad in that game,
I just played and enjoyed the game.
Way God intended.
Now, a lot of people are linking to this
one very funny video. This is a video,
official PlayStation used game
instructional video. They are making fun
of other companies that do not sell you
a physical copy of your game and this is
another reason that they should never be
fanboys or fangirls in my comment
section. For Tesla, for politicians, for
companies or anything else. Do you
remember when Samsung made fun of people
for removing the headphone jack? Do you
remember when Samsung also removed the
headphone jack and the microSD card
slot? Do you remember when people that
bought Samsung products were proud of
them because they could root them and
install different operating systems on
it? Do you know how now you can't do
that? That's because many companies are
not loyal to their customers, they're
loyal to whatever it is that will make
them the most money and whatever is
easiest for them. That's why they
published this thing showing you how you
could share your physical game with your
friends and then years later decided,
"Never mind, we're going to do the exact
same anti-consumer bullshit."
Wow, this is a really shitty commercial.
These companies are more than happy to
brag about something right now and then
a few years later just turn around and
do the exact same thing as the people
that they were bashing. This video has
20 million views and I imagine that many
of its views have been within the last 1
to 2 weeks since this garbage has been
announced. Please keep your eye on the
ball. Please make sure you're asking for
the right thing and please, above all,
never be a fanboy to a company. Loyalty
is for your interpersonal relationships
and for people that have stuck up for
you and nobody else would. It's not for
[ __ ] game company, politician, auto
maker that makes it very clear and
obvious
with evidence that they don't and never
have given a [ __ ] about you. That's it
for today and as always, I hope you
learned something. I'll see you in the
next video. Bye now.
>> We also have the duty not to [music]
infringe the IP rights in the process.
It is in fact the manufacturers who have
the relevant rights, not consumers.
Ask follow-up questions or revisit key timestamps.
In this video, Louis Rossmann discusses why the shift away from physical media in gaming is not the primary issue consumers should be concerned about. He argues that the real problems are Digital Rights Management (DRM) and the requirement for online server connectivity, which threaten true ownership regardless of whether a game is on a disc. He emphasizes that consumers should demand DRM-free games and avoid being 'fanboys' of companies that prioritize profit over consumer rights, pointing out that even companies that once marketed themselves as pro-consumer often pivot to anti-consumer practices later.
Videos recently processed by our community