HomeVideos

Eating for Better Sleep & Foods that Improve Metabolic Health | Dr. Marie-Pierre St-Onge

Now Playing

Eating for Better Sleep & Foods that Improve Metabolic Health | Dr. Marie-Pierre St-Onge

Transcript

3177 segments

0:00

what was it that they ate that day that

0:02

impacted how they slept that night? And

0:05

we found that higher intakes of fiber

0:09

were associated with more deep sleep,

0:11

higher intakes of saturated fat, less

0:13

deep sleep, and then more refined

0:15

carbohydrates, simple sugars, more

0:18

arousals. You're not getting deep

0:21

slowwave sleep, REN sleep as much as you

0:24

would otherwise. Welcome to the Huberman

0:27

Lab podcast, where we discuss science

0:29

and science-based tools for everyday

0:31

life.

0:35

I'm Andrew Huberman and I'm a professor

0:37

of neurobiology and opthalmology at

0:39

Stanford School of Medicine. My guest

0:41

today is Dr. Marie Pierre Strange, a

0:44

professor of nutritional medicine at the

0:46

Institute of Human Nutrition at Columbia

0:48

University School of Medicine. Today we

0:51

discuss how you eat impacts your sleep

0:53

and how you sleep impacts what you eat

0:56

as well as how your body utilizes food

0:58

depending on how you slept. Now we've

1:01

talked about food and we've talked about

1:02

sleep many times before on this podcast.

1:04

But Dr. St. On's work is unique because

1:07

she runs one of the few laboratories in

1:08

the world to look at the birectional

1:10

relationship between sleep and food. For

1:13

instance, you'll learn how even modest

1:15

sleep deprivation increases hunger but

1:17

differently in men and women. In men, it

1:20

happens to increase the hormones that

1:21

drive the desire to eat. Whereas in

1:23

women, it reduces naturally made

1:25

peptides such as GLP, which suppress

1:27

hunger. Today's discussion gets into the

1:29

specific actionable items that you can

1:31

do to improve your sleep, and the way

1:33

that your body handles food and hunger.

1:36

We talk about the role of sleep in

1:37

regulating blood sugar, cortisol levels,

1:39

overall metabolism, and cardioabolic

1:42

health. Now, because Dr. St. Oja's

1:44

research focuses on sleep and nutrition,

1:46

but she's also spent a significant

1:47

amount of time studying how specific

1:49

nutrients impact overall health and not

1:51

just sleep. We also talk about that. I'm

1:54

certain that you'll come away from

1:55

today's episode with a lot of new

1:56

information you haven't heard elsewhere,

1:58

as well as with the intention to make

2:00

small or perhaps even large changes in

2:02

behavior and nutritional choices that

2:04

the science tell us can significantly

2:06

improve your sleep, your metabolism, and

2:08

overall health. Before we begin, I'd

2:10

like to emphasize that this podcast is

2:12

separate from my teaching and research

2:13

roles at Stanford. It is however part of

2:15

my desire and effort to bring zero cost

2:17

to consumer information about science

2:19

and science related tools to the general

2:21

public. In keeping with that theme,

2:23

today's episode does include sponsors.

2:25

And now for my discussion with Dr. Marie

2:27

Pierre St. Dr. Marie Pierre St. welcome.

2:32

>> Thank you for having me.

2:33

>> Sleep impacts how and what we eat and

2:36

how and what we eat impacts sleep.

2:39

That's a different perspective than I

2:40

think most people take. I think most

2:41

people are familiar, however, with not

2:44

getting the best night's sleep, maybe

2:46

feeling like their impulsivity to eat

2:49

quote unquote bad foods is a little

2:52

higher, and then also hopefully familiar

2:54

with having a great night's sleep and

2:56

feeling like we're just kind of in

2:58

control in a different way. Maybe you

3:00

could just kind of share for us what's

3:02

really going on beneath that experience

3:04

and when subtle or not so subtle chronic

3:09

sleep loss. So not an allnighter

3:11

necessarily but you know 45 minutes less

3:13

here 90 minutes less there etc etc how

3:17

that plays out in terms of our nutrition

3:19

and then we'll go in from the nutrition

3:20

side to sleep.

3:22

>> Sure. So there's a couple of questions

3:24

that you have in there actually about

3:27

the extent of sleep loss and how that

3:30

influences your food intake, what we see

3:33

in the general population versus what we

3:36

do in a lab to address causality. So let

3:39

me start with you know the

3:40

population-based studies right. So when

3:43

I started being interested in in sleep

3:46

it was coming from an obesity angle. My

3:50

PhD is in nutrition. I trained as a

3:52

postoc in uh body composition obesity

3:55

research and we were getting a lot of

3:57

information from population based

3:59

studies that people who sleep too little

4:03

have a higher body mass index than

4:06

people who get adequate amount of sleep.

4:09

Then it became there is a higher

4:11

prevalence of people with obesity in

4:14

this short sleep uh group.

4:18

Then studies evaluating changes over

4:22

time seeing that people who don't sleep

4:26

enough tend to gain more weight. There

4:28

was a famous uh nurses health study that

4:30

I really like to site uh when I give

4:33

talks that was published in 2006

4:36

where uh they tracked nurses over 14

4:39

years and those nurses that reported

4:42

sleeping five six hours had much higher

4:45

rate of weight gain over that 14 15 year

4:49

period than the nurses who had reported

4:51

sleeping seven or eight hours per night.

4:54

So those are observations that we get

4:56

from largecale population studies,

4:58

cohorts,

5:00

but you know what they what those

5:02

studies tell us is that things are

5:03

happening at a point in time or may

5:07

influence something that's happening

5:09

over time but not necessarily that one

5:13

causes the other. Right? So I started uh

5:16

my work in this field trying to uncover

5:19

whether sleeping too little actually

5:23

causes weight gain. And so in my opinion

5:27

because I was coming from a lab where I

5:29

trained in the measurement of energy

5:30

balance. So how much energ how much

5:32

energy you eat versus how much energy

5:34

you burn like well if sleep leads to

5:38

obesity leads to weight gain it has to

5:41

impact this energy balance

5:44

regulation. So it's either that we eat

5:47

more than we should or that we exercise

5:51

less we burn less or we eat more or

5:55

maybe it's a combination of the two.

5:57

Let's try this out and and see. So my

6:00

first uh my first study, my first NIH

6:04

grant, the big RO1s, you know, was to

6:07

look at exactly at this. So we had

6:09

people who had adequate sleep and we

6:12

brought them in the lab and we asked

6:15

them in a crossover design. So half of

6:18

the participants started out sleeping

6:21

adequately. So they we gave them a

6:22

9-hour time in bed opportunity or we

6:26

asked them to sleep too little. So, they

6:28

had a 4-hour time in bed opportunity,

6:30

very short, but we did this for five

6:33

nights.

6:34

And then we took all sorts of

6:36

measurements in a controlled feeding

6:38

condition. So, for the first three days,

6:42

we told we had our participants eat the

6:44

exact same thing regardless of how much

6:47

time in bed they slept they got at

6:49

night. And then we measured appetite

6:51

regulating hormones. We did neuroiming

6:54

uh to really get at isolating the impact

6:57

of sleep duration on appetite regulating

6:59

hormones and and um neuronal responses

7:03

to foods. And then on the last day we

7:08

let them self- select their food intake

7:10

and we measured that in the lab. From

7:12

that study we showed that in men

7:15

specifically

7:17

uh we saw an increase in ghrein in

7:20

response to short sleep. So this hormone

7:22

that triggers food intake in women we

7:25

saw a reduction in GLP-1 interestingly

7:28

enough glucagon like peptide one. So the

7:31

satiety hormone was reduced as a result

7:34

of short sleep in women. And then when

7:36

uh we measured their food intake in the

7:38

lab, they ate 300 calories more in the

7:41

short sleep condition than they when

7:44

they got their regular adequate sleep of

7:47

at least 7 and 1/2 hours, a little more

7:49

than that uh per night. Then uh you were

7:53

asking about you know brain responses.

7:56

Uh we looked at neuronal responses to

7:59

food stimuli. We found upregulation in

8:02

uh reward centers of the brain in the

8:05

context of sleep restriction compared to

8:07

the context of adequate sleep. So

8:09

altogether really building a case that

8:12

when you don't sleep enough at night,

8:14

you have both physiological

8:17

signals to eat more for men or not stop

8:21

eating in women that lead to greater

8:25

food intake. that's also uh could be

8:28

impacted by just pleasurable centers

8:31

that are activated to a greater extent

8:33

as a result of uh insufficient sleep.

8:35

>> Amazing this sex specific split in the

8:38

data if I have it correctly that when

8:40

men are sleepd deprived so getting four

8:43

hours per night

8:44

>> the signals that drive a pettitive

8:48

desire to eat are higher in women it's

8:51

more that the break uh on eating on

8:53

satiety is reduced.

8:55

>> Exactly. Okay. As far as I know, the GLP

8:57

pathways are not um divergent by by sex,

9:02

but of course I'm not deeply versed in

9:04

that literature. Is there any evidence

9:05

that GLPs are functioning different in

9:07

men and women like circadian wise or

9:09

anything like that or this just this was

9:11

just a fertuitous outcome or I should

9:14

say uh incidental outcome?

9:16

>> This was an incidental outcome. We

9:18

really didn't know what to expect. We

9:20

didn't really know at all that we'd see

9:23

sex differences. Mhm.

9:25

>> Because there had been prior studies and

9:28

prior studies had shown that ghrein was

9:31

increased as a result of sleep

9:33

restriction. They also showed that

9:34

leptin was reduced as a result of sleep

9:36

restriction. And when we got our data,

9:40

if we analyzed our data with all of our

9:43

participants together

9:46

>> and there was no effect.

9:47

>> Mhm.

9:48

>> And that was surprising. And people

9:50

would say, "Don't you know? Don't you

9:52

know sleep restriction

9:54

increases grein?" Like, well, I guess I

9:57

don't know because in our study it

9:59

doesn't. But then we saw these sex

10:02

specific differences. Then it made sense

10:04

then that in the full sample when we had

10:07

an equal number of men and women we saw

10:10

no effect on ghrein because there was no

10:11

effect in women but there was an effect

10:13

in men which was reproducing what others

10:16

had found because all the prior studies

10:18

had been done in men only.

10:20

>> I'd like to take a quick break to

10:22

acknowledge one of our sponsors David.

10:24

David makes protein bars unlike any

10:26

other. Their newest bar, the Bronze Bar,

10:29

has 20 grams of protein, only 150

10:32

calories, and zero grams of sugar. I

10:34

have to say, these are the best tasting

10:36

protein bars I've ever had, and I've

10:39

tried a lot of protein bars over the

10:40

years. These New David bars have a

10:42

marshmallow base and they're covered in

10:44

chocolate coating and they're absolutely

10:47

incredible. I of course eat regular

10:49

whole foods. I eat meat, chicken, fish,

10:50

eggs, fruits, vegetables, etc. But I

10:53

also make it a point to eat one or two

10:54

David bars per day as a snack, which

10:57

makes it easy to hit my protein goal of

10:59

1 gram of protein per pound of body

11:00

weight. And that allows me to take in

11:02

the protein I need without consuming

11:04

excess calories. I love all the David

11:06

Bronze Bar flavors, including cookie

11:08

dough, caramel chocolate, double

11:10

chocolate, peanut butter chocolate. They

11:12

all actually taste like candy bars.

11:14

Again, they're amazing. But again, they

11:16

have no sugar and they have 20 grams of

11:17

protein with just 150 calories. If you'd

11:20

like to try David, you can go to

11:22

davidprotein.com/huberman.

11:25

Right now, David is offering a deal

11:26

where if you buy four cartons, you get

11:28

the fifth carton for free. You can also

11:30

find David on Amazon or in stores such

11:32

as Target, Walmart, and Kroger. Again,

11:34

to get the fifth carton for free, go to

11:36

davidproin.com/huberman.

11:39

Today's episode is also brought to us by

11:41

BetterHelp. BetterHelp offers

11:43

professional therapy with a licensed

11:44

therapist carried out entirely online.

11:47

Now, I've been doing therapy for a very

11:49

long time, and I can tell you that it's

11:50

a lot like physical workouts. There are

11:52

days when I want to do it, and there are

11:53

days when I don't want to do it. But

11:55

when I finish a therapy session, every

11:57

single time I come away feeling better

11:59

and knowing that the time was well

12:00

spent. There's just so many benefits

12:02

that come through effective therapy.

12:04

Now, with BetterHel, they make it very

12:06

easy to find an expert therapist who can

12:08

help provide the benefits that come from

12:09

effective therapy. You fill out a short

12:11

questionnaire to match you to a

12:12

therapist. And while BetterHelp has an

12:14

industry-leading match rate, if you

12:16

aren't happy with your match, you can

12:17

switch to a different therapist at any

12:19

time. And it works. BetterHelp has an

12:22

average rating of 4.9 out of five for

12:24

its live sessions based on over 1.7

12:27

million client reviews. If you would

12:29

like to try BetterHelp, go to

12:31

betterhelp.com/huberman

12:33

to get 10% off your first month. Again,

12:35

that's betterhelp.com/huberman.

12:39

Whenever I'm sleepd deprived, so four or

12:42

five hours of sleep I consider sleep

12:44

deprived. I used to pull allnighters

12:45

years ago. Now I avoid them at all

12:47

costs. But whenever I have that

12:49

experience, I feel like my whole body to

12:53

some extent is in a low level of pain.

12:56

It's like kind of like central ache like

12:58

you just and and I wonder a extent to

13:01

which people eat to overcome like to

13:03

kind of quell the the pain of sleep

13:05

deprivation. Maybe people react

13:07

differently to sleep deprivation. Maybe

13:09

their subjective experience of it is is

13:10

very different. But what do you think is

13:12

happening in that uh in that short

13:15

relatively short amount of sleep that's

13:17

missing? What is getting reset? Is it

13:20

neural? Is it endocrine? It's obviously

13:22

all those things, but what do you think

13:23

is the the switch that allows people to

13:25

enter a a day in a in a much more

13:27

healthy fashion or or a sick essentially

13:30

in a slightly sick fashion? In our

13:32

study, it was actually a 50% reduction

13:34

in sleep because when they had 9 hours

13:37

sleep opportunity, they slept around 7

13:40

and 1/2 and when they had the they were

13:43

all people who we had screened to sleep

13:45

at least seven measured by ectography.

13:48

So, and on average they get 7 and 1/2.

13:50

And in the sleep restricted condition,

13:53

they got on average about 3 hours and 50

13:56

minutes.

13:57

>> So, it's like staying up late working on

13:59

a deadline then trying to catch an early

14:00

flight. Yeah,

14:01

>> it's pretty brutal.

14:02

>> It's pretty brutal. And that was

14:03

maintained, you know, they had five

14:05

nights of that. So that

14:06

>> five nights of that. Were they coming

14:08

unglued mentally, too? That I think I

14:10

would feel terrible after that kind of

14:13

stretch

14:14

>> that the end they were done. Like there

14:15

was no way anyone would want to keep

14:17

keep coming for that. But they were in

14:19

the lab. They were under supervision the

14:20

whole time. We didn't let them go out on

14:22

their own. Uh so they were well

14:24

supervised. Make sure that nothing uh

14:26

nothing would happen to them.

14:28

>> No naps.

14:28

>> No naps. No. No. Uh but so what happens

14:32

is I think there's some subconscious

14:36

need to to eat more when you're

14:39

sleepdeprived. There's also you know

14:41

there's a thermic effect of of food,

14:43

right? So it gives you a jolt of energy

14:45

to eat something. People know that you

14:48

eat it wakes you up in a way. You know,

14:51

neuronal signaling that that enhances uh

14:55

pleasurable and reward centers of the

14:58

brain where you know when also fatigue

15:00

sits in and now it's like do you really

15:02

want to have this conversation with

15:05

yourself about what to choose at the

15:06

buffet table? you know, there's fatigue

15:11

>> and uh and others have shown also that

15:13

sleepiness tends to correlate with all

15:16

of this that there's these triggers for

15:19

more pleasurable food consumption with

15:22

um with sleep restriction and it's been

15:24

reproduced. There's been so many studies

15:27

uh and they all you know agree to to the

15:31

extent of overeating you know a meta

15:33

analysis showed 250 to 400 calories of

15:36

overeating which might not sound like

15:38

much but when you start layering that in

15:40

day after day and you think you know

15:42

3500 excess calories more or less for a

15:45

pound of body weight and then you start

15:46

when people accumulate that over time

15:48

>> if they're in a night shift condition or

15:51

new parents or

15:53

>> tending to a sick relative were just

15:55

final exams like it it's a real thing.

15:57

>> It's a real thing. Uh Neymar Kovven in

16:00

uh 2022 published a paper where uh they

16:03

had sleep restriction about 5 hours per

16:06

night versus 7 and 1 half hours per

16:08

night for two weeks and participants

16:10

gained half a kilo in a twoe period. So

16:13

you do nothing and you just you know

16:16

sleep less and gain gain almost a pound

16:19

in two weeks. It strikes me that, you

16:22

know, for a long time in the stress

16:23

research, the idea was when people are

16:25

stressed, they reach for kind of quote

16:27

unquote comfort foods, carbohydrate, and

16:29

typically starch fat, starched fat,

16:32

sugar combination foods to comfort them.

16:34

And and the the just so story was always

16:36

that uh okay, well, you know, cortisol's

16:40

main role is to deploy glucose, and so

16:42

people are doing this as a way to bring

16:44

excess energy and and it all kind of

16:46

fits together. What is the relationship

16:48

between these forms of sleep deprivation

16:50

that you work on and stress? Is it

16:52

really a way of of I'm not saying just

16:54

inducing stress because I think sleep is

16:56

its own thing, but it's stressful

16:59

>> just to be less than adequately rested

17:02

independent of the things coming at you

17:03

in life,

17:04

>> right? Is what you're studying stress.

17:06

>> So if you're thinking about

17:07

physiological stress measured by

17:09

cortisol levels in that study actually

17:11

cortisol wasn't changed

17:14

>> in the short sleep.

17:15

>> In the short sleep. Tell me more about

17:16

that. I'm fascinated by circadian

17:18

rhythms and cortisol. So what does what

17:20

does that what does that mean?

17:21

>> There was no difference between the two

17:23

conditions. The adequate sleep or short

17:25

sleep on cortisol levels

17:26

>> for 5 days of sleep restriction at

17:28

basically 4 hours a night.

17:30

>> So cortisol is still peaking in the in

17:32

the morning, still dropping in the

17:34

evening.

17:35

>> Yeah.

17:35

>> Wow. That's very surprising to me.

17:37

>> I don't know. I don't know if it's the

17:39

context of you know being in a lab where

17:42

everything's safe taken care of for

17:45

them. there is nothing outside to

17:48

aggravate

17:49

>> this. So I don't know maybe when you're

17:51

in the context of sleep restriction but

17:54

also dealing with your daily life

17:58

>> you needing to take care of your kids

18:00

needing to get to work needing to do all

18:03

the activities of daily living maybe

18:04

then that becomes you know the the added

18:07

stressful. So the message is if you

18:10

suffer less than adequate sleep, get

18:14

someone to take care of everything else.

18:16

You better be in a spa. Exactly.

18:18

Exactly. No, I and I'm not challenging

18:20

the result. I just find it really

18:21

interesting. I would have thought that

18:22

basil cortisol levels would would go

18:24

ary.

18:25

>> Well, in that study also, we didn't see

18:27

any effect on glucose or insulin.

18:29

Nothing. Nothing. The curves were

18:34

superimposable.

18:36

while

18:37

>> they were eating the exact same food at

18:40

the exact same time, exact same

18:42

quantity. The only thing we changed was

18:45

the amount of sleep opportunity they got

18:47

at night. So to me, this means that it's

18:50

a combination of different things that

18:52

causes the metabolic abnormalities that

18:55

we notice in free living populations.

18:58

People aren't isolated. They're not in a

19:00

box where they're not sleeping enough

19:02

and they're choosing to eat higher fat,

19:06

higher sugar, higher salt, poor diet

19:10

that then triggers a worsening and may

19:13

be compounded by the lack of sleep, even

19:16

worsening of of those cardioabolic

19:19

outcomes because we did a follow-up

19:22

study to this uh this severe sleep

19:24

restriction study. So the reason why we

19:25

did that was because exactly for this

19:27

reason because we did not find any

19:30

adverse impact on glucose or insulin or

19:33

lipid profile. And we're like so what is

19:36

it then? Why is it that in population

19:39

based studies we find that people who

19:41

sleep too little have higher risk of

19:45

cardiovascular disease, higher risk of

19:47

hypertension, higher blood pressure,

19:48

higher uh risk of type two diabetes. So,

19:53

because we had seen that food choices

19:55

were different, that they ate a diet

19:58

that was higher in calories, higher uh

20:00

in fat and saturated fat, we thought

20:02

maybe if you're in a free living

20:05

situation,

20:06

that's when you start to see those

20:08

cardio metabolic outcomes because it's

20:10

compounded by maybe uh more sedentary

20:14

behavior and

20:16

alterations in in uh food choices and

20:19

and diet. So the follow-up study then

20:22

was to recruit good sleepers, people who

20:26

sleep at least seven hours per night,

20:28

verified by ectography, who answer on

20:31

questionnaires that their sleep quality

20:33

is good. And then to take these people

20:37

and say, "Okay, now you're either going

20:40

to continue your excellent sleep or

20:45

you're going to now go to bed an hour

20:48

and a half later." So that you get an

20:50

hour and a half reduction in sleep.

20:52

Because when we screen people to sleep

20:55

at least seven hours per night, they

20:56

sleep about seven and a half. And

20:59

reducing by an hour and a half gets to 6

21:01

hours, which is short sleep,

21:04

insufficient

21:05

on average what people who don't get

21:07

enough sleep get.

21:09

>> They're missing a full sleep cycle.

21:10

>> Yeah, pretty much. and uh and they can

21:13

sustain that for prolonged periods

21:16

because that's what people report in in

21:18

population based studies. And now when

21:20

we did that, we saw that insulin

21:23

resistance was increased after 6 weeks

21:28

of sleep restriction compared to

21:29

adequate sleep. We saw insulin

21:32

sensitivity was reduced. It was worse

21:35

actually in post-menopausal women

21:37

compared to premenopausal women. We saw

21:39

blood pressure uh was increased. Uh so

21:43

those cardio metatabolic outcomes were

21:44

adversely impacted in free living mild

21:48

sustained sleep restriction for 6 weeks.

21:51

6 weeks was something else also. It was

21:54

it was tough.

21:54

>> I can only imagine. Wow. Okay. Because

21:58

my mind always goes to all right. Well,

22:01

we wake up in the morning because of an

22:03

increase in cortisol. That's circadian.

22:05

It's not related to sleep per se. It

22:07

just kind of overlaps with the end of

22:08

the night's sleep. If that's independent

22:11

of sleep and cortisol drives glucose

22:14

release, we know this.

22:15

>> At least in the first study you

22:17

described, glucose levels weren't

22:18

altered. You said it was isocaloric, so

22:21

people were it's not like they're eating

22:22

more. No,

22:23

>> they're the the hormones that are

22:25

driving the desire to eat more are

22:27

elevated.

22:28

>> The didn't let them eat more,

22:30

>> but you didn't let them. I think that's

22:31

a a key thing that you you pointed out

22:33

before, but I think we want to

22:35

underscore. And then of course the GLP

22:38

uh levels in women being reduced. It's

22:40

not that then they were able to eat as

22:42

we say ad libidum and then they happen

22:43

to eat more but they gained weight. So

22:46

what's kind of the action end of things

22:48

that causes them to gain weight if

22:50

they're basically in an isocchloric

22:52

diet? And I have a I have a I have an

22:54

idea what it might be but I'm curious

22:56

what the answer is.

22:58

>> Yes. I think they're they're more

22:59

sedentary

23:01

>> during the day. Less spontaneous

23:02

activity.

23:03

>> Right. less spontaneous activity because

23:05

we also did a study to look at energy

23:07

expenditure that's really difficult

23:09

actually to measure in my opinion energy

23:12

expenditure there's multiple components

23:14

to energy expenditure

23:16

uh but we did a study where this was a

23:19

small study we enrolled only women for

23:22

that and we have a metabolic chamber at

23:24

Colombia that we were able to use for

23:26

this uh so this small room in which we

23:30

keep people and we measure minuteby at

23:33

oxygen consumption and carbon dioxide

23:35

production. And we were able to show

23:38

that energy expenditure is actually

23:41

increased in the context of sleep

23:43

restriction in the metabolic chamber

23:47

because it's more costly energetically

23:51

to remain awake than to fall asleep. So

23:55

energy expenditure when participants

23:57

were awake was identical in both

24:01

conditions regardless of how much sleep

24:03

they got the night before.

24:04

>> So it's fidgeting movement because we've

24:06

talked before in this podcast about the

24:08

non-ex exercise induced thermogenesis.

24:10

It's a big number. I mean you people who

24:12

fidget a lot bounce their knee a lot. I

24:13

mean sometimes these people are burning

24:15

1500 calories more per day and everyone

24:17

goes oh my god how could that possibly

24:18

be? But I mean that's a lot. That's at

24:20

the extreme. But it is kind of

24:22

interesting to observe people out in the

24:24

world and you sometimes see that people

24:27

who are very very lean, very let's just

24:30

say thin and lean nowadays, who knows

24:32

because of the GLPS etc. But they tend

24:34

to have a lot of spontaneous movement.

24:35

They tend to stand up quickly. They tend

24:37

to walk quickly. Well, you're from New

24:38

York, so everyone there walks faster

24:40

than out here. But it's a real thing,

24:42

you know, whereas some people like me

24:44

are kind of more middle of the curve,

24:45

but you know, I sit a bit more still

24:47

unless I'm very caffeinated. These

24:48

things add up over time in ways that I

24:51

think most people underestimate.

24:54

>> Yeah. So for us it was about 5% of

24:57

energy

24:59

>> increased, but it it and it ended up

25:02

being about 90 calories, nowhere close

25:04

to the 300 calories that uh

25:06

>> more of intake they got over over a day

25:10

in the prior study. So it's still an

25:12

imbalance towards a positive energy

25:14

balance when we do the math but there is

25:17

an increase in um in energy expenditure

25:21

again in the confines of a metabolic

25:23

chamber which you know for most people

25:25

is equivalent of the size of their

25:27

bathroom. Right.

25:27

>> Right. You have like a bed, a table and

25:29

a sink, a toilet. That's it. So you

25:31

can't can't do much in there.

25:33

>> But you can do studies quote unquote out

25:36

in the wild with um acttometry or what?

25:39

Yeah,

25:41

excuse me. Yeah.

25:42

>> Yes.

25:42

>> A little while ago, I saw a study that

25:44

said that if you are one night sleepd

25:45

deprived, like you get one or two hours

25:48

less uh sleep than normally you would

25:51

get to feel rested that it's actually

25:53

advantageous to exercise because it

25:55

offsets some of the um increase in

25:56

inflammation.

25:58

>> But then if you're going multiple nights

25:59

that way, exercising on a regular basis

26:01

when sleep deprived, it just sets up a

26:04

um susceptibility to illness,

26:05

susceptibility to injury and so forth.

26:08

How much of what you observe in the

26:10

under the conditions of sleep

26:11

deprivation do you think are downstream

26:13

or upstream of this thing that we just

26:16

call inflammation? like is this just

26:18

like a bodywide response and there are a

26:20

bunch of things that have gone ary and

26:22

and so like a bunch of systems are

26:24

disregulated or can we pinpoint okay

26:26

when you're sleepd deprived

26:29

this is what this is what's happening

26:31

because I think if if women knew that

26:32

their GLPs were down

26:34

>> when they're down on sleep so that they

26:37

should expect that they would feel less

26:39

satiety if men knew that their ghrein

26:41

levels were elevated when they're down

26:43

on sleep that they're going to feel hung

26:45

hungrier I mean we have pretty big

26:47

prefrontal cortex most people anyway and

26:50

we can intervene simply on the basis of

26:52

knowledge. I think that's what's

26:54

empowering and I think about this

26:56

sometimes too when I'm when I'm thinking

26:59

about you know my my diet at times right

27:03

I'm like I do I really want to eat this

27:05

or is it because I really didn't sleep

27:07

last night right so you can you can make

27:09

you can ask yourself these questions

27:11

take a pause and say okay do I really

27:14

want you know dessert or is it just that

27:18

I'm tired and you know I should just I'm

27:21

fine I don't need it Mhm.

27:23

>> So if you if you step back and think

27:25

that maybe part of it is because you

27:27

didn't sleep well the night before, then

27:29

you can make your appropriate choices,

27:32

right? Say, "Okay, I probably don't need

27:34

the the extra calories right now." Or or

27:38

maybe you say, "You know what? I had a

27:40

really bad night last night and those

27:42

extra calories, I don't really care

27:45

because they're going to make me feel

27:46

good and I need some pickme up." But you

27:50

know

27:51

>> that's that's all the choices to make

27:53

right you know because mood comes into

27:56

comes into play as well. So

27:59

>> well ultimately that brings us to the

28:01

the other direction of the equation

28:04

right how does what we eat impact our

28:06

sleep. This is something that I think

28:08

most people have heard about in the

28:10

context of try not to eat too close to

28:12

bedtime.

28:13

>> Um this is an active debate in many

28:15

households actually. Some people seem to

28:17

be fine eating close to bedtime and

28:19

sleeping and even if they track their

28:21

sleep. Other people it really disrupts

28:23

their sleep. I'm interested in both the

28:26

timing of food intake relative to sleep

28:28

but also the content of the food and how

28:31

it impacts sleep. What's known about

28:33

that either from your work or from other

28:34

work? When we started this conversation,

28:36

I was telling you about these population

28:38

based studies, you know, cross-sectional

28:41

data where two things happen at the same

28:43

time and you, you know, you you don't

28:45

really know causality, they happen at

28:47

the same time. And I think early on uh

28:50

in this field we started thinking about

28:53

sleep as the promoter of food intake or

28:59

as a sleepcausing

29:01

changes in diet exercise but didn't

29:05

really think that maybe it's the other

29:06

way around or maybe the other way around

29:08

is just as plausible.

29:10

So I started thinking about that and

29:13

said well what what if we took the other

29:15

approach? What if we looked at diet and

29:20

examined how diet influenced future

29:22

sleep?

29:24

And my first paper in this field was

29:27

using data from the multi-ethnic study

29:29

of atheroscerosis. It's actually kind of

29:32

hard to find good cohorts that have good

29:36

nutrition data, good sleep data, and

29:40

data over over years. Right? So MESA

29:44

multi-thnics of study of atherosclerosis

29:46

is one of those great cohorts that we

29:48

have in here in the US that has all of

29:51

the above. So I paired up with a

29:53

colleague of mine, Susan Redline in

29:55

Boston and uh she's a principal

29:58

investigator on their sleep ancillary

30:00

study and we asked the question of diet

30:03

quality and its impact on sleep

30:05

duration, insomnia symptoms and we found

30:08

that having a diet that more closely

30:11

aligns with the Mediterranean diet was

30:13

associated with better uh probability of

30:17

having adequate sleep and reduced um

30:19

insomnia symptoms in this cohort. So

30:21

then it launched a whole field of study

30:24

really to to keep looking at this and

30:27

we've looked at this in different

30:28

studies and different cohorts actually

30:31

uh earlier this year we published data

30:33

from the women's health initiative

30:35

another large large cohort with good

30:37

diet data and and sleep information. We

30:40

took a really really nice approach in

30:42

this uh longitudinal analysis. I don't

30:44

know. Usually when we do longitunal

30:48

studies, we exclude people who have the

30:51

condition at baseline, right? So if

30:53

you're trying to see this factor at

30:56

baseline, how does it influence

30:59

hypertension 10 years later, you usually

31:02

exclude people who have hypertension at

31:04

baseline? Because you want to see the

31:05

development of hypertension. In this

31:08

case, we're looking at insomnia

31:09

symptoms. But insomnia is one of those

31:12

conditions that's not necessarily

31:15

static. It resolves, right? So you can

31:18

have insomnia and then a few years later

31:22

not have insomnia

31:24

or you can not have insomnia now and

31:27

develop insomnia. So what we did is we

31:30

broke our down our participants into two

31:32

groups. the people who had no insomnia

31:36

at baseline and at three years followup

31:41

participants who had insomnia at

31:43

baseline but not at 3 years followup. So

31:46

they were in the healthful sleep

31:50

improving sleep and then the other group

31:52

was all those women who had insomnia at

31:55

baseline and at 3 years and no insomnia

31:58

at baseline but insomnia at 3 years. So

32:00

they were the persistent insomnia

32:03

progressing towards poor sleep group.

32:06

And we found that the women who had a

32:10

diet that was more closely aligned to

32:12

the Mediterranean diet. But we also

32:14

looked at uh an American type of diet

32:17

profile called the DASH diet. The

32:19

dietary approaches to stop hypertension.

32:22

Women who had a dietary profile closer

32:24

to those two types of diets, healthful

32:26

diets were less likely to have

32:29

hypertension uh insomnia at three years.

32:32

And the DASH diet is what?

32:34

>> Dietary approaches to stop hypert

32:36

hypertension was developed to uh reduce

32:39

prevent hypertension, reduce blood

32:41

pressure in people by increasing intakes

32:44

of fruits and vegetables, nuts and

32:46

seeds, consuming low-fat dairy, more

32:49

plant-based types of uh diet and and can

32:52

be has been tested in a low salt or

32:56

regular salt profile.

32:57

>> How did those work out? I'm just

32:58

curious. Do you recall if the low salt

33:00

high salt um condition

33:02

>> there is salt sensitivity so there are

33:03

some people who are very sensitive to

33:05

salt and so having a reduced salt diet

33:08

will really improve their blood pressure

33:10

>> others not so much but the DASH diet

33:13

regardless of its salt content did

33:16

better than the equivalent non-dash

33:19

>> which would be your average you know

33:20

American diet whatever that is yeah

33:22

higher in saturated fat and sugars

33:25

>> which seems to be changing now because

33:26

of the GLPS I I feel Like that's, you

33:29

know, uh maybe that's a skewed

33:31

perspective, but I feel like the the

33:33

typical American diet is it might not be

33:35

changing so much in content, but in

33:37

volume it seems like people are eating

33:38

less. Certainly the snack food

33:40

companies, from what I understand, are

33:42

struggling. Alcohol companies, that's a

33:43

different issue, but there certainly

33:45

have uh sales are way way down,

33:48

>> but it just seems like people's

33:50

appetites are down.

33:52

>> Well, GLP1s will do that, right?

33:53

>> Yeah.

33:54

>> Yeah. And we were talking about this the

33:56

other day here. uh how many Americans

33:59

have tried a GLP? The estimates are

34:01

anywhere from like one in seven. Some

34:03

people say it's it's more

34:05

>> which is pretty incredible.

34:06

>> Yeah, it's pretty high.

34:07

>> But this is interesting. So how people

34:09

eat impacts their sleep, I'm sure the

34:12

listeners and I also am thinking okay

34:14

but people who are eating a

34:16

Mediterranean diet, right? olive oils,

34:18

fish, you know, fruits, vegetables, they

34:21

are probably more apt to walk more,

34:25

exercise more, socialize more, all the

34:27

how do you separate out the variables in

34:28

a study like that?

34:29

>> Uh well, so in population based studies,

34:31

we adjust for a bunch of coariants,

34:33

right? We have all these questionnaires

34:35

that uh that are given out to people

34:37

asking them about their race,

34:40

occupation, sociodemographic

34:42

stat, socioeconomic status, and then we

34:44

adjust. We adjust for um different

34:47

illnesses that they may have,

34:49

depression,

34:50

physical activity level. Um so we try to

34:55

take all this in into consideration.

34:57

Obviously we there's always unmeasured

34:59

factors that you can't control for

35:02

social interactions like you um you

35:05

mentioned. It's usually not captured

35:08

very well. It's not something that we uh

35:09

we can adjust for. But one thing that we

35:12

did in my lab uh going back to that

35:15

original study was to look at uh how

35:20

diet influenced sleep at night in the

35:23

participants in our inpatient study. So

35:27

we took the 9-hour time in bed

35:31

opportunity phase only that one. In the

35:34

4-hour time in bed opportunity

35:36

participants were very efficient. There

35:38

was not much variability in sleep

35:40

duration in that phase. They slept as

35:42

much as they could in that 4-hour

35:44

opportunity, but in the nine hours,

35:47

there was variability there. Some people

35:48

got more or less. So, we wanted to see

35:51

if food intake was related to their

35:54

sleep at night. That study, we had

35:57

polynography assessments of sleep every

36:00

single night. Like I mentioned, we had

36:04

uh control diet initially and then we

36:06

let them self- select their food

36:07

intakes. So we took a very systematic

36:10

approach to evaluating how diet could

36:12

influence sleep in that study. We said

36:15

first of all,

36:17

was the diet that they chose different

36:19

than the diet that we gave them? First

36:22

step, right? It was. So they ate almost

36:24

450 calories more. They ate 33% more

36:28

saturated fat.

36:30

uh little less protein I believe a

36:33

little more carbohydrates not much but

36:35

it it was different

36:37

>> so like okay so so there's difference

36:39

between the diets okay now

36:41

>> was their sleep at night different when

36:44

they were eating the diet that we fed

36:46

them compared to what they self-

36:48

selected

36:50

and it they it was different it wasn't

36:52

different in terms of duration but it

36:55

was different in time it took them to

36:57

fall asleep which was

37:00

over 70% longer to fall asleep when they

37:02

self- selected their diet and their

37:05

slowwave sleep. So deep sleep was

37:08

shorter. I think it was about 23 20%

37:12

shorter uh when they self- selected

37:14

their diet compared to what we had given

37:16

them.

37:17

>> Was timing of food intake impacted?

37:19

Because when I think of what impacts

37:22

what reduces um slowwave deep sleep,

37:25

it's eating too close to bedtime. Mhm.

37:28

So

37:29

we did not take that into consideration

37:32

in that study. We didn't uh we didn't

37:34

look at that. We had their their food

37:37

intake profile and didn't specifically

37:39

look in that phase when's when was their

37:43

last eating period. But it could have

37:45

been different than in the controlled

37:47

feeding condition because in the

37:48

controlled feeding condition they had

37:50

set meals at specific times. But they

37:52

all went to bed at 10 p.m. Then the

37:55

other question was, okay, what was it

37:57

that they ate that day that impacted how

38:01

they slept that night? And we found that

38:04

higher intakes of fiber were associated

38:08

with more deep sleep,

38:10

higher intakes of saturated fat, less

38:12

deep sleep, and then more refined

38:14

carbohydrates, simple sugars, more

38:17

arousals. So when we talk about arousals

38:20

in the context of polyynography, it

38:22

doesn't necessarily mean full-on waking

38:24

up or awakening, it really means going

38:27

from a deeper to lighter stage of sleep.

38:30

So you may still be asleep throughout

38:32

the night, but you're not getting deep

38:36

slow wave sleep, REN sleep as much as

38:38

you would uh otherwise.

38:41

>> Do you create a buffer between your last

38:45

bite of food and the time you go to

38:47

sleep? You personally?

38:48

>> Me personally, yes.

38:49

>> Is it an hour, two hours, three hours?

38:52

>> I personally like to eat my last meal at

38:55

least three hours before going to bed.

38:57

And I know there's variability there.

38:59

Different people have different uh

39:00

tolerance. You mentioned right before

39:02

that uh

39:03

>> you know some people may be later

39:04

chronotypes, but what we know is that

39:09

eating earlier

39:11

is better overall for cardio metabolic

39:15

health. Eating earlier is better. Me

39:17

personally, I feel I feel better by

39:20

eating earlier. If I eat too close to

39:22

bedtime, I

39:25

I get hot.

39:26

>> Right. Yeah. It's it's a thermic

39:28

effective food thermic effective. We

39:29

want to be cooling off when we go to

39:30

sleep.

39:31

>> Exactly. Exactly.

39:33

>> I'd like to take a quick break and

39:34

acknowledge our sponsor, AG1. AG1 is a

39:38

vitamin mineral probiotic drink that

39:40

also includes prebiotics and adaptogens.

39:42

I discovered AG1 way back in 2012, long

39:46

before I ever had a podcast, and I've

39:48

been taking it every day since. The

39:49

reason I started taking AG1, and the

39:51

reason I still take it every day, is

39:53

because AG1 is, to my knowledge, the

39:55

highest quality and most comprehensive

39:57

of the foundational nutritional

39:58

supplements on the market. AG1 is

40:00

designed to support things like gut

40:02

health, immune health, and overall

40:04

energy. And it does so by helping to

40:06

fill any gaps that you might have in

40:07

your daily nutrition. I get asked pretty

40:10

much all the time, if I could only take

40:11

one supplement, what should that

40:12

supplement be? And my answer is always

40:15

AG1. It has just been so helpful for

40:18

supporting all aspects of physical

40:19

health, mental health, and performance.

40:21

If you would like to try AG1, you can go

40:24

to drinkag1.com/huberman

40:26

to get a special offer. For a limited

40:28

time, AG1 is giving away a free bottle

40:30

of their new Omega-3 co-enzyme Q10

40:32

product. Omega-3 and co-enzyme Q10 are

40:35

known to support cardiovascular health,

40:37

cellular health and energy, generally,

40:39

brain health, and much more. I

40:41

personally take them both every day.

40:43

Again, go to drinkag1.com/huberman

40:47

to get a free bottle of the new Omega-3

40:49

co-enzyme Q10 with your first AG1

40:51

subscription. There seems to be

40:53

something asymmetric about sleep

40:56

requirements in my experience, and I

40:59

don't think I'm alone in this, whereby

41:03

if I go to bed at 1000 p.m., I get into

41:06

bed at 9:30, fall asleep at 10:00, I

41:08

need about 6 and 1 half, maybe 7 hours

41:10

to feel completely rested. That's how

41:12

long I'll sleep. Wake up without an

41:14

alarm, feeling great.

41:16

If I go to bed at midnight, I find I

41:19

could sleep till 9 and still not feel

41:22

completely rested. So, there's some

41:24

weird sleep inertia stuff going on

41:26

there, etc. The old adage is every hour

41:30

before midnight is worth two after. But

41:32

is there any real data to support that

41:34

or is this just all subjective and

41:36

conjecture?

41:37

>> I'm not sure there's data to support

41:39

that. I haven't seen anything. But what

41:41

I can say from what you're saying is

41:44

that if you usually go to bed at 9:30,

41:46

10:00, and then all of a sudden you go

41:49

to bed at midnight, now you're kind of

41:51

out of line with your personal circadian

41:54

system, right? And it's always harder to

41:57

to get a good night's sleep if you're

42:00

not going with your internal clock or

42:03

your internal circadian

42:05

>> preference. Um, this is what happens

42:07

with shift workers, right? for example,

42:10

they they they're not sleeping at night.

42:12

They're trying to sleep during the day.

42:15

They're trying to sleep during the day

42:16

where their melatonin is low or it

42:18

should be when it's high. So, they're

42:20

fighting their circadian system. So,

42:23

yes, they should they should be getting

42:25

seven hours, but they're not getting

42:27

seven hours because their body is not

42:30

designed to be sleeping during the

42:32

daytime hours. Plus, then you have, you

42:35

know, everything else, right? Right. The

42:37

light, the

42:38

>> lights, the noise, the kids, the

42:39

whatever life that that happens during

42:41

the daytime when everybody else is awake

42:43

and you're trying to sleep.

42:45

>> Yeah. The only thing I can think of

42:46

that's an advantage to being nocturnal

42:48

is the quiet.

42:50

>> I used to sometimes shift to a nocturnal

42:52

schedule during holidays in graduate

42:54

school when everyone would go home

42:55

because I lived my my parents lived

42:58

relatively close to where I went to

42:59

graduate school. So, I could afford to

43:01

just just go home for Christmas, right?

43:03

Just that day

43:04

>> or a couple of days. and everyone else

43:06

had to travel, so I could invert my

43:08

schedule. It just kind of drifted that

43:09

way.

43:10

>> Yeah,

43:10

>> I promise that's the only advantage of

43:13

going to bed at 4:00 a.m. and uh

43:15

sleeping until, you know, 3:00 p.m. At

43:17

least for typical people, it you your

43:20

brain gets into a kind of weird space

43:22

when you're inverted from the rest of

43:24

the world.

43:25

>> Well, the things you do when you're a

43:26

grad student, I would be the opposite,

43:28

right? I'd wake up at 4:00 a.m. and then

43:31

study because I felt like all of the

43:32

hours of studying before the sun rose

43:35

were like extras.

43:37

>> Interesting.

43:37

>> Extra time for me.

43:38

>> It was definitely extra. But you felt

43:39

like you were extra sharp at those

43:41

hours.

43:41

>> Extra sharp. I could study and then you

43:44

know I got that time done and then you

43:46

know breakfast but then I crash later in

43:48

the afternoon.

43:49

>> Yeah, that's the problem. The one 2 PM

43:51

crash. Um has your work explored napping

43:54

at all? I'm a believer in naps and

43:55

non-sleep deep breaths, yoga nidra type

43:57

things, meditation. Do naps factor into

44:00

this diet, nutrition, hunger equation.

44:04

>> So, we haven't done research on napping

44:07

per se. For me, there there's a lot

44:10

going on with napping. I don't think we

44:12

have very good data to be able to say

44:14

what's appropriate about napping. What

44:16

we do know is that you don't want to nap

44:21

too close to bedtime because you want to

44:24

build sleep pressure throughout the day.

44:26

And if you're dissipating the sleep

44:28

pressure, the sleep need too close to

44:30

bedtime, then you're not going to be

44:31

able to fall asleep when time comes to

44:34

go to bed at your usual hour. And then,

44:37

you know, you get into this vicious

44:39

cycle and it's it's not helpful. But,

44:42

you know, there are some studies that

44:43

say, well, what should you do if you

44:44

can't sleep enough at night? and you're

44:46

feeling tired, you know, should you

44:48

sleep? Should recommendations are that

44:51

you should make it a short nap, 30

44:53

minutes, no more than an hour, early

44:55

enough in the day if possible, so that

44:58

you can have sufficient time to rebuild

45:01

that sleep pressure to be able to fall

45:03

back asleep well when time comes. But

45:06

then there's also this this whole

45:08

question about what's an app for, right?

45:12

Like why are you sleepy? Of course, if

45:15

you if you've pulled an alada, it's easy

45:17

to to know. But if if you had sufficient

45:21

sleep or sufficient opportunity for

45:23

sleep at night and you're waking up and

45:25

you're not feeling refreshed, you're not

45:26

feeling like you had good quality sleep

45:28

and then you're not able to maintain

45:31

alertness throughout the day and you

45:32

need a nap.

45:35

I think it's you should check to see

45:37

like what's going on at night like why

45:38

are you not getting that good good

45:40

enough sleep? I'm chuckling because my

45:42

posttock advisor sparked this huge

45:44

debate. It was a big lab and uh we had a

45:47

couple of people in lab who like to nap

45:49

at their desk. These were people that

45:50

could just like put their head down and

45:52

nap at their desk in the afternoon. He'd

45:53

walk in, they'd be napping and then they

45:54

wake up and keep working. Everyone

45:56

everyone was working very hard. and he

45:59

had this theory uh that if you're

46:02

napping it's because you're sleepd

46:04

deprived that like napping is unhealthy

46:06

you know and it it sparked a big debate

46:09

and people because it we're a bunch of

46:10

nerds people bring data in like no you

46:13

know at the sleep lab at Stanford says

46:15

that naps can be healthy and I think it

46:17

what you just described summarizes I

46:19

think that the takeaway I'm a believer

46:21

in the short nap but but I'm one of

46:23

these people that can sleep anywhere

46:24

anytime which may be reflective of sleep

46:26

deprivation

46:27

>> maybe yeah

46:27

>> do Do you find that like when you're

46:29

going to design a study or when you're

46:31

going to like really work like this 4:00

46:32

a.m. time that it's a time of calm or

46:35

are you like a laz are you do you feel

46:37

like your mind is moving fast or you're

46:39

kind of in this like flow zone or

46:41

whatever you want to call it?

46:43

>> I'm very focused.

46:45

>> Mhm.

46:45

>> Uh very efficient.

46:48

So I try to be really attentive at my

46:52

task. I try to take take breaks once in

46:55

a while, but uh most of the time it's uh

46:59

it's very efficient. Get to the task and

47:02

get it done.

47:03

>> Earlier you were talking about biking

47:05

into work. You strike me as somebody I

47:06

always think of people who I'm always

47:08

impressed by colleagues like this that

47:09

their life is kind of like a step

47:11

function. They wake up and it's like

47:12

they're into the day and then it's down,

47:14

right? Yeah. Interesting. I think some

47:16

of us are more like this.

47:18

>> But I think it's important to have a

47:19

little bit of both though. I think it's

47:21

important to have downtime,

47:24

you know, speed time, uh

47:27

>> to to not just be go go go go go like

47:30

you were asking about uh my personal,

47:33

you know, uh actions and at one point I

47:39

was running a lot for exercise and uh I

47:44

felt like my whole life was just running

47:46

all the time.

47:48

>> Yeah. Yeah. Run to get my kids to

47:49

school. run to work, get work done, run

47:52

to then run for fun. Run, run, run. And

47:56

then I thought, okay, I kind of need to

47:59

>> I think I need a breather. And so I

48:01

started incorporating yoga into my uh my

48:05

exercise routine. I think that's I think

48:07

that's good. Actually, when I was a grad

48:09

student, I thought yoga was stressful

48:11

because I couldn't stand in those poses.

48:14

>> Exactly.

48:15

>> Yeah. Yeah.

48:15

>> But I think yoga evolved. I think the

48:17

yoga I do now, it's not as static

48:21

>> as the yoga I was doing when I was a

48:23

grad student. I think it evolved to be a

48:25

little more active than uh than back

48:27

then. I see the benefit to having, you

48:30

know, the

48:31

>> both types of uh exercise.

48:34

>> Thanks for being willing to explore

48:36

that. you know the I'm not an Ayurvedic

48:38

practitioner but the Ayurvedic folks

48:40

they'll talk about people like more fire

48:42

more more earth where you know and and I

48:44

think it's just a different lens in

48:46

nomenclature on there's a kind of array

48:49

of phenotypes but when we talk about

48:50

this thing sleep it becomes very

48:53

prescriptive right it's like we all need

48:56

6 to 8 hours I mean actually from what

48:58

you're saying today six sounds like

49:00

insufficient is what I'm hearing I'm

49:01

probably a little sleepd deprived is

49:03

what I'm kind of hearing

49:04

>> so you know a colleague of mine just

49:06

published a paper in nature about the

49:08

biological clocks and aging in different

49:10

organs. And the sweet spot really was 6

49:14

and 1 half to about 7 and 1 half 8 hours

49:17

for optimal aging. Once you get to below

49:22

that, it's basically you shaped, right?

49:23

So too much of one thing is not good.

49:25

Too too little is is not good. You want

49:28

to be in the sweet spot. Most most

49:30

organs for optimal aging was in the 6

49:33

and 1 half to 7.8. And it differed a

49:36

little bit by men and women depending on

49:38

which organs he was looking at. Uh a

49:40

little longer for women. Um some of the

49:43

curves were different where you know

49:46

some are more pronounced u shapes in in

49:48

men than women and different organs. So

49:51

>> uh very interesting paper

49:53

>> came out last week or two weeks ago.

49:54

I'll

49:55

>> have to check it out. Um what other uh

49:57

sex differences uh are known to exist in

50:00

sleep requirements, sleep dynamics that

50:02

from your work or from other work? This

50:04

is not something we've really covered on

50:05

the podcast.

50:06

>> No.

50:07

>> No. I mean, well, not in in any

50:09

sufficient amount of detail.

50:10

>> Yeah.

50:11

>> So, women tend to sleep a little longer

50:13

than men across lifespan. Although, you

50:16

know, if you ask women about their

50:17

sleep, they don't rate their sleep as

50:20

very good. Um, more women than men

50:22

report having difficulties with sleep.

50:24

Insomnia for example, insomnia symptoms.

50:28

More women than men say they have

50:29

difficulty falling asleep, difficulty

50:31

maintaining sleep uh across the adult

50:34

lifespan.

50:35

>> Why do you think that is?

50:36

>> There could be some physiological

50:37

effects, right? Some hormonal effects.

50:39

Women uh don't sleep the same across a

50:41

menstrual cycle. Uh there's discomfort

50:44

at different times. Uh and then there's

50:47

different responsibilities, different

50:48

social roles that come into play uh that

50:51

may influence women differently than

50:53

men. But you know, we were working on a

50:56

on a review paper actually about

50:58

hypertension and and sleep and sex

51:01

differences. And you know, women are

51:04

more sensitive to the impact of poor

51:07

sleep on different metabolic outcomes

51:09

than men. So for blood pressure at lower

51:12

sleep apnea for example at lower

51:15

thresholds of sleep apnnea their blood

51:17

pressure would be higher uh than men. So

51:20

I think that there needs to be for sure

51:22

a lot more research in this area to be

51:24

able to uncover you know these these

51:27

differences and then you know knowing

51:29

that there are these differences to

51:30

start probing uh women about their

51:34

sleep. Last year we published um a

51:37

scientific statement for the American

51:38

Heart Association about

51:39

multi-dimensional sleep health and we

51:41

concluded by uh recommending clinicians

51:44

that they actually ask their patients

51:46

about sleep and not ask a question a

51:49

targeted question just ask their

51:51

patients how's your sleep because if you

51:53

start asking about oh how much sleep do

51:56

you usually get at night then you tell

51:59

the person that the only thing that

52:00

matters is how many hours of sleep you

52:02

got at night That's not all sleep is

52:05

about, right? Sleep is not just about

52:08

the number of hours that you got, but

52:10

it's also about the regularity, the

52:13

quality, your satisfaction with it. Your

52:17

there's nighttime experiences, there's

52:19

daytime experiences from sleep. When you

52:21

wake up from sleep, are you feeling

52:23

refreshed? Are you feeling like you had

52:25

are you satisfied with how the sleep you

52:28

got the night before? During the day,

52:30

are you staying alert? are you vigilant

52:33

during the daytime hours uh from your

52:36

past sleep experience? So having this

52:38

open-ended question maybe maybe

52:40

clinicians uh won't have time for for a

52:44

for the answer but you know allows the

52:47

their patient to actually tell them

52:49

what's bothering them about their sleep.

52:52

>> Then you can get something like you know

52:54

my my spouse keeps kicking me because

52:56

I'm snoring too loud. Then oh well maybe

52:59

we should test you for sleep apnnea.

53:00

Does apnea always include snoring?

53:03

>> Yes.

53:04

>> So, are there some people who don't

53:05

snore who have apnea?

53:07

>> I don't think so. You stop breathing and

53:09

then there's this gasping

53:11

sound that people make when they uh they

53:14

awaken from that or they get aroused

53:17

from from this breathing interruption.

53:20

>> I feel like so many people have apnea

53:22

and don't realize it. Not because I'm

53:23

sneaking into their rooms at night and

53:25

listening to if they snore, but it is

53:27

just remarkable how many people I speak

53:29

to who say, "Yeah, I found out I had

53:31

apnea because I saw that I was snoring

53:33

because they started monitoring their

53:35

sleep." And there's generally a snoring

53:37

index on these. Or now there are free

53:39

apps that can just record you while you

53:41

sleep.

53:41

>> So, I know a lot of people are I don't

53:44

mouth tape when I sleep, but I did I do

53:47

uh sometimes use one of these nose

53:48

strips that kind of pulls the nostrils

53:50

out a bit. That certainly it's reduced

53:53

the amount of snoring for me

53:55

>> that would reduce the amount of snoring

53:57

but the sleep apnea is from the throat

54:01

right so this closure in the throat that

54:05

that obstructs the trachea and that's

54:07

what then prompts the awakening and

54:11

breathing and then the sound that comes

54:13

from there actually weight loss is

54:15

typically like the first line treatment

54:18

if someone has excess weight to start

54:20

losing weight that might help with the

54:22

uh with sleep apnnea then there's sepat

54:25

which yes people don't like but if they

54:27

are at a lower weight where the apnea is

54:30

milder the pressure may be not as uh not

54:35

as high so that might be helpful for

54:37

comfort have a colleague of mine who

54:40

does uh sleep apnnea surgeries so

54:42

implantables are also

54:44

>> if people think they might have apnea is

54:46

it just get a cap pop that thing on is

54:48

that the best line of of entry

54:50

>> I I think they should uh they should get

54:52

tested.

54:53

>> How do we how does one do that? Cuz

54:55

that's the problem.

54:56

>> If you're suspecting that you may have

55:00

sleep apnnea because you've been told

55:01

that you snore because you wake up and

55:04

you're not feeling refreshed and you're

55:05

feeling sleepy during the day. I think

55:07

you should talk to your doctor about

55:09

this. And definitely we have

55:11

polyenography is the first line, you

55:13

know, is what we use to detect um sleep

55:16

apnnea. But there's inhome sleep testing

55:19

that can be done. So you don't have to

55:21

stay overnight in a lab for for uh to

55:24

get tested for this and uh and your

55:26

doctor can prescribe that test very

55:29

easily.

55:29

>> How come we can't just go buy a CPAP on

55:31

Amazon?

55:32

>> Because you need to have the the the

55:34

pressure

55:36

determined for you, right? So you need

55:38

to know what kind of pressure to apply

55:39

and you know how to set it up. Uh it's

55:42

not as as simple as just

55:45

>> All right, fair. You need it. It needs

55:47

to have the proper settings and someone

55:48

needs to tell you which setting to use

55:50

because then that's where you run into

55:51

the trouble of having the wrong settings

55:53

and and not being effective.

55:55

>> Yeah. I just know from having done this

55:56

podcast long a while that like if people

55:59

think, okay, I got to go to my doctor. I

56:01

got to find out or convince them that I

56:04

have apnea. Then they have to like write

56:06

me a script for a CPAP. Then I got to

56:08

buy a CPAP, which I'm guessing is not

56:09

cheap.

56:10

>> I'm not sure.

56:11

>> I I don't think they're very

56:12

inexpensive. They the price might have

56:14

come down. and I got to sleep with this

56:15

thing on my face like looking like Darth

56:17

Vader so I don't sound like Darth Vader.

56:20

>> I just think very few people are going

56:22

to do it. So somebody out there should

56:23

like come up with an at home solution to

56:25

this. Something like apnea seems

56:27

important enough to daytime wakefulness,

56:29

cognitive function, longevity, metabolic

56:32

like it wicks out to so many things that

56:34

I feel like it

56:36

>> it deserves it deserves like a public

56:37

health messaging.

56:38

>> Yeah. If you use it well and you feel

56:40

better during the day, that's a that's

56:42

reinforcing, right? To keep using it

56:45

>> and and get treated for it.

56:46

>> Let's talk about food and nutrients.

56:48

You've done a substantial amount of work

56:50

here in this area, and I have a bunch of

56:52

questions, but first I want to talk

56:54

about kefir.

56:54

>> Yeah.

56:55

>> I love Bulgarian full fat plain yogurt,

56:59

but it's right next to the kefir.

57:01

>> Uhhuh.

57:01

>> And I'm always like, do I get the kefir?

57:03

Well, I don't know. I love the Bulgarian

57:04

full fat plain yogurt, so I haven't

57:06

tried the kefir yet. What's special

57:07

about kefir and why why did you study

57:09

kefir?

57:10

>> Kefir we we studied because it was a

57:13

fermented dairy product uh probiotics we

57:16

figured you know maybe it will improve

57:19

uh cholesterol synthesis based on its

57:22

impact on short- chain fatty acids. So

57:24

that was the the subject of my master's

57:26

thesis

57:28

for that study uh that was when I was at

57:30

McGill. We recruited men that had mildly

57:34

elevated cholesterol levels. We gave

57:36

them two cups per day versus just

57:39

regular milk for a month.

57:42

>> So two cups like two mugs like this.

57:44

>> Two cups like the measuring cup.

57:46

>> Okay.

57:46

>> Yeah.

57:47

>> Okay.

57:47

>> Um like 500 mls.

57:49

>> Okay.

57:50

>> And uh and we measured their the amount

57:54

of cholesterol they they produced at

57:57

baseline endpoint in both phases and

58:01

there was no effect. It was a null

58:03

study. It was one of those. It was hard

58:05

to get published.

58:07

>> Kept at it and and we got it published.

58:10

But yeah,

58:11

>> so these fermented yogurts and things,

58:13

they don't do anything for for

58:15

cholesterol levels.

58:16

>> At least in our study in this population

58:19

at this level with this comparison

58:22

>> didn't have any effect.

58:23

>> What's your general thought about uh low

58:25

sugar fermented foods? I don't know if

58:26

kefir uh qualifies as low sugar, but

58:29

based on Justin Sonnenberg's work at

58:31

Stanford and others, I've been I've been

58:33

really bullish on this idea of

58:35

>> sauerkraut, kimchi,

58:37

uh full fat Bulgarian yogurt. Fermented

58:40

foods are are interesting.

58:42

>> Yeah.

58:42

>> Are you a proponent in general?

58:44

>> I'm a proponent. Yeah, absolutely. I

58:46

think it's important to feed your gut. I

58:48

think that uh the gut microbiome is uh

58:50

getting a lot of attention for all sorts

58:52

of, you know, uh health benefits.

58:56

So I think that that's something that's

58:58

uh that's is important. So also it's

59:00

important to also consider that you know

59:03

for that study right our main outcome

59:06

was cholesterol synthesis but there's so

59:09

many other things we could have looked

59:11

at that we didn't look at right and

59:13

maybe it didn't have any impact for

59:15

cholesterol synthesis but maybe

59:20

glycemic control might be better or for

59:25

gut inflammation it would be better but

59:28

you know You pick your outcomes, right?

59:30

You study something.

59:31

>> This is the challenge of doing

59:32

controlled science. Yeah. Yeah. Sort of

59:34

the opposite end of the like X what used

59:38

to be called Twitter science where like

59:39

people just like report anecdotes but

59:42

>> actually anecdotes of that sort of

59:44

become very powerful now in the public

59:46

health space for better or worse like

59:47

people you know because

59:49

>> I we can look at any study and say well

59:51

that's a very artificial circumstance.

59:53

You say, "Well, intentionally, because

59:54

we're trying to isolate variables like

59:57

people get frustrated." Oh, that's an

59:59

observational study. Well, I'm going to

60:02

continue to eat low sugar fermented

60:03

foods every day. I I I do think in a

60:06

study like the one you described.

60:07

Occasionally, there's just there's, let

60:10

me state this differently. Historically

60:13

in science, there have been a lot of

60:15

interesting discoveries that have come

60:16

from researchers designing a study to

60:19

look at one thing and then kind of

60:20

noticing, oh, like all the subjects feel

60:23

better or sleep better, their skin, they

60:25

they're reporting things that then lead

60:27

to another

60:28

>> another line line of inquiry. But you

60:31

moved on from kefir. Tell me about this

60:33

um this paper. I was intrigued by this

60:35

when I looked over your CV.

60:37

uh a weight loss diet that includes a

60:39

coffee beverage enriched in let me try

60:42

this menolosaccharides.

60:44

>> Yeah.

60:44

>> Okay. Long word leads to a greater loss

60:47

of atapose fat tissue than placebo

60:50

beverage in overweight men.

60:52

>> Yep.

60:52

>> Tell me about this study and what these

60:54

men oligosaccharides are. And if

60:57

somebody wants to lose weight, should

60:59

they be including this in their coffee?

61:01

>> So this was industry sponsored research

61:03

that I did. um they wanted to replicate

61:05

a study that had been done in a

61:08

different country because they wanted to

61:10

replicate the findings. So we did this

61:12

study uh it was basically a placeboc

61:15

controlled study. We got we were

61:17

provided um coffee manual

61:19

oligosaccharides. So these are extracted

61:22

from spent coffee grounds. So it was

61:24

basically satchets right? So a white

61:26

packet one had the cap coffee

61:29

manualsaccharides the other one didn't.

61:32

We gave it to our study participants. We

61:34

measured their body composition. We

61:36

found an effect on body composition in

61:39

men, not in women.

61:41

>> And so that was the end of that product.

61:43

>> Really? They wouldn't market it just

61:44

because it only had an effect in men.

61:46

>> Yeah.

61:47

>> I assure you there are many men who

61:48

would love to drink a coffee drink and

61:49

lose more weight as a consequence.

61:50

>> It's not going to be our market, you

61:52

know.

61:53

>> But do we know what the ingredients

61:54

were?

61:55

>> It was manualsaccharides

61:57

extracted. Yeah. So it was just uh

61:59

basically uh a product that was tasted

62:03

like coffee, strong coffee, but it

62:06

didn't have the caffeine or anything

62:07

like that. It just had this this

62:09

manualaccharide that was extracted from

62:11

coffee.

62:12

>> So this substance comes from coffee

62:15

ordinarily,

62:16

>> but coffee is very low low calorie on

62:19

it,

62:19

>> but it's from the spent ground. So you

62:21

no one really consumes this really

62:24

because you know when you brew your

62:26

coffee you're

62:28

>> not getting it. No.

62:29

>> Can you buy it? Can people get it?

62:32

>> I don't think so.

62:33

>> So

62:34

what what do you First of all, how much

62:36

weight did they lose relative to the

62:37

>> It was statistically significant. Yeah.

62:40

>> Okay. I was intrigued by it because I

62:41

thought there there's something that I

62:43

mean you studied it's interesting. You

62:45

studied kefir metolosaccharides from

62:48

coffee. Yeah. Now I'm going to ask you

62:49

about ginger.

62:50

>> Well, when I was a graduate student, I

62:52

was interested in functional foods.

62:55

>> And I was interested in those foods that

62:57

provide health benefits beyond their

63:00

nutritional value.

63:01

>> Right? So kefir is a fermented dairy

63:05

product. It would we were studying it

63:08

for its a functional benefit on

63:10

cholesterol synthesis. That's not a uh

63:15

that's not a function of dairy, right?

63:17

Dairy is you consume it for bone health,

63:21

right? So it's basically when we talk

63:23

about different claims that foods have,

63:25

you know, there's those structure

63:26

function claims like consuming dairy

63:29

contains calcium that's good for your

63:31

bones and then there's um functional

63:34

claims. Those functional claims or

63:36

health claims we call them that say okay

63:38

well health claim there's a health claim

63:40

for oats for example, right? So

63:42

consuming fiber from oats uh reduces

63:45

cholesterol levels. That's been

63:47

demonstrated.

63:48

>> Yes. So that's that's a health claim.

63:50

That's an approved health claim. That's

63:52

why you see the hearts on some boxes of

63:54

cereal, but that's different than fiber

63:59

is good for maintaining regularity,

64:02

right? So anyways, I was interested in

64:03

in functional foods for health benefits

64:05

beyond their their nutritional content.

64:09

And so uh we we studied kefir for I

64:12

studied kefir for my master's degree and

64:14

then for my PhD studied uh mediumchain

64:18

triglycerides

64:19

um and then um ginger that was uh that

64:24

was something that I that I uh offered

64:26

to a grad student at Colombia. It was

64:29

interesting because uh the McCormick

64:31

company

64:33

had an advertisement in uh one of the

64:35

nutrition journals and they were going

64:37

to donate um spices for research. I was

64:41

like, "Okay." They had a list of

64:43

different herbs and spices that they

64:44

were going to donate for research. And I

64:46

had a grad student and I said, "Take a

64:49

look at this list, come back to me, say

64:52

if there's something in there that we

64:54

should test in the lab based on the

64:57

things that I do, don't come to me with

64:58

something that's, you know, that I don't

65:00

study." But and then he did some

65:03

research and he came back and he said,

65:05

"I think we should study ginger." I'm

65:07

like, "Okay, to do what?" like I think

65:09

you know for energy expenditure

65:11

looking at thermic effect of food it's

65:14

like okay so so we did this study I had

65:17

some some funds that I could use for him

65:19

to do that and uh

65:20

>> what did the study look like

65:21

>> a study where we looked at the thermic

65:22

effect of food

65:23

>> like so people ate ginger root spicing

65:26

their food

65:27

>> we dissolved ginger powder in warm water

65:32

>> and so that was one beverage and then uh

65:34

in the crossover again crossover design

65:37

so the next time when they came it It

65:38

was just hot water.

65:39

>> And how many times a day are they

65:40

drinking it?

65:41

>> This was a one time one time uh

65:44

consumption period. And we looked at the

65:46

thermic effect of food over a 6-hour

65:48

period. So again, they're they're under

65:50

this um we call it a metabolic hood,

65:53

right? So a little bubble and we measure

65:56

their uh oxygen consumption, carbon

65:58

dioxide production for I think it was

66:00

four or five hours

66:01

>> and it's significantly elevated.

66:03

>> Mhm.

66:03

>> With ginger.

66:04

>> With ginger.

66:05

>> Yeah.

66:06

>> Wow. So we think through the capsain

66:08

receptor there's an increase in the

66:10

thermic effect of food. So yeah, so I

66:12

was interested to see are there little

66:15

things that we could do, little changes

66:17

we can make to our diet to boost energy

66:20

expenditure relative to intake, you

66:22

know, just to tip the scale because many

66:26

adults over the course of their life

66:27

lifetime gain weight. And it's not a big

66:32

imbalance in calories on a daily basis

66:34

that leads to

66:37

10 pounds of weight gain over 10, 15

66:40

years, right? Now again the GLPs are

66:42

coming in and adjusting but yeah I'm

66:44

very interested also in foods that have

66:48

impact beyond their you know known

66:51

>> known roles. I mean the the problem is

66:54

in this area in the functional foods

66:56

area not the problems with your work but

66:58

the is that there are a lot of wild

67:00

claims that go unchecked like oh you

67:02

know walnuts are shaped like a brain and

67:04

therefore they're good for your brain or

67:06

you know which is they have certain

67:08

things in them which are brain

67:10

beneficial but it's not related to the

67:12

shape of the food so you get there's a

67:14

that area I feel of nutrition has been

67:18

um marginalized on the basis of the kind

67:20

of like quackery associ with it. But of

67:23

course there are interesting things in

67:25

different foods. I I do think that the

67:27

>> the Sonnenberg and colleagues work on

67:29

low sugar fermented foods has been very

67:32

informative for lowering the

67:33

inflammatome even more than fiber. I

67:36

mean actually in that study this is kind

67:38

of the like even Justin will kind of

67:39

downplay this a little bit. He's a

67:41

colleague so I can say in the fiber

67:43

group when they compared to low sugar

67:45

fermented foods and then they measured

67:46

the inflammatome they did a crossover

67:48

design. Within the fiber group, there

67:50

was a fair number of people who their

67:52

inflammation went way way up when they

67:54

consumed more fiber.

67:56

>> But in the low sugar fermented group or

67:58

when they were in that group, it was it

68:00

was uh always on average reduced.

68:03

>> Some people who increase their fiber

68:05

intake, their inflamm decreases. For a

68:08

lot of people, it increases, which is

68:10

not to say that fiber is bad, but I

68:11

think now we're starting to think about

68:12

like different types of fibers.

68:14

>> I was going to ask.

68:15

>> Yeah, they didn't control for that. They

68:17

just said increase the number of

68:18

servings each day. And and I know a lot

68:20

of people don't like to eat fibrous

68:22

foods because they don't feel good after

68:24

they eat them. It's like it's not that

68:26

they don't taste good. And I think

68:27

there's this whole like histamine story

68:29

that needs exploration. I I think food

68:32

and the healthy foods needs better

68:34

parsing.

68:35

>> Yeah.

68:35

>> In in my opinion.

68:36

>> Yeah. I I mean there was also

68:38

habituation. You don't go from consuming

68:42

six grams of fiber per day to 25.

68:44

>> They ramped them up. But but I have to

68:45

say they ramped them up pretty high.

68:47

Like even the low sugar fermented foods,

68:48

I think they got them up to like four

68:50

servings per day. It's a lot of kimchi.

68:52

You're not familiar with it. Like it can

68:54

be a little hard on the gut.

68:56

>> Yeah.

68:56

>> I actually take an enzyme. I think it's

68:58

called DAO.

69:00

>> Very inexpensive little it's like a tiny

69:03

tiny pill that uh that for digesting

69:05

histamines

69:06

>> because I noticed after I had whey

69:08

protein or I had broccoli or I would I

69:10

would get kind of sleepy. I was like

69:12

what is this? and a a a colleague at

69:14

Stanford, Sean Mackey, who's our head of

69:16

our pain center, said that he had gut

69:18

pain at one point, he's a pain doctor,

69:20

directs the pain center, and he figured

69:23

out by elimination and trial and error

69:26

that it was onions and other histamine

69:28

containing foods. He avoids histamine

69:29

containing foods. I'm not about to give

69:31

up the things I just described. Onions I

69:33

can do without, but so I think that

69:35

there's a there is foods have real

69:37

effect. M. So kefir, these men

69:41

olosaccharides, I have to confess I'm a

69:42

little disappointed cuz like here it

69:44

looks like it has like a cool effect,

69:45

but they didn't they didn't want now

69:46

can't get them. I'm not going to eat

69:48

coffee grounds. I'd like to take a quick

69:50

break and acknowledge our sponsor, Helix

69:53

Sleep. Helix Sleep makes mattresses and

69:55

pillows that are customized to your

69:57

unique sleep needs. Now, I've spoken

69:59

many times before on this and on other

70:01

podcasts about the fact that getting a

70:03

great night's sleep is the foundation of

70:05

mental health, physical health, and

70:07

performance. When we aren't getting

70:08

great sleep on a consistent basis,

70:10

everything suffers. And when we are

70:12

sleeping well and enough, our mental

70:14

health, physical health, and performance

70:15

in all endeavors improve marketkedly.

70:18

Now, the mattress you sleep on makes a

70:20

huge difference in the quality of sleep

70:22

that you get each night. How soft it is

70:24

or how firm it is all play into your

70:26

comfort and need to be tailored to your

70:28

unique sleep needs. If you go to the

70:30

Helix website, you can take a brief

70:32

two-minute quiz and it will ask you

70:33

questions such as, do you sleep on your

70:35

back, your side, or your stomach? Maybe

70:37

you know, maybe you don't. Do you tend

70:38

to run hot or cold during the night?

70:40

Things of that sort. You answer those

70:42

questions and Helix will match you to

70:43

the ideal mattress for you. For me, that

70:46

turned out to be the Dusk Dusk mattress.

70:48

I've been sleeping on a Dusk mattress

70:50

for more than four years now, and it's

70:52

been far and away the best sleep that

70:54

I've ever had. If you'd like to try

70:56

Helix, you can go to

70:58

helixleep.com/huberman,

71:00

take that 2-minut sleep quiz, and Helix

71:02

will match you to a mattress that's

71:04

customized for you. Right now, Helix is

71:06

giving up to 27% off their entire site.

71:10

Helix has also teamed up with TrueMed,

71:12

which allows you to use your HSA FSA

71:14

dollars to shop Helix's award-winning

71:16

mattresses. Again, that's

71:18

helixleep.com/huberman

71:20

to get up to 27% off in your work or in

71:24

your observation or in your curiosity.

71:26

What other foods are kind of intriguing

71:27

to you? Someone had a really um great

71:31

question for me at the obesity society

71:34

meeting a couple of years ago. I was

71:36

showing data that we had just obtained

71:38

in the lab that showed that if you eat

71:41

foods later in the day, your fat

71:44

oxidation is reduced. So this is a study

71:47

that we're doing. We had uh participants

71:50

on a controlled diet and they started

71:52

eating 1 hour after waking up and they

71:55

had a 10-hour eating window or they

71:57

started eating 5 hours after waking up.

72:00

So 4-hour delay relative to the other

72:02

condition. Again, same thing for a

72:05

10-hour window, 10-hour window. We gave

72:07

our participants the exact same foods,

72:10

same foods, same quantity, same timing

72:13

between meals. And this was done in a

72:16

metabolic chamber.

72:18

And the meals, especially the meals

72:21

later in the day that were consumed late

72:25

relative to the earlier version of those

72:27

meals led to less fat oxidation.

72:31

and someone in the audience stood up and

72:34

said, "So, would you then recommend that

72:38

people eat mediumchain triglycerides

72:41

in their evening meal as opposed to, you

72:45

know, a a different type of of fat?" And

72:49

my eyes just went like this because, you

72:51

know, my the my time studying medium

72:54

chain triglycerides was, you know, 15 to

72:57

20 years ago. I was like, "Wow, this

72:59

person knows my that work that I've done

73:01

and now is applying it to this work that

73:04

I'm doing currently." And I thought that

73:05

was fascinating. And I think that, you

73:07

know, timing of intake of different

73:09

foods and how it influences metabolism

73:12

is something that's uh that's

73:14

fascinating to me.

73:15

>> I confess I'm a like first bite of food

73:18

around 11:00 a.m. person. I'm trying to

73:20

eat breakfast these days and then kind

73:22

of shift things earlier. All it's really

73:24

done is added a meal because I I take my

73:26

last bite of food usually around 8:00

73:28

PM. I just can't seem to get much

73:30

earlier.

73:32

But

73:34

I and many other people have wondered

73:36

whether it's best to eat more towards

73:38

early day or whether or not it's just

73:40

overall caloric load. You're saying that

73:42

>> it does indeed make a difference.

73:43

>> It makes a difference. Yeah.

73:44

>> You want to shift most of your caloric

73:46

intake to the first like twothirds of

73:48

your waking day

73:49

>> roughly.

73:50

>> Mhm. Yeah.

73:51

>> As opposed to the last 2/3. Yes.

73:54

>> Yeah. So, in that study, 1 hour after

73:56

waking up. So, let's say basically 8:00

73:59

a.m. to 6 p.m. is our eating window.

74:01

>> I mean, this is a 10-hour eating window.

74:03

It's short. It's not, you know, typical.

74:04

So, it could be 8:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m.

74:07

>> That seems pretty

74:08

>> That's reasonable. Yeah. Versus 12:00

74:12

p.m. to 10:00 p.m.

74:14

>> The New York schedule.

74:15

>> Yeah. The New York schedule.

74:16

>> Yeah. Well, I I sort of chuckle because

74:18

when I go to New York, like it's like if

74:20

you go to dinner at 5:36, you're kind of

74:23

alone in the restaurant.

74:24

>> Depends on time of year.

74:25

>> Early bird special.

74:26

>> Yeah, it depends on time of year. And in

74:28

California, it's it's kind of in it's

74:30

the early shifted.

74:32

>> Yes.

74:32

>> But that's just more reflective of

74:34

culture. I think in Europe they they eat

74:36

very late often. Depends on where. I I I

74:39

was saying before we we started I was on

74:42

a fullbrite uh program last year in in

74:45

Spain and uh I would joke with my with

74:48

my colleagues there because they eat

74:50

very late and even the children eat very

74:53

late and I was like okay well

74:55

>> you feed me then you feed the children

74:57

>> right

74:58

>> then you have your dinner because they

75:00

could have dinner at 10 11 p.m. and the

75:02

children 8 900 p.m. And I'm like,

75:04

>> can't be good. If you uh my dad's from

75:07

Argentina, if you go to a restaurant in

75:10

Buenos Cyrus at 9:00 p.m., you're not

75:13

going to see many people at 11:00 p.m.

75:14

You'll see people in their 70s and 80s

75:16

and they're up early the next day. They

75:18

nap in the afternoon.

75:19

>> Yeah.

75:20

>> I don't know how healthy they are as a

75:21

country on average, but haven't looked

75:23

at the data, but very very late shifted

75:26

culture.

75:26

>> Well, there's been studies in Spain that

75:28

have looked at timing of eating and

75:30

their impact on weight management. I'm

75:32

thinking of work by Marta Garullet where

75:35

she showed that in her um weight loss

75:38

program the participants who have lunch

75:41

so their big bigger meal is is lunch who

75:44

have their lunch earlier in the day have

75:46

better weight loss than those who have

75:48

their lunch later in the day. So you

75:51

know even in those cultures where they

75:53

have they tend to eat late they still

75:56

find that eating earlier is tends to be

75:58

better for you. I was very very relieved

76:01

when um Alan Aragon who's a I consider

76:05

one of the best public educators on the

76:06

topic of protein and nutrition body

76:08

recomposition he's formerly trained in

76:11

this reassured me that you know nowadays

76:14

there's a lot of interest in getting

76:15

like protein ration it's probably

76:17

overdone a little bit but people are

76:18

striving to get more high quality

76:20

protein but that

76:22

except in rare circumstances where

76:24

people are really trying to optimize

76:26

every bit of muscle protein synthesis

76:29

95% of the effect of getting enough

76:32

protein can be accomplished by having

76:33

like two meals.

76:34

>> Mhm.

76:35

>> Maybe a little snack that you don't and

76:37

it can be evenly distributed or unevenly

76:40

distributed. You know, I think a lot of

76:41

people are feeling this protein pressure

76:43

and like, oh, I got to eat another meal

76:45

late in the day or I have to force

76:46

myself to eat breakfast in order to get

76:48

their protein ration. But it turns out

76:50

>> the whole notion that you could only

76:52

assimilate like 30 grams per meal is

76:54

totally false. turns out can assimilate

76:56

up to 100 gram. Now there are conditions

76:58

that set that up like exercise etc. But

77:02

I find that very liberating like you

77:04

could have breakfast and an early dinner

77:06

>> with a snack in the middle. You could

77:08

miss breakfast, have lunch and an early

77:10

dinner. What I'm hearing from you,

77:11

however, is that you really want to

77:13

avoid the the big even or just late

77:17

dinner. You just don't want to eat too

77:18

close to bedtime.

77:19

>> Correct.

77:19

>> Okay.

77:20

>> Yeah.

77:20

>> What about these MCTs, medium chain

77:23

triglycerides? These were very popular

77:24

in the health and kind of biohacking

77:26

space a few years ago. The

77:28

>> um the whole bulletproof coffee notion,

77:30

MCTs, butter coffee, and that's more or

77:33

less faded away. I don't see a lot of

77:37

people

77:38

>> putting oil in their coffee these days

77:40

or coconut. What are some of the known

77:42

benefits of MCTs? Where do you find them

77:45

and what what brought you to them as a

77:48

research topic?

77:49

>> This was a topic for my uh PhD

77:51

dissertation. So my PI got a grant

77:55

looking at the medium chain

77:56

triglycerides. He had done prior work on

77:59

this. Uh but what we did was use

78:02

purified MCT oil. So this is only uh

78:07

liquid oil that contains 8 carbon and 10

78:11

carbon chain fatty acids. Those are not

78:14

very common in our general food source.

78:17

So it was purified extracted oil that we

78:21

then gave our participants. We had

78:24

created this functional oil um that

78:27

contained flax seed oil also to be able

78:29

to get some more some omega-3 fatty

78:31

acids in there. Uh we had added plant

78:34

steriles because that was a big um big

78:36

focus of my lab uh at McGill. Plant

78:39

steriles for cholesterol reduction and

78:42

uh reduced uh risk of cardiovascular

78:44

disease.

78:45

And uh but the idea was to evaluate the

78:49

impact on energy expenditure because the

78:52

way we process mediumchain triglycerides

78:55

is different than how we process

78:57

longchain triglycerides. So the

79:01

12 14 16 and up uh carbon chains. So the

79:05

medium chain triglycerides they travel

79:07

directly to the liver they get

79:09

metabolized. we burn them off more

79:11

readily than the longchain triglycerides

79:14

that travel across in peripheral

79:16

circulation get deposited in atapost

79:18

tissue and a sort. And so what we did

79:21

what we found we did two separate

79:23

studies in men and women in both men and

79:25

women there was an increase in thermic

79:28

effect of food. So you burned slightly

79:29

more calories from the meal that

79:32

contained medium chain triglycerides

79:34

compared to the meal that contained your

79:36

standard fat. for my PhD. The first

79:38

study we did, we did in women and we

79:42

were trying to match the saturated fat

79:44

content of the diets because uh

79:47

mediumchain fatty acids are by default

79:51

saturated. They're

79:53

80 10. So I said, okay, we're going to

79:57

try to compare that to a uh a saturated

80:00

fat matched control comparison. And we

80:04

used beef tallow.

80:06

Uh it was a lot of beef tallow. Uh

80:10

participants were not happy with that

80:12

diet.

80:12

>> Eat it. Eat it direct like spoonfuls of

80:14

>> beef. We put it on to mashed potatoes.

80:17

You know, when you're when you're doing

80:19

studies like this where you're trying to

80:21

control the diet and you want to isolate

80:23

one aspect of it, right? We gave real

80:25

foods. half of the total fat of the diet

80:28

came from the the medium chain

80:32

containing versus and the beef tallow.

80:34

So it's like 20% of your fat from

80:37

>> one of the two. So you have to pour it

80:40

mask it somehow and

80:41

>> MCT. There's also this issue about

80:43

laxative effect of MCT oil that that

80:46

>> we had a few participants who initially

80:49

felt a lot of gargling

80:51

>> when like just gargling from their

80:53

stomach uh from from consuming MCT cuz

80:56

it was a lot early on it resolved. So

81:00

after a few days it was fine. It was a

81:01

one week one month I mean four week

81:04

study. So

81:05

>> after a few days no one dropped out for

81:08

>> you know any GI issues.

81:10

>> Okay. That's reassuring. Yeah. So, beef

81:13

tallow it was initially

81:15

uh beef tallow because it has a lot of

81:19

saturated fat is solid at room

81:21

temperature. So, as soon as your food

81:24

started to get a little colder, it would

81:28

kind of gel on your plate.

81:30

>> Yeah. That's sort of like if you bring

81:32

French fries home from a restaurant,

81:33

they use tallow and then you like put in

81:35

the fridge cuz you thought you wanted

81:36

them as leftovers and the next day

81:38

they're sort of like in this like stuck

81:39

to bottom of container configuration.

81:42

Yeah. It's not very appetizing.

81:43

>> Not appealing. No, there's like it's

81:45

white all underneath.

81:46

>> Yeah. It almost always goes into the

81:47

trash.

81:48

>> A couple of women felt it gave them a

81:50

headache.

81:51

>> Just the smell of it, you know.

81:53

>> So with the MCTs big significant

81:56

increase in thermic effect of food

81:57

>> that was statistically signing. Yeah. It

81:59

was about 45 to 50 60 calories.

82:04

>> Oh, I thought you were going to say

82:05

percent increase. Oh,

82:06

>> no. So, it's it's a small change, but it

82:10

was if you're going to use this versus

82:12

that,

82:13

>> you're getting a little boost here. If

82:15

you repeat this a few times in a day,

82:17

because when we measured the thermic

82:19

effect of food, we measured it only

82:21

after over one meal, but repeated over

82:24

three meals per day over a certain

82:27

period of time. We did find changes in

82:29

body composition, improvements in um in

82:32

weight status with medium chain

82:33

triglyceride consumption,

82:35

>> lean mass to to fat mass. Interesting.

82:38

>> And then we did follow-up study of a

82:41

weight loss study with medium chain

82:43

triglyceride. This time around it was

82:44

just purified MCT oil, not added with

82:47

other types versus olive oil, uh, which

82:50

is much more acceptable and found

82:52

greater weight loss with MCT.

82:54

>> Based on what you're saying, it's

82:55

reasonable if somebody wants to improve

82:58

weight loss. I'm hearing a sort of a

83:00

constellation of things. shift your meal

83:02

timing to in the first twothirds or so

83:04

of your day, which sounds like it will

83:07

also improve sleep, which will also

83:08

improve uh

83:11

>> appetite and food regul satiety and

83:13

hunger signals. What is it like a

83:16

tablespoon or two of MCT per day? Is

83:18

that kind of what this looks like for

83:19

the typical person?

83:21

>> Yeah, about that.

83:22

>> Okay.

83:22

>> Yeah.

83:23

>> In place of some other oil, not in

83:25

addition.

83:25

>> Not in addition. Correct.

83:27

>> Okay. Some ginger.

83:28

>> Yeah.

83:29

>> Are they additive? Are they synergistic?

83:31

I think they could probably be additive

83:33

because I think that the impact is

83:34

through different mechanisms. Obviously,

83:37

no one's tested that. Um, you know, it's

83:39

interesting you bring it up this way

83:41

because it makes me think of um David

83:44

Jenkins and the portfolio diet. It

83:45

actually made the New York Times uh I

83:48

think last in December.

83:50

The portfolio diet uh was a diet he

83:53

designed for maximal cholesterol

83:55

reduction. So, it was initially designed

83:58

to have uh four specific foods. So, it

84:02

was high in soy protein, nuts, plant

84:05

steriles, and soluble fiber.

84:07

>> Yeah, it's going to be a tough one to

84:08

get past most of the American public.

84:09

I'll tell you, as a as a public health

84:12

educator, I don't care if it comes out

84:13

in the New York Times, the Wall Street

84:15

Journal, the New Yorker, and everything

84:17

in between. People hear soy.

84:19

>> Yeah.

84:20

>> Nuts they like but easy to overeat. Mhm.

84:22

>> They hear plant steroids and like

84:25

they're they're they're someplace else.

84:27

>> This diet was went on a head-to-head

84:29

comparison with lipid lowering

84:33

>> agent, right? Like a statin.

84:35

>> Yeah. Yeah. They had the same

84:38

>> uh cholesterol reduction as a statin.

84:40

>> As a statin. Yeah. The portfolio.

84:42

>> Interesting name. People are definitely

84:45

>> unhealthy in this country. And if if

84:48

they can lower blood lipids

84:50

>> Yeah. They've expanded it to u to be

84:53

more flexible. So it's not just soy

84:56

protein now. It also includes legumes.

84:58

They've added monounsaturated fats. So

85:00

olive oil. You know, when I look at a

85:03

diet like the portfolio diet, which you

85:05

just I only know what you just told me

85:06

about it. Or I think about the the

85:08

current food uh

85:11

uh suggestions by by the FDA which are

85:14

you know we could call it kind of um it

85:18

emphasizes um unprocessed and minim

85:20

minimally processed food. So I think

85:22

that's a step in the right direction.

85:23

Certainly, we look at these. The issue

85:26

that always comes up for me is I think,

85:28

okay, in a more plant-based um

85:30

grainheavy nut diet, it's very easy for

85:34

people to overeat calories based on this

85:36

whole like amino acid protein foraging

85:39

hypothesis. This idea that we eat until

85:41

we get enough of the amino acids we

85:42

want. Like a like a an a chicken breast

85:45

or something and a couple eggs or or or

85:48

four eggs or something is very

85:50

satiating. M

85:51

>> whereas we can eat a lot of grains and

85:54

nuts before we kind of go okay that's

85:55

enough. There seems to be this issue

85:57

like how do how do you ensure

85:59

cardometabolic health

86:01

>> while quelling hunger

86:02

>> and we can't have people walking around

86:04

hungry all the time and the GLP's help

86:06

with that

86:07

>> and it does get down to sort of like do

86:08

you include animal-based foods or not

86:10

often.

86:11

>> So how do you think just from a public

86:13

health perspective that we can reconcile

86:16

this because clearly the highly

86:18

processed food diet is not going to

86:19

work. the standard American diet that I

86:21

think that is fading away. But now

86:22

there's this kind of polarization of

86:24

like are we going to go mostly plants,

86:25

grains, nuts, and I think low saturated

86:28

fat, blood lipids improving, or are we

86:30

going to think like, you know, more

86:33

protein satiety? Do you see where I'm

86:36

getting at here? Like I feel like this

86:38

this is the contour of things.

86:39

>> Yeah. Well, I I think that there's

86:42

there's no reason to pit one another

86:45

against the other, right? So like this

86:46

oneonone, but what's important is that

86:50

also having a diet that's more

86:53

plant-based, has higher volume, that's

86:56

filling. It's hard to eat a lot of food.

87:00

So if your food volume is high but does

87:04

not provide as much calories, you'll get

87:07

that satiety from the food volume. And

87:10

then you take you put in some some nuts

87:13

helps to prolong the satiety because

87:16

then you get some protein, some

87:17

healthful fats. And so I think that's

87:20

important. I'm not saying animal

87:22

products are bad. I think they're

87:24

they're important for a diet. I think

87:27

they're important for health. It's just

87:29

a matter of uh portion size and making

87:31

sure that uh there's not overemphasis on

87:36

animal products over plant-based

87:37

products because we know that

87:38

plant-based products are so much

87:40

healthier in terms of heart health, uh

87:43

reduction of type two diabetes, cancer

87:46

risk, and other u metabolic diseases.

87:49

>> Yeah. Well, I'm right there with you. I

87:50

love fruits and vegetables. I'm a huge

87:52

fan of uh I do eat meat half Argentine.

87:55

I mean, you know, but and chicken and

87:57

I'm not a big fan of fish. I keep

87:58

working on this, but um can't seem to

88:00

quite get there, but but I I don't eat

88:02

them in excess.

88:04

>> Mhm.

88:04

>> The things that I feel are very very

88:06

easy for people to overeat are starch

88:08

fat or starch, sugar, fat combinations.

88:12

>> It's just like it the brain and gut

88:14

respond with signals that scream more.

88:18

You just It's very hard for people to do

88:19

like a slice of pizza. I I love pizza.

88:22

It can be done, but it's just very hard

88:24

for people to do. It's like it it the

88:26

the stop signals just are all pushed

88:28

down and the go signals are are all go.

88:31

>> So reducing white foods as much as

88:33

possible is what foods.

88:34

>> Yeah. So the white flour, white rice,

88:37

white pasta, white, you know, things are

88:40

>> not as colorful. You know, if you're

88:42

eating a slice of bread and it just

88:43

dissolves in your mouth, it's not so

88:46

good.

88:46

>> This is more of a editorial reflection

88:48

again, but it's also I was looking at

88:50

the history of nutrition in this

88:51

country. Oh, you're Canadian by birth,

88:53

right? I detected that. And I don't know

88:56

what the the sort of traditional fair is

88:58

in Canada, but if you look at the

89:01

history of food in the United States,

89:03

it's never been particularly healthy.

89:05

The foods that we consider like American

89:08

foods, hamburgers, hot dogs, French

89:10

fries, corn dogs, fried chicken, donuts.

89:13

Like, we've never been healthy about

89:15

food. People probably just moved a lot,

89:17

ate less, smoked a lot more, which is an

89:19

appetite suppressant, but gives you

89:20

cancer, kills you. We've never been that

89:24

healthy with respect to food. Maybe food

89:26

volume was more in check, but if you

89:29

look at traditional food in,

89:32

you know, in Europe, probably in I mean,

89:34

in Canada, what what sort of the are the

89:36

foods nourishing and healthy? I think

89:38

we're sort of in this like delusion that

89:40

like we were once healthy about food in

89:42

this country, we were never healthy

89:43

about food. The food was always pretty

89:46

weak in terms of nutritional status

89:48

except for fruits, vegetables, and some

89:50

animal products.

89:51

>> Yeah, I think portion size has a lot to

89:54

do with it too. So, I know um moving

89:57

from Canada to US, you know, the go to a

90:00

restaurant, the portion sizes are so

90:02

big. Uh it would never have occurred to

90:04

me to take home doggy bag for at a

90:08

restaurant ever. And then here it's like

90:11

kind of have to or else you know you're

90:13

throwing away half your plate or unless

90:15

you're finishing the whole thing. So

90:16

portion size I think is a big one. And

90:18

also the foods are different in a way.

90:21

We were talking about yogurt.

90:23

So there are two things when I moved to

90:25

the US. The first thing the dietician at

90:28

my work told me was do not buy bagged

90:31

bread.

90:33

I like okay what does that mean? Don't

90:35

buy bagged bread. Like I that's what I

90:37

always do. No, she says, "You go to the

90:39

grocery store, you go to the bakery

90:40

section, they'll cut it up for you. You

90:42

ask what you want. Don't buy bad bread."

90:44

Like, "Okay, I'm not gonna buy bad

90:46

bread." So, apparently, she was talking

90:48

about like too many additives, too, too

90:50

much sugar, whatever.

90:52

>> Okay. We're talking about like the bread

90:54

that just melts in your mouth. So, and

90:57

then the other thing was uh yogurt. I

91:00

used I eat yogurt quite a bit. And then

91:02

the yogurt in the here in the US tasted

91:06

sweeter to me. the same thing, the same

91:10

yogurt,

91:11

Canada here, the same name, the same

91:13

everything.

91:15

It was sweeter. And I didn't know why,

91:17

but then it occurred to me that, you

91:20

know, foods are formulated in different

91:23

ways in different countries to appeal to

91:26

the population of that country. So

91:28

yogurt was one where it's a little less

91:30

sweet in Canada than in US and it was

91:32

less sweet even than in in Europe than

91:36

Canada and US. So there's things like

91:39

that that don't necessarily help.

91:41

>> Yeah. Yeah. We we love our um sugars and

91:44

fats in the United States and and I

91:47

think we paid a substantial health debt

91:49

as a consequence. I mean, now again, I

91:52

don't have the numbers on this, but with

91:53

Redat True Tide and the other GLPS, I've

91:56

never tried them, but a lot of people

91:57

are finding it much easier, if not easy,

92:01

to lose weight that they just couldn't

92:02

before. They just could not control

92:03

their appetite

92:04

>> and they're just not as interested in

92:06

these foods. There's this argument that

92:08

maybe they're not as interested as in

92:09

everything in life. And that's a

92:11

important question that needs to be

92:12

resolved.

92:12

>> But I do think that think that things

92:14

are changing. I think we're finding a

92:16

lot more, you know, for example, the

92:17

yogurt, right? there was a lot more

92:19

plain yogurt options than there were,

92:21

>> you know, when I first moved to the US.

92:23

So, there's, you know,

92:25

>> things are changing. It's been there's

92:26

been a lot of resistance. And I think

92:28

that the the resistance has been um

92:34

sociological in the sense that um you

92:38

know, there's been a resistance to

92:39

people being healthy. There really has.

92:42

You know, there's this idea that like if

92:44

you're eating clean, you have an eating

92:45

disorder. I did an episode about eating

92:48

disorders. I talked to a lot of experts

92:49

and this including the group at Colombia

92:52

Med that works on eating disorders. You

92:54

know, the frequency of anorexia, the

92:55

most deadly psychiatric illness of all

92:57

the psychiatric illnesses, hadn't

92:59

realized that is not increasing as a

93:01

function of social media or magazines or

93:02

anything. It's been very steady for

93:04

maybe hundreds of years. This is a real

93:06

neurological issue. There's obviously

93:08

social pressures and things like that.

93:10

But what I discovered in in like talking

93:13

to experts like uh Joanna Steinberg at

93:15

um at Colombia and others is that you

93:19

know like there is this so that was

93:21

about anorexia but what I'm about to say

93:23

is separate. There's this notion that if

93:24

you're going to be thoughtful about what

93:26

you eat you know or maybe you're not

93:27

going to eat too late or you're going to

93:29

skip dessert or until a few years ago

93:31

like if you're not going to drink

93:32

alcohol like there's something wrong

93:34

with you like that that you're being

93:35

restrictive somehow. I think again it's

93:38

kind of like the parallels to uh Europe

93:41

are kind of interesting that or the the

93:42

contrast to Europe are interesting where

93:44

there's a lot of social convention built

93:46

up around food that was healthy and I

93:49

think in the United States the social

93:51

conventions built up around food and

93:52

alcohol were pretty unhealthy. It was

93:54

like everyone does this like everyone

93:56

eats hot dogs at the game like and hot

93:58

dogs at a baseball game are a great

93:59

thing. It's like nothing is as American

94:01

as that except maybe apple pie, right?

94:03

But there's this when people start

94:05

making choices in in the direction of

94:07

their health, it was and to some extent

94:10

it still is a there's this quieter

94:12

undercurrent of well like are you being

94:15

restrictive? Like are you really going

94:16

to live like that? But then you look at

94:18

the the health outcomes and culturally

94:21

until a few years ago it was considered

94:22

very not okay to say that obesity was a

94:25

health risk.

94:27

>> And now the open discussion about

94:28

obesity and metabolic health as as like

94:30

a real health risk. I think now we're

94:33

kind of like in the actual discussion

94:35

that for a long time it was like

94:38

speaking of which and um kind of things

94:40

outside the box. There's a paper on your

94:42

CV that I could not help but ask about.

94:45

Snack chips fried in corn oil alleviate

94:49

>> cardiovascular risk factors when

94:51

substituted for lowfat and highfat

94:53

snacks. Yep.

94:54

>> What?

94:54

>> Mhm.

94:55

>> What?

94:56

>> Yes.

94:56

>> Tell me the data. I believe you. I'm

94:58

just like this is wild. This was funded

95:02

by Fritoite. At that time they had

95:04

changed the oil that they were using to

95:07

fry their corn chips. So this was

95:11

Doritos, Fritos, Cheetos, and just

95:13

Titos. All the all the

95:16

>> all the U. And so they had changed to

95:19

corn oil. They're like this is an oil

95:21

that's higher in polyunsaturated fats

95:22

than what we usually have.

95:24

>> What were they using before?

95:26

>> I'm not sure. I forget.

95:27

>> But it wasn't tallow.

95:29

>> I don't think so. like does it make a

95:31

difference? Is it going to improve

95:33

health if people choose those

95:36

snacks compared to other snacks? So, we

95:39

had three arms in that study. Uh each

95:42

person went through each of the three

95:45

arms. It was for 25 days. The question

95:48

was, okay, let's say you have a choice

95:51

for a snack today and you're going to go

95:54

to the vending machine and you have your

95:56

option. Do you eat a lowfat high

96:00

carbohydrate snack, a highfat,

96:03

high more highsaturated snack or those

96:07

chips? So, you just pick one and that's

96:11

that. So, I think we gave it was two

96:13

snacks a day for for 25 days. It was a

96:17

rotation. So, they had four Yeah, they

96:18

had four different uh chips. So, it was

96:21

two one day, two the next day like that

96:23

for 25 days. And then the controls and

96:27

yeah the the better lipid profile was

96:31

the one with was the one from the the

96:34

corn chips. They had the better lipid.

96:37

Yeah. And they had less uh lipoprotein

96:39

little a which is another you know

96:41

factor card metabolic risk factor.

96:44

>> Data or data

96:45

>> data or data. Well, I know that in the

96:47

head-to-head comparison of seed oils, of

96:49

which corn is, right, with saturated

96:51

fat, this is where kind of the

96:53

contention starts to

96:56

erupt, where there are many studies now,

96:59

I think, showing that when you

97:01

substitute saturated fat with seed oils

97:04

that cardabolic risk factors go down.

97:07

And this is true, right? Well, I by the

97:09

way, I'm just going to say I I I avoid

97:11

seed oils actively cuz I like olive oil

97:13

and butter.

97:14

>> Mhm.

97:14

>> Mostly olive oil. I avoid seed oils. I

97:17

don't like the way they taste. I love

97:19

olive oil.

97:19

>> Okay.

97:19

>> And there's some health effects of olive

97:21

oil and I eat small amounts of butter

97:23

and

97:23

>> I So, I just like duck the whole

97:26

controversy, right? And you have to make

97:28

sure you're getting real olive oil, but

97:30

that can be done. When you look at the

97:32

studies that compare saturated fat to

97:34

seed oils, you do see uh better outcomes

97:37

for seed oils. But then there's this

97:40

crowd that comes in and says, but that's

97:43

on a backdrop of reasonably high

97:44

carbohydrate intake. When you start

97:46

replacing some of those carbohydrates

97:48

with lower carbohydrate diet, increasing

97:51

protein intake, so not keto, but kind of

97:53

like lowerish starch and sugar, then

97:56

maybe that balances out. Okay. But the

97:58

big contention seems to be around the

98:00

processing of these seed oils. This idea

98:02

that when especially when you make

98:04

things like chips that when you take

98:06

fats and you combine them with

98:07

carbohydrate and you heat them up a lot

98:09

that you create factors that are not

98:12

good for the body. What is the evidence

98:14

for or against that?

98:15

>> Well, so different oils have different

98:17

smoke points, right? So each oil should

98:20

be used for its appropriate usage,

98:22

right? So cooking uh process. So I think

98:27

that's that's where you know people

98:28

think that they should be using one type

98:30

of oil for everything that they do but

98:34

some oil like you wouldn't put flax seed

98:36

oil for example and and heat it up to

98:39

very high uh temperature.

98:42

>> Are you a fan of flax seed oil?

98:44

>> I'm a fan of every liquid oil. I use I

98:46

have no no uh personal

98:49

>> you seem very healthy restriction on the

98:52

>> on the types of oils. I think that you

98:54

know oils are that remain liquid at room

98:56

temperature that should be your your

98:59

your barometer for what's better to use.

99:03

I'm also not saying that people should

99:06

avoid butter like the plague, right? So

99:09

all in moderation is is okay. Is there

99:13

any reason to

99:15

I just can't find the argument for why

99:17

anyone would replace olive oil with a

99:21

seed oil.

99:23

Olive oil has a lower smoke point than

99:25

uh than other seed oils. So peanut oil,

99:28

for example, has a higher smoke point.

99:29

So you can fry in peanut oil. You

99:31

wouldn't fry anything in olive oil.

99:33

>> I wouldn't eat anything fried.

99:34

>> Well,

99:35

>> yeah.

99:36

>> So that's that's a different question,

99:39

you know. So depending on how you want

99:40

to use your oil and you know, also some

99:43

people find, you know, olive oil and

99:45

baked goods might impart stronger taste.

99:48

So depending on the type. So some of

99:49

them are more flavorful, right? And so

99:52

they're more fragile, let's say, and

99:54

they'll impart flavors to different uh

99:56

different foods where they're not

99:58

supposed to be.

99:59

>> So you you're not seed oil averse, nor

100:02

are you pro-se

100:05

>> personally?

100:05

>> Yeah.

100:06

>> No,

100:06

>> cuz I think that the um the seed oil

100:09

debate has been very contaminated by the

100:11

issues that I mentioned before, but also

100:13

because many many processed foods

100:15

contain seed oil. they're much less

100:17

expensive than using, you know,

100:19

grass-fed butter or or olive oil or even

100:22

just ordinary butter. So,

100:24

>> it's important to be

100:26

nutrition facts literate. So, when

100:28

you're talking about uh processed foods,

100:31

so as much as possible, cooking at home,

100:34

but that's something that a lot of

100:36

people don't really know how to do, feel

100:38

they don't have the time for,

100:39

>> people aren't going to start doing that.

100:41

>> I'll tell you, they're not going to

100:42

start doing that. I wish they would, but

100:44

they they're not going to. the grocery

100:46

store to to look at the nutrition facts

100:47

panel and being like, "Okay, what's in

100:49

here? What's in there?" And comparing

100:51

products to one another, right? And and

100:53

also what's more important for your own

100:55

health,

100:56

>> right? What's relevant for my health may

100:58

not be what's relevant for your health.

101:01

You know, some people are we're talking

101:03

about salt sensitivity. Some people are

101:05

very salt sensitive. Some people are

101:07

very active and need to replace salt and

101:09

so salt is not an issue for them. But so

101:12

being able to know uh where to what to

101:16

pay attention to because otherwise it

101:18

just gets overwhelming.

101:20

>> You mentioned uh the study was p paid

101:22

for by a company and earlier you

101:24

mentioned companies. I think this is an

101:25

important issue that we've never really

101:27

direct um directly addressed on this

101:29

podcast. I mean anytime I've covered a

101:31

paper in a sometimes I do these solo

101:32

episodes. I'll get back to them soon. I

101:34

used to do a lot more of them. But I

101:36

would always look like are there

101:37

financial conflicts of interest?

101:40

What's the difference between a company

101:42

funding a study and a financial conflict

101:45

of interest if any? Like like to me a

101:47

financial conflict of interest is if the

101:50

investigators, the scientists running

101:52

the study um have stakes and you know

101:54

they have shares in the company or

101:56

they're being paid to do the study

101:58

obviously. But when a company funds

102:00

research on like this uh the snack chips

102:04

study that you did,

102:06

>> I think everyone would like to assume

102:08

that they don't have any you're not

102:10

feeling any there's no explicit nor

102:12

implicit pressure for a particular

102:14

outcome,

102:14

>> right?

102:15

>> Could you like how did how does this

102:17

stuff come about? So, I'm glad you're

102:18

asking that question because that's

102:20

something that people often have this

102:22

knee-jerk reaction to industry sponsored

102:24

studies and there I know there are

102:26

people who are very very vocal against

102:29

industry uh sponsored research but as

102:31

scientists we do research we do research

102:34

to the best of our abilities and we

102:37

provide we draft the research question

102:40

you get the data you analyze it you

102:42

publish it some of the studies that I

102:44

haven't been able to publish have been

102:45

funded by industry that have had null

102:48

results.

102:49

>> Null.

102:50

>> Null results. So, so we did a we did a

102:52

study. It was sponsored by industry. We

102:55

didn't find any significant effect of

102:57

the test product compared to the

103:00

control.

103:00

>> And you can't publish it.

103:02

>> We wrote the paper. We wrote the report.

103:04

We provided it to our sponsor

103:07

just out of uh you know courtesy. So

103:11

this is the paper. We're going to submit

103:12

it for publication.

103:15

Do what you need to do. So they've given

103:17

you the green light to submit. So the

103:18

companies aren't short circuiting this.

103:20

>> No, never. That's in the contract,

103:22

right? Your

103:23

>> right to publish because otherwise why'

103:25

you do research? There's no point doing

103:27

research if you're not going to be able

103:28

to publish your research.

103:30

>> So

103:32

basically, it's courtesy to show that

103:36

the paper that you're going to be

103:37

submitting for publication. That one

103:40

paper that I'm referring to, I must have

103:43

tried five different journals.

103:46

But the findings are not exciting.

103:50

They're showing that there's no effect

103:52

on our outcomes. And it got rejected,

103:55

rejected, rejected, rejected. And I'm

103:57

pretty persistent.

103:59

I ran out of steam. So if I run out of

104:01

steam, I can imagine so many other

104:03

people, other scientists who have no

104:05

results have run out of steam much

104:07

quicker than me.

104:08

>> So that's a no result issue. It's not

104:11

necessarily unique to industry funded

104:13

studies. No,

104:14

>> that's not unique. Yeah. So, industry

104:15

sponsored studies, you know, I often

104:17

also say there we get um NIH reports of

104:23

scientific misconduct. So, reports of

104:24

scientific misconduct condonducts can be

104:27

found from NIH sponsored studies where

104:29

they find that the principal

104:31

investigator falsified data that have

104:33

been published in a specific paper.

104:36

So to me, if you're not going to if

104:39

you're not an honest scientist,

104:43

obviously I don't think it matters who's

104:45

sponsoring your research because the NIH

104:47

finds misconduct,

104:49

>> right? I mean, doing science for any

104:52

other reason than trying to find real

104:54

answers is just insane. Like I mean,

104:57

these people are who do this are like

104:59

legitimately sick, right? You know, like

105:01

Yeah,

105:02

>> it's a lot of work.

105:03

>> Yeah. I mean I mean well do they really

105:05

think they discovered something if they

105:06

made it it's like it's like it doesn't

105:08

it's not it doesn't it doesn't it

105:10

doesn't compute well it never ends well

105:11

and you know we could spend hours

105:13

talking about the cases these things

105:15

always it always comes out in the wash

105:17

>> so I'm hearing that negative outcomes

105:18

are hard to publish

105:20

>> when you take on funding from a company

105:24

to to address a particular question

105:26

about a product that they sell you it

105:29

sounds to me I'm trying to I want to be

105:31

careful I'm not like leading the witness

105:32

here

105:33

that you don't feel any pressure.

105:42

Like why are they why are they funding

105:43

studies? I mean companies are selfish

105:45

and they should be. They have

105:46

shareholders and they need to um some of

105:48

them are public companies and so the

105:49

shareholders are the public and so why

105:52

are they funding research? I mean plenty

105:53

of people eat chips. Yeah.

105:54

>> Why are they funding research?

105:57

>> They wanted to know if it had a health

105:58

benefit

105:59

>> so they could market a health benefit.

106:01

probably market a health benefit at some

106:03

point. That could be. And then if they

106:06

don't find a health benefit, maybe they

106:08

could switch it to something else,

106:10

right? I don't know.

106:11

>> I'm very uh sympathetic to the reality

106:16

that there isn't a lot of research

106:18

funding coming through NIH and NSF these

106:21

days, but but always it's been, you

106:24

know, uh it's been low. I know because I

106:26

sat on study sections which

106:28

>> dole out grants. uh got grants, but it's

106:31

very very very competitive. Are you

106:33

taking money from companies to do this

106:35

work because it's a it's a great way to

106:37

fund studies. Like in other words, I if

106:41

if NIH had more money to study

106:43

nutrition,

106:44

>> I could imagine a world where you would

106:46

just take money from NIH to do it. Like

106:48

you wouldn't need the money from because

106:49

the budgets are better from NIH funding

106:52

than from uh from industry funding for

106:54

nutrition research.

106:56

But

106:57

>> if you if you could get an NIH grant,

106:59

that's that's the ultimate goal, right?

107:02

Or USDA or other governmental grant.

107:06

>> That's the goal.

107:07

>> But sometimes also there's specific

107:10

foods, specific products that would be

107:12

kind of hard to study without industry

107:16

support because you need to get access

107:18

to this specific food

107:21

>> or product. Well, I don't know what the

107:23

status of it is right now, but um my

107:27

fairly frequent um kind of check-in on

107:29

what the at least stated goals of the

107:33

now being revised NIH are include um

107:37

creating a forum

107:38

>> even some incentive for publishing

107:40

negative results or null results I

107:42

should say.

107:43

>> You know, Jay Bacharia who's been on

107:45

this podcast has put that out publicly.

107:48

We need to we need those results.

107:49

They're important. they steer people

107:51

away from certain things that need to be

107:53

steered away from. And also uh it seems

107:58

at least from the whole food pyramid

108:01

revision etc that there seems to be more

108:02

and more interest in nutrition

108:04

>> as a research topic and something to

108:07

really understand. So obviously it's

108:09

really important.

108:10

>> I mean people are eating every day.

108:12

>> Yeah.

108:12

>> Um they're making these choices. So

108:14

there should be more federal funding for

108:15

these things and then there's no chance

108:17

of bias.

108:18

>> Right.

108:19

>> Right. Yeah. I think that people assume

108:21

that if if industry funded a study that

108:23

um especially on food

108:25

>> that like something's not to be trusted

108:27

in there.

108:28

>> I don't know why for food in particular,

108:30

right? So if you think about it,

108:32

>> food and drugs, food and drug companies,

108:34

>> but drug companies, they do research on

108:36

their own products all

108:38

>> most of the R&D for drug companies is

108:40

definitely done inhouse. That's also

108:42

part of the scary part about it. We

108:43

don't see the null results. I actually

108:45

would prefer if it took on a different

108:48

shape. I don't know exactly what it

108:50

would look like. I mean, drug, we don't

108:51

see a lot of the negative outcomes that

108:54

might exist. So, I I don't think there's

108:56

>> probably they just die out before they

108:57

make it to next step. And

108:59

>> yeah, I think outright scientific fraud,

109:02

people making stuff up is pretty rare.

109:04

>> Very rare.

109:05

>> But I do think there's a lot of

109:07

questions about people because of the

109:09

incentives to need to publish to as you

109:11

described it's hard to publish no

109:13

results. We will never know and this is

109:15

when you run a lab is you know you want

109:16

to create a culture where graduate

109:18

students and postocs feel very

109:19

comfortable saying there's nothing here

109:21

right

109:21

>> because the stuff that didn't work out

109:24

>> you always you know it's just a question

109:26

that you always have like what what

109:28

stuff do we never hear about

109:30

>> because the negative results like they

109:32

say well that mouse was sick or this you

109:34

know there's a lot of the brain is a

109:36

crazy

109:37

>> thing that's you need to teach the

109:39

students well right you have a student

109:41

who comes to you and says

109:43

Hey, this this is lower. This is better

109:47

than this. And you look at you look at

109:48

the numbers and you say, well, it's 25

109:51

versus 27 and the standard deviation is

109:55

10. Like, no, 25 is the same as 27,

109:59

right? So, you have to make sure you you

110:01

teach well to know that,

110:03

>> you know, even numerically different

110:06

effects may not be statistically

110:09

significantly different. And that's just

110:11

part of the you know the curve right.

110:14

>> Yeah. The ideal situation is when the

110:15

student or postto doesn't believe their

110:17

own results. They're like it's not

110:18

really and then you have to convince

110:20

them actually you have something

110:21

interesting. That's a good situation.

110:22

That's a good situation.

110:23

>> That's a good situation. And then

110:24

eventually they're like oh okay you know

110:27

that's the ideal situation. But I think

110:29

this whole field of nutrition is is is

110:31

contentious uh for some of the right

110:34

reasons. It's so very important. And I

110:36

think it's contentious also for a lot of

110:39

unfortunate and unnecessary reasons

110:41

among the students and postocs and

110:44

general public when you interact what

110:45

what are people most interested in with

110:48

respect to nutrition like when people

110:50

ask you is it like what should I eat

110:53

what shouldn't I eat like what what do

110:54

what what's coming like what are your

110:56

antenna picking up when when you're out

110:58

there

110:59

>> I think what should I eat or you know or

111:02

have you heard about XYZ fad that's also

111:05

One, have you heard that whatever

111:09

product cures everything in the world?

111:12

>> No, I haven't heard that.

111:14

>> Peptides or is it like very peptide

111:16

right now? Peptides are really big.

111:18

>> It's always something else. Yeah. Yeah.

111:20

Yeah.

111:20

>> So, it's it's it's very specific to a

111:22

product.

111:22

>> Yeah. Often very specific to a product.

111:24

Yeah.

111:25

>> You won't be held responsible for your

111:26

answer. But um do you supplement your

111:29

diet with with minerals like magnesium

111:32

or anything like that or you just

111:33

completely careful food choices?

111:36

>> I prefer careful food choices. I think

111:39

it's more pleasurable to eat a complete

111:42

food uh diet. That said, I think that

111:45

there are some people who may need to

111:47

supplement their diets, but I think

111:50

people should strive to to get their

111:53

nutrients from uh from whole foods.

111:57

>> Fiber recommendations are really

111:59

growing. I I looked into this and many

112:01

many people's doctors are now telling

112:03

them you should take uh a little bit of

112:05

celium husk. I always thought, by the

112:07

way, celium husk was like the husks like

112:09

you had like they're like you're going

112:10

to eat like the seed husks. It's

112:12

actually ground into a powder or

112:13

something like that. Yeah,

112:14

>> I'm still afraid to take it, but uh I

112:16

should take a little bit of it. But

112:17

doctors now are prescribing um

112:20

supplemental fiber

112:22

>> in a pretty high rate from what I

112:24

understand.

112:25

>> Oh, that's interesting.

112:26

>> Yeah, people don't want to eat their

112:27

fruits and vegetables,

112:28

>> but there brings so much more, right?

112:31

So, yes, there's fiber in fruits and

112:34

vegetables, but there's also all sorts

112:37

of polyphenols, right? all sorts of

112:39

non-nutrient components that themselves

112:42

may have benefits for health that we

112:46

don't fully understand yet that feed

112:49

your gut that are maybe just as relevant

112:51

that may enhance fiber's impact on

112:55

health.

112:56

>> Listen, I

112:58

>> preaching to the choir. I I I love

113:00

fruits and vegetables.

113:02

>> Well, thank you so much for taking time

113:04

out of your schedule. You have a very uh

113:06

unique research program. you know, I

113:08

have to say very few people uh can work

113:10

on as many different things and find

113:12

their points of intersection and um so

113:15

I'm grateful that you're exploring these

113:16

things. I appreciate your openness about

113:19

industry funded research. This is

113:21

something that I think people uh need to

113:23

know about. I I certainly learned about

113:26

that from you today and based on your

113:27

work, I think it's fair to say that we

113:29

shouldn't just be encouraging people to

113:31

get great sleep. We should be

113:32

encouraging people to eat

113:35

at times and foods that allow them to

113:38

get great sleep, which will allow them

113:39

to get better make better food choices.

113:43

>> Yes.

113:44

>> And so forth.

113:44

>> Yeah. So, you know, I talk often about a

113:46

vicious cycle where you don't sleep

113:49

well, you don't eat well, then that

113:51

makes you not sleep so well. And really

113:55

hoping for people to get into a

113:57

healthful cycle, right? where you get

113:58

good sleep, where you can make good food

114:01

choices that then helps you get better

114:04

sleep to keep propelling this uh this

114:06

cycle of better health.

114:08

>> I love it. It's a true integrative

114:10

medicine and science. I also can attest

114:13

that uh when you sleep well, you make

114:15

better food choices. When you eat well,

114:16

>> you sleep better. So, thank you so much

114:19

for coming, for taking time out of your

114:20

schedule. Really appreciate it. And I've

114:22

learned a ton. Thank you.

114:24

>> Thank you.

114:25

>> Thank you for joining me for today's

114:26

discussion with Dr. from Marie Pierre

114:28

Strange. To learn more about her

114:30

laboratory's research and to find a link

114:32

to her book, Eat Better, Sleep Better,

114:35

please see the links in the show note

114:36

captions. If you're learning from and or

114:38

enjoying this podcast, please subscribe

114:40

to our YouTube channel. That's a

114:41

terrific zerocost way to support us. In

114:44

addition, please follow the podcast by

114:46

clicking the follow button on both

114:47

Spotify and Apple. And on both Spotify

114:49

and Apple, you can leave us up to a

114:51

fivestar review. And you can now leave

114:53

us comments at both Spotify and Apple.

114:55

Please also check out the sponsors

114:57

mentioned at the beginning and

114:58

throughout today's episode. That's the

114:59

best way to support this podcast. If you

115:02

have questions for me or comments about

115:03

the podcast or guests or topics that

115:05

you'd like me to consider for the

115:07

Huberman Lab podcast, please put those

115:09

in the comment section on YouTube. I do

115:11

read all the comments. For those of you

115:12

that haven't heard, I have a new book

115:14

coming out. It's my very first book.

115:16

It's entitled Protocols, an operating

115:18

manual for the human body. This is a

115:20

book that I've been working on for more

115:21

than five years and that's based on more

115:23

than 30 years of research and

115:25

experience. And it covers protocols for

115:27

everything from sleep to exercise to

115:30

stress control protocols related to

115:32

focus and motivation. And of course, I

115:35

provide the scientific substantiation

115:37

for the protocols that are included. The

115:39

book is now available by pre-sale at

115:41

protocolsbook.com.

115:43

There you can find links to various

115:45

vendors. You can pick the one that you

115:46

like best. Again, the book is called

115:48

Protocols, an operating manual for the

115:51

human body. And if you're not already

115:52

following me on social media, I am

115:54

Huberman Lab on all social media

115:56

platforms. So that's Instagram, X,

115:58

Threads, Facebook, and LinkedIn. And on

116:01

all those platforms, I discuss science

116:02

and science related tools, some of which

116:04

overlaps with the content of the

116:06

Hubberman Lab podcast, but much of which

116:07

is distinct from the information on the

116:09

Hubberman Lab podcast. Again, it's

116:11

Huberman Lab on all social media

116:13

platforms. And if you haven't already

116:15

subscribed to our neural network

116:16

newsletter, the neural network

116:17

newsletter is a zerorost monthly

116:19

newsletter that includes podcast

116:21

summaries as well as what we call

116:22

protocols in the form of one to

116:24

three-page PDFs that cover everything

116:26

from how to optimize your sleep, how to

116:28

optimize dopamine, deliberate cold

116:30

exposure. We have a foundational fitness

116:32

protocol that covers cardiovascular

116:34

training and resistance training. All of

116:36

that is available completely zero cost.

116:38

You simply go to hubmanlab.com, go to

116:40

the menu tab in the top right corner,

116:42

scroll down to newsletter, and enter

116:43

your email. And I should emphasize that

116:45

we do not share your email with anybody.

116:47

Thank you once again for joining me for

116:49

today's discussion with Dr. Marie Pierre

116:51

Se. And last, but certainly not least,

116:54

thank you for your interest in science.

Interactive Summary

In this episode of the Huberman Lab podcast, Dr. Andrew Huberman and Dr. Marie-Pierre St-Onge, a professor of nutritional medicine at Columbia University, delve into the bidirectional relationship between sleep and nutrition. They discuss how sleep deprivation impacts hormone levels, specifically ghrelin and GLP-1, and how this influences eating behaviors in men and women. The conversation explores the role of diet quality in sleep patterns, the impact of meal timing on metabolism, and practical evidence-based approaches to improving both sleep and metabolic health.

Suggested questions

3 ready-made prompts