The 3 Types of Luck — What 10x Winners Do Differently
237 segments
Well, we need to systematically
understand this and and Morton really
gets a lot of credit for for this
because we we figured out how to do it.
You have to first of all define what
luck is. If you're going to study luck,
you have to understand what it is and
realize that luck is not an aura or
something. It's an event. It's a luck
event. And and if we could put the
parameters of what is a luck event and
what with Morton's collaborating
together, we defined a luck event and I
think this is a really good definition
is a you didn't cause it. So if somebody
says you make your own luck, it's not
luck by definition, right? Because
there's bad luck too. If I get a cancer
diagnosis and we say I make my own luck,
no, you didn't cause it. The second is
it has a potentially significant
consequence, good or bad. And the third
is in some way it came as a surprise.
You you didn't know that it would happen
or when it would happen or what form it
would take, right? But there it is. And
any event that meets those three tests
is a luck event. And once you have that
lens,
you didn't cause a potential significant
consequence, some element, some
significant way, it's a surprise. You
begin to see their luck events happening
all the time.
And and so then what Morton and I did
was we looked at these companies and we
said, "Well, now let's actually run the
numbers and see because we always had
comparatives in that study." And we were
able to demonstrate that the big
winners, the ones who had the huge
outsized returns relative to their
direct comparisons,
did not get more good luck. They did not
get less bad luck. They did not get
bigger spikes of luck. And they didn't
get better timing of luck. So luck as a
distributed variable was pretty even
between those that were the huge 10x
winners and their direct comparisons. So
clearly luck didn't separate. And then
that led to the observation that but it
was the return on luck that when the
luck came
they had this amazing ability relative
to the comparison to make more of the
luck and that led to the return on luck
as the critical variable. So now we come
to this study and I I was looking
through you know just looking at the
amount of luck that's in these people's
lives and it's you know there's a whole
chapter on it. There's lots of
permutations of luck, including the
roulette wheel, which which set of
encodings you get thrown into at some,
you know, stage of life that just puts
you there that you didn't expect to be
there. We're talking about Grace Hopper
earlier. How'd she end up in computer
scientists? Well, World War II happened.
She got pulled out of being a professor
at Vasser. She was assigned to this
project at Harvard she didn't even know
existed. And it was the first computer,
the Mark1. And that cast the dive for
the rest of her life. Well, without
World War II or without that assignment,
without right, it would have been some
other set of encodings that that went
off. But then I started looking at what
are the types of luck and I through this
study came to see I think there are
three. There's what luck which is a good
event that goes your way or a bad event.
You know, a cancer event would be a bad
luck. What luck? There's hool luck. And
I think this is the often
underappreciated
gigantic kind of luck in life. And my
life is a continuous series of hoolock
events starting with Joanne, but others
as well. And bad luck, the bad luck of
my father. And then there's zeit luck.
and zeit luck which I didn't really see
until this study is when what you're
doing just you know happens to fit with
a particular zeitgeist that's happening
at the time of which you did not cause
but it is a huge reality so I mean
Benjamin Franklin you and I would never
talk about Benjamin Franklin if he had
been born at a time that he wasn't there
for the revolution and the founding of
the country and Alice Paul if she'd been
born 20 years later or 20 years earlier
earlier, she wouldn't have been there to
bring the 19th amendment and suffrage to
a successful close. She would have done
something else, right? But not that. And
so Jimmy Paige and had not been born in
England, coming of age in the blues rock
revolution, right there as all this
great music was happening, right?
>> I'll just say briefly, people need to
read it, but the the entire founding
story of Led Zeppelin is kind of when
you look at the number of things that
had to go right. Yeah.
>> It's just wild.
>> Yeah. And there's that great quote from
Robert Plant saying, "What was that? The
gods roared and you know, lightning
crackled and Blake wrote a poem from
under the ground and all England was
reunited." You know, it's just this
great moment in that basement that where
they had that first song when they
played train kept a rolling and the four
of them came together. Anyway, zit luck
is a big one too. And then what we found
in this study is and I think it really
is a it's a very true finding.
They were really good at getting a
return on luck when luck came because
they have that these things we called
Natalie moments. Not all time in life is
equal. And you recognize this is a not
all time in life is equal moment. And it
requires an unequal response to an
unequal moment. And so now I come back
to you, Tim. If you're good at this
return on luck thing. Okay.
>> Yeah.
>> So the 600 tennis balls are coming at
you. one of them is the one that you
decide to to hit. What about your
ability to kind of recognize it's a not
all time in life is equal moment
>> and to go to kind of a 10x intensity
in that moment. I'm curious how that
plays out for you.
>> I think there's a lot of overlap and and
certainly I I think my maximizing return
on luck has an ROI distribution very
similar to angel investing. I
So 80% of the times I hit the ball, it's
like Marco and there's no polo. Nobody
hits it back, right?
But but every once in a while I'm like,
"Holy cow, I just scored the winning
point in Wimbleton. That's crazy. Didn't
see that coming." Yeah.
>> So I'll come back and answer that. I
think they're very closely related. And
I identify with the what who and Zeit
luck for instance when I started angel
investing 2008 roughly 2008, 2009, 2010.
I mean, it was just a beautiful time to
angel invest. Yes, there's some skill
involved. I tend to disbelieve people
who attribute anything solely to luck or
solely to skill. It's usually some
combination. But there are definitely
periods of time where I felt that not
all time in life is equal and this is
where you need to apply some pressure
to the vessel. Yeah. Right. And that
could be the first book which you know
we don't need to get into right now. It
could be early on the angel investing.
>> It could be for instance around 2015
deciding to like 10x 20x 30x down my bet
on supporting science related to
psychedelic assisted therapies. And even
back then starting also but now
typically non-invasive but sometimes
invasive bioelectric medicine brain
stimulation I think that's I have very
high conviction that that is around the
corner. So taking a peek at the future
that's not evenly distributed. I feel
that way about bielectric medicine right
now. So I think they're very tightly
bound in a sense and question for you.
There's this term that I came across. I
I wish I had the attribution, but uh
believe it was from someone in Silicon
Valley or at least someone in tech. They
talked about increasing the surface area
of luck. In other words,
if you need luck, if we're talking about
good luck to stick to you, how do you
increase the surface area available to
which that luck can stick? And when I
think about my own hoolock for instance,
>> it was entirely dependent in the world
of startups and even one could argue the
success of the first book on me moving
to Silicon Valley being in the middle of
that switchbox. Without that, forget it.
There was not enough surface area to
which Hooluck could really stick.
>> Yeah.
>> And I'm just wondering if that
resonates. So first of all I think
whatever the size of the surface the
idea of luck and return on luck
is always operating if you will right
because I mean you could be you know my
family in rural northern Oklahoma on my
on my father's side isn't Silicon Valley
but my grandmother who grew up there you
know she had luck and return on luck
that her life was affected by I mean she
was this beautiful Oklahoma farm girl
and she was working at the Witchah
airport and this dashing test pilot who
was my grandfather Jimmy Collins landed
for fuel on a Memorial Day weekend and
they met and 4 days later they were
married and it was like okay this is a
hoolock moment but we're both going to
seize that not all time in life is equal
and boom right you know so that notion
of the luck and return on luck can
happen sort of anywhere There
Ask follow-up questions or revisit key timestamps.
The speaker discusses the concept of luck, defining a "luck event" as something unplanned, with significant consequences, and surprising. They explain that while luck is evenly distributed, the key to success lies in the "return on luck" – the ability to capitalize on fortunate events. The speaker identifies three types of luck: "what luck" (good or bad events), "hool luck" (often underappreciated, life-defining events), and "zeit luck" (when one's actions align with the prevailing cultural or historical moment). Examples like Grace Hopper's career trajectory due to WWII and historical figures like Benjamin Franklin and Alice Paul are used to illustrate "zeit luck." The concept of "Natalie moments" is introduced, emphasizing that not all moments in life are equal and require an "unequal response." The discussion then shifts to the idea of increasing the "surface area of luck" by being in the right place at the right time, akin to investing or being in Silicon Valley, allowing "hool luck" to stick.
Videos recently processed by our community