Why Epstein emails have so many ='s
190 segments
There's been many people reading the old
Epstein files that have been now
released by the government and it has us
asking a lot of questions. One of the
questions I wasn't prepared to hear was
this right here. Why are there so many
equal signs throughout these emails?
Like what the heck is going on? Why is
the spacing all goofy? Confidentials T
becomes an equal sign. Information's O
becomes an equal sign. The Y in property
becomes an equal sign. Why? Well,
there's a reason behind it. And the best
part is it might just be Microsoft's
fault. I've never been more excited.
This is just so good. Nothing but bugs
and viruses in the old Windows. Am I
right? All right. To understand why
there's these equal signs, the first
thing you need to understand is RFC
2045, which comes from November 1996.
The multi-purpose internet mail
extensions or mime. Yes, mime. You've
probably seen this if you've done any
developing, especially for the web.
You've seen this thing called mime type
floating around. Well, it's from this
RFC. This is the origins. Anyways, way
down inside this long RFC, there's
something called soft line breaks. The
quoted printable encoding requires that
encoded lines be no more than 76
characters long because those 80
character terminals, we do not want them
overflowing. Okay? Because we all use 80
character terminals, right? Right. So,
to get back to the equal sign,
effectively, you have a very long line
in email. Well, every 76 characters by
the RFC, we need to break it so that it
can be this beautiful quoted printable
character, right, to fit in these 80
column terminals. So, this one line, you
could imagine, could actually have to be
overflowed quite a few times before you
actually make it to the end. And how
they did the soft break is they would
insert an equal sign, a slash r, and a
slashn. That stands for carriage return
and line feed. Yes, printer terms. And
of course, the reason being, why do you
have slash RN/N? The common knowledge is
that back in the 70s and 80s, all these
different operating systems, they
weren't friends. Unix wanted to use SLN,
which is objectively correct. Mac, the
old classic map, wanted to use SLR. And
of course, MS DOS being the, you know,
unique one, it wanted SLR r/n, the old
registered nurse. And that's why all the
old internet protocols such as HTTP and
this one and many more all use the old
registered nurse for line separation.
Okay. So why is there equal sign? You're
still saying none of this actually
answers why there's equal signs. I mean
it's it's strange. Why do we do this?
Why do we put in these encoded
characters just to take them out? Well,
there's a lot of old hardware out there
running old software and if you don't
provide the right stuff, you could get
some bad email coming through. But
that's still it still does not explain
why why an equal sign and why even more
so more importantly is some of these
letters disappearing in favor of an
equal sign. So the first thing you need
to understand is a lot of these
documents were automatically processed
programmatically and a lot of that
programmatic happened on the old Windows
machine and a lot of the Windows machine
with text and binary mode file IO
happens to have an underlying method
called set mode and if you pass in the
right parameters to set mode carriage
return line feeds CRLFS the old
registered nurses that I was talking to
you about earlier those combinations are
translated into a single which is also
correct line feed character upon input.
So, Unix did win eventually. [laughter]
That means these programmatically
redacted and processed documents likely
got piped through and then they were
converted into this an equal sign/n
which then the t would be followed up
next. So, it' be equal sign.
Now, again, this does not answer the
question why oh why is the equal sign
still around? Well, there's this
excellent article called what's up with
all those equal sign anyways which goes
on and attempts to explain what was
going on. Now, it turns out this person
who had tons of experience in these old
line feed processing algorithms says a
lot of the decoders do a twopass
processing for emails. The first pass
goes on and looks for any of the
registered nurses and then just removes
those, joins the lines. Now they're back
to their original shape. The second pass
goes through and looks for an equal sign
and then a hex code. When encountering
the slash NT, it goes, I don't know what
to do. So, it does the only reasonable
fallback to do. Just remove these two
characters and leave the old equal sign
in intact. Yes, what a wonderful
fallback mechanism. Makes perfect. Like,
if I was a programmer, that's that's
what I would do. So, as you can see
right here, confidential. Wow. Oh my
gosh. Did you see the straightness of
that line? That was incredible. Okay, I
expect at least three comments
congratulating me on the pure
unadulterated smooth line I just wrote
right there. Anyways, confidential. You
can see exactly why what would happen
then. D E N. Oh my gosh, we got to put
in the old registered nurse with the
equal sign. Forgot that right there.
Confidential. All right, we got it. Oh
man, Windows processing. We go into the
equal sign, then the T. A crap. This is
just bad hex encoding. We leave that.
And what do we get after that? D E N
equal I A L, which is exactly what you
see here in the documents. These equal
signs. Apparently, people were on the
internet like, "Dude, this is this is
actually just another encoded signal. I
bet if we can decode all these equal
signs, we will figure out where Jeffrey
Epstein's been hiding all this time."
Okay, pizza gates real and Jeffrey
Epstein did not in fact kill himself.
He's off playing Fortnite. It's always
shocking to discover how much of our
life is is predicated based on some
weird '9s text processing algorithm. I
mean, it wasn't until just recently that
HTTP 1.1, which has origins back into
the 80s, was replaced by a more modern
binary encoding version of it, vastly
improving the processing of the
internet. It only took like 30ome years.
All right, I just wanted to yap about
that. It feels good. Okay, it's very,
very funny. And honestly, anytime I can
make fun of Microsoft, it just makes my
day. Oh man, Satia, we got you. But
honestly, just to be completely fair,
there was a small chance that the
Epstein files were in fact not on
somebody's desk. They are actually in a
uh version control system known as Git,
and they just happened to have auto CRLF
on, which will convert any CRLF into
just a LF, the old line feed. You know
what I'm talking about. Honestly,
classic debacle right there. The name
is, girl, let me show you my Microsoft
A gen. Hey, is that HTTP? Get that out
of here. That's not how we order coffee.
We order coffee via SSH terminal.shop.
Yeah. You want a real experience? You
want real coffee? You want awesome
subscriptions so you never have to
remember again? Oh, you want exclusive
blends with exclusive coffee and
exclusive content? Then check out Kron.
You don't know what SSH is?
>> Well, maybe the coffee is not for you.
Terminal coffee
in hand.
Living the dream.
Ask follow-up questions or revisit key timestamps.
The video explains the technical mystery behind the frequent equal signs found in the released Epstein files. The speaker clarifies that these symbols are not secret codes, but rather artifacts of 'Quoted-Printable' encoding defined in RFC 2045 from 1996. This standard was used to limit email line lengths to 76 characters for older 80-character terminals by using 'soft line breaks' (an equal sign followed by a carriage return and line feed). The artifacts specifically appeared because of how Windows systems process line endings, often converting the required CRLF sequence into a single line feed, which causes decoders to fail and leave the equal signs behind in the text.
Videos recently processed by our community