HomeVideos

Trump Just Opened Up A $400 BILLION Market (Get In Now)?

Now Playing

Trump Just Opened Up A $400 BILLION Market (Get In Now)?

Transcript

602 segments

0:00

Almost a year ago, I showed you three

0:02

quantum computing stocks on this

0:03

channel. One of them went up over

0:06

a,000%, another went up like 800%, a

0:10

third one tripled. They were real

0:11

returns properly documented. But this

0:14

video isn't about quantum computing.

0:16

This is about something completely

0:18

different. There is a market that Donald

0:21

Trump opened up with one stroke of the

0:24

pen back in April of this year. And if

0:26

I'm right about the way this is shaping

0:28

up, it could produce returns just as big

0:32

over the next three to five years. Now,

0:34

I'm bringing this to you because this is

0:35

not on the headlines. I don't care about

0:36

the headlines. I don't care about the

0:38

news. I care about where the money, the

0:40

big money is flowing and how we can

0:43

follow that. Now, of course, I'm not a

0:45

registered financial adviser. I'm not

0:46

registered for anything. I'm not telling

0:48

you what to buy, but I'm sharing with

0:51

you the research and the insight that

0:53

I've dug up that I learned from my Wall

0:55

Street mentors. And the next 20 minutes,

0:57

I'm going to break this down for you.

0:58

I'm going to give you the actual three

1:00

tickers. I'm going to show you the hows

1:01

and the wise, and then you can make your

1:03

own decision. So, what happened on April

1:06

18th? Donald J. Trump signed an

1:09

executive order fasttracking a brand new

1:13

category of mental health treatment.

1:15

Plus, he handed out $50 million in

1:17

research funding. Some of these

1:20

treatments were designated as

1:22

priorities,

1:24

national priorities, and they would get

1:27

priority voucher status for certain

1:29

drugs. Now, the category we're talking

1:32

about is called psychedelic assisted

1:34

therapy. It's mostly built around magic

1:37

mushrooms, but a sort of synthetic labm

1:39

made version of it. And they're given to

1:41

you in a clinic with a doctor on a white

1:42

coat rather than you, you know, high on

1:45

a beach in Thailand. Now, I personally

1:48

don't care about psychedelic assisted

1:50

therapy specifically, but the numbers

1:52

behind it, which I'm going to get to in

1:54

a moment, are insane. So, what happened

1:57

in the market? Well, there are three

1:59

small biotech stocks that were tied very

2:01

close to this order and they popped 20

2:04

to 50% the day after this order was

2:07

signed. Those stocks are Compass

2:10

Pathways, ticker symbol CNS,

2:13

Atibbeckley, ticker symbol ATI, and GH

2:17

Research, ticker symbol GHRS.

2:20

But after the spike, the news cycle

2:22

moved on. People are forgetting about

2:24

and the reason this category is

2:25

interesting isn't speculation. It's that

2:29

we already know exactly what this trade

2:32

looks like at scale. It's already

2:33

happening at another stock which is a

2:36

teeny tiny little company called Johnson

2:38

and Johnson. You know the people who

2:40

make baby powder safe.

2:43

Um and actually I bought this late last

2:46

year. It went up about 45% or so and I'

2:50

I've sold it again. And if you

2:52

understand how to follow the money, then

2:54

you'd understand why the heck I'd sell

2:56

it. But why am I talking about Johnson

2:57

and Johnson? The drug Johnson and

3:00

Johnson built that everybody said would

3:02

flop is now doing $2 billion a year.

3:07

This little case study here, this

3:09

Johnson Johnson case study is going to

3:10

be very important to understand the

3:13

maths later to show you the 10x

3:15

potential in this sector. I'm not

3:17

promising you 10x, right? I'm not

3:19

promising you anything at all, but I see

3:21

potential. So Johnson and Johnson, they

3:23

got FDA approval in 2019 and it's for a

3:28

drug that's called Sprat or something

3:30

like that. It's a nasal spray for

3:33

patients with depression that don't

3:35

respond to standard anti-depressants. I

3:38

hate anti-depressants. Just thought I'd

3:40

mention that. So we're looking at the

3:41

same group of people that are being

3:43

targeted by the psychedelic drugs coming

3:45

out. Now, how much does Johnson and

3:47

Johnson charge for this this little drug

3:49

of theirs? Well, of course they're doing

3:50

it basically free because they really

3:52

care about your well-being. It's $590 a

3:56

dose. You're going to take it twice a

3:57

week for the first month. And when this

3:59

came out, everyone in the industry said

4:01

that's going to be a flop. People said

4:02

it's expensive. The UK, where I'm right

4:05

now, the watchdog refused to cover it.

4:06

They said it was too expensive. The

4:08

headlines were terrible. And the

4:09

narrative was that nobody would ever pay

4:11

for this thing. Insurance would never

4:13

cover it. And Johnson and Johnson had

4:15

wasted years of R&D on a dead product.

4:17

Now, let me tell you why these people

4:19

are wrong. In the first quarter of 2026,

4:24

this little drug brought in almost $500

4:28

million in revenue. It went up almost

4:32

50% over the previous year. It's almost

4:35

$2 billion in annual revenue. Bloomberg

4:39

just called it Johnson and Johnson's

4:41

blockbuster psychedelic drug.

4:44

And understanding this, this precedent,

4:47

this proof of pudding is the precedent

4:51

for everything that comes next in this

4:53

video. We know the market exists. We

4:55

know the patients exist. We know the

4:57

insurance companies are going to pay for

4:59

it. We know you can charge a lot of

5:01

money for magic mushrooms. So, we're not

5:03

speculating about this. Could be maybe

5:06

this is already working at one very

5:08

large company and now the regulatory

5:11

door is open for three more companies to

5:13

do something very similar. But before

5:15

you run out and buy Johnson and Johnson,

5:17

I did tell you I'd already bought it. I

5:19

already sold it. Locked in 40% gains. I

5:22

tell you why. I don't think Johnson and

5:24

Johnson is the psychedelic opportunity.

5:27

It is a massive, massive company. them

5:30

selling an extra $2 billion on the drug

5:33

barely moves the stock. I mean, I say

5:35

barely, you know, we still made 40%

5:38

profits on this thing, which is better

5:40

than a kick in the teeth, but it's not

5:42

going to 10x Johnson and Johnson, right?

5:45

Johnson Shell essentially doesn't even

5:48

know they have this drug called

5:49

Sprobato. But if you picture the same

5:51

drug doing the same revenue inside a

5:54

company that's worth maybe a billion

5:56

dollars, roughly where Compass is

5:59

sitting right now, the maths becomes

6:01

very very different. If this little

6:03

company here called CMPS, that's the

6:07

ticker symbol here and I've got the

6:08

chart open here in Trade Vision. If you

6:09

guys want to get yourself access to

6:11

Trade Vision, there's a link down below

6:13

as well which includes all the AI

6:15

features and a free trial. So check that

6:16

out. But this drug that they have is

6:19

called COM P 360. Looks sexy, right?

6:24

Let's just say it does half of what J

6:29

and J does. Half, right? Over say five

6:33

years. So what does that mean? Well,

6:34

that would mean that they would get to

6:37

$1 billion in revenue in say five years.

6:41

These kind of companies who have a drug

6:44

that is patent protected, they will

6:47

typically trade at five to 10 times

6:50

valuation of their sales. So we're now

6:54

looking at a five to 10 billion

6:59

stock on the basis of one drug, four to

7:02

eight times gains compared to where it's

7:04

trading right now. If Compass got

7:07

anywhere near to like Johnson Johnson

7:08

and Johnson's numbers because Johnson

7:10

and Johnson is guiding to for 5 billion

7:12

sales a year, you'd be looking at well

7:16

some pretty crazy stuff right now. I

7:18

want to be very clear. This is not a

7:19

forecast. I don't have a crystal ball.

7:21

Winston keeps eating them, but it's what

7:23

could happen if everything goes sort of

7:26

half right. So, you got to get FDA

7:28

approval, successful commercial ramp, no

7:30

major major safety surprises, um, and no

7:34

massive dilution that wipes out

7:35

shareholders. We're going to get to all

7:37

of that, but the maths is what makes the

7:39

category worth being in the have a look

7:42

at this now phase. And if you just zoom

7:45

out for a second and look at the patient

7:48

base, why is this Johnson and Johnson

7:51

drug even possible? Because the demand

7:53

has been there for 40 years. There are

7:57

280 million unfortunate souls in the

8:00

world who live with serious depression.

8:03

About 85 million are on the same drugs

8:07

that don't work. Did I just say that out

8:09

loud? Some people might say they don't

8:12

work. Some people say that they do. So,

8:14

the pills don't do anything for them.

8:15

They've tried them often for years, get

8:17

all the side effects, none of the

8:18

benefits, except the people who make

8:21

them get a lot of benefit from them. 84

8:23

million people, right? That's the

8:25

population of Germany, which is which is

8:28

where I'm from. Um or um Iran, say,

8:30

isn't it? Isn't Iran about that? Maybe

8:32

it's a little bit more Turkey. I think

8:33

it's about the same. So, it's an entire

8:35

country's worth of patients and the

8:37

system has no real answer for them,

8:39

right? Or the veterans who come home

8:41

with PTSD, severe anxiety, uh addiction,

8:43

all that stuff, they are all being put

8:45

on these drugs. But all these people are

8:47

waiting for treatment that actually

8:49

works. So there is a real documented

8:51

insurance paying treatment seeking huge

8:55

number of patients who want stuff. These

8:58

new psychedelic drugs are targeting that

9:01

population. There is not just

9:03

depression. There is PTSD, there's

9:04

anxiety, there's addiction. It's all

9:06

sort of a variation of the same theme.

9:09

You know, people experience some

9:11

horrible trauma and then then they get

9:13

depressed. Wall Street in its loving

9:15

nature says they think that market is

9:18

worth around $400 billion in market

9:23

size. So you got 280 million people with

9:25

serious depressions. 30% of them don't

9:27

respond to standard treatment. So it's

9:29

about 85 million. So you have a huge

9:31

huge huge opportunity here. $400 billion

9:34

worth according to the Wall Street

9:36

loons. Mental health is the pretty much

9:38

the leading cause of disability

9:39

globally, right? It's a terrible thing

9:41

and it's good. We can treat it. So why

9:43

not? It isn't just a Trump story. The

9:45

reason this category was frozen for 40

9:47

years was something called uh Prozac.

9:52

Prozac came out in 1987

9:55

before the internet really existed. And

9:57

for nearly 40 years when one

9:59

anti-depressant pill didn't work, the

10:01

system always said try a different

10:03

version of the same pill. Same

10:05

chemistry, slightly different brand,

10:07

slightly different side effect profile.

10:09

Basically the same thing, right? The

10:11

door always stayed closed because there

10:13

was a regulator who wouldn't let

10:14

anything genuinely new through. So

10:16

Trump's executive order isn't the cause

10:18

of all of this, but it is a signal. The

10:21

FDA has been approving more new mental

10:24

health treatments in the last 5 years

10:25

than the prior 40 years. RFK Jr., who

10:29

now runs the HHS, has been openly

10:32

pushing the agenda. More drugs. actually

10:36

lawmakers from both parties in the US,

10:38

which is pretty rare they agree on

10:39

anything, have been introducing bills,

10:42

bipartisan bills to deal with mental

10:45

health and veteran health and so on. So,

10:46

let's look at these three names in

10:48

detail so you understand them. But

10:50

first, let me give you a framework

10:51

because I can always give you a fish.

10:53

It's going to get smelly by, you know, 3

10:55

days into it. Or I can give you a

10:57

framework, something you can actually

10:58

apply again and again and again. It'll

11:00

make you smarter, which is always my

11:01

intention. So, get a pen out, write this

11:03

down. The first number I really

11:05

generally care about is what's the

11:08

profit per sale. Wall Street calls this

11:11

gross margin, but essentially it's how

11:12

much of every dollar of sales does the

11:14

company keep after the cost of making

11:16

the drug. Now, for a real drug company

11:19

with real protection, you generally

11:21

speaking get 70% of the money. And the

11:24

second part I want to look at is how

11:27

long is that patent

11:30

valid for? How many years until

11:33

competitors can legally copy the drug

11:35

and crash the price? Five years is not

11:37

enough. 15 years is decent. The longer

11:40

the better. So 15 years plus is where

11:44

you want to be. Now the third part is is

11:47

the drug on the market making money. So

11:50

we generally speaking are cautious of

11:53

trials because they are risky and we

11:56

like things that are already selling. So

11:59

selling good trials bad. Yeah. Trials

12:02

also depend on the FDA and what they

12:04

might think and so on. So I'm going to

12:06

run all three of these companies through

12:07

these filters and they all fail some of

12:09

them for different reasons. And that's

12:10

why it's important to take some time,

12:14

look at an industry, understand what

12:15

makes a good baseline, what makes a good

12:17

company, and then make decisions after

12:19

that. So you're no longer going to be

12:21

gambling on something you don't

12:22

understand. By the end of this video,

12:24

you'll actually understand it. So let's

12:25

start off with compass pathways. Here's

12:28

the stock chart, which may may or may

12:29

not mean something to you, but if you

12:32

zoom out, it was trading at 1.60 $60,

12:34

which is uh a pretty bigly crash down.

12:37

We're still about 83% down. And I quite

12:40

like that. And I like it for a simple

12:41

reason that we've done bugger roll for

12:45

years. That is usually the kind of setup

12:47

that gives us potentially the biggest

12:50

rally. And we're already moving up,

12:53

moving on up. It's a nice 80s song,

12:55

isn't it? And that again is a positive

12:58

thing. So being if you're not looking at

13:00

this and you're going, "Oh, I'm late. I

13:01

should have put it here." No, it's good

13:03

to be a little late. It makes it a

13:05

higher probability setup, a higher

13:07

cleaner setup. So why are we starting

13:09

with compass? Compass is the furthest

13:11

along. They have the biggest catalyst,

13:13

the cleanest setup. So if any of these

13:15

three stocks really crack the um magic

13:18

mushroom, the math says the math says

13:22

it's most likely going to be compass.

13:23

They got a drug called comp 360 which is

13:26

a synthetic version of what's in magic

13:28

mushrooms and it's built specifically

13:30

for treatment resistant depression. Same

13:32

patient group that the Johnson and

13:33

Johnson lot are targeting. It's a single

13:36

dose and the effects are felt within a

13:39

day. The trials measure durability out

13:42

to 26 weeks which has never been done

13:45

with any kind of psychedelic. So they've

13:47

completed phase three trials. The data

13:50

is generally in a range that the FDA

13:52

accepts. So, we're looking for FDA

13:55

approval

13:57

maybe in 2026, late or in early 2027.

14:02

If they get it, Compass becomes the

14:04

first company in history to have a

14:06

classic psychedelic approved by the FDA.

14:10

Now, what about our filters? What's our

14:12

first filter? Profit per sale. Well,

14:15

they're not selling yet, so we haven't

14:16

got any data there. So, we kind of fail

14:18

on that count. What about the patent

14:21

stuff? Well, they have multiple patents

14:24

on it on the formulation, the dosing

14:26

protocol, the manufacturing. It's a

14:28

possible, but the proofs always in the

14:30

legal pudding once it actually is out

14:32

there and it gets challenged and someone

14:33

tries to copy it and there's a law

14:35

lawsuit, right? So, we don't really know

14:37

the data here on that yet. So, overall,

14:39

I see a lot of uncertainty

14:42

and that is exactly what you get if

14:44

you're looking for 10x stocks. You get a

14:46

lot of uncertainty. It's the same kind

14:48

of pattern, by the way, that we saw with

14:50

Regetti in the quantum video, right?

14:52

It's the same conclusion. It's not an

14:53

investment. It is a calculated

14:55

speculation. You own it for the

14:57

catalyst, not the current business. And

14:59

the catalyst calendar is, well, the FDA

15:01

approval, right? Drug goes on the

15:03

market. Insurance companies start paying

15:05

for it, right? So, why has the stock got

15:08

this crazy stock chart that would scare

15:10

most people? Well, they they listed they

15:12

listed in 2021 somewhere and then the

15:15

whole run up the whole meme stock thing

15:17

up to $60 crashed to below four

15:20

currently trading at about 10. And it's

15:22

the typical innovation story. This is

15:24

what happens to innovation stocks.

15:26

Stocks do this. Why? Because

15:28

expectations

15:29

are monstrous at the beginning. Like, oh

15:32

my god, this is amazing. It's going to

15:33

solve everything. It's going to make so

15:34

much money. Yeah. Right. And then you

15:36

realize it's going to take way way way

15:38

way way longer to get the approval and

15:40

the triyouts and everything else. And

15:43

people lose what? Interest. Not

15:46

interested anymore, but they also lose

15:48

lots of money. And then nothing happens.

15:51

And it gets really, really, really

15:52

boring.

15:54

And then typically what happens is if

15:56

the innovation is good and right, you

15:59

recover. And you don't just recover, you

16:01

potentially go much much much much

16:03

higher than the initial peak. Why?

16:06

Because usually innovation just takes

16:08

longer, but it's usually much greater

16:10

than our P-sized brains can imagine.

16:13

Same story for quantum. So, let me

16:15

quickly, a little more quickly run you

16:16

through the second stock, ATI ATI

16:20

Beckley. This is a slightly different

16:22

play. I would call this the diversified

16:25

play. Compass is focused on one single

16:28

drug bet. ATI is the platform bet.

16:32

They're a clinical stage biotech company

16:34

built like a venture portfolio. Not one

16:37

drug, not two drugs, not three drugs,

16:39

not four drugs. No, they have five drugs

16:43

that are in clinical development. Very

16:45

interesting from a commercial scaling

16:46

perspective because if it works, it's a

16:48

treatment that doesn't require a

16:49

clinical setting at all, which could be

16:51

a really, really easy way to sell it.

16:52

They merged with a company called

16:54

Beckley. at Beckley Scitec in December

16:57

which broadens the pipeline further. It

16:59

is Peter Tealbacked. You know the guy

17:02

behind PayPal and Palunteer and pretty

17:04

much every other investment out there.

17:05

Peter Tealback. Yeah. They also hold a

17:07

stake in Compass. Yes. And they license

17:12

Compass's drug for some territories. So

17:15

you get partial exposure to Compass

17:16

either way. Now they got no meaningful

17:18

sales yet. The patent protection depends

17:21

on each compound individually. Five

17:23

separate patterns estates. It's actually

17:25

a good thing because you have say if one

17:27

or two of them fail, you might still

17:29

have three or four that hold up, right?

17:31

Are they selling? No. But look at the

17:33

stock chart here. Similar story. Ran up

17:36

to like $23. It went up,300%.

17:40

And now it's basically back to where

17:42

they listed. So you you you lost all the

17:44

money. And that's what I always say.

17:45

It's it's all about following the money.

17:47

Don't buy and hold these things till

17:48

death do you part because you're going

17:50

to go broke before that. Companies a

17:51

similar size to Compass. So it's a

17:53

slightly safer bet if that word is one I

17:56

should use in this context because of

17:57

course these are very high-risk

17:59

speculations. And then third but not

18:02

least we have GH research plc. These are

18:06

the technology bet. Their technology is

18:09

built around one compound 5 ot

18:14

whatever that means. It is basically a

18:16

different psychedelic. It acts for much

18:17

shorter period of time and again it's

18:19

for treatment resistant depression. Now,

18:21

why is what they're doing important

18:23

right now? To take the compass drug a 6

18:26

to eight hour long clinical session. To

18:28

take the GH drug, if it works, it's

18:31

potentially a 30 minute session. So, if

18:34

you're a clinic, do you want to sell a

18:36

drug that takes like 6 hours to deliver

18:38

or 30 minutes to deliver? What do you

18:41

think? Shorter sessions mean more

18:43

patients per clinics, which means much

18:45

faster commercial adoption. So, if you

18:47

look apply our filter, filter one, then

18:49

no sales. paid and protection. It's one

18:51

compound, one mechanism, so it's a

18:53

little bit higher risk than the last one

18:54

we looked at and they're not selling. So

18:56

again, you haven't got much data on

18:57

these things. You can't look at the

18:58

fundamentals. You can't really look at

19:00

the margins. You haven't got any of that

19:01

data. And that's the risk if you're

19:04

looking for 10x stocks. This is a

19:06

pre-revenue biotech opportunity. It is

19:10

speculation. Speculation is fine, but it

19:13

has to be sized as speculation. I'm not

19:15

giving you financial advice, but I would

19:17

be looking at 1 to 3%

19:21

of portfolio spread across the entire

19:24

category, whether that's one stock or

19:25

three stocks. So, you want to find some

19:26

more combined. Why am I saying that?

19:29

Because look, if this thing 10xes and

19:33

I'm right, which I might not be, then

19:36

you'd end up with 10 to 30% of your

19:39

portfolio in psychedelics, which is a

19:43

pretty unreasonably large thing and you

19:45

might want to take some profits and and

19:46

get get the heck out. What happens if

19:49

you make a decision to invest in

19:50

something like this and you're wrong?

19:52

What happens? Well, you lose 1 to 3% of

19:55

your portfolio, which isn't going to

19:57

have that big of an impact on your life.

19:59

You're still going to retire roughly the

20:00

same time you wanted to. You're not

20:02

going to have to like, you know, cut out

20:03

the the biscuits. Um, you'll be just

20:06

fine. That is how smart investors

20:09

invest. They don't go all in on

20:11

something. They don't buy a lottery

20:13

ticket with all their money. They buy a

20:15

lottery ticket with a small amount of

20:16

money. That's the whole point. But there

20:18

are risks here. They might not get FDA

20:20

approval, right? To me, approval looks

20:22

probable for Compass. Not certain, but

20:24

probable. And a lot of these companies

20:26

are going to raise capital before they

20:28

really start selling these these these

20:30

these drugs. And that might dilute you,

20:32

right? So, they issue more shares. It's

20:33

like inflation. It's like what the

20:34

government does. And they might start

20:36

selling these drugs and people might be

20:37

like, "Yeah, we don't want it. Just

20:39

don't want it, right? This might not

20:41

work. Politics could change, right? RFK

20:43

might not no longer be there as the

20:45

champion of the um, you know,

20:47

alternative medicine space." and uh and

20:50

Johnson and Johnson might just be like,

20:52

"Yeah, we really don't like this."

20:53

Convince the next RFK that these drugs

20:55

really are not in the best interest of

20:57

the American public. It would be much

20:58

much better if um Johnson and Johnson

21:01

would have no competition. You know,

21:02

there might be a rational argument for

21:04

that, right? So, I'm showing this to you

21:08

because I think it's a genuine

21:09

opportunity. I think it's one of those

21:11

big ones, but I'm also saying be

21:13

careful. Don't go all in. If you go all

21:16

in, you end up crying. I don't want you

21:18

crying. and you might not like it. Well,

21:20

look what there are safer ways to invest

21:22

your money. You don't have to do the

21:24

speculation. I do both. I put a lot of

21:26

my money into what would be considered

21:28

much safer things and then I see these

21:31

opportunities and I put small amounts of

21:32

money and then if it goes right then we

21:35

potentially, you know, have a regretti

21:37

moment which was beautiful. You know,

21:40

from we first talked about it here in

21:42

late 2024 it went up, you know, some

21:44

ridiculous amount. Now, am I promising

21:47

you that? No, of course not. But it's

21:49

beautiful. But also note that from the

21:51

top we're presently down 67%.

21:56

So you need to understand when to take

21:58

profits. You need to understand there is

22:01

a timing element to it. It's not timing

22:03

it perfectly. No, you're never going to

22:04

do that. But it is about understanding

22:07

where the money flows, when the money

22:09

flows, and how the money flows and how

22:11

to read that. And if you stick around on

22:13

this channel, you'll learn it. We run

22:16

live training sessions on this from time

22:17

to time. Again, stick around on the

22:19

channel, subscribe and and you learn it.

22:20

And if you got some value or anything

22:21

you think there might be might be

22:22

something in this, then just share this

22:24

video with other people. That's all I'm

22:25

asking, right? I didn't sell you

22:28

anything. I didn't have taken a single

22:30

dollar from a pharmaceutical company.

22:32

We've never taken any money from any

22:34

third party, any other company out

22:36

there. Uh and I never will because I

22:38

don't need to. And it's a beautiful

22:39

position to be in. I don't have to be

22:41

somebody's There, I said it. So,

22:44

I wish you all the best. I wish you

22:45

tremendous success. And if you got some

22:47

value out of this, share it with

22:49

somebody else.

Interactive Summary

The video discusses the emerging investment opportunity in psychedelic-assisted therapy, a sector catalyzed by recent government actions, including a U.S. executive order. The speaker argues that while these investments carry high risk and uncertainty, they offer significant potential if they follow the success path established by companies like Johnson & Johnson, which has already commercialized a psychedelic-based treatment for depression. The video provides a framework for evaluating these stocks based on profit margins, patent protection, and market readiness, and profiles three companies: Compass Pathways, Atai Life Sciences, and GH Research. The speaker emphasizes that this is a speculative play and suggests limited portfolio exposure, while also stressing the importance of understanding the broader market dynamics and when to take profits.

Suggested questions

4 ready-made prompts