So, in this video series, I'm looking at

what are the six most powerful

investment mega trends that are poised

to deliver double-digit gains in the

next 5, 10, 15 years. And this is where

we want to focus our portfolio in order

to beat the market. Or at least that's

what I'm doing. So, if you have not

watched part one and part two, do watch

it first. And then we're going to look

at part three to continue. So, in the

first two parts, I talked about the

first three investment mega trends.

Number one, AI and robotics. Number two,

AI energy and infrastructure. And number

three, healthcare and the longevity mega

trend. And in each of these mega trends,

I talked about what are the stocks which

I think have the strongest economic

modes, highest return on capital and

strongest growth potential as well as

potential ETFs that one can look at to

ride these mega trends. If you think

that the stock market feels choppy and

unpredictable this year, you are not

alone. Many people are very concerned

about the stock market potential

overvaluation

about Trump's policy uncertainty about

Greenland about a thousand other things.

So come and join me live at Outlook 2026

the online edition this coming weekend

and I'll share with you how I intend to

position my portfolio and take advantage

of the volatility this year. It's

completely free and spots are limited.

So reserve your spot with the link below

right now. So let's now focus in this

video on the last three investment mega

trends.

The fourth investment mega trend is in

digital payments and financial

infrastructure. So what are the drivers?

Very simple. Ask yourself this question.

How often do you now pay in cash? Well,

hardly. In fact, uh you know, recently

I've been taking trips to Malaysia from

Singapore and I've been carrying a lot

of my uh Malaysian ringit notes and

increasingly I can't use the notes

because they say we don't take notes

anymore. All right? They just want you

to swipe your card or your or your your

smartphone, right? So, everywhere in the

world, whether Singapore, Malaysia, the

US, in China especially, I don't think

in China you can get around with cash

anymore. The drivers of this mega trend

will be number one increasing cashless

adoption all around the world. Number

two is embedded finance where almost

well a lot of the apps that you use have

got embedded financial features whether

is it Apple pay or grab pay or Google

pay and of course the third thing is

instant payments. People want to send

money all around the world instantly.

And why is this a mega trend? Because

money movement again is becoming

digital, is becoming global and is 24/7

and payments grow with nominal GDP. So

over time as countries increase their

nominal GDP, financial payments grow and

companies that are in this industry will

grow as a result of it. So what can we

invest in? What companies will write

this mega trend? There are three main

areas and the first area is where I'm

personally invested in for already quite

some time. It would be card networks.

These are what we call the toll roads.

It's like every time you drive on the

highway, you have to cross a toll. You

have to pay to cross the highway. In the

global digital payment highway, it's a

duopoly controlled by two companies,

Visa and Mastercard. So, both of them

have the strongest economic modes. And

as you guys know, I only like to invest

in companies that are monopolistic that

have got little little or no

competition. In this case, these are the

two companies. Now, a lot of people have

this misconception that Visa and

Mastercard are credit card companies.

No, they are not. They are payment

technology providers.

American Express is a credit card

company, but not Visa and Mastercard.

So, understand that when you get a

credit card, who issues you the credit

card? not Visa and Master. It is the

bank that [clears throat] issues you the

credit card. Who do you pay interest to?

The bank, not Visa Mastercard. Visa

Mastercard only uh provides the payment

technology that ensures the transaction

between the merchant bank and the

consumer's bank goes on smoothly with

the highest standards of trust and

security. So recently as you know uh

President Trump he said he wants to cap

credit card interest at 10%. Visa and

Mastercard are not directly affected.

Who's affected? It is the banks that

affected not Visa and Mastercard.

American Express will be affected. So

the recent drop in Visa Mastercard in my

opinion is a great opportunity to add

more shares but I haven't added more

shares because I think it hasn't dropped

enough in a sense that is not that

undervalued. I I would love it to drop a

lot more to get more undervalued before

I add more Visa Mastercard because I

already have quite a big position.

So, Visa and Mastercard understand why

it wins even if wallets change the front

end. So, as you know at the front end

people may use Apple Pay, they may use

Grab Pay, they may use Google Pay, they

may use Stripe. There there are so many

uh options at the front end. Now,

whichever one you use, Grab Pay, Apple

Pay, Stripe, guess what? Visa and

Mastercard still wins because Visa

Mastercard, they often sit under the

hood as a payment rail no matter which

of these wallets that you use

ultimately. So, Visa, Mastercard to me

are the two strongest companies within

this mega trend. Now, again, do not

blindly just invest in a stock because

it's within a mega trend. You have to

ensure it's a high quality business with

solid fundamentals. So let's take a look

at Mastercard and Visa's fundamentals.

You look at Mastercard for example, you

can see what are the things I look at. I

look for very high return on equity

ideally above 12 to 15%. That's high.

You can see their return on equity is

185%. That's insane. And then return on

invested capital ROIC. I also want it to

be above 12 to 15%. And it's 54%. That

is insane. All right. And take a look at

the consistency of their revenue,

profits, and cash flow. And you can see

how consistent it is. You can see over

the years, their revenue growing very

consistently in blue. Their operating

income and net income also increasing

consistently. We want to see that. So a

good business is one where over the

years whether you've got trade war,

you've got COVID pandemic, you've got

recession, no matter what happens, their

revenues keep growing, their profits

keep growing. That's a great business.

That's a resilient, predictable

business. And look at the cash flow. You

can see that the operating cash flow

increasing consistently and the free

cash flow also increasing very

consistently. And that's why this

company rates very high on

predictability, rates very high on

profitability, on growth. It's not a

super high growth company, but it's got

moderate growth, which is good enough

for me. You can see the projected growth

rate in the next 3 to 5 years is 15%.

Pretty good above the S&P 500. And

longer term beyond that, 18% growth

rate. And you can see that it's got a

very strong economic mode, wide economic

mode as well as very strong balance

sheet. And in terms of valuation, like I

said, it is not that cheap, but it's

also not that expensive right now. You

can see that the intrinsic value is

about 531 and the share price is now at

531. So, it is fairly priced and I mean,

it's not a sin to buy it now. You won't

die if you buy it now. But for me as a

value investor, I like to buy if it's,

you know, more undervalued. Then I got a

bigger margin of safety. Same thing with

Visa. Now between the two, Mastercard

has slightly higher growth rate, but

Visa is also pretty strong. You can see

that Visa's projected growth rate in the

next 3 to 5 years is 10.69%

and longterm is 12.36%.

So still not bad, but not growing as

fast as Mastercard. Intrinsic value is

324. and share price 325. Same thing,

fairly priced, not a big discount right

now, but again very highly predictable

company, very profitable, moderate

growth, strong mode. You can see one

economic mode, strong financials, and

what more could you ask for? Now, within

digital payments and financial

infrastructure, some people may look at

two other areas of investments. The

other one would be to invest in issuer

core processing. Now, who are issuers?

Issuers are basically banks. Banks that

issue cards and they need software at

the back end that helps them to run

their internal payments engine to uh

manage their accounts and balances. So

two companies that focus on this are

Feerfol FISV where the share price

recently dropped significantly after

they lowered their uh projected growth

guidance and they found that they

underinvested in infrastructure for

quite a number of years and their main

competitor Fidelity National Information

Services FIS. You also have got

companies that do merchant acquiring

which are basically [clears throat] they

go out there and they acquire merchants

or shops to use their hardware as well

as they offer payment processing

services. For example, yen t symbol ad

Y. You got global payments symbol GPN.

You got Flyw Wire Cop and of course the

very famous PayPal ticker symbol PPL

which I never invested in and I'll never

invest in no matter how cheap it looks

because personally I do not like PayPal

as a merchant myself. In fact, my

company, we used to use PayPal, but

because a lot a lot of the problems that

we have with PayPal that I won't mention

here, we have chosen to use Stripe

instead. But that goes to show you that,

you know, among all these companies, I

don't think that any of them have a very

strong economic mode that I'll be

interested to invest in um as a company.

So, neither of these companies I'm

actually interested to invest in

personally. Again, this is not financial

advice. You could of course invest in

them if you think they're great. But

personally for me in this entire mega

trend, I'm happy with just Visa and

Mastercard. And so as a result, I don't

see any need to invest in any ETFs

because as long as I can find companies

that are monopolistic, I rather invest

in individual companies. But within an

industry, if I find that there's no

company that's monopolistic or

duopolistic, then I may look at an ETF

to capture the growth of the entire

industry.

Let's move on to the fifth investment

mega trend and this is a very big one

and it is cyber security and data

protection. Again, you don't have to be

a genius to figure out that this is a

big business and you only grow. Why? As

everything goes online, everything is

digital, everything is um on the web,

you're going to get more and more

hacking, you're going to get more and

more cyber scams. So, every company will

need cyber security.

So the rising cyber threats and cloud

migration of companies moving to the

cloud is a huge growth uh uh driver for

this mega trend. So you find that for

corporations security demand grows

faster than IT budgets due to risk

profiles. You have to protect your uh

IT. So there are three areas uh you can

look at. Number one is platform security

which is the all-in-one security

operating system. So these are platform

vendors that bundle firewall plus cloud

plus endpoint security plus security

operation center SOC into one contract.

So very high switching cost for these

companies and strong upsell potential.

And the two companies with the strongest

modes in this area would be Paulo Auto

Networks which I've owned for many many

years. Let's take a symbol P A N W. In

fact, I think this is um kind of like

the Rolls-Royce and a Ferrari of this

industry because Palo Alto has the

broadest enterprise platform play. They

do network cloud and SOC. And in second

place, very close behind is Foret,

ticker symbol FDNT, which I also own for

many years. Products include hardware

and software. They've got a huge

installed base and strong unit economics

for network edge. So my analogy is like

Palo Alto is like the Ferrari, the

Rolls-Royce and for is kind of like the

Toyota right which is u not as premium

uh but it's it's very popular as well.

They both have solid fundamentals. If

you take a look at Palo Alto you can see

it ranks very high on predictability,

very high in profitability, very high

growth, very strong economic mode,

medium financial strength and you can

see ROIC at 14.6% 6% and ROE at 15.33%

which is relatively strong. Uh intrinsic

value right now is 195 and you can see

it's selling at 184. So it is slightly

undervalued. Now for cloud security and

cloudnative application protection

platform segment you can see that again

Palo Alto is one of the leaders in that

this segment under their Prisma cloud uh

platform. And then you've got

Crowdstrike, which I also own. But Crowd

Strike, if you look at the fundamentals,

um you can see that it's more of a

speculative growth company where growth

is very high, but it doesn't yet have

consistent profits and cash flow, which

is fine for a speculative growth

company. Uh but I would normally take a

smaller position given that it's more

speculative and is also a bit more uh

overvalued at this point of time, but I

would love to add more if it gets more

undervalued. The next segment will be

SSC, security service age and SASSE,

securing users everywhere. So as work

moves hybrid and apps move to the cloud,

companies shifted from castle walls to

securing access everywhere. Um, so the

strongest modes in this area will be

Zcaler ticker symbol ZS and once again

Paulo Auto. You can see that Crowdstrike

like I mentioned is a great company,

very high growth company growing at 17%

for the next 3 to 5 years and longerterm

growing at 22%. But it's not yet

consistently profitable. If you take a

look, revenue growing like crazy, but it

is still losing money. It is still

unprofitable, but you can see it is

already cash flow positive. net

operating cash flow increasing and

currently uh still overvalued even

though you can see it retraced

uh it retraced a bit over there. All

right, it's you can see if you look at

the charts over here uh wave up, wave

down, wave up, wave down, wave up, wave

down, wave up, wave down, but it is uh

slightly above its intrinsic value. Um

now I do have a position in crowd

strike. I've been holding it for quite a

number of years and I would love to buy

more crowd strike but again I would like

it to get undervalued before I add more

and when it comes to these more

speculative growth stocks where the

profits are not yet consistent I'm a bit

more uh cautious so I take a much

smaller position as compared to a

company like Palo Alto where they've got

very consistent uh profitability where I

dare to take a larger position now we

come to the last investment mega trend

now I must say that this investment

vector trend is really exciting and I

think that it's going to be really big

in the next you know 20 30 years but as

of now it's still quite speculative.

Most of the companies in this investment

mega trend don't yet make money but they

could make a lot of money in the future.

So what mega trend am I talking about?

I'm talking about the space economy. So

why the sudden buzz in the space

economy? Why is it that more and more

people are talking about it? In fact, a

lot of the shares of the companies have

started running up in anticipation of

future earnings potential. A few

reasons, a few drivers. Number one, of

course, would be uh the sudden IPO of

Space X uh this year that is targeted to

be a $ 1.5 trillion IPO. And of course,

that has created a lot of excitement

around other space related companies.

But that's that's just one thing. But

the main reason why now it's gaining

more and more um traction in terms of

the space economy is because there's

been recently a 90%

[clears throat] commercial launch cost

collapse. What does this mean? In the

past, it cost a lot of money to send a

rocket into space. In fact, it cost

something like $18,000 to send every 1

kilogram of a rocket into space. But

because Space X as well as Rocket Labs,

they have innovated reusable rockets,

you can now send uh a kilogram into

space uh at as low as $1,000 and the

cost is dropping rapidly. So now that

it's so much cheaper to send things into

space, a lot of things are now becoming

commercially viable, which they never

were in the past. For example,

space-based data centers. And this

doesn't sound now initially may sound a

bit crazy but it's not because now

you've got the CEO of Google um Sudai

Picha or Alphabet saying that they're

going to create uh space data centers

very soon. They're investing in space

data centers. By the way, they own 8% of

Space X. Uh you've got um Amazon CEO

saying the same thing. So many of these

mega cap companies they are now drawing

plans to build data centers into space.

And now because again commercial launch

cost is collapsing is becoming more and

more feasible. So why build data centers

into space and and not just on earth?

Well the the the the challenge with

building data centers on earth of course

number one is you need a lot of land.

Number two you need a lot of power which

has a shortage of power as I've been

talking about in the previous slides.

The great thing about space uh based

data centers is that you've got

unlimited

solar power and as you know data centers

create a lot of heat and in space

there's a natural cooling from the

vacuum in space. So space is a perfect

place to put all the data centers

required

uh to run the AI factories to generate

all the robotics and and all the stuff

that we need in the future. So that's a

really really big business. So that's

number three. The fourth thing is that

as you know the US and its allies are

now investing more and more money,

hundreds of billions into missile

defense shields. And of course the US

has got this golden dome that now now

it's going to start deploying around

above Greenland as part of Trump's deal.

The fifth thing is also a very big deal

and it is low earth orbit connectivity

or LEO connectivity. So what is this

Starink? Think of Starink. So Starink

has been providing uh LEO connectivity

now all around the world especially in

areas which have got dead zones and so

on so forth. Now, so LEO connectivity is

basically providing internet, voice, and

data centers in using satellites in low

earth orbits. And so, you know, in the

past, you use use a satellite phone, you

need a special phone, and it's not that

clear. But now with low earth orbit

connectivity, you can use a normal

smartphone to access the internet and

voice and data via these low orbiting

constellation of satellites. So what

does this mean? That means in the future

you do not need any more of these uh

territorial or landbased cell towers.

And so with this, you're going to get

global broadband anywhere, even in dead

zones, even in countries where they want

to block the internet. And again,

existing smartphones will be able to

connect directly to satellites. Our

iPhones can connect directly to a

satellite. And these companies that

provide this service like Starling for

example, and another company, which is

uh as I'll talk about in a while, they

will charge monthly subscriptions just

like your telco companies. Now could

this be a big mass market disruption to

kill many of the existing legacy telos

maybe right? So that could be something

really really big. So these are the five

main things that are now driving

excitement around space related

companies and the space economy is

projected to grow from currently $630

billion to $1.8 trillion by 2035. So

what are the leading companies in the

space economy? Well, first let's take a

look at the different segments of this

economy. Number one would be the

infrastructure leaders. Uh the upcoming

one of course is SpaceX. That's the

granddaddy of them all. But currently

they are not listed. They are still a

private company. But of course once they

get listed then that should draw a lot

of investor attention. Actually be very

interested to buy Space X shares. But

their targeted IPO price of 1.5 trillion

seems a bit expensive. And of course,

that's what companies do when they first

sell to the public. They want to price

themselves as high as possible. Well,

the good news is that if you take a look

at some great companies in the past that

listed, whether is it Visa that listed

many years ago, which I bought them by

the way, not at listing a couple of uh

months down the road, and of course,

when Facebook listed, what happened?

Many times, the share price would drop

at least 50%

before eventually going to the moon. All

right, pun intended in this case. So,

same thing for SpaceX. Once SpaceX

lives, I'll be watching it. If it drops

like 50% or more, I'll be interested to

pick up some shares because I think that

in this space economy, SpaceX will

definitely be the one with the strongest

economic mode and SpaceX is already

profitable and it is already cash flow

positive. All right. Now, so besides

SpaceX, what else is there? Uh you've

got the other infrastructure

infrastructure leaders. Uh Rocket Lab is

listed and they are the closest

competitor to Space X. In fact, they are

known as the second Space X. They are

the only other private company that's

consistently launching rockets and they

also have reusable rockets. Their space

systems division which makes satellite

parts now accounts for a huge portion of

their revenue making them a diversified

picks and shovels play as well. Besides

being an infrastructure play, the other

infrastructure leader is Red Wire,

ticker symbol RDW.

Uh this company's a leader in space

infrastructure and orbital

manufacturing. They provide the solar

arrays and robotics needed for the new

orbital data center trend.

So that's the first segment. Second

segment would be the data and

connectivity plays of which you have got

two main ones. Of course, there are many

more. These are the two leading

companies. uh as space mobile which I

mentioned earlier on or as so they are

building the first space-based cellular

broadband network to connect directly to

standalone smartphones where all our

smartphones can connect connect directly

to the satellite and anywhere in the

world we have got internet we got voice

we got data and of course they compete

directly with Starlink uh that is owned

by Space X that's under Elon Mus and

then there's planet labs so planet Labs

or PL ticker symbol

They are known as the Google maps of

space. They operate the largest fleet of

Earth imaging satellites. And as AI gets

better at analyzing satellite imagery

for agriculture, defense, and climate,

their data will become more and more

valuable. Yeah. By the way, fun fact,

Alphabet, which I have a big position

in, and I think a lot of you also own

Alphabet, which owns Google and YouTube,

they own 8% of um SpaceX. So indirectly

if you own Alphabet you already have

exposure to this space economy.

The third segment of the space economy

would be the lunar and exploration

specialist. Uh this part I'm not that

keen about. I don't think the total

addressable market is as big as the

first two but I'll just mention it.

Leading company in this area will be

intuitive machines sticker symbol Lun R.

So they're the leading provider of lunar

landers and moonto-earth communication

services. They are the primary

beneficiary of NASA's move to outsource

lunar logistics. Again, bear in mind

that all these companies I mentioned are

most of them are not profitable. They

are still losing a lot of money, but

their share price has already started

running because people are anticipating

that in the future they're going to make

a lot of money. Yeah. And as always, uh,

I don't like to chase them after they've

run, okay? So, I wouldn't buy them right

now. You know, I'll wait for a pullback.

I'll wait for retracement. And I'll look

for lowrisk entries uh to get in. And

there's no rush. Like I said, this thing

is going to go on. This investment trend

is going to go on for the next 10, 20,

30, 40 years. Uh, it's not a sprint.

It's it's a long-term marit marathon,

right? And unless I can get in at a

attractive level or attractive price, uh

I won't for more to get in. So like I

said, most of these stocks are very

speculative. They're not profitable yet.

Uh and some of them are subjected to

binary events. Like if the rocket fails

to launch, then the share price could

collapse a lot, right? If the rocket

launches and it goes up. So it's it's

very high risk at this stage. Now again,

if we take a look at these these

individual companies that I mentioned,

you notice that most of them don't make

money. And even if they do make money,

it is not consistently profitable yet.

And so, as a result, it's very hard to

value these companies because they could

be worth so much or this much or this

much. It's very hard because there's no

solid historical track record. All

right? So, that is what makes them more

risky. So, does it mean that we don't

invest in them? We could still invest in

them, but again for speculative

investments, I'll take a much smaller

position. Uh, and some of them I may not

invest in them as in um close mines and

just buy, but I may enter them as more

uh trades where I'll have like a

stop-loss in place so that if it if it

really doesn't work out, at least I get

out and I minimize my losses. So, um I

do invest in speculative stocks from

time to time and I do trade them from

time to time, but again much smaller

positions because they're a lot more uh

unpredictable if you will. But the ones

that are very predictable, yeah, I'll

invest really big and I'll close my eyes

and I just take the ride. So, so it's a

different form of investing. So, let's

let's look at a few of them. So, Rocket

Lab, which I mentioned, is the second

Space X. Uh they've got a narrow

economic mode. Uh and again you can see

if you look at the financials over here

um click on bar chart that's easy to

read. So you can see yeah revenue is

growing very fast but again they are

still unprofitable. In fact their losses

are getting bigger and bigger and

there's nothing wrong with that

especially if it's a new company that's

what usually happens but eventually um

if things work out then they'll become

very profitable. So a lot of people are

now paying up and buying the shares

already pricing in the future

profitability before it it has happened.

Hence it's very speculative. If you look

at free cash flow, free cash flow is

still negative. So they're still burning

cash. Um

and so when a company doesn't make money

right now, it's really hard to value

because a lot of the valuation is based

on, you know, what you think it could be

in the future. you're you're paying for

a castle that has not been built yet and

that that's always the challenge. So if

we look at for example intrinsic value

over here usually for companies that

don't make money uh the way we value

them is we look at the price to sales

ratio or we use a price to sales growth

ratio or we use the rule of 40.

Uh so in terms of uh mean price to sales

ratio if you use that one then it could

be worth $64. Right now it's selling at

87. All right. So even if you use the

mean price of sales

uh which values it at $64

at 87 it's still overpriced. All right.

And if you use price to sales growth

ratio method then it's only worth $7.

Right? So you can see that there are

many ways to value it. We can't value it

using discounted cash flow because

there's no cash flow. We can't value

using discounted net income. There's no

net income. We can only value it using

you know price to sales or price to book

which doesn't make sense or price to

sales growth. Again uh Oracle value

tends to be more conservative. It kind

of takes an average and adjust a lot of

the numbers. So the Oracle value is $13.

So you could take that as the most

conservative valuation. But if you want

to be more optimistic and say okay based

on mean price of sales it's worth $64.

You can also do that. Yeah. But either

case, even if you take the higher

valuation, uh the share price is still a

bit overvalued right now. So that's

Rocket Lab for example. If you take a

look at uh as Space Mobile, currently it

doesn't yet have a strong economic mode.

I think it will in the future, but not

yet. And that's what makes it more

speculative. And again, it's not making

money as well. You can look at

financials

and you can see that uh still losing

money revenue growing but still losing

money and is burning a lot of cash free

cash flow very negative burning a lot of

cash. So how do you how do you value

something like that? It it's really

difficult. Again, if you look at

intrinsic value, again,

you can't use discounted cash flow.

There's no cash flow. There's no income.

So, how do you value it? Again, the only

way is look at a mean price to sales

ratio, and that would value it at about

$51.

If you look at a price to sales growth

ratio, that values it at at $3. So,

there's a wide range of what it could

be. If you take oracle value, which

again is more conservative, then it's

worth like $33.

Now, there are some analysts that are

valuing it at $100. You may say, "How do

they get $100 valuation?" Well, it's

because this company as

uh they recently said that they their

target is to hit $1.12 billion in free

cash flow by 2030. That that's their

target. So if you believe that's going

to happen and you do a discounted free

cash flow valuation method based on that

then the shares are worth $100

about $102 if you will. And if you value

it at $102 then at a current share price

of uh uh $103 that is fairly priced.

Okay. So can we really value $100? Well

it depends right. So, if you really

think they're going to hit, you know,

1.12 billion 2030, then yes, it's worth

$100. But again, it's just a promise

they're making, you know, and and that's

always the tough part when you value a

company that has not made money yet,

that it's they're just shooting up in

the air, but uh if you believe it can

happen, it can happen. Um let's look at

the last one. Planet Labs again, you can

see, you know, um doesn't make money as

well. So, they're all very very

speculative. So, what do I do in this

case? So in this case, I may choose to

buy some of the individual companies,

but again, not as an investment because

it's too risky to invest. I'll put it in

more like a trade where I'll look for

lowrisk entry point, enter a lowrisisk

entry point, uh, put a stop-loss, and

then I'll have like a initial profit

targets where I'll take profit slowly as

the price runs. So let me give you an

example of how I would do that. So if

you look at rocket lab for example um I

I can look at weekly candles can look at

daily candles depending on your time

frame uh daily candles you tend to be

more volatile especially for for these

stocks. So if you look at uh weekly

candles you can see again watch the

price action pattern right? So you've

got a wave up you've got a wave down

you've got a wave up you've got a wave

down and now you can see it's waving up

here.

So ideally I would like so what's a

lowrisk entry point? The lower risk

entry point is you want to wait for a

future wave down to a support level. So

you can see that this has been a pretty

strong support which is roughly at the

40 EMA or 50 moving average. So it

retraces to a support here and I can see

a bullish candlestick pattern telling me

that it's going to continue the trend.

Then I could enter right there and place

a stop-loss uh right below that swing

low. So that could be a potential future

entry into rocket lapse. Again, more for

trade than a uh closed eyes kind of

investment. So the difference is trading

I I place a stop-loss. It's like trading

is like a one night stand. I got to use

protection. Whereas investment is like

marriage. I I don't need to use

protection because it is already a

proven business model that actually

makes money. So that's Rocket Lab. For

example, if you look at AS, let's look

at ASS.

Uh, again, look at the price action.

Same thing, right? You can see, you

know, you know, wave up, wave down, wave

up, wave down, wave up, wave down. Now,

it's waving up. So, when it's waving up,

I don't want to jump in and form more,

right? Wait for the wave up, wait for a

wave down to a support level, wait for a

bullish candlestick pattern. I could

enter and catch the next wave up. So,

that's one way to play it. The other way

to play it of course is to just uh look

at ETFs because ETFs are already

diversified so you don't have any

company specific risk. The two main

space economy ETFs in the market right

now would be the spider S&P Kensho final

frontiers ETF tick symbol RT. This ETF

is more concentrated in industrials and

defense and they invest in a lot of mid

to large cap companies. The other ETF is

the UFO procure space ETF tick symbol

UFO. This particular ETF it it weights

more towards satellite communications

and more towards smaller companies. So

the first one is so-called the safer

one. The second one is more of the

speculative one. Last one year UFO which

is the more speculative small cap one

has slightly outperformed ROTT.

Uh but you can see in the longer term

over the last five years ROT has uh way

outperformed UFO. Um either one you look

at you can see it's a bit parabolic

right now. So if I put in some of the

moving averages

and I'm looking at weekly candles. You

can always look at daily candles as

well. Uh you can see again right now it

is a bit overbought.

All right. So you can see wave up wave

down wave up wave down wave up wave down

wave up wave. A bigger retracement here.

Big retracement here. Wave up, wave

down, wave up, wave down. And right now,

it's kind of like a bit parabolic. It's

a bit overbought here. So, would I, you

know, jump in here? Of course not. I'll

definitely want to wait for it to

retrace. Uh, you know, ideally on the

daily candles, I only like to get in

when it is nearer the 50 moving average.

So, that tells me that it's near the

fair value for ETS, when it's near the

50 moving average on daily candles. If

I'm looking at uh weekly candles, then I

would want it to go to at least the red

line, which is the 20 EMA on the weekly

candles. So, you can see that this tends

to be a bit of a support level. So, at

least retrace somewhere there for a

better entry point again in a bigger

correction. Could it go back to the 50

moving average on weekly candles? Of

course, it could. So again, I would if I

want to be more conservative, I would

wait for a bigger retracement to the 50

moving average, but I could take an

initial position at the 20 EMA.

If you want to catch my latest videos,

click on the subscribe button right now.

Click on the bell so you get instant

notifications once I upload my latest

video. If you want to check out my

online courses, go on to

piranhaprofits.com

where you're going to learn how to

invest and how to trade the financial

markets and create an income from all

around the world. If you want to join my

live Wealth Academy program, go on to

wealthacademy global.com and find out

more about how you can learn investing

and trading live online. This is Adam

Coup and may the markets be with