There is this very weird, very online,

very smug, pro-baby movement happening

right now.

>> It is obvious that women who have

children are going to be more fulfilled.

>> Being a mother is the most important job

in the world. I could have the greatest

careers working for Elon, working in the

White House. I had three kids in four

years. But being a mother has made my

career richer, fuller, better. It's made

life richer, fuller, better. Having a

husband makes your life better. It does.

And if more women were told and more

young girls were told that a husband and

children make your life so much better,

they would do it younger. It young women

I and I talk to young conservative women

all the time about their lives and their

goals and you know the things that they

want. And what's happening is they can't

find a lot of young men who want to

marry a working woman now.

>> Please like don't put it off. Especially

if you're a young woman, don't put it

off. You can always have a career. You

can always, you know,

go back to work. You can never just go

back to having children.

>> Where a bunch of people have suddenly

decided that the biggest problem in

society right now is that women are not

having enough kids, not housing,

definitely not wages or healthcare, or

not the fact that everyone is exhausted

and broke. Like, come on, gals. Have you

tried just having more money? No. The

issue is apparently that women are too

focused on their jobs and not focused

enough on being barefoot vessels for the

future. And real quick, I'm Lauren

Peritra. Please take a moment and make

sure you're subscribed. Hit that

notifications bell. Turn notifications

on. Hype this video if you're on mobile.

Share it with a friend if not because we

cannot have these pro-baby [ __ ] like

Katie Miller, the wife of Steven Little

[ __ ] Miller, telling young people that

their primary purpose in life is to be a

birthing vessel and to submit to pasty

white nationalists like Steven Little

[ __ ] Miller, who once admitted to

living off of mayonnaise exclusively.

Look it up. I'm not making it up. And

the wild part is when we look at who's

pushing all of this. It's not single

stressed out moms or people drowning in

child care costs. It's Megan Kelly. It's

Candace Owens. It's Erica Kirk. It's

Katie Miller. My nightmare blunt

rotation. Plus the usual orbit of

right-wing tife influencers. All of a

sudden, all of them are suddenly very

invested in telling women to stop

working, to embrace motherhood as their

primary identity, and to be more

submissive and trust that everything

will just perfectly magically work out.

Which is such a funny message coming

from women who are extremely wealthy,

professionally insulated, and absolutely

not planning on giving up their own

primary income, platforms, or autonomy.

All of them just happen to have book

deals, speaking tours, podcast

sponsorships, wealthy husbands or dead

husbands in some cases, full-time

nannies, sorry, household help, media

careers requiring constant travel,

social media managers, and six figure

substacks. Megan Kelly telling women to

embrace traditional roles from the

comfort of her multi-million dollar

media career is it's performance art.

She's doing podcasts from her home

studio about how modern women are too

focused on their careers and material

success wearing $400 worth of modest

linen. No, she's explaining that

feminism ruined everything by making

women think that they need financial

independence. Just you need to trust God

and make some sacrifices and birth the

babies and everything's going to work

out. She says this right before her

assistant reminds her about tomorrow's

flight at her conservative conference

where she's going to pray to Charlie

Kirk as the keynote speaker on why women

should stay home. Candace Owens also

rallying against feminism after making a

fortune being a professional opinion

haver. 10% of women are the only women

whose marriage rates are going up. So

they're getting married, they're staying

married, and their kids are doing

better. When you look at stay-at-home

mothers, you see that they're more

likely to report being depressed.

they're more likely to report having um

anxiety and anger and all these types of

things. So, how can you say that? Seems

like a woman if you want to get married

and have kids, you should go to college

and have a career.

>> So, I it sounds to me like we are

looking at totally different statistics

because everything that you said I I've

actually read the exact opposite.

>> I'm glad we're on a fact check show with

you. Exactly.

>> It's so exciting.

>> That's going to be amazing. Okay.

Because I know, like I said, I I think

what we're talking about is that there

was this widespread report on female

happiness and I I know that it was it

was formally debunked and it was

>> that's not what I'm talking about. Pew

Research, University of California. In

fact, working mothers today spend more

time with their ch children than women

did in the 1960s that were at home.

>> Okay. Well, women that I can tell you

women that are at home are obviously

spending more time with their children

than the people who are at work.

>> And their children are not fairing off

any better and they're fairing off

worse.

>> How are you measuring their children

fairing off worse? uh how likely they

are to uh higher incomes, better scores,

fewer health problems, fewer behavioral

issues, and better mental health.

>> So the the just to get back to the claim

that I'm making here is that it is

obvious that women who have children are

going to be more fulfilled.

>> How is that obvious?

>> Because you said so.

>> No, it's not obvious because I said so.

It's because when you look at all the

statistics in terms of women who are

choosing not to have families, they are,

as the person who just sat here before

you mentioned, they are suffering from

more depression. They're suffering from

more anxiety. And I and yes, no, when

you look at voluntarily don't have

children. No, I'm not saying that. But

that's not true.

>> Okay, it is true. It is actually true

that women who are choosing their

careers over starting families are

finding themselves leaning more onto on

to medicines like Xanax, anxietyinducing

medicines and depression because they

suspended that time frame where women

really should be looking to find a

partner and to start a family because

they were instead pursuing their

careers. There has been a it has been it

is a dishonest it is it's totally a

dishonest narrative that men and women

want the same things out of life. We

don't. We absolutely do not want the

same things out of life. In fact, we

don't even measure we don't even measure

success the same.

>> And just capitalism, she loves

capitalism. Erica Kirk is the number one

pro-natalist.

>> And when it comes to career,

I I will be fully transparent. I was

fully bought into the

boss babe. I mean, I lived in Manhattan.

Mhm.

>> I Charlie essentially plucked me out of

the New York City orbit and was like,

"No, I have a healthier way of viewing

things and and looking at life and

things like that." And and and he was

right. He was right. And [snorts] I I

remember thinking

I if I would have stayed on that path I

was on, I would have lost out on some of

the most beautiful moments of of my

life. children, having a husband, being

able to create and build something so

incredibly.

>> She's making it a lifestyle, and she's

rallying up this crowd and telling them

to opt out of work. Work is not

empowering, as if financial dependence

in America isn't one of the fastest

routes to being completely [ __ ] if

anything goes wrong.

>> Feminism has packaged things for us. And

it's good to pause and to actually

reflect and to think about how that

actually began because it has been this

system of psychological conditioning for

women. And it begins as soon as you

enter the school system, you start to

see these things. You start to

understand um that feminism as a term is

all around you. It is something that you

are being forcefed whether you recognize

it or not. And make no mistake, there is

absolutely nothing feminine about

feminism, right?

There's nothing feminine about feminism.

And that is the left. They they take

words and when they sell it to you, it

always sounds good, but they're actually

doing bad. I mean, obviously a a very

big example of that is when you people

say, "Oh, I'm pro-choice and that sounds

wonderful, but actually, no. An infant

is not choosing whatsoever in that

environment." And it's the same thing

with feminism. You want to think that

that's a good word. when when you learn

about that the first time and they say,

"Well, this is about equality between

the sexes." And no, it's not. It is

absolutely not about equality between

the sexes. Actually, what feminism is is

it is about disturbing healthy relations

between the sexes. I actually say now

that if you really understand feminism

and you start to follow it and you start

to get deep into the history of

feminism, it is actually a precursor to

transgenderism.

And then we have Katie Miller. You have

three under the age of five and you're

still doing it all. You worked at the

White House. You worked for Elon Musk.

Now you have your podcast. It doesn't

inhibit your career. In fact, it ignites

gasoline to the fire. And if more women

were told and more young girls were told

that a husband and children make your

life so much better, they would do it

younger. It isn't this career gap where

you take time off, have maternity leave,

and you can't come back and see and be a

CEO. You look at Adena Freriedman, the

CEO of NASDAQ. She took part-time work

when she was a young mother. You look at

Susie Wilds, right, who was a young

mother to went part-time and then she

went into becoming chief of staff in the

White House. Married to a man, Steven

Little [ __ ] Miller, whose whole

identity is built on his passion for

ethnic cleansing. Ah, the beauty of

motherhood, right? The cognitive

dissonance is topnotch. Now, you might

be thinking, "Surely these people

advocate for policies that would make it

financially viable for average families

to have more children." No. This is not

how they approach things. Universal

healthcare? Absolutely not. That sounds

like socialism to me. Paid parental

leave. Ew. No. Just birth them and send

them back even if even if they had major

surgery immediately.

When it comes to affordable housing,

there is POV is how about don't be poor

instead. And then when it comes to

higher wages, they just say that's what

your husband's for. Universal

healthcare, they'll be like, oh no,

that's communism. What they all share is

this fantasy that if women just stop

working and start having babies, the

rest will sort itself out. Healthc care

bills, who? The husband will earn

enough. The government will help. the

community will step in. God will Venmo

you. None of this is explained, funded,

or backed by any evidence or data. So,

if it sounds soothing, maybe you've

never had to Google the average cost of

daycare and then stare at a wall for 10

minutes afterwards. Meanwhile, the same

people either oppose or downplay

literally every single policy that would

make having kids easier for normal

people. Look what they did to Mandani.

So, the message ends up being just have

babies. Don't ask for help. Don't expect

any help. Just just baby it up. Create

the next generation, but do so on a hard

focused mode. And if you struggle,

that's a personal failure. Just have

more money. It's not the system's fault.

It's not the government's the platform

that they all have, Instagram, Tik Tok,

YouTube. Stories of someone in serene

morning morning routine, probably filmed

by their assistant while having their

children play peacefully managed by

their nanny in their sprawling home

purchased with family money or

conservative think tank funding,

whoever's bankrolling this probabate

the collapse of fertility rates. When my

uncle was president, the fertility rate

in this country was 3.5%.

Today it is 1.6%.

The replacement rate, in other words,

the amount of fertility that you need in

order to keep your population even is

2.1%.

We are below replacement right now. That

is a national security threat to our

country. And we know why this is

happening. And President Trump is

addressing the root causes through his

maha agenda of reducing endocrine

disruptors, the exposure, the chemicals

that decrease fertility today.

Meanwhile, the average American woman is

trying to figure out how to afford her

$2,000 rent, how to figure out her

student loan payments, her health

insurance premiums, which are through

the roof, and maybe possibly eventually

think about having one kid if she can

save enough money for 3 months of unpaid

maternity leave. But of course, the real

real problem the real problem is she's

just been brainwashed by liberal

feminism into wanting a career instead

of just naturally designed to fulfill

her biological destiny. The funniest

part is that we actually have the data

on this, but we're ignoring it because

it's unfavorable to the grift. Countries

where people get paid leave, subsidize

child care and healthcare, they do have

higher birth rates. When raising a child

doesn't mean financial ruin, more people

are likely to do it. Shocking. Crazy how

that works out. But instead of learning

from that, American pro-babalism

has decided that the problem is women's

attitudes. That they're way too

independent. They're way too ambitious

and too willing to gamble their entire

futures on vibes and a man. You know

what's wild? These women aren't wrong

that there's something broken about

modern life, making it harder to have

families. They're just so [ __ ] wrong

about what's actually broken and who

broke it. It's not the women they

getting too ambitious. It's that wages

stagnated while costs have exploded.

It's that health care got tied to

employment. It's that child care costs

more than college. It's that housing

became an investment vehicle instead of

a place to live. It's that we built an

economy that requires two incomes to

achieve what one income brought in 1970.

Then we told women they're too selfish

for wanting to work. Just go baby it up.

But addressing these things would

actually require advocating for policies

that their donors hate. It's much easier

to blame communism, socialism, feminism,

any isism, and tell women to make better

life choices while you're on your way to

tape a podcast about how you're doing

motherhood the right way. Authentic

traditional motherhood sponsored by a

VPN company. And then there's this

unspoken assumption that everyone is

secretly rich, or at least about to be.

Like, if women just surrender their

traditional roles, the money will

appear. God will Venmo you, Jesus Christ

himself, which is hilarious in an

economy where one medical emergency can

wipe you out entirely. One bad

relationship can leave you stranded with

no income and no safety net. Telling

women to give up their economic

independence in this system isn't

wholesome or brave. That's totally

reckless. Also, notice how the sacrifice

is almost entirely one-sided. Women, you

got to submit. You got to reproduce. You

got to sacrifice. while men are just

encouraged to exist. Traditional gender

roles without the traditional

obligations. Funny how that works out.

Submission with no expectations of men

to show up. Babies without

infrastructure. Risk without protection.

It's a raw deal. The real giveaway that

this movement is totally bankrolled and

not actually about policy is watching

what happens when someone suggests

actual support for families. Suddenly,

it's whoa whoa whoa whoa, don't get all

crazy. We can't be incentivizing the

wrong people to have the wrong babies.

And then it becomes, it's the personal

responsibility of that woman. And that's

not the role of the government. The role

of the government is to fund wars in

Israel. Duh. They have universal

healthcare. Oh, so you want to have more

babies, but you don't want to make it

economically viable for people to have

babies or to keep the existing babies

alive. You want women to stay home, but

you don't want to advocate for the wages

that would make single income families

possible. You want traditional family

structures, but you oppose every policy

that would actually make them possible.

Cool. Very cool. Sounds like a real

serious Megan Kelly movement. And this

isn't just a content vertical to them.

The funniest part is that all these

influencers are literally doing what

they're telling other women not to do.

They're building their own brands.

They're monetizing their platform.

They're hiring help so they can work.

They're traveling for their careers.

Let's look at freaking Erica Kirk. She's

been on a whirlwind tour. They're

financially independent or becoming so.

They're just doing it while talking

about how women shouldn't do these

things. Very bad. It's brilliant.

Really, they found one career where you

can be a working woman while making

money telling other women not to be

working women. And if this video has

expanded your perspective, please take a

moment to subscribe. Turn notifications

on. I'm Lauren Peritra. The only way we

can combat these voices is by lifting up

other voices like yours truly. We'll be

back with more.

>> Love this video? Support independent

media and unlock exclusive content. Add

free videos and custom emojis by

becoming a paid member of our YouTube

channel today. You can also gift

memberships to others. Let's keep

growing together.