HomeVideos

Hedge fund manager with 2000% gross return in 6 years | David Orr | Senzal Insights

Now Playing

Hedge fund manager with 2000% gross return in 6 years | David Orr | Senzal Insights

Transcript

1677 segments

0:02

[Music]

0:13

hello everyone and welcome to sel

0:15

insights today I have an honor to have

0:18

my special guest David or uh David is a

0:21

hedge fund manager of militia Capital

0:24

also he recently launched an ETF uh o RR

0:29

is is the ticker and U his ETF is doing

0:33

incred incredibly well so far even

0:35

though lunch was recently uh also he's

0:39

why I call him is because he's one of

0:42

the rare uh guys that actually killed

0:46

the market and that's exactly what he

0:49

did with his hge fund since

0:52

2018 uh he generated generated 2,000

0:56

gross per for his investors uh David

1:01

welcome thank you uh okay uh first of

1:05

all uh I would I would uh like to ask

1:08

you can you tell us something about

1:10

yourself what's interesting is that you

1:12

started as a I mean you were a

1:14

professional poker player and from then

1:17

then on after that you created a hedge

1:19

fund and did incredibly well yeah I I

1:23

just sort of played poker uh you know in

1:26

high school and then in early University

1:29

um I I planned on becoming an accountant

1:32

after University but uh because the

1:34

financial crisis happened right at the

1:36

same time I graduated you know there

1:37

were no jobs um yeah so I just started

1:41

playing poker more

1:42

seriously um and I actually moved out to

1:44

Thailand uh you know just sort of a Life

1:47

Adventure at the same time and um yeah

1:51

so I just played poker out there for

1:53

till

1:55

2017 uh so about almost uh seven years

1:58

of profession poker out in

2:01

Thailand um and I had some money saved

2:04

up I was really sick of playing poker at

2:06

that point so I started sort of

2:08

self-learning about investing I didn't

2:10

have any of sort of the you know

2:13

traditional background at all I just

2:15

sort of started reading about Market

2:16

anomalies lots of academic

2:18

papers um not not the bad kind of

2:21

academic papers that tell you that

2:23

Market's efficient yeah I mean I one of

2:27

them the one that because I learned I

2:30

studied economics as one of my majors in

2:32

University and you know they always said

2:35

how efficient markets are but then this

2:37

one paper I read early on S when I was

2:40

learning about self- learning about

2:41

investing it's called bet bet against

2:43

beta um this is a great paper you can

2:46

sort of Google it um and it showed that

2:50

the contrary to the efficient market

2:52

theory it's stocks that had the lower

2:55

beta that outperformed and they didn't

2:58

they were really thorough in this paper

2:59

they they showed it wasn't just stocks

3:01

it was bonds it was currencies it was

3:04

Commodities those would all outperform

3:06

also and then on top of that they look

3:08

different time frames they different

3:10

countries and it all like across every

3:13

thing you could think about it this sort

3:15

of anomally persisted so in the

3:18

efficient market theory they say you get

3:20

paid more for taking on more risk if you

3:22

take a higher beta bet you you're

3:23

supposed to earn more but actually the

3:26

exact opposite was happening uh and then

3:28

I realized well wait a minute what if I

3:30

sort of short you know that kind of more

3:34

speculative uh volatile thing and I'm

3:38

getting along the less volatile boring

3:40

profitable thing uh that sort of became

3:43

the backbone of what I was doing early

3:46

on that's that's that's that's actually

3:48

amazing I mean it's uh also uh like from

3:52

the perspective of f French uh model in

3:54

investing and I mean factors so you

3:56

would you would basically go along uh

3:59

value Factor uh and short probably

4:03

momentum growth or or something like

4:06

that yeah it's sort of like that because

4:09

it was more like the two factors would

4:11

be I was long small and

4:13

midcaps and I uh I didn't short the

4:16

large caps because the large caps they

4:18

don't have as much dispersion there's

4:20

not really as much opportunity there but

4:22

I short the small caps as well but then

4:24

I'd be shorting yeah the sort of

4:26

speculative

4:27

non-profitable rapidly growing hyped up

4:30

thing uh over time I've tailored this a

4:32

lot though because you know if you're

4:35

just long and short only those two

4:36

factors you have this horrible mismatch

4:39

and uh when it blows out against you it

4:41

gets really bad so now I'm mixing way

4:43

more factors than I used to that's sort

4:45

of the big change over the years um

4:49

especially avoiding the

4:51

really crowded speculative shorts I mean

4:54

that's the biggest I don't short any of

4:56

those anymore and you did the early

5:01

yeah I was pretty heavy in those and

5:03

then um it's not that it just sort of

5:07

went pretty bad because joring never

5:09

went that bad for me but I realized well

5:13

if something like Neo like this is a

5:16

pretty bad electric vehicle company uh

5:19

it went from like a150 up to like 50

5:21

bucks or whatever yeah and that was just

5:24

it wasn't based on earnings or anything

5:26

so you if that stock can do that and

5:28

you're saying well

5:30

you know let's say it goes from a150 to

5:32

10 bucks you're like well now it's this

5:34

amazing short right it has to be amazing

5:37

just because the thing's gone up it does

5:39

not have to be a better short than

5:40

before at all so you know then over time

5:44

I realized these sort of speculative

5:46

stories aren't good shorts at all so

5:50

yeah yeah I mean I I I have to agree

5:51

especially because I I got burned on the

5:54

shorting paler up until

5:58

recently because uh I I was I was uh

6:01

patient I was getting in and out of the

6:03

position and I mean I I completely agree

6:06

and uh uh also we have a micro strategy

6:10

I mean micro strategy is like 50 70% uh

6:13

from from the alltime high but uh not

6:16

not only micro strategy and you also

6:19

recently had a post about about micro

6:21

strategy uh how you see it I mean uh I

6:25

mean from the perspective of beta

6:28

actually yeah I mean that's just um yes

6:31

so the post is saying that Bitcoin is

6:34

about two times beta today in the modern

6:37

market and then micro strategy is around

6:40

you know it's basically lever 2x levered

6:43

Bitcoin so you have a 4X beta and then

6:46

there's these 2x micro strategy products

6:49

out there so you have the sort of

6:51

8X uh beta bet and then on top of that

6:54

people are playing call options on those

6:56

yeah so

6:58

uh yeah that's sort of been driving uh

7:02

the market and toward at the peak of

7:03

micro strategy guys were dming me how no

7:06

I'm I'm wrong this is actually an

7:07

infinity money machine and you just

7:09

don't get it or whatever it's like I

7:11

don't think I'm the one who's missing

7:12

anything here uh yeah but also it's a

7:15

that's the kind of dangerous short

7:16

because now you know even though I maybe

7:21

that one could work out it so bad but

7:23

even now it's like now you have a bunch

7:24

of shorts who want to Revenge trade the

7:26

thing because they got hit so bad on the

7:28

way up now you're gonna have all yes I

7:31

know and like I'm sure anyone who short

7:34

sells reading this like half of the guys

7:36

listening are like God I'm shorting it

7:37

it's like well that's the problem you

7:39

know that this thing uh I think in the

7:41

hands of a skilled Trader and everything

7:43

or risk management or like if you're

7:45

just betting is if you're only betting

7:48

on a tiny percent of these speculative

7:50

things and let's say you're pairing it

7:51

long Bitcoin yeah that's going to work

7:54

out over a few years for sure so you

7:57

know as long as you're betting just a

7:58

few perent total of the entire portfolio

8:01

on companies like that let's say micro

8:03

strategy is like a half a percent that's

8:05

probably fine yeah and also I think that

8:09

uh when it comes to shorts like that I

8:11

think the risk management is definitely

8:13

the most important thing because I mean

8:15

it can go 100 200 300% up and uh even

8:20

though if you're 1% invested into the

8:22

position is going to hurt and uh my

8:25

logic behind shorts like that is that I

8:27

usually do it shortterm and uh I would

8:30

basically get 10 20% and I'm out so

8:34

because I know that I mean once the

8:37

market starts going up as you said it's

8:40

four times beta

8:42

so it's crazy it's it's it's going to

8:44

it's going to hurt you so what I want to

8:47

show right now uh I would go first

8:51

through your hedge fund and then I would

8:53

uh go to your ETF that you recently

8:56

launched and uh I mean this this

8:59

performance is remarkable I mean you did

9:02

incredibly well what's interesting is

9:04

that you started with 50,000 I suppose

9:07

it was your own money right yeah that

9:10

was like a portion of my poker money

9:13

yeah and I mean here you in first year

9:16

you outperformed S&P by 4% but what what

9:20

was interesting is that in 2019 it was

9:24

at 200k and then 2020 1.1 million and I

9:29

mean this year was uh remarkable I mean

9:32

171 gross and uh from 1.1 million to 16

9:38

million and uh what I also respect about

9:41

you is that you charge 0.5% yearly

9:44

management fee and

9:46

25% over the S&P 500 500 returns I mean

9:51

you could probably go with 1% management

9:53

fee 1.5 even maybe with those kind of

9:55

returns and I I don't think your

9:57

investors would have any kind of problem

10:00

yeah I've been pretty blatantly

10:02

undercharging it's funny because

10:03

normally there'd be like a negotiation

10:05

there but my LPS tell me like man you

10:07

you should probably charging more like

10:08

you're undercharging they they actually

10:09

tell me this plainly and I'm like I

10:11

don't really care I might actually get

10:12

rid of the um S&P 500 hurdle next year

10:15

because uh you know now that I'm backing

10:18

these other PMS uh I don't want to force

10:20

them to undercharge so much uh but I'm

10:23

going to wait to make sure the

10:24

multi-manager thing works first and uh

10:28

can you can you tell me

10:29

from your philosoph philosophical

10:32

perspective how did you evolve through

10:35

this through this period period I know

10:37

you were first one guy and then you

10:40

realize that you need to employ more

10:42

people so because once you uh reach the

10:46

uh certain assets under management it's

10:49

a different kind of game and also how

10:51

would you structure that game let's say

10:53

one game is from like 100k to 10 million

10:56

second game is from like 10 million to

10:58

probably 100 million and completely

11:00

different game is probably from 100 or

11:03

500 million yeah I think that's well

11:07

said that you're even realizing that

11:09

there's a difference some guys sort of

11:10

think that they should be you know

11:12

investing their account the same way

11:14

like A5 billion dollar hedge fund

11:15

manager is and uh yeah you definitely

11:18

shouldn't so um basically the the key

11:22

strengths of a really small account and

11:24

the key downside so key strengths you

11:27

can play anything on the entire Market

11:28

including warrants I mean you can have

11:30

an extreme Edge in these warrants I mean

11:32

the the implied value that they're

11:34

trading for it's a blatant huge discount

11:36

so if you can find anything

11:38

fundamentally real that has warrants you

11:40

know you have an amazing bet

11:42

automatically um that's one example uh I

11:45

don't think it's worth getting to it too

11:47

much because it it w't won't scale but

11:50

you know if you if you notice something

11:52

early on you can juice your return that

11:53

way you should do it and then another

11:56

big Advantage you have as a small player

11:58

is the you have no no friction cost you

12:00

can get in and out of a position

12:01

immediately you're not going to move the

12:03

market you have no idea what a luxury

12:05

that is like uh now it is if I change my

12:08

opinion on a lot of stocks you know it

12:11

take a few days at least for me to get

12:13

out of the thing and you know if I have

12:15

a strong read on the situation that's

12:16

like oh I need to get out of this thing

12:18

quickly you know you're actually

12:20

weighing like well should I be pushing

12:21

the price against me or should I just

12:24

hope the bad news doesn't come out in

12:26

the next few days and that's um I'm at

12:29

my my partition today is like 70 million

12:32

so you know that's going to become a way

12:34

bigger problem later on um and then so

12:38

that those are the strengths you have as

12:40

a small player anyway and um the

12:43

weakness is you have a big spread cost

12:46

so if you just sort of have a buy and

12:48

hold and no short-term trading no you're

12:50

not exploiting any of the small uh

12:53

anomalies in the market um you're you're

12:57

like let's say you're running 300% gross

13:00

leverage like I was your your implied

13:03

loss there is like 7 8% a year you know

13:07

yeah so and this I don't think this is

13:11

the right format to explain the spread

13:13

cost but that's that's a really big cost

13:16

so you actually as a small player you

13:19

need to be exploiting the small things

13:21

if you're like a levered investor

13:24

um yeah I think that summarizes the

13:26

really small accounts and then

13:29

I think like from 10 to 20ish million

13:33

you you can still do some of that stuff

13:35

like but then after that point it really

13:38

just goes away and at that point you

13:40

have to rely more on like a bit longer

13:43

term trading mostly unless you're there

13:46

there are some styles that you can

13:48

specialize in like liquid volatile

13:50

situations uh so I'm not talking about

13:52

that but

13:54

otherwise yeah you're basically moving

13:57

from this sort of uh

14:00

uh exploiting these small anomalies to

14:03

still having you can still have the

14:05

luxury of playing almost any stock in

14:06

the Market at that scale which is really

14:08

nice but that that also will go away

14:11

gradually as you get bigger and that

14:14

will for sure eat into your Edge and

14:16

then on the flip side your your spread

14:19

cost savings you know it's already

14:21

gotten pretty good deal at that point on

14:24

Interactive Broker so you know now you

14:27

have to start thinking about well how do

14:28

I get enough

14:29

New Edge you know at like 50 million

14:32

bucks or

14:33

whatever so from like let's say 50

14:36

million it's

14:38

uh there's no way to exploit the

14:42

inefficiencies that retail Traders can

14:46

from yeah the really big edges are

14:49

totally gone at that point so like if

14:51

you're doing um after hours trading for

14:54

example as a small scale player you can

14:56

actually get like yeah a really nice

14:58

bill for 4% position right there and but

15:01

now at 50 million you you it's not even

15:04

going to move the account value even if

15:06

you do a bunch of really good trades

15:08

so yeah yeah you can't do that anymore

15:13

yeah I mean I completely agree

15:15

especially from the point that we as a

15:17

family office uh we uh invest as a large

15:21

family office I mean we plan to launch

15:23

launch a fund in Serbia uh so we try to

15:27

invest like large investor would would

15:30

invest but from different perspective we

15:33

also try to exploit what large investors

15:36

cannot so I can see the both sides of

15:38

the spectrum for example what we like to

15:40

do is we like some of the nanocaps and

15:43

nanocaps uh can go 5x 10x in a really

15:48

short span of time and as a larger

15:50

investor you cannot go inside I mean

15:53

there are some companies that have like

15:55

10 10 million market cap I mean you can

15:58

invest like one few hundred K and that's

16:01

pretty much it and if it goes like 100%

16:04

it's not going to do much for for your

16:07

uh performance so I completely agree but

16:09

uh would you say that from the let's say

16:12

500 million is uh actually we spoke

16:15

about it uh and that's why you said that

16:17

you're are going to employ more people

16:20

uh that uh once you get to 500 million

16:25

uh it's then again completely different

16:28

game from Up up to dep uh amount yeah so

16:32

my my opinion is you know at even like

16:37

maybe 150 200 million I could still have

16:39

like a pretty good Edge but after that

16:42

you know it really starts falling off

16:43

even more and uh it really starts with a

16:48

hedge fund kind of fee so I'm

16:50

undercharging and maybe it's okay longer

16:52

than other funds but other funds man you

16:55

know you're paying a hedge fund fee on a

16:56

guy when it's just mathematically very

16:59

very hard for him to win at that point

17:01

so for a single manager fund running 500

17:04

million bucks it doesn't make any sense

17:07

at all to me I don't think that a hedge

17:09

fund b or a hedge fund vehicle is

17:13

correct at all for that most of the time

17:15

uh there's a couple outlier talented

17:18

managers and maybe that'll push to a

17:20

billion or 1.5 billion that's the most

17:23

it goes but in practice what happens is

17:25

fund managers just sort of keep growing

17:28

you know and then they're two billion

17:29

dollars and then they don't have an edge

17:30

anymore and then uh that's especially

17:33

true if your LP is paying taxes you know

17:37

yeah that's why I mean Buffett is

17:40

cherished so much because his tax

17:42

strategy was incredibly good through the

17:45

decades I mean yeah what what he did

17:49

was because so many people pretend like

17:52

they've really studied or appreciated

17:54

what Buffett did but he shut down his

17:57

hedge fund you know so he's doing what

17:59

I'm talking about and he realized well

18:01

if I want to add value for people I

18:03

can't charge them hedge fund fees

18:05

anymore so he did birkshire and he

18:07

didn't charge

18:08

anything uh I you know I'm sort of doing

18:11

this ETF path to sort of do an in

18:13

between for a while and charge a really

18:16

low fee but I'm also going to have a

18:18

permanent Capital vehicle in the end

18:20

where I'll charge zero fee and that's

18:22

the way fund managers should be doing it

18:25

uh it's not even close I I'll ask you

18:29

one more question regarding the the the

18:31

hedge fund and then we'll move to the

18:34

ETF which I think a lot of viewers is

18:37

are going to find really interesting uh

18:39

but uh uh regarding your hedge fund uh

18:42

you are closed for uh new investors

18:46

right yeah I don't accept money right

18:48

yeah you you don't accept money right

18:50

now but I would like to ask you uh as I

18:54

said earlier from uh have your uh

18:57

investment philosophy evolv over time uh

19:00

I mean uh I think that any serious

19:04

investor can cannot be cannot depend on

19:07

the news on the different analysts uh

19:11

experts and stuff like that you need to

19:15

uh have your own uh way of thinking and

19:18

that was actually the first thing I

19:19

learned from my uh CEO and mentor and uh

19:23

how do you see that and where you from

19:25

the start someone that uh was uh having

19:29

completely completely independent

19:31

thinking or was

19:33

it later

19:35

on I was totally independent from the

19:38

beginning and I think that's the way

19:40

everyone should do it like I think

19:42

reading cide analyst reports I think

19:45

that's just a liability for people um I

19:49

think trying to like figure out why

19:52

someone's 13f positions are good from

19:55

these fund managers who are managing way

19:56

too much money that's just another trap

20:00

um I yeah I really think the only way to

20:03

do it is to go in and try to block

20:06

everything out and think about the

20:07

investment and what you think you know

20:09

unique thing you know about it like do I

20:13

do I understand this does it seem cheap

20:16

you know and actually think genuinely in

20:19

terms of what's the expected present

20:21

value of cash flows that's going to get

20:23

paid to shareholders that's the key

20:24

number to focus on and uh you know

20:29

I guess some maybe good guys can use

20:32

eitaa as a proxy for that but that's

20:34

another trap I think you know don't

20:36

think about EA think about earnings

20:39

growth versus how much they're going to

20:41

pay out to shareholders every year

20:43

that's that's a that's it and you don't

20:46

need some really fancy formula you just

20:48

need to ask the qualitative questions of

20:50

you know what's the what's the earnings

20:52

growth going to be mostly right

20:56

because people people think you can just

20:58

just buy like an 8 PE stock that's not

21:01

growing and but Management's even only

21:02

paying a 3% dividend and the dividend is

21:05

not growing and they think oh it's eight

21:07

times earning it's a cheap stock right

21:10

but you know it's like what's the

21:12

present value of that actually what are

21:13

you 3% a year and you're just sort of

21:15

hoping something Good's gonna happen and

21:17

I swear with stocks like that usually

21:19

something bad happens instead and then

21:21

you know and I have the negative return

21:23

so I don't know but

21:26

yeah I think the other thing is I would

21:29

get away from the whole mindset of I'm a

21:31

value investor or I'm a growth investor

21:34

completely quality investor you you just

21:36

got to get rid of that because as soon

21:39

as you try to

21:41

um yeah as soon as you try to box

21:44

yourself into a certain style it it's

21:47

just no good you need to think about all

21:49

of that

21:51

um you know sometimes a stock for that's

21:54

trading for 30 times earnings is is

21:56

actually pretty cheap because the

21:57

earnings growth is predicted able and

21:59

it's a really high quality business and

22:02

that that's more of a value stock than

22:04

most value stocks and then you know

22:07

conversely

22:09

um I don't yeah that that's all it is

22:12

it's

22:13

just don't don't try to invest with like

22:16

a set narrow criteria it will get you I

22:20

I I completely agree and I mean as you

22:23

said everyone should be flexible and

22:26

that's something that Stanley driller

22:28

talks a lot about and I mean uh you

22:32

always need to look at different

22:34

opportunities and I mean that's why you

22:36

are invested in Japan right now Japan is

22:39

a market that's uh extremely cheap when

22:42

we look at other developed markets and

22:45

uh do you do uh both long and short in

22:49

Japan

22:51

or I'm not shorting in Japan yet I might

22:54

get into it later um but I have like one

22:58

Japanese short on sort of test the

23:01

waters um nice thing about shorting

23:04

American companies is you get the um the

23:07

positive carry but in Japan you don't

23:10

really get you don't earn any sort of

23:12

you don't have the wind at your back on

23:14

those kind of shorts because the

23:15

interest rates are too low in Japan so

23:19

yeah and that's why I have to ask you

23:20

are you worried about Yen carry

23:24

trade I mean I I'm like 50% hedged on my

23:28

Japanese Longs

23:30

so I'm not really trying to express a

23:32

view yeah you know one way or the

23:35

other um but I think the guys who were

23:39

like long American stocks on borrowed

23:41

Yen I was expressing a pretty strong

23:43

View and uh but if you're if you're in

23:46

the Yen carry trade partially to fund

23:50

Japanese Longs that are a lot earning in

23:53

Yen you know that that's not really the

23:55

same thing it could blow out temporarily

23:58

like like it did last August but that

24:00

was already a hell of a hell of an

24:02

explosion and so anyone doing that that

24:05

trade on Leverage they're already gone

24:07

so that was like a 1987 style crash

24:10

right so that you know you got to

24:12

appreciate what that means um basically

24:15

all the guys who were heavy in that

24:16

trade are out of business and you don't

24:18

see anyone really talking about that

24:19

trade anymore right or even back then

24:21

you didn't see it so it didn't even

24:24

start off that crowded or anything and

24:26

and I feel like now it's probably not

24:28

very dangerous uh now that people in

24:31

that got washed out

24:33

already yeah so you think people learned

24:35

from that actually those that didn't get

24:38

uh uh destroyed from from the from what

24:40

happened last

24:42

August yeah I

24:44

think mostly I'm kind of surprised

24:46

nobody even talks about it like this is

24:48

a subject where no one on Twitter is

24:50

talking about it and I have never I've

24:51

talked to a bunch of different fund

24:52

managers and things and no one even

24:55

really talks about well you can borrow

24:57

this currency for free yeah now it's

24:59

half a percent a year exactly and it's

25:02

kind of weird it's like what else can

25:03

you borrow for half a percent a year

25:06

yeah it's basically free

25:09

money yeah and you know

25:12

but yeah that that's a really weird

25:14

trade because another weird thing about

25:16

that trade is it's been working

25:18

spectacularly for 15 years yeah it's

25:22

like this sort of quiet just extreme

25:25

Alpha like you want to say the Spy went

25:27

on the bullet run man think about long

25:30

stocks on borrow Yen I mean that trade

25:32

killed it because you know the Yen got

25:35

weaker at the same time as you were

25:36

paying nothing and I mean is it over now

25:39

I don't know

25:41

but yeah yeah uh okay I I I have to ask

25:45

you regarding

25:47

2020 how did you manage to to do so well

25:51

on Longs and shorts I mean that year is

25:54

outlier for example in 2022 you did like

25:58

uh you lose money on Longs but you did

26:00

incredibly well on shorts I mean that

26:02

was a horrible year for stocks but you

26:04

did I mean also

26:06

2019 uh 5821 and then 2020 65

26:12

64 yeah the um 2020 was a pretty unique

26:16

year because uh the way running with

26:19

high grow leverage works is that you go

26:21

into the event right and then after the

26:23

ball blows out to over and iFix goes to

26:26

over 60 you basically have to cut most

26:28

leverage so that means uh on that drop I

26:32

made a lot on shorts but because I had

26:35

to cut leverage I didn't have very many

26:37

shorts on after the drop so then I was

26:39

just sort of riding stupidly cheap

26:42

stocks long with you know a few

26:46

shorts okay okay that oh my God man that

26:50

that was that must have been amazing

26:52

right yeah it was it was it was cool

26:55

because it sort of got the fun kick

26:57

started earlier than it would have

26:59

probably yeah I mean from 1.5 and what

27:02

happened then I mean you went from 1.5

27:05

to 16 million yeah those are the year

27:07

end numbers

27:09

so

27:10

uh yeah so friends sort of were

27:13

contributing I was doing it through like

27:15

friends personal accounts uh in 2020 and

27:18

then the fund launched in

27:20

2021 uh so when the fund launched of

27:23

course a lot more money came in and then

27:25

I kept doing well throughout 2021 so

27:27

more money just kept blowing in and and

27:29

then

27:30

uh 2022 was when you actually showed the

27:35

what you know to do and uh I mean this

27:38

looks like uh have you seen returns from

27:41

Michael

27:42

Platt no uh actually his returns look

27:46

similarly to to this I mean it's uh it's

27:50

completely crazy I mean he also did

27:51

really well in

27:53

2022 and okay cool yeah I I didn't I'm

27:57

going to look him up for sure after this

27:59

yeah I mean I I'll send you after this

28:02

okay so since your uh fund is uh close

28:06

for outside investors you decided to

28:08

launch an ETF uh o RR is is the ticker

28:13

is listed on NASDAQ and uh this is a

28:17

website can you see the website yeah uh

28:22

so there's a ticker uh fun type is

28:25

active ETF regarding regarding this uh

28:28

uh I think that we shared the view uh

28:32

that you shared The View when I say that

28:34

active fun active money management is

28:37

coming back in fashion uh because

28:40

everyone is concentrated in s similar or

28:44

completely the same strategies and

28:46

basically doing the same thing and we

28:48

had uh Nifty 50s in like 50 years ago 40

28:53

40 50 years ago when there were like 50

28:56

stocks that everyone thought going to go

28:59

up forever and then that didn't happen

29:03

so also if we look for example

29:07

to there was a guy in Market hedphone

29:10

Market Wizards series Joe Wi he uh did

29:15

till like from 98 to 2012 he was like

29:20

9% uh average annually while S&P was uh

29:24

negative I mean and he was doing long

29:26

short basically and uh now uh looking uh

29:31

forward uh I think especially this year

29:34

is a good time to launch an ETF like

29:36

this and I'm really happy that you did

29:38

uh and uh how how do you see the the

29:43

future uh regarding the fund industry

29:47

from passive and active

29:50

perspective yeah I think um I mean

29:54

passive investing keeps gaining

29:56

share tons of active managers have shut

29:59

down last year even I think it's welld

30:01

deserved I think they're really

30:03

bad

30:05

um and you know you can only charge a

30:07

huge fee on bad performance for too you

30:09

know so long and eventually people say

30:11

screw this I'm going to go with the

30:13

passive thing that keeps going up and

30:15

then of course that's going to overcrowd

30:16

the passive Investments which I think it

30:18

clearly already has I could see passive

30:21

investing maybe taking another big leg

30:24

up that could happen of course who knows

30:27

but do I think that

30:28

the index can keep compounding at this

30:30

rate long term not not a chance uh once

30:33

people start selling out of the

30:34

retirement account they're selling huge

30:36

amounts of money at that point on this

30:37

sort of gain and there's not going to be

30:40

enough buyers to offset that and then

30:42

those stocks will start going down you

30:45

know once that's been not working for a

30:47

long enough time people get bored and

30:49

sick of it and then you know you could

30:51

see a pretty big collapse but it's it's

30:54

hard to say exactly if that'll happen as

30:56

it did historically maybe this time is

30:59

different I've talked about that a

31:01

little bit on Twitter recently where I

31:03

said you know if you look

31:05

at people like to make fun of people who

31:08

say this time is different but look at

31:11

the occurrences of a recession so 500

31:15

years ago every other year was a

31:17

recession you know was this Harvest

31:20

better or worse than last year if not

31:22

it's a recession and then in the

31:24

industrial revolution you know you

31:26

started having recessions a bit less

31:28

often but still pretty bumpy yeah every

31:31

10 years

31:32

basically yeah and then it's gotten to a

31:35

point where it went from every other

31:36

year to every few years to every five

31:39

years now it went every 10 years so we

31:43

had one 80 90 2000

31:46

2010 and then uh you know now we haven't

31:49

had one

31:50

for uh not sorry not 20 uh yeah so we

31:54

have we haven't had one in 15 years now

31:56

basically besides Co which

31:58

that was sort of a special that people

32:00

wouldn't really count that as an

32:01

economic recession exactly so that's

32:04

different

32:06

um you know so if if we're not going to

32:09

have a recession you know it's it's

32:12

maybe markets can get a lot more crazy

32:14

than they have historically of course so

32:17

yeah I think that's something to keep in

32:19

mind if you're a long short guy you know

32:21

if you're trying to compare to the past

32:22

or something yeah I mean I I I

32:25

completely agree and there's actually a

32:27

really good book it's called applied

32:29

macroeconomics

32:31

and portfolio management something like

32:34

that I can't remember the full name and

32:37

uh it was a guy from I think CEO of mar

32:41

Lynch or something like that he wrote

32:43

the book ex CEO and he actually made the

32:48

same point that you did that uh in

32:51

historically we had much more recessions

32:54

and they occurred much more often and

32:57

now we we have uh I mean if you look

33:00

from the historical perspective economic

33:04

cycle was basically doing this and now

33:07

because of the Fiat money and the

33:08

monetary system that we live in and the

33:11

exploitation of Keynesian economics in

33:14

my opinion uh we we uh don't have

33:18

it the often as we do as we did

33:22

historically but now uh recessions and

33:26

the market drops are much more violent

33:30

and I think that's something that's

33:32

going

33:33

to be for probably for the next Years or

33:38

or decades we'll have large onee drops

33:42

or twoe drops and then we'll have

33:45

aggressive ways aggressive moves

33:48

up yeah I think the point about

33:52

especially the the government debt side

33:54

the fiscal side where they're just

33:56

spending like crazy

33:58

there's an argument of course that that

33:59

will all catch up to us I think that

34:01

could easily be the case as well that

34:03

could also explain why we haven't had

34:05

recession in so long um so it's a pretty

34:08

complicated

34:10

uh question but yeah for my part I'm

34:14

doing my best to say I don't know I mean

34:17

if I'm being honest I think today's

34:18

index valuations are completely insane

34:21

and uh it's not going to end well but

34:25

maybe I'm wrong I you know this is this

34:27

is a harder thing to control right this

34:28

is uh the kind

34:31

of even if I'm right maybe the price

34:34

will go against me even from here 20

34:36

years somehow and you know that's just

34:38

not a game I'm interested in thinking

34:40

too much about instead I'm looking for

34:42

you know cheap companies that I'm pretty

34:44

sure are going to go up based on real

34:46

fundamentals and I'm going to try to

34:48

short crappy companies and try to avoid

34:50

hype you know that's all I'm trying to

34:52

do and if I do that well then I don't

34:54

really have to worry about you know that

34:58

that sort of macro it'll drive a person

35:00

crazy you know yeah I mean and and and

35:04

it's impossible I remember beginning of

35:07

2023 everyone was projecting recession

35:11

everyone yeah I wasn't I in my letter I

35:14

said I I don't think we're gonna have a

35:15

recession so that's I mean well done and

35:20

I mean I remember s Stanley Draco Miller

35:22

he was like if I had to guess I would

35:25

say end of 2023 begin of 2024 Stanley

35:29

was he was projecting recession at the

35:32

beginning of

35:34

2023 but not only him a lot of different

35:37

guys I mean even a guy from uh uh his

35:41

name is from U Morgan Stanley I think

35:44

Mike Wilson

35:46

right Perma bear guy he was also like I

35:49

mean he cap capitulated in 20123 or 2024

35:54

I mean and I read pretty much every

35:57

analysis of a large investment

36:01

institution uh at the beginning of each

36:04

year that's what we do here and just for

36:07

the interesting information and but

36:10

what's interesting is that everyone is

36:13

uh wrong usually by W wide margin I mean

36:17

everyone every single one of

36:20

them yeah that one that was a weird case

36:24

because I was also bullish on housing

36:26

stocks back in 2020 which people thought

36:28

was crazy but my whole point back then

36:31

was how can you have a recession when

36:33

like many trillions of dollars in real

36:37

terms just it got inflated

36:39

away so now all these homeowners have

36:42

way way more money than before at least

36:45

short term so it just seemed impossible

36:48

to me basically that we would have a

36:50

recession in that particular environment

36:52

it didn't make any sense today I don't

36:54

really have a strong opinion I don't

36:56

know because that sort of was

36:58

a benefit that gave a boom for a few

37:00

years and then after that that's sort of

37:03

it and now new anyone getting a mortgage

37:06

today now has a much higher mortgage

37:08

rate and

37:09

everything um it sort it could work the

37:11

other way where mortgage rates just sort

37:14

of gradually very slowly grind down

37:17

nobody can really refinance then and uh

37:22

you know that's sort of a not that's

37:24

more of a an area where people don't

37:28

have a ton of extra money and you could

37:29

actually have a recession

37:33

so yeah I mean I that's actually really

37:37

interesting uh uh point of view I I to

37:41

be honest I didn't talk uh think about

37:43

the home builders uh last year even

37:46

though uh some of large investors were

37:48

buying them and they were really cheap

37:50

at the time if I remember cor correctly

37:52

I remember lar that was my my my biggest

37:56

bet back then was the Mi homes and you

37:59

could buy it for essentially homes for

38:01

like 50 50 cents on the dollar plus you

38:04

got this profitable business on in

38:07

addition and uh and I think what people

38:10

really missed there was the fact that

38:13

never before in American history for

38:16

such a long time like for a decade

38:19

people could get a mortgage for like

38:21

3% and then right after covid people can

38:24

get a mortgage for even like a lot less

38:26

and a lot of people did

38:28

get the way lower interest rate they

38:30

swapped their mortgage out and you know

38:33

that's an incredible amount of money

38:34

they made so fast when we got inflation

38:37

so but but obviously we don't have

38:41

remotely the same setup

38:43

today exactly and I think those uh

38:46

people that fixed the rates at such low

38:49

levels aren't willing to sell because to

38:52

buy something new I mean that's why home

38:55

builder case is still intact in a in uh

38:59

some way if if I mean if everything goes

39:04

uh well if you don't some don't have

39:07

some kind of uh recession or something

39:09

something like that uh let's uh go back

39:12

to your ETF what I really like about

39:15

your ETF is that it's doing incredibly

39:17

well uh I

39:19

mean there we have it and uh from

39:23

percentage point it's up since uh

39:27

uh let let's say 15th of January uh it's

39:31

up like 4

39:34

4.2% 4% and if we add for example NASDAQ

39:40

I mean we have a completely different

39:43

situation and uh I mean it's uh I mean

39:48

congratulations man good good good

39:50

timing to to launch an ETF so uh yeah

39:54

and that was a good one too because we

39:56

we're like Almost 100% net long there so

40:00

that was uh really yeah we uh our net

40:04

exposure is uh yeah I think it's maybe

40:06

75% long or something like that

40:08

something like that so then it all comes

40:12

comes down to the structure of your ETF

40:15

and uh there we can have the everything

40:18

is completely transparent I suppose this

40:20

is a hedge right no that's the cash

40:24

proceeds from Short Selling okay and

40:27

then

40:28

um and then what happens is we're we're

40:31

50% hedged on the

40:34

Yen right so like we have I think 50 or

40:38

60% gross long exposure to Japan right

40:41

now and so if you're uh you know

40:45

borrowing Yen there you have also extra

40:47

USD that way although I don't think

40:49

that's even showing up here

40:50

but um so yeah we we're sitting on a

40:54

pretty big USD balance but it's not

40:57

because we're sitting on cash exactly

40:59

it's just because you know that's the

41:01

way the Leverage is is working here yeah

41:05

yeah uh thank you for the explanation

41:07

and I mean we can see for example energy

41:09

transfer uh I mean it's really defensive

41:13

position uh and so that might be the the

41:16

one of the reasons why for example I

41:19

mean you don't you don't have like

41:22

growth names here basically it's a as

41:25

you saidil from Phil opical perspective

41:28

you uh try to find good opportunities uh

41:33

you don't go momentum factor or or stuff

41:36

like that oh yeah yeah everything here

41:41

is uh really just based on fundamentals

41:45

I'm not doing this thing where I'm

41:47

buying the 20 times Revenue stock I'm

41:50

not uh focusing on growth stocks I'm

41:54

focused on I mean these aren't all low

41:56

multiples

41:57

um but actually if you go to Morning

42:00

Star it'll summarize the stats of the

42:02

portfolio which I think is really cool

42:05

so if you type in like militia ETF you

42:07

can see things like the average PE ratio

42:10

of the stocks Morning Star yeah this is

42:14

like a really cool um you click

42:17

portfolio so the second link or yeah

42:20

click portfolio

42:23

there they've done a really good job

42:25

here and so

42:28

uh if you scroll down a little bit more

42:30

you'll see the uh stats of the portfolio

42:33

of the underlying

42:35

stocks yeah I cannot see sadly

42:38

everything Financial metrics yeah you

42:40

don't need to see that one it's the

42:42

one's up above it's the um you can see

42:45

like the earnings growth and things um

42:48

the price to earnings ratio is

42:52

9.8 the sales growth is 7% a year the

42:56

dividend yield is 4 % the price to cash

42:59

flow is six you know these are just good

43:02

numbers and then the underlying

43:04

businesses are not bad so normally you'd

43:07

have numbers like that and the

43:09

businesses are just crap like the sales

43:12

growth instead of being positive might

43:14

be negative uh or the cash flow growth

43:17

maybe that's negative but in this case

43:19

you have both a low PE a pretty solid

43:22

dividend yield you know pretty good cash

43:26

flow growth

43:27

growth um so that's you know that's

43:31

what's going to do well the cash flow

43:33

keeps growing at over 7% a year and if

43:36

the dividend is 4% a year you know and

43:39

then it's got some leverage involved so

43:42

you know now you're talking about

43:44

earning a pretty solid return there yeah

43:48

and I mean with this I mean with this

43:52

and free cash flow growth I mean they

43:53

are going to buy back the stock raise

43:55

the dividends and and so on and also

43:58

it's really really defensive let's say I

44:01

mean when momentum start stops working

44:04

uh everyone is going to pile into this

44:07

stuff I mean it's shown historically

44:10

that when

44:11

momentum doesn't work value works and

44:14

what's really interesting is that value

44:17

small value Factor actually outperformed

44:21

pretty much anything in the last like 40

44:23

years which is really

44:25

interesting yeah I think because that

44:28

anomaly became so known the uh as a

44:32

basket especially in the USA the small

44:35

value stocks got bid too high yeah which

44:38

actually pushed the returns down so

44:40

that's why I think value investing

44:42

hasn't been working so great if you pick

44:45

the index of them but if you sort of

44:48

look beneath the surface you can yeah

44:50

make an honest attempt at saying how

44:52

good is the business quality here you

44:55

know and if the business quality is

44:56

pretty good and it's a value stock then

44:58

you know that's what you're looking for

45:00

yeah I mean I completely agree I I went

45:03

through the Russell 2000 pretty much

45:05

every position and uh if you talk about

45:08

2000 of course and like I also I also

45:11

saw that you came to the same conclusion

45:14

that like at least 50 or more perc of

45:17

the companies are fundamentally not

45:20

doing well even more yeah it's it's just

45:23

a big trash Heap I mean it's really

45:25

really bad um

45:28

that's why I mean that's the biggest

45:29

short in the ETF is the covered call

45:31

version of that

45:34

um so there we have it uh amongst your

45:38

positions if I'm not mistaken yeah there

45:40

it is so what's your logic I I think

45:44

that everyone is uh going to ask the

45:47

same question uh there we have like 31%

45:51

of the net assets short disposition what

45:54

is this this is basically uh let's show

46:01

it sorry it's r yld d yeah Y what we

46:06

have here this ETF I mean this chart

46:09

chart is looking horrendous horrendously

46:12

and it but it pays a large dividend

46:15

right probably around

46:17

10% yeah it's a bit more than 10% a year

46:20

so the chart's not as bad as it looks

46:23

because it is paying that big fat

46:24

dividend but and it's one actually yeah

46:29

yeah those are new popular

46:33

strategies yeah

46:35

basically uh one nice thing about

46:38

shorting this in the ETF is that the

46:41

upside is capped and I'm trying to keep

46:43

like in the hedge fund structure if

46:45

something's going horribly wrong on

46:46

shorts you know I I I can be more Nimble

46:50

there I can make more trading Decisions

46:52

by myself but in the ETF structure I

46:55

can't do that and so having you know

46:57

this be a core part of the ETF short

47:00

book means that you know it's so much

47:04

more robust from like me not having to

47:06

put out fires which I can't do as nimbly

47:09

in the

47:10

ETF um it really because the most this

47:15

uh ETF can really get you is a couple

47:19

percent a month or maybe 3% a month

47:22

that's the most you can lose so if I

47:24

have a 30% short position and I sort of

47:26

know I can lose a percent a month on

47:28

this thing as a percent of our nav and

47:31

that's that's a

47:33

reasonable you know uh amount to lose

47:36

per month without getting run over right

47:40

not and having something explode and you

47:42

don't really even know how you can

47:44

handle it in ETF structure it's a big

47:47

difference in the hedge fund where you

47:49

can't

47:50

trade I can't be nimble and be like oh I

47:53

can get in here and cover this thing

47:54

real fast I can't tell the ETF Trader to

47:57

do

47:58

this yeah yeah and uh I mean we also

48:02

have here uh that you went you have

48:05

sqqq you went sqqq yeah yeah that's

48:10

that's um that's more of a shorter term

48:13

tactical play because that's actually a

48:16

long position essentially a 21% long

48:19

NASDAQ position yeah but because of

48:22

what's going on in the market and the

48:24

volatility I sort of am guessing that

48:26

yeah the volatility drag of these 3x

48:30

levered products gets really nasty when

48:33

the Market's volatile so I'm guessing

48:35

that the volatility is going to chop

48:37

this thing up uh and that's my main

48:40

reason and then I have similarly the TNA

48:42

is the Russell 2000 version that's a

48:45

bull position so that's actually a short

48:48

position uh and these are actually going

48:50

to hedge each other a bit um

48:53

yeah yeah so that's the bet it's not

48:56

really I'm not really betting on the

48:58

direction of the market with those bets

49:00

I'm more betting on the market

49:02

environment Trump tariffs sure seem

49:04

choppy and crazy yeah this is a perfect

49:07

environment to be short that crap yeah

49:10

yeah uh okay

49:13

uh okay I'm not going to go anym to your

49:17

positions but uh what everyone is going

49:20

to ask for sure is why is there such a

49:24

large gross expense rati yeah because

49:27

The Regulators are really bad at at

49:31

making this uh I

49:34

mean that's not a real cost at all uh

49:38

and it's just really dumb that they

49:41

forced me to put that there even on

49:43

Morning Star they don't even put that

49:45

they show like the real one the net if

49:47

you click back on that thing you'll see

49:48

it um if you uh somewhere they'll see

49:52

they show the adjusted expense

49:55

ratio and I don't not trying to do the

49:57

uh adjusted numbers thing but I think if

50:00

you go back to quote it's

50:02

there sorry I I'm not using morning

50:05

Stars so yeah it's okay adjusted expense

50:08

ratio so they're putting the real number

50:11

this is what The Regulators forc me to

50:13

put I don't know it doesn't it doesn't

50:14

mean anything at all and and why is that

50:17

uh I mean why is it showing such a large

50:21

number yeah so I'm short like these bdcs

50:24

that pay a big dividend also

50:27

that's similar to the uh Russell 2000

50:30

covered call ETF where these things

50:32

can't go up that much on you too quickly

50:34

but in a different way so it's

50:37

Diversified um and those yeah so these

50:39

short dividend expenses are considered

50:42

an expense but it's in practice you know

50:45

you can look at the chart and you'll see

50:47

every time it pays a dividend the stock

50:48

drops by the exact same amount yeah so

50:51

that's not a cost at all it's it's just

50:53

not

50:54

real um so that's most of it and then

50:58

like a smaller part of

50:59

it um is like the cost of margin so

51:04

we're we're borrowing dollars to be a

51:06

bit more long that's considered an

51:09

expense um that's sort of a real cost

51:12

but we're also long more stocks with it

51:14

right so presumably the stocks will earn

51:16

more than that hurdle rate and then the

51:20

the last big one is the short the short

51:22

selling so when you when you short sell

51:25

you're borrowing stock from somebody

51:27

and in our portfolio there it's about 1%

51:30

to borrow um so the the impact on that

51:34

18% is pretty small as a percent but the

51:38

bigger impact is that it's not including

51:40

the short rebate so the ETF holder is

51:43

actually being paid 4% a year to be

51:46

short stocks yeah uh and that's not

51:50

again it's they don't put that to offset

51:52

the 18% or the margin interest or

51:55

anything

51:56

uh so that's just why it's more

51:58

nonsensical it's counting the expense

52:00

but it's not counting the the the

52:04

benefit yeah yeah uh I mean thank you

52:07

thank you for for the explanation I

52:10

think that you probably received a lot

52:12

of messages regarding that and it's so

52:16

large and you

52:18

know what's going on are you seriously

52:21

charging this much so you charge if I

52:24

1.6 right 1.4 something like that 1.3

52:29

1.3 yeah uh and that's also reasonable

52:32

for active uh long short strategy I mean

52:35

completely reasonable and I think that

52:37

we lack like last year or the year

52:40

before that I was looking for good uh

52:44

active long short ETFs and uh I only saw

52:47

vanilla ones basically S&P

52:51

703 or 7050 or or 130 or something like

52:56

that BAS basically it was uh one yellow

52:59

one there there there isn't there isn't

53:01

a good one there's like one there's one

53:04

like okayish one sort of uh it's not

53:07

really performed great but to their

53:10

credit it's going up at least and it

53:12

perform pretty decently through bare

53:14

markets so I think that was a reasonable

53:17

one but you know I I'm hoping that I'll

53:19

be able to do a lot better than that one

53:22

yeah and and I and I hope too and uh I

53:25

need to make a disclosure that uh we we

53:27

do own the the ETF and everything we say

53:30

here is not an investment advice so do

53:33

your own research and make your

53:36

investment decisions uh with your

53:38

financial advisor or on your own but uh

53:41

just for for the record nothing we say

53:44

here is an an investment advice and uh

53:49

okay but where uh where do you see the

53:52

this situation with Trump and the market

53:55

uh from of course nobody knows but

53:58

nobody knows that's my thesis yeah uh

54:02

you know there's a bearish argument that

54:04

you think he's actually a mad man who

54:06

just likes tariffs for the sake of

54:07

tariffs and he wants to watch the world

54:10

burn and he wants to actually Ally with

54:12

Russia and all this stuff yeah yeah I

54:15

don't do I do I actually think that's

54:17

true I think most likely it's not true

54:20

but it's possible uh maybe some parts of

54:23

it are true maybe none of it is true I

54:26

don't think anybody knows uh I won't

54:29

name him but this guy's even like a

54:32

progressive he's a self-described sort

54:34

of progressive left type guy he a big

54:36

hedge fund manager we're pretty friendly

54:39

uh despite having pretty different

54:40

politics but you know privately on phone

54:43

calls what he says is a lot different

54:45

than what he posts on on the internet

54:48

right so privately in phone calls he's

54:49

pointing out that past presidents you

54:52

know very uh some some US presidents

54:55

were these super wild crazy men like no

54:58

one could predict really what they what

55:01

they were or weren't capable of okay and

55:05

if you're thinking through um sort of

55:11

um like a period where there's no

55:14

conflict there's no

55:15

volatility maybe that's pretty bad thing

55:18

he just sort of adds volatility to a bad

55:20

situ like a calm situation he's creating

55:23

problems for no reasons right so in that

55:26

situation I would be very like this is

55:28

stupid why do we have Trump but if

55:30

you're in a spot where the world's

55:33

looking very dangerous in my opinion uh

55:36

we have a hot war in Europe and the

55:38

situation in taiwan's looking bad and

55:40

you sort of have this alliance between

55:43

Iran Russia and

55:45

China you know that looks like a

55:47

dangerous sort of war world that's a lot

55:50

different than the world we were in 20

55:52

years

55:54

ago yeah and so the point is having this

55:59

leader uh who I hope has a plan and he's

56:03

not actually a crazy person like he's

56:05

acting like he is one make no mistake

56:08

what I'm saying is clearly what he's

56:10

saying is on the surface it's crazy yeah

56:13

but does he act who knows what he

56:15

believes and doesn't so that's it's a

56:17

powerful spot to be in as an opponent

56:20

okay that means the USA's opponents

56:23

don't know what the hell they're up

56:24

against either

56:26

that that is completely true

56:28

actually so that that's how I'm seeing

56:31

Trump uh I'm optimistic I'm not not

56:34

gonna say I'm Optimist I'm hopeful for

56:36

sure and

56:38

uh you know look at the Ukraine

56:41

situation he came out in such strong

56:43

support of Ukraine early on right after

56:45

the invasion am I like really to believe

56:48

that now all of the sudden he's buddy

56:49

buddy with Russia I mean no I don't

56:52

believe it at all

56:54

but you know hopefully I'm right you

56:57

know I think every even if you don't

56:58

like Trump even if you think you know

56:59

you don't like my politics whatever we

57:01

can all hope that like hope that I'm

57:04

right guys like you know we're on the

57:06

same team here yeah I mean I I I agree

57:10

with you uh but and I I think that uh I

57:15

see I see it from the point that there's

57:17

like uh not there's only like right and

57:21

left there's not a middleman there's not

57:24

someone that's going to look from the

57:26

side and be objective everyone is like

57:29

I'm Pro Trump and whatever he does I

57:31

support him and other ones are like I

57:34

hate Trump I hate everything about him

57:36

everything he does is horrible and

57:38

there's not a lot of people that are

57:41

like objective and being like okay this

57:43

is good this is bad this is good this is

57:45

bad I mean and uh that uh goes I

57:49

mean in the state of the world we live

57:52

in I mean everyone is pro Ukraine or Pro

57:55

Russia no body is like in the middle

57:57

being objective and uh uh and I think

58:00

that's the problem with the current

58:01

world and I think that's a healthy thing

58:05

about investing in the stock market

58:07

because if you are biased you're getting

58:10

destroyed I I mean for sure yeah I think

58:14

everyone should take a way more of an

58:16

approach to say you just don't know

58:18

Trump against Trump you don't actually

58:20

know guys and uh I don't know certainly

58:24

uh so yeah yeah I mean uh I I completely

58:28

agree but uh I think that bassent is a

58:33

good guy for the job I like the fact

58:36

that he wants to bring long-term

58:38

treasuries down uh hopefully he's going

58:41

to do it I mean if you look at

58:44

the where fed I mean where American

58:48

government spends like 1.2 trillion

58:51

right on interest expense I mean if you

58:54

want to lower the deficit that's uh one

58:57

that's in top three positions Medicare

59:00

interest and uh military so also it's

59:04

interesting uh that Europe is uh going

59:07

uh up it's outperforming America by a

59:10

wide margin since the beginning of the

59:12

year and since you are a tactical

59:14

investor are you looking somewhere

59:17

somewhere else other than Japan and US

59:21

yeah I mean I've got quite a few uh

59:23

European equities in the ETF I've like

59:25

this Spanish airports the Louis vaton

59:29

yeah you know I got that sort of Swiss

59:32

Railroad stock nobody ever talks about

59:34

that's good stock you know yeah I know I

59:36

was actually looking at them last year

59:38

and I didn't buy it to be honest I think

59:41

just it's a nice like it's not going to

59:43

have some outstanding return but it's

59:45

really easy to see that thing making 10%

59:47

a year it seems pretty predictable no

59:48

one's going to disrupt what they're

59:50

doing that type of investment seems

59:52

pretty damn good today you know that's

59:54

going to be hard to beat from here

59:56

and uh what are your thoughts on for

59:58

example Brazil Brazil is getting popular

60:01

again and I mean uh there as you said at

60:04

the beginning of the podcast that you

60:06

shouldn't be like I'm value investor I'm

60:10

this I'm that and a lot of those let's

60:13

say anti-growth

60:14

investors uh those that are like Pro

60:17

gold Pro gold stocks are a lot a lot of

60:21

them are bullish on uh Brazil for

60:23

example and don't I don't really

60:27

understand I've looked a few times I

60:29

just couldn't wrap my head around the

60:30

Brazilian situation uh politically

60:33

especially where it's going to go from

60:34

here the this the annoying thing about

60:37

Brazil

60:38

is I thought the old party they were

60:41

like a right-wing party but I didn't

60:43

think they were particularly good for

60:45

Brazil or at stocks either so it's hard

60:48

for me to be as bullish on

60:50

Brazil because I don't really know which

60:54

way that's going to go in

60:56

mentally um and then like the one

61:00

Brazilian stock I followed closely was

61:02

the oil company PBR yeah uh and you know

61:07

their the current government is actually

61:09

really screwing shareholders over in a

61:11

real way yeah and

61:15

so you know it's hard for me to be

61:17

bullish when that's the case um I like

61:21

Colombia a lot today because there you

61:24

can see that the Socialist president is

61:27

uh polling really poorly and he's most

61:29

likely going to lose and when he loses

61:31

the Colombian stocks are going to go up

61:33

although it sort of happened already to

61:35

some degree but I think they still have

61:37

some room to run I used to have the uh

61:40

Colombian Bank stock in the ETF but I

61:42

sold that on the jump but we still have

61:43

the Colombian oil companies uh they're

61:46

both really cheap um so I like that play

61:51

better in Colombia Brazil too hard today

61:56

yeah I agree even though we have uh

61:57

index has like 6% dividend yield which

62:00

is really attractive but still I mean if

62:04

there isn't a change in the in politics

62:07

it's uninvestable for me as well and I

62:10

mean I completely agree also interesting

62:12

uh possible interesting plays Norway as

62:14

well Norway has the more sophisticated

62:18

but fundamentally the the same problem

62:20

that they have left in in power and if

62:22

they lose which might not happen might

62:26

might happen uh it's going to be bullish

62:28

for Norway for example I mean because

62:31

because there's uh I like Scandinavia

62:34

because they have really high level of

62:36

corporate governance and they are really

62:38

I mean really transparent you know that

62:40

they're not going to lie in the yeah

62:43

it's it's weird I haven't looked more at

62:45

those stocks because they've actually

62:47

looked genuinely interesting and they've

62:49

actually seem to go up long term unlike

62:51

a lot of the world stock market uh I

62:54

really should take closer look for some

62:56

reason that's the one market like I've

62:58

looked through every Swiss stock and UK

63:00

stock and Spanish stock but for some

63:02

reason I never took the Nordic countries

63:05

seriously and I should what I wanted to

63:08

say two interesting one interesting

63:09

thing and one question and we can uh

63:11

slowly end our our podcast is first uh

63:16

what's really interesting is that uh

63:19

Southeastern let's say part of Europe is

63:21

really interesting because there's a lot

63:24

of extremely cheap

63:26

companies that are doing really well for

63:28

example

63:29

Slovenia uh did incredibly well last

63:32

year Romania for example as well and

63:35

there there you have uh some of the

63:37

banks or pharmaceutical companies that

63:40

went like like 50 60% up last year while

63:44

paying five 6 8% dividend however the

63:48

problem is liquidity liquidity is uh

63:51

really low and that that's the M main

63:53

problem of of this uh region of the

63:55

world because of Communism markets

63:58

aren't developed as well we had like

64:01

only 30 20 some 20 some other nations 30

64:05

years to develop uh working uh stock

64:09

stock market I would also like to ask

64:12

you what's your uh take on AI sorry man

64:17

I had

64:18

to yeah uh I think it's I think it's

64:22

real and I think it's going to be um

64:26

like for people with white collar jobs I

64:29

think a lot of them are going to be out

64:30

of work and you're not going to get work

64:32

again

64:33

and

64:35

um I people say it's going to be this

64:38

really bad thing for the economy and for

64:40

workers but I see it a lot differently

64:44

because in my opinion some of our best

64:46

Minds for the last 20 years they're

64:49

full-time job is like expanding

64:51

Microsoft SM or whatever or like doing

64:55

legal work for some corporation that

64:58

it's not actually helping anybody right

65:00

it's uh you know or like accounting

65:04

generally as a profession um it's just

65:07

better if a machine could do it all

65:09

perfectly and no human has to do that

65:11

it's just you save a bunch of

65:13

efficiency uh what are people going to

65:15

do instead I don't know probably

65:17

something more in the physical world I

65:19

think that there's an idea you should be

65:22

short white collar and long blue collar

65:25

yeah agree Commodities are good

65:29

uh anything where you're actually making

65:31

a

65:32

physical um physical thing that

65:36

that's because there was that saying 15

65:39

years ago software is eating the world

65:42

and but if the cost of software goes to

65:44

zero it becomes a

65:46

commodity and AI can make a better piece

65:49

of uh software than any human could huge

65:53

team of humans and it can do it this in

65:54

like an hour

65:56

well then uh software will no longer be

65:58

eating the world I posted about that

66:01

booking.com for example where their

66:04

market cap is like $150 billion dollar

66:06

or so and then that's like a larger

66:10

market cap than all of the hotels in the

66:12

world or whatever is sort of what it's

66:14

implied or it's something close to that

66:17

or maybe the hotels are worth like

66:18

double the value but this is just a

66:20

website for booking hotels on the

66:22

internet okay this they're not actually

66:24

doing anything for the world it's just a

66:26

monopoly middleman that's all it is and

66:29

once those companies stop being able to

66:31

do that I think that maybe the people

66:33

who work in hotels and things regular

66:35

people can earn way more money again and

66:37

that's probably a good thing so yeah

66:41

yeah and uh I'll have to ask you sorry

66:44

man I have to ask you new question new

66:47

questions came to my mind uh first uh I

66:50

mean second question will be regarding

66:52

books uh of course we end the podcasts

66:55

regarding in uh uh your uh book

66:58

suggestions and uh but before that I

67:00

would uh to to conclude this

67:02

conversation so uh when you decide to

67:06

Long something and when you decide to

67:08

short something what are the factors you

67:11

take into

67:12

account yeah they're totally different

67:16

um so long investing is is really just a

67:19

simple

67:20

as I'm looking for something that can

67:23

pay me 10% a year or more in today's

67:26

market valuations if Market was a lot

67:28

cheaper I'd probably have a bit higher

67:30

hurdle you know maybe I'd be looking for

67:32

12 or 13% but if I'm pretty sure that

67:35

the real present value it's paying out

67:37

to shareholders is 10% a year you know

67:40

including the growth guys U you can't

67:42

just look at today's dividend yield for

67:44

Value guys yeah um but if if I'm really

67:48

convinced of that then this is so much

67:50

cheaper relative to the market than a

67:53

I'm earning this pretty good yield for

67:55

now and then B you know there's a good

67:58

chance you'll get some multiple

68:00

expansion as it catches up to the market

68:02

and the combined irr is really good

68:05

that's it on the long side there's

68:06

nothing more to it there's no industry

68:08

type or anything um and then on the

68:11

short side I'm primarily trying to avoid

68:14

getting run over so I just want to avoid

68:17

things that will go up a ton yeah on

68:20

like it's almost like the Dumber the

68:22

story is uh the more worried I am I I've

68:26

become in the last month or so I've been

68:29

becoming vocal about a bunch of shorts

68:31

that I normally wouldn't be attacking uh

68:34

but that's just because I I'm it's more

68:36

of a tactical short-term idea I think

68:39

there's a lot of weakness in the market

68:42

uh in speculative junky stocks yeah but

68:44

that's not that's a very shortterm thing

68:46

for me and uh once I think this brief

68:49

moment passes I'm just going to go back

68:51

to completely avoiding stocks like that

68:54

and instead I'm gonna focus on you know

68:57

the boring business that shouldn't exist

69:00

and the earnings are going down and it

69:02

probably won't exist in three years or

69:04

maybe another type of stock

69:06

is this is just really low return on

69:09

Capital it's got pretty bad management

69:12

who's going to sort of incinerate most

69:13

of the money that they do generate the

69:16

stock will probably go nowhere or down

69:18

slightly longterm that's also a great

69:21

short you know I'm not I don't have to

69:23

make a big score on everything I just

69:24

have to not lose too

69:26

bad yeah I mean uh what you said earlier

69:30

I mean I I had to short HS I mean h and

69:34

I mean I had to do it that went well

69:35

right that that that killed it I saw

69:38

yeah yeah that that that went especially

69:40

well but there's a lot of scams I I was

69:43

also short Reddit because I did a deep

69:46

research on Reddit and in my opinion

69:48

it's a scam company and uh on the other

69:51

hand uh paler in my view is manag

69:55

enrichment vehicle so it's and it's

69:58

dangerous to short the market leaders

70:00

and crowded shorts as you said but then

70:03

we have also companies like Warner bruss

70:06

Discovery and uh I mean companies like

70:09

like that like let's call them deep

70:11

value and uh but they are also crowded

70:15

in some way even though they fell so

70:17

much they they still have like 10 20%

70:20

days from time to

70:21

time do you also like completely ignore

70:24

them as well

70:26

I'm not in those ones I'm in kind of

70:28

similar more offbeat ones that people

70:30

talk about as much I think there's a lot

70:32

less squeeze risk uh yeah but yeah for

70:35

like paler and stuff that's the kind of

70:37

short

70:39

where like people like I'll put it this

70:42

way with that company people know who

70:44

the CEO is they can actually sort of

70:47

close their eyes and know who he is as a

70:50

person yeah anytime anytime you can do

70:53

that with a company I think you should

70:54

stay the hell away from the short this

70:56

guy can go on the news and start saying

70:58

some man and you're going to

70:59

lose 80% and you'll be like damn it he's

71:02

such a bastard and it's like no man you

71:05

made the mistake not him yeah yeah yeah

71:07

yeah yeah I I completely agree and I

71:12

mean okay man uh uh no more questions

71:16

regarding that

71:18

uh can you can you give us some

71:20

recommendations uh for for the books

71:23

that you enjoy

71:25

yeah um I'd say one of the more offbeat

71:28

ones because I could say ones that

71:30

people have probably heard of but yeah

71:31

yeah this one this one called the Scout

71:34

mindset um it's basically a book about

71:37

how to try to keep as open mind as

71:40

possible um try to go in and assume you

71:44

genuinely don't know things try to

71:47

figure out what's true not what you want

71:49

to be true try to avoid like a tribal

71:52

mentality yeah uh that's what the book

71:55

talks about um some of the exercises are

71:58

kind of hokey in it you don't really

71:59

have to do those but the ideas in the

72:01

book are good so I I would suggest that

72:04

because that's what kills people more

72:05

than anything markets is the sort of a

72:08

you know having to be right prove

72:11

yourself that you're right or whatever

72:13

rather than like you know being honest

72:16

with yourself or whatever so yeah I mean

72:19

if you don't admit it you're it's going

72:21

to happen again and uh as you said uh

72:24

regarding uh crowds I mean I see a lot

72:27

of companies as like elephants sitting

72:30

on a branch and what's crazy about the

72:32

markets is that uh branch is going to I

72:37

mean elephant is going to fall down but

72:39

because of the madness of the crowds a

72:41

lot of them are going to come under the

72:44

elephant and try to support him and uh

72:47

but uh that cannot happen for a long

72:50

time so some of them are going to escape

72:52

and some of them are not going to and uh

72:54

I mean see paler and all those companies

72:58

like that like yeah also also to be

73:01

clear today those might be fine ones to

73:03

press for a while yeah but don't forget

73:05

the game that you're playing because man

73:07

once the um once the stuff corrects and

73:10

things sort of settle for a while I'm

73:12

telling you man that guy's gonna get on

73:14

the news and he's gonna pump his

73:15

and you're gonna lose

73:18

so you know that's yeah just avoid the

73:22

brain damage unless you see a good

73:23

tactical short term reason to be short

73:26

is the short obvious fundamentally yeah

73:28

but that doesn't make you make money

73:31

yeah and especially the I'm against

73:33

staying in those shorts more than like a

73:35

week or two I mean you squeeze in one

73:38

day and that's pretty much

73:41

it okay man uh thank you a lot I really

73:45

I really enjoy this talk uh I would use

73:49

this opportunity to invite you next year

73:51

to come come again and and to see how uh

73:55

you did your fund did and your ETF of

73:57

course because I think that there's

73:58

going to be a large interest in in your

74:02

ETF and thank you a lot uh and I'll of

74:06

course put your links to X and other

74:09

networks for everyone else that's

74:11

interested all right thanks man thank

74:14

you see you man goodbye

Interactive Summary

In this interview, David, the founder of Militia Capital and manager of the ORR ETF, shares his journey from professional poker player to a hedge fund manager with a 2,000% gross return. He discusses his 'bet against beta' investment philosophy, the challenges of scaling capital, and the reasoning behind his move into active ETF management. The conversation covers diverse topics including the Japanese market, the Yen carry trade, the impact of AI on white-collar labor, and specific strategies for managing risk in both long and short positions.

Suggested questions

4 ready-made prompts