Hedge fund manager with 2000% gross return in 6 years | David Orr | Senzal Insights
1677 segments
[Music]
hello everyone and welcome to sel
insights today I have an honor to have
my special guest David or uh David is a
hedge fund manager of militia Capital
also he recently launched an ETF uh o RR
is is the ticker and U his ETF is doing
incred incredibly well so far even
though lunch was recently uh also he's
why I call him is because he's one of
the rare uh guys that actually killed
the market and that's exactly what he
did with his hge fund since
2018 uh he generated generated 2,000
gross per for his investors uh David
welcome thank you uh okay uh first of
all uh I would I would uh like to ask
you can you tell us something about
yourself what's interesting is that you
started as a I mean you were a
professional poker player and from then
then on after that you created a hedge
fund and did incredibly well yeah I I
just sort of played poker uh you know in
high school and then in early University
um I I planned on becoming an accountant
after University but uh because the
financial crisis happened right at the
same time I graduated you know there
were no jobs um yeah so I just started
playing poker more
seriously um and I actually moved out to
Thailand uh you know just sort of a Life
Adventure at the same time and um yeah
so I just played poker out there for
till
2017 uh so about almost uh seven years
of profession poker out in
Thailand um and I had some money saved
up I was really sick of playing poker at
that point so I started sort of
self-learning about investing I didn't
have any of sort of the you know
traditional background at all I just
sort of started reading about Market
anomalies lots of academic
papers um not not the bad kind of
academic papers that tell you that
Market's efficient yeah I mean I one of
them the one that because I learned I
studied economics as one of my majors in
University and you know they always said
how efficient markets are but then this
one paper I read early on S when I was
learning about self- learning about
investing it's called bet bet against
beta um this is a great paper you can
sort of Google it um and it showed that
the contrary to the efficient market
theory it's stocks that had the lower
beta that outperformed and they didn't
they were really thorough in this paper
they they showed it wasn't just stocks
it was bonds it was currencies it was
Commodities those would all outperform
also and then on top of that they look
different time frames they different
countries and it all like across every
thing you could think about it this sort
of anomally persisted so in the
efficient market theory they say you get
paid more for taking on more risk if you
take a higher beta bet you you're
supposed to earn more but actually the
exact opposite was happening uh and then
I realized well wait a minute what if I
sort of short you know that kind of more
speculative uh volatile thing and I'm
getting along the less volatile boring
profitable thing uh that sort of became
the backbone of what I was doing early
on that's that's that's that's actually
amazing I mean it's uh also uh like from
the perspective of f French uh model in
investing and I mean factors so you
would you would basically go along uh
value Factor uh and short probably
momentum growth or or something like
that yeah it's sort of like that because
it was more like the two factors would
be I was long small and
midcaps and I uh I didn't short the
large caps because the large caps they
don't have as much dispersion there's
not really as much opportunity there but
I short the small caps as well but then
I'd be shorting yeah the sort of
speculative
non-profitable rapidly growing hyped up
thing uh over time I've tailored this a
lot though because you know if you're
just long and short only those two
factors you have this horrible mismatch
and uh when it blows out against you it
gets really bad so now I'm mixing way
more factors than I used to that's sort
of the big change over the years um
especially avoiding the
really crowded speculative shorts I mean
that's the biggest I don't short any of
those anymore and you did the early
yeah I was pretty heavy in those and
then um it's not that it just sort of
went pretty bad because joring never
went that bad for me but I realized well
if something like Neo like this is a
pretty bad electric vehicle company uh
it went from like a150 up to like 50
bucks or whatever yeah and that was just
it wasn't based on earnings or anything
so you if that stock can do that and
you're saying well
you know let's say it goes from a150 to
10 bucks you're like well now it's this
amazing short right it has to be amazing
just because the thing's gone up it does
not have to be a better short than
before at all so you know then over time
I realized these sort of speculative
stories aren't good shorts at all so
yeah yeah I mean I I I have to agree
especially because I I got burned on the
shorting paler up until
recently because uh I I was I was uh
patient I was getting in and out of the
position and I mean I I completely agree
and uh uh also we have a micro strategy
I mean micro strategy is like 50 70% uh
from from the alltime high but uh not
not only micro strategy and you also
recently had a post about about micro
strategy uh how you see it I mean uh I
mean from the perspective of beta
actually yeah I mean that's just um yes
so the post is saying that Bitcoin is
about two times beta today in the modern
market and then micro strategy is around
you know it's basically lever 2x levered
Bitcoin so you have a 4X beta and then
there's these 2x micro strategy products
out there so you have the sort of
8X uh beta bet and then on top of that
people are playing call options on those
yeah so
uh yeah that's sort of been driving uh
the market and toward at the peak of
micro strategy guys were dming me how no
I'm I'm wrong this is actually an
infinity money machine and you just
don't get it or whatever it's like I
don't think I'm the one who's missing
anything here uh yeah but also it's a
that's the kind of dangerous short
because now you know even though I maybe
that one could work out it so bad but
even now it's like now you have a bunch
of shorts who want to Revenge trade the
thing because they got hit so bad on the
way up now you're gonna have all yes I
know and like I'm sure anyone who short
sells reading this like half of the guys
listening are like God I'm shorting it
it's like well that's the problem you
know that this thing uh I think in the
hands of a skilled Trader and everything
or risk management or like if you're
just betting is if you're only betting
on a tiny percent of these speculative
things and let's say you're pairing it
long Bitcoin yeah that's going to work
out over a few years for sure so you
know as long as you're betting just a
few perent total of the entire portfolio
on companies like that let's say micro
strategy is like a half a percent that's
probably fine yeah and also I think that
uh when it comes to shorts like that I
think the risk management is definitely
the most important thing because I mean
it can go 100 200 300% up and uh even
though if you're 1% invested into the
position is going to hurt and uh my
logic behind shorts like that is that I
usually do it shortterm and uh I would
basically get 10 20% and I'm out so
because I know that I mean once the
market starts going up as you said it's
four times beta
so it's crazy it's it's it's going to
it's going to hurt you so what I want to
show right now uh I would go first
through your hedge fund and then I would
uh go to your ETF that you recently
launched and uh I mean this this
performance is remarkable I mean you did
incredibly well what's interesting is
that you started with 50,000 I suppose
it was your own money right yeah that
was like a portion of my poker money
yeah and I mean here you in first year
you outperformed S&P by 4% but what what
was interesting is that in 2019 it was
at 200k and then 2020 1.1 million and I
mean this year was uh remarkable I mean
171 gross and uh from 1.1 million to 16
million and uh what I also respect about
you is that you charge 0.5% yearly
management fee and
25% over the S&P 500 500 returns I mean
you could probably go with 1% management
fee 1.5 even maybe with those kind of
returns and I I don't think your
investors would have any kind of problem
yeah I've been pretty blatantly
undercharging it's funny because
normally there'd be like a negotiation
there but my LPS tell me like man you
you should probably charging more like
you're undercharging they they actually
tell me this plainly and I'm like I
don't really care I might actually get
rid of the um S&P 500 hurdle next year
because uh you know now that I'm backing
these other PMS uh I don't want to force
them to undercharge so much uh but I'm
going to wait to make sure the
multi-manager thing works first and uh
can you can you tell me
from your philosoph philosophical
perspective how did you evolve through
this through this period period I know
you were first one guy and then you
realize that you need to employ more
people so because once you uh reach the
uh certain assets under management it's
a different kind of game and also how
would you structure that game let's say
one game is from like 100k to 10 million
second game is from like 10 million to
probably 100 million and completely
different game is probably from 100 or
500 million yeah I think that's well
said that you're even realizing that
there's a difference some guys sort of
think that they should be you know
investing their account the same way
like A5 billion dollar hedge fund
manager is and uh yeah you definitely
shouldn't so um basically the the key
strengths of a really small account and
the key downside so key strengths you
can play anything on the entire Market
including warrants I mean you can have
an extreme Edge in these warrants I mean
the the implied value that they're
trading for it's a blatant huge discount
so if you can find anything
fundamentally real that has warrants you
know you have an amazing bet
automatically um that's one example uh I
don't think it's worth getting to it too
much because it it w't won't scale but
you know if you if you notice something
early on you can juice your return that
way you should do it and then another
big Advantage you have as a small player
is the you have no no friction cost you
can get in and out of a position
immediately you're not going to move the
market you have no idea what a luxury
that is like uh now it is if I change my
opinion on a lot of stocks you know it
take a few days at least for me to get
out of the thing and you know if I have
a strong read on the situation that's
like oh I need to get out of this thing
quickly you know you're actually
weighing like well should I be pushing
the price against me or should I just
hope the bad news doesn't come out in
the next few days and that's um I'm at
my my partition today is like 70 million
so you know that's going to become a way
bigger problem later on um and then so
that those are the strengths you have as
a small player anyway and um the
weakness is you have a big spread cost
so if you just sort of have a buy and
hold and no short-term trading no you're
not exploiting any of the small uh
anomalies in the market um you're you're
like let's say you're running 300% gross
leverage like I was your your implied
loss there is like 7 8% a year you know
yeah so and this I don't think this is
the right format to explain the spread
cost but that's that's a really big cost
so you actually as a small player you
need to be exploiting the small things
if you're like a levered investor
um yeah I think that summarizes the
really small accounts and then
I think like from 10 to 20ish million
you you can still do some of that stuff
like but then after that point it really
just goes away and at that point you
have to rely more on like a bit longer
term trading mostly unless you're there
there are some styles that you can
specialize in like liquid volatile
situations uh so I'm not talking about
that but
otherwise yeah you're basically moving
from this sort of uh
uh exploiting these small anomalies to
still having you can still have the
luxury of playing almost any stock in
the Market at that scale which is really
nice but that that also will go away
gradually as you get bigger and that
will for sure eat into your Edge and
then on the flip side your your spread
cost savings you know it's already
gotten pretty good deal at that point on
Interactive Broker so you know now you
have to start thinking about well how do
I get enough
New Edge you know at like 50 million
bucks or
whatever so from like let's say 50
million it's
uh there's no way to exploit the
inefficiencies that retail Traders can
from yeah the really big edges are
totally gone at that point so like if
you're doing um after hours trading for
example as a small scale player you can
actually get like yeah a really nice
bill for 4% position right there and but
now at 50 million you you it's not even
going to move the account value even if
you do a bunch of really good trades
so yeah yeah you can't do that anymore
yeah I mean I completely agree
especially from the point that we as a
family office uh we uh invest as a large
family office I mean we plan to launch
launch a fund in Serbia uh so we try to
invest like large investor would would
invest but from different perspective we
also try to exploit what large investors
cannot so I can see the both sides of
the spectrum for example what we like to
do is we like some of the nanocaps and
nanocaps uh can go 5x 10x in a really
short span of time and as a larger
investor you cannot go inside I mean
there are some companies that have like
10 10 million market cap I mean you can
invest like one few hundred K and that's
pretty much it and if it goes like 100%
it's not going to do much for for your
uh performance so I completely agree but
uh would you say that from the let's say
500 million is uh actually we spoke
about it uh and that's why you said that
you're are going to employ more people
uh that uh once you get to 500 million
uh it's then again completely different
game from Up up to dep uh amount yeah so
my my opinion is you know at even like
maybe 150 200 million I could still have
like a pretty good Edge but after that
you know it really starts falling off
even more and uh it really starts with a
hedge fund kind of fee so I'm
undercharging and maybe it's okay longer
than other funds but other funds man you
know you're paying a hedge fund fee on a
guy when it's just mathematically very
very hard for him to win at that point
so for a single manager fund running 500
million bucks it doesn't make any sense
at all to me I don't think that a hedge
fund b or a hedge fund vehicle is
correct at all for that most of the time
uh there's a couple outlier talented
managers and maybe that'll push to a
billion or 1.5 billion that's the most
it goes but in practice what happens is
fund managers just sort of keep growing
you know and then they're two billion
dollars and then they don't have an edge
anymore and then uh that's especially
true if your LP is paying taxes you know
yeah that's why I mean Buffett is
cherished so much because his tax
strategy was incredibly good through the
decades I mean yeah what what he did
was because so many people pretend like
they've really studied or appreciated
what Buffett did but he shut down his
hedge fund you know so he's doing what
I'm talking about and he realized well
if I want to add value for people I
can't charge them hedge fund fees
anymore so he did birkshire and he
didn't charge
anything uh I you know I'm sort of doing
this ETF path to sort of do an in
between for a while and charge a really
low fee but I'm also going to have a
permanent Capital vehicle in the end
where I'll charge zero fee and that's
the way fund managers should be doing it
uh it's not even close I I'll ask you
one more question regarding the the the
hedge fund and then we'll move to the
ETF which I think a lot of viewers is
are going to find really interesting uh
but uh uh regarding your hedge fund uh
you are closed for uh new investors
right yeah I don't accept money right
yeah you you don't accept money right
now but I would like to ask you uh as I
said earlier from uh have your uh
investment philosophy evolv over time uh
I mean uh I think that any serious
investor can cannot be cannot depend on
the news on the different analysts uh
experts and stuff like that you need to
uh have your own uh way of thinking and
that was actually the first thing I
learned from my uh CEO and mentor and uh
how do you see that and where you from
the start someone that uh was uh having
completely completely independent
thinking or was
it later
on I was totally independent from the
beginning and I think that's the way
everyone should do it like I think
reading cide analyst reports I think
that's just a liability for people um I
think trying to like figure out why
someone's 13f positions are good from
these fund managers who are managing way
too much money that's just another trap
um I yeah I really think the only way to
do it is to go in and try to block
everything out and think about the
investment and what you think you know
unique thing you know about it like do I
do I understand this does it seem cheap
you know and actually think genuinely in
terms of what's the expected present
value of cash flows that's going to get
paid to shareholders that's the key
number to focus on and uh you know
I guess some maybe good guys can use
eitaa as a proxy for that but that's
another trap I think you know don't
think about EA think about earnings
growth versus how much they're going to
pay out to shareholders every year
that's that's a that's it and you don't
need some really fancy formula you just
need to ask the qualitative questions of
you know what's the what's the earnings
growth going to be mostly right
because people people think you can just
just buy like an 8 PE stock that's not
growing and but Management's even only
paying a 3% dividend and the dividend is
not growing and they think oh it's eight
times earning it's a cheap stock right
but you know it's like what's the
present value of that actually what are
you 3% a year and you're just sort of
hoping something Good's gonna happen and
I swear with stocks like that usually
something bad happens instead and then
you know and I have the negative return
so I don't know but
yeah I think the other thing is I would
get away from the whole mindset of I'm a
value investor or I'm a growth investor
completely quality investor you you just
got to get rid of that because as soon
as you try to
um yeah as soon as you try to box
yourself into a certain style it it's
just no good you need to think about all
of that
um you know sometimes a stock for that's
trading for 30 times earnings is is
actually pretty cheap because the
earnings growth is predicted able and
it's a really high quality business and
that that's more of a value stock than
most value stocks and then you know
conversely
um I don't yeah that that's all it is
it's
just don't don't try to invest with like
a set narrow criteria it will get you I
I I completely agree and I mean as you
said everyone should be flexible and
that's something that Stanley driller
talks a lot about and I mean uh you
always need to look at different
opportunities and I mean that's why you
are invested in Japan right now Japan is
a market that's uh extremely cheap when
we look at other developed markets and
uh do you do uh both long and short in
Japan
or I'm not shorting in Japan yet I might
get into it later um but I have like one
Japanese short on sort of test the
waters um nice thing about shorting
American companies is you get the um the
positive carry but in Japan you don't
really get you don't earn any sort of
you don't have the wind at your back on
those kind of shorts because the
interest rates are too low in Japan so
yeah and that's why I have to ask you
are you worried about Yen carry
trade I mean I I'm like 50% hedged on my
Japanese Longs
so I'm not really trying to express a
view yeah you know one way or the
other um but I think the guys who were
like long American stocks on borrowed
Yen I was expressing a pretty strong
View and uh but if you're if you're in
the Yen carry trade partially to fund
Japanese Longs that are a lot earning in
Yen you know that that's not really the
same thing it could blow out temporarily
like like it did last August but that
was already a hell of a hell of an
explosion and so anyone doing that that
trade on Leverage they're already gone
so that was like a 1987 style crash
right so that you know you got to
appreciate what that means um basically
all the guys who were heavy in that
trade are out of business and you don't
see anyone really talking about that
trade anymore right or even back then
you didn't see it so it didn't even
start off that crowded or anything and
and I feel like now it's probably not
very dangerous uh now that people in
that got washed out
already yeah so you think people learned
from that actually those that didn't get
uh uh destroyed from from the from what
happened last
August yeah I
think mostly I'm kind of surprised
nobody even talks about it like this is
a subject where no one on Twitter is
talking about it and I have never I've
talked to a bunch of different fund
managers and things and no one even
really talks about well you can borrow
this currency for free yeah now it's
half a percent a year exactly and it's
kind of weird it's like what else can
you borrow for half a percent a year
yeah it's basically free
money yeah and you know
but yeah that that's a really weird
trade because another weird thing about
that trade is it's been working
spectacularly for 15 years yeah it's
like this sort of quiet just extreme
Alpha like you want to say the Spy went
on the bullet run man think about long
stocks on borrow Yen I mean that trade
killed it because you know the Yen got
weaker at the same time as you were
paying nothing and I mean is it over now
I don't know
but yeah yeah uh okay I I I have to ask
you regarding
2020 how did you manage to to do so well
on Longs and shorts I mean that year is
outlier for example in 2022 you did like
uh you lose money on Longs but you did
incredibly well on shorts I mean that
was a horrible year for stocks but you
did I mean also
2019 uh 5821 and then 2020 65
64 yeah the um 2020 was a pretty unique
year because uh the way running with
high grow leverage works is that you go
into the event right and then after the
ball blows out to over and iFix goes to
over 60 you basically have to cut most
leverage so that means uh on that drop I
made a lot on shorts but because I had
to cut leverage I didn't have very many
shorts on after the drop so then I was
just sort of riding stupidly cheap
stocks long with you know a few
shorts okay okay that oh my God man that
that was that must have been amazing
right yeah it was it was it was cool
because it sort of got the fun kick
started earlier than it would have
probably yeah I mean from 1.5 and what
happened then I mean you went from 1.5
to 16 million yeah those are the year
end numbers
so
uh yeah so friends sort of were
contributing I was doing it through like
friends personal accounts uh in 2020 and
then the fund launched in
2021 uh so when the fund launched of
course a lot more money came in and then
I kept doing well throughout 2021 so
more money just kept blowing in and and
then
uh 2022 was when you actually showed the
what you know to do and uh I mean this
looks like uh have you seen returns from
Michael
Platt no uh actually his returns look
similarly to to this I mean it's uh it's
completely crazy I mean he also did
really well in
2022 and okay cool yeah I I didn't I'm
going to look him up for sure after this
yeah I mean I I'll send you after this
okay so since your uh fund is uh close
for outside investors you decided to
launch an ETF uh o RR is is the ticker
is listed on NASDAQ and uh this is a
website can you see the website yeah uh
so there's a ticker uh fun type is
active ETF regarding regarding this uh
uh I think that we shared the view uh
that you shared The View when I say that
active fun active money management is
coming back in fashion uh because
everyone is concentrated in s similar or
completely the same strategies and
basically doing the same thing and we
had uh Nifty 50s in like 50 years ago 40
40 50 years ago when there were like 50
stocks that everyone thought going to go
up forever and then that didn't happen
so also if we look for example
to there was a guy in Market hedphone
Market Wizards series Joe Wi he uh did
till like from 98 to 2012 he was like
9% uh average annually while S&P was uh
negative I mean and he was doing long
short basically and uh now uh looking uh
forward uh I think especially this year
is a good time to launch an ETF like
this and I'm really happy that you did
uh and uh how how do you see the the
future uh regarding the fund industry
from passive and active
perspective yeah I think um I mean
passive investing keeps gaining
share tons of active managers have shut
down last year even I think it's welld
deserved I think they're really
bad
um and you know you can only charge a
huge fee on bad performance for too you
know so long and eventually people say
screw this I'm going to go with the
passive thing that keeps going up and
then of course that's going to overcrowd
the passive Investments which I think it
clearly already has I could see passive
investing maybe taking another big leg
up that could happen of course who knows
but do I think that
the index can keep compounding at this
rate long term not not a chance uh once
people start selling out of the
retirement account they're selling huge
amounts of money at that point on this
sort of gain and there's not going to be
enough buyers to offset that and then
those stocks will start going down you
know once that's been not working for a
long enough time people get bored and
sick of it and then you know you could
see a pretty big collapse but it's it's
hard to say exactly if that'll happen as
it did historically maybe this time is
different I've talked about that a
little bit on Twitter recently where I
said you know if you look
at people like to make fun of people who
say this time is different but look at
the occurrences of a recession so 500
years ago every other year was a
recession you know was this Harvest
better or worse than last year if not
it's a recession and then in the
industrial revolution you know you
started having recessions a bit less
often but still pretty bumpy yeah every
10 years
basically yeah and then it's gotten to a
point where it went from every other
year to every few years to every five
years now it went every 10 years so we
had one 80 90 2000
2010 and then uh you know now we haven't
had one
for uh not sorry not 20 uh yeah so we
have we haven't had one in 15 years now
basically besides Co which
that was sort of a special that people
wouldn't really count that as an
economic recession exactly so that's
different
um you know so if if we're not going to
have a recession you know it's it's
maybe markets can get a lot more crazy
than they have historically of course so
yeah I think that's something to keep in
mind if you're a long short guy you know
if you're trying to compare to the past
or something yeah I mean I I I
completely agree and there's actually a
really good book it's called applied
macroeconomics
and portfolio management something like
that I can't remember the full name and
uh it was a guy from I think CEO of mar
Lynch or something like that he wrote
the book ex CEO and he actually made the
same point that you did that uh in
historically we had much more recessions
and they occurred much more often and
now we we have uh I mean if you look
from the historical perspective economic
cycle was basically doing this and now
because of the Fiat money and the
monetary system that we live in and the
exploitation of Keynesian economics in
my opinion uh we we uh don't have
it the often as we do as we did
historically but now uh recessions and
the market drops are much more violent
and I think that's something that's
going
to be for probably for the next Years or
or decades we'll have large onee drops
or twoe drops and then we'll have
aggressive ways aggressive moves
up yeah I think the point about
especially the the government debt side
the fiscal side where they're just
spending like crazy
there's an argument of course that that
will all catch up to us I think that
could easily be the case as well that
could also explain why we haven't had
recession in so long um so it's a pretty
complicated
uh question but yeah for my part I'm
doing my best to say I don't know I mean
if I'm being honest I think today's
index valuations are completely insane
and uh it's not going to end well but
maybe I'm wrong I you know this is this
is a harder thing to control right this
is uh the kind
of even if I'm right maybe the price
will go against me even from here 20
years somehow and you know that's just
not a game I'm interested in thinking
too much about instead I'm looking for
you know cheap companies that I'm pretty
sure are going to go up based on real
fundamentals and I'm going to try to
short crappy companies and try to avoid
hype you know that's all I'm trying to
do and if I do that well then I don't
really have to worry about you know that
that sort of macro it'll drive a person
crazy you know yeah I mean and and and
it's impossible I remember beginning of
2023 everyone was projecting recession
everyone yeah I wasn't I in my letter I
said I I don't think we're gonna have a
recession so that's I mean well done and
I mean I remember s Stanley Draco Miller
he was like if I had to guess I would
say end of 2023 begin of 2024 Stanley
was he was projecting recession at the
beginning of
2023 but not only him a lot of different
guys I mean even a guy from uh uh his
name is from U Morgan Stanley I think
Mike Wilson
right Perma bear guy he was also like I
mean he cap capitulated in 20123 or 2024
I mean and I read pretty much every
analysis of a large investment
institution uh at the beginning of each
year that's what we do here and just for
the interesting information and but
what's interesting is that everyone is
uh wrong usually by W wide margin I mean
everyone every single one of
them yeah that one that was a weird case
because I was also bullish on housing
stocks back in 2020 which people thought
was crazy but my whole point back then
was how can you have a recession when
like many trillions of dollars in real
terms just it got inflated
away so now all these homeowners have
way way more money than before at least
short term so it just seemed impossible
to me basically that we would have a
recession in that particular environment
it didn't make any sense today I don't
really have a strong opinion I don't
know because that sort of was
a benefit that gave a boom for a few
years and then after that that's sort of
it and now new anyone getting a mortgage
today now has a much higher mortgage
rate and
everything um it sort it could work the
other way where mortgage rates just sort
of gradually very slowly grind down
nobody can really refinance then and uh
you know that's sort of a not that's
more of a an area where people don't
have a ton of extra money and you could
actually have a recession
so yeah I mean I that's actually really
interesting uh uh point of view I I to
be honest I didn't talk uh think about
the home builders uh last year even
though uh some of large investors were
buying them and they were really cheap
at the time if I remember cor correctly
I remember lar that was my my my biggest
bet back then was the Mi homes and you
could buy it for essentially homes for
like 50 50 cents on the dollar plus you
got this profitable business on in
addition and uh and I think what people
really missed there was the fact that
never before in American history for
such a long time like for a decade
people could get a mortgage for like
3% and then right after covid people can
get a mortgage for even like a lot less
and a lot of people did
get the way lower interest rate they
swapped their mortgage out and you know
that's an incredible amount of money
they made so fast when we got inflation
so but but obviously we don't have
remotely the same setup
today exactly and I think those uh
people that fixed the rates at such low
levels aren't willing to sell because to
buy something new I mean that's why home
builder case is still intact in a in uh
some way if if I mean if everything goes
uh well if you don't some don't have
some kind of uh recession or something
something like that uh let's uh go back
to your ETF what I really like about
your ETF is that it's doing incredibly
well uh I
mean there we have it and uh from
percentage point it's up since uh
uh let let's say 15th of January uh it's
up like 4
4.2% 4% and if we add for example NASDAQ
I mean we have a completely different
situation and uh I mean it's uh I mean
congratulations man good good good
timing to to launch an ETF so uh yeah
and that was a good one too because we
we're like Almost 100% net long there so
that was uh really yeah we uh our net
exposure is uh yeah I think it's maybe
75% long or something like that
something like that so then it all comes
comes down to the structure of your ETF
and uh there we can have the everything
is completely transparent I suppose this
is a hedge right no that's the cash
proceeds from Short Selling okay and
then
um and then what happens is we're we're
50% hedged on the
Yen right so like we have I think 50 or
60% gross long exposure to Japan right
now and so if you're uh you know
borrowing Yen there you have also extra
USD that way although I don't think
that's even showing up here
but um so yeah we we're sitting on a
pretty big USD balance but it's not
because we're sitting on cash exactly
it's just because you know that's the
way the Leverage is is working here yeah
yeah uh thank you for the explanation
and I mean we can see for example energy
transfer uh I mean it's really defensive
position uh and so that might be the the
one of the reasons why for example I
mean you don't you don't have like
growth names here basically it's a as
you saidil from Phil opical perspective
you uh try to find good opportunities uh
you don't go momentum factor or or stuff
like that oh yeah yeah everything here
is uh really just based on fundamentals
I'm not doing this thing where I'm
buying the 20 times Revenue stock I'm
not uh focusing on growth stocks I'm
focused on I mean these aren't all low
multiples
um but actually if you go to Morning
Star it'll summarize the stats of the
portfolio which I think is really cool
so if you type in like militia ETF you
can see things like the average PE ratio
of the stocks Morning Star yeah this is
like a really cool um you click
portfolio so the second link or yeah
click portfolio
there they've done a really good job
here and so
uh if you scroll down a little bit more
you'll see the uh stats of the portfolio
of the underlying
stocks yeah I cannot see sadly
everything Financial metrics yeah you
don't need to see that one it's the
one's up above it's the um you can see
like the earnings growth and things um
the price to earnings ratio is
9.8 the sales growth is 7% a year the
dividend yield is 4 % the price to cash
flow is six you know these are just good
numbers and then the underlying
businesses are not bad so normally you'd
have numbers like that and the
businesses are just crap like the sales
growth instead of being positive might
be negative uh or the cash flow growth
maybe that's negative but in this case
you have both a low PE a pretty solid
dividend yield you know pretty good cash
flow growth
growth um so that's you know that's
what's going to do well the cash flow
keeps growing at over 7% a year and if
the dividend is 4% a year you know and
then it's got some leverage involved so
you know now you're talking about
earning a pretty solid return there yeah
and I mean with this I mean with this
and free cash flow growth I mean they
are going to buy back the stock raise
the dividends and and so on and also
it's really really defensive let's say I
mean when momentum start stops working
uh everyone is going to pile into this
stuff I mean it's shown historically
that when
momentum doesn't work value works and
what's really interesting is that value
small value Factor actually outperformed
pretty much anything in the last like 40
years which is really
interesting yeah I think because that
anomaly became so known the uh as a
basket especially in the USA the small
value stocks got bid too high yeah which
actually pushed the returns down so
that's why I think value investing
hasn't been working so great if you pick
the index of them but if you sort of
look beneath the surface you can yeah
make an honest attempt at saying how
good is the business quality here you
know and if the business quality is
pretty good and it's a value stock then
you know that's what you're looking for
yeah I mean I completely agree I I went
through the Russell 2000 pretty much
every position and uh if you talk about
2000 of course and like I also I also
saw that you came to the same conclusion
that like at least 50 or more perc of
the companies are fundamentally not
doing well even more yeah it's it's just
a big trash Heap I mean it's really
really bad um
that's why I mean that's the biggest
short in the ETF is the covered call
version of that
um so there we have it uh amongst your
positions if I'm not mistaken yeah there
it is so what's your logic I I think
that everyone is uh going to ask the
same question uh there we have like 31%
of the net assets short disposition what
is this this is basically uh let's show
it sorry it's r yld d yeah Y what we
have here this ETF I mean this chart
chart is looking horrendous horrendously
and it but it pays a large dividend
right probably around
10% yeah it's a bit more than 10% a year
so the chart's not as bad as it looks
because it is paying that big fat
dividend but and it's one actually yeah
yeah those are new popular
strategies yeah
basically uh one nice thing about
shorting this in the ETF is that the
upside is capped and I'm trying to keep
like in the hedge fund structure if
something's going horribly wrong on
shorts you know I I I can be more Nimble
there I can make more trading Decisions
by myself but in the ETF structure I
can't do that and so having you know
this be a core part of the ETF short
book means that you know it's so much
more robust from like me not having to
put out fires which I can't do as nimbly
in the
ETF um it really because the most this
uh ETF can really get you is a couple
percent a month or maybe 3% a month
that's the most you can lose so if I
have a 30% short position and I sort of
know I can lose a percent a month on
this thing as a percent of our nav and
that's that's a
reasonable you know uh amount to lose
per month without getting run over right
not and having something explode and you
don't really even know how you can
handle it in ETF structure it's a big
difference in the hedge fund where you
can't
trade I can't be nimble and be like oh I
can get in here and cover this thing
real fast I can't tell the ETF Trader to
do
this yeah yeah and uh I mean we also
have here uh that you went you have
sqqq you went sqqq yeah yeah that's
that's um that's more of a shorter term
tactical play because that's actually a
long position essentially a 21% long
NASDAQ position yeah but because of
what's going on in the market and the
volatility I sort of am guessing that
yeah the volatility drag of these 3x
levered products gets really nasty when
the Market's volatile so I'm guessing
that the volatility is going to chop
this thing up uh and that's my main
reason and then I have similarly the TNA
is the Russell 2000 version that's a
bull position so that's actually a short
position uh and these are actually going
to hedge each other a bit um
yeah yeah so that's the bet it's not
really I'm not really betting on the
direction of the market with those bets
I'm more betting on the market
environment Trump tariffs sure seem
choppy and crazy yeah this is a perfect
environment to be short that crap yeah
yeah uh okay
uh okay I'm not going to go anym to your
positions but uh what everyone is going
to ask for sure is why is there such a
large gross expense rati yeah because
The Regulators are really bad at at
making this uh I
mean that's not a real cost at all uh
and it's just really dumb that they
forced me to put that there even on
Morning Star they don't even put that
they show like the real one the net if
you click back on that thing you'll see
it um if you uh somewhere they'll see
they show the adjusted expense
ratio and I don't not trying to do the
uh adjusted numbers thing but I think if
you go back to quote it's
there sorry I I'm not using morning
Stars so yeah it's okay adjusted expense
ratio so they're putting the real number
this is what The Regulators forc me to
put I don't know it doesn't it doesn't
mean anything at all and and why is that
uh I mean why is it showing such a large
number yeah so I'm short like these bdcs
that pay a big dividend also
that's similar to the uh Russell 2000
covered call ETF where these things
can't go up that much on you too quickly
but in a different way so it's
Diversified um and those yeah so these
short dividend expenses are considered
an expense but it's in practice you know
you can look at the chart and you'll see
every time it pays a dividend the stock
drops by the exact same amount yeah so
that's not a cost at all it's it's just
not
real um so that's most of it and then
like a smaller part of
it um is like the cost of margin so
we're we're borrowing dollars to be a
bit more long that's considered an
expense um that's sort of a real cost
but we're also long more stocks with it
right so presumably the stocks will earn
more than that hurdle rate and then the
the last big one is the short the short
selling so when you when you short sell
you're borrowing stock from somebody
and in our portfolio there it's about 1%
to borrow um so the the impact on that
18% is pretty small as a percent but the
bigger impact is that it's not including
the short rebate so the ETF holder is
actually being paid 4% a year to be
short stocks yeah uh and that's not
again it's they don't put that to offset
the 18% or the margin interest or
anything
uh so that's just why it's more
nonsensical it's counting the expense
but it's not counting the the the
benefit yeah yeah uh I mean thank you
thank you for for the explanation I
think that you probably received a lot
of messages regarding that and it's so
large and you
know what's going on are you seriously
charging this much so you charge if I
1.6 right 1.4 something like that 1.3
1.3 yeah uh and that's also reasonable
for active uh long short strategy I mean
completely reasonable and I think that
we lack like last year or the year
before that I was looking for good uh
active long short ETFs and uh I only saw
vanilla ones basically S&P
703 or 7050 or or 130 or something like
that BAS basically it was uh one yellow
one there there there isn't there isn't
a good one there's like one there's one
like okayish one sort of uh it's not
really performed great but to their
credit it's going up at least and it
perform pretty decently through bare
markets so I think that was a reasonable
one but you know I I'm hoping that I'll
be able to do a lot better than that one
yeah and and I and I hope too and uh I
need to make a disclosure that uh we we
do own the the ETF and everything we say
here is not an investment advice so do
your own research and make your
investment decisions uh with your
financial advisor or on your own but uh
just for for the record nothing we say
here is an an investment advice and uh
okay but where uh where do you see the
this situation with Trump and the market
uh from of course nobody knows but
nobody knows that's my thesis yeah uh
you know there's a bearish argument that
you think he's actually a mad man who
just likes tariffs for the sake of
tariffs and he wants to watch the world
burn and he wants to actually Ally with
Russia and all this stuff yeah yeah I
don't do I do I actually think that's
true I think most likely it's not true
but it's possible uh maybe some parts of
it are true maybe none of it is true I
don't think anybody knows uh I won't
name him but this guy's even like a
progressive he's a self-described sort
of progressive left type guy he a big
hedge fund manager we're pretty friendly
uh despite having pretty different
politics but you know privately on phone
calls what he says is a lot different
than what he posts on on the internet
right so privately in phone calls he's
pointing out that past presidents you
know very uh some some US presidents
were these super wild crazy men like no
one could predict really what they what
they were or weren't capable of okay and
if you're thinking through um sort of
um like a period where there's no
conflict there's no
volatility maybe that's pretty bad thing
he just sort of adds volatility to a bad
situ like a calm situation he's creating
problems for no reasons right so in that
situation I would be very like this is
stupid why do we have Trump but if
you're in a spot where the world's
looking very dangerous in my opinion uh
we have a hot war in Europe and the
situation in taiwan's looking bad and
you sort of have this alliance between
Iran Russia and
China you know that looks like a
dangerous sort of war world that's a lot
different than the world we were in 20
years
ago yeah and so the point is having this
leader uh who I hope has a plan and he's
not actually a crazy person like he's
acting like he is one make no mistake
what I'm saying is clearly what he's
saying is on the surface it's crazy yeah
but does he act who knows what he
believes and doesn't so that's it's a
powerful spot to be in as an opponent
okay that means the USA's opponents
don't know what the hell they're up
against either
that that is completely true
actually so that that's how I'm seeing
Trump uh I'm optimistic I'm not not
gonna say I'm Optimist I'm hopeful for
sure and
uh you know look at the Ukraine
situation he came out in such strong
support of Ukraine early on right after
the invasion am I like really to believe
that now all of the sudden he's buddy
buddy with Russia I mean no I don't
believe it at all
but you know hopefully I'm right you
know I think every even if you don't
like Trump even if you think you know
you don't like my politics whatever we
can all hope that like hope that I'm
right guys like you know we're on the
same team here yeah I mean I I I agree
with you uh but and I I think that uh I
see I see it from the point that there's
like uh not there's only like right and
left there's not a middleman there's not
someone that's going to look from the
side and be objective everyone is like
I'm Pro Trump and whatever he does I
support him and other ones are like I
hate Trump I hate everything about him
everything he does is horrible and
there's not a lot of people that are
like objective and being like okay this
is good this is bad this is good this is
bad I mean and uh that uh goes I
mean in the state of the world we live
in I mean everyone is pro Ukraine or Pro
Russia no body is like in the middle
being objective and uh uh and I think
that's the problem with the current
world and I think that's a healthy thing
about investing in the stock market
because if you are biased you're getting
destroyed I I mean for sure yeah I think
everyone should take a way more of an
approach to say you just don't know
Trump against Trump you don't actually
know guys and uh I don't know certainly
uh so yeah yeah I mean uh I I completely
agree but uh I think that bassent is a
good guy for the job I like the fact
that he wants to bring long-term
treasuries down uh hopefully he's going
to do it I mean if you look at
the where fed I mean where American
government spends like 1.2 trillion
right on interest expense I mean if you
want to lower the deficit that's uh one
that's in top three positions Medicare
interest and uh military so also it's
interesting uh that Europe is uh going
uh up it's outperforming America by a
wide margin since the beginning of the
year and since you are a tactical
investor are you looking somewhere
somewhere else other than Japan and US
yeah I mean I've got quite a few uh
European equities in the ETF I've like
this Spanish airports the Louis vaton
yeah you know I got that sort of Swiss
Railroad stock nobody ever talks about
that's good stock you know yeah I know I
was actually looking at them last year
and I didn't buy it to be honest I think
just it's a nice like it's not going to
have some outstanding return but it's
really easy to see that thing making 10%
a year it seems pretty predictable no
one's going to disrupt what they're
doing that type of investment seems
pretty damn good today you know that's
going to be hard to beat from here
and uh what are your thoughts on for
example Brazil Brazil is getting popular
again and I mean uh there as you said at
the beginning of the podcast that you
shouldn't be like I'm value investor I'm
this I'm that and a lot of those let's
say anti-growth
investors uh those that are like Pro
gold Pro gold stocks are a lot a lot of
them are bullish on uh Brazil for
example and don't I don't really
understand I've looked a few times I
just couldn't wrap my head around the
Brazilian situation uh politically
especially where it's going to go from
here the this the annoying thing about
Brazil
is I thought the old party they were
like a right-wing party but I didn't
think they were particularly good for
Brazil or at stocks either so it's hard
for me to be as bullish on
Brazil because I don't really know which
way that's going to go in
mentally um and then like the one
Brazilian stock I followed closely was
the oil company PBR yeah uh and you know
their the current government is actually
really screwing shareholders over in a
real way yeah and
so you know it's hard for me to be
bullish when that's the case um I like
Colombia a lot today because there you
can see that the Socialist president is
uh polling really poorly and he's most
likely going to lose and when he loses
the Colombian stocks are going to go up
although it sort of happened already to
some degree but I think they still have
some room to run I used to have the uh
Colombian Bank stock in the ETF but I
sold that on the jump but we still have
the Colombian oil companies uh they're
both really cheap um so I like that play
better in Colombia Brazil too hard today
yeah I agree even though we have uh
index has like 6% dividend yield which
is really attractive but still I mean if
there isn't a change in the in politics
it's uninvestable for me as well and I
mean I completely agree also interesting
uh possible interesting plays Norway as
well Norway has the more sophisticated
but fundamentally the the same problem
that they have left in in power and if
they lose which might not happen might
might happen uh it's going to be bullish
for Norway for example I mean because
because there's uh I like Scandinavia
because they have really high level of
corporate governance and they are really
I mean really transparent you know that
they're not going to lie in the yeah
it's it's weird I haven't looked more at
those stocks because they've actually
looked genuinely interesting and they've
actually seem to go up long term unlike
a lot of the world stock market uh I
really should take closer look for some
reason that's the one market like I've
looked through every Swiss stock and UK
stock and Spanish stock but for some
reason I never took the Nordic countries
seriously and I should what I wanted to
say two interesting one interesting
thing and one question and we can uh
slowly end our our podcast is first uh
what's really interesting is that uh
Southeastern let's say part of Europe is
really interesting because there's a lot
of extremely cheap
companies that are doing really well for
example
Slovenia uh did incredibly well last
year Romania for example as well and
there there you have uh some of the
banks or pharmaceutical companies that
went like like 50 60% up last year while
paying five 6 8% dividend however the
problem is liquidity liquidity is uh
really low and that that's the M main
problem of of this uh region of the
world because of Communism markets
aren't developed as well we had like
only 30 20 some 20 some other nations 30
years to develop uh working uh stock
stock market I would also like to ask
you what's your uh take on AI sorry man
I had
to yeah uh I think it's I think it's
real and I think it's going to be um
like for people with white collar jobs I
think a lot of them are going to be out
of work and you're not going to get work
again
and
um I people say it's going to be this
really bad thing for the economy and for
workers but I see it a lot differently
because in my opinion some of our best
Minds for the last 20 years they're
full-time job is like expanding
Microsoft SM or whatever or like doing
legal work for some corporation that
it's not actually helping anybody right
it's uh you know or like accounting
generally as a profession um it's just
better if a machine could do it all
perfectly and no human has to do that
it's just you save a bunch of
efficiency uh what are people going to
do instead I don't know probably
something more in the physical world I
think that there's an idea you should be
short white collar and long blue collar
yeah agree Commodities are good
uh anything where you're actually making
a
physical um physical thing that
that's because there was that saying 15
years ago software is eating the world
and but if the cost of software goes to
zero it becomes a
commodity and AI can make a better piece
of uh software than any human could huge
team of humans and it can do it this in
like an hour
well then uh software will no longer be
eating the world I posted about that
booking.com for example where their
market cap is like $150 billion dollar
or so and then that's like a larger
market cap than all of the hotels in the
world or whatever is sort of what it's
implied or it's something close to that
or maybe the hotels are worth like
double the value but this is just a
website for booking hotels on the
internet okay this they're not actually
doing anything for the world it's just a
monopoly middleman that's all it is and
once those companies stop being able to
do that I think that maybe the people
who work in hotels and things regular
people can earn way more money again and
that's probably a good thing so yeah
yeah and uh I'll have to ask you sorry
man I have to ask you new question new
questions came to my mind uh first uh I
mean second question will be regarding
books uh of course we end the podcasts
regarding in uh uh your uh book
suggestions and uh but before that I
would uh to to conclude this
conversation so uh when you decide to
Long something and when you decide to
short something what are the factors you
take into
account yeah they're totally different
um so long investing is is really just a
simple
as I'm looking for something that can
pay me 10% a year or more in today's
market valuations if Market was a lot
cheaper I'd probably have a bit higher
hurdle you know maybe I'd be looking for
12 or 13% but if I'm pretty sure that
the real present value it's paying out
to shareholders is 10% a year you know
including the growth guys U you can't
just look at today's dividend yield for
Value guys yeah um but if if I'm really
convinced of that then this is so much
cheaper relative to the market than a
I'm earning this pretty good yield for
now and then B you know there's a good
chance you'll get some multiple
expansion as it catches up to the market
and the combined irr is really good
that's it on the long side there's
nothing more to it there's no industry
type or anything um and then on the
short side I'm primarily trying to avoid
getting run over so I just want to avoid
things that will go up a ton yeah on
like it's almost like the Dumber the
story is uh the more worried I am I I've
become in the last month or so I've been
becoming vocal about a bunch of shorts
that I normally wouldn't be attacking uh
but that's just because I I'm it's more
of a tactical short-term idea I think
there's a lot of weakness in the market
uh in speculative junky stocks yeah but
that's not that's a very shortterm thing
for me and uh once I think this brief
moment passes I'm just going to go back
to completely avoiding stocks like that
and instead I'm gonna focus on you know
the boring business that shouldn't exist
and the earnings are going down and it
probably won't exist in three years or
maybe another type of stock
is this is just really low return on
Capital it's got pretty bad management
who's going to sort of incinerate most
of the money that they do generate the
stock will probably go nowhere or down
slightly longterm that's also a great
short you know I'm not I don't have to
make a big score on everything I just
have to not lose too
bad yeah I mean uh what you said earlier
I mean I I had to short HS I mean h and
I mean I had to do it that went well
right that that that killed it I saw
yeah yeah that that that went especially
well but there's a lot of scams I I was
also short Reddit because I did a deep
research on Reddit and in my opinion
it's a scam company and uh on the other
hand uh paler in my view is manag
enrichment vehicle so it's and it's
dangerous to short the market leaders
and crowded shorts as you said but then
we have also companies like Warner bruss
Discovery and uh I mean companies like
like that like let's call them deep
value and uh but they are also crowded
in some way even though they fell so
much they they still have like 10 20%
days from time to
time do you also like completely ignore
them as well
I'm not in those ones I'm in kind of
similar more offbeat ones that people
talk about as much I think there's a lot
less squeeze risk uh yeah but yeah for
like paler and stuff that's the kind of
short
where like people like I'll put it this
way with that company people know who
the CEO is they can actually sort of
close their eyes and know who he is as a
person yeah anytime anytime you can do
that with a company I think you should
stay the hell away from the short this
guy can go on the news and start saying
some man and you're going to
lose 80% and you'll be like damn it he's
such a bastard and it's like no man you
made the mistake not him yeah yeah yeah
yeah yeah I I completely agree and I
mean okay man uh uh no more questions
regarding that
uh can you can you give us some
recommendations uh for for the books
that you enjoy
yeah um I'd say one of the more offbeat
ones because I could say ones that
people have probably heard of but yeah
yeah this one this one called the Scout
mindset um it's basically a book about
how to try to keep as open mind as
possible um try to go in and assume you
genuinely don't know things try to
figure out what's true not what you want
to be true try to avoid like a tribal
mentality yeah uh that's what the book
talks about um some of the exercises are
kind of hokey in it you don't really
have to do those but the ideas in the
book are good so I I would suggest that
because that's what kills people more
than anything markets is the sort of a
you know having to be right prove
yourself that you're right or whatever
rather than like you know being honest
with yourself or whatever so yeah I mean
if you don't admit it you're it's going
to happen again and uh as you said uh
regarding uh crowds I mean I see a lot
of companies as like elephants sitting
on a branch and what's crazy about the
markets is that uh branch is going to I
mean elephant is going to fall down but
because of the madness of the crowds a
lot of them are going to come under the
elephant and try to support him and uh
but uh that cannot happen for a long
time so some of them are going to escape
and some of them are not going to and uh
I mean see paler and all those companies
like that like yeah also also to be
clear today those might be fine ones to
press for a while yeah but don't forget
the game that you're playing because man
once the um once the stuff corrects and
things sort of settle for a while I'm
telling you man that guy's gonna get on
the news and he's gonna pump his
and you're gonna lose
so you know that's yeah just avoid the
brain damage unless you see a good
tactical short term reason to be short
is the short obvious fundamentally yeah
but that doesn't make you make money
yeah and especially the I'm against
staying in those shorts more than like a
week or two I mean you squeeze in one
day and that's pretty much
it okay man uh thank you a lot I really
I really enjoy this talk uh I would use
this opportunity to invite you next year
to come come again and and to see how uh
you did your fund did and your ETF of
course because I think that there's
going to be a large interest in in your
ETF and thank you a lot uh and I'll of
course put your links to X and other
networks for everyone else that's
interested all right thanks man thank
you see you man goodbye
Ask follow-up questions or revisit key timestamps.
In this interview, David, the founder of Militia Capital and manager of the ORR ETF, shares his journey from professional poker player to a hedge fund manager with a 2,000% gross return. He discusses his 'bet against beta' investment philosophy, the challenges of scaling capital, and the reasoning behind his move into active ETF management. The conversation covers diverse topics including the Japanese market, the Yen carry trade, the impact of AI on white-collar labor, and specific strategies for managing risk in both long and short positions.
Videos recently processed by our community