HomeVideos

We're Absolutely Cooked

Now Playing

We're Absolutely Cooked

Transcript

282 segments

0:00

It's that time again where I drop

0:02

trousers and plant a stinky one on

0:04

Burger King. It is unbelievable how

0:07

often I make fun of this company. I

0:09

believe they have some of the worst fast

0:11

food in the world. Your money would be

0:13

better spent buying rats to eat than

0:15

their food. It is just absolutely

0:17

terrible. But the thing that keeps me

0:20

shooting spitballs at them is they are

0:22

addicted to awful, awful decisions.

0:25

They're like the Ubisoft of fast food.

0:28

They're just incapable of even

0:30

accidentally stumbling into a good

0:32

decision for their business. At least in

0:34

America. Every time I mention this and

0:36

go on this rant on stream, there's

0:38

always someone like Clockwork that says,

0:40

"But Charles, that's only in the

0:42

States." Internationally, Burger King is

0:44

serving up some highquality cuisine. You

0:47

know what's better than serving up

0:48

smiles? It's like, okay, I guess I can't

0:50

speak for the quality of Burger King

0:52

outside of America, but every Burger

0:53

King in America is a [ __ ] hate crime

0:56

when it comes to food. It's terrible.

0:57

It's terrible. And now their most recent

1:00

announcement is probably their stupidest

1:03

one yet, which is that's an

1:05

accomplishment. That is actually an

1:07

achievement. I cannot believe Burger

1:10

King found a way to get stupider, but

1:11

they did it. That orb of confusion

1:13

working overtime over there at the

1:15

Burger King HQ.

1:16

>> Good morning, Patty.

1:17

>> Would you want an AI voice in your

1:19

headset all day at work built to assist

1:22

you? Looks like the women's restroom

1:25

needs cleaning, but also potentially

1:27

listening in on your interactions with

1:29

customers.

1:30

>> Thank God. Finally, an AI assistant that

1:34

can jack into the headset of all Burger

1:36

King employees to act like their [ __ ]

1:39

mother saying, "Hey, did you remember to

1:41

clean the bathroom? Go lick the [ __ ]

1:43

clean, please. Burger King demands it."

1:46

and then also monitoring your speech to

1:48

ensure you are saying please and thank

1:50

you enough times per day. Excellent.

1:54

This is what everyone's been begging

1:55

for. This is probably the most desperate

2:00

attempt to hamfist AI into a corporation

2:04

to try and see any kind of like clawback

2:07

on money because I bet Burger King's

2:09

already lost quite a bit investing in AI

2:11

in somewhere in their pipeline. So

2:12

they're like, "Okay, let's check for

2:14

please and thanks you. thank yous and

2:16

then anyone who's not, you know, pinky

2:18

up saying please and thank you to every

2:19

customer will just [ __ ] fire. And

2:21

they're trying to frame this as a

2:22

friendliness coach. My left butt cheek,

2:26

a friendliness coach. All it's doing is

2:29

reminding them to do chores and

2:31

monitoring their speech. it it like it's

2:34

going to be used as a tool of fear

2:36

because if you don't say please and

2:38

thank you enough or go, you know, shove

2:40

your head in the toilet and give

2:41

yourself a swirly when AI Patty at

2:44

Burger King tells you to do so, you

2:46

might lose your job. How is this

2:49

coaching you in any way, shape, or form?

2:52

This is outrageous. And also, believe it

2:55

or not, Burger King's biggest issue

2:57

isn't the lack of manners and

3:00

friendliness. You know, it's not because

3:02

they're devoid of pleases and thank

3:04

yous. That's that's what that's not why

3:06

people avoid Burger King like the

3:08

plague. It's because they literally

3:10

serve up the plague on a bun. They serve

3:12

you sewage. They serve you radioactive

3:14

sludge. If if Burger King wants to

3:17

improve customer satisfaction, work on

3:19

your [ __ ] menu, not the pleases and

3:22

thank yous from your employees.

3:24

>> Well, that's what a new tool at Burger

3:26

King plans to do, and it's causing quite

3:28

a stir. The company's chief digital

3:30

officer telling The Verge the new BK AI

3:33

named Patty was listening for certain

3:36

words like please and thank you so

3:38

managers could see how their staff was

3:40

performing on friendliness.

3:42

>> The chief digital officer over there at

3:44

Burger King is a damn clown. This is so

3:47

[ __ ] stupid. What incarnation?

3:50

Imagine everything goes wrong in your

3:51

life and you unfortunately go to the

3:53

Burger King drive-thru because every

3:54

other fast food place is burnt down for

3:56

some reason. So, you're in the Burger

3:57

King drive-thru and you're communicating

3:59

with the worker and they just keep

4:02

saying please over and over and over

4:04

again and you pull up to the window and

4:06

you see sweat pouring down their face.

4:08

You know, they're [ __ ] panic in their

4:10

eyes because they've got Patty in their

4:13

headset threatening their life if

4:15

there's not enough pleases in there.

4:16

They're going to stop their heart or

4:17

something like blow up their brain like

4:19

it's Suicide Squad. You only said please

4:22

15 times during that interaction. I'm

4:24

sorry, Doug. This is the end of the

4:26

line. Your [ __ ] head pops.

4:28

>> Burger King providing NBC News with this

4:31

video showing off the new tool.

4:33

>> Is there anything that needs my

4:35

immediate attention?

4:36

>> The team's friendliness scores this

4:38

morning were the highest this week.

4:40

>> Yeah, we new record for the friendliness

4:43

score.

4:45

We did it. BURGER KING EMPLOYEES. WE ARE

4:47

SUPER FRIENDLY. Thank you uh AI

4:49

assistant Patty for keeping everyone in

4:51

line and coaching us on how to say

4:53

please and thank you enough. We saved

4:56

Burger King.

4:56

>> The company telling us in a statement

4:58

that the tool listening for keywords was

5:01

used in limited pilot restaurants.

5:03

>> This is anonymized data. So it is not

5:06

tied back to to an employee.

5:07

>> Let me interrupt you there. No, it's

5:09

not. You're full of [ __ ] You You're

5:12

full of [ __ ] dog [ __ ] Actually,

5:14

there's no such thing as anonymized data

5:16

in the current day and age. Everything

5:19

you interact with, everything you use,

5:22

and certainly every AI spy that they're

5:26

jacking into your [ __ ] headset is

5:28

collecting data. No doubt in my mind. I

5:31

don't even know why you're bothering to

5:32

try and spin that baloney. Everyone

5:34

knows that's not true, brother. What the

5:37

[ __ ] is even the point in trying to hide

5:38

it? There's no punishments for it or

5:40

anything anymore. Just say it with your

5:41

whole chest. Everyone knows it's

5:43

despicable, but that's the state of the

5:45

world right now.

5:46

>> And it's really a coaching tool. It's

5:47

about uh ensuring that we raise the

5:50

hospitality for the overall restaurant.

5:52

>> The company also saying we believe

5:54

hospitality is fundamentally human.

5:56

>> Fundamentally human you say? Why are you

5:59

using AI to teach it then? Oh, this this

6:02

uh hospitality thing fundamentally

6:04

human. Which is why we brought in Jarvis

6:06

over here that can blow up your [ __ ]

6:08

if you don't say please enough to teach

6:10

you how to be human. That makes a lot of

6:13

sense there. Chief digital clown. Good

6:15

work. You could call it the friendly

6:17

wars in retail.

6:18

>> The customer interaction matters. And

6:21

for evidence of this, just take a look

6:22

at the success of Chick-fil-A. A lot of

6:25

people when they talk about Chick-fil-A

6:27

don't actually talk about their chicken

6:28

sandwiches. They talk about how the

6:30

employees greet them. What world are you

6:33

living in, Buster? When people talk

6:35

about Chick-fil-A, they are often

6:37

talking about the food. them having to

6:40

say my pleasure like [ __ ] corporate

6:43

drones is not necessarily something

6:45

people love about the experience. I

6:47

don't know real human beings like real

6:51

nonbot people that go to Chick-fil-A and

6:55

really feel like butterflies in their

6:57

tummy and get tingly and excited when

6:59

they say my pleasure when they get

7:00

served by the Chick-fil-A employee. They

7:02

are forced to say that. Like that makes

7:05

it a non-genuine interaction. That makes

7:08

it insincere. The reason Chick-fil-A is

7:10

successful is not because they say my

7:13

pleasure. It's because the food is very

7:15

high quality compared to other options.

7:17

Like [ __ ] Burger King, for example.

7:19

Like, it's this is ridiculous. And

7:21

improving the friendliness score of

7:23

Burger King isn't the secret ingredient

7:26

here, the chemical X to save the

7:28

business, man. There's only like one

7:30

spot worse on the planet for food than

7:32

Burger King, and that's Long John

7:33

Silvers. Like if you go to Long John

7:35

Silvers and you try and eat the whole

7:36

menu, you're basically committing

7:38

suicide. So that is like the lowest food

7:41

can go and Burger King is just barely

7:43

above that. And no amount of

7:44

friendliness is going to change people's

7:47

want to be in Burger King. Like Long

7:51

John Silvers could offer you a [ __ ]

7:53

every time you walk through the doors

7:54

and people probably still wouldn't go if

7:56

they also had to order food to receive

7:58

it cuz it's not worth it. It doesn't

8:00

matter how friendly they are. Is it a

8:03

nice thing if the employees are like

8:05

really friendly and customers feel like,

8:08

you know, they had a joyful experience

8:10

or whatever? Yeah, that's cool. Like

8:12

Culver's, I've always mentioned Culver's

8:14

is my favorite fast food place. I think

8:17

their food is extremely good. And I've

8:19

only had a positive experience there.

8:20

Like the first time I ever went to

8:22

Culver's, the manager or whatever came

8:24

up and apologized for the long wait for

8:26

my [ __ ] chicken tendies, even though

8:28

it only been like 2 minutes. I didn't

8:30

even realize I was waiting. Like I I

8:32

placed the order and then I sat on my

8:34

phone for like what felt like 10

8:36

seconds. The guy that came over, he's

8:37

like, "Oh my god, I'm so sorry this took

8:38

so long. Here, here's a little gift card

8:39

for some custard and stuff. I'm super

8:41

sorry for the wait. It's almost ready."

8:42

I was like, "Brother, I didn't realize I

8:43

was waiting. It's no big deal, man." And

8:46

like he it was super nice and like every

8:48

time I've been to Culver's, everyone's

8:49

been great. But that's not the reason I

8:51

keep going back. It's because the food

8:53

is really good. That's just a nice

8:54

little perk, I suppose. But the food is

8:57

the reason why I keep going back to

8:59

Culver's. And that's going to be the

9:01

same song and dance across the board.

9:02

And like the difference is when it feels

9:05

organic, it's significantly better when

9:07

it's forced by Burger King's AI patty

9:11

that's jacked into their cerebral

9:12

cortex, forcing them to say please and

9:14

thank you out of fear for being fired.

9:17

Like, if you're trying to create a

9:18

positive atmosphere, it should probably

9:20

start with the employees, I would say,

9:23

more so than the customers. If the

9:25

employees are happy and having fun, the

9:29

friendliness score might just naturally

9:31

boost because, well, maybe then it'll be

9:34

a better environment that they'll want

9:35

to interact more positively with

9:37

customers as opposed to being forced

9:39

under the corporate thumb to do so. It's

9:41

so dumb. This whole idea of an AI system

9:45

assistant being used to coach employees

9:48

on how to be friendly, it's outrageous.

9:50

It's absurd. It's [ __ ] gross. What a

9:54

completely useless use of AI for the

9:57

sake of having AI in Burger King. I

10:00

cannot believe how dumb Burger King is,

10:04

man. It blows my mind. So, anyway, just

10:08

wanted to insult them again for the

10:10

millionth time because they keep doing

10:13

absolute garbage like this. That's about

10:15

it. See you.

Interactive Summary

The speaker severely criticizes Burger King, asserting it offers some of the worst fast food in America and consistently makes poor business decisions. The latest such decision is the implementation of an AI assistant named "Patty" in employee headsets, ostensibly to coach them on friendliness by monitoring their speech for phrases like "please" and "thank you," and reminding them of chores. The speaker views this AI not as a coach but as a tool of fear, making interactions insincere and potentially threatening employees' jobs. He argues that Burger King's real problem is its abysmal food quality, not a lack of employee manners, and ridicules the company's claims about anonymized data and using AI for "fundamentally human" hospitality. Drawing comparisons with Chick-fil-A and Culver's, the speaker emphasizes that genuine customer satisfaction comes from high-quality food, with friendliness being a natural perk rather than a forced, AI-monitored requirement. He concludes that the AI initiative is a useless and gross application of technology that fails to address Burger King's core issues.

Suggested questions

6 ready-made prompts