Jon Stewart Rewatches Himself on ‘Crossfire’ | The Ezra Klein Show
371 segments
You're gonna enjoy this. So, I'm gonna
play a clip. Sorry. This is on This is
not
>> You You've done a lot to You've done a
lot to deserve this. There's karma. You
do this to other people.
>> You're [laughter]
You have listeners.
>> Has this not happened to you?
>> No.
>> Really?
>> You put a No.
>> Yeah. Unfortunately, it's happened to
me.
>> I've not had a This is your life like
this where you you play things. My wife
after my wife and this was before it
everything became viral and things like
that. That really hadn't happened at
that point. This was a long time ago. My
wife called me, called me, not texted me
on my iPhone, like none of that [ __ ]
existed. She called me and said, "Don't
you ever do something like that again."
>> Why?
>> And and I
>> Well, I'm going to play first what you
did and then we can talk about it.
Sorry, you can cover your ears.
I'm not. I'm here to confront you
because we need help from the media and
they're hurting us. And it's the idea is
>> if the indictment, let me get this
straight. If the indictment is
>> uh if the indictment is and I have seen
you say this, that crossfire reduces
everything as I said in the intro to
left, right, black, white. Well, it's
because see we're debate show. It's like
single.
>> No, no, no. That a storm. would love to
see a debate in a 24-hour day where we
have each side on as best no that would
be great and have them fight it out.
>> To do a debate would be great, but
that's like saying pro wrestling is a
show about athletic competition.
>> I I think you're a good comedian. I
think your lectures are boring. Let me
ask you let me ask you a question on the
news.
>> Now, this is theater. I mean, it's it's
obvious. How old are you?
>> 35.
>> And you wear a bow tie.
>> Yeah, I do. I do. So, I do. So, this is
>> No, no, I know. I know you're right. Let
me just go now. And listen, I'm not I'm
not suggesting that you're not you're
not a smart guy because those are not
easy to tie. But the thing is
>> that this you're doing theater when you
should be doing debate, which would be
great.
>> It's not honest. What you do is not
honest. What you do is partisan hackery.
>> You can put him on now. You're It's
okay. Yeah, it's it's safe now. We're
we're back in a safe space.
>> Yeah, it's all right. I apologize. Yeah,
>> I knew Tucker Carlson in those days and
his signal characteristic to me, the
thing I think you were picking up on
particularly about him is he treated it
all as a joke. You can go back and read
Tucker Carlson's old magazine journalism
and it's great, hilarious magazine
journalism. He's a very very good
magazine writer when he was young
>> and he went through all these, you know,
very quick transformations. He was on
MSNBC for a while. People forget that.
Um Rachel Matts, one of her early uh
breaks was that she was a regular
contributor to Tucker Carlson's show on
MSNBC. He was this kind of good times
libertarian type and he was a guy who
treated it all kind of as a game. I
guess what I will say for him now is I
don't think it's a joke to him now.
Something happened there. I think his
politics are much more serious and much
more
>> real and obviously for that much more
dangerous.
>> Humiliation happened.
>> Yeah. Yeah. I'm curious how you
understand his what what what
>> happened to him psychologically.
>> Well, I think that
and I I hate to do this to you, Ezra.
I'm going to I'm going to describe this
to you in professional wrestling terms
since that was one of the analogies that
I used on there. [snorts]
>> See, this is actually the sport I know.
>> Okay, then Ezra, you and I,
>> we're in good shape here. Kayfabe, I got
it.
>> Beautiful. So what I was complaining
about on Crossfire was kayfabe was this
idea that this is just theater and
everybody's playing a character and
nobody's blah blah blah. But the other
way to describe it for them is so
there's an establishment and then
there's the anti-establishment, right?
The disruptors and the rebels.
Tucker Carlson was establishment. He
was, you know, and he tried to be a
face. He was a heel like like Fox News.
Megan Kelly, same thing. FA face being a
good guy, heel being a bad guy.
>> That's right. So, she was kind of a
she's on the heel network, Fox, but
she's kind of the face on Fox. She's the
one that like every now and again will
say something and like the establishment
or liberals will go like, "Wow, she
actually that's empathy. That's like
that's interesting. Oh, she's not towing
a dogmatic party line." Right? So, they
decide like, "Oh, I will live amongst
the faces. I will join them. I will be a
part of the establishment." and the
establishment and the faces reject them.
They feel wrongly and with a dogmatic
litmus test and it's never good enough
and it's their intolerance that put them
in that position. So they tried to live
amongst the normies, right? And when
that blows up and creates humiliation,
the anger and bitter and returns them to
I think
their truer selves. I I prefer them the
way they are right now. I kind of dig
it. It is like,
>> explain that.
>> I'd rather someone not pretend to be
Barbie and just be who she is, which is,
I think, Ursula from The Little Mermaid.
>> See, I went from It really went from pro
wrestling to The Little Mermaid. You
know, in many ways, Ezra, I am still
stuck in the same entertainment options
that I was using when my kids were
little. And that's that's I'm I'm frozen
in that time. But but do do you get my
point about like what happened is they
view and Donald Trump in the same way.
He views that there's this world that is
excluding them and they are excluding
them purely for dogmatic and they think
they're better than me and they hold
these views that they think their [ __ ]
doesn't stink. and I stepped into that
world and and tried to, you know, be
amongst them and and they rejected that
because they're [ __ ]
and now I can just be in my own world
and be as angry and as vicious as I
think I was treated.
>> I
>> and I think that's kind of the way it
goes.
>> I think it's so interesting. I I don't
know Megan Kelly's story as well as I
know or watched Carlson and and Trump. I
think it's a very s I think it's very
similar.
>> Yeah, I'm just
>> Her moment was the I joined NBC.
>> This morning is the launch of Megan
Kelly today just about six minutes from
now.
>> Megan, good morning.
>> Good [cheering] morning.
>> Show didn't go that well. And and by the
way, in both instances after being run
out of Fox News, by the way, because she
asked hard questions of Donald Trump at
the first debate, right, she was
rejected by the right first because she
was not sufficiently pro-Trump and he
came after her and within a year
>> and that's why we're seeing that's what
I meant by she was a face. She became a
face. But so if you think about it, both
Tucker Carlson and Megan Kelly were
rejected and the reasoning behind their
rejection, I think, is still
misunderstood.
I didn't get Crossfire canceled.
Crossfire's ratings sucked and CNN
looked for a way out and that was a
convenient flash point. And by the way,
none of that had much to do, you know,
with Tucker Carlson. Anyway, person I
really didn't like there was Novak, but
he just wasn't on the show that day. And
Megan Kelly in the same thing. Her show
just wasn't connecting on NBC.
>> I'm Megan Kelly and I want to begin with
two words. I'm sorry.
You may have heard that yesterday we had
a discussion here about political
correctness and Halloween costumes
>> and then she had that moment of it was a
blackface I think comment about the
thing.
>> I defended the idea saying as long as it
as it was respectful and part of a
Halloween costume it seemed okay. Well,
I was wrong and I am sorry.
>> If her show was killing it, they'd have
found a way to forgive it. They'd have
found a way to keep her on there. They'd
have found but they used it as a
convenient excuse. Megan Kelly looks to
be parting ways with NBC. Her show Megan
Kelly Today is now cancelled.
>> The move comes 4 days after her
blackface comments that provoked a
firestorm leading to a tearful apology.
>> The chairman of NBC News condemned
Kelly's remarks during a staff town
hall. according to Variety saying there
is no place on our air or in this
workplace for them.
>> But I'm sure for her it was incredibly
painful
and felt like a cancelled because of my
viewpoints. But the truth of the matter
is NBC executives and CNN executives,
they aren't woke. They aren't any of
those things. They're [ __ ]
desperately trying to hold on to their
jobs by generating ad revenue by
whatever means necessary. And and so
that's what they got caught up on. And
by the way though, the way that it
happened
attacked them at a core level and that's
what's created that. Like I've been
cancelled a [ __ ] ton of times. But the
only reason I was canceled is like the
network executives just were like,
"Yeah, this show sucks or you're not."
But they didn't say like, "You're a bad
person and that's why we're canceling
the show." And that's what they did to
them. the industry rather than standing
up for what was really going on there,
which is you're not generating enough
revenue and interest to justify your
large contract or whatever it is. They
turned it into we're getting rid of you
for a moral failing or lapse. And that
was wrong. I I I really And that's not
Listen, I I don't care for what they do.
I don't care for their opinions, but
what happened to them
was wrong.
>> The executives are interesting here. Uh
I was thinking about this when you were
relaying that story about Roger Als.
>> Yes.
>> Cuz I there was a period of time in my
life I did a lot of MSNBC and was a a
guest host on a lot of the prime time
programs there. And so I knew the people
who ran it pretty well.
>> And what I would say about the people
who ran it was they were fundamentally
not that ideological. They were
television executives. what they cared
about and that's why Tucker Carlson had
a show and why they were so excited
about Joe Scarboro uh you know and still
and still are why recently they tried to
hire Ronald McDaniel the uh RNC chair
sort of disgraced RNC chair that didn't
end up working out due to a revolt by
people at the um network of morals
>> Roger Als is honestly ideological right
he had as he's put it he had a vision
right he had a view about how things
should be he wanted to be successful but
he also actually knew what he was trying
to achieve in the world. Those NBC
executives who brought on Megan Kelly,
it was obvious to me that that show
wasn't going to work, but they they
wanted the look of bringing on Megan
Kelly because they are not that
ideological and particularly don't want
to be seen as
>> they're lying to themselves because they
place things in a moral universe when
they really are just crass executives
who are trying to sell. Like that's the
part where I think the critique if if
there's one critique of the media from
the right that I do agree with is the
moralizing nature. You know the idea
that these media executives moralize
their position. Like there may be no
greater disparity between uh reality and
whatever idealized moral image you have
of yourselves than the Washington Post
putting on their uh uh mass head,
democracy dies in darkness. Like who the
[ __ ] do you think you are?
Like what world? You have a board up in
your room that shows like who's getting
what clicks where. Like that's just
nonsense. And this idea that I mean I
would almost welcome maybe not
necessarily a more moral component but a
component of the news media that is more
forceful uh editorially. Like Als's
greatest trick was delegitimizing the
idea of editorial authority
while exercising almost complete
editorial authority but doing it a way
that was really smart. Like there is no
uh condescension and moralizing on Fox.
It's people on a couch asking questions.
Are you worried about how many
terrorists are coming in on the border?
Do you ever worry about that? Whereas if
you turn on MSE sometimes you're like
it's like birds descending you know at
at sea on a tuna boat going that's
factually incorrect incorrect
not correct incorrect
and YOU'RE JUST LIKE I CAN'T listen to
this but that's the brilliance of it but
you know so so when I say like Megan
Kelly's right like I do believe she's
right they pretended that they had to
get rid of her out of some moral
obligation
to enlightened racism
sensibility like [ __ ] you. That is so
not what you did. If they're making
money, they're making money. And they'll
let you get away with anything. Anything
as we see. But when you ain't making
money anymore and they don't, for some
reason have the timmerity to just go,
"Yeah, you're not making us any money."
They find some pretense of your moral
failing
and yank you.
And so I get
where the where some of that anger comes
from from those folks. don't have a ton
of sympathy because I've been fired a
bunch of times too, but for the the
old-fashioned reasons of sucking.
Ask follow-up questions or revisit key timestamps.
The video discusses the shift in media personalities like Tucker Carlson and Megyn Kelly, moving from what was perceived as entertainment or a game to a more serious and potentially dangerous political stance. It explores the idea of 'kayfabe' in media, comparing it to professional wrestling where characters play roles. The transcript suggests that figures like Carlson and Kelly were initially part of the establishment or played certain roles (like 'heels' or 'faces') but were later rejected by the right for not being sufficiently aligned with a particular ideology, especially concerning Donald Trump. The discussion delves into how media executives, driven by revenue rather than strong ideology, sometimes use moral failings as pretexts to remove personalities whose shows are not performing well, rather than admitting a lack of success. This is contrasted with figures like Roger Ailes, who had a clear vision, while others are seen as crass executives moralizing their positions. The overall sentiment is that while the media landscape has changed, the underlying business motivations remain, and the 'cancellation' of personalities is often misconstrued.
Videos recently processed by our community