HomeVideos

375 - The ketogenic diet, ketosis, and hyperbaric oxygen: weight loss, cognition, cancer, and more

Now Playing

375 - The ketogenic diet, ketosis, and hyperbaric oxygen: weight loss, cognition, cancer, and more

Transcript

3959 segments

0:00

Hey everyone, welcome to the Drive

0:02

Podcast. I'm your host, Peter Aia.

0:11

Hey Dom, thank you for making the trip

0:13

out to Austin. It's uh boy, it has been

0:15

a long time since we've been in person.

0:17

I I'm I'm afraid to uh to hazard a guess

0:20

as to when, but I know you and my

0:22

brother see each other a lot more, and

0:24

I'm always getting pictures of you

0:26

visiting him and him visiting you.

0:28

>> Yeah. Yeah. Paul's amazing. Yeah, he uh

0:31

he's a mentor to me and as you are in

0:33

through the health and Paul's like an

0:35

amazing you know entrepreneurial mentor

0:36

and a life mentor in many different

0:38

ways. So but great to see you both and

0:41

uh you guys are such you know uber high

0:44

achievers in different domains and I

0:46

think it's great to see you know it's

0:48

great to see you in person for one thing

0:49

but it's great to see both of you thrive

0:52

in doing what you do. Well, the same can

0:54

be said for you. Um, Dom, you've been on

0:57

this podcast a couple of times, but I I

0:59

know that in podcast land, uh, it's a

1:02

we've probably got, you know, hundreds

1:04

of thousands of listeners today that

1:06

weren't listeners, you know, the first

1:07

and second time you were on the podcast.

1:10

Um, and frankly, those that were, I

1:12

think it would be understandable that

1:13

they've forgotten most of what we've

1:14

spoken about. Um, and maybe just by way

1:18

of background, I'll I'll let folks

1:19

understand how how you and I connected.

1:21

I believe Ken Ford connected us back in

1:26

2011ish

1:27

thereabouts. Um, at the time I had was

1:30

about a year into experimenting with a

1:32

ketogenic diet. Um, having all sorts of

1:36

interesting success with it for the most

1:37

part once I once I got over the hump of

1:39

figuring out how to do it. Um, and I

1:42

think we must have connected at uh at

1:45

his institute and then the rest is kind

1:47

of history. We we then through our

1:50

friendship became very uh deeply

1:53

involved in the testing of the earliest

1:56

generations of um various forms of

1:59

synthetic ketones. A topic we will

2:01

undoubtedly get to today because it's

2:04

impossible to imagine how much

2:05

proliferation there has been of these

2:07

things that were I mean literally you're

2:10

sending me like dirty plastic bottles

2:12

with stuff in my kitchen that I'm

2:13

experimenting with and and it's like now

2:15

look at what you've done. Um so maybe

2:18

let's just talk a little bit about how

2:20

your interest in this space came to be.

2:22

So um for for even for my recollection I

2:26

don't recall your PhD was in

2:27

neuroscience if I'm not mistaken.

2:29

>> Yeah. Uh nutrition and then at the time

2:33

studying nutrition and biology I started

2:34

doing u a undergraduate thesis project

2:38

in neuroscience and the neural control

2:40

of autonomic regulation. So specifically

2:43

the brain network the rostal vententral

2:45

lateral medela. So they are the brain

2:47

stem network that controls respiration

2:50

uh so inspiratory neurons expatory

2:52

neurons and how they respond to oxygen

2:54

and uh CO2 and that led me down the path

2:58

of oxygen hypoxia hyperoxia hypercapneia

3:02

extreme environments and what what

3:04

happens to the brain under oxygen

3:05

deprivation and nutrient deprivation. At

3:08

the time I was interested in alpha L

3:10

polyactate because it was in cytoax

3:13

which was something I used because I

3:14

race mountain bikes. So I was testing

3:17

some things uh lactate and then I got

3:18

steered onto the ketogenic diet. uh

3:21

after getting a fellowship a a post-doal

3:25

fellowship by the office of navy

3:26

research which is part of the department

3:28

of defense to understand the cellular

3:31

and molecular mechanisms of central

3:33

nervous system oxygen toxicity which

3:36

manifested seizures. So I was mostly

3:39

interested in drugs but then I pivoted

3:41

and went back to the ketogenic diet

3:43

because the ketogenic diet works for

3:45

many different seizure disorders when

3:47

drugs fail. So I was like, "Oh, I can

3:49

get nutrition back." Although I was

3:52

gravitating towards a tenure track

3:54

position and everybody told me this is

3:56

like the dumbest thing to do to like you

3:58

can't get NIH funding with, you know,

4:00

ketogenic. Nobody heard of the ketogenic

4:01

diet.

4:02

>> What year was this? Uh this was around

4:04

200 uh five I started tinkering with

4:07

ketones but 2007 I started writing

4:10

grants and then I hit on a grant in 2008

4:13

like post-doal uh grant and I was I had

4:16

a weird position from posttock to

4:18

something called a research assistant

4:19

professor which is like an intermediate

4:21

position before you get into a tenure

4:22

track and the university was just kind

4:24

of gauging to see my productivity and uh

4:27

as my post-docctoral grant was very

4:29

sizable it was above like an NIH level

4:31

grant which I was getting and it paid

4:33

full indirects for that and we can talk

4:35

about you know

4:35

>> and that came from the military.

4:37

>> Yeah. Office of Navy research as part of

4:39

the department of defense and then uh

4:41

and then I got good data on hyperbaric

4:43

atomic force microscopy very mechanistic

4:46

research. I also did patch clamp

4:48

electrophysiology and conffocal

4:51

microscopy.

4:52

uh my work was really focused on redux

4:56

mechanisms and looking at super oxide

4:58

production undergraded levels of oxygen

5:01

and different different metabolites.

5:04

So in the process of doing all that I

5:06

had no interest in cancer but we had

5:08

some glyobblastoma cells and we threw

5:10

them into the hyperbaric chamber and

5:12

under uh under conffocal microscopy we

5:16

could see the mitochondria were lighting

5:17

up and then kind of exploding or

5:20

disappearing uh in the cancer cells and

5:22

that was kind of unique and uh and that

5:25

led me on a side tangent thing to study

5:28

cancer but my central thing that I

5:31

studied was neuroscience and I've always

5:32

I've been in neuroscience department and

5:35

just mainly focused on that.

5:37

>> Let's go back to something you said at

5:38

the outset just because folks might not

5:39

understand why the Navy would be

5:42

interested in the effects of too much

5:46

oxygen, right? When you think of the

5:47

Navy, you think of being underwater.

5:49

When you think of being underwater, you

5:50

think of oxygen deprivation. So, what is

5:52

it about certain types of diving that

5:54

actually bring about the opposite

5:56

problem?

5:57

>> Yeah, good question. Uh so hyperaric

6:01

oxygen you experience that with

6:03

hyperbaric oxygen therapy right and

6:04

there's 14 different FDA approved

6:07

applications and that you in that

6:09

context you only go to about a maximum

6:11

of 2.5 to three atmospheres of pure

6:14

oxygen in the context of military diving

6:18

like a Navy Seal use a closed circuit

6:20

rebreather because there's no bubbles so

6:22

there's a stealth component to that and

6:24

you're breathing uh high concentrations

6:26

of oxygen And at at 50 feet of seawater,

6:30

the potential for oxygen toxicity

6:32

exists.

6:33

>> And just explain tools. Sorry, Don.

6:35

Explain to folks exactly what that is.

6:37

So, how does a rebreather work? What's

6:39

the concentration of oxygen that they're

6:41

breathing in?

6:42

>> Yep. So, uh a closed circuit rebreather

6:45

for example, like a drager rebreather

6:47

like the original ones, uh those early

6:49

rebreathers and even now it's high

6:52

concentration. It's like a essentially

6:54

100% oxygen, right? You're breathing

6:55

100% oxygen. So there's no nitrogen.

6:59

There's 80% nitrogen air we're breathing

7:01

right now, right? Uh there's no

7:02

nitrogen. So you avert the potential for

7:05

nitrogen narcosis. So nitrogen's not

7:08

narcotic at one atmosphere, but there

7:10

you get something called the martini

7:11

effect. And as you go down lower,

7:13

nitrogen becomes narcotic. So that's

7:15

something else that we study. But uh so

7:17

you're breathing 100% oxygen and uh and

7:20

then there's a CO2 scrubber. So you're

7:22

blowing out the exhaled carbon dioxide

7:24

is scrubbed out from the breather and uh

7:27

and that keep it's a closed circuit. So

7:30

there's no offging associated with uh

7:33

scuba diving or even other types of uh

7:36

technical diving where you have some

7:38

offging, right?

7:39

>> And the reason that they can do that is

7:41

because you're not wasting gas on the

7:44

80% nitrogen. You basically you're you

7:46

basically just have to store the CO2

7:48

that's coming out once you've scrubbed

7:50

it. you've got pure O2 coming in. So

7:52

your title your your volume of air

7:54

needed is much lower cuz you're just

7:55

solving for the oxygen.

7:57

>> That's part of it because the oxygen

7:59

tanks are are pretty small, right, with

8:00

a rebreather. But uh it's analogous to

8:05

uh we have a couple ponds on our

8:06

property, right? And I I uh when I go in

8:09

the pond and uh and I see bubbles coming

8:13

across the pond, I know an alligator is

8:15

coming towards me, right? So that's how

8:17

I when your brother was there, we were

8:18

like we were looking at the alligators

8:20

and and just uh getting them to come to

8:22

us by throwing pebbles in there when

8:23

they hear something. So if I go to the

8:25

lawn to the pond with a weed whacker, I

8:27

see bubbles coming across. So analogous

8:29

situation would be a Navy Seal coming

8:32

across a body of water that's still you

8:34

can clearly see the bubble trail coming

8:36

to you. So with a a closed circuit

8:38

rebreather that completely averts that

8:40

the bubble trail and then there's also

8:42

the noise that the bubbles make, right?

8:44

So you don't have that. The problem is

8:47

if you're wearing a closer and you dive

8:48

down to a 100 like 100 feet of seawater

8:52

because someone starts shooting at you

8:53

or you have to go down deep to put a

8:55

mine on the bottom of a bridge or

8:56

something like that, you're going to

8:58

have a seizure within like 5 minutes. So

9:00

oxygen is a stimulant. It stimulates a

9:03

massive amount of uh glutamate release

9:06

that activates amperceptors, NMDA

9:08

receptors. uh it stimulates the neural

9:11

network um in ways. It also sort of

9:14

deactivates or inhibits an enzyme

9:16

glutamic acid decarbox which converts

9:19

more glutamate to GABA. So there's like

9:22

uh a and there's a big burst in reactive

9:24

oxygen species. So you have a

9:26

constellation of things going on in your

9:27

brain. So I study the negative effects

9:30

of high high oxygen which kind of has

9:33

some people who study hyperbaric oxygen

9:35

a little bit standoffish towards me

9:37

because I study the but in the context

9:39

of lower oxygen oxygen uh hyperbaric

9:42

oxygen therapy can be very therapeutic

9:44

and

9:44

>> I do want to talk about that. So um

9:47

there's a lot I want to ask you about

9:48

hyperbaric oxygen but I want to finish

9:50

the swing on this particular

9:52

application. When was it clear to the

9:55

Navy the problem that you described,

9:57

which is when we have um closed circuit

10:00

rebreathers with 100% oxygen, we're

10:02

running into problems with our divers.

10:05

And it these problems are dramatic. I

10:07

mean, if you have a seizure at 100 feet,

10:08

you're going to die pretty quickly. So,

10:11

when when did they come to realize this?

10:13

And and how is this was this a

10:16

relatively recent discovery?

10:17

>> No, it's not. And my mentor, Dr. J.

10:19

Dean, our lab is like a museum. So we

10:22

have all the historic pictures on there

10:24

and there's a guy that wrote a book and

10:26

his name was Fred Bear and uh he was a a

10:29

French physiologist and uh he did a lot

10:32

of seinal studies back you know over

10:34

well over a hundred years ago in the

10:36

1800s showing that like you could give

10:39

animals uh they called it like uh

10:41

quesons disease too. So that could when

10:43

you go down in like chambers when you're

10:45

building a bridge you're under high

10:47

pressure oxygen or high atmospheric uh

10:50

effects. So yeah, I would say about 150

10:54

years ago, we realized that oxygen was a

10:57

stimulant. We didn't know why. And uh

11:00

and then with military diving, then you

11:02

have the problem of, you know, averting

11:04

oxygen seizures. And there's a number of

11:06

people in the Navy. Frank Butler comes

11:09

to mind, Claude Pianadosi, Richard Moon.

11:11

There's there's a network at Duke

11:13

University which did a lot of the

11:15

seminal studies and uh and that of and

11:20

they established the dive tables for

11:23

preventing oxygen toxicity, seizures,

11:25

nitrogen narosis, high pressure nervous

11:27

syndrome. So these are all things that

11:28

you have to avert like when you're

11:30

diving depending on what kind of diving

11:32

you're doing. Was the Navy coming to you

11:34

to say, "Look, we know this is

11:35

happening. Can you help us push the

11:36

envelope?"

11:37

>> Yeah. Well, I kind of went to them or

11:39

they came to me because I'd like

11:41

specialized knowledge, but I wrote

11:43

grants uh to to really delve into it.

11:46

It's unknown why these seizures occur,

11:48

but it gives us a lot of insight into

11:50

the brain to understand it, right? From

11:52

a redux effect, from a neuropharmacology

11:54

effect. So the grants that I had were

11:57

literally called you know uh

11:59

investigating the cellular and molecular

12:02

mechanisms of CNOS oxygen toxicity and

12:04

they kind of gave me unlike the NIH they

12:07

gave me like I had a lot of tools to

12:10

play with that were really expensive

12:11

that we got through what's called a a

12:13

DoD Durup grant and that bought chambers

12:15

and microscopes and electrophysiology

12:18

equipment and I was it allowed me to

12:20

tinker in the lab and in the process of

12:22

tinkering we just had some serendipitous

12:25

discoveries, you know, with the cancer

12:26

things and then just fundamental effects

12:29

that happen in cells under high

12:31

pressure, oxygen, you know, nitrogen,

12:33

helium, different gases and just very

12:36

basic uh so the office of navy research

12:39

has a 6.1 program and that's like basic

12:41

science and then 6.2 2 6.3 and as we as

12:45

I progressed in my career I started

12:47

working up from you know a cellbased

12:49

system to animal models to then it went

12:51

to a pig model system and now now

12:54

essentially we're doing the rat studies

12:55

at Duke with human subjects that get

12:57

inside a chamber and there we get

13:00

diaphragmatic we get EEG we have a line

13:03

going into their arm that goes to like a

13:04

mass spec to get like blood gases to do

13:07

metabolomics

13:09

uh they're working a simulator a flight

13:10

simulator they're exercising thing

13:12

they're it's water out immersion so

13:14

their body's underwater but you get the

13:17

the hypovalmic effect of the fluid shift

13:20

and things like that to simulate that

13:21

dive and then we push them to a seizure

13:24

believe it or not so this got approved

13:26

through an IRB which is even more

13:28

amazing than the Khill study uh but we

13:31

push them to an EEG seizure to where we

13:34

can see the se and then we decompress so

13:36

we look at latency to seizure under

13:39

ketosis dietary ketosis or supplemental

13:42

ketosis or the combination. So those

13:45

those clinical trials, I'm

13:46

co-investigator on it because it's being

13:48

done at Duke. Uh they're registered

13:50

clinical trials on clinical trial.gov.

13:53

So you can look at look at that.

13:54

>> And these are being funded by the DoD.

13:56

>> Uh Department of Defense has Office of

13:58

Navy research. They have the CDMRP which

14:01

is congressionally directed medical

14:02

research program and also NAVC. So this

14:05

is uh an ONR project that got spun into

14:08

a NAVC project. So naval, you know, uh,

14:12

sea command project. So NAVC is more

14:15

human studies and then ON&R is basic

14:17

science and then some human research.

14:19

>> All right. Well, I want to come back and

14:20

talk about a lot of these things, but I

14:22

feel like we should now kind of get

14:23

people up to speed on

14:25

>> what ketones are. Again, we we can sit

14:28

here and talk about this and take this

14:29

stuff for granted all day. You obviously

14:31

threw around the term nutritional

14:32

ketosis. You've also talked about

14:33

supplemental ketosis, sometimes referred

14:36

to as exogenous ketones. Let's start

14:38

with nutritional ketosis and just give

14:40

people um some definitions of um how you

14:44

achieve it, how much variability there

14:46

can be in a diet to get there, what the

14:49

thresholds are, and a little bit about

14:51

what's happening physiologically.

14:52

>> Yeah. Uh before I before I begin, I want

14:55

to direct people to your early blogs,

14:57

which I assume are still up on

14:58

nutritional ketosis.

14:59

>> I'm sure they are somewhere.

15:00

>> Yeah. on the delta G, there's one with

15:02

exogenous ketones, you know, and our

15:05

study we kind of did with the ketone

15:07

salts, which increased your uh

15:09

efficiency, oxygen utilization. So,

15:11

nutritional ketosis, uh the key to well,

15:15

let's take a little bit of a step back.

15:16

Ketosis, uh I like to start with

15:18

fasting. So, when you stop eating,

15:20

right, you suppress the hormone insulin,

15:22

you mobilize fatty acids for fuel. The

15:25

brain's not a good, it can't use the

15:26

longchain fatty acids that are stored in

15:28

your atapost tissue. So through beta

15:31

oxidation of fatty acids in the liver uh

15:34

beta o accelerated beta oxidation in the

15:37

context of insulin suppression generates

15:40

these molecules beta hydroxybutyrate and

15:42

acettoacetate and then they spill into

15:44

circulation and uh they become largely

15:48

responsible for preserving brain energy

15:51

metabolism in the context of

15:54

uh energy deprivation or carbohydrate

15:57

restriction. So and the elevation of

15:59

beta hydroxybutyrate or acettoacetate in

16:02

the blood in the urine or the breath

16:04

becomes a biioarker. So uh for ketosis

16:10

so you can achieve ketosis through

16:12

fasting through diet through supplements

16:14

or uh alcoholic keto acidosis right

16:17

that's another thing or diabetic keto

16:19

acidosis and we could talk about that in

16:21

context and then you have nutritional

16:23

ketosis which is eating carbohydrate

16:26

restricted ketogenic diet that's

16:28

primarily high in fat. The original diet

16:30

was 90% fat. modified versions of the

16:33

diet are about 60 to 70% uh fat with

16:36

higher protein. Now, we know especially

16:38

in kids, you restrict protein too much,

16:40

you could stunt their growth and have

16:41

some issues there. So, clinically, a

16:45

modified version of the ketogenic diet

16:46

is actually being kind of gravitated

16:48

more towards even in pediatric epilepsy.

16:51

So, we're learning that protein is

16:52

really important and it was

16:53

underappreciated, I guess, in the early

16:55

ketogenic diets. In the context of

16:56

sports, it's extremely important and we

16:58

can talk about that. So but still it

17:01

remains that uh the ketogenic diet is

17:04

the most scientifically researched diet

17:06

that has an objective biioarker that

17:08

defines the physiological state of being

17:10

in the diet and that's beta

17:12

hydroxybutyrate above 0.5 mill moles per

17:15

liter. So that's clinical ketosis and in

17:18

the context of ketosis it has um uh

17:23

there are remarkable changes in our

17:26

metabolic physiology and the

17:27

neuropharmacology of our brain and also

17:30

beta hydroxybutyrate has very unique

17:32

effects uh epigenetic effects which is

17:35

kind of a new buzzword that people are

17:36

talking about and we we my student just

17:38

finished a project on that um and I

17:42

think there's uh it's pleotropic so

17:44

ketogenic diets have pleotrop ropic

17:46

effects and uh

17:48

>> tell folks what that means.

17:49

>> Yeah, plyotropic is kind of like a fancy

17:52

somewhat nebulous word that basically

17:54

means there are multiple mechanisms that

17:56

are activated uh biochemically,

18:00

physiologically, neuropharmacologically

18:03

uh that have beneficial effects. So um

18:07

and I can go through the explosion of

18:09

research that has occurred on PubMed and

18:12

clinical trials.gov, gov. But the

18:14

important thing is that uh nutritional

18:17

ketosis or therapeutic ketosis uh or

18:21

let's take a step back. The ketogenic

18:22

diet, some people say the ketogenic diet

18:24

is not magical. The kid does nothing

18:26

magical in the context of body

18:28

composition alterations or fat loss.

18:31

That could be there's truth to that.

18:33

However, I I I say there's a hard stop

18:36

there. The ketogenic diet is indeed a

18:38

magical diet in the way that uh it

18:41

remarkably changes our physiology and

18:44

there's no other diet uh that exists

18:47

that can for example manage drug

18:50

resistant seizures and it does that

18:52

because it profoundly changes our fuel

18:54

system, our physiology, our biochemistry

18:57

and our neuropharmacology.

18:58

>> Let's talk a little bit about that.

18:59

You've mentioned it a few times now. Um

19:01

so let's help folks understand what's

19:03

going on here. So this was first um

19:06

identified in kids and if I'm not

19:08

mistaken um

19:10

>> well adults actually if you go back to

19:12

yeah like the Mayo Clinic in 1920s

19:14

because there was no drugs for epilepsy

19:16

so we

19:17

>> so what gave them the idea

19:19

>> that hey we've got these people that are

19:21

experiencing this awful thing now they

19:22

had EEGs back then but they really

19:24

didn't know much

19:25

>> true yeah they actually did some really

19:27

good physiology back in the 1930s4s

19:29

underappreciated uh well we knew that

19:32

fasting controlled seizures Right. I

19:34

mean like that was the first

19:35

observation.

19:36

>> Yeah. I mean gospel of Mark talks about

19:38

yeah fasting I mean there's it's all

19:40

over like in the literature fasting

19:41

could control seizures. So a ketogenic

19:44

diet by virtue of elevating these ketone

19:46

bodies which were showing up in the

19:47

blood and the urine and even in the

19:49

breath. Uh they just understood that

19:51

these ketone bodies were somehow

19:53

associated with seizure control and we

19:55

did not have anti-seizure drugs back

19:57

then.

19:57

>> And when were these first identified? So

19:59

you've got Banting and Best identify

20:01

insulin or at least isolate insulin in

20:03

the 1920s. So that's really the in my

20:06

mind I think of that as kind of the

20:07

golden era of metabolism.

20:09

>> Um when were ketones first isolated BHB

20:12

specifically?

20:13

>> Yeah, just uh within a decade around

20:16

that time. So yeah, so around with

20:18

Banting and Best uh kind of discovered

20:20

it in the context of diabetic keto

20:22

acidosis and then work at the Mayo

20:25

Clinic by Wilder and a few other people

20:28

were helping uh sort of established the

20:31

framework for what would be ultimately

20:33

the first ketogenic diet kind of kind of

20:35

therapies. And the thing was just eating

20:38

like all fat. And then we realized we

20:40

got to titrate in the protein to prevent

20:41

protein malnutrition. And then there was

20:44

a tiny in 1921

20:47

there in a clinical it was just like a a

20:50

a side note on a on a clinical journal

20:53

there was the first observation or

20:55

clinical report of a ketogenic diet you

20:58

know used in epilepsy and the remarkable

21:00

effects and we didn't have anything to

21:02

we didn't have

21:03

>> and they didn't understand why

21:05

>> uh they mechanistically I mean we could

21:07

go you know a hundred years later and we

21:10

don't fully grasp and understand all the

21:12

mechanisms involved and that's why it's

21:14

such a fruitful robust area of research

21:17

right now with drug companies scrambling

21:19

to mimic the keto if we had a drug that

21:21

would mim mimic the ketogenic diet it

21:22

would be a blockbuster drug

21:24

>> because if I understand correctly Dom

21:26

>> if you take patients if you took a

21:29

hundred patients who are drugresistant

21:34

so they're having non-stop seizures

21:36

despite all the best available

21:38

pharmarmacology my recollection this

21:41

could be incorrect And you can update

21:43

this

21:44

>> is that a ketogenic diet will completely

21:47

cure onethird of them will cause about a

21:50

50% reduction in seizure activity for

21:52

another third of them while onethird of

21:54

them will still be unresponsive. Is that

21:56

still directionally correct?

21:58

>> Yeah. In the context of pediatric

21:59

epilepsy about twothirds will be so it's

22:02

that high

22:03

>> two-thirds will be

22:04

>> twothirds will be uh therapeutic

22:06

therapeutically responsive uh to a

22:08

ketogenic diet therapy for managing

22:10

seizures are are highly efficacious for

22:13

managing seizures. Twothirds of people

22:15

who have failed drug therapy and not

22:17

we're not just talking about one drug

22:18

we're talking about polyfarm pharmacy

22:19

adding multiple drugs like you know uh

22:22

the list goes on.

22:23

>> And what about adults? Uh so in adults

22:26

it's more about closer to

22:28

post-adolescence about 30 to 40%. Uh but

22:33

then it's thought that at adherence and

22:35

compliance right with adolescence with

22:37

kids the the parents feed you know

22:39

usually a ketogenic formula and

22:41

calculated out.

22:43

>> Uh but there's also something about the

22:44

pediatric brain that's probably more

22:46

responsive. And then of that 2/3 about

22:49

onethird have like uh complete like

22:52

seizure control like more than you know

22:54

95 to 100% seizure control and then like

22:57

10 to 15% and this really interested me

23:00

uh when I went to the first conferences

23:02

back maybe 15 years ago were super

23:04

responders meaning that they could get

23:06

on a ketogenic diet follow it for a year

23:08

or two transition off and never get

23:10

seizures again.

23:11

>> Wow. So that so they talked about the

23:13

ketogenic diet being curative and that

23:15

was really interesting to me. Of course

23:17

the brain is changing as you go through

23:19

development but it was shifting brain

23:22

networks and network stability uh you

23:25

know suppressing inflammation and

23:27

changing neurotransmitters in a way that

23:29

was there's the kindling effect with

23:31

seizures. So seizures beget seizures. So

23:34

once you have a seizure uh you're more

23:36

likely to have another seizure. So if

23:38

you control seizures and you do it

23:39

through a protracted time frame, even if

23:42

you had it's going to lessen the chance

23:43

of you, it's going to decrease that

23:45

kindling effect. So um so there's

23:48

something going on there and we've

23:49

replicated that just throwing you know

23:51

sodium beta hydroxybutyrate into a

23:52

hypocample brain slice preparation under

23:54

different levels of you know things that

23:56

stimulate seizures like measuring

23:57

seizures in a in a slice with like the

24:00

orthodromeic population. uh you can

24:02

stimulate and measure the orthodic

24:04

population spike of the neurons like uh

24:06

firing back and then you can decrease

24:09

the amplitude of that over time and

24:10

essentially just silence seizures in a

24:12

slice and at the same time you're making

24:15

that hippocample brain slice more

24:17

metabolically resilient. You could throw

24:19

different agents at it that would be

24:20

neuro degenerative or you know uh

24:24

hyperexitable and it will protect it

24:25

under the context of various

24:27

neurotoxins.

24:29

So uh so that I think that that really

24:33

interested me. So the early observations

24:36

and then I was completely unaware of all

24:38

this literature in my posttock and then

24:40

when I started delving into it I was

24:42

like I have to change the trajectory of

24:43

my career to do you know to to just but

24:47

I'm going to do it in an innovative way.

24:48

I'm going to study the ketogenic diet,

24:50

but also in parallel or in tandem or

24:52

maybe in some cases exclusively just

24:55

delve into what is the most efficacious

24:58

form of exogenous ketone we can use and

25:00

how can we can it augment the

25:02

therapeutic efficacy of a ketogenic

25:04

diet? Like there's a lot to unpack here

25:06

and nobody was doing it at the time.

25:08

>> You've obviously experimented a lot with

25:10

a ketogenic diet yourself. I mean when

25:12

did you first try a ketogenic diet? like

25:15

the clinical ketogenic diet where I got

25:17

the little cardio check meter which was

25:19

super expensive at the time. I would say

25:21

2009 I started actually checking ketones

25:25

and uh and the cardio they still had

25:27

this cardio.

25:28

>> I was using the Abbott one.

25:30

>> Yeah.

25:30

>> Precision the precision. I got that

25:32

later. I don't even think that might

25:34

have been out yet, but I got that soon

25:37

after because the cardio check actually

25:39

did like your HDL and like triglycerides

25:41

and things. It was a little bit. We

25:43

compared it to uh we also had like an a

25:45

lab assay like an Eliza assay. Yeah. We

25:48

were comparing it to it. Uh yeah. And

25:49

then we got uh the the precision extra

25:52

by Abbott. And then I remember I bought

25:55

something like $10,000 of strips.

25:57

>> I was about to say the strips were $5 to

25:59

$10 each.

26:00

>> Yes.

26:01

>> At the time

26:02

>> I found uh I bought them in bulk and I

26:04

think

26:05

>> Yeah. You hooked me up at one point and

26:06

we were able to get them for like a

26:08

$1.50 or something. I was going through

26:10

three a day. Yeah.

26:13

>> Yeah. So, uh that price point has come

26:15

down, but now we have the Keto Mojo

26:16

which is actually uh aligns more with

26:19

our assays and and it does the glucose

26:21

ketone index that we can talk about. Uh

26:24

yeah, so I started doing that and I have

26:26

to when I started it within I guess 5

26:29

years after starting the ketogenic diet,

26:30

I probably rapidly lost 10 to 15 pounds

26:33

and then my my exercise and my lifts

26:35

tank too. Like I lost strength on bench

26:37

press and not so much deadlift and

26:40

squat. But I saw that but I didn't

26:41

really care that much at the time. But I

26:43

also learned the lesson that protein was

26:46

really important. I was thinking ketones

26:48

would be basically save you know muscle

26:50

and but they don't they have an

26:52

anti-catabolic effect that we can talk

26:53

about but there's nothing you know if

26:57

your protein goes from like 250 grams a

26:59

day to like you know 70 to 80 grams a

27:02

day you're going to lose a lot of muscle

27:04

and the ketones have

27:05

>> just don't tell the USDA that or you

27:07

know the the RDA they still want you to

27:09

believe that 08 grams per kilogram uh is

27:13

all you need

27:15

>> it's very context dependent right to I

27:17

was kind of in the gym and I was even

27:19

training with legally facitious. I mean

27:21

these these guys are out to lunch and

27:23

they just can't seem to they just want

27:25

to cling on to this idea that protein is

27:27

bad.

27:28

>> Yeah. I they're avoiding like uh work

27:30

from Donald Layman and Stu Phillips and

27:33

guys I think you might have had on the

27:34

podcast, right? So uh yeah, I learned a

27:36

lot of lessons. I learned that uh uh

27:39

clinical ketogenic diet skyrockets my

27:41

LDL and APOB and that's an I've learned

27:44

how to manage that pharmacologically. I

27:46

have a mutation for the MPC1L1 receptor.

27:48

So, a tiny dose of a zettoide brings

27:50

that down. But most importantly, I

27:52

realized that titrating the protein in

27:55

to meet whatever to to meet, you know,

27:58

your your needs for protein. And if

27:59

you're an athlete, if you have a high

28:01

metabolic rate, if uh you're trying to

28:03

gain muscle, you know, you do have to

28:06

leverage protein and that becomes the

28:09

key factor. I think the key variable in

28:12

getting the ketogenic diet to work for

28:14

you and also tracking your lipids is

28:16

really important.

28:17

>> What do you think are the most common

28:18

mistakes people make when they're trying

28:20

to um uh enter nutritional ketosis? What

28:24

what would be the top three or four

28:25

mistakes that people are making?

28:26

>> Yeah. Not tracking. I mean, people do

28:28

it. They're just like, "Oh, I'm just

28:29

going to eat, you know, this or that and

28:31

not try." It's like, uh, no, you need to

28:33

like just write. You don't have to do it

28:34

every day, day in and day out, but you

28:37

know, use a good tracking metric. Uh,

28:39

Carbon app is great. I know you've had

28:41

Lean on. I've used that.

28:43

>> And there's other apps out there. The

28:45

>> app tracking because you want people to

28:47

be able to correlate the blood levels

28:49

they're seeing with what they're eating.

28:51

>> Yeah. So, the macronutrient uh ratios

28:54

and the composition, but also the total

28:56

amount of calories, which at the time

28:58

when I get into this, no, everybody was

29:00

said, you know, if you do ketogenic

29:01

diet, you don't have to try calories.

29:02

Calories don't matter. But we know

29:04

that's like I just knew that was BS to

29:06

begin with because there are some people

29:08

who can easily overeat on a ketogenic

29:10

diet. You know, I could sit down with a

29:12

bag of of macadamia nuts and polish the

29:14

bag off or sour cream or heavy cream or

29:17

whatever. So, it's easy to do. So, yeah.

29:19

Uh track total calories, macronutrients,

29:22

track your blood ketone levels. Uh you

29:24

could do urine or breath, too.

29:26

>> Are there what what is the

29:27

state-of-the-art on urine and breath

29:29

meters these days? Yeah, I I you know,

29:31

with the breath meter, I do think that's

29:33

pretty legitimate because breath acetone

29:35

correlates with seizure control. There

29:36

was the Biosense device, but uh they've

29:39

kind of fallen out of favor. There's a

29:40

device called Keto Air that's pretty

29:42

good. It's a small, it's like the size

29:44

of a pen,

29:45

>> and that actually correlates really well

29:47

uh with some of the blood ketone

29:49

measurements. I do notice that if I'm in

29:51

a calorie deficit, my blood uh ketones

29:54

are can be very low, but my breath

29:56

ketones are high. And I think your

29:58

ketone production that you're measuring

30:01

is a consequence of ketone production

30:03

and ketone utilization. And in the

30:05

context of uh an energy deficit, your

30:08

tissues are sucking up ketones out of

30:10

your blood fast, but you're blowing off

30:11

more uh acetone. So your your blood

30:15

ketones are and I think you maybe made

30:17

some observations of that too with with

30:19

differenti you know under

30:21

>> also under high utiliz under high

30:22

exercise low like normal exercise

30:25

supernormal exercise fasting etc.

30:28

>> Yeah.

30:29

>> Um and then urine uh people I I mean do

30:33

>> people still use it.

30:34

>> Yeah. But but you know my my view back

30:37

at the time was I was never going to get

30:39

better precision than using blood.

30:41

>> Yeah. blood's still the gold standard

30:42

and there's a lot of uh uh and then you

30:45

have interstitial right so I just

30:48

switched out I was wearing a continuous

30:50

ketone monitor and

30:52

>> how many companies make those now

30:53

>> well Abbott makes one I can't use it

30:56

because they use test flight software

30:58

and I have an Android I'm the guy that

30:59

has the Android uh so I can't use that

31:01

but uh I've sort of done you know uh I

31:05

been involved with the company a little

31:06

bit and just you know had some calls

31:08

with them I know I think you have maybe

31:10

two involved with them. Uh, but there's

31:12

a company

31:13

>> I have no involvement.

31:14

>> Okay. Uh, yes, but just disclosed, I

31:16

don't get paid by them or anything, but

31:17

there's a company that's in China and I

31:20

think now they have a footprint in the

31:21

US. They're called Sai Bio.

31:23

>> And I am very impressed with Sy Bio. So,

31:26

the first week the ketone measurements

31:28

are very accurate, but the last week

31:30

they tend to measure about only half of

31:32

what you measure in blood.

31:34

>> So, it's a it's a device. Is it micro

31:37

needles or is it a long filament? looks

31:39

exactly like a CGM device. Uh, uses

31:42

essentially the same technology, just a

31:44

different enzyme. And, uh, you know, I

31:46

could swim all day in salt water. I can,

31:49

you know, do stuff on the farm. I don't

31:50

knock it off. I It's like probably as

31:53

reliable as a CGM device now. It's

31:55

remarkably reliable. Uh, the specificity

31:58

is good and

31:59

>> and it's BHB.

32:00

>> It's beta hydroxybutyrate. Yeah. It's

32:02

important to uh acknowledge that it's

32:04

the D anantimer or the R anantimer of

32:07

BHB because there's supplements out

32:08

there that are recemic. So you can uh

32:10

but yeah I've tested it you know uh

32:12

pressure tested it if you will with high

32:14

doses of ketones and it it performs well

32:18

and so there's emerging technologies. So

32:20

the continuous ketone monitor continuous

32:22

lactate monitor which is I think it's

32:24

going to be lactates and ankome

32:25

metabolite.

32:26

>> Does anybody have one of those

32:27

commercially ready yet?

32:28

>> Not commercially ready yet. There's

32:30

programs, but I don't think monetarily I

32:33

don't think the companies are motivated

32:34

to bring it to market. And I think

32:36

there's some more testing that needs to

32:37

be done. But for example, my colleagues

32:39

at the Moffett Cancer Center, you know,

32:41

they're like salivating over the the

32:43

opportunity to do glucose, ketone, and

32:46

uh lactate monitoring especially, you

32:48

know, I mean, we see that tumor burden

32:50

is tightly correlated with blood lactate

32:53

levels. So we use lactate monitoring and

32:56

that and if you have an expanding mass

32:58

of like metastatic cancer like it just

33:00

correlates very nicely and lactate an

33:03

metabolite that should be measured.

33:05

>> So if mistake number one is you're not

33:07

measuring your actual ketone levels and

33:09

you're not tracking what you're eating

33:11

so you can see the association of hey

33:12

when I ate this it went down when I ate

33:14

this it went up. Um what are some other

33:17

mistakes people make with their diet

33:18

formulation? Is it too is is that they

33:21

typically airing on the side of too much

33:22

protein, not enough protein? Are they

33:24

not realizing where carbs are sneaking

33:26

into their diet? And and what kind of

33:28

guidance do you give people? How many

33:29

grams of carbs a day do you tell

33:30

somebody? Or do you vary that based on

33:32

their activity level?

33:33

>> Yeah, taking a step back. So, I view

33:36

unlike many people out there, I view a

33:38

ketogenic diet as a prescription

33:42

metabolic therapy. So that's the world

33:45

that I come from, you know, and then

33:46

there's like, you know, there's clinical

33:48

keto and then there's like internet

33:50

keto. So a a and which a lot of people

33:53

are following a low carb diet which has

33:55

a plethora of metabolic benefits. You

33:58

know, you just have to be up on your

33:59

blood work and you have to be very

34:01

vigilant with tracking, you know, your

34:03

biomarkers. Uh but a clinical ketogenic

34:07

diet is typically done uh with

34:09

consulting or advice or even following

34:12

the framework of for example a lot of

34:15

books out there by Eric Kasoff uh if you

34:18

have cancer Miriam Calamian has a guide

34:20

ketogenic diet for cancer. Uh so books

34:23

that are out there that tell you step by

34:25

step on how to do it. And from a

34:28

practical or logistical point of view we

34:31

had a small study we ran with Dr.

34:33

Allison Hall uh that looked at people

34:36

that were just uh they didn't have any

34:38

overt pathology but they were just like

34:40

take normal people put them on a low

34:42

carb ketogenic diet and over the

34:44

practitioners tell me that if you

34:45

transition a person over four to six

34:48

weeks they adhere to it better and you

34:50

actually get more favorable health

34:53

responses. You don't have a lot of funky

34:56

blood work that come back. You know, it

34:58

could be the electrolytes with people

35:00

that have certain mutations with fatty

35:02

acid oxidation disorders. Even ApoE4

35:04

carriers tend to like you'll see their

35:06

LDL go up and you'll see things like HDL

35:09

go down and you'll see they start the

35:11

diet and their triglycerides go up. Like

35:13

I, you know, I've seen that a lot in

35:15

quite a few people and I think there's

35:16

some genetics that need to be unpacked

35:18

there. Uh in several cases it was people

35:21

that were APOE E4 carriers like they're

35:24

homozygous. So I think there's something

35:25

to unpack there. they just don't uh

35:28

metabolize their lipid metabolism is a

35:30

little bit different. So I think it's

35:32

really important to get blood work,

35:33

track triglycerides, track HDL, APOB,

35:36

LDL, hemoglobin A1C, insulin levels. I

35:39

think I've seen people's insulins go up,

35:41

but generally speaking, 90% or 80% or

35:44

more insulin goes down. Uh but really

35:47

just to um to use there's so many

35:50

different guides out there and if you're

35:51

doing it to manage a clinical condition,

35:55

you should be working with a registered

35:56

dietitian that's savvy and the people I

35:59

recommend there's advanced ketogenic

36:01

therapies and it's a team of people and

36:04

it's kind of spearheaded by uh Denise

36:06

Potter. She's a registered dietitian,

36:08

but she was came from the world of

36:10

epilepsy and worked as a conventional

36:12

registered dietitian and then

36:14

transitioned to ketogenic and now has a

36:16

team of a half dozen or more people.

36:18

>> But if someone just says, look, I just

36:19

want to do this on my own just like any

36:21

other diet I might follow. What would be

36:22

sort of the guidance you'd give them?

36:24

>> Yeah, it depends, you know, why they

36:25

want to use it. Uh many

36:26

>> Well, I think the most common reason

36:28

would be weight loss, right?

36:29

>> Yeah, weight loss. Uh so I would say

36:31

calories are super important. So just uh

36:34

gravitate towards a high protein

36:37

ketogenic diet. And if it's just purely

36:40

weight loss, I would say high protein,

36:42

moderate fat, and then high fiber. So

36:45

the carbohydrates that you're getting uh

36:49

should be just fibrous carbohydrates. So

36:51

you can get 50 to even 100 grams of

36:53

carbs per day if onethird of those

36:55

carbohydrates are fiber. So that

36:58

excludes all ultrarocessed food, even

37:00

processed food. Like broccoli is about

37:02

1/3 fiber. So, if you go down the list,

37:04

there's about I think I have a list of

37:06

about 30 or 40 forms of carbohydrates

37:08

that are about like one/ird uh a quarter

37:10

to 1/3 fiber. So, if you're pulling from

37:13

that list, uh you're

37:15

>> so you've got you've got all your leafy

37:17

vegetables. You mentioned broccoli.

37:20

Would carrots be in there?

37:21

>> No. No. Broccoli, cauliflower, uh

37:24

carrots, no, especially if they're

37:25

cooked, they're high they can be highly

37:26

glycemic. Uh but avocado,

37:29

>> bell peppers. Yeah, bell peppers are a

37:32

little bit too high in sugar. They're at

37:33

the cut off point. Maybe like a green

37:35

pepper or something like that. But

37:37

generally things that you'd find in

37:39

like, you know,

37:40

>> cucumber.

37:40

>> Cucumber, yes. Um, you know, uh,

37:44

asparagus tomato is tomato. No, tomato

37:47

is like a fruit, pretty high in sugar.

37:48

>> So, these are things that you need to be

37:50

kind of vigilant and there's a lot of,

37:52

you know, go-to guides. And that's why I

37:54

think it's important to use like a

37:56

tracking app, right? And you don't have

37:58

to do it like I would never use Oh, I

38:00

use it now time to time if I want to

38:02

make adjustments. So, um, and and be

38:05

very v cuz one thing I noticed

38:07

especially using the carbon app or other

38:09

apps is that I was like I'm getting

38:11

about 3 3200 grams of of or 3200

38:13

calories per day, but when I put it into

38:15

these tracking apps, it's more like

38:17

4,000 calories per day. I,

38:20

>> you know, meaning you think you're at

38:22

32. Yeah. I always always underestimate

38:25

it. Uh probably because just fat is so

38:28

calorically dense, right? So the amount

38:30

of egg yolks and a lot of fatty fish.

38:33

This morning I had like three cans of

38:35

sardines. Each can is 20 grams of fat

38:37

and 15 grams of protein. And that's so

38:40

20 that's 60 grams of fat just from

38:42

sardines and extravirgin olive oil, you

38:44

know, and that's it adds up. It just

38:46

seems like oh this is like nothing. This

38:48

is like, you know, it's less than I

38:49

would have if I'm eating at home. But uh

38:51

it adds up. And I think that people that

38:53

are not losing weight or managing

38:56

whatever they're trying to manage with a

38:57

ketogenic diet, they need to track

38:59

calories and simple caloric restriction

39:02

or creating even like a 10 or 20% energy

39:04

deficit will be the big lever that's

39:08

going to cure 90% of what most people

39:10

are seeking the ketogenic diet for. And

39:12

you could do that.

39:13

>> So what's the efficacy then? So what why

39:14

do you think a ketogenic diet works? Uh,

39:16

do you think it works because under

39:18

conditions of caloric restriction, it's

39:20

more satiating than diets that are high

39:23

in carbohydrates?

39:24

>> Yeah, I mean, uh, three, just off the

39:26

top of my head, it's, uh, hyper

39:28

satiating, especially a high protein

39:30

ketogenic diet. It's hypo palatable.

39:34

Some people may argue that, but you're

39:35

not going to overeat a ketogenic diet

39:37

just because it doesn't have the hyper

39:39

palatability of a standard American

39:41

diet, you know. And I think it

39:43

fundamentally is changing metabolic

39:46

physiology and brain neuropharmacology

39:48

in a way that decreases appetite

39:50

regulation. So you know with a higher

39:53

protein diet, you're getting higher

39:54

GLP1, you're reversing insulin

39:56

resistance, you're improving uh fatty

40:00

acid oxidation and I think you're

40:03

fundamentally weaning your brain off

40:06

glucose. So your your brain has is

40:08

dependent on glucose with a standard

40:10

American and as you're decreasing

40:12

glucose availability your brain has a

40:14

counterregulatory

40:16

dysphoric reaction to that and as it

40:18

transitions into ketosis

40:21

uh you could avert a lot of this simply

40:23

by using ketone electrolytes right so uh

40:26

like the stuff that I gave you right so

40:28

the key to start so that's you know

40:30

electrolytes similar blend as element

40:32

but bound to beta hydroxybutyrate

40:34

consume that when you start the diet And

40:36

that'll largely mitigate two things.

40:38

It'll mitigate the electrolytes uh which

40:41

you dump a ketogenic diet has a

40:43

naturetic effect which means you dump uh

40:45

sodium and a diuretic effect. So you

40:48

have when you

40:49

>> let's talk about let's talk about why

40:50

those occur

40:51

>> and that's important because these are

40:53

the things that kind of really throw a

40:55

monkey wrench into some of the clinical

40:56

trials when people become you know their

40:58

electrolytes and they get dehydrated. So

41:00

it's important topic.

41:01

>> So when I stop eating carbohydrates and

41:05

ramp up my fat. By the way, I do want to

41:07

go back to sorry one other point. You

41:08

keep saying high protein. Can you define

41:10

high protein in this context? You talk I

41:12

mean are you talking high by the

41:14

standards of the RDA or are you just

41:17

saying like you know are you saying like

41:19

one gram per pound of body weight? Is

41:21

that sort of your guidance?

41:22

>> Yeah I mean historically you know 8 to

41:25

10 to 12% was used with ketogenic diets.

41:29

So, I'm talking about a ketogenic diet

41:31

that's 20 to 30% protein. So, that's

41:35

considered high,

41:36

>> but that's hard for people, I think,

41:38

sometimes. I mean, you can obviously

41:39

back calculate into that by the

41:40

calories, but do you find it easier to

41:42

just say, look,

41:44

>> keep your carbs at 50 gram and try to

41:46

get them from high fiber carbs, get your

41:49

protein to x grams, and then limit your

41:52

total calories to whatever 3,000 with

41:55

fat filling the rest. Um, in other

41:57

words, what is it typically working out

41:59

to in terms of grams per pound of body

42:01

weight in term in protein?

42:03

>> Yeah, in protein uh if me for example,

42:07

right? So, uh would be upwards of I'm

42:11

about 220 pounds. So, that would be uh I

42:14

know it sounds crazy, but you know, from

42:16

the average RD registered dietitian, but

42:18

220 grams of protein. Yeah. So, that

42:20

would be the upper end if I'm very

42:22

active. I mean today maybe I won't get

42:24

that or when I'm traveling

42:26

>> but that amount of protein I think uh is

42:29

the upper end. I don't think there's any

42:31

benefits to go above and be beyond that.

42:33

>> And at that level of protein you're not

42:35

undergoing so much glucanogenesis that

42:37

you're making too much glucose that's

42:38

offsetting the ketone process.

42:41

>> Yeah. Everybody's a unique uh metabolic

42:43

entity. So they're going to have a

42:45

different response. But for me

42:46

personally, uh especially having eaten 4

42:49

or 500 grams of protein, and that's not

42:51

I'm not exaggerating there. When I was

42:53

in my late teens and 20s, uh that works

42:56

for me. That level of protein works for

42:58

me. Uh for some people, especially if

43:00

they're going to jump from 50 grams a

43:02

day or the RDA recommendations to uh and

43:05

you want to do that to ideal body

43:06

weight. So if you have some

43:08

>> because the RDA for you is 80 gram.

43:11

>> Yeah.

43:11

>> Exactly. 80 grams. You're you're 100

43:13

kilos. Yeah.

43:14

>> The RDA recommends you have 80 g of

43:16

protein, not 220 g.

43:19

>> At 80 g, you would not be able to

43:21

maintain your muscle.

43:22

>> No, not not in my context. No,

43:25

definitely not. Uh the more muscle you

43:27

have, the more protein, they just have

43:30

much higher protein turnover. So, you're

43:32

breaking down protein, building protein.

43:34

That whole cascade is amped up probably

43:38

several times higher in the especially

43:40

if you're working out and breaking down

43:41

protein, you have a fast metabolism. uh

43:44

my recent uh you know resting metabolic

43:47

rate showed it was 34% higher. So I

43:50

don't you know I don't know give I I'd

43:52

have to do further studies but they

43:53

thought it was they wanted to redo it

43:54

and then they

43:55

>> that's even when adjusted for your lean

43:57

mass.

43:57

>> Yeah. Am I resting? Yep. So uh and I

44:01

don't know you know I'm I'm going to

44:02

redo it in about two weeks. I was also

44:04

off creatine and some other things. So

44:06

I'm reloading on creatine just started

44:08

and uh and gonna redo that again. But

44:11

yeah, my my lean mass is kind of I'm

44:13

pretty heavier. So I don't want to throw

44:16

that's the upper limit. And I think if

44:18

people you can gradually increase your

44:20

protein but I'm pro I've been very

44:24

vigilant now with my protein especially

44:26

after turning 50 that this is important

44:28

because things start to your sarcopenia

44:32

and the loss of lean body mass is almost

44:35

considerably higher you know as you know

44:37

like in your 50s and there's different

44:39

reasons for that but activity is the

44:41

main mitigator for that. So, if you're

44:43

providing a stimulus for your body to

44:45

grow and maintain muscle, you need uh

44:48

protein that's double the recommended

44:51

daily allowance. I think if you're

44:53

really going to be proactive about it,

44:56

>> any other kind of quick dos and don'ts

44:59

around things like fruit, berries, uh

45:02

artificial sweeteners, how do you think

45:04

about all of those things as they factor

45:05

into a ketogenic diet?

45:07

>> Yeah. Uh, I think fat and I tend to like

45:10

I guess carb backload at the end of the

45:12

day. I eat no carbs all day and at

45:15

dinner I'll have like a salad or

45:17

vegetables and then in the evening I

45:19

have wild blueberries which have like a

45:21

third of the the sugar of regular uh

45:24

raspberries, blueberries, wild ones. And

45:26

then I have like uh a keto mousse which

45:29

is just cocoa powder, chocolate ketone

45:32

powder and uh and some stevia or monk

45:36

fruit and cinnamon in that and it's has

45:39

no effect on my CGM. It actually goes

45:41

down. So uh I I found out what works for

45:46

me and as long as I am eating you know

45:49

fiber if the if the carbohydrates are

45:51

delivered with fiber there's really no

45:54

uh no glycemic you know counter effect

45:57

to that no spiking uh I have a short

46:01

list of foods so it's basically you know

46:03

berries broccoli

46:06

asparagus

46:08

dark chocolate like these are things

46:10

that I eat every day you know maybe not

46:12

the asparagus, but broccoli, berries,

46:14

dark chocolate, uh, and salads. And, you

46:17

know, that's enough. I'm kind of simple

46:18

and I keep things, you know, pretty

46:20

simple. I don't like even have, in the

46:23

past, I had a desire to have more

46:26

different kinds of foods. Uh, I enjoy

46:28

that. I mean, we were traveling in

46:29

Greece and I'm not going to, you know,

46:31

pass up all the great food like when I'm

46:34

traveling. Uh, and I ate as much

46:37

carbohydrates, you know, as whatever

46:40

they were serving me. and I came back

46:41

six lbs lighter because, you know, I'm

46:42

in and out of the water every day. I'm

46:44

walking out in the sun and things like

46:46

that. So, actually increasing tripling

46:48

or quadrupling my carbohydrate made me

46:50

lose six pounds when I come back. And I

46:52

was I thought for sure I was eating. I

46:53

know.

46:54

>> But how did you feel? Did you feel

46:55

different?

46:56

>> I felt I felt great. Yeah, I'm pretty

46:58

metabolically flexible. So I think

46:59

that's also a consideration

47:02

that if you really delve to into

47:04

carbohydrate restriction and your body

47:06

is completely fat adapted and it's like

47:09

carbohydrates are a foreign substance

47:11

and glucose spikes or you're going to

47:13

have uh sort of a a pretty big

47:17

counterregulatory effect once you start

47:19

getting bolining carbohydrates again. So

47:22

because you're changing your physiology,

47:24

you're changing enzyme. So your gut for

47:26

one thing is not going to tolerate that.

47:28

You know, just from like fitness

47:29

competitors when they diet and then they

47:31

finish competition and then they go out

47:33

and have, you know, like a cheat meal,

47:35

then they're up all night with gas and

47:37

bloating because simply if you start

47:39

with I mean I could go through all the

47:41

different systems, but the GI system

47:42

takes a big hit. The liver takes a big

47:44

hit. The glucose hitting the peripheral

47:46

system can't absorb it. So your CGM goes

47:49

off the charts and that can trigger

47:51

inflammation. That can alter like gut

47:52

microbiome. it's going to affect your

47:54

mood. Like these are wild swings that

47:57

yo-yo dieters go through. So if you're

47:59

low carb, you achieve your goals like

48:01

your weight and you want and you miss

48:02

carbohydrates, you can slightly just

48:04

titrate them back in and just uh just do

48:07

fibrous vegetables, just start with

48:09

that. And some people can't tolerate

48:10

that. But, you know, low fruits, most

48:13

people who have like an aversion to

48:16

plants or some immune reaction to them

48:19

usually can tolerate fruits. So before

48:21

we go to the exogenous or synthetic

48:23

ketones, I want to now ask you about an

48:24

even more uh extreme form of diet, which

48:27

I'm sure you get asked a lot about. I

48:28

know I do, and I have no insight

48:31

clinically, nor do I have any personal

48:32

experience with this. Let's let's talk

48:33

about this carnivore diet.

48:35

>> So I I I realize there are different

48:38

ways people go about doing this. There

48:39

are some versions that are incredibly

48:42

strict where you literally are just

48:43

eating meat and nothing but meat. And

48:46

then there are others where you expand

48:48

that into well you can eat other animal

48:51

products you can eat eggs you can have

48:53

dairy and things like that. Um but let's

48:56

start with just the meat only version of

48:59

that diet. Now

49:02

first of all what do you think is

49:04

happening metabolically? How does one

49:06

achieve ketosis with just meat? Because

49:11

even the fattest serving of meat, even

49:13

if you were eating just ribe eyes, I

49:16

don't imagine Well, I I suppose it's

49:18

possible that you could get 30% of your

49:20

calories from protein and 70% from fat.

49:24

So, does it does it produce a ketoic

49:26

state as well? Typically,

49:28

>> I had a ribeye the other night I think

49:29

would hit the keto macros because it was

49:32

a lot of fat and I was kind of annoyed

49:34

because, you know, there was like less

49:36

meat and more fat. But uh yeah, I I

49:38

think you can achieve ketosis with a

49:42

fatty carnivore diet, especially if

49:44

calories are restricted,

49:44

>> but you couldn't do it if it was a New

49:46

York strip or a fillet. You just don't

49:47

have enough fat in it relative to the

49:49

protein, right?

49:49

>> Uh you could if you were in a caloric

49:53

deficit. So if you're in an energy

49:54

deficit, right? So your insulin is going

49:56

to get like everything is going to get

49:58

kind of go in the right direction. So

49:59

and that's the issue. Uh I I'm a firm

50:02

believer that uh carnivore diets can be

50:06

therapeutic for people who have

50:07

autoimmune disorders. So that's pretty

50:10

clear. There's some people who

50:12

>> uh they could also follow a path and do

50:14

an elimination diet, but the carnivore

50:16

diet is the ultimate elimination diet.

50:18

So you're meeting your protein

50:20

requirements.

50:21

>> You're have enough protein to build

50:23

muscle. uh protein has pretty much or

50:26

you know um steak and an animal-based

50:29

protein diet has pretty much all the

50:30

micronutrients. I mean you could argue

50:33

you could argue maybe uh vitamin C and

50:36

magnesium but you do not see vitamin C

50:39

deficiency in people that are on

50:41

carnivore diets surprisingly. So there's

50:44

some vitamin C in like liver and stuff

50:45

too. So if you're eating nose totail

50:47

that's not something you have to worry

50:48

about. I've seen magnesium trending low

50:51

although we don't have the best

50:53

magnesium you know measurements but uh

50:56

or the blood work for but I've seen uh

50:58

magnesium being beneficial for people

50:59

because magnesium is something it's you

51:03

we get it from chlorophyll right it's

51:04

like the central molecule of the of

51:06

chlorophyll right magnesium uh and we're

51:09

not getting any of that really with a

51:10

ketogenic diet or very little

51:12

>> I mean you're getting a lot cuz you're I

51:13

mean I got a ton I mean I would I had

51:15

two salads a day when I was on a

51:16

ketogenic diet

51:17

>> I'm talking pure carnivore.

51:19

>> Yeah, I see. I see.

51:19

>> Like they I mean like we're talking

51:22

steak and water, right? Like not even

51:24

coffee, not even putting pepper on the

51:26

steak. Like there are a group of people

51:28

who believe that and it's working for

51:30

them and they have

51:32

>> they have a lot of anecdotal data, you

51:35

know, to support that. And I get I get

51:36

an inbox full of people that say, "Hey,

51:38

look, I had this condition or that

51:40

condition. I follow carnivore and here's

51:41

my blood work." And I can't argue with

51:43

that.

51:43

>> Yeah. No, I I I I would I find that

51:45

stuff pretty compelling from an

51:47

elimination diet perspective. And and I'

51:49

I've certainly met a number of folks who

51:50

who feel that way. And um yeah, I mean I

51:54

I think again it's quite binary. It

51:56

either it works or it doesn't. And for

51:58

many of these people, they're so

51:59

debilitated on any other form of diet

52:01

that it's a no-brainer. You're going to

52:02

stick with that type of restriction.

52:04

>> Yeah. The influencer voice is also

52:06

amplified. like Joe Rogan for example uh

52:09

had vitilgo and you know that's an

52:11

autoimmune disorder and I know people

52:13

who have that and uh saying it's the

52:15

only thing going on a carnivore diet you

52:17

know cured my vitilgo like so I have you

52:20

know people that are interested in that

52:21

so there's a wide variety of things you

52:23

know that it can be therapeutic for

52:25

there's a group in uh Budapest Hungary

52:27

called Paleo Medicina and I went to

52:29

their clinic and they pulled their files

52:30

and I saw everything from type 1

52:32

diabetes to cancer to different uh

52:36

different neurological disorders,

52:38

>> you know, and these are all but they're

52:39

showing me blood work longitudinally

52:41

over time and um could be cherrypicked

52:44

the cases, but it was pretty convincing

52:45

and they probably have a dozen or more

52:47

publications out case series and things

52:49

like that. So, uh so there's it's but

52:52

it's a form of a ketogenic diet. So I

52:54

think that's important to understand

52:55

like a carnivore diet is fundamentally

52:58

uh if practiced the way they do with

53:00

paleomicina where you just focus on

53:02

super fatty cuts, fatty fish, fatty, you

53:04

know, fatty meats and uh it's a version

53:06

of a ketogenic diet and I think that's

53:08

why it works.

53:09

>> All right, let's go back to

53:12

now talk about this world of exogenous

53:14

ketones, these supplemental ketones.

53:16

Now, you alluded to them already through

53:18

the lens of kickstarting a ketogenic

53:20

diet, but before we talk about

53:23

application, I want to kind of orient

53:25

people to the journey you've been on.

53:28

>> Um, I was once on that journey with you

53:30

being a a regular consumer of all sorts

53:33

of these things. Um, I will say lately,

53:36

and I when I mean lately, I mean only in

53:38

the past 3 months, I recently uh tried a

53:41

product uh that I like. I put it in my

53:44

coffee in the morning and I believe it

53:46

is a

53:48

disaster of 13 butane dial.

53:52

>> So it doesn't come with sort of the

53:54

liver toxicity that I think we should

53:56

talk about with respect to 13 butane

53:58

dial which unfortunately seems to be

53:59

running rampant right now.

54:01

>> Um but it's a white powder and what's

54:04

blows my mind about it is when you mix

54:07

it in water and drink it it's palatable.

54:10

It's not delicious, like you wouldn't go

54:12

out of your way to drink it, but it is

54:14

not horrible the way that most of these

54:16

synthetic ketones used to taste. So, you

54:19

can just make a shot glass of it and

54:21

it's totally reasonable. Alternatively,

54:23

it's the creamer in my coffee and it's

54:26

fantastic. Um, but let's go way back to

54:29

the beginning.

54:30

>> Yeah. Yeah.

54:31

>> So, circa 2011

54:34

>> Mhm. You had

54:37

basically only two products you could

54:39

consume, right? You had a beta

54:41

hydroxybutyrate monoester.

54:46

Actually, there were more than that.

54:47

There was a ketone salt, which we should

54:49

talk about. And you had an accetoacetate

54:52

diester. Is that correct?

54:53

>> Yep. BHB monoester and and 13butane

54:57

dial. Acceto acetate diester. Two

54:59

accetoates on 13 butane dial. So, there

55:01

are two esters.

55:02

>> So, just explain to people. Well, I mean

55:03

I unfortunately we have to get into a

55:05

little biochemistry here for you to

55:07

explain the difference between esters

55:09

and salts. And so to everybody

55:11

listening, apologies, but if you want to

55:14

if you want to understand these things,

55:16

and you have to if you want to be a

55:17

consumer of them, because everybody is

55:20

talking about these things as though

55:21

they're the same, and they're

55:22

categorically not the same. Um, and most

55:25

people have no idea what they're talking

55:27

about, and most people who are selling

55:28

these things are not being transparent

55:31

about what it is you're buying. They

55:32

just call everything a ketone.

55:34

>> Yeah.

55:35

>> So, let's do a little bit of

55:37

biochemistry, Dom.

55:38

>> Sure. Yeah. Glad to do that. Uh I think

55:41

it's maybe even good to step back a

55:43

little bit. Uh because if you go to

55:45

clinicaltrials.gov and you search ketone

55:48

supplement, MCT. So that that's a that's

55:50

a 8 to 10 carbon fatty acid that can

55:54

convert to ketones. So that's that

55:56

that'll come into the conversation, but

55:58

I want to throw it. But one of the

56:00

original kind of ketogenic substances

56:02

was 13b butane dial and I have uh I

56:06

think compliments of Ken Ford some of

56:08

the MIT reports of you know testing this

56:12

compound that from the 1960s and then

56:14

there was a report written uh by people

56:17

at NASA where they were basically

56:19

looking at this as a longduration

56:21

spaceflight food 13 butane dial which is

56:24

an alcohol it's a dalcohol or a glycol.

56:28

So uh it is remarkably ketogenic which

56:31

means you consume it and you elevate

56:33

beta hydroxybutyrate and uh it's

56:36

incredibly stable. So hence you know for

56:38

long duration space flight it was reject

56:40

oh also it it preserves food. So in the

56:44

report they basically soaked they put it

56:46

into some biscuits and the biscuits were

56:49

like extremely shelf stable. So it's a

56:51

hctant which means it keeps uh food

56:54

moist and it is it's actually grass

56:56

approved to be uh like they put it in

56:59

sausage casings and things like that

57:01

right so that existed that was 13 butane

57:04

dial and I think you know I would say

57:06

Dr. there was two people who really I'd

57:09

like to credit Dr. Henri Bruningraber

57:12

from Case Western and Dr. Richard Vichch

57:14

the late Dr. Richard Vch who passed away

57:16

a mentor of mine. Yeah. He passed away

57:18

like two or three years ago I think.

57:21

>> Uh and I remember Dr. Vch saying uh

57:24

because I was trying to acquire his

57:26

ketoneester for some studies and uh I

57:28

ultimately you know used the 13 butane

57:30

dial or the monoester beta

57:32

hydroxybutyrate for seizures but it

57:34

didn't work. And I will I'll pivot and

57:36

talk about that. So you have 13 butane

57:38

dial was the original kind of ketogenic

57:40

molecule and then you have two people

57:42

who spearheaded ketone esters. Sorry,

57:44

just before we leave that one, you said

57:47

13b butane dial elevates beta

57:49

hydroxybutyrate. Let's explain how and

57:50

why.

57:51

>> Yeah, good, good. Okay, so you can

57:53

consume 13b butane dial and it's a

57:55

precursor to beta hydroxybuterrate. When

57:58

you consume it, it goes through the

58:00

alcohol dehydrogenase pathway and

58:03

produces much like alcohol and you can

58:06

elevate BHB with this precursor, but it

58:09

needs to be metabolized by the liver.

58:11

And when it's metabolized by the liver,

58:14

the liver does have to work a bit. If

58:16

you consume enough to like jack up your

58:18

ketones to three or five millolar for

58:20

two or three weeks, you're going to see

58:22

your liver enzymes jump up. So, I've

58:23

done that with 13. And you have to take

58:25

a lot of it. You're talking about 150 to

58:27

200 milliliters per day for someone like

58:29

me to be in therapeutic ketosis. So,

58:32

when you do that, you also you're

58:34

generating an aldahhide. So you're

58:36

generating

58:37

>> and do we think that that's what's

58:38

driving up because because let let's

58:40

take a step back here.

58:42

>> If I asked you to consume

58:46

100 grams of ethanol a day y

58:50

>> for two weeks your transaminas would go

58:54

up.

58:55

>> Yeah. Yeah. You see Yeah. I've done that

58:57

before.

58:58

>> Yeah. So let's let's talk about that. So

58:59

So a standard drink is about 15 g of

59:02

ethanol. So now I'm going to ask you to

59:04

maybe more, right?

59:05

>> Yeah. Call 20. We round up 20. So now

59:08

I'm asking you to have five alcoholic

59:10

beverages a day. And by the way, you

59:12

could space that out over the course of

59:13

the day and not even get a buzz, right?

59:15

But I'm going to give you say five

59:16

alcoholic beverages a day

59:18

>> for two weeks. You are metabolizing

59:21

ethanol with alcohol

59:22

>> dehydrogenase

59:24

>> and you're going to create all of the

59:27

various metabolites. Um and the reason

59:31

your trans aminases are elevating is

59:33

those enzymes are leaking out of

59:35

hpatocytes because the hpatocytes are

59:37

injured due to the inflammation that

59:39

results from that metabolic pathway. Is

59:42

that at all analogous to what's

59:44

happening with a comparable dose of 13

59:46

butane dial?

59:47

>> Yeah, it is. There's a couple things

59:48

going on. You drink alcohol, you're

59:50

deenergizing the redux state of the

59:52

liver and you're generating acetal

59:54

aldahhide, an aldahhide molecule which

59:56

you know aldahhide damages DNA. It's got

59:59

oxidative stress issues that baggage

60:02

that comes with it. You're also

60:04

generating acetate. When you drink

60:05

alcohol, you're generating acetate. And

60:08

the brain acetate is actually something

60:10

I looked into. It's a remarkable

60:12

alternative fuel for the brain. So, uh,

60:15

so that's like a lot maybe a lot of

60:17

people don't know that, but when you

60:18

drink alcohol, you're giving your brain

60:20

acetate, and that's we can come back to

60:22

that. It's analogous to drinking 13

60:26

butane dial is analogous to drinking

60:28

alcohol. Instead of generating acetate,

60:30

you're generating beta hydroxybutyrate,

60:32

another alternative fuel for the brain.

60:35

Uh in the intermediary,

60:37

>> but do you generate the same amount of

60:39

aldahhide?

60:40

>> Uh you are generating a beta

60:42

hydroxybutyrate aldahhide that is

60:44

relatively short-lived, but you can

60:48

overwhelm the ADH enzyme. So by if you

60:52

drink too much of it you can cause uh

60:55

you can overwhelm the enzyatic

60:57

degradation and Henry Bruningraber did

60:59

some seminal studies on this that he

61:00

shared with me some of it's published

61:02

they had a they had a ketogenic dog

61:05

model that they gave 13b butane dial is

61:08

a hypoglycemic agent. So it's a

61:10

hypoglycemic agent because it

61:12

deenergizes the liver and prevents uh

61:16

glycogenolyis and gluconioenesis because

61:20

those path those uh mechanisms in the

61:23

liver are highly highly energy

61:25

dependent. So so that's analogous to

61:27

alcoholic keto acidosis. When you have

61:29

an alcoholic that's fasting and he

61:31

overconumes alcohol, he goes to the ER

61:34

because he experiences alcoholic keto

61:35

acidosis, which is basically it's, you

61:38

know, you have runaway ketogenesis

61:41

because you have you're inhibiting

61:43

glucanogenesis. Uh, but

61:45

>> why can't that patient make enough

61:49

insulin in response to the beta

61:51

hydroxybutyrate to bring the acidosis

61:53

under control?

61:55

because the liver cannot uh if you

61:59

increase insulin right that insulin is

62:02

going to only like you know facilitate

62:06

glucose disposal so the main thing is

62:08

the liver the liver is like

62:09

>> you're saying the liver doesn't respond

62:11

to the insulin signal to make less BHB

62:14

in that situation

62:15

>> and alcoholic keto acidosis

62:16

>> it does it doesn't so why does it in the

62:19

rest of us

62:20

>> like when you and I used to do our

62:22

ridiculous 10day fasts and all Do you

62:24

still do those by the way?

62:25

>> Uh I do like a sardine fast, right? So

62:28

I'll do like five day Yeah. two or three

62:31

cans of sardines a day and that I get

62:33

the same benefits and it mitigates a lot

62:35

of the negative effects.

62:36

>> Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. So but when we used to

62:38

do these 10 and 14 day water only fasts,

62:41

um

62:42

>> our ketones would actually plateau.

62:44

>> Yeah. And even when George Cahill did

62:46

the, you know, the seinal studies of

62:49

40-day water only fasts, their plat

62:52

their ketones plateaued at 7 to 10 days.

62:55

And a big part of that was that insulin

62:57

is now keeping them in check, right? Any

62:59

more elevation in the key the reason the

63:01

ketones aren't going to produce a level

63:03

of acettosis. Acidosis is is that and

63:05

that's why of course kids primarily with

63:08

type 1 diabetes can develop keto

63:11

acidosis. they don't have the beta cell

63:13

uh capacity to offset that rise in

63:16

ketones. So this is this this case of

63:18

the alcoholic is very interesting to me.

63:20

I actually was never aware of this.

63:21

>> Yeah. I mean it's you have uh you

63:24

deenergize the liver so the liver can't

63:25

undergo glucanogenesis and some extent

63:28

glycogenolyis. Then you have the

63:30

electrolyte balance. You get

63:32

dehydration. So it's a constellation of

63:34

things. But you know in getting back to

63:36

13 butane dial if you consume it and you

63:39

consume large amounts of it uh like some

63:42

of the early work that was done by you

63:44

can overwhelm that enzyatic cascade and

63:47

you can start generating you know a lot

63:49

of these aldahhide intermediates and

63:51

that's maybe not a good thing. So uh so

63:54

with 13 butane dial I see like two

63:56

problems I think people should be aware

63:58

of especially people like maybe that are

64:00

elderly or using it for cognitive

64:02

enhancement is that you get buzzed on it

64:04

and I've I've I know I've probably

64:07

consumed 13b butane dial than anybody. I

64:09

mean we have we had it in like you know

64:11

big 20 liter vials of it and I was

64:13

drinking

64:14

>> I used to buy it at Sigma Chemicals like

64:16

the stuff was dirt cheap.

64:17

>> Yeah. Yeah. Uh so I've done experimented

64:20

with the recemic and then also with the

64:22

um with the RN antimer and kind of the

64:25

same thing. Uh it's great and actually I

64:28

think it has applications for cancer

64:30

because it does have a glucose lowering

64:32

effect. We mixed it in with a standard

64:34

diet and gave it to animals with

64:36

metastic cancer and it suppressed cancer

64:38

growth and and put them into keto. So it

64:40

has some applications there. Uh but

64:43

getting back to the ideal ketone, it's

64:45

like it's like it's it's analogous

64:47

drinking

64:49

13b butane dial to elevate BHB is

64:51

somewhat analogous to drinking alcohol

64:54

to generate acetone or or acetate which

64:56

is a great molecule. I mean

64:57

>> Right. But it's a very indirect way to

64:59

do it that comes with toxicity.

65:01

>> Yeah. So what Dr. Vich and Henry

65:03

Burningber did and and there was some

65:04

others too involved in in the research.

65:07

uh Sammy Hasham developed a glycerol uh

65:09

beta hydroxybutyrate esther but they

65:12

take uh you can take 13b butane dial and

65:15

do a transestrification reaction and add

65:17

beta hydroxybutyrate to it or you can

65:19

add accetoacetate

65:21

to the molecule and when you consume it

65:23

you quickly liberate the ketones. So you

65:25

get a quick uh elevation of ketones,

65:28

beta hydroxybutyrate or accetoacetate

65:30

and then the 13 butane dial then goes to

65:32

the liver and the pharmacocinetics are

65:35

as much as you and we mimicked it

65:37

exactly in our lab. You go up you have

65:39

an initial peak and then like an hour or

65:41

two later you have a second peak from

65:42

the 13 butane dial and so it's it's a

65:45

nice molecule. I mean it's a nice uh and

65:48

I think it's it's dose dependently

65:51

potentially problematic. And with the

65:53

13b butane dial there's two issues would

65:55

be the potential for liver toxicity in

65:58

people do that do not have healthy

66:00

livers like my liver is pretty healthy I

66:02

think and it doubled my liver enzymes if

66:04

I take a large dose for two weeks and

66:06

then the other thing is if you take a

66:08

large dose of 13b butane dial the

66:10

narcotic effect in someone who doesn't

66:12

have good who is frail who doesn't have

66:15

good stability it's going to you know in

66:18

Dr. beach's word, it's going to make you

66:20

drunk stupid because I was trying to

66:22

acquire some of his Esther for something

66:24

and I was like, well, I'm just going to

66:25

use 13 and he kind of talked me out of

66:26

it, you know, and the whole reason for

66:29

developing the monoester was to avert

66:30

the problem.

66:31

>> So, the monoester is beta

66:34

hydroxybutyrate with a monoester bond to

66:37

13b butane dial.

66:39

>> Uh, yeah. Or yeah, 13 butane dial that's

66:41

Yeah. bounded to beta hydroxybuterrate,

66:43

but you said it in Yeah. So, you could

66:45

say it either way. Yep. And why is it

66:47

that you don't experience the same

66:49

negative issue with that molecule? Is it

66:52

because you just consume less of it

66:53

because you're getting the one uh you're

66:55

you're getting the BHB directly?

66:57

>> Yeah, you could take, you know, half the

67:00

amount and and get and then the kinetics

67:02

are a little bit slower too because you

67:04

have to hydrayze the BHB from that and

67:06

the liver.

67:07

>> And why can't you just consume BHB? Why

67:09

is is that not stable enough by its own

67:11

other than in a salt?

67:12

>> Uh you can. Yeah. So, there's a free

67:14

acid and that I tinkered with that

67:16

originally with the free acid because

67:18

you could buy it and it's super acidic

67:20

and it's not very stable in solution and

67:23

>> for a variety of different reasons

67:25

although you could put free acid needs

67:27

to be liquid into like an electrolyte

67:29

formulation. So we gravitated towards uh

67:33

at the time I was using in my

67:35

electrophysi electrophysiology

67:37

experiments you can't put a ketoneester

67:39

in the bath right because uh it doesn't

67:41

it needs to be metabolized by the liver

67:43

so you can't put it onto neurons so you

67:45

have to use a salt so you mimic you know

67:47

the pharmacocinetics of what you get

67:49

with the esester so we were putting

67:50

sodium beta hydroxybutyrate in

67:53

>> and I was thinking okay I'll give this

67:55

to the animals but then it was like okay

67:57

I'll I have to I was very concerned

67:59

concerned with the sodium overload like

68:01

you know you know uh hypertension all

68:04

the negative effects about salt

68:06

>> but all the negative effects about salt

68:09

and your listeners may not know this but

68:11

most physiologists kind of do that study

68:13

it

68:14

>> the salt sensitive people or the the

68:16

problem with salts and people maybe even

68:18

think ketone salts is that when you

68:20

consume salt you get hypertension and

68:22

some people salt sensitive but that's

68:23

specific to sodium chloride so sodium

68:26

bicarb sodium citrate sodium beta

68:29

hydroxy Butyrate is what I'm talking

68:30

about. If you consume large doses, gram

68:33

molecules of that, you're not that

68:35

doesn't have the same hypertensive.

68:37

Something about chloride. So, sodium

68:39

chloride. So, you could use potassium

68:42

chloride, you know, instead of sodium

68:44

chloride for salt. But I but I think

68:46

that's an important thing to consider uh

68:49

because a lot of people shy away from

68:51

ketone salts because it's sodium. But

68:53

the salt sensitive sort of hypertension

68:56

that you get was pretty much is

68:58

associated with sodium chloride. Uh so I

69:02

and I was communicating with Patrick

69:04

Arnold at the time and we were I kind of

69:06

have I was like if I have sodium

69:08

chloride but I wanted to get potassium

69:10

chloride but I looked I couldn't buy it

69:12

from Sigma. It wasn't in the cast

69:14

database and nobody had thought about

69:16

this. I could like how could nobody have

69:18

thought about putting ketones on

69:20

different electrolytes? It just wasn't

69:22

out there. So, um, so I kind of had the

69:24

idea of like sodium, calcium, potassium,

69:28

uh, magnesium, you know, so there's

69:30

different things that you can combine.

69:32

>> So, you just needed a positive cation.

69:36

>> Yeah. And I wanted to balance the

69:38

potassium uh, the sodium with potassium.

69:41

So, that was my original thing. I was

69:42

like, I was going to create a ketone

69:44

salt and just balance the sodium with

69:46

potassium.

69:47

>> And are those covealently bound or not?

69:49

You don't bound. Yeah.

69:50

>> Ionically bound. Okay.

69:52

sodium's trying to get everybody back to

69:55

high school chemistry. Y

69:56

>> you can either take this highly highly

69:58

acidic BHB molecule and you can

70:01

covealently bind it through an esther to

70:04

13 butane dol

70:06

>> or you can say let's be done with that

70:08

baggage of the 13 butane dol and let's

70:10

have um uh let's have a non-coovvealent

70:17

an ionic bound to a salt and I just need

70:20

a positive charge to offset the negative

70:21

charge. Y

70:22

>> so then you were saying okay I want to

70:24

do sodium cuz I can do a lot with it and

70:26

then tell me where the potassium comes

70:28

in cuz you want sodium and potassium two

70:30

both of them are two positive charges

70:32

instead of one calcium or one magnesium

70:34

which have two positive charges.

70:36

>> Yeah. So the idea is to have monovalent

70:38

and dvalent cations ions and you can

70:40

spread the beta hydroxybutyrate out to

70:43

create like a quad salt was the idea

70:45

that back in 2011. So reaching out to

70:48

Patrick you know is like it wasn't in

70:49

the cast database no one had thought

70:51

about it. it wasn't you couldn't buy it

70:53

so we had to make it right and then we

70:55

made the calcium and the magnesium and

70:58

through time basically we settled on a

71:00

ratio of sodium potassium to calcium

71:02

similar to element so they're kind of

71:04

ahead of but element is you know sodium

71:06

chloride so uh uh keto start or from

71:10

audacious nutrition is sodium beta

71:12

hydroxybutyrate it's got you know and

71:14

the calcium and it's got a spread of

71:16

electrolytes that are similar so you're

71:17

giving electrolytes and also giving

71:19

ketones and that's really important when

71:22

you start a ketogenic diet because

71:24

you're replenishing

71:26

the the electrolytes that you are

71:28

spilling out more through a naturic

71:30

effect especially the sodium and also

71:33

there's an energetic gap in the brain

71:35

when you start a ketogenic diet where

71:38

you have you know u uh an energetic need

71:41

for the increase in ketones so that had

71:44

that becomes

71:45

>> that's important for people we should we

71:47

should go back to that Don because I

71:48

think a lot of people

71:50

>> have lived bad experience and they don't

71:52

understand why, right? Which is in the

71:54

early stages of a ketogenic diet,

71:56

especially there's there's little room

71:58

for error where as glucose levels are

72:01

going down and ketone levels haven't

72:03

come up enough to fill the gap, you

72:05

really feel lousy.

72:07

>> Yeah.

72:07

>> Um and and again in in retrospect, uh

72:12

you you can work around that, but it's

72:13

easy to miss it. and meaning it's easy

72:16

to miss the mark and therefore suffer

72:18

that that that painful transition which

72:21

can last weeks in some people um and

72:24

therefore using these exogenous ketones

72:26

can be a very elegant bridge through it

72:28

so that you don't experience the

72:30

>> the the the negative side effects of the

72:32

transition.

72:33

>> Yeah. So you have the energetic effects.

72:36

If you do a FG PET scan, you're going to

72:38

see like less brain glucose, you know,

72:40

utilization for one thing. And then you

72:43

have uh with the keto you have the

72:45

contraction of plasma volume because as

72:47

you lose water and electrolytes so that

72:49

you might have orthostatic hypotension,

72:51

you just don't you get the brain fog and

72:53

then you have electrolytes which are

72:55

literally like molecules that are

72:57

involved in action potentials in keeping

73:00

membrane potentials in cells. So uh and

73:03

all these can be kind of mitigated

73:05

through u you know uh ketone salts uh h

73:09

have an advantage over the ketone

73:12

esters. They also have the advantage

73:13

because the mineral delays gastric

73:16

absorption. So when you take a dose of a

73:18

ketone salt it does not cause an insulin

73:21

effect. If you drink a ketone estester

73:24

or a large dose of 13b butane dial and

73:26

I've done this before and you do an

73:28

insulin measurement, you know, an hour

73:31

after that's you're going to see your

73:33

insulin levels increase.

73:34

>> How much would you see an increase in

73:36

you?

73:36

>> So the increase seems to be proportional

73:39

to the differential. So if you rapidly

73:42

increase ketones 2 millmer and if you

73:46

stay under 2 millmer then you don't get

73:48

the spike in insulin. But if you consume

73:51

it and you get above 1.5 to 2 millmer,

73:55

at least in me and a few other people

73:57

that did this, then you see this counter

74:00

regulatory dump in insulin. So, and that

74:03

would also explain when people drink a

74:05

large dose of a ketoester, their glucose

74:07

levels go down. And it's a bit of a

74:09

scary situation because I know people

74:11

have gotten themselves into the

74:12

situation is that when you drink the

74:14

ketoester

74:16

about two hours later or thereabouts,

74:19

you can be hypoglycemic and also

74:21

hypoctootic, which means your ketones

74:23

come up, you utilize them as fuel, but

74:26

you've released insulin

74:28

peripheral glucose disposal, and then

74:30

you get into a point where you're

74:31

running, for example, and then you tank

74:33

because you don't have and you can it

74:36

could trigger a headache. it could I

74:37

mean as it does with me uh if you take a

74:39

large dose so there's ways around that

74:42

>> but you're saying the salt produces that

74:44

effect much less

74:46

>> the salt does not produce that effect at

74:47

all so for a number of different reasons

74:49

I think uh it's not the rate of rise of

74:53

ketones in the bloodstream seem to be

74:56

the predictor of if you're going to

74:58

release insulin for one thing and then

75:00

there's something about the electrolytes

75:02

too that maybe delays gastric absorption

75:05

and with the salts you're just not

75:06

getting that elevation of ketones that's

75:09

as high and as rapid as you would get

75:12

with a ketoneester. So these are all

75:14

things that can

75:15

>> So in the packet of the the one that

75:17

what's the brand that you brought for

75:19

me?

75:19

>> Uh Audacious Nutrition Keto Start.

75:22

>> Okay. So in that packet you're getting

75:24

about how many grams of electrolytes?

75:26

About one gram total.

75:29

>> Yeah. Total about one gram like sodium

75:32

then calcium, magnesium, potassium.

75:34

Right. And you're getting uh so there's

75:37

different formulations the original

75:40

formula so the packets are a little bit

75:41

smaller about the size of element now

75:43

but you're getting about 6 to 10 grams

75:47

of pure beta hydroxybutyrate minus the

75:49

electrolytes. So a lot of people that

75:52

say you're getting this amount of

75:53

ketones that also includes the

75:55

electrolytes. So you're getting, you

75:56

know, depending upon which packet you

75:58

take, 6 g or 10 g of pure beta

76:01

hydroxybutyrate and the two different

76:03

anantimer. So that's another thing that

76:06

we could talk about too. Uh so ketones

76:09

>> equal mix of R and D.

76:10

>> Uh yes, a 50/50 ratio of D and the L

76:16

and RNS,

76:17

>> right? So um you know, I guess you could

76:21

say there's four different ketone

76:22

molecules. There's D beta

76:24

hydroxybutyrate the L or the RNS if you

76:27

use that nomenclature and then you have

76:28

the accetoacetate and beta

76:30

hydroxybutyrate does need to break down

76:32

to accetoacetate to be used in the

76:34

mitochondria and then you have acetone

76:36

which has some interesting signaling and

76:38

metabolic effects surprisingly. So it

76:41

also correlates really well with seizure

76:43

control. So we're not I'm not forgetting

76:45

about acetone. Still, it's like,

76:46

>> so in somebody my size, 180 lbs, 10

76:50

grams of BHB will take me to what level

76:52

for how long?

76:53

>> Yeah. So,

76:54

>> and rest, let's just say I'm not

76:55

exercising.

76:56

>> For me, maybe we can include it in the

76:58

show notes. I could show you my uh uh my

77:01

CKM, my continuous ketone monitor, and

77:04

>> shoots me up for I guess it's about 4

77:07

hours, like one packet, four hours.

77:10

>> But you're starting at a high level. I'm

77:11

at zero, right?

77:12

>> No. Well, I would eat carbohydrates to

77:14

make sure I'm zero to start with and I

77:16

did it under I've done this dozens of

77:18

times, but I it's interesting. If I'm

77:21

sitting in my car and driving, I had a

77:22

road trip and I drank it and I had my

77:24

CKM on. It was elevated for like four to

77:27

six hours and I was like super like

77:29

hyperfocused driving and it was great.

77:32

Like

77:32

>> elevated like one to two.

77:34

>> Uh yeah, it was about one Yeah, between

77:37

one and two which I think is an ideal

77:40

range because you're not stimulating

77:41

insulin. uh a 10. Uh so and interesting

77:45

is that uh keto start is D and the L and

77:49

it was only measuring the D. So uh but

77:52

it's not accounting for the L or

77:55

accetoacetate or acetone, right? So it's

77:58

a 50/50 mixture of D and L, but it's

78:00

only measuring the D and it's still

78:01

getting between like one and two miller.

78:03

>> Does that mean you're actually at twice

78:05

that level?

78:06

>> Potentially. Yeah.

78:07

>> What were we doing with our Abbott

78:08

finger sticks?

78:09

>> Measuring D beta hydroxybutyrate. So

78:11

does that mean every time we were

78:13

measuring this we were probably only

78:15

capturing half what Cahill was capturing

78:17

or was has everybody always measured

78:19

half?

78:20

>> No. Well okay so recemic ketones were

78:23

some of the first ones to come out on

78:25

the market and then everybody gravitated

78:26

to the D animer.

78:28

>> I think we should stop Dom and explain

78:29

to people what the hell we're talking

78:31

about. I don't think people know what an

78:32

antimer are.

78:33

>> Okay. Uh so beta hydroxybutyrate is

78:36

produced in the body primarily uh in the

78:40

form of d beta hydroxybutyrate

78:43

which is a form uh the mirror image of

78:46

beta hydroxy of d beta hydroxybutyrate

78:49

is L beta hydroxybutyrate

78:51

so we say if a if a beta hydroxybutyrate

78:55

supplement is recemic it has D and it

78:58

has L in it so I think of the

79:01

>> let's go back to what you said a second

79:02

ago because I want to make sure

79:03

understand the mirror. It's literally a

79:06

mirror image. So for example, alulose is

79:09

an anatimer of fructose. Yeah.

79:11

>> Right. So if you hold if you draw

79:13

fructose and you hold it in the mirror,

79:16

what you see is not fructose. It's the

79:18

reflection of fructose. But that's

79:19

alulose.

79:20

>> Alulose is not an anantimer. It's an

79:23

epimer.

79:24

>> It's an epimer.

79:25

>> I always thought it was an antimer.

79:26

>> No, it's an epimer. So it has a Yeah,

79:28

>> it has it has another flip.

79:30

>> Yeah. Yeah.

79:30

>> Oh, okay. So it's two flips. It's it's

79:32

similar to an anime but it's an epimer.

79:34

>> Uh the I think an important thing to

79:36

remember is that like you have like

79:38

ringer's lactate which is also dlactate.

79:40

So you could I mean maybe analogous

79:41

>> but why does this matter chemically? I

79:43

think this is the point I want to make

79:44

to people is when you when you have a D

79:47

and an L of something do they behave the

79:49

same?

79:50

>> Yeah. So uh I'll get it's not so there's

79:52

also u there's a lot of recemic

79:54

compounds. So statins, aderall,

79:58

ibuprofen. So these are all recemic

80:00

mixtures of the same molecule. So

80:03

recemic beta hydroxybutyrate you have

80:04

the D the D beta hydroxybutyrate gets

80:07

metabolize like l like very very fast.

80:10

So it gets in your system your tissues

80:12

suck it up you metabolize it you do make

80:15

your body makes very small amounts of L

80:18

beta hydroxybutyrate with a rasmise

80:20

enzyme. That rasmise enzyme is not in

80:22

the liver but it's in the tissues. So

80:25

that that's very interesting because I

80:27

think some tissues are converting D to L

80:29

to maybe use the L beta hydroxybutyrate

80:31

as a signaling but I'm just speculating

80:33

but nonetheless you have D gets

80:35

metabolized very quickly and then the L

80:38

is like a timed release version of beta

80:41

hydroxybutyrate. That's how I've always

80:42

thought about it even even in like you

80:44

know uh Brianna Stubs did some some nice

80:47

work looking at the D to L and we've

80:48

done quite a bit of work on the D and

80:50

the L and the uh a lot of work with

80:52

recemic compounds. So the L will get

80:55

metabolized like three or four times

80:57

slower and you get about 20 or%

81:00

conversion of the L back to D but it's a

81:03

very slow process. Uh the advantage of

81:06

taking the D to L is that or the recemic

81:09

when you consume a recemic mixture the

81:12

the ketones elevate and stay elevated

81:15

quite a bit longer but then you get I

81:17

think of the L beta hydroxybutyrate as

81:19

an important signaling molecule because

81:21

you get higher concentrations of L in

81:24

the brain. So if you give someone

81:25

recemic beta hydroxybutyrate and then

81:28

you pull out you know the heart and you

81:31

take samples of the brain out the levels

81:33

of of lb beta hydroxybutyrate are going

81:35

to be quite a bit higher

81:36

>> and is that just because it sticks

81:38

around longer and therefore crosses the

81:40

bloodb brain barrier or in the case of

81:41

the brain

81:42

>> it metabolizes slower. So this is

81:45

important. We think this is important

81:46

because the LBA hydroxybutyrate

81:49

>> probably does not have the same it

81:52

definitely does not have the same

81:53

energetic potential in regards to

81:55

generating ATP.

81:56

>> It does not.

81:57

>> So no V told me that and I'm a believer

81:59

that the L because it gets metabolized

82:01

much slower.

82:02

>> Right. But if you just take the total

82:04

metabolism of it, are you saying one

82:06

mole of one and one mole of the other

82:08

produce a different amount of ATP? Yeah,

82:10

they will ultimately L beta

82:11

hydroxybutyrate will go into acetal COA

82:14

but it'll be metabolized more like a

82:15

fatty acid. So where the D gets uh the D

82:19

has a redux shift and it causes a

82:22

reductive shift. Actually you could have

82:25

reductive stress. I'm going to come to

82:26

that in a minute. But you have the D and

82:28

the L. They get metabolized at different

82:30

rates. D gets metabolized slower than

82:32

the L takes about three or four times

82:34

longer. But the L seems to have

82:37

>> sorry you said D metabolize slower I

82:39

think. Is it D is quicker?

82:41

>> Detabize very fast and L metabolize

82:43

slower. Sorry. Uh but the L retains

82:46

signaling effects that D does. So for

82:48

example the NLR NLRP3 inflammosome,

82:51

right? So the nature medicine paper in

82:53

2015 doesn't seem to be an antimer

82:56

specific. So the D will suppress it. So

82:59

that's important because if the L gets

83:01

elevated in the brain then it could

83:03

inhibit neuroinflammation and

83:05

inflammatory processes. So it's like the

83:07

almost like the drug form of BHB. Also

83:10

the epigenetic effects the signaling

83:13

effects and the epigenetic effects of

83:16

the L seem to be present too. So you

83:20

have the D that gets burned up quickly

83:22

for fuel and then the L that kind of

83:24

hangs around gets metabolized slower but

83:27

then that's hitting the various

83:28

receptors. So you have the GP uh GPR

83:32

109A receptor and you have you have

83:34

epigenetic effects. You have the NLRP3

83:36

inflammosome. So you have uh important

83:39

signaling functions that ketones are

83:41

attributed to and deba hydroxybutyrate

83:44

has been sort of spent and used as fuel

83:46

but the L is hanging around and actually

83:50

uh preserving uh that signaling effect

83:53

the positive signaling effect

83:54

>> and sorry the continuous ketone monitor

83:56

and the Abbott are more measuring D or

83:57

L.

83:58

>> They only measure uh the D the D they do

84:01

not measure the L. I've had

84:02

conversations, you know, with them and

84:05

uh they don't because

84:07

uh even though your body makes small

84:09

amounts of it, it's usually just in the

84:10

tissue. Uh however, pharmaceutical

84:14

companies are the ones kind of that have

84:16

reached out and they kind of as you know

84:18

there's there's quite a bit of patent

84:20

literature that because I was talking

84:22

about this like a while ago. So I think

84:24

the Buck Institute has like patents on

84:27

LBA hydroxybutyrate. There's I would say

84:30

there's probably about three dozen

84:32

patents on L now because I've kind of

84:34

probably attributed to me because I'm

84:36

talking about the effects. However, I

84:38

think Dr. Vch brought up a good point

84:40

and he was right in that the D beta

84:41

hydroxybutyrate is energetically

84:43

favorable for producing ATP.

84:46

Uh but a DL mixture is almost like you

84:49

get the benefits of the D, right? And

84:51

then you get the signaling benefits of

84:53

the L. And we delivered that with an

84:57

esther. We delivered that with a with

84:59

the ketone diester and that gave us

85:01

remarkable results in uh seizure control

85:05

in in animal models of cancer. Uh and we

85:08

also use the DL salts. So uh so I think

85:12

the the industry is kind of coming full

85:14

circle. So now you have Lenriched

85:17

formulations with D. Uh, but we've

85:20

always kind of stuck with the recemic

85:21

mixtures because I kind of knew that

85:23

there was fundamentally something

85:26

interesting about the D and the L

85:28

because when I use pure D beta

85:30

hydroxybutyrate, it actually trended to

85:32

make seizures happen faster and I didn't

85:34

know why. Uh,

85:36

>> say that again.

85:37

>> The when we use pure beta

85:39

hydroxybutyrate the dantimer and with an

85:41

esther like the monoester.

85:44

>> Um,

85:44

>> this is when you were saying that Vich's

85:46

initial compound

85:47

>> Yeah. was your first attempt

85:50

>> and it didn't work.

85:50

>> Yep. 13 butane dial and then the

85:52

monoester uh had no effect on seizures.

85:55

So my colleague Dr. Jung Row said you

85:58

need to look at accetoacetate and when

86:00

you elevate beta hydroxybutyrate and

86:02

accetoacetate in a 1:1 ratio that

86:05

creates a redux balance and I do think

86:07

that's important. Also people have

86:09

brought to my attention that when you

86:11

rapidly spike DBA hydroxybutyrate you're

86:13

causing something called reductive

86:15

stress. So you have the the the

86:18

production of NADH from NAD and that's

86:21

actually depleting NAD. A ketogenic diet

86:24

will boost your NAD. Like you could take

86:26

uh NAD supplements.

86:28

>> That's something that we're working on

86:30

too because I think a central mechanism

86:32

in ketogenic diets and supplements is

86:35

the elevation of NAD. So we're working

86:37

with NAD compounds MIB 626 and other

86:40

comp I can't talk about that because

86:42

it's through an industry but there are

86:43

multiple compounds of stabilized NAD

86:46

that have interesting and remarkable

86:49

effects and we're going to combine them

86:50

with various key new ketone molecules

86:53

that we're developing. But NAD is sort

86:55

of like this hub that is a central

86:58

player in the benefits of ketogenesis.

87:00

But what do you make of the fact that

87:02

there hasn't been any efficacy of NAD

87:04

supplementation or even NAD precursors?

87:07

So NR and NMN have really not yielded

87:10

any meaningful or measurable benefits.

87:13

The only thing I've ever seen that

87:14

looked

87:15

>> somewhat positive was in the trial that

87:17

looked at patients with ALS and you saw

87:20

a slightly shorter time to ventilator

87:23

use with an NR

87:26

>> uh formulation. Yeah,

87:27

>> but but but really we just haven't seen

87:29

any benefits. And so what what do you

87:31

what do you attribute that to with

87:32

respect to the NAD story? And what do

87:34

you think might be missing if indeed

87:35

there's efficacy there?

87:37

>> Well, uh I mean just I can't say what

87:40

I'm doing now, but we're running

87:42

experiments I think even today. Uh so

87:44

there's different NAD molecules that are

87:46

out that are stabilized forms of them

87:48

that are in clinical trials. I think

87:50

phase two and maybe phase three clinical

87:52

trials. Uh and I'm not going to mention

87:56

a delivery problem.

87:58

>> It's a stabilized. You have to stabilize

88:00

NAD. And I think that's important to

88:02

have it stabilized because when you

88:04

consume it, the liver takes a lot of it.

88:07

And if it doesn't,

88:08

>> you're not taking enough of it in a

88:10

stabilized form, the liver is very

88:12

greedy. And uh actually, I think it'd be

88:15

good for non-alcoholic fatty liver

88:16

disease. So that's another I think NAD

88:18

could be uh important for that. Uh, but

88:21

I think you have to take a dose that

88:23

gets past the liver into circulation and

88:26

crosses the bloodb brain barrier and

88:28

there's a number of different stabilized

88:30

versions of NAD that are in development

88:32

and testing and some of them we're

88:34

working on that I think have potential

88:37

for oxygen toxicity. So, we're working

88:39

on those now giving acutely and also

88:40

chronically in graded doses.

88:42

>> Will will there be other applications

88:43

for a DOM such as the holy grail of

88:46

Jirro protection or even just

88:47

performance enhancement, physical

88:49

performance enhancement? Yes. So I am

88:52

convinced that some of the animal

88:53

literature is pretty I want to replicate

88:55

it. So I'm not going to believe

88:56

something until I replicate it. So uh so

88:59

I think uh we have plans to do some

89:02

exercise studies, oxygen toxicity, brain

89:04

studies. So um I do think that you need

89:07

to give quite a bit of it in a

89:08

stabilized form and it needs to get to

89:10

the muscle and for me I'm very

89:12

interested in it crossing the blood

89:14

brain barrier and getting to the brain.

89:16

uh I also think that these things will

89:19

be more efficacious in the context of

89:23

energetic metabolic stress. So for

89:26

someone who's already aged where your

89:28

NAD level tanks and goes down uh in a

89:31

linear fashion like with age uh NAD goes

89:34

down but also in the con context of like

89:37

traumatic brain injury or shock or and

89:40

these are the things that we study. So

89:42

I'm not studying NAD as a longevity

89:45

molecule. I'm studying in the context of

89:48

rare disorders to military like

89:51

operational stress, extreme

89:53

environments, you know, things like

89:55

that.

89:55

>> But you have to kind of have to do those

89:58

studies and then you glean insights into

90:00

that that can then, you know, translate

90:02

into the world of longevity. If you're

90:05

showing mitochondrial enhancement and

90:07

you know preservation because as we age

90:09

and we go through different stress

90:10

conditions then it's kind of it's

90:12

analogous to some of the things that we

90:14

study right but I do think I know

90:16

there's a lot of buzz about NAD and a

90:18

lot of work going on in different I I'm

90:20

also very interested in

90:21

>> I feel like the buzz over NAD has

90:23

largely died actually I feel like people

90:25

I feel like it's sort of underdelivered

90:26

and most people aren't really talking

90:28

about it anymore. I I you know some

90:30

people say that with keto right but uh I

90:33

went to PubMed right before coming here.

90:34

There's 6,000 public uh peer-reviewed

90:37

publications on PubMed and over the last

90:39

year 717 of them and there's also 558

90:45

registered clinical trials on a

90:47

ketogenic diet on clinical trials.gov. I

90:50

mean you could look at CARTT therapy is

90:52

something like this. There's like maybe

90:53

four or 500. I mean, so this is

90:55

something there's been an experience

90:56

>> those spread mostly between cancer,

90:59

metabolic disease.

91:01

>> Yeah, I actually wrote like uh I've been

91:03

on top of this because I've given like

91:05

there's 50 CL 40 to 50 clinical trials

91:08

on psychiatric disorders. So that

91:10

includes bipolar schizophrenia, major

91:13

depression, uh anxiety disorders,

91:16

anorexia,

91:17

uh alcohol use disorders, alcohol

91:19

withdrawal, uh traumatic brain injury,

91:22

autism, uh

91:24

>> anorexia is quite interesting. What do

91:26

you think? What do you think is the uh

91:28

the hypothesis there?

91:29

>> Well, anorexia is uh a psychiatric

91:32

disorder. It's the psychiatric disorder

91:34

that kills more people. It's the highest

91:36

mortality.

91:37

So uh yeah there was uh a number of

91:40

studies uh Guido Frank he's at

91:43

University of San Francisco I believe uh

91:46

he's an expert in eating disorders as is

91:49

my colleague uh Dr. Deanna Rancort who

91:52

kind of has a peripheral like interest

91:53

in this but Dr. Dr. Guido Frank is

91:55

running a study on anorexia. I believe

91:59

from what I last heard, can't talk about

92:01

it too much, but I think some of the

92:02

data is very encouraging. There was case

92:04

reports that combined u a ketogenic diet

92:08

with uh ketamine and that put uh

92:14

anorexia into remission. And there's

92:16

been some quite a bit of buzz about

92:17

that. And uh for anorexia typically you

92:22

steer people away from any kind of

92:24

dietary restriction.

92:26

>> Traditional thinking.

92:27

>> Yeah. But you have uh the brain the

92:30

effects of the ketogenic diet on

92:33

neuropharmacology on the hedonic

92:35

response on just stabilizing your mood

92:39

and other factors that could play into

92:41

anorexia seem to be at play. I was super

92:44

skeptical because it flies in the face

92:45

of everything that I know, you know, and

92:47

I've we have one of the leading experts

92:49

at

92:50

>> University of South Florida, Diana

92:51

Rancqu, I remember talking to her about

92:53

it and she, you know, kind of was a

92:55

little bit skeptical, but the data

92:57

coming out and uh looks very promising

93:00

and compelling. So, there's continuing

93:03

emerging data on psychiatric disorders

93:05

largely funded by the Bazooki group, I

93:08

think exclusively funded by Jan and

93:10

David uh Bazooki, their foundation. And

93:13

I think they're funding million-dollar

93:15

studies. Six of them that I know. Uh you

93:19

have Ohio State University, uh uh

93:22

Stanford, Oxford, uh Stonybrook, UCSD,

93:26

UCLA, I think Edinburgh, there's a study

93:29

too. Uh there's a I'm just looking at

93:32

like the different applications. So

93:34

they're funding many different studies

93:36

mostly across severe psychiatric

93:38

disorders.

93:38

>> And are they doing this with ketogenic

93:40

diets? ketogenic diets plus supplements

93:43

just supplements.

93:44

>> Yeah. Uh primarily the ketogenic diet

93:47

although having served as a reviewer

93:50

because they have study section there's

93:52

in the pipeline of emerging studies that

93:54

they're funding I would say quite a few

93:57

studies will be incorporating exogenous

93:59

ketone supplementation. So they see that

94:02

as an innovative approach uh and a

94:05

necessary approach for the feasibility

94:07

of therapeutic ketosis because with a

94:09

psychiatric disorder it's really

94:11

difficult to get someone to adhere to a

94:14

ketogenic diet with bipolar with

94:16

schizophrenia. I mean it's like a

94:17

nightmare.

94:18

>> Yeah. So if if an individual says look

94:20

I'm I I totally understand why a

94:22

ketogenic diet might have efficacy for

94:24

weight loss. Um there could be multiple

94:26

mechanisms that explain it, but um I

94:30

there are undoubtedly thousands of

94:32

people listening to us who have no

94:34

interest in weight loss. They're they're

94:35

they're at an appropriate weight.

94:36

They're happy with their weight, but

94:38

some of the things you've talked about

94:39

might have piqued their curiosity with

94:41

respect to performance be let's just

94:43

start with cognitive performance. Um,

94:46

can you get all the same benefits of a

94:49

person who slaves their way through

94:52

what, you know, I used to do and you you

94:54

do and and and maybe, you know, uh, to

94:57

varying degrees do, uh, where you're

94:59

you're on this very very strict diet.

95:01

Can they get virtually all of those

95:03

benefits through judicious use of ketone

95:06

supplements?

95:07

>> Well, uh, it depends. You know, people

95:09

don't like that answer and it's also

95:10

very context dependent, but I'll say

95:12

this that there are benefits that you

95:15

get from carbohydrate restriction that

95:17

cannot be replicated with exogenous

95:19

ketone supplementation. With that said,

95:22

exogenous ketone supplementation tends

95:24

to lower blood glucose independent of

95:26

carbohydrate restriction

95:27

>> indep. What about is it part of the

95:29

mechanism that you just described

95:30

earlier where look, you ingest enough

95:31

ketones, you're going to drive insulin

95:33

enough that's going to drive down

95:34

glucose, which by the way would not be

95:35

the most desirable way to lower glucose.

95:37

Well, that's what I originally thought,

95:39

right? And uh actually, I do remember

95:41

talking with Dr. Vich about this and his

95:44

opinion was that you're enhancing

95:45

insulin sensitivity and and facilitating

95:48

glucose disposal by virtue of enhancing

95:51

insulin sensitivity. But I think it's a

95:53

combination of different factors. I

95:55

think consuming exogenous ketones

95:58

uh influences the liver in ways that we

96:01

don't understand. So one of uh I are the

96:04

next big project that I want to do is

96:06

liver metabolomics uh giving exogous

96:08

ketones because the liver is the master

96:10

regulator of metabolism especially in

96:12

the context of everything really

96:14

everything that we study. So what I

96:16

think is happening is that it's

96:17

decreasing gluconioenesis it's decre

96:20

decreasing glycogenolyis and also

96:23

simultaneously

96:25

>> enhancing insulin sensitivity for

96:27

greater glucose disposal. However, if

96:30

ketones get too high, then you have

96:32

competition. The the tissues are

96:35

basically uh happy with with ketones and

96:39

they probably decrease glucose uh

96:41

consumption to some extent. Uh so an

96:44

important message that I want to send is

96:46

that higher ketones are not advantageous

96:50

and I think potentially very

96:52

problematic.

96:52

>> Define high in that setting. We've

96:54

killed quite a bit of animals

96:56

inadvertently, you know, in early

96:58

studies by putting them into

97:00

ketoacidosis with different ketone

97:02

nesters. We've never done that with

97:04

ketone salts, although we can achieve

97:06

therapeutic ketosis with ketone salts or

97:08

MCT. So, high ketosis would be in

97:11

animals. Once we get above six or seven,

97:14

then they start sort of like

97:16

hyperventilating. They get sluggish and

97:18

sometimes we can't bring them back.

97:19

>> Wow. So that has made me a bit scared

97:22

about you know some of the ketone esters

97:25

and I think some of them are could be in

97:27

the bucket of a drug and I think

97:30

especially if used in pediatric

97:31

population I think that's important. So

97:34

higher ketones it's like like we don't

97:36

we're not shooting to get our glucose to

97:38

like you know 7 8 millmers. So we should

97:40

not when you when glucose there's very

97:43

powerful homeostatic mechanisms that

97:45

maintain glucose under normal

97:47

conditions, right? If we're jacking up

97:49

our ketones above two, once you get

97:52

above two together three, four, and

97:54

five, then you're approaching uh energy

97:58

toxicity. So you have a level of ketones

98:01

in your blood that's producing energy

98:03

toxicity. Energy toxicity is defined by

98:07

an elevation of a metabolite circulating

98:09

in your blood that is causing a number

98:12

of things. One is a counterregulatory

98:15

reaction which means it's it's

98:17

increasing the release of insulin the

98:19

secretion of insulin and your kidneys

98:22

have to dispose about dispose of that

98:24

and our blood gases and blood pH blood

98:28

pH will start to go down. Your blood

98:30

will become more acidic. That's not a

98:32

good thing. And that occurs once you get

98:33

above two or 3 mill mo

98:35

>> above two pretty much always kind of

98:37

above two maybe three in the context of

98:41

supplemental ketosis. So if you're on a

98:43

ketogenic diet and your glucose is so

98:45

low your levels of ketones may approach

98:48

three or four because of the glucose

98:52

deficiency that you have in your body.

98:54

So fat oxidation is so high. It's a very

98:57

elegant and finely tuned you know

99:00

response that you have uh with that. So

99:03

in that context you're presumably in an

99:05

energetic it's happening slowly enough.

99:07

>> Yeah.

99:08

>> That the the redux reaction to balance

99:12

your pH is happening. So you're going to

99:14

you're absolutely blow off enough CO2 I

99:17

assume in that situation if you're

99:18

nutritionally at 3 or 4 mill. I don't

99:21

remember what my blood gas looked like

99:23

but

99:23

>> yeah I mean you have respiratory and

99:24

renal compensation. Yeah. And that's not

99:26

hard at all, right? So for you to do so,

99:28

u but if you have if you're consuming

99:31

large doses of exogenous ketones, this

99:34

is does not apply to the the ketone

99:37

salts because the key the salt is

99:38

actually a natural buffer, right? So

99:40

that's the ionic bond is a positive and

99:42

a negative. When you consume large doses

99:45

of beta hydroxybutyrate, it's an annion

99:48

and you're you're creating an acidic

99:50

condition that your body needs to

99:52

mitigate through respiratory and renal

99:54

compensation.

99:55

So, uh, that's I think that can be

99:57

problematic especially in people like

99:59

purchasing maybe keto nesters in elderly

100:01

population where liver function is not

100:03

good. They're not very stable and

100:05

they're already under metabolically

100:07

compromised uh situations.

100:10

So, so that's something I think that

100:13

people don't think about is energy

100:16

toxicity in the context of supplemental

100:18

ketones. We think energy toxicity in the

100:20

form of supplemental you know uh

100:22

calories but uh which is problematic and

100:25

in reversing that but but it is

100:27

>> so do you think there's any meaningful

100:28

application for a BHB monoester these

100:31

days given the

100:32

>> what is the application for that in your

100:34

mind?

100:34

>> Well I think it's it's context dependent

100:36

but I think these things can be given

100:38

you know orally or IV in the context of

100:41

acute situations. So I'm in favor of uh

100:44

ketone esters and more potent ketone

100:46

molecules for medical applications

100:48

quickly elevating ketones under for

100:51

example status epilepticus traumatic

100:53

brain injury like uh blast injury

100:55

>> but I thought you said they didn't work

100:57

well in epilepsy

100:59

>> it depends no I'm talking about maybe a

101:00

ketone diester of accetoacetate which we

101:03

use so okay so the monoester

101:05

>> yeah I'm talking about the original

101:07

>> the original molecule from from NIH that

101:11

was a monoester of BHB

101:13

>> I think they can be formulated. So this

101:15

comes to a this comes to uh something

101:17

that's a gap in the literature and

101:19

there's a gap because every company or

101:22

university with IP wants to study a

101:24

single molecule in isolation. I think

101:27

what we need to do is actually formulate

101:30

things and that's kind of what we do. Uh

101:33

so every molecule will have pros and

101:36

cons and caveats and you could largely

101:39

mitigate uh the problem with ketone

101:41

esters by you know simply mixing it with

101:44

MCT. Uh but you're still going to have

101:46

the the 13 butane dial issue. You know

101:49

if you're consuming that over long

101:51

periods of time that is something to

101:53

consider. But you can also have a

101:55

glycerol uh traster of beta

101:58

hydroxybutyrate or accetoacetate. We

102:00

published uh the title is like novel

102:02

ketogenic formula where we had a beta

102:04

hydroxybutyrate uh or uh glycerol

102:06

triestester. So we're working with those

102:09

compounds too. But I but I think uh

102:12

yeah, it's very context dependent and

102:14

the go-to would probably be the

102:16

electrolyte salts just because you don't

102:18

want to for the average person if you

102:20

stay into that sweet spot of 1 to two

102:22

millmer.

102:24

>> If you elevate beta hydroxybutyrate in

102:26

the blood one millmer that represents a

102:29

10% increase of available energy to the

102:32

brain.

102:33

>> So we know that roughly speaking. So uh

102:35

so all these calculations from the AV

102:37

difference have been done. So I think

102:39

that's important. Lactate is also

102:41

something uh to consider.

102:43

>> So when you think about the advantages

102:46

of lactate for uh alternative brain fuel

102:49

and ketone as an alternative brain fuel,

102:51

you know, I had George Brooks on the

102:52

podcast a while ago and he talked about

102:54

how you could probably rescue concussion

102:56

patients if you administered lactate

102:58

quickly following a concussion. Would

103:00

you say the same is likely true for

103:02

ketones?

103:02

>> Yeah, I think lactate's uh an incredible

103:04

molecule. my early studies in 2004 and

103:08

five I think with lactate but the

103:09

ketones represented a more viable option

103:12

and also had the anti-seizure effects

103:15

that we had plus I was inspired by the

103:17

work of of of George Cahill and Dr. V

103:21

and you know Theodore Van Italy and then

103:24

I got steered towards beta

103:26

hydroxybutyrate but I think an important

103:28

message is that uh formulation is the

103:32

key. So you have beta hydroxybutyrate,

103:35

you have lactate, you have MCTs cross

103:38

the blood brain barrier. So it's a type

103:39

of fat that actually can cross.

103:41

>> Do you still use MCTs for anything?

103:42

>> I think MCTs are great. Yeah, I think

103:44

you know I put it I use a coffee creamer

103:46

called Keto Brains. It's like alpha GPC,

103:49

MCT, you know, theanine has a couple.

103:52

It's a mixture of combinations of

103:53

things. But when you combine a ketone

103:56

salt with MCT, then you have a you have

104:00

a formulation that stimulates your own

104:02

ketone production while you're

104:04

delivering an exogenous ketone. And if

104:06

it's a recemic uh DL beta

104:08

hydroxybutyrate like ketoart,

104:11

uh then you have a sustained ketone

104:13

delivery system for you know, you know,

104:15

half of the day. So you just dose that a

104:17

couple times. Uh but also some of the

104:20

problems that we talked about with fast

104:23

entry of ketones into the bloodstream

104:25

with the ketone esters or 13b can if you

104:27

formulate that with MCT which we've

104:30

published on that that can mitigate uh

104:34

some of the negative effects. So we

104:35

don't see you can mitigate the toxicity

104:37

at least in animal models from uh you

104:40

need to appreciate the the rate of rise

104:44

of ketones is that's kind of the trigger

104:46

for some of the counterregulatory

104:48

effects. So a slow so it's kind of more

104:50

like a dosing issue

104:51

>> and if you're taking the currently

104:52

formulated ketone salt that you brought

104:56

um you do not have to worry about the

104:57

electrolyte load. So, if you're

104:59

consuming three of those a day, that

105:00

would be 3 g of additional electrolytes,

105:03

which again, based on what you're also

105:05

getting in your food, a lot of people

105:06

would say, gosh, that's too many

105:07

electrolytes. But you're not seeing the

105:09

effect because of the lack of chloride.

105:12

Yeah, I would say for people that have

105:14

like normal physiology, no kidney or

105:17

maybe even with impaired kidney function

105:19

because you know there's uh keto citrus

105:22

is sold. I think a study just came out

105:24

with beta hydroxybutyrate citrate for uh

105:27

and other electrolytes too for for

105:29

kidney disorders but generally no. So I

105:32

was concerned that sodium would cause

105:35

hypertension and an increase but uh

105:37

sodium chloride seems to be the the

105:39

major player there. So I would say no,

105:42

but also do your blood work. Uh I

105:45

haven't seen that and that was one of

105:47

the early concerns I had actually it

105:49

steered me toward developing something

105:52

other than sodium to potassium and

105:54

calcium and other so electrolytes are

105:57

largely you know uh benign unless you're

106:00

above the 10 grams per day kind of

106:03

issue. And I think even with sodium, the

106:05

guidelines are something like five grams

106:07

of sodium per day, like dietary sodium.

106:10

But then something just came out that

106:12

said like that's should probably be more

106:14

like 8 to 10, you know, could start to

106:17

be concerned about five. Uh

106:20

>> the the guidelines right now, I think

106:22

cap it at five grams of sodium.

106:25

>> I think a lot of them are recommending

106:27

errone in my mind erroneously like two

106:29

to three.

106:30

>> Yeah. Yeah. depending on what guideline,

106:31

but I think maybe the more looser

106:33

guidelines saying it becomes problematic

106:35

after five.

106:36

>> Okay. I want to talk about two

106:37

particular applications with ketogenic

106:39

diets. Both of which well one of which

106:41

you've spoken about a little bit. The

106:42

other one we've sort of talked about um

106:45

kind of indirectly, but let's let's say

106:47

a word about what you think the future

106:48

is for ketogenic diets and the treatment

106:51

of cancer and then separately for the

106:53

treatment of dementia, specifically

106:54

potentially Alzheimer's disease, but any

106:56

form of dementia.

106:57

>> Yeah. uh we had a review come out with

107:00

49 authors and the title was uh ketone

107:04

metabolic therapy framework for

107:06

glyopblasto

107:08

uh so there was you know that includes

107:11

basic science researchers a number of

107:13

oncologists at major cancer centers and

107:15

stuff so the gist of that uh that I

107:19

think it's really important to focus on

107:21

cancers that where the standard of care

107:23

doesn't work so advanced metastatic

107:24

cancer obviously pancreatic and

107:26

glyobblastoma but glyobbl STS has always

107:28

been sort of the heart of what we're

107:30

studying. Uh and I think the idea is to

107:34

make metabolic therapy part of the

107:37

standard of care. So the general just

107:39

with that review and the senior author

107:42

was Dr. Thomas Safe and I know you've

107:44

had him on the podcast and uh Tomas Dac

107:47

or Dai he was a primary author.

107:50

>> Uh in that in that review it creates a

107:54

framework that has uh there's so much in

107:56

that review. It ended up it was like 200

107:58

pages carved down to like 50 pages with

108:00

about a thousand references. Right? So

108:02

just like short making it super concise

108:05

explanation. So the gist of that for

108:08

ketone metabolic therapy for cancer

108:10

management specifically glyobblasto but

108:12

we think similar reviews can be written

108:14

for other types of cancers that are

108:17

specifically like hot that are highly

108:20

glycolytic and have the warberg effect.

108:22

So really hot on an FG PET scan. So

108:24

above like 2.5 SUVs like on a PET scan

108:28

would define it as hypoglycolytic.

108:30

Achieve and maintain a glucose ketone

108:33

index of 1 to four. So that's the

108:37

millimmer concentration of glucose over

108:39

ketones. So if your glucose was four,

108:43

which is relatively normal and

108:45

>> and your ketone levels were one, you

108:48

know, which is the entry of that zone

108:49

>> where I'm at now. So that gives me a GKI

108:52

of four. standard American uh diet

108:55

produces of like a GKI of 50, right? Or

108:57

40 or 50. So so simply the the

109:00

guidelines are one to two but I think

109:02

that's too strict. Achieving a glucose

109:04

ketone index of 1 to four

109:06

>> is the base of the basis of the therapy

109:10

and that sets the stage for other

109:12

modalities to work. Uh for example, you

109:15

could have uh you want to then target

109:18

glucose and glutamine with various

109:20

drugs. And if we're going to talk about

109:22

anti- glycolytic drugs, uh, metformin,

109:26

we've done quite a bit of research with

109:28

metformin and I think that's a great

109:29

molecule could be a synergizer. I also

109:32

think of that as a redux and I'll come

109:34

to that.

109:35

>> But let me ask a point blank question,

109:36

Dom.

109:37

>> Um, glyobblasto carries with it a

109:40

mortality rate of 100%. Y

109:42

>> So it's been said that any patient who

109:44

survives a glyopblasto has been

109:45

misdiagnosed. They didn't have

109:47

glyopblasto. I mean, meaning it's just

109:50

it's it's one of the cancers that really

109:52

gives cancer a bad name. Is there any

109:55

evidence that any form of ketogenic

109:57

diet, even at a 1:1 ratio of glucose to

110:00

ketone, is going to produce a durable

110:02

remission in a patient with a GBM?

110:05

>> Durable? No, it's not going to cure it.

110:07

So, we're talking about the standard of

110:09

care does nothing. We're talking about

110:11

>> life extension.

110:12

>> Yeah. We're talking about doubling

110:14

survival, like tripling. And then as we

110:17

learn more, so the the ketone metabolic

110:20

therapy framework for GBM is like the

110:23

first document in a series of documents

110:26

that will ultimately be you know version

110:30

number three will be

110:31

>> are there any AI platforms to like you

110:34

know decode the genetics.

110:36

>> Are there RCTs that have and and an RCT

110:39

when you place full standard of care

110:41

versus full standard of care plus

110:43

ketogenic therapy? What is the

110:45

difference in median survival?

110:46

>> Yeah, those studies are ongoing now.

110:49

Jethro Hugh at UCLA just published a

110:51

study uh at UCLA just showing you know

110:54

improve metrics of survival and you know

110:57

uh increased quality of life and

110:59

different and I didn't get a chance to

111:00

it just came out a paper just came out

111:02

so that research is ongoing. I'd say

111:04

there's at least a half dozen clinical

111:07

trials in progress now and there's

111:11

problems associated with those clinical

111:12

trials that I could get into that

111:14

prevents us from getting to the

111:16

question. So the way to like do the

111:18

clinical trial is which you know has not

111:21

been done yet is to achieve and maintain

111:23

a glucose ketone index of 1 to4 like

111:26

that has never been done. So you want to

111:28

do that and then that is not alone a

111:31

ketogenic diet. So what I'm talking

111:32

about here is an adgiant to the standard

111:34

of care, right?

111:35

>> So achieve a GKI of 1 to four, maintain

111:38

that and then you go and aggressively

111:41

target glucose and glutamine. So you

111:43

could target glucose with lonitamine.

111:45

It's a hexokinise inhibitor, three

111:47

brooyrovate, two deoxylucose,

111:50

you can use an SGLT2 inhibitor, you can

111:53

use I mean we have about two dozen

111:54

different drugs that you could use and

111:57

off-the-shelf kind of things like SGLT2.

112:00

And then you want to target glutamine

112:02

because uh cancer cells will use in you

112:05

know you could take glucose out of cell

112:07

media and put in glutamine and maintain

112:09

cancer cells in glutamine without

112:11

glucose. So you want to and certain uh

112:13

cells are more adept to use

112:15

>> but it's hard to imagine you're ever

112:16

going to get glucose to less than 40% of

112:19

the brain's fuel which would be which

112:21

would be a big achievement right? So if

112:23

you if you did all of those tricks,

112:25

>> you ramped up ketones, you took glucose

112:28

down peripherally to 2.5, even 3 mill.

112:32

>> Um,

112:34

>> all of, you know, so if you have a if

112:35

you have a glucose to ketone index of

112:37

1.1 and they're both sitting at 3 mill

112:40

>> um, and you're doing all those

112:41

therapies, the brain, the neurons are

112:43

still getting 40 to 50% of their energy

112:45

from glucose.

112:46

>> I know. So it's like how But the idea

112:48

then is to use like something like

112:49

lonitamine, like inhibit hexokinise,

112:51

too. So uh there are enzymes glycolytic

112:56

enzymes that are upregulated. There are

112:58

transporters that are upregulated and if

113:00

you create an energy crisis in GBM cells

113:04

that's great enough then you trigger

113:06

autophagy and then you trigger uh cell

113:09

death because there's an incredible

113:11

glycolytic energetic demand in

113:14

glyobblasto cells and if that demand is

113:16

not met then that triggers cell death

113:19

pathways. So, but to make inroads into

113:22

that and create that energetic crisis,

113:24

you have to decrease glucose

113:25

availability

113:27

uh increase uh decrease circulating

113:30

insulin which decreases growth factors

113:32

like IGF-1 and and a whole host of other

113:34

mTor and other growth factors and then

113:36

aggressively target pharmacologically

113:39

uh circulating glucose and glycolytic

113:41

enzymes. And then you have to

113:43

aggressively target uh glutaminolyis

113:46

circulating glutamine and also uh drugs

113:50

that inhibit glutamine metabolism in the

113:53

cancer cells. So you could uh target

113:55

glutamine. So there's a drug dawn that

113:58

uh that Dr. Seafford uses and I have not

114:02

used it. I've talked to some patients

114:03

that use it does cause some GI stress.

114:05

That's a pretty big heavy hitter. Uh but

114:08

you have uh a number of different

114:10

things. sodium fennelbutyrate, glycerol

114:13

phenol, fennelutyrate, which is actually

114:16

an HDAC inhibitor. It will bind up

114:18

glutamine and then you pee some of it

114:20

out. Uh there's EGCG,

114:23

there's curcumin, uh corsetin has

114:27

glutamine, glutamines inhibiting

114:29

properties,

114:29

>> but again, none of this has been

114:31

demonstrated clinically. This is all

114:32

kind of anecdotal, meaning we don't have

114:35

evidence in a clinical trial that this

114:37

works. We're we're we're sort of

114:38

extracting mechanistically from what we

114:40

think these things do.

114:41

>> No RCTs. So there's cell data, there's

114:44

animal data, and then there's like uh

114:47

>> so what's the hold up? Right. I

114:49

interviewed I interviewed Tom 7 years

114:52

ago and we had this exact same

114:54

conversation. Why do you think for

114:58

especially for these cancers that have

115:01

that are basically just killing machines

115:03

like they just they they kill people are

115:05

dead within a year of diagnosis.

115:08

Why why is it so hard to do these

115:10

trials?

115:10

>> I understand your frustration. Yeah, I'm

115:12

super frustrated. That's what motivates

115:13

me kind of to work. But the I would uh

115:16

encourage people to read that framework

115:18

of the ketone and then look and it's

115:21

really important to access the

115:22

supplementary uh information which gives

115:24

all the different drugs and everything.

115:26

>> But the problem is oncologists are not

115:27

going to read that right. So the people

115:29

that are on the front lines that are

115:30

taking care of these patients

115:32

>> some of them are authors so they they

115:33

they have read it. Yeah.

115:34

>> But but again what they want and what

115:36

they need is a clinical trial that says

115:38

this stack of interventions is going to

115:40

double

115:42

>> median survival. So if someone came

115:43

along and said, "Look, we're going to do

115:45

all the things. We're going to rub

115:46

curcumin on people's testicles and do

115:48

all the things that are anecdotally

115:50

supposed to help and it takes median

115:52

survival from 11 months to 27 months.

115:56

Wow, that's huge. Oh, and by the way,

115:58

it's going to reduce the burden of

115:59

seizures and it's going to reduce the

116:01

catastrophic, debilitating side effects

116:03

of this tumor and its therapy. I mean,

116:05

it's going to become the standard of

116:06

care, but the trial has to be done. The

116:09

trial has to be done. It can't be these

116:12

sort of oneoff cluji like off in the

116:14

corner little nonsense trials that

116:16

aren't getting attention right. So why

116:18

is that?

116:19

>> So we have to you know ask the question

116:22

who's going to fund this clinical trial.

116:24

So they have the policy makers and the

116:26

people at the foundations, people at the

116:28

the federal government, the NIH, the

116:31

DoD, they fund uh cancer. They have to

116:34

be convinced that this is going to work,

116:36

right? Uh that ketogenic diet uh and

116:39

that we're not we're talking about

116:40

something way beyond the ketogenic diet

116:41

here. We're talking about a very

116:43

comprehensive calculated metabolic based

116:46

intervention that targets

116:49

>> diet, glycolytic drugs, anti-glutamine

116:51

drugs, and then there's a redux

116:53

component too. So it's synergized with

116:55

with different drugs. So that could be

116:57

uh you know hyperbaric oxygen therapy

117:00

but uh radiation and chemo kill cancer

117:03

cells through oxidative stress. So and

117:06

then uh another thing to so where the

117:08

money is actually kind of or the

117:10

interest is going now is that the the

117:13

focus has been using ketone metabolic

117:16

therapy as an adivant for like mafet

117:20

institute carti therapy for lymphoma. So

117:22

they have that project but we just

117:24

working on some grants for ketone

117:26

metabolic therapy and it's strictly

117:28

their focus on beta hydroxybutyrate

117:30

because that correlates with the

117:32

adaptive immune response that will

117:34

augment uh checkpoint inhibitors

117:37

specifically PD1 inhibitors and CTLA uh

117:41

for uh checkpoint inhibitors. So and

117:44

also the ketogenic diet uh expands it

117:47

can expand the CARTT cells too. So that

117:50

because of that observation and that

117:51

correlated with beta hydroxybutyrate

117:54

seem to be involved with cartis cell

117:55

expansion that became of interest. So

117:59

right now the the funding agencies are

118:02

kind of focused on augmenting the

118:04

standard of care because we already use

118:05

the standard of care.

118:07

>> But to run a clinical trial with dietary

118:10

therapies involves you you have to have

118:12

oncologists who are savvy and

118:14

knowledgeable about ketogenic diets. You

118:16

have to have an RD team. You have to the

118:18

inclusion exclusion criteria uh are

118:21

really important. The heterogeneity of

118:24

many people with brain tumors. I mean

118:26

that's like you know something to

118:27

consider. Also when you have a a patient

118:30

with a glyobblastoma the pharmaceutical

118:32

companies are scrambling to get their

118:34

drug into that patient. So they are

118:36

paying a lot of money to the uh major

118:39

institutes to conduct the research to do

118:43

you know industry sponsor.

118:44

>> Is GBM the wrong model then? Should

118:46

should should should all this because

118:48

you need a win, right? You got to

118:49

demonstrate a win. Should the first one

118:51

be pancreatic adno you have far more

118:53

patients.

118:54

>> Life expectancy is a little bit longer

118:56

but it's equally fatal meaning metastic

118:58

or advanced pancreatic cancer is

119:00

uniformly fatal. Um should should should

119:03

we be using that as a model where of

119:06

course look all cancers are

119:07

heterogeneous heterogeneous rather but

119:09

but it might be that GBM is even more so

119:12

and it's also heavily impacted by the

119:14

radiation like the radiation then

119:16

completely changes it virtually all of

119:18

these patients are going to need

119:19

radiation which makes it even more

119:21

difficult. So anyway, look, I'm I I

119:23

don't want to offer advice from the

119:25

peanut gallery because I'm in the peanut

119:27

gallery for a reason on this, but but

119:28

that that might be something worth

119:30

considering.

119:31

>> Um, let's talk about Alzheimer's

119:32

disease. So,

119:34

>> equally devastating, much longer tale,

119:37

>> but in my mind seems somewhat easier to

119:40

address through metabolic therapies

119:41

because

119:43

>> at least in the subset of those patients

119:45

for whom an energetic crisis is at the

119:48

core and I don't think that that's all

119:49

cases. I think it's a I think that's

119:51

also a very heterogeneous disease, but

119:53

at least one subset of these people are

119:55

probably in an energetic crisis. What

119:58

what do we know about the current

119:59

research and what's the current state of

120:01

affairs for using ketogenic therapies?

120:04

>> Yeah. Well, uh you're familiar with the

120:06

Alzheimer's drugs, right? And you know,

120:08

uh there's been not a whole lot of

120:10

movement there. We have the antibodies.

120:13

You know, you go to antibody therapy,

120:15

you're talking 50k at least, you know,

120:18

hundreds of thousands of dollars. You

120:20

have the potential for side effects like

120:21

cerebral hemorrhage and things like

120:23

that. And they move the needle maybe for

120:26

prevention. Uh a hallmark characteristic

120:29

of Alzheimer's disease is glucose hypom

120:31

metabolism. So that is actually being

120:33

part of the criteria for evaluating. Uh

120:36

my thoughts are that in communicating

120:38

with hundreds of people with Alzheimer's

120:41

and in communicating with people that do

120:43

dietary therapies is that there's a

120:45

subset of people with Alzheimer's

120:47

disease or let's just call it dementia,

120:50

right? Because Alzheimer's is still

120:52

pretty fuzzy diagnosis, you know, uh

120:55

clinically and we have the f we have the

120:57

PET scans to look at amaloid and then

120:59

there's ptow and and other things. Um

121:03

but I think I think it's better to put

121:06

it under the umbrella of you know uh

121:09

mild cognitive impairment. I think it's

121:11

important to focus on that and advance

121:12

Alzheimer's disease. So a ubiquitous

121:15

characteristic is glucose hypom

121:16

metabolism. So uh we are under I've

121:19

always been under sort of the the

121:22

impression that uh the accumulation of

121:24

amaloid and towel are a consequence or

121:27

downstream

121:29

epiphenomenon

121:31

of

121:33

inflammation neuroinflammation. Uh

121:35

there's of course huge I think there's

121:37

like 50 different genes or you know that

121:39

can cause Alzheimer's disease. So if

121:41

we're talking about APOE4 carrier that's

121:43

like

121:45

I don't know 80% likely to get you know

121:48

advanced Alzheimer's or early onset

121:50

two if you have two copies

121:52

>> if you have like two or even one copy

121:53

>> maybe even a bit less than that but one

121:55

one copy is is

121:56

>> if you have two copies you are destined

121:58

to have it. I mean well

122:00

>> if you have there's really only there

122:02

are a handful of genes in which you are

122:03

destined to get it. Yeah,

122:05

>> unfortunately at this point um you know

122:07

PS1 PS

122:10

if you do nothing

122:11

>> but but again I mean you know 25% of the

122:14

population are hetererozygous

122:16

>> for APOE4 and and they're you know their

122:19

risk is twofold higher

122:21

>> but but I you know I don't think anyone

122:22

would consider that sort of destiny.

122:24

>> Yeah, your genes are not your destin. I

122:26

don't want to make that

122:27

>> sort of assumption but it puts you at

122:29

greater risk for sure. So, um I think

122:34

you know just taking a step back that we

122:36

I think inflammation is the major driver

122:40

the more and that wasn't even on my

122:42

radar probably the last time we talked

122:43

or maybe 10 years ago

122:45

>> but I do think that uh systemic

122:48

inflammation leads to neuroinflammation

122:50

and uh you know we know that if we take

122:55

mice or if we take humans or take mice

122:57

and inject LPS we can rapidly cause uh

123:01

amaloid progression like and so those

123:03

studies have been done. So uh

123:07

metabolic based therapies, ketogenic

123:10

therapies, you know, diet, these things

123:13

um not only change metabolic physiology

123:16

and brain energy metabolism, but they

123:18

change they reduce systemic

123:21

inflammation. And I don't know if you

123:22

measure your you know inflammatory

123:24

markers like HSCRP,

123:26

mine is even non-detectable. You know, I

123:29

I'll even do things like work out really

123:30

hard and go and it's pretty much low. It

123:33

only was elevated when I lived in an

123:35

undersea environment and was breathing

123:36

hypercapnic, you know, under a lot of

123:38

stress. But I but I think uh the

123:41

advantage of ketogenic metabolic

123:43

therapies for Alzheimer's disease is

123:47

uh really hinging upon suppressing

123:49

inflammation, improving glucose

123:51

metabolism and and elevating ketones to

123:55

increase uh symptomatically brain energy

123:58

metabolism. Uh so I think these

124:01

>> of those would you say that the that the

124:03

latter is the most important that it's

124:06

the alternative fuel source that is the

124:07

most important and again let's go back

124:10

to I I haven't paid any attention to

124:11

this. What's happening in clinical

124:12

trials? This is a much easier thing to

124:14

test.

124:15

>> Yeah. So has someone done the experiment

124:18

where you take people in the earliest

124:20

stages of dementia or in you know modest

124:24

stages of of MCI mild uh cognitive

124:27

impairment who are progressing towards

124:28

dementia and you randomize them to

124:31

standard of care versus the exact same

124:33

standard of care plus a KD. Has that

124:36

experiment been done cleanly in a

124:37

randomized fashion? those experiments

124:40

like many things are ongoing and uh and

124:42

I think you need you have the acute

124:45

effects. So I I think what we can say

124:47

that acutely if we elevate ketones in

124:50

the context of a cognitive deficit we

124:52

can improve cognition under a battery of

124:55

different uh exams. But the question

124:58

that investigators are after is that if

125:01

you do an amaloid PET scan, you know, at

125:06

at baseline and 2 years, 5 years, 10

125:09

years, that is of the highest interest

125:11

because amaloid is basically that's how

125:14

you you know that's the prerequisite for

125:16

having Alzheimer's disease. So those

125:18

studies are ongoing and I'm connected

125:21

with some investigators that are doing

125:22

it and some that have done more acute

125:24

studies and uh the feedback is that I

125:28

think there's a subset of people most

125:30

people respond favorably but there's

125:32

also a subset of people that are hyper

125:34

respponders and you can have with

125:37

Alzheimer's disease there's like you

125:38

know vascular dementia it could be a

125:40

blood flow problem it could be excess

125:42

glutamate problem it could be a number

125:44

of different things that are amendable

125:46

to uh being reversed or mitigated

125:49

through ketone metabolic therapy. So,

125:51

>> so patient selection is going to matter.

125:53

>> Yeah, I think it's going to be huge. So,

125:54

I think uh and I don't think they've

125:56

done this yet is that inclusion criteria

125:59

should be patients that uh present with

126:01

remarkable glucose hypom metabolism. So,

126:04

I think that's that's really an

126:06

important key uh because I mean we know

126:09

there's people who have brains that are

126:11

chuck full of amaloid that have are

126:13

completely sharp and are completely

126:15

normal. So the amaloid hypothesis has a

126:18

lot of baggage with it right. So I think

126:20

tal maybe I am amaloid and we have ptow

126:23

that we can look at but there's other

126:25

things in the pipeline. I think the p75

126:28

uh receptor uh agonist or amplifier

126:31

looks pretty promising. Those studies

126:32

are ongoing.

126:34

uh and then you know for prevention I

126:37

think some of these things the uh

126:38

antibodies do have applications but they

126:41

also come with a lot of baggage with uh

126:43

not only the cost and accessibility but

126:45

cerebral hemorrhage

126:46

>> y

126:47

>> something you have to have to consider.

126:49

So the lowhanging fruit would be a a

126:52

dietary or more likely uh with this

126:55

population a a an a ketone metabolic

126:58

therapy intervention that could be a

127:01

ketogenic formula that could also you

127:04

know have a number of different

127:06

co-actors and other things that can be

127:08

but like there's lactate, there's

127:11

creatine monohydrate,

127:13

there's um you know there's alpha

127:16

ketoglutarate but no one as and and this

127:19

is a problem with funding agencies. They

127:20

don't want to fund a formula. You know,

127:23

there's some work done with MCT. Sam

127:25

Henderson published in 2008 when the

127:27

molecule was AC202. So, but if you look

127:30

at the patent, it was just capryillic

127:31

triglyceride and actually improved mini

127:34

mental status exam and Dr. Mary Newport

127:36

kind of saw that and gave her her

127:39

husband coconut oil and MCT oil and he

127:41

improved and a case report with Dr. Vich

127:44

being one of the co-authors on that was

127:46

published just a ketogenic intervention

127:48

and they followed that was the longest

127:50

case report for years followed his

127:52

progression and stabilization he ended

127:54

up succumbing to the disease but she got

127:57

many more years with him you know

127:59

through ketogenic intervention so uh I

128:02

think we have to you know think about uh

128:05

putting together a comprehensive

128:07

metabolicbased formula and and Dale

128:09

Bredesen has been you know spearheading

128:11

some things and looking at more of a

128:12

comprehensive approach. Dr. Steven

128:15

Kunain has been kind of working on MCTs

128:18

and other ketogenic agents for

128:19

Alzheimer's. Also did a dual PET scan

128:21

where you do a glucose ketone PET scan

128:24

and showed and published that you know

128:26

as we age our capacity to use glucose

128:29

decreases over time but that does not

128:31

happen with ketones. So our abil our

128:33

brain's ability to use ketones over time

128:35

is preserved. Uh so that's an important

128:38

distinction and a good uh foundational

128:41

framework for the rationale for doing

128:43

ketone metabolic therapy. But I think

128:46

you'll probably have more benefit by

128:49

thinking about it as a comprehensive

128:51

metabolic therapy where you can target

128:53

different things. And I think you know

128:54

there's another a number of different

128:56

molecules like alpha GPC but no one does

129:00

anything with formulations. They're

129:02

pretty much always doing a funding

129:04

agency is not gonna ask.

129:05

>> What do you think is the state of the

129:06

art with alpha GPC just in general for

129:08

normal cognitive enhancement?

129:10

>> Yeah, I don't it's hard because I always

129:12

take it with like something else, but

129:14

I've used it by itself and it kind of

129:16

gave me a headache when I when I took

129:19

it. So, and I didn't really notice any I

129:21

think it has the ability to be

129:23

beneficial in the context of cognitive

129:26

deficit, you know, like many things. And

129:28

I do think that ketones are, you know,

129:30

listen, everything that we study is in

129:32

the context of environmental stress or

129:35

some kind of deficit, right? And that's

129:37

where ketones shine and they just tend

129:39

to work. Uh, but I mean, just speaking

129:41

personally, I think they give you an

129:43

extra booth boost because they're a

129:45

source of energy.

129:46

>> What do you think they're best taken

129:47

with?

129:48

>> Ketones in general.

129:49

>> Oh, no, sorry. Alpha.

129:50

>> Alpha GPC. Um,

129:53

>> I think it works good with caffeine. So

129:57

alpha GPC, MCT and caffeine and maybe

130:01

theanine too, which is um has like a

130:05

little bit of a gabaurgic effect. Uh

130:07

that describes a product called a keto

130:09

brain. So that's uh a pretty good

130:11

product that is kind of a staple product

130:14

for me. Uh I ran out of it. I kind of

130:17

miss it. So I'm going to reminds me I

130:18

have to go buy that. But it's been sort

130:20

of what I sip on. I put that into my

130:22

coffee and sort of when I'm working on

130:24

grants or giving lectures, I just need

130:26

long periods of cognitive. But I think

130:28

alpha GPC cause maybe a little bit of

130:30

too much uh uh just makes me a little

130:33

bit too hyperfocused and a little too

130:35

stimulated and I think it maybe can

130:36

affect my sleep uh too. So I think

130:39

people I use that as situationally just

130:41

as I use fasting now. So I use fasting

130:44

very situationally and that's what I

130:46

recommend to people. It shouldn't be

130:47

your default. I shouldn't be like, you

130:49

know, fasting every day because I think

130:51

the more you do it, uh, the easier it

130:53

gets. But I think you can actually maybe

130:55

derive more benefits situationally if

130:58

you have an inflammation event. Like

131:00

there's a person, two people that

131:02

reached out to me that has shingles or

131:04

uh herpes simplex flare up and then they

131:06

fast then then it works for that. Or

131:08

they have a GI, you know, some kind of

131:10

GI issue or some kind of

131:12

>> or if they're traveling or for me when

131:14

I'm just, you know, bogged down with a

131:16

lot of uh paperwork, grant reviews,

131:18

writing grants or something, I'll I'll

131:20

fast through for half of the day or more

131:22

of the day and I'm just sharper, you

131:23

know, and just using situationally.

131:25

>> All right, let's talk a little bit about

131:26

hyperbaric oxygen. Now, you mentioned

131:28

and alluded to the fact that there are a

131:30

handful of FDA indications for them. To

131:32

me, the two most apparent would be

131:34

treatment of the bends and obviously for

131:36

burn uh for burn patients. So, it

131:38

dramatically um aids with wound healing.

131:41

>> But there are many things that are

131:43

conspicuously absent from any FDA

131:45

approval, right? There's no FDA approval

131:46

for TBI.

131:48

>> There's no FDA approval for concussion.

131:51

There's no FDA approval for anything

131:54

girrotective.

131:56

And yet I've always um said every time

132:00

I've done gone back and I maybe do this

132:02

every two years. I go back and look at

132:03

the data around concussion and TBI

132:06

that

132:10

you it depends how you look at the data.

132:12

There could be a case for it. And you

132:15

know patients are always asking me about

132:17

hyperbaric oxygen. It's truly one of the

132:19

things I get asked about the most. And I

132:20

generally tell tell patients it's not

132:22

worth the cost. It's not worth the

132:24

hassle. it's not worth the

132:25

inconvenience. The only except outside

132:27

of the approved FDA indications, the

132:30

only thing I would suggest going against

132:33

the FDA recommendation is if I were to

132:36

have a concussion, if one one of my kids

132:37

had a concussion, I would probably say

132:41

the downside of hyperbaric oxygen is low

132:43

enough. I think the potential upside is

132:45

there. I think it's worth the risk. Uh

132:47

first of all, do you agree with that

132:48

statement? If not, modify it

132:51

>> in the context of uh acute concussion or

132:54

a brain injury. I

132:56

>> start with the concussion and then yeah,

132:57

talk brain injury after.

132:58

>> Uh yeah, in the context of acute like

133:01

within the first 48 to 72 hours. I think

133:05

hyperbaric oxygen can be remarkably

133:07

effective in for kids and for younger

133:10

population and probably effective for

133:12

adults if early. The jury

133:15

>> what protocol would you recommend in

133:16

that situation? Yeah, I would well if

133:19

it's a penetrating traumatic brain

133:21

injury as Okay. Okay. Blunt blunt. We're

133:24

not military.

133:24

>> Yeah. Okay. Yeah. So, uh I would go with

133:28

like standard protocol like two

133:29

atmospheres of oxygen, you know, 60 to

133:31

90 minutes, 5 days a week. Uh you know,

133:35

minimum maybe 3 days a week, 40 40 dives

133:38

over that period of time. Um I think

133:41

would be could be potentially uh

133:44

beneficial. Yeah, that could be

133:46

>> that's a hell of a lot. That's you're

133:48

talking two months.

133:49

>> Yeah, 40 sessions. That's that's like

133:51

the most like I mean maybe you could

133:53

probably maybe

133:54

>> and you can understand why I don't

133:56

recommend people do this. Like that's a

133:57

that's a job. Yeah, you just basically

133:59

decided you're not working for a month

134:01

because if you got to drive 30 minutes

134:04

each way and you're going to spend 90

134:05

minutes in it, that's 2 and 1/2 hours, 5

134:08

days a week

134:10

>> for, you know, 6 weeks or whatever it

134:13

is. I mean, it's that's just an insane

134:15

amount. That's it's an insane

134:17

commitment. There better be some

134:19

reasonable evidence for it. Again, I'm

134:21

on the fence on this particular

134:22

indication. Um, but that's I mean I I

134:27

can't make that much time to do anything

134:28

in my life.

134:29

>> I know. Uh I mean there are some gyms

134:31

that have like the soft chambers and I

134:34

think uh we're gravitating that there's

134:36

a little more buzz about it about it

134:38

with people biohacking.

134:39

>> How much atmospheric uh how far can you

134:42

get in a soft chamber?

134:43

>> Yeah, about 1.3 atmosphere. So, that

134:46

would be maybe a good place to start if

134:47

you've had u uh you know, if you want to

134:50

do mild uh mild if you have a mild

134:53

concussion or you want to do more of a a

134:55

mild hyperbaric oxygen protocol 1.3

134:59

three times per week for like two weeks

135:01

or something and I'm just speculating,

135:02

but I just I know these people that run

135:04

the hyperbaric chambers like I got to go

135:06

in for, you know, minimum 20 sessions,

135:08

40 sessions. We want to get in for 40.

135:10

So I've been a reviewer on a variety of

135:13

different publications, systematic

135:15

reviews and things like that and been on

135:17

top of this field and uh there's some

135:19

data that will be coming out from two

135:22

different groups uh that suggested that

135:25

if you had a traumatic brain injury even

135:27

like you know years ago that uh

135:30

hyperbaric oxygen increased cognitive

135:33

function and pretty much all metrics of

135:35

cognitive

135:37

uh after that. So that was this protocol

135:40

I believe was uh 40 to 60 sessions

135:44

uh 1.5 to two atmospheres uh of

135:48

hyperbaric. There's also by me we have

135:51

this community called the villages and

135:55

uh there's a there's a clinic there

135:57

called the Aviv clinic and they've

136:00

treated like you know they're not

136:02

interested in publishing or anything but

136:04

they have they've treated like tens of

136:05

thousands of patients like at least

136:06

10,000 patients and they have convincing

136:10

data from what I'm told uh from people

136:13

that have worked with them and I've

136:14

talked to the director that they have

136:16

remarkable you know increase in

136:18

cognitive function

136:20

from elderly people there that are not

136:24

you know they don't have TBI but they

136:25

have improved cognitive function across

136:28

different and also just like

136:29

cardioabolic biomarkers are improving

136:31

over time like glucose control I'm a

136:34

little bit skeptical on that but I do

136:35

see in our animals sometimes they just

136:36

go hypoglycemic when we pull them out

136:38

>> I was just about to say that glucose

136:40

control could be because they're not

136:41

eating in the chamber for they're

136:43

spending 10 hours a week in a chamber

136:45

not eating

136:45

>> and oxygen increases metabolic activity

136:47

too so especially if you're hype. But um

136:50

but yeah, there's you know there's

136:53

there's a problem with uh with the

136:56

studies that have been done because the

136:59

DoD funded a study where they did

137:01

hyperbaric oxygen and the control was

137:03

hyperbaric air, right? So hyperbaric

137:06

oxygen is 100% oxygen, you know, it

137:08

increased.

137:09

>> So you're still getting hyperbaric

137:10

exposure to 20% oxygen.

137:12

>> Yeah. So the control was just hyperbaric

137:14

pressure and then both groups got

137:16

benefits. So uh to there's a lot of

137:20

muddy waters. So the DoD wants to put a

137:23

nail in this coffin. So they actually

137:24

funded my university, University of

137:26

South Florida. We have six beautiful

137:28

chambers in a facility that's run by the

137:31

neurosurgery and neuroscience department

137:33

and uh my friend Dr. Joe Dur kind of

137:35

runs the facility there. Uh which is

137:39

putting putting a nail in this coffin.

137:41

So they have subjects with PTSD and also

137:44

subjects with with brain injury, but

137:45

it's more of a PTSD trial. And they have

137:49

a sham. The sham is that they pulse the

137:52

pressure during the initial compression

137:54

to make you think like you're undergoing

137:56

pressure but keep it at one atmosphere

137:58

and at the end with the decompress they

138:00

pulse it so you you feel a little bit.

138:02

>> And then you have people that you know

138:03

they'll work with.

138:04

>> But why PTSD as opposed to TBI? Uh,

138:08

well, it's it's brain injury, PTSD. So,

138:11

it's just answering that question

138:12

because PTSD is such a a huge problem.

138:15

>> Sure.

138:15

>> For one thing, as is, you know, brain

138:17

injuries, but they kind of across the

138:19

board they're treating and the these

138:21

chambers, six chambers are active from

138:23

morning till night. So it's a $30

138:24

million project

138:26

>> that that is has all the right controls

138:30

all the people involved and uh multiple

138:33

institutes are sort of collaborating but

138:35

the central location is

138:37

>> yeah it's ongoing like

138:39

>> and when does it read out

138:41

>> uh it will be done I think some

138:43

preliminary data should be coming out

138:45

within the next year but it will be and

138:47

if people do get a benefit from it uh

138:51

and they're in the sham group uh or if

138:54

they're in the hyperbaric group, then

138:55

they'll have the the you know, they're

138:57

going to give them access to that. Yeah.

138:59

So, it's going to become like a

139:00

treatment center.

139:01

>> Uh I I was not actively involved in the

139:05

initiation of that maybe because I study

139:07

the negative effects of fibra, but I've

139:08

been like peripherilally involved of it.

139:10

I saw I've been inspired by the work

139:12

that they're doing and the level of

139:14

scientific rigor that they're using to

139:16

approach this question of the potential

139:20

neuro regenerative and uh cognitive and

139:24

just you know even mental health effects

139:26

of hyperbaric oxygen which have been

139:28

reported anecdotally but have not been

139:31

systematically studied in this rigorous

139:34

way. So that project is ongoing right

139:36

now. But in addition to that, I've

139:38

reviewed some papers that'll be coming

139:39

out and some some work that has been

139:41

done to suggest that

139:43

>> if you had a if you had traumatic brain

139:45

injury years ago and you go into

139:47

chambers that and you use a rigorous

139:49

meth method of the only thing is they

139:52

did not have a sham control. They did

139:54

not have a control. who you know it's

139:57

it's hard to do a control but they've

139:58

figured out a way to do it at USF and

140:01

they have um even like a psychiatrist

140:03

come like they have a person that comes

140:05

in to question the person uh and figure

140:08

out if they're lying or not you know

140:10

about the about the control like did you

140:12

experience it and basically all the

140:14

subjects that are getting the sham have

140:16

no idea if they got sham or treatment

140:18

>> so no no experiment no protocol that's

140:21

gonna be great I've never done that

140:23

before and just the sheer amount of

140:24

people that are going to be treated. I

140:26

think

140:26

>> all veterans.

140:28

>> Yeah. Yep.

140:29

>> Well, that's great to hear, Dom. This

140:31

has been um really interesting. I mean,

140:34

to me, there have been a lot of things

140:36

that unfortunately haven't changed fast

140:38

enough since we last spoke, namely

140:40

around our insights around cancer and

140:42

Alzheimer's disease, largely due to a

140:45

lack of clinical trials. But the

140:48

unbelievable change in exogenous and

140:51

supplemental ketones, it's it's

140:52

exploded. you've been leading the charge

140:54

in that. It gives someone like me a lot

140:56

of hope. I mean, I've long ago given up

140:58

on the uh the discipline of a ketogenic

141:00

diet. Although I achieved remarkable

141:04

benefit from it. Um but but something

141:08

just changed when my daughter was old

141:09

enough and I just wanted to start eating

141:11

everything. Um and that hasn't vanished.

141:13

So I'm on the I'm on the seafood diet.

141:16

That is e food diet. I

141:18

>> You're not managing epilepsy or anything

141:20

like that. Yeah. You got benefits of it.

141:22

I know at the time like I distinctly

141:24

remember going to the gym with you and

141:25

the amount of like volume that you would

141:27

do or you know just riding the bike and

141:29

just swimming and yeah it's just it was

141:31

crazy.

141:32

>> But I really I you've really piqued my

141:34

curiosity about these um exogenous

141:36

ketones and and in addition to that one

141:38

that I've just started putting into my

141:39

coffee. I think I'm going to really give

141:41

some of these salts a try. Um especially

141:44

given what you've said about the cuz I

141:46

you know I'd always felt that well I

141:48

need to kind of be somewhat mindful of

141:49

of of of electrolyte load beyond what I

141:52

already consume.

141:54

>> Um and also although we didn't talk

141:56

about it I know you and I have spoken

141:57

about it just before which was you don't

141:59

have the same GI consequences that used

142:01

to exist with the ketone salts which

142:03

largely limited their consumption. So uh

142:06

tell me tell me and tell everybody again

142:08

the brand that that you're suggesting I

142:10

give a try to that you brought.

142:12

>> Yeah. Uh, Keto Start by Audacious

142:14

Nutrition is Keto Start. Yeah, Keto.

142:17

>> You can buy it online. It's direct. You

142:18

buy directly from them. Is it on Amazon?

142:20

>> Right on the I think. Yeah, it's on

142:21

Amazon. Should be on Amazon. So, yeah.

142:23

So, I mean, that's what I use and it's

142:25

kind of evolved out of uh, you know, it

142:28

was essentially the molecules that we

142:30

originally studied and kind of stuck

142:32

with even after, you know, looking at

142:35

all the different

142:36

>> You're not financially involved in this

142:37

company? No. Your wife advises them

142:39

though.

142:39

>> Yes. Okay.

142:40

>> So, uh,

142:41

>> so yeah, I've been more I I'm on the

142:44

sidelines. So, I don't sell anything.

142:45

So, I don't have any companies. I don't

142:47

say anything. I do advise for for

142:48

companies. And we talked about CGM. So,

142:50

I'm an adviser for Levels Health. I'm an

142:53

adviser for MedSAI, ME TYS.

142:57

So, it's uh essentially an app and a

142:59

program for metabolic psychiatry and

143:02

advised a little bit for uh RX Sugar,

143:05

which sold alulose. So, I kind of

143:06

disclosed those things. who I don't

143:08

think we talked about alulose too much

143:10

but uh

143:11

>> we got to say something for next time.

143:12

>> Yeah. So uh yeah but just I don't I'm

143:14

not I don't have any brands or selling

143:16

anything but I do have keto nutrition.

143:18

So that's myformational website and I

143:20

think the big thing that I'm involved in

143:22

is uh the well the metabolic link

143:26

podcast and that's our podcast that we

143:29

want to have you on of course and the

143:30

metabolic health initiative which is an

143:33

ACCME accredited medical education

143:36

platform. So that platform has is

143:38

associated with a podcast but we have

143:40

educational information where we have

143:43

doctors, neuroscientists, cardiologists,

143:46

oncologists, you know, doctors that

143:48

treat metabolic disorders uh give

143:50

lectures on this and so you can get

143:52

medical education and learn about

143:54

ketogenic met and we have you know

143:56

there's uh it's got to meet the ACCME

143:59

bar of of standards. So that's metabolic

144:02

health initiative and also the uh

144:05

metabolic link podcast and also the

144:07

metabolic health summit which we've had

144:09

many of people that have been on your

144:11

podcast have been you know spoken at the

144:13

summit. It's a big and that was in

144:14

Clearwater, Florida. So, we're

144:16

regrouping and figuring out what the

144:18

future of that's going to be. But

144:20

there's no really experience that you

144:23

can mimic than an in-person kind of

144:26

event and you can network with people

144:28

and we have basic science, clinical

144:30

science, and also uh uh a big focus of

144:33

it too is having patients talk and then

144:36

talk about the implementation strategies

144:39

uh with with what we're talking about

144:40

here. So, yeah, I'd like to put that on

144:43

people's radar. Well, we'll stick all of

144:44

that in the show notes so that everybody

144:46

can find you and and you're also just

144:49

arguably the single most generous person

144:51

with this time I've ever met. I I

144:53

>> I know that you you personally take so

144:56

much time to respond to strangers who

144:59

are contacting you and um you know that

145:01

is I suppose the burden and

145:02

responsibility of being one of the most

145:03

knowledgeable people on this planet when

145:05

it comes to this type of therapy. So uh

145:07

on behalf of all those people, thank you

145:09

and thank you for for coming all the way

145:11

out here. appreciate taking you. I know

145:12

how I know how busy you are.

145:14

>> Thanks for having me. It's been my

145:15

pleasure. Yeah. Thank you.

Interactive Summary

The video features a discussion between Peter and Dom on the topic of ketogenic diets and exogenous ketones. Dom, with a background in neuroscience and nutrition, shares his research journey, starting with his work on oxygen toxicity and the ketogenic diet's role in seizure disorders. The conversation delves into the mechanisms of ketosis, the history of its use in epilepsy, and its potential applications in various health conditions. They explore the differences between ketone salts and esters, the importance of proper formulation, and the potential benefits and drawbacks of different approaches. The discussion also touches upon the role of NAD, the carnivore diet, and the latest research in cancer and Alzheimer's disease treatment. The conversation highlights the growing interest and scientific exploration of ketogenic therapies and their potential to revolutionize metabolic and neurological health.

Suggested questions

4 ready-made prompts