HomeVideos

How to Use Ketosis for Enhanced Mood, Cognition, and Long-Term Brain Protection — Dr. Dom D'Agostino

Now Playing

How to Use Ketosis for Enhanced Mood, Cognition, and Long-Term Brain Protection — Dr. Dom D'Agostino

Transcript

3514 segments

0:00

I think first and foremost it's weight

0:02

loss. So it's very satisfying to go into

0:05

a state of ketosis because you do see

0:08

the scale change pretty dramatically and

0:11

that's due in part to some fluid loss

0:13

associated with a reduction of fluid

0:16

volume. It does have a diuretic effect.

0:18

Ketosis does ketogenic diets and

0:20

obviously fasting and also a naturic

0:22

effect where you dump out some sodium.

0:24

Your blood volume will contract a little

0:26

bit. So, if you have high blood

0:27

pressure, that will likely go down. So,

0:29

if you're on blood pressure medication,

0:31

you have to think about that. But first

0:33

and foremost, it's an effective way to

0:35

get your body to lower the hormone

0:38

insulin. If you have insulin resistance

0:40

and [snorts] shift your metabolism to

0:42

burning fats, and as we burn more and

0:46

more fat, that stimulates the production

0:48

of ketones.

0:49

>> Dom, happy holidays. Nice to see you.

0:51

>> Great to see you, Tim. Thanks for

0:53

connecting.

0:54

>> Definitely. I suggested we hop on the

0:56

phone because I have been harassing

1:00

the living hell out of you with so many

1:02

questions via text message and I

1:04

thought, you know, this must be pretty

1:06

annoying. So rather than answer me once,

1:09

why don't we hop on and record a bunch

1:12

of the details because the details are

1:15

so fascinating. And for people who are

1:16

just tuning in who might not know

1:21

the good Dr. D Augustino Dominic

1:25

we should establish some basics and I at

1:28

this point have been quote unquote in

1:31

ketosis for 18 days now and we'll dig

1:36

into a lot of questions around that

1:39

tactical practical questions but before

1:42

we do why would someone and we can talk

1:45

about what it is and so on but first

1:47

let's just give some of the let's call

1:51

it establish lished

1:53

benefits

1:55

ideally in human studies but could

1:57

extend to animal models and then if

2:00

there's anything on the horizon say in

2:02

the next few years because you're at the

2:04

cutting edge if you think there's

2:05

anything that might plausibly be

2:06

established as a benefit what could that

2:09

be so what would you put on the bullet

2:12

list of benefits of intermittently or

2:15

for extended periods of time being in

2:18

ketosis

2:20

>> there are many benefits to being in

2:21

ketosis and a ketogenic diet if we're

2:25

going to go there kind of has the

2:26

benefits of fasting and there you know

2:29

for millennia we know the benefits of

2:31

fasting without the without the baggage

2:33

without the metabolic baggage you know

2:35

the muscle loss the fatigue obviously

2:38

you can't live in a you know that level

2:40

of caloric deficit but in regards to

2:44

the practical applications of it

2:47

we know that being in a state of ketosis

2:49

really quiets the mind [sighs] and I

2:51

think that has major implications and

2:54

this was you know from centuries we knew

2:57

this and now over the past decades this

3:00

has been like a term kind of used and

3:02

it's backed up by experimental data to

3:05

show that there's an elevation of GABA

3:07

obviously it's silencing a broad array

3:10

of seizures independent of the ideology

3:12

temporal lobe seizures Lennox Gustoau

3:15

syndrome dur syndrome rare forms of

3:18

epilepsy the ketogenic diet just quiets

3:20

the brain, lowers glutamate and elevates

3:23

GABA, a brain stabilizing, calming

3:26

neurotransmitter. And you know, that's

3:28

why people gravitate towards alcohol,

3:29

right? The gabaurgic effects of alcohol

3:31

and bzzoiaines.

3:33

>> So you can sort of in a very gentle way

3:36

transition your physiology to a state of

3:41

ketosis which changes the

3:42

neuropharmacology of your brain to sort

3:45

of [clears throat] quiet it down. And

3:47

that I think really echoes its broad

3:50

application for metabolic psychiatry

3:52

which is everything from major

3:54

depression to bipolar to schizophrenia

3:56

to anxiety disorders to anorexia

4:00

nervosa. So that that's a very

4:02

interesting and rapidly expanding

4:05

application of ketosis that's being

4:07

funded largely by the Bazooki group.

4:09

>> Yeah.

4:09

>> You just interviewed

4:11

>> had David on.

4:11

>> Yeah. And on the physical side, some

4:14

folks, if they're old enough, may

4:15

remember the Atkins diet. Not saying

4:18

that is what we should hold up as the

4:20

necessarily the end- all beall of any

4:23

sense, but why would someone go on this

4:26

for

4:28

benefits outside of the cognitive

4:31

psychiatric? Are there any other

4:33

benefits that you could list off?

4:34

>> I think first and foremost, it's weight

4:37

loss. So, it's very satisfying to go

4:39

into a state of ketosis because you do

4:42

see the scale change pretty dramatically

4:45

and that's due in part to some fluid

4:47

loss associated with a reduction of

4:50

fluid volume. It does have a diuretic

4:52

effect. Ketosis does ketogenic diets and

4:55

obviously fasting and also a naturic

4:57

effect where you dump out some sodium.

5:00

Your plasma volume, your blood volume

5:02

will contract a little bit. So, if you

5:04

have high blood pressure that will

5:05

likely go down. So, if you're on blood

5:07

pressure medication, you have to think

5:09

about that. But first and foremost, it's

5:11

an effective way to get your body to

5:14

lower the hormone insulin if you have

5:16

insulin resistance and [snorts] shift

5:18

your metabolism to burning fats. And as

5:22

we burn more and more fat, that

5:24

stimulates the production of ketones,

5:26

ketogenesists. And ketones have a broad

5:28

array of applications, metabolic

5:31

signaling, epigenetic,

5:33

that have real world applications. And

5:36

that's why the whole field of exogenous

5:38

ketones has developed and there's 160 or

5:42

more registered clinical trials on

5:44

exogenous ketones on clinical

5:45

trials.gov. And I could go into each of

5:47

the applications individually if we want

5:49

to go there.

5:50

>> Well, as we talked about before

5:52

recording and I have to act as a bit of

5:55

a referee for my audience because I know

5:56

you can go as deep as as we want down

6:00

the rabbit hole into the 17th dimension

6:02

of biochemistry. So, if you get

6:04

possessed by the the organic chemistry

6:07

demons and [clears throat] start

6:09

speaking in tongues, I'll rein you in a

6:11

little bit. However, let me perhaps

6:13

provide a personal example first for

6:15

folks because some of this will be

6:18

familiar to people who have listened for

6:19

a long time, maybe to other episodes of

6:22

the two of us, but a lot of it's going

6:25

to be new, but I want to establish some

6:27

priors just so people are aware of what

6:29

this might look like in practice. So, I

6:32

have experimented with the ketogenic

6:35

diet, also extended fasting. You can

6:38

arrive at some similar places, but like

6:40

you said, there can be some pretty heavy

6:42

taxes to pay with extended fasting. The

6:46

ketogenic diet I've experimented with

6:48

all the way back to the '9s. Some of you

6:51

weren't even born probably who are

6:53

listening, but some of you will remember

6:54

the '90s. And I was using it

6:57

specifically for mood stabilizing. This

7:00

was towards the end of college, but also

7:03

to lean out while building muscle on

7:07

something called the cyclical ketogenic

7:09

diet.

7:10

>> So, we're going to get to that later in

7:11

the conversation, but it was

7:13

effectively, let's call it, 6 days of

7:16

focusing on a ketogenic diet with one

7:19

day or a half to threequarters of a day

7:21

of [snorts] glycogen depletion and then

7:24

loading with more carbohydrates, lower

7:27

fat, etc. The reason that the ketogenic

7:31

diet became doubly interesting to me is

7:34

that when I had Lyme disease the second

7:36

time, which came with all sorts of co-

7:38

infections like besiosis and so on. And

7:40

this isn't

7:42

chronic fatigue or depression searching

7:44

for a diagnosis that is external. I I

7:47

feel like sometimes the cottage industry

7:49

of diagnosing and treating people for

7:51

quote unquote Lyme disease can be shady

7:54

at best. But in this case, I'm coming

7:56

from Long Island. Everybody in my family

7:58

has had tickborne disease. Wow.

7:59

>> And was credibly diagnosed. So the

8:02

second time I had lime, [snorts]

8:05

>> I got to a point because I I did not see

8:08

the bullseye rash. Assumed I did not

8:10

have it, which is a mistake because

8:13

sometimes you don't see the

8:14

dermatological response and you

8:17

nonetheless have contracted something

8:18

like Lyme disease. I ended up weeks

8:21

later slurring my speech. took me

8:24

minutes to get out of bed because my

8:26

joints hurt so much. Forgetting friends

8:28

names and my assistant said,"Tim, you

8:31

really need to see someone. This isn't

8:32

fatigue. I've seen you sick. I've seen

8:34

you tired. This is something else." And

8:37

suffice to say, that turned into several

8:40

months even post antibiotic treatment,

8:43

which I do think is important, of we

8:46

could call it pseudo dementia. I mean I

8:48

I really felt like I was operating at

8:50

10% cognitive capacity and basically at

8:54

my wit's end I said well what can I

8:57

control because a lot has not done the

9:00

job and I went into

9:03

strict ketosis. What does that mean?

9:06

That means that I'm consuming moderate

9:08

[snorts] protein, probably getting at

9:10

least 50% of my calories from fat, and

9:12

keeping my my carbohydrates to less than

9:16

20 gram a day, probably at that point.

9:18

And within 3 or 4 days, I'd probably say

9:21

around day 3 or four because I wasn't

9:23

very fat adapted at the time. My body

9:26

wasn't well trained to use fat because I

9:29

wasn't doing intermittent fasting, which

9:31

we'll come back to. And within 3 or 4

9:33

days, effectively, all of my cognitive

9:36

symptoms disappeared. And I stayed in

9:39

that state through nutritional ketosis

9:42

for a few weeks, had complete remission

9:46

of any of the cognitive symptoms plus

9:48

the joint pain symptoms, and those never

9:51

came back. And I recommended that and

9:54

this is not a randomized control trial

9:56

but over the years due to various

9:58

factors we've had ticks growing in

10:02

population also expanding to the coasts

10:05

and on the west coast that is and

10:07

elsewhere had three friends replicate

10:10

this with ketosis after suffering

10:12

various symptoms from tickborn disease.

10:15

And

10:17

you know, we were texting, maybe even

10:18

talking about this, but I never had a

10:21

great explanation for why it worked. I

10:23

said, I don't know the exact mechanism.

10:25

Maybe I have faulty glucose metabolism

10:27

that was somehow maybe something was

10:30

impaired by the ticks and therefore I'm

10:32

giving my brain this alternate fuel that

10:34

it really likes, ketones. But it didn't

10:36

explain necessarily the durability of

10:39

the changes. Right. In brief, do you

10:42

[snorts] have a theory or an explanation

10:43

for why that would work?

10:46

>> Yeah, I'm glad you brought that up

10:47

because quickly dozens if not hundreds

10:49

of people with tick born diseases,

10:52

including Lyme disease and all the tick

10:55

born diseases have communicated with me

10:58

and one of the patients is actually

11:00

Deanna Tadon who was diagnosed with ALS

11:03

and prior to 2010 and has basically been

11:06

stabilized,

11:08

given three years to live. So, I

11:10

realized that it's underdiagnosed. The

11:13

the tests to do that are kind of

11:16

controversial, you know, with the CDC

11:18

testing, the two-tier testing and

11:20

hygienics. So, I know I'm going off

11:22

track a little bit here, but I think

11:23

it's important to say that the spyroet

11:25

morelia that spyroet is essentially 100%

11:28

glycolytic.

11:29

>> And when you limit glucose availability

11:32

and glycolysis, you are targeting the

11:34

energy systems of that microbe. So,

11:37

that's one thing to think about. And

11:39

it's well established now. It wasn't

11:41

three years ago, but a ketogenic diet,

11:44

in particular, beta hydroxybutyrate

11:46

elevated in the blood, stimulates the

11:49

adaptive immune response. And that's

11:51

essentially your body's ability to

11:53

target foreign invaders and neutralize

11:56

them. And that has become a rapidly

11:59

growing area of interest. University of

12:01

Pennsylvania, you know, they're doing

12:03

CARTT therapy and and checkpoint

12:05

inhibitors because of the ketogenic

12:09

enhancement of the adaptive immune

12:11

response. So, and I think that plays a

12:13

role and situationally I have observed

12:17

that you go into ketosis if you have an

12:19

inflammatory process and Lyme disease is

12:22

is inflammatory. But people who have

12:24

shingles and herpes simplex and things

12:26

like that, I have an inbox full of

12:28

people that do that and I would like to

12:31

experimentally go down that direction to

12:33

understand why. But I think there's two

12:35

reasons. You're targeting the energy

12:36

systems and you're augmenting the immune

12:39

response to keep the spyroet in a

12:42

[clears throat] dormant stage or maybe

12:45

eradicating it in in some context.

12:47

>> It's really incredible on a whole lot of

12:51

levels and I'm just lucky that I had the

12:52

prior experience with the ketogenic diet

12:55

to even have it occur to me as a last

12:57

ditch effort. And for people if it

12:59

wasn't clear I mean you explained it

13:01

clearly but glycolytic I'm simplifying

13:03

here but it means that something needs

13:05

to eat sugar or metabolize you know

13:08

carbohydrates to survive right and there

13:10

are also Dom correct me if I'm wrong but

13:12

particular cancers that are very

13:14

sensitive to being starved of glucose as

13:18

well and for people who want more on

13:20

fasting ketosis as it relates to cancer

13:22

we may come back to it also but we've

13:24

had prior conversations about this and

13:26

the benefits some of the incredible

13:28

effects of fasting prior to cancer

13:31

treatments of of various types. So, is

13:34

it fair to say, do you think most of the

13:35

benefits that someone would derive from

13:37

fasting prior to cancer treatments, they

13:40

could also get from ketosis or is it

13:42

dialed back to

13:45

smaller percentage of effect?

13:47

>> That's a good question. I think it

13:49

requires a nuanced answer that we

13:50

probably don't have time for. But if you

13:52

are overweight and your BMI for example

13:54

is like as many cancer patients tend to

13:57

be like 28 30 32 a fasting or a

14:03

calorically restricted ketogenic diet is

14:05

the way to go. If a patient is trending

14:08

towards being lighter like a BMI you

14:10

know 20 22 something like that a U

14:12

caloric meaning like keeping stable

14:14

caloric level to maintain your weight is

14:17

going to be important and then elevating

14:19

beta hydroxybutyrate

14:21

will be important to get some of the

14:24

anti-inflammatory effects and also the

14:26

immune boosting effects and [snorts] the

14:28

neuroprotective effects going into

14:31

cancer therapy because there's people

14:33

studying ketosis for chemobrain like

14:36

reverse hemobrain and like managing

14:37

that. So, it has a broad array of

14:40

applications, not just targeting, it's

14:43

targeting the tumor growth and putting a

14:45

break on it, not it's not a cure for

14:47

cancer. And I cringe when people talk

14:49

about that online, the ketogenic diet

14:51

curing cancer. It does slow it down,

14:54

especially if it's highly glycolytic,

14:56

which 80% of cancers are. And it

14:59

enhances and augments the response to

15:01

the standard of care, that's radiation,

15:03

chemo, and immune-based therapies. We

15:06

know that now.

15:07

>> All right. So, why have I been in

15:09

ketosis for 18 days and why am I doing

15:11

it a few times a year? Well, part of how

15:14

I implement this does hinge and will

15:16

continue to hinge on some of the answers

15:19

in this conversation from Tom because

15:21

this is very self-interested. But what I

15:24

have found is that for mood

15:26

stabilization and you mentioned

15:28

metabolic psychiatry I've had and you

15:30

made the introduction I believe Chris

15:32

Palmer out of Harvard on the podcast to

15:34

discuss this but there are certain

15:35

conditions whether it's depression but

15:37

even more squirly when you're dealing

15:39

with something like schizophrenia for

15:40

instance or different types of bipolar

15:43

people who have been on dozens of

15:44

medications who go into let's call it

15:47

remission or they no longer meet the

15:49

criteria right for the diagnosis of some

15:52

of these

15:53

after being treated on a ketogenic diet

15:55

of one type or another. It is

15:57

astonishing. And so for my own mental

16:00

health, I've noticed complete

16:03

stabilization

16:05

and without subduing the highs, right?

16:08

I've never had mania necessarily. I'm

16:10

not talking about that. But I'm not

16:12

muted. I feel just calm, stable, sharp.

16:17

And that's one reason in and of itself

16:20

to do it for periods of time. But I seem

16:24

to feel a carryover effect.

16:27

Also have Alzheimer's and other neuro

16:30

degenerative diseases in my family. I

16:32

have three relatives with rapidly

16:33

advancing Alzheimer's at the moment. So

16:37

maybe we could talk also to how these

16:39

things might intersect. But my feeling

16:41

is possibly and I'd love your input

16:44

here. If I follow a ketogenic diet for a

16:47

number of weeks or maybe a month and a

16:50

half or something like that, I'd love to

16:51

know the timing you might recommend.

16:53

Let's say I do that two or three times a

16:55

year that there could be enduring

16:59

effects that have protective carryover,

17:02

right? And I also find it much easier

17:06

now that I started doing intermittent

17:08

I've been intermittent fasting pretty

17:10

much every day for the last 6 months,

17:12

which means I'm eating between typically

17:15

2:00 p.m. and like 8 or 9:00 p.m. and

17:19

having two meals a day. That's it. Not

17:21

hungry at all. Like I haven't eaten

17:22

today. It's 12:30 my time. I will not be

17:26

hungry for another 2 2 and 1/2 hours.

17:28

That by itself completely

17:32

completely revolutionized I mean that's

17:34

an overused word but completely polished

17:36

my insulin sensitivity and metabolic

17:40

health on a bunch of levels like my labs

17:41

have never been better my oral glucose

17:43

tolerance test has never been better

17:46

>> and one question I have for you which is

17:49

just for Timmy Tim but will apply to

17:51

other people is is there an argument to

17:55

be made and maybe I'm totally off base

17:57

but that if

17:58

follow a ketogenic diet and make it work

18:02

for a multi-week period of time that

18:05

you're changing your metabolic machinery

18:08

or just your body in some way that has

18:11

carryover effects even after you stop

18:13

the diet or is that me just doing some

18:16

handwavy

18:18

fancy footwork as a muggle? I just I

18:20

don't know if there's a there there but

18:22

what are your thoughts?

18:23

>> I would say absolutely. I think the

18:24

science is still working to clarify that

18:28

and make it less ambiguous the benefits

18:30

that we are deriving from that. But that

18:32

is kind of like one of the pitches for

18:35

the fasting mimicking diet by Dr. of

18:37

Walter Longo who was one of our keynote

18:39

speakers at Metabolic Health Summit and

18:40

he's presented some really compelling

18:42

research on that that opened my eyes to

18:45

that 5 days of fasting can have I think

18:48

he presented at the time even three

18:49

months of effects on sort of

18:51

cardioabolic biomarkers

18:53

>> in his case this would be the fast

18:54

mimicking diet so a few hundred calories

18:57

a day

18:57

>> yeah like 600 you know using his

18:59

protocol of various foods kind of

19:03

gravitating towards more of a

19:04

plant-based lower protein strategy and I

19:08

think that it's promoting metabolic

19:10

flexibility and ramping up fatty acid

19:13

oxidation enzymes and much like muscle

19:16

memory I think there's a metabolic

19:18

memory the more you stay in ketosis the

19:20

easier it gets and the more benefits you

19:22

derive from it and the more that you

19:24

shift your body to being more fat

19:26

adapted

19:28

just like you can build your V2 when you

19:31

build your V2 max or you build up to

19:32

like a 400 lb bench press and you take

19:35

like months off and you go back and you

19:37

can only do like 225 for a couple reps.

19:38

It only takes like two or three months

19:40

to get back, but it took you 10 years to

19:42

get there. You know, that muscle memory

19:45

snaps back quick. And everybody agrees

19:48

that there's this metabolic memory. And

19:51

I think there's a lot of things at play,

19:54

including, you know, gene programs,

19:56

epigenetic regulation that comes to

19:58

play. So, first and foremost is changing

20:00

our mitochondrial function and

20:01

mitochondrial capacity. So the number of

20:04

mitochondria increase and then when you

20:06

take a break and then get that

20:09

stimulation again that mitochondria is

20:10

kind of there and it responds very

20:13

rapidly.

20:14

>> So thank you for that and I want to

20:16

bookmark maybe we come back to this but

20:18

if people are trying to think about this

20:20

understanding that the [gasps]

20:22

the science right now is maybe

20:25

provisional or you know hypothesis worth

20:27

disproving at this point but that it

20:29

seems to make sense right from an

20:30

evolutionary perspective. Yeah. that

20:32

both muscle memory and metabolic memory

20:36

would be a thing. Otherwise,

20:38

it makes sense your body would want to

20:40

adapt to be prepared for the next famine

20:43

or whatever it might be, right? I just

20:45

want to say muscle memory is metabolic

20:48

memory. So, someone I gave the analogy

20:50

of like lifting weights, but someone who

20:52

runs marathons, it's the same same

20:54

scenario. They take time off and then

20:56

that B2 max quickly establishes again

20:59

and it's muscle but it's it's metabolic.

21:02

So I like to use the term metabolic

21:04

memory.

21:04

>> Metabolic memory. Okay. Yeah. Metabolic

21:06

memory. Just so people know where I am

21:09

at at the moment. And actually, yeah,

21:11

I'll just tell people like what I'm

21:13

doing because I know they're probably

21:14

getting itchy for some just like what

21:15

does this look like in practice? And

21:17

then I want to talk a bit about

21:20

how ketosis or the ketogenic diet may or

21:25

may not

21:27

be helpful for maybe not treating, maybe

21:30

treating. I've certainly seen some

21:32

interesting effects in some of my

21:33

relatives when I give them exogenous

21:34

ketones where suddenly their sentences

21:36

are three or four times longer 30

21:38

minutes later, which is wild to see. But

21:40

in terms of prevention or staving off

21:43

the onset of some of these diseases, I'd

21:44

love to hear your perspective. But let

21:46

me tell people what I've been doing for

21:48

the last few months and especially in

21:49

the last 18 days. So for the last

21:51

whatever it is, I think I mentioned 6

21:53

months I've been doing intermittent

21:54

fasting. And uh that was after hearing a

21:56

conversation between Dr. Dr. Ronda

21:59

Patrick, who I'm a big fan of, and Mark

22:02

Matson, M- A- T- S O N, who's done a lot

22:05

of research related to intermittent

22:07

fasting. And the key piece for me,

22:09

because you see all these different

22:11

types of intermittent fasting, all these

22:12

different ways to do timerestricted

22:14

feeding, and I am going to paraphrase

22:17

here, so Mark, I apologize if I'm

22:19

getting this wrong or oversimplifying,

22:20

but in effect, it's important that you

22:23

fast. This means no calories. Or we

22:26

could talk about pure fat, but let's

22:27

just assume you're not consuming any

22:29

calories for 16 hours because you want

22:32

to deplete your liver of glycogen. And

22:35

once you deplete your liver of glycogen,

22:37

your body experiences this metabolic

22:39

switching. And I've certainly felt this

22:42

just doing intermittent fasting where my

22:44

meals contain carbohydrates later that

22:47

around the end of that fasting period,

22:50

boom, something switches and my mind is

22:54

sharper, right? M

22:56

>> and then when I got to the point of

22:59

going into the ketogenic diet this time

23:02

and also a few months ago because I was

23:05

doing the intermittent fasting and it

23:06

takes it took me about a week and a half

23:08

for my body to to get comfortable with

23:10

that at which point it was no problem

23:13

but I was a little pissy a little

23:14

irritable for a little while a little

23:16

foggy and then when I went into the

23:19

ketogenic diet this time it was the

23:21

easiest transition I've ever had. I did

23:23

not have any foggess. I did not have low

23:28

energy. I did not have what some people

23:30

might call the kind of keto flu adaptive

23:32

period, which it seems to be pretty

23:36

remediated or or addressed with

23:38

electrolytes for a lot of people. But it

23:41

was incredibly easy just straight into

23:44

the ketogenic diet with no problem

23:46

because I was already doing the

23:47

intermittent fasting. And then for 18

23:50

days, I've been

23:53

having two meals a day. And you've

23:56

recommended a few that sound, frankly,

23:59

pretty disgusting, but that are actually

24:01

really easy. Like two cans of canned

24:03

mackerel with about 2 tablespoons, 30 ml

24:06

of MCT oil plus apple cider vinegar with

24:11

some salt and pepper. It's actually

24:12

delicious. I just love mackerel. Oh,

24:14

there it is. Yeah, you've got your apple

24:15

cider vinegar right there.

24:16

>> Cheap stuff you can get on Amazon. So

24:18

>> yeah, for people who might think, "Oh,

24:20

wow. This is what for fancy people who

24:22

can do all sorts of expensive things in

24:23

their diet." We're talking about like

24:25

how much does that meal cost? Three

24:26

bucks.

24:27

>> A dollar a can for that chicken of the

24:29

sea. And literally you get almost a

24:32

pound of mackerel. And this is like

24:35

third party tested, very low chub

24:37

mackerel, the little mackerel.

24:38

>> Yep.

24:39

>> So $150 for almost a pound of mackerel

24:42

that you can get that for. Like you

24:44

can't And the omega-3s are off the

24:46

charts. the heavy metals are low. You

24:49

know, I consume pounds of this stuff and

24:51

I've gotten my blood and my hair heavy

24:53

metals tested and it's like like super

24:55

low, like non-detective. So, I wouldn't

24:57

worry about that. People have questions

24:59

about cost and heavy metals and that's a

25:01

non-issue, you know, for me. And maybe

25:03

you could mention, I'll put links in the

25:05

show notes as well, but since we're on

25:07

the topic, any any brands that you

25:10

default to that you like and that chub

25:12

mackerel piece for folks that detail is

25:14

important cuz there are mackerel of many

25:16

different sizes.

25:17

>> Yeah, King mackerel is kind of high.

25:19

This is chicken of the sea. So, if you

25:21

want to do the budget, you buy the case,

25:23

the more you buy and then Amazon

25:25

subscription and then it goes on sale.

25:28

You can actually get it for like less

25:29

than a dollar a can. And I do the same

25:31

with chicken of the sea jack mackerel.

25:34

Just chub mackerel or jack mackerel. So

25:36

they're both small fish. And I kind of

25:39

like the King Oscar brand, too. Yeah.

25:42

>> Just a little bit more pricey. And

25:44

Season's brand is pretty good, too. But

25:46

I mean, it's like as cheap as dog food.

25:49

[laughter]

25:50

>> I mean, we buy some pretty fancy

25:52

freeze-dried. We don't buy the kibble

25:53

stuff, but when you run the numbers,

25:56

>> it's very inexpensive. We buy cases of

25:59

eggs for like 120 per, you know, if you

26:01

do like eggs, fish, beef, and also

26:04

turkey. You can get turkeys for under a

26:05

dollar a pound, the whole turkey. And

26:07

just for people who are like, "Oh my

26:09

god, I can't believe you guys are eating

26:12

mackerel mixed with oil and vinegar in a

26:14

dog bowl." That's not all you can eat.

26:17

Like, there's more that you can eat. You

26:18

can have like chicken with cheese on it.

26:20

You can have vegetables. There are

26:22

certain things you have to watch out for

26:24

so you're not whacking yourself out of

26:25

ketosis. But in my particular case, I

26:28

don't mind. And the fact of the matter

26:30

is when I wrote the 4-hour body, people

26:32

were like, "Oh my god, you want us to

26:34

repeat the same meals over and over

26:35

again?" I'm like, "What did you have for

26:36

breakfast the last 5 days?" And they ate

26:38

the same damn thing. You're just

26:40

swapping out to fall meals. So my first

26:42

meal is something typically pretty

26:43

small, like the the mackerel I

26:46

explained, and then I have a big meal. I

26:48

might have some more protein in between,

26:49

but it's like yesterday I had lamb chops

26:51

that were delicious with some vegetables

26:55

made in an air fryer. No problem, right?

26:57

And later on, I might have like a ribeye

26:59

chopped up on a big gigantic salad with

27:02

some other stuff added to it, but that's

27:04

about it. You have to be careful with

27:05

the macadamia nuts. Those things will

27:06

creep up on you. But that is in effect

27:08

the diet, right? And I'm doing my

27:10

training. I'm doing my rehab. I'm doing

27:12

my zone 2. I do find I'm a little,

27:16

let's say, lower performance when I'm

27:19

when I'm in ketosis. But what I wanted

27:21

to talk about is

27:24

maybe a false negative that I've

27:26

experienced. And I'll explain what that

27:28

is. So, how do you know if you're, and I

27:30

keep putting this in quotation marks,

27:31

like quote unquote in ketosis, right?

27:33

Because most people are, or maybe all

27:34

people are producing some level of

27:37

ketones. So, there are different

27:39

concentrations, right, that you can

27:40

measure with a finger prick, just like

27:42

you would look at glucose. And at least

27:44

with the finger prick, I think that's

27:45

measuring what you mentioned earlier as

27:47

being so beneficial in a lot of studies,

27:49

the beta hydroxybutyrate, BHB.

27:52

>> Mhm.

27:52

>> I also have because I wanted to run this

27:55

tracking, a G7 Dexcom continuous glucose

27:59

monitor on one arm and then a SI bio,

28:01

apologies, I'm not pronouncing that

28:03

correctly, continuous ketone monitor on

28:05

the other arm. And I'm wearing an Aura

28:08

ring when I sleep to see how all of this

28:09

affects my sleep architecture and

28:11

everything else. So, I'm gathering all

28:13

this, but then I notice something really

28:15

weird, which I've texted you about

28:17

because I I keep feeling like I'm

28:18

failing at keto. I feel great. I feel

28:22

sharp.

28:24

And yet, when I look at not just the

28:28

continuous glucose monitor, but even

28:31

with the fingerprint, because you do

28:32

have to often calibrate these things,

28:34

right? Don't assume that your continuous

28:36

monitors are accurate. You want to

28:38

calibrate them. But I'm looking at the

28:41

numbers and for instance, my girlfriend

28:44

freaked out the other night because my

28:46

phone started screaming. I had earplugs

28:47

in cuz I didn't hear it and it was like

28:49

critical medical alert or whatever the

28:51

code read was because my glucose was 69.

28:55

I suppose it's gotten quite a bit lower

28:57

on ketosis, but you know, usually hovers

29:00

somewhere between like 65 and 80. And my

29:04

ketones were 0.2 millmers. Now, when

29:08

we've talked in prior conversations

29:10

about what kind of target you might aim

29:12

for, it seems like, you know, between

29:15

1.2 and 2 millmers is anxolytic, right?

29:19

Lowers anxiety. And then you're looking

29:21

for this ratio. You could talk about

29:23

this, but the GKI, there's a ratio of

29:26

glucose to ketones. And I look at those

29:28

numbers and I'm like, this makes no

29:30

sense to me because I'm not getting

29:32

enough glucose to function well. And if

29:35

I'm basing it off of the Keto Mojo

29:38

finger prick, even the precision extra

29:41

from Abbott or my continuous ketone

29:44

monitor, I'm not getting any ketones

29:46

either if you're taking it at face

29:48

value. So, how am I functioning?

29:51

[laughter]

29:52

How would you answer that? Because I

29:53

don't think I'd be the only person who

29:56

feels like they're doing something wrong

29:58

if they run into this, but how would you

30:00

interpret this? I would definitely say

30:02

you're running lean and I think what

30:04

you've done and your O GT test is really

30:07

good. I think you had messaged that.

30:09

>> And the O GT for folks is just that oral

30:11

glucose tolerance test where you drink a

30:13

bunch of dextrose water and then they

30:15

take your blood every 30 minutes for two

30:17

hours to see how you're responding to

30:19

it.

30:19

>> Yeah. The biggest metabolic lever would

30:21

be you have enhanced insulin sensitivity

30:25

and I think that has been the focus. For

30:27

example, Ben Bickman wrote a book on

30:29

this and you know doing hundreds of

30:31

podcasts on insulin resistance,

30:33

reversing insulin resistance and low

30:34

carb ketogenic, you know, being

30:36

effective for that. So that first and

30:38

foremost, your insulin sensitivity is

30:40

very high, your fat oxidation is really

30:43

high and your glucose disposal is high.

30:46

And if [snorts] you're in a caloric

30:47

deficit, your ketone uptake is very

30:51

high. We see this quite convincingly,

30:54

you know, in older rats where we like

30:57

gavage, where we tube feed the rats and

31:00

they're older, the ketones get to toxic

31:02

levels, whereas like a younger

31:03

metabolically fit rodent will dispose of

31:06

it very quickly. Same with a couch

31:08

potato human, same with an elite level

31:10

athlete. So you have very rapid. So when

31:13

you measure ketones in the blood, that's

31:14

a function of ketone production and

31:16

ketone utilization. And you could have

31:19

two to five times higher ketone

31:22

utilization, you know, with high

31:24

metabolic fitness. And that's due in

31:26

part to ketoytic enzymes. The you

31:29

upregulate the MCT transporters that

31:32

could be two or in rodents two or three

31:34

times higher. We I haven't done that

31:35

personally and we have some data in

31:37

humans we haven't published yet, but

31:39

that is a real thing and I think that

31:41

you're experiencing. Also, I if you're

31:43

in a caloric deficit, there's less

31:45

spillover. I just bought like an antique

31:48

motorcycle and it's got a carburetor and

31:49

the float sticks a little bit and it

31:51

always drips out the carburetor when I'm

31:53

running it and when I stop and it's like

31:55

kind of pouring out the carburetor so

31:57

there's spillover of fuel, right? So,

32:00

but when I'm running it, it's running

32:02

lean because I'm using I'm using the

32:04

fuel that's kind of going to the

32:05

carburetor. And kind of the same analogy

32:07

here is that, you know, for example, it

32:10

might be good to just sit in one spot

32:11

and relax and maybe eat a little bit of

32:14

surplus calories or even eat a little

32:16

bit of carbs. And what you'll see often

32:18

is like your ketones spike up. Yeah.

32:20

>> So I remember some of my highest ketone

32:22

levels ever is when I consumed

32:25

[laughter] carbohydrates after I was

32:27

fasting or in a state of keto, it like

32:28

jumped up to 5, six, seven. I was like,

32:30

what is going on here? But the glucose

32:32

in that context is ketone sparing. But

32:35

the glucose will also shut off

32:37

ketogenesis. So it'll tank you know

32:39

after but

32:40

>> afterwards. So it sounds like then

32:42

because of probably the intermittent

32:44

fasting in large part I would think if

32:47

my insulin sensitivity is high enough

32:50

that can be paired with higher ketone

32:52

utilization. So if on the assembly line

32:55

of my body right they're producing 10

32:57

units of ketones. If I didn't have good

33:00

ketone utilization and it was my first

33:02

rodeo with ketosis, let's just say, or a

33:04

ketogenic diet, the finger prick might

33:07

pick up all 10 of those units. I'm

33:09

simplifying here, right? But if I have

33:10

high ketone utilization and my body's

33:13

quickly using eight of those, especially

33:15

in a caloric deficit, then it's only

33:18

measuring two and I'm getting the false

33:20

negative that I'm not actually producing

33:23

ketones in the first place. Is that a

33:25

fair, very, very simplified description?

33:27

And you're not measuring tissue levels

33:28

of ketones, which we have done too, even

33:30

in the brain. And that can shoot up like

33:33

really high also. And I've done this

33:35

with Peter Aia too. We were measuring

33:37

blood and then breath. And it seems like

33:39

when we were in a caloric deficit

33:41

fasting, our ketones were like really

33:43

low in the blood.

33:44

>> Low is [clears throat] like one to two,

33:46

but we're like really deep into fasting,

33:49

whereas our breath ketones were maxing

33:51

out the meters. We kind of concluded

33:53

that after a lot of testing that the

33:56

breath ketones were almost a better

33:58

indicator of ketosis, a more accurate, I

34:01

guess you could say in a caloric deficit

34:03

because when you're in a caloric

34:05

deficit, you just have very high ketone

34:07

disposal uptake into the tissues.

34:10

>> It looks like a breathalyzer, right? So,

34:11

is that measuring what is it?

34:13

Accetoacetate. No, I'm just trying to

34:15

repeat words that I've heard once or

34:17

twice, but it's not BHB.

34:18

>> Acetone.

34:19

>> Acetone. God damn it. All right, I know

34:22

I was close. That was It was a 50/50.

34:25

>> Comes from the spontaneous

34:26

decarboxilation of accetoacetate. Like

34:29

we'll spit out about 20% of the

34:31

acettoacetate will kick off to acetone

34:33

and then you can measure.

34:34

>> I got it.

34:35

>> We've measured blood levels of each and

34:37

it's very tricky to do that, but we've

34:39

done it in the lab.

34:39

>> All right, here's another practical

34:42

tactical question for you because I've

34:43

gone back and forth on this and Uncle

34:45

Chad GPT has confused the out of

34:47

me. So maybe you can help resolve it.

34:49

gluconneogenesis

34:51

and protein intake, right? So, you

34:53

consume what is it between like 200 240

34:56

grams of protein a day? Something like

34:58

that. Is that roughly?

34:59

>> Yeah. On active days, on like less

35:01

active days, if I'm just behind my

35:03

computer all day, maybe closer to 180

35:05

200, but yeah, generally speaking,

35:07

>> and people might have picked up when Dom

35:09

was casually throwing around like, you

35:11

know, when you've been squatting 400 and

35:12

you take a break and then you go back

35:14

and you only could squat 300 lb. Tom's a

35:16

pretty big guy who's also deadlifted 500

35:19

lb for like 10 reps before after fasting

35:22

for a week. So, he and I [snorts] are

35:23

not the same size. But, nonetheless, I'm

35:26

trying to figure out on one hand how

35:28

much protein I can eat without my liver

35:32

taking excess protein amino acids and

35:34

turning it into glucose. Right? And

35:36

depending on what I look at and I have

35:38

looked at sources outside of chat GPT on

35:42

one hand there are folks who say don't

35:44

worry about it if you're consuming

35:46

enough fat you really don't have to

35:48

worry about it and then there are other

35:49

folks are like watch out watch out if

35:51

you consume more than x number of grams

35:53

at a given meal you can very easily

35:55

knock yourself out of ketosis which

35:57

would if that's true be maybe an

35:58

alternate explanation for why I'm

36:01

getting these low readings if I'm having

36:03

a small meal around 3 and then a

36:05

gigantic meal later on. How should I and

36:09

how should listeners think about this?

36:12

>> If you were to consume protein in the

36:14

form of liquid, for example, like whey

36:16

or something like that, then the the

36:19

rapid entry of amino acids into your

36:21

bloodstream from your small intestine

36:23

will shut off ketosis. So fat and fiber

36:27

and salt because your pyloric sphincter

36:30

will basically be pretty tight until

36:33

your stomach

36:34

>> talking dirty dumb

36:36

>> pyloric sphincter where your stomach

36:38

connects to your small intestine. If you

36:40

have a very fatty, salty, high-fiber

36:42

meal, that little that entryway, we call

36:45

that the sphincter. It's the pyloric

36:46

sphincter will remain shut until like

36:48

the contents of your stomach become

36:51

isotonic which means that your body has

36:53

to kind of give up water and it's got to

36:55

churn it and break it down. So you could

36:58

delay gastric absorption simply with

37:00

fat, fiber and salt is pretty good too.

37:03

You could do ketone salts or just salt

37:05

electrolytes. So that will delay the

37:07

entry of amino acids or protein into the

37:10

small intestine and thus amino acids

37:11

into the bloodstream. And that's the

37:13

major regulator of ketosis, you know,

37:17

having an impact on insulin and also

37:19

having impact on glucanogenesis to that

37:22

rate of entry. And if you can slow that

37:24

down, you see nothing on the CGM and

37:27

your ketosis levels can basically stay.

37:30

You could further augment that by using

37:32

MCT oil with the protein and the fiber.

37:36

And so if you have longchain fats from

37:38

like a fatty steak and MCT oil and then

37:41

fiber and that could be insoluble fiber

37:44

is pretty good to soluble and insoluble

37:46

that can slow the entry of amino acids

37:48

and essentially buffer the glucanogenic

37:51

response.

37:52

>> So let's say I was stuck in San

37:55

Francisco late. I'm just taking a rare

37:58

trip over here.

37:59

which is pretty exciting time to be here

38:02

with all of the mania with AI going on.

38:05

Everyone's kind of drunk on the

38:06

Kool-Aid, but that's a separate story. I

38:07

got trapped downtown because didn't want

38:11

to deal with traffic and blah blah blah

38:14

blah blah. So, I ended up having a huge

38:16

bunless double cheeseburger, like

38:19

gigantic. This thing, I did not expect

38:20

it to be as big as it was, right? And so

38:22

I go online to try to figure out what

38:25

the protein content of this thing might

38:27

be. And it's like 80 gram of protein,

38:30

[clears throat]

38:30

>> but plenty of fat, certainly tons of

38:33

fat, salty AF, plenty of salt, not a lot

38:37

of fiber. We'll give that one a pass.

38:39

Should I be worried about something like

38:41

that knocking me out of ketosis?

38:43

>> I think you need to measure. So, I'm

38:45

kind of default back to like everybody's

38:47

a unique metabolic entity. But if you

38:49

eat that and kind of your activity level

38:52

is high and you're in a bit of a caloric

38:55

deficit and you were to have that and

38:58

sort of not overdo it on the total

39:00

calories, I know my body. I know my

39:02

body. I could stay in ketosis.

39:05

But if you have that oversatiated

39:08

feeling, so we have we have neurons, we

39:10

have neuronal pathways to and from the

39:13

liver and to and from the gut. We call

39:14

that apherant and epherent signaling,

39:16

right? and the entic nervous system and

39:19

a big meal will basically tell your

39:21

brain that you had a big meal and

39:24

independent I talked about the amino

39:26

acids going into the bloodstream kind of

39:28

kicking you out of ketosis but there's

39:30

also like this when you have stretch

39:33

receptors and you have a big full meal

39:35

in your gut then that could actually

39:37

tell your brain to activate the

39:39

sympathetic nervous system and then that

39:41

by virtue of spilling out catakolamines

39:44

can basically like we're talking adrenal

39:46

epinephrine, things like that that can

39:48

further augment and enhance

39:51

glucanogenesis. So,

39:53

>> okay, let me just translate that for a

39:54

second. So, people wake up, cortisol's

39:57

developed this like bad reputation among

40:00

a lot of like online influencers, but

40:02

it's like you really need cortisol,

40:03

right? So, when you wake up in the

40:05

morning and you see a bit of a glucose

40:07

spike, like it's actually important to

40:08

get your ass up and moving. If you're in

40:10

ketosis, it's a different thing, right?

40:12

So, if I'm hearing you correctly, right,

40:14

outside of how people think about

40:17

digestion,

40:19

blood sugar, insulin, etc., that just

40:24

based on stretching your stomach, etc.,

40:28

right, with these mechano receptors

40:30

taking the inputs that that signals to

40:32

the brain, it's go time. So, let's

40:36

basically get things moving with with

40:38

these hormones. And that could in and of

40:42

itself then trigger the liver to produce

40:48

more glucose or liberate more glycogen.

40:52

I guess

40:52

>> it can if it's above and beyond what you

40:55

normally eat.

40:56

>> Yeah. Yeah,

40:56

>> if you train your body to that size

40:58

meal, but it also activates other gut

41:01

hormones like choleiccytoinine that's

41:03

called CCK and other things that can

41:06

then activate the parasympathetic

41:08

nervous system that comes in a little

41:09

bit after. At the same time, it sort of

41:12

kind of bifurcates, but then the

41:15

parasympathetic nervous system is sort

41:17

of relax, digest, rest and relax,

41:20

digest. So that kind of comes in after.

41:22

So you might see a blip and sort of

41:25

might feel kind of stimulated. Also all

41:27

the salt if it's a salty meal, it's

41:29

going to expand your plasma volume. Your

41:32

blood volume will increase and that can

41:33

increase your blood pressure a little

41:35

bit and that can activate your

41:36

sympathetic nervous system. So it's

41:38

always good to go take a walk after a

41:41

big meal.

41:42

>> Yeah, I do that. Not like a strenuous,

41:44

not like go squat and deadlift, but just

41:47

yeah, even a 10, 15, ideally like a 20

41:49

minute brisk walk is really good after a

41:52

big meal.

41:52

>> Let me ask you this on the walk timing.

41:56

So when I have a big meal and I will say

41:58

I think I have trained my body to have

42:00

big meals and what the exact response

42:02

is. I can only give you subjectively

42:06

what I feel and I can give you what the

42:08

monitors show. But I typically feel

42:10

pretty good. However, if I have a big

42:12

meal, whether this is in ketosis or

42:14

otherwise, I don't see the biggest spike

42:16

until something like depends on the

42:19

meal, right? But 60 to 90 minutes later,

42:22

that's when I see the spike. So, should

42:24

I do the walk at 60 to 90 minutes or

42:28

should I do the walk right after the

42:30

meal? When should I actually time the

42:31

walk?

42:32

>> So, you eat a meal, you go walk, and

42:34

then you see the rise 60 to 90 minutes

42:36

after, or is that independent of the

42:38

walk?

42:38

>> Independent of the walk.

42:39

>> Okay. So, you're not walking, but you

42:41

see the rise 60 to 90 minutes later. So,

42:43

I'm I'm saying that you might not see

42:45

that rise 60 or 90 minutes later

42:47

>> if you did it right after the meal.

42:49

>> Yeah. Just because a little bit goes a

42:52

long way. So, just like walking actually

42:54

doing like some stretching and walking

42:55

too, it activates the glucose 4, the

42:59

glut 4 transporters.

43:01

>> Yep.

43:01

>> That's insulin independent. So, less

43:03

insulin is dumped, greater glucose

43:05

uptake. And you're also using sort of

43:08

the sympathetic nervous system

43:10

mobilization of glucose through

43:11

glucanogenesis during that walk. So it

43:14

then attenuates the buffering of

43:16

ketogenesis. A very short walk can go a

43:19

long way.

43:20

>> Okay, cool. Yeah, the is it glut? How do

43:22

you pronounce that? I don't know. How do

43:24

people say that?

43:24

>> I say glute. I say glute for.

43:26

>> All right. Glute for

43:27

>> people say glut.

43:28

>> Yeah. For the OGs in the audience, go

43:30

back and look for glute for in the for

43:34

our body. It's in there. So the other

43:36

measurement question I want to ask you

43:38

about which is you know these continuous

43:42

glucose and ketone monitors are not

43:44

designed for someone like me, right?

43:46

They're developed presumably I don't

43:48

know about the keto monitor but in the

43:50

case of glucose to help people with

43:53

serious conditions not end up in very

43:55

serious situations. So when I am looking

43:58

at my ketone levels right like right now

44:01

I feel very sharp. I had some keto

44:04

start. You know this well. Exogenous

44:07

ketone saltbased

44:10

product not too long ago just in hot

44:13

water with a little bit of MCT oil. This

44:16

was I guess an hour hour and a half ago.

44:18

But I'm at 0.4 millmers. And I guess

44:21

what I'm saying is whether I have a huge

44:23

meal or I'm fasting as I am right now my

44:26

range is basically 0.1 to 0.4 4 95% of

44:32

the time. There are a few outlier cases.

44:36

If I'm just doing like a yolo, you know,

44:38

as many grams as possible

44:41

exogenous ketone party, then maybe I

44:43

could goose it. But we can talk about

44:45

this. Like once it gets past a certain

44:47

point, then I might spike insulin and

44:49

have a subsequent crash. But I guess

44:51

what I'm trying to say in brief is my

44:52

range for the most part is 0.1 to 0.4

44:56

for regardless of whether I'm fasting or

44:58

eating a gigantic double cheeseburger.

45:00

So, I'm not really sure how to determine

45:04

what effect it's having. I can watch the

45:06

glucose, but you know, right now I'm 0.4

45:09

millmers of concentration on the side

45:11

bio. And as we've talked about, maybe

45:14

maybe the precision extra would give me

45:16

an extra.1 or two, but they've been

45:19

pretty close so far. And then ever since

45:22

my cheat meal, we had this experiment,

45:26

right? I wanted to see if I did a

45:27

workout and then had one or two cheat

45:30

meals last Saturday. It is now Thursday,

45:33

but my glucose right now is is 103,

45:37

right? Which is which is higher than the

45:39

week prior.

45:40

>> Mhm.

45:40

>> But it goes [clears throat] around. It

45:41

moves around. Last night it was probably

45:43

70 something. Do you have any

45:45

suggestions for how to read the tea

45:46

leaves or is it mostly just subjective

45:49

feel? I mean, still thinking about the

45:52

size of the meal. I guess what I'm

45:53

saying is if my device is telling me as

45:57

it is right now, right? 0.4 fat not

46:00

burning. You're almost not burning fat

46:02

at the moment. Not in ketone. Like, it's

46:04

very chastising. So, if I'm to believe

46:06

this by the letter of the law on the

46:09

screen, I'm failing at ketosis. Any

46:12

thoughts on how to kind of read the tea

46:13

leaves here?

46:14

>> I would kind of ignore that. I think

46:17

that's sort of an app in the process of

46:20

being sort of developed the fat simul.

46:24

Yeah. So you would need like whole body

46:26

metabolomics to really answer that

46:28

question if you're in fat burning or do

46:30

metabolic cart and look at respiratory

46:31

quotient or whatever. But

46:33

>> subjectively if you feel good we have

46:35

seen like in athletes especially more

46:37

advanced athletes that and we do a very

46:40

strict keto macros and everything that

46:41

basically with a bunch of athletes 0.8 8

46:45

is about as high as we get and that's

46:47

the average across sometimes you get

46:49

guys like 2.5 2.6 six like every day and

46:52

the same guy with the same you know

46:53

essentially metabolic phenotype will be

46:56

running 4.3 he could potentially just

46:59

have greater ketone

47:01

>> utilization

47:02

>> utilization so I think it would be

47:05

important to measure your blood so a

47:08

continuous ketone monitor measures

47:09

interstitial

47:11

>> ketones that can be different the bio I

47:15

think it's a great device it's very

47:16

versatile I can kind of you know jump in

47:19

and out of salt water the thing stays is

47:20

on me. It's I almost like more reliable

47:22

than a CGM. But I did notice and I

47:25

probably used about 50 of these devices

47:27

that the first week is pretty accurate

47:30

and then it tapers off the sensitivity.

47:33

And this is a known limitation of the

47:35

technology is that essentially the the

47:38

enzymebased sensor system tends to just

47:41

de and you could get around that

47:43

conceivably just by having the ability

47:46

in the app to calibrate it. Mhm.

47:48

>> So, if you were to measure it and the

47:50

continuous ketone monitor is measuring

47:52

1.0, but your blood ketones is 2.0, that

47:56

you should be able to calibrate it like

47:58

you can with a Dexcom.

48:00

>> So, they acknowledged that at the

48:02

company and they said, "Yes, we realize

48:04

that would fix the problem, but that's

48:06

not a feature of the app yet."

48:08

>> They do have in events they have blood

48:10

ketone on the bottom right. I don't know

48:13

if it actually calibrates it. It may

48:15

just record the blood ketone at this

48:17

point. It does not have the ability to

48:19

calibrate it to my knowledge.

48:22

>> I inputed one measurement on the the

48:24

Keto Mojo and it didn't seem to change

48:25

it, right? The number stayed the same.

48:27

No.

48:27

>> So, I think it's just logging it

48:29

>> because you can do that with a

48:31

glucometer.

48:32

>> Well, you can do it with Dexcom.

48:33

>> Dexcom,

48:34

>> but not Abbott.

48:34

>> Yeah. Okay.

48:35

>> So, that's a problem with the Abbott

48:37

Freestyle, too. And that's a feedback I

48:38

gave them because I put these devices

48:40

on, it's reading me like 130. Yeah.

48:42

>> But I measure I'm like 80. It's

48:45

literally like 50 because

48:46

>> Wow. If you are lean and it's stuck in

48:49

your muscle instead of your atapost

48:51

tissue,

48:52

>> oh, [groaning]

48:54

>> the glucose levels are going to be

48:55

higher, especially like when you work

48:56

out and stuff.

48:57

>> So, I've noticed this and that's why the

49:00

Dexcom is very nice because I can

49:02

calibrate it too. Yeah.

49:04

>> And I consistently show that and that

49:06

was a major issue I had. Let me hop in

49:08

also and just tell folks this is not

49:10

going to be very quantifiable, but for

49:13

what it's worth, part of my reason I

49:15

avoided intermittent fasting for so long

49:17

is that I thought I would not be able to

49:19

get sufficient protein or caloric intake

49:22

and that I would lose a bunch of muscle

49:23

mass. I was dead wrong about that. I was

49:26

very very wrong. If anything, it seems

49:28

to have enhanced my ability to put on

49:32

muscle kind of per calorie or per gram

49:34

of protein ingested. And so, I admit I

49:38

was totally wrong about that.

49:39

Furthermore, on this ketogenic diet

49:42

where I've historically found it pretty

49:44

hard to put on muscle or I shouldn't say

49:48

keep muscle because I'm only doing it

49:49

for a few weeks, but I have been

49:51

astonished by having one small meal.

49:56

Like I'll have some oxtail soup after

49:58

this with some veggies and and obviously

50:00

oxtail.

50:01

It's a whole separate story. And

50:03

[laughter] then I'll go out and have

50:04

another meal probably in like 3 or 4

50:06

hours which will be a much bigger meal.

50:09

And just with that, and I am watching

50:11

some of the grams of protein intake and

50:14

so on, but I have not looking in the

50:17

mirror and looking at the weights that

50:19

I'm putting up in the gym, I don't feel

50:22

like I have lost any muscle and I feel

50:24

like I have leaned out. Some of that's

50:27

losing fluid, but I've been really

50:30

impressed with how little relative to

50:33

what I used to do in college, like

50:34

taking weight gainers and just all this

50:36

garbage. like how little it actually

50:38

takes to at least maintain muscle mass.

50:41

But I do have a question for you which

50:43

I've never really been able to answer to

50:45

my satisfaction and it kind of relates

50:47

to rabbit starvation.

50:51

For people who don't know what that is,

50:52

you could probably give a better

50:53

description. But if you've ever watched

50:55

the show Alone, Alone is probably the

50:57

only reality TV show that I love to

50:59

watch. Seasons six and seven in

51:01

particular are outstanding for folks.

51:03

But what you will notice is that if

51:05

people are trying to survive in the

51:06

wilderness to outlast everyone else,

51:08

that's what the show is. You get to pick

51:10

a handful of items, you get dropped off,

51:12

you don't get to choose where you're

51:13

dropped, and then you just need to

51:15

survive for as long as possible.

51:16

Sometimes it's 100 days, sometimes it's

51:18

last man or woman standing. If somebody

51:21

is only eating lean protein like

51:24

rabbits, they will waste away. They will

51:28

not last. They will have to get yanked

51:29

out for medical reasons. And that might

51:32

seem strange to people. My question

51:34

though is on a ketogenic diet

51:36

specifically, can you just consume

51:39

leaner protein and then rely on body fat

51:41

for the fat? And some people are like,

51:43

"Yeah, everybody knows that doesn't

51:45

work." But I really want to understand

51:46

why that's the case, right? Because I

51:48

understand dietary fat sort of dampens

51:51

insulin response, or at least that's my

51:53

understanding. Maybe there's a rate

51:55

limiting step in how much body fat you

51:59

can break down and use, right? And who

52:01

knows if [clears throat] that's mediated

52:02

by the kidneys or who the hell liver, I

52:04

don't know, right? I guess it would

52:06

probably be liver. But I'd love to hear

52:09

your take on it, right? Because

52:11

certainly in the past, I and lots of

52:14

people reading the 4-hour body have been

52:15

able to lose more body fat than they are

52:17

told they are capable of losing as

52:19

measured through DEXA scans and other

52:21

things. Can you do a like moderate fat

52:24

or low-fat proteinbased

52:27

keto diet if your goal in part is to

52:31

lose body fat or does that backfire?

52:33

>> Yeah, just not indefinitely. So, when I

52:35

was did the ketogenic diet for a year, I

52:38

was cruising about 300 to 320 gram of

52:41

fat, sometimes 350 grams of fat per day.

52:44

And then just experimenting, I would

52:47

throw in two days per week of protein

52:50

veggies

52:51

>> with about 50 to 100 grams of fat. And

52:53

in those days of dropping to 300 plus

52:56

grams of fat to 50 to 100 grams of fat

52:59

after two days like I swore like I lost

53:02

like a 2% body fat like in that and I

53:04

would just transition back. So I would

53:06

just periodically throw in protein

53:09

veggie days. I would cruise on keto and

53:12

then periodically titrate in the protein

53:14

veggie days to assist body composition

53:17

alterations. And if I kept that going, I

53:20

could get pretty dramatic like almost

53:22

scary lean to where it happened very

53:25

fast. It's almost keto trains your fat

53:27

metabolism. And then if you just start

53:30

titrating in, it's just pulling fat out.

53:33

And I think my body really liked

53:35

throwing in the veggies with the fiber

53:36

seemed to help with gut health. And I

53:38

would do that twice a week and it's

53:41

pretty dramatic.

53:41

>> Why not do it seven days a week? What

53:43

happens when you try to do it for more?

53:45

>> If the idea is to stay in ketosis, it

53:48

was really hard for me to stay in

53:50

ketosis if I do protein veggies. Like

53:52

after 2 days, I would kind of be out,

53:54

but my metabolism would be cranking.

53:56

>> Mechanistically, why is that the case?

53:58

Why doesn't your body just break down

53:59

more body fat?

54:00

>> Well, it's taking body fat exogenously

54:04

and endogenously. And I think the more

54:06

fat going to the liver, you know, and

54:09

the more fat that's in circulation gets

54:11

sort of shuttled to the liver and then

54:13

that's sort of stimulating

54:17

beta oxidation in the liver. You just

54:19

have a greater fat pool. But actually, I

54:21

think the day that I would do protein

54:24

veggie days and then the day I would

54:25

jump back into ketosis, I would see this

54:27

big ramp up in ketones like that day.

54:30

Whereas, if I did like a cheat day and

54:33

just ate a lot of carbohydrates, it took

54:35

me like two or three days to get back

54:37

into ketosis. But if I just did like

54:39

protein and veggies

54:40

>> and cruise back into ketosis, then I

54:43

would rapidly get back into ketosis and

54:45

just gave my body a break from from the

54:47

fat. But I think just that short amount

54:49

of time really stimulates mobilization

54:52

of fat from your body because your body

54:54

is used to getting it exogenously and

54:56

then you're pulling more fat off. But

54:58

yeah, I think on the protein veggie

55:00

days, I'm getting higher amounts of

55:02

calories from protein. So that has a bit

55:04

of an anti- ketogenic effect. Yeah. And

55:07

then shifting back into ketosis on that

55:09

third day, I always had probably the

55:11

best, you know, ketone numbers for the

55:13

week. I don't want to beat this dead

55:15

horse too long, but I'd love to just

55:18

hear you riff on this a little bit more

55:20

because I guess in my mind I'm thinking,

55:22

well, on your protein veggie only days,

55:26

if you're getting not enough protein to

55:29

satisfy all of your resting metabolic

55:32

rate, right? Like you're hypoc caloric,

55:34

but you're getting enough protein to not

55:36

lose muscle. Why wouldn't the body just

55:40

break down the fat that it needs to

55:42

continue producing ketones? Right? So,

55:46

I'm trying to avoid the gluconneogenesis

55:47

problem where you're having like 200 g

55:50

at a meal with no fat to offset it. But

55:52

if you're having smaller amounts that

55:54

are slowly digested, but it's just

55:57

enough to keep you from losing muscle

55:58

mass, maybe you're doing some weight

56:01

training to help with that, you know, or

56:02

whatever, then I guess what I'm trying

56:05

to figure out is why the dietary fat is

56:08

so important because I think of the

56:10

body, right? It's like each pound of

56:11

stored body fat is what?

56:13

>> 3600 calories,

56:14

>> right? So 3,600 calories,

56:16

that's a decent amount of calories,

56:19

right? And for for somebody who's let's

56:21

just say you're 150 lb 10% body fat.

56:24

Okay, you got 15 time 3600 you got

56:26

plenty of body fat to go around. So it

56:29

would seem to be enough to do a few

56:31

weeks of ketosis

56:33

that is low fat, higher protein, but not

56:36

enough protein to necessarily be

56:39

hammering your liver with

56:41

gluconneogenesis if you're dividing it

56:42

up slowly digested protein. Some people

56:45

are going to be really annoyed with me

56:46

dragging this out so long, but why is

56:48

dietary fat so important?

56:50

>> Because I mean that's the fuel that that

56:52

you are using. You coax your body into

56:54

using. And I should probably add a

56:56

little bit of context to my protein

56:58

veggie days. So I would go from like 125

57:00

grams of protein to like 300 grams of

57:04

protein.

57:04

>> Right. Right.

57:05

>> That's a pretty big bolus of protein.

57:07

>> That's a lot. Yeah. And if one was to go

57:10

100 grams of protein or whatever and

57:13

then bump it up to like 170 or 200 or

57:15

something, they may not, you know, kick

57:18

out of ketosis, but I remember just

57:19

lower ketones, but not out of I was

57:21

still in ketosis. Yeah.

57:23

>> But typically how I think I did it my

57:25

protein veggie days were following like

57:26

a heavy deadlift or squat workout. So

57:28

the thinking was that I'm recovering for

57:31

those two days and the extra amino acids

57:33

and proteins and mTor activation is sort

57:35

of assisting in recovery and

57:38

regeneration and skeletal muscle protein

57:41

synthesis and then I would kind of go

57:43

back I calculated it in that way. So

57:46

yeah I like doubled the protein on the

57:47

protein veggie days but my calories were

57:49

about the same or maybe a little bit

57:51

lower. Yeah, I need Sibio, if you're

57:54

listening, please allow me to calibrate

57:56

this with a finger prick because I need

57:58

a little more range. [laughter]

58:00

I need a little more range than 01 to 04

58:04

for me to be able to read this type of

58:06

thing effectively, right? Because

58:08

technically, if I'm reading this as it

58:10

is, like I'm never in ketosis. I

58:11

shouldn't say never. That's not true.

58:13

But in any case, it would be nice to be

58:15

able to calibrate. Let's come back to

58:17

something I promised that I would ask

58:19

about which is neurodeenerative disease,

58:23

Alzheimer's, etc. Could the ketogenic

58:27

diet benefit people with these

58:29

conditions? And just as important,

58:33

certainly for me personally, is it

58:35

plausible there's a mechanism by which

58:38

the ketogenic diet regularly done could

58:41

help delay the onset of any of these

58:46

diseases or am I just polyiana hoping

58:49

for a pie in the sky? I think that's a

58:52

question we don't have an unambiguous

58:54

answer to, but I think all the science

58:57

points into the direction that if you

59:01

improve upon and optimize your

59:03

cardabolic I like to say cardioimuno

59:06

metabolic biomarkers instead of cardio

59:08

metabolic biomarkers because if you can

59:11

lower for example your insulin and keep

59:14

that between 2 to six and if you lower

59:16

your HSCP

59:18

below 0.6 6 and then optimize your

59:22

hemoglobin A1C, your glucose. And I

59:24

think also, and I've talked about this

59:27

with Rhonda Patrick and other people,

59:28

too, that if you measure your omega-3

59:30

fatty acids and look at your omega 3 to6

59:33

ratio, I think that's going to be a

59:36

biioarker that's probably going to end

59:38

up in standard blood work because it's

59:40

so compelling, the data behind it.

59:42

>> And you also measure your B12, too. I

59:45

think that's important. people coming

59:47

into the Alzheimer's center that can

59:49

present as flatout Alzheimer's disease

59:52

and then you correct their B12, a B12

59:54

deficiency will cause brain atrophy. So,

59:57

and that could be reversed with B12. So,

59:59

the things that if you're following

60:03

ketone metabolic therapy, it's impacting

60:07

the things that we know are driving age

60:10

related chronic diseases and then you

60:12

know obviously one of them is

60:13

Alzheimer's. So the level of

60:14

inflammation HSCRP now is probably more

60:17

aogenic than LDL. Like there's probably

60:20

people selling statins that don't want

60:22

to hear that, but we know that the data

60:23

is emerging on that now. So lower

60:25

insulin, lower inflammation,

60:27

>> and that's an inflammatory marker,

60:28

right? The C reactive protein. What does

60:30

the HS stand for? Or what is that?

60:32

>> High sensitivity. C reactive protein.

60:34

>> High sensitivity.

60:35

>> So it measures in that lower range.

60:39

And I used to trend to like two to two

60:42

to three. Like my early CRP, HSCRP, when

60:45

I was like on a high carb, I only had it

60:47

measured twice when I was on a high carb

60:50

diet. But, you know, since I've been

60:52

keto, it's either non-detectable or like

60:54

0.2 or when I did extreme environment

60:58

research on myself, you know, then I

61:00

could bump it up a little bit. And when

61:01

I had

61:03

>> a bacterial or viral gastroenterteritis,

61:05

it shot through the roof. So because it

61:07

activated your immune system but

61:08

generally that HSCP

61:10

>> is a big driver. I used to laugh at it

61:12

and be like ah it's this nonsensitive

61:14

thing but now like all the data is

61:16

pointing to the direction that we need

61:18

to add that to that and your omega-3

61:21

status your B12 make sure you don't have

61:23

any deficiencies because that could lead

61:25

to sort of rapid progression

61:28

>> to Alzheimer's disease your magnesium

61:30

levels

61:31

>> but also just in general like exercise.

61:34

>> Yeah. the biggest metabolic lever and

61:36

your body weight, body composition. Get

61:39

Dexa scans. I know it might be good for

61:41

you to do a DEXA scan with your keto

61:43

experiments, too. So,

61:45

>> yep.

61:45

>> I was doing once a year, but now I end

61:47

up doing like three or four times a year

61:48

because I do these many experiments to

61:51

see how acutely some of the things are

61:53

impacting my body composition

61:55

>> because I I just get antsy for like an

61:57

answer to that. Mhm.

61:58

>> It's a long-winded explanation to just

62:00

basically say that your your metabolic

62:03

health is tightly linked to your brain

62:05

health and can dramatically delay the

62:09

onset of Alzheimer's disease. Not that

62:11

you're going to get it or reverse it

62:12

altogether before something else gets

62:14

you in the end.

62:15

>> The metabolic health piece, just to

62:17

underscore that, I mean, one of my

62:19

relatives in question, ApoE3, I

62:22

understand that's not the only risk

62:23

factor, but there something just seemed

62:25

to be missing, right? Because the

62:26

decline was so precipitous, it didn't

62:28

map to any

62:31

patient data or clinical data that a

62:33

number of doctors who are also

62:35

researchers I was working with had seen.

62:37

Also, because this person, this relative

62:39

had been assessed four or five years

62:40

prior and did not show any indication of

62:44

predisposition to a rapid decline. I'm a

62:46

boy E34. again recognizing there are

62:48

other factors at play but when she just

62:52

kind of disintegrated a few things there

62:55

are a few things that came to light

62:56

number one is her local GP had basically

63:01

missed severe metabolic dysfunction for

63:03

years and I can't remember the reference

63:06

range but like insulin let's let's call

63:08

it upper bound of 12 I'm making this up

63:10

but you'll get the idea and she was like

63:12

43 right it was just absolutely

63:14

atrocious

63:15

>> and her body weight and just general

63:17

like composition.

63:19

>> Poor body composition. Yeah. Poor body

63:21

composition. Very little exercise

63:23

despite my best efforts. Misbehaves

63:26

horribly dietarily. Not morbidly obese,

63:29

but certainly

63:30

>> smoking, alcohol, other drugs.

63:32

>> No smoking or alcohol.

63:33

>> Okay.

63:34

>> But here's the other piece. So she had

63:36

been diagnosed stage one breast cancer

63:38

had a lumpctomy was removed late7s was

63:42

put on an estrogen I think it's an

63:44

estrogen blocker called let

63:48

looked at this and I spoke to a friend

63:50

of mine who was a radoncologist and she

63:52

said it is very poorly tolerated by most

63:55

women from a cognitive perspective like

63:57

they get smashed by and large

64:01

>> guys too by the way guys. Yeah, guys,

64:04

too.

64:04

>> Guys that take aromaticase inhibitors,

64:06

you know, for like TRT and things like

64:08

that. It's it's not a good thing to do.

64:10

>> So, I was looking at it and I mean it's

64:12

upsetting that I'm the one who has to

64:14

kind of find these things. But it's

64:15

like, okay, well, we think about the

64:16

oncologist role. It's to prevent my mom

64:18

from dying of cancer. That's the

64:19

directive, right? But if she were 30 and

64:23

had later stage cancer that was really

64:25

aggressive, it's one thing. But she's

64:27

late 70s, stage one, all cancer removed.

64:33

and so got her off of the letol with the

64:36

cooperation and after discussions with

64:38

doctors and almost saw an immediate

64:41

turnaround within a handful of weeks

64:44

after the wash out period and everything

64:46

but it seems to I mean look I'm not an

64:48

MD I don't play one on the internet but

64:50

it seems to have done some real damage I

64:54

mean there's the metabolic piece that is

64:56

very non-trivial but the the

65:00

acceleration of decline was just so

65:03

absurd over the course of a handful of

65:06

months. Terrifying to see. But I guess

65:08

I'm laying this all in not necessarily

65:10

to explore this particular case because

65:13

I've got a lot of people on it for all

65:15

of my relatives, but it's just to say

65:17

that I am not going quietly into the

65:21

night with something like Alzheimer's,

65:23

right? And so what I'm trying to figure

65:24

out for myself, I'd be curious to hear

65:26

your perspective. I will be honest, I

65:28

find keto pretty goddamn boring. like I

65:30

don't find it to be the most diverse

65:33

diet in the world. I don't really want

65:35

to do it all year round. I also have

65:37

some maybe compromising

65:40

cardiac elements. Uh I'm a cholesterol

65:43

hyperabsor so I do I use again guys talk

65:47

to your doc. Don't just copy me but it's

65:48

like I'm using rapatha taking a zetto. I

65:51

have been also taking nexet but that

65:52

might end up being redundant the bidolic

65:54

acid with the rapatha. That is a a long

65:56

way of saying like I got to keep an eye

65:58

on the heart stuff because

66:00

neurodeenerative disease and

66:01

cardiovascular disease is what's kills

66:04

everybody in my family. So, for a lot of

66:05

reasons, I don't want to do keto all

66:07

year, but I'm trying to figure out like

66:08

what is the sort of minimal effective

66:11

dose

66:13

that [clears throat]

66:14

and I know we're going to have to

66:15

probably take a couple of speculative

66:17

leaps here, but just as a working

66:20

hypothesis, right? What does a minimum

66:23

effective dose of following a strict

66:25

ketogenic diet look like for me?

66:28

assuming the rest of the time I'm still

66:30

doing intermittent fasting. I'm not

66:31

eating a lot of refined carbohydrates.

66:34

But how might you suggest that I think

66:36

about that? Because I don't know what

66:37

the durability of kind of keto memory

66:39

like metabolic memory is. So, I'm trying

66:42

to figure out like can I get away with

66:44

two three to four week periods a year

66:47

where there's some carryover of like

66:50

cancer protective

66:52

you know our last conversation we kind

66:54

of talked about thinking about ketones

66:55

as hormones but in terms of

66:57

neuroprotective anti-inflammatory yada

67:00

yada yada what are your thoughts

67:02

>> well I think in your context it's hard

67:04

to say like you know to give absolutes

67:06

but I would say you can get 80% of the

67:10

benefits

67:11

with a low carb diet. Low carb meaning,

67:14

you know, 100 grams a day, just fibrous,

67:16

non- starch, non- sugar carbs, low carb,

67:20

Mediterranean, if you want to call it

67:21

that. And then periodically, maybe one

67:25

one week out of a month, get into a

67:27

deeper state of ketosis and higher is

67:30

not better. We know that from the

67:31

research. When ketones get into that

67:33

two, three, four, five millmer range,

67:36

that creates energy toxicity and

67:39

something we call reductive stress. And

67:41

that that is not good. I did not know

67:43

this before getting into this kind of

67:44

research. But the sweet spot seems to be

67:46

between one and two for therapeutic

67:48

ketosis. Unless you're metabolically

67:50

managing a disorder that's highly

67:54

responsive to a ketogenic diet, like you

67:57

know, neuromabolic diseases and and some

68:00

of the things that we actually study

68:01

need to be in the two to three millolar

68:04

and and oxygen toxicity needs to be like

68:06

four to five because it's a very

68:07

powerful seizures. [snorts] But one to

68:09

two seems to be the sweet spots for

68:12

metabolic management of many different

68:14

things. and also just general metabolic

68:16

health. And I think what you'd be doing

68:18

just doing low carb and periodic ketosis

68:21

is just enhancing your metabolic

68:22

flexibility and maybe increasing the

68:25

diversity of food that you're eating to

68:27

prevent micronutrient deficiencies too.

68:30

I am of the opinion that plants are good

68:33

for you to eat. broccoli, asparagus,

68:37

salads, you know, colorful vegetables,

68:39

things like that that kind of fit into a

68:43

pattern of eating that we've known. Even

68:44

things like lentils are probably good.

68:46

Lentils actually have like zero CGM

68:48

response to me.

68:50

>> Really?

68:50

>> Yeah. Lentils seems to like skyrocket

68:53

other people that I know. I'm like

68:55

completely flat.

68:56

>> I'm like somewhere in between. Yeah, I'm

68:57

somewhere in between.

68:58

>> Like completely flat. I don't know.

69:00

Maybe it's the time of day that I have

69:01

them at dinner. Then I always go take a

69:02

walk, but it's like no bump at all

69:05

>> in my CGM. And I think that's where CGM

69:08

comes into play. And we can do a

69:09

personal precision

69:12

engineered diet, if you will. And it

69:14

gives us insight into the types of foods

69:16

and the amount of foods that we can eat.

69:17

And I think that's going to be really

69:19

important information. And I know

69:21

there's a lot of people harping on

69:23

because another study came out on CGMs

69:25

provide no benefit at all to the

69:27

non-diabetic. Yeah. And I've had this

69:29

conversation with people actually at a

69:31

big event and people that were type two

69:33

diabetics and I asked them just flat

69:35

out. I just went around the around the

69:37

table and just saying if you're type two

69:39

diabetic when you were diagnosed what

69:41

like three years ago if you were to be

69:43

giving a CGM

69:46

five years before that or even one year

69:48

before that do you think you would have

69:49

been diagnosed with type two diabetes?

69:51

And they said no.

69:52

>> They said once they got type two

69:53

diabetes and got a CGM it gave them the

69:55

awareness. I mean, you can ask anyone

69:57

who has flat out overt type two diabetes

70:00

and just ask them the question, hey, if

70:01

you were given a CGM a year or two in

70:04

advance and you understood the impact of

70:07

foods. So, so I think a CGM is going to

70:10

be important for delaying Alzheimer's

70:12

disease. And if you have loved ones,

70:13

Tim, and your family, that I think you

70:15

would encourage them to slap on a CGM

70:18

and get some insight into what they're

70:20

eating. But it's also forcing them to

70:23

exercise because, you know, we're

70:24

talking about diet here. Yeah,

70:26

>> but just getting out and doing a brisk

70:28

walk 20, 30 minutes a day can go a long

70:31

way. Resistance exercise, I'm a little

70:33

biased towards that, but muscle is like

70:35

an endocrine organ that produces, you

70:38

know, hormones and various molecules

70:41

that are neuroprotective and muscle is

70:44

tightly linked to brain size

70:46

>> and of course your your waist and your

70:49

visceral fat. I would also encourage

70:50

them to get a DEXA scan and gify it and

70:53

say every year I'm going to get a DEXA

70:54

scan and every year like I do I just

70:57

kind of like it create like a lot of

70:58

stress for myself to like beat my DEXA

71:00

scan every year and get their friends

71:02

involved. Make it like a social event.

71:04

Everybody goes and gets their DEXA and

71:06

then every year you go back and just try

71:08

to beat

71:09

>> beat your scores.

71:10

>> Yeah, these are lowhanging fruit kind of

71:12

things people should be doing.

71:13

>> Yeah, I think probably fair to say make

71:15

sure you consistently hydrate for any of

71:17

these things.

71:17

>> Yep. like a DEXA scan. I do I do have a

71:20

follow-up question. So, also in the

71:22

exercise piece, people can look up

71:24

something called Clotho, K L O T H O.

71:26

There's a lot more that comes of

71:28

exercise like BDNF and all these various

71:30

things. There's a book called Spark that

71:31

covers some of it, but it's very

71:32

outdated. But check out cloth. There are

71:35

a lot of good reasons to exercise.

71:38

Thinking of muscle like an endocrin

71:40

organ. That's a really good way to put

71:41

it. My question to you was you mentioned

71:45

say one week per month going to more of

71:48

a lower carb or katotic state. How would

71:51

you think about the benefits of one week

71:54

per month assuming that the rest of the

71:56

time I'm behaving right most of the time

71:58

with a like lower carbohydrate

72:02

Mediterranean diet. Let's just say,

72:04

okay, one week per month,

72:07

every 3 months, or 3 weeks,

72:11

contiguous weeks,

72:14

once a quarter. Do you feel like one of

72:16

those is superior to the other?

72:18

>> Not really. I think whatever pattern

72:21

works best, I think you would gain

72:23

benefits for both. That would be an

72:25

interesting experiment to do. I'm just

72:26

thinking about the lead time to get into

72:28

a like a properly ketogenic state if I'm

72:31

going from some carbohydrate to ketosis.

72:35

We could talk about things that might

72:36

accelerate it, but like if it takes me 2

72:38

days to get there or 3 days and then I

72:40

only have kind of 4 days in the sweet

72:41

spot.

72:42

>> Mhm.

72:42

>> These are things running through my

72:43

mind. I'm just curious to get your take.

72:46

>> The one week intervention for the month,

72:48

my kind of opinion is that it could be

72:50

pretty aggressive. like you cut calories

72:52

50% the first two days and then cruise

72:55

into it so you're really cranking

72:56

ketones by the end of the week

72:58

>> and then you're also cruising into it

73:00

from what should be like a low carb

73:02

diet. So you should have that metabolic

73:04

flexibility to kind of seamlessly

73:06

transition into that ketosis state and

73:11

>> you could do intermittent fasting with

73:13

mild caloric restriction for the first

73:15

two days to to ramp up ketones.

73:17

Alternatively, if your schedule permits

73:19

and like you know your work and you have

73:21

like three weeks where you need to

73:23

really dig deep into a research project

73:26

or something and ketosis seems to give

73:28

you that cognitive flow or boost, then

73:31

that might situationally fit into your

73:34

schedule. And I definitely have periods

73:37

of time where I do that, especially like

73:39

if my wife is traveling or something

73:41

like that or on a research project or

73:42

something. I just like, okay, I clean

73:44

the house of certain foods and then I

73:47

just prepare. I mean, simple things like

73:49

that, too. I know just from the clinical

73:51

ketogenic world is that if you have a

73:53

family member that stocks the shelves

73:56

with certain foods that can trigger and

73:59

cause food noise, then that can really,

74:01

you know, hamper your compliance to

74:04

that. But you want to prepare the house

74:08

before if you're going into a oneweek or

74:10

you're going to a 3-week, prepare the

74:12

house and just make sure that you could

74:14

do, of course, you could just call Uber

74:16

Eats and get anything delivered, but you

74:17

want to kind of have the house prepared

74:20

for that and mentally prepare for it. So

74:22

for you personally, if you had some

74:26

hereditary gnarliness, right, if you

74:29

looked back at your family tree and

74:30

you're like, "Oo, whether it's a bunch

74:32

of cancer or a bunch of neuro

74:34

degenerative stuff, maybe bit of both,

74:36

who knows?" Would you be more inclined

74:38

to do the one week per month just for

74:40

you personally? Or

74:41

>> I would

74:42

>> Yeah, one week per month.

74:43

>> Yeah. And I would shoot to get a glucose

74:46

ketone index of like one to two

74:50

for at least three days out of that

74:54

week. So really do a fairly aggressive

74:57

ketone metabolic therapy intervention.

75:00

Kind of even think about it as like a

75:02

prescription intervention just like

75:04

Walter Longo's diet is a prescription

75:07

medical therapy. Right? So I would shoot

75:10

to achieve a glucose ketone index of one

75:13

to two for three days. and everything

75:16

that we've seen in the lab that I've

75:18

seen sort of on paper. Of course, people

75:20

aren't out there measuring the

75:21

autotheazome like P62 and other things,

75:24

but that you are achieving a level of

75:26

autophagy, and that's also stimulating

75:30

many of the benefits of ketosis, not

75:32

just ketones as an energy source, but

75:33

you're getting many of the robust

75:35

signaling effects and really adapting

75:38

your metabolism to fat and ketone sort

75:42

of oxidation that has long-term benefits

75:45

that can go at least 3 weeks. So I'm

75:49

convinced of that. So you get benefits

75:50

for 3 weeks, reset one week, benefits

75:54

for 3 weeks, reset one week. So you're

75:56

always kind of getting whereas if you do

75:58

3 weeks and then take a period of time

76:00

off, I'm not totally convinced that

76:03

those benefits are going to span that

76:05

amount of time frame. That's

76:06

>> my thinking.

76:07

>> And you mentioned people can find

76:09

calculators out there and actually a lot

76:11

of the devices will try to provide this

76:14

to you. Well, actually, is that is that

76:17

true? I guess they would have to have

76:18

both data streams, so probably not. But

76:20

the GKI, the glucose ketone index, you

76:23

can find calculators for this, but fact

76:25

check this since this is AI overview

76:27

from Google. I wanted to just take a

76:28

look at it. Divide your blood glucose

76:30

level by your ketone level. If your

76:32

glucose is millig per deciliter, common

76:34

in the US, you first divide it by 18.

76:36

This is an important step to convert it

76:38

to millmers

76:40

per liter matching the ketone units.

76:42

Then perform the division. So you can

76:44

figure this out very easily. And that is

76:46

the GKI that you were mentioning of a 1

76:50

to2. What might that look like just

76:52

offhand? Not known for my quick mental

76:55

arithmetic [laughter]

76:57

on the podcast, but what would a GKI of

77:00

say one or two look like in terms of the

77:03

readout on the glucometer and the

77:05

readout on the finger prick for the

77:07

millimmers for ketones? What would be an

77:10

example? So if people are like don't

77:13

want to do the millolar concentration of

77:15

glucose if your glucose is 80 and then

77:18

your ketones are 2 millmer you are right

77:20

into that one to two the glucose ketone

77:23

index of one to two you're between that

77:25

level if you could bring your glucose

77:27

down to like 68 70 and get your ketones

77:30

up to three. So that would be a GKI of

77:34

one. So that's pretty hard to achieve,

77:36

but relatively definitely doable with

77:39

exogenous ketones and MCT and things

77:41

like that.

77:42

>> Yeah. I think what's totally feasible is

77:44

getting your glucose down to like 80 80

77:47

to 85 in that range and getting your

77:50

ketones, you know, at the end of the

77:53

oneweek fast up to two and maintaining

77:55

that. So that would be kind of achieving

77:57

that GKI of two. I think I'm probably

78:01

saying what I wish to be true,

78:03

[laughter]

78:04

which is that my insulin sensitivity has

78:07

improved a lot in the last certainly

78:10

year in particular. And that is to

78:13

explain in part the or maybe wholly the

78:17

lower readout on the ketone meters. But

78:19

part of the reason I have confidence in

78:21

that is that I'm using the same devices

78:23

that I used to use. And back in the day,

78:26

I would have much higher miller

78:28

readouts. Of course, I have new strips.

78:31

I did at least to the extent that I can

78:34

for the continuous monitors. I've done

78:37

calibration for the CGM, at least the

78:39

glucose monitor. But that presents a

78:40

problem. Even if that is good news, Tim

78:43

Ferrris, you're not failing at keto.

78:45

You've actually just made yourself a lot

78:46

healthier with intermittent fasting and

78:48

other things. it still presents a

78:50

problem for me to figure out if I am in

78:52

that GKI sweet spot. How would you

78:55

suggest I try to figure that out? Is

78:58

there a way to measure my ketone uptake

79:02

and therefore modify the equation such

79:06

that I factor that in somehow like

79:08

there's a multiplier of the readout on

79:10

the finger prick or something like that?

79:13

How would you handle that? Let me look

79:15

real quick because I got a lot of little

79:17

gadgets around.

79:19

>> Dom is looking into his Santa's workshop

79:21

of [laughter]

79:22

various metabolic devices.

79:24

>> I have a lot of different devices. So,

79:26

one is the Keto Mojo [clears throat]

79:29

device.

79:30

>> Yep, that's the one I have. Yeah, I've

79:31

got the Keto Mojo.

79:32

>> Okay. So, that I mean you could just

79:35

calibrate it such that it reads in

79:36

millolar concentration and glucose and

79:39

ketones and it actually gives you this

79:41

is the GKI version. It'll just spit out

79:43

the GKI.

79:44

>> Oh, you know what? I do have the GKI

79:46

because you're right, the Keto Mojo also

79:48

measures glucose. I guess what I'm

79:50

asking for myself is since my readouts

79:53

are so low presumably as a placeholder

79:56

due to improved insulin sensitivity and

79:59

ketone utilization,

80:01

I'm going to fail, right? If I'm just

80:02

using the glucose and the ketone strips

80:05

for the Keto Mojo because right now, if

80:08

it's telling me that I'm at 0.4 4

80:10

millmers. And I can tell you

80:11

subjectively, I do not feel like I'm at

80:13

0.4. [laughter] I feel like I've got a

80:16

lot more juice and a lot more gas in the

80:19

tank. Is there a way to,

80:23

whether it's on paper or otherwise,

80:24

account for the increased

80:27

ketone utilization? I mean, it'd be

80:29

great for me just to verify that

80:30

somehow, but then whether I can verify

80:33

it or not, if I wanted to try to

80:36

determine during that week, like if I'm

80:38

hitting my target GKI, how would you

80:41

suggest that someone like me do that if

80:44

I'm just not getting the numbers

80:46

necessary to make the the regular math

80:49

work?

80:49

>> One to two is a high bar, I guess, a GKI

80:52

of 1 to2. And I think we've had this

80:54

conversation back and forth with this

80:57

group that we're working with in the in

80:59

the cancer community. The Society for

81:01

Integrative Metabolic Oncology is a

81:04

group that we're discussing the GKI and

81:06

Thomas Safe Reed's very adamant about

81:08

getting to one to two. But I give push

81:10

back and say 1 to4

81:13

if you look at the published literature

81:15

1 to4 is absolutely 100% therapeutic

81:19

across not only cancer but also like

81:22

seizures and everything. So, I'm going

81:23

to expand that range to a 1 to4. So,

81:25

what does that mean? That would mean

81:27

that your glucose level can be upwards

81:31

of 80. And so, you could have a glucose

81:34

level of 75 to 80 and then get your

81:38

ketone levels to one. And that would be

81:40

a GKI of one essentially if you don't

81:43

have the glucose calibration for that or

81:45

that would be a GKI of four. And it

81:47

would be really rare, if not impossible,

81:49

for anyone in the general population to

81:52

even achieve a GKI of 5 to 10.

81:55

>> Mhm.

81:56

>> That's indicative of high fat oxidation

81:58

ketone production. And I think that

82:00

you're getting a lot of therapeutic

82:02

benefits. Also, a millar concentration

82:05

of one in your blood represents a 10%

82:09

available energy for your brain. And

82:11

also the keto mojo device is measuring

82:14

deta hydroxybutyrate. And if you're

82:16

doing supplementation with recemic D and

82:18

L then you're not picking up the L. So

82:21

that could be a factor too if you're

82:22

using recemic ketone salts and there's a

82:25

number of publications that have already

82:28

happened and some in the pipeline

82:29

basically showing that elbate

82:31

hydroxybutyrate takes about four to five

82:33

times longer to metabolize. So that's in

82:36

circulation more. And also if you're on

82:38

a ketogenic diet for reasons we don't

82:40

fully understand and we are to rip out

82:42

the heart about 34 to 40% of the ketone

82:47

in the heart is L beta hydroxybutyrate

82:49

and we don't know why it converts the D

82:52

to the L but it serves

82:54

>> a function

82:56

>> that the groups that have done the

82:58

research are convinced it's not an

83:00

energetic but it's actually impacting

83:02

cardiac output and reducing peripheral

83:04

vascular resistance maybe at the glyco

83:07

kaix. So I don't want to go down that

83:08

rabbit hole, but basically it's like if

83:10

your heart is pumping against pressure

83:13

and think of it as like a garden hose

83:15

and you kind of take the kink out of the

83:17

garden hose, the L beta hydroxybutyrate

83:19

is kind of taking the kink out of the

83:21

garden hose of your vascular endothelium

83:24

and then that's also in your brain. So

83:26

you have better blood flow

83:28

>> to your brain. And I am convinced I mean

83:31

there's tons of data out there showing

83:33

an increase in brain blood flow with

83:35

beta hydroxybutyrate and the L trends

83:38

better to increasing that blood flow. We

83:40

do a Doppler blood flow measurement on

83:42

various wound healing things that we

83:44

we've done in the lab. So I mean a lot

83:46

of people have vascular dementia, right?

83:48

Yeah.

83:49

>> So there's different types of dementia

83:51

and it might be not completely one or

83:53

the other and the metabolic phenotype of

83:56

dementia could be vascular. you got a

83:58

restriction of oxygen and and energy to

84:00

the brain. My point is that one millmer

84:04

of beta hydroxybutyrate in circulation

84:07

has an energetic effect and it also has

84:10

a pronounced effect on the vascular

84:12

endothelium to increase blood flow and

84:15

circulation. So you are getting a

84:17

benefit.

84:18

>> I've never had this experience in

84:20

ketosis before where these levels have

84:22

been this low. It's so bizarre. Mhm.

84:25

>> And yet, let's say back in the day

84:27

before the intermittent fasting and it's

84:30

pretty much the lever that I pulled that

84:34

I think changed things. Prior to that,

84:37

like I could tell you probably within 60

84:40

minutes of hitting 0.7

84:42

millmers on the precision extra. Like I

84:45

knew when my brain clicked past that

84:48

point and [snorts]

84:51

I did years and years and years of this

84:53

stuff. So, I think as much as I like to

84:56

measure things, I should just assume,

84:58

right? If I'm having a bowl of mackerel

85:01

dog food with MCT [clears throat] oil

85:04

and apple cider vinegar and salt and

85:06

pepper and then having a meal later that

85:08

effectively has close to zero

85:10

carbohydrates, if I'm doing that for

85:12

almost 3 weeks, there doesn't seem to be

85:17

a physiological option C for failure,

85:21

right? It's like, what's my body going

85:22

to do? like it has to be doing

85:24

something. [laughter] I'm not getting

85:26

the dietary carbohydrate and I'm not

85:29

just mainlining whey protein isolate all

85:32

day. I think I'll probably just have to

85:33

kind of trust in the process because if

85:36

I do have the increased ketone

85:38

utilization and um just somewhere

85:40

between 0.2 and 0.4 millmers for the

85:45

most part, I just don't think that the

85:46

math might be really hard even to hit

85:48

the GKI of four. But it's like if you're

85:52

following the process, I guess you're

85:53

following the process, right? [laughter]

85:55

It's like

85:56

>> I say trust the process and also think

85:58

about I'm I'm talking about like blood

86:01

biomarkers, but let's talk about

86:03

physical metrics that could be

86:06

considered biomarkers, right? So if

86:08

you're training, so for me it's all

86:10

about the numbers.

86:11

>> Yeah.

86:11

>> My lab books and stuff like that have

86:13

numbers like in the lab, but also

86:14

training. I know exactly what I'm going

86:16

to do going into the next workout. and

86:18

it's all about, you know, x amount of

86:19

weight for x amount of reps. So, you can

86:22

also do that with various brain training

86:24

apps.

86:26

>> You can do reaction time. So, for our

86:29

NASA Nemo experiments where we're in

86:30

extreme environment and we're working

86:32

with astronauts, like you know, we're

86:33

assessing reaction time, decision-

86:35

making, risktaking where like this

86:38

balloon blows up and you don't know when

86:40

it's going to blow up, but you have to

86:41

stop. It's like a weird risk game. So we

86:43

have this whole metric of testing

86:47

cognitive function reaction time and

86:49

things like that. So there are things

86:50

that you could do you know even with an

86:53

appbased thing to assess that and I

86:56

think that would be a good thing and we

86:58

know that brain training we have a

87:00

massive NIH grant at University of South

87:02

Florida on brain training games you know

87:05

and assessing performance on that. If

87:07

Alzheimer's was in my family, I would

87:09

basically be doing everything possible.

87:11

Physical training, dietary, metabolic

87:14

training with nutrition,

87:15

supplementation, and also brain

87:17

training. And with brain training

87:19

>> games and we use Jogle, the NIH toolbox.

87:22

I mean, we have like about six or eight

87:24

different types of tests that we do to

87:26

get like a very objective measure of

87:29

cognitive function. And I think it would

87:31

be good to establish that now

87:34

>> and then get your baseline just like

87:36

we're doing a dexa for body composition

87:38

and then test that you know every six

87:40

months and then do it in the absence and

87:43

presence of being in ketosis.

87:44

>> Yeah.

87:44

>> So I would suggest you know something

87:46

like that.

87:47

>> I have time blocked out in my calendar

87:48

this Friday to do a whole battery of

87:50

cognitive testing. And I've also I will

87:53

say and again this is not super precise

87:56

but having tracked myself for so long

88:00

and developed a water feel for certain

88:02

types of performance zone 2 feels a lot

88:06

easier right now

88:07

>> a lot easier than usual coming back to

88:09

your your prior comments. And then I

88:12

would say I'm using software right now

88:15

at some point I'll be able to talk more

88:17

about this but to basically train my

88:20

visual processing to compensate for

88:22

presbopia. It is crazy some of the

88:25

effects that this stuff has, but it also

88:29

is very much indirectly a measure of

88:32

reaction speed. And they see some really

88:36

cool carryover effects. And my speed in

88:39

terms of time to completion for four

88:42

bouts, like modules of tasks has just

88:45

gone up and up and up since I've sort of

88:47

been in extended ketosis. And that's

88:50

very easy for me to see. So folks who

88:53

are listening, I'll have more to share

88:54

on that later, but it's pretty

88:56

mind-blowing stuff. So Dom, you know, a

88:58

few things have come up that I would

89:00

love to chat about because I get these

89:02

questions all the time which relate to

89:04

exogenous ketones. And people have heard

89:06

this term exogenous, endogenous. It's

89:08

very fancy talk and a tuxedo for outside

89:11

the body in the body, right? So I'm

89:14

simplifying here, but the easy way to

89:16

remember exogenous is exoskeleton,

89:18

right? It's like a skeleton on the

89:20

outside of your body. exogenous ketones.

89:22

Ketones that you are taking from outside

89:24

and putting inside. People always ask,

89:27

and I know you kind of have a dog in the

89:28

fight here, so I I want to recognize

89:30

that, too.

89:32

But how should people think about

89:35

supplemental ketones? And are there any

89:38

warnings or disclaimers that you want to

89:41

add to that? Right. Because this is a

89:44

topic dour.

89:46

[sighs] I think there's probably no

89:48

biological free lunch if people are

89:49

going to be mainlining

89:52

Fruity Pebbles and eating tons of

89:54

carbohydrates. Maybe not a great idea to

89:56

eat tons of exogenous ketones. I don't

89:58

know. I'd be curious to get your take on

90:00

that. But what's the good, the bad, and

90:02

the ugly of exogenous ketones? Where

90:05

should people go? How should they think

90:07

about it?

90:07

>> The things to consider would be when

90:10

you're thinking about a ketone

90:12

supplement to think about palletability.

90:14

If it doesn't taste okay, you're not

90:16

going to consume it. I would, but most

90:18

people won't. Palatability,

90:21

tolerability, if it gives you disaster

90:23

pants or it makes you nauseous or

90:25

something. So, palletability,

90:27

tolerability, and then the next one, the

90:29

third one would be the pharmacocinetics.

90:32

So, you want something that when you

90:34

consume it that it has an ideal

90:36

pharmacocinetics, meaning it's not going

90:37

to spike up in 30 minutes and be out of

90:40

your system in like an hour or two.

90:42

>> Yeah. Phicinetics is like the stock

90:44

chart for something you put in your

90:46

body, right? In this case, right?

90:47

[laughter]

90:48

>> And that's kind of important because if

90:49

you have a very rapid rate of rise of

90:51

ketones, that can trigger an insulin

90:53

response. And what I've observed, if I'm

90:56

cruising in ketosis and I take a large

90:58

dose of a ketoneester, it shoots my

91:00

ketones up real high and it's back down

91:03

within like two hours, but it also kicks

91:05

out insulin and that shuts off my own

91:07

ketone production. then I'm hypoctootic

91:09

and hypo glycemic from the insulin and

91:11

that can create you know an energy

91:13

deficit in the brain.

91:15

>> How long does that last for you?

91:16

>> It lasts in the context of consuming for

91:18

example a ketoneester by itself but if

91:21

you consume the ketoneester with MCT if

91:23

you could tolerate that you could buffer

91:25

that response to some extent or you to

91:28

take it with food or something or you

91:30

could avert that by different ketone

91:32

formulations

91:33

and we could talk about that but I just

91:35

want to move down. So you got

91:36

palletability, tolerability,

91:38

pharmacocinetic properties and you also

91:41

have toxicity. So that would be the four

91:44

things that you need to consider when

91:46

sort of

91:47

>> selecting an exogenous ketone. And those

91:50

things differ depending upon if you're

91:52

using it acutely like in a medical

91:54

situation or it's like a daily thing

91:56

that you want to take every day for

91:57

prevention.

91:58

>> Let's talk about toxicity first.

92:00

>> Toxicity is probably the most important

92:02

too. And let's for the time being not

92:05

talk about the acute medical delivery.

92:07

Okay.

92:08

>> Let's talk about recreational

92:11

slash better said lay person use. Right.

92:14

This is as a dietary supplement.

92:16

>> Yep.

92:16

>> Could you speak to the toxicity piece?

92:18

>> What we observed like about 10 years ago

92:21

was that formulations that contained 13b

92:24

butane dial that includes an esther. I

92:27

have a lot of patents on and I have

92:28

actually ongoing experiments with 13

92:31

butane dial by itself is a ketogenic

92:34

agent and that can have toxicity when

92:36

used chronically. 13b butane dial is an

92:39

alcohol dimer and it gets metabolized

92:41

through alcohol dehydrogenase and

92:44

aldahhide dehydrogenase. Aldihide

92:45

dehydrogenase kicks out a beta

92:47

hydroxybutyrate aldahhide that can be

92:49

toxic.

92:50

>> How is it toxic? What are its toxic

92:52

effects? Well, alcohol dehydrogenase

92:54

uses NAD, consumes NAD as its function,

92:58

right? So, it can basically

93:00

[clears throat] deplete the liver of NAD

93:02

and aldahhide dehydrogenase also

93:04

consumes up NAD and it rapidly depletes

93:08

for example the liver the apatocytes of

93:11

ATP. So we've know that there's a paper

93:15

coming out that'll show that in in our

93:17

lab we've seen therapeutic effects in

93:21

certain contexts but when delivered

93:24

acutely but when consumed chronically

93:27

when we go beyond our experimental

93:29

window and give these things chronically

93:31

as like a lifestyle exogenous ketone and

93:35

then we sacrifice the animals and then

93:37

we do blood work and we look at the

93:39

liver, we see signs signs that are kind

93:42

kind of scary, right? And this could be

93:43

inflammation in the liver, TNF alpha,

93:46

sinosoidal dilation, sort of like gaps

93:48

in the liver, fatty liver, a number of

93:51

different things start to surface, and

93:53

that's pretty much just due to

93:55

metabolizing something that's considered

93:57

a toxin to the body, 13butane dial. It's

93:59

a very versatile drug. 13butane dial by

94:02

itself is more toxic than 13 dial based

94:06

ketone esters. So you have the ketone

94:08

monoester which is

94:11

technically the millolar concentration.

94:14

You have 51% of a ketone monoester is3

94:17

butane dial. So it hydrayze in the liver

94:20

gets in the circulation. Still over 50%

94:22

of that is 13b butane dial that kind of

94:26

needs to be detoxified but 13 butane

94:29

dial does get broken down to beta

94:30

hydroxybutyrate. The diester is about

94:32

35% 13b butane dial. So I see these as

94:36

as potentially problematic.

94:38

>> The diester is what percentage

94:40

>> a ketone diester which would be 13b

94:42

butane dial with two ketones on it. We

94:45

use acettoacetate on each that's 35%

94:49

of that molecule is 13b butane dial in

94:52

circulation.

94:53

>> I got it.

94:53

>> And then the beta hydroxybutyrate

94:55

monoester is 51%

94:58

13b butane dial in circulation. Mhm.

95:00

>> So this can become problematic when it's

95:02

used as like a supplement and a

95:04

lifestyle thing like day in and day out.

95:06

>> Can you translate from the animal models

95:10

to humans do you think? Right. Cuz we

95:14

all know humans are not just big furry

95:16

mice, right?

95:17

>> Y

95:17

>> do you think it translates and this

95:19

might be just like a precautionary

95:21

measure. It's like well like pending

95:23

additional studies let's hit pause in a

95:26

sense but if it were to translate do you

95:30

have any idea what type of dosing per

95:33

day or per week with which we might see

95:37

this toxicity in humans.

95:39

>> So there is a posity of data there's

95:41

[clears throat] a deficiency of data on

95:43

the use of these agents 13 butane dial

95:46

and that are long-term studies. Only

95:48

study that I'm aware of is a case report

95:50

with Dr. Mary Newport's husband, Steve.

95:52

And then there's a 28 day

95:55

>> study that used 25 grams.

95:56

>> 25 grams.

95:58

>> 25 grams per day. Yeah. And that

96:00

produces like 0.1 to 1 millmer. But what

96:03

I have done is I took the R13 dial and

96:08

then the recemic 13 butane dial at

96:09

different time points and I basically

96:11

dosed it for two weeks to keep my ketone

96:14

levels at 2 millmer, which would be like

96:16

a therapeutic. And when you do that,

96:18

what you will see and I well I was going

96:21

to say I you know tell people that go

96:23

ahead and do it but maybe don't do this

96:25

but when you take something like 13

96:27

butane dial at a dose which for me

96:30

requires 30 milliliters three times per

96:32

day to keep at 2 millmer throughout the

96:35

course of the day. If you do that for

96:37

two weeks and then you test your

96:40

transaminases so that would be a alt and

96:43

gggt they will go up. So that's a clear

96:45

indication. We've done this in animals

96:48

and fed it at a pretty high level and we

96:50

did not see transaminases going up.

96:52

>> So transaminases are what people could

96:54

think of as liver enzymes on their blood

96:56

panels, right?

96:57

>> Liver enzymes. Yeah.

96:58

>> ALT. Is GGGT typically tested?

97:01

>> GGT is like the wild card. But what's

97:03

good about GGGT is like it's the canary

97:06

in the coal mine. It will go up before

97:09

ALT and AST. So if you expect someone

97:12

has a problem with alcohol and let's say

97:14

they're not drinking and you want to

97:16

figure out if they're drinking or not,

97:17

say, "Hey, can I see your blood work and

97:19

make sure the doctor adds GGGT just to

97:21

get a better and that's elevated and

97:24

your ASN or not. The only things that'll

97:27

really shoot up GGT is like alcohol.

97:29

It's a very sensitive and also the size

97:31

of the red blood cell too can be if

97:34

they're like larger. That's an

97:35

indication like someone's drinking too

97:36

much alcohol. And they could be just

97:38

like two or three glasses a day, but

97:40

that will elevate GGGT. So we observed

97:43

that transaminas is actually don't

97:46

didn't go up in our animals fed the

97:49

ketone esters or 13 butane dial

97:51

chronically. But when we pulled the

97:53

livers out and then looked at the

97:54

livers, then we saw things that kind of

97:57

concerned us.

97:58

>> And we published this recently. And it's

98:00

good to know like when someone has

98:01

non-alcoholic fatty liver disease, they

98:03

can have normal transaminases but have a

98:06

necrotic liver.

98:07

>> Yuck. Didn't I did not know that. That's

98:10

terrifying.

98:11

>> Yeah. Yeah. So if I mean you look very

98:13

closely at ALT longitudinally and that's

98:16

creeps up. But basically you you

98:18

basically have to do like a CT scan or a

98:20

high resolution ultrasound of the liver.

98:23

And basically, you could just take a

98:26

subset of the American population that

98:28

trends to be overweight and you do some

98:30

liver scans and you find that they can

98:33

have overt, you know, fatty liver

98:35

disease and have completely normal

98:37

transaminases are just trending up,

98:39

right? So, my liver enzymes tend to

98:42

trend a little bit higher just because I

98:43

eat a lot of protein.

98:44

>> Yeah. So with 13b butane dial and 13b

98:47

butane dial base ketone esters you have

98:51

a problem with tolerability

98:54

palletability potentially feasible

98:57

pharmaccoinetics and also toxicity. So

98:59

it almost like checks all the boxes in a

99:02

negative way.

99:03

>> Yeah.

99:04

>> The field is trending towards non13b

99:06

butane dialbased

99:08

>> exogenous ketones and that could be free

99:11

acids. It could be a triest with

99:14

glycerol and and also the ketone

99:16

electrolyte salts. But you could also

99:19

avert part of this just by formulation.

99:21

The issue is that companies have one

99:23

molecule and then they test that one

99:25

molecule. But you know, I think

99:27

formulation is the way to go and

99:30

companies don't kind of want to hear

99:31

that because they have all their IP in

99:34

like one molecule.

99:36

We've always done a formulation kind of

99:37

based lab

99:39

>> and always saw that these things always

99:42

have drawbacks when used as a

99:43

monotherapy but when you start combining

99:45

them together that's when you get better

99:47

therapeutic effects.

99:49

>> Got the hounds [laughter]

99:51

>> out there. Hopefully not next to the

99:53

gate gators. We won't spend any time on

99:56

this, but I just wanted to tell people

99:57

that before we started recording, you

99:58

were telling me that you caught a 10-ft

100:01

alligator that was trying to eat your

100:02

dogs and then you pinned it down and

100:05

taped its mouth and then measured its

100:07

glucose and ketones. [laughter]

100:10

Turns out that alligator had a pretty

100:12

good GKI, but that's a story for another

100:14

time. So, only in the things that only

100:17

Tom would do [laughter]

100:19

category that's stand out. So, we're

100:22

talking about a lot of terms that are

100:24

likely unfamiliar to folks. I don't want

100:26

to throw anybody under the bus here,

100:28

right? But people should do their

100:29

homework. 13b butane dial is very, very,

100:32

very common. It's very inexpensive or

100:35

relatively inexpensive to produce. So,

100:37

just keep an eye out for 13 butane dial

100:40

if this is of interest to you. I have no

100:42

investment in any ketone supplement

100:44

company or anything. I do not have a

100:46

stake in this. But what I would love to

100:48

ask, I would like to ask a couple

100:49

things. So I have experimented as you

100:51

know with ketone monoester diester

100:55

ketone salts. I've kind of played with

100:57

everything and I found the diester to

101:01

cause quite a bit of intestinal

101:04

discomfort to put it mildly at least the

101:06

first one or two times. I will say for

101:08

folks [laughter] if at first you don't

101:10

succeed meaning you have to run to the

101:12

toilet you may acclimate to it which I

101:14

did in that case but I I felt

101:17

subjectively less and less effect. I

101:19

seem to develop tolerance very quickly.

101:21

I I don't know why that would be the

101:22

case, but I I seem to experience it. The

101:25

ketone monoester,

101:27

which is the 13 butane dial bound to

101:31

BHB, if I understand it correctly,

101:33

right? I do like that. I like the

101:35

subjective feeling of it. But if that's

101:39

only at about 11 millilit, if I take 25

101:43

plus, speaking to your pharmacocinetics,

101:46

right? like the stock pops and then it

101:49

drops and then I feel very tired and

101:51

often feel more anxiety. It seems to

101:55

prompt in me more anxiety. I guess my

101:57

question is and then I mean look we got

101:59

to we got to talk about this. Not that

102:02

it invalidates what you're saying in any

102:03

way but your wife runs a company that

102:05

sells ketone salts which I also have

102:07

I've been using most consistently.

102:09

Ketoarter people can check it out. But

102:11

on the keto monoester, what I'm

102:13

wondering is if I'm only taking, let's

102:15

say, 11 milliliters once or twice a day

102:18

and I'm taking it alongside MCT oil,

102:22

where would you put the kind of risk

102:23

[clears throat] analysis on something

102:25

like that?

102:26

>> Good question. Yeah, I would say the

102:28

risk is very minimal for a healthy

102:30

person. So I have a super healthy liver.

102:34

I even take, you know, an

102:36

acetylcysteine, alphalapoic acid, all

102:38

these things. So I was surprised to see

102:40

sort of the liver climbing. What we see

102:42

in our older animals is that they are

102:44

selectively vulnerable to 13 butane dial

102:47

toxicity from acutely and also

102:49

chronically. So for a normal healthy

102:52

person, especially someone that's sort

102:54

of, you know, really good metabolic

102:56

health and liver function and, you know,

102:58

they don't drink or drugs that

102:59

compromise the liver, I would say

103:01

upwards of

103:04

13 butane dial 20 to 20 milliliters a

103:08

day is probably where you want to cap it

103:10

and maybe not do it every day. Mhm.

103:12

>> 13 butane dial based ketone esester

103:14

would do that. But you can also probably

103:17

achieve and maintain the same level of

103:19

ketosis with ketone salt. Beta

103:21

hydroxybutyrate salt. And I do like the

103:23

idea of a D and the L, the two

103:26

anantimer, which is a conversation that

103:28

you may or may not want to have. So the

103:30

L is basically like it's packaged beta

103:33

hydroxybutyrate in the time release form

103:35

and it has some signaling effects. And

103:37

[snorts] then you have free acids too

103:38

that are kind of coming up on the market

103:40

and various liposal formulations. I'm

103:42

not sure if they're commercially

103:43

available yet, but these are some things

103:45

in the pipeline.

103:46

>> But yeah, 13 dial based monoester. I

103:51

think there's there's good data behind

103:52

it. I think the the science that's

103:55

published is kind of biased in the

103:57

direction because that was the molecule

104:00

that a lot of companies associate with

104:02

and then they test that molecule in and

104:04

of itself as a monotherapy and I am of

104:07

the opinion that things are definitely

104:10

optimized. You could avert a lot of the

104:12

problems just by formulation.

104:14

>> How does the MCT oil help? I guess

104:17

basically it it makes the ramp up more

104:22

gradual. Is that the effect that the

104:24

sort of co-conumption of the MCT oil

104:26

has?

104:26

>> Yeah. It delays gastric absorption for

104:28

one thing, but it's also stimulating the

104:30

production, your endogenous production.

104:33

>> So the MCT goes to the liver,

104:36

>> right? Right.

104:37

>> Not through like kyomicrons, it goes

104:38

right to the liver and stimulates your

104:40

body's ketone production. And I think

104:41

that's important. And it's almost like

104:43

training your liver to ramp up fat

104:45

oxidation and it's almost like

104:47

exercising your liver to stimulate it.

104:49

What we've also observed and we

104:51

published on that like a large dose of

104:53

MCT when you take the liver out and look

104:56

at it there's globules of fat all in the

104:59

liver.

104:59

>> Oh, that sounds bad.

105:01

>> Well, we see a fatty liver but we did

105:03

not see evidence of necrosis but we did

105:05

see some inflammatory markers but

105:07

>> necrosis is dead tissue, dead cells.

105:10

Yeah, we did not see that. But we saw

105:12

sinosoidal dilation and TNF alpha was

105:15

elevated and some other things to

105:16

suggest that large doses of MCT and if

105:20

you do the human the human equivalence

105:23

it would be like me taking upwards of

105:25

like 80 to 100 milliliters per day.

105:28

>> So that's a lot. You know,

105:30

>> it's not that much though, right? I mean

105:32

cuz 30 milliliters is like two

105:33

tablespoons. Is that

105:35

>> Yeah,

105:35

>> roughly. Right. So, it's like six

105:37

tablespoons. If you're just squirting it

105:39

into your coffee, like it's not hard.

105:41

>> Yeah.

105:41

>> To necessarily get above 100. It's

105:43

actually pretty easy. So, where would

105:45

you recommend capping MCT consumption?

105:48

I'll get rid of my camel back with the

105:50

MCT oil in it, but where would you

105:52

recommend capping the MCT consumption?

105:54

The studies that were done showing

105:57

benefits is like 20 milliliters per day,

106:00

but they only did like a single dose,

106:01

which is kind of weird, but that was the

106:03

old Exona studies. And like 80% of

106:05

people tolerated that, 20% didn't. But

106:08

I'm of the opinion that 20 milliliters

106:10

twice per day would be perfectly fine

106:12

for essentially

106:14

most people that can tolerate that. And

106:16

you're going to have probably about 30%

106:18

or more that can. But MCT is much more

106:20

tolerable when you take it with a meal.

106:22

>> So if you take MCT on an empty stomach,

106:24

prepare to be close to to a bathroom,

106:26

right?

106:27

>> Yeah. you know, of all the disgusting

106:30

things that I have consumed in my life,

106:32

and I've had a lot, right? I mean, I've

106:34

tried early prototypes of some of the

106:36

esters and like all sorts of stuff. I'm

106:38

not going to say it was a pina colada,

106:40

but I was fine with it. MCT oil to this

106:43

day, I just find so absolutely

106:46

revolting. I don't know if it's the

106:48

neutrality and the mouth feel. I don't.

106:51

But mixed with the mackerel and that

106:53

apple cider vinegar, it sounds so

106:55

disgusting. My friend almost puked in

106:56

his mouth yesterday when I was

106:57

describing it. It's actually really

107:00

good. I'm just a sucker for mackerel.

107:01

I'll take mackerel over sardines all day

107:04

long. But let's see here. So, I think

107:06

we've covered a lot of the exogenous

107:08

ketones. I'll just pull this from our

107:09

text thread because I think it might be

107:12

a question on some people's minds. As I

107:14

was trying to troubleshoot my apparent

107:16

failure mode with ketosis because of my

107:19

low numbers, I asked you, "Is there any

107:22

argument to be made that I should have a

107:24

ketogenic breakfast instead of

107:26

intermittent fasting? Could it be that

107:29

I'm causing problems with exogenous

107:32

ketones, right? Am I delaying

107:34

potentially the onset of my own ketosis?

107:38

Is it like TRT?" Right? If you're taking

107:40

exogenous, remember that word. If you're

107:42

injecting or rubbing on or swallowing

107:45

testosterone, it's like your your lidic

107:47

cells are pretty smart. That's the

107:49

reason your balls turn into raisinets is

107:51

[laughter] because it's like, cool, we

107:53

don't have to make that anymore. So, I I

107:55

thought, am I shooting myself in the

107:57

foot by taking exogenous ketones? And it

107:59

sounds like a little bit goes a long

108:02

way, but like most things, in excess, it

108:06

kind of becomes its opposite, right? and

108:08

it becomes a hindrance and makes it

108:11

problematic. Is that fair to say?

108:12

>> Yeah, we've only seen the

108:14

anti-indogenous

108:16

ketosis effect with 13 butane dial or

108:19

13b butane dial based ketone esters and

108:22

that is due in part to their potency and

108:25

also the the rapid elevation of ketones

108:28

seem to have an insulin effect that can

108:31

double or triple insulin. Even if we

108:33

elevate ketones to the same level with a

108:35

salt, we don't see that spike up in

108:38

insulin. So that could be coming into

108:41

play with your low ketones if that's if

108:43

you are consuming the monoester.

108:46

>> Not much. Every once in a while, like

108:47

before exercise because I I might not

108:50

mind the spike.

108:50

>> Yeah.

108:51

>> But I'm not consuming a ton. But the

108:53

breakfast, I'm of the opinion that

108:55

protein loading in the morning, actually

108:57

when you first wake up, and I think

108:59

Donald Layman and maybe Stu Phillips

109:01

would also agree with this and maybe

109:02

Lane Norton too, the protein guys in the

109:05

camp, is that protein in the morning

109:06

kind of amps up your metabolism

109:09

throughout the rest of the day.

109:11

>> Yeah.

109:11

>> And I think if you abstain from eating

109:14

during the day, you tend to get the

109:15

munchies later in the day and you tend

109:17

to overeat. Whereas if you have a

109:19

proteinheavy meal in the morning with

109:22

highfat then that can sort of rev up

109:24

your metabolism for a good part of the

109:26

day and but then again some people me

109:29

included like my mind is not as sharp

109:31

when I have a big breakfast. That's the

109:34

thing, right? I would say that I mean

109:36

for

109:38

15 years, right? The sort of 30 grams

109:41

within 30 minutes of waking up has been

109:43

this sort of easy to remember heristic

109:45

that I've recommended for folks. And

109:48

that if I am not intermittent fasting,

109:51

that's also what I do. But I've become

109:52

so addicted to the mental sharpness that

109:56

it's just like man I know that if for

109:59

instance if I want to do 3 hours of

110:01

writing I do not want to have food

110:04

immediately prior to that.

110:05

>> Yeah. But I would say I'm also at a

110:08

point I think where throwing up really

110:10

heavy weight and for me, right? And

110:13

getting as big and strong as possible is

110:15

just not it's less of a priority, right,

110:18

than it once was after shoulder

110:20

surgeries and elbow surgeries and

110:21

various things. Not that I want to be

110:22

the, you know, skinniest guy in the

110:24

room, but it [snorts] sounds like the

110:26

pharmacocinetics are maybe to blame with

110:29

the associated spike in insulin for some

110:33

of the issues you might run into if

110:34

you're taking the 13 butane dial based

110:39

products.

110:40

>> It can be and I suspect it is and I've

110:42

kind of, you know, proven kind of with

110:44

myself that's the case. But it also can

110:46

be mitigated in part by taking it with a

110:49

meal or taking it with MCT. It is

110:51

metabolized like 30 milliliters of 13

110:53

butane dial is kind of like 30

110:55

milliliters of ethanol.

110:56

>> Yeah.

110:56

>> And then 13 butane dial can create

110:59

dependence and it also can create you

111:02

get withdrawal.

111:04

>> So it's established in the literature.

111:06

There's several publications just

111:07

showing that with 13b butane dial will

111:10

produce dependency and when you abruptly

111:13

stop 13 butane dial after consuming it

111:16

for a period of time there's essentially

111:19

alcohol withdrawal from that.

111:21

>> What are the symptoms of that? I mean

111:23

imagine you don't get like

111:25

DT, right? You're not getting like

111:27

shakes or anything are you? But I mean

111:29

like what happens?

111:30

>> I mean it's like classical kind of

111:32

ethanol withdrawal. maybe not quite as

111:35

dramatic, but the glycols or dials do

111:38

have a gammaurgic effect. So, you're you

111:41

know doing that. I mean, it's well

111:43

established one is a has narcotic-l like

111:45

properties and that kind of styied its

111:48

use as a as a synthetic food for space

111:51

flight. Well, I think the palletability

111:54

also factored into that, but also in the

111:56

literature, it notes, you know, a

111:58

narcotic effect of this and then the

112:00

animal studies and really showed

112:02

dependency and withdrawal.

112:04

>> Just to give a reiteration of that, I

112:06

mean, you know, the 13 butane dial based

112:09

stuff is also sold as an alcohol

112:11

replacement. So, of course, being the

112:13

idiot that I am, not idiot, just like

112:16

I'm I'm eager to experiment here and

112:17

there if it's not going to kill me. And

112:19

so, I thought, you know what, I don't

112:20

want to drink tonight. This was in I

112:22

remember where I was. I was in upstate

112:23

New York about to go to a restaurant

112:25

with a friend. I knew he would want a

112:26

drink and then I wanted to be able to

112:28

say, "Hey, I already had this ahead of

112:29

time. Don't worry, like we're on the

112:30

same level." And I chugged a small can.

112:34

It wasn't in terms of liquid volume a

112:37

lot, right? I don't know, 6 ounces, 8

112:39

ounces. And I felt like I could barely

112:41

walk to the bathroom. Like I was

112:44

smashed. It was like almost knocked the

112:47

glass off the table. I was like, "Holy

112:49

shit." I did not [laughter] do this sort

112:52

of risk assessment properly. Yeah. Like

112:54

thank God I'm not about to get into a

112:56

car because it it took a little while to

112:58

wear off. So that narcotic effect, it's

113:00

not always subtle.

113:02

>> I made jello shots. I made 13 butane val

113:04

jello shots and before we made the

113:05

ketone nesters in 2009, Patrick Arnold

113:08

and I like kind of [laughter] formulated

113:10

>> Patrick Arnold. So people who don't

113:11

recognize Patrick, listen to my

113:13

conversation with him from years ago.

113:15

But if you know Balco or remember when

113:17

Barry Bonds grew a few head sizes or any

113:19

of that stuff anyway Patrick's got some

113:22

stories. [laughter]

113:23

>> But so the jello shot. So what happened

113:25

with the jello shots?

113:26

>> Well that was the way to get it down cuz

113:28

13 butane dial is so nasty, right? So

113:30

you could basically just warm up pure

113:32

13b butane dial in a pot and then add

113:36

cherry flavored sugarfree Jell-O and

113:39

then stir it up and then pour it into

113:41

like a cookie pan and then cut it into

113:43

cubes which you get 20 milliliters per

113:46

jello shot and make it pretty strong so

113:48

it's like firm Jell-O and I would just

113:50

hit two or three of them and just be

113:52

buzzing and you know I talk about it

113:54

like one through butane dial can be fun

113:56

and it's a lesser of two evils when

113:58

we're talking about ethanol. So I

114:00

actually tried to file a patent for the

114:01

use of 13 butane dial for alcohol

114:03

withdrawal and things like that. But

114:05

actually there was some prior art on

114:07

that and this is many years ago but I

114:09

actually do think it could be part you

114:11

know used by people if they could

114:13

transition off of ethanol potentially

114:15

use that but there are other ways to get

114:18

off alcohol. I'm not advocating for

114:19

that. But my concern is why I'm talking

114:23

about it now too is that I know there's

114:24

older people out there with dementia,

114:26

perhaps Alzheimer's disease, that if

114:29

they're consuming 13butane dial as a

114:31

ketogenic supplement, it's going to make

114:33

you dizzy. It's going to decrease your

114:35

stability. It's going to make you

114:37

potentially fall, break your hip,

114:39

>> and then when you're older, your ability

114:41

to detoxify alcohol at an 80year-old

114:45

only has like 20 or 30% of the capacity

114:47

to do that. So the same amount of 13b

114:50

butane dial for a 20year-old is going to

114:53

be like three to five times harder on

114:56

your liver like as we age right and and

114:58

people note that as you age you just

115:00

can't tolerate the same amount of

115:01

alcohol. Yeah. So I think these things,

115:04

the 13b butane dial based supplements,

115:06

the straight up 13butane dial and

115:08

13butane dial based ketone esters are

115:11

problematic for the age population that

115:15

I think some of these products or

115:17

companies are targeting.

115:19

>> I say that not only as a scientist but

115:22

because of the volume of emails that I

115:23

get [laughter]

115:24

>> on that of people are like,

115:26

>> I got super buzzed. I didn't know what

115:28

happened. And some people are very

115:29

sensitive to it. Like I gave my wife a

115:32

just she can't tolerate alcohol at all

115:34

and she took a shot glass of the stuff

115:35

and she like could not believe that it

115:38

was a legal supplement to sell. And now

115:40

this will probably interest a lot of

115:42

people so they'll probably go out and

115:43

buy it. But I'm just saying if you're

115:44

sensitive to alcohol you're going to get

115:46

overly buzzed. And my concern is that

115:49

hey if you want to use it for

115:50

recreational like that's your thing and

115:52

maybe it's better than alcohol. But for

115:54

older people, a large dose of 13 butane

115:56

dial is problematic from a narcotic,

115:59

from the potential for just getting

116:01

drunk, just straight up drunk. And Dr.

116:03

Beach told me that a long time ago cuz I

116:06

was trying to get the Esther from him

116:07

and I was like, what if I just use 13

116:08

butane dilemma? It's like you'll get

116:10

drunk. So it's like he instilled that

116:12

that do not do that. That's what he

116:14

said.

116:15

>> And Vich was the co- inventor, is that

116:19

fair to say? of the bonded monoester

116:23

that was funded in part by was it the

116:27

DoD or DARPA?

116:28

>> DARPA.

116:29

>> DARPA and then patented at Oxford. Is

116:32

that right? Am I getting my facts

116:33

straight or am I getting things mixed

116:34

up?

116:35

>> Yeah. Well, Oxford sort of acquired the

116:38

IP and made a company out of it. But we

116:41

have to credit Dr. Richard Vch who

116:42

passed away a few years ago for the

116:45

conception of a ketone esther. Dr. Dr.

116:48

Beachch was the student of Hans Kreb

116:50

>> Kreb of Kreb Cycle.

116:52

>> Kreb cycle. Yeah.

116:53

>> That's wild. Wow.

116:54

>> Yeah. I went to Dr. Beach's lab at the

116:57

NIH. I saw the whole ketone process. I

117:00

tested different things. We were in

117:01

communication and I think he was a very

117:04

colorful character and he was had an

117:07

amazing mind. We agreed to disagree on

117:09

some things, but I consider him a mentor

117:11

of mine and I think we all owe a lot. I

117:13

don't think exogenous ketones may even

117:15

not exist. Well, Henri Bruning Grabber

117:18

and some other people, Sammy Hasham

117:20

developed the triest. So, there's other

117:23

people in this space, but he really

117:25

advanced the science and ultimately the

117:27

application of exogenous ketones and I

117:29

think has written extensively about it.

117:31

>> Yeah,

117:31

>> I mean these things were around for a

117:33

long time and I think as science

117:34

advances we have more information and

117:36

then we can I have pivoted away from

117:39

these things although we still use them

117:41

in in some experiments. I published some

117:43

really nice data on 13b butane dial

117:45

actually even in cancer studies too. So

117:48

but at the same time I realized that the

117:51

negative effects and I'm I can pivot

117:53

away from that we have other molecules

117:55

like in development now. So, I know as

117:58

I'm watching things get dark on the East

118:00

Coast for you [laughter]

118:02

>> that we'll wrap up in just a few

118:04

minutes, but in brief, you mentioned

118:07

fat, salt, fiber, right, as things that

118:10

can be helpful for slowing, I guess,

118:13

gastric emptying of these these meals

118:15

that I'm having. And I'm curious for you

118:18

on a ketogenic diet, what are your

118:20

favorite sources of fiber, supplemental

118:23

or in whole food form? whole food form.

118:25

I like broccoli. I buy broccoli fuettes

118:29

and then I cut the tip of the fuette off

118:32

and I have like a bowl of that and I

118:34

give the stalk and stuff to my dogs and

118:36

I chop it up for for their fiber. So

118:38

that's that's something that I do. I

118:39

don't know just to get a higher dose of

118:41

of broccoli. But broccoli and then wild

118:44

blueberries that has about half of the

118:48

sugar and more fiber. They're about a

118:51

quarter of the size of like the huge

118:53

blueberries you buy at like Walmart. So,

118:54

wild blueberries. I like apples because

118:57

they have a certain fiber called pectin

118:59

in it. Some people that have a problem

119:00

with fiber can't digest pectin or they

119:03

get gassy. So, it's on the FOBMAP list

119:06

or whatever. But wild blueberries, just

119:08

green vegetables in general, but I like

119:10

broccoli and apples are pretty much

119:13

something I have every day. Now, the

119:15

wild blueberries, I just want to really

119:18

underline wild for people [laughter]

119:21

because

119:23

that is not what you're necessarily

119:24

going to get at your local grocery store

119:26

that's been optimized to be as sweet as

119:29

>> They're in Publix, so I can get them in

119:31

Publix down here. And I think I don't

119:33

know,

119:34

>> actually I think they're in Walmart,

119:35

too. I think you go to Walmart

119:36

[clears throat] and I think

119:38

>> you might have to like sneak around for

119:39

them, but there's a brand they have wild

119:41

raspberries and blueberries and

119:43

blackberries together.

119:44

>> Okay.

119:45

>> I forget the name of the brand, but they

119:47

come in like big two or three pound

119:48

bags, too. So,

119:49

>> how much can you eat of apples or

119:52

berries before undoing all the good

119:55

metabolic work that you're doing in

119:58

ketosis, right? Because even for

119:59

instance, we've talked about how easy it

120:01

is and it really is easy as long as

120:03

you're pretty simple to please dietarily

120:06

to say travel for keto, right? So just

120:08

pack a bunch of canned sardines,

120:10

mackerel, maybe some oysters and

120:14

macadamia nuts and like you're you're

120:16

kind of good to go. Like these things

120:18

are pretty calorically dense. But the

120:20

macadamia nuts, I was looking at the bag

120:22

the other day because it's one of the

120:23

few kind of crunchy things that I feel

120:25

like I can eat aside from some of these

120:26

vegetables. And I was like, "Wow, if you

120:28

go whole hog on the macadamia nuts, you

120:30

can rack up the carbs after a while.

120:33

What about apples and berries? Where's

120:36

your cut off point for yourself?"

120:38

Macadamia nuts actually have that 3:1 to

120:40

4:1 ratio of fat, too. So, so they are

120:44

pretty high in fat, but cashews and then

120:47

almonds and other other nuts. I like

120:49

walnuts, too. I forgot to mention. So, I

120:51

have walnuts,

120:53

small organic apples. We buy wild

120:55

blueberries and broccoli pretty much

120:58

every day.

120:59

>> And all that together ends up being

121:01

about 60 to 70 g of carbs, but

121:04

[clears throat] onethird of the carbs is

121:05

fiber. So, it's essentially

121:07

non-glycemic. And then I tend to like I

121:09

haven't had any of that today, but I

121:12

tend to have that at dinner and then my

121:13

snack at night time.

121:15

>> So, everything I just mentioned, the

121:16

carbs, but I don't think about it as

121:18

undoing ketosis.

121:20

>> My glucose tank is always maybe 10 or

121:23

20% full. So, I'm always running kind of

121:25

low on glucose and on, you know, some

121:28

days I'm more active.

121:29

>> What's your height and weight, Dom, at

121:31

the moment?

121:31

>> 6 foot 220. And I've been give or take 5

121:34

lbs for for years now. Yeah. So just

121:36

always cruise at like 220. Yeah.

121:38

>> Yeah.

121:38

>> So 100 kg. So

121:40

>> yeah, good body composition. That is a

121:42

lot of muscle [laughter] for people who

121:44

are not watching the video. So I'm just

121:47

trying to set the maybe context for what

121:50

your tolerance might be for grams of

121:52

carbohydrates. I have pretty good

121:54

tolerance for carbs now, but I think I

121:57

have good tolerance more now because

122:00

I've titrated some carbs back in because

122:02

I did go probably at least five years on

122:04

like very low clinical ketogenic and I

122:07

did

122:08

>> end up losing like almost 18 pounds of

122:11

lean body mass. And then I took a year

122:13

off in 2018 when we bought our farm. I

122:16

was very busy on the farm. Then I I

122:18

bought weights and just have it on the

122:19

farm. And then I've been doing DEXA. My

122:22

last DEXA I was 218 but under I was like

122:25

9.8% body fat still under 10%. But I

122:28

gained muscle when I got back into

122:31

lifting and just did the heavy compound

122:33

movements again. But I don't go super

122:34

crazy on the weight.

122:35

>> Mhm.

122:36

>> But I do I do train hard.

122:37

>> But you found the addition of the

122:39

carbohydrates to be beneficial that

122:42

slightly higher quantity of

122:43

carbohydrates. I've added the more carbs

122:46

back in over the years and that has

122:48

helped me maintain my body weight and I

122:50

just I like eating those foods. I enjoy

122:52

those foods. I think they have

122:53

beneficial fiber, phytonutrients,

122:55

>> other micronutrients that I think are

122:57

beneficial

122:58

>> and I can maintain a level of ketosis

123:02

about, you know, 0.5 to 1.5 day in and

123:05

day out eating those foods every day.

123:07

>> Yeah. And I do titrate in like the MCTs

123:10

and I get like one or two packets of

123:12

keto start a day, maybe up to three if

123:14

I'm traveling.

123:15

>> But that's my normal protocol and that's

123:17

has optimized all my biomarkers. I

123:20

actually got full blood work today kind

123:22

of waiting for that to come back to see.

123:24

It should be interesting. I was

123:25

inadvertently took something that I

123:27

thought was laced with something some

123:28

gummies I told you about. But uh

123:30

[laughter]

123:30

>> people are going to assume when people

123:32

hear gummies they assume it's THC. But

123:35

this was what? Theonine and magnesium.

123:37

It should have been really innocuous,

123:38

right? Is that right?

123:40

>> Yeah. Theanine and magnesium. My wife

123:42

bought it at Marshalls. We both took

123:44

two. We woke up in the morning and she

123:47

says, "I'm dizzy." She's asking me,

123:48

"What did you give me last night?" I was

123:50

like, "I didn't give you anything." She

123:51

cuz sometimes they give her stuff. I

123:52

tried to get up, fell flat on the floor.

123:55

Both of us could not walk. We were both

123:57

like completely incapacitated. I called

123:59

the poison control center. And yeah, so

124:02

basically I've been running around to

124:04

different labs and now I'm doing

124:06

forensics. So there was something I'm

124:08

still buzzed.

124:10

>> Wow. Really?

124:11

>> So if I don't seem like myself because

124:13

I'm still buzzed 48 hours later.

124:15

>> That is wild.

124:17

>> We had the spinnies and even this

124:19

morning I woke up, I had the spinnies

124:20

like walking. So whatever it was, it was

124:22

pretty powerful. And I have a little bit

124:25

of a back injury from about a week ago

124:28

and I don't have any pain from that. So,

124:30

I think whatever it is, I'm thinking

124:32

potentially a fentanyl derivative or

124:34

something.

124:35

>> Yikes. That's terrifying.

124:37

>> My wife does not drink. She doesn't use

124:38

any drugs. So, she was pretty much, you

124:41

know, really floored by this.

124:43

>> Wow. Did you go back and buy some more

124:44

of them to like send off to get

124:48

analyzed?

124:48

>> Well, I have it. So, I collected my

124:50

urine. My wife collected her urine. And

124:52

then I'm doing the necessary blood work.

124:55

And I've contacted a forensic lab and we

124:58

have like, you know, doctors involved in

124:59

all this now. So,

125:00

>> they dosed the wrong guy or the right

125:04

guy because you imagine like what if

125:05

that had been a 80-year-old woman

125:09

sleeping on the second floor? I mean,

125:11

>> that's dangerous.

125:12

>> Absolutely. I just took two and I'm a

125:14

pretty, you know, big guy and

125:15

everything, but if a little kid took two

125:17

or four or five.

125:18

>> Yeah. So obviously I don't know the

125:21

company and the company you can find it

125:22

on Amazon mixed it up and it's laced

125:25

with something or they just put high

125:27

concentration THC and I kind of know

125:29

what teach but this is we're talking 48

125:31

hours later and I'm still kind of

125:33

feeling it. So I'm super curious with my

125:36

blood work so I'm waiting for that to

125:38

come in. So [laughter]

125:40

>> okay

125:40

>> be careful people out there because

125:42

>> be careful with those gummies folks.

125:44

>> Yeah it's not regulated.

125:46

>> Yeah. Dom, is there anything else you

125:48

would like to mention or anywhere you'd

125:51

like to point people before we wind this

125:54

to a close?

125:55

>> I don't think so. I mean, we talked a

125:56

lot about like sardine fasting and

125:58

everything, I think, before

126:00

>> in the prior conversation. Yeah.

126:01

>> Yeah. Yeah. I'd like to credit to Dr.

126:04

Annette Bosworth, Dr. Bos, because I

126:07

mean, I've kind of came up with this

126:08

idea, but it got traction and I think

126:11

she has a lot of people that email me

126:13

about sardine fasting heard it from Dr.

126:15

boss and she's amplified the message

126:17

with millions of YouTube followers, but

126:19

she kind of like took an idea and

126:21

actually put it into practice and

126:24

amplified it through a lot of people and

126:26

then those people emailed me about it.

126:29

So that amplified sort of and secured

126:32

like my knowledge. Yes. Okay, these

126:33

benefits are and now she's been on Diary

126:35

of a CEO podcast I think and some other

126:38

podcasts. So, I'd also like to mention

126:39

I'm testing today even there's a company

126:42

coming out.

126:43

>> I don't know if I can mention, but I

126:44

will. Metaf Foods

126:46

>> and for years there's no whole foodbased

126:49

ketogenic diet prescription foods.

126:52

>> So, I have no association with the

126:53

company. I'm just testing their product.

126:54

But they're called Medi Foods.

126:56

>> How do you spell that? Me- TI.

126:58

>> M DI F O

127:01

>> Medi [clears throat]

127:02

I got it. Medi Foods.

127:04

>> Yeah. Medi Foods with with a Z. And I

127:08

got to tell you, these are like gourmet

127:10

foods and then they hit the macros of

127:12

like a modified ketogenic diet. And we

127:15

talked about if someone says the

127:17

ketogenic diet is not palatable, they

127:20

have to see these foods.

127:21

>> They're prescription whole food. There's

127:24

other companies that tried to do this

127:26

and they even got the packaging is is

127:30

compostable. It looks like plastic, but

127:32

I could throw it in my garden and it

127:33

breaks down.

127:34

>> I'm very impressed with this. I just

127:36

mentioned that because I just got these

127:37

foods yesterday and I was really

127:40

impressed, but other companies have not

127:43

been so impressive. So, Metap Foods is

127:45

is pretty impressive. And Quest

127:47

Nutrition tried to do this a while back

127:49

and I think their foods were good, but

127:50

they got a new CEO and just phased it

127:52

out.

127:53

>> But I like the idea of a prescription

127:56

whole food ketogenic diet that

127:59

potentially a doctor could write a

128:00

prescription and these a week of foods

128:02

could be sent to the patients. I've been

128:04

questioning why this someone has not

128:06

done this but I know the margins are

128:08

very small like in the food world so

128:10

it's hard to you know kind of get that

128:12

up and running so

128:13

>> I mean they could take the approach that

128:15

a lot of companies take a lot of tech

128:17

startups take like Uber Tesla etc you

128:21

sell you sell in the beginning

128:23

>> for much higher price to people who are

128:26

willing to pay that you use that to

128:28

subsidize the R&D or the scale necessary

128:31

>> to then offer right instead of Uber Uber

128:34

Black, you have Uber X. And similarly

128:36

for a lot of companies, I mean, I would

128:39

pay for this, right? And I'm I wouldn't

128:42

say totally price insensitive, but I'm

128:44

willing to pay for convenience cuz there

128:46

does come a point where I've had enough

128:48

canned mackerel and salads with ribeye

128:51

that I would love to have something

128:53

else. Y

128:53

>> in any case, [clears throat] so I will

128:55

check out Medy Foods. Let's see. Dom,

128:58

are you active on social anywhere?

128:59

Should people find you anywhere online?

129:01

Yeah, I'm not too active, but I try to

129:05

jump on about, you know, once or twice a

129:07

week. I cap my social to maybe an hour a

129:10

week.

129:10

>> Yep. Smart man.

129:11

>> But I try to respond back to things.

129:13

Yeah. Kind of delete the the apps from

129:15

my phone or some of them, but I do

129:16

repost things and try to acknowledge

129:18

some questions and stuff people have on

129:20

this. And then I collect questions. And

129:22

then we have our own podcast, the

129:23

Metabolic Link podcast, and we have a

129:25

metabolic initiative platform which has

129:27

ACCME accreditation. So you can get CME

129:30

credits from it. So that has been a

129:32

project, you know, that we're working on

129:33

and trying to advance everything we're

129:35

talking about into human application

129:38

through that.

129:39

>> Beautiful. Well, trying to think of any

129:40

other links. Is there are there any

129:42

other links that you want to mention?

129:43

And we'll stick these all in the show

129:44

notes as well for people.

129:46

>> Keto nutrition.org.

129:48

No products. I don't sell anything. So

129:50

ketorition.org org information website,

129:53

the Metabolic Link podcast and the

129:56

Metabolic Health Initiative

129:59

education platform are like the three

130:01

biggies, I think. So,

130:02

>> beautiful. We will link to all of those

130:05

things for people listening as well as

130:07

[laughter]

130:09

God save the people who help me do the

130:11

show notes. They're going to have a lot

130:13

to dig through, but [snorts]

130:16

we will link to everything that we can

130:18

find a link for at tim.blog/mpodcast.

130:21

Just search Dominic and this will be the

130:24

most recent episode. I mean, we may have

130:26

some in the future, so you'll find it.

130:29

And Dom, thank you so much for taking

130:31

the time, man. Always great to see you.

130:32

>> My pleasure. Thank you, Tim, for having

130:34

me. Appreciate it. Good seeing you.

130:36

>> Yeah. And everybody, as per always,

130:39

thanks for tuning in. And until next

130:41

time, be just a bit kinder to others and

130:44

also to yourself, especially if you

130:47

might be self flagagillating yourself

130:48

over not hitting your GKIs like yours

130:50

truly. [laughter]

130:52

All right, take care everybody.

Interactive Summary

The discussion highlights the numerous benefits of ketosis and ketogenic diets, including significant weight loss due to fluid reduction and improved insulin sensitivity, leading to a shift towards fat burning. Beyond physical benefits, ketosis profoundly impacts cognitive function and mental health by quieting the mind, elevating GABA, and lowering glutamate, making it a promising area for metabolic psychiatry and seizure management. The speaker's personal experience with Lyme disease demonstrated ketosis's ability to alleviate cognitive and joint pain symptoms, theorized to work by targeting glycolytic microbes and enhancing the adaptive immune response. Ketosis also plays a crucial role in cancer management by slowing tumor growth and augmenting standard treatments, and it offers neuroprotective effects, potentially delaying the onset of neurodegenerative diseases like Alzheimer's. For fat-adapted individuals, low blood ketone readings might indicate high utilization rather than a failure of ketosis, with breath ketones potentially offering a more accurate measure. The body develops "metabolic memory," meaning periodic engagement in ketosis, such as one week per month, can yield enduring benefits by improving mitochondrial function. When considering exogenous ketones, palatability, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and especially toxicity are critical factors, with 1,3-Butanediol-based esters raising concerns for chronic use due to potential liver issues and dependency. Proper protein intake, slowed by fat, fiber, and salt, is essential to avoid gluconeogenesis, and physical activity after meals aids glucose uptake. The conversation also explores effective fiber sources like broccoli, wild blueberries, and apples, and recommends capping MCT oil consumption at 20ml twice daily, preferably with meals. For neurodegenerative disease prevention, a low-carb diet complemented by periodic deep ketosis, alongside exercise and regular biomarker monitoring, is suggested.

Suggested questions

11 ready-made prompts