HomeVideos

Kara Swisher's Warning About Meta's New AI Tool | Pivot

Now Playing

Kara Swisher's Warning About Meta's New AI Tool | Pivot

Transcript

1970 segments

0:00

Any adult with a public Instagram

0:01

account was automatically opted in. Cara

0:04

Swisser has opted out now. Just so you

0:05

know. These people, are they just

0:07

constant information thieves?

0:12

[music]

0:14

Hi everyone, this is Pivot from New York

0:16

Magazine and the Vox Media Podcast

0:18

Network. I'm Carara Swisser. Scott is

0:20

off again. Who knows where he is? He's

0:23

floating around on some yacht in some

0:25

Italian area, I think. Uh, and but I

0:27

have brought in someone who is much

0:28

smarter than him. Matt Bellan,

0:30

journalist, founding partner of Puck and

0:32

host of the Town Podcast. Welcome, Matt.

0:36

>> Thanks for having me. I don't know about

0:37

that comparison to Scott, but I'll take

0:38

it.

0:39

>> No, he's really smart. But in the topics

0:41

that we're going to be talking about,

0:42

and there's so many of them, you are you

0:44

just do an amazing job and an amazing

0:46

reporter on Hollywood and and and

0:48

broader. You talk about AI and manner

0:50

all manner of things. And I just want to

0:52

put a also a shout out to Eric Gardner

0:54

who writes with you sometimes on the

0:56

legal stuff. Riveting.

0:58

>> He's great. Yeah. Once a week at Buck.

1:00

He's great.

1:00

>> I got to tell you important actually.

1:02

It's stuff I didn't know about and I you

1:04

know you understand how especially

1:06

around copyright and things like that.

1:08

Anyway, it's really good. I've been

1:09

having a one of the things reason I want

1:10

to have you on because um you you really

1:14

have written some of the smartest stuff

1:16

around a lot of these mergers we and

1:18

more to come and so I want to sort of

1:19

get a preview of where you think are

1:21

going but I want to you recently I want

1:24

to bring something up. You recently said

1:25

can Lions is a quote tacky business

1:28

conference. How'd that go over?

1:30

>> Uh okay

1:31

>> tacky tacky I would the wine is lovely

1:34

but it's

1:34

>> well I did say enjoy the rosé. So

1:36

listen, I did an intro my newsletter a

1:38

couple weeks ago during Can Lion, which

1:40

I called it a soulless corporate

1:42

boondoggle and that I would not be

1:44

attending that year. Uh it seemed to

1:47

have triggered everybody who was there

1:49

because I kept hearing from people that

1:50

it was coming up at different panels.

1:52

Ben Smith asked um Alex Cooper about it

1:56

on his panel. And listen, I I think it

1:58

was a little misunderstood. I don't mind

2:00

a boondoggle. Like I love a good

2:02

boondoggle. The problem with Can Lion is

2:05

that they call it a festival of

2:08

creativity.

2:09

>> You're right. Correct. Yes.

2:10

>> And it is not it is it is about

2:13

platforms for selling advertising.

2:15

>> That's correct. That is correct. Yeah.

2:17

>> I you know through my career covering

2:19

entertainment I go to the can film

2:21

festival which happens a month earlier.

2:23

That to me is can because yes it's a

2:26

market but it's ultimately about the art

2:30

and displaying the art and you know even

2:32

like my joke is that can lion makes the

2:35

TV upfronts look like the Oscars

2:37

[laughter]

2:38

>> because at least at the upfronts they're

2:40

talking about the the the product the

2:43

shows the movies it's all about the

2:45

talent it's all that is not can line

2:47

it's

2:48

>> swinging ads is how I look at it the

2:50

>> it's about ads and it's about AI

2:52

empowered

2:53

engagement technology and just all of

2:55

that that stuff, which is fine.

2:58

Acknowledge it, but don't like these ad

3:00

executives get up there on on their

3:02

podiums and talk about storytelling and

3:06

the creativity.

3:06

>> Storytelling is back in case you're

3:08

interested.

3:08

>> It's all about story. Rita Pharaoh at

3:11

Disney, the ads the ads uh chief was all

3:13

about, you know, we empower storytellers

3:15

and I'm just like, stop. You're selling

3:18

>> pay for storytellers with the ads.

3:20

>> Yeah. Whatever. It's just the whole

3:22

thing. The whole thing to me is gross.

3:24

And you know, it doesn't mean it won't

3:25

go in the future. I like a good glass of

3:27

rosé.

3:27

>> Well, I have to say when you It's good

3:30

for it. Everyone's like, "Why do you

3:32

keep going?" I'm like, "It's really good

3:33

for my business. I get a lot of ads

3:34

there." Like I get a lot of business,

3:38

you know, you're sort of like you're

3:39

sort of prancing for the for the for the

3:41

advertisers essentially. And

3:42

>> yeah, which is the upfronts are

3:44

ultimately about that as well, but

3:46

they're also about the creativity of the

3:50

people who make the content. And I don't

3:52

think, you know, when when Alex Cooper

3:54

goes there, she's not talking about, you

3:56

know, the nuances of what what goes into

3:58

her show. She's talking about who she

4:01

reaches,

4:02

>> how it's a big audience, and why you

4:04

should buy ads with her.

4:05

>> That's correct. Yes, [laughter] she's

4:06

prancing. Prancing, you know,

4:09

>> and I think what it what it tapped into

4:11

is this. You know, there is a changing

4:13

of the guard going on right now. The

4:14

creator economy is gigantic. Obviously,

4:17

I know that the Can Film Festival has

4:20

probably seen better days in terms of

4:22

relevance to the larger culture, but

4:25

it's still ultimately about the art and

4:28

that's what I was saying.

4:30

>> Yeah, that's true. Yeah. Yeah. We're

4:31

slinging ants. That's what we're doing.

4:32

That's why I'm there. Also, the Rosa is

4:34

excellent and also my kids. I took my

4:36

kids and we have a good time.

4:37

>> I'm sure. You know what? I love a good

4:38

yacht party.

4:39

>> Yeah. I I don't go I don't can't go to

4:41

those anymore. I got invited to one.

4:43

Piers Morgan had one and I was like

4:44

there is nothing I would like to not do

4:47

more than be on a a a yacht a yacht that

4:51

doesn't doesn't go anywhere. They keep

4:53

it there. It doesn't like move. It's

4:55

>> those are the worst. The ones that are

4:57

just parked in the in like the harbor

4:59

there. It's like well

5:00

>> what's the difference between this yacht

5:02

party and going to a podium or like a

5:04

little like uh you know beach setup?

5:07

There's no difference. It's just you're

5:08

floating.

5:09

>> Yep. Absolutely. Anyway, we've got a lot

5:10

to talk to today. Um uh but first I want

5:13

to begin with I think a pretty big

5:15

story. Lawyers for several states are

5:16

finalizing an antitrust lawsuit

5:18

challenging Paramounts acquisition of

5:20

Warner Brothers. It is going to be

5:21

filed. I know a lot about this. They

5:23

have been in touch.

5:24

>> It's politically untenable to not file.

5:27

>> Correct. That's correct. The suit could

5:28

let me just put it out. Sue could

5:30

interfere with Paramount's plan to

5:31

complete the deal in the coming weeks.

5:32

The DOJ cleared the acquisition rather

5:35

quickly last month. Talk about uh this

5:38

the lawsuit. Obviously, it's Rob Bont

5:40

from California, but there are other

5:41

states. There's several states involved.

5:44

Um, and and of course there's the the

5:46

ongoing British uh the the person who's

5:48

head of essentially competition in

5:50

Britain is saying she's she's sort of

5:53

adjacent curious of slowing this thing

5:55

down at the very least. Uh which was

5:57

unusual for her to say. Several British

5:59

people are like, uh, that's not great

6:00

for them. Uh, it could be a leverage

6:02

thing. Talk about the the entire thing

6:05

and where you see it going. It's an

6:07

interesting one because first of all,

6:09

the antirust case here is not as strong

6:13

as some other ones recently that liation

6:17

etc. like this one you know Paramount

6:20

and Warers are not leaders in the

6:23

industry and they're battling these big

6:26

tech players like Netflix, Amazon,

6:29

Apple. So, it's it's you know, when they

6:32

say this merger is pro competition, it's

6:34

sort of their buzzword they always say

6:35

in their press releases. Like, they're

6:37

not totally wrong. If this works and

6:40

they can create a legitimate competitor

6:43

to a Netflix, to an Amazon, like that

6:46

that is pro competition. Now, obviously,

6:48

the wreckage within Hollywood to do this

6:52

is going to be thousands of jobs lost

6:55

and a legacy studio vanishing. And

6:58

that's what's got gotten everybody up in

7:00

arms. The the the state action I it's

7:04

going to be tough, but they need to

7:07

clear a injunction to actually stop

7:11

this. They need to go to a court and a

7:13

court needs to say, "Okay, not only do

7:15

you have a likelihood of winning here,

7:17

I'm going to enjoin this merger from

7:21

closing." That's the real leverage. If

7:24

they can get that, then they're going to

7:27

be in a best position to extract

7:29

significant concessions because I think

7:31

that's what this is happening behind the

7:32

scenes. Obviously, Megan Del Raheem, who

7:34

is their general counsel, is in the

7:36

middle of this. He's been in the middle

7:37

of the British thing. They're fighting

7:38

it on two fronts. And I think the

7:40

British group essentially just wants

7:42

stuff like promises around the

7:45

>> States want stuff, too.

7:46

>> Yes, they do want stuff. So, explain

7:48

what first start with the British there.

7:50

Just for people to know, there's a big

7:51

Harry Potter studio out there. There may

7:53

be some people visiting it, the tourism

7:55

stuff. They want job, some children's

7:57

programming stuff. Explain what they

7:59

want in Britain versus the US.

8:01

>> Yeah. So, first of all, there's there's

8:04

varying reports as to what they actually

8:06

want because they haven't actually said

8:07

the the children's programming thing

8:09

doesn't seem to be that big of a

8:11

problem. Paramount has a joint venture

8:14

in the UK to distribute movies and it's

8:17

with Comcast with NBC Universal for the

8:21

Universal movies and there's a scenario

8:24

where they exit that. Now they may

8:26

actually want to do that on their own

8:29

because the Ellison's may want to just

8:31

not have a partner there but that's one

8:33

area where they are they are together

8:36

with a competitor that they may have to

8:38

divest there. There's also some

8:41

television interest there that they

8:42

have. The the the real goal

8:46

is to get them to concede to certain

8:49

things and if it's a divestment of

8:51

certain television interests, if it's a

8:53

an exit from this joint venture, that's

8:56

something where they can claim victory

8:58

and then they can move on.

9:00

>> Job retention.

9:01

>> Uh well, I don't know actually that has

9:04

been the the something that the European

9:06

regulators have gone gone after in the

9:07

past. Mhm.

9:09

>> So that could be now I think that is

9:11

something that is going to be much more

9:12

relevant for the state cases. Rob Bont

9:15

in California, he's interested in

9:17

preserving jobs and getting a commitment

9:19

from the Ellison's to continue to

9:22

operate Warner Brothers and Paramount

9:24

separately.

9:26

You know, David Ellison has committed to

9:28

releasing 30 movies per year from the

9:30

two studios in theaters, 15 a year,

9:34

which is a pretty robust slate,

9:36

>> right? Committed. He has no he doesn't

9:38

have to.

9:39

>> No, that's that's my point is that maybe

9:41

they get that in writing,

9:42

>> right?

9:43

>> Maybe Okay.

9:44

>> There is some kind of commitment to do

9:45

that for 10 years in writing. Maybe

9:48

there's a commitment to uh avoid, you

9:50

know, the sweeping job losses at the

9:53

different studios. So, they're they're

9:55

looking here. They're the strategy is to

9:58

try to use the lawsuit and the threat of

10:03

a delay here because remember $650

10:06

million per quarter Paramount has to pay

10:09

to warn a discovery in a ticking fee

10:12

after October 1st. So if this drags on,

10:16

it gets more and more expensive for them

10:18

and they're trying to use that leverage

10:21

to get stuff. Um, I believe that

10:24

ultimately a cons a consolidation or a

10:27

concession here might be that they would

10:29

try to get them to sell CNN because

10:32

obviously this is a political concern.

10:33

That is not an antirust concern and Bont

10:36

has kind of punted on that. But I know

10:39

that in the attorney general's circle

10:44

that is something they have discussed as

10:45

a group.

10:46

>> They have I would agree with you. I

10:49

would agree that

10:49

>> the problem is that's not really an

10:51

antirust remedy,

10:52

>> right? How can you make someone do that?

10:54

I mean, a part of me is like, good idea.

10:55

The second is like, can you really make

10:57

someone do sell you don't want to sell,

10:59

right?

10:59

>> And the CNN business, while still

11:01

robust, hundreds of millions of dollars

11:03

a year in profits, that's not the basis

11:05

of this merger.

11:07

>> No, the linear networks are not.

11:09

>> No, but it's a sticking point. It's a

11:11

stick. It's a

11:12

>> It's political. And this has become a

11:14

political issue. Now, the Ellison's made

11:15

it political by jumping into bed with

11:17

the Trump administration so much, but

11:20

now you have Elizabeth Warren, you have

11:22

Lena Khan, you have all the antitrust

11:24

people that are putting pressure on

11:26

other Democrats like Rob Bont who wants

11:28

to have a future in Democratic politics.

11:31

And he needs to do something here and

11:34

get some kind of concession or trophy

11:38

that he can go back to the Democrats and

11:40

say, "We let this merger go through, but

11:42

we got XYZ." So what what do you think

11:46

he can get that? Do you think the

11:47

Ellison's would would discourage that

11:50

for example?

11:52

What else could he get? What else what

11:53

would be as important?

11:55

>> I know there is a document that resides

11:58

at Paramount that has all the things

12:00

that they are willing to concede

12:04

and it's just a question of how far down

12:06

the menu they will go and what they

12:09

actually ask for. I don't know if

12:12

they're going to agree to preserve jobs

12:16

specifically. I mean, if you look at

12:17

this company, they have$80 billion in

12:20

debt. They're

12:20

>> There's no other way. No other way. No

12:22

other way. Yeah. The entire transaction

12:25

is premised on significant synergies.

12:29

So, if you all of a sudden agree not to

12:32

fire people and then you do this deal

12:34

and you're stuck with all this cost and

12:36

you're trying to appease your lenders

12:39

and your Middle East backers, like that

12:42

puts you in a really tough spot.

12:43

>> It does. And many people off the record

12:46

who, you know, sort of performerly say,

12:48

"Yeah, great idea of a new strong studio

12:50

like the money." Like, good luck. Like

12:53

every smart person I know is like I

12:56

recall having a meeting with David

12:57

Zazoff when I said they're not going to

12:59

be able to do anything because the costs

13:01

are too high and they have to cut too

13:02

much and their debt is too high. I just

13:04

said I was just a math person so doesn't

13:06

look like they can grow easily. And he

13:09

called me and said we we should have

13:10

drinks and talk about this and I was

13:12

like I'm sorry I'm a math person. It

13:14

just doesn't work and you have to cut.

13:16

There's no growth for you anywhere. Um,

13:19

and

13:19

>> well, they [clears throat] premised that

13:20

merger on a revenue number that never

13:23

materialized.

13:24

>> Correct. And

13:25

>> they put it out there that the TV group

13:28

would generate a significant amount of

13:30

profit every year. Um, and it just kept

13:32

going down and down and down to the

13:34

point where almost immediately they had

13:35

to revise their aspirations and the

13:37

whole thing fell apart.

13:38

>> That's right. And I was like, I'm sorry.

13:40

I don't know. Are you a magician? Are

13:41

you going to start selling drugs? Like I

13:43

was like, what? Explain to me where the

13:45

money is coming. And this here it's

13:47

quantumly. except that they're rich. And

13:49

even if you're rich,

13:50

>> wild card here,

13:51

>> e even if you're rich, you're I wouldn't

13:55

say's cheap, but Larry Ellison is cheap,

13:58

right? Like ultimately, do you want to

14:00

throw this money at your son, right?

14:03

Essentially, do you want to give him

14:05

someone who has a questionable like

14:07

record of moneymaking, right? Not an

14:09

enormous money like Sky Dance was not a

14:11

big money maker. Um, and so that's the

14:14

question is how rich are you and how

14:17

much to me speaking of yachts it's like

14:20

a big leaky yacht. I was like how much

14:21

you want to put on the yacht? Like how

14:22

much do you want to

14:24

>> We have precedent here. Remember Larry

14:26

Ellison funded Anna Pererna which was

14:29

Megan Ellison's film production company

14:32

David's sister that was very prolific

14:35

for a decade and made a ton of Oscar

14:37

winning movies and her by Spike Jones

14:40

that was a Megan Ellison production and

14:42

then at some point Larry said enough is

14:45

enough you've lost so much money I can't

14:48

continue to bankroll this and the place

14:52

dramatically downsized.

14:53

>> Right. Right. And so the question is, is

14:55

he that was 10 that was Larry Ellison

14:57

many years ago. Is he willing to do this

15:00

for his son to me? Larry Ellison is the

15:02

is the fulcrum here for everything. It's

15:04

like I'm not spending I I don't want to

15:06

pay for this muffler. I don't want and

15:08

like the question is does he really I

15:09

don't think he gives a rat's ass about

15:12

CNN in any way.

15:13

>> Oh, see I've heard differently. I've

15:15

heard that that was the case in in in

15:17

the beginning,

15:18

>> but that he has come around to the

15:21

influence of it and cares very much

15:24

about Israel, for instance, and

15:26

>> wants to kind of put the media on the

15:28

right track and he's been spending time

15:30

with President Trump. And I think that

15:33

both he and David now are more

15:37

interested, not as a business. They know

15:39

that news is not a great business, but a

15:42

lot of this merger is premised on the

15:44

combination of CBS News and CNN and all

15:48

the people they can fire at those news

15:50

networks to combine their news gathering

15:52

operations. And that I think is a reason

15:55

why they may not offer to sell CNN as

15:59

part of this even though it might be

16:01

politically a winner.

16:02

>> So, oh, so to finish, what happens then?

16:04

What is what can Bont get if he can't

16:07

get that? Well, we know that

16:09

>> any chance of getting that. You say no

16:11

because Larry likes it.

16:12

>> Yeah. I don't think he's going to be

16:13

able to get it. I think they want it,

16:14

but I don't think he's going to be able

16:15

to get it. And and it becomes

16:17

complicated because of, you know, it's

16:19

not a real It opens a lot of doors that

16:22

I'm not sure the Democrats even want to

16:24

open um because something overtly

16:26

political as a concession for a merger.

16:29

But I do think they can get uh the the

16:32

movie thing, some kind of commitment in

16:34

writing. I think that you to release 30

16:37

movies a year. I think they can get a

16:40

commitment to buy a certain amount of

16:42

content or make a certain amount of

16:44

content in California, which as you know

16:47

is a big deal these days with all the

16:48

runaway productions and that will be

16:51

something that Bont could get. Um, you

16:53

know, I don't know what the specifics of

16:55

what the other states might want. You

16:58

know, you know, New Jersey is one of the

16:59

states considering and they have a big

17:01

production hub there. maybe they can get

17:03

some commitments to film there. Uh so I

17:06

think it's going to be much more about

17:07

investment than it is about preventing

17:11

the loss of jobs. Although maybe they

17:13

could get some commitment for you know

17:15

only reducing 10 15% of the workforce

17:19

per year for five years something like

17:20

that.

17:21

>> Yeah. Something. So that's where you

17:22

think it's going. I do I think that that

17:25

not these states don't have the appetite

17:27

for a three two threeyear antirust war

17:31

and Paramount certainly doesn't have the

17:33

appetite for that. So there will be some

17:35

kind of settlement but again the

17:37

leverage point comes not from filing the

17:39

lawsuit but from getting an injunction

17:42

that would prevent this deal from

17:43

closing.

17:43

>> And if they get an injunction they might

17:45

be able to get the other stuff too.

17:46

>> Exactly.

17:46

>> Because that would be an enormous win

17:48

for Bont. That would send him right to

17:50

Governor Bill.

17:51

>> I don't know about that. He's not even

17:53

running this time, but maybe in the

17:54

future. But yeah, you met him. He's

17:56

running for governor. Just FYI,

17:58

>> right? But not this time, but you know,

18:01

or eight years if if if Biser wins.

18:04

>> Yes, that's right. Yeah. Yeah. We'll

18:05

see. But in any case, he's a he's a he's

18:07

an upand cominging politician and he's

18:09

kind of in a good

18:10

>> Listen, if we get president, maybe he

18:12

could be attorney general.

18:14

>> Yeah, that's right. Well, I don't think

18:15

so. Anyway, um let's move on. Disney has

18:18

told the FCC uh that ABC uh The View

18:22

should continue to qualify as a

18:23

bonafideed news program, making exempt

18:26

from federal equal time rules for

18:28

political candidates. The filing comes

18:29

as the FCC has been probing whether The

18:31

View violates those equal time rules. A

18:33

notable line from the filing, the First

18:35

Amendment does not permit the government

18:36

to sit in an editor's chair. Yet, that

18:38

is the seat the commission now proposes

18:40

to take. ABC launched a campaign, a very

18:43

aggressive campaign, to encourage

18:44

reviewers to make their thoughts known

18:45

to the FCC in June. and the commission

18:47

received over 76,000 comments about the

18:50

case. I, as you know, I think Brendan

18:52

Gar is a [ __ ] and he's way way

18:54

overstepped here for reasons unknown.

18:56

Um,

18:56

>> well, reasons unknown.

18:58

>> Well, he wants he has he wants a big

19:00

political career and he's backing Donald

19:02

Trump to love him.

19:03

>> Yes, exactly. It's it's pathetic in so

19:05

many ways, but um I bet mom Trump

19:07

doesn't love him, by the way. Um, so

19:09

talk about the con the consequences here

19:12

for both sides because I think Brennan

19:14

Gar has overstepped especially in his

19:17

statements because his statements go way

19:19

over the line of any FCC chairman I've

19:21

heard in the many years I've covered

19:23

them.

19:24

>> Yeah, it's interesting here because the

19:26

this is all happening with the backdrop

19:29

of Trump not necessarily being as

19:31

powerful in the media sphere as he was

19:33

even a year ago. You know, we're heading

19:35

into lame duck status. the polling is

19:38

where it is and it's it's not, you know,

19:41

I think that Brennan Carr was a little

19:43

bit surprised that Disney came back so

19:45

aggressively.

19:46

>> Yes, he was. Yeah.

19:47

>> And and and he's now on Twitter like

19:50

trying to counter this this pretty

19:53

normal strategy. I mean, when there's

19:55

ever a carriage fight amongst

19:57

distributors and content providers or

20:00

>> Disney's always good at it.

20:01

>> Yeah. They they go after their fans.

20:03

>> The New York one. I loved watching the

20:05

New York one. That was a real fun.

20:07

>> And shocker, people who watch The View

20:09

are interested in The View having the

20:11

freedom to have on any guests that they

20:14

want. And if Disney communicates to them

20:16

to stand up to the government to keep

20:18

your show that you like as your show,

20:21

they're going to respond. So I think

20:23

this was totally predictable. What's the

20:25

most interesting angle to me is through

20:28

the lens of the new CEO of Disney, Josh

20:30

Dear.

20:31

>> Yes, exactly.

20:32

>> He is being aggressive here and he's

20:34

pushing back on this one. He's pushing

20:35

back on the dumb Kimmel thing, Jimmy

20:38

Kimmel thing where they claim that, you

20:40

know, they're going after Disney because

20:42

of their DEI policies, but we all know

20:45

they were trying to put fear and censor

20:48

Jimmy Kimmel and Disney's really

20:50

fighting back on that. And and I don't

20:52

know that Bob Iger, the previous CEO,

20:55

would have been as aggressive on this.

20:57

>> I think he wanted to be. I think he felt

20:59

like he was that the the way Jimmy

21:02

Kimmel went down wasn't exactly what

21:04

happened. Like I think he was he w he

21:07

had been supportive, but the way it went

21:08

down because he didn't say anything. He

21:10

didn't call reporters. He didn't, you

21:12

know, he didn't really handle that very

21:14

well.

21:14

>> Well, I did an interview with the FT a

21:16

couple weeks ago and he said that he

21:19

didn't like Kimmel's comments about

21:21

Charlie [clears throat] Kirk and wanted

21:23

him to apologize, which he had never

21:24

said before.

21:25

>> Yes. But I think he also felt that he

21:28

had supported Kimmel over the many

21:30

years, you know what I mean? And that

21:32

that his that, you know, I think he was

21:34

surprised by the pileon on him. Um, and

21:37

I, you know, I just I said to him, well,

21:40

why were you surprised? Like people like

21:41

Jimmy Kimmel, it seemed ridiculous what

21:43

Carr was doing. Like it doesn't I think

21:46

he felt like he had a long career and

21:48

should have people should have given him

21:49

a little more credit over the time. But

21:51

talk about why Josh is doing this. So I

21:53

think it's really interesting to be one

21:55

of your early moves.

21:56

>> He's a different person and he has a

21:58

different view on this and I think that

22:01

the people advising him are telling him

22:03

that they are in the right here. I mean

22:04

you mentioned Eric Gardner. He did a

22:06

whole analysis of this for Buck. Disney

22:08

has the upper hand here, right?

22:10

>> And I think Brendan Carr knows it.

22:12

They're just trying to be bullies

22:14

>> and Disney is a really big popular

22:17

corporation that people have an

22:19

emotional connection to. So, I think

22:22

that he's playing his hand here and they

22:24

know that they ultimately if this did

22:27

get litigated, they would come out on

22:29

top. So, why not be more aggressive?

22:31

>> Well, you know, it is interesting the

22:33

push back I find I I think it's the

22:35

timing is correct because one of the

22:37

things when I was arguing with them

22:38

during the Kimmel times, a lot of the

22:39

Disney executives, I was like, he's

22:41

going down. Trump is popularity is only

22:44

headed one direction at this point. I

22:46

was like, you all can look like heroes

22:48

at this moment by just stick, you know,

22:50

given the whole thing that happened with

22:52

Stephanopoulos and everything else,

22:53

which is I I suspect there was probably

22:56

more problems there to litigate that. In

22:58

this case, it's a clean shot against an

23:00

oath like who's who's [clears throat]

23:02

attached to a very increasingly

23:04

unpopular president. I was like, I don't

23:06

know. And people love the view. Like

23:08

they do the fans fans love it.

23:10

>> And here's the thing. When Iger came

23:11

back to Disney in 2022,

23:14

one of his big priorities was to

23:17

depoliticize the brand. The previous

23:20

CEO, Bob Chapeek, had gotten into this

23:22

big fight in Florida with Ronda Santis.

23:24

You had Republicans saying, you know,

23:27

boycott Disney. And that's

23:29

[clears throat]

23:31

outside of Disney. I know that was

23:32

troubling to the executives. You know,

23:33

they were marching in front of white

23:35

supremacists. If you recall, people

23:37

don't remember this.

23:38

>> Disney is an everybody brand. And Josh

23:40

Dearo is a is a brand guy. So I I

23:45

understand why they wouldn't want to get

23:48

into a fight with a Republican

23:50

president. And if you noticed last week,

23:52

no other network went harder on the

23:54

anniversary of America than Disney ABC.

23:57

They literally did 24 hours of

23:59

programming.

24:00

>> Yeah.

24:01

>> Yeah.

24:01

>> And they got 40 million viewers out of

24:03

it. But my point is like they're trying

24:06

Disney is trying to wa walk both sides

24:08

here publicly be be very kind of pro

24:12

America and pro pro- every political

24:15

party but while also now standing up for

24:18

itself which it did not do in the

24:20

Stephanopoulos matter

24:21

>> right and it will succeed here I feel

24:24

Ben car is a paper tiger

24:26

>> oh I think they will absolutely succeed

24:28

I don't know they'll back down

24:29

completely but this will eventually go

24:31

away

24:31

>> and then they will get the news the news

24:34

uh out. Correct.

24:35

>> Yes. The news you mean the news

24:37

exemption or the equal time exemption?

24:39

Yeah. I think Disney will win on that.

24:40

>> Yeah. It's clearly an interview show.

24:42

It's so It's kind of ridiculous on so

24:44

many levels.

24:45

>> Yeah. The annoying thing is that they've

24:46

kind of been chilling themselves during

24:49

this whole process and not having

24:51

political guests on as much.

24:53

>> Well, they had Vance on recently, you

24:55

know, the show they did. They had Vance

24:57

on, but yeah, you're right. I think they

24:58

definitely have, but you know, they do

24:59

better with like, you know, the guy from

25:03

um just, you know, the handsome guy, you

25:05

know, that's what they do better with

25:06

honestly.

25:07

>> I'm gonna take your word on the

25:08

programming of the view. I'm not a

25:10

regular viewer.

25:10

>> Oh, it's I I was just a guest host on it

25:13

for two days and I hit a ball. It's so

25:15

much fun and such a great audience. And

25:17

one of the things that I you know,

25:18

there's a lot of declines in watching,

25:21

but it's a really well done show. It's

25:23

really it exactly meets its audience and

25:26

it's clever and interesting and oddly

25:29

you know in a lot of these when you're

25:30

on cable shows as you know they're

25:32

they're lacking of substance it feels

25:35

substantive actually it's actually a

25:36

good talk and so I think that's why it

25:38

works

25:39

>> Barbara Walters genius was on to

25:41

something

25:41

>> genius my legend if I had to pick anyone

25:44

who was one of the finest interviews in

25:45

the land it would be Barbara Walters but

25:47

also

25:47

>> she does not get enough credit for

25:49

conceiving that show

25:50

>> yeah I agree she I agree and also by the

25:52

way Whoopy Goldberg runs that thing like

25:54

a she's a she's really good at her job.

25:56

That's all.

25:57

>> She really is and really creates a

25:59

really interesting environment that is

26:01

unexpected. Anyway, I like being on it.

26:03

I enjoy it and I hope for the best for

26:04

them because they really uh they really

26:06

produce a great show and good for Josh

26:08

Dear for this being one of his first

26:10

things because he's going to win anyway.

26:11

Okay, Matt, let's go on a quick break.

26:13

When we come back, Netflix sophomore

26:15

Slump. Support for this show comes from

26:17

BetterHel. Thankfully, talking about

26:19

mental health has become much more

26:21

common, but that doesn't mean seeking

26:23

help is easy. Better Help's 2026 State

26:26

of Stigma report surveyed 2,000

26:28

Americans and revealed that 85% of

26:30

Americans pled believe getting support

26:32

is wise. Yet, 74% say society

26:35

discourages people from doing so. With

26:37

BetterHel, you can connect with a

26:38

licensed therapist from anywhere on your

26:40

schedule. With more than 30,000

26:42

therapists, BetterHelp is the world's

26:44

largest online therapy platform, having

26:46

served over six million people

26:48

worldwide. And it works, earning an

26:50

average live session rating of 4.9 out

26:52

of five based on more than 1.7 million

26:55

client reviews. BetterHelp does the

26:57

initial matching work for you so you can

26:59

focus on your therapy goals. A short

27:01

questionnaire helps identify your needs

27:02

and preferences, and their 12 plus years

27:05

of experience in industryleading match

27:06

fulfillment rate means they typically

27:08

get it right the first time. If you

27:10

aren't happy with your match, switch to

27:11

a different therapist at any time from

27:14

their tailored rex. You don't have to

27:15

let stigma stand in the way of support.

27:18

You can start therapy with BetterHelp.

27:19

You can sign up and get 10% off at

27:22

betterhelp.com/pivot.

27:24

That's betterhp.com/pivot.

27:27

Matt, we're back. Netflix is getting

27:29

into the short form content business.

27:31

The the company announced this week it's

27:33

partnered with BuzzFeed, cond people,

27:36

and various Penske media brands to bring

27:38

the digital videos to the platform.

27:39

These videos will range from

27:40

three-minute shorts to 20-minute

27:42

episodes focusing on travel, cooking,

27:44

fashion, as well as celebrity content

27:46

profiles and viral content. All these

27:47

people have been making these extra what

27:49

I call shoulder content that you see.

27:51

>> Oh, I used to do it when I ran Holly

27:53

Deorter. We had to do the video version.

27:56

>> The video version Nas does actually a

27:58

pretty good job. They all do a pretty

27:59

good job at it. This announcement comes

28:01

in the wake of a new report that Netflix

28:03

is struggling to retain fans between the

28:05

first and second seasons of top shows

28:07

with some shows shedding 50% of their

28:09

audience. Engagement is slowing too. The

28:11

amount of time customers spent watching

28:12

Netflix last year grew by less than 2%.

28:15

Um, talk about why they're doing this.

28:17

And just for people, I last yesterday

28:19

went on Brian Williams new show which is

28:21

they're also they've also bought a bunch

28:23

of podcasters. I think the one that's

28:25

doing really well is The Breakfast Club.

28:26

>> That's the one they're talking about.

28:27

But we'll know next week when their

28:29

engagement report comes out for the

28:31

first half of the year.

28:32

>> Yeah. But I don't think they're high. I

28:34

don't I feel like

28:35

>> I have heard internally the numbers are

28:36

not high, but it's early days and that's

28:38

what they're saying. They're encouraged

28:40

by this the trends.

28:41

>> Yeah. But the Breakfast Club from what I

28:43

understand is a real standout. That's

28:44

what I heard from them. So um uh talk

28:47

about this whole thing and include what

28:48

it's not really podcasting. They're t it

28:50

was a TV show that I it was an

28:52

interview. It was like you know Charlie

28:54

Rose with 100% less creepy. It was just

28:56

I don't know. You know what I And it was

28:57

like that's what that's what the set

28:58

looked like.

28:59

>> They're calling them video podcasts. I

29:00

mean, there's a a distinction there. I

29:02

think the guilds would love for them to

29:04

call them talk shows cuz they have to

29:06

pay more for them. But

29:07

>> fine, it was a talk show.

29:09

>> This is all just about Netflix having

29:12

YouTube envy. They they look at the

29:15

engagement report every month from

29:17

Neielson. They are getting their butts

29:19

kicked by YouTube. they know why, you

29:22

know, so much of the viewing on YouTube

29:25

is this lower quality, um, you know,

29:29

usergenerated.

29:30

It's just it's it's it's it's a

29:33

different product than Netflix. It's

29:35

free. Netflix is not free. and they're

29:38

saying, "How can we boost our engagement

29:41

numbers without going fullon user

29:44

generated and becoming YouTube,

29:47

>> but having enough on the platform where

29:50

people start to consider it you the

29:52

everyday you just go there to watch

29:54

video?"

29:55

>> Yeah. Yeah. I think it's tough.

29:57

>> It's sad to me.

29:58

>> I agree

29:58

>> that Netflix has such a great thing

30:00

going. They're just so it's so in their

30:01

head that they've got to match YouTube

30:04

because they see this trajectory.

30:06

>> Should be never YouTube will eat

30:08

everything

30:09

>> and then ultimately they'll wake up in 5

30:10

years and they will have to put shows on

30:13

YouTube because it's so big and so

30:14

dominant,

30:15

>> right? That is probably true

30:16

>> because ads I mean everybody's been

30:18

talking about the Netflix stock being

30:20

down 40% from last year and part of that

30:22

is because they went after Warner

30:23

Brothers and all the investors are like

30:26

whoa wait a second you guys thought you

30:27

needed a big studio to compete here I

30:29

thought you were the darling of media

30:31

but what it really is I think now is

30:34

investors are looking for the growth

30:36

narrative from Netflix. How are they

30:39

going to continue to grow and internally

30:42

they see the ads platform as being a

30:46

growth engine?

30:46

>> It is it's been rather long.

30:48

>> It is because it's not huge. I mean

30:49

Netflix I mean Amazon turned on ads for

30:52

all Prime Video viewers and it instantly

30:54

became a gigantic ads business. Netflix

30:57

did not do that. It's an optin. You get

30:59

to pay less money to get ads.

31:01

>> It's it's it's actually more attractive

31:03

across the globe from what I understand.

31:05

>> Yeah. people like free or less money and

31:07

they're willing to tolerate ads,

31:09

>> but they need the inventory. They need

31:11

people on it because they're coming from

31:13

this position of so many of their

31:15

subscribers are non ads customers that

31:19

even though they're growing the ads tier

31:21

and they're adding a bunch, you know,

31:23

the percentage of new customers that

31:24

sign up, most of them do so with for the

31:27

ad tier, they want inventory. And the

31:29

best way to do it is this lower quality,

31:32

lower cost, uh, you know, in in a a

31:35

sports term, a baseball, you know, a

31:37

middle reliever, someone that just eats

31:39

up innings.

31:41

And that's what these podcasts are.

31:43

They're looking, you know, Netflix is

31:44

also the evening streamer. People watch

31:46

at night and YouTube is the daytime

31:49

streamer. People watch at work or at

31:52

home while they're doing laundry or

31:53

whatever. And they want to compete for

31:56

those daytime eyeballs. Which of those

31:58

businesses, what do you think of these

31:59

three? I don't I think the three minute

32:01

shorts are fine. I just don't get it. I

32:03

don't know why. One of the things, you

32:05

know, also what they picked. It's not

32:08

very contro, except for maybe

32:09

Charlemagne. It's not very

32:11

controversial, right? It's very um you

32:14

know, good, but not like wow. It's like

32:16

they just signed a cooking show, you

32:18

know, yesterday. And it's not uh it's

32:21

nothing that's in the top tiers of

32:23

podcasters,

32:25

which is really interesting. Well, Bill

32:26

Simmons is there. Bill's Bill's a big

32:29

sports podcaster.

32:30

>> Yeah.

32:30

>> And you know, they have a bunch of

32:31

Ringer shows like and I my show,

32:33

disclosure, my show is a Ringer show,

32:35

but they have like the Rewatchables,

32:37

which is a big show, and they have some

32:38

bar stool shows and stuff. They're doing

32:41

more and I've heard internally they want

32:43

to do a lot more. And, you know, they're

32:46

testing it out. This is how Netflix

32:47

works.

32:48

>> They go into an area of content and if

32:51

it works, they do a ton more. They

32:53

started doing crime documentaries. they

32:56

worked and now they do a fire hose of

32:58

crime documentaries. They started doing

33:01

these choose your own adventure shows

33:03

where you could the audience would

33:04

choose and it didn't work so they

33:06

stopped doing it and that this is how

33:08

they operate. Um you know it's just to

33:11

me I wish Netflix would be Netflix and

33:14

not try to be YouTube but I understand

33:16

why they're doing that.

33:17

>> Why would if you are a podcaster or

33:19

anybody else did to do that? Why do that

33:21

if you if you have a good money just the

33:24

money they give you? Yeah, listen, some

33:25

people like the prestige of being on

33:28

Netflix.

33:29

>> It's it's a it's definitely a cooler

33:31

brand than YouTube where anybody could

33:34

be on it.

33:35

>> Um, and you know, if Netflix is

33:37

successful here, they will change

33:39

consumer behavior. Very difficult to do

33:41

that. But their their theory here is if

33:44

we put enough on here and if we have

33:46

some breakout shows, if you're a

33:48

Charlemagne fan or whatever, you're

33:50

going to go on and then all of a sudden

33:52

on your next jog, you don't go to

33:54

YouTube for the podcast you normally

33:56

listen to. You go to Netflix and that's

33:59

how you change consumer behavior.

34:01

>> Yeah. Right. Yeah. By the way, just for

34:03

people to know, the Netflix has made a

34:05

deal for video episodes of Vox Media

34:07

podcast, Unexplainable, and Switched on

34:09

Pop, uh, which is is they have a very

34:12

it's a it's a pretty good ad business,

34:14

but they'll do better on Netflix, I

34:16

think. So, people are deciding where.

34:17

>> Do you think they'll do better on

34:18

Netflix for viewership than on YouTube?

34:20

>> I think they'll do better on money.

34:23

>> On money. Yeah, because that's what

34:24

you're sacrificing right now. Yes.

34:26

>> You're sacrificing reach on YouTube for

34:28

money from Netflix. And then the promise

34:30

of maybe down the line the engagement

34:32

numbers catch up.

34:33

>> Correct. That's right. You know,

34:34

something like a pivot like we wouldn't

34:37

because we're doing so well on YouTube

34:39

and other places. But it's just it's an

34:41

interesting ju just position. A lot of

34:43

these companies will sort of test out

34:44

certain of their products on it. Um

34:47

>> I don't think that the engagement on

34:49

these videos is going to be very high. I

34:51

agree.

34:51

>> Especially at the beginning.

34:53

>> I agree. I agree.

34:53

>> Most of them are lowquality shoulder

34:55

like the Penske videos. Most of them are

34:58

auto plays that play while you're

35:00

reading an article.

35:01

>> Yeah, but they're sitting over on

35:02

YouTube doing nothing, so it's fine.

35:04

Exactly. Fine. So, um the the last thing

35:08

with Netflix, you know, every all the

35:09

investors worried about their deal

35:10

making. What is their will their next

35:12

deal be NBC Universal? What is what is a

35:15

little bit about there? I think I I

35:18

think that they are likely to at least

35:21

explore this

35:23

>> because what we learned from the Warner

35:25

Chase is that they feel they they don't

35:29

need but they would very much benefit

35:33

from strong intellectual property. It's

35:36

so difficult to create awareness to

35:39

create um you know fandoms on your own

35:43

even though you're as large as Netflix

35:44

and they've done it successfully many

35:46

times. Don't get me wrong, but having

35:49

Jurassic per Jurassic Park,

35:52

>> having the Minions,

35:53

>> the Odyssey,

35:54

>> having Well, that's a that's different

35:57

because that's a filmmaker relationship.

35:59

But you know what? Chris Nolan won't

36:01

make movies for Netflix,

36:02

>> right?

36:03

>> There is a class of filmmaker that will

36:05

not make movies for Netflix because they

36:06

do not give their product a theatrical

36:09

release meaningfully. So they would get

36:12

into that business and if it's like what

36:14

they said with Warers, they would keep

36:16

the theatrical business running at least

36:18

at first on its own. So I think that

36:21

they will at least look I don't know if

36:22

they'll make a formal bid. There's a

36:24

complicating factor because NBC is

36:26

involved and they definitely do not want

36:28

to own linear networks. The other aspect

36:30

of Netflix that that is important here

36:32

is sports. NBC Universal has the second

36:36

best collection of sports rights second

36:39

to ESPN. do. [clears throat]

36:40

>> They've got Sunday Night Football, which

36:42

is the highest rated show on television.

36:45

They've got Major League Baseball.

36:47

They've got golf. They've got um NB a

36:50

huge new NBA deal that they just did.

36:53

And they have a subscale streamer in the

36:56

US, Peacock, which only has 47 million

36:59

subscribers. And they've got all of

37:01

these sports, right? So, Netflix,

37:03

they've got to take a look at this.

37:05

>> Yeah. So, what else would they take a

37:06

look at? There's smaller ones like

37:07

Lionsgate and others, right?

37:09

>> I and they've had the opportunity to go

37:10

after those in the past and have have

37:12

not. Um, it's got to be special. I I I

37:15

honestly I don't know.

37:17

>> I don't know.

37:17

>> Who's another buyer for this? Is it

37:19

going to get bought at all? Is who's

37:20

another buyer for

37:21

>> Well, that gets to the larger question

37:23

as to whether NBC Universal is a buyer

37:26

or a seller here.

37:26

>> Seller, right? Yeah.

37:27

>> They maintain that they can 100% go it

37:30

alone and they can be a buyer and they

37:32

can look at things. The speculation is

37:33

about perhaps a video game company like

37:36

Take Two. They they did look at

37:38

Electronic Arts a number of years ago,

37:41

but uh I I think they're either going to

37:46

do something now or they're going to

37:49

wait for a while. There's tax

37:50

implications of doing this spin-off. So,

37:53

if it actually happens, I'm skeptical

37:55

that it will get to the actual spin-off.

37:57

I think Netflix, if they're going to

37:58

come in,

37:59

>> this is a Warner situation, right? This

38:01

is what

38:02

>> if if if Netflix is going to come in,

38:03

they're going to do it soon,

38:05

>> right? soon and they would make a deal

38:07

for it. Would they get it? Is there

38:09

another buyer?

38:11

>> I mean, who knows?

38:12

>> Paramount.

38:13

>> No. Are you kid? I I I joked about that

38:15

on the town. I I don't think they have

38:16

the appetite for that right now. And I

38:18

think Larry is all tapped out.

38:19

>> No, they can't. They can't afford it.

38:21

They can't

38:22

>> uh you know, only there's only so many

38:23

Saudi and uh, you know, Middle East

38:26

moneymen that you can go to.

38:28

>> Yeah. Yeah. But there's a there's a

38:30

bunch of private equity money out there.

38:32

Yeah. You know, there's a there's Apple

38:35

sitting there. Apple, everybody's been

38:36

speculating in Hollywood for years that

38:38

Apple would buy a studio. Bob Iger keeps

38:41

talking about how he wanted to merge

38:43

Disney with Apple back in the day. Uh,

38:45

you know, Apple has shown no

38:47

inclination. I talked to Eddie Q about

38:49

this. He said, "No way." But you know

38:51

what? You never know. New there's new

38:53

leadership at Apple. Maybe he'll say,

38:54

"What are we doing in content? We have

38:57

all these great shows, but we have very

38:59

little engagement." And engagement comes

39:02

from library. Having a hundred years of

39:06

movies and television shows to keep your

39:09

audience on the platform

39:11

>> 100%. And Disney.

39:13

>> I don't think so. Do you think that Do

39:15

you think Do you think NBC Universal is

39:17

going to be the first thing Josh Jamaro

39:18

does?

39:20

>> I I think it's going to be in the AI or

39:22

gaming or something like that. It's not

39:25

going to be a traditional merger and and

39:28

they would have to sell one of the

39:30

broadcast networks or get the rules

39:32

changed.

39:33

>> Yeah. Or or sell them both. Sell them

39:35

both off or have them

39:36

>> I don't think they'd sell them both. I

39:37

mean, they they've had that opportunity.

39:38

They've double triple down on keeping

39:41

that stuff. They are,

39:43

>> you know, integrating [clears throat] it

39:44

all. And

39:45

>> the broadcast TV business is still a

39:47

business. Cable is not,

39:48

>> but

39:49

>> broadcast still is.

39:51

>> Yep. It absolutely is. Anyway, um really

39:54

interesting. Next up, we have a lot to

39:56

get to. Meta has released an AI image

39:58

generator called Muse image, which the

39:59

company's calling the creative partner

40:01

that knows your world. I can't I can't

40:03

believe these people write these things.

40:04

The generator comes uh with a feature

40:07

lets users create AI images based on

40:09

people's Instagram photos and any adult

40:10

with a public Instagram account was

40:12

automatically opted in. Cara Swisser is

40:15

opted out now, just so you know.

40:16

>> You know, I saw your post on threads and

40:18

I tried to do that last night and I

40:20

couldn't find the button to do that.

40:22

>> I will show you. I will send you a step

40:24

by step. Uh the company also previewed

40:26

an AI video generator which will be

40:28

coming available in the next month. Uh

40:31

what is these people? Are they just

40:32

constant information thieves? They just

40:35

continually

40:36

>> do this.

40:37

>> Listen, it's a uh ask forgiveness not

40:40

permission strategy. [clears throat]

40:42

It's been the case from the very

40:43

beginning in Silicon Valley and it takes

40:46

the Hollywood people to step up. The

40:49

talent agency CIA put out a pretty good

40:51

statement last night. No one, they said

40:53

no one's image, name, and likeness,

40:55

voice, or creative work should be used

40:57

by a third party, including AI models

40:59

without clear documented consent.

41:01

They're telling them essentially what

41:02

the industry said about Sora when Open

41:05

AI launched it. It's like, don't make

41:08

this opt out, make it opt in,

41:10

>> right? Exactly. They hate optin.

41:12

>> I know. Because nobody does.

41:14

>> They hated optin since AOL. They hate

41:16

optin. They hate it.

41:17

>> I get it. Listen, it's a much it's a

41:19

much less convenient business. You have

41:21

to ask permission.

41:23

>> That's correct.

41:23

>> That's kind of how it works when you

41:25

have rights like copyright and name

41:27

image likeness rights.

41:28

>> They don't care. As Walt Mossberg

41:30

famously said, they're rapacious

41:32

information thieves. Um and they

41:34

continue with that quality.

41:35

>> It's not just information though. This

41:38

is like, you know, a literally, unless

41:40

he opts out, they could take a Tom Cruz

41:43

photo that he posts of himself and suck

41:46

it into their model and create a video

41:47

based on Tom Cruz.

41:49

>> That's correct. That is It's like It's

41:51

nuts. And of course, Tom Cruz is good

41:52

for the platform being on it and putting

41:54

all this marketing stuff. It's a It's a

41:56

win-win situation for them and Tom Cruz.

41:58

And instead, they kick him in the teeth.

41:59

>> But they know that they're so big now

42:01

that Tom Cruz can't market his movies

42:03

without them. That's the problem here.

42:05

It's the problem with all of these new

42:08

innovations is that Meta looks at it,

42:11

says, "Oh, we will just clone this and

42:13

use our massive distribution to put that

42:16

person out of business or we buy them,

42:19

>> right?" Yeah. Yeah. Buy or build. That's

42:20

how they That's how they think. Anyway,

42:22

I don't think this I don't I don't think

42:24

this is a great move and I think they'll

42:26

roll it back. That's my feeling. They I

42:28

think they know they're on thin ice here

42:29

with people.

42:30

>> We'll see how the studios react this

42:32

next week. You know, they haven't

42:33

actually launched the video component

42:35

yet.

42:35

>> Right. Right. But I you can turn it off.

42:37

I recommend everyone turn it off until

42:39

we know more. All right. And I'll tell

42:40

you how to do it, Matt. Um. All right.

42:42

Let's go on a quick break. When we come

42:43

back, we'll talk about the Sam Alman's

42:45

movie Fate and a little bit about

42:46

Odyssey. The Odyssey.

42:48

>> Today's show is brought to you by

42:49

Vanguard. [music] To all the financial

42:52

adviserss listening, let's talk about

42:53

bonds for a minute. Capturing value in

42:56

fixed income is not easy. Bond markets

42:58

are massive, murky, and let's be real,

43:00

lots of firms throw a couple of flashy

43:01

funds your way. and call it a day. But

43:03

not Vanguard. Vanguard delivers

43:06

institutional quality bonds. And

43:07

institutional quality isn't just a

43:09

[music] tagline. It's a commitment to

43:10

helping your clients succeed. That means

43:12

top tier products across the lineup,

43:14

including [music] more than 80 bond

43:16

funds actively managed by a global team

43:18

of over 200 sector specialists,

43:20

analysts, and traders. Plenty of [music]

43:21

firms like to spotlight a star portfolio

43:23

manager as if one brilliant investor is

43:25

doing all the heavy lifting. Vanguard

43:27

[music] takes a different approach. They

43:29

believe the best active investing ideas

43:31

shouldn't stay with one person. They

43:32

should be shared across the entire

43:34

[music] team. So, if you're looking to

43:35

give your clients consistent results

43:37

year in and year out, go see the record

43:39

for yourself at vanguard.com/audio.

43:42

That's vanguard.com/audio. [music]

43:44

All investing is subject to risk.

43:46

Vanguard Marketing Corporation

43:48

distributor.

43:50

Matt, we're back with more headlines.

43:51

The Sam Alman focused movie. The

43:53

Artificial has found a new home at an

43:55

indie studio Neon after Amazon gave it

43:57

the boot. Amazon walked away from the

43:59

project after striking a major

44:00

partnership with OpenAI. The $40 million

44:03

uh film stars Andrew Garfield as Sam

44:05

Alman and recounts the chaotic weekend

44:07

in 2023 when he was fired and was

44:09

reinstated as OpenAI's CEO. Neon plans

44:12

to release the film later this year and

44:14

is expected to position as an awards

44:15

contender. Uh you know very well

44:18

reggarded filmmaker made it. Um uh talk

44:22

about talk about that. And then just

44:24

secondly, a big movie is obviously

44:26

coming out or you mentioned Chris Nolan,

44:28

his latest film, The Odyssey, which

44:30

could be the biggest movie of the

44:31

summer, maybe the year. Tickets went on

44:32

sale, crashing AMC's app. People are

44:34

desperate to see this. Fandango says

44:36

first day sales were 10 times higher

44:38

than Nolan's last film, Oenheimer. Early

44:40

reactions have been raves despite a

44:42

backlash online. It's a fake backlash on

44:45

downing these trailers and calling the

44:47

casting of some of the actors. It's

44:49

ridiculous. It's a right-wing lunacy.

44:51

One of the biggest critics, of course,

44:52

is Elon Musk, who's been attacking the

44:54

movie, and director Nolan for months.

44:56

Uh, I haven't seen the movie. I'm going

44:57

to see it Monday, I think.

44:59

>> Yeah, I'm going Monday as well.

45:00

>> It looks It looks astonishing, you know.

45:04

Um, talk about I mean, I think they've

45:06

beat the backlash back. I don't think

45:07

any

45:08

>> That doesn't matter. That's just

45:09

[clears throat] It doesn't matter. So,

45:10

talk about these two movies, the Sam

45:11

Alman focus movie and the um and and

45:14

this uh this other one. I think it'll do

45:17

just fine. And I think neon is a good

45:18

place for it to go.

45:20

>> Listen, th this one, I don't know if you

45:21

and Scott give a wuss of the year award,

45:24

>> but Mike Hopkins at Amazon is an early

45:28

contender.

45:29

>> All right. Well, you can have one. You

45:30

have your own podcast.

45:31

>> I know I do. Trust me, we've I've gone

45:32

on and on about this.

45:33

>> What's the year? We stick with Brandon

45:35

Car is a [ __ ] That's the people we

45:36

focus on, but you can go for Mike

45:38

Hopkins, but go ahead.

45:39

>> So, listen. Amazon developed this movie,

45:41

hired Luca Guanino, who did Call Me By

45:44

Your Name and Challengers, uh, well-

45:46

reggarded filmmaker to direct this

45:48

movie. They went through all the

45:50

motions. The only thing that has changed

45:52

from when they green lit this movie last

45:54

year until now is that they now have a

45:57

$50 billion relationship with Open AI,

46:00

[clears throat]

46:00

>> right?

46:01

>> And it's so obvious that they're not

46:04

even denying it. Well, no, but when you

46:06

go around like I've I've, you know, when

46:08

you go around to these companies like

46:09

we're not touching that, you know, if

46:11

it's an Elon Musk property, they do this

46:12

all the time, right?

46:13

>> They do. But this the difference here is

46:15

that Amazon committed to this major

46:18

filmmaker and all of this talent. And

46:20

Amazon wants to be both. They want to

46:22

serve the masters in Seattle and be a

46:26

tech platform that is looking at the,

46:28

you know, the future of AI and all the

46:29

bets they're making there. But they also

46:31

want to be able to do real Hollywood

46:35

movies like Project Hail Mary that

46:37

requires relationships with talent. The

46:39

first call that Mike Hopkins had to make

46:42

on this was to Brian Lord, the head of

46:44

CIA, the most powerful talent agency

46:46

that has a lot of talent in this movie,

46:49

and tell him this movie by your

46:51

prominent filmmaker is getting dumped by

46:53

this studio. What do you think Brian

46:55

Lord is going to do the next time they

46:57

have a hot piece of material, not take

46:58

it to Mike Hopkins?

47:00

>> Right. So, what happens here is I mean,

47:02

I have read the script. I don't

47:03

particularly like the movie. I think

47:04

there's a lot of nonsense in it like

47:06

making certain people heroes who were I

47:08

think everybody's a mess in this

47:10

situation. No one looks good. But to

47:13

make Ilia a hero questionable make Jeff

47:16

Hinton a partyier. I was like what? Like

47:19

you know there's a lot of stuff I didn't

47:20

like in the script when I read it and I

47:22

got it years ago I think. But he's a

47:24

great filmmaker. I bet it's interesting.

47:26

It's sort of like the social network.

47:28

It's not really what happened but it's

47:29

not unwhat happened.

47:31

>> It's very much like that. And the the

47:33

difference here is that the

47:35

>> the stakes are much higher

47:37

>> because we're talking about these guys

47:39

who could potentially end the world. And

47:42

that's correct.

47:42

>> From what I understand, I also read an

47:44

early draft of the script. It the tone

47:45

of it is pretty dark and it makes you

47:48

feel bad. One one potential buyer who

47:50

saw and didn't buy the movie said it

47:51

it's the feel bad movie of the year.

47:53

[laughter]

47:54

>> But it it sort of doesn't matter whether

47:56

this movie is good or bad. There is a

47:58

social contract in Hollywood where if

48:00

you commit to a filmmaker and you commit

48:03

to talent, you're in this together.

48:06

And here it's Amazon, big tech company,

48:09

finally showing its face and saying, "We

48:11

are big tech company and we will bow

48:13

down and serve our master if we think

48:16

this is going to potentially even maybe

48:20

hurt our overall business." And that's a

48:23

there's a chilling effect there.

48:24

>> Yeah. And then they buy the Melania

48:26

movie. They look like idiots. They look

48:27

like

48:28

>> I know and you know listen the the

48:29

interesting thing I reported on the deal

48:31

and according to my reporting Amazon is

48:34

giving this movie away to Neon. They are

48:37

not paying a license fee that all that

48:39

they did was they committed to spend $15

48:41

million to market it and release it in

48:44

theaters which is what the filmmaker

48:46

wanted because he wanted a big

48:48

theatrical release. They're going to do

48:49

an awards campaign if the reviews are

48:51

good.

48:51

>> It's like the Trump movie. What was the

48:53

Trump movie? The

48:54

>> Apprentice. It's very similar to this

48:56

day.

48:57

The Apprentice does not have a streaming

48:59

deal.

49:00

>> Oh,

49:00

>> none of these big streamers bought The

49:02

Apprentice.

49:04

>> And that movie did not do very much

49:06

business in theaters, but it did pretty

49:08

big business on premium video on demand.

49:10

And it got two major Oscar nominations

49:13

for

49:13

>> it. It was a good movie. It was a good

49:14

film. This probably will be a good film.

49:16

We'll see.

49:17

>> I haven't seen it. So, there's mixed

49:19

reactions from the screenings, but good

49:21

actors involved and, you know, big

49:23

talent. And I think

49:24

>> this was this a good move by Amazon or

49:26

just stupid.

49:28

>> It depends whether you're in LA or

49:30

Seattle,

49:31

>> right?

49:31

>> In Seattle, you know, Mike Cop was

49:33

probably gonna get a promotion

49:34

>> because he managed this. He managed to

49:36

avoid this problem and get it sold to a

49:39

distributor that frankly is probably

49:41

going to do a better job with a movie

49:43

like this than Amazon would have. They

49:46

just lost a same filmmaker did the Julia

49:48

Roberts movie um the Me Too movie uh

49:51

After the Hunt and that movie cost $70

49:54

million and did almost no business. So

49:56

they just had a major flop when they

49:57

maybe uh Neon will be able to market

50:00

this movie. Neon did Anora which ended

50:02

up winning best picture.

50:03

>> Big hit. Yeah. Yeah. I thought it was a

50:05

perfect film for it.

50:06

>> In Seattle I think Mike Hopkins gets

50:08

props for this. In LA I think they take

50:12

a big a big credibility hit. you puts.

50:15

Anyway, and Odyssey, I think it's gonna

50:16

be enormous hit like,

50:18

>> oh, big hit, but not the biggest movie

50:19

of the year. I mean, we still got

50:20

Spider-Man coming out and Avengers like,

50:23

>> yeah,

50:23

>> those will likely be much bigger. I

50:25

think Toy Story will probably Toy Story

50:27

5 will probably end up being bigger than

50:28

the Odyssey. But the win

50:30

>> is if they can get this movie to 8,

50:32

nine, a billion, that would be a big win

50:34

for this movie.

50:35

>> For this movie and and and and then

50:37

it'll have a huge life.

50:38

>> Yeah. We think it's the biggest event of

50:41

the year. Um, but we're old people who

50:43

love history and love Chris Nolan.

50:45

>> Oh, I don't know. My kids are interested

50:46

in this movie.

50:47

>> Okay, that's good to hear.

50:48

>> That was Well, they off of course were

50:50

completely interested in Obsession and

50:52

Back Rooms. They My son knew everything

50:55

about Obsession [clears throat] and Back

50:57

rooms.

50:57

>> Those two movies are the story of the

50:59

year in Hollywood.

51:00

>> They really are.

51:00

>> The fact that two tiny movies for Gen Z

51:03

audiences can get to three $400 million.

51:06

>> It's It's such good news for the

51:08

business. See, I'm not surprised because

51:10

it had like it's sort of like heated

51:12

rival every like what a surprise. I'm

51:13

like it was an enormous book hit among

51:16

those people who like romantic

51:18

fantasies. Like it was already had an

51:20

inbuilt audience.

51:21

>> Yes. But as much as the media talked

51:23

about heated rivalry, it was never that

51:25

big of a mainstream hit.

51:28

>> Obsession cost less than a million

51:30

dollars to make.

51:31

>> Agreed. But I'm saying all the kids knew

51:33

about this stuff. Everyone and they had

51:35

followed it. Really? Cara, we have not

51:37

followed up because I remember coming on

51:39

your show during the depths of the

51:41

pandemic where you were saying the movie

51:44

business theaters are over.

51:45

>> I know

51:46

>> and young people don't care and now

51:48

every study we see says Gen Z likes

51:51

going to movies.

51:52

>> Let me make a caveat here. I think

51:53

there's been a a ma here's I'm going to

51:56

make another prediction. I think there's

51:57

a massive move away from social media

51:59

and online life and to like that same

52:02

son is going to church all the time.

52:04

that same son is going out more. You

52:06

know what I mean? Like, so, and these

52:08

were kids who just wouldn't be seen in a

52:10

theater. Now, the slightly older one

52:11

doesn't go to the theater, but he wants

52:13

to see the Odyssey for sure in the

52:16

theater because of the IMAX and

52:17

everything else. Um, and

52:19

>> and Chris Nolan is the brand. He's

52:21

probably not going because it's based on

52:22

a book that he had to read in high

52:23

school.

52:24

>> Yes. Yes. No, no, no, no. He definitely

52:26

he But what I'm saying is there has been

52:28

a move away. I think that that you're

52:30

going to see del massive declines in

52:32

social media usage and everything else

52:33

among young people. They want to have

52:35

real life encounters.

52:36

>> My 10-year-old is the same way. He he'll

52:38

he'll do the iPad, but he so much

52:41

prefers playing with his friends and

52:43

being outside and going to baseball

52:45

games or movies or whatever.

52:46

>> Yeah, there's a shift. There's a real

52:48

there's a real perceptible I'm taking

52:50

these apps off my face. Not everybody,

52:52

but to me, I feel like all of us want to

52:55

go out, right? And there's actually good

52:57

movies to go out, too. That's the thing

52:59

and that's the issue whether it's

53:00

backrooms and obsession for the youngs

53:02

or odyssey for the olds. I mean

53:04

>> do you think in 2030 years we're going

53:06

to look back on this era like we look

53:09

back on the madmen era of everybody

53:11

smoking all the time?

53:12

>> Yes, I do. I do because I do think it's

53:15

people will incorporate it and I think

53:18

to me young people are so much smarter

53:21

about usage online usage than I think

53:23

the real problem is 35 to 54 people.

53:25

Like to me that's the real problematic

53:28

group of people. But I think you're

53:29

right. They they they just made some

53:31

movies. I don't know if they'll stay

53:32

going to movies unless they have stuff

53:34

that speaks to them, right? That

53:35

actually

53:36

>> Well, that is what Hollywood is very

53:37

much doing right now. Try to shift the

53:40

intellectual property paradigm to match

53:42

this younger audience. Superhero movies

53:45

are increasingly for older people and

53:47

they're looking for IP like Minecraft.

53:50

There's probably going to be a Roblox

53:51

movie there. Super Mario. these

53:53

properties that are just for younger

53:55

people and feels they feel ownership

53:58

over them.

53:59

>> Absolutely. And I think that's fine.

54:00

That's absolutely fine. And if it's a

54:01

good movie, everyone like look, I don't

54:03

think anyone thought Devilish Prodit was

54:05

going to make a billion dollars. I mean,

54:07

>> millennial nostalgia.

54:09

>> Yes. But it was also a good movie and it

54:10

was fun and

54:11

>> Oh, you're just saying that cuz you were

54:12

in it.

54:13

>> I also I was in it and I deserve an

54:15

Oscar, but that's another

54:16

>> I stood up when I saw you. I stood up

54:18

and applauded.

54:20

>> What my favorite thing was someone sent

54:22

me a note. There was a screening in San

54:24

Francisco. This bunch of gay guys um

54:27

rented the movie theater inside it and

54:28

then didn't know I was in it and they

54:30

shrieked because I'm well known. I'm a

54:33

well-known gay in San Francisco. But it

54:35

was very funny. It was fun. But I I

54:36

don't I didn't think it was going to be

54:37

that big, honestly. But it was

54:39

>> I didn't either. I do a box office draft

54:41

with Lucas [clears throat] Shaw and and

54:42

neither of us uh Sorry. I didn't pick

54:45

it. He picked it and he got the benefit.

54:48

>> Actually, I thought it when I saw it, I

54:49

was like, "This is a lot of [ __ ] fun.

54:51

This is and it's really good and really

54:53

fun and really actually more and more

54:55

depth actually. It was good.

54:57

>> I picked the Michael Jackson movie

54:58

though and that's going to get to a

54:59

billion dollars. So, I'm pretty happy.

55:00

>> That's also Yeah, there's some really

55:02

promising movies. There's a lot of not

55:03

ones that you're never going to see

55:05

again, too. Um, all right, Matt. One

55:06

more quick break. We'll be back for

55:08

predictions.

55:10

>> Support for the show comes from Framer.

55:12

If your team wants a website that looks

55:13

and feels handcrafted, but is still fast

55:15

to ship, Framer is built [music] for

55:17

that. You design on a visual canvas with

55:19

responsive layouts, hosting, and a CMS

55:21

built in so the work is production ready

55:23

from day one. Agents work alongside you

55:25

to draft pages and polish sections. Then

55:27

you review and publish what goes live.

55:29

Framer is the proite builder for

55:31

creators, teams, and businesses that

55:33

[music] want a professional site and

55:34

care enough to get every detail right.

55:36

Agents solve the gap between AI

55:38

generated ideas and productionready

55:39

website work. The agent works in the

55:41

same place where the real site is

55:43

designed, managed, reviewed, and

55:44

published. It lands on the canvas, stays

55:46

editable, and can be published when the

55:48

team is ready. Agents and framework work

55:50

alongside teams to streamline

55:52

collaboration on the same canvas, build

55:54

custom code components, create and

55:55

manage CMS content, [music] optimize SEO

55:57

settings, and ship everything all in one

55:59

place. Learn how you can get more out of

56:01

your site from a framer specialist. Or

56:03

get started building [music] for free

56:04

today at framer.com/pivot

56:07

for 30% off a Framer Pro annual plan.

56:09

That's framer.com/pivot

56:11

for 30% off. framer.com/pivot.

56:15

Rules and restrictions may apply.

56:18

>> Okay. Uh Matt, let's hear a prediction.

56:21

>> All right. So, I have a fun one and a

56:23

serious one. Okay.

56:24

>> I'll do the serious one first.

56:26

>> Okay.

56:27

>> I think Netflix will launch a free tier

56:31

within a year.

56:33

>> Oh,

56:34

>> this is where it's going. all of this

56:36

low value podcast,

56:40

social video, YouTube style content,

56:43

>> they are going to separate it or have it

56:46

available on the paid tier as well, but

56:48

they're going to put it into this

56:50

>> free tier that will serve as a top

56:52

offunnel for the regular Netflix and

56:55

hopefully juice their advertising

56:58

business via engagement.

57:00

>> Right. Okay. A little bit of Tuby. Go

57:01

ahead. a little bit of to compete with

57:03

those and you know query whether it will

57:07

harm the brand or cause people that pay

57:11

for Netflix to switch to a non-paying

57:14

situation but it's getting to the point

57:16

where Netflix is showing us their cards

57:18

they are so obsessed with YouTube they

57:20

will launch a real YouTube competitor in

57:23

a free service and they can put some of

57:25

this old show content that they haven't

57:28

licensed out anywhere and is not doing

57:30

much on the platform form. They can put

57:32

that on the free tier and have it be

57:34

like a Tuby or a Pluto TV where it

57:36

serves as a funnel for the other

57:38

services.

57:38

>> That's a great idea. They could do

57:39

deals. Yeah, that's an interesting

57:40

that's an you know, it was interesting.

57:41

I saw pictures of Neil Moen from YouTube

57:44

and Ted walking into the Sun Valley

57:46

thing. Uh which was interesting. I was

57:48

like, I'd like to see them chitty jet.

57:50

Like I'd like to be in front of them

57:51

seeing them. By the way, that thing also

57:54

looks bad this year for some reason.

57:55

Like I never liked it. Never get invited

57:57

because I'm a pain in the ass. But um

57:59

but they uh it looks particularly

58:03

tonedeaf this year for some reason. But

58:05

maybe you don't think so.

58:06

>> I'm interested in the fashion.

58:08

>> Oh, okay. The outfits Lauren Lauren

58:10

Sanchez

58:10

>> and the David Dazzlo denim on denim

58:12

look.

58:13

>> Denim. He's still that guy works the

58:16

lesbian look so beautifully. I

58:18

[laughter] have to say

58:20

>> I'm not going to go there, but it is

58:21

certainly it's like his his sort of uh

58:24

souped-up cowboy look.

58:26

>> Yeah. Well, I

58:27

>> I'm sure [clears throat] both those

58:28

denim jackets cost face. I'm like, you

58:30

look like a lesbian I used to date back

58:31

in the 80s. Anyway,

58:33

>> all right. Uh, speaking of the gays, do

58:35

you want my fun prediction?

58:37

>> Sure. Yes, please.

58:38

>> I think the new album from Madonna will

58:42

get a album of the year Grammy

58:44

nomination.

58:45

>> I'm with you on that.

58:46

>> Which would be her first since 1998.

58:51

Confessions 2 getting unbelievable

58:53

reviews. Um, I listen to it. You know,

58:56

dance music's not my thing, but

58:57

>> it's good

58:58

>> for what it is. It's very good. And I

59:01

think that there's a narrative around

59:02

her. She's performing at the World Cup

59:05

finale. And I think that the buzz around

59:07

Madonna is she's a survivor and will

59:09

score that album of the year nomination

59:11

from the Grand.

59:12

>> Yeah, I agree. Let Madonna be Madonna.

59:13

She hasn't like stooped. She doesn't do

59:16

nostalgia. She could easily do a lot of

59:18

stuff. She did a little bit on that last

59:20

tour that I went to. I went to the

59:22

concert. This is a great album.

59:24

No, it was not. And it made me sad. And

59:26

then now she doesn't dance like she used

59:28

to.

59:28

>> She's too slow. I'm like, don't dance.

59:30

It's like, who's that guy right now

59:32

who's dancing? Oh god, there's an old

59:34

rocker that needs

59:35

>> Oh, there was a video of Barry Manalo.

59:38

>> All of them. I was like, sit down. You

59:39

need to sit down. It's I love you so

59:41

much. And you need But in this case,

59:42

>> Billy Joel, Elton John, they sit down.

59:45

>> They sit down. And but Madonna's album

59:47

is quite good. It's really It's It's not

59:49

just And it's not nostalgia. It's

59:50

interesting. like it's an interesting

59:51

and she refuses to be anything but

59:53

herself and I I think people kind of

59:55

like that and I just think she's the OG.

59:57

>> She should be a pivot guest. I bet she

59:58

has opinions on the mergers and

60:01

acquisitions.

60:01

>> I Oh, I bet she does. She's as sharp as

60:03

a [ __ ] tack. That's one thing about

60:05

>> she went after her label. Remember she

60:07

had this whole period where she took a

60:09

big deal with Live Nation and she left

60:12

her longtime record label and was sort

60:14

of floundering and she criticized Gaio

60:17

Siri. She's she's got opinions. I I you

60:20

know what she really was she sort of she

60:22

she walked so Taylor Swift could run.

60:24

Let's just you know what I mean like in

60:25

a lot of ways. I'm going to ask you for

60:27

one more prediction.

60:29

>> How you you made a joke about this which

60:31

made me laugh hysterically but the

60:32

Taylor Swift wedding. She she goes she

60:34

couldn't possibly be preparing a movie

60:36

about it. Could she? Could she? And then

60:38

you said could she? Is she? Will she?

60:42

>> Okay. So a couple things there. I don't

60:45

think it will happen now after I have

60:47

seen you talked to a lot of people who

60:49

were there and I've seen how it played

60:51

out. She didn't get releases from all

60:55

the big stars that were there. Now, you

60:58

could argue that maybe they they put up

61:00

signs there that said like this could be

61:02

filmed, so maybe they could get away

61:04

with that. But do you think they're

61:06

going to put out a special on Disney

61:09

Plus where Tom Cruz and all these

61:13

athletes and

61:14

>> are dancing on the stage?

61:16

>> Yeah, there sort of private moments.

61:17

There were no phones or anything there.

61:19

I It would be so tacky to do that. I

61:23

talked to someone who was there who was

61:24

saying that was the most interesting

61:26

thing about the wedding is seeing all

61:27

these people like JLo and Tom Cruz and

61:30

all these people that have had handlers

61:33

around them for literally decades be

61:36

forced to socialize at a party with

61:39

other famous people without their teams

61:42

or their phones or anything.

61:44

>> Yeah, they must have loved it. They must

61:46

have loved it.

61:46

>> Or they don't know how to interact with

61:48

people. Someone said JLo was very

61:49

awkward. So, she's not making a movie

61:52

because I would watch the [ __ ] hell

61:53

out of that.

61:53

>> Oh, yeah. Everyone would watch. It's not

61:55

a matter of whether it would be popular.

61:56

It's a matter of whether they were are

61:58

willing to take a a a withdrawal from

62:01

the credibility bank to do that because

62:03

it's so tacky. Even if they made a

62:06

donation of the money they got to a

62:08

charity, it's still pretty tacky. Like,

62:11

no. Think has any celebrity done that

62:13

since Kim Kardashian?

62:14

>> Feels very Elizabeth Taylor. I bet they

62:17

I don't know. Kim Kardashian did it with

62:19

Chris Humphre and it was a big E

62:21

special,

62:22

>> but

62:23

>> I don't know. I I I

62:25

>> She might not.

62:26

>> Maybe I have more faith in Taylor than

62:28

you do. I still I just think it's be so

62:31

tacky that they won't do it.

62:32

>> Yeah. Okay. All right. I'm asking you.

62:34

That's why I want to know. I'm just

62:35

telling you. I'd watch the hell out of

62:36

it and I wouldn't consider it tacky.

62:38

>> And all the people who went there just

62:39

the level of people would find it to be,

62:42

I think, a bit of a betrayal. Although

62:44

at the same time they all managed to get

62:46

pictures themselves like here I am going

62:48

to the thing.

62:49

>> A lot of them did but a lot of them

62:50

didn't. A lot of the executives didn't

62:53

and you know [clears throat] it's the

62:54

people who already have big

62:56

>> followings on social media who leveraged

62:58

it.

62:59

>> She'll she'll she'll release a few short

63:01

videos and tasteful

63:03

>> that I agree with. The question is will

63:05

she do it with the brand or will she do

63:06

it on her own channels?

63:08

>> On her own.

63:08

>> She's bigger than any media property.

63:10

Everyone's like oh give the photos to

63:11

Vogue. Why the hell does she need Vogue?

63:13

Hey, does she need Vogue? She could do

63:15

it. She

63:16

>> does media stuff when it builds the

63:18

brand. She did the time person of the

63:19

year. She She will do stuff with media

63:22

when it suits her. But for this one,

63:24

just put it on your socials.

63:25

>> Put it on your social. She doesn't need

63:26

anybody. She doesn't She'll make a big

63:28

album out of it in a news tour and

63:30

that'll be that.

63:30

>> I know people are already joking about

63:32

the what the divorce album's going to

63:34

be.

63:34

>> Oh, stop it. It's [laughter] not

63:36

happening. That's you know, although the

63:38

guy who did Jack Antinoff is getting a

63:40

divorce from Marquali. Um They're

63:43

separated. Cara, let's not jump to

63:45

conclusions.

63:46

>> All right. I I'll try not to, but that

63:47

No one saw that coming. Anyway, uh

63:50

[laughter] this one I think is for life.

63:52

I do I have to believe in them. I I

63:55

really don't even like straight people

63:56

that much. So, but I I believe in this

63:58

wedding. I don't know why.

64:00

>> I I I am a Taylor Swift fan and I enjoy

64:03

Travis Kelce as a football player and a

64:05

media personality.

64:06

>> I hope this works out.

64:08

>> Nothing but the I do. I believe in them.

64:10

I hate I mean honestly

64:11

>> even if it doesn't work out I hope it

64:13

gives the world a Taylor Swift baby.

64:15

>> I feel like it's going to I have a

64:17

feeling it's going to I don't know.

64:19

Anyway, we want to I know I'm stupid. We

64:21

want to hear from you. Send us your

64:23

questions about business tech or

64:24

whatever's on your mind. Go to

64:25

nymag.com/pivot.

64:27

Submit a question for the show or call

64:28

8551

64:30

pivot. Okay, that's the show. Thanks for

64:32

listening to Pivot and be sure to like

64:33

and subscribe to our YouTube channel.

64:35

We'll be back next week. Uh Matt, thank

64:37

you so much. I really enjoy talking to

64:39

you. You're really such a pleasure.

64:41

>> I appreciate you having me on. I am very

64:43

much looking forward to learning where

64:44

Scott is right now

64:45

>> and tell people where what everyone they

64:48

can watch and read you obviously. I

64:49

would subscribe. I I don't like everyone

64:52

at Puck as you know, but I love you. I

64:54

love Eric. I love Cohen. You know, so

64:56

many things. [clears throat]

64:56

>> You can subscribe to Puck at puck.news

64:58

and you can listen to the town uh on all

65:01

the platforms, YouTube, Spotify.

65:03

>> Terrific. You do a terrific job. You do

65:05

a terrific job at it and it's a really

65:07

great podcast. Anyway, I really

65:08

appreciate it. Thank you for being here.

65:10

And Scott will be back next week for

65:12

wherever he is.

65:16

[music]

Interactive Summary

The discussion covers several key topics in media and tech. Matt Belloni critiques Cannes Lion as a "soulless corporate boondoggle" focused on advertising rather than creativity. The hosts delve into the antitrust lawsuit challenging Paramount's acquisition of Warner Brothers, highlighting concerns about job losses and political pressure, particularly around the potential sale of CNN. Disney's new CEO, Josh D'Amaro, is praised for his aggressive stance against the FCC's scrutiny of "The View's" news status, a move seen as politically motivated. Netflix's strategy to combat slowing engagement includes venturing into short-form content due to "YouTube envy," with a prediction of a future free tier. The hosts express concerns about Meta's AI image generator, Muse, which automatically uses public Instagram photos without clear consent, calling it "information theft." Amazon faced criticism for dropping the Sam Altman movie "The Artificial" due to its OpenAI partnership, viewed as a "credibility hit" in Hollywood. Finally, they discuss the anticipated success of Christopher Nolan's "The Odyssey" and the return of younger audiences to cinemas, while predicting Madonna's new album will receive a Grammy nomination and Taylor Swift will likely not release a movie about her wedding, deeming it too "tacky."

Suggested questions

9 ready-made prompts