HomeVideos

Leopold Aschenbrenner Just Lost $35 Billion in One Day

Now Playing

Leopold Aschenbrenner Just Lost $35 Billion in One Day

Transcript

311 segments

0:00

Why we're talking about it, this, you

0:02

know, Leopold is 24 years old. He who

0:05

runs a hedge fund that had $45 billion

0:08

in assets. Even with this huge decline,

0:11

they still run $10 billion. It still

0:13

makes it one of the world's biggest

0:14

hedge funds.

0:15

But what's gone down in the past few

0:17

days is them needing to sell off

0:20

assets in order to meet margin calls.

0:22

They had this huge exposure to AI

0:24

investments. They had a ton of leverage.

0:26

It's a story we've seen time and time

0:28

again, the risk that we see in the

0:30

market with these levered up bets.

0:32

Them needing to seek a buyer to get some

0:34

liquidity to meet the margin calls. They

0:36

found it in Citadel with Ken Griffin,

0:39

who bought a chunk of their stock

0:41

portfolios.

0:42

>> All right, guys. I got to show you

0:43

something because I don't think there's

0:45

anything crazier in terms of stories on

0:48

Wall Street or the market right now. A

0:50

couple months ago, there was a

0:51

24-year-old kid that everybody was

0:53

calling the best AI investor alive. He

0:56

was running one of the hottest hedge

0:57

funds on the entire planet, and then

0:59

about a week ago, almost all of it was

1:02

gone. I did years on Wall Street, and I

1:04

worked at Goldman Sachs, and I'm telling

1:05

you, none of this is about being smart.

1:08

It's about risk. Let me walk you through

1:10

what happened because there's a lesson

1:11

in here for every single one of us. His

1:14

name is Leopold Aschenbrenner, and look,

1:17

I'm not here to dunk on this kid, and

1:19

clearly he is brilliant. German-born,

1:22

graduated top of his class at Columbia

1:25

when he was 19 years old. And then he

1:27

goes out and works at OpenAI on a team

1:30

studying where all of this superpower AI

1:33

is headed. Now, back in June of last

1:35

year, he writes this essay called

1:37

situational awareness, right? of it is

1:40

that AI is about to get way bigger and

1:42

way faster than anybody realizes, and

1:44

it's going to take trillions of dollars

1:46

to build out. Chips, data centers,

1:49

power, all of it. That essay blew up in

1:52

Silicon Valley, and he took that

1:53

attention and raised money, reportedly

1:56

around $225 million to start his own

2:00

fund with the same name, Situational

2:02

Awareness. Now, watch what happens. He

2:05

goes all in on the AI trade, and I mean

2:07

actually all in. His fund loaded up on

2:11

names like Nebius, ticker symbol NBIS,

2:14

also Coreweave, CRWV.

2:18

You can see this on my screen right now.

2:20

These stocks had tremendous run-ups, but

2:22

also recently they had tremendous

2:25

crashes. And he ended up getting

2:27

liquidated, and he lost $35 billion.

2:31

One more stock, Micron Technology,

2:34

SanDisk, and Bloom Energy, plus a big

2:36

private stake in the AI company

2:38

Anthropic. Every single one of them

2:41

riding the same exact wave. And because

2:43

the AI sector was on fire, his fund went

2:46

absolutely parabolic. I mean, this guy

2:49

made money bicep over tricep, and then

2:51

he had extra biceps on his biceps. But

2:54

this is what actually happened. One of

2:55

the hottest funds everywhere, at its

2:58

peak, people were throwing around a $45

3:01

billion number for this thing. On paper,

3:04

this guy looked like one of the greatest

3:05

investors of all time, and he did it in

3:08

under 2 years. His Nebius bet was so

3:11

big, it literally made the news because

3:14

he went over 5%.

3:15

>> And there's major institutional

3:16

investors now, Situational Awareness IP,

3:19

which is essentially uh a hedge fund

3:21

that's was started uh by of course an

3:24

Open AI former employee. Um they

3:27

actually took a passive stake of around

3:29

5.6% and if you look at the market cap

3:32

as of yesterday, I'm just going to

3:33

roughly say it's around $3 billion

3:36

of the $58 billion market capitalization

3:39

of the business.

3:40

>> Now guys, nothing ever goes up in a

3:42

straight line. Nothing ever lasts like

3:44

that, especially in the market. Here's

3:47

what nobody cared about while things

3:49

were looking amazing. Two things. First

3:52

is concentration. He wasn't spread out.

3:54

He was packed into one single theme, and

3:57

that was AI. That's the sector that was

3:59

ripping, and it looked like he was a

4:01

genius. But, when things turn, there was

4:03

nowhere to hide. And these names had an

4:06

absolute vertical on the way up, but an

4:09

absolute elevator or cliff as they came

4:13

down. Check out what happened to Bloom

4:15

Energy, one of his top holdings. Bloom

4:18

Energy had done extremely well in fact,

4:20

over six months the stock is up 54%. So,

4:23

how does someone blow up their portfolio

4:25

when his stock is up 54%?

4:27

Well, I'll tell you what happened. As

4:29

the stock goes up, the investor

4:31

continues to buy more on risky and

4:34

dangerous leverage. And when the stock

4:36

reaches this level right here, $343 per

4:39

share, which is a ton of gains, and his

4:41

fund blows up to $45 billion in assets,

4:45

well, when you're on a ton of leverage

4:47

and the stock ends up pulling back,

4:49

especially pulling back fast, just like

4:51

this, and going basically half from

4:53

$345,

4:55

$350 per share, and you know, basically

4:58

to $175, which is literally a 50% fall,

5:02

a dangerous cliff that the stock ends up

5:05

actually jumping and losing all of this

5:09

value, that's the exact situation that

5:11

can blow up a portfolio. Here's another

5:13

stock, Nabius, which he had over 5% of

5:16

his entire money in, and because he had

5:19

so much Nabius stock, it was 5% stake in

5:23

the entire company. Basically, what

5:25

ended up happening was there was a 13G

5:27

filing. In that 13G filing, the entire

5:29

public knows his position even before

5:31

his 13F filing is filed. A 13F filing is

5:35

something that most hedge funds have to

5:36

file if they have $100 million in

5:38

assets. A 13G, though, is right there on

5:41

the spot when you have acquired too much

5:43

of one company, that is public

5:44

information. So, Nabius, he had acquired

5:47

five over 5% of their company and

5:49

trading at $280 per share. Again, this

5:52

was the peak. His fund was doing

5:53

exceptionally well, which is not that

5:55

long ago. That entire blow-up that he

5:57

had happened basically right here last

6:00

week. He ended up losing $35 billion. A

6:03

big chunk of his money just gone in a

6:05

matter of weeks. Those big swings are

6:07

just normal for the AI trade, and that's

6:10

exactly what breaks a fund that's

6:11

leveraged up and packed into just one

6:14

single trade essentially. Second and

6:16

this is a big one, leverage. It's been

6:18

reported that he was using heavy

6:20

leverage, borrowed money on his

6:22

positions. So, let me make this dead

6:24

simple for you. Leverage, if your stock

6:26

drops by a quarter, it hurts a lot, but

6:28

you live to trade another day. With the

6:30

kind of leverage that he was reportedly

6:32

using, that same drop can wipe out

6:34

completely everything. Same stock, same

6:37

move, totally different ending. So,

6:40

let's slow down right now because this

6:41

is a really important lesson for you to

6:42

learn. You should not be using leverage

6:45

in your own portfolio. Using leverage

6:48

done incorrectly will completely blow up

6:50

your portfolio. I personally use

6:52

leverage, but I've also been trading for

6:54

12 years now, and option trading

6:57

specifically is already a riskier, more

6:59

dangerous, and options are kind of built

7:01

in leverage. If you know how to use

7:03

them, they can be very powerful, but if

7:05

you're concentrated on just AI stocks

7:07

like Leopold Aschenbrenner, well, you

7:09

can see a lot of pain whenever the stock

7:11

ends up coming down, especially if

7:13

you're not diversified. So, this past

7:15

week, the AI and chip stocks fell a lot.

7:17

Last week, they had some really bad

7:20

performance. Normal market stuff happens

7:22

all the time, but for a fund that is

7:24

concentrated and leveraged, a normal

7:26

sell-off isn't normal. It turns into a

7:29

margin call, and that is when your

7:30

broker forces you to sell right now at

7:33

the worst possible moment because you

7:35

borrowed too much money. So, borrowing

7:38

money is what turns a bad week into a

7:40

completely total wipeout, right? So,

7:42

borrowing money is very dangerous and

7:45

this is exactly what Leopold

7:46

Ashenbrenner did. In my view, he already

7:48

borrowed the money to begin with. So, he

7:50

borrowed money and then he was using

7:52

leverage on top of that. Of course, he's

7:54

going to look like a genius when

7:55

everything is up. And again, I'm not

7:57

trying to say that Leopold is bad or

8:00

he's dumb. He's way smarter than me.

8:02

Probably, I'm guessing that he's way

8:03

smarter than I am. But, this guy did not

8:05

manage his risk properly whatsoever. And

8:08

it gets worse. Word gets around Wall

8:10

Street that he's in trouble and the big

8:12

sharks, they don't back off. They push

8:14

forward. They smell blood and they are

8:17

excited. He's forced to dump his entire

8:19

public stock portfolio in basically just

8:22

one shot. And guess who steps in to buy

8:24

it? Ken Griffin's Citadel, one of the

8:27

biggest, most feared funds on Wall

8:29

Street. They scooped it up and on the

8:30

way down, they ended up buying all the

8:33

assets for a lot cheaper. And a day

8:35

later, a lot of those stocks ended up

8:37

bouncing right back. That is so painful

8:40

for Leopold Ashenbrenner. And it is so

8:42

much money that Citadel made in just a

8:44

very short amount of time. Their hedge

8:46

fund ended up profiting from this very

8:48

difficult situation. So, Citadel almost

8:50

certainly walked away with a really

8:52

massive win. And Leopold, an estimated

8:55

$35 billion of that fund gone in a

8:58

single week. And here's the part that

9:00

really got me. It's reported this whole

9:02

thing went down on the same week that he

9:04

was getting married. Ooh, picture that.

9:07

Your funds are falling apart while your

9:09

wedding guests are showing up. And the

9:11

early investors, well, reportedly still

9:14

up. But, anybody who put money in near

9:16

the top or even, you know, the last 1

9:18

year is basically gone. Same fund, same

9:22

manager. The only difference was timing

9:24

and risk. So, what does this mean for

9:26

you, the viewer watching right now? So,

9:28

why I would spend 10 minutes on some

9:31

hedge fund guy that basically never met?

9:33

Because this is everything that I teach.

9:35

And it's playing out on the biggest

9:37

stage right now, and there's a lot that

9:38

you can learn.

9:39

>> Long-term vision that AI is going to be

9:41

very big

9:43

doesn't give you

9:45

a reason to take unlimited risk. And

9:47

whether we're talking about South Korean

9:48

retail investors, for that matter New

9:50

York retail investors,

9:53

or the Situational Awareness Fund,

9:56

you have to think about the long term.

9:58

You have to think about do I survive

10:00

long enough to collect on my bets.

10:03

>> So, look, not blowing up is your first

10:05

job. The smartest move isn't a home run.

10:08

It's still being here the next year to

10:10

trade and invest again. The most

10:12

successful students in my community

10:14

trading options who are generating the

10:16

type of money that lets them retire and

10:18

live a more lifestyle that they want and

10:20

not have to have a job are the ones that

10:22

are taking a boring approach, not a

10:24

risky approach, not a leveraged approach

10:26

like Leopold Aschenbrenner, and the

10:28

investor that gets to live another day.

10:30

So, Leopold here, he had the right idea

10:32

on AI, but he still got wiped out

10:34

because of how he bet, not what he bet

10:37

on. You don't put your whole entire

10:38

account on one thing. You don't need to

10:40

be crazy and dangerous leverage to end

10:43

up making money at the end of the day if

10:44

you know what you're investing in. This

10:46

is exactly why I do the boring thing. I

10:48

sell option. I collect premium. I like

10:51

to manage my risk and I like to protect

10:52

my downside. And I have a steady

10:54

approach within my community. Boring

10:57

keeps you in the game. The market

10:59

doesn't care how smart you are. It only

11:01

cares if you manage your risk properly.

11:03

That's it. That's the most important

11:05

thing. Live to see another day and be

11:07

more consistent. So, there it is. A

11:09

brilliant guy, the right call on AI, and

11:11

he still ends up blowing up because of

11:12

leverage and concentration. Right idea,

11:15

completely wrong risk, and that is the

11:17

whole story. If this one helped you, do

11:19

me a favor, hit that like button and

11:20

subscribe. It genuinely helps out the

11:22

channel. And if you want to see how I

11:24

actually manage risk and sell options,

11:26

the steady, the boring way, the link to

11:28

my community is right down in the

11:29

description. Keep learning with me. And

11:31

And let's learn. let's be safe, let's

11:33

grow together, and thanks so much for

11:35

watching. I'll catch you in the next

11:36

one.

Interactive Summary

The video discusses the dramatic downfall of Leopold Aschenbrenner, a 24-year-old hedge fund manager who saw his 'Situational Awareness' fund lose approximately $35 billion in assets. Despite correctly identifying the massive growth potential of the AI sector, Aschenbrenner failed due to extreme concentration in AI-related stocks and the dangerous use of high leverage. When the AI sector faced a normal market downturn, these factors led to margin calls, forcing him to liquidate his portfolio, which was subsequently acquired by Ken Griffin's Citadel at a significant profit.

Suggested questions

3 ready-made prompts