HomeVideos

Elon Musk on Advertisers, Trust and the “Wild Storm” in His Mind | DealBook Summit 2023

Now Playing

Elon Musk on Advertisers, Trust and the “Wild Storm” in His Mind | DealBook Summit 2023

Transcript

3465 segments

0:27

Please welcome Andrew Ross

0:29

Sorkin please Please and

0:30

his please guests CEO of

0:31

Tesla CEO of SpaceX chief

0:35

engineer and CTO of X Elon

0:37

Musk. Good evening

0:45

everybody. Thank you so

0:46

much for being with us

0:48

throughout the day and I

0:50

couldn't be more pleased

0:52

to sit with Elon Musk has

0:54

our final interview of this

0:56

remarkable time. We've all

0:58

had together. He doesn't

1:00

need much of an

1:00

introduction by which

1:01

want to say a couple things.

1:03

He's the richest person

1:04

in the world. He very well

1:05

be the most concise

1:08

how most consequential

1:10

individual in the world

1:11

right the world in

1:11

individual

1:12

most consequential console

1:12

right now. He runs the most

1:13

Innovative companies.

1:17

World Tesla SpaceX

1:17

starlink, which is part of

1:18

that neuro-link the boring

1:18

company X and his x.a. I and

1:23

he's disrupted each

1:24

of these Lanes. He's moved

1:26

at Breakneck Breakneck

1:27

speeds, but he's

1:30

facing a storm of controversy

1:30

in the process. He joins

1:32

us today following a visit

1:33

as you all know, so well

1:34

we discussed earlier on

1:36

Monday to Israel where he

1:37

met with the Prime Minister

1:39

there and the

1:40

president of Israel and we're

1:41

going to talk about

1:42

everything and my hope is

1:42

that we can talk

1:44

about how he he thinks about

1:48

He thinks his influence about

1:48

he thinks his power about

1:49

He thinks all of it.

1:50

And we're going to talk

1:50

about Innovation and

1:51

everything else. I

1:52

want to say just

1:54

two other things real quick.

1:54

So we met each other

1:56

for the first time 16 years

1:58

ago. Yes, long time

2:00

a long time and all the kids

2:02

were three when we first

2:05

met I do. I think I do

2:07

you're just you're about

2:09

to deliver your first

2:10

Roadster. I don't think you

2:10

had yet. Larry Page was

2:12

still waiting. Yeah.

2:13

It's to get like in 2007

2:15

2008 and I don't agree with

2:18

a little bit 2008. I

2:19

remember going back to The

2:20

Newsroom and saying I think

2:22

I just met the next

2:23

Steve Jobs and it was

2:26

I'm at a hold to that.

2:27

Okay, I'm gonna hold to that

2:29

but a lot has happened

2:31

between when I first met you

2:34

and now you came to deal

2:36

with been boring, that's

2:37

for sure. Well, actually it

2:38

taken by a

2:39

driver boring Kony

2:41

driver boring kony2012. You

2:42

came. To deal book and

2:46

sat on this stage and we're

2:47

thrilled to have you back

2:47

but there's been so much

2:49

that happens between now and

2:50

then and there's been

2:51

so much that's

2:51

happened in the past week

2:52

week and a half and a lot of

2:54

folks and I want to tell you

2:55

this elevator. A lot of

2:57

folks called me up

2:58

and said you really you

2:59

really going to host Elon

3:00

Musk here. Can you believe

3:02

what he just said on

3:03

Twitter on 1X on? Yeah,

3:06

Yeah. Yeah, no idea what

3:08

this Twitter thing

3:10

about. Should you platform?

3:12

Him, that's what they said.

3:14

Yeah, did you platform then?

3:15

I said that I think it's

3:18

our role. And I know you

3:19

have issues with

3:20

Journal has a platform

3:22

and I know you have

3:23

an issue with journalists

3:24

often times, but I said

3:25

it's our role to have

3:28

conversations and to inquire

3:30

and to and sometimes even

3:33

interrogate ideas and that's

3:35

what I'm hoping. We can do

3:36

that. So I want to start

3:38

just so we can begin this

3:39

conversation and just level

3:43

just and conversation this

3:43

begin can we so just start

3:44

to I want

3:44

level said take us through.

3:48

Everything that happened

3:49

if you could everything

3:49

know over the past week

3:50

and a half of your God

3:50

we're going to we've got the

3:51

time, okay. You send out

3:53

a you send out a post or

3:56

an X or a tweet,

3:57

otherwise, whatever. Yeah,

3:58

as I'm trying to like

4:02

when things were just 140

4:03

characters that made sense

4:04

coma tweet because

4:05

like a bunch of little birds

4:06

chirping, but when you know

4:07

point which you can put like

4:08

three our videos on

4:09

it's like it's very long

4:10

tweet. So here we are.

4:13

This is more descriptive I

4:14

think and at some point

4:15

I don't know where you were.

4:18

But you write in responding

4:20

to another tweet. Yes.

4:24

This is the actual truth

4:25

and it set off a firestorm

4:28

of criticism all the way to

4:30

the White House, right? And

4:32

then you make this trip

4:34

to Israel. You have

4:35

advertisers who left the

4:36

platform people calling.

4:37

Well, the trip to Israel is

4:39

independent of it wasn't

4:41

something like apology tour.

4:43

I want to be clear. That was

4:45

well. Let's talk about that.

4:46

So just but

4:47

just take this back. Back

4:48

to the moment at which you

4:49

write that trip

4:50

to Israel is independent of

4:51

was like in response

4:52

to that at all. Well, let's

4:53

do it will do is really just

4:54

a moment. I have no problem

4:56

being hated hated, hated

4:56

by the way. I hear it

4:59

away. Well, but you know

5:02

what, let's go straight to

5:04

that then for a second

5:05

sure because there is an

5:06

idea and you could say that

5:10

you don't real weakness 21

5:17

He liked a real weakness.

5:18

I do not have that. Let me

5:19

ask you this. Then. There's a

5:19

difference

5:20

you're saying I don't care

5:20

if anyone likes me or

5:21

they hate me, but given your

5:22

power and given what you

5:24

have amassed and your the

5:26

importance you have. I would

5:28

think you want to be trusted

5:31

I would think maybe you don't

5:32

need to be liked or hate

5:34

it but trusted matters if

5:37

if x is going to become a

5:37

financial platform where

5:38

people going to put

5:39

their money where people

5:40

where the

5:41

government's going to

5:41

give you money for

5:43

four Rockets where people

5:45

are going to get into the

5:45

cars. They need to

5:46

ultimately decide that

5:49

you are they don't have

5:50

to say that they love you,

5:52

but that you are ultimately

5:53

a decent and good human

5:55

being. Yes. being. human

5:56

good and decent a

5:56

ultimately you are that but

5:57

Yes. I am and I think I am.

6:01

But but I'm certainly not

6:01

going to But do but some

6:02

sort of tap dance to prove

6:03

to people that I am so as

6:06

for trust, I mean, I think

6:08

write that down in a few

6:08

ways if you want your

6:10

if you want satellites

6:11

into orbit reliably SpaceX

6:13

will do 80% of all master

6:14

orbit this year China will

6:15

be 12 percent. The rest

6:17

of the world will do eight

6:19

that includes Boeing

6:19

Lockheed and everyone else.

6:21

So the track record of the

6:24

rocket is the best by far

6:26

of anything you

6:28

could you could hey My guts

6:33

next you could not

6:34

trust me. It is relevant the

6:34

rocket

6:34

track record speaks for

6:35

itself with respect to

6:36

Tesla. We make the best

6:36

cars whether you height

6:39

your life hate me like

6:40

me or

6:42

in different different.

6:42

Do you want the best car

6:43

or do you not want the

6:45

best car so So I will

6:50

certainly not Pander and

6:53

Johnson like the only

6:54

reason I'm here is because

6:55

you are a friend. Like what

6:58

was my speaking fee? You

7:00

don't you're not making any

7:02

example. I'm Andrew. But

7:03

yeah, sorry. It's okay.

7:06

Second of all,

7:07

we've known each other

7:07

for a very long time

7:08

smoking. Yes, and listen,

7:14

you know what? I'm trying to

7:20

illustrate us that sometimes

7:21

I say the wrong thing. I

7:25

think they're a lot of

7:25

people who are tired, but

7:27

let me let me go back.

7:31

You should hear the

7:32

sketches that SNL

7:33

wooden post. By the way,

7:34

those are really good by

7:37

wooden post and I would say

7:38

By wooden post.

7:38

unfortunately or fortunately

7:39

or unfortunately whatever

7:40

friendship we have not

7:41

great. We don't talk to

7:42

each other that that much

7:43

but let me ask you this.

7:45

That's true. Where am I?

7:48

Where am I

7:53

because I need any validation

7:54

or it is that It it

7:57

we've been friends for 16

7:58

years It and I

8:00

promised you I'd be here and

8:01

that's why I'm here. Well, I

8:02

appreciate you being here

8:03

for any other reason but

8:04

let me ask you this. Then.

8:05

Let's just go at it. Just

8:06

tell me what happened you

8:08

write this tweet that says

8:10

that this is the actual

8:11

truth people read that

8:12

tweet. Yes, and they say

8:15

Elon Musk is an

8:16

anti-semite that he is.

8:20

He's riling up this base

8:22

you're hearing it from as

8:24

I said the White House your

8:29

You get from Jewish

8:29

groups all over

8:29

I think Jonathan Greenblatt

8:30

from the ADL is here.

8:31

There's lots of people who

8:31

say this and by the way,

8:33

it's not just that

8:34

generally the whole thing

8:35

during the whole I did and

8:36

that's why when I ask her

8:37

responses, excuse me,

8:38

I said more More

8:41

responses. Yeah, I said

8:42

more I said more than what

8:42

you just

8:43

read this the other was

8:44

absent. There is absolutely

8:45

more. Yes, but I'll tell you

8:47

the thing that struck me

8:48

it wasn't and I'm

8:50

an American Jew. It wasn't

8:52

just the people who had

8:54

that view was actually

8:56

people who who really

8:58

are anti-semites who said

9:00

oh my goodness go go E Lon

9:03

this is E Lon, fabulous.

9:04

E Lon E Lon, And that

9:06

actually was the thing that

9:07

really me set really

9:07

really that thing the was

9:08

actually that And back. I

9:09

said I myself

9:12

what's going on here and I

9:12

want to know how you felt

9:13

about What's going on that

9:14

what's going on in that

9:14

moment. When you when you

9:15

saw all of this happening.

9:17

Yeah. Well, first of all, I

9:20

did clarify almost

9:22

immediately what I meant,

9:24

I would say that that was

9:25

you know, if I could go

9:26

back and say I should

9:28

in retrospect not have

9:30

replied to that

9:31

particular person and I

9:32

should have written in

9:36

Greater length as to what

9:37

I meant. I did

9:40

subsequently clarify. In

9:43

replies, but

9:43

those clarifications were

9:44

ignored by the media. And

9:46

essentially I had a loaded

9:47

gun to those who hate me

9:49

and arguably to those who

9:50

had just medic to

9:53

fill in for that. I'm quite

9:54

sorry. That is not

9:56

that was not my intention

9:57

intention. So I that sorry

9:59

did, you know That sorry.

10:01

post on my primary

10:03

timeline to be absolutely

10:05

clear that I'm not

10:06

anti-semitic that and

10:07

anti-semitic not I'm that

10:08

clear absolutely be to and

10:08

that I in fact if anything

10:10

and file of Summer Enoch

10:12

and the trip to Israel was

10:13

planned before any of that

10:14

happened. It was neither

10:15

here nor there. Do you see

10:18

this thing? You know what

10:19

it is? I do because I

10:21

actually followed your tire

10:22

trip to Israel right when

10:24

I tell everybody. This is

10:28

the says. It says bring them

10:31

home. the hostages it was

10:37

given to me by the parents

10:39

of one of the hostages.

10:41

and I said I would wear it

10:43

just as long as there was a

10:44

hostage store meeting and I

10:46

have what was that trip

10:50

like and obviously,

10:51

you know that there's a

10:52

public perception that and

10:55

your clarifying this now.

10:58

but But

10:58

there is a public perception

10:59

that that was but part of

11:00

But a apology tour. If

11:02

you will that this had been

11:03

said online there was all

11:05

of the criticism there was

11:07

advertisers leaving we

11:08

talked to Bob I gotta stop

11:10

you. Hope don't Hope

11:11

gotta stop you. I Bob to

11:12

talked we leaving

11:12

was advertisers don't

11:13

advertise. You don't want

11:14

them to have a Time know.

11:15

What do you mean? If

11:18

somebody

11:19

could try to Blackmail me

11:19

with advertising

11:21

blackmail me with money go

11:22

f*** yourself. but go f***

11:30

yourself. Is that clear?

11:33

I hope it is. Hey Bob.

11:36

You're in the audience. Well,

11:38

let me ask you then. That's

11:41

how I feel. but advertise,

11:44

how do you But advertise,

11:45

think that about the

11:46

economics of x if part of

11:50

the underlying model least

11:51

today and maybe it needs to

11:53

shift. Maybe the answer

11:54

is it needs to shift away

11:54

from advertising

11:56

advertising? If you believe

11:58

that this is the one part

11:59

of your business where you

12:00

will be beholding to those

12:02

who have this view.

12:06

What do you do? Why? I

12:11

understand that there's a

12:12

reality to right.

12:17

Yes, no. No, I mean

12:19

Ocarina is right here, and

12:19

Ocarina is right here she's

12:20

got to sell advertising.

12:21

Absolutely. So no no,

12:23

don't tell you so well,

12:25

no, actually what this

12:26

advertising boycott is is

12:28

going to do it's going to

12:29

kill company. And you think

12:33

that the and And and the

12:35

whole world will know that

12:37

those advertisers killed

12:39

company and we will

12:39

document it in

12:40

great detail. But there are

12:42

those advertisers I imagine

12:43

are going to say

12:44

they're going to say we

12:45

didn't kill the company.

12:46

Oh, yeah, they can you say

12:48

hello to tell to Earth,

12:49

hello to tell to Earth but

12:49

they're going to say that

12:50

hello to tell to Earth,

12:51

they're going to say you

12:51

hello to tell to Earth

12:52

Lon that you killed the

12:52

company because you said

12:53

these things and they were

12:55

inappropriate things and

12:57

they didn't feel

12:58

comfortable on the platform,

12:59

right? platform, the

13:00

comfortable on feel didn't

13:00

they and things

13:01

inappropriate That's that's

13:02

what Amanda said. Let's see

13:02

how Earth response to that.

13:09

So many okay this then this

13:10

goes back to what

13:10

we'll both make our cases,

13:11

right and we'll see what

13:11

the outcome is. What are the

13:12

economics of that for you?

13:13

I mean you have enormous

13:14

resources so you can

13:15

actually keep this company

13:16

going for very long time.

13:17

Would you keep it going for

13:18

a long time if there was

13:19

no advertising? I mean if

13:22

the company fails because of

13:24

an Advertiser boycott, it

13:25

will fail because of times

13:26

boycott and that will be

13:28

what bankrupt the company

13:29

and that's what

13:30

everyone on Earth will know.

13:35

What do you think then

13:35

of the I can trust though?

13:36

They're not be gone and we'll

13:37

be gone because of an

13:38

Advertiser boycott, but you

13:41

recognize that some of those

13:41

people are going to say

13:43

that they didn't feel

13:44

comfortable on the platform

13:45

and I want I just wonder and

13:47

ask you about and think about

13:48

that for a

13:50

sec to adjudge with

13:51

dollar to a judge it, but the

13:51

judge is going to be

13:53

judges the public. And you

13:56

think that the public is

13:56

going to say that that

13:58

Disney is making

13:59

a mistake.

14:01

Yeah, and they're going to

14:02

boycott Disney

14:03

yeah, and they're going

14:03

Yeah, and they're going

14:04

yeah, and they're going

14:04

they already are well, there

14:06

are some that are

14:07

for lots of different

14:08

reasons, but you think that

14:09

this is going to that you

14:11

have the this

14:12

ghost actually the

14:13

interesting of power

14:14

of power and leverage let

14:15

the chips fall where they

14:16

may

14:22

Let the chips fall where they

14:22

may I just want y that is the

14:23

approach. I asked it because

14:24

you've been

14:25

with every approach. Well,

14:26

you've been very particular

14:26

about the approach to Tesla

14:29

when you think about the

14:30

engineering involved in that

14:31

the approach to SpaceX the

14:33

approach to some of the

14:34

stuff you're doing with

14:35

with AI has been very

14:38

specific right? There's not

14:40

a let the chips fall

14:41

where they may approach to

14:42

those businesses. I

14:44

don't think that we focus on

14:45

making the best products

14:46

and products best the

14:47

focus on making we

14:47

think that don't I and Tesla

14:48

has gotten

14:48

to where it's gotten. With

14:51

no advertising at all. I

14:52

understand that Tesla

14:53

currently sells to

14:55

twice as much in terms of

14:57

electric vehicles as

14:59

rest of electric car makers

15:00

and United States combined

15:03

tell has done more to help

15:04

the environment than all

15:06

other companies combined

15:09

refer to say that therefore

15:11

as a leader of

15:12

the company. I've done more

15:12

for the environment than

15:14

everyone else at any

15:14

single human on earth.

15:17

How do you feel about that?

15:19

Now

15:21

what are still about that?

15:21

Yeah. No, I'm asking you

15:22

personally how you feel

15:23

about that because this goes

15:24

we're talking about power and

15:25

influence and I'm saying

15:26

I'm saying what I care

15:27

about is the reality of

15:29

goodness not the perception

15:30

of it and what I see all

15:33

of the place is people who

15:34

care about looking good

15:36

while doing evil f*** them.

15:43

Okay. Let me ask you this

15:43

because I think part of

15:44

let me ask this Let me ask

15:45

by the way, there's some

15:45

people who said look

15:47

owning X to begin with as

15:48

just created problems that

15:49

you created so many amazing

15:51

things that are changing

15:52

our world and and I know you

15:55

want to make X at this And

15:57

world. fabulous

15:59

Town Square Free Speech

16:00

platform, but that

16:02

unto itself that that has

16:03

create such a distraction of

16:04

all of these things. This

16:05

is the conversation

16:06

we're having we're not

16:07

focus. We're not talking

16:08

lease yet and we will

16:09

on Tesla you have your

16:10

cyber truck deliveries.

16:13

Tomorrow and everything

16:14

else you're doing but

16:14

is there any will be the

16:15

biggest product launch of

16:16

anything but by far on Earth

16:18

this year is

16:19

it is there any part of you

16:20

though? That just says

16:21

you know what I just

16:23

shouldn't have done this

16:23

or maybe I should sell it

16:24

or give it away or do

16:25

something else with that

16:28

with the X piece of it.

16:29

Yeah, given given given the

16:31

propensity for some of the

16:33

things that you do and

16:34

say on that platform

16:36

to create these these issues.

16:40

Yeah. I will

16:47

the posts I've done on the

16:48

platform. I think

16:49

there might be. 30,000 or

16:52

something like that right

16:53

once in awhile. I'll say

16:56

something foolish. And I

16:59

have and I would certainly

17:01

it put and And that comment

17:02

and that you said there's

17:05

truth in among perhaps

17:07

one of the most

17:08

foolish if not the most

17:09

foolish thing I've ever done

17:09

on the platform and I did

17:13

do my best to clarify

17:15

afterwards that you know, I

17:19

certainly don't mean

17:20

anything anti-semitic in

17:21

that the nature of the

17:24

criticism was simply that

17:25

the that simply was

17:25

criticism of the nature the

17:26

that in the Jewish people

17:27

have been persecuted for

17:29

thousands of years. Ears.

17:30

There is a natural Affinity

17:32

therefore for persecuted

17:34

groups. This has led to the

17:37

funding of organizations.

17:39

organizations that

17:43

is essentially promote any

17:44

persecuted group or any

17:45

group with the perception of

17:47

persecution. This includes

17:49

radical Islamic groups.

17:52

Everyone here has seen

17:53

everyone the Everyone

17:54

everyone massive

17:55

demonstrations for Hamas in

17:58

every major city in the

18:00

West. That should be

18:04

jarring. Well a number of

18:08

those organizations received

18:10

funding from

18:11

prominent people in the

18:12

Jewish Community. They

18:14

didn't expect that

18:15

to happen it but if you

18:18

generically But it. but it

18:18

But it. without condition

18:22

sort of fund if you find

18:24

the persecuted groups in

18:26

general Some of those

18:29

persecuted groups

18:31

unfortunately won't your

18:32

annihilation. and And and

18:34

what is what I meant by

18:36

that And when I

18:37

subsequently

18:39

clarify it is is that

18:40

it's unwise to to to find

18:42

to find organizations

18:43

unwise to it's

18:43

clarified is is that

18:44

organizations that support

18:45

groups that want your

18:46

annihilation. Is this

18:49

coming across McNeely? Yeah

18:53

my question to you though.

18:54

Logically. This is makes

18:55

a lot of sense.

18:56

Is there any part of you?

18:57

Just tell me what

18:58

happens though? When once

18:59

all this happens, let's say

19:01

you find a group that group

19:02

supports

19:04

Moss. He wants you to die.

19:06

Perhaps you should not fund

19:07

them, right? But you but

19:11

you do thank you but you

19:12

But you but you you do

19:14

appreciate that when you

19:16

wade into these very

19:18

delicate Waters When that.

19:19

at these when that When

19:19

that. very delicate times.

19:21

Yes, Yes that it can create

19:23

a real. I mean as it

19:25

created headlines for the

19:26

past two weeks and and

19:27

economic impact. What I'm

19:32

just so curious what happens

19:34

in your brain when you see

19:35

all this happening, I think

19:36

are you sitting there going?

19:37

Oh my God, I stepped in it.

19:39

I wish I didn't do that.

19:40

Are you saying s***

19:41

through them? I hate these

19:42

people why they after me but

19:44

all of that. Yeah,

19:48

all of that. I mean, look,

19:51

I'm sorry for that that

19:53

pre or post. It was foolish

19:54

of me of the 30,000. It

19:56

might be literally the worst

19:57

and worst the literally be

19:58

might It 30,000. the me of

19:58

foolish of was dumbest to

19:59

post that I've ever done

20:01

and I try to do my best

20:03

to clarify six

20:03

ways to Sunday, but But

20:06

ways to Sunday. you know,

20:06

at least but ways to Sunday,

20:07

But ways to Sunday. I think

20:08

over time it'll be obvious

20:09

that in fact far from being

20:11

anti-semitic. I'm in fact

20:12

follow Semitic and my

20:14

all the evidence in my

20:16

track record

20:17

would support that.

20:19

Obviously. There are people

20:20

who say crazy things on on

20:22

X, as you know, maybe think

20:24

they're crazy people are not

20:27

they're not the crazy, but

20:28

they're think maybe know, you

20:28

as X, the aspiration for

20:29

X is to be the global town

20:35

square.

20:36

Now if you were to walk down

20:36

to let's say

20:37

x square, right? Do you

20:38

occasionally hear people

20:39

saying crazy things? Yes,

20:40

but they're not they don't

20:41

have the megaphone right and

20:43

that's that's the conundrum

20:45

but they can only say it to

20:46

50 or 100 people that are

20:47

that are sitting standing

20:48

there in Times Square. They

20:50

don't have a mega. I mean

20:51

look the the joke I used

20:52

to make about old Twitter was

20:53

it was like giving

20:54

everyone in the psych ward

20:55

a megaphone. So, you know,

20:59

you So, megaphone. ward a

20:59

the psych in everyone

21:00

giving like I'm aware of

21:00

that things can

21:04

gets promoted that are -

21:05

beyond Gets promoted the

21:05

sort of Circle of somebody

21:08

simply gets promoted

21:09

screaming crazy things in

21:10

Time Square which happens

21:11

all the time, you know, so

21:14

the it's actually it's

21:18

pretty rare for something

21:21

frankly that is hateful to

21:23

be promoted. It's not

21:24

it's not it's not

21:25

that it never happened. But

21:28

it's it's fairly rare.

21:30

I mean, I would encourage

21:31

people to look at

21:32

for those that use the

21:33

system when you look at

21:35

the the sort of the feed

21:36

that you receive. How often

21:39

is it? Is it hateful and

21:41

over time has it gotten

21:43

more or less hateful and I

21:45

would say that if you

21:46

look at at the look you if

21:48

that say I would and hateful

21:48

less or it gotten more the

21:49

X5 forms a day versus a year

21:52

ago. Go I think it is

21:53

actually much better.

21:53

I mean, what is your

21:54

clothes? Like are you

21:55

surprised I'm just curious

21:57

if you use this I use the

21:58

platform religiously I

22:01

so you admit to being an

22:02

addict you and I use the

22:03

for you and I will I will

22:05

say now the problem is

22:07

because I'm a journalist I

22:08

go looking for stuff. Well,

22:10

that's not a sentence saying

22:12

because I and I also think

22:14

the algorithm for me

22:15

personally because I'm

22:16

looking for stuff also is

22:17

feeding the others things.

22:19

This is actually a challenge

22:21

in that A a like sometimes

22:23

people will say like why

22:24

is it showing me, you know

22:27

posts from this person

22:28

that I hate and

22:30

we're like well, did you

22:31

interact a lot with this

22:32

person that you hate? Well,

22:34

yes. Well therefore

22:36

thinks that you want to

22:37

interact more with this

22:38

person that you hate.

22:39

That's like a reasonable.

22:41

Let me ask, you know,

22:42

if you kind of want

22:43

to have an argument tweet.

22:44

Yeah. Do you have a post?

22:46

Let's say post when you

22:47

post it wasn't a moment. If

22:49

anyone can I come up with a

22:49

better word? better a

22:53

come up with I can anyone

22:53

If moment. post it wasn't a

22:54

word? That would be great

22:58

when you post though, but

22:59

this bad word I can think

22:59

of is post. So when you

23:00

post though, do you are you

23:01

trying to rile up either a

23:01

base or an audience? Do

23:04

you recognize the power

23:06

you have in that? And and

23:08

also by the way not just

23:09

rile up rile up one version

23:11

of sorry, but also

23:12

write down which is to say

23:14

as I said, there are people

23:15

who are demonstrable

23:16

anti-semitic on the site

23:18

who I get jewboy things. All

23:21

sorts of things that come

23:22

through on my way.

23:23

Hey for a while. I thought I

23:24

was through so they would

23:24

you know get it to it. But

23:26

no, but the question is

23:27

condemned as Supergirl you

23:28

ever think to yourself.

23:28

You know what I'm gonna go

23:29

online and I'm going to say

23:30

these people I condemn these

23:32

people that are on my

23:33

site saying these things

23:36

because I have said I have

23:38

you see I've condemned an

23:39

assembly but do you ever

23:39

go I said I could can

23:42

literally I literally posted

23:43

I condemn anti-Semitism in

23:44

all its forms like that is a

23:46

literal we've literal post

23:48

that post we've literal

23:49

literal a like that is forms

23:49

all its in that I made.

23:53

I mean, I'm like listen if

23:54

I can get out thesaurus if

23:55

you you know, and we could

23:56

you know, I let me ask you

23:57

a different question

24:00

you you you compose it. I'll

24:00

post it. Okay. Let me

24:01

ask you this. You You you you

24:05

you you you You you you

24:06

your honor you're

24:06

on a podcast about a month

24:07

ago. And you said something

24:09

that struck me and

24:11

it struck me is accurate

24:12

came out of your mouth. So

24:13

hopefully it is but it I'm

24:16

hoping to go deep on this

24:17

stuff because it came out

24:17

of my mouth

24:18

does not mean it's true. You

24:23

said my mother who said

24:24

my mind is a storm. I don't

24:24

think most people would

24:25

want to be me. They

24:27

may think they want to be

24:28

me, but they don't know

24:30

they don't understand. What

24:33

did you mean by that?

24:34

What was that what your

24:35

mind being a storm and I

24:37

think it I mean I have

24:39

known you for quite

24:39

some time. I think it is

24:40

a bit of a storm. Yes.

24:46

Yeah, I mean I Yeah. Yeah,

24:47

know as much as a where the

24:49

metaphor make sense,

24:52

my mind is often feels like

24:54

a like a like a very Wild

24:56

Storm. I mean, I have

24:59

a fountain of ideas. I mean

25:00

I have my ideas and I could

25:01

possibly execute so

25:03

I have no shortage of ideas

25:04

Innovation is not

25:05

the problem. The problem

25:06

execution is the problem.

25:08

I've got a million ideas.

25:08

I mean, I've got an entire

25:09

entire design an got

25:10

mean, I've I

25:10

got a million ideas. I've

25:11

design for an electric

25:12

supersonic vertical. Off

25:14

jet but I mean I just if I

25:15

just can't do that as

25:16

well. I've had it for 10

25:17

years. And there's a million

25:22

things your storm a Happy

25:24

Storm. Yeah,

25:31

it's not a Happy Storm.

25:32

Yeah. tell us about that

25:34

Tell us because I think that

25:35

that tell us actually

25:36

Tell us when people try to

25:37

really understand you, I

25:38

think that there's a lot

25:39

there's a that think I you.

25:39

understand really to

25:40

people try it when of this

25:40

comes from some other place

25:41

and I want to talk about

25:42

that. What do you think

25:42

that is? It was really like

25:59

a psychiatrist catch her or

25:59

something. You know, I think

26:07

to some degree I was

26:08

born this way, but and then

26:09

it was Amplified by a

26:10

difficult childhood rightly.

26:13

So but I can remember even

26:16

in the happy moments when

26:17

I was a kid that there's

26:19

kid that was a I

26:20

happy moments when there's

26:20

just it just feels like

26:22

this just a rage of horses

26:26

Rage in my mind constantly

26:29

now this, you know

26:30

productively

26:31

manifests itself in

26:34

technology and Building

26:35

Things for the most part,

26:38

so And I think on balance

26:43

the output has been very

26:44

productive. I think the

26:48

results at as we you know,

26:50

discussed earlier with

26:51

SpaceX Tesla PayPal, which

26:53

is you know, still going

26:56

today the first year and a

27:00

company that I started in

27:01

fact the first In started.

27:02

year in a company I started

27:02

of to was funded by

27:07

New York Times company

27:08

Hearst knight-ridder and

27:09

remember We wrote some

27:12

of the software for we the

27:14

New York Times website We

27:15

we and we help bring

27:17

online several hundred

27:19

newspapers that previously

27:20

were only in front. Now.

27:23

This is in the 90s, which

27:25

at this point is like

27:26

I'm like good grandpa

27:28

black, but

27:31

basically, you know the

27:32

nineties and internet feels

27:33

like a Precambrian era when

27:34

there were only the sponges

27:38

so Anyway, so, anyway, so,

27:41

Anyway, so, you know,

27:42

anyway, so, I feel like that

27:43

a lot of productive things

27:43

have been done and you can

27:44

also look at Tesla as being

27:46

through as Tesla at look

27:46

can also you and been done

27:47

have productive things many

27:48

companies and wine like are

27:48

super charging network is

27:50

if it were if this

27:53

it tells

27:54

a supercharger Network

27:55

where its own company,

27:55

it would be a Fortune 500

27:56

company by itself. It's

27:58

just just the super

28:00

charging system. We also

28:03

make the cells we build the

28:07

electronics in the

28:08

power train from scratch.

28:11

We have the most Innovative

28:12

structural design. The

28:14

larger castings ever used.

28:17

We have the best

28:18

manufacturing technology

28:18

have the best manufacturing

28:19

We used. ever castings

28:20

larger technology

28:20

at Tesla better manufacturing

28:21

technology than

28:22

companies that have been doing

28:23

it. For 100 years. So so

28:24

these these Demons of the

28:26

mind, you know, I

28:30

for the most part harnessed

28:32

to productive ends, it's

28:35

Luna a script that does

28:37

it mean that once in a while

28:37

while. They they while

28:40

you know, go wrong wrong,

28:44

wrong wrong, but but and

28:46

this is a question, I think

28:47

a lot of lot of people,

28:48

think a question, I a is

28:48

this and wrong know, go

28:49

people, you know are always

28:49

trying to figure out about

28:50

not just you but sometimes

28:53

Meaning what is driving all

28:54

this you're doing all of

28:54

these things. Do you think

28:57

it's do you think that you

28:58

would be as successful?

29:00

Whatever success is if it

29:03

wasn't being If if driven

29:04

by some I think that

29:05

there's something

29:06

you're trying to prove

29:07

either yourself or to

29:08

somebody. I don't know. We're

29:09

all trying to prove that

29:10

the person who is my

29:11

mother. I don't know. No,

29:14

if I were to sit

29:15

describe My Philosophy it

29:17

is a philosophy of

29:18

curiosity. I did have this

29:26

existential crisis when I

29:27

was around 12 about

29:30

what's the meaning of life,

29:32

isn't it all pointless?

29:34

Why not just commit suicide

29:35

why exist? I read the

29:40

religious texts. I read the

29:42

philosophy books that are

29:46

especially the German

29:47

philosophy books made me

29:48

quite depressed frankly when

29:49

frankly depressed quite me

29:50

made books philosophy

29:50

German the when you're not

29:51

read schopenhauer

29:52

and each has a teenager. But

29:55

then I read but But but

29:57

Douglas Adams

29:58

Hitchhiker's Guide to the

29:59

Galaxy which is a book

30:00

on philosophy in the form of

30:01

humor. And the point that

30:05

Adams was making there was

30:05

that we don't actually

30:10

know what questions to

30:11

ask. That's why I said

30:13

that, you know, the answer is

30:14

that 42. that, that

30:15

Basically it's a giant

30:16

computer and and it came

30:17

up with the answer 42, but

30:18

then to actually figure out

30:20

what the out what figure

30:20

actually then to but 42,

30:21

answer with the up the

30:21

question is. That's

30:25

Actual hard part I

30:26

think this is generally true

30:26

also in physics at the

30:27

point of which you can

30:28

properly frame. The

30:29

question. The answer is is

30:32

actually the easy part. So

30:37

so so mi order vation then

30:41

was that well. My life is

30:44

finite really a

30:45

flash in the pan and on a

30:46

galactic time scale, but if

30:50

we can expand the scope and

30:52

scale of consciousness.

30:54

Then we are better able

30:55

to figure out what

30:59

questions to ask about the

31:01

answer. That is the universe.

31:05

And we're maybe we can

31:06

find out the meaning of

31:07

life or even what

31:08

question to what the right

31:09

question to ask is.

31:13

You know, where do we come

31:14

from? Where are we going?

31:17

Where are the aliens are

31:18

there aliens?

31:22

At you know, these these

31:23

questions. You you You know

31:26

is their new physics to you

31:28

discover or is this because

31:30

there's addition to be some

31:31

real questions about

31:32

dark matter and dark energy

31:34

energy. And so the

31:38

purpose of SpaceX

31:40

is to extend life beyond

31:41

Earth on a sustained basis

31:44

so that we can at least

31:46

pass one of the Fermi great

31:48

filters, which is that of

31:50

being a single planet

31:51

civilization if we are

31:53

single planet civilization

31:55

then Then we are simply

31:57

waiting around for some

31:58

then Extinction event

31:59

whether that is man-made

32:01

or natural. natural,

32:03

natural. But if

32:05

you're a single planet

32:05

civilization, eventually you

32:07

will something will happen

32:09

to that planet and you

32:10

will die. If you

32:12

were a multi-planet

32:12

civilization, you will live

32:13

much longer. Also multi

32:14

plant civilization is

32:17

that's the natural stepping

32:18

stone to being a multi

32:20

Stella civilization

32:21

and being out there Among the

32:22

Stars so, you know this

32:24

I think has To that. This is

32:31

not simply a defensive

32:31

motivation, but it is also

32:32

one where that you know

32:35

that gives meaning

32:36

Man's Search for meaning

32:38

triple

32:41

ask you if there's this

32:41

philosophy Point even

32:42

though it may seems rather

32:43

esoteric that may resonate

32:45

with a few people. We must

32:48

get past this Fermi filter

32:50

of Venus a great future of

32:52

being a single planet

32:54

civilization. And if we do

32:56

that will more likely to

32:58

understand the nature of

32:59

the universe and what

33:00

questions to ask if you're

33:04

a believer in the

33:06

philosophy of curiosity then

33:07

Philosophy of then

33:07

philosophy of I think

33:08

you should support this

33:09

Philosophy of ambition and

33:12

but it's more that there's

33:14

being a multi-planet species

33:16

is more than than simply.

33:19

You know life

33:20

insurance life insurance for

33:21

Life collectively. That's a

33:22

defensive reason, but but I

33:25

think also that that life

33:27

has to be more than

33:29

simply solving one side

33:31

problem after another,

33:33

you know, they're happy that

33:35

be reasons many where you

33:36

wake up in the morning and

33:38

you're happy to be alive.

33:44

They have to be reasons that

33:44

you you have to say.

33:45

Why are you excited about the

33:46

future like what gives you

33:48

hope? And and if you if you

33:53

are unsure ask your kids.

33:56

And and I think the idea of

33:58

us being a spacefaring

34:00

civilization and being out

34:01

there Among the Stars. Is

34:04

incredibly inspiring and

34:06

exciting and something

34:07

to look forward to. And they

34:09

need to be such things

34:10

in the world.

34:13

May I ask you a different

34:13

question about confidence?

34:15

We were having

34:16

a conversation here earlier,

34:16

but people and where your

34:18

where people get

34:19

their Confidence from some

34:20

people have written

34:22

security other people have

34:24

insecurity great great

34:24

confidence and I was

34:26

thinking about you because

34:29

you have a very interesting

34:31

history where people have

34:33

told you over and over

34:34

again that you're wrong.

34:37

Well, sometimes

34:37

they're right. Well,

34:40

sometimes they are but I

34:41

would say that when

34:42

it comes to Tesla when it

34:44

came to SpaceX people

34:46

told you that you were

34:47

crazy. You're out of your

34:48

mind. This was never going

34:49

to happen. Yeah,

34:50

it's going to work. And so

34:51

yes, we ask you this

34:52

though and so

34:53

we're going to work is now

34:56

when people say you're

34:57

wrong. This isn't right.

35:01

Do you look at that and say

35:03

you know what that's like

35:03

a red flag for me because

35:05

you know, I've been told so

35:06

often that I'm wrong that I

35:09

know that I and I know

35:10

I'm right because I've had

35:11

that experience or other

35:14

people in your life

35:15

when they say, you know,

35:15

what Ilan this is not this

35:17

is not right. Do you know

35:19

what I'm saying? I mean,

35:22

I think

35:23

we're just trying to say is

35:24

that do at this point think

35:25

because

35:26

what you're trying to say is

35:27

I've been right so many times

35:27

for others have said I'm

35:28

wrong that now I passed

35:29

believe I'm right when

35:31

I fact I'm wrong.

35:33

You did very well. What

35:35

do you think

35:37

know? I'm right.

35:37

know? I'm right

35:37

know? I'm right. So

35:43

yeah, no, look. Here's

35:44

the thing No, I'm right.

35:45

think?

35:45

physics is unforgiving for.

35:46

Yeah, look here's the thing

35:47

physics is unforgiving

35:49

physics is unforgiving. So.

35:54

I mean I have you know,

35:55

these very simple things

35:56

I've come up with that

35:58

physics is the law and

35:59

everything else was a

36:00

recommendation right in the

36:02

sense that you can break any

36:04

law made by humans, but

36:07

try breaking a law made by

36:08

physics as much more

36:10

difficult. So if you are

36:12

wrong and persistent being

36:14

wrong, the Rockets will

36:16

blow up and the cars will

36:17

fail. So this is

36:23

we're not trying to

36:24

figure out what

36:25

flavor of ice cream is the

36:27

best flavor Figure out

36:28

figure out of ice cream the

36:29

like if there's a

36:31

thousand things that can

36:32

happen on a rocket flight

36:35

and only one of them gets

36:37

the rocket orbit. and And so

36:39

being wrong and And

36:41

results in Failure

36:44

when dealing with physical

36:45

objects, but that's

36:47

the interesting part. So now

36:47

you've built this these

36:49

great companies that

36:50

physically the physics of

36:52

them are enormously

36:53

successful. So successful

36:55

arguably that you have

36:57

leverage over everybody

36:59

else, right? There's nobody

37:00

else can do starlink.

37:01

Nobody else can get I

37:04

nobody else can get the

37:05

rockets in space yet Amazon

37:06

and Jeff Bezos are trying

37:07

but they haven't yet.

37:09

I hope he does you hope

37:10

he does. Yeah, and I think

37:12

you know, but I actually

37:15

agree with with love

37:16

Jeff's motivations. I mean,

37:18

I think you know he's so

37:24

I'm living for their

37:25

but this way if

37:26

there was a button I could

37:26

press that would delete

37:28

blue origin. I wouldn't

37:29

press it. So I think it's

37:32

good that he's spending

37:33

money on on making Rockets

37:35

to you know, it's just

37:38

Pepsi spend more time. it

37:39

but you know, it's up It

37:40

to him the

37:46

to make a point here. So

37:48

nothing nothing any of my

37:50

companies have done has

37:51

been to stifle

37:52

competition. In fact, we've

37:54

done the opposite. So at

37:56

Tesla we have open sourced

37:58

our patents anyone can use

38:01

anyone patents our sourced

38:01

open have we Tesla at So

38:02

opposite. the done our

38:02

patents for free how many

38:04

companies do not have done

38:04

that? Can you name one? I

38:09

can't at SpaceX. We don't

38:12

use patterns. So I mean

38:16

said once in a while will

38:18

file a patent just so some

38:19

patent troll doesn't

38:20

cause trouble but we're not

38:23

stopping any

38:24

that we've done we've done

38:25

nothing anti-competitive.

38:27

We've done nothing to stop

38:28

a not just you at all.

38:30

I just want to clarify

38:30

for the audience because

38:31

some companies have done

38:33

done anti-competitive

38:34

things. I think think the I

38:36

things. anti-competitive

38:36

done have companies the

38:37

strange thing about the

38:41

unusual. Thing about

38:41

space X and Tesla is

38:42

that we've done things that

38:42

have helped a competition.

38:43

So at Tesla we have made

38:46

our supercharger system

38:49

Open Access. We made our

38:53

we Access, We Access.

38:54

charger technology we

38:54

Access, available for free

38:55

to the other manufacturers.

38:58

The reason I know

38:59

Walled Garden we could have

39:00

put a wall up

39:02

the road instead. We invited

39:02

them in the reason I

39:03

mention this though is

39:04

because you've had

39:05

the success had you've

39:05

because though is this

39:06

mention I reason the

39:06

the success in the physical

39:07

physics world, you know.

39:10

Now have now have these

39:11

very difficult Now have

39:11

decisions now have that

39:12

have huge impacts on the

39:12

world that are not physical

39:14

decisions at all their

39:16

decisions of the Mind the

39:17

decisions that you and

39:19

others have to make

39:20

it as a question whether you

39:20

should be making these

39:21

decisions at all and I think

39:23

about in the context of

39:25

starlink. Obviously there

39:26

was the report about how

39:28

it's being used in Ukraine

39:29

and the rough War there's

39:31

questions about what you

39:32

know, Taiwan whether Taiwan

39:34

should use it or

39:35

we'll use it. I believe

39:36

they're not right now because

39:38

they're worried that at At

39:39

at some point maybe the

39:39

Chinese At will tell you

39:40

that you have to

39:42

they have leverage over you

39:42

and you're going to have

39:43

to turn that off right

39:45

then. These are these are

39:46

very difficult decisions.

39:47

And I'm so curious how

39:48

you think how you curious so

39:49

I'm and decisions, difficult

39:50

very are these about that

39:50

and not just the

39:51

decisions the fact that you

39:52

have that power. I think

39:58

it's important for the

39:58

audience to understand. The

39:59

reason I have these Powers

39:59

not because of some

40:00

anti-competitive actions

40:00

it simply because we've

40:01

executed very well. Oh, I'm

40:02

not dismissing that I think

40:03

there's so many people

40:04

by the way who are huge

40:05

supporters of what you

40:06

there are already dead lights

40:07

out there, you know, but

40:09

they're and but they're not

40:10

as good as yours and

40:11

the same and we can say

40:12

that maybe make the same

40:13

argument of cars and

40:13

everything else. But as a

40:15

result that gives that

40:16

result a as But else.

40:16

everything and cars of

40:17

argument same gives you

40:17

enormous Leverage Right,

40:21

okay with the exception of

40:22

the by the way, these

40:22

advertisers weren't on X in

40:23

every other instance.

40:23

Everybody needs you. Well,

40:27

I mean nobody's letting

40:29

them use our product if it's

40:30

better than you somebody

40:31

else's product. If it's

40:31

there are other

40:33

products better and I

40:34

accept that and maybe one day

40:35

so I can also create a better

40:36

product. Like, you know,

40:38

like, product Like, product.

40:39

how like, product is it about

40:39

thing to make better

40:41

products

40:41

with other companies? Well,

40:42

and I wanted to go back to

40:44

this to the

40:45

Starling piece of it though

40:46

because it that has sort of

40:47

a geo

40:49

geo political ramification

40:49

in terms of your power and

40:52

how you think about that

40:53

specific power and then

40:55

the power that the u.s.

40:56

Government might have

40:57

either over you or Not

40:58

Over Not or you over

40:59

either have might

41:00

Government u.s. the that

41:00

power Over You the The power

41:04

of the Chinese government

41:05

might have over you or not

41:05

over you and how those

41:06

things get used.

41:08

We're in what are you

41:09

suggesting? I'm asking the

41:11

question around this this

41:12

very idea of how these

41:15

satellites are going to be

41:17

used. Whether you think that

41:18

you should have control of

41:19

control have should you

41:19

think that you Whether used.

41:20

be to of them whether the

41:21

government should have

41:21

control of them was the

41:24

government. Well, that's a

41:25

there's a lot of people who

41:26

don't trust the government

41:27

exactly. But then this

41:28

goes back to the trust of

41:29

you. Right? I mean like

41:32

said that we're not the only

41:34

company who has communication

41:35

satellites. There are

41:36

considered lights are just

41:37

much better than theirs.

41:39

So it's not like we have

41:41

added Monopoly. Do you feel

41:43

do you feel like anybody has

41:44

attacked? has

41:45

you feel like anybody do

41:45

you feel do Monopoly

41:46

haven't

41:46

attacked? It's not like

41:47

you feel anybody has

41:47

leverage over you. I mean,

41:53

I think at the end

41:54

of the day if we make bad

41:55

products that

41:55

people don't want to use

41:56

then the vote will users

41:58

to use then the don't want

41:59

people that

41:59

if we make bad products users

42:00

will vote with their

42:01

resources and you something

42:05

else. It hit the

42:06

conversation for a

42:07

sec. I mean certainly

42:09

me and my company is

42:09

overseen by regulators and

42:11

and while you know, once it

42:14

once know, you while and

42:15

by regulators

42:15

and my company is overseen

42:16

it since SpaceX darling

42:21

Tesla. Are overseen by are

42:22

Are cumulatively are over

42:25

100 Regulators in actually

42:28

more than that few hundred

42:29

Regulators because you got

42:30

we're in 55 countries if you

42:36

sum up all the times that I

42:38

If countries. had an

42:38

argument with Regulators

42:40

of hundreds of regulators

42:42

over decades, it can sound

42:45

really terrible except

42:47

but they forgot to mention

42:48

that there were 10 million.

42:50

Galatians we complied with

42:51

and only five that I

42:53

disagree with

42:56

that little fight the five

42:56

and it sounds like wow

42:57

this guy's a real Maverick.

42:58

I'm like, yeah,

42:59

but what about the 10

43:00

million we complied with

43:01

do you limit one related

43:03

thing on this and The

43:04

Leverage of countries and

43:05

things over you and

43:07

Regulators X is this free

43:10

speech platform, you

43:11

platform do platform,

43:11

business platform in China

43:12

lots of business China.

43:13

That's an important part of

43:14

your business. I imagine

43:16

well not SpaceX. How do you

43:19

think about how do you the

43:20

How do you leverage that

43:21

the Chinese have over you

43:23

and do they have leverage

43:25

over you and how do you

43:26

feel about some people

43:27

would say is it

43:28

hypocritical for you to be

43:30

doing business in China or

43:32

frankly in other countries

43:33

as well as it relates to

43:33

X and other things that

43:35

don't follow this free

43:36

this follow don't that

43:37

things and other X

43:37

Where as it relates to free

43:38

speech path that you have

43:42

espoused. The best that

43:43

their platform can do is

43:45

adhere to the laws of Any

43:45

Given country. Do you think

43:48

there's something more

43:48

we could do than that

43:50

I think would be very hard.

43:51

But I just wonder given the

43:53

sort of strong philosophical

43:55

approach that you've

43:57

you've been vocal about

43:58

whether you say to yourself,

44:00

you know, maybe I shouldn't

44:00

be doing business in that

44:02

country. Well, first of all

44:07

Starling and SpaceX to are

44:09

no business in China

44:10

whatsoever. Tesla has one of

44:13

four factories for vehicle

44:15

factories in China and

44:17

China's, you know, I

44:18

don't know a quarter of our

44:20

Market or something like

44:21

that. And so it's a quarter

44:22

of Market of one company.

44:25

The same is true by the way

44:25

of all the other

44:27

car companies. They also

44:29

have something on that order

44:30

of that order on something

44:30

have also companies. They

44:31

car the other of quarter of

44:32

their sales in China. So if

44:39

you if that's a problem for

44:39

Tesla

44:40

to pump every car company.

44:40

I mean, I think

44:41

one has to be careful about

44:41

not conflating the various

44:44

companies because I can only

44:46

do things that are within

44:47

the bounds of the law. I

44:48

cannot do beyond that. My

44:51

aspiration is to do as much

44:51

good as possible and

44:53

to be as productive as

44:54

possible within the bounds

44:55

of what is legal. More than

44:57

that I cannot do I want to

45:00

Pivot in talk about AI for a

45:01

moment. We had

45:02

Jensen Wong here who's big

45:03

fan of yours is you know,

45:04

yeah Johnson's also

45:06

talk about talking about

45:07

bringing you the first box

45:08

by the way with Ilya

45:10

interestingly enough. Yes

45:12

back in 2016. I think

45:14

there's a video of Jensen

45:16

and be unpacking the first

45:20

AI computer at open a.i. So

45:23

I'm so curious what you

45:24

think of what's just

45:25

happened over the past

45:27

two weeks

45:28

while you were dealing with

45:29

this other headline series

45:33

of headlines. I was a whole

45:35

other whole

45:35

headlines. I was a of

45:35

series headline other this

45:36

with series of

45:37

have evolved in a

45:37

isopropanol AI. What did you

45:38

think? Well, you found it

45:46

co-founded. Oh found it. Yeah,

45:47

I'm well the whole Well

45:50

well Arc Well of open

45:51

and I frankly is a little

45:52

troubling because the the

45:54

reason for starting opening

45:56

I was to create a counter

45:57

counterweight to Google

45:59

Google and deepmind which

46:00

at the time had

46:03

two thirds of all AI talent

46:05

and basically infinite money

46:07

and compute and there was no

46:09

there's no counter weight.

46:10

It was unipolar world and

46:12

Larry Page and I used to be

46:13

very close friends and I

46:14

would stay at his house and

46:15

I and house his stay at

46:16

I would and friends close

46:16

be very to and I talk

46:17

to Larry. Too late hours

46:20

of the night about AI

46:21

safety too late Too late

46:22

too late and it became

46:23

apparent to me that Larry

46:26

what did not care about AI

46:28

safety. I think perhaps the

46:30

thing that gave it away

46:31

was when he called me a

46:32

speciesist for being pro

46:34

Humanity as in you know,

46:37

like erasers but for species

46:41

so I'm like, wait a second.

46:43

What side are you on Larry?

46:49

And I'm like, okay. Listen

46:50

this guy calling

46:50

me as fishiest. It doesn't

46:51

care about AI safety. We've

46:53

got to have some

46:54

counter point here because

46:55

the seems like we could be

46:59

this isn't just this is no

47:00

good. So, okay. I was

47:03

actually started at it was

47:04

meant to be open source. I

47:06

named it over and II after

47:09

open source. It is in fact

47:12

closed-source super

47:12

in fact closed-source is It

47:13

source. open my eye after

47:14

over super close.

47:14

You should be named renamed

47:16

super close source for maximum

47:17

profit. May I so because

47:21

this is what it actually

47:22

is. I mean fate loves

47:25

irony. I mean, in fact

47:29

friend of mine has this

47:31

says like the way to

47:32

predict outcomes is the

47:32

most ironic outcome is to

47:34

vote. It's like is

47:34

Occam's razor like

47:35

the simplest sort of

47:36

explanation is most likely

47:38

and my friend

47:40

join us viewers that the

47:40

most ironic outcome is the

47:41

most likely and that's

47:43

what's happened with

47:43

open a.i. It's gone from

47:45

an open source. Foundation

47:50

a 501 C3 to Suddenly It's

47:52

like a 90 billion dollar

47:53

for profit Corporation with

47:54

clothes horse. So I

47:56

don't know how you go from

47:57

here to there. But

47:59

that seems like a

48:01

I don't know how you get. I

48:02

don't know if this is legal.

48:04

It's like that's so as you

48:06

saw Sam Altman get ousted

48:08

Yeah by somebody, you know

48:09

Elia and helium was

48:11

somebody who was a friend of

48:12

yours. Yes, you brought him

48:13

there your relationship

48:15

with Larry Page

48:16

effectively. Down over you

48:20

recruiting him away.

48:20

I think that's correct.

48:21

That was the fact that was

48:21

the Larry refuse to be

48:22

friends with me after I

48:23

recruited illya and so

48:25

here's Elia apparently

48:27

saying something is very

48:28

wrong. I think we should be

48:30

concerned about this because

48:31

I think Elly actually has a

48:32

strong moral compass.

48:34

He thinks about you know,

48:36

he really sweats it over

48:39

questions of what is right

48:41

and if he felt strongly

48:42

enough to Want to you know

48:47

fire Sam Sam. Well, I think

48:49

the world should know what

48:51

was that reason. Have you

48:52

talked to him? I reached out

48:55

but he doesn't want to

48:55

talk to anyone. Have you

48:57

talked to other people

48:58

behind the scenes is this

48:59

is all happening.

49:01

I've talked to a lot of

49:02

people as nobody I've not

49:07

found anyone. Who knows why

49:10

have you I think we are all

49:12

still trying to find out

49:14

I mean one of two things is

49:16

either it was a serious

49:17

thing and we should know what

49:19

it is or it was not

49:20

a serious thing and and then

49:22

the board should resign.

49:24

What do you think

49:25

of Sam Altman?

49:28

I have mixed feelings about

49:29

Sam. I do. You know the

49:36

ring of power. You know can

49:39

corrupt. and

49:45

here's the ring of power so

49:50

You know, I don't know.

49:52

I think I want to know why

49:54

Ilya felt so strongly as

49:55

fire Sam the sounds like a

49:57

serious thing. I don't think

49:59

it was trivial. and And I'm

50:02

and quite concerned that

50:03

this that this um, you

50:06

know you dangerous element

50:07

of AI that they've

50:08

they've discovered? Yes, you

50:10

think they've discovered

50:11

something?

50:12

That would be my guess. Where

50:15

are you with your own AI

50:18

efforts relative to where

50:20

you think open AI is where

50:22

you think Google is. where

50:26

the others are I mean

50:32

on the AI front of in

50:33

somewhat of a quandary here

50:34

because I've thought I could

50:38

be something that would

50:38

change the world

50:40

in a significant way since

50:40

I was in college. I mean

50:41

like 30 years ago. Well,

50:44

the reason I didn't go

50:46

college, bull day. I

50:47

write for the get-go

50:48

was because I was uncertain

50:49

about which which edge

50:52

of the double-edged sword

50:53

which would be sharper the

50:55

good edge of the vat Edge.

50:58

So I held off on

51:00

doing anything on a I could

51:00

have created. I think

51:02

leading a company and kind of

51:05

opening I actually kind of

51:05

is that because I was just

51:09

uncertain if you make this

51:11

magic Genie what will

51:12

happen? you know, where as I

51:15

think

51:18

Building sustainable energy

51:19

technology is much more

51:19

of a single-edged sword.

51:21

That is that

51:22

single-edged sword single

51:22

edge. Good making life

51:25

multiplanetary. I think

51:26

single-edged good.

51:30

You're stalling mostly

51:32

single-edged good. I mean

51:33

giving people better

51:33

connectivity to people

51:35

that you know, don't don't

51:36

you know have connectivity

51:36

or too expensive I think is

51:40

very, you know, very much a

51:41

good thing. So only was

51:45

instrumental by the way and

51:47

the whole thing the Russian

51:47

Advance the Ukrainian said

51:49

so so, you know, I think

51:52

there's think know, I so, you

51:53

so said Ukrainian the

51:54

Advance Russian the

51:54

if it was AI, you've got the

51:56

magic Genie. Problem.

52:00

You may think you want

52:00

a magic Genie. But once

52:05

you've got Genies

52:05

out of the bottle, it's hard

52:07

to say what happens how far

52:09

are we away from that

52:11

Jeanne be kind of bodily think

52:12

we think it's already out.

52:14

When the genie is

52:16

certainly poking his head

52:16

out. the AGI The the idea of

52:21

the artificial general

52:21

intelligence The given

52:23

what you now are working on

52:24

yourself and you know how

52:26

easy or hard it is to train

52:28

to create the inferences

52:29

to create the wait. I hope

52:32

I'm not getting too far

52:33

in the weeds of just how

52:34

this works. But those

52:35

are the basics behind the

52:37

software end of this.

52:41

It's funny, you know all

52:42

these weights. They're just

52:43

basically numbers in a

52:44

are just weights

52:44

It's funny, you know, all

52:45

comma separated value file.

52:46

That's our digital God the

52:48

CSV file. on that are funny,

52:52

On that are on that are

52:52

On that are but that's

52:57

the kind of literally what

52:58

it is. So I think it's

53:01

coming pretty fast,

53:02

you know is that I mean,

53:05

you've famously have

53:06

admitted to overstating how

53:07

quickly things will happen.

53:08

But how quickly do you think

53:10

this will happen? You say

53:17

smarter than the smartest

53:17

human at anything. Yep. It

53:22

may not be then quite

53:23

smarter than all humans

53:26

will machine

53:27

augmented humans, you know,

53:28

because we keep y'all got

53:29

computers and stuff

53:32

as a higher bar. But you say

53:33

smaller than any, you know,

53:35

can write as good a

53:36

novel is say JK Rowling or

53:39

discover new physics or

53:40

invent new technology. I

53:43

would say that we are less

53:44

than three years from

53:45

that point. Let me ask you

53:47

a question about xai and at

53:50

what you're doing and

53:51

because there's an

53:52

interesting thing that's

53:53

different. I think about

53:54

what you have relatives

53:57

of some of the others which

53:57

you have data you have

53:59

information you have all of

54:01

the stuff that everybody in

54:02

here has put on the

54:04

platform to sort through

54:07

and through sort to

54:07

platform the on put has

54:08

here in everybody I don't

54:12

Everybody realized that

54:13

initially. What is the value

54:13

of that? Yeah, I'm data is

54:21

very important. You could

54:25

say that is probably

54:26

more valuable than gold. But

54:29

then maybe you have

54:30

actually maybe you have

54:31

more you maybe you have the

54:32

gold in X in a different

54:34

way in a way again that I

54:37

don't know if the public

54:38

appreciates what that

54:39

means. Yes, X is the

54:45

might be the single

54:45

best source of data. I mean

54:49

it is there more. You know

54:53

people links that go to

54:55

fill click on more links

54:56

2x than anything else on

54:57

Earth. Sometimes

54:58

people think Facebook or

54:59

Instagram is a bigger

55:00

thing, but actually

55:02

there are more links to

55:03

external anything you can

55:04

this is public information

55:05

you can Google it. Okay. Let

55:06

me ask you a so it is

55:08

it is a where you would find

55:11

what is happening right now

55:12

on Earth at any given point

55:14

in time the whole open a

55:15

drama played out out. out

55:16

in fact In out. on the

55:18

export form. So it is one

55:21

is it form. So expert the

55:21

on fact out. played drama

55:22

open a of the it's

55:22

not there. Are you know

55:26

Google certainly has a

55:26

massive amount of data so

55:27

does Microsoft? So it's

55:30

not like

55:31

B is one of the best sources

55:32

of data. Can I ask you

55:36

an interesting IP issue,

55:37

which I think is actually

55:38

something I can say as

55:40

somebody who's in the

55:41

Creator business and

55:42

journalistic business and

55:43

whatnot were care about

55:46

copyright. So one of the

55:49

things about training on

55:50

data has been this idea

55:51

that you're not going to

55:52

train or these things are

55:53

not being trained on

55:55

people's copyrighted

55:56

information historically,

55:57

that's been the concept.

55:58

Yeah. That's a huge lie.

56:00

Say that again.

56:01

That's what these

56:03

are. These are all trained

56:03

on copyrighted it obviously

56:05

so you think it's a lie

56:07

when open a.i. Says that

56:09

this is not none of these

56:10

guys say they're training on

56:12

copyrighted day though.

56:13

That's a lie. It's a lie

56:14

a lie. It's a though. That's

56:15

day copyrighted on

56:15

guys had their training

56:16

straight up straight up

56:16

lie. Okay our said

56:22

soon obviously it's

56:22

been trained on perforated

56:23

data. Okay. So let me ask

56:24

the second question which is

56:24

all of the people who have

56:25

been uploading and it's like

56:28

whatever minute all of the

56:28

people have been uploading

56:30

articles the best quotes

56:32

from different articles

56:34

videos to X all of that

56:38

can be trained on and it's

56:40

interesting because people

56:41

put all of that there and

56:43

there of that all put people

56:43

because interesting it's and

56:44

and those quotes have

56:44

historically been considered

56:46

fair use Right, they do

56:48

people are putting those

56:49

quotes up the and

56:49

individually on a fair use

56:50

spaces you'd say

56:51

OK that makes sense. But now

56:53

there are people who do

56:54

threads and by the way,

56:55

there may be multiple people

56:56

who've done, you know at

56:58

article could has a thousand

56:59

words technically all

57:00

thousand words could have

57:01

made it onto X somehow and

57:04

effectively now you have this

57:06

remarkable repository and I

57:08

wonder what you how you

57:09

think about that again and

57:11

how you think the creative

57:12

community and those who were

57:14

the original original Ip.

57:15

the were who those and

57:15

community creative the A

57:19

owners should think

57:20

about that. I don't know

57:21

except to say that the by

57:21

the time these lawsuits are

57:23

decided we'll have digital

57:24

God. So that's

57:26

that's digital.

57:26

that's digital

57:26

that's digital. God at that

57:27

point. that's digital These

57:29

lawsuits won't be decided

57:29

before on a

57:31

time frame that is relevant.

57:33

Is frame that is relevant.

57:34

a time on before decided

57:34

be won't Is that a good

57:35

thing or a bad thing?

57:41

I think we live you know,

57:42

there's that I don't know

57:43

if it's actually a real

57:44

Chinese thing or not, but

57:46

may you live in interesting

57:46

times? But apparently not

57:50

but times, a But times?

57:51

good thing, but times, but

57:53

good thing good thing,

57:54

good thing and I would

57:55

prefer to personally

57:55

I would prefer to live in

57:56

interesting times and and we

57:58

live in the most

58:00

interesting of times.

58:02

I think for a while

58:04

there. I was like really

58:05

getting demotivated and

58:06

losing sleep over.

58:09

the sort of the threat of

58:10

AI danger and then I finally

58:11

sort of became fatalistic

58:13

about it and said well

58:15

Even if I knew it was

58:18

Annihilation was certain.

58:21

What I choose to be alive

58:22

what What at that time

58:24

or not, what and I said

58:25

I probably would have

58:27

choose to be alive at that

58:27

time because it's the most

58:28

interesting thing. Even if

58:31

there was nothing I could do

58:31

about it. So then, you know,

58:33

then basically sort of a

58:35

fatalistic resignation help

58:37

me sleep at night because I

58:38

was having trouble sleeping

58:39

at night because of AI

58:40

danger now what to do

58:43

about it. I mean, I've been

58:46

the biggest or the one

58:48

banging the drum for the the

58:49

hardest by far the longest

58:57

Or this one of the longest

58:57

for a high danger and or

58:58

and these regulatory things

58:58

that are happening

58:59

are happening. are happening

59:00

the single biggest reason

59:00

that happening is because

59:01

of me we are ever going

59:03

to get their arms around

59:03

it. We talked to the vice

59:05

president this afternoon.

59:05

She said she wants to

59:06

regulate it people

59:08

can try to regulate social

59:09

media for years and have

59:11

done nothing effectively.

59:13

Well, there's

59:14

regulation around anything

59:15

which is a like a physical

59:17

danger to a danger to the

59:18

public. So like cars like

59:19

So to the public. a danger

59:19

to danger physical a like

59:20

is a are heavily regulated.

59:24

And Communications and I

59:24

have And early regulated

59:25

rockets and and aircraft are

59:26

heavily regulated the general

59:28

philosophy about regulation

59:29

is that when something is

59:31

a danger to the public

59:32

that there needs to be some

59:34

Governor oversight? So

59:37

I think in my view AI is

59:40

more dangerous than nuclear

59:42

bombs, which we regulate

59:44

nuclear bombs. You

59:44

can't just go make

59:45

a nuclear bomb in your

59:46

backyard. I think we should

59:49

have some kind of

59:51

Regulation with a I now

59:53

this tense cause the AI

59:56

acceleration is to get up

59:57

in arms because they think

59:59

I is sort of having

60:02

basically, but

60:04

you're typically don't like

60:05

don't typically but you're

60:05

basically, having of

60:06

is sort think I regulation.

60:06

You've pushed back on

60:07

Regulators for the

60:08

most part in the of Of

60:10

Tesla of and with so many

60:11

so many instances where we

60:11

read articles about you

60:12

pushing back pushing you

60:13

about articles read we

60:13

where instances many so on

60:14

The Regulators.

60:15

I'm so curious. Why in this

60:15

instance now you own one

60:16

of these businesses. As I

60:19

said a moment ago as As

60:20

as one should not take

60:25

what is viewed in the

60:27

media as being the

60:28

whole picture. There are

60:31

literally hundreds like this

60:33

is probably not an

60:34

exaggeration. So

60:35

they're probably 100 million

60:37

regulations that that might

60:40

companies comply with and

60:41

they're probably five that

60:43

we don't and if they're if

60:46

we And disagree with and

60:47

some of those regulations,

60:48

it's because we think the

60:49

regulation that is meant

60:50

to do good doesn't

60:51

actually do good. But that

60:53

is not the thing to Flying

60:54

regulations for the question

60:55

if there are laws and

60:56

rules. Whether the

61:01

ideas that you're making the

61:02

decision that the

61:02

law and the whether the

61:03

Whether the rule

61:03

shouldn't be the law on the

61:04

rule and then right isn't

61:05

that I'm saying

61:06

follow my name is taken and

61:07

and you should be obvious

61:08

that you're mistaken. My

61:09

company's Automotive

61:12

is heavily regulated. We

61:14

would not be allowed to put

61:15

cars on the road. If we did

61:16

not comply with this

61:17

vast body of Regulation.

61:18

Now you could you could

61:19

fill up the stage with

61:22

literally, you know, six

61:24

foot high with the

61:26

regulations that you have

61:27

to comply with. To make a

61:31

car and make you could have

61:33

a room full of phone books.

61:35

That's how many that's how

61:36

big the regulations are and

61:37

if you don't comply

61:38

with all of those you can't

61:40

sell the car and if we

61:41

don't comply with all the

61:43

regulations for Rockets or

61:44

for Starling they shot us

61:45

down. So in fact, I am

61:48

incredibly compliant with

61:49

regulations now once in a

61:51

while, they'll be something

61:53

that I disagree with the

61:54

reason I would disagree

61:55

with that. It's because

61:55

I think the regulation in

61:57

that particular case

61:58

in that rare. Our case

61:59

our case does not Our case

61:59

serve the public good

62:00

our case and therefore

62:01

I think it is my obligation

62:03

to object to

62:04

a regulation that is meant to

62:05

serve the public good.

62:06

If it doesn't that's the

62:07

only time I object not

62:09

because I seek to object.

62:11

In fact, I'm incredibly

62:13

rule-following.

62:14

Let me ask you a

62:14

separate question is social

62:15

media related question. We've

62:16

been talking about

62:17

Tick-Tock today ahead of the

62:19

election sir. Soccer's

62:22

what do you think of

62:23

tick-tock? Do you think

62:23

it's a national security

62:24

threat I don't use like

62:31

talk it again. You don't

62:33

I don't personally use it.

62:38

but for people that

62:40

for teenagers and people in

62:43

their 20s, they seem

62:44

almost And and religiously

62:44

And addicted to technology.

62:48

So we will watch

62:50

Tech talk for like 2 hours

62:51

a day. I stopped using

62:58

Tick-Tock when I felt the

62:59

AI probing my mind and I

63:00

don't make me uncomfortable.

63:04

So I stopped using it.

63:11

And in terms of

63:12

anti-Semitic content, I

63:13

mean Tick Tock is Rife with

63:14

that. It has the most viral

63:17

anti-semitic content

63:18

anti-semitic most viral

63:18

has the It with that.

63:19

Tick-Tock is Rife

63:19

anti-semitic content by

63:20

far, but you think the

63:21

Chinese government is using

63:21

it to manipulate. The

63:24

minds of Americans though.

63:26

Is that something that

63:26

you think we should

63:27

worry about? I mean you

63:29

have a different states

63:29

that are trying to ban it.

63:30

I don't think this is a

63:32

sometimes going plot, but it

63:36

is The Tick Tock algorithm

63:39

is entirely a high-powered.

63:40

So it is really just

63:44

try to find the most viral

63:44

thing possible that it's

63:48

what is going to keep you

63:48

glued to the screen. That's

63:50

screen. the to glued you

63:50

to keep is going what it's

63:51

that it now the On

63:55

sheer numbers. There are on

63:57

the order of 2 billion

63:58

Muslims in the world and

63:59

I think You know you know

64:02

You know much you know

64:03

smaller number of Jewish

64:04

people for 20 million

64:06

something many orders

64:08

of magnitude fewer. So if

64:09

you just look at at

64:11

content production just

64:14

unsure numbers basis is

64:16

going to be overwhelmingly

64:19

at Semitic. Let me ask you

64:20

about another the

64:21

mess your political question

64:23

and I've been trying to

64:24

square this one in my head

64:24

for a long time. Yeah

64:26

in the last two or three

64:28

years you have moved

64:31

decidedly to the right I

64:33

think have I well we can

64:34

discuss this. I think that

64:37

you have been espousing and

64:40

promoting a number of

64:44

Republican candidates and

64:45

others you've been very

64:47

frustrated with the body

64:48

Administration over I think

64:49

unions and feeling like

64:52

they did not respect what

64:55

you've created. Well, I

64:56

mean with without any

65:00

during nothing to provoke

65:01

the veteran administration,

65:02

they held an electric

65:04

vehicle Summit at the White

65:04

House and specifically

65:05

refused to let Tesla

65:08

and this isn't the first

65:09

And this six months of the

65:09

and this administration

65:10

And this and we

65:11

inquiry like we literally

65:12

make more electric cars

65:14

that everyone else combined.

65:14

Why are we not allowed? Why

65:16

are you only letting your

65:17

84 GM Chrysler and UAW and

65:21

you're specifically

65:22

disallowing us from the EV

65:23

Summit at the White House.

65:25

We're done nothing to

65:26

provoke them then

65:29

Biden went on to add

65:29

insult to injury and

65:31

publicly said that GM was

65:32

leading the electric car

65:34

Evolution. This was in the

65:35

same quarter that

65:37

Tesla made 300,000

65:40

electric cars and GMA 26

65:42

Does that seem fair to you?

65:45

So wierd Kappa tell me this

65:46

then it doesn't seem fair.

65:49

And and I've asked

65:51

repeatedly

65:52

you've probably seen me

65:52

but we had a

65:53

great relationship with

65:53

Obama. So there's not a

65:56

stupid amount, but then

65:57

there's other

65:58

for a long. I stood certain

65:58

hours for sick. I

65:59

stood in line for six hours

66:01

to Shag Obama's head. Okay,

66:03

so we just okay. So let me

66:05

just ask on a personal level.

66:06

me just ask on a personal

66:06

so we just okay. So let Okay,

66:07

head. I can see it in your

66:07

face this this hurt you

66:09

personally. And I hope

66:11

the company and to And and

66:12

it was an insult to

66:14

you know, did Tesla has

66:17

140,000 employees? Okay of

66:19

the employees. it Tesla

66:19

half of them are in

66:20

the United States tells us

66:21

created

66:22

more manufacturing jobs

66:23

in everyone else combined.

66:27

So we asked this then you've

66:28

devoted at least the last

66:30

close to 20 years

66:31

your life. If not more to

66:33

the climate climate change

66:36

trying to get Tesla off the

66:37

ground in part to improve

66:38

climate. You talked about

66:39

that a real right-wing

66:41

motive repeatedly got a

66:44

far-right if anything, I

66:45

understand that and then

66:47

it's so it's a good guys

66:49

reverse psychology Next

66:50

Level. Well, no, but so

66:52

here's

66:53

in the question, which is

66:53

how do you square the

66:57

support that you have given,

66:58

Support I believe you were

66:58

at a fundraiser for the

67:02

Vogue ramaswamy. For

67:03

example, who says that

67:06

the climate climate issue is

67:08

a hoax, right?

67:10

I disagree with him on that.

67:11

I but I would think that

67:12

that would be such a

67:13

singular issue for you.

67:15

I would think that that the

67:16

climate issue be such a

67:17

singular issue for you that

67:18

actually it would

67:19

disqualify almost anybody

67:21

who didn't take that

67:22

issue seriously. Well,

67:25

I haven't endorsed anyone

67:25

for president. I mean I

67:27

wanted to hear what

67:28

they had to say because

67:30

I think some of his things

67:31

are there some things he says

67:33

I think are pretty solid,

67:35

you know is concerned about

67:37

government overreach

67:39

but about gun control of

67:39

information. I mean the

67:42

degree to which old Twitter

67:43

was basically a sock puppet

67:45

of the government was

67:47

ridiculous. So, you know,

67:50

it seems to me that

67:51

me that the seems to it

67:51

know, you So, ridiculous. was

67:52

the there's a very severe

67:54

violation of the amendment

67:56

in terms of how much

67:57

the government control

67:58

how much control the

67:59

government had overall

68:00

Twitter and it no longer is

68:03

so, you know, there's

68:04

a reason for the First

68:05

Amendment. The reason

68:07

for the First Amendment for

68:08

freedom of speech is because

68:10

the people that immigrated

68:11

to this country came from

68:13

a place is where there was

68:14

not reading of speech and

68:16

and they were like, you know

68:17

what we got to make sure

68:19

that that's constitutional

68:21

because where they came

68:22

from if they said something

68:24

that we put

68:31

Resume whether it be,

68:31

you know, something

68:32

bad would happen to him. So

68:32

and freedom of speech

68:33

you have to say, when is

68:33

it relevant? It's only

68:34

relevant when when someone

68:36

you don't like can say

68:38

something you don't like or

68:40

it has it or like don't

68:40

you something say can like

68:41

don't you has no meaning and

68:43

as soon as you sort of

68:46

You know throw in the towel

68:48

and can see to censorship.

68:50

It is only a matter of

68:51

time before someone sensors

68:53

you and that is why we

68:55

have the First Amendment.

68:58

Could you see yourself

68:59

voting for President Biden

69:01

if it's if they Biden Trump

69:03

election, for example I think

69:10

I would not vote for

69:11

vitamin. You vote for

69:12

Trump. Let s vote

69:14

for Trump, but I mean This

69:18

is this is definitely a

69:19

difficult Choice here.

69:21

You know, we would you

69:23

or would you vote for

69:24

Nikki Haley Nikki Haley, by

69:24

the way, once Haley all

69:26

social media names to be

69:30

exposed as you know, no, I

69:31

think that's outrageous.

69:33

Yeah. No. No, I'm not

69:34

going to vote for some pros

69:35

and censorship. Canada that.

69:38

like Canada and censorship

69:38

pros some vote for to

69:39

going I'm not

69:39

like that. I mean, I think

69:40

these you have to you have to

69:43

consider that there is

69:44

a lot of wisdom in these

69:47

amendments, Consider

69:48

you know, I mean the

69:49

Constitution and and you

69:52

know, a lot of these

69:53

a lot of things

69:54

that we take for granted

69:55

here in the United States

69:57

that don't even exist in

69:58

Canada. There's not enough

70:01

constitutional

70:02

right to freedom of speech

70:03

and Canada. So, you know,

70:06

so and there's no

70:07

Miranda rights in Canada

70:08

people like think like, you

70:09

know, you have the right to

70:10

remain silent. You don't

70:11

actually in Canada. So so

70:15

you don't have Canadian I So

70:16

can save you some coffee, but

70:19

you know, so like you just

70:21

got you the

70:22

say these things about

70:23

freedom of speech is

70:25

incredibly important. Even

70:28

when people said and I

70:29

like that because it's a

70:31

it's actually especially

70:32

important. In fact, it is

70:33

only relevant when people

70:36

you don't like can say

70:37

things you don't like and

70:39

do you think right now

70:40

as they're meaningless you

70:41

think right now the

70:42

Republican candidates for

70:43

the Democrats are more

70:45

inclined. I mean, this is

70:46

where you go to I assume to

70:49

to woke an anti woke

70:49

an anti woke assume 22 woke

70:50

and the mind Virus issue

70:51

that you've talked about.

70:54

Which party do you think is

70:55

is more Pro freedom of

70:58

speech given all the things

70:59

you've seen is. We also

71:00

see, you know, DeSantis,

71:03

you know, preventing people

71:04

from Reading certain things.

71:05

Maybe you but maybe you think

71:06

that's that's that's

71:07

correct. No, look

71:12

we actually are in an odd

71:13

situation here where on

71:16

balance the Democrats appear

71:18

to be more Pro Spencer

71:21

censorship than the

71:23

Republicans. That

71:23

used to be the opposite

71:24

it used to be, you know,

71:26

that left position was

71:28

freedom of speech. You know,

71:32

I believe at one point the

71:35

ACL u-- even defended the

71:37

right of someone to claim

71:38

that they were not see or

71:39

something like that,

71:40

you know, so like they

71:42

weren't there really were

71:43

like the left was

71:45

three of us peaches is

71:46

fundamental and I mean my

71:50

deception Perhaps it is

71:51

inaccurate is that The

71:57

pro censorship is more

71:57

on the left than the right.

72:00

We certainly get more

72:01

complaints from the left

72:02

and the right

72:02

because that way so but my

72:08

aspiration for the X

72:09

platform is that it is

72:10

the best source of Truth

72:12

or the least

72:13

in accurate source of

72:13

Truth. Truth and well, And

72:15

Truth. you know, I don't

72:16

know you won't believe me

72:18

or not, but I think but I

72:19

not, me or believe you won't

72:20

know don't I know, well, you

72:20

Honesty is the best policy

72:21

and I think that

72:23

the truth will win.

72:24

In overtime and the

72:25

in overtime you know, we've

72:26

In overtime got this this

72:27

great system and

72:28

it's getting better called

72:29

Community notes, which is

72:31

fantastic. I think it

72:33

correcting falsehoods or

72:35

adding context. In fact,

72:37

we make a point of not

72:39

removing anything but only

72:41

adding context now that

72:42

context could could include

72:44

this is completely false

72:45

and here's why and and and

72:48

no one is immune to this.

72:49

I'm not immune to it

72:50

advertisers it to immune

72:51

not I'm this. to is immune

72:51

one no advertisers not

72:52

immune to it. In fact,

72:53

we've had community. Notes,

72:56

which is caused us some

72:56

loss in advertising

72:57

speaking of lost some

72:58

advertising Revenue. We're

73:01

for Community note, if

73:03

an app if this false

73:04

advertising the community

73:05

note will say this is

73:07

false and here is why

73:10

let me like there's one

73:12

specific example that is

73:13

public knowledge. So

73:14

I'll mention it which is

73:15

one point Uber had it, it

73:17

this ad which said

73:19

earn like a boss and it was

73:21

Community noted if by boss

73:22

if by noted Community was it

73:23

and boss said earn like a

73:23

which ad boss you mean

73:28

And 47 cents an hour this

73:29

distant cause at least

73:30

a temporary suspension of

73:30

advertising from Aruba. I

73:32

got to ask you a question

73:32

that might make

73:33

everybody in the room

73:34

comfortable or not

73:35

uncomfortable and it goes

73:36

to the Free Speech issue

73:37

the New York Times company

73:38

and the New York Times

73:40

newspaper it appeared

73:41

over the summer to be

73:43

throttled. What did the New

73:46

York Times? Well, we're do

73:48

require that that everyone

73:51

has to buy a subscription

73:53

that we don't. Make make

73:54

exceptions for Make make

73:54

anyone and and I think if I

73:57

want the New York Times I

73:57

have to pay for

73:58

a subscription and they

73:59

don't give me a free

74:00

subscription. So I'm not

74:02

going to give them a free

74:03

subscription. But were you

74:04

what were you throttling

74:05

the New York Times relative

74:07

to other news organizations

74:08

relative to everybody else

74:09

was it was it was it

74:10

specific to the to the times

74:12

that it applies of Griffin

74:16

by the only cost like

74:16

a thousand dollars a month.

74:17

So if they just do that

74:19

then then they the back

74:22

in back in the saddle, but

74:23

but but you are saying that

74:25

it was throttled now I'm

74:27

saying I mean was there a

74:29

conversation that you had?

74:29

Is somebody you said look,

74:30

is somebody you

74:30

Is somebody you you know, I'm

74:31

unhappy with the

74:32

is somebody you times they

74:33

should either be buying

74:34

the subscription where I

74:34

don't like their content or

74:36

whatever any organization

74:39

that refuses to buy

74:40

a subscription is is not

74:43

going to be recommended.

74:46

But then what does that say

74:47

about free? Speech and what

74:49

does it say about the

74:50

amplifying we

74:52

search for it cost a little

74:53

bit right but That's it. But

74:57

that's an interesting.

74:58

Yeah, it's like an

75:01

South Park might I say,

75:03

you know Freedom isn't free

75:04

of cost a buck 05 or

75:06

whatever. So but it's pretty

75:08

cheap. Okay, it's So, low

75:11

cost So So, low cost

75:12

freedom. I got a couple

75:13

more questions for you.

75:15

You're headed back to Texas

75:16

after this. We're

75:18

going to launch

75:19

the stopper truck. Yeah.

75:21

It's going to be a big

75:21

launch, but I wanted to ask

75:23

you right now more broadly

75:26

just about the car business

75:27

The the The and what you see

75:28

actually happening and

75:31

specifically the government

75:33

put in place lots of

75:34

policies as you know to try

75:35

to encourage more Evie's

75:37

and one of the things

75:38

that's happened uniquely

75:39

is you have now a lot of

75:41

car companies saying

75:43

actually this is too

75:44

ambitious for us. These plans

75:45

are too ambitious for

75:46

thousand dealers. I don't

75:47

if you saw just yesterday

75:48

sent a letter to the White

75:49

House saying this

75:50

has gone too far. You're

75:52

going too far you had far you

75:53

too going

75:53

gone too far. You're has

75:54

this saying had this

75:54

on TV. It was a it was

75:58

this It was is going

75:58

too fast it was too far and

75:59

that there's not enough

76:00

demand are underneath all

76:03

this is his idea

76:04

that maybe there's not

76:04

enough demand for Evie's

76:06

that the American public has

76:07

not bought into the I mean

76:08

they bought into with with

76:10

your company, but they

76:11

haven't bought into

76:12

it broadly enough.

76:13

Well, I think if you make a

76:14

compelling electric

76:15

car, if you will buy it

76:16

no question about it. I mean

76:18

electric car sales in China

76:19

are gigantic. gigantic

76:21

that's by far the biggest

76:23

category biggest

76:23

that's by far the gigantic

76:24

are China sales in car and I

76:25

think that

76:26

would be the case. No,

76:28

I mean it's worth noting.

76:29

Okay. So the probably the

76:31

best reputation of that

76:32

is that the so Okay,

76:33

Tesla Model y will be the

76:35

best selling car of any

76:37

kind on Earth this year.

76:41

Of any kind gasoline or

76:42

gasoline of otherwise, is

76:43

there another car company

76:45

that you

76:46

think is doing a good job

76:47

with these? I mean, I think

76:49

the Chinese called companies

76:50

are extremely competitive by

76:52

far our toughest

76:53

competitions in China. So,

76:57

I mean there's there's a lot

76:59

of people who are out there

77:02

think that the top ten car

77:03

company is going to be Tesla

77:04

followed by nine Chinese

77:05

companies. I think

77:07

they might not be wrong.

77:09

So China is So wrong. be

77:12

not might they I think

77:12

companies. car Chinese nine

77:13

super good at manufacturing

77:13

and the work ethic is

77:14

incredible. So you know,

77:19

like You if we consider

77:20

different leagues of you

77:21

competitiveness at Tesla,

77:23

we consider the Chinese

77:24

League to be the most

77:25

competitive. And by

77:27

the way, we do very well

77:27

in China because are

77:30

trying to China team is the

77:30

best

77:31

China how worried are you

77:32

that the

77:33

union has unionization

77:34

effort that just

77:34

took place at what

77:38

I should say effort. But but

77:39

effort, the the new the new

77:41

wages in the like at GM and

77:43

Ford are that they're

77:44

coming for you. They are

77:47

coming for you. What

77:48

is that going to mean to

77:48

you and your business? Well,

77:51

I mean, I think it's

77:51

generally not good to have

77:53

an adversarial relationship

77:56

between people online,

77:59

you know one group at the

78:01

company and another group.

78:01

In fact, I mean I disagree

78:04

with the idea of unions,

78:07

but the professor mean, I

78:07

reason that is different

78:08

than you may expect

78:09

is which I just don't like

78:13

anything which creates

78:13

kind of Lords and peasants

78:14

sort of thing. And I think

78:14

the Union's naturally try to

78:16

create. Negativity in a

78:19

company negativity

78:19

Negativity and and create a

78:21

sort of Lords and peasants

78:23

situation. There are many

78:25

people at Tesla who have

78:27

come and gone from

78:28

working on the line to

78:29

being in Senior Management.

78:30

There is no laws and

78:32

peasants. Everyone eats the

78:33

same table or approximate

78:35

a parking lot, you know GM

78:37

there's a special elevator

78:38

for only for senior

78:40

Executives. We have no such

78:41

thing at Tesla, you know,

78:44

at Tesla, thing such no

78:45

Executives. We have senior

78:45

for only the things that I

78:46

actually know the people

78:47

on the line because I

78:48

worked on the line and I

78:49

walked the line and I slept

78:51

in the factory and I

78:52

worked beside them. So

78:57

I'm no stranger to them and

79:01

they're actually many

79:02

times. I've said well

79:04

can't we just hold a union

79:05

vote but apparently a

79:06

company is not allowed to

79:07

hold a union vote. So it

79:09

has to be somehow cool for

79:10

but the union can't do it.

79:12

So I said we'll just have

79:14

to hold a vote and see what

79:15

happens the actual problem.

79:19

It is the is as the

79:20

opposite. It's not that

79:21

people trapped are people

79:21

that not opposite. It's the

79:22

as the is is problem

79:23

are trapped at Tesla

79:23

building cars the trip. The

79:26

challenges is how do we

79:27

retain? Great people to do

79:30

the hard work of building

79:31

cars when they have like

79:33

six other opportunities that

79:34

they can do that are

79:35

easier. That's the actual

79:37

difficulty is that

79:38

bullying cars is hard

79:39

work and and there are much

79:41

easier jobs and I just

79:43

want to say that

79:45

I'm incredibly appreciative

79:46

of those who have cars and

79:48

they know it, you know, so

79:54

there's There's there's

79:55

There's I don't know. Maybe

79:55

there will be

79:56

your be nice. If I said

79:58

like if Tesla gets your

79:59

nights will be because we

80:00

deserve it and we fell in

80:01

some way, but

80:05

we certainly try hard to

80:07

way ensure the prosperity

80:08

of everyone. We give

80:09

everyone stock options.

80:12

made We've options. stock

80:12

everyone give We everyone.

80:13

of prosperity We've made

80:14

many people who are just

80:16

working the line.

80:17

Who didn't even know what

80:18

stocks were we made the

80:18

millionaires. So we're

80:21

going to run on time

80:22

final couple quick

80:23

questions. When do you have

80:25

the time? To tweet or

80:29

the post. I actually think

80:32

about all the time as

80:32

I said, I used it bathroom.

80:34

Sometimes I use it all the

80:36

time meaning if we were

80:38

to if we were to open

80:39

up our phones and look at

80:40

the screen time. What

80:41

does yours look like? Well

80:45

about every three hours I

80:47

make a trip to the lavatory

80:50

and that's the only time you

80:51

do this seems like

80:52

you're on there a lot.

80:58

No, I mean I did they'll be

81:00

like brief moments between

81:02

meetings. I mean, it's not

81:07

obviously I've had like 17

81:08

jobs so, you know so so,

81:11

and so no no, I guess

81:13

technically it's work this

81:15

point it is but I'm thinking

81:17

just in terms of your mind

81:18

sharing. I mean, by the

81:18

way, there's a lot of

81:19

people who should be working

81:20

who are who are on this app

81:22

technically posting on

81:22

Twitter is 0 or X is work

81:25

it does count as work. So

81:26

that's you know, there's

81:28

that but no, I mean, I think

81:32

I'm on. Well, I guess well,

81:36

usually probably Well,

81:36

I'm on well, for longer

81:37

than I think I

81:39

know what I know but you think

81:39

that you have a day for

81:41

the screen time of like

81:42

number of hours per week.

81:43

It's another that's a scary

81:44

number. It's probably

81:47

number hours per week.

81:48

I don't know. It's a little

81:48

over an hour a day or

81:49

something like that. Just

81:50

an hour a day. If we

81:53

really looked at this

81:54

together, do you have

81:55

your phone with you? Yeah,

81:57

you want to look? Okay. Okay,

82:02

here we go. You're ready

82:05

screen time in general

82:07

in time. in time? You ready

82:08

time? Sometimes. It's

82:09

a scary number. I know

82:11

that's why I thought I just

82:23

got a new phone. So I think

82:24

this is not accurate because

82:25

I'm a it's one minute

82:28

minute for one it's

82:28

for sure. It's more than

82:29

that. Alright, it's over the

82:30

week. Either

82:32

go. Yeah, go girl go to the

82:32

week. Okay, so it's

82:35

so wrong. It's more than

82:36

four minutes. I just got

82:39

a new phone. So this is not

82:40

accurate.

82:42

The police are four minutes

82:42

new phone. Tim. Cook's

82:43

end of the phone if

82:45

new phone who does you know,

82:47

I should

82:48

ask by the way because I

82:48

just mentioned Tim Cook.

82:49

Do you feel like you're

82:50

going to have to have a

82:51

battle with him eventually,

82:52

is that the next fight?

82:54

I mean, I'd over the App

82:55

Store the idea of making a

82:56

phone call. You mean like

82:58

no. No so of the App Store

83:01

value make a phone. Sam

83:03

Altman is apparently I'm

83:03

thinking about making

83:04

a phone with Johnny Ive.

83:05

I mean, I don't think there's

83:07

a real need to make

83:07

a phone maybe if those are

83:12

essential needs

83:12

megaphone or make it fun,

83:13

but I got a lot of fish

83:15

to fry. So I mean I do

83:19

think there's a

83:19

there's a there's a

83:20

fundamental challenge that

83:21

phone makers have at this

83:21

point because you've got

83:23

basically got you've because

83:23

this point at have makers

83:24

phone that basically a black

83:25

rectangle. You know, how do

83:28

you make that better?

83:31

So you want to do that?

83:32

What does that was that

83:32

look like in elon's head?

83:36

So that's literally

83:37

yes. Good good phrase

83:39

in the head

83:40

neurolink. Well,

83:42

there we go. That way we

83:44

need times before it's over.

83:45

You know, the best interface

83:47

would be a neural interface

83:48

directly to your brain so

83:50

that they'll be in

83:51

your life. How far we do you

83:52

think from that and how

83:53

excited or scary does that

83:55

seem to be and we read

83:56

these headlines obviously

83:57

about a monkey's who died as

83:59

you know, what

84:00

should we think about that?

84:03

Yeah, actually the this is

84:07

yeah, Yeah, the USDA

84:09

inspector yeah, who came by

84:11

neural link facilities

84:13

literally said in said

84:13

literally

84:13

neurolink facilities in her

84:14

entire career. She has never

84:15

seen a better Animal Care

84:19

Facility. it is It we are

84:19

it the It nicest channels

84:21

that you could possibly be

84:23

even to the rats and mice

84:24

even though they did the

84:25

plague and everything. So

84:30

it is it is like monkey

84:31

Paradise. So the thing

84:37

that's gets conflated is

84:38

that there were some

84:39

terminal monkeys where you

84:41

know, this is like this

84:42

is actually several years ago

84:43

where the monkeys were about

84:44

to die

84:46

and I'm like, okay, we've got

84:46

an experimental device.

84:47

It's

84:49

so kind of thing, which only

84:52

On a monkey that's about

84:53

today. And then you know

84:54

now the monkey died but

84:54

didn't die because the

84:55

neural link died because

84:55

it was, you know

84:56

had a terminal case of

84:56

cancer or something like

84:57

that. So you're like it has

85:02

never caused the death of a

85:04

monkey Sylvester.

85:05

I'm unless they're hiding

85:06

something for me is is

85:08

never caused death of monkey.

85:09

And in fact, we've not had

85:11

monkeys with neural

85:13

implants for 23 years and

85:15

they're doing great. So And

85:20

we've even replaced the

85:21

dinner like twice. It's and

85:23

we're getting ready to do

85:24

the the first it's

85:26

dinner like twice It's

85:26

dinner like twice. it's

85:27

dinner like twice implants

85:27

and hopefully in a few

85:28

months the they're only

85:32

implementations

85:33

of neural link. I think are

85:33

unequivocally good speaking

85:34

of the double-edged sword.

85:35

I think these early

85:36

implementations are

85:37

single edged sword because

85:38

the first implementations

85:40

will be to enable people

85:41

who are have rushed the

85:43

brain-body connection to be

85:46

able to operate a computer

85:47

or phone faster than someone

85:48

who has hands. That work

85:51

so you can imagine if

85:52

Stephen Hawking could that

85:53

communicate faster than

85:54

someone who had for body

85:57

functionality Now Incredible

85:58

that would be well that's

85:59

what this device will do

86:02

and we should have

86:03

a proof of that in a human

86:05

hopefully in a few months

86:07

it already Works in monkeys

86:09

worked quite well with

86:11

monkeys that can play

86:13

video games just using just

86:14

by thinking so then the

86:17

next application after the

86:21

the sort of those, you know

86:22

dealing with The the

86:23

tetraplegic some The quite a

86:25

really quite a few tricks

86:26

is going to be Vision

86:29

vision is the

86:30

the next thing so it's like

86:30

if somebody is like has

86:35

lost both eyes or

86:37

the optic nerve has failed

86:39

basically where there's

86:40

Basically failed. they have

86:41

no possibility basically

86:41

failed of Basically failed.

86:42

having sort of some

86:43

ocular correction that

86:45

that would be the next

86:46

thing of when your

86:49

link is a direct vision.

86:49

face and in fact, then you

86:50

Face could be like Face,

86:51

face, Geordi laforge from

86:51

Star Trek you could you could

86:53

see in like any frequency

86:54

actually could see in radar

86:56

if you want to final

86:58

questions and then we're

86:59

going to do in this

87:00

conversation, which I think

87:01

has taken everybody Inside

87:02

the Mind of Elon Musk

87:03

today. Not as well as the

87:05

neural link below.

87:06

neural link below

87:11

it actually goes to

87:12

self-driving

87:13

It actually goes

87:13

neural link below. cars and

87:14

vision and everything else

87:15

everything and vision and

87:16

cars driving self

87:16

it actually goes and I

87:17

asked this question of

87:17

people to judge

87:19

Transportation secretary.

87:20

Three it's actually

87:21

something you retweeted. So

87:22

I wanted to ask you

87:22

the same question.

87:24

There's a big question about

87:25

autonomous vehicles and the

87:28

safety of them. But there's

87:29

also a question about when

87:32

will be politically

87:33

palatable in this country

87:36

for. people to die in

87:42

cars that That that

87:44

are controlled by computers,

87:45

which is say That we have

87:46

35 40 thousand deaths

87:48

every year in this in this

87:49

country. Yeah, if you could

87:50

bring that number down to

87:53

10,000 5,000. That might be

87:55

a great thing. But do we

87:56

think that the country will

88:00

accept the idea that 5,000

88:01

people that your family

88:03

might have perished in a

88:06

vehicle as a result not of

88:09

human making a mistake but

88:10

of a computer. Yes. Well,

88:14

first of all humans are

88:14

terrible drivers, so

88:16

people text and drive

88:18

the drink and drive they get

88:20

into arguments they you

88:21

know Do all sorts of

88:26

things in cars that they

88:27

should not do. So so So

88:32

it's actually remarkable

88:33

that there are not more so

88:34

deaths than there are what

88:37

will find with computer

88:39

driving is I think probably

88:40

an order of magnitude

88:41

reduction in deaths. I think

88:44

now and the US has actually

88:47

far fewer deaths per capita

88:48

than the rest of the world

88:49

world. If you go if you

88:50

world If you world.

88:51

worldwide, I think there's

88:52

something close to a million

88:53

deaths per year due to

88:56

Automotive accidents. So

88:59

I think computer

89:02

after driving will probably

89:03

drop that. By 90% or more

89:06

it won't it won't be

89:07

perfect, but it'll be

89:08

ten times better

89:09

than that. The public will

89:10

accept that you think the

89:11

government will accept

89:12

that. Well in large numbers

89:15

the well Well it will

89:16

certainly be so obviously

89:17

true that it really

89:20

cannot be denied. And what

89:21

do you think? I know we've

89:22

talked about the timeline

89:23

before and I know people

89:25

have criticized you for

89:27

putting out timelines that

89:28

may not have come true

89:30

just yet. But what do you

89:31

think? Yeah it is.

89:33

Do you feel that? You

89:34

yourself said that sure

89:37

of course. so yeah, I I'm

89:49

optimistic about I mean,

89:50

I think I'm like naturally

89:51

optimistic about time

89:52

scales. If I was not

89:53

naturally optimistic, I

89:53

wouldn't be doing

89:54

the things

89:54

naturally optimistic. that

89:55

I'm doing.

89:55

naturally optimistic,

89:56

I mean I certainly want to

89:57

start a rock company or

89:58

like a car company if I

89:59

wouldn't have some sort of

90:01

pathological optimism

90:02

frankly. So as you

90:06

pointed out many people

90:06

said they would fail and

90:07

in fact I said, I actually I

90:09

agreed with him I said, yes,

90:10

we probably will fail and

90:11

they're like, okay, but I

90:14

thought SpaceX and Tesla had

90:15

less than I like okay,

90:16

a 10% chance of success

90:16

when we started them. So

90:22

yeah everybody but the

90:24

self-driving thing is

90:26

I've been optimistic about

90:27

it, but we certainly made a

90:30

lot of progress if anybody

90:31

If progress. has tried the

90:33

very has been using

90:34

the sort of full

90:35

self-driving beta the

90:37

progress is, you know,

90:38

every year has been

90:40

substantial. It's really

90:43

now the point where in most

90:44

places it'll take you from

90:46

one place to another with

90:47

no interventions. And the

90:50

data is and unequivocal

90:51

that And and that

90:55

supervised for self-driving

90:56

is somewhere around

90:57

four times safer or maybe

90:58

more than just human

91:01

driving by by themselves.

91:04

So I'm you know

91:10

I can certainly see it

91:10

coming at what actually

91:11

really the is another five

91:12

or ten years and then

91:13

people say,

91:14

oh, no definitely not

91:14

oh no definitely not

91:15

definitely not did you feel

91:17

like investors have

91:18

invested in something that

91:20

hasn't happened yet? Is

91:21

that is that fair to

91:22

them? And that's the other

91:23

questions people have about

91:24

that. Well, I mean, I think

91:26

the their Vol with rare

91:29

exception thought it wasn't

91:31

happening. So they were

91:32

investing in despite

91:33

thinking they're very clear

91:34

that they don't think it's

91:35

real so real it's think

91:36

don't they very clear that

91:36

they're thinking they don't

91:37

saying oh we're we just

91:41

leave everything you

91:41

and says Hook Line

91:42

& Sinker, We we but

91:44

the thing is that I mean, I

91:45

would be a fair criticism

91:47

of me to say that I'm

91:48

late, but it isn't but I

91:50

always deliver in the end.

91:53

And that's your final

91:53

question. I took note of

91:54

this. It was November 11th.

91:56

And you took to Twitter and

91:58

you wrote only two words.

92:00

You said amplify empathy.

92:03

Right. I was taken back

92:05

by that given all the things

92:07

that have been going on

92:07

in the world. You remember

92:10

what you were thinking?

92:13

Well, I think it's quite

92:14

literally a I understand it

92:16

but you always what was

92:17

going on. What why did

92:18

you write that? Well, I was

92:22

encouraging people to apply

92:23

empathy. It

92:26

literally attention quite

92:27

literal, but was there

92:28

something that it happened?

92:31

That you had seen that you

92:32

said yourself. I need to

92:33

I want to say that I think

92:35

I'm talking to some friends.

92:38

And we all agreed that we

92:39

should try to amplify

92:40

empathy and so I wrote

92:42

a profanity. If you wanted

92:47

an unvarnished look inside

92:48

the mind of Elon Musk. I

92:49

think you just saw it.

92:50

Look sometimes it's pretty

92:51

simple, you know. Elon Musk.

92:55

Thank you very very much

92:55

for the conversation.

92:57

Thank you.

93:00

Thank you. Thank you so

93:00

much here. Take that

93:03

with your second cousin.

93:06

I'm just going to say thank

93:07

you to everybody who stuck

93:08

around for what has been a

93:10

remarkable day. We are so

93:12

appreciative of everybody

93:14

who has been with us for so

93:15

many years coming back to

93:17

this every year. So,

93:18

thank you. Thank you. Thank

93:19

you. I hope you had a great

93:20

day, and I hope we have

93:22

an opportunity to do this

93:23

again Elon Musk everybody.

93:24

Thank you.

Interactive Summary

This interview features Elon Musk discussing a range of topics including his recent controversies, the business operations of his companies (Tesla, SpaceX, X, and Neuralink), and his philosophical outlook on the future. Musk addresses criticism regarding his posts on X, his trip to Israel, and his relationship with advertisers. He provides insights into his 'stormy' mind, his motivation for building a multi-planetary civilization to ensure humanity's survival, and his views on AI safety, regulation, and the necessity of free speech. The conversation also touches on his leadership style and the challenges of managing multiple high-profile companies.

Suggested questions

4 ready-made prompts