HomeVideos

Remote Work Under Fire: All-In Podcast Unpacks Jamie Dimon’s Leaked Rant!

Now Playing

Remote Work Under Fire: All-In Podcast Unpacks Jamie Dimon’s Leaked Rant!

Transcript

318 segments

0:00

Jamie Diamond went on a rant about

0:02

remote work and and zoom uh in a town

0:06

hall and uh here's a snippet a lot of

0:09

you were on the zoom and you were doing

0:11

the following okay you know looking at

0:13

your mail sending text to each other ask

0:16

the other person is okay not paying

0:19

attention not reading your stuff you

0:21

know and if you don't think that slows

0:22

down efficiency creativity creates

0:25

rudeness and Stu it does okay and when I

0:27

found out that people are doing that you

0:30

do that my goddamn meetings you go to

0:32

meeting with me you got my attention you

0:33

got my focus I don't bring my goddamn

0:35

phone I'm not sending text to people

0:37

okay it simply doesn't work the Young

0:40

Generation is being damaged by this that

0:42

may they may or may not be on your

0:44

particular staff but they are being left

0:46

behind they're being left behind

0:47

socially ideas meeting people in fact my

0:51

guess is most you live in communities a

0:52

hell of a lot less diverse than this

0:54

room that's not how you run a great

0:56

company we didn't build this great

0:58

company by doing that by doing the same

1:00

semi disease that everybody else does

1:03

Colson Brothers tell us about how you

1:04

run stripe are you remote does this

1:07

resonate with you four years after we've

1:09

come out of the

1:10

pandemic I love listening to Jamie

1:12

Diamond rants like I feel like that's

1:15

business ASMR um business ASMR that

1:19

itself to be a great podcast I was about

1:21

to say I'm subscribing that's an instant

1:23

$10 a month

1:25

subscription what do you think John yeah

1:27

I don't know people just said a lot of

1:29

during the the pandemic like you

1:31

remember it's like oh handshakes are

1:32

going to be over business travel is

1:33

going to be over every company is going

1:35

to be fully remote I would say stripe

1:38

broadly is in a pretty similar spot to

1:40

where it was beforehand which is most

1:42

people go into an office like most

1:44

people are you know uh part of our San

1:46

Francisco office or New York or Dublin

1:47

or or Singapore wherever and then we

1:50

have a bunch of people also who work

1:51

remotely I

1:53

think kind of obviously you know Jimmy

1:55

is right on some points I think also

1:57

working remotely has had a bunch of

1:59

benefits where there's a way larger

2:01

talent pool available to companies like

2:03

stripe and there's a lot of people you

2:05

know you see uh kind of the two- body

2:07

problem where it allows a lot of couples

2:09

where you know maybe one partner is

2:11

assigned to some Hospital in Idaho and

2:14

like they don't get to choose what

2:15

hospital necessarily they got assign to

2:17

and the other person gets to work a a

2:19

high-paying Tech job and so I don't know

2:21

I think when like like one of the

2:22

theories for declining dynamism in the

2:25

US and declining tfp is there allocative

2:27

efficiency uh of of you know people

2:29

deine as women enter the workforce

2:31

because now you have you know what John

2:34

describes this two body problem where

2:35

you know both people have to make

2:36

coordinated

2:37

switches and uh rem remote works out

2:41

actually yeah freeberg you're running a

2:43

company now you're the CEO of ohalo tell

2:47

us uh does this resonate with you what

2:49

do you think especially about younger

2:50

people his point and like being rude or

2:52

being focused being in the meeting and

2:55

then like maybe there's too many

2:56

meetings where people are partially

2:58

paying attention maybe there should be

2:59

half as many meetings and people should

3:00

be paying attention what do you think

3:02

well there's always room for

3:03

optimization there we we deal with this

3:05

too too many meetings too many people I

3:07

think what was most striking for me

3:09

about the Jamie Diamond rant and the

3:11

resonance it seems to be having

3:12

particularly in Silicon Valley and

3:14

particularly with folks that are in

3:15

leadership positions or on boards is

3:18

that this is another example of what I

3:21

think is kind of a different tenor for

3:23

leaders in business right now relative

3:26

to where we were a few years ago leaders

3:28

are starting to step up and speak their

3:31

mind and speak more directly and lead

3:32

from the front rather than lead from the

3:35

back I think the last couple of years

3:37

and I would say that the whole kind of

3:39

transition a away from wokeism and

3:41

coddled employee workforces which is

3:44

something that a lot of folks talk about

3:45

I'm I'm not trying to just characterize

3:47

it I'm just saying that's the

3:48

characterization that's been placed on

3:49

it is that the employees made the

3:52

decisions and then the leaders kind of

3:54

said okay I'm subjugated to the

3:55

employees whims and needs and look at

3:57

what's gone on with Zuck he said you're

3:59

with me you're me here's a buyout option

4:01

Elon obviously was an Exemplar of this

4:04

at Twitter uh We've now seen this become

4:07

coinbase Brian and his letter and we've

4:10

now seen this become I think a bit more

4:11

of a standard in the kind of emergence

4:14

in the postco era that leaders can lead

4:16

from the front speak directly and say

4:18

this is the way things are going to be

4:20

my job is not to coddle my employees my

4:22

job is to lead my employees so that our

4:24

organization our team wins and we

4:27

achieve our mission that's the objective

4:29

it's not to create a family workplace

4:31

for everyone to be happy all the time

4:33

it's to help the organization succeed

4:35

and so I think I have heard from people

4:37

individually I've seen this tenor shift

4:39

underway right now um and I think that

4:41

Jamie Diamond is another kind of

4:42

Exemplar of this that that seems to have

4:44

some resonance all right shth I want you

4:46

to respond specifically to this next

4:48

clip let's play the second clip about

4:50

organizational bloat every area should

4:53

be looking to be 10% more efficient if I

4:56

was ready to depart with 100 people I

4:57

guarantee you if I wanted to I could run

5:00

it with 90 and be more efficient I

5:02

guarantee you I could do it just I could

5:03

do it in my sleep and the notion these

5:06

bureaucracies I need more people I can't

5:09

get it done no because you're you're

5:11

filling that request that don't need to

5:12

be done your people going to meetings

5:14

they don't need to go to someone told me

5:16

to approve some his wealth management

5:18

that they had to go to 14 committees I

5:20

am dying to get the name of the 14

5:22

committees and I feel like firing 14

5:24

chairman of committees I can't stand it

5:27

anymore all right shth the bloated

5:30

bureaucracy at big companies your

5:32

thoughts well you know there's that

5:33

adage that says something akin to 50% of

5:36

advertising is useless we just don't

5:38

know which 50% yeah I think it's

5:41

probably true for most corporate

5:43

structures in general which is that a

5:46

lot of the organizational bloat has

5:49

evolved because of the way that people

5:53

have responded to how you use technology

5:56

so meaning if you went looked back 50

5:59

years years ago if you look at that

6:00

famous picture of the Microsoft early

6:03

team they didn't rely on software

6:05

necessarily there wasn't Salesforce

6:07

there wasn't work day there wasn't all

6:08

of this

6:10

infrastructure and so instead they

6:12

probably organized by what they were

6:13

good at and they just tried to do things

6:15

efficiently and I suspect that many

6:17

companies in the absence of Technology

6:20

found a way to just be very efficient

6:22

that started to change when you had

6:24

these rigid demarcations of where one

6:26

job ended and another job started and

6:28

part of why that happened is because you

6:30

had all this software that went in and

6:32

convinc people this will create

6:34

efficiency but in return the chief

6:36

marketing officer's job is XY and Z this

6:38

is how the roles are defined this is how

6:41

people do it and so I think that the

6:43

reason why things have become so

6:44

bureaucratic and Bloated is that there

6:47

is just this propensity to run towards

6:50

software because you think it's a

6:52

solution at best it's a

6:55

symptomatic Aid it doesn't address the

6:58

root cause and in fact it otes

7:00

bureaucracy and it promotes the bloat

7:02

that Jie's talking about and if you look

7:03

at Jamie's p&l he spends $16 billion a

7:07

year on it and I suspect that if you

7:10

streamlined that you'd actually have

7:12

half as many people because they'd be

7:13

doing the job in a wholly different way

7:16

and by the way the the counterfactual to

7:18

it is if you look at companies like

7:19

Facebook or Google or Tesla or SpaceX

7:24

who designs and I'm sure stripe is the

7:25

same who designs a lot of stuff

7:27

internally that's custombuilt

7:30

for their or I think the way that you

7:32

see this in the revenue per employee and

7:34

a bunch of these other metrics in terms

7:35

of the efficiency of those companies so

7:37

I think what he is talking about is that

7:39

he is a

7:40

victim of this push to productivity

7:43

because he would look like a lite if he

7:44

didn't ad drop technology but by

7:46

adopting the off-the-shelf stuff he

7:49

introduces organizational blo because

7:50

these things are demarked very very you

7:54

got the marketing team as you mentioned

7:55

using HubSpot and then you got like the

7:57

sales team using I don't

8:00

organ the other thing I just want to say

8:02

on the first topic is I've mentioned

8:03

this

8:05

before other than Engineers who are who

8:10

are naive but can be extremely

8:12

productive from day one there are very

8:14

few other job types where naivity is an

8:17

asset most people early in their career

8:21

are in a jcurve where they are

8:23

negatively contributing and the whole

8:25

whole goal SL everybody down and the

8:27

whole goal is that you invest in these

8:28

people so that come out of the J curve

8:30

there are probably other jobs that are

8:31

like engineering but many many are not

8:34

and so I think it's important to get the

8:36

kind of Ming you get by being in an

8:38

office and in the absence of that I

8:41

think these young people like Jamie said

8:42

are totally lost that's that's on them

8:46

but then for the company they're

8:47

completely unproductive and useless

8:48

which is on us hey John uh Toby I I

8:52

don't know if you know Toby from Shopify

8:53

but he did this like zerob based

8:54

budgeting kind of concept for meetings

8:56

he just purged all meetings at the

8:58

beginning of the year he just like

8:59

deleted everybody's meetings from the

9:01

top down I'm curious how you think about

9:04

bloat and just all of these meetings and

9:07

committees do you worry about that at

9:09

strip we know Toby very well and I don't

9:12

know I always feel like yeah we should

9:15

I'm tempted to uh take some of the ideas

9:17

like we haven't done the meeting

9:18

deletion one and you just say oh the

9:19

meetings get recreated but they measured

9:21

it and they didn't it sounds like uh and

9:25

I do always enjoy Toby's perspective

9:27

which I think that you know many organiz

9:29

ation problems are in fact software

9:31

problems and you know you just need to

9:32

write a script to literally like I think

9:34

he wrote the script to all the meetings

9:37

you know from the Google Calendar

9:38

instance but uh there's kind of this

9:40

Purity that uh you're you're over

9:42

intellectualizing your problems and I do

9:44

agree with jamat on the remote thing

9:45

where like it's it's very dangerous one

9:49

thing that can be dangerous with as CEOs

9:51

think about this stuff is I think there

9:53

is these unfair anecdotes that feel

9:56

unfair that get people really riled up

9:58

the quiet quitter is the anti-work

10:00

subreddit you know all these talk of

10:01

people working two jobs and that

10:04

generates a lot of energy with corporate

10:05

leaders but you don't want to design

10:07

your policies around like the bottom 5%

10:10

of the company that would be a horrible

10:11

mistake yeah you want to design your

10:13

policies against the top town and we

10:14

have some like outrageously productive

10:16

remote people and they're off and again

10:17

the cabin Idaho somewhere just you know

10:19

Co coding up a storm the thing that we

10:21

have seen and interestingly we measured

10:23

this before Co because we were doing a

10:26

lot of remote hiring and we wanted to

10:28

see we want wanted to see how much we

10:30

should lean into it is that it is not

10:32

good for early career people we could

10:33

actually measure it in our productivity

10:35

Data before the whole discussion about

10:36

remote work happened during covid and

10:38

it's bad from a work point of view it's

10:40

also just bad from a personal point of

10:42

view where they go mad because they're

10:43

23 years old and they're not solitary

10:47

confinement it's literally solitary

10:49

confinement it's ridiculous and by the

10:51

way breaking news here Jamie Diamond now

10:54

uh knows which 2,000 or I'm sorry

10:57

1,739 employees to lay off first there

11:00

is a coworker.org petition to get Jaimie

11:03

to retract his statement so the optin

11:06

has been created if I know Jamie I know

11:09

he'll be retracting that statement right

11:10

away

Interactive Summary

Loading summary...